Fiscal Year 1987 '-' 4 . - rr i- scalSYear188 (1 Octobe 19 - 30 Septembe1 9 S A S S S.- 0 -. - 6 0uI S FY 1987 STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS ITEM APPROPRIATIONS ($ Millions) Navigation ........................................... Flood Control Total .................................... Flood Control Mississippi River and Tributaries' ................... ... Multipurpose including power ................ .......... Beach Erosion Control .................................. Total New W ork� ...................................... Other W ork' .......................................... T O T A L ............................................. NAVIGATION (Calandar Year)* Ton-Miles of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports ................................. Foreign, Great Lakes Ports .............................. Domestic, Coastal (Intraterritory not compiled) ............. Domestic, Great Lakes ................................. Domestic, Inland ...................................... Dome sticL,o cal ....................................... T O T A L ............................................. Tons of Commerce (Millions) Foreign Coastal Ports .................................. Foreign Great Lakes Ports .............................. Domestic, Coastal and Intraterritory ...................... Domestic, Great Lakes ................................. Dom estic, Inland ...................................... Dom estic, Local ....................................... T O T A L ............................................. FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billions) .............. . FLOOD DAMAGES SUSTAINED ($ Billions) ................ POWER Inatalled (Cumulative in millions of kw) ................... . Generated (Billions of kwh) ............................... RESERVOIR STORAGE (Millions of acre-feet) All Purposes ........................................... Flood Control (Maximum) ................................ W ater Supply ........................................... Irrigation .............................................. PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS (Billions of vistior hours, calendar years) ................... . 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 443 299 787 673 304 257 577 552 607 485 395 357 676 647 832 774 772 873 802 895 (206) (227) (225) (203) (291) (177) 69 93 112 171 221 247 23 17 12 25 5 7 1,322 1,082 1,104 1,127 1,685 1,580 1,813 1,658 1,797 1,561 1,734 1,417 3,135 2,740 2,901 2;688 3,419 2,997 (211) (158) (188) 538 358 155 9 12 12 1,905 1,567 1,719 1,296 1,233 1,070 3,201 2,790 2,789 47,274.2 44,769.3 46,509.0 45,287.0 51,262.7 58,929.2 60,569.8 59,940.5 58,925.6 24,235.2 27,171.9 32,249.3 24,309.4 27,165.5 35,294.0 33,679.6 43,146.4 42,108.8 580,888.7 10,976.5 593,923.0 649,749.4 632,707.1 634,765.3 631,149.2 532,290.2 540,373.2 43,198.2 48,183.9 49,784.4 43,088.1 35,623.3 62,148.4 61,749.1 77,971.9 76,284.0 248,116.9 232,707.5 242.855.4 225,628.2 217,026.7 231,184.1 227,343.0 217,090.2 209,266.2 1,192.2 1,102.0 1,157.1 1,099.6 1,111.7 1,315.6 1,596.4 1,710.2 1,339.8 944,910.4 964,911.1 966,478.2 989,161.7 964,897.0 1,023,636.5 1,016,085.1 931,846.4 928,297.6 791.4 723.0 744.5 702.7 769.2 823.9 860.8 919.7 875.5 45.7 51.3 58.7 48.4 50.4 62.3 60.6 73.8 70.6 312.0 313.2 311.1 312.8 312.9 322.0 333.2 308.7 308.6 87.4 92.0 98.0 83.5 72.1 115.4 115.2 143.6 142.7 560.5 534.7 542.5 487.1 495.5 520.7 535.0 535.0 534.5 77.4 74.2 81.1 73.1 75.6 93.2 94.2 93.1 89.5 1,874.4 1,788.4 1,835.9 1,707.6 1,776.7 1,938.4 1,999.0 2,073.9 2,021.4 5.2 27.3 10.8 16.8 23.2 4.3 1.2 7.3 19.4 6.3 1.5 6.0 .5 4.0 2.1 1.0 1.8 3.6 1.1 1.5 20.5 20.5 20.1' 20.1' 19.7' 19.7' 74.0 80.7 88.3 91.2 88.2 75.8 273.6 273.6 272.1 270.6 269.0 123.3 123.3 123.0 123.0 123.0 9.5 9.5 9.2 9.2 9.2 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 506 502 482 480 480 19.2' 19.0' 19.0' 17.9 77.3 77.8 81.2 83.6 268.5 263.3 263.3 262.9 122.7 120.4 120.4 120.1 9.1 8.9 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 469 457 449 439 FUNDING General Investigation .................................... 136,287 128,972 Consruction (General) ................................... 1,152,150 919,345 Operations Maintenance General .......................... 1,389,846 1,319,973 Flood Control, MIssissippi River & Tributary ................ 310,797 314,760 General Expense ........................................ 115,000 107,000 Flood Control & Coastal Emergencies ...................... 10,000 25,000 Revolving Fund......................................... 12,000 7,000 Permanent Appropriations ................... ............ ',000 8,000 TOTAL ............................................. 3,135,080 2,830,050 1,784,1992.0 'Included in Flood Control Total. 'Advance engineering and design, and construction. (Including major rehabilitation projects.) Savings and slippage applied to projects. 'Operation and maintenance, surveys, administration and misc. programs and activities. 'Includes New Melones and Spettisham, built by the Corps and operated by others. *For further information on waterborne commerce, see Warterborne Commerce of the United States, published annually. It may be obtained by writing the District Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, Louisiana 70160. (Note: 1986 navigation figures were not available as of press time, and will be included in the FY 1987 Annual Report on Civil Works Activities.) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY .OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY $ WASHINGTON, DC 20310 0 NOV 3 0 1988 TO : THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUBJECT: Annual Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1987 I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for the Fiscal Year 1987 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1986 and September 1987. Robert W. Page Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) HECSA Technmlal Libra~ CONTENTS Page NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ............... ....................................................... 1-1 NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: New York, NY, District .......................................................................... 2-1 Philadelphia, PA, District ........................................................................ 3-1 Baltimore, MD, District ......................................................................... 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District.................................................................................. 5-1 SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION: Wilmington, NC, District ................................................................. ....... 6-1 Charleston, SC, District ........................................................................... 7-1 Savannah, GA, District ........................................................................... 8-1 Jacksonville, FL, District ................................................................ ....... 9-1 M obile, AL, District ......................................................... ......... 10-12.......... LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION: New Orleans, LA, District........................................................................ 11-1 Vicksburg, MS, District ........................................................................ 12-1 Memphis, TN, District .......................................................................... 13-1 St. Louis, MO, District ............................................................................ 14-1 SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION: Galveston, TX, District ........................................................................... 15-1 Fort Worth, TX, District.......................................................................... 16-1 Albuquerque, NM, District ....................................................................... 17-1 Little Rock, AR, District......................................................................... 18-1 Tulsa, OK, District................................................................................ 19-1 MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION: Kansas City, MO, District ........................................................................ 20-1 Omaha, NE, District .............................................................................. 21-1 OHIO RIVER DIVISION: Ohio River........................................................................................ 22-1 Nashville, TN, District ........................................................................... 23-1 Louisville, KY, District......................................................................... 24-1 Huntington, W V, District......................................................................... 25-1 Pittsburgh, PA, District .......................................................................... 26-1 NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION: St. Paul, M N , District............................................................................ 27-1 Rock Island, IL, District.......................................................................... 28-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .................................... 29-1 Chicago, IL, District.............................................................................. 30-1 Detroit, M I, District.............................................................................. 31-1 Buffalo, NY, District ............................................................................. 32-1 SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Los Angeles, CA, District......................................................................... 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District....................................................................... 34-1 Sacramento, CA, District ......................................................................... 35-1 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION:....................................................................... 36-1 NORTH PACIFIC DIVISION: Portland, OR, District.......................................................................... 37-1 Seattle, W A, District........................................................................... 38-1 W alla W alla, W A , D istrict........................................................................ 39-1 A laska D istrict ............................................... .................................. 40-1 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors .......................................................... 41-1 M ississippi River Comm ission....................................................................... 42-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities........................................ 43-1 California Debris Commission ...................................................................... 44-1 W aterways Experiment Station ..................................................................... 45-1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ...................................... 46-1 Investigations of Projects Under Federal Power Actrc o...................................................... 47-1 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness ........................... 48-1 International Boundary W aters Boards.............................................................. 49-1 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory ...................................................... 50-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ................................................................. 51-1 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory...................................................... 52-1 W ater Resources Support Center.................................................................... 53-1 APPENDICES: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable September 30, 1987............................................. A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction During Fiscal Year 1987 .................................. B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable September 30, 1987.......................................... C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction September 30, 1987........................................ D-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power In Operation September 30, 1987 ............................ E-1 Multipurpose Projects Including Power Under Construction September 30, 1987..................... F-1 Flood Damages Prevented (By Region and by District) During Fiscal Year 1987..................... G-1 IN D E X ..................... ......... ........................................... I-1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION* The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control ...................... 1-3 2. Black Rock Harbor, CT .................... 1-3 3. Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI ................. 1-3 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA ....................... 1-3 5. Chatham (Stage)Harbor, MA ............... 1-4 6. Connecticut River Below Hartford, CT ............................... 1-4 7. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA .................... 1-5 8. Green Harbor, MA ......................... 1-5 9. Hampton Harbor, NH ...................... 1-5 10. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI .......... 1-6 11. Hyannis Harbor, MA ....................... 1-6 12. Jonesport Harbor, ME ..................... 1-6 13. Kennebec River, ME ....................... 1-7 14. Milford Harbor, CT ........................ 1-7 15. New Haven Harbor, CT .................... 1-7 16. Newburyport Harbor, MA ................. 1-8 17. Plymouth Harbor, MA ..................... 1-8 18. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, Point Judith, RI ................. 1-9 19. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH ............. 1-9 20. Rockport Harbor, ME ..................... 1-10 21. Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA ....................... 1-10 22. Rye Harbor, NH .......................... 1-11 23. Sesuit Harbor, MA ........................ 1-11 24. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ................................... 1-11 25. Other authorized navigation projects ................................... 1-11 26. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) ......................... 1-11 27. Authorized bridge alteration ............... 1-11 Beach Erosion Control 28. Revere Beach, MA ........................ 1-11 29. Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects .................... 1-12 30. 31. Page Other authorized beach erosion control projects ............................ 1-12 Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) .............. 1-12 Flood Control 32. 33. 33A. 33B. 34. 35. 35A. 35B. 35C. 35D. 35E. 35F. 35G. 35H. 35I. 35J. 35K. 35L. 35M. 35N. 350. 35P. 35Q. 35R. 35S. 36. 37. 37A. 37B. Big River Reservoir, RI ................... 1-12 Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI ......... 1-12 Clear River, Burrillville, RI ............... 1-13 West Hill Dam, MA ....................... 1-13 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ....................... 1-13 Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT .......................... 1-13 Ball Mountain Lake, VT .................. 1-14 Barre Falls Dam, MA ..................... 1-14 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH ................. 1-14 Birch Hill Dam, MA ...................... 1-15 Colebrook River Lake, CT ................. 1-15 Conant Brook Dam, MA ................... 1-15 Knightville Dam, MA ..................... 1-15 Littleville Lake, MA ...................... 1-15 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT ............... 1-15 North Hartland Lake, VT ................. 1-16 North Springfield Lake, VT ................ 1-16 Otter Brook Lake, NH .................... 1-16 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA ........... 1-16 South River, Conway, MA ................. 1-17 Surry Mountain Lake, NH ................ 1-17 Townshend Lake, VT ....................... 1-17 Tully Lake, MA ........................... 1-17 Union Village Dam, VT ................... 1-18 West Springfield, MA ..................... 1-18 Gulf Street, Milford, CT ................... 1-18 Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA ........ 1-18 Black Rock Lake, CT ...................... 1-19 Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA ...................... 1-19 1-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Page 37C. Hancock Brook Lake, CT .................. 1-19 37D. Hop Brook Lake, CT ...................... 1-19 37E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ................ 1-19 37F. Thomaston Dam, CT ...................... 1-19 38. Machias River, Machias, ME ............... 1-20 39. Marginal Way, Oqunquit, ME .............. 1-20 40. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ....... 1-20 40A. Blackwater Dam, NH ..................... 1-20 40B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ............. 1-21 40C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH .................. 1-21 40D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ............. 1-21 41. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, M A ............................. 1-21 42. New London, CT .......................... 1-21 43. Pleasant Point, Perry, ME ................ 1-22 44. Roughans Point, Revere, MA ............... 1-22 45. Saint John River Basin, ME ............... 1-22 46. Stamford, CT ............................. 1-22 47. Thames River Basin, CT, RI and M A ................................... 1-23 47A. Buffumville Lake, MA .................... 1-23 47B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ................. 1-23 47C. Hodges Village Dam, MA ................. 1-23 47D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ................ 1-23 47E. West Thompson Lake, CT ................. 1-24 47F. Westville Lake, MA ....................... 1-24 48. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA ............................ 1-24 49. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................ 1-24 50. Flood control reservoir operations ................................. 1-25 51. Hurricane barrier operations .............. 1-26 52. Other authorized flood control projects ............................ 1-26 53. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 1-26 54. Deauthorized projects ..................... 1-27 General Investigations 55. Surveys ................................... 1-27 56. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 1-27 57. 58. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .......................... 1-28 Advance Engineering and Design .......... 1-28 Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement .......................... 1-30 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 1-39 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. 1-45 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .............. 1-49 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 1-50 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power ...... 1-51 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ................ 1-52 Table 1-H' Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 .................. 1-54 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 .................. 1-54 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 .................. 1-55 Table 1-K Blackstone River Basin ............... 1-55 Table 1-L Connecticut River Basin ............... 1-56 Table 1-M Housatonic River Basin ............... 1-57 Table 1-N Merrimack River Basin ............... 1-59 Table 1-0 Thames River Basin .................. 1-60 Table 1-P Boston Harbor, MA ................... 1-60 Table 1-Q Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .................... 1-61 1-2 Page NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance in the eradication or control of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing program). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. On request, technical information was provided to local interests on specific aquatic weed problems. Information was also provided to the Waterways Experiment Station on the degree of the problems in the Division, as well as the existence and status of State laws pertaining to the regulation of problem aquatic plants. We continue to work closely with the States. 2. BLACK ROCK HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island, about 51 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12369). Existing project. Black Rock Harbor and Cedar Creek Channel, 18 feet deep and 100 to 200 feet wide from the 18-foot contour in Black Rock Harbor to the heads of both branches of Cedar Creek, about 2.4 miles. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 6 waterfront facilities serving Black Rock Harbor. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Field Verification Program (FVP) studies continued. The FVP is monitoring the impact of disposal of contaminated material from the harbor on open water, a wetland area, and an upland site. In conjunction with the FVP, $23,000 was expended to extend existing lease for the upland and wetland sites. 3. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, RI Location. Bristol Harbor is on the east side of upper Narragansett Bay, in Bristol County, about 13 miles southeast of Providence, Rhode Island. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13224, 13221 and 13218). Existing project. The project provides for an offshore breakwater 1,600 feet long located about 400 feet west of the Coast Guard pier and extending generally in a northwesterly direction. Construction has not begun. Revised plan developed during advance engineering and design recommends an A-frame type breakwater 1,250 feet long. Total estimated cost (June 1986) of the modified plan is $4,600,000 of which $1,996,000 is non-Federal cost. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and provide a cash contribution currently estimated at 50 percent of project cost based on project benefits. Terminal facilities. The developed waterfront of Bristol Harbor is concentrated along a half-mile stretch of east shore of harbor. In this section, there are six privately owned landings, two owned by the town, one by the State, and one by the Federal government. All private landings are of granite construction and have truck access. Two have gasoline and one has diesel oil service; and are used primarily for landing shellfish. Town and State piers are open to public, and include facilities for about 50 small boats and finger piers for larger craft. Operations during fiscal year. New work: As a result of economic update studies conducted as a part of the preparation of the General Design Memorandum, which showed insufficient benefits to warrant project implementation at this time, the project was placed in the "inactive" category as of February 6, 1987. 4. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from head of Buzzards Bay, MA, to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. In general direction canal trends from Buzzards Bay easterly to Cape Cod Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13246). Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, 1-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract, awarded last fiscal year, for the installation of suspension cables and other repair work on the Bourne and Sagamore Bridges was completed in July 1987 with $1,467,100 expended this fiscal year. A contract for the consolidated shop building was awarded in September 1986 and was 88 percent complete ending the fiscal year. Contract payments of $682,100 were made in fiscal year 1987. $595,167 was expended for maintenance dredging of isolated shoals in the canal, with the work being performed in October 1986 by the Governmentowned hopper dredge MC FARLAND. Approximately 177,000 cubic yards of material was removed and disposed of at the Cleveland Ledge disposal site in Buzzards Bay. A contract for architectural engineering to prepare plans and specifications for rehabilitation on the railroad bridge in the amount of $48,000 was awarded and completed in fiscal year 1987. Other fiscal year 1987 costs for work accomplished by hired labor and contract were: resource management facilities $50,000; replacement parts for computerized electronic traffic control system $47,800; replacement of project maintenance equipment $73,900; engineering and design $230,400; supervision and administration of contracts $165,300; operation and maintenance of railroad bridge, tower and signal system $91,500; vessel traffic control activities $1,077,600; operation of recreation areas $358,700; supervision and administration by Division Office $79,000; real estate activities $97,300 and operating costs for roads, bridges and project facilities $682,200. 5. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. At northeastern corner of Nantucket Sound, about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor, RI at northern extremity of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain 8-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. A new 10-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to commercial users. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was awarded in March 1987 and completed in June 1987 with disposal on a portion of Harding Beach west of the channel. A total of 117,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $616,000. Hired labor costs of $74,213 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, an environmental assessment, supervision and inspection, plotting and surveys. 6. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT Location. Has its source in Connecticut Lake in northern New Hampshire, flows southerly 380 miles and empties into Long Island Sound at Saybrook, CT, 14 miles west of New London. Hartford, now head of commercial navigation, is 52 statute miles, by channel, from mouth. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12373 and 12377). Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Eightmile River, CT, elimination as separate project: Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 75 feet wide from deep water in Connecticut River to Hamburg and for turning basin of same depth, 150 feet wide, approximately 300 feet long at Hamburg. Project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1910. Costs and expenditures were $9,000 all for new work. In accordance with River and Harbor Act of 1950, project for Connecticut River below Hartford was modified to include project for Eightmile River. Aforementioned Act also provided for an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and about 6.5 acres in area in upper cove in Hamburg. A channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide for a distance of 52 miles upstream to Hartford; two riprap jetties at the mouth of the river; and dikes, training walls, revetments and other regulatory works along the river between Hartford and Gildersleeve Island. The project provides for small-boat improvements at Wethersfield Cove; Eightmile River; Essex; and North Cove, Old Saybrook. For a more detailed description of project see page 7 of Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Existing project was completed in September 1965 with the construction of channel and anchorage in North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT. For further details, see Annual Report for 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along both Connecticut and Eightmile Rivers there are two or three wharves at each river town, one or more in each town being open to public use. At Hartford and Middletown there is about one-half of wharf frontage along west bank of river. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Scheduled major maintenance dredging was deferred due to relatively minor shoaling despite significant spring floods. Dredging of isolated shoals in Calves Island, Brockway, Glastonbury 2 Piers and Pistol Point Bars was accomplished in July 1987 by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK, at a rental cost of $93,986. 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Additional charges were pending at the end of the fiscal year. Charges of $3,965 were incurred for the leasing of electronic positioning equipment. Approximately 57,000 cubic yards of material was removed and placed in riverine disposal sites, returning the project to adequate navigable depth. Hired labor costs of $57,729 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, environmental assessment, supervision and inspection and surveys. In addition, $25,658 was expended for a report completed previously by the National Marine Fisheries Service on Shortnose Sturgeon research in the river. Work under a contract awarded last fiscal year for maintenance dredging of the entrance to Wethersfield Cove was completed in November 1986. Approximately 200 cubic yards of material was removed and disposed of in the river downstream from the entrance. Contract payments this fiscal year were $10,600 for a total lump sum contract cost of $14,600. 7. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA Location. At eastern end of Cuttyhunk Island, at western entrance to Buzzards Bay, about 14 miles south of New Bedford Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13229). Existing project. A channel generally 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from outer harbor to westerly terminal in Cuttyhunk Pond, about 3,500 feet; an anchorage in inner harbor 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, and 800 feet wide; and maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. Existing project was completed in 1939. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Disposal areas for maintenance will be furnished when required. Terminal facilities. Two town wharves of timber and pile construction, having total berthing space of 400 feet, are open to public use. Limited mechanical-handling facilities are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An emergency maintenance dredging contract for the entrance channel was awarded in May 1987. The lump sum contract of $54,160 was completed in June 1987. Approximately 8,500 cubic yards of material was removed by hydraulic dredge and used to nourish the beach south of the entrance channel. Hired labor costs of $26,840 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspections, surveys and plotting. 8. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield about 30 miles southeast of Boston and 9 miles north of Plymouth Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253) Existing project. Provides for channel 6 feet deep (8 feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; 5-acre anchorage near Town Pier, 6 feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200 foot extension of existing west jetty at elevation +12, with dike to beach berm at elevation +14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation +14. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract in the amount of $234,000 was awarded in February 1987 for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel. A total of 27,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $157,950. Disposal was in open water off Green Harbor Beach. The contractor left the work site in June 1987; surveys later revealed significant remaining shoals. Dredging was resumed in July but was halted due to environmental concerns. Work remained incomplete through the end of the fiscal year while surveys and probings were being performed and evaluated. Hired labor costs of $65,590 were incurred for an environmental assessment, preparation of plans and specifications, supervision and inspection, surveys and plotting. Additional hired labor costs of $24,714 were incurred for analysis of alternatives and preparation of a report on entrance modification by the Waterways Experiment Station. 9. HAMPTON HARBOR, NH Location. On New Hampshire seacoast 13 miles south of Portsmouth Harbor, 5 miles north of mouth of Merrimack River at Newburyport, MA. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278). Existing project. Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet of south jetty and constructing a 180-foot spur to high ground, and dredging to provide a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across entrance bar. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project was completed in November 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers in Hampton Harbor. State of New Hampshire maintains three pile and timber piers, two in Hampton about 1,500 feet north of entrance and one in Seabrook one-half mile south of entrance. Hampton pier has a 6-foot walkway to a float that has depths of 4 to 6 feet. Seabrook pier has a float and a water depth of about 3 feet at outer end. One landing is open to the public. Facilities are adequate for exsisting commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the 8-foot channel was awarded in June 1987 and completed in September 1987. A total of 21,389 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $256,240. Disposal was in open water off the north end of Hampton Beach. Hired labor costs of $51,737 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, environmental assessment, supervision and inspection and surveys. 1-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 10. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. On east side of Block Island, near south end of inner curve of shoreline 13 miles south-southwest from Point Judith Harbor and about 25 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13217). Existing project. For description of existing project, see Annual Report for 1976. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Completed in 1916 except for inactive portion. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Two wharves in harbor, both steel sheetpile bulkhead which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. One wharf owned by town and open to public, is considered inadequate for present general needs of boating in harbor. There is limited room for expansion of terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An emergency dredging contract for the entrance channel was awarded in May 1987 and completed in June 1987. Approximately 16,200 cubic yards of material was removed by hydraulic dredge and deposited on Crescent Beach. Total lump sum contract was $150,000. Hired labor costs of $15,200 were incurred for supervision and inspection, preparation of plans and specifications, plotting, and surveys. 11. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA Location. On south shore of Cape Cod about 16 miles west of Chatham, Massachusetts and 20 miles northeast of Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237). Existing project. A stone breakwater 1,170 feet long, lying about 0. 7 mile off shore, dredging to 15.5 feet deep in protected area behind brealkwater; a channel 12 feet deep with widths of 150 and 100 feet in outer and inner harbors respectively, an anchorage area 12 feet deep and about 5 acres in area adjacent to inner harbor channel north of Harbor Bluff; and a riprap jetty 1,000 feet long extending south from Dunbar Point. Mean spring tidal ranges in outer harbor 3.1 and 3.7 feet, respectively. Breakwater was completed in 1882 and dredging behind breakwater in 1906. Rehabilitation was necessary to restore breakwater to its designed purpose of providing a harbor of refuge. Restoration was completed in November 1961. Construction of 12-foot channel and anchorage was initiated in May and completed in November 1959. Commonwealth of Massachusetts constructed the jetty extending south from Dunbar Point in 1962. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves in the inner harbor. One has a bulkhead frontage of about 800 feet. Other private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The fiscal year 1985 maintenance dredging contract had not been closed out at the end of the fiscal year pending resolution of claims. Hired labor costs of $6,490 were incurred for supervision and inspection associated with the contract claim. 12. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME Location. Jonesport Harbor is situated on the north side of Moosabec Reach in Washington County, Maine about 190 miles northeast of Portland, Maine, and about 40 miles southwest of the Canadian border at Eastport, Maine. Existing project. Provides for a combined rubble mound and cellular steel sheet pile breakwater, 1,200 feet in length; a 15-acre anchorage composed of 9 acres, 6 feet deep, and 6 acres, 8 feet deep; and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Latest approved cost estimate (September 1987) is $9,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), local interests are required to provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from the construction and maintenance of the project; provide, maintain, and operate necessary mooring facilities and utilities including a public landing in Sawyer Cove with berthing depths alongside the landing commensurate with the depth provided in the entrance channel and including an adequate access road, parking area, and suitable related facilities open to all on equal terms, including transients; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility or other relocations or alterations as necessary for project purposes; reserve spaces within the harbor adequate for the accommodation of transient craft; regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms, including transients; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of Jonesport Harbor by users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; pay 10 percent of project cost during construction; and pay an additional 10 percent of project costs within a period of 30 years following completion. Terminal facilities. There are thirteen privately owned wharves in the harbor, twelve of which are used by local fishermen and one which is used for receiving about three million gallons of petroleum annually. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Local interests obtained financing as required under the Local Cooperation Agreement. Construction bids were received 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION in July and a contract in the amount of $7,175,726 for construction of the project was awarded on September 4, 1987. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 13. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME Location. Drains a large number of lakes and minor streams, and flows from Moosehead Lake about 150 miles southerly and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 25 miles east of Portland. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13298). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A channel 27 feet deep and not less than 500 feet wide, extending from mouth to bridge at Bath; thence to Gardiner a channel not less than 150 feet wide, 17 feet deep at Beef Rock Shoal, at foot of Swan Island, 18 feet deep through rock at Lovejoy Narrows, near head of Swan Island, decreasing to 16 feet deep at Gardiner; channel west of Swan Island, 100 feet wide, 12 feet deep, except at upper shoal, where depth was to be 15 feet; and channel 125 feet wide and 11 feet deep from Gardiner upstream to Augusta at head of navigation. Section of river included in project is about 44 miles long. Work includes dredging, rock excavation, and two riprap training walls. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharves suitable for landing or loading are at Bath, Woolwich, Richmond, Randolph, Gardiner, Hallowell, and Augusta. Rail connections are available at some wharves. Depths alongside range from 12 to 25 feet. Many facilities are equipped with mechanism for handling passengers and freight. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Payment of an additional $17,151 was made for demobilizing the Government-owned hopper dredge MC FARLAND for maintenance dredging performed last fiscal year. Hired labor costs of $799 were incurred for plotting surveys. 14. MILFORD HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 8 miles west of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12370). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel, an anchorage and two riprap jetties. For further detailed description, see Annual Report for 1974. Project is complete except for following inactive portions: an 8-foot east basin anchorage and Section 107 6-foot anchorage. Burns Point jetty was repaired in 1963. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Specifically authorized project. Fully complied with for completed portion. Disposal areas are required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Three bulkhead wharves near entrance are used by oyster industry. City wharf and launching ramp near head of navigation are open to public use. Connecticut State Shellfish Commission operates a small wharf not open to public. There are several yacht landings. Facilities are adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $24,999 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications and surveys in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. Work includes reorienting project limits to resolve longstanding encroachment problems. Contributed Funds in the amount of $200,000 were received from the city of Milford to cover the initial cost of realignment dredging. 15. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 75 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12371). Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A main channel 35 feet deep, 400 to 800 feet wide, from Long Island Sound to Tomlinson Bridge; two anchorage basins below Tomlinson Bridge of 16- and 15-foot depths; a pile-and-riprap dike about 4,200 feet long, to contract tidal flow at Fort Hale bar; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 to 150 feet wide, from southwest corner of 16-foot anchorage basin via City Point and West Haven wharf front to Kimberly Avenue Bridge; thence 12 feet deep and prevailing width of 75 feet up West River to about 600 feet upstream of Kimberly Avenue Bridge, and an anchorage basin 6 feet deep in West River opposite Mars wharf; a channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep from 15-foot anchorage basin toward Brewery Street, about 300 feet; a channel in Quinnipiac River 22 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide to a point about 1,000 feet above Ferry Street, thence 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Grand Avenue, with turning basin 22 feet deep, 200 to 800 feet wide, and 700 feet long at mouth of Mill River; a channel up Mill River 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide to junction of two branches above Chapel Street, thence to Grand Avenue, 100 feet wide in East Branch and generally 125 feet wide in West Branch; and removal of certain obstructive rocks in Morris Cove. Modification authorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for: deepening the main ship channel to 40 feet; widening main ship channel from 400 to 500 feet; widening ship channel bend at Southwest Ledge from 500 feet to a minimum of 780 feet, straightening the channel bend downstream of the existing turning basin and; revising the configuration of the existing 35-foot deep turning basin to provide a common, smaller 40-foot turning basin. Total estimated cost (October 1986) for new work is $27,200,000 exclusive of $4,205,246 for new work completed before 1953 and amounts expended on previous projects. The 22-foot channel and turning basin is to be restudied. Estimated cost (1960) of this portion is $980,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Assurances for 1986 modifications have not been requested. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction and later maintenance of the project; 1-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 pay 100 percent of the costs for local improvements, presently estimated at $1,140,000; pay 25 percent of project costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $6,515,000; and pay an additional 10 percent of project costs within the 30-year period following construction, offset by a credit for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations) and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 24 waterfront facilities; most are within city limits of New Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of city wharf and U.S. Coast Guard wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Some of the facilities have rail connections and all are accessible by paved streets. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Ports of Southern New England No. 4, revised 1983). Operations during fiscal year. New work: Planning, engineering and design effort for this improvement was initiated this year. Efforts were focused on an update of project economics and studies of the project's impact on the oyster beds in New Haven Harbor. The Congressional authoritization required a report within one year on the impacts to the oyster industry, and that report was essentially complete by fiscal year end. Services of the Waterways Experiment Station were utilized in conjunction with the oyster beds study as well as for ship simulation model studies. 16. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA Location. On south bank of Merrimack River, about 2.5 miles above mouth, and about 48 miles by water north of Boston. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13282). Existing project. Two jetties, one projecting 4,118 feet from the north shore, the other projecting 2,445 feet from the south shore, converging until 1,000 feet apart, then extending seaward 1,000 feet parallel to axis of channel; partially closing Plum Island Basin by a timber dike; channel 12 feet deep and 400 feet wide through bar, thence 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide to and including a widened turning basin in front of wharves. (See Table 1- B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Existing project was completed in August 1958, with the improvement of 12-foot channel and outer harbor. North jetty was completed in 1914; south jetty was completed, except for a length of about 30 feet at its outer end, in 1905. Required rehabilitation in these jetties completed in September 1970. Plum Island Basin was partially closed in 1883 by construction of a timber dike. North Rock was removed on 1901. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Marinas, a yacht club, public landings, and a commercial fish pier extend along a frontage of the south bank of Merrimack River below highway bridge and one town pier and four marinas on the north side of river. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in July 1987 and completed in September 1987. Contract costs were $288,464 with 156,265 cubic yards of material removed by hopper dredge and disposed of in open water off Plum Island Beach. Hired labor costs of $54,637 were incurred for preparation of an environmental assessment, plans and specifications, supervision and inspection and surveys. 17. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA Location. Harbor is 45 miles by water south of Boston. Its outer anchorage, the "Cow Yard," is common to Plymouth, Duxbury, and Kingston. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1815 and 1938. Existing project. Provides for: protecting by riprap sections of Long Beach damaged by storm of November 1898, and restoring Eel River to its former course; dredging a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide, increased at entrance and on curves, from the bay to town wharves, formerly in areas south of State pier, a distance of about 2.5 miles, with a suitable turning basin at inner end; dredging a channel 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep, extending northwesterly about 0.3 miles from a point off site of northerly Craigs wharf (now State pier) with a turning basin 300 feet square, and of same depth, at its northwesterly end; maintenance of area dredged to 18 feet deep by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, connecting 15- foot channel with 18-foot channel in vicinity of State pier; a rubblestone breakwater extending 1,400 feet easterly from a point north of Town wharf, and thence southeasterly for 2,100 feet; an anchorage 8 feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater; and elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project; recreational development, to provide for sport fishing from breakwater, consisting of stone causeway about 360 feet long from westerly end of breakwater to land, guardrail along top of breakwater and causeway, footbridge spanning a navigation opening through breakwater, and public access, parking and sanitary facilities for sport fisherman use. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project is complete. Construction of anchorage 8 feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater was completed in 1967. Construction of the rubblestone breakwater was completed in 1971. Rehabilitaion of Long Beach Dike was completed in 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three wharves of pile and timber construction; one is owned by the State, one by the town, and the third by Plymouth Yacht Club. State and town wharves are open to public use. In addition, there are two boatyards with marine railway facilities along waterfront, equipped for boat building and repairs. Local interests will maintain existing public landings open to all on equal terms, and provide all necessary mooring facilities in anchorage. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract was awarded in August 1987 for maintenance dredging of existing Federal channel. Hired labor costs of $39,406 were incurred for preparation of 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION plans and specifications and surveys. Contractor earnings this fiscal year were $20,000 for mobilization costs. Dredging had not started at close of fiscal year. 18. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI Location. Point Judith marks southwestern entrance to Narragansett Bay. Harbor lies in shallow bight west of point, about 14 miles southwest of Newport Harbor, RI, and 33 miles east of New London Harbor, CT. Point Judith Pond is a shallow salt pond, with a length north and south of about 4 miles, lying in rear of sandy beach of Rhode Island shore, just west of Point Judith Harbor by a narrow opening through sand dunes. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13218 and 13219). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1977. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). All work for project authorized prior to 1949 was completed in 1950. Breakwaters were completed in 1914 and dredging of shoals in project area was done in 1921. Main and east shore arm breakwater had deteriorated and required restoration to project design. In 1962 reconstruction of east arm breakwater and main breakwater dock facilities were completed. Rehabilitation required for remainder of breakwater restoration was completed in October 1963. The extension of the 15-foot channel was completed in April 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of one town wharf of steel sheetpile bulkhead construction which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical handling facilities are available. Wharf is owned by the town and open to the public. State of Rhode Island maintains two State piers, one in Galilee and one in Jerusalem, each having about 500 feet of berthing space. A facility comprising a bulkhead with 15 finger piers projecting channelward there from provides berthing space of about 4,000 linear feet. This facility is used for receipt of fish and fish products. Mechanical handling facilities including fish pumps, are available for discharge of cargo. In addition, there are approximately 10 small privately owned wharves used in the fishing business and passenger traffic. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Payment of $739,293 for contract claims was made to the contractor relative to the main breakwater repair contract which was terminated in fiscal year 1984. Further payments, if any, are pending results of audit. Total contract cost through the end of the fiscal year was $1,950,702. Costs of $126,974 were incurred during the fiscal year for an audit performed by the Chicago Distrct relating to the contract claim. A payment of $1,476 was made this fiscal year for the removal and disposal of stockpiled stones for a total contract cost of $3,690. 19. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME AND NH Location. Piscataqua River forms a portion of boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Mouth of this river is called Portsmouth Harbor. It is 45 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, MA and 37 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Gangway Rock, southwest point of Badgers Island and Boiling Rock to 35 feet deep; widening 35-foot channel at bends by removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Henderson Point, Gangway Rock, Badgers Island, Maine-New Hampshire Interstate Bridge and Boiling Rock; and extending channel from above Boiling Rock to a point about 1,700 feet above Atlantic Terminal Sales dock in Newington generally 400 feet wide, and 35 feet deep below mean low water with manuevering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project; channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from Little Harbor through Rye-New Castle drawbridge, then northerly between mainland and Leach's Island to deep water in vicinity of Shapleigh and Goat Islands, channel 75 feet wide 6 feet deep up Sagamore Creek to public landing on downstream side of Sagamore Avenue bridge and anchorage strip, 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, totalling 3 acres, adjacent to channel in Sagamore Creek. Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended in 1965 and by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965 authorized construction of the 6-foot channels and anchorages. Modification authorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for: widening of the 35-foot deep channel from 600 feet to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widening northern limit of 35-foot deep channel adjacent to Badgers Island by 100 feet; and widening southern limit of existing 35-foot deep channel at Goat Island from 400 to 550 feet. Total estimated cost (October 1986) for new work is $18,400,000 exclusive of $5,384,043 for new work completed before 1971 and amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Assurances for 1986 modification are being processed. Local interests must pay the initial 25 percent of project costs concurrent with project construction and reimburse the additional 10 percent within the 30-year period following completion of construction. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way necessary for construction and later maintenance of the project including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; accomplish all alter- 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 ations and relocations of transportation facilities (excluding railroads, combined highway and railroad and publicly owned highway bridges and approaches thereto), storm drains, sewer outfalls, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the project; prohibit the erection of any structure, within a distance to be determined by the Chief of Engineers, from the bottom edge of the proposed channel and turning basin. Terminal facilities. Waterfront terminals are chiefly on south bank of Piscataqua River in Portsmouth and Newington. U.S. Navy Yard is on opposite bank at Kittery, Maine. Eighteen piers, wharves, and landings represent available terminals for handling the port's waterborne commerce. Navy Yard is not used for commercial activities. On Maine side of river are a town landing and two docks. On New Hampshire side there are 13 terminals, 6 of which include a public landing, 2 docks, 3 facilities used for vessel mooring and landings, are at Portsmouth. In addition there are a number of private recreational boat docks. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport and Portland, Maine, and Portsmouth, NH) Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction engineering and design, including the preparation of contract plans and specifications, was essentially completed during the year. A Local Cooperation Agreement was drafted and reviewed by all parties during the year, and at year end a final copy was with the project sponsor, the State of New Hampshire, for signature. The New Hampshire Legislature appropriated the sponsor's portion of construction costs as required under the terms of the Local Cooperation Agreement. Funds to initiate construction were appropriated by Congress this year. 20. ROCKPORT HARBOR, ME Location. On the westerly side of Penobscot Bay, about 6 miles north of Rockland, Maine. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13305 and 13307). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Remove the ledge at the entrance to the depth of 15 feet at mean low tide, thereby widening the entrance channel about 250 feet. The mean range in tides is 9.8 feet. Project was completed in December 1913. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. The major facility is a town operated marine park. There is a Rockport Boat Club, apprenticeshop, marine and a town operated commercial bulkhead. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract was awarded in July 1987 for maintenance dredging with work to be performed after late September. Hired labor costs of $11,805 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, plotting and surveys. Contractor earnings this fiscal year were $19,999 for mobilization costs. Dredging had not started at the end of the fiscal year. 21. ROCKPORT HARBOR and PIGEON COVE, ROCKPORT, MA Location. The town of Rockport is located on the seaward end of Cape Ann on the northeast Massachusetts coast about 35 miles north of Boston. The town is bordered by the city of Gloucester to the west, Essex Bay to the north, Massachusetts Bay to the south, and Sandy Bay to the east. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13278 and 13279). Existing project. Rebuilding the two breakwaters at entrance of harbor with rubblestone to a height of 18.5 feet and removing the principal rocks in the harbor. This work was completed in 1905. Current modification: An access channel -10 feet deep at mean low water (MLW) by 80 feet wide, leading from deep water outside the existing Federal breakwaters 1,100 feet to the town wharf at the center of the harbor. At the wharf the 10-foot channel branches to form two 40-foot-wide channels leading to the north and south inner anchorage basins which are separated by the wharf. The North Basin would have an area of 1.7 acres and a depth of -8 feet MLW. The South Basin would have an area of 1.3 acres and a depth of -8 feet MLW. Two additional outer harbor anchorages, both 8 feet deep at MLW would be located along the 80-foot wide access channel between the breakwaters and the town wharf. The plan of improvement developed for Pigeon Cove consists of a 75-foot wide channel -10 feet deep MLW extending from deep water outside the breakwater 550 feet across the southeast end of the cove to the public pier and offloading facilities. An anchorage area north of the channel would be dredged to -8 feet deep MLW. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. For the current modification: contribute in cash, prior to construction, 3.3 percent of the first cost of construction; provide, maintain and operate without cost to the United States, an adequate public landing with provisions for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water open and available to the use of all on equal terms; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States alterations and relocations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; provide and maintain mooring facilities as needed for transient and local vessels as well as necessary access roads, parking areas and other needed public-use shore facilities; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitations; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor. Terminal facilities. There are four commercial wharves, one of granite, the others of timber construction. There is one yacht club with a public landing. Facilities are adequate for present commerce. 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work on the improvement dredging contract awarded last fiscal year was begun in late October 1986 and completed in July 1987. Contract earnings to date are $876,697; current contract amount is $962,947 but final contract figure is yet to be determined pending review of liquidated damages assessment, time delays, and possible claims. 22. RYE HARBOR, NH Location. On Atlantic coast of New Hampshire about five miles south of Portsmouth Harbor. It is a natural cove of about 39 acres protected by two breakwaters. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13283). Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep for 600 feet through entrance, thence 8 feet deep for 1,700 feet within harbor; dredging two 5-acre anchorages, one 8 feet deep and the other 6 feet deep; and maintaining existing breakwaters. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean range of tide is 8.4 feet. Existing project was essentially completed in October 1962. Removal of ledge encountered during dredging process was completed in July 1964. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Much of the shoreline around Rye Harbor is undeveloped State property. Private ownership is limited to about 500 feet on the north shore west of Ragged Neck State Park, and to the south shore between the bridge and breakwater. State docking facilities and a boat launching ramp are available at the head of the harbor. Primarily, berthing is in the Federal and State anchorages. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Scheduled maintenance dredging was deferred pending resolution of ongoing disputes concerning the disposal site provided by the State. $350,000 in Contributed Funds for disposal site construction and State of New Hampshire maintenance and improvement dredging was returned to the State. Hired labor costs of $40,967 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, field surveys, plotting, and sampling and testing. 23. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, MA. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on the west. Land area within the town is 20.66 square miles and has a tidal shoreline of 29.8 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13250). Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep below mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project was completed in August 1982. Local cooperation. Local interests are responsible for fifty percent of the project construction costs, as well as the costs for dredging of all berthing areas outside the limits of the Federal project. They would also be responsible for provision of necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way; any necessary vegetation of disposal areas; holding the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of additional berthing spaces as required for expansion of the project support facilities during the life of the project as well as establish regulations prohibiting disposal of pollutants into the waterway. Required contributions have been received. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $4,745 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications for maintenance dredging of the project. Bids for the work were opened in July 1987. Contract award was deferred pending resolution of questions concerning the apparent low bidder's ability to perform the work. 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter). 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter). 26. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PRE AUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter). Alterations of Bridges 27. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. 28. REVERE BEACH, MA Location. In the city of Revere, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, approximately 7 miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor and 6 miles northeast of the city of Boston. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quadrangle). Existing project. Placement of sandfill along 13,000 feet of beach. The top of the sandfill will be placed at 18 feet above mean low water, including a 50-foot wide berm, sloping one-foot vertical in 15 feet horizontal to meet the existing beach. The total width of the beach will 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 extend approximately 300 feet, of which, about 185 feet is above the mean high water line. The estimated total first cost (October 1986) of the project is $7,110,000 of which 35 percent is non-Federal. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), local interests are required to: contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost of construction of the project, presently estimated at $2,490,000; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of 50 years, now estimated at $22,500 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first 50 years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design continued with focus on coordination with local interests on availability and suitability of sandfill source, satisfying environmental and permit requirements, and the preparation of a Local Cooperation Agreement. Although initial construction funds were appropriated this fiscal year, the Local Cooperation Agreement had not been executed by fiscal year end and hence construction had not been initiated. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of beach erosion projects were not conducted in fiscal year 1987. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter). 31. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-I at end of chapter). Flood Control 32. BIG RIVER RESERVOIR, RI Location. Dam would be located just upstream of the existing Flat River Reservoir in Coventry, Rhode Island, where Ifarkney Hill Road crosses the Big River. The reservoir would be in communities of Coventry and West Greenwich, Rhode Island. (See Geological Survey Maps for Hope Valley, Slocum, Crompton and Coventry Center, RI). Existing project. Dam would be rolled-earth 2,240 feet long with height of 70 feet over streambed. Total storage capacity provided by the reservoir would be 95,400 acrefeet consisting of 12,300 acre-feet of conservation storage, 73,600 acre-feet of water supply storage and 9,500 acrefeet of flood control storage which is equivalent to six inches of runoff from the 29.7 square mile watershed above the dam. Outlet works located in the left abutment would consist of an intake channel, a gatehouse of twinwell design to provide for flood control regulation and releases for water supply, conduits, outlet structure and outlet channel to the upstream end of Flat River Reservoir. The spillway would be located in a rock cut in the left abutment and would consist of a chute-type spillway with a 400-foot uncontrolled concrete weir. Discharge would be directly into the upstream end of Flat River Reservoir. Operation of the proposed Big River Reservoir in combination with the existing water supply facilities at Scituate Reservoir would provide a safe yield for water supply purposes of about 113 MGD. Total estimated cost (October 1986) for new work is $34,630,000 for construction and $54,270,000 for lands and damages (including road and utility relocations), a total of $88,900,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests must provide: 5 percent of the total costs allocated to flood control presently estimated at $374,000; all lands, easements rights-of-way and relocations allocated to flood control but limited such that the value is 45 percent of total cost allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $3,366,000; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement for flood control facilities presently estimated at $106,000 annually; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $79,660,000 for construction and $420,000 annually for operation, maintenance and major replacements; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $660,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $88,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. 33. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-K at end of chapter on reservoir and local protection projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan). 33A. CLEAR RIVER, BURRILLVILLE, RI Location. The town of Burrillville is located in the northwest corner of Rhode Island. The main stem of the Clear River originates in the northwest corner of Rhode Island and flows easterly for 8 miles to its confluence with the Branch River. Existing project. Remove approximately 60 linear feet of granite retaining wall, which has been damaged from erosion, and construct a new mortared stone wall. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The construction contract awarded last fiscal year was completed in October 1986. Final contract amount was $108,884. 33B. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, 3 miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps - Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA and Grafton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to construct restroom access and repair the dam road was awarded in November 1986 and completed in August 1987. Contract amount was $42,166. 34. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts- Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal aquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling 8,102 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The aquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. The latest cost estimate for new work is $9,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Land aquisition is complete. A total of 3,210 acres have been aquired in fee at a cost of $2,152,683 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,892 acres at a cost of $591,193. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plan lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances have been received. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Resolution of remaining condemnation cases continued. Of 22 tracts remaining to be settled at the beginning of the fiscal year, 19 were resolved. Fiscal year costs totalled $46,706 including $17,550 for fee/easement aquisition, $9,356 in hired labor costs for miscellaneous project administration activities, and $19,800 for condemnation trial activity. Maintenance: Contract costs of $165,500 for boundary marking were incurred. Hired labor costs for project surveillance and inspection as well as land use administration were $83,200. 35. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN VT, NH, MA and CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of 10 reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorzation for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conser- 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 vation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, Vermont project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, Vermont; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, New Hampshire, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, New Hampshire project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, Hartford, VT, and Wethersfield, CT authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Local protection project at Keene, NH authorized in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act, is under construction. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT and Conway, MA authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed in 1987. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin). Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, Vermont to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, Vermont, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. The estimated project cost is $1,000,000. 35A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is 2 miles north of village of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of initial recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA, and Wachusett Mountain, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to paint and repair flood control gates was awarded in August 1986 and completed in September 1987. The contract amount was $63,436. A contract awarded in October 1986 for pavement repairs at two projects was completed in September 1987. Total contract amount was $156,360. Pending final payment, $96,310 was the Barre Falls portion. The contract to repair the gatehouse masonry, awarded in May 1986, was 96 percent complete at fiscal year end. A contract for bridge restoration was awarded in August 1987. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 35C. BEAVER BROOK, KEENE, NH Location. Keene is located in southwestern New Hampshire approximately 15 miles north of the Massachusetts border and 12 miles east of the Vermont border. Existing project. Consists of structural modifications to the outlet of the Three Mile Swamp and widening the 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Beaver Brook channel in the reach between Water Street and Marlboro Street. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Additional contract costs for construction completed last fiscal year have increased earnings to date to a total of $1,870,999. Final contract amount is still pending. 35D. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed inprovement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repaint floodgates and replace gate seals was awarded in March 1987 in the amount of $84,695. At fiscal year end the contract was 15 percent complete. 35E. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the emergency generators at various locations was awarded in July 1987. Work had not started at fiscal year end. Another contract for pavement repairs at various locations was awarded in November 1986. The contract amount was $133,550 of which $30,845 is the Colebrook River Lake portion thru this fiscal year. 35F. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about 2 miles southeast of community of Monson. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35G. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is 4 miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace emergency generators at various locations was awarded in July 1987. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 35H. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, 1 mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for pavement repairs was awarded in August 1986 and completed in June 1987. Contract amount was $149,164. 35I. MILL BROOK, BROWNSVILLE, VT Location. The project is located along Mill Brook behind the Gleanor Grange Hall in the village of Brownsville, Vermont. The village is located in the town of West Wind- 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 sor, Vermont in Windsor County, about 12 miles north of Springfield, Vermont and 9.5 miles northwest of Claremont, New Hampshire. Existing project. The streambank stabilization project consists of concrete grid block protection placed along 120 feet of eroded streambank. The grid block is 8 inches thick, placed on a 1-foot gravel layer on a slope 1 vertical to 1- 5 horizontal. The grid block is to be anchored 5 feet below the streambed and will extend approximately 8 feet above the channel bed. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume the resposibility for all costs in excess of the Federal limitation of $250,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract was awarded last fiscal year in the amount of $48,735. Work began in June 1987 and continued thru September 1987. Ending fiscal year the contract was 77 percent complete. 35J. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 1 mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35K. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and 3 miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT and Claremont, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract for remedial measures for seepage control, completed in June 1986; required supplemental payments this fiscal year of $16,080. Final contract amount was $826,080. 35L. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for surface treatment of the access road, awarded last fiscal year, was completed in October 1986. Contract amount was $32,405. 35M. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The town of West Springfield is situated in southwestern Massachusetts about 90 miles west of Boston and 135 miles northwest of New York City, on the west bank of Connecticut River. Riverdale is in the northern portion of the town of West Springfield. Existing project. The plan of improvement involves the construction of approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log storage structures. The levee provides protection against a flood greater than any of record reduced by the approved plan of reservoirs. The grades are all points above the maximum stage of the greatest flood of record, that of March 1936. A modification authorized in 1987 calls for the expansion of the gravity outflow and pumping capacity of the existing Riverdale Pumping Station. This includes adding a 24-inch, diesel powered pump into the existing station. The proposed project also includes jacking a separate 5-foot diameter, reinforced concrete culvert through the dike, running parallel to the existing culvert to increase the gravity outflow capacity. During emergenices, the gate could be operated manually from a new bridge and tower structure on the river side of the dike. An existing 9-foot diameter culvert, about 400 feet downstream on Bagg Brook will be replaced with a realigned 8-foot x 13- foot corrugated metal arch and a 50-foot long transition aligned to tie smoothly into the existing downstream channel. Project cost estimate for the modification is $736,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have been requested. The local sponsor shall be solely responsible for operating, maintaining, replacing, and rehabilitating the project; provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs, currently estimated to be $36,800; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project, currently estimated to be $2,000; 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 20 percent, presently estimated at $145,200, so that the total contribution equals 25 percent of total project costs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords, or that would hinder operation and maintenance; and the local sponsor will assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of $5 million. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work continued on the project design, the preparation of plans and specifications, and obtaining a water quality permit from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Coordination with the town of West Springfield continued toward completing the Local Cooperation Agreement. 35N. SOUTH RIVER, CONWAY, MA Location. The South River originates below the Lower Reservoir in Ashfield, Massachusetts and joins the Deerfield River in Conway. The river is approximately 15 miles long and flows in a southeasterly direction through Conway. The town of Conway is located in Franklin County in western Massachusetts within the 655 square mile Deerfield River drainage basin. It is situated approximately five miles west of Interstate 91 between the communities of Greenfield and Shelburne Falls to its north, and Northampton to its south. Existing project. The plan at Site 2 calls for clearing and grubbing of the existing slope and refilling the eroded areas with compacted random fill. Slope protection consisting of a 3-foot thick uniform stone layer underlain by filter layers of 1-foot thick stone bedding and 1- foot thick gravel bedding would be placed on the random fill. The plan at Site 3 calls for clearing and grubbing the existing terraced slope and refilling the eroded areas with compacted random fill. Slope protection would be provided for the lower bank consisting of a 2-foot thick uniform stone layer underlain by a 1-foot thick gravel bedding layer and continuing to the top of the bank with loam and seed. (See Table 1-B at end of chatper for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The construction contract awarded last fiscal year was completed in May 1987. Final contract amount was $75,087. 350. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6, miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 5 miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35P. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about 2 miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about 4 miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract awarded last fiscal year to replace the emergency generator was completed in February 1987. Contract amount was $42,213. Another contract awarded last fiscal year for pavement repairs in the recreation area was completed in October 1986. Final contract amount was $43,384. A contract for pavement repairs, awarded in July 1987, in the amount of $98,333, was 32 percent complete at fiscal year end. Another contract for pavement repairs was awarded in July 1987 but work had not started at fiscal year end. 35Q. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is 1 mile north of Fryville, MA and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 pavement repairs at various locations was awarded in October 1986 and completed in September 1987. Contract amount was $156,360. Pending final payment, $50,243 was the Tully Lake portion. Another contract to repaint the floodgates and replace gate seals was awarded in April 1987 and completed in September 1987. The contract amount was $39,850. 35R. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, 4 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is one-fourth mile north of Union Village, VT and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35S. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The West Springfield local protection works are located in the town of West Springfield, MA. The project is on the west bank of the Connecticut River, 76 miles above its mouth. (See Geological Survey maps for Springfield South and West Springfield, MA-CT). Existing project. This project consists of a system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approximately 24,500 feet in length. The system starts at high ground, in the vicinity of Harrison Place, and extends downstream along the Connecticut River and up the north bank of the Westfield River to high ground at the Boston & Albany Railroad. The work involved raising 13,700 feet of existing levee, constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall, improving 2,400 feet of river bank, and treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities were also constructed for the disposal of interior drainage. The project, with the approved plan of reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The levee and floodwall grades are, at all points, above the maximum stage of the greatest flood of record, that of March 1936. A modification to the project was authorized in October 1982 providing for the raising of the floodwall sections by one foot and the provision of a flood forecasting system. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938. The project is complete. Construction of the prior project work was initiated in March 1939 and completed in July 1942 with the exception of foundation treatment along the Westfield River south of Agawam Bridge, which was initiated in May 1947 and completed in November 1947, and relief well and drainage system, which was initiated in August 1952 and completed in July 1953. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Local interests continued aquisition of easements needed for installation of field equipment that will become part of flood warning system. 36. GULF STREET, MILFORD, CT Location. The city of Milford, is located in the southwest corner of New Haven County, in southwestern Connecticut. The erosion site at Gulf Street is located immediately to the southeast of Milford Harbor and the site at Trumbull Avenue is located immediately to the southwest of Milford Harbor. Existing project. Shoreline protection measures will consist of construction of stone slope protection for the 140- foot long reach of shoreline, roadway and associated utilities. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The construction contract, awarded last fiscal year in the amount of $174,200, was completed in August 1987. Final contract cost is pending determination of final quantities. 37. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT and MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributatries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergengy snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury - Watertown, CT 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-M on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin). 37A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook about 2 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was awarded in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstreaam of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for pavement repairs at various locations was awarded in November 1986. The contract amount was $133,550, of which $19,999 was the Black Rock Lake portion thru this fiscal year. 37B. COVERED BRIDGE, HOUSATONIC RIVER, SHEFFIELD, MA Location. The town of Sheffield is located in the southwestern corner of Berkshire County, Massachusetts, approximately 7.5 miles east of the Massachusetts - New York state line and about 4.2 miles north of the Massachusetts - Connecticut state line. Existing project. Construct a 70-foot long stone apron to protect the slopes and bottom of the bridge channel. Also, a total of approximately 500 linear feet of riprap to be located upstream and downstream from the bridge on both riverbanks. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract awarded last fiscal year was started in October 1986 and continued thru September 1987. Contract costs thru September 1987 were $162,382. 37C. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 37D. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 37E. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town of Thomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 37F. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was started in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repaint the access and service bridges was awarded in May 1987 and completed in August 1987. Contract amount was $24,480. A contract for pavement repairs at various locations was awarded in November 1986. The contract amount was $133,550, of which $49,580 was the Thomaston Dam portion thru this fiscal year. 38. MACHIAS RIVER, MACHIAS, ME Location. The town of Machias is a coastal community located about 83 miles east of Bangor, Maine and 46 miles southwest of the U.S. - Canadian border town of Eastport, Maine. Existing project. The plan calls for the construction of 250 linear feet of stone slope protection along the north bank of the river, adjacent to the municipal parking lot. The project includes a 50-foot extension upstream of the municipal parking lot to tie the upstream end of the stone protection into stable natural banking. Project is complete. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations necessary for project construction, estimated to be $2,000; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract in the amount of $115,220 was awarded in September 1986 and completed in June 1987. 39. MARGINAL WAY, OGUNQUIT, ME Location. The town of Ogunquit is located within York County along the coast of southern Maine about 15 miles north of Portsmouth, New Hampshire and 40 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. Marginal Way is a public footpath that starts near the center of town and follows the edge of the ocean atop rugged cliffs to Perkins Cove. The walkway is about a mile and a half long and was constructed in 1926. Existing project. Construction of 240 linear feet of 42- inch thick stone slope protection along the unprotected portion of the walkway which is adjacent to and just north of the rebuilt section. Project is complete. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction, estimated to be $2,000; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of Federal cost limitation of $250,000; insure that erosion conditions along portions of Marginal Way, outside the limits of the proposed Corps project, are protected and properly maintained; maintain Marginal Way as a public walkway. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The construction contract awarded last fiscal year was completed in April 1987. Final contract amount was $193,590. 40. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system for four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-N at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin). 40A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, NH, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, just above village of Swetts Mills, 12.5 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract to replace the emergency generator at three damsites, awarded last fiscal year, was completed in December 1986. Total contract amount was $69,663, of which $20,700 was the Blackwater Dam portion thru this fiscal year. 40B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Manadnock, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Comstruction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract awarded last fiscal year to repaint the service bridge and floodgate was completed in August 1987. Contract amount was $22,000. A contract was awarded in July 1987 to resurface the access road and was 70 percent complete at fiscal year end. 40C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, NH, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2/2 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the gatehouse roof was awarded in September 1987. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 40D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, NH, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, NH, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract awarded last fiscal year to replace the emergency generator at three damsites was completed in December 1986. The contract amount was $69,663 of which $9,334 was the Hopkinton-Everett Lakes portion thru this fiscal year. A contract was awarded in July 1987 for restroom renovations. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 41. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operating costs included $100,600 for project operations and $17,600 for administrative activities. 42. NEW LONDON, CT Location. In the city of New London, CT, about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, CT, and 50 miles southwest of Providence, RI. (See Geological Survey map for New London, CT). Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rock-faced earthfill dike and 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw Cove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of dike and floodwalls will be 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures will include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Last estimate (December 1984) for the project is $11,560,000 for construction and $1,140,000 for lands and damages including relocations, a total of $12,700,000 for new work. Total includes local 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 costs of $1,140,000 for lands and relocations and a $2,310,000 cash contribution. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project is under construction and is approximately 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations; (c) bear 30 percent of construction cost with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; and (e) maintain and operate all works. Assurances have been provided. Operations during ficscal year. New work: Administrative closeout of Part VI contract continued. Continued efforts to obtain values for project real estate from city of New London in order to ascertain appropriate project cost-sharing. The city still has not provided the required information. 43. PLEASANT POINT, PERRY, ME Location. The town of Perry is located within Washington County along the coast of northeastern Maine about 126 miles east of Bangor, Maine and 20 miles south of Calais, Maine. Existing project. The project consists of 800 linear feet of stone slope protection. The stone is placed on a slope of 1 vertical to 2 horizontal and extends from mean high tide up to the height of expected storm wave runup. A gravel walkway will run along the top of the stone protection. Project is complete. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The construction contract awarded last fiscal year was completed in June 1987. Final contract amount was $123,418. 44. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is located in Suffolk County on the Massachusetts coast about 2 miles northeast of the East Boston section of the city of Boston. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front area of Revere. The area has 55 acres which lie below elevation 10 feet NGVD. Existing project. Consists of stabilizing the existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves. The revetment would extend from a point 400 feet north of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The plan also calls for "backwater" protection by constructing an earth berm one foot high and 200 feet long on the existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station, a new gravity drain and two sluice gates. The total estimated project cost (October 1986) is $9,400,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements, presently estimated at $13,000 annually; pay 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction, presently estimated at $3,290,000; provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas, and other public use facilities, open and available to all on equal terms; accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, highway bridges, and other structures made necessary by construction of the project; and prior to initiation of construction prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on the interior ponding easment areas. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work included subsurface exploration, wave analysis and initiation of project design as part of the General Design Memorandum (GDM). 45. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME Comprehensive plan for water resources development within the basin was comprised of the multiple-purpose Dickey and Lincoln School Reservoirs on the upper Saint John River. Projects were authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 substantially in accordance with plans included in report of Department of Interior and Corps of Engineers dated August 1964 which is supplement to July 1963 report of International Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project and Upper Saint John River Hydroelectric Power Development. The Dickey Dam component of the project was deauthorized by Public Law 97-128 on 29 December 1981 and the project in its entirety was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) on November 17, 1986. Local protection project at Fort Kent authorized by Chief of Engineers on September 25, 1975 in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-F at end of chapter for authorized multiple-purpose projects including power). 46. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT). 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Local interests will provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make modifications to existing storm drainage system which may be required to obtain full benefits of protection plan, all necessary modifications to existing sanitary sewer facilities required to prevent entry of tidal-waters, and all changes, alterations and additions to or relocations of any buildings and utilities made necessary by construction of project; bear 30 percent of total first cost, estimated at $4,340,000 and consisting of cost items listed above plus a cash contribution estimated at $3,150,000; contribute in cash, in lieu of cost of annual maintenance and operation of tidal portion of East Branch barrier which is to be operated and maintained by the United States, an amount estimated at $880,000; maintain and operate all works after completion with exception of tidal portion of East Branch barrier and aids to navigation; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances received and cash contributions have been deposited except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. New work: A strong request was again made to the city of Stamford for payment of the $662,000 still outstanding as a result of claims settlement. 47. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan). 47A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River and 8 miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 47B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River and 1 mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract awarded last fiscal year to replace the emergency generator was completed in November 1986. Final contract amount was $24,500. 47C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about 5 miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for pavement repairs was awarded in July 1987. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 47D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is 4 miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. 1-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for pavement repairs to the access road was awarded in May 1987 and completed in August 1987. Final contract amount was $24,185. 47E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, 2 miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. The contract awarded last fiscal year for construction of a storage building was completed in December 1986. Final contract amount was $57,960. 47F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repaint the floodgates was awarded in April 1987 and completed in September 1987. Final contract amount was $68,850. 48. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY and BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, 7 miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Provides for the construction of a 12- foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. New reinforced concrete box outlets will be constructed under the Southern Artery and an adjacent automobile dealer parking lot. In conjunction with this, the left bank of the Town River below the Southern Artery will be widened to provide sufficient channel capacity. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by modifications to the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook which will include a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1986) is $28,400,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, presently estimated at $250,000; provide safety modifications to Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity, presently estimated at $270,000; pay a cash contibution of 23 percent of the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $6,580,000 so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements, presently estimated at $8,400 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all projectrelated channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The feature Design Memorandum (DM) on the tunnel, conduits, and shafts was approved by Chief of Engineers in November 1986. The last planned feature Design Memorandum for the project (the Old Quincy Dam reconstruction) was completed and approved in June 1987. Revised plans and specifications for the Town River improvements were essentially completed and were coordinated with the MDC, applicable utilities, and the city of Quincy. 49. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936. as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: October 1986 and May 1987 - Ansonia, Derby, East Hartford, Hartford, New London, Pawcatuck, Stamford; April 1987 - Bridgeport, Colchester/ East Hampton, East Branch, Hall Meadow, Mad River, North Canaan, Salisbury, Sucker Brook, Torrington, Waterbury, Winsted, Woodbury; May 1987 - Danbury, New Fairfield, Norwalk, Wethersfield. MAINE: May 1987 - Beals, Blaine, Castine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Harpswell, Hartland, Indian Island, Islesboro, Lubec, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: October 1986 and April 1987 - Gardner, Haverhill, Lowell, Springfield; October 1986 and May 1987 - Charles River Dam, Fitchburg, Holy- 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION oke, Northampton, Saxonville, West Springfield; April 1987 - Alford, Canton, Huntington, Lancaster, Lee, Pittsfield, Scituate, Sheffield, Three Rivers, West Warren, Worcester; May 1987 - Amesbury, Blackstone, Chicopee, Hayward Creek, Millbury, Quincy, Ware, Weymouth-Braintree. NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 1986 - Beaver Brook, Keene; October 1986 and May 1987 - Nashua; April 1987 - Lincoln, Shelburne, Wilton; May 1987 - Charlestown, Farmington, North Stratford, West Stewartstown. RHODE ISLAND: October 1986 and April 1987 - Woonsocket. VERMONT: April 1987 - Weston; May 1987 - Saxtons River. 50. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multipurpose in nature and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. During the period 31 March to 8 April 1987, a pair of intense rainstorms hit most of New England, causing major flooding in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine. These two storms, augmented by snowmelt in the mountains and northern areas, resulted in the most widespread flooding in about 50 years. The storms created two separate and significant flood peaks, especially in southern and central regions. Basin conditions prior to the flooding were the result of minimal precipitation and sunny, clear weather during February and March. This resulted in a substantial reduction of snow cover throughout New England from the nearrecord highs of late January, and was especially true in southern New England where the snow pack had mostly disappeared. However, significant amounts of snow still remained in higher elevations of western Massachusetts and Connecticut and the hilly and mountainous areas of the three northern states. In the week before the first storm, windy and sunny weather reduced water content in the snow pack by 2 to 3 inches in the Connecticut River Basin and up to 3 inches in the Merrimack River Basin. This condition increased flows on the mainstems of the Merrimack and Connecticut Rivers to about 40 to 50 percent of channel capacity on 30 March. Flood control gates at Corps reservoirs were throttled to minimum releases on 30 March, as a precautionary measure to a forcasted storm. During the next two days an extremely intense storm system buffeted the entire New England area with heavy rainfall, strong southerly winds and temperatures in the fifties and sixties. Precipitation totals amounted to 3 to 5 inches of rain in southern and coastal areas and 2 to 3 inches over much of northern New England with its remaining snowpack containing 3 to 5 inches of water equivalent. This rainfall caused significant rises in all rivers, but water levels remained below flood stage in the smaller basins of southern New England such as the Blackstone, Thames and Naugatuck, because of Corps reservoirs and dry antecedent conditions with no snowmelt. Active snowmelt in the hills and mountains of northern and central Vermont and New Hampshire, however, combined with the rainfall to create flood conditions along the mainstems and tributaries within the Connecticut and Merrimack Basins. The entire length of the Connecticut River from White River Junction, Vermont to Long Island Sound rose to several feet above flood stage, and the Pemmigewasset River upstream of Franklin Falls Dam and the Merrimack River at Lowell, Massachusetts also experienced flood conditions. Corps reservoirs reduced stages significantly during this flood, as flood control storage utilized ranged from about 30 to 70 percent at reservoirs in the Connecticut River Basin and between about 40 and 75 percent at reservoirs in the Merrimack River Basin. Regulation at Corps reservoirs in the remaining basins resulted in lesser amounts of flood control storage. Just as runoff from this first storm was being released from flood control storage, another intense storm was forecast for New England. Because of this, releases from Corps reservoirs were throttled to a minimum again, just as a large slow moving storm hit southern and much of central New England with heavy rainfall ranging from 4- 7 inches. Resulting inflows into already partially full reservoirs resulted in record pool levels at 21 projects and near record amounts at 8 others. In six cases (Knightville, Townshend, Ball Mountain, Surry Mountain, Otter Brook, and Edward MacDowell) flood control storage was exceeded resulting in uncontrolled spillway discharge. The extensive runoff created widespread flooding conditions particularly within the middle and lower reaches of the Merrimack and Connecticut River Basins. At Lowell, Massachusetts the Merrimack River rose to its highest level since September 1938, and the Nashua, Concord and Spicket Rivers experienced serious flooding. In the Connecticut River Basin the mainstem again rose several feet above flood levels from Brattleboro, Vermont to its mouth, and flooding was experienced in the West, Ashuelot, Deerfield, Westfield and Farmington River watersheds. Within the Naugatuck, Shetucket, Quinebaug, French and Blackstone River watersheds the main rivers rose to bank full capacities, but no significant flooding was experienced in areas located downstream of Corps reservoirs. A tabulation of damages prevented by Corps projects by states during these two floods is given below: Connecticut .......................... $224,164,000 Massachusetts .......................... 201,684,000 New Hampshire ...................... 14,397,000 Rhode Island ............................... 9,975,000 M aine .................................... 7,605,000 Vermont .................................. 4,771,000 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Connecticut River Basin Storages at Corps reservoirs for the March-April event exceeded 100 percent at Knightville, Townshend, Ball Mountain, Surry Mountain and Otter Brook. In addition to these projects, storage at many of the other reservoirs in the basin exceeded the previous maximum. These included Littleville - 89 percent, North Springfield - 82 percent, Birch Hill - 80 percent, Barre Falls - 72 percent, North Hartland - 71 percent and Tully - 62 percent. Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Ball Mountain and Townshend - October 1986 and May 1987, Birch Hill and Tully - April 1987 and Knightville and Littleville - March and April 1987. Non-flood releases were made from Colebrook Lake for low flow augmentation in July and August 1987 and for water supply throughout the year. Non-flood releases from North Hartland Lake have been controlled by the Vermont Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative for hydropower throughout fiscal year 1987. Merrimack River Basin The March-April flood not only resulted in spillway discharge at Edward MacDowell Lake but also in record levels at other reservoirs in the basin. Levels reached 95 percent of storage at Hopkinton-Everett and 90 percent of storage at Blackwater. At Franklin Falls, the 76 percent storage represented the second greatest level at the project. Blackwater Dam was regulated for canoe races in April 1987. Thames River Basin Reservoir levels in the Thames River Basin as a result of the flood of March-April rose to record levels at three of the six reservoirs in the basin. Those experiencing record levels were West Thompson - 60 percent, Hodges Village - 59 percent and Buffumville - 58 percent. East Brimfield and Westville experienced reservoir levels of 47 and 48 percent of capacity which were nearly equal to the maximum levels experienced during the flood of 1984. Other regulation activities in the basin included regulation for canoeing at Mansfield Hollow in June and September, East Brimfield, Westville and Hodges Village in April. Also the permanent pool at West Thompson was raised on several occasions during fiscal year 1987 to accommodate AKC retreiver trials and powerboat competitions. Water supply releases were made from East Brimfield during August. Naugatuck River Basin Regulation of reservoirs in the Naugatuck River Basin during the March-April floods resulted in a record level at the East Branch reservoir of 31 percent. Other levels experienced during this flood were Black Rock - 41 percent, Hancock Brook - 37 percent, Hop Brook - 35 percent and Thomaston - 34 percent. Blackstone River Basin As a result of the flood of March-April, the reservoir level at West Hill Dam reached 67 percent of capacity, which exceeded the previous maximum level experienced in 1984. 51. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes for severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, Connecticut and New Bedford-Fairhaven, Massachusetts barriers. The Fox Point, Rhode Island and the Pawcatuck and New London, Connecticut barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: Stamford Barrier. The barrier gates were operated on sixteen occasions for coastal storms and prevented $150,000 in damages during fiscal year 1987. New Bedford Barrier. The New Bedford Barrier was operated on five occasions for coastal storms and prevented $575,000 in damages during fiscal year 1987. Fox Point Hurricane Barrier. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1987 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1987 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. New London Hurricane Barrier. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1987 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. 52. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter). 53. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J at end of chapter). Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Blackstone River, Millbury, MA ................. $4,000 H artford, VT ..................................... 6,500 Kennebec River, Bingham, ME .................. 7,500 Saco River, Conway, NH ........................ 5,000 Suncook River, NH ............................... 3,500 Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Baker Brook, Rumney, NH ..................... $3,500 Belfast, M E ................... ............... 19,840 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Blackstone River, Millbury, MA ................. 1,696 Bottom Brook, Northfield, MA ................... 5,700 Clear River, Burrillville, RI ................... 113,034 (See Section 33A of Text) Connecticut River, Chesterfield, NH .............. 3,435 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT ............. 16,479 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA ................ 194,832 (See Section 37B of Text) Farmington River, CT .......................... 35,436 Gulf Street, Milford, CT ....................... 189,474 (See Section 36 of Text) Herring River, Scituate, MA ..................... 6,970 Machias River, Machias, ME .................. 134,143 (See Section 38 of Text) Manet Beach, Quincy, MA ......................... 483 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME ................. 201,427 (See Section 39 of Text) Mason, NH .................... ................ .. 8,300 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT .................... 60,335 (See Section 351 of Text) Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME ............... 4,800 Newbury Neck, Surry, ME ...................... 3,518 North River, Colrain, MA ....................... 17,500 North River, Shelburne, MA ..................... 5,500 Northumberland, NH ............................ 6,000 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME ................... 11,945 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME ..................... 137,797 (See Section 43 of Text) Roosevelt International Park, Lubec, ME ......... 41,990 Russell, M A ..................................... 4,000 Sandy Point, West Haven, CT .................... 7,500 Smith River, Grafton, NH ...................... 7,126 South River, Ashfield, MA ...................... 17,500 South River, Conway, MA ...................... 90,887 (See Section 35N of Text) Surf Street, Saco, ME .......................... 23,863 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $146,307 for disaster preparedness. Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Act of 1974 as amended in 1976 (Section 32 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. P.L. 93-251). There were no fiscal year costs for demonstration project proposals. Total costs to 30 September 1987 were $1,204,996. 54. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), signed on November 17, 1986, deauthorized a number of unconstructed projects or portions of projects. They included: Connecticut - Bridgeport Harbor-Black Rock Harbor, Connecticut River below Hartford, Mystic River, Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Stonington Harbor, Thames River, New Haven Harbor, and Milford Harbor. Maine - Bar Harbor, Dickey-Lincoln School, Kennebec River, and Rockland Harbor. Massachusetts - Edgartown Harbor, Fall River Harbor, Ipswich River, Nantucket Harbor of Refuge Anchorage, New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor, Newburyport Harbor, Nookagee Lake, Pleasant Bay, Salem Harbor, Winthrop Beach, Lynn Harbor, Monoosnoc Brook, Monoosnoc Lake, and Town Neck Beach. Rhode Island - Great Salt Pond, Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, Providence River and Harbor, and Westerly Hurricane Protection. General Investigations 55. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $1,619,894 of which $132,409 was for two navigation studies; $231,594 for two flood damage prevention studies; $893,199 for four comprehensive studies; $5,308 for review of three completed or deferred projects; $357,384 for coordination studies. 56. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during the past year kept closely in touch with developments in the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total costs for the fiscal year were $15,114. Total costs to 30 September 1987 were $194,537. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including indentification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $185,774. Total costs to 30 September 1987 are $5,130,399. 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 57. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Total costs for continuation of Planning and Engineering were $181,221 of which $258 was for channels and harbors and $180,963 for local protection. The channels and harbor study was at Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The continuing local protection studies were for Town Brook in Quincy, Massachusetts and for Roughans Point in Revere, Massachusetts. 58. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Advance Engineering and design costs were $290,357 for navigation projects at Bristol Harbor, RI and New Haven Harbor, CT. 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION MAXIMUM STORAGE FOR NEW ENGLAND DIVISION FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS DURING THE MARCH-APRIL 1987 FLOOD PEAK DRAINAGE PEAK STAGE FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT AREA STAGE RANKING STORAGE UTILIZED ACRE- MILLION PERCENT SQ. MI. FEET GALLONS INCHES FULL Connecticut River Basin UNION VILLAGE 126 97.8 4 12,600 4,100 1.9 34 NORTH HARTLAND 220 135.8 1 48,800 15,900 4.2 71 NORTH SPRINGFIELD 158 85.2 1 40,300 13,200 4.8 82 BALL MOUNTAIN 172 213.9 1 54,300 17,700 5.9 100+ TOWNSHEND 106 (net) 98.6 1 35,000 11,400 6.2 100+ SURRY MOUNTAIN 100 66.1 1 32,800 10,700 6.1 100+ OTTER BROOK 47 99.4 1 18,100 5,900 7.3 100+ BIRCH HILL 175 33.8 1 40,500 13,200 4.3 80 TULLY 50 35.3 1 12,600 4,100 4.8 62 BARRE FALLS' 55 801.4 1 16,700 5,400 5.6 72 CONANT BROOK 7.8 17.7 6 250 80 0.6 6 KNIGHTVILLE 162 132.4 1 51,500 16,800 6.3 100+ LITTLE VILLE1 52 571.7 1 21,000 6,800 7.7 89 COLEBROOKI 118 732.8 5 43,0002 14,0002 6.72 41 MAD RIVER 18 74.5 2 2,360 770 2.5 26 SUCKER BROOK 3.4 24.9 2 340 110 1.9 24 Merrimack River Basin FRANKLIN FALLS1 1000 375.4 2 116,100 37,800 2.2 76 BLACKWATERI 128 564.1 1 40,900 13,300 6.0 90 HOPKINTONEVERETTI 446 (net) 415.8 1 154,000 50,200 6.5 95 MACDOWELL1 44 949.8 1 16,200 5,300 7.0 100+ Naugatuck River Basin THOMASTON 70.7 (net) 75.6 3 14,300 4,700 2.7 34 BLACK ROCK 20.4 79.0 3 3,600 1,200 3.6 41 HOP BROOK 16.4 50.5 4 2,500 800 3.0 35 HANCOCK BROOK 12 19 (est) 2 1,400 460 2.2 37 NORTHFIELD BROOK 5.7 62 (est) 2 750 240 2.5 32 HALL MEADOW 17.2 21.6 2 1,800 590 2.0 19 EAST BRANCH 9.3 39.8 1 1,330 430 3.2 31 Thames River Basin EAST BRIMFIELD 67.5 26.0 2 14,000 4,600 3.9 47 WESTVILLE 32 (net) 49.2 2 5,300 1,700 3.1 48 WEST THOMPSON 74 (net) 40.9 1 15,400 5,000 3.9 60 HODGES VILLAGE 31.1 27.4 1 7,900 2,600 4.8 59 BUFFUMVILLE 26.5 32.5 1 6,500 2,100 4.7 58 MANSFIELD HOLLOW 159 46.8 4 25,500 8,300 3.0 50 Blackstone River Basin WEST HILL 28 25.5 1 8,350 2,700 5.6 67 NOTES: (1) Elevation of the pool is in feet MGVD. (2) Volume of runoff stored during flood event 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Black Rock Harbor, CT 3. Bristol Harbor Bristol, RI 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 5. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 6. Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (Contributed Funds) 7. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Total Cost to FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 7,995 79,359 242,071 4,865,718 5,311,711 14,269 509,000 509,225 1,775,602 3,387,864 40,000 35,241 22,900 22,180 -531 6,469,630 6,765,682 30,000 31,931 23,000 23,000 113,000 64,396 6,093,171 6,101,729 168 -400 42 177,567 179,124 19,880 19,880 129,792 118,673 20,516 20,654 12,000 257,496 8,770 251,423 10,300 1,561,559 23,750 1,555,714 -35,000 316,288 13,604 316,288 - 1,654 - 1,654 - 32,786,2191,2 - 32,786,2191,2 5,850,021 92,546,605 5,709,255 92,136,029 - 115,432 - 115,432 - 390,677 - 390,677 - 26,609,000 - 26,609,000 - 266,70541 - 266,70541 692,982 2,612,95542 692,995 2,612,95542 - 43,500 - 43,500 - 1,541,1853,4 - 1,541,1853,4 228,904 14,973,2056 229,000 14,962,1645 - 60,000 - 60,000 - 130,410 - 130,410 - 27,167 - 27,167 87,095 1,051,16943 87,095 1,051,16943 - 11,643 - 11,643 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 8. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 9. Hampton Harbor, NH (Contributed Funds) 10. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI 11. Hyannis Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 12. Jonesport Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds - Required) 13. Kennebec River, ME 14. Milford Harbor, CT (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 15. New Haven Harbot, CT New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 254,512 - 254,512 154,525 192,598 254,900 264,505 58,116 310,696 2,075,995 44,232 268,600 2,008,979 168,000 9,658 168,000 317,558 311,599 -6,000 - - 200,000 - - 200,000 4,000 299,800 2,062,016 3,587 299,749 2,061,510 - 193,761 - 193,761 - 576,856 - 576,856 16,105 16,105 18,398 18,398 25,000 13,889 357,454 339,813 40,000 3,725 14,664 192,442 1,534,397 14,664 192,442 1,534,397 15,184 16,473 205,000 2,860,000 261,017 38,658 - 80,000 22,003 422,302 22,003 421,393 22,082 22,082 57,390 57,390 - 484,499 - 484,499 2,000 643,1956 6,490 631,3336 - 103,001 - 103.001 3,370,000 539,837 80,000 - 1,599,9407 - 1,599,9407 38,188 2,253,246 39,097 2,253,246 35,275 35,274 - 200,000 90,50644 90,50644 715,03445 715,03345 11,380 11,380 200,000 - 600,000 4,805,2468 - 276,753 4,481,9998 648,500 971,281 106,071 103,063 22,564 25,795 15,514 12,805,2389 16,214 12,805,1889 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 16. Newburyport Harbor, MA 17. Plymouth Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds - Required) 18. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (Contributed Funds) 19. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (Contributed Funds - Required) 20. Rockport Harbor, ME 21. Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove Rockport, MA (Contributed Funds - Required) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 569,225 569,225 -19,652 6,305 236 236 -125,695 612,029 21,243 24,225 10,395 10,395 -358,831 644,031 34,909 36,759 343,200 4,438,661 343,100 4,438,048 - 1,415,524 - 1,415,524 - 2,127,21812 - 2,127,21812 - 70,000 994,90146 - 69,405 994,30646 426,000 425,264 - 573,000 - 541,611 - 894,475 - 894,475 - 2,714,51011 - 2,714,51011 927,000 4,769,884 920,741 4,759,129 - 1,926,000 - 1,926,000 - 17,587 - 17,587 - 13,605 889,482 889,033 748 1,844 - 200,258 5,584,30110 13,349 138,211 5,522,25410 2,800 2,800 12,121 1,949,080 12,121 1,949,080 - 99,707 - 99,707 - 32,00047 - 32,00047 - 31,640 - 31,596 2,258 105,000 85,406 86,160 86,116 50,000 1,127,000 1,562,000 47,420 1,058,356 1,470,881 - 39,000 39,000 39,000 39,000 1-32 TABLE 1-A (Continued) See Section In Text Project 22. Rye Harbor, NH (Contributed Funds - Required) (Contributed Funds - Other) 23. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds - Required) 28. Revere Beach, MA (Contributed Funds) 33A. Clear River, Burrillville, RI 33B. West Hill Dam, MA 34. Charles River (Natural Valley) Storage Areas), MA 35A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 35B. Barre Falls Dam, MA 35C. Beaver Brook, Keene, NH NEW ENGLAND DIVISION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 22,173 22,173 15,804 15,804 32,093 32,093 4,887 4,887 - 230,000 - 195,093 - 50,000 - 40,704 182,000 171,654 125,000 118,167 132,000 120,973 4,000 3,872 354,000 341,628 252,000 240,017 50,000 22,795 212,700 196,959 140,000 177,899 144,000 149,099 336 698 588,800 456,093 416,600 378,002 44,819 44,819 19,817 19,817 34,807 130,000 7,180 264,000 243,999 191,000 96,871 198,000 156,239 606,000 660,207 405,000 334,097 236,000 1,775,000 223,473 1,731,994 - 130,342 - 130,342 52,077 180,530 51,644 180,097 - 61,338 - 61,338 - 81,548 - 81,548 - 226,306 - 226,306 9,704 50,212 9,050 49,558 - 124,588 - 124,588 125,000 608,71213 124,486 608,09813 - 142,965 - 142,965 -10,000 170,000 113,034 160,918 - 2,306,90214 - 2,306,90214 360,200 3,084,434 338,096 3,016,161 0 8,606,000 46,706 8,520,893 226,100 700,100 248,942 675,253 - 11,039,29815 - 11,039,29815 337,200 5,814,939 352,118 5,727,710 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 436,400 4,123,027 476,702 4,027,121 240,000 2,526,000 330,001 2,525,869 1-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 35D. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) 35E. Colebrook River Lake, CT 35F. Conant Brook Dam, MA 35G. Knightville Dam, MA 35H. Littleville Lake, MA 351. Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 35J. North Hartland Lake, VT 35K. North Springfield Lake, VT 35L. Otter Brook Lake, NH 35M. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 35N. South River, Conway, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 230,000 230,800 217,000 204,543 261,717 215,317 - 4,815,67916 - 4,815,67916 363,500 4,131,227 281,087 4,039,812 - 32,00017 - 32,00017 - 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 107,000 104,747 150,900 159,338 190,000 185,002 308,100 2,307,544 275,495 2,263,685 - 2,950,530 - 2,950,530 82,000 76,250 59,000 55,768 588,000 349,400 465,260 490,983 126,000 115,990 296,000 301,828 237,000 248,800 464,000 251,701 250,330 290,889 - 15,000 - 10,694 38,000 23,188 301,000 329,700 279,000 281,472 325,812 264,351 312,000 818,000 861,000 309,613 715,240 972,541 2,000 2,525 339,000 321,897 112,500 1,193,180 102,705 1,164,231 - 3,415,64018 - 3,415,64018 384,000 5,312,904 319,196 5,238,295 - 7,013,412 - 7,013,412 268,500 3,478,391 426,542 3,455,946 45,000 60,335 98,000 94,217 - 7,312,2251's - 7,312,225's19 298,300 4,071,115 323,690 4,049,446 - 6,831,52620 - 6,831,52620 559,000 6,541,097 504,542 6,473,762 - - - 4,360,44821 - - - 4,360,44821 401,300 356,000 299,100 4,018,714 333,319 448,103 299,796 3,999,136 - 20,000 - 7,125 - 44,500 - 7,735 50,000 28,263 105,000 1,263,000 109,734 1,254,859 - 25,000 - 25,000 45,000 139,500 90,887 126,885 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 350. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 35P. Townsend Lake, VT 35Q. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 35R. Union Village Dam, VT 35S. West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 36. Gulf Street, Milford, CT 37A. Black Rock Lake, CT 37B. Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA (Contributed Funds - Required) 37C. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 37D. Hop Brook Lake, CT New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 2,833,61022 - - - - 2,833,61022 394,000 391,300 280,000 289,100 4,782,543 403,328 373,176 294,216 282,718 4,752,306 - - - - 7,398,41323 - - - - 7,398,41323 289,000 673,900 472,000 456,300 5,532,771 266,179 569,734 541,835 469,469 5,471,315 - - - - 1,666,75224 - - - - 1,666,75224 285,000 371,900 313,000 323,000 3,922,986 279,572 297,333 310,633 397,130 3,897,446 - - - - 40,00017 - - - - 40,00017 - - - - 4,095,16025 - - - - 4,095,16025 293,000 250,700 284,628 243,528 - 112,162 13,000 12,169 - 48,500 - 38,921 181,000 178,239 35,000 33,286 162,000 170,351 660 216,000 243,036 37 190,000 10,309 191,000 172,852 50,000 2,073 - 180,000 79,000 77,599 382,000 379,251 94,400 96,252 375,400 321,003 84,000 80,751 531,000 499,564 251,900 3,777,456 245,621 3,762,911 - 1,793,72448 649 1,762,25148 - 13,000 11,500 250,000 189,474 238,704 - 8,182,300 - 8,182,300 213,400 2,384,009 203,952 2,354,574 153,000 194,832 175,999 250,000 242,833 180,000 175,999 - 4,178,911 - 4,178,911 68,700 1,144,349 62,798 1,135,125 - 6,151,56226 - 6,151,56226 523,900 4,454,785 542,357 4,365,174 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 37E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT 37F. Thomaston Dam, CT 38. Machias River, Machias, ME 39. Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME 40A. Blackwater Dam, NH 40B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH 40C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 40D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 41. New Bedford, Fairhaven and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 42. New London, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Other Contributed Funds) 43. Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 44. Roughans Point, Revere, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 129,000 117,350 254,000 236,598 167,000 165,282 205,000 207,435 325,000 336,139 429,000 428,898 202,000 330,791 825,000 625,839 300,000 93,884 84,750 58,208 156,800 151,456 588,500 405,293 32,500 13,081 193,200 197,527 232,600 229,583 200,000 202,038 343,000 533,544 53,500 31,996 - 2,850,51227 - 2,850,51227 165,300 1,813,011 173,108 1,797,769 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 621,400 4,914,167 352,751 4,625,309 113,500 167,000 134.143 166.139 30,000 187,500 250,000 22,784 201,427 237,292 - - 1,319,74628 - - 1,319,74628 248,000 216,000 3,066,985 213,093 239,615 3,054,759 - - 2,014,25329 - - 2,014,25329 277,000 379,700 3,751,092 254,523 349,964 3,680,613 - - 7,950,48730 - - - 7,950,48730 562,100 367,000 389,122 5,783,259 563,698 438,508 361,738 5,740,621 - - - 21,452,44031 - - - 21,452,44031 568,800 512,500 528,722 6,717,262 489,672 502,046 568,737 6,649,191 227,750 120,000 230,766 115,033 350,000 540,331 65,000 218,246 37,640 124,061 54,932 6,500 3,500 63,000 46,949 - 11,510,088 - 11,510,088 122,400 3,682,264 119,269 3,671,802 - 6,513,76332 - 6,513,76332 - 9,272,046 24,802 9,267,992 - 2,255,00033 -21 2,251,29333 - 222,250 - 219,250 130,000 193,000 137,797 184,746 15,779 183,000 284,901 - 74,673 106,972 483,680 181,645 1-36 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 46. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Other Contributed Funds) 47A. Buffumville Lake, MA 47B. East Brimfield Lake, MA 47C. Hodges Village Dam, MA 47D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 47E. West Thompson Lake, CT 47F. Westville Lake, MA 48. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 190,000 364,097 297,000 305,796 164,000 137,426 308,000 291,612 207,000 204,938 480 320,000 376,345 210,000 207,808 312,400 292,103 - - 9,911,300 - 22 9,900,640 156,000 123,100 2,581,472 185,598 117,216 2,567,863 - - 3,367,97034 - - 3,367,45334 - - 210,000 - - 209,969 - - 2,998,60335 - - 2,998,60335 243,000 213,400 3,302,722 256,020 202,934 3,281,956 - - - 7,057,04336 - - - 7,057,04336 191,100 215,000 254,400 2,775,083 208,938 211,889 225,428 2,732,371 195 - - 4,461,26837 195 - - 4,461,26837 350,800 271,500 484,400 3,468,488 350,711 295,212 383,725 3,343,613 - - - 6,447,16438 - - - 6,447,16438 239,500 178,000 335,400 3,426,197 244,183 173,872 322,863 3,408,035 - - - 7,001,22039 - - - 7,001,22039 317,300 423,000 318,400 3,675,398 301,293 423,571 322,774 3,656,569 243,000 373,300 199,852 377,556 - 20,740 382,000 342,850 250,000 217,001 - 5,684,68340 - 5,684,68340 409,900 3,478,996 461,487 3,431,238 350,000 620,740 345,011 562,012 1-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 1 Includes $6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. 3 Includes $287,374 for previous projects. 4 Excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT". 5 Includes $366,348 for previous projects. 6 Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1961. 7 Includes $509,411 for previous projects. 8 Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 Public Works Funds. S9 Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 10 Includes $130,393 for previous projects. 11 Includes $12,000 for previous project. 12 Includes $188,647 for previous projects. 13 Excludes $73,800 for previous project. 14 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 15 Includes $504,060 Code 711 funds. 16 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 funds. 17 Recreational cost sharing. 18isI ncludes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 20 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 23 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. 24 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 25 Includes $88,932 Code 711 funds. 26 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 28 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 29 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. o30 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 31 Includes $179,728 Code 711 funds. 32 Cash for construction only. Excludes $164,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 33 Excludes $22,517 expended to date for land condemnations. 34 Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 35 Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 36 Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. 37 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. 38 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 39 Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 40 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 41 Includes $7,889 for previous project. 42 Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous project. 43 Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds expended for maintenance. 44 Includes $42,340 for previous project. 45 Includes $3,160 for previous project. 46 Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition $400 was expended for maintenance from Contributed Funds. 47 Excludes $15,000 expended for previous project. 48 Includes $245,000 Public Works Funds. 1-38 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text). Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. July 3, 1930 August 13, 1968 Jan. 21, 1927 (Sec. 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, Sept. 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration program Apr. 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 June 10, 1872 Mar. 3, 1881 June 25, 1910 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 May 24, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960, as amended BLACK ROCK HARBOR, CT (See Section 2 of Text). (Authorized and constructed as part of the Bridgeport Harbor, CT project). Black Rock Harbor 18 feet deep and 100 to 200 feet wide from the 18-foot contour in harbor to the heads of both branches of Cedar Creek, about 2.4 miles. BRISTOL HARBOR, BRISTOL, RI (See Section 3 of Text). Construction of a rubblestone breakwater 1,600 feet long CAPE COD CANAL, MA. (See Section 4 of Text). Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct 3 bridges and widen canal to 250 feet Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of 8 feet. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance Channel 10 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. CONNECTICUT RIVER BELOW HARTFORD, CT (See Section 6 of Text). Jetties at the mouth The Hartford dike. Channel and turning basin in Eightmile River. Present project dimensions of channel over Saybrook Bar. Dikes, training walls, and revetments Present project dimensions of channel and additional dikes, training walls, revetments, and accessory works. Park River declared nonnavigable. Channel and anchorages, North Cove, Old Saybrook Channel and anchorage in Essex Cove. Channel and anchorage in Wethersfield Cove. H. Doc. 281, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 174, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168 85th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1942. Present project dimensions approved by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 22, 1887. Present project dimensions authorized by Chief of Engineers in 1889. H. Doc. 327, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1294, 61st. Cong.,3rd sess. H. Doc. 132, 65th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 49, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Ltr. Sec. War, Apr. 21, 1937. H. Doc. 368, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 18, 1961. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1960. 1-39 July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960, as amended in 1965 July 11, 1870 Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1827 July 11, 1871 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Oct. 17, 1940 June 2, 1874 Oct. 16, 1879 June 13, 1902 August 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep, 75 feet wide. Anchorage 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, 800 feet wide. Maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. HAMPTON HARBOR, NH (See Section 9 of Text) Extending north jetty 1,000 feet, raising outer 300 feet south jetty and constructing 180-foot spur to high ground, channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 10 of Text). The main breakwater Repairs to basin walls and cliff protection east of harbor. Breakwater inclosing inner harbor. Raising crest of main breakwater and making it sandtight. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA (See Section 11 of Text) Breakwater. Present dimensions of breakwater. Dredging behind breakwater. Channel, anchorage and jetty. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME (See Section 12 of Text). A steel sheetpile breakwater 1200 feet in length. A 15-acre anchorage composed of 9-acres; 6 feet deep and 6 acres 8 feet deep. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME (See Section 13 of Text). Channel between Augusta and Gardiner, ME Channel below Gardiner, ME Channel west of Swan Island. 27-foot channel from mouth of Bath. MILFORD HARBOR, CT (See Section 14 of Text). East jetty at the mouth of the river. West jetty at the mouth of the river. Entrance channel. Anchorage west of channel and present project dimensions of channel above Merwin's Wharf 6-foot anchorage west of 8-foot channel. H. Doc. 81, 75th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 15, 1965. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1964. Annual Report 1868, p. 785 and S. Misc. Doc. 81, 40th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Ex. Doc. 26, 47th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 27, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1885, p. 610. H. Doc. 83, 54th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 32, 18th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 63, 41st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 96, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 98, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 481, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. 23 Sept. 76 and S. Res. 1 Oct. 76 pursuant to Sec. 201 of cited Act. H. Doc. 262, 56th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 321, 59th Cong. 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 746, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.' S. Doc. 55, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 107, 42nd Cong., 3rd sess., and Annual Report 1873, p. 1042. Authorized by Dept., Oct. 16, 1879, Annual Report for 1879, p. 342. H. Doc. 280, 56th cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 77, 75th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 13, 1961. 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Do. July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Aug. 16, 1949 Aug. 9, 1955 Nov. 17, 1986 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 4, 1913 Sept. 22, 1922 Oct. 23, 1962 July 9, 1965 Sept. 16, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960, as amended Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT (See Section 15 of Text) Sandy Point dike. The 16-foot anchorage basin. Present project dimensions of channels in Mill River. Present project dimensions of West River channel and anchorage. 18- and 16-foot channels in Quinnipiac River. 25-foot channel 30-foot channel and anchorage and present location of 16-foot anchorage. 35-foot main channel, elimination of 30-foot anchorage, present location and extent of 16-foot anchorage Brewery Street channel declared nonnavigable. Abandonment of upper end of West River. Deepen main ship channel to 40 feet; widen main ship channel to 500 feet; widen at Southwest Ledge to minimum of 780 feet; straighten channel downstream of turning basin. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA (See section 16 of Text). Construction of rubblestone jetties. Dredging the bar at entrance to harbor. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA (See Section 17 of Text). Beach protection. Dredging 18-foot channel. Dredging 15-foot extension, including turning basin. Rubblestone breakwater. Anchorages are 8 feet deep inside breakwater. Elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project. Recreational development. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI (See Section 18 of Text). The main breakwater. Present dimensions of eastern shore arm. Western shore arm. Removing 3 shoals from the harbor arm. Abandons project for entrance to Point Judith Ponds, and authorizes channels and anchorages in lower pond and upper pond. Extension of existing 15-foot channel. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR & PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME and NH (See Section 19 of Text). Removal of ledge rock; widening 35-foot channel; extending channel and maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project. Modified existing project for widening and extending 35-foot channel Construct 6-foot channels and anchorages Widen 35-foot channel to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widen northern limit of 35-foot channel by 100 feet and widen southern limit to 550 feet at Goat Island. Plans approved by a Board of Engineers, Oct. 2, 1882. H. Doc. 82, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 26, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 686, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 479, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 307, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 517, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.' Annual Report 1910, p. 59. Annual Report for 1899, p. 1089. H. Doc. 1194, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 996, 66th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 124, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 66, 51st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 60, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 911, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 2001, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 15, 80th Cong., 1st sess. PL 86-645, Section 107, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sept. 29, 1976. Annual Report 1892 H. Doc. 556, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 482, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 11, 1888 June 25, 1910 July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960, as amended Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 July 24, 1946, as amended Mar. 7, 1974 June 30, 1948, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended ROCKPORT HARBOR, ME (See Section 20 of Text). Dredge an area about 400 feet by 600 feet in front of wharves at the head of the harbor to a depth of 12 feet at mean low tide and for removal of a small ledge. Remove the ledge at the entrance to a depth of 15 feet at mean low tide; widening the entrance channel to 250 feet. ROCKPORT HARBOR AND PIGEON COVE, ROCKPORT, MA (See Section 21 of Text). An access channel - 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide. Two outer harbor anchorages between the breakwater and the town wharf. Pigeon Cove consists of 75-foot wide channel - 10 feet deep; dredge anchorage area north of channel to -8 feet. RYE HARBOR, NH (See Section 22 of Text). Dredge channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep for 600 feet through entrance, thence 8 feet deep within harbor; dredge 2 anchorages and maintain existing breakwaters. SESUIT HARBOR, MA(See Section 23 of Text). Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. REVERE BEACH, MA (See Section 28 of Text). Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill BIG RIVER RESERVOIR, RI (See Section 32 of Text) Construct rolled-earth dam. CLEAR RIVER, BURRILLVILLE, RI (See Section 33A of Text.) Remove approximately 60 linear feet of granite retaining wall, damaged from erosion, and construct a new mortared stone wall. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA (See Section 34 of Text). Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. BEAVER BROOK, KEENE, NH (See Section 35C of Text). Construct improvements to reduce the damaging effects of floods. MILL BROOK, BROWNSVILLE, VT (See Section 35I of Text). Clear lower portion of bank and fill with compacted gravel. Protect bank with layer of "tri-lock" grid blocks extended approximately 9 feet above channel bed. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 35M of Text). Construct improvements to existing pumping station River and Harbor Act. H. Ex. Doc. 141, 50th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 963, 60th Cong. 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, March 27, 1986. H. Doc. 439, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, February 6, 1980. H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. 15 Dec. 70 and S. Res. 17 Dec. 70 pursuant to Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 15, 1985. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 21, 1985. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 23, 1986. P.L. 80-858, Section 205, Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 13, 1986. 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946, as amended June 28, 1938 June 30, 1948, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946 as amended July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 July 24, 1946, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 SOUTH RIVER, CONWAY, MA (See Section 35N of Text) Site 2 protection consisting of 3-foot thick uniform stone layer; site 3 terraced slope refilled with compacted random fill. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 35S of Text). A system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approx. 24,500 feet long. Work involves raising 13,700 feet of existing levee; constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall; improving 2,400 feet of river bank; treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities also constructed. Raise the floodwall section of the West Springfield project by 1 foot in combination with a flood forecasting system. GULF STREET, MILFORD, CT (See Section 36 of Text). Construction of stone slope protection. COVERED BRIDGE, HOUSATONIC RIVER, SHEFFIELD, MA (See Section 37B of Text). Construct 70-foot long stone apron. On both banks upstream and downstream of bridge, place riprap along 500 linear feet. MACHIAS RIVER, MACHIAS, ME (See Section 38 of Text). Construct 250 linear feet of stone slope along north bank adjacent to the municipal parking lot. MARGINAL WAY, OGUNQUIT, ME (See Section 39 of Text) Place 2-foot layer of armor stone along the 150-foot section of walkway. Construct 150 linear feet of 42-inch thick stone slope along walkway. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA (See Section 41 of Text). Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. NEW LONDON, CT (See Section 42 of Text). Hurricane barrier protecting city of New London from tidal damage. PLEASANT POINT, PERRY, ME (See Section 43 of Text) Construct precast concrete modular wall stacked to 6-foot height along 600 feet of shorefront. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 1, 1986. H. Doc. 455, 75th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 5, 1982. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 11, 1984. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by by Chief of Engineers, July 24, 1984. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by chief of Engineers, July 29, 1986. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 7, 1986. S. Doc. 59, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 31, 1986. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 44 of Text). Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm 1-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. 1-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents STAMFORD, CT (See Section 46 of Text). July 14, 1960 Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. tidal damage. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 48 of Text). Nov. 17, 1986 Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground. 1 Contains latest maps. 2 Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Andrews River, MA1,6,15 Apponaug Cove, RI' Bagaduce River, ME3,4, 5 Bar Harbor, ME 1' Bass Harbor, ME1,"6 Bass Harbor Bar, ME' Beals Harbor, ME 1' Belfast Harbor, ME' Bellamy River, NH1,3, 4 Beverly Harbor, MA' Boothbay Harbor, ME 1' Boston Harbor, MA",22 Branford Harbor, CT' Bridgeport Harbor, CT' Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME' 6 Bucksport Harbor, ME 1' Bullocks Point Cove, RI' Bunker Harbor, ME",6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA1,6 Camden Harbor, ME 1' Canapitsit Channel, MA', 4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME 1' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME 1' Cathance River, ME'1, 3 Clinton Harbor, CT' Coasters Island Harbor, RI"4 Cobscook Bay, ME1,3, 4 Cocheco River, NH',, 4 Cohasset Harbor, MA' Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT8 Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME', 6 Criehaven Harbor, ME 1' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' Damariscotta River, ME', 4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME',4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA" Duck Island Harbor, CT' Duxbury Harbor, MA' East Boothbay Harbor, ME 1' Eastport Harbor, ME' Edgartown Harbor, MA' Essex River, MA' Exeter River, NH', 4 Fall River Harbor, MA' Falmouth Harbor, MA' Fivemile River Harbor, CT' Frenchboro Harbor, ME' Georges River, ME 1' Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA' Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI' 5 Greenwich Bay, RI' Greenwich Harbor, CT' Guilford Harbor, CT' Harraseeket River, ME', 4 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY' Hendrick's Harbor, ME 1 Hingham Harbor, MA' Housatonic River, CT6 Ipswich River, MA Island End River, Chelsea, MAI,6 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME 1 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH' 1954 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1984 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1969 1978 1978 1983 1983 1893 1969 1983 1896 1931 1957 1954 1983 1969 1983 1980 1977 1981 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1953 1984 1978 1983 1976 1907 1979 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1985 1911 1866 1913 1979 1932 1984 1939 $ 219,042 156,8742 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,56132 34,643 246,048 18,000 25,313,08333 9,537 4,491,11949 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 104,957 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,76738 116,324 797,954 40,776 24,200 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,29729 6,500 638,67547 65,61435 21,759 27,454 6,164,75740 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 1,296,93436 189,037 2,000 198,758 137,222 30,963 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 $ 421,477 $ 187,500 23,429 39 2,187 21,475 12,175 104,272 252,763 16,821 22,983 9,890,81319 1,013,268 2,002,41250 16,838 13,593 76,667 28,406 183,74946 125,936 12,279 347,865 9,021 953,027 13,161 42,617 219,713 15,822 73,150 8,125 54,328 905 304,621 399,546 798,722 17,238 192,624 48,699 83,93814 3,032 2,064,76734 287,622 188,802 24,616 228,937 1,458,475 550,235 6,527 204,872 1,230,576 5,309 31,120 6,325 156,022 2,437,499 32,947 163,280 643,364 1-45 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 127,000 35,00030 10,000 35,000 25,500 100,000 25,500 222,010 314,50048 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Josias River, ME 1 1977 115,565 122,173 26,813 Kennebunk River, ME' 1985 261,417 1,234,403 88,917 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA' 1895 8,940- Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA1, 6 1976 99,098 9,089 80,990 Lamprey River, NH, 4 1913 19,980 33,563 Little Harbor. NH,4, 26 1977 133.227 266,119 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA', 4 1906 18,000 5,224 Lubec Channel, ME1 1956 380,322 23,941 Lynn Harbor, MA' 1956 755,576 206,203 Machias River, ME' 1972 32,000 185,217 Malden River, MA1, 2 0 1922 104,853 45,097 62,000 Matinicus Harbor, ME 1 1962 14,00021 8,989 Medomak River, ME 1 1953 17,000 92,359 Menemsha Creek, MA' 1981 56,926 629,644 12,500 Merrimack River, MA' 1940 369,891 158,224 Mianus River, CT' 1985 132,435 659,390 46,500 Moosabec Bar, ME 1 1930 11,400 25,227 Mystic River, CT' 1957 197,582 125,012 14,000 Mystic River, MA1 1986 3,222,777 1,964,740 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA' 1965 502,66123 458,705 Narraguagus River, ME 1 1969 821,144 71,087 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA' 1953 1,857,618 708,967 20,385 New Harbor, ME 1 1966 118,62024 26,944 7,015 New Haven Breakwater, CT' 1950 1,242,246 40,273 New London Harbor, CT' 1986 638,77417 1,813,465 Newport Harbor, RI' 1953 733,524 128,223 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT1,6 1972 66,464 71,570 67,500 Northeast Harbor, ME 1 1954 138,942 51,047 Norwalk Harbor, CT 1 1983 531,12939 3,723,52042 34,500 Owl's Head Harbor, ME is 1968 124,158 13,867 4,383 Patchogue River, CT1,22 1984 355,445 621,988 56,694 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT' 1978 318,78731 656,506 20,000 Pawtuxet Cove, RI' 1975 295,356 152,105 295,356 Penobscot River, ME' 1985 501,020 877,567 Pepperell Cove, ME' 1969 171,351 26,553 Pig Island Gut, ME1, 6 1966 191,753 46,460 Pleasant River, ME 1 1892 3,500 217 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA' 1956 1,083,504 846,590 Portland Harbor, ME 1 1985 9,588,71027 7,903,331 Potowomut River, RI' 1882 5,000 50 Providence River & Harbor, RI' 1976 25,417,02228 3,830,502 Provincetown Harbor, MA 5 1985 3,548,95441 1,053,966 760,000 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA6,s 1972 38,764 - Richmond Harbor, ME1,"4 1883 20,000 - Richmond's Island Harbor, ME1,4 1882 119,844 1,808 Rockland Harbor, ME 1 1976 1,948,462 452,800 255,000 Rockport and Old Harbors Rockport, MA 1986 22,000 194,963 Royal River, ME1,6 1986 336,704 670,29512 49,562s" Saco River, ME,' 1986 1,064,983 1,676,752 St. Croix River, ME 1 1950 179,550 36,392 19,892 Sakonnet Harbor, RI' 1983 764,651 180,016 21,928 Sakonnet River, RI1,o 1909 38,427 9,549 Salem Harbor, MA 1969 1,693,202 437,788 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA" 1922 1,925,553 16,060 Sasanoa River, ME1,3, 4 1915 35,000 124 Scarboro River, ME 1 1976 392,635 1,239,293 10,000 Scituate Harbor, MA 1971 379,851 131,507 69,976 Searsport Harbor, ME 1966 572,56816 31,120 Seekonk River, RI' 1954 672,214 793,234 67,792 South Bristol Harbor, ME' 1971 89,593 11,052 2,663 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Southport Harbor, CT1 1962 96,9277 251,842 18,525 Southwest Harbor, ME 1 1962 180,042 66,540 7,501 Stamford Harbor, CT 5 1980 892,82437 1,683,02045 169,636 Stockton Harbor, ME1,3,4 1915 33,000 23,216 Stonington Harbor, CT1 1959 377,328 123,060 Stonington Harbor, MEl,6 1985 898,500 5,067 Stony Creek, Branford, CT',6 1978 112,487 274,413 92,000 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME 1 1914 19,871 - Taunton River, MA 5 1948 442,895 32,917 Tenants Harbor, ME 1 1920 18,750 13,292 Thames River, CT 1 1967 1,471,919 1,588,546 Union River, ME3,15 1912 146,855 119,515 Vineyard Haven, MA 1 1943 27,186 8,699 Wareham Harbor, MA 5 1896 95,997 10,296 Warren River, RI' 1890 5,000 - Warwick Cove, RI1',6 1975 155,430 51,196 107,220 Wellfleet Harbor, MA' 1981 157,63425 904,469 32,000 Wells Harbor, ME 1 1979 360,973 1,615,162 212,000 Westcott Cove, CT' 1978 55,960 217,309 21,000 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT5 1972 19,308 180,824 Westport River, MA 4 ,9 1942 - - Weymouth Back River, MA' 1944 48,740 7,184 20,000 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rivs., MAI,22 1979 and 1983 30,194,61343 1,339,06844 630,133 Wickford Harbor, RI1,22 1973 233,410 70,435 49,094 Wilson Point Harbor, CT',4 1895 54,177 - Winnipesaukee Lake, NH' 1952 7,500 29,870 Winter Harbor, ME",6 1976 162,937 - Winthrop Harbor, MA' 1895 8,992 38,515 Wood Island Harbor, and Pool at Biddeford, ME 1 1957 143,112 72,977 12,000 Woods Hole Channel, MA' 1940 230,000 51,718 York Harbor, ME' 1977 239,654 351,090 32,161 1 Completed. 2 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation require ments, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 4 No commerce reported. 5 Completed except for inactive portion. 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86- 645, Sec. 107). 7 Includes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. Excludes $18,525 Contributed Funds, of which $1,785 was for work outside approved project. 8 Inactive. 9 Awaiting local cooperation. Improvement to be restudied. 1o Commerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. 11 Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an incomplete and an inactive portion. 12 Excludes $20,000 expended from Contributed Funds, Other. 3 Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. Portion of project authorized by the Chief of Engineers (P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107) is complete. 14 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. 15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 16 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Includes $40,800 for previous project. 18 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 19 Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 20 Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 22 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 23 Excludes $211,649 expended for rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. 24 All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 25 Includes $11,350 for previous project. 26 H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminating maintenance dredging. 27 Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 28 Final fund adjustment made FY 1978 ($52,323.28). 29 Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. 30 Excludes local requirements of $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction costs. 3' Includes $133,357 for previous project. 32 Includes $22,000 for previous projects. u Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Includes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 34 Includes $81,410 for previous project. 35 Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 36 Includes $21,000 for previous projects. 3z Includes $135,143 for previous project. 38 Includes $10,000 for previous project. 39 Includes $162,517 for previous project. 40 Includes $330,204 for previous project. 41 Includes $215,801 for previous project. 42 Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 43 Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore R.) and $25,000 (Town R.). 44 Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $12,577 (Weymouth, Town River). 45 Includes $59,420 for previous project. 46 Includes $35,214 from previous project. 47 Excludes $141,530 expended Contributed Funds, Other. 48 Excludes $829,000 Contributed Funds, Other expended. 49 Includes $378,450 for previous project. 50 Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 51 Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-48 - -C- I I NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept. 30, 1987 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT' 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT' 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA' 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI6 1984 405,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT' 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT' 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT' 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT' 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT' 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT' 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH1 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT' 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 1986 50,000 - Middle Beach, CT 1 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 3 1963 14,512 29,024 Nantasket Beach, MA 4 1971-- North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA 1 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA' 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI' 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA' 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT 1 1958 104,573 240,819 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MAx 1962 621,440 1,242,880 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI' 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1961 23,759 47,518 Seaside Park, CT 1 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT' 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT' - 5 - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, CT 1 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH 1 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA' 1971 180,944 200,208 Willard Beach, South Portland, ME 1983 171,000 - Winthrop Beach, MA' 1960 176,567 353,134 Woodmont Shore, Milford, CT' 1961 53,838 111,6792 S Completed. 2 Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 3 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. 4 Project inactive. s Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. 6 Completed except for inactive portion. 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alley Bay, Beals, ME3,4,1� Alford, Green River, MA3,4 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA3,4 Ansonia-Derby, CT3 Bagaduce River, ME 3,4,10 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA3,4,1�0 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA3,4 Canton, MA 3 ,4 Charles River Dam, MA 3 Charlestown, NH3,4 Cherryfield, ME 3,4 Chicopee, MA3 Chicopee Falls, MA 3 Cocheco River, NH3,4 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH3,4 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH3, 4 Danbury, CT3 Derby, CT3 East Branch Dam, CT3 East Hartford, CT3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT3,4 Fort Kent, ME3,4 Fox Point Barrier, RI3 Gardner, MA 3,4 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT 3 Hartford, CT 3 Hartford, White River, VT, 4 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA3,4 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME3,4,1� Holyoke, MA3 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA3,4 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT3,4,10� Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA3,4,10 Huntington, MA3,4,1� Island Avenue, Quincy, MA3,4 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME3,4,10� Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME3,4,10 Keene, NH 3,4 Lancaster, Israel River, NH3,4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA3,4,10 Little River Dike, Westfield, MA3 Lowell, MA 3 Lower Woonsocket, RI 3 Mad River Lake, CT 3 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME3,4,10 Nashua, NH 3 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT3,4,10 Northampton, MA 3 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT3,4 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA 3 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA3,4,10 Norwalk, CT3,4 Norwich, CT 3 Park River, Hartford, CT 3 Pawcatuck, CT 3 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI 3,4 Penobscot River, Old Town, ME3,4 Phillips Lake, MA Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT3,4,1o Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME,4,1o Salmon River, Colchester, CT 3,4 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME Saxonville, MA 3 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 3,4 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH3,4,1o Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA3,4 1979 1977 1978 1977 1985 1986 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1963 1982 1976 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1970 1960 1973 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1982 1976 1945 1977 1973 1980 1950 1985 1950 1977 1981 1979 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1982 1986 1980 1983 1984 1981 1985 1977 1978 $ 190,500 41,419 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 248,650 47,300 180,6705 41,170,921 113,330 203,000 1,433,6007 2,183,912 183,100 180,000 54,703 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 2,572,357 6,094,1009 332,236 2,235,470 207,390 3,418,000 739,003 102,800 202,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,100 551,606 37,852 5,000 490,60011 6,600,681 4,773,020 107,681 270,0008 222,500 680,00017 73,865 3,235,00023 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 60,157,274 644,311 3,171,309 178,045 300,000 227,500 73,674 247,100 127,500 4,218,700 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,739 1-50 21 4,576 92,891 5,554,08715 385 411,29222 24,447 13 1,266,63820 327 - 16 7,637 3,679,50014 15,500 2,781,100 24,447 -_ 1 ,-3, 62 -2 -_ 1 -1,0 -_ NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Springdale, MA3 1952 700,000 - Springfield, MA 3 1950 577,00018 5,350 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT3,4 1983 116,296 - Stony Brook, Wilton, NH 3,4 1973 19,500 - Sucker Brook Dam, CT3 1976 2,227,712 58,800 Three Rivers, MA 3 1970 1,577,18912- Torrington, East Branch, CT3,4 1963 389,200 - Torrington, West Branch, CT3,4 1963 228,300 - Trumbull Lake, CT1 1983 1,498,799 - Village of Saxtons, VT3 ,4,10 1985 140,500 - Ware, MA3,4 1963 400,000 - Waterbury-Watertown, CT3,4 1963 263,300 - Weston, VT3,4 1957 13,000 1,800 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA3,4 1983 116,492 - West Warren, MA3,4 1964 389,200 41,000 Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 605,023 - Winsted, CT 3 1954 245,500 - Woonsocket, RI3 1962 4,040,000 224, 500 Worcester Diversion, MA 3 1978 5,086,859 79,300 1 Inactive. 15 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. 2 Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed 16 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. Funds, Other. 17 Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 3 Completed. 18 Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 19 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 5 Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 6 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 21 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 22 Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and 8 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. funds expended. 23 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration 9 Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. O10 Emergency Bank Protection. 11 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 12 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 14 Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnation. TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME 1 1935 6,384,394 1 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report For Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir - Aug 1977 $ - $ - Andover Lake, CT - Aug 1977 - - Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Oct 1978 - - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000 - Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1932 Nov 1986 - - Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 78,000 - Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Apr 1978 378,300 - Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 205,000 - Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979 -- Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1980 Nov 1979 - - Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Aug 1977 - - Cambridgeport Lake, VT - Aug 1977 -- Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 -- Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Dec 1970 242,700 - Clyde, RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800 - Connecticut River below Hartford CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541 - Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME 1984 Nov 1986 26,285,298 - Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1984 Nov 1986 - - Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Oct 1978 - - Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600 - Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 -- Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1959 Oct 1978 -- Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - - Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 - Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1956 Nov. 1986 - - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 - Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 - Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 -- Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1981 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Brook, MA 1967 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Lake, MA 1967 Nov 1986 - - Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 - Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 -- Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) 1965 Nov 1986 - - Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 -- Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) 1953 Nov 1986 -- Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Nookagee Lake, MA 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 - - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI 1978 Nov 1986 and CT (uncompleted portion) Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 - - Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Nov 1986 - - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report For Deauthorized Federal Funds Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 -- Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 -- Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 -- Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 - - Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 - Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT1 1964 Nov 1986 - - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1959 Nov 1986 - - Stonington Harbor, ME 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1967 Nov 1986 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA 1961 Nov 1986 - - Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 July 1960 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 - - Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1972 Nov 1979 - - Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 - Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) 1960 Nov 1986 - - 1 Walnut Beach and impermeable groins. 1-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-H Study Identification NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Costs Bar Harbor, ME Bass Harbor, Tremont, ME Bass River, MA Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA Green Harbor, Marshfield, MA Lubec Harbor, ME Nasketucket Bay, Fairhaven, MA Nantucket Inner Harbor - Polpis, MA New London Harbor, CT Noank Harbor, Groton, CT North Cove, Old Saybrook, CT Northeast Harbor, Mt. Desert, ME Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, MA Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME Pig Island Gut, Beals, ME Pine Point Harbor, Scarborough, ME Pines River, Revere, MA Plymouth Harbor, Plymouth, MA Provincetown Harbor, MA Point Judith Pond, RI Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA Scituate Harbor, MA Stonington Harbor, CT Taylor Point, Bourne, MA Winthrop Harbor, MA Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 78-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Columbia Point Beach, MA Conimicut Beach, Warwick, RI Kennebunk Beach, Kennebunk, ME Lighthouse Park Beach, CT Mosman Park Beach, ME North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA Ocean Grove Beach, Swansea, MA Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT South Middle Beach, Yarmouth, MA Sea Gull Beach, Yarmouth, MA Town Beaches, CT West Haven Beaches, CT Woodmont Beach, CT 1-54 $ 6,278 39,113 13,348 7,409 22,069 19,384 5,000 18,059 17,766 4,494 1,920 4,171 5,392 470 43,558 15,583 20,209 2,443 17,353 24,957 35,834 32,279 10,001 19,949 13,633 53,213 44,752 Fiscal Year Costs $ 5,000 24,224 4,143 7,500 7,500 40,402 7,375 46,301 15,000 202 16,166 4,487 33,072 I - I I I I _ I _ - I - - NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME $ 73,163 Assabet River, Berlin, MA 7,500 Beaver Brook, Londonderry, NH 5,771 Bell island, Norwalk, CT 3,074 Canton, E 7,500 Connectict River, Northampton, MA 6,366 Housatoni River, Shelton, CT 5,362 Industrial Area, Waterbury, CT 77,732 Lake Massasecum, Bradford, NH 7,094 Mad River, Waterbury, CT 7,069 Millers River, Athol, MA 6,000 Minnewawa River, Marlborough, NH 7,171 Pemigewasset River, Holderness, NH 11,786 Pemigewasset River, Plymouth, NH 5,000 Piscataquog River, Goffstown, NH 5,110 Point of Pines, Revere, MA 22,719 Quinnipiac River, Wallingford, CT 104,140 Randolph, ME 7,500 Rippowam River, Stamford, CT 44,967 Spicket River, Lawrence, MA 7,500 Spicket River, Methuen, MA 5,500 Spicket River, Salem, NH 10,269 Springfield, MA 24,797 Sugar River, Claremont, NH 5,000 Ten Mile River, Cheshire, CT 29 Wepawaug River, Milford, CT 11,367 West River, New Haven, CT 209,861 Winnipesaukee River, NH 247,460 TABLE 1-K BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 33 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester, MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,902 $940,000 $2,306,902 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. 1-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-K (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,0002 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,740,100 1,069,0003 4,809,100 Lower Woonsocket, RI 13 Flood wall, conduits and channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection '250,000 - 250,000 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 170,000 - 170,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 - 4,125,0004 1 Includes relocations. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 3 $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. 4 $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-L CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Conne- Reservoir Lands cticut Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village2 White River 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $3,186,860 $ 908,300 $4,095,160 Junction North Hartland2 White River 211.7 185 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,225 963,000 7,312,225 Junction North Spiringfield 2 Springfield 191.3 120 Earthfill 50,600 4,781,526 2,050,000 6,831,526 Ball Mountain2 Brattleboro 178.2 265 Rockfill- 54,600 10,689,298 350,000 11,039,298 earth Townsend2 Brattleboro 168.3 133 Earthfill 33,200 5,520,413 1,878,000 7,398,413 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain2 Keene 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Otter Brook2 Keene 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 1,740,679 3,075,000 4,815,679 Tully2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,298,752 368,000 1,666,752 Barre Falls2 Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,819 39,000 1,967,819 earth Knightville2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville2 Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,412 1,150,000 7,013,412 Conant Brook2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,935,530 1,015,000 2,950,530 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,0004 6,983,020 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,227,712 180,000' 2,407,712 SIncludes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. 3 Non-Federal cost. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1-56 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-L (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Conne- Lands cticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages1 Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $ 2,525,869 - $ 2,525,869 Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,135,447 271,000 2,406,447 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 495,691 35,000 530,691 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 6,930,0004 1,150,000 8,080,000 Hartford, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,100 - 44,100 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 94,217 - 94,217 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,0005 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT2 51 Conduit 60,164,740 1,300,000 61,464,740 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,138,000 50,000 1,188,000 Salmon R., Colchester, CT2 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 126,885 - 126,885 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 932,0006 272,000 1,204,000 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 1,579,0003 30,000 1,609,000 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 389,200 64,000 453,200 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 1 To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests 4 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. portion of relocation. 5 Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 2 For details see individual report. 6 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. TABLE 1-M HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 37 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Nagua- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow 4 Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,0008 $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch5 Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,0003 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. 4 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970. 5 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. 1-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-M (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS1 Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Alford, Green River, MA 111.0 Earth dike and stone slope $ 41,419 $ - $ 41,419 protection Ansonia-Derby, CT 13.0 Wall, levee, channel 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 improvement and pumping station Danbury, CT 56.0 Walls, channel improvement 13,143,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 and bridge replacememt Derby, CT 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping 7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 station North Canaan, Blackberry 83.0 Snagging and clearing 73,865 - 73,865 River, CT project Pittsfield, MA 133.0 Stone arch culvert 739,003 85,000 824,003 Salisbury, CT 76.0 Gabionade with slope 102,800 - 102,800 protection Sheffield, MA 96.0 Stone slope protection 202,608 - 202,608 Squantz Pond, New 43.0 Timber Bulkhead 116,296 - 116,296 Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT 51.0 Dike and channel 389,200 - 389,200 improvement Torrington, West Branch, CT 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,300 - 228,300 Waterbury- Watertown, CT 32.0 Wall, dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-58 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-N MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 40 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Franklin Falls2 Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater 2 Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton-Everett 2,4 Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell2 Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,0003 Whitmanville Fitchburg. MA 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 11,590,000 6,210,000 17,800,000 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 4 Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance 2 For details, see individual report. and height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for 3 Based on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Hopkinton Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. Nookagee Lake. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Above Estimated Cost Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and reventment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA 2 Nashua, NH2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,0004 Lowell, MA2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,6005 90,000 580,600 North Nashua River, MA2,3 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 1 To be borne by local interests. 2 Project completed. a Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 1-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 1-0 THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 47 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Above Estimated Federal Cost Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity and Name Nearest River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages1 Total Hodges Village2 Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville2 Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield2 Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville2 Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson2 Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow2 Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 1 Borne by local interests. TABLE 1-P BOSTON HARBOR, MA Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1987 Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $21,881,851 $9,166,295 $31,048,146 Public Works 1,030,806 - 1,030,806 Emergency Relief 935,303 - 935,303 $23,847,960 $9,166,2951 $33,014,255 1 Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. 1-60 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-Q RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted Massachusetts Connecticut River below Hartford, Wethersfield Cove Housatonic River Annisquam River Dec 1986 Boston Harbor, Reserve Channel Dec 1986 Boston Harbor, 35-foot Anchorage and Channel; 40-foot Main Channel Cuttyhunk Harbor EdgartownIarbor, Martha's Vineyard Lagoon Pond, Tisbury, Martha's Vineyard Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard Nantucket Harbor Newburyport Harbor Salem Harbor, South River and Derby Wharf Salem Harbor Vineyard Haven Harbor New Hampshire Kennebec River, Vicinity of Doubling Point Kennebec River, Vicinity of Popham Point Saco River Wells Harbor Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Sep 1987 May 1987 Mar 1987 Portsmouth Harbor, Piscataqua River, Vicinity of Simplex Pier Rhode Island Block Island, Entrance to Great Salt Pond 1-61 Connecticut Maine Jun 1987 Mar 1987 Mar 1987 Sep 1987 Oct 1986 Oct 1986 Oct 1986 Dec 1986 Sep 1987 Jun 1987 Jun 1987 Oct 1986 Mar 1987 Jun 1987 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT* This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. It exercises jurisdiction, however, over all matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Aquatic Plant Control ................................................................. 2-2 Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels. N.Y..................................2-2 Bronx River, N.Y ........................................................................ 2-2 Browns Creek, N.Y.....................................................................2-3 East Chester Creek, N.Y............................................................2-4 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y........................................................2-4 ire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y.................................................2-5 Hudson River, N.Y.....................................................................2-5 Jones Inlet, N.Y ........................................................................... 2-6 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y.............................2-7 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y.....................................................2-7 Long Island Intra Coastal W/W, N.Y...................................2-8 Moriches Inlet, N.Y..................................................................... 2-8 Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y.......................................2-8 Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J ......................................................................... 2-9 New York and New Jersey Channels................................2-10 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of drift..............................................................2-11 18. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels & Anchorage areas ............................................................. ..2-11 Raritan River, NJ.................................................................2-12 Rondout Harbor, N.Y.................................................................2-13 Shark River, NJ...........................................................................2-13 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y.................................................................2-14 Westchester Creek, N.Y............................................................2-14 Supervisor of New York Harbor...........................................2-15 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys............................2-15 Other authorized navigation projects................................2-15 Navigation work under special authorization................. 2-16 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. Ardsley, N .Y................................................................................... 2-17 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ...... ............. 2-18 Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y. Phase I...........................2-18 Sawmill River Elmsford-Greenburgh, N.Y......................2-19 Inspection of completed flood control projects...............2-19 Other authorized flood control projects.............................2-19 Dam Safety Program................................................................2-19 Flood control work under special authorization.............2-20 Emergency streambank and shoreline protection under special authorization...................2-20 General Investigations 41. 42. 43. Surveys.....................................................................................2-20 Collection and study of basic data........................................2-20 Deauthorized projects ............................................................... 2-20 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement.....................................2-21 Table 2-B Authorizing Legislation ............................................. 2-26 Table 2-C Hudson River, N.Y. Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project............2-31 Table 2-D Total Costs for Existing Project..............................2-31 Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities........................................... 2-31 Table 2-F Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys............2-32 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects...............2-33 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control P jts2-3 Beach Erosion Control 28. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I)..........................................2-16 29. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.......................................2-16 30. Other Authorized Beach erosion control projects..........2-17 31. Beach erosion control work under special authorization.......................................................2-17 l ec : ......................................................................... c Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..........2-35 Table 2-J Surveys ............................................................................. 2-36 Table 2-L Costs for Flood Plain Management Services...2-36 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects................................................2-36 Table 2-N Section 107 Continue Reconnaissance Repcrt.........................................................................2-37 Table 2-0 Section 103 Continue Reconnaissance Rep .......................................................................... 2-38 Table 2-P Section 205 Continue and Complete Reconnaissance Reports ..................................... 2-38 Table 2-Q Section 14 Complete Reconnaissance Report and Planss and Specs ............................. 2-38 2-1 Navigation Page Flood Control 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Page 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987, Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. However in FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88 local sponsors must be prepared to contribute 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY1987 has been the sixth year of a ten year control program, started in FY 1982, for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in Lake Champlain. This work was performed for the removal of water chestnut in the southern part of the lake and Eurasian milfoil in St. Albans Bay at a cost of $243,000. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division area was completed in August 1967. Planning for the water chestnut control in the Hudson-Mohawk basin was completed by the New York District, contracts for $189,363 accomplished during FY 1970 through FY 1976. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $1,229,350. 2. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. Location. These channels lie along east shore of Upper Bay, New York Harbor and, with Buttermilk Channel, form an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from the Narrows to East River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327 and 12334). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1768 and 195, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 1,200 feet wide and 40 feet deep at mean low water from the Narrows to Bay Ridge Avenue, Brooklyn, thence 1,750 feet wide to junction of Bay Ridge and Red Hook channels, thence 1,200 feet wide through Red Hook Channel to junction with Buttermilk Channel and a channel of same depth extending into Gowanus Bay from junction of Bay Ridge Channel with Red Hook channel, narrowing uniformly in width to about 500 feet at 28th Street, Brooklyn. Section included in project is 4 miles long. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $4,277,197, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract in the amount of $2,746,622 for the removal of approximately 823,000 cubic yards of material, except ledge rock, lying above the plane of 40 feet below mean low water in specified sections of Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. with satisfactory disposal of the dredged material at the EPA approved Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean was awarded on September 8, 1986 to Gulf Coast Trailing Company. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $48,776 was expended on engineering and design and surveys. A total of 351,694 cubic yards of material was removed during FY 1987 from the Red Hook Section of the project of which 87,593 cubic yards was excess over depth and side slopes. The dredging work commenced on 24 October, 1986 and completed 23 February 1987. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $2,847,961 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and administration, and contract work for this project. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced March 1901 and completed June 1940. 3. BRONX RIVER, N.Y. Location. Empties into a shallow bay in north shore of East River, 11 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12339.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915, page 1762, and Annual Report for 1938, page 166. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide to extend from deep water in East River to the head of navigation at the dam at East 172nd Street, involving the first dredging from 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT East River at Randall Avenue to a width of 200 feet; thence to Spofford Avenue, 150 feet; thence to Watson Avenue, 125 feet; thence to railroad bridge near Westchester Avenue, 100 feet, except in southern approach to bridge, where it is to be 140 feet. Section included in project is about 2.4 miles long. Mean tidal range is 6.9 feet in the estuary; mean range of spring tides, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of project as described above cost $1,080,910, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects, and exclusive of $10,000 contributed by local interests. Channel widening from Westchester Avenue to East 172d Street is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1913, provides that any right-of-way that may be necessary for the execution of the project shall be furnished free of cost to the United States. Right-ofway within bulkhead lines below Westchester Avenue Bridge was accepted by Chief of Engineers June 1920, and above the Westchester Avenue Bridge October 28. On September 10, 1940, the Chief of Engineers approved releases from damages furnished by adjoining property owners between Westchester Avenue and East 172nd Street. On November 12, 1940, the Chief of Engineers approved an agreement under which City of New York would reimburse the United States for cost of a retaining wall to protect adjoining property in reach of river between Westchester Avenue and New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad bridge in lieu of furnishing additional right-of-way. On October 28, 1940, the Secretary of War authorized the acceptance of $10,000 from the city of New York to defray the cost of retaining wall. Additional right-of-way required in the section below East 172d Street has not been furnished. City of New York indicated it does not feel justified in acquiring any additional land along the river. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A lump sum contract in the amount of $671,313 for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 10 and 12 feet below mean low water in specified sections of Bronx River, N.Y. with satisfactory disposal of the dredged material at the EPA approved Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean, was awarded on 24 April 1986, to Weeks Dredging Company. The dredging work commenced on 5 August 1986 and was substantially completed on 10 October 1986. However, due to hard material encountered under and above the Bruckner Boulevard Bridge, probing was required to determine depths attainable. Following completion of probing, the work was substantially completed on 5 February 1987. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $11,516 as of 30 September 1987 was expended for engineering and design, supervision and administration for this project during FY 1987. Condition as of September 30. Work under entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Active portion of existing project was commenced in 1914 and completed in 1941. Work remaining under existing project consists of widening reach between Westchester Avenue Bridge and East 172d Street. Channel between 172d Street and the upper limit of authorized project was filled in by City of New York under a Department of the Army permit and is no longer a waterway. 4. BROWNS CREEK. N.Y. Location. A narrow, crooked tidal stream emptying into Great South Bay, near Sayville, Long Island, N.Y., about 15 miles by water northeast of Fire Island Inlet, and about 65 miles by water east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from 6-foot contour in Great South Bay for 1,850 feet, and thence, with same width, 4 feet deep for 1,350 feet; also for two stone jetties to protect the entrance, east jetty to be 448 feet long and west jetty 700 feet long. Section included in project is about 0.6 mile. Mean tidal range, 0.6 feet; mean range of spring tides 0.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water up to 3.2 feet above mean high water. Cost of new work for completed portion of project is $33,976. Dredging of channel to a depth of 4 feet for 3,300 feet northward to upper limit of project and extension of jetties; east jetty to 1,400 feet long and west jetty 1,600 feet long were deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminals, including several ferries, with a total available dockage of 7,980 feet, are scattered along shore of creek between its mouth and head of improved channel. Three are publicly owned; all are open to the public. None has rail connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during the period. A continuing contract in the amount of $117,132 for the removal of approximately 20,392 cubic yards of material, except ledge rock lying above the planes of 6 feet and 4 feet below mean low water with disposal of the dredged material on a confined upland disposal site was awarded to Gibson & Cushman Dredging Corporation on 26 September 1986. 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $18,412 was expended on engineering design and surveys. A total of 24,751 cubic yards of material was removed, of which 6,580 cubic yards was excess over depth and side slopes. The work commenced on 12 November 1986 and completed on 15 December 1986. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $149,588 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and administration, and contract work for this project during FY 1987. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1891 and completed July 1927. East jetty was completed to a length of 448 feet in 1893. West jetty was completed to a length of 492 feet in 1892 and extended in 1927 to a total length of 700 feet. Six-foot channel has been completed. Four-foot channel has been.completed for 1,350 feet. 5. EAST CHESTER CREEK, N.Y. Location. This creek, also known as Hutchinson River, is a small tidal stream emptying into East Chester Bay, an indentation in north shore of Long Island Sound immediately north of Throgs Neck, 12 miles southwest of Connecticut State line and 21 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12366) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1929, 1938 and 1949, pages 1761, 167,163, and 208, respectively. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and generally 150 feet wide from Long Island Sound through East Chester Bay to a point 700 feet below Boston Post Road Bridge, and thence 70 feet wide extending to a point where the creek divides into a Y, thence approximately 1,000 feet into east branch of the Y and approximately 500 feet into west branch of the Y; a passing basin south of Boston Post Road Bridge; widening channel at Boston Post Road Bridge; and construction of a check dam.,at head of navigation. Section included in project is 5 miles. Mean tidal range, 7.3 feet in the estuary; mean range of spring tides, 8.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.1 feet above mean high water. Estimate of cost for new work is $2,550,000 (October 1976) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and inclusive of an estimated $40,000 non-Federal cost for lowering utilities, (See Table 2-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, provides that local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. City of New York has complied with requirements. Assurances are yet to be received from other local interests concerned with improvement. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2. Operations and results during period. Operations and results during period. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount $47,489.00 was expended on reconnaissance surveys, engineering and design and bulkhead stability analysis study for the maintenance of the "Y" shaped portion of this project, authorized under Water Resources Act of 1988. Condition as of September 30. No work has been accomplished under the existing project. Work under the 1930 project was completed in August 1941. 6. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 39 terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway. Nine of these are oil terminals, one of which has a railroad spur. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with a berthage of 7,655 feet. Of these, 21 have marine railways and 1 has mechanical-handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $49,360.00 was expended during FY 1987 on engineering and design to accomplish dredgning in FY 1988. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long, was completed in July 1834. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 7. FIRE ISLAND TO JONESINLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel generally parallel to the jetty 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from a littoral reservoir (sediment trap) in the ocean to deep water in the inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 ft. and 2.4 ft. respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements & rights-of-way. Terminal facilities. None within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvements. Operations and results during the period. At the request of local interests, maintenance dredging of the project channel was postponed in 1979 until the completion of an Inlet Dynamic Study. The residents of Oak Beach contend that dredging the Inlet exposes Oak Beach to direct wave attack thereby causing an erosion problem. The Inlet Dynamic Study was completed in 1985; study results showed the project to be economically justified, that there were no significant salinity effects on Great South Bay and that there were no anticipated adverse effects on wildlife or the environment. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced in late 1973. As a result of three consecutive dredging operations completed in 1977, the project channel was brought to the approximate authorized dimension at that time. Due to the aforementioned local concerns maintenance has been deferred since 1979 which has allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge. 422,460 cy was dredged at a cost of $882,000 operations and maintenance funds. 0 & M funds of $320,400 was also expended on a continuing contract for jetty repair work. Plans and specifications for the authorized project are being prepared and alternative courses of action are still being examined. 8. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay. Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335,12341,12343,12347,12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1764 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of the Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of New York. Mean range of pool elevation above Federal dam at Troy, in seasons of moderate rains, is about 2.2 feet, as determined in 1934. Mean tidal range is about 4.8 feet between May and October and 5.1 feet between July and September at Albany, extreme range due to freshets is 33.1 and 25.9 feet, respectively normal pool level above Federal dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.33 feet above mean sea level. In tidal section of river below dam, assumed lowest low water plane from Troy to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6. 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and results during period. A contract in the amount of $2,964,000 was awarded on August 18, 1986 to North American Trailing Company for removal of approximately 497,500 cubic yards of material. The 3,600 cubic yard hopper dredge Sugar Island began work on 25 September 1986 and completed work on 22 November 1986. The 2,178 cubic yard hopper dredge Northerly Island assisted with the work during the period of 27 October through 13 November 1986. A total of 572, 132 cubic yards dredged material was removed consisting of 349,310 cubic yards of material above grade and 222,822 of allowable over depth. Seeding and other restoration work of the dikes and areas disturbed outside the exterior dike limits began on June 24, 1987 and completed June 26, 1987. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $2,874,594 was expended to accomplish dredging under this contract. A continuing contract in the amount of $995,250 for the removal of approximately 162,500 cubic yards of material, except ledge rock lying above the plane of 32 feet below mean low water in specified areas of Haverstraw Bay area of Hudson River with satisfactory disposal of the dredged material at the EPA approved Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean and awarded on 13 August 1987 to Weeks Marine, Inc. Operations and maintenance in the amount of $756,223 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and administration, surveys and contract work during FY 1987 for this project. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of stumps, snags and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $152,539 for maintenance in FY 1987. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing dredging and project condition surveys at a cost of $212,228 for maintenance in FY 1987. Funds in the amount of $24,499 were expended for environmental testing and funds in the amount of $26,800 were expended for Stream Gauges during FY 1987. Government plant and hired labor were employed throughout the fiscal year with operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam including the associated buildings and grounds. Operation of the Lock was suspended for the 1986 navigation season on December 1, 1986 and was resumed for the 1987 navigation season on May 4, 1987. Total cost incurred for the operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and the associated building and grounds was $605,924 for FY 1987. In addition, contracts in the amounts of $103,631 and $57,342 respectively were completed for modifications to the Electrical System and Fabrication of Pivot Castings at the Troy Lock. An on-going A/E contract was also modified in the amount of $96,724 for design of required repairs to insure continued operability and safety of the Troy Lock and Dam. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear-foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1,300 linear feet of the 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. Work remaining under the project consists of completion of the 12-foot harbor at Troy and dredging the 27-foot and the remainder of the 32-foot channels at Albany which are not deemed necessary at this time; and reconstruction of dikes. 9. JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. An entrance jetty and a channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tide varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) SLocal cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and numerous boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are nine public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operations and results during period. A contract in the amount of $963,830 for the removal of approximately 367,000 cubic yards of material with 2-6 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT satisfactory disposal of the dredged material offshore of the beach was awarded on 19 June 1987 and completed on 27 August 1987. Removed 449,005 cubic yards of material. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,342,412 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and inspection, and contract work for this project during FY 1987. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. JONES INLET - JETTY REHABILITATION ($34,500). The purpose of this study is to develop a feasible and cost effective design for rehabilitation of the Jones Inlet Jetty to insure structural stability and maximize the sand trapping efficiency of the structure. Inlet hydrographic and existing jetty condition surveys have been performed. Preliminary design and cost estimates for alternative schemes have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. JONES INLET - MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS ($49,264). The purpose of this study is to develop feasible and cost efficient alternative which would minimize channel maintenance requirements. Existing tidal/inlet hydraulics, inlet/bay stability, jetty impoundment rates, etc., have been evaluated. Several methods of shoaling analysis were reviewed and the most applicable used. Preliminary design layouts and cost estimates for a deposition basin and navigation channel have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. 10. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $195,000,000 with an additional $147,000,000 to be contributed by local interests (Oct 87 P.L.). Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Contract No. 1 is proceeding successfully. Plans and Specs for FY 88 contracts are being developed. 11. LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On east end of Long Island, about 3 miles by land west of Montauk Point and 125 miles by water east of New York City. It is land-locked on the east, south and west sides and is connected to the north with Block Island Sound by an artificial inlet. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13209) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending from 12-foot contour in Block Island Sound to same depth in existing yacht basin east of Star Island; a boat basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long, northwest of Star Island; repair and extension shoreward of the east and west jetties; and addition of sport fishing facilities on top of both jetties. Section included in the project is 0.7 miles long. Mean tidal range, 1.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 2.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2 feet below; mean low water up to 7 feet above mean high water. For latest published map see project document. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are fourteen marinas and mooring facilities for recreational boats. In addition, two terminals are used for commercial fishing vessels. None of the terminals have rail connections or are equipped with freight handling devices. Terminals are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and Results during fiscal year. A contract in the amount of $100,000 for the removal of 5,361 cubic yards of material, except ledge rock, lying above the plane of 12 feet below mean low water with disposal of the dredged material on the beach was awarded on 2 September 1987 to Gibson and Cushman Dredging Corporation. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $124,806 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and inspection and contract work for this project during FY 1987. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1942 and was completed November 1968. Dredging entrance channel and shoreward extension of west jetty were performed from August 1942 to January 1943, at the request of the Navy Department with Navy funds. Extension of east jetty and repair of both jetties, provision of sport fishing facilities on both jetties and dredging the boat basin was completed November 1968. 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 12. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. Location. Extends from East Rockaway Inlet, on the south side of Long Island, to Great Peconic Bay at eastern end of Long Island. Section included under this project extends from Great South Bay opposite Patchogue to the south end of Shinnecock Canal. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from the federally improved channel in Great South Bay, opposite Patchogue to south end of Shinnecock Canal. Section included in project is 34 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from 1 foot in Shinnecock Bay to 0.7 foot in Patchogue Bay; mean range of spring tides varies from 1.2 feet to 0.8 foot; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water to 12 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are 17 boat repair and storage yards within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. There is ample room for expansion and development of terminals when future commerce warrants. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract in the amount of $1,880,930.50 for the removal of approximately 158,475 cubic yards of material, except ledge rock lying above the plane of 6 and 10 feet below mean low water in specified sections within the Bellport Bay reach, Narrow Bay reach, Moriches Bay reach and Quantuck Bay reach, of Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, New York, with disposal of the dredged material on nearby beaches and on confined upland area was awarded on 2 September, 1987 to Gibson and Cushman Dredging Corporation. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $769,107 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and inspection, and contract work for this project during FY 1987. Condition as of September 30. Original work under the existing project was commenced Oct 1939 and completed Sept 1940. 13. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.7 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1.1 miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost of work is $13,050,000 (October 1987 P.L.) including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $4,550,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all easements, rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for improvements at an overall 35% cost sharing basis. The annual Operations and Maintenance cost is estimated to be $1,860,000, of which the local share is 50% or $930,000 per year. An Agreement of Local Cooperation was executed on 30 June 1986. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. No terminals are within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. However, numerous public and private terminals facilities are available in Moriches Bay and in the connecting canals. Several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharfs and landings,, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay. The yacht clubs and boatyards have equipment for servicing boats. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future commerce warrant. Operations and results during period. Preconstruction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e. navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). A post authorization change was approved in September 1983 to allow construction of each project purpose separately which clarified authority to defer all purposes except navigation. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. Condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated. Preconstruction planning (advance engineering and design) has been completed and contract plans and specifications were completed in January 1985. 14. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. & V.T. Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. at 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See N. O. S. Chart 14784.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y., at head of Lake Champlain, to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low lake level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 20 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In Whitehall Harbor consisting of three timber wharves, aggregating 4,200 feet in length. State of New York constructed a barge canal terminal at Whitehall, just south of terminus of canal, which has been equipped with a 5- ton hand-operated derrick and a storehouse. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags that posed a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $14,139. Government plant and hired labor were employed in replacing deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $6,102. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $10,139 were expended on engineering and design for future maintenance of this project. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least a width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock). 15. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RWERS, N.J. Location. Newark Bay is an estuary about 1.25 miles wide and 6 miles long extending southerly from confluence of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers to New York and New Jersey Channels. Hackensack River rises near Haverstraw, Rockland County, N.Y. and flows about 45 miles into Newark Bay. Passaic River rises in highlands of northeastern New Jersey and flows about 80 miles into Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333 and 12337.) Previous projects. For details see 1926 Annual Report, pages 265 and 266; and Annual Reports for 1929,1938,1954, and 1976, pages 301,244,134, and 2-11 respectively. Existing project. A main channel 700 feet wide to the branch channel to Port Newark, thence 500 feet wide to a turning basin 1,300 feet long and 900 feet wide at the junction of the Hackensack and Passaic River channels, length about 4.7 miles; a maneuvering area south of the former Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge 2,200 feet long and 300 feet wide with depths of 38 feet in the south half and 35 feet in the north half; a combined bend cutoff and maneuvering area at the south side of the junction with Elizabeth branch channel; and widening of bends at the Kill Van Kull and Port Newark Channels. (Authorized depth 35 feet except as noted above.) (adopted 1966.) At Port Newark - A branch channel 800 feet wide leading to an inshore channel 400 feet wide 1.6 miles (adopted 1945). Authorized depth 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material; a pierhead channel 200 feet wide along the east bulkhead between the Port Newark and Elizabeth branch channels, length 4,100 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). At Elizabeth Marine Terminal - A branch channel 500 feet wide, length about 1.4 miles; a pierhead channel along the east bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 1.1 miles; a south channel along the south bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 2,600 feet; a southern approach area just above former Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge enlarged for turning and maneuvering, with a maximum length of about 2,700 feet and width (between the pierhead channel and Newark Bay channel) of about 800 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-ofway, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial construction and future maintenance; provide depths commensurate with channel depth in approaches and berths at terminals of companies which would use improvement; and hold the United States free from damages. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests must provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and construction, hold United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, and accomplish without cost to the United States, removal or relocation of pipelines, cable and other utilities. Assurances were furnished by Port of New York Authority and accepted June 12, 1964. Local cooperation required by previous modifications is fully compiled with. 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract in the amount of $1,180,300 for the removal of approximately 300,000 cubic yards of material above the plane of 35 feet below mean low water in specified areas of Port Newark Bay Channel, and Main Channel of this project with disposal of the dredged material at the EPA approved Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean was awarded on 7 August 1987 to Weeks Marine, Inc. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $799,434 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and inspection and contract work for this project during FY 1987. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of project began June 1976 and is 100 percent complete. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of; deepening the Hackensack River channel to depths of 32 feet and 15 feet. Work was initiated for modification of project consisting of additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 37 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island. Two contracts for the removal of all material including ledge rock to 37 feet mean low water were completed at a total cost of $4,402,631. 16. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York bay and Raritan bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between states of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333,12331, and 12327.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively; thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide from a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the, channel along New Jersey pierhead line; and thende 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook, and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract in the amount of $510,136 was awarded on 7 May 1987 to Weeks Marine, Inc. for the removal of approximately 136,400 cubic yards of material, except ledge rock, lying above the planes of 35 feet below mean low water, in specified areas of channel North of Shooters Island with disposal of the dredged material at EPA approval Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean. A total of 202,234 cubic yards of material was removed, of which 48,003 cubic yards was excess side slopes and over-depth. The work commenced on 12 May 1987 and completed on 6 June 1987. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $792,986 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and administration and contract work for this project. Conditions as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sand Hook. (See Table 2-D for total cost for existing project to September 30, 1987.) 17. NEW YORK HARBOR - COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1970 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterways and was funded as a maintenance activity. Estimate of first cost under the 1987 Supplemental Appropriations Act is $134,600,000 (October 87 P.L.) including $25,930,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $56,770,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements- and rights-of-way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results during period. New work: A total of five Liberty State Park Contracts were completed at a cost of $4,649,000. East River- Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,478,000. A contract for the removal of Piers 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $220,000. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $792,000. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,000. A contract for the City of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,160,100. Work along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at a cost of $956,000. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,599,000. A continuing contract was awarded for Brooklyn Reach One at an estimated cost of $4,165,000. Weehawken to Edgewater contract No. 2 was awarded at an estimated cost of $5,449,000. Hoboken Pier B contract was awarded at an estimated cost of $632,000. The Bayonne (mainland) contract was awarded for the base bid only in the amount of $221,000. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2 and the Arthur Kill reach in New York. In the State of New Jersey Arthur Kill Reach and Jersey City North Reach are being investigated. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 645,942 cubic feet (5,046 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $2,988,000 in FY 1987. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weehawken, and Edgewater. In New York City, work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River inclusive of Piers 17 and 18, Stapleton, Staten Island. Removal work is currently underway at Brooklyn. 18. NEW YORK HARBOR - ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor, Mass., and 165 miles northwest of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327,12334,12335, and 12349). Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay, opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; a southerly entrance channel, Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 3.7 miles from junction with new southerly entrance to junction 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 with Main Ship Channel; Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in Anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage, 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesend Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dredge "McFarland" was employed from September 1987 to October 1987 to restore project dimensions in Sandy Hook Channel. Removed 285,250 cubic yards, place measurement, of material at a cost of $1,080,000. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600- foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends near southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, 50, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section) was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay Anchorage was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 19. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. Location. Rises in north-central part of New Jersey and flows generally southeasterly into Raritan Basin, between Perth Amboy and South Amboy, about 24 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12332.) Previous projects. For Details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1777, 359, and 259 respectively. Existing projects. A channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide extending 5.8 miles from turn in New York and New Jersey Channels near Great Beds Light to Government wharf on Main Channel, widened to 600 feet for 1,000 feet long opposite wharf to form a turning basin of same depth; thence a channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide 3 miles to Washington Canal; thence 10 feet deep in soft material, 11 feet deep in rock, and generally 100 feet wide with widening at bends 5 miles to Delaware and Raritan Canal entrance at New Brunswick, and a South Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide 0.8 mile from junction with Main Channel at Keasby to upper limit of Titanium Pigment Co. property; thence 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide 0.4 mile to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority; thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide 2 miles to a point 1,300 feet below upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tides is 5.1 feet at mouth of river and 5.6 feet at New Brunswick; mean range of spring tides, 6.1 and 6.6 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to winds and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. New work for completed portion of project, consisting of channels described above cost $1,237,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and including $66,000 contributed by local interests. Dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance to 25-foot channel from New York & Long Branch Railroad bridge to junction of Main and South Channels, and in South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. property. River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides local interests furnish spoildisposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, required for 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT maintenance of improvement, and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No.5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2, pages 274-279 and 281. Operations and results during period. A contract in the amount of $2,105,400 for the removal of approximately 660,000 cubic yards of material, except ledge rock lying above the plane of 25 feet below mean low water with disposal of the dredged material at EPA approved Mud Dump site in the Atlantic Ocean was awarded on 22 April 1987 to Atlantic Trailing Company. A total of 721,983 cubic yards of material was removed, of which 119,976 cubic yards was excess overdepth and side slopes. The work commenced on 14 July 1987 and completed on 27 September 1987. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $2,345,369 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and inspection, and contract work for this project during FY 1987. Conditions as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 96 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project was commenced September 1919 and completed July 1941. A shoal along northerly channel line in vicinity of Victory Bridge was eliminated by relocation of channel in February 1959. Main Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction with New York and New Jersey Channels to and including a turning basin of same depth opposite Government wharf, thence 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to mouth of Washington Canal, thence 10 and 11 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Delaware and Raritan Canal outlet locks at New Brunswick. South Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,200 feet, thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 12,400 feet to within 1,300 feet of junction with Main Channel to Crab Island. Model study of Raritan River was completed in March 1952. Work remaining under existing project is dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. 20. RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Comprises tidal mouth about 3.5 miles long, of Rondout Creek, whose source is about 18 miles west of Rondout. Creek empties into Hudson River from the west, about 89 miles north of the Battery, New York City, and 55 miles south of Albany. Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide, widening at bends, and 14 feet deep from deep water in Hudson River to highway bridge, 1.3 miles above mouth, thence 12 feet deep to 3.5 miles above mouth, two parallel dikes 350 feet apart to maintain channel, and a branch dike to extend upstream from outer end of north dike to protect that dike from running ice in Hudson River. Mean tidal range, 3.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 4.2 feet; extreme range, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to freshets vary from 2 feet below mean low water up to 2.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $131,140. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1965 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the Federal project as modified and for construction and maintenance of aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore or the costs of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages, and provide and maintain depths in berthing areas serving terminals commensurate with depths provided in related project areas. Assurances of local compliance were furnished by town of Ulster on June 9, by city of Kingston on June 17, and by town of Esopus on June 20,1966. Terminal facilities. Seventeen timber wharves with available dockage of 12,132 feet along waterway. Four terminals are equipped with transfer facilities; all are privately owned. Terminals adequate for present needs of commerce. (For latest full description see Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports on Upper Hudson River, 1941, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $70,814.00 was expended on surveys and engineering and design for rehabilitation of dikes at Rondout Harbor, N.Y. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under existing project was commenced April 1873 and is about 87 percent complete. Part of diking originally proposed was not built because it was deemed of doubtful usefulness. Two parallel dikes of an aggregate length of about 5,000 feet, generally 350 feet apart, with a now obsolete spur from the old lighthouse south of south dike, were built across the bar at mouth of creek. A branch dike about 1,000 feet long, extending northerly from outer end of north dike, was also constructed. Work remaining consists of removal of shoals in the 12 and 14 foot projects and rehabilitation of deteriorated sections of the parallel and branch dikes. 2L SHARK RIVER Location. A small stream entering Atlantic Ocean 20 miles south of Sandy Hook on the New Jersey coast. Forty miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12326.) Existing project. A 1.7 mile channel 18 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide across the bar at 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 entrance to inlet; thence 12 feet deep and generally 100 feet wide through main channel and south channel to Route 35 bridge; thence 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide to upper limit of the Belmar municipal boat basin, with additional depths and widths where necessary and practicable to produce satisfactory current velocities at bridges: and an anchorage 12 feet deep over about 7.3 acres east of Route 4-N bridge. Mean tidal range at mouth is 4 feet; mean range of spring tides 4.8 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost was $150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoildisposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Two yacht basins are located on south shore of lower portion of Shark River. One is publicly owned and has a berthage of 2,600 feet. Several boatyards, boathouses, and landings for commercial and recreational craft are located in the lower portion of Shark River. o Operations and results during fiscal year. A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of channel to restore projects depth was awarded in FY 1981. Work was completed February 24, 1982. Expended $29,985 in Fiscal Year 1984 for Modification of Contract for survey costs. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $24,041 was expended on reconnaissance surveys for this project during Fiscal Year 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1947 and was completed October 1947. 22. SHINNECOCK INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 95 miles east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the sandy barrier beach, connecting Shinnecock Bay with the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep (mlw) and 200 feet wide extending through the inlet to Shinnecock Bay for a distance of about 0.7 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of about 1 mile; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost for work is $12,100,000 (October 87 P.L.) of which the Federal share is $9,700,000 and non-Federal share is $2,700,000. Local cooperation. The navigation improvement will accrue both recreational and commercial benefits which result in a first cost allocation of 71 percent Federal and 29 percent non-Federal. The authorizing document also requires that local authorities: provide without cost to the United States, all lands easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance, when and as required; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project; maintain and operate the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; provide and maintain suitable terminal facilities when and as required for the accommodation of vessels that would navigate the inlet and adjacent bays, open to all on equal terms; maintain, for the duration of the economic life of the project, continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores and their administration for public use, and continued availability for public use of the privately owned shores upon which a portion of the Federal share of the costs is based. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation expressed their intent to provide required items of local cooperation by letter dated 8 September 1986. Terminal facilities. Shinnecock Bay, and adjacent ocean area, constitute an important marine fishery. The public fishing facility includes three docks, one of which, the Shinnecock Fishermens Cooperative, stores and market the catch for the fishermen. Operations and results during period. Work was completed on a draft General Design Memorandum. Condition as of September 30. No Federal construction has been done. Preconstruction engineering and design is continuing. 23. WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. Location. A tidal stream flowing into East River from north at a point 14 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12336.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1921 and 1938, pages 238 and 164, respectively. Existing project. A 2.6 mile channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 100 feet wide for 2,000 feet through the estuary; thence 80 feet wide for 3,000 feet; and thence 60 feet wide 8,800 feet to head of navigation at East Tremont Avenue (Fort Schuyler Road), with widening at bends, and two turning basins, one near upper end of channel, the other near Eastern Boulevard (Unionport) Bridge. Mean tidal range, 7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed active portion of the project cost $98,751 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Dredging turning basin to a depth of 12 feet below mean low water, 250 by 1250 feet in extend, 500 feet downstream from head of navigation, is inactive and excluded 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides that local interests agree to furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and maintenance and furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance as required; hold the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain a suitable bulkhead or other works approved by Chief of Engineers for retaining the east bank of the turning basin alongside Hutchinson River Parkway; and that local interests give assurances they will construct a public wharf when required. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A lump sum contract in the amount of $719,217 for the removal of all material, except ledge rock, lying above the plane of 12 feet below mean low water with satisfactory disposal of dredged material at the EPA's approved Mud Dump Site in the Atlantic Ocean was awarded on 24 April 1986 to Weeks Dredging Company. The dredging work commenced on 22 July 1986 and was completed on 10 October 1986. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $17,756 was expended for engineering and design, and supervision and administration during FY 1987 for this project. Conditions as of September 30. Work under the entire existing project is about 82 percent complete. Work under active portion of existing project commenced March 1932 and was relocated by city of New York in 1941. Head of navigation is at East Tremont Avenue, Bronx, about 2.6 miles above the mouth. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging to 12 feet below mean low water a turning basin 250 by 250 feet in extent to be 500 feet downstream from head of navigation. 24. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of those channels by ocean steamships and ships of deep draft; the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 307, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under jurisdiction of the New York District was accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the waterfront for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of the 3-mile limit of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol was limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with twoway radios patrolled shorefront facilities and property. These inspectors operate out of field offices located at Melville, New York and one inspector working at the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit applications. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 25. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 26. OTHER AUTHIORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) Beach Erosion Control 28. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PT.1) Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327,12350, and 12326.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 8.7 million cubic yards of sand fill including the advanced placement of a two year supply of beach nourishment of the shore protection works for 10 years after completion of the initial beach fill. Federal participation (50 percent) includes first cost and periodic beach nourishment, the total estimated at $25,400,000 (Oct. 1986 P.L.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear 50 percent of total first cost presently estimated at $25,400,000 consisting of a cash contribution of $8,813,500 the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs and values have been determined and $16,586,500 for periodic nourishment, hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly-owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; local cooperation agreement was executed by the State May 17, 1974 and approved for Secretary of Army May 21, 1974. On May 22, 1974 sent to State an approved Escrow Agreement. Operations and results during period. Plans and Specs for periodic nourishment Contract No. 5 are underway. The contract is scheduled to be awarded in May 88. Condition as of September 30. Advance engineering and design is completed. Final Environmental Impact Statement on file with Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration completed in FY 1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August 1982. Contract for construction of stone groin at Beach 149th Street was completed in September 1982. Contract for third periodic nourishment contract No. 4. is completed. The fifth nourishment contract is scheduled for summer 1988. This is the final nourishment contract in which Federal participation is authorized. 29. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Barnegat Inlet, Length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Sea Bright to Ocean Township by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water and by the construction of 23 new groins and the extension of 14 existing groins in the Sea Bright - Ocean Township section. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 10 years from the year that the total quantity of fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions in that section. Total estimated Federal cost is $91,000,000. Total estimated non-Federal for all requirements of local cooperation is $12,000,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Reconstruction of the sea wall at Sea Bright and Monmouth was funded by the State. In addition the State provided funds in the amount of $100,000 for a limited analysis by the New York District with a view to deferring certain construction elements. Operations and results during period, and Condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated, but the project is in active status with work continuing on the preparation of General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement. 2-16 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT SECTION II- ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan - length about 9 miles. Recommended project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 10 years from the year that the total quantity of fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions in that section. Total estimated Federal cost is $21,000,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $20,600,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Operations and results during period, and Conditions as of September 30. The project is in active status with work on the Preconstruction Engineering & Design (PED) effort initiated in FY 1987. The PED effort which is continuing will result in the development of a General Design Memorandum (GDM), Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as well as the Plans and Specifications. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 31. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th Congress as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 2-0 at the of chapter.) Flood Control 32. ARDSLEY, N.Y. Location. The Village of Ardsley in Westchester County, New York is located on the Saw Mill River approximately 5 miles upstream from its junction with the Hudson River. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The Federal flood control project provides for relocation of the existing channel from the upstream limit of the project downstream for approximately 1,000 feet, and approximately 290 feet of concrete channel upstream of the new Ashford Avenue Bridge. Upstream of the concrete channel along the left bank of the Saw Mill River, 425 feet of floodwall will be constructed running north of the Conrail Bridge. Ponding areas, drainage ditches and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $4,830,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,610,000 (October 1987 P.L.). Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in S.1567, local interests are required to furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for flood control improvements presently estimated at $840,000 and operate and maintain the project at an estimated cost of $82,000; interests pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to flood control for a total cost of $1,610,000 project cost but not less than that required by project authorization presently estimated at $1,610,000. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the local sponsor, in an 11 December 1973 letter, indicated its intent to comply with the items of local cooperation and reaffirmed this on 15 August 1979 and 23 August 1985. The State of New York, in a 18 October 1985 letter, expressed this willingness to assume responsibility as local sponsor in accordance with the Cost Sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the Administration and Senator Majority Leadership Compromise as reflected in WRDA 1986. Operation and results during period. Preconstruction planning continued. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved in March 1979. Construction has not been initiated. The lowest reach of the project was awarded 25 September 1987 and construction is expected to begin in late December 1987 or early January 1988. Construction of the middle and upper reaches will commence once the required Real Estate is received from the State. 33. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. Location. At Liberty Park, in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, directly behind Ellis Island and Statue of Liberty, in Upper New York Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12334.) Existing project. Construction of a levee and sea wall, and pedestrian walkways; over environmentally sensitive areas. The construction of the levee project will allow the creation of a large Greenpark to include a wetlands preserve, an inland water course and boat basin, a marina, an amphitheater, indoor and outdoor recreation facilities, picnic areas, historic areas, community facilities, restaurants, plaza, and many other areas 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 for both active and passive recreational and aesthetic benefit to visitors. The stone armored levee will also serve as a settlement-free base for subsequent construction of a tree-lined promenade, the Liberty walk, curving along the water's edge. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $19,100,000; with an additional $19,100,000 contribution by local interests including lands, certain relocations, utilities, and interior drainage. Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all land, easements and rights-of-way including relocations, save those existing utilities passing through the proposed levee, necessary for the flood control improvements and to operate and maintain the project at an annual cost estimated to total $58,000. The State will assume all costs for construction of an interior drainage system to provide (10) year level of protection estimated to be $5,100,000. Local interests have agreed to voluntarily pay 50% of project cost. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection is the local sponsor. The local cooperation agreement was executed on 26 June 1986. Operation and results during period and Conditions as of September 30. Phase I is completed. A contract for the levee and seawall was awarded in February 1987 and will be completed in January 1988, approximately one year ahead of schedule. Contract documents for the pedestrian walkways contract are being finalized and it is intended to advertise this contract in January 1988. 34. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic River Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Two Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, N.J. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, N.J., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. Existing project. The project was authorized for Phase I advance engineering and design study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the February 18, 1976 report of the Chief of Engineers. The estimate of Federal cost under the authorizing legislation is $1,170,000,000 (October 1987 P.L.), plus a $235,000,000 cash contribution from local interests and $155,000,000 for items of work to be contributed by local interests. The recommended plan for flood protection, navigation, hurricane protection and recreation, included a flood detention reservoir, channel diversions and modifications, levees and floodwalls, and streambank filling and grading. These works would provide protection against storm with a recurrence interval of 235 years, which is 20 percent larger than the October 1903 flood of record. Six independent tributary local protection plans were also recommended. However, because of a lack of public support for structural components of the project in the New Jersey portion of the Basin, the entire project was reformulated during the Phase I study. The House Public Works Committee Report (94- 1702) on the 1976 Water Resources Development Act directed "...the reformulation of the plan for water management and flood control for the entire Passaic Basin." This report further stated that local opposition to any plan which relies upon extensive use of dikes, dams and levees, such as those proposed in previous survey reports, mandates that the following alternatives, or any combination thereof, shall be the only ones surveyed and considered: (a) A full range of nonstructural flood control alternatives to include land acquisition, flood plain mapping, flood-proofing, developing early warning systems and relocation of buildings; (b) A tunnel diversion plan; (c) A system of tunnels addressing the needs of the entire basin; (d) Plans that combine local protection works where locally acceptable and nonstructural solutions including improvements to stream carrying capacity in accordance with different needs in the Lower Basin and in the Central Basin; (e) Evaluation of fulfilling water supply objectives together with flood control; (f) Aquifer recharge and underground storage; and (g) Reservoir management in the headwaters. The Phase I Study considered these alternatives in the formulation of revised plans. Conditions as of September 30. The reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 under the existing authorization and Congressional Guidance in House Report 94-1702. The Study schedule runs through September 1988 at an estimated cost of $21,000,000. A wide range of feasible Basin-wide alternative plans were developed. These 2-18 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT alternatives, which were presented for extensive public review, included tunnel diversions, channel modifications, levees and floodwalls, and nonstructural measures. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the local option for detailed plan formulation. A draft Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, recommending the Pompton River/Passaic River Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1986. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 35. SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD AND GREENBURGH, N.Y. Location. On the Saw Mill River in the town of Greenburgh, N.Y. One portion known as Babbitt Court lies along the river immediately south of the Village of Elmsford. The second portion of the project, known as the Elmsford-Greenburgh area, is north of the Village of Elmsford, separated from Babbitt Court by approximately 4,000 feet. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 2.6 miles of 20 foot wide channel improvement along the Saw Mill River from the upper reaches in the Town of Greenburgh downstream to approximately Exit 7A of the New York State Thruway, with an additional 675 feet of channel modification along the tributary Mine Brook. A diversion channel will be constructed south of the Saw Mill River Parkway. The total estimated Federal cost (October 1987 P.L.) for the project is $4,680,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,570,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way for construction, including borrow, ponding, and waste disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate completed works; provide all alterations, relocations, and necessary replacements of existing facilities, including bridges, highways, sewers, utilities, and railroad modifications and relocations other than bridges and bridge approaches; protect the channel and other flood works from future encroachment or obstruction, including waste disposal which would reduce or otherwise impair their flood-carrying capacity, to compensate for any loss in ponding area effectiveness due to modification of or encroachment upon such areas; take appropriate measures to control development in partially protected areas and fringe areas not included in the project with a view toward preventing an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and at least annually, notify those affected that flooding will still be possible from large floods. New York State is Local Cooperating Agency. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, by letter dated June 12, 1974, indicated the State's intention to cooperate in the proposed plan, and agreed to the current Administration's cost sharing by letter dated 11 June 1986. Operation and results during period. During Phase I preconstruction planning the authorized project was found to be no longer economically justified. Phase I project reformulation to develop an alternative plan of improvement has been completed. Condition as of September 30. Plan of Study approved January 28, 1977. Preconstruction planning started in February 1977. The final Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved in March 1986. The final Phase II General Design Memorandum is scheduled for submission in April 1988. 36. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PRECTS Inspections of completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extend of compliance by local interests with the requirements of operation and maintenance. 37. OTHER AUTHORIZEDi FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-I at end of chapter.) 38. DAM SAFETY PROGRAM Beginning in FY 1985 the New York District performed a two phase modification to Waterbury Dam in an attempt to drastically reduce or totally eliminate a long existing seepage problem at the dam. The first phase of construction is the addition of 48 inch pipe to the two existing 54 inch pipes that comprise the existing outlet works of the dam. This work was completed in July 1985 at a cost of $513,400. The second phase of work is the partial rebuilding of the toe of the dam to include a seepage filter and monitoring system and to fill voids by means of sand injection and to fill voids in the river gorge by grouting. The seepage filter was completed on 11 November 1986 at a cost of $933,100. The sand injection and gorge grouting work was completed on 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 17 December 1986 at a cost of $1,604,367. The sand injection and gorge grouting work was done by the Baltimore District for the New York District. In FY 1987 the New York District completed inundation mapping, lands downstream of spillway studies, and seismic studies at Waterbury Dam, Vermont. Additionally, lands downstream from spillways studies and inundation mapping was completed for East Barre Dam, Vermont and Wrightsville Dam, Vermont. These studies were completed at a FY 1987 cost of $105,000. 39. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. (Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation) provides for advance preparation, emergency operations, rehabilitation, emergency drinking water, advance measures and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals and pamphlets, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response and preparation, provided in-house training to District employees in emergency operations activities, and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fighting and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District provided technical assistance and sandbags to local, county and state governmental organizations which requested such aid during several minor storm/flood events. The New York District completed a rehabilitation report on damage to the North Ellenville Flood Control Project caused by the storm of 3-4 April 1987. The report recommended the repair and shoring of the floodwalls in specified sections as well as removal of rock outcrops within the channel. The work was subsequently approved by OCE. An emergency contract will be let under Rehabilitation Code 910-300 in FY 88. The District received a mission assignment from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under the provisions of PL93-288 to assist FEMA forces in the preparation of detailed damage survey reports for upstate New York counties following the Presidential Disaster Declaration resulting from the rain of March 30, 31 and 3, 4 April 1987 in the Hudson River Basin (FEMA 792-DRNY). 33 applicants in 3 of the 5 counties were surveyed for damages by District forces, including State agencies county and local governments. 40. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-Q at end of chapter.) 41. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $103,558 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 43. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS A total of 23 projects were deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Section 12 of Public Law 93-251, Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-20 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A See Section in Text Projects COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 84 FY85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to September 30,1987 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels, N.Y. 3. Bronx River, N.Y. 4. Browns Creek, N.Y. 5. East Chester Creek, N.Y. 6. East Rockaway Inlet 7. Fire Island To Jones Inlet, N.Y. 8. Hudson River, N.Y. New Work Approp Cost New Work Aprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 100,0( 43,9I 1,339,0( 1,339,0( 185,000 176,102 DO 73 00 7,059,000 00 7,056,993 - 60,000 - 59,390 - 199,790 - 199,790 220,000 170,000 277,065 182,791 164,000 2,842,000 159,069 2,847,961 837,000 826,094 - 717,000 - 716,771 - 390,034 2,030,000 3,937 377,768 2,042,166 - 1,695,700 21,005 1,681,761 -0- 11,516 18,412 148,000 18,412 149,588 - 50,000 - 47,489 50,000 49,360 60,000 58,340 425,000 438,934 1,293,806 1 1,278,432 2 5,523,297 5,528,29727 33,010,988 33,010,011 1,149,946 1,149,946 2,844,853 2,844,853 5 33,97630 33,97630 673,529 673,369 592,056 592,056 1,521,042 1,519,302 83,969 533,334 4 7,572,736 7,571,946 594,355 594,35528 5,185,404 5,240,137 - 44,249,8036,7,8 - 44,249,865 758,400 1,299,002 673,000 1,792,600 4,545,900 ,579,097 1,873,853 4,549,347 33,921,315 33,819,626 2-21 -~---' --- --- - - c - I'' REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 2-A (Continued) See Section in Text Projects COST AND FINANICIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 84 FY85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to September 30, 1987 9. Jones Inlet, N.Y. 10. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y (Required Contributed Funds) 11. Lake Montauk Harbor 12. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. 13. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 14. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 15. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Appr. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 98,000 1,709,966 98,000 1,699,398 -- 1155,00,00 00 - 1,822,53010 - 1,822,530 128,500 137,883 240,000 254,025 1,354,000 1,342,512 7,100,000 1,504,912 3,869,000 195,133 203,000 203,000 70,862, 100,000 81,283 - 125,000 - 124,805 450,000 449,913 15,000 -0- 975,000 776,000 971,074 769,107 95,000 2,475,000 64,000 167,509 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 29,000 28,744 30,000 29,326 82,000 82,930 - 1,196,615 36,000 30,379 - - - 630,000 - - - 630,000 3,866,000 (295,000) 955,000 803,000 3,936,107 (296,200) 956,975 799,434 12,619,576 12,607,002 7,340,000 1,773,937 - 3,869,000 195,133 791,68037 791,68037 974,709 974,514 235,964 235,964 5,454,862 1 5,456,956 1 3,616,000 1,243,791 9,422 9,422 4,586,615 681,81112 681,811 1,057,695 1,052,053 29,014,510 9,014,51122,23 29,009,036 24,010,861 2-22 sl ---- -- L- -- I NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (Continued) See Section in Text Projects COST AND FINANICIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 84 FY85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to September 30, 1987 16. New York and New Jersey Channels 17. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift (Required Contributed Funds) 18. New York Harbor- Entrance Channel and Anchorage Areas 19. Raritan River, N.J. 20. Rondout Harbor, N.Y. 21. Shark River, N.J. (Other Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint & Oper Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 73,053,435 - 73,052,43515,16,17 8,704,000 1,162,000 1,332,000 794,000 8,386,840 1,096,073 1,397,900 792,986 7,102,359 41,450,560 454,773 454,773 2,700,000 2,960,800 2,700,000 2,960,800 1,380,950 1,250,972 1,930,000 2,105,000 3,657,000 1,801,315 2,351,181 1,992,556 2,820,000 2,786,239 707,096 537,350 3,210,000 3,145,000 3,278,166 2,987,798 470,459 1,830,700 181,077 32,991,000 20,563,479 42,192,89619 42,387,718 24,424,000 23,471,670 6,464,328 7,424,32229 - 45,009,71020 - 45,009,710 8,739,000 3,4419,900 9,132,502 3,508,699 4,033,000 2,013,000 4,130,537 2,022,305 42,395,524 45,224,780 - 1,,551,47021 - 1,551,47025 180,000 1,119,000 177,126 1,119,269 20,000 2,350,000 22,004 2,345,369 - 58,000 - 58,000 30,000 29,295 75,000 70,814 - 24,536 - 24,041 13,782,703 13,777,671 142,437 142,437 275,437 271,251 150,000 150,000 1,149,940 1,149,322 437,500 335,083 2-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 2-A (Continued) See Section in Text Projects COST AND FINANICIAL STATEMENT Funding FY84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to September 30, 1987 22. Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. 23. Westchester Creek, N.Y. 24. Supervisor of New York Harbor 28. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (PI) (Required Contributed Funds) 29. Sandy Hook to Barnegat, Int., NJ. 32. Ardsley, N.Y. 33. Liberty State Park and Seawall, N.J. (Required Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost - 200,000 - 200,000 -0- 200,000 200,000 -0- 151 173 - 175,9339 - 175,933 - 950,000 - 932,244 483,006 526,571 2,900,000 2,918,123 560,000 564,738 -0- 3,871,31111 17,756 3,871,311 577,000 600,000 576,363 593,071 2,250,000 3,445,000 2,224,852 3,212,342 50,000 96,784 - 2,316,000 3,145,000 -0- 3,967 2,251,199 2,909,104 162,226 - 1,300,000 1,435,000 2,300,000 - 1,252,310 1,435,815 2,186,594 45,000 32,325 15,000 -0- - 20,000 - -0- 83,000 300,000 83,000 237,963 25,000 7,175,000 20,250 6,093,751 - 7,170,000 - 5,999,657 28,740,447 29,215,827 21,395,356 21,180,553 17,120,961 19,438,942 5,035,000 4,873,704 743,000 653,287 7,400,043 6,294,089 7,170,000 5,999,657 2-24 -- NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Include $1,040,000 for new work and $1,040,000 expended for the portion under construction general. 4. Excludes $1'00,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public work fund. 5. Includes $68,036 for new work and $216,931 for maintenance for previous projects. 6. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief runds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropiation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 10. Excludes $1,882,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $66,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Includes $115,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 15. Includes $ 12,809,975 for new work for previous projects and $6,621 for new work for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 16. Excludes $7,712 for new work expended from contributed funds. 17. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 18. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance of Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 19. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O&M funds). 20. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 21. Includes $673,155 for new work for previous project. 22. Includes $1,836,403 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23.: Excludes $285,600 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $1,490,715 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $292,685 for new work expended from Ordinance funds and $66,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 27. Include $1,246,100 for new work for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 28. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. 29. Includes $400,000 Jobs Bill funds. 30. Includes $200,000 Jobs Bill funds. 37. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2-25 TABLE 2-A (Continued) COST AND FINANICIAL STATEMENT - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents River and Harbor Act of 1958 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive Eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st seas. Section 104 and Harbor Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully Act of 1958 by the United States. Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 July 3,1930 Mar. 4,1913 Sept. 19,1890 May 17,1950 July 3,1930 Aug. 26,1937 May 17,1950 1958 River and Harbor Act 1962 River and Harbor Act June 25,1910 Mar. 3,1925 July 3,1930 July 1,1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Modified project to include control of waterchestnut. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 40 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide. Dredging to obtain first a depth of 35 feet, subsequently increasing depth of 40 feet for full width. Widening of Bay Ridge Channel to 1,780 feet. BRONX RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from East River to Dam at East 177th Street. BROWNS CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) 6 foot channel for 1,850 feet and 4 feet for 1,350 feet, and 2 jetties. EAST CHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 to 70 feet wide. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet. Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westery beaches. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. Channel 27 feet deep fromHudson to Albany, N.Y. Channel 27 feet below Hudson Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12-foot channel between Troy and Waterford H. Doc. 337, 54th Cong. 2d Sess. (Annual Report 1899, P. 1177). Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 71st Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 897, 62d Cong. 2d sess. H. Ex Doc. 22, 51st Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 749, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 1st ses. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong.1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2d ses. 1 H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st ses. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 350, 68th Cong., 1st seas. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st ses. S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. 2-26 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 20,1938 Sep. 3,1954 P.L. 89-72 Mar. 2,1945 Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany and Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities. JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 228, 83d Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 77th Cong. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL99-88) Mar. 2,1945 Aug. 26,1937 July 14,1960 Aug. 8,1917 Mar. 2,1907 Feb. 27,1911 July 25,1912 Jan. 21,1927 July 3,1930 Mar. 22,1945 Mar. 2,1945 Sept. 3,1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7,1966 KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, N.J. & N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 44 feet. LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, 10 foot boat basin; H. Doc. 369. 76th Cong., repair and extension of two jetties; and addition of sport fishing 1st sess. facilities on top of jetties. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATER, N.Y. (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 13 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in inlet and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. H NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. (See Section 15 of Text) 16-foot channel in Passaic River H Widening 16-foot channel in Passaic River 20-foot channel in Passaic River. 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 30-foot channel in Passaic River. 35 and 37 feet in main channel of Newark Bay and branch channel to an inshore channel at Port Neward terminal and remove portion of rock area at Bergen Point to same depths. Modification of local cooperation for 10-foot channel in Passaic River 34-32 foot channel in Hackensack River including approach channel in Newark Bay from branch channel at Port Newark Terminal and a 25-foot turning basin. 35-foot channels at Port Elizabeth. Widening 35-foot channel in Newark Bay, provision of two maneuvering areas, widening entrance into Port Elizabeth and Port Newark branch channels, deepening and widening Newark Bay 32-foot channel, and provision of a turning basin at junction of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers; and deepening 12-foot channel in Hackensack River to 15 feet. H. Doc 181, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess. . Doc. 1387, 62d Cong., 3d sess. . Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. . Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2d sess. . Doc. 707, 62d Cong., . Doc. 284, 60th Cong., H HH 2d sess. H. Doc. 156, 71st Cong., 2 sess. S. Doc 250, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 430, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 252, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 289, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 494, 89th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Additional widening at junction with Kill Van Kull by deepening to 35 feet a triangular area at the eastern end of the 30-foot channel south of Shooters Island. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 16 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. Report on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 89th Cong., 1st sess. NEW YORK HARBOR, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 17 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal P.L. 91-611, 91st of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and Cong., H.R. 19877 debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. July 5,1884 Mar. 3,1899 June 25,1910 Aug. 8,1917 Aug. 8,1917 Mar 2, 1919 Jul. 3,1930 Jul. 3,1930 Jul. 3,1930 NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 18 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet for width of 1,000 feet (dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, De. 27,1886 by authority of Act of Aug. 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Maintenance of entrance channel under 1 head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay Removal of Craven Shoal RARITAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 19 of Text) Channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Washington canal 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to canal locks and 10 feet deep thru South Channel.7 Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide up to New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge. Channel 10 feet deep in earth and 11 feet in rock to New Brunswick. Width reduced to 100 feet. Relocation of lower reach to South Channel. Annual Reports 1887, p.6 2 and 1888, p. 6 3 H. Doc. 159, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1899, p. 1279) H. Doc. 518, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1341, 62d Cong., 3d. sess. H. Doc. 127, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 454, 70th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 2-28 Sept. 6,1933 Aug. 30,1935 May 28, 1935 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar.4,1915 July 3, 1930 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7,1974 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26,1937 Oct. 17,1940 Oct. 23,1962 June 10,1872 Aug. 30,1935 Oct. 27,1965 Mar. 2,1945 July 14,1960 Sept. 22,1922 1965 Flood Control Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act July 3,1958 Section 201 Flood Control Act of 1965 1976 Water Resources Development Act Channel 25 deep and 300 feet wide to junction of main and south channels, thence of same depth on South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction of main south channels to government wharf, including a turning basin. In South Channel, maintenance of 15-foot channel to dock of Middlesex County Sewerage Authority. RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 20 of Text) Parallel dikes, branch dike, and entrance channel, 14 feet deep. Extension of 14-foot channel and for 12-foot channel., Extend 12-foot channel from mile 1.8 to 3.5. SHARK RIVER, NJ. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep, 150 feet wide across entrance bar, 12 feet deep 100 feet wide to Route 35 bridge, 8 feet deep 100 feet wide to upper limit of Belmar boat basin; and 12-foot anchorage SHINNECOCK INLET, N.J. (See Section 22 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in Inlet, and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay, and 2jetties. WESTCHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 23 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and two turning basins. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (PART 1). (See Section 28 of Text) Hurricane barrier, dikes, levees, floodwalls, fill, placement, stoplog structures, stairways, ramps, road raising, fishing platforms, annual nourishment. Authorized beach erosion control aspect to be constructed independent of the hurricane flood protection aspect of the project. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 29 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and extension of 14 existing groins. ARDSLEY, N.Y. (See Section 32 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, levees, various drainage structures. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, NJ. (See Section 33 of Text) Approximately 7,000 feet of seawall and elevated pedestrian walkway. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 74, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Report on file in the Office. Chief of Engineers (report not printed) H. Doc. 455, 86th Cong., 2d sess. S. Ex. Doc. 35, 42d Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1872, p. 810 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 288, 89th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map.) H. Doc. 102, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong. 1st sess. FY 83 Supplemental Appropriations Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 215, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 332, 85th Cong., 2d sess., modified by Appr. Act for Energy and Water Dev. for FY 85. H. Doc. 215/89/1. 2-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 2-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 1976 Water Resources Development Act Section 101(a) 1965 Flood Control Act PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y., PHASE I (See Section 34 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. SAW MILL RIVER AT ELMSFORD AND GREENBURGH, N.Y. (See Section 35 of Text) Levees, floodwalls, channel improvement. H. Rpt. 94-1702 H. Doc. 94-465, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 2-30 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Completed: 1917 Cost: $1,463,014 TABLE 2-D TOTAL COSTS FOR EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 See Section Operation of Text Project Funds New York Rehabilitation Maintenance and Cost Total 8. Hudson River, Regular $38,560,839 - $3,685,725 $863,621 $43,110,185 N.Y. - Public Works 238,350 - - - 238,350 Emergency Relief 311,461 - - - 311,461 TOTAL $39,110,650 - $3,685,725 $863,621 $43,659,996 16. N.Y. and N.J. Regular $57,412,152 - $ 792,986 - $58,205,138 Channels Public Works 807,000 - - - 807,000 Emergency Relief 2,023,308 - - - 2,023,308 Contributed 7,712 - - - 7,712 TOTAL $60,250,172 - $792,986 - $61,043,158 TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (See Section 24 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1987 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore 345 b. Vessel 250 Air (helicopter) 1 Total 596 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities 546 b. Vessels 49 Total 595 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration 63 b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted 23 c. Permit not required or already under permit 297 d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney 3 a Cases pending as of October 1,1982 220 Total 606 2-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1987 NAME OF PROJECT NEW JERSEY Cheesequake Creek................................................. Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic Rivers. Raritan River ............................................................. Sandy Hook Bay at Leanardo............................ Shrewsbury River ................................................... NEW YORK * .Jan. 1987 Sep. 1987 * Browns Creek ................................................................................................................................................. Bronx River................................................. Coney Island Channel............................. Coney Island Creek.................................. Eastchester Creek...................................... East River...................................................... East Rockaway Inlet................................ Echo Bay Harbor.................................... Fire Island Inlet.......................................... Flushing Bay & Creek.............................. Glen Cove Creek........................................ Great South Bay......................................... Hudson River Channel........................... Huntington Harbor.................................. Jamaica Bay ................................................ Jones Inlet.................................................... Keyport Harbor ......................................... Lake Montauk Harbor ............................ Long Island Intracoastal Waterway. Mamaroneck Harbor .............................. Matawan Creek ......................................... Mattituck Harbor...................................... Milton Harbor ............................................. New Rochelle Harbor ........................... New York Harbor..................................... New York & New Jersey Channels.. Northport Harbor ..................................... Saugerties Harbor .................................... Westchester Creek .................................... . ..Sep. 1986 * ..Oct. 1986 * .May 1987 .Oct. 1986 - Mar, Jul 1987 * .Feb., Jul., Aug. 1987 Jun.. Jul. 1987 ......Mar. 1987 .....Apr. 1987 * ...... Jun., Jul. 1987 ...... Apr., Oct. 1987 ...A.p.r.. . 1987 ....... Mar. 1987 .......Aug., Sep., Oct. 1986 ...D.ec... 1986 ...A.p.r.. 1987 ...... Aug., Sep. 1987 ...D.e.c... 1987 .Dec. 1986-Jan., Mar. 1987 .Dec. 1986-Feb., Mar. 1987 * .1May 1987 * *Items for which no date is furnished reflects costs for gathering data only. Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1987 was $1,069,248. 2-32 TABLE 2-F DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED " ............................................................... ...................................................................................... ....................................................................... ....................................................................... .................................................................... ....................................................................... ....................................................................... I ~ NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept, 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Burlington Harbor Vt.1' Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt.1,2 Coney Island Channel, N.Y. East Chester Creek, N.Y. East River, N.Y. Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y.' Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt.1,2 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. Great Chazy River, N.Y. Great Kills Harbor, N.Y.1,2 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. Great South Bay, N.Y.' Greenport Harbor, N.Y.1' Harlem River, N.Y.1 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. Keyport Harbor, N.J. Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. Lemon Creek, N.Y. (Inactive)2,3 Little Neck Bay, N.Y.1 Mamaroneck harbor, N.Y. Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (Inactive)3 Matawan Creek, N.J. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. Milton Harbor, N.Y. Newtown Creek, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y.1,2 Northport Harbor, N.Y.' Orowoc Creek, N.Y.(Inactive)3 Otter Creek, Vt. Peconic River, N.Y.' Peekskill Harbor, N.Y.1' Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. Port Henry Harbor, N.Y.1' Port Jefferson Harbor Raritan River to Authur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J. Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y.' Sag Harbor, N.Y.1 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt.1,2 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, NJ.1,2 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y.1,2 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y.1 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. Shooters Island, N.Y. & N.J. Shrewsbury River, NJ. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. bridge across Arthur Kill, N.Y. 1966 1986 1909 1973 1985 1985 1953 1984 1986 1892 1972 1980 1962 1976 1974 1953 1969 1969 1980 1953 1985 1985 1970 1937 1969 1981 1948 1984 1981 1984 1986 1971 1956 1949 1977 1953 1951 1986 1985 1931 1977 1972 1895 1964 1917 1985 1967 1968 1948 1984 1983 1986 1973 2-33 706,414 9 4,590,20111 31,000 111,371 592,05 6 32,723,70012 64,584 2,102,905 7 29,760 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,30115 266,857 74,681 3,616,119 39,468 6,771,87027 91,081 4,545,753 40,475 76,065 6,621 1,741,21019 513,764 21,000 177,925 32 151,373 18 1,168,354 73,214 8 78,64423 60,254 25,000 19,400 198,415 433,470 69,40625 221,128 31 810,500 98,468 121,80526 3,125 508,936 56,470 81,905 33,828 124,57220 100,000 1,145,457 7,730,476 283,556 4,269,773 1,288 294,109 1,519,302 4,458,80012 21,571 4,352,089 59,760 115 255,291 292,919 88,029 457 1,290,469 21,720 480,777 76,49716 24,970,637 57,527 2,632,160 848,130 267,768 1,621 537 551,677 4,636 237,097 935,786 986,520 1,675,292 152,411 11,487 4,951 27,059 116,509 66,037 256,415 1,060,100 1,299 359,294 2,019,141 249 11,710 385 3,902,330 93,964 169,18128 5,364 1,104,940 21 2,473,888 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 2-G (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. 1,2 1895 7,000 13 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. 1 1974 69,836 431,199 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. 1 1953 18,174 36,312 Wappinger Creek, N.Y.1,2 1950 13,000 44,691 Washington Canal and South River, N.J.1 1953 206,116 212,827 30 Waycake Creek, N.J.2,3 1949 - 2,781 Woodbridge Creek, N.J.1 1953 48,823 178,398 1. Completed. 2. No commerce reported. 3. Awaiting local cooperation. 5. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 6. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 7. Excludes $419,879 for new work expended from contributed funds and $580,425 contributed funds other and $8,752 expended by the Worlds Fair Corp. for riprap protection of rubble dike. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,425,133 for rehabilitation. 11. Includes $77,182 for new work for previous projects. 12. Includes $6,187,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 13. Includes $4,813,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 14. Excludes $94,366 for rehabilitation. 15. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 16. Included $64,034 for maintenance of previous projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 18. Excludes $119,276 required contributed funds and $72,619 other contributed funds. 19. Excluded $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 27. Includes $668,820 public works funds. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $10,646 for previous projects. 32. Excludes $34,580 for new work from contributed funds. 2-34 - -- -- NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets 1959 - - Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 1981 18,044,667 217,899 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. 1979 8,880,000 - Perth Amboy, N.J. 1966 - - TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Construction to Sept. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass.1 1964 6,282,3072 - Bennington, Vt. 1974 670,000 - Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn.1,3 1959 363,515- East BarreDam, Winooski River, Vt.1 1963 2,878,334- East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) 1976 1,185,365- Elizabeth, NJ. 1985 54,165,128 - Fire Island to Montauk Point N.Y. 1984 12,441,8646 143,753 Herkimer, N.Y. 1973 1,206,9819 - Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y.'1 1956 1,064,626 - Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams 4,5,6 1939 - - Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt. 1,3 1965 238,169 - North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. 1968 15,412,1027 - North Ellenville, N.Y. 1978 3,900,650 - Rahway, N .J. 1971 973,1426 - Rahway, South Branch, N.J. 1979 15,863,723 - Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. 1981 11,061,256 262 Rosendale, N.Y. 1975 3,684,966 - Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt.4 1963 211,015 - Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. 1976 109,702 - South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y.1 1967 1,564,976 - South Ellenville, N.Y. 1984 289,702 - South Orange, N.J. 1981 6,857,484 - Staten Island, N.Y. 1983 644,998 - Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y.1, 3 1959 142,075 - Waterbury Reservoir, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1976 886,769 8,200 Winooski River, Vt.1 1940 5,897,427 - Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. 1970 1,549,929 - Yonkers, N.Y. 1984 13,641,77110 2-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 1. Completed. 6. Includes $3,788,341 contributed funds. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under otheer contributed funds. Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized on August 4. Inactive. 5,1977. 5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. 10. Includes $622,871 contributed funds. TABLE 2-J SURVEYS (See Section 41 of Text) Study Class Cost Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Beach Erosion Studies Special Studies1 Total Surveys $1,154,650 4,478,207 49,998 371,269 6,054,124 1Includes review of Authorized Projects, Inspection of Dams, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, Planning Assistance to States, International Water Studies Investigations, Review of FERC Licenses and Preconstruction Engineering and Design. TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (See Section 42 of Text) Studies and Services Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $41,624 Flood Plain Management Unit 61,934 Total 103,558 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 43 of Text) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds and Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance Bronx River, N.Y.4 ,6 Brown's Creek, N.Y. Cheesequake Creek, N.J.4,6 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 4 ,6 East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y. Elizabeth, NJ. Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. 1981 1980 1953 1952 1963 1948 1966 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 3503,96913 60,481 165,882 1,159,94612 33,976 8 40,000 69,489 100,000 60,481 165,882 4,11 10,000 829,421 1,947,8536 505,369 30,675 1,622 - 59,391 2,455 2-36 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-M (Continued) DEAUITHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds and Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenance Hudson River, NY( to Albany4,18 1982 Aug.1982 - - - - Huntington Harbor, N.Y. 1953 Aug. 1977 49,035 68,5814,5,14 19,546 51,566 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. 1947 Aug.1977 - - - - Lamoille River, Vt. 1939 Aug.1977 49,837 49,837 - - Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.1.J6 1982 Aug. 1982 - - - - New York and New Jersey 1982 Aug. 1982 - - - - Channels4,17 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. 2,3 1967 Aug.1977 433,470 433,4704 - 441,656 Proctor, Otter Creek, Basin, Vt.6,7 1937 Aug. 1977 - - - - Rahway River, 7,9 1948 Aug. 1982 - 37,0004 - 307 Raritan River, N.J.4 6 1981 Aug. 1982 1,551,470 1,617,4701s 66,000 10,113,903 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y.6 ,7 1959 Aug. 1982 7,000 7,000 - - Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive)6 1888 Aug. 1977 - 70,5004 - 235 Ticonderoga River, N.Y.1,6 1895 Nov. 1983 167,760 16,500 - 1,260 Waterbury (1941 Act), Vt.7,6 1951 Nov. 1981 9,253 9,253 - - Waterford, N.Y.6,7 1939 Aug. 1982 - - - - Westchester Creek, N.Y. 1981 Aug. 1982 175,933 175,933 - 2,921,311 1. No commerce reported. 10. Under Section 12 Public Law 93-251. 2. Completed. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 3. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. 4. Uncomplete portion deauthorized. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 5. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from 14. Includes $19,546 expended from contributed funds. contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Inactive. 16. 1912 authorization. 7. Entire project deauthorized. 17. 1935 authorization. 8. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 18. 1910 construction dikes. 9. Deferred. TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 (See Section 27 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 CONTINUE RECONNANISSANCE REPORT Belford Harbor, N.J. $5,000 2-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 2-0 SECTION 103 (See Section 31 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 CONTINUE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Asharoken Beach, Huntington, J.Y. $10,000 TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 (See Section 39 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 CONTINUE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Great Chazy River, Champlain, N.Y. $10,000 Hackensack River, N. Milford, N.J. 2,000 McGregory Brook, Peekskill, N.J. 7,500 CONTINUE DETAILED PROJECT STUDIES Missisquoi River, Vt. $16,600 COMPLETE DETAILED PROJECT STUDIES Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. $16,500 Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. 5,900 COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y. $9,000 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 (See Section 40 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Green Brook, Somerset, N.J. $5,000 COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Green Brook, Green Brook, N.J. $21,900 2-38 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small Part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage Navigation Page 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ ........................ 3-2 2. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ........ .................. 3-2 3. Cohansey River, NJ ....... ................. 3-3 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ ....................... 3-3 5. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ ........... 3-4 6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea.................... 3-4 7. Delaware River in Vicinity of Camden, NJ............................ 3-5 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE ............. 3-6 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE........ .................. 3-6 10. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD ............ 3-7 11. Maurice River, NJ.......................... 3-8 12. Mispillion River, DE....................... 3-8 13. Murderkill River, DE ...... ................. 3-9 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization............................. 3-9 15. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway .......... 3-9 16. Salem River, NJ .......................... 3-10 17. Schuylkill River, PA ........................ 3-11 18. Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE ...................... 3-11 19. Wilmington Harbor, DE .................. 3-12 Beach Erosion Control Page 20. Shoreline Erosion Control.................... 3-12 21. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ............... 3-13 basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. Flood Control Local Protection Page 22. Beltzville Lake, PA........................3-13 23. Blue Marsh Lake, PA......................3-13 24. Delaware Coast Protection, DE ............. 3-14 25. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....... ....................... 3-14 26. Emergency Bank Protection................ 3-14 27. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA ................. 3-14 28. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ............................. 3-15 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...........................3-15 30. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ........... 3-16 31. Prompton Lake, PA .................... 3-16 32. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys .................................. 3-16 33. National Emergency Preparedness.......... 3-16 General Investigations Page 34. Surveys ................................... 3-16 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 3-16 TABLES TABLE 3-A TABLE 3-B TABLE 3-C TABLE 3-D TABLE 3-E TABLE 3-F TABLE 3-G Page Cost and Financial Statement......3-17 Authorizing Legislation........... 3-20 Other Authorized Navigation Projects............... 3-25 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .......... 3-27 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..................3-27 Multiple Purpose Project Including Power.................. 3-28 Deauthorized Projects ............ 3-28 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 NAVIGATION 1. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications are to be constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the existing groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction would be placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and would be stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations would be placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1985) Federal share is $11,000,000 and non-Federal is $25,800,000. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included velocity readings, subsurface explorations, surveys and tide gaging. New Work, contract: Initiate construction of new South Jetty. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance and surveys. Work also included maintenance dredging by U. S. Government Side Casting Dredge FRY from 7 October 1986 to 31 October 86 removing 25,245 cubic yards of material at a cost of $103,267; and from 12 February 87 to 14 April 87 removing 157,290 cubic yards of material at a cost of $282,100. There was maintenance dredging by Dredge CURRITUCK from 28 May 1987 to 4 July 1987 removing 96,990 cubic yards of material at a cost of $169,400. New Work, hired labor: Engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 2. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94-641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document for Cape May Inlet to Lower Township would provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Project estimate costs (October 1985) is Federal, $17,900,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on 31 May 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Beach surveys, planemetric mapping, and groin surveys. New work, hired labor: Work included benefit reevaluation. 3. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ Location: Rises in Salem County, NJ, flows southerly and southwesterly 27 miles through Cumberland County, and empties into Delaware Bay about 62 miles below Philadelphia, PA.(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218). Previous projects: For details see page 1785, Annual Report for 1915, and page 348, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from that depth in Delaware Bay through a neck of land at the mouth and within the river to the south side of Glass Street in Bridgeton, 19 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide to Broad Street; and thence 75 feet wide to Commerce Street Bridge, 19.25 miles above the mouth; and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 800 feet long formed by widening the channel on the south side to a maximum width of 250 feet just below Glass Street. Section included in project is about 19.5 miles long. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. Extreme tidal range is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Completed project cost $110,756 for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Existing project was completed in 1939. Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for required maintenance. Terminal facilities: Twenty wharves, of which 16 are at Bridgeton and 4 at Greenwhich. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included cultural resource and maintenance dredging by Paz Brothers, Inc. from 1 October 1986 to 9 December 1986 removing a total of 114,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $400,000. Maintenance, hired labor: Work supervision and administration. included 4. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942.(For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. 3-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included subsurface testing and surveys. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, hydrology studies, environmental and sand bypassing studies, study management, engineering and design, and plans and specifications. Also maintenance dredging by Dredge CURRITUCK from 30 July 1987 to 16 August 1987 removing a total of 14,432 cubic yards of material at a cost of $71,450. 5. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA, AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous projects: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966) Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, environmental monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 6. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous projects: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938 Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 oi the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce.(For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included lease and general maintenance of equipment, disposal area well testing and surveys. There was snag clearing maintenance of disposal area, rock removal, aerial mapping, and construction of bentonite trench at Penns Grove disposal area. There was maintenance dredging by Norfolk Dredging Company from 1 October 1986 to 20 December 1986 removing a total of 2,058,271 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,087,406; and by American Dredging Company from 12 June 1987 to 30 September 1987 removing 1,300,000 at a cost of $2,000,000. Also, from 26 December 1986 to 4 March 1987 unclassified excavation was done by American Dredging Company removing 9,000 square yards of material at a cost of $1,844,968. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, disposal area well testing, short nose sturgeon studies, and, environmental coordination at Penns Grove. There was also, preparation of environmental document, BCR update, National Park drainage, construction of dikes, sluices and pipelines, disposal ditching, and plans and specifications on maintenance dredging. Aerial mapping, design of dike for Artificial Island and Killcohook, disposal area management planning, design of disposal area handling basin, and supervision and administration was done. Work included maintenance dredging by U.S. Government Hopper Dredge MCFARLAND from 24 October 1986 to 11 November 1986 removing 60,441 cubic yards of material at a cost of $516,906 and from 11 August 1987 to 17 September 1987 removing 428,765 at a cost of $1,653,078. 7. DELAWARE RIVER IN VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ Location: Camden, NJ, on east bank of Delaware River, is directly opposite city of Philadelphia, PA. It is about 51 miles above mouth of river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) Previous projects: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910. No work was done on this project, for further details, see page 321, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: The existing project which is a modification to the Delaware River from Philadelphia to the Sea project was adopted as House Document No. 63-1120 in 1919 and modified by House Document No. 70-111 in 1930 and House Document No. 77-353 in 1945. It provides for dredging in front of Camden to a depth of 18 feet from Cooper Point to Berkley Street and 30 feet from the latter point to Newton Creek, with the depth increased to 37 feet in front of the Beckett Street marine terminal. These depths extend from the ship channel in Delaware River to a line parallel with and 50 feet distant from the established pierhead line. The project length is about four miles. Project depths are well maintained in 30-foot depth section of channel. Work was initiated to dredge the project depth of 37 feet in front of the Beckett Street Marine Terminal in FY 1987. Estimated cost for New Work (October 1985) is Federal, $3,220,000 and non-Federal, $1,545,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. 3-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: A Local Cooperation Agreement for the 37 foot project was executed on 28 April 1987. Terminal facilities: There are 55 piers, wharves, and docks near project area along Delaware River waterfront at Camden and Gloucester, NJ, including 3 oil terminals on Petty Island. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included initiating dredging of the 37 foot project. New work, hired labor: Work included plans and specifications, preparation of draft and final LCA, and supervision and administration. 8. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No.1219.) Previous projects: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included aerial mapping and repair to South Jetty. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included BCR update, hydrologic monitoring, and engineering and design. 9. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence through marshes back of Cape Henlopen to Lewes River; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous projects: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge at Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance dredging by Garden State Dredging Company from 20 December 1986 to 18 March 1987 removing 24,318 cubic yards of material at a cost of $148,636. Removal of sheet pile jetty at Delaware Bay entrance was accomplished. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included survey on maintenance dredging, plans and specifications, and supervision and administration. 10. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE, AND MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous projects: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is $139,574,000 (October 1985). Total estimated cost of new work includiig original purchase is $147,534,000. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954).(See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) 3-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16,1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included finalization of sludge monitoring document, environmental monitoring, painting of Chesapeake City Bridge and St. Georges Bridge, repair to 5th St Bridge and night lighting. Installation of computer on Reedy Point Bridge was accomplished. There was also maintenance dredging by Norfolk Dredging Company from 1 October 1986 to 23 December 1986 and 15 July 1987 to 30 September 1987 removing a total of 3,418,252 at a cost of $6,009,878. Rehabilitation, design memo, and repairs on Summit Bridge. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included maintenance dredging by U.S Government Hopper Dredge MCFARLAND 11 November 1986 to 15 December 1986 removing a total of 418,961 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,739,858. There was also dredging from 29 June 1987 to 10 August 1987 removing a total of 333,347 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,739,845. Work included general maintenance and design of disposal areas and bridges, maintenance of rip-rap, roadways, canal banks, night lighting, building and grounds, banks, auxiliary roads and traffic controlled TV. Also accomplished was environmental drainage of disposal areas, lease of equipment, bridge inspections, trash removal, engineering surveys, environmental monitoring, advance maintenance dredging and commercial activity studies, Summit Bridge Deck overlay. Pipelines were submerged, plans and specifications accomplished. Sub-surface testing of disposal areas, Reedy Point Bridge computer installation, repair of 5th St. Bridge, engineering and design, and supervision and administration were completed. 11. MAURICE RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Gloucester County, NJ flows southerly and southwesterly 33 miles through Cumberland County, and empties into Delaware Bay through Maurice Cove about 87 miles below Philadelphia, PA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1218.) Previous projects: Adopted by the River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1982, and modified in 1890 and 1892. For further details, see page 1785, Annual Report for 1915. Existing project: The existing project adopted as HD 59-644 in 1910 and modified as HD 73-275 in 1935. This provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay across Maurice Cove to the mouth; thence a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide to the fixed bridge at Millville, a distance of twenty one and one-half miles, including a turning basin 7 feet deep at Millville. The total length of the section included in the project is about 24 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean high water. Work remaining to be done is the deepening of the entrance channel from 7 feet to 8 feet, and the dredging of a channel 7 feet deep, 60 feet wide and 650 feet long in the upper end of the project. The entrance channel portion of the project has been made inactive due to a problem with local cooperation, whereas the unconstructed portion at the upper end of the channel was deauthorized 2 November 1979, under Section 12, PL 93-251. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to September 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are numerous wharves and piers at the several towns along the river. Public wharves are located at Millville, Mauricetown, Dorchester, and Bivalve. Several boat yards with railways and repair and construction facilities are also located along the river. Most of the wharves at Millville and Bivalve have railroad connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included engineering and design. 12. MISPILLION RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent and Sussex Counties, DE, flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen.(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous projects: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water; in October 1964 from 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Milford, 6.1 feet. For details see page 243 of Annual Report for 1957. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complies with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included maintenance dredging, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 13. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21,52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62d Congress 3d Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance dredging by Garden State Dredging Company from 1 October 1986 to 30 November 1986 removing a total of 17,770 cubic yards of material at a cost of $137,320. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included maintenance dredging, plans and specifications, and supervision and administration. 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant To Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Name of Project Cost to 30 Sep 1987 Detail Project Reports Schuylkill River-Fairmount Park, PA Reconnaissance Reports Gardners Basin, NJ Wills Hole Thorofare, Pt. Pleasant, NJ Plans and Specifications Wilmington Harbor, DE $1,375 $6,287 $4,624 $61,532 15. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. 3-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Estimated cost for new work is $71X549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525,79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240,82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead- Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey -donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvement. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included Pt. Pleasant bulkhead coating and Phase 2, bank stabilization of Cape May South, repair bulkhead of fence, field survey of Cape May Canal, lease equipment. There was maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company from 24 March 1987 to 28 September 1987 removing a total of 250,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $944,333. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, BCR update, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 16. SALEM RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles , emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. For further details see page 1784, Annual Report for 1915; page 349 of Annual Report for 1924; and page 346 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware River across Salem Cove to the mouth, thence 100 feet wide to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River at Salem, 2 1/4 miles above the mouth. It also provides for a cutoff to eliminate a large horseshoe bend between the mouth and Salem. The total length of the section included in the project is about 4 miles. The mean tidal range is 5.4 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. The estimate of cost for new work is $51,825 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $51,825 contributed by local interests. The portion of the project comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The existing project is about 64 percent completed. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In January 1961, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 12.0 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 0.9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H.Doc. 110, 68th Cong. 1st Sess.). The latest published map is in the document. Section 859 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 feet. Local cooperation: The existing project required local interest contribute 50 percent of the estimated costs of new work and that a right-of-way for the proposed cutoff shall be conveyed to the United States free of cost. The contributions thus far made provided the right-of-way for the cutoff and 50 percent of the cost of the 12-foot channel up to a point 225 feet above the county (Penns Neck) highway bridge, amounting to $51,825. Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, NJ. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included environmental monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 17. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, environmental monitoring, and engineering and design. 18. WATERWAY FROM INDIAN RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH BAY, DE Location: In southeasterly part of Sussex County, connects Rehoboth Bay with Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous projects: None Existing project: This provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from water of 6-foot depth in Rehoboth Bay to water of the same depth in Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.7 miles. The mean tidal range in the vicinity of the project in Rehoboth Bay is 0.5 foot; in Indian River Bay 0.9 foot. The extreme tidal range is from 1.5 feet below mean low water to about 2.5 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $90,908, exclusive of $20,000 contributed by local interests. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act Cong., 1st Sess.) The latest published map is in the project jocument. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total zosts for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: The act authorizing the project provides that local interests shall give assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will 3-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, initial work and subsequent maintenance when and as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds; and (c) make a cash contribution of $20,000 toward the construction of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were approved on February 27, 1956. Conditions of local cooperation have been complied with expect that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for subsequent maintenance as required. Terminal facilities: There are no terminal or transfer facilities in the area that are fully open to public use. However, existing facilities that are available on a limited basis are adequate for the present demand, and can be expected to expand to meet future needs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: BCR review. 19. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous projects: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River shipchannel; thence decreasing a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No.4; and thence 7 feet and 100 feet wide for a distance of of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 35 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 approved channel and turning basin deepened from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987. See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included mixing zone contract, water quality and shad monitoring, cultural resource investigation, lease of equipment, construction of dikes and sluices, construction of disposal area, subsurface testing, investigation of sunken vessel, and USGS Stream Gaging. There was maintenance dredging by American Dredging Company from 25 April 1987 to 17 June 1987 removing a total of 520,864 cubic yards of material at a cost of $494,299. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, disposal area and dredge monitoring, environmental coordination for reef design, predeployment for reef, installation and maintenance of Stream Gaging by USGS, ditching, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Beach Erosion Control: 20. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION Location: Demonstration projects were undertaken at a total of 16 sites nationwide, 6 of which are located in the Delaware Bay and include Pickering Beach, Kitts Hummock, Slaughter Bowers Beach, Broadkill Beach, and Lewes, Delaware. The latter three sites were only monitored as there are presently Federal and State projects in progress. Existing project: Section 54 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974 authorized a nationwide, 5 year program to test and evaluate low cost shoreline erosion control measures, both structural and vegetative, which can be implemented by individual private property owners. The emphasis of the program was not to solve individual problems, so much as to 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT explore the effectiveness of various ways to control erosion at different types of shorelines, and provide this information to private and public landowners. The construction and evaluation at all sites are completed and information dissemination has been started. Development and dissemination of public information guide books. As such we are the repository of these guide books. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Dissemination of reports as requested by OCE. 21. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Name of project Cost to 30 Sep 1987 Detailed Project Reports North Shore-Indian River Inlet South Shore-Indian River Inlet $ 7,428 12,308 Flood Control 22. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included recreation safety program, USGS Stream Gaging equipment, snow survey program, repair and maintenance of specific gages, water quality testing and monitoring, bulkhead water quality monitoring, monumentation survey, and repair outlet channel side slope. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, safety inspection, dam safety training, USGS Stream Gaging, installation of WCDS equipment. Work also included reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring, repair and extend drainage ditch, clean trash rack, test and evaluation of emergency bulkhead, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 23. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA(See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control.(For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance, recreation safety program, sewage treatment plant, drill well for recreation area, sewage vacuum system, USGS Stream 3-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Gaging, snow survey and NOAA Weather Service Cooperation. Work also included maintenance and repair of specific gages, water quality testing and monitoring, installation of computer terminal and peripherals, lawn maintenance, janitorial services, trash removal, replacements of piezometers, purchase and repair of water equipment, and cost incurred for Lower Heidelberg Township police department. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir and recreation area, annual safety inspection, instrumentation and surveillance, installation of WCDS equipment, reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring. There was joint use of water facilities, erosion control, repair access road, plans and specifications on treatment plant roof, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Also incurred were costs for seasonal employment at recreation area. 24. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a plan of improvement which consists of the construction of dunes and beach fill; the construction of bulkheads at Rehoboth and Dewey beaches; periodic nourishment of the beaches; placement of sand fences; planting dune grass; and maintenance' and replacement of existing structures.(For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong. 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1985) $11,600,000 includes $2,700,000 required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Other work undertaken has been engineering and design associated for the remaining portion of the project. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included subsurface testing. New work, hired labor: Work included planning management and engineering and design. 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1987 Reconnaissance Reports Palmerton, PA Plans and Specifications Delaware River, Port Jervis, NY Pennypack Creek, Hatboro, PA Construction Poquessing Creek, Bucks Co. PA $ 21,097 $ 91,552 $ 1,164 $507,279 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $ 177,448 for disaster preparedness. 26. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, 79-526. Darby Creek-Lansdowne Borough, PA Construction Delaware River, Ft. Mifflin, PA Reconnaissance Report Plans & Specifications Perkiomen Creek - Berks County, PA Construction Ridley Creek - Philadelphia, PA Reconnaissance Report Plans & Specifications Public Law $117,522 7,500 37,242 40,519 7,500 31,288 27. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA(See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA) 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 587,79th Cong.,2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522,87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 263 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 180,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 2,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1985) is $14,700,000 including $100,300,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is now underway. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1987.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1982. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included general maintenance, analysis mapping, USGS Stream Gaging and snow surveys, NOAA Weather Service, water quality testing and monitoring, and monumentation of surveys. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir and recreation facilities, instrumentation and surveillance of reservoir, safety inspection, initial reservoir filling plan, emergency planning, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, installation of WCDS equipment, reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 28. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and'Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Federal cost of new work was $ 4,064,510. Non-Federal funds not required. Project completed in June 1960. Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included instrumentation survey, USGS Stream Gaging, NOAA Weather Service, repair specific gages, and water control data equipment. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of the reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, safety inspection, dam safety plan, inundation mapping, dam break analysis, safety training, water quality and data collection, reservoir regulation data collection, cut and reshape ditches, supervision and administration, and engineering and design. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION DATES Lehigh River at Allentown, PA 6 November 1986 19 May 1987 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA 13 November 1986 27 May 1987 Delaware River at East Branch, NY 5 November 1986 15 May 1987 Rancocas Creek at Mount Holly, NJ 14 November 1986 26 May 1987 Chester River at Chester, PA 10 November 1986 15 May 1987 Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection 23 & 25 September 1987 3-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $9,555. Total costs were $114,437. 30. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-Federal levees was conducted at a cost of $2,233 at the following site: Stroudsburg, East Stroudsburg, PA Hawley, PA 2 June 1987 3 June 1987 31. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles "above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1985) is $43,300,000 including $5,200,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was advanced engineering and design. Local cooperation: Prbject modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification.: Preconstruction planning has resumed Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included instrumentation survey, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, NOAA Weather Service, repair and maintenance of specific gages, water quality monitoring and testing, and installation of seismograph. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, periodic inspection, dam safety training, disposal area break analysis, reservoir regulation data collection, water quality monitoring and testing, cut and reshape ditch, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 32. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Murderkill Mispillion Salem River L & R Canal Date Survey Conducted 15 April 1987 14-17 April 1987 18 February 1987 22 September 1987 (Partial) 24 June 1987 33. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $117,822. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 34. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $906,053 for navigation studies; $149,716 for flood control studies: $1,154,110 for special studies: a total of $2,209,879. 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $202,237. 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 SEPT. 30, 1987 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ 3. Cohansey River, NJ (Regular Funds) 4. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River Between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Delaware River PA, NJ and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds)* 7. Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ (Regular Funds)* (Contributed Funds) 8. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 210,000 206,975 670,000 694,337 (3,000) 15,951 112,000 112,554 298,125 298,476 15,000 3,022 289,000 286,860 66,000 65,367 (1000) (1,385) 3,328,000 3,321,857 110,000 61,094 515,000 509,472 1,434,000 1,424,916 266,000 264,703 3,005,000 3,009,484 4,425,000 1,442,663 619,000 624,227 1,992,000 226,659 150,000 130,150 132,000 137,808 158,000 151,386 261,000 260,475 5,208,849 2,162,603 11,144,135 11,141,552 2,292,000 526,659 300,000 280,150 146,75620 146,75620 2,404,931 2,401,022 879,275 879,275 2,814,507 2,806,210 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,000 8 150,0008 72,147,8001 72,147,8001 33,102,8602 33,100,6742 15,000 15,000 57,879,8723 57,879,8723 21,533,300 25,051,286 14,309,000 14,655,000 338,599,1684 21,639,766 25,051,908 14,287,846 14,662,843 338,567,6484 - - - 508,324 - - - 508,324 - - - 1,610,000 2,074,906's - - - 1,173,708 1,638,6141s - - - 362,962 - - - 362,799 - - - 970,000 985,000 - - - 708,330 723,330 - - - 511,2106 - - - 511,210 4,000 22,000 64,000 30,000 2857923 4,171 20,617 65,196 30,145 2,857,881 - - - 1,323,775 - - - 1,323,775 - - - 210,000 - - - 210,000 3-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 3-A (continued) COSTAND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 SEPT. 30, 1987 9. Inland Waterway New Work Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) 11. Maurice River, NJ (Regular Funds)* 12. Mispillion River, DE (Regular Funds) 13. Murderkill River, DE (Regular funds) 14. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Salem River, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Schuylkill River, PA (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 30,000 32,572 19,000 16,346 208,000 208,523 335,800 338,986 10,488,275 12,068,000 11,129,053 21,925,400 10,666,460 11,940,091 11,295,557 21,846,350 - - - 15,000 - - - 14,943 11,000 11,000 159,000. 160,280 1,121,000 1,152,487 1,241,000 1,244,884 7,500 7,500 111,000 110,600 979,000 981,788 1,693,000 1,641,466 211,000 210,107 153,000 149,713 2,563,300 2,560,237 125,000 125,433 37,000 34,758 253,491 41,000 43,653 2,533,000 2,478,900 40,000 36,000 104,000 97,895 561,514 561514 1,867,778 1,868,833 60,000 60,000 132,535,5926 132,532,6006 181,490,1607 181,365,7127 6,095,000 6,065,412 143,98416 143,98416 162,050 161,993 385,34817 385,34817 1,618,566 1,608,094 253,491 37,630 37,630 1,309,355 1,308,720 71,5499 71,5499 24,678,87210 24,621,48010 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 107,63419 107,634 1,403,00422 1,398,78922 51,825 51,825 3,334,00711 3,334,00711 2,6171,034 26,164,714 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 SEPT. 30, 1987 17. Waterway from New Work Indian River Inlet Approp. - - - 90,908 to Rehoboth Bay, Cost - - - 90,908 DE (Regular Maint. Funds) Approp. - - - 18,000 265,497 Cost - - - 12,336 253,833 18. Wilmington New Work Harbor, DE Approp. - - - 1,954,72512 (Regular Cost - - - 1,954,72512 Funds) Maint. Approp. 2,006,000 3,226,600 4,207,700 13,826,200 48,831,664 Cost 2,069,777 3,215,739 4,217,572 13,768,314 48,765,444 (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. - - - 60,000 Cost - - - 60,000 19. Beltzville Lake, New Work PA Approp. - - - 100 22,931,932 (Regular Cost - - - 700 22,931,830 Funds) Maint Approp. 655,800 521,000 515,000 617,500 5,935,675 Cost 713,170 521,407 496,875 635,506 5,933,770 20. Blue Marsh New Work Lake, PA Approp. - - - 63,180,300 (Regular Cost 3,212 5,479 (1551) (1730) 63,165,988 Funds) Maint. Approp. 1,002,200 1,186,000 1,053,000 1,106,322 7,668,522 Cost 1,068,725 1,167,543 1,058,095 1,122,178 7,644,812 21. Delaware Coast New Work Protection Approp 775,000 200,000 550,000 3,003,95321 (Regular Funds) Cost 455,165 120,542 148,701 9,080 2,205,97221 Maint. Approp. 88,000 - - 215,350 Cost 88,000 - - 215,350 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. (921) - - 1,033,473 Cost 11,538 614,809 1,052 1,033,473 22. Francis E. New Work Walter Dam, PA Approp. - - - 11,503,432's13 (Regular Cost - 1,460 - 11,503,43213 Funds) Maint. Approp. 383,700 422,000 460,000 474,500 5,468,021 Cost 388,882 421,975 449,970 465,297 5,437,920 * Total Adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. ** For Construction, General funds only on legislative Phase I AE&D, or support work for Phase II AE&D. 1. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) to Delaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under 1954 modification. 2. Included $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000 Jobs Bill Funds. 3. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 4. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 5. Excludes $10,000 for previous project. 6. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 7. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Jobs Bill funds. 8. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 9. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 10. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department funds expended for maintenance. 11. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 12. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 13. Includes $40,000 appropriated and expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 14. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excludes $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 15. Excludes $219,500 expenditures under AE&D. 16. Incl. $43,000 New Work funds expended on previous projects. 17. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 18. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 19. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 20. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 22. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition survey in fiscal year 1957, $1,792 operation and maintenance cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous project. 3-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 3-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 SEPT. 30, 1987 23. General Edgar New Work Jadwin Dam and Approp. - - - 4,073,105 Resevoir, PA Cost - - - 4,073,105 (Regular Maint. Funds) Approp. 74,200 243,000 222,000 155,500 1,768,064 Cost 88,156 242,742 210,796 156,995 1,758,027 24. Prompton Lake New Work PA Approp. - - - 4,609,48314 Cost - - - 4,609,48314 Maint. Approp. 298,000 353,000 287,000 296,000 2,996,162 Cost 306,608 348,359 295,841 282,282 2,980,006 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 2, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 2, 1907 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 2 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; maintenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep over entire project. Channel 12 feet deep to Glass Street, thence 8 feet to Commerce Street with turning basin. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 5 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73d Con.,2d sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85, 74th Con.,2d sess.1 H. Doc.358, 79th Cong 2d sess. H. Doc.236, 99th Cong 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 WRDA of 1986 H. Doc.645, 59th Cong 1st sess. Senate Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc.388, 59th Cong 2nd sess. H. Doc.262, 77th Cong 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 19352 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Sept 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19353 June 20, 19384 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Mar 2, 1945 Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200, 13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. DELAWARE RIVER IN VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ (See Section 7 of Text) Located in Camden, NJ on east bank of Delaware River directly opposite City of Philadelphia, PA. Project will permit ready access and egress of deep draft vessels transporting general cargo and coal exports to and from Beckett Street Terminal. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong. 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3d sess. H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess.1 Specified in Act. H.Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2d sess.' H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong. 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc 353, 77th Cong. 1st, Sess. 3-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 3-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 July 25, 1912 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 7, 1939 Sept 3, 1954 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 Sep 3, 1954 July 13, 1982 A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 8 of text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 9 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties.6 INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 10 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extension of south jetty. Extension of north jetty. 3-22 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 2st sess.' H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong. 2d sess. H.Doc.275, 73d Cong. 2d sess.1. H. Doc. 678, 62d Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 83 74th Cong., 2d sessi S. Doc 229, 81st Cong., 2d sess' H.Ex.Doc 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. (See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 1, 1954 Nov 17, 1986 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 NEW JRSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 15 of text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ, to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000 foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 16 of Text) A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant Extension of project to Clements Bridge. A channel of 20-foot depth SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 17 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. H.Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 525 79th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA of 1986 H.Doc 217, 70th Cong. 1st Sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15 73d Cong., 1st sess.' WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sess 1 A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project 2d sessi channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. May 17, 1950 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 July 1960 WATERWAY FROM INDIAN RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH BAY, DE (Section 18 of Text) Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from water of 6-foot depth in Rehoboth Bay to water of the same depth in Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 19 of Text) Depths of 21,10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Approved channel and turning basin deepened from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. H.Doc. 304, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Section 107 3-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 3-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 30, 19358 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Oct 17, 1940 Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 22 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 11/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (Section 24 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. Project is modified to authorize the construction of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (Section 27 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir Provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (Section 28 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment. PROMPTON LAKE, PA (Section 29 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Contains latest published maps. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935 Also Public Works Administration. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Chanel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28,1935,under Emergency Relief Administration. 3-24 H. Doc .522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 90, 90th Cong 2nd sess. WRDA of 1986 Sec. 869 July 14, 1960 Nov 17, 1986 1. 2. 3. 4. PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Completed Projects Status Report for Construction Maintenance Active Projects Absecon Creek, NJ1 COMPLETED 1969 11,935 167,682* Absecon Inlet, NJ COMPLETED 1984 534,209 2,939,312 Appoquinimink River, DE COMPLETED 1934 36,973 41,270 Big Timber Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1962 58,6652 53,916* Broadkill River, DE COMPLETED 1976 68,228 243,641 Cedar Creek, Sussex City, DE COMPLETED - 256,100 - Cooper River, NJ' COMPLETED 1962 33,102 379,244* Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ COMPLETED - 256,624 - Double Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1912 7,800 _ Harbor of Refuge COMPLETED 1985 516,230 1,104,769 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay COMPLETED 1981 168,41213 98,36014 Little River, DE COMPLETED 1980 12,016 288,310 Mantua Creek, NJ COMPLETED 1966 169,687 339,340* **Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA COMPLETED 1968 128,20316 54,601 Oldmans Creek, NJ COMPLETED 1941 31,188 32,125 **Pepper Creek, DE1 COMPLETED 1965 138,0945 1,797* Raccoon Creek, NJ COMPLETED 1981 83,66515 341,734 St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon"" COMPLETED - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and entrance at mouth - - - Manasquan River, NJ COMPLETED 1986 8,006,80718,20 3,417,55719 Murderkill River, NJ COMPLETED 1986 37,630 1,265,067 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA' COMPLETED 1955 4,291,810 _ Smyrna River, DE 1949 -- Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing" COMPLETED - 198,844 197,327 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. SEE TABLE 3-G - - Toms River, NJ 1950 -- Channel 5 feet deep' COMPLETED - 10,050 33,311 Channel 12 feet deep8 SEE TABLE 3-G - - - Tuckerton Creek, NJ COMPLETED 1986 60,242 638,860 Woodbury Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1940 27,09312 56,474 For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Inactive Projects Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alloway Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE 1975 87,594 - Chester River, PA3 INACTIVE 1931 6,000 1139 Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - Goshen Creek, NJ 1 INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA16 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE 1 6 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - Leipsic River, DE' INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, NJ' 4 INACTIVE -' 15,048- Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE 1948 -- 3-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Cont For Last Full Report See Annual Cost to September 30, 1987 Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report for Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon"1'1 - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth9 DEFERRED - - - Completed. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. Includes $6,000 new work and $63 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st Sess. Maintenance assumed by local interests. Harbor not now required by commerce. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. Deferred Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous projects. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. xcludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. Includes $555,600 for previous project. ***OPrpoejreacttiso nau athnodr imzeadin bteyn tahnec eC hfiigeuf re includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. of Engineers. 3-26 TABLE 3-C 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ ACTIVE* 1978 314,400 - Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ ACTIVE* 1978 387,882 Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ ACTIVE* - - Absecon Island* ACTIVE -- Brigantine Island* ACTIVE - - Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ ACTIVE * 1978 314,400 - Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ ACTIVE * 1978 387,882 - Hereford Inlet* ACTIVE - - Long Beach Island* ACTIVE - - Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ ACTIVE * - -- Atlantic City, NJ INACTIVE 1972 2,083,289 1 Ocean City, NJ INACTIVE 1969 395,8313 1 Stone Harbor, NJ INACTIVE 1961 - 1 Barnegat Light, NJ DEFERRED 1964 70,908 1 Cape May City, NJ DEFERRED 1961 22,9572 1 Long Beach Island, NJ DEFERRED 1964 40,665 1 North Wildwood, NJ DEFERRED 1961 - 1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE4 1965 326,116 1 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, NJ DEFERRED 1961 -- 1 1. Operation and maintenance required under Public 3. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and Works Acceleration Program for by law to be assumed by $272,766 Federal participation expended under local interests. Extension of five existing groins Extension of five existing groins completed 11 May 1964. completed 4. This project was included in and modified by the 2. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Delaware Coast project. Works funds expended for extension * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 -1 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 - Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 -1 Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - Tamaqua, PA4 ACTIVE 1984 524,373 - Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 - Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. New project deferred. 3. $1,316,464 expended for pre-construction planning only. 4. Transferred to Baltimore Dist. in 1982. 3-27 1. 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 3-F MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Tocks Island Lake, PA, NJ and NY2 1979 65,106,2601 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) PA2 1979 195,223 1. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. Corps' authority to proceed with the project. Legislation 2. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated would be required to proceed with the project. TABLE 3-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE1 1931 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $ 78,243- Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Chester River, 17 Nov 86 Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323- Delaware River, Mouth of 5 Aug 77 Neversink 1917 HD 94-192 - - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project 2 Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 -- Oldmans Creek, NJ 1941 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 63,313- Rancocas River, NJ4 1942 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 57,590- Smyrna River, DE5 1949 2 Nov 79 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. HD 95-157 $396,169- Toms River, NJ6 1950 2 Nov 79 Channel 12 feet deep Section 12 PL 93-251 $43,361- Trexler Lake, PA 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat. 1180 -- Flood Control Projects 2 Nov 79 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Section 12 PA7 1966 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Includes $10,050 new work, and $33,311 for maintenance. 7. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 3-28 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA ............... 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ....... 3. Cambridge Harbor, MD ................ 4. Claiborne Harbor, MD ............... 5. Fishing Creek, MD.................. 6. Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, MD ....................... 7. Herring Creek, MD .................... 8. Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD...................... 9. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD ......................... 10. Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE & MD .......... 11. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ................ 12. Parish Creek, MD................... 13. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift ................ 14. Potomac River-Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC........... 15. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD............... 16. St. Patricks Creek, MD ................ 17. Shallow Creek, MD.................. 18. Slaughter Creek, MD................. 19. Tred Avon River, MD ................. 20. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD.................... 21. Upper Thorofare, MD ................. 22. Washington Harbor, DC ............... 23. Wicomico River, MD .................. Page 4-3 4-4 4-4 4-4 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-6 4-6 4-6 4-7 4-7 Navigation (cont'd) 24. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys... 25. Navigation work under special authorization ....................... Beach Erosion Control 26. Beach Erosion Control Work under special authorization ........... Flood Control 27. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV... 28. Fourmile Run, VA.................... 29. Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV ..... 30. Lackawanna River Basin, PA ........... 30A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA ............ 31. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA ................... 32. Southern New York Flood 32A. 32B. 4-7 32C. 32D. 4-8 32E. 32F. 32G. 4-8 32H. 4-8 321. 4-8 32J. 4-9 32K. 4-9 32L. 32M. 4-9 32N. 4-10 33. 4-10 34. 4-10 Page 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-11 4-12 4-12 4-12 Control Projects ................. 4-12 Addison, NY ....................... . 4-13 Almond Lake, NY .................... 4-13 Arkport Dam, NY ................... 4-13 Avoca, NY ........................... 4-13 Binghamton, NY.................... 4-13 Canisteo, NY ....................... . 4-14 Corning, NY ....................... . 4-14 East Sidney Lake, NY................. 4-15 Elmira, NY ....................... 4-15 Hornell, NY........................ 4-15 Lisle, NY .......................... 4-16 Oxford, NY ........................ 4-16 Whitney Point Lake, NY ............... 4-16 Whitney Point Village, NY ............. 4-16 Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA.. 4-16 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA ................ 4-17 4-1 l~l--Ll )~I l Il sa-n----r- ~--sr~ _ _ I_~ _ _ _ _ _ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 34A. Cowanesque Lake, PA ................. 4-17 34B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ............ 4-17 35. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA . 4-18 35A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ............... 4-18 35B. Curwensville Lake, PA................ 4-18 35C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA ......... 4-18 36. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA ............ 4-18 37. Tamaqua, PA ....................... 4-19 38. Wyoming Valley, PA .................. 4-19 39. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA ............ 4-19 40. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 4-20 41. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ....................... . 4-20 42. Flood Control Work under special authorization ..................... . 4-20 Water Supply 43. Washington Aqueduct ................ :4-20 General Investigations 44. Surveys .......................... 4-21 General Investigations (cont'd) Page 45. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 4-21 16. Pre-construction Engineering and Design ............................. 4-21 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement ...... Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ........... Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................. Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................ Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ............ Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............... Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects .............. 4-22 4-28 4-33 4-35 4-36 4-37 4-38 4-39 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Navigation 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing Project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50- foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Sections; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch: (a) Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; (b) Ferry Bar West Section: a channel, 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, from the Ferry Bar East Section to Ferry Bar, a distance of 0.8 mile; (c) Spring Garden Section: a channel, 27 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from Ferry Bar to and including a turning and anchorage basin immediately below the Western Maryland Railway Bridge, a distance of 1.0 mile; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Quarantine Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 600 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (3) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (4) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $379,541,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $332,800,000 (October 1987 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $450,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $332,350,000 is Corps of Engineers and non- Federal. Widening 35-foot depth from Port Covington Channel from 150 to 400 feet to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at upper end is considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $1,603,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The three grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 13 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1983)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: Remaining work under the River and Harbor Act of 1958, deepening and widening the Connecting Channel (Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension), from 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide, by contract, which commenced on August 22, 1986, was completed on December 21, 1986. A total of 3,978,440 cubic yards was dredged and deposited in Hart-Miller Island at a cost of $8,522,364. Construction of the work authorized by the River & Harbor Act of 1970 was initiated in February 1987. New work dredging, by contract, of 13,845,600 cubic yards from the Craighill Angle, Craighill Upper Range, Fort McHenry Channel, Curtis Bay Channel, and East and West Channels, Northwest Branch at a cost of $50,817,500 commenced on June 2, 1987 and was approximately 38% complete as of September 30, 1987. New Work Norfolk District: New work dredging, by contract, of 5,003,400 cubic yards from the Rappahannock Shoal Channel at a cost of $4,957,700 commenced on March 12, 1987 and was essentially completed on May 28, 1987. New work dredging, by contract, of 4,999,900 cubic yards from the York Spit Channel at a cost of $9,299,810 commenced on April 2, 1987 and was 79% complete as of September 30, 1987. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging of the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, Swan Point and Tolchester Channels, by contract, which began on July 11, 1986 and was completed on December 21, 1986. A total of 1,908,736 cubic yards of material was dredged and deposited in the Hart-Miller Island containment facility at a cost of $5,585,000. Maintenance dredging of 878,100 cubic yards, by contract, from the Craighill Angle, Craighill Upper Range, Fort McHenry Channel, and Curtis Bay Channel at a cost of $3,081,500 commenced on June 2, 1987 in conjunction with new work dredging of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of 1970 and was 74% complete as of September 30, 1987. Maintenance, Norfolk District: A condition survey of the Cape Henry Channel was made. Maintenance dredging of 6,300 cubic yards from the Rappahannock Shoal Channel at a cost of $6,200 commenced on March 12, 1987 and was essentially completed on May 28, 1987. Maintenance dredging of 21,100 cubic yards from the York Spit Channel at a cost of $39,250 commenced on April 2, 1987 and was 79% complete as of September 30, 1987. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 19,440 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Location. This harbor is a tidal estuary on the south side of Choptank River about 18 miles above its mouth. It is approximately 70 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Previous project. For details see page 1789 of Annual Report for 1915, page 424 of Annual Report for 1924, and page 373 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in the Choptank River for an approximate distance of 2,000 feet; then widen into a triangular shaped turning basin 25 feet deep, 1,400 feet long and 750 feet wide; then continue with a channel 150 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the Market Street Bridge over Cambridge Creek; then 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the head of the harbor with a turning basin of the same depth and irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres; an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel; another basin of the same depth, 225 feet long, and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel below the bridge; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the Choptank River to the municipal boat basin north of the harbor entrance. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. The waterfront of Cambridge is generally built of solid bulkhead wharves and pile and timber piers, only a few of which have mechanical freighthandling facilities. With the exception of a municipally owned terminal which is open to the public, the wharves are privately owned. There are town marine railways with boat-repair shops, five oil and gasoline terminals, two large fertilizer companies and one large packing house located on the shore of Cambridge Creek. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 4. CLAIBORNE HARBOR, MD Location. The harbor is located on the eastern side of Eastern Bay, an arm of Chesapeake Bay, about 42 miles 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT southeast of Baltimore Harbor. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1225.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 14 feet deep from the vicinity of the harbor wharves to deep water in Eastern Bay with widths of 100 feet at mean low water for a distance of 1,800 feet to the bend opposite the existing Black Beacon, thence widening in a distance of 260 feet to 150 feet to the 14-foot depth in Eastern Bay, with necessary widening at the bends. The total length of the channel is about 4,400 feet. The project also provides for a 250-foot extension of the jetty built by the railway company. Terminal facilities. There are two solid bulkhead wharves, with open pile piers at their outer ends, served by this improvement. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on March 29, 1987. A total of 18,000 cubic yards of material was removed. Rehabilitation of revetment (500 L.F. ) was completed February 3, 1987. 5. FISHING CREEK, MD Location. A narrow winding tidal stream which enters Chesapeake Bay from the west 56 miles south of Baltimore and about 26 miles south of Annapolis, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12266.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 and 60 feet from deep water in the Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in marsh 500 feet above mouth of creek, and twin stone jetties at entrance; north jetty is about 1,050 feet long, and south jetty about 1,100 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 1 foot. Cost of new work for the completed project was $111,242. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Seven hundred feet of bulkhead wharf are available on the south side of the entrance channel running west from bay shore, and the U.S. Navy Department constructed a pile-and-timber wharf on west side of basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 6. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Location. Herring Bay is a wide-mouthed indentation on the west side of Chesapeake Bay about 20 miles below Annapolis, MD. It is about 3 miles long from north to south and penetrates the shore for a depth of about 1 mile. Rockhold Creek, which is about 2.5 miles long, is an estuary which extends northward from the northerly end of Herring Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot contour in Herring Bay to vicinity of county wharf on Rockhold Creek, with turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 150 feet long at head of channel, and a stone breakwater approximately 900 feet long east of entrance channel. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and extreme tidal range about 4 feet. The Federal cost of new work for completed project was $50,591. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Consists of a public wharf on Rockhold Creek about 600 feet below the county bridge, open to all, together with a few private landing stages. No freight-handling devices are installed on any of the wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on August 11, 1987, to remove approximately 36,000 cubic yards of material. 7. HERRING CREEK, MD Location. Herring Creek in St. Marys County, MD., is a small tidal stream 1 miles in length which flows in a westerly direction and enters the north bank of the Potomac River 16 miles upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 92 miles downstream from Washington, DC (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 557.) Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and approximately 1,630 feet long extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water within the creek, a turning basin of irregular shape 6 feet deep adjacent to the proposed public wharf, and riprap-stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.6 feet; irregular, 1.9 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The project was modified in 1986 under Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. The modification consists of constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment and upgrading 350 linear feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront south of the project inlet to preclude shoreline erosion induced by the project jetties. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) includes the following provisions: 1. The Local Sponsor will assume full responsibility for initial project costs in excess of the $1,000,000 Federal Cost Limitation. 2. Compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970. 3. Provide without cost to the United States, when and as required all lands, easements, rights-of-way and soil-disposal areas necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project. 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 4. Hold and save the United States free from damages to other property resulting from the improvement. Terminal facilities. There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: The contract for construction of the project modification was completed on June 9, 1987. 8. ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD Location. Island Creek in St. Marys County, MD., is a tidal estuary three-fourths of a mile long, flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the right bank of St. Marys River at its junction with the Potomac River, 11 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay and 97 miles downstream from Washington, DC. It lies entirely within the lower half of St. Georges Island. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long from the St. Marys River through the entrance to Island Creek and a turning basin 5 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long within the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. Costs of Federal new work for the completed project were $6,230. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On Island Creek there are five small private landings or stagings which are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 1, 1987 to remove approximately 9,000 cubic yards of material. 9. LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Location. This is a tidal waterway, about 1.5 miles long and from one-eighth to one-half mile wide, branching off from Tangier Sound between Deal Island and Little Deal Island, MD. It is about 12 miles north of Crisfield Harbor, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. The original project was dated March 3, 1881. For further details see page 1790 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Tangier Sound to and including a mooring basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. The cost for new work for the completed project was $39,658, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are three packing-house wharves and a small marine railway above the head of the project channel at Wenona. The facilities are privately owned but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Present facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Sufficient areas are available for the construction of additional terminals when and as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed on July 24, 1987 for a 750 L.F. stone jetty and 900 L.F. breakwater. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on January 3, 1987. A total of 42,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 10. NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK), DE & MD Location. Headwaters of Nanticoke River consist of numerous branches rising mainly in the northern portion of Sussex County, DE. The river is about 50 miles long and flows southwesterly from its source to Tangier Sound. Northwest Fork is a branch of Nanticoke River which rises in Kent County, DE, and flows past Federalsburg, MD, generally southerly through Dorchester County, MD, to its junction with the main river opposite Riverton, MD. It is about 30 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 77.) Existing project. Nanticoke River: Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to the highway bridge at Seaford, DE, with a turning basin at the upper end. Disjointed sections included in the project is about 4 miles long, extending over 32 miles of river; lower end of the first section of the project is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 3.4 feet, and the extreme tidal range is 4.3 feet. Northwest Fork: Dredging a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide at mean low water from upper Browns wharf to within one-half mile of the southern boundary of town of Federalsburg, with a turning basin at the upper end. Section included in the project is about 4 miles long, and its lower end is 11.75 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Waterfront at Seaford consists largely of unconnected pile-and-timber bulkhead wharves with earthfills. One public wharf is used as a launching ramp. Remaining wharves are privately owned. A rail siding extends along a considerable portion of waterfront and offers facilities for interchange of rail and water traffic. Existing terminals are reasonably adequate for present and prospective commerce. Terminal facilities on Northwest Fork are all privately owned and open to general public use. They consist of 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT one solid bulkhead wharf of 80-foot frontage and 3 landings each with 60-foot frontages. Depths of water are from 2 to 8 feet. Landings are log revetments backed by earthfill and are in poor condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 11. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1220.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the 16-foot depth curve in Atlantic Ocean through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the project harbor; a depth of 14 feet and 150 feet wide to the head of the harbor, a length of approximately 3,400 feet; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction claim for the jetty rehabilitation was paid at a total cost of $497,000, fiscally completing the project. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 12. PARISH CREEK, MD Location. A small branch of West River, an estuary of Chesapeake Bay on Maryland western shore, at Shadyside, MD., about 7 miles south of mouth of Severn River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, widened at ends, from deep water in West River to head of south fork of Parish Creek, and an anchorage basin at junction of north fork having a depth of 6 feet and an area not exceeding 1 acres. Mean tidal range is about 2 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $19,170 exclusive of $1,000 contributed by local interests. Average annual maintenance cost for past 5 years was $6,000. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 30, 1935. (See H. Doc. 185, 72d Cong., 1st Sess., which contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $1,000 toward cost of improvement, furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas, and provide a suitable water freight terminal at head of Parish Creek, open to all on equal terms. Total funds required to complete project were provided by Works Progress Administration. Local interests furnished disposal areas. Not fully complied with in that a public wharf has not been provided. Terminal facilities. There are numerous timber piers, one bulkhead wharf, two marine railways, 300 feet of concrete bulkhead and 350 feet of timber bulkhead on Parish Creek. Piers and bulkheads are privately owned, but open to the public for transaction of business with owners. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on June 13, 1987. A total of 42,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 13. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 23 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 294,840 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 14. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Location. The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC extending southward to the U.S. Route 301 Bridge (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA which must be reexecuted annually expires on September 30, 1986 includes the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests. Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harvesting operations resulted in 43 acres of nuisance aquatic plants at 17 sites in Maryland and 19 acres at 10 sites in Virginia. There were no harvesting operations conducted in District of Columbia this fiscal year. 15. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintanance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks and/or fishing appurtenance. There were no detailed investigations of sunken vessels/wrecks resulting in no declarations of "Hazards to Navigation" issued. 16. ST. PATRICKS CREEK, MD Location. St. Patricks Creek in St. Marys County, MD is a small tidal stream 1 1/2 miles long which flows in a southeasterly direction and enters the west side of St. Clement Bay at its junction with the Potomac River. The creek is 33 miles upstream from the Chesapeake Bay and 83 miles downstream from Washington, DC (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 558). Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 7 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and approximately 2,450 feet long from deep water in St. Clement Bay to deep water within the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: mean, 1.9 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work for the completed project was $15,752, exclusive of $1,000 contributed by local interests. The latest (1950) approved estimate for the annual cost of maintenance is $4,800. Local cooperation. The existing project was approved subject to the provisions that (a) local interests contribute $1,000 in cash toward the cost of new work; (b) hold and save the United States free from any damage resulting from construction and maintenance of the improvement; (c) furnish releases from damages to oyster grounds; (d) furnish free of cost to the United States suitable spoil-disposal areas for new work and subsequent maintenance, when and as required; and (e) agree to provide a suitable public wharf with access road open to all on equal terms. Items (a) through (d) have been fully complied with. Local interests have initiated action to complete item (e). Terminal facilities. There are 41 small wharves and stagings located in the creek. All are privately owned, but one is open to the public. There is also one marine railway in the creek. The terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on May 5, 1987. A total of 10,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 17. SHALLOW CREEK, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Shallow Creek is a tidal water tributary of the Chesapeake Bay and is located directly adjacent to Fort Howard Veteran's Hospital in southeast Baltimore County, approximately 10 miles southeast of Baltimore, Maryland. Existing project. Provides for a channel 50 feet wide and 5 feet deep from that depth in Chesapeake Bay to 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT and including a turning basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 100 feet long at the head of the channel. Total project length is 4,000 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to provide or pay to the Government the full cost of providing dredged material disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on July 10, 1987 for removal of approximately 36,000 cubic yards of material and construction of a 14.5 acre disposal site. 18. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Location. This is a waterway about 8 miles long and tidal throughout connecting with Little Choptank River 5 miles from its mouth. It lies in Dorchester County, MD, between Taylors Island and the mainland of the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. The mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and the extreme tidal range is 2.9 feet. The cost for new work, made in 1911, is $4,140. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one solid bulkhead wharf about 300 feet long, served by this improvement. It is privately owned but open to general public use, and is considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on May 30, 1987. A total of 15,000 cubic yards of material was removed. Dredged material was used in conjunction with oyster shell culch as a beneficial use of dredged material demonstration to rehabilitate an existing unproductive oyster bar. 19. TRED AVON RIVER, MD Location. This stream, formerly called Treadhaven Creek, rises in Talbot County, MD, flows southerly and empties into Choptank River 10 miles above its mouth. It is about 10 miles long and is a tidal estuary with very little natural flow. Draining area is 36 square miles. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 78.) Previous project. For details see page 397 of Annual Report for 1951. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Tred Avon River from that depth in river near Peach Blossom Creek to Easton Point, thence a channel of same depth and width and about 1,400 feet long in the North Fork, thence a channel of same width and 8 feet deep and about 700 feet long with a turning basin of same depth at upper end. Project also provides for a turning basin in South Fork 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide and 600 feet long on east side of main channel at Easton Point. Section included in project is about 2 miles long, and its lower end is about 7.5 miles above mouth. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-11 of Fiscal Year 1979 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Five large terminals for receiving and distributing petroleum products, and a marina with stalls and ships, marine railway, a launching ramp, and a 6-ton travel-lift at Easton Point. These facilities are in good condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on November 25, 1986, to remove approximately 130,000 cubic yards of material. Protest of the contract award delayed dredging until August 1987 and is scheduled to be completed in fiscal year 1988. 20. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, MD, southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, MD, thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pileand- timber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to the public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed August 7, 1987. A total of 24,000 cubic yards of material was removed and used in conjunction with a longard tube as a beneficial use of dredged material demonstration. 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 21. UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Location. Natural waterway lying between Deal Island and mainland of Somerset County, MD., on eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 277 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Entrance channel from Tangier Sound 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, thence of irregular width to and along south shore of Thorofare, protected by two stone breakwaters at entrance, north breakwater is about 410 feet long and south breakwater about 310 feet long, with a turning basin at inner end 9 feet deep on south side of channel to within 50 feet of bulkhead along south shore, an anchorage area 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending across waterway parallel to highway bridge to within 50 feet of bulkhead on south shore, and an anchorage area 650 feet long, 300 feet wide, and 9 feet deep on north side of channel between breakwater and 6-foot anchorage. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $62,116. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A small packing-house wharf on shore of Tangier Sound south of project channel: two small packing houses along approach channel at which seafood is landed; and a public wharf at turning basin with a suitable road connecting it with the road system. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed January 3, 1987. A total of 100,182 cubic yards of material was removed. 22. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, DC, and Anacostia River, DC. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 23. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pileand- timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on August 31, 1987, to remove approximately 37,000 cubic yards of material. 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $12,133 for Island Creek, St. Marys Co., MD; and $34,971 for Long Point Channel, Chester River, MD. Aquatic Plant Control pursuant to Sec. 302 of Public Law 89-298, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $24,992 for Chesapeake Bay (Hydrilla), MD. Beach Erosion Control 26. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $9,834 for town of North Beach, MD. Flood Control 27. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Estimated cost (October 1986) of new work is $176,270,300 of which $58,521,700 is required non- Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia has been executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The project became operational for water supply, flood control, and for water quality control in July 1981. The project was rededicated in May 1987 in honor of retired Senator Jennings Randolph of West Virginia. A construction claim was paid this year at a cost of $55,000. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28. FOURMILE RUN,VA Location. The project is located in the City of Alexandria and in Arlington County, VA, on Fourmile Run immediately above its confluence with the Potomac River at Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for Alexandria, VA, Annandale, VA, Falls Church, VA, and Washington West, DC, MD and VA.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a floodwall protection system, an improved channel, and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-17 of Fiscal Year 1977 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract claim was paid this year at a cost of $700,000, fiscally completing the project. 29. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project were $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removal of gravel deposits, grass cutting of areas channelward of levees, and removal of brush and debris from channel were accomplished as required in channel area. 30. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 30A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost-sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400 of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non- Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. A hydroelectric plant is being constructed on the Raystown Lake project and is scheduled to be completed May 1988. The construction licensee is Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 32A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscaroroa Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 32C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spilway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for correction of the underseepage at the First Ward Area, Front Street Levee were completed and the locals have acquired the lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction. Bid opening was held in September 1987 and no bids were received. Contract will be readvertised. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operaton and maintenance of the project continued. 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 32H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains.all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 321. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded in September 1987 to remove the concrete weir at Cedar Street. Removal of the weir will help regain the original channel flow capability. 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 32K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 33. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder utilized to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres,and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 34. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 34A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project constructed under the Flood Control Act of 1958 provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1986) of the modification is $53,114,000 of which $970,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $52,144,000 is non- Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $11,760,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $970,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Modification to relocate the Town of Nelsonconstruction claim was paid at a cost of $170,000, fiscally completing the project. Modification of Cowanesque Lake: Contracts were awarded for the slope modification and tower and access ramp modification. Cultural and historical work progressed as well as continuing engineering and design of the remaining plans and specification packages. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Estimated Federal cost (October 1986) of new work is $193,120,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction, $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations and $7,500,000 is for construction of the Mill Creek recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required on the completed portion of the project; however, construction of the Mill Creek Area recreation facilities relies on local interests providing specialized facilities including buildings, lodges, demonstration centers, and non-water oriented equipment and accepting full responsibility for operation and maintenance of the entire recreation area. 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Planning for the joint development of the Mill Creek Recreation Area continued by the Baltimore District and Mansfield University including preparation of plans and specifications for construction of the Federal project. Progress was slowed down due to non-Federal sponsor lack of funds. Non-Federal sponsor is having a fund raising campaign. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek) and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard) on the West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, PA; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, PA; and on Bald Eagle Creek about one mile upstream from Blanchard, PA, respectively. In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 35A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure,about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 35B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Recreation facilities include a seasonal recreational pool of 790 acres, access roads, parking areas, beach area, boat dock, and launching ramp. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 35C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities include a summer recreation pool of 1,730 acres, a conservation pool of 630 acres for the preservation of fish life, access roads, parking areas, boat docks and launching ramps, and camping areas. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location. Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA.) Existing project. Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 587, 79th Cong. 2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 24 Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1987) is $124,000,000 including $112,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is complete. Local cooperation. None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in October 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued on the project modification. The Geology, Soils, Embankment FDM and Real Estate FDM were approved this year with the Outlet Works Tower FDM submitted for approval. 37. TAMAQUA, PA Location. The authorized project is located in Tamaqua Borough and Walker Township, Pennsylvania. Both municipalities are within Schuylkill County. Existing project. The project as authorized provides for a 2,930-foot long tunnel, 10 feet in diameter with appurtenant structures, through Sharp Mountain. The tunnel would extend from Wabash Creek on the west boundary of Tamaqua to the Little Schuylkill River just south of its confluence with Wabash Creek. The proposed improvement includes an intake structure, a stilling basin, and a 70-foot long highway bridge. The Phase I portion of the advance engineering and design was completed in 1981. The findings from that phase resulted in the addition of a small dry detention dam to the project plan. Phase II of advance engineering and design was completed in 1984 and reduced the level of protection to 100-year. This reduced the tunnel's diameter to 9 feet. Estimated cost of project (October 1987) is $11,7.0,000 including $2,925,000 required non-Federal costs. The local sponsor, by letter of October 2, 1985, requested the project be constructed in two stages. It was also requested that the tunnel be constructed first followed by the dam. Estimated cost of tunnel only project (October 1987) is $8,740,000 including $2,185,000 required non- Federal costs. Local cooperation. The Borough of Tamaqua is the local sponsor. The Borough, by letter of June 25, 1968, indicated its intention to comply with the items of local cooperation. The assurance was reaffirmed by the Borough on September 2, 1977, September 2, 1980, and again on October 2, 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contracted with architect-engineer to separate tunnel contract documents from combined tunnel and dam documents. Continued coordination with local sponsor towards developing a financial plan and draft Local Cooperation Agreement. 38. WYOMING VALLEY, PA Location. The project is located in Luzerne County, PA, on the Susquehanna River. The project area is limited to the four existing Federal flood control projects. These levee improvements are in Plymouth, Kingston- Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. Existing project. The four projects were constructed during the period 1935 through 1976 and consist of levee, sheet piling, flood wall, and associated interior drainage structures along both banks of the Susquehanna River which provide flood control benefits estimated at $46.1 million annually. Remedial measures to protect against levee failure under future high discharge conditions consist of: weighted filter drains on the landside of the levees to protect against erosion due to seepage in certain areas; stability berms and toe protection on the riverside of the levees in certain areas to stabilize the riverbank and protect against erosion due to river flows; stabilization of sheet piling in certain areas; and additional relief wells to control the underseepage in other areas. Local cooperation. Lands and relocations for construction of the existing projects at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 were provided by the Boroughs of Kingston, Edwardsville, Plymouth, the City of Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, and Luzerne County. These entities also operate and maintain the existing projects. Updated assurances were obtained during preparation of the General Design Memorandum. Additional local costs in connection with the proposed remedial work are expected to be minor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Phase II construction was completed in May 1987. Phase I was completed in September 1986. Completion of the Phase II work concluded the overall construction of the project. 39. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Pennsylvania-York and Hanover.) 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. Dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See Table 4-I. 41. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $37,583. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $42,850. 42. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Cost for the period was $561,507 of which $289,891 was for Disaster Preparedness Program, and $271,616 was for Rehabilitation and Emergency operations. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $69,783 for Conklin-Kirkwood NY. Non-structural study for Conklin-Broome (Ice Jam) NY; $19,754 for Hyndman, PA; $7,352 for Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA; and $30,953 for Hills Point Rd., MD; $76,080 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD; $9,337 for Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD; $11,736 for Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA; and $9,446 for Potomac River, Sportsmans, Berkeley, WV. Water Supply 43. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1987 was 71,958 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 276 million gallons and average daily consumption was 197 million gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington pCeoru dnatyy . aTnhde FCaollrsp sC ohfu Ercnhg, iVneAe rws aws a4s1 r.2e immbilulirosne dg ainll otnhse amount of $5,699,941 fo r furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. The treated water delivered to the 1.1 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct met or surpassed all Water Quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.L. 93-523.) 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT General Investigations 44. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $1,183,478 of which $828,628 was for flood damage prevention studies, $105,112 for shoreline protection studies, $42,166 for special studies, $80,000 for special investigations, and $127,572 for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $38,567 for shoreline protection studies. 45. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $246,678. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 46. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Susquehanna Basin at Harrisburg, PA-The authorized project provides for an impervious railroad embankment/ floodwall line of protection 3,800 feet long, a pump station and floodgates for interior drainage, a dry detention dam along Asylum Run (a small tributary of Paxton Creek), an enlarged earth and concrete channel for Paxton Creek about 4 miles long, and minor recreation and fish and wildlife facilities. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $4,600,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $523,582. Lock Haven, PA-The authorized project provides for 36,600 feet of levee, 1,000 feet of flood wall, five closure structures, one pumping station, non-structural flood control measures for Woodward Township, and minor recreation facilities. Preparation of a Phase II General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $3,881,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $843,733. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)-The authorized project provides for raising the existing levees and flood walls between 3 and 5 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities, and providing some new flood walls and levees to maintain the system's integrity. The plan also includes raising four other local protection projects, removing an abandoned railroad bridge, and providing non-structural measures to mitigate any significant induced damages and the potential of a catastrophic failure of an existing project. Preparation of a Phase II General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $7,700,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $721,347. Atlantic Coast of Maryland & Assateague Island, VA-The authorized project provides for constructing a steel sheet pile bulkhead about 1.8 miles, and constructing a sand dune about 6.3 miles for hurricane protection. Preparation of a combined General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,600,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $620,722. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA-(Modification)-The authorized project would provide for modifying the existing single purpose flood control project by raising the existing dam 30 feet thereby adding water supply and recreation purposes. Pre-construction planning was completed at a total cost of $5,688,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $175,936. Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street) regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Preparation of a combined General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year and total costs were $412,768. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,300,000. 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor MD Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Cambridge Harbor, MD 4. Claiborne Harbor, MD 5. Fishing Creek, MD 6. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD 7. Herring Creek, MD 8. Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD 9. Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 770,000 1,055,174 12,865,0002 13,035,8148 455,000 555,821 15,637,000' 15,637,0126 5,904,000 5,585,736 7,440,7918 7,440,790' 25,579,000 25,840,645 5,992,2048 5,992,027' - 17,674,000 - 17,198,010 202,000 202,323 24,000 '24,000 205,000 201,424 95,129 95,127 80,450 80,450 19,310 19,310 20,000 20,000 236,000 239,574 68,000 68,000 432,750 432,748 20,000 20,000 503,200 478,502 14,000 14,000 1,369,000 117,978 164,500 164,499 217,000 217,002 10,000 10,000 423,600 423,599 49,700 49,702 138,000 137,999 398,500 423,195 79,100 79,100 215,359 210,742 132,900 132,899 373,500 1,612,421 126,500 126,501 350,000 264,348 4-22 78,334,7121 78,205,7951 79,409,85510 79,409,67310 17,674,000 17,198,010 3,504,210 3,504,209 195,97411 195,97411 688,258 688,258 42,97412 42,97412 682,333 682,330 111,242 111,242 1,422,100 1,422,100 50,591 50,591 612,248 612,247 1,186,500 1,186,497 145,329 145,329 225,665 221,048 23,836 23,836 475,010 475,009 1,787,15818 1,775,057" 631,942 631,942 350,000 264,348 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 10. Nanticoke River River (Including Northwest Fork), DE & MD 11. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 12. Parish Creek, MD 13. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection & Removal of Drift 14. Potomac River- Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC 15. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 16. St. Patricks Creek, MD 17. Shallow Creek, MD 18. Slaughter Creek, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,000 - 22,944 - 935,000 781,000 2,106,987 709,961 1,750,000 1050,000 2,734,267 1,056,190 - - - 31,578 - 31,578 352,000 410,000 353,227 394,333 770,000 115,000 188,269 694,703 162,000 51,000 162,000 50,949 - 8,354 - 8,354 4-23 51,800 51,800 422,600 493,639 38,000 47,143 19,400 19,400 417,000 432,664 378,000 323,826 54,363 35,825 84,000 84,040 15,000 15,000 43,500 7,600 143,13415 143,13415 636,577 636,577 350,19314 350,19314 9,663,608 9,663,608 4,335,000 4,334,999 19,17016 19,17016 443,148 443,148 6,701,375 6,701,113 1,427,000 1,363,048 231,363 139,669 4,541,040 4,541,040 15,752 15,752 133,402 133,402 273,500 228,195 219,843 212,717 4,140 4,140 591,570 591,570 12,100 12,102 497,000 497,399 329,314 329,314 481,200 480,942 164,000 156,250 177,000 103,844 85,000 85,011 86,800 86,800 230,000 220,595 219,843 212,717 143,540 143,540 40,000 40,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 19. Tred Avon, New Work MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 20. Twitch Cove & New Work Big Thorofare, Approp. MD Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21. Upper Thorofare, New Work MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22. Washington Harbor, New Work DC Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 23. Wicomico River, New Work MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 27. Jennings Randolph New Work Lake, MD & WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 28. Fourmile Run, New Work VA Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 29. Cumberland, MD New Work and Ridgeley, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 30A. Aylesworth Creek New Work Lake, PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 17,000 17,000 36,000 36,000 27,569 27,569 10,000 10,000 63,000 77,569 134,000 915,074 -100,000 582,603 988,978 1,005,530 29,294 162,656 162,656 45,000 45,000 72,925 75,636 206,782 206,782 681,000 681,000 1,900,000 1,974,750 1,160,200 1,163,471 43,000 43,000 55,000 55,000 358,500 358,498 44,000 44,000 49,000 49,001 26,678 1,759,000 1,759,018 704,400 704,399 171,300 171,299 351,400 351,398 99,100 99,102 523,310 523,310 814,243 814,242 171,300 171,299 193,175 193,175 2,289,211 2,298,209 62,446 62,446 805,041 805,041 3,191,0776 3,191,07716 47,800 4,842,2961718 47,800 4,842,2961718 366,000 365,999 55,000 55,000 1,121,700 1,111,628 471,60919 471,60919 6,328,737 6,328,735 176,325,300 176,321,783 177,392,000 177,378,411 700,000 52,480,000 700,000 52,480,000 108,429 108,429 55,930 55,930 113,500 113,424 61,000 61,000 101,000 101,071 3,393,809 3,393,809 64,000 63,998 116,900 116,104 15,633,97020 15,633,97020 703,229 703,227 2,320,400 2,320,400 1,080,502 1,079,699 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 31. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 32A. Addison, NY 32B. Almond Lake, NY 32C. Arkport Dam, NY 32D. Avoca, NY 32E. Binghamton, NY 32F. Canisteo, NY 32G. Corning, NY 32H. East Sidney Lake, NY 321. Elmira, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,741,000 2,125,500 2,108,000 2,149,000 1,778,456 2,077,231 2,138,283 2,160,024 16,049 16,124 160,772 164,920 78,363 87,246 18,300 18,300 28,300 28,398 25,800 25,802 25,600 25,600 300,118 302,918 20,400 20,400 17,200 17,200 379,500 379,362 130,700 130,621 23,526 23,525 18,000 18,000 53,474 53,472 53,900 53,900 262,100 262,095 25,900 25,900 14,100 14,091 234,000 234,127 148,000 148,073 24,300 24,300 383,000 40,480 35,200 35,200 25,900 25,874 38,500 38,500 330,000 329,995 28,300 28,297 9,300 9,309 324,800 322,169 199,900 199,401 31,300 31,300 -320,000 20,392 28,700 28,700 27,800 27,827 50,100 50,100 378,800 378,421 27,600 27,603 4-25 77,408,770 77,408,770 19,916,295 19,909,266 827,050 827,050 187,455 187,455 5,760,211 5,760,211 3,347,640 3,344,995 1,910,00021 1,910,00021 1,791,074 1,790,566 436,37422 436,374"2 411,961 411,960 3,015,00023 3,012,87223 442,481 442,481 1,183,111"4 1,183,11124 645,935 645,934 3,322,000" 3,322,00026 691,658 691,658 6,049,504 6,049,504 3,826,119 3,825,724 6,883,305 6,883,305 292,149 292,149 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 32J. Hornell, NY 32K. Lisle, NY 32L. Oxford, NY 32M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 32N. Whitney Point Village, NY 33. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 34A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 34B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 35A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 85,051 176,056 25,400 25,453 15,900 15,900 265,843 266,070 33,200 33,253 201,340 201,680 106,170 106,168 19,800 19,800 17,600 17,600 304,800 304,721 20,500 20,500 211,700 211,631 670,000 1,065,000 722,340 853,691 743,904 932,800 754,305 938,312 -60,000 23,487 35,000 30,000 135,900 135,901 26,100 26,098 11,300 11,290 644,000 643,908 18,400 18,380 218,000 218,056 195,000 418,395 894,200 897,042 90,000 65,546 242,400 242,399 28,600 28,602 9,100 9,110 403,800 398,680 16,600 16,620 223,800 223,206 622,000 197,929 974,300 970,947 1,277,000 577,849 360,000 265,978 1,144,289 1,540,700 1,329,800 1,412,600 1,166,973 1,540,278 1,330,248 1,403,881 403,810 572,896 427,300 427,275 463,000 452,583 537,700 546,080 4,558,69826 4,558,69826 3,232,533 3,232,529 661,19927 661,19927 670,722 670,722 131,00028 131,00028 209,832 209,832 5,421,539 5,421,539 4,498,940 4,493,641 424,096 424,096 340,261 340,261 5,725,700 5,725,700 2,284,009 2,283,396 108,582,700 108,155,797 5,643,654 5,639,653 1,277,000 577,849 19,104,800 18,981,324 9,867,254 9,858,466 7,103,001 7,103,001 4,668,322 4,666,251 4-26 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 35B. Curwensville Lake, New Work PA Approp. - - - - 20,396,060 Cost - - - - 20,396,060 Maint. Approp. 405,491 491,100 628,000 456,300 6,445,689 Cost 405,237 492,316 628,049 455,574 6,444,934 35C. Foster Joseph New Work Sayers Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 30,887,06329 Cost - - - - 30,887,06329 Maint. Approp. 446,722 472,300 424,000 549,400 5,455,484 Cost 449,450 472,515 423,980 549,169 5,455,224 36. Francis E. Walter New Work Approp. - - - 1,441,000 1,441,000 Cost. - - - 1,057,656 1,057,656 37. Tamaqua, PA New Work Approp. - - - 50,000 50,000 Cost - - - 34,712 34,712 37. Wyoming Valley, New Work PA Approp. 2,190,000 6,800,000 740,000 -550,000 12,690,000 Cost 3,205,348 2,686,198 3,531,080 881,410 12,680,457 39. York, Indian New Work Rock Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 5,061,16730 Cost - - - - 5,061,16730 Maint. Approp. 373,344 534,000 548,000 384,300 5,251,51731 Cost 379,530 523,994 557,982 384,227 5,251,41291 Contributed Approp. - 85,000 - - 85,000 Cost - - 81,849 2,002 83,851 1. Includes $8,764,003 for previous projects. 2. Includes $40,000 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 3. Includes $200,691 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 4. Includes $88,000 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 5. Includes $88,001 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 6. Includes $967,791 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 7. Includes $967,791 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 8. Includes $127,604 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 9. Includes $127,518 for sections of project in Norfolk District. 10. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 11. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $61,321 for previous project. 12. Project deferred for restudy. 13. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 14. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 15. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 16. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 17. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. 18. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 19. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 contributed funds. 20. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 21. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 22. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 24. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 25. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 26. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 27. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 29. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of sanitary system for public use. 30. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 4-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor. 2 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. Increased anchorage facilities. Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordnance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1970 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-28 1. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Jun. 30, Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary 1948 waters. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Mar. 3, Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the drawbridge 10 feet deep and 1925 100 feet wide from the bridge to the upper end of the harbor with a turning basin. Aug. 26, Channel 14 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the head of the 1937 harbor with widths of 150 feet below the Market St. Bridge in Cambridge and 100 feet above, and a turning basin of the same depth at the head of the channel; for an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long, and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel and a second basin of the same depth 225 feet long and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the municipal boat basin. Jun. 30, Modification providing for deepening of the channel in Choptank River and 1948 Cambridge Creek to 16 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and of irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres. Jun. 16, Modification providing for Federal maintenance of locally constructed channel 1978 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep, from that depth in the Choptank River to and including a irregularly shaped turning basin of the same depth, with such modifications as in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advised at an added first cost to the United States presently estimated at $257,000. CLAIBORNE HARBOR, MD Jun. 13, A channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water to the railroad 1902 pier in the harbor, and thence shoreward along the south side of the pier with a width of 195 feet and a length of 500 feet. An extension of the present jetty. FISHING CREEK, MD Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 feet and 60 feet from deep water in 1937 Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of the same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in the marsh 500 feet above the mouth of the creek and twin stone jetties at the entrance. HERRING BAY & ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Jul. 3, A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from the 6-foot contour in Herring Bay 1930 to the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. Jun. 20, For the present project channel dimensions, 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide, 1938 the turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. HERRING CREEK, MD Jul. 3, Provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a 1950 turning basin of irregular shape and 6 feet deep, and riprap stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The project length is 1,630 feet. Mar. 7, 1986 Sec 111 Constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment, and upgrading 350 feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront. ISLAND CREEK, ST. GEORGES ISLAND, MD (See Section 9 of Text) Mar. 2, A channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide through the entrance to Island 1945 Creek with an anchorage basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long in the creek. River and Harbor Act of 1948 H. Doc. 210, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 381, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 355, 95th Cong., 2 Sess. 1 H. Doc. 81, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 241, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 595, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 159 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Detailed Project Report July 18, 1985 H. Doc. 99, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-29 4. 5. 6. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 4-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 7, 1986 Sec 107 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 9. OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 19358 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the 1935 west side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet 19456 above mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. PARISH CREEK, MD Aug. 30, Provide a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, widened at its ends, from 1935 deep water in West River to the head of the south fork of Parish Creek, and an anchorage basin at the junction with the north fork of Parish Creek, having a depth of 6 feet and an area not exceeding 1.5 acres. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC-COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1965 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting 1986 to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 28, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, 1958 and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) LOWER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, from Tangier Sound to the wharves at Wenona; widening the angles and the end to furnish anchorage basins. Modified to provide a channel 60 feet wide, 7 feet deep from Tangier Sound to and including a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, 300 feet long, in the marsh at the head of the cove at Wenona. Constructing a stone breakwater within Lower Thorofare, and a stone jetty on Deal Island to reduce channel maintenance. NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK), DE & MD A 9-foot channel, 100 feet wide up to Seaford, DE, with a turning basin. Slight widening between bridges in harbor at Seaford, DE. A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide in Northwest Fork, together with turning basin. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Tangier Sound to highway bridge at Seaford, DE. 4-30 10. Documents H. Doc. 76, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' Detailed Project Report. Mar. 8, 1984 H. Doc. 323, 53rd Cong., 3rd Sess., and Annual Report, 1985, p. 1165. H. Doc. 674, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 869, 60th Cong., 1st Sess.s S. Doc. 69, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 185, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. State Design memorandum July 2, 1986 River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1958 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. v BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 16. 17. Jun. 20, 1938 Present project dimensions of main channel with twin jetties at entrance. May 17, Anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long on west side 1950 of project channel at Ewell, MD, and an extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long. UPPER THOROFARE, DEAL ISLAND, MD Aug. 30, A 9-foot channel 75 feet wide protected by breakwater at entrance, with 1935 turning basin at inner end and anchorage area 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Aug. 26, Widen entrance channel to 100 feet, extend 9-foot turning basin and 6-foot 1937 anchorage, and dredging an additional anchorage area on north side of channel. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. ST. PATRICKS CREEK, MD May 17, Entrance channel 7 feet deep, 60 feet wide and approximately 2,450 feet 1950 long from deep water in St. Clement Bay to deep water within the creek. SHALLOW CREEK May 22, Dredging a navigation channel, 5 feet deep at mean low water, 50 feet wide, 1986 and 2,700 feet long from the Patapsco River to a turning basin, 100 feet wide by 100 feet long at the head of creek. SLAUGHTER CREEK, MD Jul 25, A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at mean low water through the 1912 bar at the mouth, a distance of about one-third of a mile, the lower end of the section extending about 900 feet into Little Choptank River. TRED AVON RIVER, MD Jul. 25, Restore the channel, formerly dredged from Peach Blossom Creek to Easton 1912 Point, to 8 feet deep at mean low water, and 150 feet wide, widening out at the upper end. Mar. 2, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide up the North Fork, with a turning 1919 basin at the upper end. Oct. 27, A 12-foot channel from a point near Peach Blossom Creek to Easton Point, 1965 thence 1,400 feet in North Fork and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide and 600 feet long in the South Fork. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Jul. 25, A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big 1912 Thorofare River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. Jul. 3, A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 25 feet wide from Twitch 1930 Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare River to a point on Levering Creek about 800 feet north of canal at Ewell, MD. Aug. 30, A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Twitch Cove through Big 1935 Thorofare River to a point on Levering Creek about 800 feet north of canal at Ewell, MD. 4-31 H. Doc. 671, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Detailed Project Report Jan. 1986 H. Doc. 87, 62nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 399, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess? H. Doc. 26, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 225, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 285, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 313, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 67, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 340, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 76, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 23. Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 25, 1970 Jul. 17, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 29. Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. FOURMILE RUN, VA Construction of a levee and floodwall protection system with associated interior drainage facilities, an improved channel and replacement of two highway and four railroad bridges. Modification providing for channel capacity of 27,000 c.f.s.; increase channel bottom widths along Fourmile Run; deletion of pumping stations, ponding areas, and levees, except for a short levee on Long Branch; and the addition of recreation as a project feature. CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local pro- 1962 tection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. Oct.23, 1962 Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Sep. 19, Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. 1890 Jun. 25, Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the 1910 Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Mar. 2, Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, 1919 including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. Jul. 3, A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. 1930 Aug. 26, A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south 1937 prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet 1954 deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a T-shaped harbor. H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-32 i i 27. 28. 30. 31. 32. H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947, H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.1 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 358, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. e BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 33. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Aug. 18, Construction of a flood control reservoir. H. Doc. 702, 1941 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 34. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood H. Doc. 394, 1958 protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improve- 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. ment at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to 1976 relocate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by 1983 Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). 35. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Sep. 3, Construction of three flood control reservoirs. H. Doc. 29, 1954 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 36. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Oct. 23, Modification to the existing flood control project by adding 23 billion gallons H. Doc. 522, 1962 of water supply storage by raising the dam and the permanent pool. 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 37. TAMAQUA, PA Mar. 7, The improvement will consist of constructing a nine-foot diameter tunnel Secretary of Army 1974 under the Borough. Report on Development in Appalachia dated April 12, 1971. 38. WYOMING VALLEY, PA Jun. 22, Construction of a levee and flood wall protection system with associated H. Doc. 308, 1936 interior drainage facilities at Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville- 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township. 39. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus H. Doc. 702, 1936 Creek. 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive por- authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by tion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing Ocean City. a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above upper end. mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 3. Included in Public Works Administration program 1956. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C Cost to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA' Anacostia River and Flats2 Annapolis Harbor, MD Completed Deferred Completed 1878 1953 1946 $ 5,000 3,910,582 34,2508 $- 15,623 4-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,465' 11,770 Back Creek, MD Completed 1946 23,061 23,072 Betterton Harbor, MD Inactive 1960 3,482 - Black Walnut Harbor, MD Completed 1982 32,631 420,346 Bonum Creek, VA 6 Completed 1982 202,0006 155,314 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Completed 1950 15,755 17,675 Breton Bay, MD' Inactive 1950 47,9248 12,621 Broad Creek River, DE Completed 1964 64,510' 114,373 Broad Creek, MD Completed 1962 28,227 81,219 Chester River, MD Completed 1986 70,49510 1,364,473 Choptank River, MD11 Completed 1979 96,796 94,095 Corsica River, MD Completed 1948 39,07112 90,735 Crisfield Harbor, MD Completed 1980 349,15418 570,320"1' Cypress Creek, MD Completed 1947 3,057 10,528 Duck Point Cove, MD Completed 1982 25,289 302,535 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD" Completed 1932 90,12116 53,808" Fishing Bay, MD Completed 1985 33,874 715,592 Goose Creek, MD 5 Completed 1973 75,900 8,312 Honga River and Tar Bay (Barren Island Gaps), MD Completed 1985 66,11918 2,998,926 Island Creek, MD Completed 1948 6,230 54,828 Knapps Narrows, MD Completed 1985 46,12119 562,583 La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,064 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,00020 7,327 Little Wicomico River, MD Completed 1986 81,88521 1,383,261 Lowes Wharf, MD Completed 1986 21,000 317,829 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 25,143 Madison Bay, MD5 Completed 1977 125,550 32,087 Manokin River, MD22 Completed 1919 34,788" 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,715"4 34,355 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1982 12,460 207,685 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD 5 Completed 1984 64,001 391,708 Nan Cove, MD5 Completed 1965 34,861" 22,498 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD15 Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 Nanticoke River, MD Completed 1971 73,243 76,89526 Neabsco Creek, MD Inactive 1978 14,600 - Neale Sound, MD Completed 1982 12,60027 308,777 Neavitt Harbor, MD5 Completed 1968 36,500 28,084 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA25 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Northeast River, MD Completed 1984 28,48929 928,474 Occoquan Creek, VA'5 Completed 1971 66,253s0 176,920 Patuxent River, MD'5 Completed 1905 14,0008' - Pocomoke River, MD Inactive 1985 191,72632 1,537,535 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA Completed 1965 95,214 506,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA'5 Completed 1984 17,000 314,083 Potomac River below Washington, DC Completed 1984 153,836 1,876,673 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Completed 1956 1,744,692" 27,46126 Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,858"s 321,803 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Completed 1986 304,000 711,194 Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1982 1,072,500" 77,113 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,531"s 14,921 St. Catherines Sound, MD Completed 1981 29,94737 271,618 St. Georges Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 - 4-34 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance St. Jeromes Creek, MD Completed 1982 44,35738 400,243 St. Michaels Harbor, MD5 Completed 1964 16,72337 7,742 St. Peters Creek, MD 5 Completed 1963 46,74039 17,084 Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 8,551 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,5704� 929,018 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA5 Completed 1974 57,03141 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1983 424,80042 378,783 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 29,368 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,29743 54,302 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,041" 145,911 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 23. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. August 5, 1977. 24. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and 2. Project deferred for restudy. $54,000 from contributed funds. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous project. 25. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 26. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expend- 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. ed for waterchestnut removal. 6. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. 27. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 28. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 8. Includes $37,500 for previous project. November 6, 1977. 9. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 29. Includes $20,640 for previous project. 10. Includes $38,041 for previous project. 30. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 11. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the 31. Includes $10,617 for previous project. project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 32. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. In- 22, 1979. cludes $20,500 for previous project. 12. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 33. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 13. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 34. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 14. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 35. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 15. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 36. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. November 2, 1979. 37. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 16. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes 38. Includes $26,500 for previous project. $8,414 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 17. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 40. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized 18. Excludes $2,200 contributed includes $27,668 emer- November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and gency relief funds. $97,390 for previos project. 19. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 41. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 42. Excludes $16,409 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 43. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 22. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th 44. Includes $6,000 for previous project. Cong., 1st sess.) OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH TABLE 4-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD1 Completed 1978 $ 97,750' - Colonial Beach, VA Active 1986 518,030 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. 4-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E Cost to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Completed 1980 $ 6,042,325 $1,417,655 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD' Completed 1977 1,000,0008 - Bainbridge, NY *,4 Completed 1959 382,000 - Bath, NY5 Completed 1970 638,332 - Bayard, WV' Completed 1965 55,2188 - Black Walnut Point, MD Completed 1985 200,500 - Bridgewater, VA' Completed 1953 136,500 - Bull Run, PA Completed 1984 2,742,000 - Conklin-Kirkwood, NY' Completed 1955 71,000 - Cortland, NY7 Completed 1970 324,486 - Elkland, PA Completed 1971 1,297,850 - Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Completed 1979 7,034,5348 - Forest Heights, MD' Completed 1964 430,000' - Greene, NY' Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,3941� - Kitzmiller, MD' Completed 1965 501,50011 - Latta Brook Rd., NY Completed 1984 115,500 - Lock Haven, PA12 Active 1980 450,000 - Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY' Completed 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY' Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,68914 - Savage River Dam, MD Completed 1954 2,271,93915 33,999 Scranton, PA" Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,00017 - Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tyrone, PA 8 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,000"' - Upper Marlboro, MD' Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA2� * Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92721 - Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,457" - Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,893" - 1. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 2. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 5. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 6. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 7. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 9. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 10. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 11. Authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 12. Excludes $481,000 for Phase I funded under General Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 13. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 14. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 15. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 16. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 17. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 18. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 19. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 20. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 21. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 22. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-36 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY"12 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD Coan River, VA Copes Corner Lakes, NY2 Cuckold Creek, MD 4 Cunninghill Cove, MD 4 Davenport Center Lake, NY 2 Fall Brook Lake, PA'5 Genegantslet Lake, NY 1970 1920 1949 1949 1940 1937 1970 1978 1977 1970 1970 1954 1950 1937 1950 1950 1949 1941 Governors Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 17, 1986 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-37 $ 24,6223 787,710 212 112 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 7,9283 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Saint Georges Creek, MD 1971 Sep. 23, 1986 $ -- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA6 1974 Dec. 29, 1981 -- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act South Plymouth Lake, NY 1953 May 6, 1981 100,036 - 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Waterway from Little Choptank River to 1939 Aug. 5, 1977 305- Choptank River, MD 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act West Oneonta Lake, NY 2 1970 May 6, 1981 189,100- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization 5. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. expired May 26, 1953. 6. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of ad- 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. vanced engineering and design. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H Date Survey Project Completed MARYLAND Black Walnut Harbor December 1986 Corsica River December 1986 Crisfield Harbor September 1987 Duck Point Cove December 1986 Fishing Bay April 1987 Knapps Narrows December 1986 Madison Bay April 1987 Middle River and Dark Head Creek January 1987 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves December 1986 Nanticoke River at Bivalve April 1987 Neale Sound November 1986 Northeast River June 1987 Shad Landing State Park June 1987 Tyaskin Creek April 1987 VIRGINIA Bonum Creek May 1987 Lower Machodoc Creek November 1986 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon May 1987 4-38 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Forest Heights Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Bainbridge Bath Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Corning-Monkey Run Cortland Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Oneonta Owego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston-Edwardsville Milton Plymouth Swoyersville-Forty Fort Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. Williamsport VIRGINIA Fourmile Run WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Ridgeley November 1986 November 1986 November 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 September 1987 September 1987 September 1987 September 1987 September 1987 October 1986 October 1986 September 1987 September 1987 4-39 Proj-ect I -- NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, Virginia, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, Virginia. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION PAGE 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ................... 5-2 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) ............... 5-2 3. Cape Charles City H arbor, VA ............................... 5-3 4. Chincoteague Inlet, VA ................... 5-3 5. Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA ....................... 5-4 6. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, VA (Collection and Removal of D rift) .............. .................... 5-4 7. James River, VA .......................... 5-4 8. Little Machipongo River, VA .............. 5-5 9. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA ..................... 5-5 10. Meherrin River, VA ....................... 5-6 11. Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Deepening), VA ................ 5-6 a. Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA ............ 5-6 b. Channel to Newport News, VA .......... 5-6 c. Norfolk Harbor Channels, VA ........... 5-7 d. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA ............. 5-8 12. Parker Creek, VA .......................... 5-8 13. Quinby Creek, VA ........................ 5-8 14. Rudee Inlet, VA ............................ 5-8 15. Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) ........ 5-9 16. Tangier Channel, VA .................... 5-10 17. Waterway on the Coast of VA ............. 5-10 18. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................... 5-10 19. Virginia Beach, VA ...................... 5-11 20. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization .............. 5-11 FLOOD CONTROL PAGE 21. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA ....................... 5-12 22. Richmond, VA ........................... 5-12 23. Saxis Island, VA ......................... 5-12 24. Scottsville, VA ........................... 5-12 25. Virginia Beach Streams, Canal Number 2, VA ..................... 5-13 26. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 5-13 27. Emergency Flood Control Activities ............................. 5-13 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 28. Surveys ................ ................. 5-13 29. Collection and Study of Basic D ata ............... ............... 5-13 TABLES Table 5-A Cost and Financial Statement .... 5-14 Table 5-B Authorizing Legislation .......... 5-18 Table 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks ................ 5-22 Table 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 5-23 Table 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................. 5-24 Table 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................. 5-24 Table 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............... 5-25 5-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, VA, 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection of canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for FY 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on the 5-year maintenance and repair contract, awarded Feb 83, is 92% complete and progressing satisfactorily. Other operations performed included repairs to the bridge deck at Great Bridge and bulkhead replacement at Deep Creek and Great Bridge. Ordinary operation and maintenance of the project was accomplished to include care of locks and dams, condition and operation studies, outgranting, engineering and design, supervision and administration. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 2A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA Location. At mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of Rappahannock River and about 50 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12221.) Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. For details of previousprojects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New Work and Maintenance: Dredging was performed on York Spit Channel between Apr - Jun 1987. A total of 1,576,752 cubic yards of credited material were removed. Other operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design and supervision and inspections. 3. CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA Location. Town of Cape Charles, VA is on Chesapeake Bay on west side of peninsula separating the bay from Atlantic Ocean. It is about 11 miles north of the southern extremity of the peninsula and 45 miles south of Maryland- Virginia State line. Cape Charles City Harbor is an artificial land-locked harbor on the south side of the town. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12222). Existing project. A channel 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from that depth in Chesapeake Bay through Cherrystone Bar and inlet to the entrance to Cape Charles City Harbor, a distance of 2.71 miles; a basin in the harbor of the same depth 400 to 800 feet wide and 3,000 feet long; a channel 10 feet deep, 100 to 180 feet wide and 260 feet long connecting a basin of same depth 180 feet wide and 420 feet long at head of Mud Creek, and a harbor of refuge on the north side of Mud Creek, 7 feet deep, 200 to 250 feet wide, and 375 feet long connected to Mud Creek with an entrance channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide. Project also provides for protective works in form of a stone jetty on north side of harbor entrance and sand mole 1,350 feet long south of harbor entrance. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet with extremes of 2.5 feet below and 8 feet above mean low water. Cost for new work for completed project was $628,644, including $6,000 from contributed funds. Widening the basin an additional 200 feet is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $207,000. Local cooperation. Items of local cooperation in connection with Harbor of refuge have been complied with. Terminal facilities. The Pennsylvania Railroad owns a wooden pier 200 feet long and two transfer ships in the outer harbor. On the south side of the harbor, Bay Shore Concrete owns an 800-foot bulkhead. A bulkhead providing 200 feet of berthing space is on the south side of the main harbor and is owned by a fish plant. There are about 1400 feet of cityowned bulkhead open to the public. The Coast Guard owns a 100-foot pier on Mud Creek. The harbor of refuge should accommodate about 50 boats when berthing facilities are completed. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance was performed consisting of condition surveys, engineering and design and supervision and inspections. 4. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211). Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteage, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was accomplished between Feb - Jul 1987. There were 200,000 cubic yards of credited material removed. Other work performed consisted of condition surveys, budgeting and scheduling, and engineering and design. 5. FINNEY CREEK AT WACHAPREAGUE, VA Location. The town of Wachapreague is located on the eastern shore of Virginia in Accomack County. Finney Creek, a tidual estuary, establishes the eastern boundary of the town's limits. Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide and 3,000 feet long starting at the 6-foot contour with the junction of the Waterway on the Coast of VA and terminating at the town-owned public landing. Local cooperation. The Local Sponsor (County of Accomack) shall: (a) Provide and maintain at its own expense all project facilities other than those for general navigation. (b) Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including dredged material disposal areas and perform all relocations or alterations of facilities (except relocations or alterations of highway and railroad bridges), determined to be necessary for construction, operation, or maintenance of the project. (c) Perform or assure performance of all utility relocations or alterations determined necessary for construction, operation, or maintenance of the project. (d) Provide during the period of construction, a cash contribution equal to 10 percent of the total costs of construction of the general navigation facilities assigned to commercial navigation. 5-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 (e) Provide, during the period of construction 50 percent of the total costs of the general navigation facilities assigned to recreational navigation. (f) Repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years, following the completing of the project, an additional 0-10 percent of the total costs of construction of the general navigation facilities assigned to commercial navigation, depending on the value of items provided pursuant to paragraph b. above, to the extent such items are allocated to general navigation facilities assigned to commercial navigation. (g) Pay 100 percent of the cost of operating and maintaining the general navigation features of the project assigned to recreational navigation. (h) Assume full responsibility for all Project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $4,000,000. Terminal facilities. Virginia Institute of Marine Science Laboratory (State owned under direction of William and Mary University) Public Dock and Landing (Owned by the Town of Wachapreague, VA 23480) Tyler's Marine Railway (Dave Tyler, RFD, Accomack, VA 23301) Public Landing (Owned by the Town of Wachapreague, VA 23480) Clam House (Dr. Donald J. Amrien, 204 Willow St., Chincoteague, VA 23336) Ed Aigner's Marina (Tom Richardson, Wachapreague, VA 23480) Earl and Ray's Marine Railway (Earl and Ray Packer, Wachapreague, VA 23480) Wachapreague Lodge and Marina Wachapreague Marina and Restaurant (Z. R. Lewis, P. O. Box 360, Wachapreague, VA 23450) Operations during fiscal year. New Work. Plans and specifications for construction were completed this fiscal year. 6. HAMPTON ROADS HARBOR OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Charts No. 12248, 12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of 63,560 cubic feet of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 7. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows easterly 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Charts No. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long along side the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin minR ichmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. The estimated (1971) total cost for new work is $71,145,940 including required non-Federal cost for conditions of local cooperation imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1930, 1945, and 1950, estimated (1939) to be $1,949,700; and by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, estimated (1971) to be $2,950,000. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation: Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. Terminal facilities: River commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharf, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharfs within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed on the Shoals to Hopewell, and the Richmond Deepwater Terminal between Jul - Aug 1987. A total of 117,237 cubic yards of material was removed. Other operations performed included condition surveys, budgeting and scheduling, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 8. LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA Location. This river, locally known as 1 arting Creek, has its source in the marsh of Bell Neck, Northampton County Va., flows in a southerly and easterly direc n about 5 miles, and empties into Great Machipongo River, about 12 miles by water from Great Machipongo inlet, and about 28 miles by water from Cape Charles, Va. The drainage area is about 11 square miles. No information is available as to the discharge of this stream. The length of the tidal reach is about 2 miles. The Great Machipongo Inlet and the Great Machipongo River are the waterways connecting with the Atlantic Ocean, and have a controlling depth of 16 feet. Willis Wharf, a town with a population of about 500, is located on the west bank about 1 mile above its junction with the Great Machipongo River. The high-water width varies from about 450 feet at the mouth to 350 feet at Willis Wharf. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 1221.) Existing project. This project provides for a channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 80 feet wide from the town of Willis Wharf to deep water in the river below. The mean range of tide is about 0.7 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities, at the town of Willis Wharf, there are three wharves with a total wharfage space of about 300 feet, five bulkheads with a total wharfage space of about 1,140 feet, and two marine railways which will accommodate vessels up to 50 feet in length. All facilities are privately owned, being used for packing seafoods and servicing fishing vessels. The wharves have no railroad connections, but are served by local roads connecting with the country and State highway system. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed Jun 1987. There were 29,467 cubic yards of credited material removed. Other operations performed included before and after dredging surveys, engineering and design and supervision and inspections. 9. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA Location. On south shore of Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, VA. Inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in northern half of city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 1222.) Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Depths are referred to mean low water. Mean ranges of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhorn Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local winds. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with, except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. 5-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details, see Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed or the Entrance Channel, the Turning Basin, Long Creek, and Broad Bay Channel during May -Jun, 1987. A total of 233,549 cubic yards of material were removed. Other operations performed included engineering and design, supervision and inspection, and before and after dredging surveys. 10. MEHERRIN RIVER Location. Rises in Lunenberg County, VA, flows southeasterly about 126 miles and empties into the Chowan River, NC, about 39 miles above Albemarle Sound, NC. (See U.S. Geological Survey, Winton Quadrangle, NC.) Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep from the mouth of the State highway bridge at Murfreesboro, about 10.5 miles, with a cut-off channel through Devil's ElboV4 miles above the mouth, 80 feet wide through the cutoff and 100 feet wide and 500 feet long, at Murfreesboro. The entire stream is nontidal and, except during freshets, its water surface rises and falls as winds raise or lower the water level of Albemarle Sound. Freshets cause variations of water level from 3 to 4 feet in the navigable portion of the river. The estimate of cost for new work, revised in 1935, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, is $46,000. The latest (1950) approved estimate of annual cost of maintenance is $3,500. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The nature and use of private wharves, piers and berthing areas has changed since project authorization. The project originally provided for steamboat lines making regular triweekly trips from Murfreesboro to various points on the Chowan River, Albemarle Sound, and their tributaries. The commerce carried by the vessels consisted of peanuts, fish, cotton, cotton seed, fertilizer, tobacco, grain, lumber, and general merchandise. The Smith Douglas fertilizer plant and the Standard Oil company plant were the major developments located at the town clock in Murfreesboro. Today the fertilizer facilities are still in use, however the use of the Standard Oil Company facilities has changed. The Town of Murfreesboro and its historical association have plans to promote historical attractions in the downtown area. To this end they have acquired the former Standard Oil Company site and are making plans for providing a terminal for local town boats. Once the tourists reach the terminal they will be transported into town to view historical attractions. Work incidental to site clearing and preparation is planned in FY 88. Operations during fiscal year. FY 87 funds were expended for permit evaluation and initial work for potential snagging and clearing. 11. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA The four projects, Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA; Channel Newport News, VA; Norfolk Harbor, VA; and Thimble Shoal Channel, VA, are grouped under the above heading for construction purposes only. Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work for all three projects is $117,000,000, exclusive of amounts expended for previous projects. Details of each project are given below. 11A. ATLANTIC OCEAN CHANNEL, VA Location. The Atlantic Ocean Channel is located offshore of Virginia Beach, VA in the Atlantic Ocean. It extends southeastward from a point approximately 3.5 nautical miles offshore of Cape Henry to approximately 10 nautical miles offshore of Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, VA. Previous project. None. Existing project. A channel 57 feet deep at mean low water, 1,000 feet wide and approximately 10 miles long between 57-foot contours in the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. Local cooperation. See "Norfolk Harbor" writeup. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preparation of the General Design Memorandum for construction was completed. 11B. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart 400.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. See "Norfolk Harbor" Writeup. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design, using Government plant and hired labor, was completed for deepening the channel to 55 feet. Deepening the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet is scheduled for construction during 1988. 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 11C. NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNELS, VA Location. Norfolk, VA is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 400 and 452.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. SOUTHERN BRANCH: A channel 45 feet deep and 450 feet wide from the junction with the Eastern Branch to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railway Bridge; thence 45 feet deep and 375 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge; thence 40 feet deep and 250 feet to 500 feet wide to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge; thence 35 feet deep and 250 feet to 300 feet wide to a point 0.8 miles above Interstate 64 high level bridge. Project includes an approach and turning basin 45 feet deep opposite the Norfolk Naval Shipyard; a turning basin at the mouth of St. Julians Creek 40 feet deep, 400 to 600 feet long, and 800 feet wide; a turning basin at the mouth of Milldam Creek 40 feet deep and 800 feet square and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek, the upstream end of the project, 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of .38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGES: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55 foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of oen space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45 acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. DISPOSAL AREA: A disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, inclosed by stonefaced levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit channels connecting rehandling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55-foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (Commonwealth of VA) shall: (1) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers; including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged material; (2) Accomplish without cost to the United States, all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, tunnels, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements including pier modifications made necessary by plan implementation, except for altering or replacement costs for obstructive railroad and public highway bridges, such costs to be apportioned in accordance with the principles of Section 6 of the Bridge Alteration Act of 21 Jun 1940, as amended; (3) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; (4) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to implementation, operation, and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (5) Prohibit the erection of any structures within a distance to be determined by the Chief of Engineers from the botton edge of the proposed 55-foot, 45-foot, and 40-foot channels and turning basin; and (6) Provide without cost to the United States, all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, or the costs of such retaining works required for the project including all monitoring features and stilling basins. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The first phase of deepening the channel to 50-feet over an outbound width of 650 to 800 feet is in progress. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress for deepening the 40-foot channel to 45 feet over its existing 750 foot width from Lamberts Point to the junction of Southern and Eastern Branch. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress for 5-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 deepening the 40-foot channel to 45-feet over its existing 375 to 450 foot width between the junction of the branches and the N & W RR Bridge, for deepening the 35-foot channel to 40 feet over its existing 250 to 500 foot width from the N & W RR Bridge to U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge, for deepening the existing turning basin at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard from 40 to 45 feet and deepening the existing turning basin at St. Julians Creek from 35 to 40 feet, and for constructing the new 40-foot turning basin near Milldam Creek. Preconstruction engineering and design is completed for anchorage improvements in Hampton Roads. Enlarging the easternmost anchorage opposite Sewells Point to provide a swinging radius of 1,400 feet and depth of 45 feet, and construction of a new 55-foot anchorage near the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel with a swinging.radius of 1,500 feet have been recommended. MAINTENANCE: Operation and maintenance of the Craney Island portion of the project consisted of dredging 1,681,024 cubic yards of credited material from the Rehandling Basin, operation and maintenance of roads, service facilities, rental equipment and government plant, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 11D. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 13.4 miles from a point 1 miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 1222.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1966. Existing projects. Provides for dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water, 1,000 feet wide and approximately 13.4 miles long between 55-foot contours in lower Chesapeake Bay. Local cooperation. See "Norfolk Harbor" writeup. Terminal facilities. Project serves an an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See "Norfolk Harbor," "Newport News Channel, VA," etc. Operations during fiscal year. New Work and Maintenance: Preconstruction engineering, and design was completed for deepening the channel from 45 to 55 feet. Deepening the channel from 45 to an intermediate depth of 50 feet over an outbound width of 650 feet was in progress at year end. Dredging was performed during Mar - May 1987. There were 1,380,687 cubic yards of credited material removed. Other operations performed included condition surveys, budgeting and scheduling and engineering and design. 12. PARKER CREEK, VA Location. Parker Creek empties into the western side of Metomkin Bay in Accomack County, Virginia. It is on the ocean side of Virginia's Eastern Shore, about 20 miles south of Maryland-Virginia State line. Existing project. The existing project, authorized under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, provides for establishment and maintenance of a channel 40 feet wide and 5 feet deep at mean low water from the same depth in Metomkin Bay into the mouth of the creek, a distance of about 2,200 feet or 0.5 mile. The existing project was completed in 1964 at a cost of $15,530 to the Federal Government and $1,350 to local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Non-Federal contributions amounted to $1,350. Terminal facilities. There are 9 small privately owned boat landings and two small public landings on the creek. Local interests have also constructed a 50-foot public dock with adequate shore facilities. These facilities are deemed adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was performed between Sep - Oct 1986. There was 37, 185 cubic yards of material removed. Other operations performed included quantity surveys and supervision and inspection. 13. QUINBY CREEK, VA Location. A natural channel on Atlantic Ocean side of Delmarva Peninsula about 32 miles north of Cape Charles; and about 33 miles south of Chincoteague, Va. Creek extends in a generally southeasterly direction between Quinby Landing at Quinby, VA and head of Tony Rock Drain, in Upshur Bay, a distance of 6,900 feet (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12210). Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep in Upshur Bay to a point 600 feet bayward from Quinby Landing, thence 60 feet wide to Quinby Landing, a total distance of about 6,900 feet and a turning and mooring basin of the same depth, 200 feet wide and 400 feet long opposite public terminal and landing. Mean range of tide is 4.4 feet. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of 1950. (H. Doc. 241, 81st. cong., 1st sess. which contains latest published map.) Project is complete, for details see Annual Report for 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for initial construction. Local interests provide spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are two open-pile wooden wharves and about 125 feet of wooden bulkhead at Quinby, VA, which are privately owned. In addition, a number of berthing spaces, a wooden dock and launching ramp were 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT constructed and open to all on equal terms. These facilities are connected to the State Highway system by a suitable access road and are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was accomplished Oct - Dec 1986. There were 64,293 cubic yards of credited material removed. Engineering and design and supervision and inspection was performed to include before and after dredging surveys. 14. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. Rudee Inlet is located on the Atlantic Ocean at Virginia Beach in an area where boating is a major activity. It provides a gateway to a variety of oceanic pursuits varying from pleasure cruising to commercial deep sea fishing. Existing project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 110 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18 ft-deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. The Local Sponsor (The City of Virginia Beach) shall: (a) Share in paying the total project construction costs, on the following basis: 50% of the cost of general navigation facilities of the project assigned to recreational navigation 10% of the cost of general navigtion facilities of the project assigned to commercial navigation; (b) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material, and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefore, or the cost of such retaining works; (c) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, including, but not limited to failure of shoreline and waterway structures such as bulkheads; except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) Provide, maintain, and operate without cost to the United States at least one adequate public landing with mooring facilities, and provisions for the sale of engine fuel, lubricants, and potable water as needed for transient and local crafts as well as necessary access roads, parking areas, and other needed public-use shore facilities if the needs of traffic so require and none is available. All of the facilities, at all times throughout the period of cooperation, shall be open and available to the use of everyone on equal terms. It is agreed that the presently existing privately operated facilities satisfy these conditions; (e) Accomplish without cost to the U.S. alterations and relocations as required of buildings, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities; (f) Enforce such management techniques for controlling erosion and sediment, non-point pollution and runoff in the watershed areas of Rudee Inlet, Lake Rudee, Owl Creek, and Lake Wesley which have been developed by the Virginia State Water Control Board and the Hampton Roads Water Quality Agency and promulgated in the Best Management Handbook-Urban Planning Bulletin 321 of the Virginia State Water Control Board; (g) Assume full responsibility for all project construction costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation for Section 107 projects; (h) The City in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-ofway for project construction, operation and maintenance will comply with the provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, and; (i) The city will comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352, to wit: that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, color or national origin. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were completed and items of local cooperations were secured for construction. 15. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451) as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3,1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act 5-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, debris removal, investigation and removal of sunken or abandoned vessels and navigational hazards, and support for Federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted dredging, and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 16. TANGIER CHANNEL, VA Location. A tidal channel about 2 miles long extending from Tangier Island, Virginia, northeasterly to deepwater in Tangier Sound, Chesapeake Bay and northwesterly to deepwater on Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12228.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from 8-foot contour to Tangier Sound to day marker No. 4, and thence 8 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the town of Tangier, with an anchorage basin adjacent of town 400 feet square and 7 feet deep. A channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide for about 4,000 feet from the anchorage basin northwesterly across Tangier Island to Chesapeake Bay. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet and extreme tidal range 4.7 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that interests must furnish spoil disposal area as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Accomack County constructed a public dock in 1961. There are four privately owned docks adjacent to existing project and two marine railways. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and engineering and design were accomplished. 17. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, throughfares, and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorizes relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was accomplished at Magothy Bay during Mar - Apr 1987 and Burton's Bay in Apr 1987. A total of 126,718 cubic yards of material were removed. Other work performed included a long term disposal analysis, before and after dredging surveys, condition studies, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 18. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION STUDY/PROJECT Meachim's Creek, VA Hunting/Guilford Creeks, VA Scotts Creek, VA Little Machipongo River, VA Bennett Creek, VA Kings Creek, VA FY 87 EXPENDITURES STATUS 7,455 Appraisal Report determine negative. 7,964 Reconnaissance study terminated due to lack of local cooperation. 24,964 Favorable reconnaissance study completed. 1,434 Plans and specifications initiated. 2,383 Detailed Project Study completed. 600 Detailed Project Report determined negative. 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT BEACH EROSION CONTROL 9. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of virginia-North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape tenry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 leet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to insure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges therewith would be less than the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The United States shall participate in the first cost of the project to the full extent of its proportionate share of cost as a landowner, plus one third total first cost of restoring and protecting all publicly-owned sections of the shore. The 1962 modification provided that the United States shall further participate in periodic beach nourishment of the beach in the amount of one third the cost for 25 years from date of commencement of operations in placing an initial quantity of nourishment material equal to deficiency in the design beach at that time. Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act increased Federal participation to one-half of the cost incurred after October 23, 1962. Estimated Federal cost (1987) is $5,000,000. Estimated cost to local interests is $5,000,000. Construction of the groin system is not included in the above estimate. The 1962 estimate for this work was $549,000 Federal cost and $531,000 cost to local interests. The 1974 modification which provides for structural and nonstructural improvements was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Structural measures will be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street. This will include maintaining the beach at elevation 5.4 feet and a width of 100 feet and construction of a stepped-face concrete seawall just seaward of the existing bulkhead from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 58th to 89th Streets. The estimated cost (1987) of the structural improvements are Federal $26,120,000 and non-Federal $14,220,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of Annual Report for FY 81 and for 1962 modification. For the 1974 modification, local sponsor (The City of Virginia Beach) is required to: (a) Provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; (b) Accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations; and alterations as may be necessary for project purposes; (c) Share in paying the total project construction costs as follows. If the costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and alterations provided by the city for the functions of hurricane protection and tidal flooding protection are equal to or less than 35 percent of all final first costs allocated to said functions, provide a cash amount necessary to equal 35 percent of said final costs. The allocations shall be based on conditions existing at the time of construction; (d) Hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from construction and subsequent operation, maintenance, and public use of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors' (e) Maintenance and repair of the project and assure the local share of periodic beach nourishment, i.e., 50 percent of the cost of annual beach nourishment, during the useful life of the project as required to serve the project's intended purpose; (f) Assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore area included within the project during the useful life of the project; (g) Provide and maintain for the use and benefit of the general public throughout the entire project area convenient access to the beach, sufficient on and off street parking, and other necessary public use facilities needed to accommodate reasonably expected beach visitation open to all on equal terms; (h) Enforce existing ordinances, and any amendments thereto which are designed to prohibit unwise future development in those areas that would be inundated. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project, as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, expired Feb 87. A re-evaluation report, to extend federal participation from 25 years to 50 years, was initiated Jun 87 with the receipt of $96,000. The report is anticipated to be submitted for Division review Jan 88. The 1974 modification project is in the preconstruction engineering and design phase. The final General Design Memorandum is scheduled for completion Sep 30, 1988. Completion of the preconstruction engineering and design effort through plans and specification is scheduled for Jun 1, 1989. 20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None this fiscal year. 5-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 FLOOD CONTROL 21. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA. Location. Site of proposed Gathright Dam is on Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 and Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in reach of Jackson River known as the Gorge. About 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA at the elevation at the top of the conservation pool. Gathright Reservoir will extend upstream about 9 miles (see Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long rolled rock fill dam with an impervious core, with a top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam: a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450- foot long fixed crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch, about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Last approved estimated Federal cost (1979) is $83,000,000. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: $300,000 paid to W. G. Construction Corp. to finance settlement of project claim for time and associated delay costs. Maintenance: Operations performed this fiscal year consisted of care of service and recreational facilities, water contrpl management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. 22. RICHMOND, VA. Location. The city of Richmond, the capital of Virginia, is located in the Piedmont Plateau and is bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into two areas, the Shockoe Creek area on the north bank and the industrial-commercial complex on the south bank. Previous project. None. Existing project. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on both sides of the river in the downtown area, which would protect against a flood higher than that which occurred in June 1972 which is the maximum flood of recent record. The project to be constructed is that generally described in House Document 98-178, 98th Congress, 2nd Session with modifications recommended by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on February 21, 1984. The present construction cost of the project is now estimated at $90,300,000. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1986. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued with economic studies, hydraulics and hydrology, geotechnical investigations, subsurface explorations and structural engineering. Construction is scheduled for Feb 88 with the first phase demolition at the southside alignment and completion scheduled for Sep 1993. 23. SAXIS ISLAND, VA. Location. Located adjacent to the town of Saxis, VA, in Accomack County. This Eastern Shore island is approximately 80 miles north of Norfolk, VA, and 100 miles southeast of Washington, D.C. Previous project. None. Existing project. Shoreline erosion threatens a public landing owned by Accomack County and located at the southern end of Saxis Island. The threatened public landing is currently protected by a timber bulkhead which is in danger of immediate failure due to erosion. Consideration was given to a cantilever steel sheet pile wall and an anchored timber system. However, the recommended plan provides for construction of an anchored timber bulkhead along the northern and western portions of the landing. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1986. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction, initiated the end of Fiscal Year 86, was completed this fiscal year. 24. SCOTTSVILLE, VA. Location. The town of Scottsville, VA is located in Albemarle and Fluvanna Counties, on the north bank of the James River, 185 miles above its mouth. Previous project. None. Existing project. The town encompasses 130 acres and the 1980 population was 250. It includes small commercial establishments and dwellings including many of historical value. A relatively large tire manufacturing plant is located adjacent to the town in Albemarle County and is the largest employer in the area with about 270 employees. 5-12 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of FY 85 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction, initiated in FY 85, is continuing. Work performed consisted of engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 25. VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2, VA Location. The canal number 2 watershed with a drainage area of about 37 square miles lies within the city of Virginia Beach. The city consists of 255 square miles of primarily low, flat terrain with about 75 percent of the area below elevation 15 feet, mean sea level. The existing canal, from the Eastern Branch of the Lynnhaven River to the North Landing River is about 12 miles long and follows a north-south alignment. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12205.) Existing project. The project will provide for channelization of an existing canal for a length of 1.1 miles. The canal bottom width will range from 45 feet to 80 feet and a depth from -4 feet mean sea level to -8 feet mean sea level with a flow capacity great enough to carry a 100 year flood. Its construction will require dredging 741,000 cubic yards of material. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-14 of FY 81 Annual Report. Requirements may change if legislation is enacted regarding new cost-sharing proposals. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were completed in preparation for construction and the items of local cooperation were secured. 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. The District was reimbursed for 9 unfavorable Initial Appraisal Reports: Jackson River at Scottsville, VA; Jackson River at Covington, VA; Jackson River, Industrial Park, VA; Piney River, VA; St. Mary's River, VA; Little Calfpasture River, VA; Glasgow River, VA; Goshen, VA; and Ramsey's Draft, VA. Total expenditures amounted to $67,065. 27. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. During FY 87 $132,649 was spent on the National Emergency Preparedness Program. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 28. SURVEYS. Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $452,575. Work performed consisted of: Flood Control Studies,; Supplemental Preauth Studies Flood Control, 121,303; Review of Authorized Projects, 58,289; Shoreline Protection Studies, 52,625; Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, 42,000; Special Investigations, 35,000; FERC Licensing, 3,000; and Navigation Studies, 2,998 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of Basic Data was $119,383, consisting of $52,389 for Management Service Unit, $57,055 for Technical Service, and $9,939 on a Hurricane Evacuation Study. 5-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Sect. Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 To 30 Sep 1987 in Tect 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, VA and the St. John's River, FL (Norfolk Dist) (Regular Funds) 2. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk Dist) (Regular Funds) 3. Cape Charles City Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) 4. Chincoteague Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Fi.nney Creek at Wachapreague, VA 6. Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, VA Collection and Removal of Drift (Regular Funds) 7. James River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost Recreation Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 1,213,817 2,570,649 1,964,374 2,699,229 2,343,728 2,521,787 1,931,265 2,723,252 40,000 200,690 32,724 33,977 1,381,182 1,484,896 169,526 221,568 88,000 88,001 968,902 967,792 113,223 113,222 918,015 917,618 178,241 178,209 127,604 127,518 495,612 184,301 65,107 1,041,410 65,508 1,041,409 24,500 20,861 185,105 185,163 814,658 1,538,877 2,311,895 1,076,147 1,430,155 2,312,981 56,000 19,755 31,512 63,000 15,127 3,639 260,000 257,865 935,997 1,045,823 8,063 5-14 3,688,3721 3,688,372 47,868,5642 47,806,539 479,947 479,947 59,871 59,871 8,015,0733 8,015,073 9,773,992 9,772,796 622,6444 622,644 1,102,543 791,231 227,000 227,000 6,485,924 6,485,923 3,850 3,850 24,500 24,500 3,200,984 3,198,849 7,639,9045 7,639,904 29,459,478 29,458,412 413,456 368,913 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total.Cost Sect. Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 To 30 Sep 1987 In Text 8. Little Machipongo River, VA (Regular Funds) 9. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 10. Meherrin River, VA (Regular Funds) 11. Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Deepening), VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11A. Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11B. Channel to Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11C. Norfolk Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 67,500 39,163 5,590 5,590 83,414 83,372 11,000 28,579 64,811 64,809 2,424 84,934 84,735 510,456 510,498 1,434 243,262 243,463 670,611 670,607 5,173 5,173 91,809 2,075,000 4,615,000 - 2,042,215 2,625,036 - - 2,945,000 - - 2,239,892 19,201 19,202 1,400,715 1,400,335 208,750 218,413 316,470 320,816 (2,589) (2,459) 19,203 1,278,130 - 1,214,701 (8,897) 625 178,371 130,937 (100) (100) 54,000 49,784 386,827 386,484 4,627,375 3,816,880 5,369,398 3,031,795 9,369,636 3,739,813 4,840,919 3,259,794 - - - 134,500 - - - 112,104 93,500 86,600 473,590 473,590 445,354 445,354 2,768,646 2,768,642 54,764 54,764 6,781,8096 4,667,251 .6 -6 2,945,0006 2,239,8926 _6 _6 219,0546 219,038 .6 514,0436 451,753 5,718,660 5,718,410 54,0006 49,784 1,684,1606 1,601,185 77,929,4497 77,548,900 134,5006 112,104 5-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Sect. Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 30 Sep 1987 In Text 11D. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Parker Creek, VA (Regular Funds) 13. Quinby Creek, VA (Regular Funds) 14. Rudee Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) 15. Supervision of Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA (Regular Funds) 16. Tangier Channel, VA (Regular Funds) 17. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 19. Virginia Beach, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 39,979 69,860 34,203 65,729 65,729 21,000 20,999 129,000 156,489 230,912 274,501 425 247,759 247,229 536,348 536,346 175,000 547,251 430,000 384,330 212,000 211,272 9,747 271,650 4,058,699 288,285 2,106,990 188,611 169,820 2,756,500 2,078,004 29,329 29,328 40,766 30,766 30,000 29,482 260,225 261,036 76,399 76,401 76,419 76,421 292,910 302,910 10,000 545 354,000 348,498 7,915 7,915 1,048,097 1,027,841 900,425 1,174,569 330,000 361,017 605,000 569,030 5-16 4,364,5526 2,395,275 11,214,344 11,195,552 2,756,5006 2,078,004 34,000 15,530 224,392 224,392 104,176 104,176 1,064,883 1,064,883 235,000 224,993 5,457,824 5,452,322 116,550 116,550 2,422,744 2,422,744 850,498 850,498 11,938,570 11,936,817 4,875,195 4,806,060 204,683 204,683 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Sect. Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 30 Sep 1987 In Text 21. Gathright Dany and New Work Lake Moomaw, VA Approp - - - 300,000 80,970,527 (Regular Funds) Cost - - - 298,670 80,969,197 Maint Approp 820,000 870,000 880,842 919,322 8,177,164 Cost 914,128 852,484 851,948 916,775 8,120,267 22. Richmond, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp - - 1,613,179 1,153,000 2,766,179 Cost - - 1,602,465 1,055,916 2,658,381 23. Saxis Island, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp - 37,700 20,000 215,900 273,600 Cost - 21,670 14,693 237,237 273,600 24. Scottsville, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp 213,500 3,090,000 100,000 3,403,500 Cost 47,345 151,884 722,029 1,024,288 1,945,546 25. Virginia Beach New Work Streams, Canal Approp - 15,000 408,000 1,200,000 2,043,000 Number 2, VA Cost 10,864 7,088 43,661 28,022 491,683 1 Includes $292,096 for previous projects. 2 Includes $52,804 for previous projects. 3 Costs prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD (Baltimore District). Costs listed are for York Spit Channel, VA; Cape Henry Channel, VA and Rappahannock Channel, VA 4 Includes $445,291 military funds expended from new work dredging on existing project and $83,041 expended military funds for construction of a wharf. 5 Includes $763,000 for previous projects. 6 Excludes previous projects. See Annual Report for FY 1986. SIncludes $72,039 for previous projects. 5-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 1 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, Va. to sounds of North Carolina July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) July 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 June 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Congs., 3d sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62d Congs., 2d sess. H. Doc. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 23. 71st Cong., 1st sess.' Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Sept. 19, 1890 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) A channel 42 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Dredging a channel through Cherrystone Inlet and bar CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 4 of Text) Existing Project FINNEY CREEK AT WACHAPREAGUE, VA (See Section 5 of Text) Construct a channel 6 feet deep, 60 ft wide and 3,000 ft long H Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 19i H Doc. 86. 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 190, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 Unknown Approved in 1972 Approved in 1986 HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA. COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 6 of Text) Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads andSpecified in Act its tributary waters. 5-18 May 17, 1950 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents and training dikes Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Form a turning basin by widening channel at Richmond Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Removal of Trigg cofferdam Turning basin at Richmond Harbor Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA (See Section 8 of Text) Jul. 3, 1930 Existing Project. Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA (See Section 9 of Text) Existing Project Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet Modification MEHERRIN RIVER, VA (See Section 10 of Text) Mar. 2, 1907 Removal of Shoals and obstructions to make river safely navigable for vessels of less than 7-foot draft Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1986 Oct. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Present project dimensions NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA (See Section 11 of Text) ATLANTIC OCEAN CHANNEL, VA (See Section 11A of Text) Construct a 60 foot channel CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA (See Section 11B of Text) Deepen existing 45-foot channel to 55-feet NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNEL, VA (See Section 11C of Text) Hampton Roads and Elizabeth River Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard. Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch. Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal. 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point. Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet deep JAMES RIVER, VA. (See Section 7 of Text) July 5, 1884 Channel 22 feet deep from mouth of Richmond and construct spur H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. 5-19 S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 260, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 580, 87th Cong., 2nd Ses. Approved in 1982 H. Doc. 137, 59th Cong., 1st Ses. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. (Contains latest published map) H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 30, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 June 30, 1948 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 17, 1986 SOUTHERN BRANCH Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet. Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge. Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia Ry bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR Bridge. Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square. Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Julians Creek. Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. Deepen existing 40-foot portions to 45-feet deep Deepen portion of the 35-foot, from mile point 15 to Gilmerton Bridge, to 40 feet deep H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 182, 73d Cong., 2d sess. 2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. EASTERN BRANCH Mar. 2, 1907 Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet. Removel of shoals at mouth. Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge. July 3, 1930 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley. Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge. WESTERN BRANCH Mar. 4, 1913 Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge. July 3, 1930 For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge. July 3, 1930 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 SCOTTS CREEK Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide toa point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge. ANCHORAGES 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long. Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius. Construct a 55-foot anchorage and increase the radius to 1500 feet for an existing 45-foot anchorage H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 3 H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2d sess.' S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2d sess.' H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. 5-20 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) May 17, 1950 Oct. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 3, 1934 (P.W.A. Act) & Aug. 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 107) Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 July 24, 1946 Aug. 15, 1985 Oct. 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 1948 (Sec. 205) Oct. 27, 1965 (Sec. 201) THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 11D of Text) A channel 40-feet deep and 750 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channels on either side 32-feet deep and 450 feet wide. A channel 45 feet deep and 100 feet wide Deepen existing 45-foot channel to 55-feet PARKER CREEK, VA (See Section 12 of Text) Existing Project QUINBY CREEK, VA (See Section 13 of Text) Existing Project RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section 14 of Text) Project Authorized TANGIER CHANNEL, VA (See Section 16 of Text) Channel from Tangier Sound and anchorage Modified project dimensions Channel across Tangier Island WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 17 of Text) Existing project adopted. Project modified. Project widened to 100 feet, partially relocated, and incorporated in Delaware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterway in Delaware-Maryland-Virginia H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. Approved in 1964. H. Doc. 241, 81st Cong., 1st Session H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 63rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 51, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 141, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1964 H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Approved in 1970 VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (See Section 19 of Text) Project authorized. H. Doc. 186, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. Project modified. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess Engineering and Design. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 21 of Text) Project authorized. H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. RICHMOND, VA (See Section 22 of Text) Existing project. Project authorized for construction. SAXIS ISLAND, VA (See Section 23 of Text) Existing project. SCOTTSVILLE, VA (See Section 24 of Text) Project approved. VA. BEACH STREAMS, CANAL NO.2, VA. BEACH, VA. (See Section 25 of Text) Project authorized. H. Doc. 178, 98st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99st Cong., 2nd Sess. Approved in 1986. H. Doc. 551, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess. 5-21 1 Contains latest published map. 3 For latest published map. See H. Doc. 1246. 62d Cong., 3d Sess. 2 Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 23, 1935. >. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 5-C ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Avail- Year of able Miter Sills Opened Miles Chain- for Full Character to from Location ber Width Lift Upper Lower of Navi- Cost Norfolk, Va. feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation 12.4 Albemarle and Chesa- 75 600 2.7 Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 peake Canal (Great and shells Bridge, Va.) 10.7 Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp Canal 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $372,556 (South Mills, N.C.) with cutoff walls '16 feet at mean low water 5-22 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Appomattox River, Va. 1 1980 $870,341 $863,140- Aberdeen Creek, Va.2 1975 109,643 200,893- Blackwater River, Va. Active portion2 11 1975 342,118 151,735 19,300 Broad Creek, Va.2 1986 27,888 568,418 500 Carters Creek, Va Active portion2 3 1951 28,398 3,277- Channel to Newport News, Va. 1985 8,955,974 5,720,969- Channel from Phoebus, Va. to deepwater in Hampton Roads2 1944 11,500 32,442 1,200 Channel connecting York River, Va Back Creek to Slaights Wharf 2 1950 14,855 36,874 2,500 Chesconessex Creek, Va.2 1968 25,516 31,889- Chincoteague Bay, Va. 1984 25,126 371,984- Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. 1985 49,396 132,327- Chowan River, N.C. 2 1975 107,220 - 5,700 Cockrells Creek, Va.4 1949 - - - Cranes Creek, Va. 1986 6,274 394,556- Davis Creek, Va.2 1971 97,612 158,323 4,000 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., Va. 1974 83,000 39,675- Deep Creek, Newport News, Va.2 1980 288,278 2,054,201- Dymers Creek, Va.2 1953 5,582 4,610- Greenvale Creek, Va.2 1986 20,003 223,125- Hampton Creek, Va. 1981 186,237 1,116,952 62,969 Horn Harbor, Va.2 1964 13,987 88,488- Hoskins Creek, Va.2 1977 44,100 622,801 500 Jackson Creek, Va.2 1971 8,500 34,437- Jarvis Creek, Va.4 1979 39,259 -- Kings Creek, Va.4 1957 5,593 -- Lafayette River, Va.2 1982 242,047 153,598 188,962 Little River (Creek), Va.2 13 1966 168,623 442,033 16,955 Locklies Creek, Va.2 1928 11,581 9,560- Millford Haven, Va.2 1950 24,568 32,322- Mill Creek, Va.2 1937 5,445 4,346- Mulberry Creek, Va.2 1950 2,393 2,458- Nandua Creek, Va.2 1950 6,988 39,804- Nansemond River, Va.6 1978 167,477 426,777- Newport News Creek, Va.2 1962 135,600 147,570- Nottoway River, Va.2 1986 44,295 8,734 43,000 Occohannock Creek, Va. Active portion2 1951 13,859 78,283 Onancock River, Va.2 5 1963 187,914 427,233 Oyster Channel, Va.2 1984 119,117 630,353 Pagan River, Va.2 6 1950 51,425 284,381 Pamunky River, Va. Active portion2 1964 31,376 161,183 Parrotts Creek, Va.2 1957 37,045 37,771 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot 2 1947 165,566 66,162 Queens Creek2 1979 26,949 101,803 Rappahannock River, Va. 9 10 12 1983 414,633 1,958,360 Rappahannock Riverat Bowlers Wharf, Va.4 1950 5-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Starlings Creek, Va. Taskinas Creek, Va. Totuskey Creek, Va. Tylers Beach, Va.2 Urbanna Creek, Va.2 7 Whitings Creek, Va. Winter Harbor, Va.2 Willoughby Channel, Va.2 Wishart Point Channel, Va.2 York River, Va. Active portion2 1Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 2Completed. 31n addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 4lnactive. 5lncludes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for previous projects. 6lncludes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEA( 71n addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. 8lncludes $30,000 for new work and $7,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 91n addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 10lncludes $197,146 for previous new work projects. "Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 12lncludes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. 13Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. CH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Anderson Park, 1979 S471,474 - $176,671 Newport News, Va. Hampton Institute 1976 . $156,906 - $175,845 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report1 Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Buena Vista, Va. 1977 $ 417.900- Newmarket Creek, Va. 1970 1,000,000 12,283 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. 1973 1,851,933 32,877 516,256 Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. 1985 478,224 - - Salem Church Lake, Va. 1976 1,896,716 - - 'Preconstruction planning terminated. 'lncludes $144,785 for previous projects. 5-24 1981 1975 1970 1982 1963 1971 1981 1953 1975 1986 66,242 7,479 167,869 261,201 55,724 21,630 171,334 8,500 118,762 180,904 603,632 135 450,693 404,943 106,868 112,333 291,048 42,485 102,244 204,854 2,000 500 2,973 30,625 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-G RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Dismal Swamp Canal Baltimore Harbors and Channels, VA Cape Henry Channel Broad Creek, VA Channel to Newport News, VA Newport News Anchorage Chincoteague Bay, VA Chincoteague Inlet, VA Cranes Creek, VA Davis Creek, VA Deep Creek, Newport News, VA Horn Harbor, VA. James River, VA Richmond Harbor to DWT City Point Shoal Jordan PT - Windmill PT - Harrison PT Richmond Harbor DWT to Hopwell Little Creek, VA Newport News Creek, VA Norfolk Harbor, VA Eastern Branch Elizabeth River Western Branch Elizabeth River Oyster Channel, VA Queens Creek, VA Tangier Channels, VA Tylers Beach, VA Urbanna Creek, VA Waterway on the Coast of VA Metompkin Bay Horn Harbor Onancock River Magothy Bay Eckichy Marsh Channel Chesapeake Bay to Magothy Bay Northam Narrows and Kegotank Bay Gargathy Inlet Feb87 Jun 87 Jul 87 Nov 86 Oct 86 Mar87 Jun 87 Oct 86 Dec 86 May 87 Nov 86 Nov 86 Dec 86 Apr87 Feb87 Jun 87 May 87 May 87 Jun 87 Oct 86 Oct 86 Oct 86 Dec 86 Jul 87 Oct 86 Oct 86 Oct 86 Nov 86 Feb 87 Jul 87 Apr87 Feb 87 Recondition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Recondition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition SCondition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition 5-25 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin- Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965)....... ................... 6-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District)........ ...... 6-2 3. Beaufort Harbor, N. C........ ................ 6-4 4. Belhaven Harbor, N. C.......................6-4 5. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above Wilmington....... 6-5 6. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C.........................6-5 7. Far Creek, N. C................. ............ 6-5 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C.. ............... 6-6 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C................6-6 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C...................6-7 11. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C.........................6-8 12. Shallotte River, N. C........................6-8 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C.....................6-8 14. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and.Beaufort Harbor, N. C...................6-8 15. Wilmington Harbor, N. C.....................6-9 Flood Control 16. Ararat River, Mount Airy, N. C............... 6-10 17. Cape Fear River Basin, N. C..................6-10 17A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C.........6-10 17B. Randleman Lake, N. C.......................6-11 18. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C............6-11 19. Neuse River Basin, N. C....................6-12 19A. Falls Lake, N. C...................... .6-12 20. Scuppernong River, N. C.....................6-12 21. Stuart, Va....... ..................... 6-13 Page 22. Yadkin River Basin, N. C. and S. C............. 6-13 22A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C............. ............... 6-13 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.....................6-14 24. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization......................6-14 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 25. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C............6-14 25A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservior, Va. and N. C................... ............ 6-14 25B. Philpott Lake, Va................ ........... 6-15 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations......................6-15 General Investigations 27. Surveys ..... ................. ........... 6-16 28. Collection and Study of Basic Data........... 6-16 29. Continuation of Planning and Engineering...........................6-17 30. Preconstruction Engineering and Design..... 6-17 Tables Page Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement......... 6-18 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation.............6-22 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects................6-25 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects...................6-26 6-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Page Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................. ........... 6-27 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects............... 6-28 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................... 6-29 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization...............6-29 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs................6-30 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................ 6-31 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 30 percent (50 percent after FY 1987) of the cost of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Operations for FY87 included chemical and biological control efforts on 209 acres of hydrilla and chemical control on 94 acres of alligatorweed. The only chemical hydrilla control site was Big Lake in William B. Umstead Park where 14 acres of hydrilla were treated with Sonar. Three Lakes were stocked with triploid grass carp, including Lake Wheeler, Fred Bond Park Lake, and Lake Rogers. Triploid grass carp were first introduced into Lake Wheeler in the fall of 1985 at a rate of 20 fish per vegetated acre to control a 100-acre infestation of hydrilla with marginal results. Lake Wheeler was restocked (at the same rate) in the spring of FY87. Two new sites, Fred Bond Park Lake (25 acres of hydrilla) and Lake Rogers (70 acres of hydrilla) were stocked at a rate of 20 fish per vegetated acre in FY 87. All alligatorweed control in FY 87 was by the application of rodeo herbicide. The Scuppernong River and navigable tributaries remained under maintenance control with only 8 acres requiring treatment. Major drainage canals in the Scuppernong Basin required an additional 12 acres of treatment. Alligatorweed in the Little River Basin required limited applications that totaled about 5 acres. The Pasquotank River Basin was added as a treatment area in FY86. Excellent results from last year's treatment on the Pasoquotank River (over 40 percent reduction in the infested area) reduced our FY87 treatment needs to 15 acres. New alligatorweed treatment areas for FY87 included the Lumber River, New River and major tributaries, and Sweetwater Creek (a tributary to the Roanoke River). The Lumber River and Sweetwater Creek were heavily infested with alligatorweed, with reaches from 90 to 100 percent covered. FY87 treatment acres at these sites were 37 to 17, respectively. The New River had a relatively minor infestation (about 3 acres); however, herbicide application was made to preclude significant weed problems from occurring in the future. Planning efforts included investigations and the preparation of Supplement to the Environmental Assessment for the inclusion of new alligator weed control sites in the Lumber River, New River, and Roanoke River Basins and studies for inclusion of Lake Rogers as a hydrilla control site. Studies for the inclusion of Egeria sp. as a new problem plant species are ongoing. Several reconnaissance investigations of aquatic weed problems in response to requests by others were also made in FY87. Control work was accomplished for $42,595. Planning was accomplished at a Federal Cost of $31,339. Condition at end of fiscal year. No hydrilla is known to be growing in any of the Umstead State Park Lakes at this time; however, tubers are present and regrowth is expected. It appears that all three lakes in Umstead State Park may require herbicide treatment in FY88. The sterile triploid grass carp stocked in Lake Wheeler provided control throughout the FY87 recreation season and long-term control is expected.Some weed reduction may occur by FY88 in Fred Bond Lake and Lake Rogers; however, good control is not expected until the following year. Alligatorweed is under maintenance control in the Scuppernong River, Little River, New River and their major tributaries. These sites should require only spot treatments in FY88. The Scuppernong River Canals, Pasquotank River, Lumber River, and Sweetwater Creek will require extensive weed-control operations. Investigations of acquatic weed problems, in response to requests by county governments and municipalities, may result in the addition of new treatment sites and species in future years. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) 6-2 Tables Table 6-E Table 6-F Table 6-G Table 6-H WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwaterintrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $60,700,000 (1987). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12 feet deep channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The south jetty at Masonboro Inlet has an estimated Federal cost of $9,210,000 (1987) and is complete except for the training wall. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Joseph P. Knapp Bridge (formerly Coinjock) was completed at a cost of $85,503. Design of Core Creek Bridge was initiated at a cost of $26,951. The supplement for the Masonboro Inlet South Jetty GDM cost $1,258. Maintenance: Through Channel - During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $147,750. Between December 12, 1986 and May 8, 1987, the contract dredges Northwood II and Hampton Roads removed 389,283 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel and at inlet crossings at a cost of $1,214,344. Between January 23 and September 30, 1987, the contract dredge Richmond removed 301,252 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between Swansboro and the South Carolina state line at a cost of $1,269,675. Between March 24 and September 10, 1987, the contract dredges Clinton and Cherokee removed 524,741 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel at a cost of $1,662,270. Costs in connection with prior and current year pipeline dredging was $6,070. Design costs for dredging in FY 1988 was $14,490. Marking of easements along the AIWW cost $19,016. Easement and boundary surveys in 6-3 REPORT OF TIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Onslow County cost $1,164. Disposal area stabilization at Swansboro and Sneads Ferry cost $278,420. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $36,526. Archeological investigations of sounds and inlets cost $1,935. Structural repairs to three remaining bridges cost $511,727. Emergency repairs to Fairfield Bridge cost $333,725. Condition and operation studies cost $380,372. Periodic inspection of three remaining bridges cost $55,369. Three highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $489,851. Bogue Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 163,639 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet and channel at a cost of $331,535. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 96,983 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $174,116. Costs in connection with the Snell was $1,446. Condition and operation studies cost $16,260. Carolina Beach Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 28,917 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $45,089. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 240,275 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $379,315. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 1,036 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $8,100. Monitoring of Carolina Beach Inlet cost $45,393. Marine archeological survey of wrecks cost $17. Condition and operation studies cost $34,881. Masonboro Inlet - Prior year pipeline dredging cost was $945. Monitoring at Masonboro Inlet was $57,695. Condition and operation studies cost $844. New River Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 94,785 cubic yards from shoals in New River at a cost of $265,249. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 100,839 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $254,898. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 28,955 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $44,751. Archeological investigations cost $1,680. Condition and operation studies cost $31,635. New Topsail Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 102,033 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $180,152. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 50,286 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $95,596. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 33,015 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $110,865. Costs in connection with the Snell was $1,446. Condition and operation studies cost $30,726. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1983 except for the training wall, three tieup dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the three remaining bridges. Coinjock Bridge was completed on November 13, 1986. Design of Core Creek Bridge was initiated in FY 1987.Total cost for existing project to September 30, 1987 was $124,474,339, of which $41,737,731 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $82,736,608 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 3. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-footlong section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 9, 1986 and March 23, 1987, the contract dredgeRichmond removed 147,573 cubic yards from shoals in Bulkhead Channel, Taylors Creek and Morgan Creek at a cost of $380,490. Between September 1 and 10, 1987, the contract dredge Clinton removed 33,195 cubic yards from shoals in Gallants Channel at a cost of $38,592. Condition and operation studies cost $24,918. Contributed funds of $116,142 were expended on dikes for pipeline dredging. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1987, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $3,615,035 for maintenance, including $284,975 contributed funds, a total of $4,442,075. 4. BELHAVEN HARBOR, N. C. Location. The town of Belhaven is at the junction of Pantego Creek and Pungo River, about 11 miles above the mouth of the latter. The harbor consists of the lower 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT reaches of Pantego Creek and is about 6,000 feet long. Pungo River forms part of the Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk and the St. Johns River. Norfolk is 130 miles north of Belhaven and Beaufort 66 miles south. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 123.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water in Pungo River to a point about 800 feet east of the highway bridge, with a turning basin 800 feet long and 300 feet wide at the upper end; and for the construction of timber breakwaters at the mouth of Pantego Creek. Pungo River is a nontidal stream with little slope. Variations in the water surface, due to winds, seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and June 20, 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 12 wharves along the town waterfront, all of timber construction; one is owned by the town and is open to all without charge; four have rail connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repair of timber breakwaters cost $63,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1940. 5. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy systems at the locks at a cost of $310,089. Between October 23, 1986 and February 10, 1987, the contract dredge Buxton removed 79,492 cubic yards from shoals in the river channel at a cost of $273,227. Design for future years pipeline dredging cost $19,489. Design of portages at the locks cost $2,566. Repair and installation of dikes at lock and dam no. 1 cost $169,380. Perimeter security fences at lock and dam nos. 1 and 2 cost $19,336. Periodic inspection of locks and dams cost $10,328. Condition and operation studies cost $73,917. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $233,388. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987, were $17,316,918 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $13,706,464 for maintenance. 6. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The dredge Currituck incurred cost of $626. The debris boat Snell incurred cost of $1,446. Disposal ara stabilization at Bardens Inlet cost $46,075. Condition and operation studies cost $14,566. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 7. FAR CREEK, N.C. Location. Flows easterly from Englehard into Pamlico Sound, about 95 miles south of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232). Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to highway bridge at Englehard, with a turning basin 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 900 feet long at the head. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and May 17, 1950. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully compiled with. Terminal facilities. Project is served by 12 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,300 feet, all privately owned. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed June 1957. 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 8. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interest must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating ; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and, (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 51,613 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $80,889. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 67,710 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $161,514. General archeological investigations cost $1,334. Archeological investigations of the blockade runner Bendigo cost $5,101. Condition and operation studies cost $31,856. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 9. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12 foot deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deepwater near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12 foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $80,000,000 (1987). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreational navigation presently estimated at $11,800,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreational navigation facilities presently estimated at $1,230,000 annually; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $7,600,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas presently estimated at $6,800,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the modification cost $158,185. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 340,253 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet and west of the bridge at a cost of $1,111,725. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 19,960 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $39,584. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 84,743 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $313,577. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 41,400 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $127,189. During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell repaired dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $69,144.Between January 20 and April 20,1987, the contract dredge Clinton removed 272,689 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel at a cost of $594,938. Between April 9 and May 22, 1987, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 249,093 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel and west of the bridge at a cost of $586,994. Between March 11 and June 2, 1987, the contract dredge A tchafalaya and Mermentau removed 365,906 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $679,094. Between June 5 and July 22, 1987, the contract dredge Nermentau removed 533,183 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $814,874. Cost in connection with prior years dredging was $34,777. Expansion of disposal islands cost $25,011. Project monitoring cost $50,268. Condition and operation studies cost $158,422. Contributed funds of $156,000 were expended for diking for pipeline dredging. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 10. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200-foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow-draft channels. Project deepening was completed on August 2, 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between December 9, 1986 and March 23, 1987, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 351,588 cubic yards from shoals in the basin and channels at a Federal cost of $508,728. Between April 7 and May 6, 1987, the contract dredge Sugar Island removed 534,555 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $922,921. Cost adjustments for prior year dredging caused a decrease of $6,140. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $2,349. Monitoring at Morehead City Harbor cost $23,353. Condition and operation studies cost $144,592. Contributed funds of $47,455 were expended for diking for pipeline dredging. Contributed funds of $252,215 were expended for State Ports dredging. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the jetties. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1987, was $49,289,990 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $42,788,421 for maintenance, including $1,173,924contributed funds. 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 11. OCRACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 43 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide. Construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The Schweizer incurred cost of $794. Condition and operation studies cost $10,703. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 12. SHALLOTTE RIVER, N. C. Location. A small stream in Brunswick County, N. C., rising in the large swamp country between Cape Fear and Waccamaw Rivers, known as Green Swamp. Stream is about 30 miles long and flows southerly into Atlantic Ocean and 20 miles west of mouth of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 835.) Previous project. For details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. A channel 4 feet deep at mean low water and 36 feet wide from the mouth to town of Shallotte. Section under improvement is 9 miles long. River is tidal, range varying from 5 feet at mouth to 3 feet at Shallotte. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 caused a tide about 16 feet above mean sea level in the river at Shallotte Point. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, and January 21, 1927. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A marine railway and shop at Shallotte Point and another in town of Shallotte with facilities for building and repairing boats up to about 60 feet long. On Shallotte River, there are 17 docks varying from 16 to 321 feet of frontage, providing 1,334 feet of wharf and docking space. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs in connection with FY88 pipeline dredging was $2,440. Project condition surveys cost $19. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in 1929. 13. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 59,148 cubic yards from shoals in Teaches Hole channel at a cost of $139,994. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 23,819 cubic yards from shoals in Teaches Hole channel at a cost of $43,400. Between October 13 and November 22, 1986, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 233,281 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough and Teaches Hole channels at a cost of $672,834. Condition and operation studies cost $18,772. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 14. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $9,600. Project condition surveys cost $12,278. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 15. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River; a 38-footdeep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast (Cape Fear) River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. A modification to widen the 38-foot by 400-foot Fourth East Jetty Chanel to 500 feet; deepen the 32-foot by 400-foot channel between Castle Street and the N. C. 133 bridge to 35 feet; deepen and widen the 32-foot by 1000-foot by 800-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast (Cape Fear) River to 35 feet by 1,000 feet by 900 feet; and environmental improvements to include acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 1,800 acres of wetlands, river bluffs and ecotones and provision for a minimum number of specially designed corridors across the wetlands for industrial access to the river was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal cost is $7,700,000. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas including necessary retaining dikes presently estimated at $418,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs for dikes presently estimated at $4,000 annually; (2) pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement presently estimated at $1,200,000, and pay 25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $14,000 annually; (3) and pay 35 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas), presently estimated at $1,500,000. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost adjustments on the debris boat Snell resulted in reduction in cost of $1,950. Between January 2 and February 4, 1987, the U. S. hopper dredge McFarland removed 662,862 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,332,850. Between January 14 and April 15, 1987 the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 1,097,060 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a Federal cost of $657,581. Design for fiscal year 1988 bucket and barge dredging cost $46,233. Environmental analysis of proposed dredged material disposal sites cost $81,154. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $1,227. Condition and operation studies cost $240,021. Contributed funds of $55,107 were expended for State Ports dredging. Contributed funds of $31,555 were expended for design of Eagle Island dikes. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed October 1982 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1987, was $70,657,429 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $56,567,817 was for maintenance, including $3,605,467 contributed funds. 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Flood Control 16. ARARAT RIVER, MOUNT AIRY, N. C. Location. Ararat River is a tributary of the Yadkin River and is located in Surry County, N. C. The river flows through Mount Airy, N. C., to its confluence with the Yadkin River. The entire project borders Mt. Airy. (See USGS quadrangle sheets, Mount Airy, North, Va. and N. C. and Mount Airy, South, N. C.) Existing project. The project consists of approximately 5,100 feet of industrial area dike construction, approximately 6,700 feet of channel improvement, approximately 1,800 feet of floodwall/dike at the Pine Street commercial area, and a flood warning system. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 10, 1983, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The estimated Federal construction cost is $4,000,000 (1986). Local cooperation. Local interest must: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and spoil disposal areas and suitable conservation lands to partially compensate for loss of fish and wildlife resources as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction of the project; (b) accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; (c) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damage due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; (e) prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachment on channels and interior ponding areas which would reduce their flood-carrying capacity or hinder maintenance and operation, and control development in the project area to prevent an undue increase in the flood damage potential; and (f) assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $4 million. Formal assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction was completed at a Federal cost of $308,711. Contributed funds of $878,385 were expended for construction. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed April 30, 1987, and was turned over to the local sponsor for operation and maintenance on January 29, 1987. 17. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs). Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1987, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 17A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N.C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $138,330,000 (1987), consisting of $80,040,000 for construction, and $58,290,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,900,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $40,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $330,000. 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Assurances that these obligations for water storage would be assumed have been received from the Department of Natural and Economic Resources, State of North Carolina. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $795,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction of wildlife subimpoundments was continued at a cost of $1,746,330. Poplar Point recreation area was continued at a cost of $3,784,355. The Tailrace access area was continued at a cost of $339,107. The management center was completed at a cost of $106,687. The N. C. maintenance center and security building was initiated at a cost of $475,496. Ebenezer Church recreation area as initiated at a cost of $10,000. Crosswinds recreation area was initiated at a cost of $20,000. Seaforth recreation area was initiated at a cost of $484,813. Total Federal expenditures were $8,662,787 including the above items. Contributed funds of $20,000 were expended for the maintenance center security building. Status of plans and specs: Poplar Point, Parkers Creek and Crosswinds security buildings, 100 percent; and rehabilitate Mason House, 100 percent. Maintenance: Water quality studies were conducted at a cost of $26,385. Periodic inspections cost $19,903. Automatic gate control system cost $4,627. Sedimentation surveys cost $3,266. Normal operation and maintenance cost $772,849. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $66,678. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are bascially complete except for Public Service Gasline, recreation facilities, and project operations facilities. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for September 1989.' 17B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,300 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $111,000,000 (1987), consisting of $54,362,600 for construction and $56,638,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Based on the termination of Federal interest in the project by the ASA(CW), no local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Advance engineering and design cost $26,402. The State of N. C. was reimbursed $387,064 and AT&T has been reimbursed $39,397 for costs incurred under an advance participation agreement. Project coordination and completion of design effort prior to termination cost $46,018. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 1982. The Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority plans to build a water supply and possible recreation facility at Randleman. All pertinent data that may be useful in the construction has been provided. 18. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 31,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of sufficient material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. Along the northern 2,050 feet, the project includes a rock revetment at elevation 12 fronted by a 130-foot-wide berm at elevation 8. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $15,200,000 (1987). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design for the second increment of renourishment cost $17,840. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 completed in September 1983. The first increment of renourishment was completed in June 1985. A contract for the second increment is scheduled for award in January 1988. 19. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1987. 19A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 92 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100-feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 335,620 acre-feet, of which 220,880 acre-feet is for flood control, 34,970 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 54,700 acre-feet for water-quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $165,000,000, (1987) consisting of $73,403,000 for construction and $91,597,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $12,400,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $91,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $18,600,000, and, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,261,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non- Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate deficiency payments cost $1,395,376. Rolling View campground and recreation facilities were continued at a cost of $2,781,163. Sandling Beach miscellaneous features, were initiated at a cost of $58,111. Tailrace access area was initiated at a cost of $130,719. Total Federal expenditures were $5,969,059, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: Fish and wildlife subimpoundments, 97 percent; Mangum House rehabilitation, 100 percent; and State maintenance center and security building, 99 percent. Maintenance: Water quality studies were conducted at a cost of $173,737. Repairs to the dam cost $56,333. Borrow area repairs cost $210,046. Emergency lighting system cost $2,222. Periodic inspections cost $26,312. Normal operation and maintenance cost $796,108, for a total of $1,264,758. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $66,678. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. Dam, access road, clearing, main operations area, all relocations and 46 percent of the recreation facilities are completed. Recreation facilities, fish and wildlife facilities and State management and O&M facilities are the major items remaining. 20. SCUPPERNONG RIVER, N.C. Location. The stream rises in the east-central portion of Washington County, N. C., flows east into Tyrrell County, and thence north into Albemarle Sound, a total distance of about 22 miles. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheet, Creswell, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for excavating a 70-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 9 feet to 12 feet, along Scuppernong River from Spruills Bridge to the confluence with Mauls Creek, a distance of 2.0 miles, and excavating a 45-foot-bottom-width channel, with depths ranging from 6 feet to 8 feet, along Mauls Creek from Scuppernong River to County Road 1163, a distance of 1.8 miles. Total project length is 3.8 miles. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $509,000 (1984). 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Project was approved by the Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1966 (with modification adding Mauls Creek approved June 16, 1967), under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations and alterations, and highway or highway-bridge construction and alterations necessary for construction; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate project after completion; contribute, in cash, 31.4 percent of construction costs, currently estimated at $141,000; and prevent future encroachment. Formal request has not been made. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project reanalysis cost $921. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project reanalysis and environmental studies have been completed. The project has been terminated due to the State of N. C. not issuing a water quality certification. 21. STUART, VA. Location. The project is located on the South Mayo River at Stuart, Va., above and below Route 8 highway. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Stuart, Va.) Existing project. The recommended plan consists of a 100-foot-bottom-width high flow diversion channel combined with downstream river widening. A wier will be placed across the entrance to the diversion channel and a bench channel design will be used for the downstream river widening. The South Mayo River above Route 8 highway will be widened to a 50-foot bottom width, using a trapezoidal channel design and the commercial site northwest of Route 8 will be filled to the elevation of approximately the 200-year frequency flood. All river widening, except for a short distance above Route 8, will be done on the north bank. Estimated Federal cost of construction is $2,280,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 1, 1985, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and spoil disposal areas, and all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $4 million; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachments; continue to enforce flood plan regulations that comply with FEMA guidelines; and at least annually, inform affected interests regarding the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Formal assurances have been received. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued at a cost of $1,623,188. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded May 16, 1986, and is scheduled for completion in November 1987. 22. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24,1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 22A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acrefeet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Paving of recreational roads cost $8,833. Rehabilitation of campsites was accomplished at a cost of $49,135. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,128,116 for a total of $1,186,084. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $66,678. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1987: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Onslow County, N. C.; Pungo Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; South Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Pungo River, Beaufort County, N. C.; and Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.; Ararat River, Surry County, N.C.; and Leith Creek, Scotland County, N. C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $35,000. Total cost to September 30, 1987, was $374,559, charged to operations. 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Program cost $85,157. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $102,794. Field surveys for the February - April 1985 flooding on the Roanoke River cost $11,261. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 25. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 25A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and $24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost-sharing with the State of N. C. at various sites cost $373. Maintenance: Cost adjustments on preservation of archeological sites at Satterwhite Point caused a decrease of $40. Stability analysis of the dam cost $3,497. Construction of the management center was completed at a cost of $638,346. Design and repair of highway bridge cost $356,301. Study on impact of water withdrawals cost $196. Work on the South Boston litigation cost $26,602. Work on the fire protection system for the powerhouse cost $76,904. Work on the fire extinguishing and suppression system cost $2,842. Dam break model analysis cost $161. Replacement of the powerhouse computer was initiated at a cost of $34,966. Real estate work in the South Boston area cost $7,472. Periodic inspection of the dam bridge cost $5,900. Final guide taking line study cost $10,097. Flood damage and benefit updating system cost $936. Construction of a washhouse at Longwood and a dump station and washhouse at Northland Park was completed at a cost of $2,450. Investigation and stability analysis of earth dikes cost $2,485. Design of courtesy docks cost $22,774. Replacement of guard rail at Island Creek dam cost $48,380. Design of Northbend Park water system improvements cost $76,828. Design for recreational road paving cost $16,236. Design for replacement of powerhouse roof cost $3,278. Normal operation and maintenance cost $3,969,483 for a total of $5,306,094. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $66,678. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 25B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. On Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Construction of management and visitors center was continued at a cost of $369,604. Sluice bulkhead was completed at a cost of $356. Replacement of the powerhouse computer was initiated at a cost of $10,596. Condition survey of a crack cost $12,400. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,299,709, for a total of $1,692,665. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $66,678. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1987 at elevation 211.60 feet, MSL or 4.40 feet below normal pool. The spring and summer of 1986 turned out to be the worst drought the Cape Fear River Basin has experienced over the period of record going back to 1908. Declining inflows lowered the lake elevation to 207.85 feet MSL or 8.15 feet below normal pool on November 12, 1986, utilizing 67% of the total conservation pool storage. This is the lowest level for Jordan Lake since impoundment in February of 1982. As a result of the drought conditions and a rapidly declining lake level, the State of North Carolina temporarily lowered the downstream water quality target flow at Lillington, N. C. Above average rainfall during November and December, along with reduced downstream target flows helped to produce a steady rise in Jordan Lake. On January 3,1987, Jordan Lake was at the normal pool elevation of 216.00 feet MSL. On January 23 and April 19, two major flood peaks occurred in which Jordan Lake reached elevation 221.70 and 226.80 feet MSL respectively. A third flood peak of 230.15 feet MSL on March 4 was the maximum elevation for the fiscal year and since impoundment in February 1982. At this point, 49% of the flood control pool storage was utilized. During the months of May through the middle of July, the reservoir level fluctuated near normal pool. However in late July, a gradual lake level drawdown began as a result of below average rainfall. Jordan Lake had fallen to elevation 212.28 feet MSL by September 7 when heavy rainfall refilled the lake to near normal pool. Jordan Lake ended the fiscal year at elevation 214.39 feet MSL or 1.61 feet below normal pool. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1987 were $7,665,000 which makes the cumulative total since impoundment of the project equal to $11,367,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $146,190. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1987 at elevation 248.26 feet MSL or 1.84 feet below normal pool. Below normal rainfall and continuing drought conditions experienced during most of 1986 produced a gradual drawdown of the lake to elevation 245.95 feet MSL on November 26 which was the minimum level for the fiscal year. Rainfall during late December and early January ended the drought conditions and brought the lake level back to near the normal pool level of 250.1 feet MSL. Above normal rainfall during mid- January resulted in a lake level rise to elevation 255.14 feet MSL on January 24. The lake level returned to normal by mid-February. Very heavy rainfall caused Falls Lake to rise to elevation 258.55 feet MSL on March 3 which was the maximum elevation for the fiscal year and also the highest level since permanent impoundment began in January 1983. Heavy rainfall occurred again during mid- April and resulted in a rise of the lake level to elevation 254.94 feet MSL on April 18. The lake level remained near normal through May and most of June. Below normal rainfall from May through early September caused a gradual drawdown of the lake level to elevation 247.31 feet MSL on September 6. After rising slightly above elevation 248.0 feet MSL during mid-September, Falls Lake ended the fiscal year at 247.51 feet MSL. Total flood and conservation storage utilized during the year was 54 percent and 45 percent respectively. Flood damage prevented during fiscal year 1987 were $12,839,000 which makes the cumulative total since inception of the project equal to $21,558,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $122,631. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservior, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began fiscal year 1987 at elevation 295.38 feet MSL or 4.12 feet below rule curve. Below normal rainfall and drought conditions experienced during most of 1986 continued through October causing the minimum elevation of the fiscal year of 294.05 feet MSL or 4.55 feet below rule curve on October 14. The reservoir level gradually rose to rule curve on November 19. Above normal rainfall with periods of heavy rainfall occurred over the Roanoke River Basin during November 1986 to April 1987 and marked the end of the drought conditions. Minor rises in reservoir level occurred in December and January. Increasing inflows in March and April produced sharp reservoir rises to 312.49 feet MSL on March 6 and 319.61 feet MSL on April 29, respectively. The latter reservoir peak was the maximum elevation of the fiscal year and also the maximum elevation since impoundment in 1952. During this flood, five tainter gates were opened 1 foot on April 29 to prevent the reservoir level from rising above top of flood pool elevation, 320 feet 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 MSL. All tainter gates were closed on April 30. The reservoir level was lowered to the rule curve elevation of 301.7 feet MSL on June 2. After a minor rise on July 16, the reservoir level gradually dropped to elevation 295.95 feet MSL on August 28 or 3.55 feet below rule curve. Heavy rainfall in September caused a reservoir level rise to 307.31 feet MSL on September 14. The reservoir level was at 300.40 feet MSL or 0.90 feet above rule curve at the end of the fiscal year. The 13-foot minimum stage required in the lower Roanoke River at Weldon for striped bass fish spawning was met from April 15 to June 19 by flood releases and fish augmentation flows from John H. Kerr. The total flood and current contractual power pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 97 percent and 86 percent, respectively. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 660,733,700 kilowatts hours and net marketed power revenue was $5,884,683 making a cumulative total since inception of $126,098,711. Flood damage prevented by John H. Kerr project during the fiscal year was $63,000,000 which makes the cumulative total since the project began equal to $139,207,000. The total cost of functional operation for the fiscal year was $255,776. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began fiscal year 1987 at elevation 963.81 feet MSL or 7.69 feet below the rule curve. Below normal rainfall during October, and continuing drought conditions lowered the lake level to the minimum elevation for the fiscal year of 962.21 feet MSL or 9.29 feet below the rule curve on October 31. From November to January, the lake level gradually recovered and returned to the rule curve by mid-January as rainfall was above normal. The lake level remained near the rule curve for the last half of January and through February. During the first week in March, heavy rainfall raised the lake level to 979.05 feet MSL on March 2 but a gradual drawdown returned the lake level to slightly above the rule curve by the end of the month. Excessive rainfall during the month of April raised the lake level to 979.09 feet MSL on April 17 and to 977.11 feet MSL on April 25. A new record high rainfall amount of 10.84 inches for the month of April was recorded for the area above Philpott Dam. From May through August, below normal rainfall produced a gradual drawdown of the lake to slightly below the rule curve. The lake level rose to the maximum elevation for the fiscal year, 979.52 feet MSL or 7.29 feet above the rule curve, on September 8 following heavy rainfall in the area. The rainfall gage at Philpott Dam received 8.28 inches of rain on September 8 which sets a new maximum daily amount for the period of record. Philpott Lake ended the fiscal year at 971.74 feet MSL or 0.24 feet above the rule curve. The floods in March, April and September required water to be released through the sluice gates. Maximum controlled flood and dependable capacity power pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 49 percent and 55 percent respectively. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year were $120,165,000 which makes the cumulative total since inception of the project equal to $142,835,000. The project prevented $106,663,000 in flood damages during the September flood. Gross generation amounted to 37,104,130 kilowatt-hours and power revenue was $1,337,038 for a cumulative total of $16,012,260 since inception. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $108,879. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir ,located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1987 at elevation 1,025.62 feet MSL or 4.38 feet below normal pool. Below normal rainfall, declining inflows, and continuing drought conditions caused the reservoir level to drop to the minimum elevation of the fiscal year of 1,023.78 feet MSL on October 25 or 6.22 feet below normal pool. Scott Reservoir returned to normal pool elevation 1,030.00 feet MSL on November 27. After a rise to 1,036.60 feet MSL on December 25, the reservoir level returned to normal pool on December 29 and remained near normal pool until February 28. Observed rainfall and inflows in March and April were above normal and maximum reservoir elevation for the fiscal year was on March 2 at 1,047.03 feet MSL or 17.03 feet above normal pool. Additional rises of 1,036.50 feet MSL and 1,038.95 feet MSL occurred on April 16 and April 26, respectively. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir level was at normal pool on April 29 and remained near normal pool until July 15. Below normal rainfall caused a gradual reservoir level drop to elevation 1,025.64 feet MSL on September 5. Heavy rainfall and increasing inflows caused a slight rise to 1,029.49 feet MSL on September 14 and W. Kerr Scott Resevoir ended the fiscal year at 1,027.46 feet MSL or 2.54 feet below normal pool. The total flood and conservation pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 27 percent and 24 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1987 were $4,208,000 which makes the cumulative total since inception of the project equal to $64,292,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $93,495. General Investigations 27. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $932,085, of which $78,748 was for navigation studies, $675,813 was for flood control studies, $56,280 was for beach erosion studies, $80,000 for Special Investigations, $3,133 for FERC licenses review, $3,000 for soil conservation service, $8,681 for hydrologic studies, and $26,430 for cooperation with states. 28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non- Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $237,616. Total costs to September 30, 1987 were $4,046,649. 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 29. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Continuation of Planning and Engineering for the Roanoke River Upper Basin, Virginia, Headwaters Area cost $212,740. 30. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for Wilmington Harbor, Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C., was initiated at a cost of $296,547. PED was initiated on Roanoke River Upper Basin, Virginia, Headwaters area at a cost of $289,264. 6-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Belhaven Harbor, N.C. 5. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 6. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 7. Far Creek, N. C. 8. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 70,000 43,591 876,080 3,934,987 3,760,711 4,011,260 1,551 29,051' 14,000 -23,849 186,771 43,500 44,344 46,000 50,440 4,800,000 4,057,998 5,205,000 5,345,207 76,400 76,379 34,000 1,106 1,106 424,400 423,514 136,200 138,455 517,800 519,195 146,400 146,585 - 636,000 - 636,140 -156,545 -78,833 361,000 356,941 92,65011 235,600 232,291 100,000 83,917 6,469,000 7,324,248 9,777,600 9,563,186 718,630 653,300 58,000 73,934 135,000 113,712 8,742,100 8,535,338 -65,330 411,400 383,421 31,809 31,8091 41,986,9732 41,849,5872 82,826,7603 82,176,942 3 86,851 86,851 667,300 667,300 - - 818,0405 - - 818,0405 51,200 444,000 3,342,9146 51,221 444,000 3,342,9146 - - 34,000 - - 34,000 - 116,142 284,975 - 116,142 284,975 - - 126,687 - - 126,687 13,800 73,200 127,606 13,800 63,200 117,606 - - 3,759,573' - - 3,759,573' 618,000 967,000 13,720,614 8 468,696 1,111,720 13,714,642 8 13,000 12,754 63,000 62,713 1,100 100 746,200 287,500 746,165 280,694 88,328 88,328 2,332,171 2,330,443 164,642 164,642 1,183,004 1,182,004 241,2729 241,27210 3,673,346 3,651,051 92,650 92,650 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 9. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. 12. Shallotte River, N. C. 13. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 500,000 407,323 3,004,500 3,981,556 10,000 1.906 59,000 169,188 5,145,900 5,166,545 963,940 965.826 3,459,011 1,794,000 3,554,083 1,745,676 - 270,954 - 55,000 5,000 5,435 -208 -208 40,000 154,087 6,259 8,224 14,100 14,741 109,007 4,126,500 4,315,962 6,262,000 6,310,359 261,550 122,543 11,000 12,438 165,000 158,185 4,598,700 4,605,597 156,000 156,000 1,E 1, 1,188 1,188 391,400 338,255 198,833 198,837 2,521,850 3,902,000 2,513,647 3,997,363 - 580,284 255,004 553,500 168,000 177,145 232,732 232,732 2,590,000 2,553,489 452,560 398,651 7,649,94512 7,632,26412 38,667,107 38,653,219 1,227,940 1,221,732 - 6,546,05313 - 6,546,05313 639,000 41,942,27314 595,803 41,899,05414 -54,579 1,174,636 299,670 1,173,924 - 346,240 - 346,240 11,700 919,844 11,497 918,440 - 18,181 - 18,181 39,519 210,475 2,459 173,415 - 184,284 - 184,284 831,000 4,481,618 875,000 4,481,618 - 75,000 - 75,000 - 502,567 - 502,567 22,878 2,412,199 21,878 2,411,199 - 2,452 - 2,452 - 18,715,22615 - 18,715,226's 2,322,500 53,569,82018 2,357,116 53,564,9641" 338,215 4,120,76017 86,662 3,784,5187 6-19 f REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 6-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project 16. Ararat River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17B. Randleman Lake, N. C. 18. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19A. Falls Lake, N. C. 20. Scuppernong River, N.C. 21. Stuart, Va. 22A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C. 25A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, VA & N.C. 25B. Philpott Lake, Va. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 260,00018 226,746 18 12,300 5,800,000 5,304,189 632,900 601,634 250,000 298,513 -295,000 -120,714 267,796 1,450,000 4,688,430 601,000 584,999 33,776 30,81222 60,000 35,771 1,172,716 1,268,670 225,000 76,081 4,001,091 4,128,796 80,000 118,049 1,158,300 1,223,739 2,000,000 280,590 1,000,000 22,366 6,041,000 6,145,290 822,400 789,652 86,195 803,000 835,817 992,200 898,787 5,200,000 4,388,394 917,200 901,339 43,000 39,76722 115,000 127,330 1,103,200 1,130,085 4,550,000 4,579,003 4,047,200 4,168,199 -50,000 30,222 1,368,100 1,315,095 997,540 2,765,469 1,103 8,109,000 8,595,667 814,400 879,704 27,356 -40,739 -52,624 40,789 2,694,000 3,876,795 1,748,000 1,461,526 14,830 570,000 202,768 1,216,100 1,159,355 5,400 199,367 6,857,000 6,576,725 -5,400 22,770 2,089,000 2,082,671 292,460 308,711 -110,446 878,385 9,834,000 8,662,787 911,000 893,708 100,000 20,000 490,000 498,881 17,840 7,045,000 5,969,059 1,164,000 1,331,436 -650 92122 1,540,000 1,623,188 1,236,000 1,252,762 373 5,222,900 5,372,772 1,672,000 1,759,343 6-20 4,000,000 4,000,000 901,854 901,854 123,991,641 120,389,664 5,237,35619 5,158,50220 1,821,389 1,741,389 4,660,588 4,643,067 7,898,533 7,866,932 5,694,96521 5,694,96521 142,059,996 140,268,566 5,439,20019 5,241,678 20 234,032 234,032 2,330,00023 2,031,53324 8,841,326 8,841,326 13,802,54825 13,658,26726 94,402,927 94,398,316 65,074,942 27 64,533,769 28 14,796,384 14,796,384 20,617,306 29 20,491,97130 i WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 3. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 4. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 6. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 7. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 8. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 9. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 10. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 11. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 12. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 13. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 14. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 15. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 16. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 17. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 18. Includes $6,924 preauthorization costs. 19. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678. 20. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678. 21. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 22. Preauthorization cost. 23. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 83, $45,000; FY 84, $9,986; and preconstruction funds: FY 84, $50,014; FY 85, $115,000. 24. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 83, $42,496; FY 84, $12,490; and preconstruction costs: FY 84, $23,281; FY 85, $127,330. 25. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds; FY 87, $66,678. 26. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678. 27. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678. 28. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83,$77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678. 29. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of dams funds: FY 87, $66,678. 30. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678. 6-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 Nov. 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 31, 1970 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 2 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River Section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins.5 A 12-foot channel in New River. 6 Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.7 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.1 H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.1 H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.1 H. D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 6-22 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 Oct. 17, 1940 Feb. 7, 1967 sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 3 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 13 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 14 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. No. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H. D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' S. D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' 6-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H. D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1968 July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. Sept. 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. Feb. 24, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 July 14, 196010 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N.C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986 under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control1 (R& H Act of 1958 and 1962) Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. Avon Harbor, N. C.1 Bay River, N. C.' Black River, N. C. Cashie River, N. C. Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C.' Chowan River, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Drum Inlet, N. C.' Edenton Harbor, N. C.' Fishing Creek, N. C.' Knobb's Creek, N. C.', 2 Mackay Creek, N. C.' Neuse River, N. C.' Newbegun Creek, N. C. Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.1 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C.' Pembroke Creek, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Roanoke River, N. C.', ' Rollinson Channel, N. C.' Scuppernong River, N. C.' Smith Creek, Pamlico County, N. C.' Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' South River, N. C.' Stumpy Point Bay, N. C.' Swift Creek, N. C.' Trent River, N. C.', s Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. Wrights Creek, N. C.1 1969 1976 1986 1950 1969 1950 1975 1975 1950 1941 1979 1960 1922 19613 19383 1982 19283 1950 1986 1976 19103 1983 1986 1950 1984 1950 1936 1984 1940 1968 1965 1976 1984 1984 70,664 29,101, 74,096 44,382 12,358 40,403 69,610 42,029 64,395 166,119 73,750 22,715 80,500 13,375 477,2238 4,802 10,688 674,651 60,000 13,750 404,584 589,105 81,164 113,273 8,507 12,452 268,381 1,600 115,199 132,834 751,196 911,099 68,325 66,630 438,035 49,627 124,846 15,905 25,615 5,685 32,247 1,050,579 47,642 8,633 48,969 6,273 328,607 247 61,139 822,978 414 550,409 1,376,151 80,682 37,712 18 23,686 736,815 5,422 143,579 85,221 2,893,812 182,725 166,602 1. Completed. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 4. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 5. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N.C. 7. 50-mile long channel above Palmyra Landing to Weldon deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99462. 6-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-D For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report Project See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 1984 490,000 Fort Macon Park, N. C.' 1973 620,000 - 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6-26 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Black River, Harnett County, N. C.' Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.' Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)" Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Core Creek, N. C.' Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.' Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.',' 0 Gardners Creek, N. C.' Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N. C.12 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' Leesville, Va. - Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo Project Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C.',' Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.','0 New River, N. C.' New River, Onslow County, N. C.' Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N. C.' Old Field Swamp, N. C.',' 0 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C.' Reddies River Lake, N. C.'" Roaring River Lake, N. C.' Simmons Bay, N. C.' 0 South Creek, N. C.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. & S.C.',' 0 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.' Wrightsville Beach, N.C. 1984 1972 1976 1960 1939-1943 & 1958 1965 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1980 1984 1986 1982 1974 1978 1979 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1980 1978 1963 1971 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1953 1961 1963 1983 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 11. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 12. Reclassified to deferred category October 2, 1980. 13. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 14. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 15. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 6-27 475,574 283,846 572,114s 29,867 50,889 236,2239 394,055 223,413 138,1176 37,7773 374,005 54,5976 167,800 50,430 698,400 606,189's 364,425 430,151 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 51,896 580,977 95,873 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6022,3 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,367' 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 64,769 67,821 214,286 3,013,188'3 - 623,687 61,473 - -147 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Report Date Funds Funds Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Mooring Basins AIWW - Peltier Creek, 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N. C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C., Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon Rockfish Creek, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960 as amended. 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 9-662. 6-28 1982 None None None None None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 8 Sep. 812 5 Aug. 771 17 Nov. 865 23 Sept. 861 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 82' 17 Nov. 86 s 1 Nov. 81' 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 78^ 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 86 s 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 78' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 86 s 17 Nov. 86 s 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 77' 219,477 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 107,472 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 - 129,592 157,721 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Rollinson Channel, N. C. August 1987 Smiths Creek, Pamlico County, N. C. August 1987 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C. September 1987 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Harkers Island Harbor,N. C. 137,670 Walters Slough, N. C. 2,136 White Oak River, N. C. 7,207 Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Passing Lane' 39,740 1. Includes $7,500 reimbursement to the revolving fund. 6-29 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construe- Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages 17. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan 2 River Basin, Howards Mill 2 , 1 4 N.C. Randleman 2 Small reservoirs 19. Neuse River Falls 2 Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Beulahtown Bakers Mills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Hillsboro Orange 22. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Basin, N.C.&S.C. S 25. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and O Basin, Va. and N.C. 2 N.C. Philpott, Va. 2 Gaston, Va. and N.C. 6 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Leesville, Va. 9 Taber, Va. Melrose, Va. Randolph, Va. Stuart, Va. and N.C. Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C. Randleman, N.C. Falls, N.C. Wilson Mills, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Princeton, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Durham, N.C. Durham, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Boydton, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Vs. Altavista, Va. Brookneal, Va. Chase City, Va. Spray, N.C. Danville, Va. Haw Deep Deep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin-Pee Dee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 55.0 85.0 404.0 178.7 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265.9 112 E 106 E 110 E 20 to 70 + E 92 E 81 CG,E 50 E 53 E 51 E 63 E 42 E 36 E 39 E 33 E 37 E 136 E 107 E 148 E 753,500 233,000 108,000 923,000 335,620 201,000 81,000 36,000 13,000 119,000 35,000 48,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 123,000 57,000 153,000 - 80,040,000 - 18,874,000 - 54,362,000 - 73,403,000 - 5,749,343 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 220 CG 1 1 108 CG,E 75 CG 244 CG 95 CG,E 54 CG 110 CG,E 147 CG,E 138 E 126 CG,E 249,800 432,000 59,300 825,000 76,900 34,000 120,000 350,000 163,000 248,000 14,000 54,000 83,000 41,000 20,000 12,000 43,000 48,000 15,000 80,000 13,933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,900,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests and $330,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $12,400,000 presently allocated to water supply and $18,600,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $66,405,000 presently allocated to water supply, $7,951,000 allocated to recreation and $7,444,000 to flood control to be paid by local interests during construction. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category October 2, 1980. Key E - Earth CG - Concrete Gravity 58,290,500 14,726,000 56,638,000 91,597,000 3,360,657 138,330,000' 33,600,000 ' 111,000,000'" 38,454,000 165,000,000 13,000,000 9,300,000 6,600,000 1,100,000 17,300,000 6,700,000 5,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 550,000 8,100,000 3,500,000 9,110,000 92,050,0005 15,090,000 30,500,000 32,100,000 31,800,000 10,100,000 9,700,000 23,700,000 o 26,800,000 10,100,000 36,000,000 0 0 'Si 0 0 Iai x0 1,157,000 3,500,000 800,000 3,800,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 6,000,000 4,700,000 1,100,000 6,400,000 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended TABLE 6-K (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA.2 7,500 Buffalo Creek, Lee County, N. C.' 7,500 Carolina Beach, N. C. 55,206 Carvins Creek, Roanoke, VA. 49,492 Chapel Hill, N. C. 21,947 Crabtree Creek & Trib., Wake County, N. C. 128,751 Dan River-Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, Madison, N. C. 3 35,586 Great Coharie Creek, N. C. 49,888 Grifton, N. C.2 7,500 Jordan Creek, Henry County, VA.2 7,500 Little Creek, Jacksonville, N. C.2 7,500 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N. C.' 67,544 Peters Creek, Roanoke, VA. 89,120 Siler City Streams, N. C.2 7,500 Soules Swamp, Whiteville, N. C.2 5,500 Tinker Creek and Tributaries, VA. 31,068 1. Includes $40,000 contributed funds. 2. Reimbursement to revolving fund. 3. Section 14 project. 6-31 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT * This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC ................. 7-1 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ....... 7-2 3. Charleston Harbor, SC .................... 7-2 4. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ....... 7-3 5. Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC ...... 7-3 6. Folly River, SC ........................... 7-4 7. Georgetown Harbor, SC .................... 7-4, 8. Jeremy Creek, SC ......................... 7-4 9. Little River Inlet, SC & NC ................ 7-5 10. Murrells Inlet, SC ......................... 7-5 11. Port Royal Harbor, SC .................... 7-5 12. Shipyard River, SC ....................... 7-6 13. Town Creek, SC .......................... 7-6 14. Reconnaissance And Condition Surveys ...... 7-6 15. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 7-6 16. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 7-6 Beach Erosion 17. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .......................... 7-6 18. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 7-6 Flood Control 19. Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC ...... 7-7 20. Scotts Creek, SC .......................... 7-7 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................................. 7-7 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, S.C. Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. 22. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .... 7-7 23. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 7-7 Miscellaneous 24. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization ............................ 7-7 General Investigations 25. Active Investigations ...................... 7-7 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement ..... 7-8 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 7-10 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 7-13 Table 7-D Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 7-13 Table 7-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects ........................... 7-13 Table 7-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................... 7-14 Table 7-G Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............. 7-14 Table 7-H Active General Investigations ...... 7-15 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of the cost of field operations. The South Carolina Water Resources Commission is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 40,000 acres, with the 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 worst problems being in Lake Marion. During FY 87, 3,821 acres of aquatic plants in 30 water bodies were treated with herbicides. Grass carp were purchased and stocked in five lakes having a total surface area of 108 acres. The cost of field operations in FY 87 was $467,853 and included $421,295 for the application of herbicides, $6,675 for the purchase and stocking of grass carp, $11,159 for aquatic plant surveys, and $28,724 for program management by the contractor. The cost of planning and contract administration was $134,790. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project is ongoing. Federal costs for the project to date have been $2,715,092 for new work. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects.For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island, and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: FY 87 cost for contract maintenace dredging performed in FY 86 was -$3,706. The mosquito abatement control contract costs were $55,196. The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Winyah Bay to Little River area was $109,540. Costs of $22,000 were also incurred for contract dike management. Condition and operation studies, natural resource management, inspections and reports, real estate, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $491,125. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $7,345,888 for new work and $45,659,375 for maintenance, for a total of $53,005,263. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, S.C., and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1808 of Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 35 feet deep with varying widths from the Atlantic Ocean to the mouth of Goose Creek, a total of 26.3 miles, together with a 35-foot depth by 500-foot width channel via Town Creek. Also, a ten foot depth by 110-foot width channel on the Mount Pleasant side of the harbor into Shem Creek to U.S. Highway 17 Bridge, and a 30-foot anchorage basin in the lower harbor between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. A 40-foot channel estimated to cost $6,060,000 (1960) was authorized to be executed when found necessary in the interest of national defense from the 40-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean to U.S. Naval Base. For further details see page 425 of Annual Report for 1962. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River channel to 35 feet at federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with their responsibility to date but are experiencing difficulty in securing disposal areas for dredged material for continued future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about one mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River waterfront. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U.S. Navy Department has modern facilities for maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear-powered submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U.S. 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging was performed by pipeline dredge during July-September 1987 in the upper and lower Wando River, removing 391,591 cubic yards of material. Total FY 87 cost for dredging was $800,000. Dike management costs were $1,091,558 including the cost of $833 for the Riverine Utility Craft operation. The cost of mosquito abatement for FY 87 was $75,876. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, inspections and reports, real estate, project operations management, lands and damages, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $956,972. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties protecting the entrance channel across the bar were completed in 1895. The existing project was completed in October 1962 except for the national defense portion. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $3,328,349 for new work and $93,637,472 for maintenance, a total cost of $96,965,821. 4. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location.Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, S.C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which traps sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of depostion. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to divert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per secon (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,100 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the plan includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. Estimated cost of the project (1985) is $191,500,000, all Federal. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Funds were received for initiation of construction during FY 75. Costs during FY 87 were $5,869 for lands and damages, $23,890 for the fishlift contract, $304,713 for the powerplant, $1,950 for cultural resources, and $90,165 for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Maintenance: Funds of $3,863,929 were spent for maintenance of completed work and included $1,991,095 paid to the South Carolina Public Service Authority for power losses incurred as a result of this project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed at the end of FY 74. The General Design Memorandum was completed in January 1972 and work is proceeding on schedule on other phases of the project. Construction was initiated March 1977. The project is 99% complete. The poweron- line date was March 1985. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $189,761,061 for new work and $9,650,669 for maintenance, a total of $199,411,730. 5. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION, S.C. Location. The Cooper River Seismic Project is located in Berkeley County, South Carolina, about 50 miles north of Charleston, South Carolina. Existing project. The Santee-Cooper Project was constructed in the early 1940's using the latest state-ofthe- art design for that time. The project is currently licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as project number 199.. FERC requires that the project receive independent inspections at least once every five years. It was during the 1977 inspection that the seismic deficiency of both the West and North Dams was noted. This was confirmed again in the 1982 inspection. As a result of studying the possible consequences of the loss of both dams, the S.C. Congressional Delegation introduced legislatien which was approved in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriation Act to provide $2 million for design and $20 million for construction of remedial measures. The design and construction responsibility was assigned to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps began to study various alternatives to provide remedial measures for the liquifiable foundation of the West Dam in August 1983. Current estimated cost of the project is $22,000,000, all Federal. Local cooperation. None required. Condition at end of fiscal year. In September 1987, the final design was submitted to FERC for approval and is under review. This project will be ready to be 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 advertised in early FY 88.The plans and specifications are complete. 6. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides: an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U.S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with Folly River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) in the entrance bar by the sidecaster dredge, Fry, removing 36,709 cubic yards at a cost of $131,983, (b) in Folly River during August-September 1987 removing 40,374 cubic yards at a cost of $131,174. Condition and operations studies, water control management, inspections and reports, project operations management, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $80,523. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 1979. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and $1,514,159 for maintenance, a total of $1,851,895. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U.S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosoted-timber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) in the Sampit River during September 1986-January 1987, removing a total of 1,341,300 cubic yards of material in FY 87 at a cost of $354,546, (b) in upper Winyah Bay from May 1987-September 1987 removing 425,373 cubic yards of material at a cost of $782,454, (c) in Georgetown entrance channel from August 1987- September 1987 removing 648,183 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,275,000, and (d) costs of $100,000 were incurred for dredging an estimated 50,000 cubic yards in Sampit River. Contract dike management costs were $271,500 and mosquito abatement costs were $8,010. Water control management, natural resources management, condition and operation studies, inspections and reports, project operations management, income credits to operations, funds returned to the US Treasury by CE, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $450,388. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903-1904. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $46,073,165 for maintenance, a total of $50,689,068. 8. JEREMY CREEK, S.C. Location. Jeremy Creek is located at McClellanville, S.C. approximately 40 miles northeast of Charleston and 20 miles southwest of Georgetown. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11531 and 11518. Existing project. The dredging of Jeremy Creek or "Side Channel to McClellanville" was authorized as a part of the channel from Charleston to McClellanville (or part of what is now the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) by the River and Harbor Act of 2 March 1907 and provided for a waterway twelve feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. A turning basin twelve feet deep and 150 feet in diameter was authorized 11 January 1982. Local cooperation. Local requirements have been met by the S.C. Coastal Council. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimping facilities, one oyster packing shed, a crabbing operation, an icehouse, a fuel dock and a public launching ramp located on Jeremy Creek. The commercial facilities are privately owned, but are open to all on an equal basis. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present and near future commerce. There are areas along the east bluff shore available for the expansion of existing facilities or the construction of new ones. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design costs were $4,073. Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $49,987 for new work and $7,073 for maintenance, a total of $57,060. 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT 9. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N.C. to Georgetown, S.C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,200 feet and 3,000 feet long on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: A 5-year monitoring program was initiated in 1981 to provide information for management of the project and to determine the effect of the project on nearby coastal areas. Charleston District (SAC) collects the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. Following conclusion of the initial fiveyear monitoring plan (February 1986), CERC presented results of their preliminary analysis to SAC and South Atlantic Division at a meeting in Charleston on 8 April 1986. The data indicated that coastal processes in the vicinity of the inlet have not reached an equilibrium condition and recommended continued monitoring at a reduced level. Condition and operation studies, water control management, inspections and reports, project operations management, and supervision and administration costs were $55,353. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial construction contract was awarded 14 January 1981. The project was completed in FY 1984. Federal costs for the existing project were $17,037,428 for new work and $2,276,569 for maintenance, a total of $19,313,997. 10. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel will be stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully met. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Costs of $342 were incurred. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging performed. A monitoring program was initiated in April 1978 to provide site specific information for proper management of the project and to provide data on coastal response to the project. Charleston District collects most of the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. The monitoring program has been adjusted several times based on CERC's recommendations. Currently the program includes daily littoral environmental observations (LEO), annual aerial photography, jetty surveys and site inspections, semi-annual surveys of beaches and the deposition basis. Channel surveys are not scheduled but are conducted on an "as needed" basis. Results of the monitoring program have led to recommendations for dredging the deposition basin, nourishment of a reach of eroded beach at North Litchfield Beach and erosion protection of a section of the south jetty sand dike. This maintenance work is scheduled for completion during FY 1988. Natural resource management, inspections and reports, project operations management, condition and operation studies, water control management costs and engineering and design, supervision and administration costs were $125,715. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1981. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $13,407,465 for new work and $1,214,485 for maintenance, a total of $14,621,950. 11. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 47 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of Savannah River, Georgia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See the table at the end of the chapter for acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. The South Carolina State Ports Authority constructed a marginal concrete wharf and operates modern terminal facilities which are considered adequate for present commerce of the port. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost incurred in FY 87 for dredging accomplished in FY 86 is $-5,400. Natural resource management, condition and operation studies, water quality management, inspections and reports, and project operation management, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $56,785. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $1,786,100 for new work and $6,857,793 for maintenance, a total of $8,643,893. 12. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U.S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about three miles and empties into the Cooper River about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to Macalloy Corporation's plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Gulf Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. In the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Gulf Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is Macalloy Corporation's wharf for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies, water control management, inspections and reports, project operations management, supervision and administration, and engineering and design costs were $32,891. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $8,920,275 for maintenance for a total of $9,408,099. 13. TOWN CREEK, S.C. Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, S.C. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging performed by the sidecaster dredge Schweizer resulted in costs of $375,845. Condition and operations studies, water control management, project operations management, engineering and design, supervision and administration costs were $59,777. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and $2,650,016 for maintenance, a total of $2,869,537. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $29,138 were incurred for condition surveys on Adams Creek, S.C., Ashley River, S.C., Village Creek, S.C. and Waccamaw River, S.C. & N.C. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C.) 16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization) and Section III, Public Law 90-433, as amended. (See Table 7-D.) Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1934 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) None. Beach Erosion 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 18. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, 1960 River & Harbor Act, as amended, consisted of 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT one reconnaissance study on Pawleys Island, S.C. FY 1987 costs on this study were $9,003. Flood Control 19. COOPER ISLAND, POMPION HILL CHAPEL, S.C. Location. This project is located entirely within Berkeley County, South Carolina near the City of Charleston. Existing project. The authorized project consists of bank stabilization of approximately 200 feet of bank on the East Branch of the Cooper River. The project is adjacent to the Pompion Hill Chapel. The project was authorized on 23 July 1986 under general authorities contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract was awarded on 24 September 1986 and was completed on 11 January 1987. Costs for work completed in association with this project were $196,506. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. The project has been turned over to the sponsor for operation and maintenance. Total cost of this project to date is $211,100. 20. SCOTTS CREEK, S.C. Location. Scotts Creek is located entirely within the limits of Newberry County, South Carolina. The authorized project is located within the corporate limits of the City of Newberry, South Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project consists of channel excavation and bank stabilization of 1.05 miles of the creek. The project extends from approximately 500 feet downstream of the crossing of O'Neal Street to the crossing of Nance Street. The project was authorized on 14 November 1975 under general authorities contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations of highway bridge alterations necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; prevent future encroachments; notify affected interests annually that improvements will not provide complete flood protection; and prevent unwise future flood plain development. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract for the project awarded on 14 May 1986 was completed 25 July 1987. This work consisted of channel improvements. Costs for FY 87 were $425,138. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project has been completed and will be turned over to the sponsor for operation and maintenance. The construction contract is being held open until the establishment of acceptable stands of turf and shrubs is verified. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made of the following projects during the period: Eagle Creek, Sawmill Branch, Cow Castle Creek, Cowpens Swamp, Crabtree Swamp, Gapway Swamp, Simpson Creek, Todd Swamp, Buck Creek, Edisto River, Shot Pouch Creek, Turkey Creek, Kingstree Branch, and Wilson Branch. All projects are located primarily in South Carolina. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $32,380. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-F.) 23. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-G). Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). (See Table 7-G). Federal costs for FY 1987 were $139,082 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies and $119,277 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. Miscellaneous 24. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The only streambank erosion activity pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act (as amended) was Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), Myrtle Beach Wastewater Treatment Facility, S.C. FY 1987 costs for this project were $21,589. General Investigations 25. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-H which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Charleston Harbor, SC 4 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 5 Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC 6 Folly River, SC 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC 8 Jeremy Creek, SC 9 Little River Inlet, SC and NC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 196,000 193,631 00 0 0O 2,055,000 2,099,453 00 4,796,500 6,994,476 11,270,000 11,657,195 480,000 511,898 1,300,000 1,174,744 00 00 110,000 250,173 00 1,945,000 2,495,612 331,000 863,027 -180,000 344,186 0 140,000 658,000 657,623 00 00 3,224,700 3,251,183 00 5,366,000 5,201,014 12,910,000 11,336,085 2,556,000 1,839,765 900,000 894,513 00 00 259,000 257,359 0 0 1,796,500 1,814,224 0 -29,255 78,552 124,428 31,920 31,927 638,000 585,625 00 00 3,024,000 3,080,530 00 4,476,000 4,575,020 4,700,000 5,804,764 2,948,000 3,349,732 198,00 233,086 00 00 334,000 325,791 0 0 3,242,000 3,263,966 00 00 -33,000 437 87,000 94,771 00 566,000 602,643 00 00 754,000 674,155 00 2,831,000 2,924,406 0 426,587 3,572,000 3,863,929 745,000 749,898 00 00 328,000 343,680 00 3,544,000 3,241,898 0 0 5,000 4,073 00 52,000 55,353 00 2,733,605 2,715,092 52,028 52,028 7,455,378'/ 7,455,3781/ 45,846,0042/ 45,728,7972/ 10,165,564$/ 10,165,564/ 94,111,587'/ 94,039,461'/ 191,482,583 189,761,061 9,851,000 9,650,669 3,243,000 3,091,816 00 337,736 337,736 1,516,000 1,514,159 7,061,755/ 7,061,755/ 46,537,7806/ 46,187,7216/ 49,987 49,987 8,000 7,073 17,037,428 17,037,428 2,277,676 2,276,569 1,521,920 1,521,920 7-8 CHARLESTON, S.C. DISTRICT TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 10 Murrells Inlet, SC New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 0 0 0 0 13,419,240 Cost 12,758 4,127 -24 342 13,407,465 (Contributed Funds) Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,380,000 Cost 104,225 0 0 0 1,379,148 Maint: Approp. 0 78,000 107,600 118,100 1,284,2697/ Cost 38,647 83,886 103,438 125,715 1,281,4857/ 11 Port Royal Harbor, New Work: SC Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,786,100 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,786,100 Maint: Approp. 0 8,000 892,000 52,000 6,858,408 Cost 0 3,814 896,186 51,385 6,857,793 12 Shipyard River, New Work: SC Approp. 0 0 0 0 491,9748/ Cost 0 0 0 0 491,9748/ Maint: Approp. 15,000 691,000 106,000 34,500 8,926,692 Cost 420,227 707,639 107,700 32,891 8,920,275 13 Town Creek, SC New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 0 0 0 0 219,521 Cost 0 0 0 0 219,521 (Contributed Funds) Approp. 0 0 0 0 8,600 Cost 0 0 0 0 8,600 Maint: Approp. 345,000 178,000 325,000 422,000 2,651,000 Cost 420,739 -2,201 525,242 435,622 2,650,016 19 Cooper River, Pompion New Work: Hill Chapel, SC Approp. 0 0 46,100 165,000 211,100 Cost 0 0 14,594 196,506 211,100 20 Scott's Creek, SC New Work: Approp. 0 0 326,000 219,000 545,000 Cost 0 0 114,511 425,138 539,649 1/ Includes $109,490 for new work for previous project. Z/Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. /Includes $6,586,455 for previous projects. $3,328,349 for the existing project, and $250,760 for Phase I to deepen harbor. 4/ Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects. In addition, $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 5/ Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 6/ Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 7/ Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P. L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 8/ Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 7-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&H Act of Sep. 19, 1890 R&H Act of June 13, 1902 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19351 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 18, 1878 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of July 18, 1918 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 R&H Act of Oct. 17, 1940 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sep. 3, 1945 R&H Act of July 14, 1960 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC (See Section 1 of text.) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious acquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (See Section 2 of text.) Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, S.C. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, S.C.4 (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 3 of text.) 2 jetties.5 Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. 6 (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Sec. 302, 1965 Rivers and Harbors Act (H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p. 1908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133. H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess., pt. 1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 61-63. H.D. 249, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.3 H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 7-10 TABLE 7-B CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act of 17 Nov. 1986 R&H Act of Aug. 13, 1968 Authorized by Chief of Engrs. on Dec. 23, 1977 under authority of Section 107 R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Aug. 5, 1886 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 30, 1948 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 Authorized by Chief of Engrs. on 11 Jan 1982 under authority of Section 107 R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON, S.C. (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) (See Section 4 of text.) Redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam into the Lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION, S.C. (See Section 5 of text.) Install a closure structure in the diversion canal between Lake Marion and Lake Moultrie and construct such measures as necessary to improve the seismic stability of the Pinopolis West Dam on the Cooper River. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. (See Section 6 of text.) Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 7 of text.) Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. JEREMY CREEK, S.C. (See Section 8 of text.) To provide a waterway twelve feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. Turning basin twelve feet deep with a diameter of 150 feet. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. (See Section 9 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. 7-11 H.D. 436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 99-1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 99-662. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1968, S.D. 88, 90th Cong. H.D. 3069, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report H.Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 395, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1903, p. 1133. Detailed Project Report P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by the House Committee on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971 and the Senate Committee on Public Works on Nov. 18, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974. R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 19372 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on Feb. 12, 1974 under Auth. of Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended. Auth. under Sect. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Auth. under Sect. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. (See Section 10 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 11 of text.) A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, S.C.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles; thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the S.C. State Ports Authority. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. (See Section 12 of text.) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without loval cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburg Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. TOWN CREEK, S.C. (See Section 13 of text.) An entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 6.2 miles. COOPER RIVER, POMPION HILL CHAPEL, S.C. (See Section 19 of text.) Provides for bank protection of the Pompion Hill Chapel. SCOTTS CREEK, S.C. (See Section 18 of text.) Provides for clearing and channel excavation of 1.05 miles of channel. P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Act, H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report. Letter Report. Detailed Project Report. 1/ Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. / Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3/ Contains latest published maps. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Completed under previous projects. 6/ For national defense. 7-12 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Adams Creek, S.C. 1 Aquatic Plant Control, N.C. and S.C. 1 5 Archers Creek, S.C. Ashley River, S.C. 1 Edisto River, S.C. 1 2 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. 1 3 Mingo Creek, S.C. 1 2 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. 1 Salkahatchie River, S.C. 1 2 4 Santee River, N.C. & S.C. 1 Village Creek, S.C. Waccamaw River, N.C. & S.C. 1 Wateree River, S.C. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1978 1968 1914 1955 1938 1950 1950 1982 1896 1950 1985 1978 1940 Construction $125,697 379,680 20,646 260,996 33,103 183,712 29,050 9,500 15,841 99,750 26,500 262,814 60,000 Operation & Maintenance $ 18,280 530,852 900 269,673 7,150 84,170 180,633 105,116 278,170 151,784 1/ Completed. 2/ No commerce reported. 3/ Curtailment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Session.) 4/ Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 69th Cong., 1st Session.) 5/ Pilot Program. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 7-D (See Section 15 of Text) Study Identifications Section Fiscal Year Costs Brookgreen Gardens, S.C. 107 $34,399 Calabash Creek, N.C. 107 26,748 Charleston Harbor, S.C. 111 72,631 North Edisto River, S.C. 107 7,400 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS TABLE 7-E (See Section 6 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operations & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Hunting Island Beach, S.C. 1984 $2,872,7171 -- 1/ Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds. 7-13 TABLE 7-C REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 7-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, N.C. & S.C. 1 2 1970 $ 298,167 -- Cow Castle Creek, S.C. 1 2 1985 250,000 -- Cowpens Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1969 97,000 -- Eagle Creek, S.C. 1 2 1986 1,245,063 -- Edisto River, S.C. 1 3 1947 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. 1 2 1969 127,660 -- Edisto River, Vicinity Canaday's Landing, S.C. 1 2 1958 3,160 -- Gapway Swamp, S.C. 1969 339,197 -- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, S.C. 1 1978 247,242 -- Leith's Creek, S.C. 1 2 1982 430,951 -- Reddies River Lake, N.C. 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, S.C. 1 3 1974 4,500 -- Roaring River, Wilkes County, N.C. 14 1978 370,000 -- Saluda River, S.C. 1 2 1963 99,000-- Sawmill Branch, S.C. 1 2 1971 248,605 -- Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, S.C. 1 2 1971 77,400-- Simpson Creek, S.C. 1 2 1957 81,000 -- Todd Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, S.C. 1 2 1974 319,669 -- Wilson Creek, Sumter County, S.C. 1 2 1985 277,111 -- 1/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3/ Discontinued due to lack of interest. 2/ Completed. 4/ Phase I only. TABLE 7-G FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PREAUTHORIZATION STUDIES (See Section 23 of Text) Study Identifications Section Fiscal Year Costs Brushy Creek, Greenville, S.C. 208 $ 686 Camp Branch/Lynches Lake, Lake City, S.C. 205 32,359 Cane Creek, S.C. 205 6,784 Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, S.C. 205 2,519 Gilder Creek, S.C. 205 7,500 Hemingway Creek, S.C. 205 2,322 Hopkins Creek, S.C. 205 31,590 Jeffries Creek, S.C. 205 7,375 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, S.C. 205 29,912 Langston Creek, S.C. 205 7,486 Socastee Creek, Horry County, S.C. 205 7,893 Stoop Creek, S.C. 205 3,999 Welcome Creek, S.C. 205 41,363 7-14 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS ITEM FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 120) Gills Creek, S.C. Sugar Creek Basin, S.C. & N.C. SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 130) Myrtle Beach, S.C. REVIEW OF AUTHORIZED PROJECTS (CATEGORY 160) MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations FERC Licensing Activities COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Department of Agriculture, SCS Planning Assistance to States FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic studies FISCAL YEAR COSTS TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (CATEGORY 400) Charleston Harbor Deepening, S.C. TOTAL (CATEGORY 400) ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (CATEGORY 600) Charleston Harbor Deepening, S.C. TOTAL (CATEGORY 600) TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 7-15 TABLE 7-H $ 272,427 26,068 $ 328,636 $ 2,681 $ 49,303 5,243 $ 2,454 90,631 $ 777,443 $ 216,678 2,422 $ 219,101 $ 228,771 $ 228,771 $ 77,434 $ 77,434 $1,302,749 __ __ _L I I_ __ I_ I_ _ _I I _ __ _ _ __ - -- -- SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers................................8-1 2. Aquatic Plant Control ................. 8-2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL, (Savannah District) .......... 8-2 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA ................ 8-3 5. Savannah Harbor, GA ................. 8-4 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA .......................... 8-5 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................. 8-5 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............................. 8-5 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 8-5 Beach Erosion Control 10. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ......... 8-5 11. Tybee Island, GA ..................... 8-5 Flood Control 12. Broadway Lake, Anderson County, SC ................................. 8-6 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 8-7 14. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................ 8-7 15. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 8-7 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization ....................... 8-7 Navigation 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U.S. Geological Survey Map of Georgia.)For full de-scription of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. 8-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 17. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC .......................... ... 8-7 17A. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) .......................... 8-7 17B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC ............ 8-8 17C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) ............ 8-8 18. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and FL .............. 8-9 General Investigations 19. Surveys ............................. 8-9 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......................... 8-9 21. Research and Development ........... 8-9 22. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .................... 8-9 Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement ... 8-11 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 8-12 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 8-16 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 8-16 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes .......... 8-17 Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha Riverhave been adopted, and expenditures made under them, by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19,1890; for the Oconee River by River and Harbor Acts of June 18,1878, September 19,1890, and March 3,1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. For Further Details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Existing project. The authorized project provides for an appropriation of $40,000 annually for the Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, to maintain a 3-foot depth during ordinary summer low water and to gradually increase channel depth, so far as practicable without sacrificing the maintenance work. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, GA) a length of 137 miles, the lower 139 miles of the Oconee River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and at extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a hight of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations aheight of 32 feet, above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet, above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents; Altamaha River, HED 283, 51st Cong., 2d sess.; Oconee River, HED 211, 51st Cong., 1st sess.; Ocmulgee River, HED 215, 51st Cong., 1st sess.; and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, GA, HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed at several points. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Total maintenance costs for this fiscal year were $3,684. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bankprotection works need repairs. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, lyngbya, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The authorizing act provides that research costs Shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-C for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the planning and actual control operations of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestations in Lakes Jackson, Blackshear, and Worth. A large portion of the funds for aquatic plant control were used in the construction of a fish fence and stocking of grass carp at Little Ocmulgee State Park. Cost during the fiscal year was $143,065. The Final Environmental impact Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821 -1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive of adequate terminal facilities at ports of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Two dredges worked the waterway during this fiscal year, removing a total of 1,272,602 cubic yards of material. The length of the Savannah District's portion of the waterway was cleaned by the dredges Northwood and Hampton Roads. Total maintenance costs of the waterway were $1,536,950. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay River near St. Simons Island, GA was accomplished after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the Final Environmental impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Costs of existing completed project to September 30, 1987, were $19,027,074 of which $958,096 was for new work and $18,068,978 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the city of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modern docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During 1987, contractdredgesArlington and Cherokee removed a total of 478,777 cubic yards of material from the harbor while the government hopper dredge McFarland removed 87,455 cubic yards of material from the Bar Channel. Of the total $2,974,663 spent on the harbor during this fiscal year, the hopper dredge McFarland was rented for $1,555,129 and $545,535 was spent on contract dredges for the Terry Creek and East River projects. An additional $75,345 was spent to reimburse the Glynn County Mosquito Control Commission for work done in the vicinity of Andrews island. Expenditures for surveys totaled $178,810 for dykes 8-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 and dredging, and $83,153 for S&I.Other expenditures included $18,825 for depot operations, project management totaled $88,072, and $165,816 for E&D. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $2,974,663. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the fiscal year. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1987 were $62,482,208 of which $4,573,433 was for new work and $57,908,775 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston Harbor, SC and 70 statute miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the Seaboard Coast Line terminal; 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc. about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Turning Basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of Garden City terminal of the Georgia Port Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet wide by 600 feet long near Savannah Sugar Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7. feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet with water depths alongside ranging up to 38 feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1962. Maintenance. The contract dredge Enterprise removed a total of 1,337,398 cubic yards of material from the harbor and the Fig Island Turning Basin. Additionally, the dredges Cherokee and Jim Bean removed 3,863,402 cubic yards of material from the sediment basin and pumped to Disposal Area 13. Total operational costs for the harbor were $624,675 including such items as salinity monitoring, surveying, cultural resource surveys, and $54,988 of general overhead expenses. Total operation and maintenance costs for the fiscal year amounted to $2,799,769 of which $71,614 was spent on the operation of the Tidegate structure. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in faircondition. Authorized channels.are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. Costs of existing projects to September 30, 1987 were $191,722,029, of which $46,185,743 was for new work and $145,536,286 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between the two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, 3 miles above Fifth Street Bridge, a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at miles 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Latest approved project cost estimate for providing a 9-foot channel (September 1963) is $6,576,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Effective April 30,1987 an agreement was signed with the city of Augusta, GA to turn over operation and maintenance of the lock and recreation area. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. The total cost for the year was $788,320. There were no dredging projects during this fiscal year. Inspection of completed works amounted to $11,540, while $11,259 was spent to update the remote control facilities at the lock. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed project condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: Savannah Harbor Brunswick Harbor AIWW Savannah River Below Augusta General regulatory function expenditures for the fiscal year were $1,551,368. 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION As specified by the authorizing document for BelIville Point, GA, $20,000 was transferred to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources for use in their Oyster Seeding Program. Costs for Bellville totaled $27,205. The Valona, GA detailed project study was restored in fiscal year 87 for a total expense of $4,383. Beach Erosion Control 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION A reconnaissance investigation was initiated on the shoreline erosion problems at Crooked River State Park, GA at a F.Y cost of $11,549. 11. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of 8-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the city of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has been developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the city of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has had a wide sandy beach. The Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800 foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225 foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200 foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified and now calls for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 51.0 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (d) hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from construction, maintenance, and nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987 at a contract cost of $1,988,843. FLOOD CONTROL 12. BROADWAY LAKE, ANDERSON COUNTY, SC Location. The Broadway Lake is located about 4 miles southeast of Anderson, South Carolina. It is formed at the junction of Broadway Creek and Neals Creek in the headwaters of Rocky River, a tributary of the Savannah River. Existing project. The authorization provides for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from an existing lake known as Broadway Lake, owned by Anderson County, South Carolina. This lake has a surface area of about 1 square mile and a tributary area of about 44 square miles with an existing dam and concrete spillway. The spillway is 50 feet wide, about 19 feet high, and flanked by earth on the west side. The total length of the dam is about 610 feet. The National Dam Safety Inspection Program determined that the dam did not meet the safety criteria. Since the repairs of the dam, spillway, and low-level outlet are not the authority of the demonstration project, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers withheld implementation 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT of the project pending repairs to the dam by the state or local authorities. Local cooperation. The local interests have made the necessary repairs to the dam and have also removed the silt and aquatic weeds on their own. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The project is inactive. The Detailed Project Report was returned for the District to notify appropriate interests that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can no longer participate in primary recreation projects. Since local interests have completed the project ort their own, it has been identified for deauthorization under proceedures specified in PL 99-662, section 1001(b) dated November 17, 1986. 13. INSPECTION OFCOMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Expenditures for inspections of completed flood control projects amounted to $18,135. 14.OTHERAUTHORIZE DFLOO D CONTROLPROJECTS (See Table 8-D.) 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization studies). Preauthorization studies continued through fiscal year 87 on Placentia Canal, GA and Springfield Canal, GA. The Draft Preliminary Report on Placentia Canal continued at a fiscal year cost of $24,934. Detailed project studies continued in fiscal year 87 on Springfield Canal, GA at a cost of $75,022; Casey Canal, GA at a cost of $1,950; and Federal Prison Creek, GA costs were $13,316. The total fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies was $115,222. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation). Revisions to emergency manuals, emergency planning, inspection, supplies, emergency operations, and exercises fiscal year costs were $290,766. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. Under authorization of Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, $7,500 was expended for an initial assessment during the fiscal year. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 17. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on the Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River basin for Flood control and other purposes (H.D. 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Trotters Shoals which will replace Goat Island and Middieton Shoals was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir and Hartwell Lake are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have Ibeen constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes.) Duke Power Company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jocassee pump-storage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee- Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry-Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 17A. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) GA AND SC Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir is locatedat mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length 8-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 70,000 acres at maximum power pool elevation 330. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydropower- 1,405,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt genera-tors have a combined generating capacity of 280,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatthours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Gross generations of electric energy for the period was 551,255,700 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Prevented flood damages totaled $1,083,900. Maintenance: Operation and maintenancecostsduring the fiscal year amounted to $7,806,286. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In fiscal year 1987, 7,725,000 persons visited the facility. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recre-ational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 17B. HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravity-type structure, 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control 293,000 acre-feet hydropower; 1,416,000 acre-feet dead storage; 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 344,000 kilowatts. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Cost of activities during this fiscal year amounted to $6,792,606. A credit of $17,301 was received for cost sharing (Code 713) at the 1-85 Destination Park. The fiscal year upper diversion dam rehabilitation cost amounted to $6,848. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 350,151,300 kilowatt hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented were estimated to be $510,100,000. Maintenance. Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $6,792,607. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21, 1978. Approximately 12,900,000 persons visited the lake in fiscal year 1987. 17C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (FORMERLY TROTTERS SHOALS LAKE, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam and about 37.4 miles above Clarks Hill Dam. (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (fiscal year 1987) cost estimate for the project is $554,000,000 of which $439,811,000 is for construction; $28,580,000 for lands and damages; $4,683,000 for cultural resources; and $83,926,000 for engineering/design and supervision/administration. Approval was received January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A notice of availability of a Final Environmental Impact Statement covering pumped storage was published in the Federal Register on February 18,1977 and October 26,1979. A notice of availability on the Final Supplement of the Environmental Impact Statement on Fish and Wildlife Mitigation for the Russell project appeared in the Federal Register on December 11, 1981. Scheduled contract awards for fiscal year 88 and fiscal year 89 include:Oxygen Producing Facility; Rock Excavation Tailrace Area; Anti-Fish Entrainment (Bar Racks); Remaining Recreation Facilities, SC; Calhoun Falls State Park, SC; McCalla State Park, SC; Powerhouse Construction; Governors; 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 15 KV Disconnect Switch, Schedule D; Tailrace Dredging; and Switchyard Equipment. During fiscal year 87,362,970,000 kilowatts of power were generated. Maintenance. The operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $3,827,383. These funds were for management of the lake activities. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project is 79 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1987 were $457,524,499 of which $445,799,509 was used for new work and $11,724,990 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 18. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER Location. The West Point Lake is located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, GA and was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H.D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and stream flow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was accomplished by the Savannah District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Mobile District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. For more detail, see the Mobile, AL, District's Report of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army 1987. General Investigation 19. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,275,454 of which $502,091 was for navigation studies; $627,244 for flood control studies; $72,300 for special investigations; $72,783 for coordination with other agencies; $1,037 for coordination of FERC Licenses, and $1,010 for inspection of dams. 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of flood information, potential flood damages, and identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for Flood Plain Management Services were $94,104 while expenditures for Technical Services were $62,736. Flood Plain Management Services included responses to other Federal agencies to aide them in fulfilling the requriements of EO 11988 (Management of Base Flood Area). Through the Technical Services Program, flood problems in several areas were analyzed and possible improvements were identified. During fiscal year 87, the Flood Plain Management Services Branch continued the Coastal Georgia Hurricane Evacuation Study. This study is a three year joint effort of the state of Georgia, local officials, Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Funds available for the study in fiscal year 87 were $135,000 of which $75,000 came from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Plain Management Program funds. Fiscal year expenditures were $80,804. The hydrologic studies costs were $5,029. 21. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. 22. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Lake Lanier Reregulation Dam. In fiscal year 87, the Lake Lanier Reregulation Dam General Design Memorandum was completed at a cost of $209,567. The recommended project is the construction of a reregulation dam on the Chatahoochee River, 6.3 miles down river of Buford Dam. Project benefits are hydropower and water supply. Savannah River Basin at Oates Creek, GA. Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood waters from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond County. The recommended plan is a channel and bridge modification flood control plan and has received support from Federal, state, and local governmental agencies with no environmental opposition. The local sponsor, Richmond County, expressed support for the project and intent to participate financially. The plan consists of improvements to approximately 12,300 feet of channel and consists of concrete-lined channels, grass-lined channels, a lw levee, modifications of bridges and culverts, and relocation of utilities. The CP&E effort began in October 1983 and consisted of the preparation of a General Design Memorandum (Sept. 1986). Upon the completion and approval of the General Design Memorandum, negotiations were initiated with the local sponsor to develop a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). The LCA package was approved by Richmond County in August 1987 and was forwarded to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 8-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Office of the Chief of Engineers for approval. Fiscal year expenditures were $52,832. Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah Harbor Widening project is designed to increase the width of the navigation channel from 400 to 500 feet along a 5.6 miles section of the Savannah River. During fiscal year 87 plans and specifications were prepared and the Chatham County Commissioners, local sponsor, started acquiring property. A LCA has been signed. Fiscal year expenditures were $598,582. 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A See Section in Text COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 1. Altamaha, Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers, GA 2. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H Act) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. Johns River, FL 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA 5. Savannah Harbor, GA 6. Savannah River below Augusta, GA 11. Tybee Island, GA 12. Broadway Lake, SC 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 17.A J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 4,000 - 269 46 3,684 9,000 30,000 50,000 205,000 11,488 11,433 58,950 143,065 934,000 1,088,000 608,000 1,531,800 914,900 950,290 752,177 1,536,950 - - - 8,636,530 1,800,000 8,101,443 9,605,206 1,896,159 8,110,481 4,207,000 10,238,200 3,635,000 8,049,868 10,084,654 3,528,413 3,050,000 2,974,663 2,866,500 2,799,769 821,457' 821,457' 1,917,9823 1,917,9812.3 546,159 470,572 958,096' 958,096' 18,088,7215 18,068,9785 4,573,6086 4,573,433' 58,086,894' 57,908,7757 46,187,721' 46,185,743' 145,957,640' 145,536,286' - - - - 6,740,031' � - - - - 6,740,031' � 627,000 804,000 543,000 804,000 16,924,492 884,597 759,000 550,830 788,320 16,817,908 - 386,949 1,053,000 387,000 - 307,887 209,486 1,225,729 13,000 -15,000 18,500 21,000 59,775 15,387 29,646 18,135 - - 932,843 5,612 6,673,800 7,554,000 6,386,( 7,040,063 7,746,130 6,288,f 4,357,249" 4,352,270" 99,000 99,000 205,018 201,866 - - 84,841,29012 - - 84,840,263'2 000 7,997,022 77,159,054'3 836 7,739,609 76,125,153'3 8-11 Total Cost to SepL 30,1987I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 8-A See Section in Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 17.B Hartwell Lake, GA and SC 17.C Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -450,000 1,282,815 4,803,000 5,031,036 1,450,000 2,463,415 270,000 213,815 6,986,600 6,863,402 -100,000 138,899 36,300,000 21,400,000 35,491,655 22,368,222 1,231,300 2,870,000 1,005,621 3,055,270 -35,000 355,807 6,404,500 6,208,294 69,000 82,425 - -29,515 6,823,622 6,725,929 6,849 9,310,000 19,000,000 7,217,141 9,753,114 3,734,000 3,599,922 3,233,598 3,760,665 115,937,98514,.15 115,782,898"1415 69,188,026"6 68,358,65916 6,619,000 6,559,773 445,799,509 433,630,084 12,159,222 11,724,990 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 5. Includes $134,798 for previous projects. Does not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FYs 86 and 87. 6. Includes $643,465 for previous projects and $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $855,941 contributed funds. 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZI $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 11. Does not include $3,756,758 contributed funds. 12. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $316,760 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 14. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 has been expended. 15. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,817,985 has been expended and $545,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 16. Includes $576,019 expended special recreation use fees. NG LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 25, 1912 and March 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA. Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. HD 443, 62d Cong., 2d sess. HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. HD 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 8-12 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 I I _ SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (continued) See Section in Text AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) 3. June 3, 1896 Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Savannah, Ga. Route No. 2 adopted. Mar. 3, 1899 Route No. 1 adopted. July 13, 1892 Section from Savannah, Ga. to Fernandina, Fla. Original 7-foot channel. Mar. 3, 1905 Provided for Skidaway NarrQws. July 25, 1912 Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Aug. 8, 1917 Section fromm Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. to St. Johns River, Fla. Consolidation of the 3 sections shQwn above, into "Waterway between Beaufort, S.C. and St. Johns River, Fla." Mar. 2, 1919 Section from Beaufort, S.C. to Cumberland Sound, Ga. and Fla. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Mar. 2, 1919 Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Mar. 3, 1925 Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, S.C., and Savannah, Ga. July 3, 1930 Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. Aug. 26, 1937 A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. Aug. 26, 1937 A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, S.C., and Savannah, Ga. via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. June 20, 1938 A 12-foot channel between Savannah, Ga., and Fernandina, Fla., various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, Ga. Mar. 2, 1945 An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, Ga., not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Oct. 15, 1981 Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA 4. Mar. 3, 1879 Construction of East River jetty. Mar. 2, 1907 Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spurdikes. Mar. 2, 1919 Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deet at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. July 3, 1930 A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. July 3, 1930 Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. June 20, 1938 A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. May 17, 1950 Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Oct. 22, 1976 Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Oct. 17, 1986 Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD 1236, 60th Cong., 2d sess. HD 581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess.' SD 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess. HD 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD 114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. Annual Report, 1980, p.959 HD 407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD 393,64th Cong., 1st sess. SD 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' SD 132, 71st Cong., 2d sess.' HD 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' HD 110, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HR 6, 99th Cong. 2d sess. Section 846 8-13 Documents I I I L I C I - -- - _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 July 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct 27, 1965 SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA. Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakies Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland Waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifi- Ecantgioinnese rths ereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide, upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. HD 181, 59th cong.,,lst less. HD 563, 62d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1471, 64th Cong., 2dsess. HD 261, 69th Cong., 1st sess. HD 262, 69th Cong., 1st sess. SD 39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. HD 276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD 283, 76th Cong., 1st sess.1 HD 227, 79th Cong., 1stesess.1 HD 678, 79th Cong., 2d sess.' HD 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess.' SD 115, 87th Cong., 2d sess. HD 226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 SPWC Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 Oct. 17 1986 Sep. 19 1980 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 11. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971 and HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 12. Water Resources Development Act of March 7, 1974. 16A. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 17, 1986 January 1988 16B. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. Flood Control Act of July 3, 1958. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 18C. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 eet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 1,600 feet by 38 feet. Savannah Harbor widening as described in Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19,1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings Island Turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA. For a 5-foot channel. Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam. GA. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBEE ISLAND, GA. Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. BROADWAY LAKE, S.C. Provided for undertaking a demonstration project for the removal of silt and aquatic growth from Broadway Lake. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as project purposes. Name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake). HARTWELL LAKE, GA. AND S.C. Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Project. Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA. Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan. HD 223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD 94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. HD 6,99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct 17, 1986 Section 201 Section 867 HD 255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. & Annual Report, 1980 p.1328 HD 962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. HD 101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Comn., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. SD 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. HD 105, 92d Cong. HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct 17, 1986 Section 867 PL 93-251, 93d Cong. HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. Section 864 HJR 376 HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 85-500, 85th Cong. 2d sess. PL 94-587, Sec. 182b. 85th Cong. SD 52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HR 6 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986 Section 601 1C. otan laes pulihe mas -81-5- - --- ~IL~- .- I-- 1. Contains latest published maps. 8-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 in text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act 1962) Completed 1968 $25,700- Bellville Point, GA Completed 1986 -- Cedar Point, GA Completed 1982 656,233- Darien Harbor, GA Completed 1975 199,723 185,433 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA1 Completed 1935 8,000 7,200 St. Marys River, GA and FL, and Completed 1951 15,688 69,936 North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2'3 Completed 1929 17,906 19,594 Satilla River, GA1'5 Completed 1951 9,452 57,172 Savannah River above Augusta, GA2'3'4 See Notes 1929 69,600 5,870 Savannah River at Augusta, GA 2'3'5 See Notes 1929 200,556 17,444 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 2. Project recommended for abandonment in for construction and $12,849 for operation and H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. maintenance). 3. No commerce reported. 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 4. About84percentcompleted.Owingtoconstruction Authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella of two power dams which submerged much of the Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing work under the present and former projects, this shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodyimprovement cannot be completed as originally namic model. planned. TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 In text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Completed 1941 $643,016 $38,242 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA1 See Note 1974 - - Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden Completed 1977 132,640 5,219 County, GA Macon, GA Completed 1955 380,043 38,243 Oates Creek, GA Authorized N/A 2 - Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed 1976 582,163 5,219 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated Oct. 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. 8-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-E SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 16 In text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Reservoir, GA and SC Savannah $79,156,0004 $79,156,0001' Hartwell, GA and SC Savannah 89,240,000 89,240,0002 Goat island, GA and SCs Savannah 36,400,000 36,400,0003 Middleton Shoals, GA and SCs Savannah 16,500,000 16,500,0003 Chattooga Units (4), GA and SC Chattoga 41,700,000 41,700,0003 Tallow Hill, GA Broad 39,000,000 39,000,0003 Anthony Shoals, GA Broad 18,100,000 18,100,0003 Newry-Old Pickens, SC6 Keowee 29,500,000 29,500,0003 1. Final cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization stud2y.. ) Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 6: Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee-Toxaway Project. 8-17 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT * JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT With the exception of a small area in the northeastern section of Florida, his district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation P 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ... ........................ 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR................... 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla...................... 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. ............ 5. Canaveral Harbor, Fla ................ 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass ..................... 7. Charlotte Harbor, Fla. ................ 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ............. 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla................ 10. Fernandina Harbor, Fla............... 11. Fort Myers Beach, Fla................. 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla............... 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla............ 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to M iami, Fla ....................... 15. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla............... 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), Fla .... 17. John's Pass, Fla ..................... 18. Longboat Pass, Fla................... 19. Manatee Harbor, Fla ................. 20. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R................. 21. Melbourne Harbor, Fla. ............... 22. Miami Harbor, Fla .................. 23. New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. .............. 24. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla............. 25. Oklawaha River, Fla.................. 26. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. .............. 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla............... 28. Ponce Harbor, P.R.................... 29. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla........... 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth From Navigable Waters in the State of Florida. 31. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla ............. 32. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, Fla.................... 33. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla................... 34. San Juan Harbor, P.R... ............ 35. Tampa Harbor, Fla................... age 22 223 3445556 6 77 89 99 10 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 15 16 17 Navigation (cont.) Page 36. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ..... 18 37. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 18 38. Navigation Work under Special Authorization....................... 18 Beach Erosion Control 39. Brevard County, Fla.................. 18 40. Broward County, Fla. Beach Etosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project.................... 19 41. Dade County, Fla .................... 19 42. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, Fla.................. 20 43. Duval County, Fla ................... 20 44. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin Country line to Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line ................. 20 45. Pinellas County, Fla.................. 21 46. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..................... 21 47. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization............ 21 Flood Control 48. Central and Southern Florida .......... 22 49. Four River Basins, Fla................. 23 50. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R....... 23 51. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................... 24 52. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 24 53. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ...................... . 24 General Investigations 54. Surveys............................ 24 55. Collection and Study of Basic Data...... 24 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 9-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amends the R&H Act of 1965 and requires the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research cost that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 30 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 12,411 acres of hyacinth and/or water lettuce, 6,305 acres of hydrilla and 1,201 acres of minor plant controlled during the period. Costs incurred for engineering and design and supervision and administration were $112,813 and $49,207, respectively, and $2,408,220 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, P. R. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Place of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non Federal contribution for new work was $288,000. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the year cost $433. Supervision and administration costs were $33. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1987 were $1,128,075 for new work and $4,286,698 for maintenance, a total of $5,414,773. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, Florida, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, Fla. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For Details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (HD 898/62/2) and 1938 (HD 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently reqtuired. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. Total costs under the existing project to September 30, 1987, have been $263,659 for new work and $5,300,742 for maintenance, a total of $5,564,401. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FLA. Location. The Harbor connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11x200 feet, thence 8x100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8x200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. Project depths have been restored. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the 44-foot-deep entrance channel and 35-foot-depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; two entrance jetties 100 feet long (constructed of native stone core and granite sides and cap); a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (ocean) for harbor dike and lock, and mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-C for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (Oct. 1984 price levels) of the 1962 modification to the project is $16,900,000 Federal cost and $4,436,000 non-Federal cost ($138,000 contributed funds and $4,298,000 other costs); $700,000 costs to NASA and $85,000 costs to U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2d session. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $1,106,000. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space and 5 transit sheds with a total shed storage space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 22 storage tanks providing a total of 1,195,620 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Two hundred sixty-six acres of open storage is also available. Two cruise ship berths totaling 1200 feet long by 41-foot depth and two 8800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45-ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are two water-front marine repair facilities with the nearest drydock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harbor extension contract underway at a cost of $2,620,923. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $183,020 and $116,574, respectively. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of locks amounted to $302,296 for the fiscal year. District Communications Network cost was $36,250. Natural resource management cost $3,271. Condition and operation studies cost $92,159. Energy conservation was $3,058, and real estate management was $426. Continuing contracts from FY 86 for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel, the inner channel and the barge channel were all completed in FY 87 at a total cost of $292,392. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $122,585 and $175,698 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is about 86 percent completed. The perimeter dike and jetties are in good condition. Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and ap- 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 proximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10-foot-depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8-foot-depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses, 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande, thence 10 by 100 feet from deep water at Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water level about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower it about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $15,563. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging amounted to $-39,426. Condition and operation studies cost $47,303. District communications network costs were $13,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $12,030 and $9,849, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. Ibtal costs under existing project through September 30, 1987, have been $533,169 for new work and $11,530,739 for maintenance, a total of $12,063,908. In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9D for Locks and Dams.) Operation and maintenance of the locks and dams is a Federal responsibility. Estimated cost of new work (1970) is $179,000,000 Federal, and $19,500,000 non-Federal for lands, rights-of-way, and other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-E for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 ft., NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of pro- 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT ject commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway, Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 x 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 x 600-foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also two marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11503.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32-foot-depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800-foot-wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and two jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is 7 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-federal contribution for new work was $812,000. Terminal facilities. There are two large wharves operated by industrial plants; twelve wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; three oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $39,511 and $8,169 respectively. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $104,728. District communications network costs were $18,000. Real estate management costs $3,523. Engineering and design costs were $17,126. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 40 feet for the Kings Bay project. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,095. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimppacking houses and several fish-packing houses, two marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreationalcraft facilities include nine marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost 9-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 $80,629. Dredging cost $260. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,303 and $117 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27-foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Sta. 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30+00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130+00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 foot at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 feet by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $57,816 and $10,548, respectively. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging costs were $350,099 and condition and operation studies were $22,500, Engineering and design costs and supervision and administration costs were $4,126 and $25,030 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interests in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. The south jetty and revetments are in good condition. The north jetty is scheduled for repair in FY 86. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water level by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water level by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $14,473. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and eleven privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are six wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use of commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of channel slopes and berms cost $12,570. Real estate audits and administration costs were $9,719. Acquisition costs were $3,585. Bridge maintenance costs were $-589. District communications network cost $21,000. Condition and operations studies cost $53,139. Supervision and administration costs were $400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Casey's Pass was completed in 1983. Tobtal Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1987 were $7,597,078 for new work and $5,526,631 for maintenance, a total of $13,123,709. In addition, $14,473 contributed funds were expended for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. Location. The waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11467.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified to 10-foot-depth from Fort Pierce to Miami by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8-foot-depth; and operation and maintenance of the Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of the tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in the Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost for maintenance dredging in FY 87 was $2,617,820. The district communications network cost was $26,900 and permanent operating equipment was $2,073. Condition and operation studies cost was $74,060. Real estate management was $54,656. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $33,891 and $162,622 respectively. The highway bridge near Palm Valley was operated and maintained at a cost of $121,147. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete except for construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, which is in an inactive status. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1987, were $19,156,822 for new work: $29,287,386 for maintenance, a total of $48,444,208 regular funds. In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 by 400-1,200 feet from the ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the F.E.C. Railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington Cut and in the Old Dame Point-Fulton Channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40-foot-depth entrance channel; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; and construction of training walls and revetments. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 26.8 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 223 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tones. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Drydock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Supervision and administration cost was $378,927. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of district communications network cost $18,000. Condition and operation studies cost $144,918. Real estate management $15,931. Acquisition costs were $8,057. Maintenance dredging costs were $3,497,653. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $97,329 and $176,910, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls were in poor condition. 'Ttal Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1987, were $44,165,055 for new work, $58,909,727 for maintenance a total of $103,074,782 regular funds. In addition $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the upper 6 square miles of the Upper St. Johns River near the Jacksonville Harbor which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491). Previous project. None. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30-foot channel in Arlington cut and in the old Dame Point-Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26x200 feet along south side of Commodore Point: on approach and mooring basin 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura St.; and a depth of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura St. and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jax Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 long. Intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport Trning basin also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth at the Navy fuel depot, Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for authorizing legislation.) Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) was $4,160,000 Federal and $0 non-Federal cash contribution. Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result due to construction and maintenance other 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administrations cost were $136,661 and $12,195, respectively. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. ToIbtal cost under existing project through September 30, 1987 were $148,856 Federal funds and $0 contributed funds for new work and $0 for maintenance, a total of $148,856. 17. JOHNS PASS, FLA. Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Fla. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately one thousand linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $53,732. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alinement to the Intracoastal Waterway and extending along Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles from The Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basis which extends from the Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basis. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) $9,430,000 Federal and $12,300,000 non-Federal ($3,170,000 contributed funds and $9,130,000 for other costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands; a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3-mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates two switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track which connect with the Seaboard Coastline Railroad. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not started. LCA will be negotiated in 3rd Quarter FY 1988. Construction scheduled to start early FY 1989. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, P.R. Location. The project is on the west cost of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Trminalfacilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 x 100 feet from Indian River to a 400- x 800-foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350-foot steel bulkhead with eleven finger piers about 40 feet long each. There are also two privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500-foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36-foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; two rubblestone jetties at the entrance; a channel 15 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin at the municipal terminals; a channel 8 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the Intracoastal Waterway and thence 100 feet wide to Government Cut; a channel 15 deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet inland; and a channel 12 by 100 feet from Miami to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 15.3 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage at 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage at 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40-ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available thru local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and two offwater yards serve the port. Drydock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 70 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and thirteen tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the Seaboard Coast Line and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for recreation facilities at Bay Front Park underway cost $1,599,131. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $81,283 and $139,697, respectively. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies cost $1,356. Engineering and design costs were $-260. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, is complete. South and north jetties are in good condition. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Fla. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Golf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Place of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $45,811. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with two finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) Previous projects. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80 to 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami; near Stuart; an 8-foot depth basin at Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200-foot channel from the Gulf to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Fort Myers with a 10-foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60-foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, 1 municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/ municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River on St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, a municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate 9-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations of Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440-foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125-foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125-foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50-foot wharf at Alva; and a 30-foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-F for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing the 8-foot depth basin at Stuart, which is inactive. Tobtal Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1987, were $5,178,315 for new work, $25,681,184 for maintenance ($67,558 excluded which represents services rendered without reimbursement), a total of $30,859,499. 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles above Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 6 feet deep from the river mouth to the head of Silver Springs Run; clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles in the river and 5.4 miles in Silver Springs Run. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation-craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Road 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Oklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel maintenance costs were $59,042. Real estate management costs were $-282. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing a 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs run, which is in an inactive status. The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Fla., flood control project. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1987 have been $311,352 for new work and $2,103,312. for maintenance, a total of $2,414,664. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $509,506. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space in not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $6,138 and $1,044, respectively. Maintenance: Management of natural resources cost $375. Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $87,159. Contract for dredging maintenance cost $612,762. Real estate management costs were $377. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $26,262 and $58,342, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 86. 27. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long, respectively, and a weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. The project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate management costs were $6,357. Condition and operation studies cost $24,250. Engineering and design costs were $109,699. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Repair of the north jetty was completed in FY 86. 28. PONCE HARBOR, P. R. Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier; dredging an area off the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36-foot-deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 950 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) is $7,320,000 Federal ($6,340,000 Corps and $10,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $4,003,000 non-Federal (other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. A 25% contribution is required and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has four steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $68,581 and $9,279 respectively. 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1976 modification of the project has not commenced. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 29. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) of the 1974 authorization is $33,800,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost and $7,062,000 non-Federal cost, $160,000 contributed funds and $6,902,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local Cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under House Document 144/93/1, local interest must: provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564, 800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 square feet, cold storage at 2,098,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Drydock facilities include 2 drydocks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270-ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the Seaboard Coast Line railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982,) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract underway for canals and channels cost $9,951,304. Engineering and design and supervision and administrations costs were $210,649 and $-63,326, respectively. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 144/93/1. 30. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) (See Table 9-G for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 16,950 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinths and/or water lettuce), 3,142 acres of hydrilla and 1,024 acres of minor plants were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinths 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed are under maintenance control. 31. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 feet by 200 feet along the best natural alinement as may exist from time to time across the new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin, future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work amounted to $137,500. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 ft. in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge; these consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. None Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is completed except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1987 were $1,405,131 for new work and $4,714,107 for maintenance, a total of $6,119,238. 32. ST. JOHN'S RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Fla., near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and July 24, 1946 (S. Do. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess.). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to Annual Report for F.Y. 1963). 33. ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long;, excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing;, chan- 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 nel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Plane of reference is mean low water. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about 1 foot on the land side of the inlet. The estimated cost of the 1974 modification (Oct. 1979 price levels) to the project is $6,290,000 Federal cost and $2,525,000 nonFederal cost ($2,260,000 contributed funds and $265,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.2 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each five years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect the water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,898 and $269, respectively. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $20,527. Engineering and design costs were $73,213. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 294/93/1. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1987 were $10,948,511 for new work (including $3,086,026 contributed funds) and $4,797,674, for maintenance, a total of $15,746,185. 34. SAN JUAN HARBOR, P. R. Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico about 35 miles from the island's east end and 1100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1500-foot-long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required in sewer water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. Local interests have complied with authorization requirements to date. There was no non-Federal contribution required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deepdraft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, two piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving nel, Dock turning basin and chan- nine at the eastern side and three at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and three on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, seven are U.S. Government property, and 24 owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for the handling of loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to general public. Pier No. 6 has been repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $1,052. Contract dredging cost $-13,699. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1987 were $13,027,284 for new work and $14,256,601 for maintenance, a total of $27,283,885 regular funds. In addition, $747,684 was expended for new work and $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds and $100,000 for new work from contributed funds. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712; this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in above costs. 35. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alfia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; turning basins at Port Sutton, Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, 44 by 200 feet in Port Sutton terminal channel, and 34 x 300 in East Bay Channel. (The 46-foot and 44-foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that a 4-foot underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a 1-foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet, respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) of the 1970 modification to the project is $211,141,000 Federal ($208,856,000 Corps and $2,285,000 U.S. Coast Guard) cost and $18,361,000 non-Federal cost ($13,829,000 contributed funds and $4,532,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, HD 401/91/2 and HD 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed 20 June 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed 31 Aug. 1987. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of shed storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel is a 1,000,000 bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases or marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capaci- 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 ties up to 14,000 barrels. The Seaboard System Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #17 revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $42,340 and $-15,067, respectively. Maintenance: District Radio Communication Network cost was $25,000. Condition and operation studies was $161,087. Real estate management cost was $3,690. Engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $241,352 and $577 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (HD 401/91/2 is 65 percent complete.) 'Ibtal Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1987 were: Main project: $194,961,296 for new work and $19,632,731 for maintenance, a total of $214,594,027 regular funds. In addition, $853,050 was expended for new work from public works funds, $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds, and $1,029,180 from contributed funds. On Hillsborough River $270,466 was expended for new work. 36. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. (See Table 9-H.) 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-I.) 38. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Aguadilla Harbor, PR, $13,741; Benner Bay -Mangrove Lagoon, V.I., $2,105; Blount Island, Florida, $46; Cedar Island-Keaton Beach Channel, Florida, $41,961; Dunedin Pass, Florida, $82; North Lake Channel, Hollywood, Florida, $1,468; Pasco County, Small Boat Channel, Florida, $6,023; Rockhous Creek, Florida, $20,033; and Willoughby Creek, Florida, $319. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 39. BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1987 price levels) is $8,650,000 Federal costs and $8,753,000 non-Federal cost ($8,650,000 cash contribution and $103,000 for lands). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $13,667. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill has been provided at Indialantic and Melbourne beaches. 40. BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to provide and maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a protective and recreational beach at four locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sandtransfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) is $25,700,000 Federal and $21,900,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost of beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet, establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand- transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $12,687 and $2,084, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 41. DADE COUNTY, FLA. Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1987 price levels) is $48,800,000 Federal cost and $41,339,000 non- Federal cost ($39,500,000 cash contribution and $1,839,000 other costs). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (HD 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cost for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for the dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1)e stablish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved 30 June 1976. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for Jetty Rehabilitation and Extension continued at a cost of $2,410,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $97,320 and $50,916, respectively. 42. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FLA. Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation in the nourishment of the existing project from 10 years to the life of the project. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) was $13,500,000 Federal and $12,200,000 non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistant with the costsharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and the Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to provide lands, easements and rights-of-way and relocations, pay 50% of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, pay 35% of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention, hold the United States free from damages, control water pollution and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $37,591 and $7,718, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuation of planning and engineering. 43. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of constructing with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) $16,400,000 Federal and $13,934,000 non-Federal ($11,600,000 contributed funds and $2,334,000 for other costs). Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (HD 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for beach nourishment continued at a cost of $1,385,023. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $59,398 and $72,820, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill and four year advance nourishment has been completed. 44. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., Location. Palm Beach County is on east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Northerly reach of the project is separated from the southerly reach by Palm Beach Island. Project consists of about 12.2 miles of ocean coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 54.4 percent of the cost for the Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 54.4 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 54.4 percent for South Lake Worth Inlet-Delray Beach segment, 44 percent of the cost for Delray Beach; and 52 percent of cost for Delray Beach-Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (Oct. 1987 price levels) is $24,500,000 Federal and $26,900,000 cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications prior to commencement of work and furnish assurances that they will maintain public ownership of publicly owned shores, maintain protective measures and provide periodic nourishment of protective beaches, and control water pollution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $52,294 and $6,599, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests provided initial beach fill at Delray Beach which was completed in August 1973. A periodic nourishment contract at Delray Beach was awarded in FY 1978 by local interests and the contract has been completed. 45. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (Oct. 1987 price levels) is $20,000,000 Federal funds and $21,762,000 non-Federal funds ($21,700,000 contributed funds and $62,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Redington shore breakwater and groin cost $569,069. Contract for Long Key breakwater and beach nourishment costs were $801,000. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $366,842 and $89,977, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in 1969 and is 28 percent completed. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1987 were $5,441,215 Federal funds and $2,198,056 contributed funds for new work and $5,625 for maintenance. 46. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-J.) 47. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 108, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Boca de Congrejos, P.R., $340; Dorado Public Beach, P.R., $5,920; Dunedin Shores, Florida, $396; Guanica Public Beach, P.R., $3,020; Gulfport, Florida, $18,986; Isla de Cabras, P.R., $286; Key Biscayne, Fla., $648,324; Playa de Santa Isabel, P.R., $18; and Puerto Nuevo Beach, P.R., $617. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-483 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of1974, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 48. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is located generally within the southeastern eighteen counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River ba- 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 sin in central section above the Lake Okeechobee- Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, Fla.) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports, 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shore of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent over-drainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in the Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other relat- . ed areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. Project also provides for navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft, consisting of locks and channel dredging in the upper Kissimmee and St. Johns basins. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-K. See also Table 9-L for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) is $840,400,000 Federal funds ($838,000,000 Corps and $2,400,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $186,712,000 contributed funds, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. Local interests' costs in reviewing plans and specifications are expected to be $654,000. In addition, estimated cost to local interests of lands, rights-ofway, and relocations is $294,163,000. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-M for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date except those for the Small Boat navigation feature added in 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-N for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie locks; 5 hurricane gates; 20 gated drainage culverts through the levee; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 - total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Sec. 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W. P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the remainder of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. The scheduled work of project is 81 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been continued. For construction completed prior to Fiscal Year 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9P.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1987 were $300,617,159 for new work, $55,697,504 for maintenance, a total of $356,314,663. In addition, $53,412,653 has been expended from contributed funds for new work. 49. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins-the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers-and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area-a conservation area and three storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River-four flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures, and levees; Oklawaha River-a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of part of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River-one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River-Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon: outlet canal and control structure; Anclote River: control structure and channel improvement; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-Q on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1987 price level) is $153,000,000 Federal funds and $128,700,000 non-Federal cost. ($32,000,000 contributed funds; $57,500,000 for lands and damages; and $39,200,000 for relocations.) (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Dead River recreation sites was completed at a cost of $556,393. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $174,417 and $133,099, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. See Table 9-R for construction of major features of the project completed to date. 50. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS P.R. (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Carribean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wild- 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 life enhancement-one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2-mile tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1987 price level) is $302,000,000 Federal cost and $99,200,000 non-Federal cost ($18,000,000 contributed funds; $60,757,000 for lands and damages; $11,096,000 for relocations; and $9,347,000 for highway bridges and approaches). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was signed March 15, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Cerrillos Dam & Spillway continued at a cost of $20,352,000 hired labor costs were $68,327. Contract for Upper Portugues Channel Sections 6E and 6F cost $1,692,000. Contract for Section 7 continued at a cost of $159,000. Contracts for Bucana Debris Basin excavation and Portugues Channel improvement and debris control basin has respective costs of $684,000 and $219,000. Contract for Section 6D cost $73,000. Cultural resource investigations cost $287,000. Area office equipment cost $11,633. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,375,098 and $2,540,943, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in September 1975 and is 60 percent complete. 51. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $27,180. 52. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-S.) 53. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-T.) Emergency flood control activities-repairf,l ood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $115,950 for the Disaster Preparedness Program, and $137,311 for national emergency and mobilization readiness plans. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization.) Federal costs for the fiscal year were $142,172 for Barrio Barrero, Rincon, Puerto Rico; and $206,652 for Highway 187, El Thrraplan, Puerto Rico. General Investigations 54. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year (all Federal funds) were: navigation studies, $291,622, flood damage prevention studies $927,009, shoreline protection studies, $114,353 and special studies $0 for a total of $1,332,984. 55. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. FPMS Unit Jacksonville, Fla., $60,026. Gold coast hurricane evacuation study, $0; and Technical services, $80,983. 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 1. 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. John's River, Fla. (Federal Funds) Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 2,106,000 2,626,000 2,300,000 2,516,000 24,310,670 2,134,771 2,622,586 2,190,290 2,666,855 24,281,004 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 972,087 1,048,073 858 1,531,000 1,949,141 76,370 73,073 1,564,000 1,960,302 -70,000 458,802 149,329 122,033 500,000 246,727 1,120,000 1,114,598 200,253 190,474 6,656 -8,290 16,241 3,300,000 241,023 5,790,500 5,628,309 103,000 83,296 62,526 2,024,000 2,005,725 310,000 242,145 1,593,000 1,578,798 375,000 345,057 1,128,0751 1,128,0751 0 4,286,699 467 4,286,699 361,2252 361,2252 5,300,742 5,300,742 243,2358 243,2358 185,688 185,688 341,000 365,282 8,429 8,630 7,525 10,290 148,000 2,886,993 3,853,000 4,014,577 33,523 623,853 642,523 -116,918 -99,761 25,000 82,642 1,563,000 1,603,791 172,000 202,624 14,548,9104 13,823,2844 37,675,821 37,638,665 1,106,000 1,079,623 305,290 305,290 1,606,530 1,606,531 159,975 159,975 533,1696 533,1696 11,539,133 11,530,739 63,347,473 63,197,386 21,164,9636 21,127,8206 9,627 9,627 710,900 705,668 9-25 2,979,000 2,894,020 1,034,500 1,032,134 43,100 -22,317 -20,216 50,000 42,756 150,000 10,931 1,720,500 1,745,887 -2,616 3. 5. 9. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 10. Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Fort Myers Beach Channel, Fla. (Federal Funds) 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), Fla. (Federal Funds) 17. Johns Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost -2,000 - 116 3,768,928 4,368,503 116 -35 17,575 2,261,000 577,562 2,244,910 594,389 35 - 56,464 46,375 -134,834 125,783 170,300 810,601 709 939,046 936,138 5,365,700 8,048,812 342 37,419 37,419 77,214 63,391 125,000 139,039 929,962 852,580 7,355,000 7,362,380 1 342,839 341,589 367,561 377,389 136,675 153,614 88,200 98,667 391,036 486,735 61,000 771,854 781,020 25,000 268,015 269,265 9-26 50,000 62,193 150,000 143,378 87,500 81,006 403,000 401,755 106,000 99,824 3,095,500 3,093,169 61,000 4,000,300 3,952,929 25,000 961,000 148,856 4,197,8167 4,174,6997 22,884,019 22,875,722 812,000 811,054 158,1408 158,1408 1,173,946 1,167,191 356,056 356,056 4,193,035 4,188,852 18,574 18,574 8,112,5579 8,112,5579 5,985,73810 5,977,38010 19,251,59811 19,251,59811 29,520,96712 29,500,60812 61,000 61,000 47,596,27813 47,596,27813 59,502,58914 59,453,12714 102,813 102,813 927,65415 927,65415 25,000 25,000 961,000 148,856 82,09816 82,09816 1,407,830 1,407,830 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 18. Longboat Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Manatee Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds 20. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 21. Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 22. Miami Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) J (Contrib. Funds) 23. New Pass Sarasota, Fla. (Federal Funds) 24. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 25. Oklawaha River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 26. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 340,000 327,124 41,025 33,523 76,000 69,582 100,000 93,539 57,259 57,259 2,439 1,746,300 1,720,400 10,000 18,107 45,697 208,803 -3,984 3,039 228,000 233,567 1,000,000 269,054 116,512 60,856 894,000 892,444 262 2,084,000 2,022,254 4,062 7,594 3,725,000 3,721,562 -: 232,525 245,401 11,154 11,632 251,338 252,188 5,190,000 3,871,286 129,211 183,359 75,893 77,449 1,683,000 1,779,336 45,572 48,143 685,212 711,384 1,020,233 1,020,233 1,400,487 1,400,487 172,324 172,324 168,187 168,187 1,032,674 1,032,674 17,696 17,696 634,864 634,863 1,650,000 32,636,06617 1,820,111 30,739,66717 - 2,511,825 1,097 2,511,414 38,000 2,300,71018 11,885 2,274,59518 - 45,81119 - 45,81119 - 3,108,304 - 3,108,304 5,000 4,940 1,735,200 1,795,491 55,000 58,759 20,000 7,183 793,000 780,280 21,405,59020 21,405,53020 33,280,16621 33,256,37721 503,700 503,700 315,26422 315,26422 2,103,32028 2,103,31128 6,924,02124 6,911,20424 10,003,11825 9,987,99425 9-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Ponce Harbor, P. R. (Federal Funds) 29. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 31. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 32. St. Johns River, Fla. Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 33. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. San Juan Harbor, P. R. (Federal Funds) 35. Tampa Harbor, Fla. (Main Project) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work; Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,600,000 2,742,016 6,465,846 6,477,022 106,192 108,285 13;2-,500 140,306 15,624 25,025 32,771 38,000 35,020 1,533,415 350,000 304,179 25,000 6,187 131 2,500 3,500,000 4,165,925 170,889 216,660 25,795 23,506 24,117 53,000 283,422 36,810 36,790 200,000 77,861 10,200,00 10,098,627 1,953,277 1,953,277 15,367,086 15,357,772 2,415,600 2,415,600 1,379,000 612,663 682,90726 530,55926 1,327,870 1,327,870 54,508,77327 54,345,58127 1,598,480 1,598,410 2,622,000 2,465,000 2,474,000 2,738,000 30,749,370 2,803,286 2,450,831 2,477,801 2,744,421 30,721,931 80,000 74,285 33,615 33,589 514,688 286,610 273,332 394,043 176,942 168,086 150,725 9,870,000 9,352,559 210,700 463,233 60,000 63,490 90,000 74,992 324,991 320,979 585 2,075,000 2,079,004 233,983 382,492 170,229 150,401 17,015,000 18,838,450 170,000 165,443 100,000 111,481 367,049 387,772 16,039 20,077 30,986 60,091 57,293 74,172 2,339,241 2,376,226 1,354,000 1,669,404 255,000 262,361 11,543 3,167 92,000 93,740 -15,050 -14,847 200,000 158,499 430,000 431,706 44,450 1,476,43428 1,476,43428 4,714,107 4,714,107 1,171,24329 1,171,24329 1,300,299so 1,300,2993s0 7,863,60231 7,862,48531 4,808,006 4,797,674 3,086,026 3,086,026 13,774,96882 13,774,96832 14,326,13133 14,326,13138 196,058,64334 195,945,57234 19,652,522>6 19,649,83886 1,074,412 1,029,180 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 39. Brevard County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 40. Broward County. Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41. Dade County, Fla. Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds) 42. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, Fla. Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds) 43. Duval County. Fla. Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds) 44. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin County line to Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line (Federal Funds) 45. Pinellas County, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 48. Central and Southern Florida (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -3,315 3,637 4,730,000 4,773,650 246,200 50,000 59,751 17,945 -1,797 50,000 -300,000 279,393 360,000 33,204 15,000 3,598 17,615 940,000 1,759,116 741,000 683,129 135,000 12,939 13,667 2,346,492 2,288,416 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,257,081 244,000 11,277,100 14,771 11,015,254 - 26,884 - 26,884 - 1,758,84136 - 1,758,84136 3,359,000 3,191,419 1.985,000 1,601,237 100,000 45,309 - 1,500,000 1,000,000 258,970 200,000 23,089 2,350,000 1,096,216 2,370,000 926,428 300,000 2,050,000 48,942 1,884,034 700,000 290,475 -140,706 217,566 8,600,000 11,422,711 4,292,000 4,550,595 2,179,837 1,652,885 -130,000 316,002 368,342 50,710 8,400,000 7,439,279 4,073,000 4,254,980 1,770,263 1,030,971 -506,000 1,221,457 272,094 -300,000 35,599 3,544,000 2,881,443 3,955,250 1,862,188 234,000 58,893 803,000 885,000 943,102 746,218 549,250 439,840 6,065,000 7,814,088 4,733,500 4,916,056 1,322,261 813,118 1,435,000 407,100 9,814,000 9,487,398 4,507,200 4,517,244 179,183 1,025,861 36,642,95685 36,267,41287 25,560,08538 24,787,37038 250,000 58,248 1,500,000 12,456,900 11,263,102 10,667,650 7,198,229 4,154,834 3,898,302 13,621 13,621 4,797,693 4,360,545 5,625 5,625 4,537,641 3,044,996 301,935,39740 300,617,15840 55,741,661 55,697,505 55,552,819 53,587,652 9-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Thxt Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 49. Four River New Work: Basins, Fla. Approp. -1,600,000 1,050,000 903,000 566,000 72,946,09541 (Federal Funds) Cost 764,489 564,734 1,714,126 581,791 72,822,98741 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 335,412 647,000 360,000 - 12,746,860 Cost 335,379 359,508 347,003 259,425 12,629,902 50. Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. 18,700,000 22,600,000 20,949,000 39,697,000 181,071,568 P. R. Cost 16,702,794 24,210,107 21,238,471 27,285,097 166,987,149 (Federal Funds) 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 1. Excludes $288,000 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3. Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. 4. Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock. 5. Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project from contributed funds. 6. Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operation of dams. 7. Includes $174,880 expended for recreation facilities. 8. Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Sec 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 9. Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work. 10. Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 11. Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. 12. Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 13. Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 14. Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 15. Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 16. Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 17. Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $6,777,906 for recreation facilities. 18. Includes $381,479 work-in-kind and $172,314 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. 19. Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. 20. Includes $16,222,275 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 21. Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 22. Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 23. Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for the permanent indefinite appropriation. 24. Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. 25. Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. 26. Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 27. Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. 28. Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. 29. Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 30. Includes $25,838 under previous project. 31. Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 32. Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 33. Includes $44,730 in maintenance under previous project. 34. Includes $853,050 for new work under previous project. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. Includes $215,000 Appropriation and $139,792 cost for new work East Bay Channel. 35. Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 36. Excludes work-in-kind. 37. Includes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 38. Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 39. Excludes $300,083 in property for services furnished by local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 40. Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla., project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. Includes $175,000 appropriation and $175,000 cost for new work at C&SF St. Johns Water Mgtm. District. 41. Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 9-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 July 14, 1960 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 Report of the Chief of Engineers Oct. 1985 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 P.L. 675/77 July 23, 1942 November 17, 1986 June 20, 1938 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control ARECIBO HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cut-offs BAKERS HAULOVER (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Trning Basin Project. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. (See Section 6 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at the bend Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc 189, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 November 1986 99th Congress 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-622 17 November 1986 99th Congress. 2nd sess. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. 9-32 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act. Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. March 1, 1962 By Senate and House Public Works Committee Auth. by Chief of Engineers March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties Raising and extending jetties to provide 19-foot depth Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20- to 24-foot depth and 400- to 600-foot channel width Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor Provided for a 26-foot channel Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. (See Section 11 of Text) 12- x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals Extension of 11- x 125-foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. (See Section 13 of Tebxt) 9- x 100-foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U. S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1i Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act H. Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 6- x 80-foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay January 21, 1927 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. (See Section 14 of lText) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. 9-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. Do. July 3, 1958 Chief of Engineers Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel March 2, 1907 Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 Feb 1982 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 2, 1964 Under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act. Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1900 R&H Act, as amended Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 May 1980 August 30, 1935 August 20, 1937 July 3, 1930 Channel width of 100 feet Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge Thrning basin at Jacksonville Beach Channel 12 x 125 feet Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian Thrning basin at Vero Beach Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FLORIDA (See Section 16 of Text) Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as circulation. JOHN'S PASS, FLA. (See Section 17 of iText) Channel 10 x 150 feet in the gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW-2.6 miles long LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. (See Section 18 of Text) 12- x 150-foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10- x 100-foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge MANATEE HARBOR, FLORIDA (See Section 19 of Text) Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-ft. deep draft navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay Channel to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR P.R. (See Section 20 of Telbxt) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal MELBOURNE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. Specified in Act 9-34 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PWA Program September 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 August 13, 1968 Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. The channel at the Dinner Key Airport An 18-foot channel in a landcut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912 A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward The Virginia Key improvement For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interest contribute one-third of the cost Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot-wide section to 400 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot-wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepeing existing turning basins at Biscayne Blvd. terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. (See Section 23 of IText) 10- x 150-foot entrance channel; 8- x 100-foot inner channels; and 8-foot-deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. (See Section 24 of Telbxt) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart S.Doc. 95, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers November 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Report of the Chief of Engineers, 10 December 1985 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976 S.R. October 1, 1976 Enlarge existing 8- x 90-foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 26 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests, to 20 feet Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration and widening the channels to existing project dimensions enlarging the 700-foot-square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and restoring existing jetties Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949 An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long, merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west Assume maintenance PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. (See Section 27 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south side of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir PONCE HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 28 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot-depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion of the adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. Annual Report 1889, p. 1360 H.Doc 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 185, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185. 73d Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 1986 99th Cong. 2nd sess. H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 9-36 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 29 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase turning basin in size and depth Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 30 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical, or other means Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 31 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 32 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka The improvement of Deep Creek Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project.) A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff) A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. (See Section 33 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93d. Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report for 1989, p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 9-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 August 4, 1976 Report of the Chief of Engineers 23 Dec. 1982 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet thru bar cut, tapering to 150 feet thru the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period SAN JUAN HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 34 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel Modified condition of local cooperation Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32-foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage A bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepenig San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet to the west; deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1500-foot-long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 35 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong. 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 9-38 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. Do. May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. Do. For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tam a Ba Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12-foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under the title Improving Hillsborough Bay, Fla.) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950) For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the Gulf to Mullet Key Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, pp. 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Do. Do. 9-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. August 15, 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 Jan. 1979 W.R.D.A. 17 November 1986 BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 Port of the Chief of Engineers 2 April 1982 August 13, 1968 Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a turning diameter of 1,200 feet Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 5,500 feet TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Tampa Channel and existing turning basins at the entrance to Ybor Channel and at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 ft. with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL Maintenance dredging BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 39 of Txt) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project BROWARD COUNTY, FLA., BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 40 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, Fla. and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsborough Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA Shoreline Protection DADE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 41 of 'Tbxt) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st. sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd Sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 9-40 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 15, 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 27 Dec 1983 October 27, 1965 Report of the Chief of Engineers 21 Dec 1981 Report of the Chief of Engineers 22 April 1984 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 23 April 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 28 Feb. 1986 Report of the Chief of Engineers 26 Feb. 1980 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS June 30, 1948 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Do. Do. Do. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FLA. (See Section 42 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 43 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA Shoreline protection along 1.7 miles of Vero Beach, a 1.7 miles beach fill along Sebastian Inlet State Park and periodic nourishment of the new beaches. MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA Modification of existing project from 6200-ft. long to 8770-ft. long beach fill stabilized with two groins and periodic nourishment. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 45 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project Restoration of 5,000 ft. of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, 49,000 ft. of beach at Sand Key, 9,200 ft. of beach at Treasure Island, and construction of 600 ft. of revetment at Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island. SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA Shoreline protection along 12,600 ft. of shoreline on central Longboat and 21,100 ft. on Manasota Key in the vicinity of Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA Shoreline protectin along 2.5 miles of problem area in the St. Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic nourishment. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 48 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County Project for Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tbhopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congess, 2nd sess. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 november 1986 99 Congress, 2nd sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Contress, 2nd sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. P.L.. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong. 1st sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 9-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. October 27, 1965 Do. August 13, 1968 Do. Approved December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties Improvement of supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park andother related areas. Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. (See Section 49 of Tbxt) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (See Section 50 of Txt) LAGO de CERRILLOS, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply, and recreation LAGO de PORTUGUES, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation PONCE, P.R. Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. 9-42 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-C CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, Fla. Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock Dimensions 90' wide; 600' long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,966,539 ' 56 x 400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was constructed increased to 600 feet to be compatible with increased width. Opera- 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost ($700,000). Length tion and maintenance of lock is a Federal responsibility. TABLE 9-D CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) Henry H. Buckman Lock Eureka Lock and Dam R. N. Bert Dosh Lock Nearest town (miles) Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Lock dimensions (ft.)' Normal lift (ft.) Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) Lower (ft.) Character of foundation Kind of dam Type const. Percent complete Estimated contract cost Palatka, 11.2 90.4 84 x 600 20 14 15 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 $6.094.000 'Clear width and greatest available length. 2pool level varies with natural ground water profile from Sparr, 15.8 111.4 84 x 600 20 17 14 Piles in sand Movable Earth3s 100 Ocala, 8.9 127.7 84 x 600 0-152 16-312 16 Piles in sand None 0 Dunnellon, 2.5 156.5 84 x 600 12-272 16-312 18 Rock None 0 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 Inglis, 3.2 168.6 84 x 600 28 18 15 Rock Movable Earths 100 $7,800,000 minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 'With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-43 Dunnellon Lock Inglis Lock and Dam REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-E CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 8 of 'Tebxt) Work Performed Cost Operation and Maintenance: Operations of locks, operations and maintenance of dams, spillways reservoirs and bypasses, debris removal, performance monitoring system $ 502,442 Contract maintenance of locks, grounds maintenance, trash removal, potable water testing 56,708 Natural Resource Management 46,491 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, sanitary facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters and contract mainenance of grounds 296,874 Condition and operations studies and periodic inspections 37,079 Energy Conservation 801 Water quality studies, data collection and processing, reimbursement to USGS, water control analysis, Lake Oklawaha and Inglis Bypass, and water management control 169,516 Real Estate audits, inspections and outgrants 10,093 OSHA medical exams 180 Supervision and Administration 13,078 Sub-Tobtal 1,133,262 Maintenance: Maintenance of dams and spillways $ 9,908 Maintenance of locks and lock repair contract 55,468 Maintenance of roads, bridges 40,895 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment (Recreation) 78,688 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment 177,078 Bank stabilization-maintenance of slopes and berms, Rodman and Inglis dams, and bank stabilization contract. 120,399 Maintenance of canals, clearing and snagging 89,421 Engineering and Design 15,382 Supervision and Inspection 446 Real Estate encroachments 30,079 Sub-Ibtal 617,764 Income Credits -5,139 Sub-Total 612,625 Grand Total $1,745,887 9-44 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-F OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of Locks, and Performance Monitoring System 405,837 Contract maintenance buildings grounds, potable water testing, repair and replacement of project signs, operation and maintenance of District communications network 346,997 Natural resource management 80,677 Management of recreation areas and facilities 357,415 Real estate management and energy conservation reports 33,992 OSHA medical exams and inspections 1,370 Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections 42,116 Supervision and Administration 51,920 Sub-Total 1,320,324 Maintenance: Maintenance of locks and contract maintenance of locks 185,957 Real estate acquisitions, surveys and encroachments 45,065 Maintenance of recreational facilities and permanent operating equipment 55,989 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment, nonrecreational 80,608 Bank Stabilization 345 Contract operation of reservoir and dam maintenance 26,552 Channel and canal maintenance 52,816 Engineering and Design 37,115 Supervision and Inspection 4,002 Sub-Total 488,449 Income Credits -7,325 Total 1,801,448 9-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-G REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 30 of 'ext) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. John's River and tributaries and Withlacoohee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 15,627 $1,878,670 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 3,978 599,361 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, engines, and work tools 35,150 Income credits -402 Operation of communications network 18,000 OSHA medical exams -0- Engineering design 33,491 Supervision and Administration 179,748 Total 19,605 2,744,420 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 36 of 'Tebxt) Date Cost Incurred Survey During Project Conducted Period AIWW, Norfolk-St. Johns River, FL AUG 87 $159,929 Anclote River, FL AUG 87 5,761 Arecibo Harbor, PR OCT 86 731 Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL JUN 86 2,098 Cedar Keys Harbor, FL SEP 86 442 Charlotte Harbor, FL JUL 87 888 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, V.I. MAR 87 32 Clearwater Pass, FL OCT 87 465 Courtney Channel, FL AUG 86 486 Crystal River, FL MAR 86 604 Daytona Beach Side Channel, FL (IWW) JUL 87 7,968 Horseshoe Cove, FL SEP 87 19,474 IWW, Jacksonville-Miami, FL JUL 87 668 Johns Pass, FL JUN 87 16,097 Kissimmee River, FL JUL 86 1,030 Largo Sound Channel, FL AUG 86 533 Longboat Pass, FL AUG 87 232 Miami Harbor, FL DEC 86 55,460 Miami River, FL AUG 87 11,645 New Pass, FL JUL 87 20,362 New River, FL JUL 86 786 Oklawaha River, FL NOV 84 1,018 Pithlachascotee River, FL AUG 86 466 Ponce De Leon Inlet, FL MAY 87 7,671 Port Everglades Harbor, FL APR 87 25,694 San Juan Harbor, PR OCT 86 2,088 St. Lucie Inlet, FL JUL 86 4,036 St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney OCT 87 39 Suwannee River, FL JAN 87 2,275 Supervision and Administative Cost 12,709 Total Costs 362,416 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Txt) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, Fla. 1974 267,427 628,142 Aquatic Plant Control, Fla. (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 2,619,7002- Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. 1939 5,099,153- Bayport, Fla3 1972 58,4954 - Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla 1977 168,5696 70,240 Christiansted Harbor. St. Croix. V.I.,6 1964 303,317 57,800 Clearwater Pass, Fla.2 1 1980 46,3497 1,220,271 Courtenay Channel, Fla' 1940 22,846 26,779 Crystal River, Fla.? 1941 25,000 128,000 Everglades Harbor, Fla.1 1964 221,5098 51,034 Fajardo Harbor, P.R.3 1945 -- Guayanes Harbor, P.R.3 1945 -- Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla.3 1974 38,850 - Homosassa River, Fla.? 1937 3,9999 23,334 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. 1977 347,521 137,493 Hudson River, Fla.3 1974 9,889- Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla.3 1963 243,079 28,046 Key West Harbor, Fla? 1972 1,548,89210 534,623 Kissimmee River, Fla.? 1931 23,479 112,954 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla.11 1931 10,276 9,035 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. 1, 12 1966 117,44318 51,149 Little Manatee River, Fla. 8, 11 1949 11,90314 - Manatee River, Fla. 6 1970 123,350 194,516 New River Fla.? 1956 36,518 31,296 Orange River, Fla. 1962 2,000 24,918 Ozona, Fla., channel and turning basin' 1963 105,527 15,089 Palm Beach, Fla., side channel and basin3 1946 - Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. 1, 16 1966 41,29717 60,268 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. 1973 400,00018 261,401 Rice Creek, Fla.? 1957 85,20819 18,814 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. 1983 255,60820 1,570,45921 St. Thomas Harbor. V.I.3 1949 1,989 - Steinhatchee River, Fla.1 1940 135,053 43,329 Suwannee River, Fla. 6 1977 76,41822 219,261 Withlacoochee River, Fla.6 1969 614,91228 370,305 1. Complete. 2. Excludes $918,205 contributed funds. 3. Inactive. 4. Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. 5. Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6. Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 7. Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10. Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 11. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 12. Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13. Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14. Expended on restudy. 15. Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 16. Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Sections 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 17. Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 20. Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21. Includes $20,532 under previous project. 22. Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 23. Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 9-47 TABLE 9-I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-J OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 46 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Full Report See annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park 1969 34,8621 - El Thque Beach, Ponce, P.R. 1985 1,396,730 - Key West, Fla. 1963 96,3402 3,794 Lee County, Fla. 1971 - - Lido Key, Fla. 1971 - - Mullet Key, Fla. 1973 436,2018 1,656 Manatee County, Fla. 1983 217,600 - Punta Salinas, P.R. 1984 855,5114 - Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,1406 6,257 San Juan, Puerto Rico 1965 - - Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. 1978 1,667,2206 1,022 1. Includes $2,462 cost of reconnaissance and detailed project 4. Excludes $360,000 contributed funds. reports but excludes $13,818 contributed funds. 5. Excludes $781,188 in property or services furnished by local 2. Excludes $192,168 contributed funds. interests in lieu of cash contribution. 3. Excludes $187,133 contributed funds. 6. Excludes $714,522 contributed funds. TABLE 9-K CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 48 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Corn- Actual No. Name (miles) (ft.) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston Fla. 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, Fla. 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, Fla. 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, Fla. 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, Fla. 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 1All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 9-48 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-L CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 48 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Character Kind Kind Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool Depth of of of of Percent Contract Town Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) sills (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete Cost W.P. Franklin At Olga 0 56 x 400 2.5 3.0 14 Piles in Lock and Dam1 S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock c S-65E Lock Moore Haven Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 (HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 (HGS-6 Mod.) S-308B (Port Mayaca) S-57 S-58 S-59 S-60 S-61 S-62 S-63 S-63A S-96 S-96A S-53 S-55 S-157 S-158 Frostproof Avon Park Sebring Sebring Okeechobee Okeechobee Hoore Haven Clewiston Okeechobee Pahokee Ashton Ashton Kissimmee Ashton St. Cloud Ashton Ashton Ashton Sebastian Sebastian Eau Gallie Christmas Sebastian Titusville 23 26 20 25 14 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 11 9 5666 10 12 14 14 16 8 12 4 15 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 30 x 90 50 x 250 50 x 60 50 x 60 56 x 400 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 9Q 20 x 90 30 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 4.2 6.3 6.0 7.2 5.8 4.6 9.4 5.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.5 10.0 20.0 4.5 48.5-52.33 46.3 40.0 34.0 26.8 21.0 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 62.0 64.0 58.0 64.0 55.0 61.0 62.0 57.0 24.0 25.0 17.5 14.0 20.0 4.0 6 6 6 6 6 6 11 12.9 7.5 18 6 6 66666 66 6 6666 clay Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Earth foundation, sand Piles in sand Slab on sand Piles in sand and slab on sand Slab on sand Earth foundation, sand Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. 1Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. 3The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. 2Estimated (Oct 1984). Movable Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete rigid frame None Reinforced concrete None Steel sheet pile lockwalls None Reinforced concrete None Reinforced concrete Fixed Reinforced concrete None Concrete and steel sheet pile None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. None Do. Cz r 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 000000000 $3,803,655.00 $1,211,464.70 $1,531,489.91 $1,068,396.69 $1,357,246.12 $1,242,908.51 $1,320,039.84 $369,0002 $3,448,406 $523,0002 $8,308,700.00 $2,004,0002 $2,004,0002 $2,000,0002 $2,004,0002 $689,217.00 $2,004,0002 $2,004,0002 $1,962,0002 $1,757,0002 $1,672,0002 $1,623,0002 $1,664,0002 $2,116,0002 $1,913,0002 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-M CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 48 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contributions1 June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sept. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 July 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 PL 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for 50.0 under Provisions of recreational craft Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act 1Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Construction of: Railroad bridges $ 0 Channels and canals 69,490 Levees 4,020,054 Floodway control and diversion structures 1,826,764 Pumping Plants 0 Buildings, grounds and utilities 0 Cultural Resource Preservation 16,340 Equipment operation 0 Depreciation 0 Engineering and design 3,559,251 Supervision and administration 846,362 Total cost 10,338,261 Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system 479,374 Maintenance, buildings and grounds, operation of District communications network, repair and replacement of project signs 252,487 Patrol, inspection, and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike, HGS 3, 4, and 5, operation and maintenance of drainage ditches, culverts and 16 spillways, and mowing of levees 619,248 Natural resource management 71,926 Operation and Maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning 306,173 Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies 87,881 Water quality/water control studies, data collection, regulation of Lake Ockeechobee and three conservations areas 898,459 Energy conservation 1,775 Real Estate outgranting 7,443 Supervision and Administration 86,155 Sub-Total 2,810,921 Maintenance: Real Estate encroachments and boundary monumentation contract 120,888 Maintenance of locks 120,261 Maintenance of non-recreational roads and bridges 160,061 Repair and stabilization of Crown Road, Herbert Hoover Dike, removal of weeks, rebuilding and regrading of levee slopes, modification and maintenance of safety barriers, HGS 3, 4 and 5, cleaning landslide toe ditches, repair of culverts, replacement of fences, removal of trees, topping of trees, control of Melaleuca, replacement of rip rap on slopes and berms 575,227 Maintenance of recreational facilities 28,739 Maintenance of recreational roads and bridges 34,527 Maintenance of hydrometrological network 46,660 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment 204,489 Bank stabilization contract 234,390 Maintenance of non-recreational roads and bridges 12,800 Non-dredging channel maintenance and debris removal 3,093 Engineering and Design 56,457 Supervision and Inspection 109,434 Income credits -2,704 Sub-Total 1,709,026 Total 4,517,243 Special recreation user fees 80,860 9-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Channels and Canals: C-51 East End May 1982 - June 1987 Structures: S-155 May 1982 - June 1987 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Construction Approx. % Feature Started Complete Levees: Herbert Hoover Dike Revetment 1st Contract (4 miles) March 1983 100 3rd Contract February 1985 45 4th Contract July 1985 90 5th Contract August 1986 25 6th Contract December 1986 70 Structures: HGS-4 Replacement (S-351) January 1986 70 HGS-5 Replacement (S-352) April 1987 36 9-52 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 49 of Text) Nearest town Name of nearest town Distance above mouth of River Lock dimensions Normal lift Elevation of normal pool surface Depth of sills Character of foundation Kind of dam Tyrpe of construction Percent complete Estimated Cost (including dam and spillway) 20 miles Ocala, Fla. 65.5 miles 30 x 125 feet 18.0 feet 58 feet 12 feet Piles in sand None Reinforced concrete 100 $1,990,138 TABLE 9-R FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 49 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Br., B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. 1A C-135, Sec. 1B C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites July 1968 - Mar. 1970 May 1971 - Jan. 1973 Jan. 1973 - Jan. 1974 Oct. 1972 - Jan. 1975 Dec. 1972 - July 1975 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 July 1966 - Aug. 1967 May 1968 - Sep. 1972 Jan. 1971 - Dec. 1973 Dec. 1972 - Apr. 1975 Feb. 1975 - Aug. 1977 Apr. 1976 - Jan. 1979 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 July 1973 - Apr. 1975 July 1973 - Jan. 1974 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Apr. 1966 - Jan. 1969 June 1970 - July 1971 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 May 1967 - Dec. 1968 Aug. 1975 - May 1977 Apr. 1975 - June 1977 July 1967 - Sep. 1968 Apr. 1967 - Mar. 1969 July 1970 - Feb. 1972 June 1968 - July 1970 July 1970 - Sep. 1971 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 May 1978 - July 1981 May 1978 - July 1981 May 1978 - July 1981 April 1979 - Aug. 1981 June 1979 - Sep. 1981 December 1982 - August 1984 March 1985 - July 1986 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. July 1975 Dec. 1968 Oct. 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct. 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov. 1977 Dec. 1975 Dec. 1975 Sep. 1968 Apr. 1969 Nov. 1971 Dec. 1968 Nov. 1977 Apr. 1977 Nov. 1968 Dec. 1975 Not transferred Dec. 1975 Dec. 1975 Oct. 1980 Jan. 1983 Jan. 1983 Jan. 1983 Oct. 1981 Jan. 1985 Dec. 1986 9-53 TABLE 9-Q _ ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 9-S OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 52 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1985 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, Fla. 1960 $66,4851- Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection2 1966 - - Hillsborough Bay, Fla.2 1969 - - Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla.2 1966 - - 1. Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was 2. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as Modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. TABLE 9-T FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 53 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Alligator Creek Basin, CL Fla. $ 6,566 Bear Creek, Pinellas County, Fla. 2,643 Curiosity Creek, Tampa, Fla. 7,396 Crane Creek, Melbourne, Fla. 16,620 Lagrange Gut, Frederiksted, VI. 7,485 Manatee River, Manatee County, Fla. 7,489 Naquabo River, P.R. 86,056 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta Santiago, P.R. 31,209 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, P.R. 66,861 Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel 6,090 Rio Manati, Barceloneta, P.R. 2,043 Rio Niqua, Arroyo, P.R. 47,250 Rio Tallaboa-Penuelas, P.R. 432 Sabana Grande, P.R. 497,027 Savan Gut-St. Thomas, V.I. 1,317,650 Seminole Basin-Largo, Fla. 13,581 Sion Farm, St. Croix, V.I. 7,336 Strawberry Hill, St. Croix, V.I. 7,475 Sugar Creek, Valdosta, Ga. 21,519 lhrpentine Run, St. Thomas, V.I. 52,372 Wares Creek, Bradenton, Fla. 4,137 9-54 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until 1 October 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Apalachicola Bay, FL .................. 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ............................. 3. Bayou Coden, AL .................... 4. Bayou La Batre, AL ................ 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS .................... 6. Biloxi Harbor, East Harrison County Canal, MS .................... 7. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL .......................... 8. Bon Secour River, AL ................ 9. Dauphin Island Bay, AL ............... 10. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL ............. 11. East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL ........... 12. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL ............... 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border (Mobile D istrict) ............................ 14. Gulfport Harbor, MS ................. 15. Mobile Harbor, AL .................. 16. Panama City Harbor, FL ............. 17. Pascagoula Harbor, MS ............. 18. Pensacola Harbor, FL ................ 19. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ........... 20. Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS ................. 21. Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS ........ 22. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............................ 23. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 24. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................ Page Deauthorized Projects 10-3 25. Deauthorized Projects ............... Beach Erosion Control 10-3 26. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 1100--43 Control Project ..................... 10-4 27. Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Special Authorization .......... 10-5 Flood Control 28. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................ 10-5 29. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula 10-6 River, M S ......................... 10-6 30. Big Brown Creek and 10-7 Tributary, Prentiss Co., MS .......... 31. Boligee Canal Boligee, AL ............. 10-7 32. Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL ..... 10-7 33. Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS ... 34. Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL .... 35. Houston School Rd. Bridge Itawamba Co., MS ................... 10-8 36. Leaf and Bowie Rivers, 10-9 Hattiesburg, MS .................... 10-9 37. Martin Creek, Prentiss Co., MS ....... 10-10 38. Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, 10-10 Brewton, AL ....................... 10-11 39. Noxubee River Relief Bridge, 10-11 Shuqualak, MS ..................... 40. Sewerline Protection, 10-12 Valley, AL ......................... 41. Sope Creek, 10-12 Marietta, GA ....................... 42. Tallabinella Creek, 10-13 Chickasaw Co., MS .................. 43. Tombigbee River (East Fork), 10-13 MS and AL ........................ 44. Tombigbee River Tributaries, 10-13 MS and AL ........................ 10-1 Page 10-13 10-13 10-13 10-13 10-13 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-15 10-15 10-15 10-15 10-16 10-16 10-16 10-16 10-16 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 45. Old Highway 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS ..................... 46. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL ........................ 47. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 48. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .................... 49. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................ Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 50. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA ........................ 50A. Carters Lake, GA ................... 0SOCB.l aiborne Lock and Dam, AL ......... SOC. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL ... SOD. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, A L ................................ 50E. Coosa River Navigation .............. Page 51. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River 10-17 Basin, GA .......................... 52. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, 10-17 and Flint Rivers, AL, GA, and FL ..................... 10-17 52A. Buford Dam, GA ................... 52B. George W. Andrews Lock and 10-18 Dam, AL and GA ................... 52C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, GA 10-18 and FL ............................ 52D. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL and GA ........................ 52E. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and AL ............. 53. Scheduling Flood Control 10-18 Reservoir Operations ................ 10-19 10-19 10-19 General Investigations 54. Surveys ... ....................... 10-20 55. Collection and Study of Basic 10-20 D ata .............................. Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-I Table 10-J Cost & Financial Statement .................. Authorizing Legislation ....... Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ...... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. Deauthorized Projects ........ Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........ Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Special Authorization ............... Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......... 10-25 10-31 10-41 10-41 10-42 10-42 10-43 10-43 10-43 Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............ 10-44 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project ........ 10-44 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA and FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple- Purpose Development Included in Existing Project ............ 10-45 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ........ 10-46 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, MS and AL ........ 10-47 Completed Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Hazard Information Reports .......... 10-48 10-2 Page 10-20 10-21 10-22 .10-22 10-22 10-23 10-23 10-24 10-24 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL. Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) PreVious project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and nine feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-andtimber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. NOperations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $55,015. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $1,898,848 for new work and $3,471,627 for maintenance, a total of $5,370,475. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 30 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design costs and work on channels and canals amounted to $37,674. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $565,837. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The project provides for a channel eight feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence eight feet deep by 100 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin eight feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $15,327. Supervision and administration of maintenance features cost $924. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated 31 March 1975 and completed 26 March 1976. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $325,051 for new work and $746,642 for maintenance, a total of$1,071,693. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $50,000 for maintenance. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, Al., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition and operation studies cost $45,802. Water control management cost $4,386. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs total $486. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $311,095 for new work and $3,065,996 for maintenance, a total of $3,377,091. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $10,500. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project Were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on 28 March 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 412,900 cubic yards of material at a cost of $216,218. Other work on channels and canals cost $67. Condition surveys cost $249,734. Engineering and design cost $16,859. Water control management and miscellaneous supervision and administration costs total $27,223. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 4975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal costs under existing project as of 30 September 1987 were $1,171,054 for new work and $8,102,769 for maintenance, a total of $9,273,823. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 6. BILOXI HARBOR, EAST HARRISON COUNTY CANAL, MS Location. Biloxi Harbor is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, approximately 75 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana, and 45 miles west of Mobile Bay, Alabama. The City of Biloxi is situated on a peninsula bounded by Mississippi Sound on the south, Biloxi Bay on the east, and Back Bay of Biloxi on the north. Existing project. The project provides for the improvement and maintenance of the East Harrison County Canal to a 12-foot project depth, 130 feet wide, and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300- by 300-foot turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction was initiated and essentially completed during FY 1986. Minor administrative costs during FY 1987 total $723. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of construction as of September 30, 1987 amounts to $216,483. 7. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to the vicinity of Birmingham is about 415 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides essentially for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams with 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement for the old Oliver Lock has been authorized and will be located 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock will have dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway will extend 815 feet across the river. Minimum provision will be provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs in connection with the modification of Franklin Ferry Bridge were $129,693. Construction costs for the new Oliver Lock and Dam total $12,759,767. Recreation facilities at Demopolis cost $29,220. Recreation attendance during CY 1986 totaled 6,834,900. Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system cost $6,280,871. Condition surveys cost $592,305. Engineering and design cost $416,951. Supervision and administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $2,087,020. Other maintenance costs for the system include: Coffeeville Lock and Dam, $565,573; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $947,524; Selden Lock and Dam, $459,820; Oliver Lock and Dam, $398,182; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $522,482; Holt Lock and Dam, $914,691; and reservoir operation, $1,808,187. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original locks and dams (4,5,6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1, 2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15, and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed 6 February 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The cost to September 30, 1987 for replacement of the lock was $47,258,651. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Engineering and design and land acquisition for the new Oliver Lock and Dam are essentially complete. Project construction began in November 1986 and is scheduled for completion in 1992. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $122,838,504 for new work and $192,950,212 for maintenance, and $47,258,651 for major rehabilitation, a total of $240,208,863. 8. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and supervision and administration cost $71,942. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $118,615 for new work and $269,511 for maintenance, a total of $388,126. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 9. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel seven feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about seven acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel four feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin seven feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about four feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Work on channels and canals cost $32,349. Condition surveys cost $28,830. Water control management and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $18,519. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $292,864 for new work and $1,393,639 for maintenance, a total of $1,686,503. 10. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376). Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The total length to be dredged is 3,300 feet. The Fowl River project provides for a channel eight feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November, 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Dredging of the Dog River Channel to specifications was completed in September 1986. The city of Mobile constructed the disposal dikes and contributed $81,150 for the recreation use of the project. Federal costs during FY 1987 amounted to $60,784. Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels and canals cost $21,143. Condition surveys and water control management cost $29,096. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs total $39,968. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel was initiated and essentialy completed during FY 1986. Total Federal costs on the existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $2,271,046; $376,101 for new work and $1,894,945 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,250. 11. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 100-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. The west jetty is provided with a low weir section 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 500 feet by 1,500 feet located between the west jetty and the navigation channel. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 357,100 cubic yards of material at a cost of $61,943. Condition surveys cost $111,614. Supervision and administration cost $116,180. Engineering and design and miscellaneous costs totaled $47,435. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $916,715 for new work and $7,306,127 for maintenance, a total of $8,222,842. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 12. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Ala., 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of 10-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Ala. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on both banks near mouth of creek, consisting of a small pile-and timber service wharf, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a marginal timber wharf and shed for commercial fishing boats on right bank of creek immediately above first bend. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance:. Contract dredging removed 12,470 cubic yards of material from Fly Creek and Pass Drury at a cost of $38,558. Condition surveys cost $23,355. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $17,342. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1987 amounted to $431,617 of which $29,000 was for new work and $402,617 for maintenance. 13. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with for the work authorized prior to 1966. For modification of the Gulf County Canal which was authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required in connection with disposal of spoil, or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to construction and maintenance of the project including damages to wharves, piers, bridges, and other structures; provide and maintain at local expense adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas commensurate with depths provided in related project area; and accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other facilities as well as their maintenance. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou LaBatre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle-Apalachicola Bay section: Condition surveys, water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $28,942. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Condition surveys cost $97,813. Routine maintenance of channels and canals cost $45,679. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $20,707. St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Bank stabilization cost $362,063. Contract dredging removed 149,200 cubic yards of material at a cost of $376,961. Condition surveys cost $103,045. Engineering and design cost $46,674. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $194, 819. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Condition surveys cost $53,960. Water control management and supervision and administration costs totaled $19,914. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: Routine maintenance of channels and canals cost $504,563. Condition surveys cost $223,065. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $55,407. Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Condition surveys, water control management and supervision and administration cost $189,274. In addition, compliance inspections cost $388,238; direct charges to Mobile Area Office cost $199,448; and direct charges to Panama City Area Office were $15,522. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1987 were $54,515,480, of which $6,434,694 was for new work and $48,080,786 for maintenance. 14. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747, Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a small-boat basin, all at a depth of eight feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. It is proposed to modify the existing ship channel to 36 x 600 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance : Contract dredging removed a total of 4,212,100 cubic yards of material from the outer bar, the sound and the harbor channel and anchorage basin, all at a cost of $1,331,434. Condition surveys cost $285,368. Engineering and design costs totaled $28,106. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $89,006. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $635,758 for new work and $33,165,703 for maintenance, a total of $33,801,461. 15. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower five miles of Mobile River, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 42-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 40-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence to a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22- foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U. S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Although the authorized project is for the construction of a 55 foot by 550 foot channel, the current proposed plan of improvement consists of deepening the entrance channel from 42 feet to 47 feet for a distance of 6. 1 miles from the Gulf of Mexico to Mobile Bay; and deepening the bay channel from 40 feet to 45 feet from the mouth of the bay north for a distance of 31.2 miles to the McDuffie Coal Terminal. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project in increments. The first increment is described above. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for Mobile Harbor cost $444,538. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 833,950 cubic yards of material from Mobile Harbor and Theodore ship channel at a cost of $2,837,449. Condition surveys cost $1,128,836. Water control management, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $793,294. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1931 and completed in July 1965 except for the Theodore Channel portion, which was essentially completed in August 1981. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $61,952,193 for new work and $83,131,631 for maintenance, a total of $145,083,824. Contributed funds expended amounted to $7,745,408 for new work and $846,706 for maintenance. 16. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project (as modified) provides for a channel about 3.7 miles long extending from deep water in St. Andrew Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 40 feet deep in the bay and 450 feet wide, 42 feet deep and about 1.1 miles long in the approach channel in the Gulf, protected by two jetties, each about 700 feet long; branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel; a channel in Watson Bayou, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge, about 1.75 miles; channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities. The east and west jetties have been reworked and are presently about 2,075 and 2,896 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $87,639. Engineering and design, water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $36,090. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $1,434,485 for new work and $6,697,007 for maintenance, a total of $8,131,492. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 17. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 503,800 cubic yards of material from the Channel, River and Sound at a total Federal cost of $1,882,792. Condition surveys cost $468,513.Water control management, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $242,666. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. Total Federal costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $5,668,543 for new work and $38,514,721 for maintenance, a total of $44,183,264. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $2,035,676. 18. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel; (d) an innerharbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $83,330. Water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $31,194. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except those features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1987 were $875,005 for new work and $6,164,147 for maintenance, a total of $7,039,152. 19. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence nine feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $25,740. Water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $1,690. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal costs of the existing project to September 30, 1987 were $629,860 for new work and $5,974,854 for maintenance, a total of $6,604,714. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 20. TOMBIGBEE RIVER AT COLUMBUS PORT, MS Location. The project is located in east-central Mississippi at the site of Lowndes County Industrial Park in Columbus, MS, about 131 miles northeast of Jackson, MS. The industrial park is located in the Aliceville Pool of the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. The entrance to the project channel is located about 4,000 feet upstream of the confluence of the Tenn-Tom Waterway and Luxapalila Creek. Existing project. The Tenn-Tom Waterway (TTWW), authorized in the River and Harbors Act of 1945, extends from Demopolis, AL to the Tennessee River in northeast Mississippi. The Columbus Port project provides for a navigation channel 100 feet wide by 9 feet deep from the juncture of the old Tombigbee River channel and the TTWW upstream for about 1.5 miles to the port. This reach of the TTWW is known as the Aliceville Lake. The work will also include construction of a 200-foot by 200-foot wide turning basin at the port. About one acre of land will be removed at the entrance to the proposed channel to enhance vessel access into the port. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Construction of a public terminal and waterfront industrial park with road and rail access and appropriate utility services has been completed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs total $452,535. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was begun and essentially completed during FY 1987 at a Federal cost of $452,535. Contributed funds expended amounted to $53,000. 21. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Location. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. The plan of improvement consists of three sections. (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the lateral canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which the bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River; the total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must make and maintain alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held 5 December 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30, 1987, only twelve such facilities were operational, while four were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total cost of new work during the fiscal year was $15,256,360 of which $2,573 was for work on Demopolis Lake; $49,570 for Gainesville Lock and Dam; $4,521,358 for Aliceville Lock and Dam; $1,038,062 for Columbus Lock and Dam; $1,315,783 for Aberdeen Lock and Dam. Canal section cost included: Lock A, $124,022; Lock B, $3,316,692; Lock C, $171,019; Lock D, $142,792; Lock E, $1,104,712. Other costs associated with the overall project amounted to $3,469,777. Contributed funds amounted to $4,035. Maintenance: Contract dredging was performed on the river system and 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT rocks removed from the bendways at a total cost of $3,855,879. Cost for operation of the completed portion of the project during the year amounted to $18,765,500, which included general charges of $10,593,387; Gainesville Lock and Dam, $498,598; Aliceville Lock and Dam, $526,544; Columbus Lock and Dam, $369,471; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, $369,185; Lock A, $306,333; Lock B, $324,514; Lock C, $313,581; Lock D, $345,771; Lock E, $321,817; Bay Springs, $1,110,384; lake charges of $3,685,915. Recreation attendance for CY 1986 totaled 4,033,200 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal costs under the existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $988,386,269 for new work, and $65,829,802 for maintenance for a total of $1,054,216,071. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is about 96 percent complete. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 23. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $568,236. (See Table 10-H.) 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) 25. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) Beach Erosion Control 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) 27. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Studies conducted under Section 103,1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to $11,541. (See Table 10-I.) Flood Control 28. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and topof- conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Minor administrative costs total $283. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,020,843. Benefits attributed to flood control storage and regulation amounted to $694,835. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1986 totaled 1,196,285 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $9,739,455 for new work and $9,293,461 for maintenance, a total of $19,032,916. 29. TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MS Location. The project is on Tallahala Creek, 81,1 miles above its mouth, in Jasper County, Mississippi, 13 miles north of Laurel. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The dam will consist of a compacted earth fill 8,000 feet long, with top elevation 343.5 feet above national geodetic datum, or a maximum 71.5 feet above streambed elevation, with a top width of 18 feet, and a 300-foot long saddle dike with maximum height of 15 feet in the left abutment. The spillway which is 6,000 feet northeast of the left abutment, will consist of an unpaved, freeoverflow type, 500 feet long, with fixed crest at elevation 335.0. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam will serve an 8-foot diameter, horseshoe-shaped concrete conduit. The reservoir at maximum pool elevation 306.5 will have an area of 4,000 acres and a total capacity of 63,000 acre-feet of which 35,900 acrefeet between elevations 288.5 and 302.0 will be used for water supply, 20,000 acre-feet between elevations 302.0 and 306.5 will be used for water quality improvement, and 7,100 acre-feet below elevation 288.5 will consist of 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 dead storage. A volume varying seasonally from 50,000 to 70,000 acre-feet between elevations 306.5 and 315.0 will be reserved for flood storage. Estimated cost for 1987 is $123,490,000 of which $62,540,000 is Federal and $60,950,000 non-Federal. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to reimburse the United States for all costs allocated to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended; and one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to general recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. In addition, local interests are required to reimburse the United States for the annual operation, maintenance and replacement cost allocated to water supply, and bear all cost of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife areas and facilities for initial development. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs total $18,833. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not been initiated. 30. BIG BROWN CREEK AND TRIBUTARY, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located at the Marietta- Hazeldell Road bridges crossing Big Brown Creek and Big Brown Creek tributary located about 2.0 and 2.2 miles, respectively, east-north-east of Marietta in Prentiss County, MS. Existing Project. The authorized project provides for emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottoms of the channels to retard erosion at the described project site. The banks and bottoms will be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on six inches of bedding material and filter fabric. The placement of the riprap at the bridge crossing Big Brown Creek would begin 50 feet downstream from the centerline of the bridge and will extend upstream for 100 feet. The placement of the riprap at the bridge crossing Big Brown Creek tributary will begin 60 feet downstream from the centerline of the bridge and will extend upstream for 100 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of project during FY 1987 cost $111,039. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated in FY 1986 and completed in FY 1987 at a total cost of $137,500. 31. BOLIGEE CANAL, BOLIGEE, AL Location. Boligee, Alabama is located in southern Greene County about 40 miles west of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Boligee Canal originates about five miles northeast of Boligee and flows southwesterly to a point north of Boligee where it turns west and flows for about 1.5 miles before it enters a natural channel, approximately two miles upstream from its mouth on the Tombigbee River. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing and snagging Boligee Canal from its confluence with the Tombigbee River upstream to mile 5.84. Work will be done from within the channel and extend from top bank to top bank, an approximate width of 20 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Minor costs associated with the project total $1,052. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is essentially complete at a total cost of $163,606. 32. CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER, EUFAULA, AL Location. The project is located at the Alabama State Docks Barge Port on the Chattahoochee River in Eufaula, AL. Existing project. The authorized project provides for shoreline protection consisting of riprap placed on the slopes for 300 feet along the State Docks and a 60 linear foot sheet pile cutoff wall driven behind the docks wharf. Work will prevent further erosion and loss of fill material under the wharf. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs total $190,615. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in FY 1986 and essentially completed in FY 1987 at a total cost of $204,780. 33. GOODFOOD CREEK, CHICKASAW COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located at Goodfood Creek Road about 1.5 miles east of U.S. Forest Service's Davis Lake recreation area in the northern portion of Chickasaw County, MS. Existing project. The authorized project provides for bridge protection using riprap extending 30 feet up and downstream of the bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs total $67,896. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated in FY 1986 and essentially completed in FY 1987. 34. HIGHWAY 39 BRIDGE, GAINESVILLE, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River, upstream of the Highway 39 bridge in Gainesville, AL. 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for slope protection for a 2000-foot reach of the east bank of the Tombigbee River, immediately upstream of the existing Highway 39 bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs total $62,867. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project continued during FY 1987. Total cost of the project to date is $64,121 35. HOUSTON SCHOOL ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA COUNTY, MS Location. Houston School Road Bridge crosses Tynes Branch, a Twenty Mile Creek tributary, and is located about two miles west of Houston in northwest Itawamba County, MS. Existing project. The project provides for bridge protection using riprap extending 62 feet downstream of centerline of bridge and extending upstream for 99 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs total $35,870. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was initiated in FY 1986 and essentially completed in FY 1987. 36. LEAF AND BOWIE RIVERS, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The Leaf River forms the east boundary of the city of Hattiesburg, the county seat of Forrest County, located in south-central Mississippi. The river separated Hattiesburg from the smaller city of Petal. Bowie River flows southeasterly along the northern boundary of Hattiesburg and joins the Leaf River at the northeast corner of the city. Existing project. The project provides for channel snagging, overbank clearing within the flood plains, riprap protection of the Southern Railroad and River Avenue Bridge piers and removal of the Petal sewage lagoon. Work will also include installation of a flood warning system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction costs amounted to $292,108. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was essentially completed in FY 1987. The remaining work consists of minor grassing and installation of the flood warning system. This work is scheduled to be completed in FY 1988. Total cost of construction as of September 30, 1987 is $1,359,580. 37. MARTIN CREEK, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located at the Altitude Road bridge crossing Martin Creek about 6.7 miles eastsoutheast of Booneville in Prentiss County, MS. Existing project. The project provides for emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottom of the channel to retard erosion at the Altitude Road bridge crossing Martin Creek. The banks and bottom will be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. Two hundred linear feet of barbed wire fence will have to be moved. Two acres of land will be required for construction of the project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction costs amounted to $63,691. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was essentially completed in FY 1987 at a total cost of $78,335. 38. MURDER AND BURNT CORN CREEKS, BREWTON, AL Location. The project is located in the city of Brewton, AL near the confluence of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks in the commercial district of downtown Brewton. Previous project. A limited stream clearing and snagging project was completed in 1980 on portions of both creeks to remove obstructions to flows. This interim measure was undertaken to reduce flooding in Brewton and East Brewton. Further, an evacuation plan for East Brewton was implemented under the Section 205 authority. The project involved removal of damageable structures from the low-lying flood plain of Murder Creek. Existing project. The authorized non-structural project provides for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10-year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate acquisitions during FY 1987 cost $427,607. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real estate purchases will continue through FY 1988. Total cost of project as of September 30, 1987 is $662,231. 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 39. NOXUBEE RIVER RELIEF BRIDGE, SHUQUALAK, MS Location. The Noxubee River relief bridge is located on the Shuqualak-Mahorner Road near Shuqualak, Mississippi. The Noxubee River at this location flows through Noxubee County, which is located in east central Mississippi. The project is about 48 miles south of Columbus, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides for streambank protection at Noxubee River relief bridge consisting of grading and protecting of banks with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. This would preclude any erosion from high velocities or from sudden drawdown associated with receding floodwaters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs total $87,810. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in FY 1986 and essentially completed in FY 1987 at a total cost to date of $119,123. 40. SEWERLINE PROTECTION, VALLEY, AL Location. Valley, Alabama is located on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River in the southeast corner of Chambers County. The West Point Lake and Dam is located approximately 11 miles up river from Valley and controls a drainage area of approximately 3600 square miles. A sanitary sewage line and pumping station were built in 1972 to provide service from approximately 200 homes and several businesses located near Valley. This line serves as the only sewage transport for this area. Existing project. The project provides for the restoration of approximately 1600 linear feet of streambank. This will consist of placing approximately 1550 cubic yards of No. 5 riprap on 4445 square yards of filter fabric. Any reshaping of the bank will be done by placing backfill material as opposed to cutting the existing streambank. The reshaped bank will then be grassed. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local coolperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Minor costs associated with project total $2,924. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in FY 1985 and essentially completed in FY 1986 at a total cost to date of $170,793. 41. SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA Location. The project is located in Marietta, Georgia in Cobb County which is in the north-central section of Georgia, just north-northwest of Atlanta. Sope Creek is a small tributary of the Chattahoochee River and flows generally from northwest to southeast from its beginning in the city of Marietta. Existing project. The project provides fors flood control measures along Sope Creek in Cobb County, Georgia. The project provides for both a structural and nonstructural component. The structural component provides for clearing and snagging of the creek. This would involve the clearing of all material, trees, shrubs and any underbrush less than 12 inches in diameter from a strip 30 feet wide on each side of the creek and removing all trees, shrubs and underbrush within the creek banks. Snagging would involve the removal of all fallen trees and debris which are in the creek. The nonstructural component provides for the evacuation of 13 structures located on the west side of the creek within the Fox Hill subdivision. The project provides for purchase and removal of the structures. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project costs totaled $18,584. Condition at end of fiscal year. The nonstructural work was essentially completed in FY 1986. The clearing and snagging phase of the project will be readvertised in FY 1988. 42. TALLABINELLA CREEK, CHICKASAW COUNTY, MS Location. The project is located along Tallabinella Creek at Pleasant Valley Road about 3.5 miles northwest of the city of Okolona in northeast Chickasaw County. Existing project. The project provides for bridge protection using riprap extending 30 feet up and downstream of the bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction costs total $57,222. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was initiated in FY 1986 and essentially completed in FY 1987. 43. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MISS. AND ALA. Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line, by clearing the banks of trees and underbrush to flood stage, the removal of drift jams and the excavation of 13 cutoff channels; and for additional channel improvements and related works for flood control of the Tombigbee River and tributaries above the mouth of and including the Noxubee River in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers, to protect people and valuable agricultural property from over- 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT flow waters of the Tombigbee River. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1936 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $101,298. Routine maintenance of channels and canals cost $21,458. Engineering and design of maintenance features cost $2,490. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. The over-all project, as modified, is about 55 percent completed. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $134,801 for new work and $2,503,340 for maintenance, a total of $2,638,141. 44. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River by means of channel clearing and snagging. Approved estimate of cost (1987) for new work is $50,47,000; consisting of $48,000,000 Federal funds, and $2,447,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Provided riprap armor for bank stabilization and erosion control at Twenty Mile Creek at a total cost of $1,677,675. Engineering and design costs for Luxapalila Creek were $133,818. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1987 was $20,034,481 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $63,281. 45. OLD HIGHWAY 82 BRIDGE, COLUMBUS, MS Location. The Old Highway 82 bridge is located at Columbus, Mississippi in east-central Mississippi and crosses the Tombigbee River at river mile 364.96. It is about 131 miles northeast of Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides protection along the right descending bank. The slope protection would consist of 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and a filter fabric. The riprap placement would begin approximately 140 feet downstream of the centerline of the bridge and extend upstream along the right descending bank for 330 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Minor miscellaneous costs total $5,532. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded on 25 July 1985. Project was essentially completed in FY 1986. 46. INTERSTATE 59 BRIDGES, FOSTERS, AL Location. The Interstate 59 bridges are located near the community of Fosters in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama and crosses over the Black Warrior River at navigation mile 320.5 The bridges are about 10 miles southwest of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The project provides streambank protective measures at the bridges. Bank stabilization would consist of placing riprap along a 195-foot reach of the left descending bank at the bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Minor construction costs totaled $20,982. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded on 13 September 1985. Project was essentially completed in FY 1986. 47. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 River Basin. Channel rectification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pond and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection arid erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Leaf River, Mahned, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 87 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $67,064. Total cost to September 30, 1987, was $446,364 charged to maintenance. 48. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E) 49. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Pre-authorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public Law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 50. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non- Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The present phase of improvement provides for construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiplepurpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and for construction of Carters Dam, a multiple-purpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petro- 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT leum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Public use areas at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam cost $2,136. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river system cost $2,654,574. General charges for engineering and design, condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $1,223,027. Coosa River Reservoir operations cost $549,056 and lock operations $392,182. In addition, operation of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam cost $2,040,427, Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, $2,608,238; Carters Lake, $2,923,539; all for a total maintenance cost of $12,391,043. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962 on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was essentially completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is essentially complete. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1987 are $425,619,426, including $305,735,490 for new work and $119,883,936 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 50A. CARTERS LAKE, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Carters, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a power house on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pumpgenerating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acrefeet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration incidental thereto cost $2,923,539. Gross power generation amounted to 544,719,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1987, of which 157,935,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1986 totaled 1,078,500 recreational user days. Reduced flood damages attributed to the Carters project and to the joint operation with Allatoona were $2,561,121 during FY 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. Total Federal costs of the existing project as of September 30, 1987 are $135,415,018, including $111,140,340 for new work and $24,274,678 for maintenance. 50B. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location.The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is at elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: none. Maintenance: none. Recreation attendance during CY 1986 totaled 784,200 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. 50C. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 245.4 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 245.4. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $2,040,427. Gross power generation amounted to 288,767,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1987, of which 282,189,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at R.E. "Bob" Woodruff Lake during CY 1986 totaled 2,699,800 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is essentially complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1987 were $102,231,619, including $83,360,800 for new work and $18,870,819 for maintenance. 50D. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and anearth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa' project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor costs spent for public use facilities total $2,136. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration incidental thereto cost $2,608,238. Gross power generation amounted to 330,334,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1987, of which 324,605,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir duriig CY 1986 totaled 2,399,600 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operation in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal costs of the project as of September 30, 1987 were $63,124,643 for new work and $31,435,039 for maintenance, a total of $94,559,682. 50E. COOSA RIVER NAVIGATION Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama- Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on 27 January 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The water-way to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The estimated 1987 cost for the waterway from Montgomery to Gadsden is $1,406,600,000 of which $1,349,400,000 is Federal and $57,200,000 non- Federal. Funding was initiated in FY 1978 for preconstruction planning. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 51. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installed capacity will be 110,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration incidental thereto cost $5,327,800. Gross power generation at Allatoona Reservoir amounted to 108,640,500 kilowatt-hours during FY 1987 of which 106,423,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during CY 1986 totaled 9,458,500 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal costs under existing project as of September 30, 1987 were $35,709,084 for new work and $5,327,800 for maintenance, a total of $41,036,884. 52. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles, to be accomplished by dredging, contraction works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were deauthorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage is provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs include $9,149 at West Point Dam; $2,041 at Buford Dam and $4,240 at Walter F. George. Maintenance: The contractor's dredge removed 628,200 cubic yards (net) of material from the river system at a cost of $2,696,082. Other costs incidental to the overall project amounted to $2,205,698. Operation of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $297,150. Operations and maintenance locks and dams: Buford Dam cost $9,107,400; Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, $5,630,585; Walter F. George Lock and Dam, $6,823,873; and West Point Lake, $6,372,604. Total FY 1987 cost for entire project was $33,144,582, of which $11,190 was for new work, and $33,133,392 waS for operation and maintenance. Detailed information on operations and costs applicable to the individual dam 10-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 projects is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. West Point is essentially complete with the exception of adding recreation facilities. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Work remaining to complete the project consists of completion of recreational facihlities at Lake Sidney Lanier, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Walter F. George Lock and Dam and West Point Dam. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 52A. BUFORD DAM, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs total $2,041. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $9,107,400. Gross power generation amounted to 122,761,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1987, of which 119,910,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during CY 1986 totaled 16,604,300 recreational user days. Flood control benefits attributed to the project for FY 1987 amounted to $64,562. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. 52B. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Recreational attendance at George W. Andrews Lock and Dam during CY 1986 totaled 458,200 recreational user days. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963. 52C. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acrefeet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoildisposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River; and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $5,630,585. Gross power generation amounted to 191,164,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1987, of which 187,482,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during CY 1986 totaled 4,189,600 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The lock was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. 52D. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL. AND GA. Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,400 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. The approved (1987) estimate for rehabilitation work to control seepage is $14,500,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs total $4,240. Maintenance of the project for operation and care was $6,823,873. Gross power generation amounted to 430,839,000 kilowatthours during FY 1987, of which 424,424,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1986 totaled 7,740,300 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed on-the-line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. 52E. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravitytype concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankmeht retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acrefeet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed on operation in March and April, 1975. The ultimate installation is 108,375 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Miscellaneous costs totaled $9,149. Maintenance: Operation and care of the project cost $6,372,604. Gross power generation amounted to 170,424,000 kilowatt-hours during FY 1987, of which 165,791,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1986 totaled 6,977,900 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was essentially complete at the end of FY 1984. 53. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers System. General Investigations 54. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,874,114 of which $576,624 was for navigation studies; $1,082,228 for flood damage prevention studies; $121,066 for special studies; $20 for review of authorized projects; $31,779 for special investigations; $5,647 for coordination with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; $24,796 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests; $31,953 for a supplemental preauthorization study at Dalton, GA. Continuation of planning and engineering included $7,163 for Mobile Harbor; $27,687 for Oliver Lock and Dam; $1,633 for Panama City Beaches; $6,635 for Sowashee Creek; $12,371 for Three Mile Creek; $589 for Village Creek; for a total of $56,078. Advance engineering and design includes $87,999 for Gulfport Harbor; $48,956 for Pascagoula Harbor; $134,489 for Fort Toulouse; and $117,881 for Moundville for a total of $389,325. Contributed funds required for an authorized Federal project included $85,131 for Bayou La Batre, AL and $35,293 for Mississippi Gulf Coast for a total of $120,424. 55. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management services were performed at a cost of $207,289. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 1987.) For listing of previous reports see page 10-50 Annual Report for 1974, page 10-44 of FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-48 of FY 1978 Annual Report, page 10-43 of FY 1983 Annual Report, and page 10-49 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Costs incurred for environmental data studies total $8,105. Minor costs associated with the National Program for inspection of non-Federal dams total $6. 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 1. Apalachicola Bay New Work: FL Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2. Aquatic Plant New Work: Control Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) Maint: Contrib. Cost 3. Bayou Coden, AL New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost (Contributed Funds) Maint: Contrib. Cost 4. Bayou La Batre, AL New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost (Contributed Funds) Maint: Contrib. Cost 6. Biloxi Harbor, New Work: East Harrison Approp. County Canal, MS Cost 7. Black Warrior & New Work: Tombigbee Rivers, Approp. AL Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost 8. Bon Secour River, New Work: AL Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 10,000 16,632 85,000 77,296 60,000 41,082 25,000 22,778 24,000 22,460 165,000 151,489 683,000 689,170 27,000 36,475 322,000 325,982 326,000 326,248 2,001,000 2,014,130 455,000 455,263 5,000 41,048 75,000 96,785 - 220,000 224,570 501,000 514,885 14,354 3,605,000 153,586 15,962,000 16,904,377 19 20,000 22,452 23,000 26,531 - 2,033,4611 - 2,033,4611 55,000 3,642,8072 55,015 3,640,3942 93,000 642,687 37,674 565,837 - 21,225 - 21,225 - 330,7013 - 330,7013 16,000 747,533 16,251 746,642 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 311,095 - 311,095 50,000 3,066,852 50,674 3,065,996 - 10,5004 - 10,5004 - 1,215,4365 - 1,215,436 s 510,000 8,200,1066 510,101 8,199,2786 - 102,600 - 102,600 72,104 238,640 72,105 238,640 -25,800 216,48333 723 216,48333 15,222,000 128,100,9427 12,918,680 123,445,4357 14,942,300 193,142,9768 14,993,606 193,000,2128 - 48,065,300 - 47,258,651 - 118,615 - 118,615 72,000 270,478 71,942 269,511 10-25 - 166,536 - 166,535 61,300 140,000 35,225 145,490 35,000 2,850,000 1,797,450 2,102,535 14,087,000 8,424,000 13,553,608 9,317,927 - -62,000 895 482 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp: Cost 9. Dauphin Island, New Work: Bay, AL Approp. Cost - 9,700 - 9,700 - 292,864 - 292,864 10. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 11. East Pass Channel New Work: From Gulf of Approp. Mexico into Chocta- Cost whatchee Bay, FL 96,000 93,672 36,000 39,417 163,000 165,309 - 217,000 - 124,622 2,037 191,000 187,526 2,200 922,000 925,433 81,150 55,893 80,000 79,698 -20,000 60,784 91,000 90,207 25,257 - 916,715 - 916,715 12. 13. (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Fly Creek, AL New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Gulf Intracoastal New Work: Waterway between Approp. Apalachee Bay, FL Cost and Mexican Border Maint: Approp. Cost 14. Gulfport Harbor, New Work: MS Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 15. Mobile Harbor, AL New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost 16. Panama City New Work: Harbor, FL Approp. Cost 626,000 610,614 109,000 106,550 3,009,000 4,536,371 2,293,300 3,281,516 31,404 485,000 717,401 2,908,700 5,172,873 695,000 627,559 15,00 2,83 5,141,00 5,175,52 2,285,00 2,363,21 15,00 19,44 4,805,00 4,819,69 805,00 834,70 588,000 768,130 1,000 15,356 3,502,000 3,515,992 0 )5S 0 :5 0 -112,000 0 -70,000 0 130,000 8 89,275 - 2,685,000 - 1,968,039 0 8,646,000 '6 8,796,672 0 - 6 - 425,500 7,394,660 337,172 7,306,127 - 398,000 - 398,000 - 29,000 - 29,000 80,000 403,621 79,255 402,617 - 6,480,2999 - 6,480,2999 2,967,000 48,195,72210 2,926,095 48,145,92310 - 904,775" - 904,775" 1,733,000 33,166,80812 1,733,914 33,165,70312 1,015,000 69,262,9373's 444,538 68,635,297's 1,650,000 8,667,500 1,612,400 7,745,408 4,889,000 87,415,18314 4,759,579 87,228,30214 - 817,000 - 846,706 - 1,638,045's15 - 1,638,045'15 10-26 1,395,026 1,393,639 387,695 376,101 1,896,593 1,894,945 197,450 195,250 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 17. Pascagoula Harbor, New Work: MS Approp. Cost (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) Maint: Contrib. Cost Pensacola Harbor, New Work: FL Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Perdido Pass New Work Channel, AL Approp. Cost (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost 761,000 761,668 435,000 431,355 617,000 620,887 125,000 123,729 7,212,33416 7,210,61116 - 80,000 - 80,000 - 6,572,985'7 - 6,572,9857 2,066,000 4,587,968 300,000 496,024 3,127,000 3,150,431 770,028 735,831 3,154,000 3,162,738 75,456 75,456 2,653,000 2,593,971 305,885 279,250 38,794,4208 38,727,34518 2,117,309 2,035,676 - 1,469,693'9 - 1,469,693'9 2,032,000 1,967,593 68,000 145,898 19,000 20,328 114,000 6,291,23820 114,524 6,290,79520 - 629,860 - 629,860 -62,000 743,601 60,000 51,595 936,000 944,695 28,000 5,976,217 27,430 5,974,854 - 510,000 - 510,000 - 10,325 - 10,325 20. Tombighee River New Work: Columbus Port, MS Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 21. Waterway Con- New Work: necting Tombigbee Approp. and Tennessee Rivers Cost AL, and MS Maint: Approp. Cost 28. Okatibbee Lake, MS 29. Tallahala Creek Lake, Pascagoula River, MS 30. Big Brown Creek, Prentiss County, MS 31. Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 490,000 - 452,535 - 53,000 - 53,000 155,107,000 88,011,301 7,456,000 7,447,345 620,000 86,839 1,008,000 1,184,145 1,809 -19,750,000 43,785,515 10,291,000 11,170,456 -100 421,348 859,000 8 13,827 593 26,496,000 24,174,109 13,159,425 13,171,967 119,906 793,000 877,052 3,931 - 52,500 - 26,461 - 163,600 - 162,554 -5,060,000 15,256,360 18,816,000 18,765,500 490,000 452,535 53,000 53,000 995,218,20021 988,498,47521 66,498,75622 66,064,13322 - 9,739,528 283 9,739,455 1,031,800 9,319,692 1,020,843 9,293,461 18,833 85,000 111,039 1,052 3,945,757 3,945,459 137,500 137,500 163,600 163,606 10-27 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding 32. Chattahoochee New Work: River, Eufaula, AL Approp. Cost 33. Goodfood Creek, New Work: Chickasaw Co., MS Approp. Cost 34. Hwy. 39 Bridge, New Work: Gainesville, AL Approp. Cost 35. Houston School Rd. New Work: Bridge, Itawamba Approp. Co., MS Cost 36. Leaf and Bowie New Work: Rivers, Hattiesburg, Approp. MS Cost 37. Martin Creek, New Work: Prentiss County, Approp. MS Cost 38. Murder and Burnt New Work: Corn Creeks, Approp. Brewton, AL Cost 39. Noxubee River New Work: Relief Bridge, Approp. Shuqualak, MS Cost 40. Sewerline Protection New Work: Valley, AL Approp. Cost 41. Sope Creek, New Work: Marietta, GA Approp. Cost 42. Tallabinella Creek New Work: Chickasaw County, Approp. MS Cost 43. Tombigbee River New Work: (East Fork), Approp. MS & AL Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 44. Tombigbee River New Work: Tributaries, Approp. MS and AL Cost 45. 46. 50. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost Old Hwy 82 New Work: Bridge, Columbus, Approp. MS Cost Interstate 59 New Work: Bridges, Fosters, Approp. AL Cost Alabama-Coosa New Work: Rivers, AL and GA Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 27,50 10,34 310,00 9,92 312,00 463,70 1,400,00 2,494,13 14,00 13,16 27,50 18,56 100,00 608,67 11,741,5(0 13,176,9(0 0 1 14,54 - 185,0( - 17,3 0 1,110,0 1 833,31 0 449,0( 1 452,2 40 2,000,0( 6 985,3: )0 5 3 135,0(30 4 35,1 - 160,0( - 15,1' )0 10 84,4 )0 11,224,0 )4 10,795,4 - 52,500 - 14,165 - 37,500 - 22,699 - 50,000 - 1,254 - 42,300 - 20,738 - 1,340,000 - 1,067,472 - 32,500 - 14,644 - 550,000 - 234,624 - 25,000 43 6,429 D0 - 87 150,482 00 -20,000 83 314,854 - 35,000 - 22,900 00 153,000 13 164,098 00 2,297,000 30 3,297,214 64 - 00 - 17 84,286 00 -17,500 79 I 19,039 - -293,000 76 46,180 06 9,346,000 82 10,018,072 184,100 236,600 190,615 204,780 60,000 97,500 67,896 90,595 50,000 100,000 62,867 64,121 20,000 62,300 35,870 56,608 155,000 1,495,000 292,108 1,359,580 55,000 87,500 63,691 78,335 390,000 940,000 427,607 662,231 69,000 123,500 87,810 119,123 -14,000 171,000 2,924 170,793 -165,000 1,235,000 18,584 1,176,742 50,000 85,000 57,222 80,122 - 134,801 - 134,801 125,000 2,505,100 125,246 2,503,340 3,027,000 21,633,225 1,811,493 20,034,481 - 94,700 - 63,281 -19,000 143,500 5,532 143,499 12,700 155,200 20,982 155,200 -49,000 309,448,63023 2,136 309,447,97323 12,541,400 123,185,36024 12,391,043 122,658,26624 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 50A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA 50B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL 50C. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL 50D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL 50E. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL 51. Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, GA 52. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL and GA 52A. Lake Sidney Lanier, GA 52B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA 52C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, GA and FL 52D. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL and GA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 312 - -106,000 - 866 2,522,500 2,321,000 2,437,000 2,806,966 2,361,379 2,507,840 - 111,140,340 - 111,140,340 3,064,800 24,531,100 2,923,539 24,274,678 27,997,450 27,997,450 -300,000 239,173 1,755,000 1,994,862 400,000 306,625 12,150 1,759,000 1,776,575 51,806 -187,000 793 1,858,000 1,858,604 38,776 3,450,000 2,499,000 2,360,000 3,774,011 2,544,735 2,392,094 62,560 70,000 169,716 4,776,000 5,666,044 1,702,000 1,959,105 20,520 -7,000 65,389 5,149,000 4,816.217 -1,500 28,177 5,745 7,671 5,278,000 5,746,764 196 - 83,360,800 - 83,360,800 2,024,800 18,962,578 2,040,427 18,870,819 - 63,125,300 2,136 63,124,643 2,585,000 31,545,965 2,608,238 31,435,039 -49,000 14,986,400 - 14,986,400 - 35,709,08525 - 35,709,08425 5,315,800 58,405,323 5,327,800 58,161,917 - 339,094,09326 11,190 339,004,53226 22,362,000 26,743,000 27,337,000 34,565,300 309,697,66427 24,142,063 26,228,528 28,785,527 33,133,392 307,338,91027 6,400,000 4,439,449 3,000 166,190 5,342,000 6,298,978 30 30 -1,000 292 3,810,000 4,057,310 8,483 4,105,313 -1,500 10,398 6,948,000 6,879,884 30 30 3,505 4,1 19,000 4,154,005 -700,000 468,153 -2,038 7,152,000 7,328,659 30 30 796 4,768,000 4,910,998 14,274 - 10,500,000 4,240 10,252,003 - 53,030,03828 2,041 53,037,41928 9,729,900 72,573,807 9,107,400 71,720,228 - 13,038,42729 - 13,038,42729 30 30 - 48,017,85831 - 47,978,7493' 6,451,800 56,703,881 5,630,585 55,749,756 - 88,295,77932 - 88,295,78032 10-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept. 30, 1987 Maint: Approp. 4,620,000 5,779,000 7,063,000 6,894,800 69,064,364 Cost 4,544,659 5,947,570 7,347,633 6,823,873 68,791,996 Major Rehab: Approp. 6,400,000 - -700,000 - 10,500,000 Cost 4,439,449 4,105,313 468,153 4,240 10,252,003 52E. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. 1,700,000 10,948 - - 131,557,359 Basin, GA and AL Cost 1,784,140 - 1,432 9,149 131,510,509 Maint: Approp. 3,103,000 3,934,000 5,266,000 6,368,800 36,000,100 Cost 3,130,304 3,958,108 5,288,528 6,372,604 35,739,067 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,075,899 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes 2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers project. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963' Feb. 5, 1975' Aug. II, 1983' July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 June 2, 1969' Oct. 27, 1965 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels, 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channels is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and about I mile long, parallel to shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, AL. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR(Sec. 107) DPR(Sec. 107) DPR(Sec. 107) H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 87-874 -%7tirCong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979' August 8, 1985' July 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sept. 19, 1890 Sept. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, MS. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500- by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500-foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150- foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about I mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. BILOXI HARBOR, EAST HARRISON COUNTY CANAL, MS (See Section 6 of Text) The project provides for the improvement and maintenance of the East Harrison County Canal. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL. (See Section 7 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887. Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis. Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 1stS ess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1stS ess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 June 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 July 30, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 May 16, 1963' Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 19, 19691 Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL. (See Section 8 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swift'Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL. (See Section 9 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL. (See Section 10 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. 10-33 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, p. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.45, 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1t Sess. Public Law 97-377 Public Law 98-63 The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 23, 1942 June 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL. (See Section 11 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL., AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 13 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL., TO MOBILE BAY, AL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (P.L. 96-367) H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. 10-34 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 July 23, 1930 June 30, 1948 July 3, 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 Sept. 3, 1954 July 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) GULFPORT HARBOR, MS. (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound, and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. MOBILE HARBOR, AL. (See Section 15 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the Mobile Bay Channel to turning basin at the inner end of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet, Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. The Energy and Water Development Approp. Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) 10-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin Aug. 15, 1985 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967' June 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL. (See Section 16 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS. (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River, 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass. thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth I mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. The Energy and Water Development Approp. Act 1985 (P.L. 99-88) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-36 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 x 80 feet extending about 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an upland diked area. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL. (See Section 18 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvement of Bayou Chico. June 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 27, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jan. 20, 1987' July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 743, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-37 July 11, 1983' Modified improvement of Bayou Chico, FL. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL. (See Section 19 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemound jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TOMBIGBEE RIVER AT COLUMBUS PORT, MS (See Section 20 of Text) Provides for a navigation channel 100 feet wide by 9 feet deep from the juncture of the old Tombigbee River channel and the Tenn-Tom Waterway upstream for about 1.5 miles to the port. Also, construction of a 200-foot by 200-foot wide turning basin. Will also include removal of about one acre of land at the entrance to the proposed channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING TOMBIGBEE AND TENNESSEE RIVERS, AL. AND MS. (See Section 21 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms.; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS. (See Section 28 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control. water supply, water quality control, and recreation. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 7, 1968 April 30, 19864 March 24, 19863 July 25, 19864 May 6 19864 July 2, 1986 July 25, 19864 October, 3 19852 May 6, 1986 April 18, 19862 May 7, 19854 TALLAHALA CREEK LAKE, PASCAGOULA RIVER, MS. (See Section 29 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. BIG BROWN CREEK AND TRIBUTARY, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS (See Section 30 of Text) Emergency streambank protection to the banks and bottoms of the channels to retard erosion at the Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridges crossing Big Brown Creek and Big Brown Creek tributary. BOLIGEE CANAL, BOLIGEE, AL (See Section 31 of Text) Clearing and snagging Boligee Canal from its confluence with the Tombigbee River upstream to mile 5.84. Work to be done from within channel and extend from top bank to top bank, an approximate width of 20 feet. CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER, EUFAULA, AL (See Section 32 of Text) Shoreline protection consisting of riprap placed on the slopes for 300 feet along the State Docks and a 60 linear foot sheet pile cutoff wall driven behind the docks wharf. Work will prevent further erosion and loss of fill material under the wharf. GOODFOOD CREEK, CHICKASAW COUNTY, MS (See Section 33 of Text) Bridge protection using riprap extending 30 feet up and downstream of the bridge. HIGHWAY 39 BRIDGE, GAINESVILLE, AL (See Section 34 of Text) Slope protection for a 2000-foot reach of the east bank of the Tombigbee River, immediately upstream of the existing Highway 39 Bridge. HOUSTON SCHOOL ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA COUNTY, MS (See Section 35 of Text) Bridge protection using riprap extending 62 feet downstream of centerline of bridge and extending upstream for 99 feet. LEAF AND BOWIE RIVERS, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 36 of Text) Channel snagging; overbank clearing within the flood plains: riprap protection of the Southern Railroad and River Avenue Bridge piers, and removal of the Petal sewage lagoon. Work also includes installation of a flood warning system. MARTIN CREEK, PRENTISS COUNTY, MS (See Section 37 of Text) Emergency streambank protection to the banks and bottom of the channel to retard erosion at the Altitude Road Bridge crossing Martin Creek MURDER AND BURNT CORN CREEKS, BREWTON, AL (See Section 38 of Text) Non-structural project providing for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10-year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. NOXUBEE RIVER RELIEF BRIDGE, SHUQUALAK, MS (See Section 39 of Text) The proposed project for streambank protection at Noxubee River relief bridge would consist of grading and protecting of banks with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. 10-38 H. Doc. 143, 90th Cong., Ist Sess. DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 208) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) Urgent Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1986 Public Law 99-349. DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents April 18, 1985 August 23, 19842 May 7, 19864 Aug. 18, 1941 July 23, 1958 July 8, 1980 July 19, 19844 August 9, 19854 Mar. 2, 1945 June 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Aug. 18. 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 SEWERLINE PROTECTION, VALLEY, AL (See Section 40 of Text) The project provides for the restoration of approximately 1600 linear feet of streambank. This will consist of placing 1550 cubic yards of riprap on 4445 square yards of filter fabric. SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA (See Section 41 of Text) The project provides for flood control measures along Sope Creek in Cobb County, Georgia, by clearing and snagging and evacuation of 13 structures. TALLABINELLA CREEK, CHICKASAW COUNTY, MS (See Section 42 of Text) Bridge protection using riprap extending 30 feet up and downstream of the bridge. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 43 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 44 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. OLD HIGHWAY 82 BRIDGES, COLUMBUS, MS (See Section 45 of Text) The project provides restoration and stabilization along the right descending bank of the bridge. The stabilization would consist of 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and a filter fabric. The riprap placement would begin approximately 140 feet downstream of the centerline of the bridge and extend upstream along the right descending bank for 330 feet. INTERSTATE 59 BRIDGES, FOSTERS, AL (See Section 46 of Text) The project provides streambank protective measures at the bridges. Bank stabilization would consist of placing riprap along a 195-foot reach of the left descending bank at the bridge. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL. AND GA. (See Section 50 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 51 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) Special Report on Record in OCE. (Public Law 222,) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., Ist Sess. PL (96-304) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 228, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. 10-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL., GA. AND FL. (See Section 52 of Text) Mar. 2, 1945 Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and 1st Sess. recreation. July 24, 1946 Modified general plan for full development of H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System Ist Sess. and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Dec. 22, 1944 Authorized recreation facilities. Jan. 27, 1981' Modified the existing project to provide for DPR (Sec. 107) nine foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. (See Section 52A of Text) July 24, 1944 Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL. AND GA. (See Section 52B of Text) July 24, 1946 Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., and low dam at George W. Andrews site. 1st Sess. Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FL. (See Section 52C of Text) Dec. 22, 1944 Provided recreation facilities. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL., AND GA. (See Section 52D of Text) May 19, 1953 Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George H. Comm. on site and low dam at Columbia site. Public Works WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND AL. (See Section 52E of Text) October 23, 1963 Authorized construction for flood control, power H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., recreation, fish and wildlife development, and 2d Sess. streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946. 10-40 TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION (See Section 21 of Text) PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $283,562 Bluff Creek, MS' 1963 1,000 6,883 Cahaba River, AL2 1894 45,000- Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 705,118 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 1979 481,627 379,413 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,102,094 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 82,693 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS 2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, MS' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, GA and FL' 2 1900 5,000- Old Town Creek, MS I 2 1887 3,000- Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA' 2 1907 32,656- Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 92,352 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 139,653 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,885,1453 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 84,115 Tallapoosa River, AL2 1893 43,972- Upper Chipola River, FL, from Marianna to its mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 I. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 96-157, 1st Session. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 3. Includes $80,000 contributed funds. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 25 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance2 Harrison County, MS, shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000- 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-41 TABLE 10-E REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 48 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance2 Alabama River at Montgomery,. AL' 1965 $144,194- Armuchee Creek, GA 1966 115,547- Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA 1958 149,815- Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS 1985 132,174- Black Creek, Gadsden, AL 1953 125,389- Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL 1986 181,500- Burketts Creek, Amory, MS 1984 1,366,454- Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL 1985 121,718- Clanton, AL 1964 274,024- Collinsville, AL 1940 71,119- Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 1985 802,026- Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS 1982 238,219- Jackson and East Jackson, MS 1979 7,190,200- Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA 1970 164,998- Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS 1986 231,618- Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL 1965 113,849- Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 1980 190,974- Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL 1986 903,474- Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 250,000- Pearl River, Interstate 20 Bridges, Jackson, MS 1985 250,000- Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL 1946 649,280- Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA 1985 85,029- Rome, Coosa River, GA 1955 384,550- Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS 1956 142,637- Sun Creek, Oktibbeha County, MS 1984 55,569- Town Creek, Americus, GA 1965 340,409- Trim Cane Creek, Oktibbeha County, MS 1984 145,519- Trussville, AL 1965 141,334- Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS 1986 215,860- West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA 1955 599,637- Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 114,753- Wolf Creek, U.S. Hwy. 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1986 154,641- Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA 1966 330,734- 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no con- 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local struction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for pre- interests. authorization studies. TABLE 10-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 25 of Text) Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document Deauthorized Bayou Galere, MS' Navigation 1946 H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., 5 Aug. 1977 1st Sess., as amended. GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to Navigation 1986 Public Law 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 St. Marks River, FL 99th Congress Lazer Creek Lake, GA Hydroelectric power 1986 Public Law 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Congress Lower Auchumpkee Creek Lake, Hydroelectric power 1986 Public Law 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 GA 99th Congress Pensacola Harbor Modification, FL Navigation 1986 Public Law 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Congress Spewrell Bluff Lake, GA Hydroelectric power 1986 Public Law 99-662, 17 Nov. 1986 99th Congress 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-C. 10-42 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1987 Costs Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 28,707 Shell Point, Wakulla County, FL 107 59 Soldiers and Palmetto Creek, AL 107 $19,978 South Fork Bon Secour River, AL 107 5,450 Total $54,194' 1. Excludes construction costs of $723 for Biloxi Harbor, Harrison County Canal, MS; $60,784 for Dog River Channel, AL and $452,535 for Tombigbee River, Columbus, MS. TABLE 10-I BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 27 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1987 Costs Boggy Bayou Shoreline, Valparaiso, FL 103 $11,541 Total $11,541 TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 49 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1987 Costs Big Wills Creek, Etowah County, AL 205 $ 7,317 Chattahoochee River, Vinings, GA 205 18,223 Cochgaleechee Creek, Phenix City, AL 205 1,868 Collinsville, AL 205 7,378 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL 205 58,145 Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL 205 181,328 Five Mile Creek, Brookside, AL 205 12,864 Glencoe, AL 205 62,866 Greens Creek, Petal, MS 205 14,111 Kinchafoonee Creek, Lee County, GA 205 2,632 Magby Creek, Columbus, MS 205 4,703 Mill Creek, Dalton, GA 205 12,503 Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS 205 30,164 Mixons Creek, Lamar County, MS 205 15,175 Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA 205 17,632 Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA 205 38,208 Silver Creek, Rome, GA 205 19,842 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS 205 226,458 Three Mile Creek, Mobile, AL 205 218,592 Tibbee Creek, Reform, AL 205 442 Toulmins Spring Branch, Prichard, AL 205 8,531 Trim Cane Creek, MS 205 15 Upper Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 205 31,309 Village Creek, AL 205 47,052 Coosa River, Whartons Bend Road, AL 14 415 Hurricane Creek, Marietta Hazel, MS 14 7,018 St. Louis Bay Shoreline, Hancock County, MS 14 3,800 Elliotts Creek, Moundville, AL 208 16,845 Fish River, Baldwin County, AL 208 9,780 Little Wills Creek, Attalla, AL 208 7,300 Total $1,082,516 10-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-K RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 24 of Text) Cost During Project Date of Survey Fiscal Year Blackwater River, FL May, 1987 869 Bon Secour, AL June, 1987 1,681 Cadet Bayou, MS May, 1987 20,404 Carrabelle Harbor, FL August, 1987 5,217 Escambia Bay, FL July, 1987 26,316 Fly Creek, AL September, 1987 2,090 La Grange Bayou, FL August, 1987 5,556 Panacea, FL August, 1987 869 Panama City, FL December, 1986 24 Pass Christian, MS June, 1987 36,863 Pensacola Harbor, FL July, 1987 35,045 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL March, 1987 12,279 St. Marks River, FL August, 1987 3,882 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS July, 1987 21,286 Total $172,381 TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Sections 50 and 51 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.1' 42.2' 245.4' 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 -- Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 Varies seasonally Depth over sills at low water 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 -- (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date:5 $27,997,450 $63,124,643 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,084 I. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. 5. 10-A. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10-44 TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 52 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews George Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Miles above mouth 107.6' 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 Nearest town Chattahoochee, Columbia, Al. Ft. Gaines, West Point, Buford, Ga. Fl. Ga. Ga. Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - - available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 -- Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1070 surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 -- water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Height of dam (feet) 67 62 114 95 192 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 (acre-feet) Power development 30,000 - 130,000 73,875 86,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - Estimated cost: - - - - - Cost to date:3 $47,978,749 $13,038,427 $98,547,7834 $131,510,509 $53,037,419 i. Above the mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,252,003 for major rehabilitation. 10-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 7 of Text) Armistead I. William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolis Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam' Milesabove Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 338.2 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Oak Grove Distance (miles) 3)within city) 6 15 Lock: Greatest length available for full width (feet) 600.0 600.0 600.0 450.0 600.0 600.0 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 95 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 12.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1940 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1939 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $4,450,874 $28,100,000 $47,258,6514 1. Single lift lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Al. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Cost to date (FY 87) for replacement of single lift lock which was essentially completed in FY 80. Excludes $1,435,636 cost of land submerged, damage to structures, and cost of spillway. Also excludes $3,824,859 cost of original double lift lock. 10-46 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 21 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Bay Springs Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and Lock and and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway and Dam Miles above mouth' 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 412 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, AL Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Tupelo, MS Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (Summer)414 pool surface (msl) (Winter)409 Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Sandstone Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay and Shale. Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated N/ A Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 103 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (Summer)180,000 (acre-feet) (Winter) 143,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151.255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 147,000,000 Cost to date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 130,398,000 1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90) IH- 0 TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1982 THRU FY 1987' (See Section 55 of Text) Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Anniston, Alabama Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 82 $80,900 Calhoun County, Alabama Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 82 61,200 Cave Springs, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 84 22,500 Columbus, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 36,000 Lowndes County, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 229,000 Aberdeen, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 35,000 Amory, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 50,000 Cherokee County, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) July 85 168,000 Monroe County, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Oct 85 140,000 Floyd County, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 85 330,000 Dale County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 86 82,000 Lauderdale County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 87 144,000 Houston County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 87 114,000 St. Clair County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 87 43,000 Special Flood Hazard Information Chattahoochee River, Supplement Atlanta Reg. Planning Mar 82 5,000 to Buford to Whitesburg Report Commission Oothcalooga Creek Gordon Co., GA Board of Jun 82 10,000 Commissioners Canton Creek, Ga. City of Canton, Ga. Dec 82 3,000 Oktasasi Creek, Ala. Alexander City, Ala. Jan 83 3,000 Cordele Creek & City of Cordele, Ga. May 83 4,000 Malcolm Branch, Ga. Hull Branch, MS East Central Planning and Jun 84 7,000 Development District Percosin Creek & Tribs., GA City of Albany, GA Nov 84 14,000 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay City of Ellijay, GA Jul 86 22,000 Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS Ellisville, MS Jan 87 19,000 Springers Branch, MS Starkville, MS May 87 13,000 Dixie Creek, GA La Grange, GA Jun 87 15,000 Little Scooba Creek, MS Scooba, MS Jun 87 18,000 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 through FY 1984 reports 10-48 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, including drainage area of Red River south of Fulton, AR, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes, drainage area of Ouchita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Leland Bowman Lock, LA (Replacement of Lock) (Formerly Vermilion Lock, LA ........ 2. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA ................ 3. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ...... 4. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA .............. 5. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayous Grand.Caillou and LeCarpe, LA ........................ 6. Navigation work under special authorization ................. Flood Control 7. Grand Isle & vicinity, LA ............ 8. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ............ Page Flood Control (cont.) 9. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) ... ....... .. 11-2 10. Morgan City and vicinity, LA (hurricane protection) ............. 11-2 11. New Orleans to Venice, LA, 11-3 (hurricane protection) ................. 12. Inspection of completed flood 11-4 control projects .. ........................... 13. Flood control work under special authorization ........................ 11-5 Tables Table 11-A 11-5 Table 11-B Table 11-C 11-5 11-6 Table 11-D Table 11-E Cost and Financial Statement .. Authorizing Legislation ...... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............. Active General Investigations .. Page 11-7 11-8 11-8 11-9 11-10 11-11 11-13 11-16 11-18 11-20 11-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. LELAND BOWMAN LOCK, LA (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (FORMERLY VERMILION LOCK, LA) Location. In the Louisiana section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway near Abbeville, Vermilion Parish, LA, about 163 miles west of Harvey Lock. Existing project. The present Leland Bowman Lock, located in the most heavily utilized section of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, is the controlling structure in both width and depth. The lock is used for navigation and flood control (prevention of salt water intrusion). The tumbler-type gates are unsatisfactory for the dual purpose. (Flood Control-Navigation) operation required, since once the gates are lowered to pass flood flows, they cannot be safely raised until the differential stage across the lock is reduced to about 0.5 foot. The replacement lock also will provide a larger and more efficient outlet for floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work (October 1982) is $32,200,000 Federal and $240,000 non-Federal. The project was renamed "Leland Bowman Lock (Replacement)" by House Resolution 4284 dated Sep. 21, 1981 (House Report 97-234.) Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance works. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury furnished assurances covering all requirements of local cooperation, including PL 91-611 and PL 91-646, on Mar. 19, 1975. These assurances were in the process of being accepted by the United States, when the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 was enacted authorizing the 110-foot-wide lock. Amended assurances of local cooperation were accepted on behalf of the United States by the Secretary of the Army on Jul. 5, 1977. The Vermilion Parish Police Jury on May 26, 1981 granted right of entry for construction of project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was initiated Oct. 15, 1981, and completed Mar. 9, 1985 at a cost of $26,781,241. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 100 percent complete. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Location. This reach of the river flows southeasterly through southeastern portion of Louisiana. At Head of Passes, approximately 233.1 miles below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge, river branches into three main passes: Southwest Pass, South Pass, and Pass a Loutre, two of which, Southwest Pass and South Pass, are improved under existing project. Head of Passes to mouths of Southwest and South Passes are 20.1 and 13.5 miles, respectively. Mouth of Southwest Pass is 141 miles west of Mobile, AL, and 349 miles east of Galveston, TX. Mouth of South Pass is 18.5 miles northeast of mouth of Southwest Pass. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11361, 11364, and 11369; MRC alluvial valley map, and Zachary, Baton Rouge, White Castle, Donaldsonville, Thibodaux, Mount Airy, Bonnet Carr&, Hahnville, New Orleans, St. Bernard, Barataria, Pointe a la Hache, Black Bay, Empire, Forts, West Delta, East Delta, and Southwest Pass quadrangles and 1980 (48th edition) folio of flood control and navigation maps, Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA, published by the MRC.) Previous projects. For details see page 552 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions as follows: Between a line one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge 129.3 miles to upper port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet mean low water; within limits of port of New Orleans, where that authority has jurisdiction over both banks of river, a distance of 17.8 miles, 35 by 1,500 feet, measured from a line generally 100 feet from face of left bank wharves, but not closer than 100 feet to wharves on right bank; within 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans, 40 by 500 feet; from lower limits of port of New Orleans 86.7 miles to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 17.5 miles from Head of Passes to jetty channel, 40 by 800 feet; 4.1 miles in the Southwest Pass bar and jetty channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass from Head of Passes to outer ends of jetties, 13.5 miles, 30 by 450 feet; and 1.2 miles in the South Pass bar channel, 30 by 600 feet. Plane of reference below New Orleans is mean low gulf. Plane of reference above and through New Orleans is low water reference plane. General plan of improvement of Southwest Pass provides for constructing pass to uniform cross section with about 1,420-foot surface width by means of jetties, spur dikes, and bulkheads; for channel maintenance by dredging from Cubits Gap, mile 3.5 AHP through the gulf entrance channel, mile 21.5 BHP; for construction of small revetted openings through narrow portions of banks of pass for purpose of strengthening and nourishment of banks; for closure of minor outlets not required for maintenance of banks; for construction of sills to prevent enlargement of the Venice Jump and Cubits Gap; for repairs to sill across Pass a Loutre and bank revetment at Head of Passes; for construction of dikes with a view to reducing width of river above Head of Passes; for construction of a submerged deflecting dike above Head of Passes; and for other minor work. East jetty is about 24,950 feet long and west jetty 19,699 feet. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses, orginally built to about elevation of mean low gulf, surmounted with a superstructure of concrete blocks and large riprap and/or stone rubble mound of core and cover stone. 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Spur dikes are constructed of round timber piles and/ or triangular prestressed concrete piles, with riprap at the landward ends to connect the dikes to the bank line. General plan of improvement of South Pass provides for construction and maintenance of jetties and spur dikes; for channel maintenance by dredging from Head of Passes through the Gulf Entrance Channel beyond mile 13.5 BHP; maintenance of a sill across Pass a Loutre, and for seaward extension of east jetty at mouth of pass; removal of west dike and construction of spur dikes and bank revetment at Head of Passes; removal of false point at head of South Pass to bottom elevation of minus 45 feet and revetment of new bank line and construction and maintenance of east and west headland structure at Head of Passes. East jetty foundation is 12, 070 feet long; inner east jetty is 11,170 feet long; west jetty is 7,820 feet long; and inner west jetty is 4,710 feet long. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses surmounted by a superstructure of stone and/or concrete blocks and large riprap. Plane of reference is mean low gulf. Variation of water surface is 16 inches at mouths and 10 inches at head of the passes, due to tides. Extreme range of tides at mouths of passes due to hurricanes in about 10 feet. At New Orleans extreme range of water surface is about 20 feet due to floods. At Baton Rouge extreme range is about 45 feet due to floods. Estimated cost of existing project (October 1986) is $343,000,000 Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $29,000 and $2,000,000 Non-Federal pipeline relocations. Local cooperation. None required, except for modification of project in connection with Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, or docks serve the Port of New Orleans. Most wharves on east or left bank parallel riverbank forming nearly a continuous covered quay about 10 miles long. Public wharves controlled by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans (the Dock Board), cover 62 percent of improved waterfront. These facilities include a shipside grain elevator, general cargo and cotton wharves, fruit landings, bunkering facilities, terminal warehouses, railroad terminals, marine railways, and drydocks. (For further details see Port Series No. 20, "The Port of New Orleans, LA" revised 1977.) A foreign trade zone is located in Port of New Orleans. City of Baton Rouge has a reinforced concrete dock for deep-sea vessels with mechanical-handling facility. Attached to downstream end of wharf is a floating wharf boat 231 by 40.5 feet, of 2,000-ton capacity. Facilities are served by a transfer boat and municipal terminal having a capacity of 40 cars per day. Private terminals for handling oil, grain, bauxite ore, and other products are at points on both sides of river between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details, see "Port Facilities" included in "Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico, LA," published annually by the MRC, and Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, FL, Pensacola, FL, Baton Rouge, LA, and Lake Charles, LA," revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. The Supplement II to the GDM was completed in March 1986 and the environmental impact statement (EIS) for this supplement was completed in May 1986. Maintenance: (a) Baton Rouge to New Orleans: One dustpan dredge removed 5,133,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $2,672,000. (b) New Orleans Harbor: Two leased dredge contracts removed 5,368,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,653,000. (c) Cubit's Gap (mile 3 AHP) through Southwest Pass: One hopper dredge and two cutterhead dredges removed 16,549,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $13,711,000. (d) Southwest Pass Channel Enlargement: One government hopper dredge and two cutterhead dredges removed 13,956,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $4,450,000. (e) Southwest Pass: Work was completed on two pile dike repair contracts at a total cost of $1,668,000. In addition, repairs were performed to a foreshore rock dike between miles 7.5 and 8.6 BHP on the right descending bank at a cost of $319,000. Hired labor repairs to pile dikes totalled $163,000, and hired labor repairs to the crib dike at the west headland of Head of Passes cost $300,000. Condition as of Sep. 30. The existing project is 50 percent complete. Deepening Southwest Pass to 40 feet mean low gulf, as authorized by the modification of Mar. 2, 1945, was completed in September 1963. Deepening the channel to 40 feet mean low water from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and to 40 feet mean low gulf in New Orleans Harbor, as authorized by the modifications of Oct. 23, 1962, was completed in August 1963. The foreshore dike Mile 0.5 to Mile 4.0 AHP on the right descending bank is complete. The foreshore dike Mile 0.6 to Mile 7.2 BHP on the left descending bank is complete. The foreshore dike Mile 0.8 to Mile 4.7 BHP right descending bank is complete. The foreshore dike Mile 4.0 to Mile 3.0 AHP right descending bank is complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 11373. Also see MRC 1980 (48th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending westerly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1987) is $509,000,000 Federal and $273,800,000 non-Federal. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The only facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at mile 63. Two newcontainer ship berths have begun operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering and economic studies continued for the new lock and connecting channels feature. Maintenance dredging under three contracts in the Gulf Entrance Channel, Breton Sound and Michoud Canal include the removal of 15,206,134 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,870,308. The U.S. Hopper Dredge Wheeler removed 2,042,213 cubic yards of material in the Gulf Entrance Channel at a cost of $2,723,007. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958 and entire project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. Principal work required to complete project, construction of new ship lock, raising and extending dikes and foreshore protection. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to Bayou Bienvenue, is in a deferred status. The site for the lock remained the major problem. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site for the proposed shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that, if justified, the existing lock should be replaced and expanded in place and that care should be taken to minimize dislocation of residents living adjacent to the site. These recommendations are being addressed in an Evaluation Report scheduled for completion in FY 1990. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, consisting of the Mississippi River and its outlets to the Gulf of Mexico. Existing project. Provides more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 87) is $143,000,000 Federal and $344,000,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $3,027,000. Local cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that prior to initiation of construction, local interests, shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction or operation and maintenance of the project except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Provide to the Federal Government, the non-Federal share of all other costs of construction of the project. These costs include 25 percent of the construction costs incurred for construction of the navigation channel to a depth of 45 feet, and 50 percent of the construction costs incurred for deepening the channel between 45 and 55 feet. In addition, the local sponsor shall repay the Government 10 percent of the construction costs over a 30-year period. The local sponsor may be permitted to include, toward sums to be reimbursed, all or part of the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and relocations (other than utilities) contributed or expended by the non-Federal sponsor; (d) 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Be responsible for 50 percent of the incremental maintenance below 45 feet on a channel depth greater than 45 feet. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between the Government and the State of Louisiana was signed on June 30, 1986. A supplement to the LCA was signed on June 15, 1987, to comply with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. This agreement provides for the dredging of a 45-foot channel from the gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. GDM Supplement No. 4 was completed in Dec. 1986. The GDM plan would eliminate the need for training works at Southwest Pass for the 45-foot channel. Construction was initiated on July 1, 1987, on the dredging of the channel to 45 feet from the Gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. Two hopper dredge contracts were awarded from Mile 21.0 BHP to the Gulf and Mile 18.8 BHP to Mile 21.0 BHP. Two cutterhead dredging contracts were awarded for Mile 3.5 AHP to Mile 18.8 BHP. Condition as of Sep. 30. The dredging of Southwest Pass to 45 feet is completed from the Gulf to Mile 21.0 BHP. Construction of the 45-foot channel is underway from Mile 18.8 BHP to 21.0 BHP and Mile 3.5 AHP to Mile 9.0 BHP. Completion is scheduled for Nov. 1987. This will provide a 45-foot channel to the Port of New Orleans. Studies are underway to determine the most economical plan to mitigate for saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. Until these studies are complete, an interim plan has been developed that will provide for the barging of fresh raw water to three water treatment plants in Plaquemines Parish. The construction of mooring facilities for the barges at each of these plants is underway. 5. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Location. Bayou LeCarpe is a tidal stream which rises about 1.5 miles southeast of Houma in Terrebonne Parish and flows southerly into Bayou Pelton, thence into Bayou Grand Caillou, which flows southwesterly into Caillou Bay, a total distance of about 40 miles. (Refer to Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart, No. 1116 and Geological Survey maps of Houma, Dulac, Bayou DuLarge, and Dog Lake quadrangles.) Existing project. As modified, provides for a 10-' by 45-foot channel in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 2.6 miles to Houma navigation canal; a 5- by 40-foot channel through Bayou Pelton and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, a distance of about 13.7 miles. Between miles 2.6 and 5, this project coincides with or is adjacent to 15- by 150-foot Houma navigation canal. Normal range of tide is 3 to 10 inches; from winds, 1 to 3 feet. Cost of new work, completed in August 1964, was $129,662. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-5 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Many terminal and transfer facilities are in Houma and along waterways which flow through area between Houma and Gulf of Mexico. All facilities are privately owned and operated. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce and for reasonably prospective commerce. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities or for construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor consisted of real estate activities, reconnaissance surveys, and water quality studies. One contract for maintenance dredging at Bayou LeCarpe was completed October 1986, included the removal of 65,217 cubic yards at a cost of $359,800. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 5- by 40-foot channel was constructed from January 1938 to August 1938, and modification of October 23, 1962, for enlargement of 2.54 miles of Bayou LeCarpe to 10 feet by 45 feet was initiated in May and completed August 1964. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization.) Preauthorization studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1987, were $887,267 for Bayou Grand Caillou. Flood Control 7. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of southwest pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1987) is $17,587,000 Federal and $10,980,000 non-Federal, including $6,419,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Local interests have the responsibility of providing rights-of-way, 30 percent of hurricane protection costs, 75 percent of beach erosion costs, and operation and maintenance of the completed work. The Louisiana Legislature, by Act 833 of 1982, authorized the Office of Public Works of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development to provide the non-Federal assurances for the Grand Isle Hurricane Protection and Beach erosion project. On Jan. 11, 1983, the Louisiana State Government authorized the Office of Public Works to execute the required assurances as a co-sponsor with the Town of Grand Isle. The required assurances were executed on March 16, 1983, the construction rights-of-way were provided on May 4, 1983, and local interest provided a cash contribution of $2,100,000 on June 1, 1983, and $70,000 in November 1985. An additional amount of $3,249,000 will be required prior to project completion. The construction rights-of-way were provided on June 29, 1987. Maintenance of the project is the responsibility of the local assurer. The local assurer will receive Federal aid for repairing erosion and other damage to the project for a period of 15 years. The average annual Federal maintenance cost identified in the Act of Assurances is $44,000; however, this is not a fixed amount. Periodic nourishment to repair erosion will not necessarily be conducted every year, but as needed, with an estimated frequency of one in eight years on the average. It is estimated that the Federal share of the maintenance cost will be 25 percent for the 15- year period. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle will be accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix) will consist of 500 feet extensions of the east and west jetties, removal of about 408,000 cubic yards of sand from the cuspate bar, and placement of the excavated sand on the eroded beach in the East End State Park. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract (total fix) will accomplish all additional items of work necessary to fully restore the project, including the placement of one million plus cubic yards of sand to reconstruct the beach and dune, construction of offshore breakwaters, placement of a clay core in portions of the dune, and restoration of vehicular ramps, pedestrian crossovers and dune vegetation. The partial fix contract was awarded Sep. 16, 1987. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 80 percent complete. Partial fix contract was awarded Sep. 16, 1987. 8. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow landlocked tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greatel New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricanegenerated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan will provide for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of US Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1987) is $486,000,000 Federal and $208,000,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. The State of Louisiana formed the Jefferson Levee District and assigned to it the Jefferson Parish levees, previously the responsibility of the Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette area plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the barrier plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette area plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, and the East Jefferson Levee District. The St. Tammany Parish portion of the project has been placed in an inactive status since the local sponsors have not provided acceptable assurances. Supplemental Assurances in connection with the High Level Plan were executed by the Orleans Levee District on May 29, 1985, and approved by the United States June 21, 1985. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan were executed by the East Jefferson Levee District for the Jefferson Parish portion of the project on Jan. 16, 1987. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan were executed by the Pontchartrain Levee District for the St. Charles Parish portion of the project on Apr. 20, 1987, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Aug. 7, 1987. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan are not required from St. Bernard Parish Police Jury and the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District for St. Bernard Parish. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. Preparation of seven design memorandums are underway. Three are scheduled for completion in FY 88, two in FY 89 and two in FY 90. A Draft Reevaluation Report (including Draft Environmental Impact Statement) recommending the tentatively selected high level plan (lieu of Barrier Plan) was submitted by New Orleans District to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division in December 1983. The final Reevaluation Report was submitted to LMVD on Aug. 8, 1984. A Record of Decision was signed in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on Jan. 17, 1975. By Court Order dated Dec. 30, 1977, a revised Environmental Impact Statement was ordered. A draft revised Environmental Impact Statement for the High Level Plan and reevaluation report which documents the proposal to adopt that plan instead of the barrier plan was released to the public and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 16, 1983. The final revised Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 7, 1984. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS is currently being prepared. A series of public meetings and workshops were held to facilitate participation in mitigation plan formulation by other agencies, environmental groups, local sponsors, and other interested groups. Prior to selecting the tentative plan, the three final plans were presented to the public at a meeting on Jul. 29, 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 76 percent complete. Contract work continued on eight contracts. Plans and specifications are underway on six contracts scheduled for award in FY 1988. 9. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lke Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point-a-la- Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116 Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 1987) is $69,400,000 Federal and $29,700,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for the construction of the project; all at an estimated cost of $14,050,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $29,700,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $15,695,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13, 1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. 10, 1973 and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Local interests have requested and received funds from the State of Louisiana for right-of-way acquisition and relocations required to support construction work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work continued on design memorandums and plans and specifications by hired labor forces. Four contracts were awarded and plans and specifications are underway on two contracts scheduled for award in FY 1988. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1975 and is 56 percent complete. 10. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In south-central Louisiana, Morgan City proper, and the adjacent areas. It includes the land south of Grand Lake, Six Mile Lake, and Lake Palourde extending from Morgan City westward to Charenton drainage and navigation canal. Lower Atchafalaya River and Wax Lake Outlet, the principal outlets for Atchafalaya Basin Floodway, traverse the area. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway crosses the area in an east-west direction. Numerous bayous and artificial canals excavated for drainage purposes or for access to oil developments exist throughout the area. (See Engineer quadrangles Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, Foster, Belle Isle, Point Au Fer, Morgan City, and Lake Decade; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1116.) Existing project. Morgan City: Construction of about 5.6 miles of new levees along shore of Lake Palourde and west bank of Bayou Ramos and about 0.5 mile of new levee from Southern Pacific railroad embankment near Wyandotte to tie in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee, and construction of three gravity drainage structures. Franklin and vicinity: Enlargement of about 21.6 miles of back levee and construction of about 3.5 miles of new levees to effect a complete closure of area to be protected, construction of one floodgate and eight gravity drainage structures, and alteration of existing drainage facilities where necessary. Normal range of tide is 1.6 feet. Storm and hurricane tide have produced elevations up to 10 feet while northerly storms during winter depress the gulf level as much as 3 feet below mean sea level. During low water periods on Atchafalaya River, generally September through November, the effect of tide extends about 35 miles above Morgan City. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-8 of the FY 1986 Annual Report. Operations and results during period. The GDM for the Morgan City area was completed in FY 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Due to lack of financial local support this project has been moved to a defererd status. 11. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from City Price to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent over topping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1987) is $225,000,000 Federal and $96,000,000 non-Federal, including $76,050,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $7,473,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $12,477,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $96,000,000, and cash contribution presently estimated at $76,050,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal flooding and that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91- 646), in acquiring real property. PL 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. PL 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972 allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B- 1, B-2 and C, furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council were accepted on behalf of the United States on Apr. 14, 1965. Supplemental assurances covering provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jun. 20, 1973. Local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee on Jun. 10, 1975, Feb. 23, 1976, and again on Aug. 19, 1983. By letter dated Feb. 5, 1985, the local sponsor requested the Corps of Engineers to defer further work on the design of Reach A and direct their efforts toward earliest possible construction of the East Bank Barrier Levee or a suitable alternative thereto. The Corps, with the concurrence of the local sponsor, has selected a West Bank Levee alternative to the East Bank Barrier. The local sponsor has indicated their willingness to provide the supplemental of local cooperation for the West Bank River Levee. A Local Cooperation Agreement was submitted to the local sponsor on Aug. 25, 1987, and a response is anticipated in the near future. By letter dated Jul. 28, 1987, the local sponsor also requested the Corps of Engineers to advance construction on Reach A, based on the results of the geotextile test section. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee configuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so that the owners of the pipelines can be advised. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Commission Council. Assurances for all reaches of the project, except the East Bank Barrier levee, have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. A GDM recommending the West Bank River Levee in lieu of the East Bank Barrier Levee was completed and submitted to LMVD on Mar. 26, 1987. Plans and specifications for segments of Reaches A. B-1, B-2, C and West Bank River Levee were initiated and are continuing. Construction during FY 87 was initiated on two contracts and continued on three others. Plans and specifications were initiated on four construction items scheduled for award in FY 88. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on Jan. 24,1975; however, during subsequent review, it became apparent that the final Environmental Impact Statement was deficient. A draft Environmental Impact Statement supplement was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on Mar. 23, 1984, and the final Environmental Impact Statement supplement with a Section 404 evaluation was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Apr. 12, 1985. A draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Supplement 11) for work on the West Bank River Levee was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on Aug. 5, 1987, and the final is scheduled for submittal in November 1987. The levee on the west bank from Tropical Bend to Venice would impact about 14,000 acres of which approximately 9,000 acres are marsh and 4,000 acres are shallow open waters. Although most of these impacts are temporary, about 1,000 acres of marsh would be permanently lost. To compensate for this loss, a mitigation plan has been formulated which would result in the creation of natural marsh on the Delta- Breton National Wildlife Refuge. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 37 percent complete. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1986. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as-needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $267,079. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1987, were $2,226,906. 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $161,450. Emergency Operations: Total costs to Sep. 30, 1987 were $898,829. Rehabilitation costs for FY 87 was $204. 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 1. Leland Bowman Lock, LA (Replacement of lock) 2. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA 3. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) 5. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterways to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayou Grand Caillou & LeCarpe, LA) 7. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (Contrib. Funds) 8. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost $ 10,325,000 8,341,621 2,578,556 447,155 280,357 800,000 4,000,000 13,251,000 20,110,000 878,037 1,192,445 16,022,664 15,429,842 48,510,600 39,039,920 24,957,067 25,153,650 47,713,135 41,229,463 25,630,318 25,117,781 500,000 1,664,718 9,705,000 10,169,620 2,200,000 1,286,205 4,429,000 4,515,392 121,500 77,500 696,000 6,933,000 7,684,892 6,663,500 6,808,104 594,000 691,278 8,340,000 8,373,119 631,000 3,730,000 1,074,000 3,591,928 - - - 1,070,453 - - - 1,396,000 1,423,000 2,832,000 1,240,276 849,700 1,394,421 2,881,422 1,239,090 861,475 40,000 43,223 4,161,000 6,714,791 2,110,000 2,000,000 228,000 177,151 -21,000 -21,000 432,000 653,469 100,000 100,000 56,395 532 31,470 376,800 30,669 377,601 1,000,000 735,330 70,000 70,000 961,000 42,691 368,000 8,800,000 11,158,000 20,358,000 13,375,000 7,937,422 10,382,763 21,676,920 13,331,227 325,000 260,000 195,000 260,000 510,988 1,102,053 281,518 34,518 5,700,000 5,865,000 4,221,000 4,813,000 6,901,800 7,441,971 4,073,880 5,018,844 182,000 182,000 250,000 234,087 $ 32,200,0101 32,177,3331 78,272,7972 75,054,3942 493,157,5613,5 492,750,1634" 88,867,200 88,758,260 110,654,080 110,612,047 1,240,4776 1,196,4776 9,074,000 5,274,000 1,070,453 1,396,000 10,740,776 10,732,538 637,622 641,608 1,276,032 1,276,032 10,303,500 9,048,371 2,648,000 2,170,000 194,971,000 193,408,775 4,602,690 4,988,247 47,001,000 45,773,449 2,521,721 2,477,355 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 11-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 10. Morgan City and New Work vicinity, LA Approp. 387,000 280,000 -79,000 - 1,953,000 (Hurricane Cost 367,606 221,260 21,762 - 1,975,628 Protection) 11. Mississippi New Work River Delta at Approp. 2,830,000 1,920,000 971,000 4,908,000 59,268,000 and below New Cost 3,581,564 1,630,947 1,449,660 4,546,692 58,866,809 Orleans, LA (New Orleans to Venice, LA, Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - 1,368,989 340,000 5,125,419 Cost 450,000 - 984,106 724,883 5,125,419 1. Includes AE&D funds for replacement of Vermilion Lock. 2. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 3. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 4. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 5. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 6. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 WRD Act of 1976, dated Oct. 22, 1976 (PL 94-587) Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) LAKE CHARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. LELAND BOWMAN LOCK LA (REPLACEMENT OF LOCK) (FORMERLY VERMILION LOCK) (See Sec. 1 of Text) A replacement lock, 110 feet wide and 1,200 feet long, to accommodate present and projected marine traffic. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet, Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 4 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. Approved by Secretary of the Army, May 1967, under authority of the R&H Act of 1909. H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong.. 1st sess.1 S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 11-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 11-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their portion of the project costs, and implements harbor maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) (See Sec. 5 of Text) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16,3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou igolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, at a total cost of $2,300,000. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 7 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See. Sec. 8 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 9 of Text) A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 10 of Text) Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. WRDA of 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.i H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 11 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing sess. heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. WEST BANK HURRICANE PROTECTION LEVEE, JEFFERSON PARISH, LA Water Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, Resources to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental 1986. Development Impact Statement for the West Bank Hurricane Protection Act, 1986 Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non- Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1987 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge1 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Baton Rouge Harbor, Segment between Mi. 2.5 and 5.02 Barataria Bay Water, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA '", 6 Bayou Dupre, LA7 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA8 Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA4,9 Bayou Vermilion, LA4 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA3 Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA1o Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA11 Cane River, LA3,6 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA12 Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA" 3 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA14 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur- Bulkheads and Jetties Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA15 Little Caillou Bayou, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 19462 1984 1974 1887 1968 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 19422 1950 1973 $ - 28,234 12,687,204 69,087 69,087 1928 30,354,630 44,568,522 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 1969 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 27,807,310 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 20,008,457 320,758 104,1877 123,454 119,191 829,756 223,616 36,780 28,315 239,717 4,897,347 1,668,036 251,691 200,169 37,169 101,758,663 2,000 463,401 452,611 16,278,840 14,48012 1914 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 May 1981 1938 May 1956 1915 March 1923 March 1957 1916 1896 3 Oct. 1968 April 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 63,284,470 193,383,356 - 18,950,290 249,052 552,780 - 11,699 Nov. 1979 77,761 241,896 751,485 1929 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1987 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Complete 1977 5,197,97516 114,519- Mermentau River, LA Complete 1985 4,672,579 19,065,687 Jul. 1952 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 - Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,008,100 10,732,538 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)17 - 1957 - 139,755- Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 13,545 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Inactive 1981 - 1,450,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 - 24,284,781 Sulphur River, AR and TX3,6 - 1919 45,989 - - Tangipahoa River, LA - 1985 - 630,988- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA4 Complete 1973 8,115 92,163 1921 Vinton Waterway, LA21 Deauthorized 1950 - - Nov. 1979 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LAs -1948 10,904 0,742 Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,005,238 Jun. 1950 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. 2. Date authorized. 3. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 4. Includes previous project costs. 5. No commerce reported. 6. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 7. Includes $56 cost incurred in 1969. 8. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. 9. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. 10. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. 11. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." 12. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 13. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." 14. Not completed; superseded for most of its length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. 15. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. 16. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. 17. Work is under continuing authority. 11-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 11-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD PROJECTS CONTROL For Last Cost to Sep. 1987 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA1 Amite River and Tributaries, LA Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA1, 12 Bayou Choupique, LA3 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, LA3 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA 1,2,12 Bayou Rapides, LA3 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA 1,4,5,12 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, LA' Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA 1,7 ,12 Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA1,7 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX8 East Point, LA Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' the Pines, TXs,9 Garland City, AR 12 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA",9 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA AHRe.m1,9p,1s2tead County Levee District No. 1, Maniece Bayou, AR. 1,2,12 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR.' 0"12 Natchitoches Parish, LA 1,2 Pineville, Red River, LA 1", ,12 Posten Bayou, AR. 11,12 Red River Parish, LA" ,9 ,12 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1,12 Saline Point, LA",9 Aug. 1977 1956 1964 1948 1954 1964 1951 1952 1945 1963 1978 1977 1938 1979 1969 1979 1976 1941 1979 1941 1970 1963 10o 1956 1953 1973 1939 1953 1945 $ 1,653,189 3,034,2552 319,200 129,930 70,717 243,3362 95,179 336,063 1,655,700 741,892 70,348 20,839,300 486,069 14,175,197 1,335,842 38,809 1,018,005 88,006 970,9322 1,529,478 232,426 149,435 3,908,000 124,111 8,301,021 11-18 Apr. 1955 Feb. 1964 Jan. 1948 Mar. 1954 Jun. 1964 Jun. 1939 Dec. 1951 May 1963 Jul. 1978 Apr. 1976 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 9 Aug. 1969 Aug. 196955 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 9 Mar. 1953 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (CONTINUED) Cost to Sep. 1987 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Twelvemile Bayou, LA3 1966 335,433 - May 1965 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX8 - 1979 35,659,176 11,195,021 - 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from con tributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ............. $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ........................ 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ...... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ....... ...................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR....................39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA .............. . . 250,000 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended.) 4. Construction not initiated. 5. Inactive. 6. Includes $92,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. These projects transferred to the Fort Worth District, Southwestern Division, during FY 1979. 9. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 10. Date authorized. 11. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12. These projects transferred to the Vicksburg District during FY 1983. 11-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 11-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 87 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) Bayou Lafourche & Lafourche-Jump Waterway, LA -1009 $ 21,575 GIWW LA & TX Section -10032 355,608 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, St. Bernard Parish, LA (Bank Erosion) -10241 100,567 477,750 Flood Control Studies (120) Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA -12123 9,226 Amite River & Tributaries, LA -50100 361,016 Lake Pontchartrain-West Shore, LA -79700 98,751 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Hurricane Protection -12445 170,285 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Land Loss & Marsh Creation -12348 91,343 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Shore & Barrier Island Erosion -12354 109,812 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Water Supply -12355 0 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA -34014 459,670 Upper Bayou Teche, LA -12435 33,861 West Bank of Mississippi River-Vicinity of New Orleans, LA -59360 291,118 1,625,082 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Deauthorization Review -77000 135 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 21,925 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 0 Planning Assistance to States (186) -14822 46,316 TOTAL (Category 100) $2,171,208 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 147,741 South East Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation -83001 27,479 TOTAL (Category 250) 175,220 Coastal Data Collection (280) Re-evalhation of Section 54 Projects -53891 4,428 TOTAL (Category 200) 179,648 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $2,350,856 11-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT* This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi- Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, Arkansas; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas- Arkansas state line. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR ......................... 2. Red River emergency bank protection ........................... 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA .............. 4. Yazoo River, MS ..................... 5. Navigation work under special authorization ........................ Flood Control 6. Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA .............. 7. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA .......................... 8. Lead Bayou, MS ..................... 9. Ouachita River Levees, LA ........... 10. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA ........................... 11. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ........ 12. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA .......................... 13. Porter Bayou, MS .................... 14. Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) ..................... 15. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) .................. Page Flood Control (cont) 16. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, 12-2 LA, to Index, AR ..................... 17. Inspection of completed Flood 12-2 Control Projects ...................... 18. Flood control work under 12-2 special authorization ................. 12-3 12-3 Tables Table 12-A 12-4 12-4 12-5 12-5 12-5 12-5 12-6 12-6 Table 12-B Table 12-C Table 12-D Table 12-E Table 12-F Table 12-G 12-7 Table 12-H 12-7 Table 12-I Cost and Financial Statement ...................... Authorizing Legislation ........ Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams ........... Other Authorized Navigation Project ...... ................ Ouachita River and Tributaries Existing Project .............. Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) New Projects ................. Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) Incorporated Projects ......... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... Active .General Investigations ... Page 12-7 12-7 12-8 12-9 12-11 12-14 12-15 12-17 12-18 12-19 12-20 12-22 12-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. New work for completed project costs $7,064,031.68, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. This is being accomplished by construction of four new locks, 84 feet by 600 feet; new dams; channel realinement to accommodate the 9-foot draft tow; and measures to preserve Catahoula Lake for migratory waterfowl. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized establishment of wildlife refuges along Bayou D'Arbonne (14,700 acres) in connection with Columbia Lock and Dam and at Felsenthal Lock and Dam (65,000 acres). The Bayou D'Arbonne refuge was increased to 18,000 acres at the request of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Estimated cost for new work for 9-foot navigation project is $274,702,000 including $258,000,000 Federal and $16,702,000 non-Federal for lands, damages, and relocations. Local cooperation. Local cooperation for all completed work in Louisiana has been furnished in a timely manner. It is anticipated that local interests in Louisiana will be able to supply the necessary rights-of-way for construction of the cutoffs and bend widenings. Local interests in Arkansas have furnished the rightsof- way for the Felsenthal and H. K. Thatcher Locks and Dams, formerly called Calion Lock and Dam, and it is anticipated that the remaining rights-of-way will be furnished when needed. The city of Camden, AR, has furnished land for the Sandy Beach recreation area. All assurances from local interests including supplemental assurances (Public Law 91-646) have been accepted. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grainhandling ftcilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. The following recreation facilities in the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge were completed: Shallow Lake Access Point, Pine Island Access Point, Pereogethe Lake Access Road, Calion Lock and Dam No. 8, and Shallow Lake Access Road. Other construction contracts completed during FY 87 were: Beautification and Landscaping at Felsenthal, Calion Wastewater Disposal System, and Calion Access Channel Part II. The Vicksburg District initiated construction of the last three recreation projects in the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge (Crossett Harbor Phase II, Grand Marais Phase II, and H. K. Thatcher Access Site). Initiated construction of the beautification at H. K. Thatcher Lock and Dam. Maintenance dredging removed 1,650,195 cubic yards of material from the Ouachita-Black Waterway during FY 87. Condition as of Sep. 30. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. With the completion in FY 87 of Calion Access Channel Part II Construction Contract, nine-foot navigation depth is now provided for the entire project limits. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1986) is $85,400,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Completion of the Goose Lake realignment, river mile 407- L, and Little River Phase III revetment, river mile 405-L. Oak Revetment Extension, river mile 347-R, is continuing. Fulton Upstream Extension, river mile 402-L and Candler Lake Revetment, river mile 365- R were initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 76% complete. 3. RED RIVER WATERWAYMISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,621,307,000 Federal and $87,464,000 non-federal, including $43,677,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost excludes $307,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana which were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued work on Design Memoranda, preparation of Plans and Specifications, Surveys, General Engineering, and Model Studies. The following sixteen bank stabilization items were awarded: Pool I - Hog Lake ACS, Pool 2- Wiggins Revetment Ph II, Darrow Realignment, Deloges Bluff Revetment, Colfax Revetment, Whittington Dikes, and Alexandria Front Revetment, Pool 3 - Socot Realignment, St. Maurice Realignment, Kadesh Realignment, Ile au Vaches Realignment, Lumbra Revetment, Campti Realignment and Smith Island Realignment, Pool 4 - Carrol Realignment Ph I, Pool 5, - Wilkerson Pt. (Rothschild) Realignment. Also initiated was the Lock and Dam No. 1, Ph I Recreation Site; Initial Construction Dredging in Pools 1 and 2; and Initial Excavation and Cofferdam work at Lock and Dam 3. Items continuing include John H. Overton Lock and Dam, reaching 94 percent completion in September 1987, Lorran Lake Realignment, Joffrion Revetment, Cognac Revetment, Bayou Cocodrie. Dikes and Larto ACS, and Phase II Recreation facilities at Fort Buhlow. The following contracts were completed: Hadden Ft. DeRussy Capout, Phillip Bayou Realignment, Meade Realignment, Grand Bend Realignment, England Realignment, and the contract consisting of bank stabilization and a portion of the cofferdam at Lock and Dam No. 3. During FY 87, approximately 1,958,000 cubic yards of material were dredged in Pool 1 and below Pool 1. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 44 percent complete. 4. YAZOO RIVER, MS Location. Formed by junction of Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers in Leflore County, MS, flows about 169 miles southerly and southwesterly, and enters Mississippi River at Vicksburg, MS. (See Mississippi River alluvial valley quadrangle maps.) Previous projects. See page 681 of Annual Report for 1961 for details. Authorized project. The Yazoo River Navigation project consists of a 9-foot channel from its mouth to Greenwood, MS, mile 164.9 (present mileage), with a minimum width of 150 feet. The project includes a single lock (84 feet by 600 feet) and a dam located near Vicksburg, dredging and channel realinement; 600,000 acre-feet of additional storage in Sardis Lake to augment low flows in the Yazoo River, and recreation features. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-3 of FY 80 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Greenwood there is a privately owned dock and a grain-loading facility. There are privately owned facilities for loading grain at Belzoni and Satartia. At Yazoo City there is a privately owned grain-loading facility, a private log-loading facility, a private dock to handle dry and liquid fertilizer, and a public terminal. Operations and results during fiscal year. No activity for the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. A portion of the river is navigable; however, in order for the entire system to be that way, alteration of the Sheppardtown Bridge will be necessary. No funds have been provided for this alteration. No work done on new authorization. Phase I studies are being deferred on the nine foot project due to lack of economic justification. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended (preauthorization). As stated in the FY 86 Annual Report, the following projects were terminated due to new policy guidance on small ports: Union County, AR; Greenwood Port, MS; Bastrop Port, LA; Yellow Bend, AR; and Two Bayou, AR. No work was perforemd on these projects 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 in FY 87 due to the same policy guidance. In regard to Yellow Bend, AR, Congress has added $1,000,000 to the FY 88 Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Bill. Flood Control 6. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Bayou Bartholomew rises in Jefferson County, AR, about 10 miles northwest of Pine Bluff and flows southerly about 370 miles to join the Ouachita River upstream from Sterlington, LA. Authorized project. Project includes ten waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of Bayou Bartholomew in Louisiana. However, because of public opposition to construction of the loop levees, preconstruction planning of the six loop levees has been deferred until such time as there is sufficient support by local interests. Channel improvements previously authorized are deferred. Latest approved (1979) estimated cost of new work is $46,913,000 including $44,800,000 Federal and $2,113,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-5 of Fiscal Year 80 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and design have been deferred pending favorable benefit-cost ratios. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of general design memorandum has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. Status of studies: A re-evaluation study is underway to determine if there are any feasible alternatives. 7. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. In east bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat River, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. Authorized project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chtte Bayou; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alignment of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President's request. As a result of this review, the President recommended that project construction be halted and the project be deauthorized. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Engineering and design work for the induced flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project modification studies were being conducted when President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4, 1981, the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed without further study and analysis" the plan for flood control for the project as approved by the Flood Control Act of 1965. Resumption of construction was scheduled to begin in 1984. The project sponsor, however, requested that construction be delayed while a reevaluation of the project was made. The reevaluation study has been completed. A summary of study results was submitted in January 1987 which recommended no further Federal action. The Lower Mississippi Valley Division approved the report and a notice of study termination was disseminated in June 1987. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 25, Annual Report for FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor forces consisted of completion of the reevaluation study. 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. Alternatives to provide flood protection are being considered and these efforts will continue. 8. LEAD BAYOU, MS Location. Lead Bayou is a tributary of the Sunflower River in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS, approximately 30 miles from the Mississippi River near Cleveland, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement was for enlargement of the existing Lead Bayou channel to provide a 1.5-year degree of protection to agricultural areas and a 10-year degree of protection to the small developed area near Cleveland, MS. Total estimated Federal cost is $1,526,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The stabilization of one bridge has been accomplished by the Vicksburg District. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed Sep. 14, 1983. The stabilization of (1) bridge remains and will be accomplished by the Vicksburg District. 9. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project, There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A letter report, approved by the Chief of Engineers, authorized gravel surfacing 40.3 miles of levee, enlargement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7- mile southward extension of the east bank levee. Approved (1979) estimated Federal cost is $9,400,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $25,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item I of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed July 7, 1978. Additional work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system is necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The summary report has been sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers to meet engineering and budgetary requirements prior to resumption of funding. bridge remains and will be accomplished by the Vicksburg District. 10. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-F. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include ten water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Monroe Floodwall, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985 report and Monroe 84 report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-F. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. An overall basin study is ongoing. Interim study of the Ouachita River Levees is complete. The Interim Report recommended raising the levee to authorized grade. The Levee Project has been reclassified as active. Interim studies for Monroe-West Monroe and the Arkansas Lakes are continuing. Studies for Youngs Bayou and Chauvin Bayou in Monroe have been completed and a report recommending construction under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1945 submitted to OCE, Construction of flood damage reduction measures for Monroe-West Monroe, Ouachita Parish, LA, is authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 subject to the review of the Secretary of Army. 11. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the Southcentral portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba county, MS and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogulasa, LA. At that point, 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.1 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 5.34 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank Levee system along the Fortification Street 1-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law #98-63, dated July 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 85 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal Cost of this project is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated August 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Local cooperation. For the Jackson-East Jackson and vicinity of Jackson Projects, the requirements are as prescribed in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended. This Act requires that a local sponsor provide the easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The Slidell Levee Project authorization required cost-sharing and new guidelines for local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement consistent with Public Law 99-88 was signed by the Slidell Local Sponsor and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on June 30, 1986. The local sponsors are as follows: Jackson-East Jackson, Rankin-Hinds Pearl River Flood Control Drainage District; Vicinity of Jackson Project, Pearl River Basin Development District; Slidell Levee Project, St. Tamany Levee District. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is underway. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS recommending the Shoccoe Dry Dam, and for Slidell, LA; recommending a 15 mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies are underway for Shoccoe Dam and the Slidell levee system. Studies of various flood control measures for the Carthage - Leake County, MS, area have been completed. Several of these features were authorized by Public Law 99-662. Flood control feasibility studies for the remainder of the basin include major emphasis on Columbia, Picayune, and Monticello, Missisippi; Bogulusa, Louisiana, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin. Navigation Studies are being conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. 12. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchatrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of 1-10 consists of 4.5 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate, and other minor drainage structures. This levee protects the Slidell area north of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment south of 1-10 consists of 10.5 miles of levees, two pumping stations, floodgates, and other minor drainage structures. This levee protects the Slidell area south of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These 2 levee segments total 15 miles of levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. Tammany Levee District, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act (PL 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement June 30, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued engineering studies in preparation of General Design Memorandum. Condition as of September 30. Process of developing General Design Memorandum. No previous construction has taken place. 13. PORTER BAYOU, MS Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and travels through the town of Shaw, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement calls for selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter Bayou area. All 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT construction is being performed from one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $1,214,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed November 16, 1983. A separate contract was let to biologically remove alligatorweed at Shaw, Mississippi, and follow-up with herbacide has been added. 14. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River"-1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non- Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83d Cong., 2d sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-H for new projects and Table 12-I for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 15. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, Ar, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA, on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1984) is $59,650,000 Federal and $1,560,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. The Belcher realignment, river miles 299-306, and the Gahagan revetment, mile 225-L were completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levees are complete and bank stabilization is 98 percent complete. 16. RED RIVER WATERWAY SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, LA, and Index, AR. Existing project. To provide for realigning the channels of Red River from Shreveport, LA, to the levee system near Index, AR, by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1985) is $217,000,000 Federal and $27,500,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on pages 12-10 and 12-11 of Fiscal Year 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued reevaluation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. Completion of a General Re-evaluation Study will be required prior to construction of the project. The engineering and economic feasibility of constructing the authorized project must be reviewed in light of changed conditions within the project area. 17. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $214,565 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1986, is $1,965,093. 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 18. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $286,675. Rehabilitation, total expenditures during FY 86 amounted to $646,838 which included work on the Red River below Denison Dam. Advance measures, FY 87 costs were $4,079. Total Public Law 99 cost during FY 87 was $937,592. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). Total FY 87 costs for emergency bank protection work was $1,155. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During FY 1987, detailed studies were completed on Canal 43, Desha and Lincoln Counties, AR, at a cost of $1,333 and Three Mile Creek, Jackson, MS at a cost of $5,671. Detailed studies continued on Bayou Natchitoches, LA, at a cost of $79,151; Pearl-Flowood, MS $5,507; Lead Bayou, $59,619; and Canal 43, $1,333. 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 1. Ouachita and Black New Work Rivers below Cam- Approp. den, AR (6.5-foot Cost navigation project) Ouachita and Black New Work Rivers below Cam- Approp. den, AR (9-foot Cost. navigation project) Maint. Approp. Cost 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 4. Yazoo River, MS New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12,700,000 14,599,659 4,486,300 4,962,300 4,000,000 8,662,235 4,962,000 4,855,884 6,098,000 7,064,032 3,375,000 3,495,000 5,630,000 7,000,000 1,270,000 3,779,352 5,878,490 3,073,870 91,313,000 87,090,000 91,585,000 91,266,477 81,574,966 65,955,521 -122,000 169,900 142,171 186,237 80,000 80,927 -66,000 1,892,000 1,537,703 1,602,515 861,437 10,000 64,744 1,580,000 1,864,677 154,936 153,230 -147,000 74,782 66,200 66,200 7,814,000 8,537,018 5,235,000 5,033,649 2,355,000 3,497,107 68,000,000 398,724,000 77,210,592 374,463,716 1,121,100 1,117,843 3,000 2,479 6. Bayou Bartholomew New Work and Tributaries Approp. AK and LA Cost 7. Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA 8. Lead Bayou, MS 9. Ouachita River Levees, LA 11. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson 12. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 400,000 331,125 15,000 162,003 265,000 445,448 200,000 234,820 710,000 1,195,000 43,737 1,820,453 0 187,980 0 2,428 21,217 15,000 437,000 - 264,524 -116,000 72,417 631,000 372,065 14,000 69,619 176,000 175,956 97,500 116,973 413,000 232,288 12-9 5,248,6191 5,248,6191 224,436,000 220,778,318 74,373,467 74,098,213 19,617,0002 18,269,220 6,825 6,825 4,996,1003 5,200,1653 2,547,3563 1,787,5043 9,679,661 9,341,826 1,197,515 1,196,781 974,000 974,000 1,038,000 1,037,952 631,000 372,065 1,824,000 1,822,799 2,682,000 2,682,000 2,081,000 2,061,363 97,500 116,973 865,000 496,812 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 12-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 13. Porter Bayou, New Work MS Approp. -15,000 - - - 1,035,278 Cost 270,363 5,391 - - 1,029,257 15. Red River below New Work Denison Dam, Approp. 1,600,000 1,000,000 957,000 -963,000 8,254,700 Levees and Bank Cost 1,356,651 1,871,520 2,286,507 185,772 7,206,089 16. Red River Water- New Work way, Shreveport, Approp. 90,000 50,000 - - 140,0003 LA, to Index, AR Cost 88,730 48,736 13,684 - 155,4853 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previousprojects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 27, 1965 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthall, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text) Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. YAZOO RIVER, MS (See Section 4 of Text) Removal of obstructions to navigation from mouth to Greenwood, MS, 189 miles. Nine-foot channel from mouth to Greenwood, mile 154.9 (persent mileage), with a lock and dam near Vicksburg, channel improvements, alteration of bridges, additional storage space in Sardis Lake to augment low river flows, and recreation features. Authorized intermittent dredging and such other work as may be required on the Yazoo River in MS, from Greenwood south, to remove natural shoals so as to allow commerce to continue. The authorized navigation project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of the alteration of the Shepardstown Bridge (mile 147.8) shall be 50 percent. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW, AR AND LA (See Section 6 of Text) Authorized channel improvements on Bayou and Tributaries (see above). Modified 1950 authorization to include 10 lakes in the west escarpment in Arkansas and 6 local levees in Louisiana, and acquisition of lands for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. The previously authorized channel improvement was deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 7 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou, and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near 3unction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 342, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 506, 98th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 12-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 12-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. LEAD BAYOU, MS (See Section 8 of Text) Channel enlargement. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHITA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 10 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 35 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design engineering and construction of a levee system for Slidell LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized flood control project at Shoccoe, MS, as outlined in Report of Chief of Engineers dated March 17, 1986, and also several project features which would provide flood control to the upstream areas of the Pearl River Basin in MS. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 12 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chief's report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 12-12 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 PEARL RIVER BASIN, SHOCCOE DAM, MS Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 13 of Text) Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 15 of Text) Levee and bank stabilization. Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-13 - -- TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Sill at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Pre- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; 1002 $ 43,100,000 bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 952 44,300,000 fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, AR 1 227 84 600 18 701 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; 882 99,300,000 navigation pass with inflatable dam on crest; steel mitering lock gates Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 882 71,300,000 H. K. hinged crest gated hatcher) navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Estimated Federal Cost $258,000,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost 16,702,000 Total Estimated Cost $274,702,000 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. elevation .65. L'J O mA O O Lu] 0 Au 0I 0 O 0o VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1987 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR1, 2 , 3, 4 - 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 1 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1, 2, 4 - 1941 19,000 37,804 1 Big Black River, MS 1, 4, 5 - 1895 15,000 - 1 Big Sunflower River, MS 1, 4, 6, 7 - 1942 560,027 459,328 1 Boeuf River, LA1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9 - 1949 30,000 103,737 1 Claiborne County Port, MS - 1985 2,000,000 2,000,000 1 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA15 Complete 1971 202,817 452,611 Dec. 1914 Homochitto River, MS 4 - 1910 15,482 8,518 1 Lake Providence Harbor, LA - 1985 208,537 2,586,573 15 Little Missouri River, AR1, 4, 5 - 1873 19,992 - 1 Little River, LA1, 4, 5, 10 - 1890 1,500 - 1 Little Tallahatchie River, MS 1'7 - 1913 19,000 - 1 Madison Parish Port, LA - 1985 655,999 529,031 1 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS 1, 7,11 - 1953 1,179,211 217,266 1 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA,12_1 Felsenthal Canal 193712 1 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA - 1985 - -350,500 1 Pearl River, MS - 1985 1,354,400 1,306,423 1 Red River below Fulton, AR1, 16,17,18 - 1978 1,963,806 2,147,890 1 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX1, 17, 18 - 1969__1 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX 1976 70,000 - 1 Removing snags and wrecks from - 1948 - 272,500 1 Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers 11 Rosedale Harbor, MS - 1985 2,000,000 1,829,480 1 Saline River, AR1, 3, 4, 5 - 1931 26,900 12,792 1 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS 1 4 5 -1939 43,481 173,066 1 12-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 12-D (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1987 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA1, 8, 12 1949 38,367 85,352 1 Yalobusha River, MS 1,4 5, 14 - 1937 7,000 15,936 1 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway- Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway- Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 12-16 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA (1) 44,800,000 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $198,704,7434 1. See individual reports herein. 2. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed by local interests. 3. Actual cost of completed project. 4. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) was $4,190,000. 12-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA - 1,158 - - $25,100,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA - - - - 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 - - - - 243,3363 Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake - - - 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River - - - 1,950,0003 Garland City, AR 16 - - - - 1,450,000' Maniece Bayou, AR - - - - 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR7 8 - - - - 5,610,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2 6 69 - - - - 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR and LA1,3 - - - - 59,650,0003 Total 99,191,885 1. Details presented in individual report herein. 2. Construction on this project not started. 3. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ........................................................ $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution)...........................................89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ...................................................................................... 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ..................................................... 480,000 East Point .......................................................................................... 67,000 G arland City, A R ...................................................................................... 6,000 M aniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ............................................................... 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ............................................................ 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA ....................... 1,560,000 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. 6. Inactive. 7. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. 8. Joint-use pool (sediment). 9. Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 14 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,5291 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5 ' 6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481, 7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No. 1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271, 8 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711, 3 4 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District August, 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1987 Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. If See Annual and If Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA' Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA1 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA Bayou Pierre, LA Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1, 2 Big Black River, MS3 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3, 4 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA1, 5, 6 Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AK Buffalo River, MS7 Caddo Lake Dam, LA Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA1 8 DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR East Point, LA Garland City, AR Grant Parish below Colfax, LA1, 3 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR 1 3 Homochitto River, MS 3 Maniece Bayou, AR 1, 2 McKinney Bayou Finn Bayou Segment, ARU Monroe Floodwall, LA Murfreesboro Dam and Lake 4 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AK Natchez Port Area, MS 3 , 4 Natchitoches Parish, LA1, 2 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS Pineville, Red River, LA3, 4 Posten Bayou, AR' � Poverty Point, LA Red River Parish, LA1,3 Nov. 1986 Aug. 1977 1956 1948 1985 1985 1951 1956 1966 1945 1985 1940 1986 1978 1938 1985 1969 1976 1941 1941 1956 1970 19639 1984 1951 1985 1969 1956 1986 1953 1973 1986 1939 $ 1,653,189 319,200 243,3362 910,185 248,823 34,023,108 $ - 2,208,190 83,866 670,750 Apr. 1955 Jan. 1948 Apr. 1961 FY 1939 Jun. 1939 3 3 47,108,075 Oct. 1955 621,858 1,655,700 70,348 72,033,992 286,069 1,335,841 38,809 88,006 205,000 970,9322 2,560,000 16,516,689 538,000 1,529,478 290,000 232,426 250,000 149,435 - Jul. 1978 31,092,018 Dec. 1971 144,650 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 3 3 3 Aug. 1969 33,663,952 May 1950 - 5 - Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 Oct. 1985 3 12-20 TABLE 12-H (CONTINUED) VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1987 Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. If See Annual and If Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1 1953 3,908,000 - Mar. 1953 Saline Point, LA 1, 3 1945 124,111 Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1966 335,433 - May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA 1985 - 571,890 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ............ $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA .................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA .... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ............................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR ................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ............... 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205 Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. donstruction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 8. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 9. Date authorized. 10. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 12-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 87 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) ($) ($) Flood Control Studies (120) Ouachita River Basin AR & LA -12046 $ 574,934 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA -12234 666,938 Pine Bluff Metro, AR -12015 0 Subtotal 1,241,872 Comprehensive Studies (150) Red River Below Denison Dan (153) -81129 102 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171 -17250 19,943 Review of FERC Licenses 172) -53857 1,934 Subtotal 21,877 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Seryice (181) -51840 2,001 Planning Assistance to States (186) -51850 0 Technical and Engineering Assistance on Shoreline and Streambank (188) -51731 0 Subtotal 2,001 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,265,852 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Inspection of Dams (230) Inventory of Dams 0 Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 177,819 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 11,074 Subtotal 188,893 TOTAL (Category 200) 188,893 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) Flood Control Projects (450) Pearl River, Slidell, LA (451)-12442 168,946 Pearl River, Shoccoe Dam, MS (452)-12444 472,450 Subtotal 641,396 TOTAL (Category 400) 641,396 ADVANCE E&D (Category 600) Navigation Projects (620) Locks and Dams, Yazoo River, MS (622) 00083 0 Flood Control Projects (650) Local Protection, Red River Waterway, Shreveport to Index (651) -75023 344,324 Local Protection, Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS (651) -75426 431 Reservoirs Pearl River Shoccoe Dam, MS (652) -12444 585,088 Subtotal 929,843 TOTAL (Category 600) 929,843 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $3,025,984 12-22 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation work under special authorization ........................ Flood Control 2. Hatchie River, Alcorn Co, MS ........ 3. Humboldt, TN ...................... 4. Nonconnah Creek Interceptor Sewer, M emphis, TN ....................... 5. Turner Creek, Corinth, MS ........... 6. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................ Page Flood Control (cont.) 7. Flood control work under special 13-1 authorization ....................... Tables 13-1 Table 13-A 13-2 Table 13-B Table 13-C 13-2 13-2 13-3 Table 13-D Table 13-E Cost & Financial Statement .... Authorizing Legislation ...... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... Active General Investigations .. Page 13-3 13-4 13-4 13-5 13-6 13-7 Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $26,137 was expended on reconnaissance studies on DeValls Bluff Harbor, AR. Flood Control 2. HATCHIE RIVER, ALCORN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI Location. The project is located in Alcorn County in northeast Mississippi, along the Hatchie River 5 miles upstream of U.S. Highway 72. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. The project consists of removal of a 1,000-foot-long massive logjam where the Hatchie River channel was completely blocked and stream flows were diverted into the adjacent bottomland hardwood forests. Timber will be restored or preserved on over 1,100 acres of valuable forests. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project and all necessary modifications or relocations of roads, bridges, and utilities other than railroad bridges and bridge approaches; to the extent of the legal authority of the Hatchie Drainage District of Alcorn County, hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed works, except those damages due to the sole fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; to the extent of the legal authority of the Hatchie Drainage District of Alcorn County, maintain and operate the completed works without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the 13-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Army; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project for flood control after project construction; pay all costs associated with project features designated to be local interest responsibilities; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611; comply with the provisions of Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin. Local interests have furnished the required assurances. Condition as of Sep. 30. The channel blockage was removed in August 1985 and the remaining cleanup was completed in Feb. 1986. 3. HUMBOLDT, TN Location. Humboldt is located in Gibson County, TN. Existing project. Authorized July 23, 1984, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of clearing and snagging approximately 2,200 feet of existing channel and the construction of 2,600 feet of enlarged channel. The project will provide a 10-year level of protection for area residents and is expected to reduce average annual flood damages by 64 percent. The current estimated construction cost for the project is $1,110,000. The project assurances of local cooperation have been furnished. The construction contract for required channel improvement was awarded in July 1986. It has been determined that no adverse environmental impacts will result from construction of the project. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 13-4 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel work was completed Dec. 18, 1987. A contract for construction of a railroad drainage structure was awarded on June 2, 1987. The work is expected to be completed in November 1987. 4. NONCONNAH CREEK INTERCEPTOR SEWER, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Location. The project is located in southeastern Memphis, Tennessee, along the right (north) bank of Nonconnah Creek through a reach extending from about 600 feet upstream to 100 feet downstream of the Highway 78 (Lamar Ave.) bridge. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. The project consists of providing bank protection along a 700 foot reach of eroding creek bank to protect a major interceptor sewer line and the U.S. Highway 78 bridge. Protection is to be provided via grading and shaping the bank and armoring it with riprap stone. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; provide without cost to the United States all necessary relocations and alterations of buildings and utilities, sewers, related and special facilities; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Memphis, Tennessee; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; to the extent of the legal authority of the City of Memphis, Tennessee, maintain and operate the project works after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611; assume any construction costs in excess of $250,000, the monetary limit established in Section 27, Public Law 93-251; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project; if applicable, adjust all claims covering water rights; comply with the provisions of Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352. The city of Memphis, Tennessee has provided the required local cooperation assurances and rights-ofway. Condition as of Sep. 30. A contract for construction of the project was awarded on 30 September 1986. The work was completed on December 6, 1986. 5. TURNER CREEK, CORINTH, MISSISSIPPI Location. The project is located in northcentral Mississippi in Alcorn County on the left and right banks of Turner Creek immediately downstream of Highway 45B in Corinth, Mississippi. Existing project. Authorized under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946. The project consists of a timber retaining wall along 73 feet of the right bank to control erosion which was threatening a city-owned community theater building and a 121-foot long left bank wall to protect a privatelyowned service station which might have been com- 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT promised due to deflection of flow from placement of the right bank wall. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all land, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; provide without cost to the United States all necessary relocations and alterations of buildings and utilities, sewers, related and special facilities; hold and save the United States free from all damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project works after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; comply with provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646; comply with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611; assume any construction costs in excess of $250,000, the monetary limit established in Section 27, Public Law 93-251; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project; if applicable, adjust all claims covering water rights; comply with the provisions of Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Public Law 88-352. The Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District provided the required local cooperation assurances and rights-of-way. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated on Sep. 29, 1986, and completed on March 20, 1987. 6. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $129,115 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1986, was $1,297,853. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 7. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During this period $65,400 was expended on reconnaissance study on Ramsey Creek, Scott City, MO and $387 on Tuscumbia Rivers, MS. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1987, $19,669 was expended on Perkins Street Bridge, Nonconnah Creek, Memphis, TN; $379 on Quince Road Bridge, Nonconnah Creek lateral, Memphis, TN; and $546 on Fletcher Creek Stabilization, Memphis, TN. Monies on all of these projects were used to initiate reconnaissance studies pursuant to the authority. Emergency flood control activities - rehabilitation of private levee (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost was $251,150 for disaster preparedness in FY 87. This includes $11,003 for Phase I flood protection. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 208, Public Law 780, 83d Cong., as amended. No work was accomplished this period under this authority. 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 2. Hatchie River New Work Alcorn Co., MS Approp. $ - $ 62,676 $ 10,802 $ - $ 73,478 Cost - 62,673 10,802 - 73,475 3. Humboldt, TN New Work Approp. 155,000 - 333,333 707,000 1,195,333 Cost 124,150 11,539 349,736 510,151 995,576 4. Nonconnah Creek New Work Interceptor Approp. - - 30,000 204,000 234,100 Sewer, Memphis, Cost - - 29,435 200,000 229,435 TN 5. Turner Creek New Work - - Corinth, MS Approp. - - 27,500 60,000 87,500 Cost 27,500 67,743 95,243 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents HATCHIE RIVER (See Sec. 2 of Text) Sep. 24, 1954, Clearing and snagging within channel. Approved Jul 24, 19858 as amended HUMBOLDT, TN (See Sec. 3 of Text) June 30, 1948, Channel improvement within the city of Humboldt. Approved Jul. 23, 19841 as amended NONCONNAH INTERCEPTOR SEWER AND U.S. HIGHWAY 78 (See Sec. 4 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946, Stabilization - streambank caving. Approved Oct. 18, 19852 as amended TURNER CREEK, CORINTH, MS Jul. 24, 1946, (See Section 5 of Text) Approved May 23, 19862 as amended Stabilization - streambank caving. WHITE RIVER NAVIGATION TO BATESVILLE, AR Nov. 17, 1986 Dredge and maintain general navigation channel. Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 2. Authorized under authority of Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. 3. Authorized under authority of Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood control Act, as amended. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1987 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO - 1984 $768,992 $ 1,963,079 Dec 80 Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork1',2 - 1912 25,000 425,857 - Helena Harbor, AR - 1984 90,847 4,344,714 Sep 63 Hickman Harbor, KY - 1984 149,827 3,739,720 Jan 63 New Madrid Harbor, MO - 1984 196,373 385,509 Oct 70 Obion River, TN 1' 3 - 1911 28,716 - - Osceola Harbor, AR - 1984 269,115 5,438,684 Nov 74 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers4�' 5 - 1948 - 318,833 4 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, AR 1 2 - 1942 92,000 300,449 - White River, AR (below Newport) - 1984 169,994 18,562,372 - Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN - 1984 586,500 8,562,854 1959 1. No commerce. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 13-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1987 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR1 Bradford, TN Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, AR1 Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL 2 Drinkwater Sewer, MO Dyersburg, TN 2 Dyersburg, TN (SW) Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN Huntingdon, TN Long Lake Area Helena, AR Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL 4 Nixon Creek, TN 2 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) Sandy Creek Jackson, TN St. Francis River Highway No.90 AR Treasure Island, MO US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY - 1977 $ 70,363 $ - 6 May 81 6 May 81 Sep 1980 Jul 1983 1937 1984 1964 1984 1962 1981 1985 1983 1983 1960 1955 1952 1983 1983 1985 1985 1981 1984 1983 95,061 147,000 1,494,828 229,6493 1,820,869 155,280 2,900,281 61,281 11,141,199 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 249,999 238,000 161,000 861,528 369,200 1,674,180 Dec 1983 Feb 1964 Jun 1980 Jun 1962 Oct 1976 Aug 1985 - May 1959 Oct 19595 Dec 1951 Nov 1981 Sep 1980 Dec 1984 Sep 1985 Mar 1978 Mar 1983 Oct 1976 1. Inactive, awaiting local cooperation. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 4. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 5. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 87 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $ 33,620 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Planning Assistance to States (186) - 14847 42,525 TOTAL (Category 100) $ 76,145 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 234,684 TOTAL (Category 200) $234,648 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $310,793 13-7 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) ................. 2. Kaskaskia River, IL .............. 3. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) S (Includes L&D 26 Replacement) ..... 4. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO, and IL .... 5. Southeast Missouri Port, MO ........ Flood Control 6. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL ...... 7. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 8. Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL ............ 9. Meramec River Basin, MO ......... 9A. Meramec Park Lake, MO .......... 9B. Pine Ford Lake, MO .............. 10. McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL ..................... 11. Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee District, IL ..... 12. Mississippi River Agricultural Area8, MO ..................... 13. Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL .................... Page Flood Control (cont.) 14. Perry County Drainage and Levee 14-2 Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO ...... 14-2 15. Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL .... 16. Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 14-2 17. Inspection of completed flood control projects ................... 14-2 18. Navigation work under 14-3 special authorization .............. 19. Flood control work under special authorization .............. 14-3 Multiple-Purpose Project 14-3 Including Power 20. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain 14-4 Salt River, MO ................. 14-4 14-4 Tables 14-4 Table 14-A Table 14-B 14-5 Table 14-C Table 14-D Table 14-E Table 14-F 14-5 14-5 14-5 Cost and Financial Statement . Authorizing Legislation ...... Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... Lakes, Levees, and Recreational Facilities ....... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... Active General Investigations (96X3121) ..... Page 14-6 14-6 14-6 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-7 14-8 14-10 14-13 14-13 14-14 14-16 14-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Location. The river rises in Champaign County, IL, about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in east-central part of State. It flows southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 8 miles above RCihveesrt.e r, II, or about 118 miles above mouth of Ohio (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1896, page 171. Existing project. Improvement for navigation provides a channel 9 feet deep and 225 feet wide from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. Improvement consists of enlarging present channel where required, making overbank cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, and construction of a dam at mile 0.8 with a single lock 84 feet wide and 600 feet long, at an estimated total Federal project cost (1984) of $145,060,000. Non- Federal project cost is $7,665,000, of which $1,500,000 is local contribution. Local cooperation. State of Illinois passed legislation authorizing Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings to enter into assurances of local cooperation with the United States. These assurances have been furnished and were accepted on behalf of the United States on Sept. 10, 1965; these assurances were supplemented on Aug. 7, 1972, to incorporate the provisions of PL 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of remaining project items (Redressing and Revetment) was completed. A contract was awarded for replacement of the floating guidewall timber fenders. Hired labor performed operation and maintenance of the project. miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (1987) of $181,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $245,073,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3d sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooneration. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are con- 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN sidered adequate for existing commerce. MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNE- Operations and results during fiscal year. Reg- APOLIS MN (ST. LOUIS DIST.) ulating Works: Contract was continued on stone dike N (ST.and revetment construction as was engineering and (INCLUDES L&D 26 REPLACEMENT) design and supervision and administration. Construc- See separate section entitled "Mississippi River be- tion on existing project began in 1881 and project has tween Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed been in beneficial use practically from its inception. in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. . Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 76 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN work completed to date. Dredging is required at low OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain re- MO AND IL quired channel depths. River is generally above 10- foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, to the latter part of August, during which time project MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 channel depths generally prevail without dredging. 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Maintenance. Work consisted of 2,475 feet of dike and 20,443 feet of revetment repair. U.S. plant and hired labor performed channel dredging removing 2,925,100 cubic yards of material from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. 5. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSOURI Location. The project is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River at river mile 30 above the Ohio River in the counties of Scott and Cape Girardeau in Southeast Missouri. Existing project. Pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended, a slackwater channel, 2000 feet long, 230 feet wide and 9 feet deep is being constructed. This project will provide a navigation channel for development of a port and related facilities at this location. Total estimateed cost is $4,256,000 (1,971,200 non-federal). Location cooperation. On May 22, 1987, a Local Cooperation Agreement was signed between the Port District and the St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers. Results during fiscal year: Construction work began on August 8, 1987. The contractor has completed an estimated 18 percent of the work by the end of the Fiscal Year 1987. Flood Control 6. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottomlands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorizatio. n provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia- Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with the requirements of local cooperation for work under the 1936 authorization. For work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances were accepted on the Blue Waters Ditch area on Jun. 25, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of project modifications authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 was continued. This work included ditching contracts and the Blue Waters Ditch pumping station. Work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936 is complete. The East St. Louis Pumping Station, which was constructed under the authority of the Flood Control Act of 1936, underwent major repairs to pumping units, gates and other equipment. 7. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Federal project cost (1986) is $14,100,000. Non- Federal cost is $2,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 23 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. Construction is complete on the gravity drains. Plans and specifications for raising and enlarging the levee are complete and construction was continued on this item. 8. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Scott County, IL on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 63.5 and 67.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000). Existing project. Project provides for raising a portion of the existing levee and construction of two railroad closure structures. Project will provide protection to 5,700 acres of land against a flood of 100- year frequency. Based on cost sharing requirements prior to enactment of PL 99-662, the estimated total Federal project cost (1987) is $1,840,000. Non-Federal cost is $185,000. Project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1985, Public Law 98-360, 98th Cong., 2nd Session. Local cooperation. The village of Naples, IL, signed a letter of intent, dated March 13, 1985, indicating a willingness to comply with the terms of local cooperation including provisions of the Uniform Relocations and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970 (PL 91-646) and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (PL 91-611). Local Cooperation requirements are: furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary and accomplish all relocations necessary for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, save and except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. It has been determined that cost sharing must be in accordance with the provisions of PL 99-662, which requires a substantial increase in cost of local cooperation. Details of local cost sharing have not been resolved. The Village of Naples is doubtful that they can assume responsibility for cost sharing as required by PL 99-662; however, they are still seeking resources necessary for the project to be undertaken and no decision has yet been reached to abandon the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning was completed on all items. Further actions have been deferred pending a decision concerning local cooperation. 9. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO Location. The basin lies within the State of Missouri and comprises 3,980 square miles. The river is a west bank tributary of the Mississippi River at mile 161 above mouth of Ohio River. Major streams in the basin include the Meramec, Big, and Bourbeuse Rivers. The basin extends about 100 miles southwesterly from St. Louis into the Ozark Highlands. (See St. Louis, MO, and Rolla sheets of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The project provides for the construction of Meramec Park and Union Lakes, authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act; and Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 Lake projects, and 19 angler-use sites, authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. Under the plan, Irondale and 1-38 Lakes will reduce flood damages in the upper Big and Bourbeuse Rivers. Meramec Park, Union, and Pine Ford Lakes will substantially reduce flooding in the lower basin area and will lower flood crests on the Mississippi River. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife conservation. (See Table 14-D for additional data on this comprehensive project.) 9A. MERAMEC PARK LAKE, MO Location. Proposed dam will be at mile 108.7 on Meramec River in Franklin County near Sullivan, MO. Reservoir will be mainly in Crawford, Franklin, and Washington counties, MO. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Project was deauthorized by Public Law 97-128. Land is being disposed of in accordance with deauthorizing act. 9B. PINE FORD LAKE, MO Location. Proposed dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake would extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1984) is $147,000,000, of which $8,173,200 and $22,900,000 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocation to water 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of Operations and results during fiscal year. Project 1958. has now been placed in the inactive category. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning previously funded but not completed. 10. McGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Brown and Pike Counties, IL, on the right bank of Illinois River between miles 67.2 and 75.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Kansas City sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Project provides for reconstruction of 14.7 miles of levee, construction of a new pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to about 12,080 acres of agricultural land against a flood of about 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1983) is $25,500,000. Non-Federal cost is $930,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have executed assurances in compliance with Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is essentially complete. 11. MEREDOSIA, IL, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK, AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL Location. The levee district is in Morgan and Scott Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 67.0 and 72.2 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for construction of 11.0 miles of new or enlarged levee, a pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 8,215 acres of land, 7,640 of which are highly productive agricultural lands, and 575 acres of noncrop and farmsteads against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $12,100,000. Non- Federal cost is $1,030,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. 12. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO Location. Area 8 is in Lincoln and Pike Counties, MO, on west bank of Mssissippi River between river miles 249 and 261 above the Ohio River. Small community of Elsberry lies within the area. (See Quincy sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The 1966 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 510, 89th Cong., 2d sess.) authorized the raising and enlarging of existing levees to provide 24.4 miles of riverfront, flank, and back levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of drainage structure, highway and railroad closure structures, and alterations to existing pumping plants. The project has been reduced in scope to consist of replacing one existing drainage structure, replacing an obsolete stream driven pump unit with a new one of 150 cubic feet per second capacity, and rehabilitation of the pump station. Project will afford protection to the area against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1980) is $2,400,000. Non-Federal cost is $20,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 14-10 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project is complete. 13. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 mile of new levee, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,635 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $6,510,000. Non- Federal cost is $450,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was continued under the gen- 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 eral investigation appropriation. Construction has not begun. 14. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO Location. Districts are in Perry County, MO, and Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 95 and 111 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see 475 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project area contains about 26,881 acres protected from floods of the Mississippi River by levees. However, when Mississippi River stage exceeds 13 feet on the Chester, IL, gage, substantial damage results from impoundment of precipitation or seepage, or a combination thereof. Authorized project provides for construction of four pumping stations to reduce interior flooding. Estimated total Federal project cost (1982) is $8,812,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances were furnished by local interests (presently, Boil Brule Levee District, MO). on Nov. 16, 1978, and were accepted Nov. 27, 1978, by the District Engineer under delegated authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is essentially complete on all four pumping stations. 15. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Location. The lake is in Franklin and Jefferson Counties in southern Illinois. The dam is on Big Muddy River, 103.7 miles upstream from its confluence with the Mississippi River, and about 3 miles northwest of Benton, IL. (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth dam, ungated concrete spillway, relocation of roads and utilities, recreational facilities, access roads, and service facilities. In addition, two subimpoundment dams were constructed on upper arms of reservoir to enhance fish and wildlife value of project. Reservoir has an area of 24,800 acres, and a storage capacity of 294,000 acre-feet. Project provides flood control, water supply, low-flow regulations, conservation of fish and wildlife, recreation, and area development. Estimated total Federal project cost (1983) is $43,100,900, of which $12,197,700 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution for water supply is $9,941,300. Federal cost for code 711 recreation facilities is $1,060,900. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-12 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurance of local cooperation and water supply contract have been executed and approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real estate activities in connection with project completion were performed. Lands acquired to date are 39,819 acres in fee and 906 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Rend Lake Reservoir. 16. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Madison County, IL, on left bank of Mississippi River between river miles 195 and 203 above Ohio River. District includes bottom lands between river and bluffs and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the south to opposite lock and dam No. 26 at Alton, IL, on the north. Small industrial cities of Hartford, Wood River, Roxana, and East Alton and part of Alton riverfront, lie within the district. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1938 Flood Control Act authorized raising, enlarging, and extending existing levee system to provide 20.8 miles of levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations to existing or construction of new pumping plants; surfacing service road on levee crown, making necessary alterations to railroad tracks and bridges at levee crossings, seepage corrective measures and construction of a low-water dam at mouth of Wood River. Project will afford protection to this district against a flood of about 200-year frequency. Estimated total construction cost (1982) is $18,600,000 (excluding $23,000 contributed funds). Flood Control Act of 1965 modified 1938 Flood Control Act to provide for construction of a pumping station with collector ditches and necessary appurtenant facilities for removal of water impounded by existing levee. This portion of the project has been declared inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act is complete except for a closure structure. Construction was initiated on this item. 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 17. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD PROJECTS CONTROL Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $451,820 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $5,911,239. 18. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). No activity during this Fiscal Year. 19. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study costs for fiscal year were $17,391 for Columbia Levee and Drainage District, Monroe County, IL; $36,339 for Crooked Creek, Bollinger County, MO; $2,164 for E. Cape Girardeau Main Ditch, IL; $78,563 for St. Peters, MO; and $54,463 for Modoc Levee and Drainage District, IL; $5,500 for Big Muddy River, West Frankfort; $7,500 for Boise Brule Levee and Drainage District, MO; $6,628 for Lower Salt River Pike County, MO; and $9,540 for Mississippi Levee System, Monroe. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of a levee approximately one-fifth of a mile long to be built in Meredosia, IL, at a total cost of $80,000. Emergency Bank Protection. Costs for fiscal year were $150,741 for Illinois River, Hardin, IL. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $117,903 for disaster preparedness, $451,820 for inspection of completed works and $1,054,694 for rehabilitation. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 20. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR SALT RIVER, MO Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acre-feet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project plan provides for installation of one 27,000 KW conventional unit and one 31,000 KW reversible unit for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1984) is $330,000,000 of which $22,420,000 is for lands and damages; $14,300,000 for water supply; $76,000,000 for hydropower. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received from the State of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work is complete on all major items. Work remaining consists of minor items on recreation facilities. Lands acquired to date are 55,277 acres in fee and 10,068 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. 14-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 2. Kaskaskia River IL (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 5. Southeast Missouri Port, MO 6. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 7. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, IL 8 Mauvaise Terre Drainage & Levee District, IL 9A. Meramec Park Lake, MO 9B. Pine Ford Lake, MO 10. McGee Creek Drainage & Levee District, IL 11. Meredosia, IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek and Coon Run Drainage & Levee Districts, IL 12. Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, IL 13. Nutwood Drainage & Levee District, IL Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Total Funds to FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 $5,209,000 3,885,032 587,000 911,518 104,348 0 2,610,000 3,440,369 7,490,000 7,157,647 0 0 2,597,000 2,167,981 0 158,733 1,057,000 451,595 00 0 16,897 326,000 412,597 S.0 366 5,420,000 5,366,819 00 0 5,634 0 120 $5,300,000 6,419,905 1,370,000 1,345,081 0 0 4,197,000 4,571,548 12,264,000 12,217,020 00 3,450,000 2,858,126 512,750 16,250 2,750,000 2,807,469 0 149,447 0 36,346 379,000 362,268 0 721 1,780,000 2,674,729 $14,300,000 14,204,126 1,372,000 1,177,658 18,626 0 3,541,000 3,415,685 9,545,000 9,771,652 00 1,890,000 2,446,626 119,000 516,340 957,000 1,626,323 0 337,089 0 26,870 426,000 454,511 -36,000 341 0 136,924 00 0 4,063 0 0 0 0 0 169 00 $ 15,000 192,628 00 00 4,594,000 4,667,633 12,262,000 12,566,762 660,000 480,601 -112,000 134,522 0 99,176 3,951,000 4,073,697 -15,000 49,575 0 24,467 529,000 505,528 00 130,000 75,145 00 00 00 $147,415,0001 147,181,7901 11,731,256 11,485,246 1,158,356 1,118,160 179,098,6002 178,934,7782 227,218,1333 227,027,7043 660,000 480,601 16,847,3264 16,540,9165 961,750 961,750 12,658,000 12,521,365 585,000 536,111 30,568,0006 30,567,2446 4,044,600 4,007,059 3,644,001 3,644,001 25,050,300 24,882,177 370,000 370,000 2,137,000 2,137,000 670,000 670,000 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 14. Perry County New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 270,300 16,000 0 0 7,968,7007 District Nos. 1, Cost 266,200 47,146 859 0 7,968,7007 2, &3, MO 15. Rend Lake, Big New Work Muddy, IL Approp. 0 - 0 0 43,700,900 (Regular Funds) Cost 35,976 24,820 17,224 19,926 43,691,712 Maint. Approp. 1,958,000 3,302,500 2,759,600 2,558,822 28,575,6228 Cost 2,072,978 3,103,736 2,812,138 2,620,317 28,378,3438 Code 711 Funds New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,060,900 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,060,900 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 0 0 0 0 9,941,2789 Cost 0 0 0 0 9,941,2789 Maint. Contrib. 304,348 300,000 300,000 532,627 4,018,930 Cost 293,485 305,279 247,328 582,664 4,010,711 16. Wood River New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 1,000,000 0 118,000 500,000 17,207,82110 District, IL Cost 424,513 362,773 416,517 463,192 17,130,45410 20. Clarence Cannon New Work 10,240,300 3,622,000 820,000 673,000 312,692,02811 Dam and Reservoir, Approp. 8,922,842 2,948,571 1,795,702 1,625,900 311,289,80411 Salt River, MO Cost Maint. Approp. 2,074,000 3,260,500 3,929,600 4,077,322 20,157,982 Cost 2,127,691 3,190,444 3,633,059 4,340,515 19,928,608 1. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 2. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 3. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 4. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 5. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 6. Includes $200,000 for definite project under 1938 Flood Control Act. 7. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. 8. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administra tion Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. 9. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. 10. Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 11. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19543 Jul. 3, 19584 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended, Section 107 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL (See Section 2 of Text) Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 4 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. LOCK AND DAM NO.26 (REPLACEMENT) Construct new Dam and a 1,200 Foot Lock approximately two miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO (See Section 5 of Text) Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 6 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Congress. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc. 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 14-10 TABLE 14-B (Continued) Acts Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 23, 1962 Adopted by Senate and House Committee resolutions, Oct. 12, 19725 Oct. 23, 1962 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION - --- ~ Work Authorized HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 7 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MISSOURI As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation and environmental improvements. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 9 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angleruse sites. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA, IL, AND MEREDOSIA, WILLOW CREEK AND COON RUN DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL (See Section 11 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AGRICULTURAL AREA 8, MO (See Section 12 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and alter pumping plant to reduce flooding. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 13 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. PERRY COUNTY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, & 3, MO (See Section 14 of Text) Construct pumping plants and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL (See Section 15 of Text) Construct dam at Benton, Ill., and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. 14-11 Documents H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 360, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL, WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 14-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents STE. GENEVIEVE, MO Nov. 17, 1986 As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers Public Law 99-662, 99th and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Devel- Cong., 2d Sess. opment Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 16 of Text) Jun. 28, 1938 Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO (See Section 20 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Modified act of 28 Jun. 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d and reauthorizing it as a separate multiple-purpose project. sess. Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, 89th designation. Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Inactive. 4. All work completed. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1987 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO - 1883 $ 12,000 $ - Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL Nov. 1977 19622 - - Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Nov. 1977 19582 - - - Moccasin Springs, MO - 1969 76,4363 - - Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Nov. 1977 19542 - - - Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Nov. 1977 19502 - - - Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL - 1961 2,653,194 1961 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 2. Year authorized. 23, 1900. 3. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. TABLE 14-D LAKES, LEVEES, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Estimated See Required Total Estimated Section Estimated Non-Federal Cost (Date to in Text Project Name Federal Cost Cost Revision) 11. Meramec River Basin, MO Lakes: Union2 101,305,000 11,695,000 113,000,000 (1982) Pine Ford' 115,926,800 31,073,200 147,000,000 (1984) Irondale3 8,744,370 66,700,000 1982 I-382 27,294,000 2,306,000 29,600,000 1982 1. Separate reports are included herein. 2. See 1979 Annual Report for details. 14-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1987 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL' Cache River Diversion, IL Cape Girardeau, MO, reaches Nos. 1, 3, and 4 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 Carlyle Lake, IL Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL2 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, IL Eldred, IL Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944) 4 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)4 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District IL Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL' Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL' Lake Shelbyville, IL Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10, and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Miller Pond Drainage District, IL Oct. 1986 Oct. 1986 Oct. 1978 Nov. 1979 Oct. 1986 Nov. 1981 Oct. 1986 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1979 Oct. 1978 1967 $ 1953 1959 1965 1981 1955 1964 1981 1959 1976 1963 19623 1950 1953 1952 1946 1970 1971 1959 1981 1959 1981 1979 1979 1978 1944 1955 2,837,114 22,000 5,157,805 46,013,699 185,700 4,984,500 2,818,000 5,889,500 1,720,000 1,920,600 1953 39,692,401 1964 Oct. 1976 1955 1963 55,415 1,033,279 50,000 25,000 1,154,800 4,677,900 5,829,000 297,460 47,927,562 Aug. 1981 1959 1976 1963 Oct. 1949 1951 Jan. 1952 Aug. 1945 1958 1959 Mar. 1981 - 1949 36,936,298 Sep. 1978 496,000 249,738 164,183 1944 1955 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1987 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO - 1980 79,265,166 - Jan. 1980 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Nov. 1979 1967- Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO - 1967- Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures - - 85,422 - Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1957 939,569 - 1957 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL5 - 1970 6,005,127 - 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL - 1959 3,882,600 - 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1959 1,866,910 - 1959 Richland Creek, IL - 1969 401,000 -- Riverland Levee District, MO Aug. 1977 19363 -- Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL Oct. 1986 - - Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 19363 - St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 19363 - - - Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, IL - 1957 2,123,700 - Aug. 1956 Union Lake, MO6 - 1979 4,918,203 -- Urban areas at Alton, IL - 1960 192,000 -- Village of New Athens, IL - 1981 1,983,000 - Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 - 1967 91,952 - 1967 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO Nov. 1977 19363 - 1. Projects authorized or modified by Flood Control Act of Oct. 23, 1962 (see H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for details). 2. Completed except for seepage control measures, which are inactive. 3. Year authorized. 4. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. 5. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. 6. Includes $183,638 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. Includes Highway 185 funds. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). 14-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 87 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL -12217 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO & IL -55040 Creve Coueur Crk, MO -12440 Meramac R. Basin Missouri Study, Mo. -14056 Sub-total Review of Authorized Projects (160) Vandlia D&LD No. 2 -77000 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 Review of FERC Licenses -53857 Sub-total Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Agric. - Soil Cons. Service -51840 Plan Assist to State of Ill. -14817 Plan Assist to State of Mo. -14829 Sub-total TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) -82030, and 82040 Hydrology Studies (260) -53820 TOTAL (Category 200) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) Energy Management (372) -31372 TOTAL (Category 300) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) St. Louis Harbor, Mo. & II. -10184 Maline Creek, Mo. -12297 TOTAL (Category 400) ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Cape Girardeau - Jackson -12356 Maline Creek, MO -12297 Meredosia IL, and Meredosia, Willow Creek & Coon Run D&LD, IL -00069 Meremac River Basin, MO -75412 Nutwood D&LD, IL -00623 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 39,905 638,933 179,212 64,141 922,191 500 28,433 3,059 31,492 2,763 3,630 12,542 18,935 156,568 14,131 17,825 53,952 29,545 294,121 368,089 45,225 12,003 1,627 $ 973,118 $ 170,699 $ 17,825 $ 83,497 $ 721,065 $1,966,204 14-16 GALVESTON, TX DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) .............. .............. Brazos Island Harbor, TX .................. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX ............... Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ........... Double Bayou, TX .................... Freeport Harbor, TX ...................... Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX .......... Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border ........... Houston Ship Channel, TX ................. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX .............. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX ............... Texas City Channel, TX .................... Trinity River and Tributaries, TX ............ Anahuac Channel, TX ..................... Channel to Liberty, TX .................... Wallisville Lake, TX ...................... Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... Navigation Work Under Special Authorization . Beach Erosion Control Corpus Christi Beach, TX ................. 11 Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization............................11 Flood Control 18. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ........... 13 19. Clear Creek, TX ......................... 13 20. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX .............. 14 21. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection .................. ............. 14 22. Sims Bayou, TX ............. ............ 14 23. Taylors Bayou, TX ....................... 15 24. Texas City and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection .............. ............ 15 25. Upper White Oak Bayou, TX .............. 15 26. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX .......... 15 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control W orks..................................16 28. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization............................16 29. Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ........... 16 General Investigations 30. 31. 32. Surveys ............................. 17 Planning and Engineering ................. 17 Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 17 Tables 15-A Cost and Financial Statement .............. 19 15-B Authorizing Legislation ................... 25 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......... 37 15-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... 37 15-E Total Cost of Existing Projects .............. 39 15-F Channel Dimensions......................41 15-G Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels ............. .............. 45 15-H Dredging Operations ..................... 47 15-1 Navigation Page 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 13A. 13B. 13C. 14. 15. 16. 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas and the Sabine River Watershed of Louisiana. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildwife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Eradication work of hydrilla, water hyacinth and alligator weed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Eradication work by the State of Texas continued. Coordination of a Cooperative Agreement with the State for operations was initiated. Monitoring of the biological control nursery areas was continued during the year. Preliminary siting of a biological agent nursery for hydrilla control was accomplished. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $31,981,647, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal $10,293,258, including $8,793,258 contributed funds, $322,000 lands, $365,000 relocations, and $813,000 other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. (October 1, 1987 base price). Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Work remaining consists of enlarging 14.8 miles of the existing Brownsville Channel from 36 feet by 200 feet to 42 feet by 300 feet and by enlarging 2.5 miles of the entrance channel from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 400 feet. The turning basin would be enlarged to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet and a north jetty park, jetty walkways and comfort stations would be constructed. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the 42 foot project authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; levees and spillways for disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deepdraft navigation, during construction, and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. Rehabilitation of the north and south jetties cost $2,805,999. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 3. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX Location. Port Bolivar is at end of Bolivar Peninsula 15-2 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT and 4 miles north of city of Galveston. Channel connects the port with channel in Galveston Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324.) Previous Project. For details see page 1856 of Appendix to Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. Existing project dimensions for channel are shown in Table 15-F. (Also see Table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Enlargement of turning basin from 1,000 to 1,600 feet is inactive. A channel 14 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and approximately 950 feet long is maintained across the east end of the turning basin to accommodate the Galveston-Port Bolivar ferry. Project is complete except for inactive portion. Project dimensions have not been maintained in the completed part since lesser dimensions are adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminals are privately owned and consist of 2 slips and 2 piers. The piers, 400 feet wide by 1,200 feet long and 210 feet wide by 1,200 feet long, are badly deteriorated and not in use. The slips are used as anchorage by shallow-draft vessels. A highway ferry landing owned by the State of Texas is located at south end of turning basin. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 4. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast,'180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 15-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, end for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $69,024,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects; and non-Federal $19,371,068 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $8,038,840 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1987 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Work remaining consists of deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Sec. 101 of 1968 River and Harbor Act and Sec. 124 of Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for berm stabilization of Rincon Levees was completed at a fiscal year cost of $118,045. Construction of retaining works at Suntide was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $730,330. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 5. DOUBLE BAYOU, TX Location. Enters upper Galveston Bay on the east side about 30 miles north of Galveston and about 8.25 miles south of Anahuac, Texas. Existing project. Project provides for a channel 7 feet by 125 feet from the mouth of Double Bayou to the 7-foot contour in Trinity Bay, a length of 3.9 miles; and a channel, known as West Fork, 7 feet by 100 feet for a length of 2.0 miles. The project was completed in 1971. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.5 feet and extreme range is about 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on winds, and during strong north winds in the winter season, water surface may be depressed 1.5 feet below mean low tide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are privately owned. At the mouth of the bayou is a timber wharf for loading oil barges. Between miles 1 and 1.5 above the mouth are timber wharf, a boat slip, and a marine railway owned by the Brown and Root Corporation. At mile 3 above the mouth is a small depot for handling oystershell. The facility consists of a timber bulkhead and hoppers for loading trucks. One-half mile above the mouth are several fishing vessel docks. Operations during fiscal year. Boutine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 6. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 15-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $57,027,000 Federal (Corps); and $29,336,000 non-Federal, including $19,158,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $6,437,448 lands, $2,830,000 levees and spillways, and $550,000 relocations. (October 1, 1987 base price.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 26 June 1986, requires that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $8,950,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $550,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $370,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, presently estimated at $18,030,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The initial contract for the 45 foot project, awarded in May 1987, was for construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty. Fiscal year cost was $999,650. 15-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 7. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 8. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 15-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was dompleted in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: Mouth of Colorado River, dredging a navigation channel from gulf to the GIWW; construction of an impoundment basin; constructing a turning basin at Matagorda, Texas; construction of a diversion dam and channel; construction of a dam at Tiger Island Cut; construction of an oyster cultch; and recreation facilities. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 Feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $79,264,000, Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non-Federal $16,105,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $3,500,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $4,699,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and $2,944,000 other costs Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (October 1, 1987 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $3,500,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for construction of jetty walkway at the Mouth of the Colorado River initiated at a fiscal year cost of $399,540. Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $671,819, including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $380,465, including engineering and design and supervision and administration. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 9. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jenson Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. 15-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 15-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 10. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 11. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends '1 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine- Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 15-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. Rehabilitation of levees, Sabine Lake South Disposal Area cost $1,388,995. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX. Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels 52 feet, and extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and a additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $122,700,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $73,893,700 non-Federal, including $61,827,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,464,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Snake Island, $545,000 for berthing areas, and $375,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide levees for desposal areas and wetlands; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-dragft navigation to a depth of 45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45-foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 13. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. 15-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1986.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 13A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location. Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) 13B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-of-way and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 15-H for dredging operations.) D13C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 5,600-acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 4 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 58,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $69,300,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1987 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final 15-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered it Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to re-commence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and local sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest contribution is estimated at $9,530,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for the non-overflow dam, Interstate 10 to the Lock site, were approved in May 1986. Further work has been deferred pending receipt of construction funds. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted on the following projects: Project Texas City Channel Date of Survey Mar-Jun 1987 Fiscal Year Cost $37,622 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Intitial reconnaissance studies of the feasibility of navigation channel improvements on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway near Bridge Harbor Marina at Freeprot, Texas and on the Sabine River Channel at Orange, Texas were initiated at fiscal year cost of $3,338 and $1,104, respectively. Reconnaissance studies of the feasibility of navigation improvements on Matagorda and Lavaca Channels, Calhoun County, Texas were completed at a fiscal year cost of $8,945. Studies have been terminated. 15-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Beach Erosion Control 16. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 Contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. (October 1,1987 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Monitoring of accretion and erosion was performed by field survey. 17. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874: Initial appraisal studies of a beach erosion control project at Rockport, Texas, were completed at a fiscal year cost of $7,500. Reconnaissance studies of the feasibility of a beach erosion control project at Shoreacres, Texas, were initiated at a fiscal year cost of $14,137. 15-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Flood Control 18. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Estimated cost of new work is $149,700,000 Federal (Corps) including $11,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds) and $10,800,00 for Dam Safety Assurance, and $98,791,000 non- Federal, consisting of $86,891,000 for lands and relocations, and $11,900,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1, 1987 base price.) Construction of Barker Dam was completed in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was completed in 1969. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work to be accomplished includes raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities at Cullen Park was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required utility relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterments. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery range was performed by the City of Houston in March and April 1987. A construction contract was awarded for Community Park West (Phase 2), but no work was accomplished. Dam Safety Assurance: Raising Main Dam, Barker Dam, awarded in June 1986, continued during fiscal year 1987 at a cost of $782,800. Raising Main Dam, Addicks Dam, awarded in July 1986, continued during fiscal year 1987 at a cost of $722,980. Contract for armor plating the ends of the dams was awarded in May 1987. Fiscal year cost was $715,870. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. 19. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing Project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 18.5, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $44,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $40,470,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,170,000 cash contributions, $16,200,000 for lands, and $19,100,000 for relocations (October 1, 1987 base price). Local Cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 30 June 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material 15-12 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design is underway. 20. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of channel improvements to: (1) provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and (2) provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. Estimated cost for new work is $130,000,000 Federal (Corps) and $72,800,000 non-Federal consisting of $13,800,000 cash contribution, $31,000,000 for lands, and $28,000,000 for relocations (October 1, 1987 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Hidalgo County Drainage District No. 1 and Willacy County Drainage District No. 1. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $13,800,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved by the Board of Rivers and Harbors in April 1983. Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 21. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX, (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffing Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $59,703,000 Federal (Corps) and $26,036,000 non-Federal consisting of $16,016,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,168,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. No work was performed. 22. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and reparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hike and bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other outdoor leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $97,100,000 Federal (Corps) and $33,900,000 non- Federal consisting of $17,200,000 cash contributions, $11,960,000 for lands, and $4,740,000 for relocations (October 1, 1987 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay onehalf of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 12 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 23. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivotot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $40,400,000 Federal (Corps) and $22,000,000 non-Federal, including $13,800,000 cash contribution, $4,360,000 lands, and $3,840,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1987 base price.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. Clean-up dredging of Outfall Canal cost $140,618. Channel rectification, Taylors Bayou to Hillebrandt and Taylors Bayou Diversion Channel (Sta. 135+00 to 152+00) cost $5,188,298. 21. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles of concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and twQ pumping plants. The project was initiated in 1962, and physically completed in 1987. Estimated cost for new work is $37,982,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,627,000 non-Federal, including $13,937,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,363,000 for lands, and $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Plant. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for upgrading a local sponsor's pumping station cost $169,640. 25. UPPER WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the northwest portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for channel improvements in White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from its mouth to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from its mouth to Mile 4.5. In addition, the project includes regulation of the residual 100-year flood plains along these streams and recreational development on project lands along White Oak Bayou, between Mile 14.6 and Mile 18.3. Estimated cost for new work is $70,200,000 Federal (Corps) and $23,900,000 non-Federal consisting of $13,100,000 cash contribution, $6,920,000 for lands, and $3,880,000 for relocations (October 1, 1987 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; make a cash contribution, which when combined with lands required for recreation equals one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and during construction, pay 13 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 31, Planning and Engineering. 26. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Project provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. The project was initiated in 1968. All work on Vince Bayou is complete. Estimated cost for new work is $19,313,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,300,000 non-Federal, consisting of $5,100,000 for lands and $12,200,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1987 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for channel rectification on Little Vince Bayou, Mile 0 to Mile 0.7 was completed at a fiscal year cost of $222,292. Contract for channel rectification on Little Vince Bayou, Mile 2.7 to Mile 3.1 was completed at a fiscal year cost of $875,187. Contract 15-14 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT for channel rectification on Little Vince Bayou, Mile 3.1 to Mile 4.2 was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $604,540. Local sponsor, Harris County, was reimbursed $223,258 for Federal work eliminated by a locally constructed box culvert. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $122,086. ,.. Project Uate Of Inspection Tranquitas Creek, Kingsvile, TX October 1986 Highland Bayou Diversion Channel, TX October 1986 Vince and Little Vince Bayou, TX December 1986 Big Hog Bayou, Wallisville, TX December 1986 Port Arthur Hurricane-Flood Protection, TX January 1987 Little Cypress Bayou, Orange, TX January 1987 Guadalupe River Flood Protection, Victoria, TX February 1987 Brays Bayou Channel Rectification, Houston, TX April 1987 Texas City Hurricane-Flood Protection, TX April 1987 Colorado River, Flood Protection, Matagorda, TX May 1987 Guadalupe River (Log Jams), TX May 1987 Galveston Seawall, Galveston, TX June 1987 Three River, Flood Protection, TX July 1987 Lavaca-Navidad River Flood Protection, Halletsville, TX August 1987 White Oak Bayou, Channel Rectification, Houston, TX August 1987 Freeport Hurricane-Flood Protection, TX September 1987 28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: A Local Cooperation Agreement was prepared for a flood control project at Kirbyville, Texas, at a fiscal year cost of $1,734. Initial reconnaissance studies of the feasibility of flood control projects on Baldridge Creek and Waelder Branch at Waelder, Texas; on Sam Bell Gully at Oakridge North, Texas; on the Lower Guadalupe River, Texas; at East Matagorda Bay, Texas; and on Buckners Creek in Fayette County, Texas were completed at fiscal year cost of $7,426, $3,595, $8,843, $8,939, and $10,000, respectively. All studies have been terminated. An initial reconnaissance study of the feasibility of a flood control project at Pinewood Estates, Texas was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $9,531. Reconnaissance studies of the feasibility of a flood control project at Taylor Lake Village were continued at a fiscal year cost of $32,274. Emergency flood control activiteis - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Costs were $199,184 for disaster preparedness and $16,417 for emergency operations. Rehabilitation work for Brays and White Oak Floodways cost $116,697. 29. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, as amended: An appraisal report on the feasibility of bank stabilization measures on the Brazos River at East Columbia, Texas, was completed at a fiscal year cost of $7,470. The study has been terminated. 15-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,188,878 of which $130,332 was for navigation studies, $968,860 was for flood damage prevention studies, $1,358 was for shoreline protection studies, $6,173 was for coordination with other agencies, $23,739 was for Special Investigations, and $58,416 was for Planning Assistance to States. 31. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Brazos Island Harbor, Texas (42-Foot Project) - The project will provide for enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties; and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,230,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1987. Fiscal year costs were $201,963. Sims Bayou at Houston, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou to provide flood protection, environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development consisting of hike-and-bike trails connecting public parks, as well as picnic and other day-use facilities. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,300,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Fiscal year costs were $508,887. Texas City Channel, Texas (50-foot Project) - The project will provide for enlargement of Texas City Channel to 50 feet deep and 600 feet wide over its 6.7 mile length and enlargement of Galveston Harbor Channel to 50-52 feet deep and 800 feet wide over the 10.5 mile length. The Galveston Entrance Channel would be extended 12.5 miles to the 52-foot bottom in the Gulf of Mexico. A 50-year dredged material disposal plan will be provided by a combination of containment of dredged material on Snake Island, establishment of 600 acres of wetland, enlargment of Texas City Dike, and deposition of dredged material in the Gulf. Ninety acres of water-oriented recreational facilities on the Texas City Dike are included as a part of the proposed project. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,000,000. Planning and engineering studies were intitiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Fiscal year costs were $789,006. Upper White Oak Bayou and Tributaries, vicinity of Houston, Texas - The project will provide for channel improvements on White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.5, for a total of 18.6 miles. Project also provides for flood plain zoning and regulation on the residual 100-year flood plains on White Oak Bayou from Mile 19.9 to near Mile 25.5; on Cole Creek form Mile 4.9 to near Mile 6.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 4.5 to near Mile 6.5; and includes recreational development along White Oak Bayou from near Mile 14.6 to near Mile 18.3. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,700,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in 1982. Fiscal year costs were $441,756. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management and technical services were performed at a cost of $24,977 and $96,753, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $7,774. 15-16 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 198727 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Double Bayou, TX 6. Freeport Harbor, TX 7. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) New Work: Approp. 180,000 Cost 130,816 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. 448,100 Cost 2,091,003 Major Rehab: Approp. - Cost - New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. (-)3,700 Cost 535 New Work: Approp. 3,100,000 Cost 4,943,296 Maint: Approp. 5,514,200 Cost 6,826,376 Major Rehab: Approp. - Cost - New Work: Contrib. 1,300,000 Cost 1,397,580 New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. - Cost 414 New Work: Approp. (-)25,000 Cost 29,224 Maint: Approp. 1,891,650 Cost 2,061,605 Minor Rehab: Approp. - Cost - New Work: Approp. - Cost - Maint: Approp. 12,061,900 Cost 12,337,285 Major Rehab: Approp. - Cost - New Work: Approp. 2,300,000 Cost 2,218,220 Maint: Approp. 9,878,800 Cost 13,015,122 Major Rehab: Approp. - 261,000 350,000 410,000 2,358,1001 209,089 423,289 218,283 2,091,0011 - - 263,000 12,120,5022 - - 201,963 12,059,4652 90,000 862,876 4,324,300 40,038,6613 85,612 807,209 4,384.707 40,038,5603 - - - 2,170,080 - - - 2,170,080 - - - 133,9254 - - - 133,9254 40,000 8,879 57,000 1,177,9015 260 48,946 55,992 1,176,8925 2,980,000 5,186,000 5,186,000 63,824,3596 3,024,206 4,433,754 5,820,870 63,407,4746 3,242,650 3,958,900 1,500,800 84,735,5787 3,087,727 4,158,250 1,501,507 84,733,8377 - - - 3,576,684 - - - 3,576,684 250,000 200,000 900,000 4,542,088 395,274 63,401 966,167 4,297,014 - - - 226,558 - - - 226,558 115,000 63,743 5,752,000 6,079,286 - 290,100 - 290,038 55,000 1,400,000 143,688 1,312,905 790,100 1,774,100 801,255 1,752,328 1,412,0788 4,412,0168 4,412,1529 4,315,9639 44,013,31510 43,988,78610 8,935 8,935 - - - 29,096,39211 - - - 29,096,392" 2,149,920 2,151,100 256,800 76,068,72312 2,129,284 2,168,744 252,486 76,055,33012 - - - 7,969,329 - - - 7,969,329 6,920,000 1,445,000 600,000 61,853,303 la 7,515,223 1,407,010 601,461 61,741,977 la 9,888,525 10,452,810 14,157,400 13,885,258 11,807,8! 12,291,3 93 207,212,04814 28 207,095,66614 - 434,638 15-17 - GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT TABLE 15-A See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 198727 8. (Continued) 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) 12. Texas City Channel, TX 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) 16. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 18. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 19. Clear Creek, TX Cost - - - - 434,638 Minor Rehab: Approp. - - - - 835,873 Cost - - - - 835,873 New Work: Approp. - - - - 35,760,3821s Cost - - - - 35,760,38215 Maint: Approp. 6,640,880 3,912,500 3,303,100 4,573,100 102,748,72316 Cost 8,161,017 4,302,086 3,269,155 4,625,738 102,735,83616 New Work: Approp. - - - - 18,058,77717 Cost - - - - 18,058,77717 Maint: Approp. 2,745,800 434,000 3,110,545 1,898,700 38,368,288 Cost 3,055,463 438,273 3,056,503 1,954,301 38,362,335 New Work: Approp. - - - - 56,136,81518 Cost - - - - 56,136,81518 Maint: Approp. 13,419,700 6,028,900 4,859,500 8,801,900 138,702,42019 Cost 14,438,456 6,216,929 4,930,766 8,830,303 138,700,04919 New Work: Approp. - - 287,000 800,000 14,412,47220 Cost - - 266,519 789,006 14,380,99720 Maint: Approp. 583,700 1,353,000 1,955,900 756,300 21,964,56121 Cost 393,238 1,554,590 1,963,470 755,245 21,963,43721 Major Rehab: Approp. - - - - 726,158 Cost - - - - 726,158 New Work: Approp. 640,000 70,000 196,000 96,000 29,201,67622 Cost 564,548 312,119 182,708 49,190 29,090,47022 Maint: Approp. 399,500 444,000 1,930,800 856,800 10,633,40323 Cost 430,108 358,725 2,001,202 811,757 10,568,43323 New Work: Approp. 595,000 0 (-)120,000 - 2,030,641 Cost 53,377 123,491 264,506 9,337 2,005,746 New Work: Approp. 50,000 475,000 (-)60,000 - 2,038,345 Cost 53,377 111,499 280,045 9,444 2,009,401 New Work: Approp. - - - - 57,206,32424 Cost - - - - 57,206,32424 Recreation: Approp. - - - - 377,804 Cost 2,953 167,072 98,400 86,703 370,536 Maint: Approp. 1,924,600 1,038,000 1,452,700 1,166,600 18,405,413 Cost 1,966,162 1,358,579 1,442,566 1,196,542 18,369,462 Major Rehab: Approp. - - - - 12,475,000 Cost 127 - - - 12,475,000 Dam Safety: Approp. - - 1,471,000 5,210,000 6,681,000 Cost - - 623,544 2,902,172 3,525,716 New Work: Approp. 152,000 21,157 350,000 579,000 3,780,361 Cost 226,687 58,330 331,139 572,718 3,731,519 15-18 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 198727 19. (Contributed Funds) New Work: (Continued) Approp. - - - 300,000 300,000 Cost - - - 200,000 200,000 21. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX New Work: Hurricane-Flood Protection Approp. (-)276,000 - - - 59,702,509 (Regular Funds) Cost 151,068 10,902 (-)2,599 26 59,682,066 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 16,291,97525 Cost 64,957 2,293 1,517 - 16,237,64425 22. Sims Bayou, TX New Work: Approp. - - 383,000 552,000 935,000 Cost - - 300,776 508,887 809,663 23. Taylors Bayou, TX New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 2,650,000 3,550,000 3,594,000 4,700,000 19,237,198 � Cost 1,943,612 3,933,121 3,749,224 4,767,108 19,027,288 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 500,000 1,099,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 5,299,000 Cost 425,850 1,284,523 1,138,507 1,745,394 5,264,640 24. Texas City and Vicinity, TX New Work: Hurricane-Flood Protection Approp. - 122,000 300,000 - 37,982,400 (Regular Funds) Cost 1,558,750 941,301 639,007 138,296 37,948,600 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 900,000 200,000 175,000 15,000 14,225,10026 Cost 669,567 446,234 354,683 137,455 14,219,27426 25. Upper White New Work: Oak Bayou, TX Approp. - - 253,000 539,000 792,000 Cost - - 237,984 441,756 679,740 26. Vince and Little Vince New Work: Bayous, TX Approp. 1,300,000 2,340,000 3,145,000 2,800,000 17,953,100 Cost 2,499,132 1,953,848 3,203,495 2,464,974 17,229,627 ' Excludes $473,800 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $1,806,619 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. 3 In addition, $14,692 expended from contributed funds. 4 Includes $48,711 for previous projects. s Includes $46,101 for previous projects. 6 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. 7 Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $445,269 expended from contributed funds. 8 In addition $102,325 expended from contributed funds. 9 Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $1,143,203 expended from contributed funds. ($384,900 on 45' project.) 10 In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. " Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 12 Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,099,360 expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado River ($2,454,949). 14 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition, $22,672 expended from contributed funds. 's Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. 16 Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $512,969 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. 17 In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. 18 Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. 19 Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $2,868,071 expended from contributed funds. 20 Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 21 Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 22 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. in addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 23 Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 24 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 25 Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 26 Excludes $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 27 Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 15-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in ITet Act Project and Work Authorized Documents AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL 1. Oct. .27, 1965 Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Nov. 17, 1986 Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. 2. Jun 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Mar. 2, 1945 Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Jul. 24, 1946 Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. May 17, 1950 Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 27 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX H.Doc. 251,89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 201, PL 99-662 3. Jun. 25, 1910 A channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Galveston H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., Harbor extending to a turning basin 1,000 feet square and 30 feet deep.31 2nd Sess. Mar. 4, 1919 Enlargement, extension and protection of turning basin.31 CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX 4. Mar. 3, 1899 Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Jun. 13, 1902 Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. H. Doc. 1122, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 Specified in Act. Specified in Act. 15-20 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION TABLE 15-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Feb. 27, 1911 Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Mar. 4,19132 Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Sep. 23, 1922 Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Jul. 3, 19303 Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Jul. 3, 1930 Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredged by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Aug. 30, 1935 Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Jun. 20, 1938 Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tile Lake. Mar. 2, 1945 Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tle Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Jun. 30, 1948 Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. Sep. 3, 1954 An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in TuIbrtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Sep. 3, 1954s Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. Sep. 3, 1954 An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Does. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 13 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 63 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Congr., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Congr., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Congr., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Congr., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Congr., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Congr., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Congr., 1st Sess. 15-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gult to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Chanal to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Jul. 3, 1958 Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Jul. 3, 1958 Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Oct. 22, 1976 Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility DOUBLE BAYOU, TX H. Doc. 361, 85th Congr., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Congr., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Congr., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Sec. 124, PL 94-587 5. Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Oct. 25, 1965) 6. Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 A channel 6-feet deep and 100-feet wide through the bar at mouth of Double Bayou. 7-foot by 125-foot channel from the 7-foot depth in Trinity Bay to the intersection of Double Bayou Channel with the channel to Liberty; and thence a 7- by 100-foot channel upstream for 2.0 miles. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confied to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-halftime for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Jul. 3, 1930 Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. H. Doc. 387, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-22 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION TABLE 15-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Jul. 3, 1958 Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Oct. 5, 1961 Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Dec. 31, 1970 Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Nov. 17, 1986 Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. 7. Aug. 5, 1886 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. Jun. 13, 1902 A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.8 Mar. 3, 1905 Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Mar. 2, 1907 Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St. and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Sep. 22, 1922 Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Jan. 21, 1927 Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.10 Aug. 30, 1935"11 Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Aug. 30, 1935 Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Apr. 4, 1938 Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Sec. 101, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. 15-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 Deepen Glaveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. May 17, 1950 Construct extension of Galveston Seawall from 61st Street, southwesterly 16,300 feet along gulf shore. Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen Galveston Harbor to 42 feet from gulf to point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty and 40 feet thence to Bolivar Roads. Jun. 23, 1971 Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res.) GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER 12 8. Mar. 2, 1907 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Mar. 3, 1925 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Jan. 21, 1927 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Aug. 26, 1937 Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Jun. 20, 193813 Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19459 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 194514 Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity ofMexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Jul. 24, 1946 Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Jul. 24, 1946 Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 173, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong., 1st Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 15-24 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION TABLE 15-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text .Act Project and Work Authorized Documents to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. May 17, 1950 Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. May 17, 1950 "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Jul. 12, 1952 Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Sep. 3, 195415 Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Sep. 3, 1954 Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Sep. 9, 1959 Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Jul. 14, 1960 Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Jul. 14, 1960 Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing (As amended the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Jul. 14, 1960 Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at (As amended Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 Dec. 31, 1970( feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Oct. 23, 196216 Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Oct. 23, 1962 Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Oct. 27, 196517 Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Continued from previous page May 17, 1950 15-25 H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 1968 Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel Nov. 17, 1986 Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX 9. Mar. 5, 1905 Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.' 8 Mar. 2, 1919 A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. Mar. 3, 1925 A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou.19 Jul. 3, 1930 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Mar. 2, 1945 Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Mar. 2, 1945 Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Jun. 30, 1948 Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Jul. 3, 195820 Jul. 14, 1960 Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Tbrkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Oct. 27, 1965 Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou. 2 1 Nov. 17, 1986 Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX 10. Jun. 25, 1910 Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Aug. 30, 1935 Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Aug. 26, 1937 Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 107, PL 86-645 R. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 15-26 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION TABLE 15-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. Mar. 2, 1945 A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. Jul. 3, 1958 An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 11. Jul 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Thke over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Thylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Jan. 21, 1927 Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine- Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Aug. 30, 1935"11 A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Thylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Thylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Oct. 17, 1940 Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Mar. 2, 1945 Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Mar. 2, 1945 Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 15-27 Mar. 2, 1945 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Jul. 24, 194623 Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Jul. 24, 194624 Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Jul. 24, 1946 Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. May 17, 1950 Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Sep. 3, 195425 Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine- Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Oct. 23, 196226 Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX 12. Mar. 4, 1913 A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. Jul. 3, 1930 A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Aug. 30, 193511 Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. S. Doc. 158, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. ')2, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 15-28 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION TABLE 15-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Jun. 30, 1948 Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Jul. 14, 1960 Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Oct. 12, 1972 Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation (Senate Res.) of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in Oct.12, 1972 the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin (House Res.) at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. Nov. 17, 1986 Depening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of wateroriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) Sec. 201, PL 99-662 13. Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Mar. 2, 1945 Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Jul. 24, 1946 Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Oct. 23, 1962 Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Oct. 27, 1965 Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Jul. 30, 1983 16. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st. Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) 15-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX 18. Jun. 20, 1938 Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Sep. 3, 1954 Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Oct. 27, 1965 Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. CLEAR CREEK, TX 19. Aug. 13, 1968 Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.30 Nov. 17, 1986 Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX 20. Nov. 17, 1986 Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Vila, and Lyford. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) 21. Oct. 23, 1962 Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. 28 SIMS BAYOU, TX 22. Nov. 17, 1986 Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX 23. Oct. 27, 1965 Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge. 29 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) 24. Jul. 3, 1958 Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. UPPER WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX 25. Nov. 17, 1986 Channel improvements in White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from its mouth to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from it mouth to Mile 4.5; and recreational development on project lands along White Oak Bayou, between Mile 14.6 and Mile 18.3. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 101, PL 99-662 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. l Sec. 401, PL 99-662 26. Oct. 23, 1962 Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles for both streams. H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 1 Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive 3 Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. a Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. SWest leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. SDredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. 8 Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 15-30 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. o1D0e epening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251 11 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13 Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 15 Inactive. 16 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 or PL 93-251. 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 18 Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 19 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec 12 of PL 93-251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL93-251. 27 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 28 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 30 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 31 Turning basin was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 15-31 L I TABLE 15-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)6 1967 38,2521 - Bastrop Bayou, TX2 1931 9,920 27,129 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington3 1924 216,9894 223,010 Cedar Bayou, TX7 1984 681,2635 2,089,3166 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX8 1922 2,476 847 Johnson Bayou, LA9 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX'� 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 - - 1 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. 7 Mile 3 to Mile 11 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 2 Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth was 8 In inactive category for maintenance. deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Channel adequate for existing commerce. 3 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 10 Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX., 4 Includes $123,676 for previous projects. constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act 5 Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition, $25,000 (H. Doc. 114, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.) in 1955 under Department expended from contributed funds. of Army permit. 6 Includes $69,784 for previous projects. TABLE 15-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX 1986 201,300 - Baytown, Texas' 1980 245,400 - Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection 2 1984 29,285,0423 - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 - Highland Bayou, Texas2 1984 12,254,390 - Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - General channel project 1952 21,086 - Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas6 1971 98,517 - Mill Creek, Texas' 1952 24,753 - Peyton Creek, Texas4 1975 66,377 - San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - Three Rivers, Texas5 s 5,835,927 - 1 Inactive. 2 Completed. 3 In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. 4 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. s See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16-12. 6 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 15-32 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-E TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 6. Freeport Harbor, TX 7. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 8. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 12. Texas City Channel, Tx 13. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project $ 8,535,050 2,848,560 1,683,258 13,066,868 85,214 85,214 61,710,653 324,287 4,297,782 66,332,722 1,716,695 276,720 68,326,137 4,052,290 116,575, 1,143,203 5,312,068 360,249 5,672,317 11,920,187 8,754,209 3,648,932 24,323,328 60,568,791 466,477 3,557,433 64,592,701 395,000 139,776 65,127,477 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 13,877,878 136,296 1,023,819 15,037,993 27,124,164 66,000 27,190,164 $ 40,038,560 14,692 40,053,252 1,130,791 1,130,791 84,671,385 445,269 85,116,654 85,116,654 43.988,786 229,311 44,218,097 44,218,097 75,443,920 512,163 13,121 2,099,360 78,068,564 205,569,102 22,672 205,591,774 205,591,774 101,522,694 462,578 101,985,272 136,320,372 2,868,071 139,188,443 139,188,443 21,768,354 21,768,354 10,024,771 10,024,771 $ 2,170,080 2,170,080 3,576,684 3,576,684 3,576,684 8,935 8,935 $ 50,743,690 2,848,560 1,697,950 55,290,200 1,216,005 1,216,005 149,958,722 324,287 4,743,051 155,026,060 1,716,695 276,720 157,019,475 48,050,011 116,575 1,372,514 49,539,100 - 360,249 8,935 49,899,349 7,373,356 94,737,463 595,973 9,862,345 - 13,121 - 5,748,292 7,969,329 110,361,221 1,270,511 267,408,404 - 466,477 - 3,580,105 1,270,511 271,454,986 - 395,000 - 139,776 1,270,511 271,989,762 - 130,564,987 - 2,612,932 - 1,845,338 - 135,023,257 - 185,912,703 - 1,363,652 - 4,971,506 - 192,247,861 - 32,000 - 116,760 - 192,396,621 726,158 36,372,390 - 136,296 - 1,023,819 726,158 37,532,505 - 37,148,935 - 66,000 - 37,214,935 15-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1887 TABLE 15-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 6. Freeport Harbor, TX 7. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX Outer Bar and Jetty Channel 44-42 Padre Island to Long Island 42 Long Island to Goose Island 42 Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension 42 Turning Basin Extension 42 Brownsville Turning Basin 36 Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout 36 West Wye, from Brownsville Channel 36 Port Isabel Turning Basin 36 Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin 15 Middle Basin 15 East Basin 15 Connecting Channel 15 Entrance Channel 15 Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Channel 47 Aransas Pass Jetty Channel 45 Inner Basin at Harbor Island 45 Channel to Port Aransas 12 Port Aransas Turning Basin 12 Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas 12 Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 45 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction 45 LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin 45 Corpus Christi Turning Basin 45 Industrial Canal 45 Avery Point Turning Basin 45 Channel to Chemical Turning Basin 45 Chemical Turning Basin 45 Tule Lake Channel 45 Tule Lake Turning Basin 45 Viola Channel 45 Viola Turning Basin 45 Channel to LaQuinta 45 LaQuinta Turning Basin 45 Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction 45 Jewel Fulton Canal 12 Jewel Fulton Turning Basin 12 Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) 45 Mooring Area (b) 45 Outer Bar Channel 47 Jetty Channel 45 Quintana Turning Basin 45 Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin 45 Brazosport Turning Basin 45 Channel to Upper Turning Basin 45 Upper Turning Basin 45 Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant 30 Stauffer Turning Basin 30 Brazos Harbor Channel 36 Brazos Harbor Turning Basin 36 Entrance Channel 52 Outer Bar Channel 52 Inner Bar Channel 50 Anchorage Basin 36 15-34 400 300 300 38-36 36 36 2.1 2.5 9.6 300 500 1,000 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 36 36 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 300 200 200 200 500 1,200 200 200 1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,0503 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 150 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200 5 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,2503 100 200 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 3.2 1.3 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 0.3 1,200 0.2 1,470 .03 1,230 0.2 770 0.1 1.8 1.0 1,550 - 0.1 200 - 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 5,423 1.0 1.1 1,150 0.2 1,690 1,000 1,000 800 1,250 400 667 600 500 675 0.6 0.3 3.1 0.2 1.8 0.2 5.6 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.8 3.0 0.8 1.2 0.1 1.4 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 4.7 1.7 3.2 1.8' 150 150 400 400 7504 400 1,0004 375 1,2004 200 500 200 7504 800 800 800 2,8751' 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 30 42 42 40 36 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS TABLE 15-F Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 7. (Continued) 9. Houston Ship Channel, TX Bolivar Roads Channel 50 800 40 800 - 1.0 Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins 40 Port Arthur East Turning Basin 40 Port Arthur West Turning Basin 40 Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins 40 Taylors Bayou Turning Basin 40 Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River 40 Turning Point at Mile 19.5 40 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Turning Point, Mile 31.1 40 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 40 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 40 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 36 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Beaumont Turning Basin 34 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension 34 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company 30 1,125 400 400 300 300 900-1,0009 8009 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 600 200-250 150-1,000 400 9004 400 1,0004 1,0004 1,0004 350 Irregular 500 350 200 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 16 16 8 10 10 36 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 1,125 400 400 300 300 948-1,0009 965-1,0709 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 100 1,100 125 1,375 1,592 3,100 1,000 1,000 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 350-550 3.9 26.2 12.8 2.4 5.3 0.6 2.9 0.6 0.2 0.9 1.5 0.2 1.9 - 4.1 - 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 532 1,682 1,750 3,000 0.2 4.1 0.1 1.9 0.3 0.3 20.2 14.7 3.4 4.1 5.6 6.2 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 1,610 0.3 200-250 - 0.6 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 400 - 11.2 9004 _- 8 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 Irregular 160-535 300 30 200 700 930 1,530 1,265 18.3 0.2 1,300 0.2 1,500 0.3 - 0.4 - 0.7 15-42 60 60 10. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX 11. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 15-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions See Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom Section (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 11. (Continued) Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo7 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 1 Average. 2 Includes 100-foot channel width. 3 Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. a Diameter. s Includes 350-foot channel width. 6 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 7 Deauthorized. 8 Included in channel length. 9 Includes 300-foot channel width. 15-36 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 15-G FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length Tributary Channel Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel1 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout 2 West Turnout 3 9-Foot Channel 4 Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel S Colorado River Channel 6 Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios 8 Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay 9 Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield to10 Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 125 12 12 999999 15-12 12 12 12 12 12 69999999999 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 125 2.3 - 12 125 0.4 2,200 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 12 12 9999 12 12 12 12 999999 99 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 600(AVG) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 12 200 12 200 14 14 14 14 8 12 12 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 125 16.1 200 0.1 300 0.2 130-400 0.1 100 34.8 500(AVG)0.1 100 0.8 100 2.0 200 - 100 0.5 500 635 1,130 800(AVG) 230 200 2.1 - 342(AVG)0.2 1,225 125-175 6.1 - 300 0.4 2,212 125 0.2 - 300 0.3 1,800 250 100 300 100 0.8 0.4 0.1 7.7 300 300 12 100 0.6 12 100 0.6 14 100 0.3 12 200 12 200 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 1,250 580 860 1,450 12 12511 25.812 - 15-37 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS TABLE 15-G Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Feet Bottom Depth in Feet Bottom (Below Mean Width (Below Mean Width Length Tributary Channel Low Tide) (Feet) Low Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 0.1 500 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 0.7 - Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 0.6 - Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 0.4 - South Leg 12 125 12 125 0.2 - Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 1.4 - Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 0.3 - Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 0.2 1,308 1 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. 5 Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) SAuthorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. 8 Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. to1A0ls o provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 11 South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized. 15-38 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 15-H DREDGING OPERATIONS See Section in Thxt Project Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Brownsville Channel December 29, 1986 to June 8, 1987 1,169,359 $1,130,809 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX (Maintenance) Dredging channel to Port Bolivar August 4, 1987 to September 30, 1987 36,289 $55,500 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (New Work) Dredging Chemical Turning Basin thru Tule Lake Turning Basin April 13, 1987 to September 30, 1987 646,404 $3,551,912 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging La Quinta Junction to Beacon 82 July 10, 1987 to September 30, 1987 1,835,184 $1,088,000 Double Bayou, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Double Bayou Channel June 6, 1987 to March 12, 1987 331,227 $253,418 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Outer Bar and Jetty Channel May 28, 1987 to July 23, 1987 1,241,905 $1,049,913 Dredging Outer Bar Channel (Hopper Dredge WHEELER) September 22, 1987 to September 30, 1987 58,400 $397,662 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Bolivar Roads to Ferry Landing October 1, 1986 to October 17, 1986 675,549 $53,802 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and Mexican Border (Galveston District) (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Victoria and Channel to Seadrift October 1, 1986 to October 23, 1986 269,395 $150,395 Dredging Matagorda Bay to San Antonio Bay October 1, 1986 to January 26, 1987 748,182 $397,612 Dredging Texas City Junction to Galveston Causeway October 1, 1986 to December 25, 1986 97,008 $485,239 Dredging Freeport Harbor to Cedar Lakes and San Bernard River Channel October 1, 1986 to December 6, 1986 1,416,978 $1,073,022 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay October 1, 1986 to January 1, 1987 40,956 $3,828 Dredging Cow Bayou to Bastrop Bayou October 1, 1986 to April 27, 1987 1,370,974 $955,487 Dredging Corpus Christi Bay to Mud Flats October 6, 1986 to December 7, 1986 1,747,443 $878,700 Dredging Main Channel across Aransas Bay January 11, 1987 to January 28, 1987 797,489 $253,879 Dredging Colorado River to Matagorda Bay March 5, 1987 to July 11, 1987 2,171,451 $1,035,672 Emergency Dredging, Main Channel in Matagorda Bay April 20, 1987 to May 18, 1987 183,748 $331,482 Emergency Dredging, Main Channel vicinity of F.M. 457 May 6, 1987 to June 12, 1987 81,482 $172,408 Dredging Main Channel, Port Isabel to Mile 643 and Tributary Channels May 5, 1987 to September 19, 1987 1,784,219 $1,423,890 Dredging High Island to Port Bolivar August 4, 1987 September 30, 1987 227,364 $263,520 Emergency Dredging, Brazos River Crossing September 7, 1987 to September 30, 1987 167,319 $150,000 Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Red Fish Reef to Morgan Point and Five Mile Cut October 1, 1986 to December 26, 1986 3,619,951 $1,863,794 Dredging Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou February 8, 1987 to August 31, 1987 882,107 $1,572,981 15-39 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT DREDGING OPERATIONS TABLE 15-H Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort October 1, 1986 to January 1, 1987 1,534,698 $97,484 Dredging Channel to Port Lavaca and Harbor or Refuge January 3, 1987 to January 30, 1987 929,584 $277,495 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Port Arthur Canal January 12, 1987 to June 23, 1987 2,025,807 $1,300,845 Dredging Port Arthur Turning Basin and Junction Area August 18, 1987 to September 30, 1987 721,086 $1,211,000 Dredging Sabine Pass Outer Bar and Sabine Bank Channel (Hopper Dredge WHEELER) July 11, 1987 to September 21, 1987 3,972,320 $3,902,100 Texas Dity Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Texas City Channel April 3, 1987 to May 6, 1987 948,267 $467,237 Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Maintenance) Dredging and snag and debris removal, Anahuac Channel Channel to Liberty October 1, 1986 to December 22, 1986 225,482 $136,199 Emergency Dredging, Channel to Liberty April 10, 1987 to May 20, 1987 22,736 $67,288 Emergency Dredging, Anahuac Channel August 29, 1987 to September 30, 1987 147,410 $192,800 15-40 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Trinity River Project, TX ............... 16-2 Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX ...................... 3. Bardwell Lake, TX .................... 4. Belton Lake, TX ....................... 5. Benbrook Lake, TX ..................... 6. Boggy Creek, TX ..................... 7. Canyon Lake, TX ..................... 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .......... 9. Elm Fork Floodway, TX ................ 10. Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O'The Pines, TX 11. Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill) ............ 12. Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road) ......... 13. Grapevine Lake, TX .................... 14. Hords Creek Lake, TX ................. 15. Joe Pool Lake, TX ..................... 16. Lavon Lake, TX ...................... 17. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fort Channel Improvement, TX ............. 18. Lewisville Dam, TX .................... 19. Millican Lake, TX .................... 20. Navarro Mills Lake, TX ................ 21. O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX ......... . 22. Proctor Lake, TX ...................... 23. Ray Roberts Lake, TX ................. . 24. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ... 25. San Gabriel River, TX .................. 26. Somerville Lake, TX ................... 27. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ............. 28. Waco Lake, TX ....................... 16-2 16-3 16-3 16-3 16-3 16-4 16-4 16-5 16-5 16-6 16-6 16-6 16-7 16-7 16-7 16-8 16-8 16-8 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-9 16-10 16-10 16-11 16-11 16-11 Flood Control (cont) Page 29. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ....... 16-11 30. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 16-12 31. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .......................... 16-12 32. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ... 16-12 33. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 16-12 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 34. Belton Lake Modification, TX ........... 35. Dam "A" Lake, TX .................... 36. Rockland Lake, TX ................... 37. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX ..... 38. Tobwn Bluff Dam-B .A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 39. Town Bluff Hydropower, TX ............. 40. Whitney Lake, TX .................... 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-13 16-13 16-13 General Investigations 41. Surveys ............................. 16-13 42. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 16-13 Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement .... 16-15 Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 16-19 Table 16-C Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... . 16-22 Table 16-D Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 16-22 Table 16-E Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........... 16-23 16-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tnnessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tnnessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,235,000 including $10/,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning continued. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to RM 45 above Liberty, Txas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Thxas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to RM 45 above Liberty, Txas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $147,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $44,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $191,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d)reimburse the Federal Government for onehalf of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $34,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tnnessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION: Location. Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Txas. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated Federal cost is $68,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $63,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $131,000,000 for the improvement (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all alterations to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the project after completion, and (d)reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $1,878,000 (excluding future recreation) exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Teas, and about 24.0 miles north ofWaco,exas. 16-2 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29,1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. To date, the Authority has paid $78,121 toward principal and $12,513 to operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Aquilla project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $1,234,000. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. lb date the authority has paid $411,999 toward principal and $543,403 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Bardwell project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $9,112,700. 4. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $1,115,617 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,059,012 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2, 1957. Amount of $152,435 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Belton project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $118,135,500. 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is inThrrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $122,580 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $106,219 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20,1977. To date, $18,171 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 are estimated at $51,449,400. 6. BOGGY CREEK, AUSTIN, TX Location. The project is located on Boggy Creek in southeast portion of the city of Austin, Texas. Existing project. The recommended plan consists of concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Bolm Road. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition into the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 1.7 miles. New bridges would be required at four street crossings and two railroad crossings. The plan calls for acquisition of 54 acres of land adjacent to the lower 16-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 end of the channel to mitigate habitat losses and also to provide for environmental quality enhancement. About 2.25 miles of trails along the channel and 0.95 miles in the Environmental Quality/mitigation area will also be provided. Estimated Federal cost is $15,300,000 and $10,600,000 non-Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). The proposed flood control channel will provide capacities for the 100 year flood. Design will provide for containment of flows within the banks of the improved channels. Bottom widths for the concrete channel will vary from 60 feet to 90 feet, and top widths from 80 feet to 120 feet. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the City of Austin is required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas, presently estimated at $4,708,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project presently estimated at $4,096,000; pay onehalf of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $327,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $30,000 annually; pay five percent of cost allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $1,276,000; and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $42,000 annually; pay 33 percent of the first costs allocated to environmental quality enhancement, presently estimated at $74,000; pay 37 percent ofthe separable first cost allocated to fish and wildlife mitigation, presently estimated at $119,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $5,000. The city will alsobe required to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all works after completion, prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project, provide and maintain adequate lateral drains and channels, publicize flood plain information for all streams in the watershed and adopt and enforce regulations to minimize damages to future developments within the 100-year flood plain, and administer and assure access to the recreational facilities and lands to all on an equal basis. Operations during fiscal yean A reevaluation of the Interim Survey Report was submitted May 5, 1982, and approved May 18, 1982. The Phase II General Design Memorandum was submitted in January 1984. Specific authorization for construction of Boggy Creek is found in FY 1985 Supplemental Act. In FY 1987 the Phase Icontract was awarded in May 1987. Engineering and Design continue. 7. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24,1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the Water Storage contract is about $9,000,000. Tb date $1,340,900 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $949,719 has been paid. Operations during fiscal yean Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Canyon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $58,878,300. 8. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper Dam is located in northeast Txas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.2 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Txas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 45 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 55 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 98 percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Cooper lake. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on 16-4 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Lake. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again, however, in May 1971. The Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Pblicy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24,1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the lake and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 0.9 mile of levee, and the acquisition of 25,500 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, - and briefs were subsequently filed. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1,1987 base price) is $130,000,000, non-Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $51,600,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. Except for Cooper Lake, local interest must furnish lands and rights-of-way and alter and relocate highways and related facilities and utilities, except railroads, for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion, and preserve channel capacities by preventing encroachment. Local agencies furnished rights-of-way for the first two phases of work on the levees and channel downstream from Cooper Dam. Rights-of-way acquisition for the second phase was also essentially complete when construction was halted. Assuring agencies are the following counties in Txas: Delta, Hunt, Franklin, Lamar, Morris, Hopkins, Titus, and Red River. Basic assurances have been received. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have not been received from Delta, Lamar, Morris, or Hunt Counties Operations during fiscal yean After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22,1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court in May 1983. Since that time, several briefs have been filed with the New Orleans Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Current action centers on the Appeal and resolution of the litigation. On July 16,1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. Contracts awarded during FY 1987 include the following: Initial Embankment and Diversion Channel, awarded December 1986; Relocation of United Telephone, awarded May 1987; Relocation of Delta County Road, awarded May 1987; Embankment, Spillway and Outlet Works, South Access Extension and Stilling Basin, and Levee Downstream were awarded July 1987; Relocation of Farmers Electric Coop, awarded August 1987; and Relocation of Hopkins County Road, awarded September 1987. Through FY 1987 the following is approximately complete: Levees and Channels, 98 percent; Real Estate, 55 percent; Embankments, Spillway and Outlets, 0 percent. Land Acquisition and Engineering and Design continues. 9. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TX Location. The project is located in Dallas and Denton Counties, Txas. A portion of the improvement will be in and adjacent to the Cities of Dallas, Irving and Farmers Branch, Txas. Existing project. Improvement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth to Lewisville Dam and along Denton Creek, a tributary of the Elm Fork to Grapevine Dam. The plan of improvement provides for enlargement and realignment of about 22 miles of the Elm Fork, enlargement and realignment of about 20 miles of tributary channels, construction of about 39 miles of new levee, rehabilitation of about 2 miles of existing levees, modification of 14 street and highway bridges, 4 railroad bridges and alteration of utilities. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $60,700,000, and non-Federal estimated cost is $88,600,000, a total of $149,300,000 (Oct 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide, without cost to the Federal Government, except for the main channel thereof, all lands, easements, utilities and bridge relocations ,except railroad bridges, necessary for construction and operation of the project. Assurances were signed March 20, 1969 by the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, that they would provide items required of local interests. Operations during fiscal yean Preconstruction planning was suspended in 1973. Further Studies have been delayed until a definite plan has been accepted by local interests. 10. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,100 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed in June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $6,139,000. 11. GRAND PRAIRIE, TX, SANITARY LANDFILL Location. The project is located at a bend of the West Fork of the Trinity River, bxas, approximately 19,500 feet upstream of the confluence of the West Fork and Elm Fork of the Trinity River. This bend in the river is adjacent and north of the city of Grand Prairie sanitary landfill which lies within Dallas County and is located in northeast Grand Prairie. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1985. Construction was started September 1983 and completed in 1985. The total Federal and non-Federal cost of the project is $595,000. Local cooperation. In accordance with Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, the city of Grand Prairie is required to assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. In addition, the city is required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance; bear the cost of all alteration and relocations of utilities, storm drains, roads, highway bridges, and community services; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction work; operate and maintain all works after completion and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project; publicize and notify all interested parties that the project will not provide protection from the occurrence of storms greater than the project design flood; comply with Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, and with the requirements of Section 221, Public Law 91-611, approved December 31, 1970, as amended. 12. GRAND PRAIRIE, TX, STREAMBANK EROSION AT MEYERS ROAD Location. The project is located at a bend of the West Fork of the Trinity River approximately 6.1 miles upstream of the confluence of the West Fork and Elm Fork of the Trinity River. This bend in the river is adjacent to Meyers Road which lies within Dallas County and is located in northeast Grand Prairie. More specifically Meyers Road is north oflInterstate Highway 30 and west of the city's sanitary landfill. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1985. Construction was started in January 1984 and completed in 1985. The total Federal and non-Federal estimated cost of the project is $300,000. Local cooperation. In accordance with Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, the city of Grand Prairie is required to assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. In addition, the city is required to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance; bear the cost of all alteration and relocations of utilities, storm drains, roads, highway bridges, and community services; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction work; operate and maintain all works after completion and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project; publicize and notify all interested parties that the project will not provide protection from the occurrence of storms greater than the project design flood; comply with Public Law 91-646, approved January 2,1971, and with the requirements of Section 221, Public Law 91-611, approved December 31, 1970, as amended. 13. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Txas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Txas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21,1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with City of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17,1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with City of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14,1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved 16-6 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $62,228 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $103,231, Dallas $482,169, and Grapevine $98,237. Operations during fiscal yean A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30,1983 and continues. The proposed plan of improvement provides for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment and completion in FY 1987. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $942,720,300. 14. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Toxas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Reportfor 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost ofproject is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $937,200. 15. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Txas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 24,200 feet, including 50-foot uncontrolled ogee type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acrefeet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $193,000,000 (Oct. 1,1987, base price) including $9,500,000 non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28,1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Tbxas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21,1980. Recreation development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21,1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $47,150,000 for water supply and $8,850,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $56,000,000 exclusive of interest. Operations during fiscal yean The project has been under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1986 is approximately 89 percent complete overall. Contracts awarded during FY 1987 include the following: Recreation Facilities, Part 3, Lynn Creek Park, awarded April 1987; Visitor Overlook and Toilet, awarded September 1987; Recreation Facilities, Part I, awarded September 1987; and Recreation Facilities, Loyd and Britton Park, awarded September 1987. Land Acquisition and Engineering and Design continue. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $1,764,800. 16. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Txas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Txas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date the district has paid $682,768. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the district has paid $584,654. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Benefits accrued to Lavon project: Accumulated flood damages preyented through FY 1987 were $91,035,100. 17. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Txas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. Reservoir modification provides for raising top of existing dam from elevation 502.0 to 514.0 and lengthening existing dam from about 9,499 feet to about 19,493 feet; modification ofexisting concrete spillway structure; enlargement of existing reservoir area, involving acquisition of additional rights-of-way; relocation and alteration of highways, county roads, railroads and utilities; and provision of recreational facilities. East Fork Channel and floodway improvements consist of 25 miles of channel enlargement and straightening of the East Fork between River Mile 0.0 and 31.8; replacement of inadequate leveesluice structures; rehabilitation of existing levees; acquisition and clearing of land areas as required for rights-of-way along improved channel and existing levees; alteration of existing railroad, highway and county road bridges crossing the improved channel as well as relocation of existing utility lines; and strengthening and raising about 202,400 linear feet of levees of seven existing levee districts. Reservoir will provide a total storage capacity of 748,200 acrefeet (275,600 are for flood control, 380,000 for water supply storage, and 92,600 for sedimentation reserve). Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and estimated cost to local interests is $220,000 for lands and damages and relocations, a total of $69,970,000. Construction was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Txas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22,1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $2,804,064 has been paid. North Trxas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,787,324. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal yean A construction contract for Levee Improvement, Increment I, East Fork was awarded May 1, 1981, and continues. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 99 percent complete. 18. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Txas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Tbxas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with City of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16,1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denton must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $3,000,210 and Denton $128,132. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system comprised ofLewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake, and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1986 were $879,242,900. 19. MILLICAN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on the Navasota River at mile 24.1, approximately 7.0 miles north of Navasota, Txas in Grimes and Brazos Counties, Toxas. This project would be the first of a two-stage development consisting of Millican and Navasota Dams, both of which would be units in the overall plan of improvement for the Brazos River Basin. Existing Project. The project provides for construction of a concrete and earthfill dam 25,300 feet long including a 472-foot gate-controlled spillway, rising 83 feet above the streambed. Without Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control pool (elevation 234.0) would provide 1,557,400 acre-feet of storage space and cover a surface area of 66,000 acres. There would be 784,800 acre-feet of flood control; 680,200 acre-feet for water supply (surface area 42,400 acres), and 92,400 acre-feet for sediment reserve. With Navasota Lake in operation, the top of flood control elevation and total storage would remain the same. The flood control pool would be 359,600 acre-feet, water supply storage would be 1,125,800 acre-feet (surface area 55,500 acres) and sediment reserve would be 72,000 acre-feet. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $108,000,000 16-8 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT (Oct. 1,1987 base price)and $273,000,000 non-federal first cost for a total project cost of $381,000,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 applies. By letter dated December 9, 1974, the Brazos River Authority stated that they would be the state agency to cost share for both water supply and recreation. Operations during fiscal yeas Preconstructionplanning continued. 20. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, 'Tbxas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project is $13,154,000, including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3,1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. lb date the Authority has paid $721,755 for water supply and $803,971 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $27,732,000. 21. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Tbxas. Existingproject. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3,1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,324towardoperationandmaintenancefor a50-year period. The Authority mustpay additional considerationof $1ayearforuseful life ofproject,beginningJanuary 1,1965. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: AccumulatedflooddamagespreventedthroughFY 1987 were $2,375,600. 22. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Toxas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authoriation act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1,1960, and was modified and approved May 9,1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $315,943 for water supply and $304,764 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Proctor project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $7,721,400. 23. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Txas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acrefeet. with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $292,000,000 (Oct. 1,1987, base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4,1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. Operations during fiscal yean The project is about 80 percent complete overall. Acquisition of real estate continues FY 1987 funds were used to award the following contracts: FM Road 423, Lewisville, awarded October 1986; Southwestern Bell Telephone FM 423, awarded October 1986; Denton County Electric, awarded October 1986; Central Telephone, awarded March 1987; Alternate Recreation Facilities Part I, Lewisville, awarded August 1987; Clearing Part II, awarded October 1986; Lewisville Clearing, awarded September 1987; Boundary Delination Part IV, awarded August 1987; Plug Oil Wells, awarded June 1987; 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Recreation Facilities Part I, Initial Facility, awarded March 1987; and North Texas State University Mitigation, awarded September 1986. Deliberate Impoundment was June 30, 1987. At the request of the City of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. Engineering and design continue. 24. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Aqueduct located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Existing project. Provides for clearing, widening, deepening, and straightening about 34.9 miles of river and creek channels to carry standard project flood discharges, construction of channel walls, paving, conduit, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $114,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $75,100,000 which includes $3,000,000 cash contributions and $72,100,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $191,100,000. Existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 83 percent complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were acceptedby the District Engineer on April 15,1957. b date $999,525 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio channel. Operations during fiscal yean FY 1987 funds were used to award the following contracts: Phase II Inlet, Unit 7-3-1, awarded September 1986, and Phase II Tunnels- Three Units, awarded September 1987. Engineering and design studies continued. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1987 were $117,514,900. 25. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San GabrielDam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price),and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet lon& including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acrefeet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18,1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24,1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal yean Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on 16-10 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed inpreparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. This reaffirmation is currently scheduled for submission in October 1986 and to be fully coordinated by February 1987. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $19,022,200. 26. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, to date, $989,147 has been paid. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Somerville project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $32,194,000. 27. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $1,254,854. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $601,477. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1987 is $25,306,200. 28. WACO LAKE, TX its confluence with Brazos River, at City of Waco, McLennan County. Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non- Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the City of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $1,619,716. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $767,408 and the City has paid $121,552. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operations and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Waco project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $60,053,900. 29. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17,1968. To date the City has paid $391,138. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $13,697,000. 16-11 Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with section 208.10, of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local floodprotection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 16-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY from regular funds for maintenance were $119,436. 'Total costs to September 30, 1987 were $730,639. 31. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944 expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near City of Austin, 'bxas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near City of San Angelo, lbxas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1987 were $190,093,400 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1987 were $418,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $74,100,800. 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 16-C.) 33. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 16-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $313,057 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 34. BELTON LAKE MODIFICATION, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Belton Lake, 'Tbxas in this chapter. Existing project. The modification of Belton Lake to provide installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1954. The plan of improvement provides for reallocation of the gross storage capacity in Belton Lake to provide a power pool and the installation of hydroelectric power generatingfacilities. Operations during fiscal yean The modification is classified as deferred until the Chief of Engineers determines it is advisable. 35. DAM A LAKE, TX Location. The dam would be located approximately 18 miles west of Jasper and about 4 miles west of Horger, 'Thxas Existing project. The project is designed to be used as a run-of-river plant for the generation of power and to reregulate power surges from the proposed Rockland Lake. The last estimate of project cost was $3,220,000 in 1954. For last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Operations during fiscal yean The project is classified as deferred. 36. ROCKLAND LAKE, TX Location. The dam would be located approximately 3 miles west of Rockland, Tbxas, on the Neches River. Existing project. The project would control floods, generate hydroelectric power, and provide water supply for various uses. The last estimate of project cost was $767,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1985 base price), including $145,900,000 Federal cost and $621,100,000 non-Federal cost. For the last full report see Annual Report of 1952. Operations during fiscal yean The project was reclassified to active status December 2, 1982. 37. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Thxas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22,1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $3,800,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply 16-12 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT storage was approved May 27,1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $114,559. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $116,926. Operations during fiscal yean Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1987 were $127,494,400. 38. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal yean Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 39. TOWN BLUFF HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town BluffDam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Feasibility Report was approved September 9,1983 and a Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 indicated that installing hydropower at this project is now economically feasible. The hydropower facilities will include a 6,000 kilowatt power plant (two units at 3,000 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment to be located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel and will be operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The installation and operation of hydropower facilities will not result in the altering of the existing operation at Town Bluff. The project will produce an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by Non-Federal funds. The estimated Non-Federal cost is $18,100,000. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Fower Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operation during fiscal yean Plans and specifications were completed and construction on the turbine-generator was initiated in FY 1986. Construction on the powerhouse was initiated in FY 1987. Project completion date is scheduled for 1989. 40. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from City of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for Water Supply Storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date the authority has paid $124,835. Operations during fiscal yean Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Whitney project: Accumulated flood damages prevented throuth FY 1987 were $134,777,000. General Investigations 41. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $763,314 for flood damage prevention studies, $93,118 for coordination with other agencies, and $0 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $856,432. 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $323,699. Fiscal year costs were $4,952 for hydrologic studies. 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 This page intentionally left blank. 16-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 16-A See Section in Text Project 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, 'Tnnessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Boggy Creek, TX (Federal Costs) (Contributed Funds) 7. Canyon Lake, TX (Federal Funds) 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX 9. Elm Fork Floodway, TX 10. Ferrells Bridge Dam Lake O' The Pines, TX 11. Grand Prarie, TX Landfill (Contributed Funds) 12. Grand Prairie, TX Myers Road COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost To FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 17 212,999 (-)20,000 (-)81,000 275,000 22,574,865 216,206 53,412 161,064 235,826 22,535,638 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Aprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: AProp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 325,069 249,000 287,859 561,200 972,137 57,000 63,661 1,236,000 1,533,021 (-)5,160 2,457 2,357,000 2,098,363 100,000 79,858 635,000 1,065,277 175,000 319,458 1,458,080 2,502,913 7,683 412,000 400,259 1,124,800 1,116,537 (-)9,000 (-)2,557 1,622,600 1,640,448 58,974 329,000 327,291 790,000 789,322 3,162 1,278,600 1,308,974 1,355,200 1,970,936 5,000 13,559 1,113,000 1,122,862 792,000 1,901,072 1,424,500 1,425,959 11 00 1 86 1 )00 1 50 1 ,,-.. 11 66 1,087,000 1,068,610 3,301,000 3,181,603 1,660,200 1,697,636 11 S-218,800 (-)24,666 218,800 (-)24,666 311,164 211,600 234,587 1,247 858 32,589 - 45,506,300 13,509 45,504,976 506,300 1,632,300 519,866 1,610,384 - 10,934,505 - 10,934,505 954,122 12,319,00918 963,614 11,117,24718 - 16,960,549 - 16,960,5491 ,488,622 16,809,16418 ,481,234 16,623,88418 - 13,130,463 - 13,069,9912 ,100,522 17,328,93618 ,105,422 17,274,80218 ,045,000 2,065,000 ,102,585 2,031,337 16,500 16,500 - 19,088,524 - 19,088,524 ,094,522 12,791,52618 ,095,387 12,520,90818 ,055,000 33,976,000 ,082,525 33,623,768 - 662,400 - 662,400 - 14,175,1974 - 14,175,197s 8 ,860,122 21,674,95318 ,854,337 21,635,11918 - 250,000 - 219,960 - 345,000 - 345,000 - 250,000 - 248,048 16-15 1,112,0 1,140,1 295,0 215,9 TABLE 16-A See Section in bxt Project (Contributed Funds) 13. Grapevine Lake, TX 14. Hords Creek Lake, TX 15. Joe Pool Lake, TX 16. Lavon Lake, TX 17. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 18. Lewisville Dam, TX 19. Millican Lake, TX 20. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 21. O. C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 22. Proctor Lake, TX 23. Ray Roberts Lake, TX FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Ibtal Cost To Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 17 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8,040 4,200,000 5,371,807 1,758,000 1,743,680 1,511 250,000 462,395 1,450,600 1,504,755 40,000 5,500,000 5,165,510 2,024,550 2,730,034 20,000 18,076 1,370,000 1,792,382 17,200,000 14,842,702 (-)14,000 812 1,691,150 2,742,378 220,000 221,839 755,160 1,151,615 2,928,000 3,839,707 70,000 24,566 (-)9,551 2 1,571 1,572 658 650 11,100 5,739 355 354 1,552,800 1,904,600 2,148 1,515,928 1,945,384 2,152 105,939 - 2,912 122,469 4,274,500 2,043,428 36,993 (-)184,000 3,529 2,054,600 1,876,603 23,008 40,000 -== - 21,317,790 ,801 21,304,198' ,122 19,943,890 '1 8 ,836 19,904,49418 - 2,731,089* - 2,731,089 ,300 9,890,969 ,938 9,807,25618 ,000 170,889,000 ,280 165,017,256 ,800 463,800 ,030 459,948 - 12,864,796 - 12,864,796 ,322 20,763,94018 ,944 20,707,51418 - 69,796,862 184 69,796,862 - 25,333,988 - 25,333,988' 3,899,822 29,251,32510o 1 3,929,412 26,770,60410 16 - 3,627,000 - 3,627,000 - - - - 9,846,759 480 - - - 9,846,75911 788,400 1,074,300 843,000 1,095,422 12,052,10015 1,129,622 1,095,363 888,742 1,080,767 12,010,93611 - - - - 16,027,467 - - - - 16,027,467 704,900 1,428,000 601,000 685,900 11,140,83111 1,142,469 1,436,960 603,677 646,518 11,062,22515 821,000 1,522,872 46,000,000 44,353,854 1,083,9 1,107,1 41,500,0 40,690,9 - - - 14,409 00 1,081,000 98 1,085,535 00 44,118,000 56 46,428,681 938,0: 942,5 39,000,0 33,801,1t 36,3( 25,7 - 14,469,585 - 14,469,585 22 11,892,7541$ 57 11,677,765' 00 236,712,700 89 229,537,095 00 36,300 54 25,754 16-16 - - - 1,924 951,000 928,181 1,055,580 980,194 15,550,000 1,951,000 14,593,636 7,404,030 - 108,000 - 105,918 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Txt Project Funding 36. Rockland Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost 37. Sam Rayburn Dam New Work: and Reservoir, TX Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 24. San Antonio Channel New Work: Improvement, TX Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 25. San Gabriel River, New Work: TX Approp. Cost Granger Maint. Approp. Cost Lake Georgetown Maint. Approp. Cost 26. Somerville Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 27. Stillhouse Hollow New Work: Dam, TX Approp . Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 38. 'lbwn Bluff Dam- New Work: B. A. Steinhagen Approp. Lake, TX Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 39. 'bwn Bluff New Work: Hydro ower, TX Contrib. (Contributed Funds) Cost 28. Waco Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 39. Whitney Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 29. Wright Patman Dam New Work: and Lake, TX Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1 Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance deposited to miscellaneous receipts. Total Cost To FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1986 " 143 3,126,800 3,844,076 (-)425,000 989,645 (-)20,000 72,540 709,900 1,357,865 475,000 783,364 110,000 102,184 2,266,800 3,254,200 745,300 1,037,452 1,011,100 1,464,428 1,825,300 2,428,338 2,594,5 2,739,7 808,01 548,81 200,0 338,8 1,211,7 1,222,3 939,0 960,6 17,5 1,816,5 1,838,9 844,0 843,9 762,0 788,2 2,087,11 2,093,71 2,078,000 2,079,9 2,807,910 2,035,3 885,600 1,379,767 of land 1,736,5 1,744,7 - 269,000 - 251,649 00 2,441,600 58 2,455,388 00 2,114,000 01 2,119,855 00 191,000 97 181,784 00 1,208,000 10 1,202,657 00 964,000 70 980,679 45 3,568 00 1,563,600 50 1,586,603 00 841,000 90 900,650 00 859,000 53 848,855 - 1,761,000 - 1,313,111 00 1,838,800 03 1,891,769 00 2,484,600 49 2,471,637 00 1,541,600 16 1,534,545 1 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposted to miscellaneous receipts. 16-17 - 269,000 14,917 266,566 - 60,670,957 - 60,670,95612 2,455,322 34,573,53616 2,451,539 34,197,71416 10,859,000 51,074,048 5,985,903 45,912,914 353,935 1,353,460 - 999,525 23,000 101,796,100 36,593 101,796,100 834,722 6,961,47818 839,763 6,933,95318 1,044,822 6,104,55416 1,004,730 6,052,52416 - 27,790,438 27,790,436 2,190,122 18,105,95818 2,183,967 17,564,26218 - 20,522,08413 S 20,510,642 921,122 11,170,34816 886,513 11,092,57118 - 6,602,737 - 6,602,73714 747,400 12,226,96818 757,622 12,122,58818 4,541,000 6,302,000 4,417,320 5,730,431 - 49,521,12115 - 49,521,121 1,772,722 18,558,78 '* 1,800,333 18,440,6t65 1 - 42,952,938 - 42,952,93816 2,428,122 31,876,00218 2,490,316 31,492,6911 - 35,731,626 - 35,731,626 2,023,322 22,728,01216 I 1,945,964 22,587,3206 TABLE 16-A FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ' Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4 Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. * Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. * Claim Northeast Thxas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. ' Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. * Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. * Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposted to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 1o Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 11 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 12 Excludes $3 million expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 16 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 1* Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. ' Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 16-F. i* Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 16-18 _ I _ _ _ _ LI L _ _ _ _ __ _ _ I__ _ _ __~I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 31, 1960 Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 5. Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 22, 1936 7. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 3, 1955 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 12. Jul. 24, 1946 13. Mar. 2, 1945 2. 3. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification (see Sec. 32 of Text) of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BOGGY CREEK, TX Construction of a concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Bolm Road. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition with the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 1.7 miles. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. DAM "A" LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River about 18 miles west of Jasper, Texas. ELM FORK FLOODWAY, TX Realignment and enlargement of the Elm Fork of the Trinity River and Denton Creek, and a parallel levee system from the existing Dallas levee system upstream to near the Dallas and Denton county lines. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-f'll dam and reservoir area. GRAND PRAIRIE LANDFILL, TX Construction of a cutoff channel to eliminate an oxbow in the West Fork of the Trinity River. GRAND PRAIRIE, MEYERS RD, TX Slope Restoration with riprap side slopes along streambank of West Fork Trinity River, adacent to Meyers Road. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. 16-19 S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Act of 1936 (PL 738) H. Doc. 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Act of 1946 Flood Control Act of 1946 H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 6. 8. 35. 9. 10. 11. TABLE 16-B See Date Section Auth< in Text Act FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION orizing Project and Work Authorized 14. Aug. 18, 1941 15. Oct. 27, 1965 16. Mar. 2, 1945 17. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 18. Mar. 2, 1945 19. Aug. 13, 1968 20. Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 21. Aug. 18, 1941 22. Sep. 3, 1954 23. Oct. 27, 1965 36. Mar. 2, 1945 37. Mar. 2, 1945 24.. Sep. 3, 1954 25. Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 26. Sep. 3, 1954 27. Sep. 3, 1954 HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. MILLICAN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Navasota River about seven miles north of Navasota, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O. C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. ROCKLAND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River approximately three miles west of Rockland, Texas. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Seas. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Seas., and H. Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Seas. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Seas. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Seas. 16-20 - -- -~- ---- - --~-DI---"I-- ~---YI~--"--~ Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 38. Mar. 2, 1945 39. Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 28. Sep. 3, 1954 40. Aug. 18, 1941 29. Jul. 24, 1946 TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. TOWN BLUFF HYDROPOWER, TX Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with Town. Bluff Dam. B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 16-21 TABLE 16-C FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 33 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Big Fossil Creek, TX3 1969 - - Big Sandy Lake, TX2 1986 - - Big Spring, TX2 1979 - - Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX5 - - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX2 1979 - - Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX4 1983 - - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX3 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX3 1971 - - Greenville, TX3 1983 - - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX4 1983 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX5 - - - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX4 - - - Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, TX4 - - - Plainview Local Flood Protection Project, TX4 1979 - - Roanoak Lake, TX2 1979 - - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX3 1969 - - Zacate Creek Channel, TX3 1983 - - Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX3 1986 - - I Deauthorized 1 Nov 81. 2 Inactive. 3 Completed. 4 Recommended for deauthorization, H.R. 3678, August 23, 1983, 98th Congress, 1st Session. 5 Deauthorized Nov 86. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 16-D (See Section 31 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek Dallas Floodway East Fork Fort Worth Floodway Grand Prairie Landfill Grand Prairie Meyers Road Greenville Irving Floodway Munday Pleasanton Poteet San Antonio Floodway Sulphur River Levees Wheeler Creek Zacate Creek Sep. 26, 1986 Jul. 31, 1986 Sep. 4, 1986 Oct. 1, 1987 Jul. 24, 1987 Jul. 24, 1987 Jan. 14, 1987 Jul. 28, 1986 Dec. 5, 1986 Jan. 23, 1987 & Aug. 16, 1987 Jan. 21, 1987 Aug. 18, 1987 Aug. 23, 1985 Apr. 23, 1987 Jan. 22, 1987 16-22 - -- I -- -- - - I-I - -- - -- I -I -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 16-E (See Section 34 of Text) Project Cost Blockhouse Creek, Cedar Park, TX Bunker Hills Creek, Watauga, TX Burton Creek, Bryan, TX California Creek, Hamlin, TX Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX Chambers Creek, Everman, TX Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX Dry Branch, Irving, TX Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX Elm Fork, Gainsville, TX Grassy Branch, Millsap, TX Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX Lower Walnut Creek, Austin, TX Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX South Mesquite, Mesquite, TX Spanish Oak Creek, Cedar Park, rTX Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX Ten Mile Creek, Duncanville, TX Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX Walnut Creek, Sequin, TX Walnut Creek Tribs, Austin, TX Whitney Creek, Whitney, TX Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX $ 1,971 5,465 61,462 886 (-)120,090 13,501 5,295 7,260 66,453 60,186 7,394 34,499 113,541 33,976 16,531 20,929 43,300 7,191 61,656 62,184 7,500 6,326 23,701 13,035 172,048 16-23 -- -- -- -- -- --- -- II- ------ Y-~~--ap-----"--sll-U-------- ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of Canadian River and tributaries and the watershed of Arkansas River and tributaries in colorado including Colorado and New Mexico; the watershed of Rio Grande and tributaries including Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the watershed of Mimbres River and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM. 2. Conchas Lake, NM. ....... 3. E1 Paso, TX. ......... 4. John Martin Reservoir, CO. . 5. Rio Grande Basin, NM . . . . . 5A. Abiquiu Dam, NM . . . . . . . 5B. Cochiti Lake, NM . . . . . . . 5C. Galisteo Dam, NM . . . . . . . 5D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM. . . 5E. Rio Grande Floodway, NM . . . 5F. Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, NM. .... 6. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM. Page 17-1 17-2 17-2 17-3 17-3 17-3 17-4 17-4 17-5 17-5 ... . 17-6 . . . . . . 17-6 7. Trinidad Lake, CO ................ 17-7 8. Two Rivers Dam, NM . . . . . . . . . . . 17-7 9. Inspection of completed flood control projects..............17-8 10. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-8 11. Other authorized flood control projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17-8 12. Flood Control work under special authorizations . . . . . . . . . . . 17-9 General Investigations 13. Surveys..................17-9 14. Collection and study of basic data . . . . . 17-9 Flood Control 1. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. In an area which comprises 'watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. Combined drainage area of tributaries is about 276 square miles. Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of Rio Grande, forms eastern border of watersheds. Crest of mountain range rises more than a mile over river to elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Improvements consist of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to the valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For description of complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North Diversion Channels prevented $6,786,000 in flood damages during FY 1987. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented were $56,487,900. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1987 were: North Diversion Channel near Alameda 7,400 c.f.s.; South Diversion Channel: 500 c.f.s.. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 17-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the north and south diversion channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct this problem was initiated and completed in FY 1987. 2. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. Dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on Canadian River, about one-fourth mile downstream from confluence of Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map.Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. Main section contains conduits in its base for release of water to maintain low flows and for drainage of reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. Earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. Reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 529,000 acrefeet (198-900 for flood control, 259,600 for water conservation and irrigation, and 70,500 dead storage). Dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of reservoir continued. Reservoir was operated for storage of floodwaters and releases for irrigation purposes. $423,200 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1987 while no flood damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1987 were $3,037,800. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1987 were $240,800. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1987 were $9,177,900. Pool elevation at start of FY 1987 was 4,196.34 feet with corresponding storage of 287,458 acre-feet. Total releases for reporting period were 247,820 acre-feet. Releases of 66,745 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 2,097 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. Pool elevation on September 30, 1987 was 4,199.44 feet with corresponding storage of 315,283 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 3,779 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was essentially complete in 1940. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. Irrigation of some lands under project was begun in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. 3. EL PASO, TX Location. At El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on left bank of Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of international boundary between United States and Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Consists of a single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into Rio Grande. Runoff from tributary arroyos on eastern, southern, and western slopes of adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of city and its outlying suburban developments. Project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1987 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); and Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986). During FY 1987 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal; 17-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. The estimated total flood damages prevented since completion of Northgate and Range Dams in 1973 through FY 1987 were $22,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has temporarily ended in the Central Area. The only remaining work is the Pershing Dam, Dam Safety Assurance. The Central and Northwest Areas of the project are for all practical purposes 100 percent complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Southeast Area was completed in September 1987. 4. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. On Arkansas River, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, in Bent County, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. A concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of reservoir at spillway crest is 615,500 acre-feet (270,200 for flood control and 345,300 for conservation and recreation storage). Reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For detail of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of Arkansas River Compact. $15,721,000 in flood damages and $369,900 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1987. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by project through FY 1987 were $91,526,700. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1987 were $585,600. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $23,274,200. Maximum pool elevation of 3,856.80 feet with corresponding storage of 416,861 acre-feet occurred on May 31, 1987. Total releases for FY 1987 were 534,220 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 148,904 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 3,303 acre-feet for FY 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. 5. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized flood control phase of comprehensive plan of development of water resources of Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice to future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by States of Colorado and Texas, that project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized for construction irrigation phase of comprehensive plan as recommended by Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with joint agreement approved by Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of unified plan of improvement. Authority for Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation and Table 17-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects in authorized plan are individual reports on the following pages. 5A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan for Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio 17-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of left abutment. Reservoir provides 565,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,212,000 acre-feet. For detail description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September, 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1986, the pool elevation was 6,245.38 feet. The maximum pool (6,261.06 feet) and storage (402,258 acre-feet) occurred on June 22, 1987. On September 30, 1987, the pool elevation was 6,235.98 feet with a corresponding storage of 263,342 acre-feet. There was 2,370 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1987. There were $38,890,700 in flood damages prevented during FY 1987. Sediment damages prevented were $265,400. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by project since completion were $229,649,400 through FY 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in February 1963. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5B. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. Dam is at river mile 340 on Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project Consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. Project extends generally in an east-west line across Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of Rio Grande and then southward across Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460-foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is at the embankment on south side of Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in left abutment on Rio Grande. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 492,500 acre-feet for flood control, 103,800 acre-feet for sediment and 45,700 acre-feet for recreation within the sediment space, for a total of 596,300 acre-feet. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvement details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1986, the pool elevation was 5,330.67 feet with a corresponding storage of 51,158 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,434.50 feet with a storage of 396,167 acre-feet on June 23, 1987. On September 30, 1987 the pool elevation was 5,398.10 feet with a corresponding storage of 217,130 acre-feet. There was 2,053 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1987. There were $57,107,500 in flood damages prevented during FY 1987. Sediment damages prevented were $229,900. Accumulated total damages prevented are $251,845,300. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. Dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of Rio Grande. Reservoir will extend upstream from dam for about 4 miles to near village of Waldo, NM (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10-foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in right abutment. The flood control storage is 89,000 acre-feet. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see 17e4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1986. No storage occurred during FY 1987. Peak inflow was 983 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 993 c.f.s. There was 25 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1987. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $2,800 totaling $113,600 through FY 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1970. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. In Sandoval County, NM, on Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from confluence of Jemez River and Rio Grande; about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 135 feet above streambed, and offchannel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-f6ot diameter gated outlet in left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. Reservoir has a capacity of 106,100 acre-feet (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 33,100 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1986, the pool elevation was 5,197.92 feet with a corresponding storage of 31,089 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,220.30 feet with a storage of 72,254 acre-feet on June 2, 1987. On September 30 1987 the pool elevation was 5,195.46 feet with a corresponding storage of 27,676 acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1987. Sediment deposition during FY 1987 was 1,146 acre-feet. There were $1,851,000 in flood damages prevented during FY 1987. Sediment benefits during FY 1987 were $128,400. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1987 were $11,826,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 5E. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. Project is one unit of flood control phase of comprehensive plan of improvement for Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espanola, NM, about river mile 394. (See table 17-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. Consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect levees. Construction of project is a joint undertaking by Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channelrectification and drainage-rehabilitation work the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist through reach of river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by meandering river. (See Table 17-D on existing project and Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with construction of Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred category. Neither the city of Espanola or Santa Clara Pueblo have not given indication they plan positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. 17-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and results during fiscal year. There were $1,148,300 in flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1987. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1987 amounted to $43,475,100. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 7,840 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on July 24, 1987. The peak at San Acacia was 5,680 c.f.s. on July 22, 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Albuquerque unit of Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bernalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit was reclassified to the active category in July 1985. The General Design Memorandum for the Truth or Consequences Unit was completed in september 1987. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 5F. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. Vicinity city of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948 and 1950, is modified to provide that the Secretary is authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande in lieu of the authorized floodway. The project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $14,900,000 ($11,900,000 Federal and $4,000,000 Non-Federal) 1 October 1987 price levels. (See Table 17-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Letter of intent has been received from the City of Truth or Consequences (dated April 23, 1986). Operations and results during fiscal year. The General Design Memorandum was completed in September 1987. 6. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. Lake is in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project Project operation began in November 1979. Authorized plan of improvement consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. Project purposes are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 447,100 acre-feet which includes 80,100 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. Surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,685 acres. Contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Summer Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs will be responsibility of Federal Government; however, Carlsbad Irrigation District will be required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. Carlsbad Irrigation District also has agreed to use Sumner Lake for flood control. Because they will realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Pool elevation at start of fiscal year was 4,745.90 feet with storage of 105,371 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 130,259 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1987 was 4,747.50 acre-feet with a storage of 111,557 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,749.75 feet with a storage of 120,647 acre-feet 17-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT on May 8, 1987. There was 1,021 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $114,400. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 30,984 acre-feet Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $108,500 with an accumulative total of $1,117,900 through FY 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the recreation area was awarded in September 1979 and completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. 7. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. On Purgatoire River about 161 miles above its junction with Arkansas River. Project is about 4 miles upstream from city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project Consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long, with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,870 c.f.s. with water surface at top of flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. Reservoir provides for storage of 60,000 acre-feet for flood control, 39,000 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 123,500 acre-feet. Reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and will be operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17- 14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control and irrigation releases during the fiscal year. On October 1, 1986 the pool elevation was 6,163.06 feet with a corresponding storage of 11,876 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,222.54 feet with a corresponding storage of 61,668 acre-feet on June 22, 1987. On September 30, 1987 the pool elevation was 6,208.74 feet with a corresponding storage of 45,467 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1987 was 729 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1987 was $272,600. Accrued sediment benefits are $1,974,700. Irrigation benefits for FY 1987 were $70,000. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1987 were $1,088.000. Irrigation releases for the year were 55,427 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was awarded in September 1982. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 8. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. About 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on Rio Hondo and Rocky Arroyo. Rio Hondo is formed at confluence of Rio Ruidoso and Rio Bonito, near village of Hondo, NM, in foothills region of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with Pecos River near Roswell, NM (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 1,000 c.f.s. Capacity of Two Rivers Reservoir at spillway crest is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 18,000 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1986. The maximum pool elevation of 3,981.48 feet with a corresponding storage of 281 acre-feet occurred on April 22, 1987. There 17-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 were no flood damages prevented during 1987. Sediment damages prevented were $176,600. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1987 were $7,696,500. There were 1,577 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1987. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1987 are $834,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. Project features are in good condition and in operation. 9. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year were $104,600. An appropriation of $56,000 was provided through the Inspection of Completed Works program in FY 1987 to evaluate the performance of the Albuquerque North Diversion Channel project. 10. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, four projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, and Navajo Dams. Platoro Dam on Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. Authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 60,000 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet for flood control. The 54,000 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (see H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1986 storage in Platoro reservoir was 52,137 acre-feet, elevation 10,026.0 feet. Maximum storage of 53,782 acre-feet, elevation 10,027.8 feet occurred on July 4, 1987. On September 30, 1987, storage was 43,961 acre-feet, elevation 10,016.7 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 2,010 c.f.s. on June 10, 1987. $551,800 in flood damages were prevented by the project during FY 1987. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $4,507,500. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers during FY 1987 was $13,582. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County Colorado. Pueblo reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1986 was 251,996 acrefeet, elevation 4,877.74 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 271,010 acre-feet, elevation 4,881.87 feet on February 6, 1987. Storage on September 30, 1987 was 229,777 acre-feet, elevation 4,872.65 feet. There were $90,200 in flood damages prevented in FY 1987. Total cost for FY 1987 activity, by the Corps of Engineers was $13,872. Total flood damages prevented to date are $2,852,100. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1986 was 50,571 acre-feet, elevation 4,260.7 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1987 was 68,111 acrefeet, elevation 4,266.4 feet on December 25, 1986. Storage on September 30, 1987 was 36,803 acre-feet, elevation 4,255.3 feet. Total cost for FY 1987 activity, by the Corps of Engineers was $14,527. Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Storage on October 1, 1986 was 1,508,900 acre-feet, elevation 6,072.35 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1987 was 1,572,400 acre-feet, elevation 6,076.78 feet on 7 November 1986. Storage 17-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT on 30 September 1987 was 1,094,000 acre-feet, elevation 6,038.53 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1987 activity was $11,762. 11. Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year 1987 were $155,356 for advance preparation, $13,244 for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. 12. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs during FY 1987 were: Arkansas River, Freemont County, CO $9,399; Canipa Creek at Acoma, NM $1,162; Fountain Creek, Stratmore Hill, CO $7,847; Gallup Sewage Treatment Plant, NM $5,633; Gila River, Redrock, NM $7,500; Ruidoso River City Road B-015, NM $4,628; Santa Fe River Reserve, NM $38,005; Alameda Street, Santa Fe, NM $7,500; Arroyo Mascaras, Santa Fe, NM $672; Fountain Creek, Colorado Springs, CO $2,035; Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO $10,756; Fourmile Creek, Park Center Water System, Freemont County, CO $10,000; Fourmile Creek, Canyon City, CO $7,500; Rio Costilla, Amalia, NM $2,416 and Stratmoor Utility, Colorado Springs, CO $7,500. General Investigations 13. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $735,664 for flood damage prevention studies, $23,265 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies), and $55,968 for preauthorization studies, Arkansas River and Tributaries above John Martin Dam, Colorado, Phase I. 14. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $190,578 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, hydrometeorological studies, and sedimentation studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $10,945. 17-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 1. Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 2. Conchas Lake, NM 3. El Paso, TX 4. John Martin Reservoir, CO 5. Rio Grande Basin, NM 5A. Abiquiu Dam, NM SB. Cochiti Lake, NM SC. Galisteo Dam, NM Total Cost5 to Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 301,000 17,569,450 277,737 17,546,187 518,356 518,356 854,644 854,644 s 31,900 696,200 366,107 4,100,000 4,267,354 70,000 95,377 -2,912 542 805,000 838,774 941,000 905,216 7,350,000 3,538,000 9,062,333 3,743,565 - 13,821,4991 - 13,821,4991 679,322 13,245,694 725,985 13,206,141 598,000 58,615,294 715,687 58,505,594 10,022 797,800 1,000,000 875,971 1,020,695 128,771 -135,000 1,771 1,270,600 2,231,000 1,292,150 2,368,302 -9,600 53,404 706,900 1,148,752 5,000 13,177 100,000 106,851 955,000 1,085,222 976,245 1,081,879 14,318 1,958,000 3,925,122 2,032,253 3,682,277 154 1,014,000 1,083,745 9,287 124,000 142,277 1,010,000 996,402 1,217,022 1,208,537 15,555,3582 15,555,3582 15,622,722 15,596,558 26,745,028 26,745,028 17,199,928 16,860,193 97,084,559 97,084,559 10,940,722 10,893,153 - 14,275,053 - 14,275,053 88,000 97,215 141,000 135,193 1,629,477 1,620,905 17-10 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 17-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost5 Section to In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 5D. Jemez Canyon New Work Dam, NM Approp. -775 - 1,457,000 610,000 6,293,972 Cost 36 - 1,457,797 601,864 6,284,633 Maint Approp. 193,600 245,000 198,000 233,000 5,556,051 Cost 342,025 269,016 201,545 195,877 5,513,144 5E. Rio Grande New Work Floodway, NM Approp. 155,000 200,000 367,000 254,000 6,152,8683 Cost 164,711 162,971 276,605 366,766 6,147,9563 6. Santa Rosa Dam New Work & Lake, NM Approp. -60,000 - - - 41,041,562 Cost 138,593 49,734 20,833 5,621 41,016,440 Maint Approp. 500,000 622,000 491,000 621,000 3,773,200 Cost 561,101 680,429 489,720 627,678 3,739,504 7. Trinidad Lake, CO New Work Approp. 60,000 - - - 55,774,758 Cost 369,297 384,730 20,746 23,344 55,774,583 Maint. Approp. 290,000 535,000 459,000 441,000 4,304,500 Cost 311,317 598,337 425,597 485,188 4,291,087 8. Two Rivers Dam, NM New Work Approp. -3,625 - - - 4,847,244 Cost 1,014 - - - 4,847,244 Maint. Approp. 156,700 183,000 209,000 242,000 2,409,712 Cost 198,258 188,678 214,225 240,312 2,401,255 1Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement Cochiti to Rio Puerco units and for preconstruction costs and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes planning of Espanola Valley unit. Excludes $1,000,011 $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the appropriated funds transferred to Bureau of Reclamaauthority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of tion under memorandum of agreement between that 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with agency and the Corps. funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. 4Starting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded 2Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. Includes $30,000 for Code 710. 3Includes funds for completed Albuquerque and through GI appropriations. 5lncludes funds (3,192,000) provided by Jobs Act (PL 98-8 March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 17-F of FY 1985 Annual Report. 17-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 17-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Oct. 27, 1965 5. June 30, 1948 May 17,1950 July 14, 1960 5E. June 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 SF. June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 November 17, 1986 EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department ofthe Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (See Table 17D.) TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for flood control of Rio Grande Basin. In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande Basin, at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. Modify previous authorizations to provide that the Secretary is authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek in lieu of the authorized floodwav. H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1 H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' and Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Contains latest published maps. 17-12 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 17-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9 of Text) Drainage Miles Area Total Above Nearest (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espanola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 26,797,096 NM 1,212,000 acrefeet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 Dam NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 to 3941 - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,0002 Floodway enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 3401 Cochiti,NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY,NM TABLE 17-D EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9E of Text) Location Estimated Reach (river miles)1 Cost Truth of Consequences unit (formerly Hot Springs) 123 to 129 $9,200,000 San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit 155 to 226 6,200,000 (1960) Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit (not including Albuquerque unit) 236 to 340 2,658,000 Albuquerque unit 286 to 305 3,130,0004 Espanola Valley unit 366 to 394 456,000 (1970) 1River mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Deferred for restudy. 3In addition, $1,650,000 incurred by the Bureau of Reclamation in this reach. 41n addition, $ 75,000 incurred by local interest in this reach. 51n addition, estimated cost to local interests is $69,000 (1970). 17-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Alamogordo diversion channel, Tularosa (dclosed) Basin, New Mexico Alpine, Texas3 Cibolo Creek, Texas' Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway)1 Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' Highway 12, Colorado Holly, Colorado' Las Animas, Colorado2 Las Cruces New Mexico 2 Pecos, Texas3 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' Pueblo Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)1 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico 3 Smith Creek, Colorado1 Socorro diversion channel, tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico 'Completed. 2Responsibility of local interests. 3lInactive. - -- -- Cost to September 30, 1987 Construction 189,356 130,488 829,500 Operation & Maintenance For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1966 1977 1983 1959 1952 1985 1985 1980 1980 1977 1954 1983 1985 1965 4Deferred. 17-14 881,262 219,789 120,500 2,021,400 4,956,000 4,752,310 480,273 130,678 201,958 1,123,900 219,000 2,259,328 .. LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri within the Arkansas, Little, and White River Basins. The District's responsibilities include those areas embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, AR, and below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. The District has responsibility for planning, design, construction and operation and maintenance of the navigation portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in the State of Arkansas (including that portion below Pine Bluff). The District's responsibilities in the Little River Basin covers those AR, DISTRICT portions of the drainage basin of the Arkansas portion of Little River and its tributaries above its mouth near Fulton, AR. The District's responsibilities in the White River Basin cover those portions in southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas embraced in the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS .... 18-2 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9), AR ................................ 18-2 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification AR .......................... 18-2 4. David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), AR ............................... 18-3 5. James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13), AR .............................. 18-3 6. Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas River, AR ...................... 18-3 7. Lock No. 2 and Wilbur D. Mills, Dam (No. 2), AR ......................... 18-3 8. Lock and Dam No. 3, AR ................. 18-3 9. Lock and Dam No. 4, AR ................. 18-3 10. Lock and Dam No. 5, AR ................. 18-3 11. Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, AR .................... 18-3 12. Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7), AR ........ 18-3 13. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 18-4 14. Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1) and Entrance Channel, AR .................... 18-4 15. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 18-4 16. Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8), AR ................................ 18-4 Flood Control 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR .................. 18-4 18. Clearwater Lake, MO ...................... 18-4 19. DeQueen Lake, AR ....................... 18-4 20. Dierks Lake, AR ......................... 18-5 21. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ............................. 18-5 22. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR ...... 18-5 23. Gillham Lake, AR ......................... 18-5 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................... 18-6 25. Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR ..... 18-6 26. Little Red River & Tributaries, Clinton, AR .............................. 18-6 27. Little River Basin (Little Rock District), A R ...................................... 18-6 Flood Control (cont) 28. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR ............... 18-6 29. Millwood Lake, AR ....................... 18-6 30. Nimrod Lake, AR ......................... 18-7 31. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...................................18-7 32. Otter Creek & Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR ........................ 18-7 33. White River Basin (Little Rock District) AR & M O ................................ 18-7 34. White River, Jacksonport, AR .............. 18-7 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. Beaver Lake, AR ......................... 18-8 36. Bull Shoals Lake, AR ..................... 18-8 37. Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10), AR ..... 18-8 38. Greers Ferry Lake, AR ................... 18-8 39. Norfork Lake, AR ........................ 18-9 40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), AR .............................. 18-9 41. Table Rock Lake, MO ..................... 18-9 General Investigations 42. Surveys ................................... 18-9 43. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 18-9 44. Continuation of Planning and Engineering..18-10 Cost & Financial Statement ....... 18-11 Authorizing Legislation .......... 18-14 Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............. 18-16 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 18-17 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ............ 18-18 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation .............. 18-19 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes .................. 18-22 Little River Basin, AR: Lakes ..... 18-23 White River Basin, AR and MO: Lakes ........................... 18-24 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............ 18-25 Tables Table 18-A Table 18-B Table 18-C Table 18-D Table 18-E Table 18-F Table 18-G Table 18-H Table 18-I Table 18-J Table 18-K Table 18-L 18-1 _ __ C REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO, and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 559 miles above Head of Passes, LA. (See Geological Survey state maps, 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel of 9 feet deep and 445.3 miles long, beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 50.3 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, OK Waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 18-H and 18-I, and Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation Lakes. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Pine Bluff-Jefferson County, Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa- Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. (See Tables 18-H and 18-I for navigation and lakes listings.) For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see the Tulsa District report. Details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Tables 18-H and 18-I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation/ Lakes for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan. The overall project is 99 percent complete. Construction of the Holla Bend Closure (Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam) was completed in September 1987. Remaining work on the Arkansas River project in this District is continuation of rock removal in Pool 7, construction of meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and White Rivers, land acquisition, continue detailed engineering studies to modify Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2), to improve navigation at the Entrance Channel, and raising the existing North Little Rock floodwall and levee. 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (NO. 9), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986. Holla Bend Closure was completed in September 1987. Non-Federal hydropower is being developed at the project under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. 3. BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White Rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the Annual Report FY 81. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock District. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. 18-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in August 1968. 5. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND DAM NO. 13, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Non-Federal hydropower is being developed at the project under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1968. 6. LITTLE ROCK SLACKWATER HARBOR, ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Location. On the right bank of the Arkansas River at navigation mile 111.5, Little Rock, AR, along the Arkansas River. Existing project. The Corps excavated an access channel 130 feet wide and 4,800 feet long with a 500-foot diameter turning basin at the landward end. The sponsor paid for the excavation of 50-foot berthing areas along the channel, provided the land and constructed levees to contain the excavated material. The sponsor will also extend utilities to the site and provide improvements necessary for use of the disposal area by water-oriented industry. Construction cost was $1,803,991: $763,869, Federal; $1,067,122, non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project has been turned over to the Little Rock Port Authority for operation. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1987 and was completed in September 1987. 7. LOCK NO. 2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS DAM (NO. 2), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. The barges that clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood revealed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in high current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream scouring), the structure could fail. This condition exists primarily because the structure was constructed on piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to extend the stilling basin downstream. Studies are continuing on the type of extension. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in April 1967 and dam was placed in operation in March 1968. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at the dam that resulted from the barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. 8. LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 10. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 11. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and it was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. 12. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. 18-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and results during fiscal year. Excavation of the high rock in Pool 7 is 50 percent complete. Non-Federal hydropower is being developed at the project under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Recreation facilities are complete except for cost sharing items under the 710 program. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. 13. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing authorization program: Navigation activities, Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Little Rock, AR FY 87 costs, $790,163 (For details see project writeup); Russellville- Dardanelle Port, AR costs, 0. 14. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Recommended modification. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES), Vicksburg, MS, is conducting a test model of an addition lock and dam in the White River Entrance Channel. This alternative is being tested to relieve restrictions on the navigation system during low flows. WES has determined that the other alternatives tested would not solve the low-flow problem. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in June 1967. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects. 16. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to that city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. Flood Control 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. See Table 18-I, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $5,069,974. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Blue Mountain Lake for prevention of flood damages were $162,000 for a total of $19,047,000 through September 30, 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in May 1940, and was placed in operation in March 1947. 18. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. See Table 18-K. White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $11,395,000. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B, Authorizing Legislation. Project modification. A contract was awarded in July 1987 to construct a seepage berm on the upstream face of the dam, a grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along the dam. An additional 9 acres of land will be required to widen the spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet. The parapet wall and the widened spillway will pass about 90 percent of the probably maximum floor. The estimated project cost is $10,700,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Total estimated monetary benefits attributed to Clearwater Lake for prevention of flood damages through September 30,1987 totaled $74,772,000. Releases made from lake during low-water periods were sufficient to supply municipal water for Poplar Bluff and other usages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreational facilities. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 19. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 18-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of project is $19,623,752. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to DeQueen Lake for prevention of flood damages were $108,000 for a total of $4,672,000 through September 30, 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966 and project placed in useful operation in August, 1977. 20. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24-inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acrefeet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. Federal cost of project is $16,002,781. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 87 are estimated at $109,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $2,823,000. During the year, 238 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tr-Lakes Water District. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Fiscal year costs were $24,808: Black River Clober Bend, AR, $12,500; Black River Highway HH, Wayne County, MO, $163; Bryant River Warren Bridge, Ozark County, MO, $6,002; Swan Creek Bridge Taney County, MO, $6,144. (2) Floor control activities, Section 205, Public Law 80-858. Fiscal year costs were $446,787 (for more information, see Table 18-L). (3) Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control, Section 208, Public Law 73-780. Fiscal year costs were $31,997, White River, St. Paul, AR, project. (4) Emergency flood control activities, Rehabilitation work, under Public Law 84-99, of Crawford County Levee District is physically complete; FY 87 costs are $53,506. 22. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. Existing project. The flood damage reduction channel project consists of widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway and railroad bridges. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated project cost is $22,900,000; $14,000,000 Federal, $8,900,000, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project sponsor, signed the .local cooperation agreement on August 20, 1987. Operations during the fiscal year. Funds have been provided ($360,000) to prepare plans and specifications for the first contract, to initiate design of other contract items, and to initiate construction. The first construction contract ($1,792,000) was awarded September 28, 1987. 23. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham, Sevier County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Gillham Dam, quandrangle, AR, quandrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Page 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $17,826,703. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tr-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 87 are estimated at $188,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $4,933,000. During the year 664 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tr-Lakes Water District. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 18-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Cost for fiscal year was $70,528. Total cost through September 30, 1987, was $1,104,926. 25. LITTLE MASSARD CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southeast Fort Smith, near Highway 22 and East of 1-540, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of a 30-foot width earthen channel between river mile 1.104 and 1.49 and alteration of the 91st Street bridge over Little Massard Creek. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during the fiscal year. An O&M manual was prepared and furnished the city of Fort Smith. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in 1983 and the city of Fort Smith assumed operation and maintenance of the project in July 1984. 26. LITTLE RED RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CLINTON, AR Location. In Clinton, Van Buren County, AR, along the tributaries of the Little Red River. The city lies between the tributaries of Archey Fork and South Fork and is bisected by Town Branch. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of 100-foot bottom-width channel for 1.35 miles on Archey Fork Creek and a 30(0-foot bottom-width channel for 1.99 miles on South Fork, Little Red River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during the fiscal year. An O&M manual was prepared and furnished the city of Clinton. Mitigation measures to compensate for damages to the walleye pike fishery are being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in 1985 and was transferred to the city of Clinton in August 1986 for operation and maintenance. 27. LITTLE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries, Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-J, Little River Basin. Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River, and two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 28. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The detailed project report was approved December 5, 1985. The plan of improvement consists of improving 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifying six bridges. The estimated project cost is $6,833,000: $3,820,000, Federal; $3,013,000, non-Federal. The study, which began under the General Investigations Program, has been shifted to the Continuing Authority Program due to the size of the project. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. Plans and specifications are being prepared. 29. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Red Bluff, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $46,100,082. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 53,944 acre-feet of water was released from the lake for water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Millwood Lake 18-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT for prevention of flood damages for the fiscal year were $246,000, for a total of $6,402,000 to September 30, 1987. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in August 1966. Work required to complete project consists of additional recreational facilities under the cost sharing program. 30. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. See Table 18-I, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,005,627. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 1,978 acres of improved land during fiscal year. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Nimrod Lake for prevention of flood damages were $308,000, for a total of $11,870,000 through September 1987. Ninety-two acre-feet of water were withdrawn by the city of Plainview, AR, from Nimrod Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreation facilities. Construction of project began in January 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 32. OTTER CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, SHANNON HILLS, AR Location. In Shannon Hills, Saline County, about 10 miles southwest of Little Rock, AR. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consisted of construction of a 50-foot channel upstream of Beechwood Street to about 2,000 feet downstream of the corporate limits, and the replacement of the bridge at Shannon Hills Drive in the community of Shannon Hills. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during the fiscal year. An O&M manual was prepared and furnished the city of Shannon Hills. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction began in 1984 and the city of Shannon Hills assumed operation and maintenance of the project in December 1985. 33. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO Location. Improvements are on White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 18-K, White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. Plan now includes seven lakes, of which two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. Bell Foley lake was reclassified to inactive in June 1977; reviewed for the purpose of deauthorization and placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Lakes in plan are listed in Table 18-K, White River Basin. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Estimated monetary flood control benefits attributed to Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Greers Ferry, and Clearwater lakes for FY 87 totaled $9,870,000. A cumulative total of flood damages prevented by the lakes through September 30, 1987, is estimated at $279,020,000. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during the fiscal year totaled 1,385,979,700 kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acrefeet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery, 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery, and 14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, 31,165 acre-feet from Beaver Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, AR, 2,430 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; the Community Water System, Cleburne County, AR, and the city of Clinton, AR, 1,856 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project has been placed in a deferred status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. 34. WHITE RIVER, JACKSONPORT, AR Location. In the west-central part of Jackson County at Jacksonport, about 2 miles northwest of Newport at 18-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 the confluence of the White and Black Rivers. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of raising 5.1 miles of the existing levee and extending it about 1.4 miles to high ground to provide an approximate 100-year level of protection plus 3 feet of free board. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during the fiscal year. An O&M manual was prepared and furnished the city of Jacksonport. Condition at the end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began 1984 and the city of Jacksonport assumed operation and maintenance of the project in April 1986. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. See table 18-K. White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see pages 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 87 are estimated at $1,255,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $20,291,000. During the year, 155,106,700 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 31,165 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. Since the dam was constructed there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone foundation under Dike No. 1 and 200 feet of the north end of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan of improvement is a concrete seepage cutoff in Dike No. 1 and the north end of the main dam. 36. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. See Table 18-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating units is $96,356,000. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 87 are estimated at $5,100,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $84,088,000. During the year, 566,883,000 kilowatthours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. 37. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 30), AR Location. See Table 18-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-foot power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation continued. During FY 87, 831,194,100 kilowatt- hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock was placed in operation in December 1969. Lock was unwatered, inspected, and repaired September 14-23, 1981. Information Center and resident office were completed in FY 85. 38. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. See table 18-K, White River, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 87 are estimated at $256,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $17,032,000. During the year, 105,292,600 kilowatthours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water 18-8 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT supply storage withdrawn during the year was 1,856 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in June 1957, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in January 1962, and power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in March and May 1964, and water supply was placed in operation in April 1971. The visitors center was completed in June 1984 at a cost of $922,340. 39. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. See Table 18-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Total estimated cost is $111,624,000, including $38,700,000 for addition of power units 3 and 4, and $40,000,000 for highway bridge construction. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 18-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 87 are estimated at $245,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $30,094,000. During the year, 126,506,400 kilowatthours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply withdrawn by city at Mountain Home, AR, totaled 2,430 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 40. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), AR Location. See Table 18-H, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed. It has a spillway with 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is provided in Pool No. 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Estimated cost is $86,167,000. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Delivered 341,104,500 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Continued operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: Unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973, and unit 5, May 1974. Work remaining consists principally of modifications to powerplant. 41. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. See Table 18-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000. For further information see page 893of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 18-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 87 are estimated at $3,014,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $52,743,000. During the year 432,191,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $544,612: $17,426, navigation studies; $375,657, flood damage prevention studies; $10,776, comprehensive studies; $1,437, review of completed project; $37,946, special investigations; $3,000, review of FERC licenses; $98,370, coordination studies with other agencies. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for these services for the fiscal year were $211,990. Flood plain management services (FPMS). The authority for the FPMS program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the 18-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year: Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished during FY 87 totaled 19,100. This total included services to Federal and non-Federal agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Costs for providing these services during FY 87 totaled $209,863. Hydrologic studies. During the fiscal year, 109 stations were operated, 72 cooperatively with USGS and 37 by the Corps. The total cost for streamflow and some sediment data from all sources of funding for FY 87 was $513,410, of which $377,400 was transferred to USGS. The District also participated in a cooperative program with National Weather Service for rainfall and/or river reporting stations for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records were also collected at certain hydroclimate rainfall stations under a cooperative program between the two agencies. For these services, $38,000 was transferred to the National Weather Service. 44. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING During this fiscal year, a total of $122,153 was expended: Fourche Bayou - vicinity of Little Rock, AR ($54,713), and North Little Rock (Dark Hollow), AR ($67,440). 18-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT1 ,23, See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 19872 1. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., & Kans. 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR 2, 4-5, Navigation 7-10, 12, Locks & Dams, 14, 16. AR 6. Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR 18. Clearwater Lake, MO New Work Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Maint. Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Rehab. .Approp. Cost. New Work Contrib. Cost Special Funds Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost. Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 2,144,000 -72,000 2,216,000 2,456,752 71,746 2,385,006 40,244,566 8,849,697 31,394,869 42,894,970 8,881,670 34,013,300 3,450,000 3,450,000 2,464,283 7,366 2,456,917 52,292,456 10,730,500 41,561,956 53,144,241 10,637,899 42,506,342 $ 971,000 971,000 1,072,738 1,072,738 51,802,900 11,478,700 40,324,200 56,383,991 12,196,588 44,187,403 $ 3,346,000 $1,464,552,127 - 150,318,533 3,346,000 1,314,233,594 4,400,979 1,463,863,707 - 150,279,504 4,400,979 1,313,589,203 53,820,069 653,804,8483 11,386,703 144,242,993 42,433,366 509,561,855 54,463,823 656,253,7153 11,676,676 144,182,613 42,792,147 512,071,102 - 291,106 - 291,106 - 1,609,842 - 1,609,842 - 19,926,755 - 19,926,755 - 531,336 - 531,336 - 119,300,184 - 119,300,184 - 4,561,666 - 4,561,666 2,220,000 2,331,168 12,302,000 15,282,239 2,600,000 493,000 3,154,000 425,176,473 2,419,272 785,392 3,614,165 425,031,413 11,466,000 12,237,000 18,739,150 205,942,9523 16,019,197 15,261,530 18,913,983 208,482,1603 - - - 973,385 - - - 963,567 - - - 531,336 - - - 531,336 - 110,000 842,000 - 103,970 790,062 952,0004 894,0324 - - - - 5,069,974 - - - - 5,069,974 627,000 656,000 624,000 701,722 10,522,0163 675,029 652,016 636,896 693,553 10,506,7303 - - - - 10,453,403 - - - - 10,440,204 1,469,000 1,342,000 1,419,000 1,540,922 22,088,4443 1,633,639 1,366,720 1,391,455 1,555,704 22,073,84T7 18-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1,23, See Section in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total to FY 87 Sept. 30, 19872 19. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, AR 20. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, AR 22. Fourche Bayou (Little Rock Dist.) 23. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, AR 25. Little Massard Crk, Fort Smith, AR (Contributed Funds) 26. Little Red River & Tributaries, 27. Little River Basin, (Little Rock Dist.) 28. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR 29. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, AR 30. Nimrod Lake, AR 32. Otter Creek & Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approx. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -1,100 37 515,000 585,145 14,770 510,000 595,000 686,000 634,524 -1,600 2,006 495,000 642,099 77,400 95,000 77,725 (1,456,000) 92,952 -2,700 56,371 3,513,000 4,181,253 39,558 1,993,000 2,358,113 147 705,000 747,627 (70,000) 147,126 671,000 809,000 674,275 805,368 195 685,000 721,135 685,000 683,107 624,000 649,813 300,000 297,042 626,000 816,000 574,264 841,872 - 18,096 1,138 339 1,060,000 2,550,000 777,727 2,815,619 7,835 1,127 3,539,500 3,336,000 3,577,991 3,632,464 - 162,000 - 99,493 7,640 1,557,500 1,608,317 1,127 1,323,600 1,335,411 812,000 922,000 820,871 914,350 - (24,796) 10,050 - - 19,629,753 - 19,623,752 691,400 5,799,4303 713,943 5,793,9333 - 16,002,904 - 16,002,781 697,300 6,178,0033 707,478 6,177,7203 360,000 2,031,00@0 343,750 1,958,4233 - 17,827,111 - 17,826,703 766,722 5,387,2073 814,460 5,383,1843 - 110,0964 -8,453 71,5454 -5,775 89,225 11,499 89,225 - 3,911,50@ - 3,686,2985 - 99,959,850 - 99,544,384 3,865,144 38,201,4243 3,945,354 38,117,3913 90,000 252,0004 122,848 222,3414 - 46,087,3823 - 46,091,1483 1,709,722 20,573,165 1,712,473 20,765,5543 - 4,092,826 - 4,005,627 916,722 12,386,165 909,774 12,360,4883 - 239,7045 5,000 162,2044 18-12 _ __ _ LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1,23a, See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 19872 33. White River Basin (Little Rock District) 34. White River, Jacksonport, AR 35. Beaver Lake, AR 36. Bull Shoals Lake, AR 37. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10), AR 38. Greers Ferry Lake, AR 39. Norfork Lake, AR 40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam (No. 12), AR 41. Table Rock Lake, MO New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 20,700 936,207 15,455,000 16,641,871 (616,000) 82,901 -4,300 3,933 2,200,000 2,326,174 - - - 335,031,873 288,799 160,297 9,005 334,758,666 16,366,500 15,961,000 20,126,632 255,393,1113 16,875,975 18,584,487 20,196,826 257,740,5323 - 948,000 - 2,770,5005 864,801 1,579,228 8,627 2,770,5005 - - - 46,183,033 4,039 - - 46,112,072 2,555,500 3,043,600 3,416,922 34,591,3513 2,563,211 3,082,886 3,382,140 34,516,7803 - - - - 88,858,711 - - - - 88,858,707 3,386,000 3,889,500 4,754,600 4,435,922 54,345,2753 3,625,680 4,210,600 4,754,193 4,430,634 58,850,1723 - - - - 84,270,124 - - - - 84,261,240 3,198,000 3,541,000 3,751,000 4,284,300 47,788,1693 3,372,791 3,575,685 3,633,834 4,425,056 47,686,1843 - - - - 48,865,512 77,853 - - - 48,865,512 3,061,000 3,197,500 3,745,600 3,832,922 46,491,0603 3,230,760 3,256,122 3,716,466 3,886,414 46,421,6833 25,000 847,235 - 159,899 - 159,899 - 70,997,929 378 70,716,087 2,264,000 2,238,500 2,423,600 2,537,022 41,875,2133 2,394,031 2,310,590 2,442,185 2,547,120 41,738,0213 - - - - 85,629,412 89 - - - 85,629,412 2,923,000 2,608,000 2,295,000 3,526,400 39,117,8783 3,537,134 2,839,221 2,322,962 3,525,398 39,092,2203 - - - - 67,224,000 19,330 - - - 67,224,000 3,075,000 3,143,500 3,229,600 4,362,922 54,176,2883 3,431,587 3,168,732 3,197,302 4,394,814 54,127,1503 1. For more details on project funds, see text for individual projects. 2. Includes funds (total cumulative amount $3,839,700 (excluding $236,700 expended for Continuing Authority projects)) provided in the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 18-M of FY 85 Annual Report. 3. Beginning data shown in Table 18-A includes special recreation use fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 4. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 5. Includes total project funds. 18-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960 June 10, 1948 June 30, 1948 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of Text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and MO, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all previous authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (See Section 22 of Text.) Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 25 of Text.) Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas River, Little Rock, AR (See Section 6 of Text.) Mill Creek Fort Smith, AR (See Section 28 of Text.) Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR. (See Section 32 of Text.) 18-14 Flood Control Conm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Sec. 401 Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 March 1, 1974 June 30, 1948 October 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 27 of Text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 33 of Text) Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake., AR, and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake. Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (See Section 26 of Text.) White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. White River, Jacksonport, AR. (See Section 34 of Text.) H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess Flood Control Conm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 352, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Conm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Water Resources Development Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105 Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 18-15 Documents __ ~ __ ~ I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Black River, AR, and MO ' 1950 $ 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, AR, and MO ' 1964 17,0002 132,178 Upper White River, AR 3 4 1952 813,197 1,788,374 White River, AR, (above Peach Orchard Bluff)' 5 1950 - 785,666 1. Channel adequate for existing commerce. Completion not contemplated. 2. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 3. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1, 2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Cong. 4. Completed. 5. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR, transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 18-16 LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR' Inactive 1975 $1,407,116 - Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO Completed 1985 44,500 - Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Completed 1958 584,315 - Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 919,955 - Clarksville, AR Completed 1962 271,717 - Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1959 187,440 - Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 1,018,840 - Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 390,952 - Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1954 2,001,820 - Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR Completed 1983 117,899 - East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Completed 1958 304,699 - Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1941 99,511 - Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1951 1,077,546 - From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR (above Plum Bayou) Completed 1954 845,300 - Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR 2 Cancelled 1973 22,890 - Jackson County Levee District 2, White River, AR Completed 1986 131,699 - Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR Completed 1983 63,355 - Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou Completed 1975 1,901,899 - McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1950 422,549 - Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1953 198,069 - Newport, White River, AR Completed 1941 314,276 - North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1958 512,001 - Petit Jean River, AR Completed 1966 84,350 - Pine Mountain Lake, AR Inactive 1985 1,432,331 - Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR Completed 1983 86,943 - Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1950 269,907 - Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR Completed 1983 64,500 - Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR Completed 1941 81,023 - South Bank Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR Completed 1964 1,404,852 - South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Completed 1961 409,115 - Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 - Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 - Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR" Completed 1972 1,567,156 - Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, AR Inactive 1977 510,217 - West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 - White River, at Hwy 14, /4 mile east of Oil Trough, AR Completed 1981 214,308 - White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,1(X) - 1. Reclassified as inactive in Jun '77; reviewed & de- 3. Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. ferred in May '85. 4. See H Doc. 577, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for description of 2. Construction of project cancelled because local in- project. terests failed to provide right-of-way for construction and 5. Reclassified in Jun '77; inability of local interests to maintenance. meet local cooperation requirements. 18-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Federal Contributed Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds Crooked Creek Lake & Levee, AR 1969 1968 FCA 1986 - Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR 1959 1938 FCA 1977 $130,653 - Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO 1959 1983 FCA 1977 $414,011 - 18-18 - I-- ---- TABLE 18-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Char- Year Up- Upper Depth on Miter acter Opened stream Lock Pool Sill of Kind to Total from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- of Type of Navi- Estimated Feature Mouth1 Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Construction gation Cost LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell L&D No. 1 Lock No. 2 Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) L&D No. 3 L&D No. 4 L&D No. 5 David D. Terry L&D (No. 6) Murray L&D (No. 7) Toad Suck Ferry L&D (No. 8) Arthur V. Ormond L&D (No. 9) 10.3 13.3 40.5 50.2 66.0 86.3 108.1 125.4 155.9 8 east of Arkansas Post, AR 6 east of Arkansas Post, AR 3 southeast Arkansas Post, AR 5 north of Grady, AR 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 12 southeast of Little Rock, AR 6 northwest of Little Rock, AR 6 west of Conway, AR 176.9 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 30 max. 20 nom. 28 max. 20 14 17 18 18 16 142 162 182 196 213 231 249 265 110 by 600 19 -287 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 15 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Piles in sand Clay Piles in sand Shale Shale Fixed overflow Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Concrete Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends 1967 1967 1968 1968 1968 1968 1968 1969 1969 1969 $34,265,00( 43,869,000 33,791,000 40,831,000 29,568,000 62,585,000 37,492,000 56,912,000 34,357,000 I TABLE 18-H (Continued) Miles Upstream Feature Dardanelle L&D (No. 10) L&D No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D (No. 12) James W. Trimble L&D (No. 13) from Iouth' 205.5 2 n ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR. OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Elevation Char- Uper Depth on Miter acter Lock Pool Sill of Kind Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Founda- of Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) tion Dam Co orthwest of 110 by 600 54 338 18 14 Movable Sandstone G Dardanelle, AR - Deleted 256.8 1 east of Ozark, AR 292.8 7 east of Fort Smith, AR 110 by 600 34 370 18 15 Sandstone Movable and shale 110 by 600 20 392 18 14 Sandstone Movable and shale Year Opened to Type of Navinstruction gation ated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends TULSA DISTRICT3 James W. Trimble L&D (No. 13) (part) W. D. Mayo L&D (No. 14) Robert S. Kerr L&D (No. 15) Webbers Falls L&D (No. 16) Chouteau L&D (No. 17) Newt Graham L&D (No. 18) 319.6 336.2 366.6 401.4 421.6 4 east of Redland, OK 1 north of Cowlington, OK 1 northwest of Gore, OK 4 northwest of Okay, OK 8 southwest of Inola, OK 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 20 48 30 21 21 412 460 490 511 532 14 18 19 15 15 15 14 16 14 14 Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Movable Movable Movable Movable Movable Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Gated concrete spillway with embankment ends Total Estimated Cost $84,270,124 85,629,412 46,187,000 1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 1970 6,858,000 32,655,000 94,578,237 83,738,277 31,619,000 44,355,000 0y O c12 0 0 z 0 C12 0 1. TABLE 18-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff. 100 per cent complete .............. $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals., 99 per cent complete ....... ................................ 7,500,000 Total. Little Rock District .................. .............. 716,556,720 Navigation aids (US Coast Guard)........................... 2,268,000 Tulsa District:; Bank stabilization and channel rectification. Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete ................................... 12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, com plete .................................................. 2,750,000 Subtotal .................................. .............. $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes. Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete ....... ................................ $ 46,772,329 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, com plete ......... ........................................ 123,171,173 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, com plete ................................................ 123,350,747 Subtotal .............................................. 293,294,249 Total, Tulsa District....................... ............. 602,547,801 Total Project Cost 99.8 percent complete ............... $1,319,104,521 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River except Dam No. 2 is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Includes cost of entrance channel. 3. Details in Tulsa District report. TABLE 18-I ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or Total Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Estimated Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Cost Blue Mountain, AR Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 - 1947 $ 5,069,97 Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 - 1948 11,209,83 Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 (Table Mound) 107 Earthfill 284,300 - 1966 19,052,99 Eufaula, OK 1 2 Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 123,350,79 Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 - 1949 10,550,87 Fort Gibson, OK' Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete-gravity 1,284,400 45,000 1953 42,591,29 Keystone, OK1 2 3 Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 Earthfill 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,171,17 Markham Ferry, OK Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,908,75 Neodesha, KS5 Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 - 0 97.91 Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Concrete-gravity 336,010 - 1942 4,092,82 Oologah, OK2 Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Earthfill 1,519,000 - 1974 46,722.32 Pensacola, OK' 6 Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 Concrete arch 2,197.000 86,400 1940 52,12 Tenkiller Ferry, OK' a Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1,230,800 34,000 1953 24,017,72 Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Earthfill 199,700 - 1960 13,896.32 Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 - 1949 10,501.22 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah, 93 percent complete 148,041,86 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS: Navigation (Table 18-11) 1.319,104,52 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 98 percent complete 1,467,146,38 4 4 0 1 3 8 3 6 0 6 9 6 4 4 6 1 1 2 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Details in Tulsa District report. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O' The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. I) C 'O) 0y LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 27 of Text) Project River Site' Nearest Town DeQueen Lake' Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake' Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake' Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake' Little River 16.0 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. 18-23 TABLE 18-K WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES (See Section 33 of Text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power Total Above Area Height of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estimated Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost1 Beaver2 White 609.0 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 50,797,00 Bell Foley3 Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 - 93,700,00 Bull Shoals2 White 41&6 Mountain Home, AR 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,356,00 Clearwater2 Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 - 11,395,00 Greers Ferry2 Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, AR 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,00 Norfork2 North Fork 4.8 Norfork, AR 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111,624,00 Table Rock 2 White 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,00 Total 15,580,000 828,550 490,230,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. Current FY price levels unless otherwise noted. 2. For details, see individual reports. 3. Inactive-placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1982 price levels. LITTLE ROCK, AR, DISTRICT TABLE 18-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Section 205, PL 858, 80th Cong., as amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 21 of Text) Total Costs Study Identification Initiation Status Completion FY 87 through Date Date Costs Sept. 30, 1987 Blossom Way Creeks, Rogers, AR1 Aug 1983 Recon 1 *Sep 1985 $ 18 $112,500 Carter Creek & Spring River, Carthage, MO' Apr 1986 Appraisal' *Sep 1986 7,500 7,500 Cloverdale Drain, Little Rock, ARI Dec 1983 DPR' *Sep 1986 980 97,500 Crooked & Dry Jordan Creeks, Harrison, AR2 Sep 1984 Recon Jun 1988 46 85,000 Current River & Tributary A, Van Buren, MO Aug 1985 Recon Mar 1988 32,933 45,699 Holly & Dierks Creeks, Dierks, AR Aug 1983 Recon' *Feb 1987 7,977 47,499 Hurricane Creek, Ashdown, AR Sep 1983 Recon Aug 1988 142 24,140 Kelley Creek, Monett, AR3 Sep 1983 Recon 3 *Jul 1987 32,795 106,349 Lost & Little Lost Creeks, Seneca, MO2 Aug 1983 DPR2 *Apr 1985 69 76,335 McKenzie Creek, Piedmont, MO Sep 1983 DPR Jun 1988 47,852 162,873 Mine & Dodson Creeks, Nashville, AR' Jan 1983 Recon' *Jan 1986 214 87,500 Prairie Creek, Russellville, AR Nov 1983 Recon' *May 1987 237 56,201 Spring River, Carthage, MO Apr 1986 Appraisal' *Sep 1986 7,500 7,500 Sulphur Creek, Heber Springs, AR Aug 1983 Recon Oct 1987 38,927 56,497 Taylor Loop Creek, Hwy 10, Little Rock, AR Sep 1986 Appraisal' *Nov 1986 7,500 7,500 Tucker Creek, Conway, AR3 Sep 1984 Appraisal3 *Aug 1985 42,090 50,933 White River, Batesville, AR Aug 1983 DPR Jan 1988 37,511 172,639 White River, St. Paul, AR4 Aug 1985 Appraisal 4 *Sep 1986 7,500 7,500 *Accomplished. 1. No further studies recommended. 2. City unable to provide assurances. 3. Further study recommended. 4. Further study recommended under Sec. 208, 1954 FCA. 18-25 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 160,000 square miles which includes Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas-Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Fulton, AR. The District is also responsible for operation and maintenance of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in Oklahoma. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK ............... 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ... Flood Control 3. Arcadia Lake, OK ................... 4. Arkansas City, KS ................... 5. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX ...... 5a. Area V, Estelline Springs ............. 5b. Area VIII........................... 6. Birch Lake, OK..................... 7. Candy Lake, OK ..................... 8. Canton Lake, OK .................... 9. CopanLake,OK .................... 10. Council Grove Lake, KS ............... 11. El Dorado Lake, KS .................. 12. ElkCityLake,KS .................. 13. Fall River Lake, KS .................. 14. Fort Supply Lake, OK ................ 15. FryCreek, OK ...................... 16. Great Bend, KS..................... 17. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK ............ 18. Halstead, KS .................. 19. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK ... 20. Hugo Lake, OK ...................... 21. Hulah Lake, OK ..................... 22. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS .. 23. Kaw Lake, OK ...................... 24. Lake Kemp, TX ..................... 25. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX ...... 26. Marion, KS ........................ 27. Marion Lake, KS .................... 28. Mingo Creek, OK .................... Page 19-2 19-2 19-2 19-2 19-3 19-3 19-3 19-3 19-3 19-4 19-4 19-4 19-4 19-4 19-4 19-4 19-4 19-5 19-5 19-5 19-5 19-5 19-5 19-6 19-6 19-6 19-6 19-6 19-6 19-6 29. Oologah Lake, OK .................. . 30. Optima Lake, OK ................... 31. Parker Lake, OK .................... 32. Pat Mayse Lake, TX ................. 33. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS ...... 34. Pine Creek Lake, TX ................ 35. Sardis Lake,OK ..................... 36. Skiatook Lake, OK ................... 37. Toronto Lake, KS ................... 38. Upper Little Arkansas River, KS ....... 39. Waurika Lake, OK .................. 40. Wister Lake, OK.................... 41. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . 42. Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects ................... 43. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ....................... Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 44. Broken Bow Lake, OK ............... 45. Eufaula Lake, OK .................. 46. Fort Gibson Lake, OK ................ 47. Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, OK ...... 48. Keystone Lake, OK .................. 49. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK andTX ........................... 50. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK ....................... 51. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK ............. 52. W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, OK ......... 53. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK ....... 19-1 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-7 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-8 19-9 19-9 19-9 19-9 19-9 19-9 19-9 19-9 19-10 19-10 19-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 General Investigations 54. Surveys ............................ 19-10 55. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 19-10 56. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ......................... 19-10 57. Advanced Engineering and Design ....... 19-10 Tables 19-A Cost and Financial Statement............ 19-11 19-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 19-16 19-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..... 19-18 19-D Not Applicable 19-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects... 19-18 19-F Not Applicable 19-G Deauthorized Projects ................ 19-19 19-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple- Purpose Plan ........................ 19-19 19-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects .................... 19-20 19-J Not Applicable 19-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 19-21 19-L General Investigations .... ............ .19-22 Navigation 1. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan- Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma- Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiplepurpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provided for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan-Kerr project consists of bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and a minimum width of 250 feet on the Arkansas River, and a minimum width of 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of the: Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers FallsLock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK. At Sallisaw, OK a port authority has been active in seeking development of public facilities at that location. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See table 19-C. Flood Control. 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Deep Fork River at river mile 213.8, in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 104 feet high and 5,200 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works will consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake will have a total capacity of 92,000 acrefeet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve) and will control a drainage area of 105 square miles. Construction began in October 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938; the Water Supply Act of 1958; the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965; and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscalyear. The project is 94 percent complete as of September 30, 1987. Estimated cost is $89,700,000 (October 1987 price level). Work to complete the relocation of the Turner Turnpike and to complete the embankment, spillway, and recreation facilities, and the clearing of some project land was performed during the fiscal year. 4. ARKANSAS CITY, KS. Location. On the confluence of the Arkansas and Walnut Rivers in southern Kansas, approximately 4 miles north of the Kansas-Oklahoma State line at the crossroads of U.S. Highways 77 and 166 in Cowley County, OK. (See Arkansas City, KS Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and is available for initiation of preconstruction engineering and design. The plan of improvement provides for raising and 19-2 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT extending the existing horseshoe-shaped levee to provide standard project flood protection for the city. The lower Walnut River channel would be modified to a 350-footbottom width with 3-1 side slopes for 1.9 miles. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors are required to contribute a minimum of 25 percent of the total project cost, with a minimum cash payment of 5 percent; all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged materials; and to operate and maintain the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work to plan, design, and construct a standard flood protection project, by raising and extending the existing levee. Estimated project cost of the plan is $15,000,000 (October 1987 price level). 5. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX. Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project. Provided for studies involving control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and Red Rivers represent major national and regional water resources severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. These studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 sites. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. 5a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. The plan of improvement consisted of an earthen dike, 9 feet high and 340 feet in diameter, around Estelline Springs. The springs were a salt water source which decreased the usability of the surface water in the area. Construction was started in 1963 and the structure was completed in 1964. 5b. AREA VIII. Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9 of the South Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of two low-flow collection dams with attendant pumping stations and pipeline facilities. These two structures (the Bateman Low Flow Dam and the Ross Ranch Low Flow Dam) will be equipped with an inflatable fabric-type weir located in the spillway section which would be deflated to pass relatively good quality high flows. The collected brines will be pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, would contain the collected brines from this area as well as future collections from Area X. Preconstruction planning for Area X is essentially complete and construction is awaiting approval from the Secretary of the Army and funding from Congress. Local cooperation. See page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Dam in 1976. The project was completed in FY87. Estimated cost of the Area VIII project and Stage I development of Truscott Brine Dam is $50,833,000 (October 1987 price level). 6. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in November 1973 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 7. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10- by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18- by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18- inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a sevenlake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was 13 percent complete when construction was 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 delayed because the U.S. Justice Department decided to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. Estimated cost of the project was $38,300,000 (October 1984 price level). The project was deferred in January 1984. 8. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394;, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 9. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. SLocal cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Copan Lake became operational in 1983. There are some real estate deficiencies remaining to be settled, some final contract payments, and construction of remaining recreation facilities, for which funds were provided in FY 86. 10. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959 and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 11. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a threelake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973 and impoundment began in June 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 99 percent complete. Work to complete the real estate activities and recreational facilities was performed during the fiscal year. 12. ELK CITY LAKE, KS. Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 13. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the dam began in May 1946 and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 14. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 15. FRY CREEK, OK. Location. On the north side of the city of Bixby in Tulsa County, OK. (See Bixby, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by the Water Resorces Development Act of 1986. The plan of improvement includes enlarging both Fry Creeks in their upper reaches, merging the two creeks, and then diverting the combined creeks to the Arkansas River. A levee will be built to protect the area against flooding from Haikey Creek. About 4.3 miles of modified channels and diversions will be built and 20 acres of land for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses will be acquired. 19-4 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests are required to contribute lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material, plus a cash contribution of five percent of the total cost, and to operate, maintain, and rehabilitate the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work to complete preconstruction engineering and design plans continued. Total estimated project cost is $14,800,000 (October 1987 price level). 16. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversion levees along the Arkansas; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the city of Great Bend, KS, agreed to participate in project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work accomplished includes the completion of a design memorandum and plans and specifications, awarding of a construction contract for initial levee work, completion of a local cost sharing agreement, and continuation of engineering and design on other project features. Estimated cost of the project is $44,500,000 (October 1987 price level). 17. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938 and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 18. HALSTEAD, KS. Location. In the city of Halstead in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with clearing, snagging, straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 60-foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorizing document requires a report on the need for acquisition of additional land and access points to mitigate the adverse affects of the project on fish and wildlife habitat. The report was scheduled for completion in 1987. Other work in fiscal year 1987 included the design of drainage structures, gate closures, a levee, and channel modifications. Physical construction was delayed to allow the local sponsor to obtain the necessary financing for their share of the project. The plans and specifications and the contract award are scheduled to be completed in fiscal year 1988 pending execution of a cost sharing agreement. Estimated project cost is $7,500,000 (October 1987 price level). 19. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction started in March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. 19-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 22. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966 and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 24. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 25. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita and Archer Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The proposed plan includes the replacement of the existing Lake Wichita dam with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long, a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, and low-flow outlet works. The plan also includes channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles. Local cooperation. The city has removed one bridge, initiated construction of a portion of the channelization, initiated acquisition of real estate necessary for construction of the project, and initiated engineering and design for the relocation of utilities, streets, and highway bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and was funded in fiscal year 1987 for initiation of construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Wichita Falls has been signed. Estimated project cost is $41,200,000 (October 1987 price levels). 26. MARION, KS. Location. On Mud Creek at Marion, the county seat of Marion County, KS. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-6 of the Annual Report for 1984. Construction began in June 1975 and was completed in May 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. The city of Marion, KS, is responsible for project operation and maintenance. 27. MARION LAKE, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964 and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites which would capture peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There would be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of Mingo Creek. This plan will provide a minimum of 65- year protection in the major damage area. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all re- 19-6 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT quired payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. On 26 August 1983, the city adopted a Resolution of Assurance to provide a minimum share equal to 35 percent or the traditional lands, easements, and rights-of-way, whichever is greater, and will be required to assist in the actual financing of construction. The city has constructed 3.5 miles of channeland placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate preconstruction engineering and design were appropriated in fiscal year 1985. Funds to initiate construction were appropriated in fiscal year 1987. Estimated project cost is $158,000,000 (October 1987 price level). 29. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950 and was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction was resumed in December 1955 and was completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967 and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 30. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966, impoundment began in October 1978, and construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. PARKER LAKE, OK. Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake is a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project consists of an earthfill dam about 2,100 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 600-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 237,000 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the local sponsor, has agreed to provide 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control upfront and to reimburse the costs allocated to water supply over a 30-year period. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work to complete preconstruction engineering and design plans continued. Total estimated project cost is $47,200,000 (October 1987 price level). 32. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 33. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974 and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 34. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Work to complete sanitary facilities at the park was conducted during the fiscal year. 35. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake will be operated as a unit of a three- 19-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The three-lake system includes Hugo and Tuskahoma Lakes.) Construction began in August 1975 and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $67,144,000 (October 1987 price level). The project is 80 percent complete. Funds were provided in FY 86 to complete the remaining recreation facilities at full Federal expense. Work was initiated to improve an existing road from Daisy, OK, to the lake area. 36. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure 3,590 feet long, 143 feet high, with a crown width of 32 feet. An uncontrolled 100-foot spillway is located in the right abutment. Outlet works consist of a controlled intake structure, a 10.5-foot-diameter tunnel stilling basin, a 2.5- by 5-foot low-flow sluice, and a 36-inch water supply pipe. The lake provides a total storage of 513,500 acre-feet (319,400 for conservation storage, 182,300 for flood control, and 11,800 for sedimentation), and controls a 354-square-mile drainage area. Skiatook Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 92 percent complete. Estimated cost of the project is $120,325,000 (October 1987 price level), including deferred recreational development at $9,000,000. Work to plug oil and gas wells, complete real estate activities, and construct embankment, access roads, and recreation facilities was performed during the fiscal year. 37. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954 and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 38. UPPER LITTLE ARKANSAS RIVER, KS. Location. The Upper Little Arkansas River watershed lies principally within McPherson, Rice, and Reno Counties northwest of Wichita in central Kansas. Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The recommended plan of protection consists of a system of 18 small dams designed for 100-year sediment and 25-year flood control storage. The flood plain covers 65,000 acres along the main stem of the Little Arkansas River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors are required to contribute a minimum of 25 percent of total project costs with a minimum cash payment of 5 percent; all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material; and to operate and maintain the project after construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work to complete plans for preconstruction engineering and design continued. Total estimated project cost is $12,800,000 (October 1987 price level). 39. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OK-TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971 and impoundment began in August 1977. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 40. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946 and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 41. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See table 19-E. 42. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed local flood protection projects operated and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers to determine if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table 19-I for a list of projects inspected in FY 1987. Fiscal year cost was $104,888. Existing project. The project was authorized by the 19-8 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT 43. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See Table 19-K for fiscal year 1987 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects; Snagging and Clearing; and Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies - Rehabilitation Projects. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 44. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 19-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 45. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Work to plan, design, and construct a replacement bridge over Piney Creek was performed during the fiscal year. Negotiations are currently underway with the Local Cooperation Agreement and the state of Oklahoma to allow the initiation of construction of a bridge over Muddy Creek. 46. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942 but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction resumed in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the construction of hydropower units 5 & 6. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 47. GRAND LAKE O' THE CHEROKEES, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 77.0, near the town of Disney in Mayes County, OK. (See Spavinaw, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Grand Lake O' the Cherokees is a Grand River Dam Authority project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control operations at this project are controlled by the Corps. See Section 35 andTable 19-J for additional details. 48. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957 and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 49. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK and TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939 and was completed in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth power units. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 50. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw in LeFlore County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units number 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in 19-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Seven sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 51. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947 and was completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 52. W.D. MAYO LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 319.4, about 9 miles west of Fort Smith, AR, in LeFlore and Sequoyah Counties, OK. (See Fort Coffee, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The proposed plan includes construction of a powerhouse which would contain six 7.34- megawatt bulb generating units for a total installed capacity of 44 megawatts. The installation would produce an average 171,417,300 kilowatt-hours of energy annually. The powerhouse would be located adjacent to the left side of the existing spillway in the overflow embankment. Approach and exit channels would be dredged to top of rock. Power would be transmitted by connection to an existing Southwestern Power Administration (SWPA) powerline about 3 miles northeast of the project. Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma to design and construct hydroelectric generating facilities at W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam on the Arkansas River in Oklahoma. The Act provides for design and initiation of construction within 3 years after a binding agreement is executed between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the SWPA and the Cherokee Nation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work to complete plans for preconstruction engineering and design continued. The Federal Government will operate and maintain the project and the power will be marketed by SWPA. The total estimated project cost is $90,000,000 (October 1987 price level). 53. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest ofWebbers Falls in Muskogee County, OK.(See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility were built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority. Liquid cargo loading facility and steel unloading facility were built by Frontier Steel Company to serve existing traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. General Investigations 54. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $3,842,692 which included one navigation study, seven flood damage prevention studies, three comprehensive studies, two restudies of deferred projects, two reviews of completed projects, one review for deauthorization studies, inventory of dams - special investigations, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 19-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 55. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $238,798 which includes flood plain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 19-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 56. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING. Fiscal year cost was $243,584 which includes three local protection projects and one flood control reservoir. Table 19-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 57. ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Fiscal year cost was $1,113,235 which includes one navigation project, two local protection projects and one flood control reservoir. Table 19-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 19-10 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987' 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas New Work River Navigation System, OK, (Tulsa District Portion)* 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 5. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, OK and TX 5a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX 5b. Area VIII, TX 6. Birch Lake, OK 7. Candy Lake, OK 8. Canton Lake, OK 9. Copan Lake, OK Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint . Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 130,936,6389 - 130,936,638' 6,540,500 7,600,266 8,635,900 3,022,850 113,377,9612 6,403,180 7,865,411 9,120,610 2,995,992 108,884,6832 3,800,000 9,330,000 6,646,000 6,300,000 79,840,289 8,967,266 9,687,358 11,417,121 6,092,367 79,518,244 5,215 6,000 5,425 437 43,000 42,891 100 -315 182 3,146 4,410 168,700 142,836 168,800 142,521 - 25,705,208 330,844 26,035,536 222,000 3,524,615 222,000 3,637,940 - 300,028 - 300,028 5,500 4,791 4,600 4,233 6,000 5,882 1,829,000 -33,000 943,000 1,527,050 562,003 601,912 - - 127,300 - - 127,232 177 529,200 658,700 595,000 489,132 735,047 611,520 - 2,908 120 1,663 8,285 435 1,660 137,511 152,179 - 46,493,000 - 45,630,415 459,500 457,269 586,800 584,501 - 13,549,170 - 13,549,296 615,400 5,498,8012 611,826 8,794,655 2 - 4,949,9222 47,590 4,919,4422 - 11,209,834 - 10,918,727 1,048,700 1,695,800 1,188,500 1,146,922 16,910,794 1,072,826 1,766,592 1,297,427 1,142,413 16,981,3952 - 8,663,000 3,092,000 450,000 88,676,999 - 104,440 8,531,025 1,050,879 725,909 89,506,659 316,200 516,700 491,000 587,100 2,118,000 305,573 507,386 501,204 609,896 2,103,067 19-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 19-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 19871 10. Council Grove Lake, KS New Work 11. El Dorado Lake, KS 12. Elk City Lake, KS 13. Fall River Lake, KS 14. Fort Supply Lake, OK 16. Great Bend, KS 17. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 18. Halstead, KS 19. Heyburn Lake, OK Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - - 2,940 66 -2,940 - 11,810,509 - 11,810,509 615,866 864,200 856,000 1,420,122 10,159,7442 565,348 899,513 876,525 1,444,285 10,126,1602 5,300,000 2,370,000 2,096,205 3,491,995 319,000 312,064 741 710,266 734,948 1,412,317 - 90,371,468 453,181 89,882,234 355,700 319,800 329,100 1,975,200 371,549 338,798 328,807 1,969,832 - - - 19,052,990 - - - 19,052,990 601,700 870,500 532,204 917,213 654,300 8,987,7062 686,243 8,950,8662 - 10,550,873 - 10,550,873 651,020 791,600 835,800 640,445 587,760 1,091,136 696,600 9,243,195 703,723 9,405,940 - 7,724,134 - 7,723,127 476,000 624,000 487,499 634,882 671,000 687,903 622,600 8,786,8732 619,807 8,756,3572 - 220,000 - 126,531 220,000 126,531 - 4,626,270 - 4,626,270 272,900 458,000 291,510 307,513 479,200 636,153 370,600 5,535,907 366,615 5,525,713 - 250,000 - 156,920 -1,900 - - 3,971 - - 461,170 463,100 495,200 431,927 600,987 531,820 250,000 156,920 - 2,560,572 - 2,560,572 610,400 7,277,7232 564,381 7,326,3482 19-12 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 19871 20. Hugo Lake, OK 21. Hulah Lake, OK 22. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 23. Kaw Lake, OK 24. Lake Kemp, TX 25. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 26. Marion, KS 27. Marion Lake, KS 29. Oologah Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Min Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 20,000 3,128 -279,088 - - 37,759,742 - 1,868 37,427,111 985,721 1,186,900 1,217,600 2,712,122 13,091,2502 1,447,283 1,103,885 1,264,286 2,597,490 12,761,8082 -2,400 15,130 2,500 615,970 878,300 291,600 484,631 835,107 497,400 - 11,388,150 - 11,182,433 642,100 9,778,9792 648,068 9,729,1372 - - - - 135,718 - - - - 135,718 - - - - 28,151,515 - - - - 28,151,515 1,202,000 3,776,066 1,380,600 1,009,622 16,043,2772 850,643 4,123,729 1,563,663 892,125 16,001,0572 -71,900 214,312 -4,518 143,616 - 109,430,750 5,264 109,426,562 1,145,800 1,454,800 1,714,200 2,118,422 15,120,0902 1,165,463 1,407,293 2,080,047 2,139,648 15,067,2832 - - - - 7,637,702 - - - - 7,637,702 141,000 130,672 148,600 138,000 136,531 172,196 118,300 1,666,534 120,895 1,665,178 - 805,000 - 677,910 339 71,000 70,236 7,227 29,616 839 797,434 986,600 719,300 730,648 1,028,180 789,868 -4,000 30,049 805,000 677,910 - 5,519,200 1,931 486,980 - 13,420,817 - 13,420,817 831,500 10,213,9462 830,572 10,181,8212 - 46,722,3293 - 46,721,5563 1,154,400 1,168,900 1,179,000 1,252,522 16,420,6262 1,074,913 1,200,842 1,306,646 1,246,801 16,878,0272 19-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 19-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY 85 FY 86 FY87 Sep 30, 19871 30. Optima Lake, OK New Work 31. Parker Lake, OK 32. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 33. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 34. Pine Creek Lake, OK 35. Sardis Lake, OK 36. Skiatook Lake, OK 37. Toronto Lake, KS 39. Waurika Lake, OK Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Main Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 10,000 1,201 420,368 442,400 485,500 455,925 455,332 490,736 - 47,173,438 - 47,273,438 451,500 3,654,522 448,801 3,684,694 - 961,000 - 55,496 961,000 55,496 - 9,310,661 - 9,310,661 848,900 1,185,400 930,000 620,839 1,347,577 1,018,712 - -241,000 45,090 -147,645 548,000 603,900 797,600 504,413 590,428 825,038 188,400 134,740 100,486 154,343 45,998 865,870 927,600 924,900 645,695 1,008,083 1,065,137 1,288,000 - 122,000 7,453,000 -27,969 696,504 1,055,291 395,000 451,100 673,700 378,047 451,528 671,787 10,000,000 2,375,000 8,804,556 5,499,255 1,041,357 - 218,400 578,600 - 202,153 524,973 652,800 9,426,1092 689,368 9,404,8572 - 16,879,166 - 16,879,165 767,300 3,668,2002 786,870 3,669,3902 - 20,628,0492 22,313 20,628,0492 780,800 9,198,558 768,370 9,117,598 572,000 61,328,479 3,607,419 57,348,562 665,350 2,490,150 690,076 2,477,438 230,000 103,748,282 509,874 103,668,657 609,700 1,406,700 639,033 1,366,159 - 13,896,324 - 13,896,324 264,000 188,000 301,000 268,588 213,803 292,120 1,314 - 12,313 24,340 776,500 727,100 938,200 730,723 770,961 958,274 400,500 4,761,003 410,820 4,758,272 - 67,080,050 29,910 66,957,608 901,922 6,503,2662 899,739 5,488,9752 19-14 40 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 40. Wister Lake, OK 44. Broken Bow Lake, OK 45. Eufaula Lake, OK 46. Fort Gibson Lake, OK 47. Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, OK 48. Keystone Lake, OK 49. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX 50. Robert S. Kerr Lock & Dam & Reservoir, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Min Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 10,501,226 - 10,501,226 500,614 735,900 718,400 468,971 742,409 777,134 774,500 9,208,959 758,208 9,186,187 - - - - 41,222,692 - - - - 41,222,692 1,213,463 1,527,500 1,274,100 1,334,022 15,212,441 1,809,738 1,629,880 1,393,509 1,342,585 15,192,058 - 850,000 478,000 200 37,645 287,346 192,000 123,350,7475 786,814 122,931,3495 2,495,070 2,737,100 3,137,400 3,771,922 42,489,2662 2,619,134 2,849,316 3,319,004 3,751,284 39,481,2292 - 14,000 35,489 - 42,591,2986 6,625 - 43,497,7916 2,378,281 2,685,400 2,898,800 3,239,622 39,038,2882 2,391,757 2,645,762 3,187,330 3,144,482 40,286,1782 - - - - 52,126 - - - - 52,126 500 23,500 1,800 100 6,200 6,488 232,608 232,552 - 123,170,1737 - 123,170,675' 2,148,600 2,953,264 2,681,300 3,081,022 33,208,8522 2,163,686 3,041,800 2,844,576 3,033,653 33,227,1362 54,400 128,434 - 68,168,9604 15,512 - 68,019,1094 5,006,165 6,254,300 5,070,800 4,593,222 70,782,0702 5,444,478 6,640,360 5,433,240 4,534,606 70,639,2462 - - - - 46,237 - - - - 46,237 - - - - 94,578,237 - - - - 94,578,237 2,234,200 2,562,400 2,452,000 2,413,300 33,713,1362 2,014,661 2,669,319 2,510,997 2,531,516 33,307,7582 19-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 19-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987' 51. Tenkiller Ferry New Work Lake, OK Approp - 58,000 - - - 24,017,720 Cost 35,249 - - - 24,057,7188 Maint Approp 2,194,416 2,392,800 2,927,600 3,115,037 33,170,8142 Cost 2,110,520 2,674,605 3,081,392 3,178,124 33,149,6752 53. Webbers Falls Lock New Work & Dam, OK Approp - - - - 83,738,277 Cost - - - - 83,738,701 Maint Approp 1,869,900 2,282,026 3,561,800 2,341,900 34,460,9642 Cost 2,252,816 2,445,589 3,867,890 2,368,464 34,563,3602 *These figures represent the total investment for the Tulsa special funds. District in the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation 4. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange System in Oklahoma. These values include all features of the $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. navigation system as listed in Section 1 of the text. Projects 5. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 which include power are also shown in their respective section of special funds. this report. 6. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 1. Includes funds ($2,077,900) expended by the Jobs Act Public Works acceleration funds. (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 19-M 7. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. of the Fiscal Year 1985 Annual Report. 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 2. Beginning fiscal year 1984, data shown on Table A Public Works acceleration funds. includes special recreation use fees. Data for previous fiscal 9. Corrected amount. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. Stabilization and Channel Rectification. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 TABLE 19-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 1. July 24, 1946 McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER HD 79-758, PL 525 NAVIGATION SYSTEM 3. December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 4. November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 6. October 23, 1962 7. October 23, 1962 8. June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 9. October 23, 1962 10. May 17, 1950 11. October 27, 1965 12. August 18, 1941 13. August 18, 1941 ARCADIA LAKE Change water quality to water supply ARKANSAS CITY ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII and X Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV BIRCH LAKE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE HD 91-299 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 SD 87-107 PL 89-789, SD 110 PL 91-611 HD 87-563 HD 87-563 HD 75-569 HD 87-563 HD 80-442 HD 89-232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 19-16 5. 5.a 5.b TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. July 30,1983 45. July 3,1958 October 23,1962 46. July 24,1946 June 22,1936 November 17,1986 November 17,1986 June 22,1936 November 17,1986 July 24,1946 July 24,1946 June 22,1936 May 17,1950 February 15,1958 October 23, 1962 October 23,1962 November 17,1986 Section 201 May 17,1950 November 17,1986 June 28,1938 June 22,1936 October 23,1962 October 23, 1962 November 10,1978 July 3, 1958 October 23,1962 December 4,1981 October 23,1962 August 18,1941 November 17,1986 December 30,1963 November 17,1986 June 28,1938 FORT SUPPLY LAKE FRY CREEK GREAT BEND GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK HUGO LAKE HULAH LAKE JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change KAW LAKE LAKE KEMP LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK MARION, KS MARION LAKE MINGO CREEK OOLOGAH LAKE OPTIMA LAKE PAT MAYSE LAKE PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE Authorized name change PINE CREEK LAKE SARDIS LAKE Authorized name change SKIATOOK LAKE TORONTO LAKE UPPER LITTLE ARKANSAS RIVER WAURIKA LAKE W. D. MAYO LOCK AND DAM WISTER LAKE Conservation pool elevation changed BROKEN BOW LAKE EUFAULA LAKE 19-17 Documents HD 74-308 PL 99-662 PL 99-662 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 HD 79-602 HD 74-308 HD 80-442 PL 85-327 HD 87-143 HD 87-144 PL 99-662 HD 91-256 HD 80-442 PL 99-662 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong, 1st Session HD 74-308 HD 88-71 HD 87-472 PL 95-265 HD 85-170 SD 87-145 PL 97-88 HD 87-563 HD 76-440 PL 77-228 PL 99-662 SD 88-33 PL 88-253 PL 99-662 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong, 1st Session PL 98-63 HD 85-170 SD 87-137 HD 79-758 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 19-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 47. August 18,1941 FORT GIBSON LAKE HD 76-107 July 24, 1946 Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin November 17,1986 Hydropower Units 5 and 6 PL 99-662 48. August 18,1941 GRAND LAKE O' THE CHEROKEES HD 76-107 July 24, 1946 Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan PL 76-228 for the Arkansas River 49. May 17,1950 KEYSTONE LAKE SD 81-07 50. LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) June 28, 1938 Flood control and power HD 75-541 October 17,1940 Navigation and regulating flows PL 76-868 September 30, 1944 Authorized name PL 78-454 August 14,1953 Water supply PL 83-273 November 17, 1986 Recreation PL 99-662 51. November 17,1986 PARKER LAKE PL 99-662 52. July 24,1946 ROBERTS. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR HD 79-758 July 8,1963 Authorized name change PL 88-62 53. June 28,1938 TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. June 24,1946 Power HD 79-758 54. July 24,1946 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 TABLE 19-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR Complete 1983 536,952 0 Red River from Fulton, AR, to Mouth of Washita River Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 TABLE 19-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Arkansas River Project Augusta L.P.P., KS1 Big Pine Lake, TX Boswell Lake, OK Cherry and Red Fork Creeks L.P.P., OK Crutcho Creek L.P.P., OK Enid L.P.P., OK Flat Rock Creek, Tulsa, L.P.P., OK 2 Florence L.P.P., KS Hutchinson L.P.P., KS Deferred Complete Deferred Deferred Complete Deferred Complete Complete Complete Complete 1986 1938 1984 1952 1970 1972 1963 1975 1965 1956 1,701,670 261,448 213,016 743,612 1,741,000 369,782 3,497,718 84,217 14,599 19-18 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-E (continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Iola L.P.P., KS Complete 1939 22,290 - Jenks L.P.P., OK Complete 1950 344,797 - Lukfata Lake, OK Inactive 1983 1,424,685 - Oklahoma City L.P.P., OK Complete 1960 8,047,512 - Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison Complete 1953 222,105 - Sand Creek L.P.P., KS Complete 1968 545,996 - Sand Lake, OK Deferred 1963 - - Shidler Lake, OK Deferred 1983 568,191 - Tulsa/West Tulsa L.P.P., OK Complete 1954 2,785,070 - Turtle Creek L.P.P., Yukon, OK Deferred 1975 144,853 - Tuskahoma Lake, OK Inactive 1963 - - West Branch Chisholm Creek L.P.P., KS Complete 1965 364,200 - Wichita and Valley Center L.P.P., KS Complete 1960 12,247,379 - Winfield L.P.P., KS' Complete 1937 - - L.P.P. - Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. TABLE 19-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Cedar Point Lake, KS 1980 November 17, 1986 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 Public Law 99-662 El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 Public Law 99-662 Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 392,361 0 Public Law 99-662 TABLE 19-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile Nearest Town North Canadian Elk River Canadian Fall River 394.3 8.7 27.0 54.2 Canton, OK Elk City, KS Eufaula, OK Fall River, KS 19-19 LAKES Canton Elk City Eufaula Fall River REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 19-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (continued) (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile Nearest Town Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK' (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification Verdigris and Arkansas N/A2 Fort Smith, AR, to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Lock and Dam 13, AR Arkansas 292.8 Fort Smith, AR Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. Navigation miles - McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. 2. As required for channel 9 feet deep. TABLE 19-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 42 of Text) Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date Cherry and Red Fork Creeks, OK December 1986 Deep Fork River, OK April 1987 Dodge City, KS October 1987 Enid, OK November 1985 Flat Rock Creek, OK December 1986 Florence, KS December 1986 Hutchinson, KS May 1987 Iola, KS February 1987 Jenks, OK October 1987 Joe Creek, OK October 1987 Lamed, KS December 1986 Marion, KS December 1986 Oklahoma City, OK November 1986 Park City, KS May 1987 Sand Creek, Newton, KS December 1986 South Deer Creek, OK October 1986 Tulsa/West Tulsa, OK October 1987 Wichita and Valley Center, KS May 1987 19-20 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 43 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS (Section 205) Blackboy Creek, Tulsa, OK 3,565 Caney River, Bartlesville, OK 19,348 Coal Creek, Henryetta, OK 42,901 Coweta Creek, Coweta, OK 14,895 East Cache Creek, Lawton, OK 38,622 Fort Gibson, OK 4,239 Garden City, Tulsa, OK 4,171 Haikey Creek, Tulsa, OK 6,662 Lamed, KS 102 Line Creek and Washita River 286 Little Wichita River, Clay County, TX 4,757 Main Branch Chisholm Creek, Park City, KS 6,936 Merkle Creek, Norman, OK 44,400 North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma City, OK 5,761 Rock Creek, Sapulpa, OK 7,458 Spunkey Creek, Catoosa, OK 10,000 Squirrel Creek, North Canadian River, Shawnee, OK 35,019 Squirrel Hollow Creek, Sand Springs, OK 36,304 Tar Creek, Miami, OK 37,852 Turkey Creek, Bartlesville, OK 40,044 Whiskey and Rock Creeks, Independence, KS 19,894 Whitewater and Walnut River, Augusta, KS 50,276 TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 433,491 EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Baron Fork (Camp Egan), OK 170,665 Camp Creek, Pawnee County, OK 799 Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK 9,906 Coon Creek, Washington County, OK 3,915 Deer Creek, Custer County, OK 5,544 Labette County Bridge, Neosho, KS 3,888 Murray County Bridge, OK 2,504 North Canadian River, 11th Street Bridge, Yukon, OK 9,828 North Canadian River, Okfuskee County (SR 84), OK 9,646 North Pease River, Road 656 Bridge, Motley, OK 9,595 Salt Fork, Red River, Elmer, OK 137,796 Sewage Lagoon, Washita River, OK 196,688 State Highway 48, North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK 6,689 Verdigris River City Dam, Independence, KS 23,173 Washington County Bridge, Caney River, OK 7,300 Washita River, Anadarko, OK 101,789 Washita River, Caddo County, OK 3 Water Supply Wells, South Canadian River, OK 6,689 TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION 706,418 FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES, REHABILITATION Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies 5,194 Joe Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa County, OK 6,295 Lawrence Levee 5,995 Neosho Drainage District/R. King Levee 7,233 Tulsa/West Tulsa Levee, OK 334,929 Earl Maybee Levee, Bird Creek 434 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES, REHABILITATION 360,080 19-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 19-L GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 54, 55, 56, and 57 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Navigation Studies Central Oklahoma Project 2,226 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Arkansas River, Great Bend, KS, to Tulsa, OK 483,715 Arkansas River Basin, AR and OK 227,254 Canadian River Basin, OK, TX, and NM 163,462 Grand (Neosho) River Basin, KS and OK 127,434 Lake Texoma, OK and TX 95,258 Red River Above Denison, TX and OK 172 Verdigris River Basin 133,536 Arkansas-Red River Basins Solar Energy Investigations 278 Comprehensive Studies Arkansas River and Tributaries, South Central-Southeast Areas, OK 781,594 Red River Basin, AR, TX, LA, and OK 1,256,523 Review of Authorized Projects Restudy of Deferred Projects Lukfata Lake, OK 49,880 Winfield, KS 83,551 Review of Completed Projects Hugo Lake, OK 123,208 Pine Creek Lake, OK 28,339 Review for Deauthorization Crutcho Creek, OK 479 Inventory of Dams - Special Investigations 51,747 Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Soil Conservation Service 3,630 Bureau of Reclamation 5,666 Planning Assistance to States - Texas 19,142 Planning Assistance to States- Kansas 46,809 Planning Assistance to States- Oklahoma 158,790 TOTAL SURVEYS 3,842,692 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services 92,891 Technical Services General 130,466 Tulsa Forecast Maps 13,743 Hydrologic Studies Storm Studies 1,698 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 238,798 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Local Protection Arkansas River, Great Bend to Tulsa, Halstead 64 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, McGrath Creek, TX - 272 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 29,875 Flood Control Reservoirs Parker Lake, OK 213,916 TOTAL CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING 243,584 19-22 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 19-L GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (continued) (See Sections 54, 55, 56, and 57 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Project Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks, OK 193 Local Protection Great Bend, KS 325,646 Mingo Creek, OK (CP&E) 564,073 Flood Control Reservoirs Douglass Lake, KS 223,324 TOTAL ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 1,113,235 19-23 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT * The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth)......... Flood Control 2. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO . 3. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO....... . 4. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS .... 5. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE ......................... 6. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS.... 7. 8. ....... 20-2 ....... 20-2 ....... 20-2 ....... 20-2 ....... 20-3 ....... 20-3 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ........ 20-3 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO ..................... 20-3 9. Little Blue River Lakes, MO .............. 20-4 10. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, M O ............. .................. 20-4 11. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS ........................ 20-4 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS .......... 20-5 13. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE to Mouth)............20-5 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS ............ 20-5 15. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) .......................... 20-5 16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, M O ............... ................ 20-6 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS ................. .............. 20-6 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA............ 20-6 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ...... 20-6 20. Thttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ........ 20-6 21. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS .............. 20-7 Flood Control (cont.) Page 22. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations......................20-7 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects..........................20-7 24. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ............ 20-7 25. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 20-7 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO .............. ............ 20-8 27. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO ............... 20-9 General Investigations 28. General Investigations.....................20-9 Tables Table 20-A Cost & Financial Statement..........20-10 Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 20-13 Table 20-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.............. ............ 20-16 Table 20-D Not Applicable Table 20-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ ............. 20-17 Table 20-F Not Applicable Table 20-G Deauthorized Projects .............. 20-18 Table 20-H Missouri River Levee System ........ 20-19 Table 20-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ..................... 20-20 Table 20-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 20-20 Table 20-K Active General Investigations ........ 20-21 Table 20-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ............... 20-22 20-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the channel, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of stage are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. The 1974 Base Line Study of the reach of the Missouri River in the Kansas City District estimated recreation use on the river at 1,250,000 recreation days annually. The projected tonnage on the river for FY 1986 was approximately 2.3 million. Maintenance: Repair of dikes and revetments by contract (excluding sand, gravel, and waterway improvement materials). In addition, following work was accomplished by hired labor: Construction of environmental gaps and dike and revetment repair, real estate management, channel reconnaissance, condition studies, surveys and mapping, stream gauging, engineering and design, surveys and layout of construction, and supervision and administration. No dredging was necessary. Flood Control 2. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1987) is $174,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $22,900,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The city of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and final designs are underway. The first and second channel contracts are complete. Relocation contracts had been negotiated with four railroad companies and construction is underway. 3. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in westcentral Kansas City and extending into Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1987) is $13,100,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $4,300,000. Local cooperation. The city of Kansas City provided a letter of assurance, dated June 20, 1986, officially stating its intent and ability to cost share the project. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design continues with activity in the Kansas City District and at the Waterways Experiment Station where model studies are underway to confirm design calculations. 4. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, Kansas, in Douglas County. Lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Exiting project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long 20-2 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 1,314,100 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 5. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, about 3 miles east of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. Project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 864,500 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 6. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 15 miles southwest of the Kansas City metropolitan area in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974 and project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction is $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $23,342,756 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. Local interests have shown no interest in sponsoring recreational development at this time. Therefore, only minimum recreational facilities have been built. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 432,900 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 7. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Smoky Hill River about 19 miles west and 16 miles south of Salina, Kansas, and about 205 river miles above mouth of stream. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940 and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 530,500 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included drain installation, acquisition of emergency rock stockpile, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 8. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, LITTLE BLUE RIVER, MO Location. The project is located along the Little Blue River and extends from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, 22 miles upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. The improvements consist of straightening and enlarging the Little Blue River channel from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, near Blue Mills Road, upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek, reducing the length of this section from 20.4 to about 15 miles. Alteration of six highway bridges and construction of five new highway bridges and one railroad bridge were required. Improvements in the vicinity of Lake City 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Army Ammunition Plant consists of diversion of West Fire Prairie Creek into the Little Blue River and construction of a levee. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1987) is $25,505,083 and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,390,000. Construction was initiated in December 1974. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies to the Little Blue River channel improvement works. Jackson County, Missouri, passed a bond issue for sponsorship of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished July 31, 1973. Operations during fiscal year. Project is physically complete, but not financially complete. 9. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about one-half mile south of U.S. Highway 40 and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam will be an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity will be 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Estimated Federal cost (1987) for both lakes through construction of the project is $140,500,000. Construction was initiated in September 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Estimated reimbursement for recreation is $15,180,000 of which $420,000 will be accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Longview Lake is essentially complete except for recreation facilities. Blue Springs dam, recreation facilities, and administrative facilities are underway. Project is 96 percent complete. Land acquisition is complete. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 1 mile west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity will be 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1987) is $20,391,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,709,000. construction was initiated in March 1973. Project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,573,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,709,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the city of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri State agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of city of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 643,800 visitor days. Construction of Stage 4 recreation facilities were initiated. Project is 99 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of acquisition of emergency rock stockpile and ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 2 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 705,700 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of installation of trilateration and ordinary operation and maintenance. 20-4 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT 12. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Republican River near village of Alida and about 8 miles downstream from Milford, Geary County, Kansas, and about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River near Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project at request of Governor of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. Project was placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $13,045,576 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 1,287,300 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included initiation of buried collector system, road resurfacing in the Outlet Area, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 13. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated cost (1987) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $110,760,000, including $100,950,000 Federal and $9,810,000 non- Federal contributions. Costs of $11,440,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $402,453,000 (1964 and 1987 price levels), of which $368,649,000 is Federal cost for construction and $33,804,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 20-H on Missouri River levee system. Contract for remedial work on L 246 was awarded. Planning on remaining active units continued. 14. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Delaware River about 5 miles above mouth in Jefferson County, Kansas, about 3 miles north of Perry, Kansas Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project plan at request of State of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $9,208,342 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 1,314,700 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included replacement of relief wells and ordinary operation and maintenance. 15. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation and Table 20-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 16. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. Dam is on main stem of Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above mouth of stream in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extending upstream into Polk County, Missouri. Site is about 3 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multipurpose). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 1,428,900 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 17. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. Dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 7 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet workes and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including supplemental recreational development $731,130 (Code 710), is $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $71,018. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 677,300 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. Damsite is on Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of town of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation ficilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 1,022,000 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included completion of construction of Island View shower building, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1986) through construction of the project is $87,835,000. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 1,189,100 visitor days. Project is physically complete, but not financially complete. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on main stem of Big Blue River, about 20-6 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT 12 miles above the mouth of stream in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 12 miles northwest of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 993,500 visitor days. Maintenance: Activities included boundary rectification, emergency repair of downstream sinkholes, repair of upstream riprap, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961 and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 511,300 visitor days. Maintenance: Activity consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 22. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 20-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 24. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Non-Federal flood protection works constructed or rehabilitated under P.L. 84-99 must be inspected by the Corps of Engineers to assure compliance with local cooperation agreements. 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Operations for period October 1, 1986 thru September 30, 1987 were as follows: Disaster Preparedness Program includes planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment and personnel. Flood Fighting and Rescue Work for a flood event on the Missouri River and tributaries declared in September 1986 and terminated in November 1986, and for two flood events on the Kansas River and tributaries. Rehabilitation of both non-Federal farm levees and Federal authorized levees and control works damaged. as a direct result of flooding. (See Table 20-L for costs.) Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 creates additional requirements for the non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects. The sponsor must pay 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 25 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There were no Section 205 projects under construction in Fiscal Year 1987. See Table L for expenditures under Section 205 during Fiscal Year 1987. 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineeringly feasible, economically justifiable, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $500,000. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 creates additional requirements for the non-Federal sponsor of Section 14 projects. For structural streambank protection projects the local sponsor must provide, during the period of construction, a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project cost. In addition, the sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal to not less than 25 percent of the total project cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. Projects that were physically complete in FY 86, but financially completed in FY 87 are as follows (for detailed project descriptions, see FY 86 Annual Report.): Osage River, Miller County, MO, Road HH Nodaway River, Andrew and Holt Counties, MO, Fillmore Bridge Kimsey Creek, Holt County, MO, Casteel Bridge Big Blue River, Saline County, NE, Thxedo Park Road and Bridge Yankee Creek, Johnson County, NE, West Tecumseh Bridge Yankee Creek, Johnson County, NE, Vesta Bridge Little Blue River, Adams County, NE, Overy Bridge. Projects that were physically and financially complete in FY 87 are as follows: Wakarusa River, Baldwin City, KS, City Waterline - Construction was completed in February 1987 on this project to protect the city waterline. The project consists of a sheet pile wall, stone drains, and riprap to provide erosion protection. Little Blue River, Marshall County, KS, FAS Road 1108 - Construction was completed in November 1986 on this project to protect the county road from flood-caused erosion. The project consists of a stone fill revetment with baffle dikes. Nodaway River, Andrew County, MO, Road T - Construction was completed in February 1987 on a remedial measures and repair on this project which protects the county road and bridge. The project was originally completed in December 1985, and consisted of 2,450 feet of stone fill along the streambank. However, in March of 1986, the project was damaged by flooding. Beaver Creek, Webster County, NE, Bridge 43430 - Construction was completed in October 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill. Elm Creek, Webster County, NE, Bridge 33425 - Construction was completed in October 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill. Elm Creek, Webster County, NE, Bridge 23015 - Construction was completed in October 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill. Beaver Creek, Webster County, NE, Bridge 23025 - Construction was completed in October 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of concrete rubble streambank paving on the left streambank and concrete rubble fill on the right streambank to protect the bridge abutments. Beaver Creek, Webster County, NE, Bridge 14710 - Construction was completed in October 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of concrete rubble streambank paving. Thrkey Creek, Fillmore County, NE, Bridge 123 - Construction was completed in October 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble revetment with tieback dikes. Thrkey Creek, Fillmore County, NE, Bridge 385 - Construction was completed in November 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of a revetment with baffle dikes. Little Blue River, Adams County, NE, Pauline Bridge - Construction was completed in November 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill and windrow revetment on the right streambank. Little Blue River, Adams County, NE, Pimpel Bridge - Construction was completed in November 1986 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of 450 linear feet of concrete rubble revetment with baffle dikes. See Table L for Emergency Bank Protection expenditures during FY 1987. Multiple Pupose Projects Including Power 26. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on main stem of Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway section and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with total capacity of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, 20-8 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1987) is $550 million. Construction of relocation of Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The embankment has been completed including paving the top of the dam roadway. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Administration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearing required remedial design on the bearing. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1987, power generation totaled 2,229,907,800 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $27,894,562 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 2,172,000 visitor days. Work was continued on acquisition of land and rights-of-way; relocation of roads, utilities and municipal facilities; construction of the powerplant; and construction of public use facilities. Project is 96 percent complete. During FY 1987, 460,186,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of initiation of contract for repair of turbine blade, initiation of contract for painting gates, repair of flooddamaged recreation facilities, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 27. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with Osage River, and about 2 miles east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri, lake extending into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,721,000. Estimated cost of the project, including $3,785,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $80,008,057 (1986). Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Rightof- way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend has been acquired, and construction has been completed. Remaining work consisting of completing acquisition of the sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills is underway. Completion will assure downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 cf.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 1987, power generation totaled 853,597,800 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $16,696,505 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1987 was 1,966,900 visitor days. The project is complete and in operational status. Acquisition of sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills was continued. The net amount of power marketed with Southwestern Power Administration was 63,353,000 kilowatt-hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of boundary monumentation and ordinary operation and maintenance. General Investigations 28. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1987 costs totaled $1,629,407 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 20-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, and Continuation of Planning and Engineering. 20-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARV OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 2. Blue River Channel Kansas City, MO Blue River Channel (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Funds) 3. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO 4. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 5. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 6. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 5,045,700 6,757,700 5,044,483 6,827,686 5,045,700 5,044,483 -2,225,000 1,255,250 6,757,700 6,827,686 2,028,000 6,563,575 10U,U000 - - 27,162 -2,155,000 2,028,000 1,255,250 6,590,737 -106,100 148,626 1,310,500 1,315,435 -8,000 0 1,077,100 1,114,088 39,600 203,412 669,100 669,879 1,104,500 1,104,848 1,246,400 1,247,941 14,766 585,600 585,618 - - 237,942,1901 - - 237,942,1901 6,452,000 5,312,600 275,258,8142 6,489,931 5,312,600 275,258,8142 - - 816,190 - - 816,190 - - 22,642 - - 22,642 - - 238,758,3801 - - 238,758,3801 6,452,000 5,312,600 275,281,4562 6,489,931 5,312,600 275,281,4562 6,052,000 5,750,000 23,550,171 6,123,287 3,029,536 20,824,521 - -34,704 35,296 7,073 1,061 35,296 6,052,000 5,715,296 23,585,467 6,130,360 3,030,597 20,859,817 325,000 488,000 813,000 301,712 510,235 811,497 - - 57,415,433 - - 57,415,433 1,237,000 1,193,100 8,676,400 1,237,034 1,188,950 8,672,250 - - 118,805 - - 118,805 - - 57,534,238 - - 57,534,238 - - 47,111,926 - - 47,111,9263 1,249,000 1,024,500 18,235,961 1,230,196 1,039,936 18,232,517 - - 1,017,623 - - 1,017,623 140,000 - 64,161,400 140,000 - 64,161,400 611,000 589,300 3,249,800 611,096 587,500 3,248,000 20-10 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 7. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 8. Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO 9. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 10. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 11. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 13. Missouri River Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,069,800 1,075,270 3,258,000 3,287,641 1,452,400 1,427,289 667,000 562,410 1,696,000 1,723,084 55,000 128,044 -- 12,577,227 - 12,577,2274 1,663,400 15,641,410 1,658,450 15,636,460 - 25,505,083 52,007 25,495,256 13,085,000 12,600,000 6,371,000 4,152,000 15,720,359 11,917,433 7,060,777 4,165,726 - - - 271,600 - - - 271,600 - - - 29,953 264,070 96,113 30,721 6,738 13,085,000 12,600,000 6,371,000 4,181,953 15,984,429 12,013,546 7,091,498 4,172,464 -29,400 150,000 - 480,000 80,574 121,143 48,721 374,529 413,000 567,800 503,000 685,100 415,036 567,851 503,029 680,100 108,750 - 484,612 -5,803 -20,074 98,799 59,520 224,016 79,350 150,000 484,612 474,197 60,500 219,942 108,241 598,545 1,361,900 1,364,012 15,805 1,399,800 1,405,505 196,000 209,080 1,874,900 1,888,451 1,532,000 1,533,795 1,396,400 1,397,076 512,000 516,711 2,419,500 2,376,085 1,046,000 1,046,062 1,273,000 1,273,091 583,000 583,031 1,213,200 1,213,200 1,557,400 1,555,900 2,129,000 742,202 135,011,200 134,971,419 271,600 271,600 1,217,453 1,023,763 136,228,653 135,995,182 18,286,177 18,179,273 3,638,600 3,633,600 1,119,3315 857,6076 19,405,5087 19,036,8806 37,436,530 37,436,530 12,569,960 12,569,960 49,566,492 49,566,492 17,098,924 17,096,424 59,014,851 57,627,450 - - 49,095,918 - - 49,095,918 1,533,000 1,503,200 19,146,684 1,576,795 1,502,000 19,145,484 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text 16. Project Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO 20. Tuttle Creek Lake Blg Blue River, KS 21. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 22. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 24. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees 26. Harry S. Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, MO 27. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to Funding Sept. 30, 1987 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost- Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1. Includes $8,665,594 costs of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $24,198. 4. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $7,885. 5. Correct total is $1,095,596, which includes $43,074 interest during construction. Correction pending. 6. Unable to verify. 7. Correct amount is $19,381,773. 20-12 15,000 15,000 1,578,400 1,589,591 1,818,200 1,830,355 -15,000 336,702 1,898,500 2,203,430 1,193,000 924,469 1,080,500 1,081,351 1,539,900 1,546,437 995,300 1,012,121 161,700 162,014 338,100 338,301 95,000 94,997 12,425,000 16,710,978 4,039,900 4,061,256 -269,000 855,969 2,690,900 2,699,062 - - - 17,365,452 - - - 17,365,452 1,429,500 1,453,000 1,277,400 17,865,912 1,428,495 1,454,098 1,277,400 17,865,912 - - - 14,003,238 - - - 14,003,238 1,038,200 1,058,000 1,165,900 15,142,233 1,039,549 1,058,022 1,163,088 15,139,421 - - - 27,622,159 - - - 27,622,159 2,541,300 1,609,500 1,321,300 17,759,018 2,503,486 1,627,595 1,331,082 17,749,018 - -33,000 67,000 87,685,315 774,661 370,426 35,558 87,648,178 879,000 987,000 801,100 5,898,100 875,127 990,924 801,050 5,898,050 - - - 80,584,079 - - - 80,584,079 1,476,700 1,375,000 2,036,400 17,775,179 1,477,840 1,376,718 2,022,437 17,761,216 - - - 20,463,367 - - - 20,463,367 1,109,900 1,458,000 1,671,900 13,496,946 1,110,138 1,239,997 1,889,950 13,496,946 173,000 195,160 164,000 54,178,483 174,032 195,160 164,000 54,178,483 365,000 350,340 287,400 4,280,815 364,917 350,490 287,400 4,280,815 153,000 138,000 39,000 498,000 152,458 138,546 39,000 498,000 9,200,000 3,093,000 3,507,000 528,089,900 8,860,644 3,563,417 3,412,650 527,950,852 4,859,300 5,136,000 6,444,100 32,297,300 4,870,785 5,133,990 6,438,198 32,288,288 105,000 73,000 201,000 79,932,357 132,582 451,361 220,675 79,920,914 1,876,800 1,830,000 2,217,200 23,385,500 1,868,147 1,839,804 2,220,270 23,385,440 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a mimimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro bend, and Sioux City, IA. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estimated total cost of $16,100,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS, NE, and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). EP.L. 241-62. H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). EP.L. 585-68. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., EP.L. 560-70. EP.L. 67-73 H.R.11781 EP.L. 520-71 H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). EP.L. 409-73 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). EP.L. 14-79. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, EP.L. 99-662 1962 Flood Control Act S. Doc 122, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., EP.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., EP.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; EP.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., EP.L. 534. EP.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., EL. 761. 20-13 3. 4. 5. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and provided for increased protection. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 549 ; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., PL. 780. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. 20-14 8. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Act Project and Work Authorized Sep. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 Jun. 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution on general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,000,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehenssive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. H. Docs. 642 and 5491 83rd Cong. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. H. Does. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 5491, 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) 20-15 See Section in Text 16. 17. 18. 19. Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in 'Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiatiion Doc. 1, 75th Cong., and partial accomplishment. P.L. 761. Aug. 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, P.L. 77-228. NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 21. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. Jul. 14, 19602 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River P.L. 645. Basin. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO 26. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 549; 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. Oct. 23, 1962 The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in 1962 Flood Control Act, accordance with recommendations of the Chief of H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an P.L. 87-874. estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 27. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 549 , 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, MO 1, 2 Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 Osage River, MO, lock and dam3 Complete 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. 2. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status. 20-16 TABLE 20-E KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Barnard, KS 1 Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' Big Blue River, Seward, NE 1 Big Stranger Creek, KS1 Blue River Basin, Vicinity of Kansas City 4 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)2 Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO East Muddy Creek, MO Elk Creek, Clyde, KS' Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS' Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS3 Lawrence, Kansas River, KS5 Lower Grand River, MO Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO Missouri River at New Haven, MO' Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (Advance Highway Relocation) Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (Advance Town Relocation) Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE 1 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Smithville Lake, Trimble Wildlife Area Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' Topeka, Kansas River, KS Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO Upper Grand River, MO Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Inactive Completed Active Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Active Completed Completed Inactive Inactive 1965 1973 1953 1974 1984 1966 1976 1977 1973 1974 1966 1984 1973 1976 1966 1984 1950 1984 1980 1985 1966 1967 1976 1973 1966 1976 1976 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 1974 1966 1966 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 451,400 692,706 8,052,990 51,989 989,015 726,966 757,500 1,271,025 2,782,793 67,275 25,010,500 42,434,197 8,773,488 2,488,585 432,245 139,883 2,036,624 4,462,661 390,763 91,929 5,315,168 222,193 700,000 3,878,668 126,887 6,896 246,995 21,174,593 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork classified inactive. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost for inactive units, Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork. 3. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 4. Three lakes inactive and one lake deferred. 5. Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 20-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 20-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Arlington Lake, MO Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KS1 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Kansas River Navigation Marysville, KS Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Missouri River Levee System, KS, Units R 402; R 393-395; and R 414 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1965 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1973 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) - Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1976 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1980 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 - Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 1970 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1971 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) - Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. $8,651 - 16,317 71,466 1,754,019 499,200 127,297 259,900 133,682 39,708 57,500 Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, 1982 Flood Control Act of 1962, 2,178,261 - KS October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) Pioneer Lake, KS 1952 Flood Control Act approved 95,692 - June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 Pomme de Terre Lake, MO 1954 Flood Control Act approved - - Hydroelectric Power September 3, 1954 (H.D. 549-81; Modification P.L. 83-780) Richland Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved 8,548 - June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 2, 1944 Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 77,189- 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000- Improvement - 1974 Mod.) Development Act of 1974 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 1,095,020- KS 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1. Water supply and flood problems at Hays, KS, are being studied under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 20-18 TABLE 20-H KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 13 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R 512-513 Richardson Co. D. D. #7 R 500 Iowa Point D. D. #4 Kimsey Holly Creek L 497 Forest City L. D. L488 Holt Co. D. D. #7 R 482 Burr Oak D. D. #3 L 476 Amazonia L. D. R 460-471 Elwood-Gladden L. D. L 455 S. St. Joseph L. D. L 443-448 Halls L. D. R 440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. L 408 Farley-Beverly D. D. L 400 Waldron L. D. L 385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. R 351 Atherton L. D. L 330-345 Orrick L. D. L 319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. L 246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. L 15 North County L. D. Remaining units 19.1 4.1 4.4 16.0 11.5 8.2 10.8 13.8 15.6 17.3 10.7 12.2 7.6 6.5 15.9 43.4 35.0 20.0 40.0 Complete-1958 Complete-1954 Complete-1970 Complete-1962 Complete-1955 Complete-1954 Complete-1956 Complete-1968 Complete-1967 Complete-1957 Complete-1959 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 Complete-1957 Planning underway Complete-1966 Inactive Planning underway Complete-1983 Inactive Detailed planning not initiated 20-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 20-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 15 of Text) Project Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS Bartley, Republican River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS1I Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS Indianola, Republican River, NE Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS Lawrence, Kansas River, KS Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Authorization)3 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth 4 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO Topeka, Kansas River, KS Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS Tuttle Creek Lake, KS-Road and Bridge (1976 Act) Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) 1 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS Estimated Federal Cost $ 1,099,350 118,269 84,000,000 71,4662 48,129,549 549,000,000 64,161,400 67,275 12,577,227 8,620,111 2,488,585 37,436,530 500,000 49,566,492 100,950,000 2,036,624 4,462,661 49,095,918 17,365,453 14,003,238 3,878,668 80,008,057 21,174,593 80,584,079 630,000 500,000 20,463,367 1. Deauthorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 2. Total Federal funds expended. 3. Inactive. TABLE 20-J 4. Active portion of project. Deferred portion of project is currently estimated to cost (1987) $46,753,000 Federal and $4,336,000 non-Federal. Inactive portion of project is currently estimated to cost (1987) $321,839,000 Federal and $29,468,000 non-Federal. Actual cost of deauthorized units was $57,000 Federal. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R 512-513, R 500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L 497, L 488, R 482, L 476, R 460-471, L 455, L 443-448, R 440, L 408, L 400 and R 351, L 246 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Osawatomie, Kansas Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River, Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas Mar/Sep 87 Mar/Sep 87 Oct 86/Apr 87 Oct 86/Apr 87 Oct 86/Apr 87 May/Sep 87 Nov 86/May 87 20-20 Estimated Non-Federal Cost $ 287,000 9,500 41,200,000 132,928,000 23,342,756 7,592 2,130,000 265,000 214,300 21,250,000 348,300 876,000 1,960,000 17,458,000 10,383,492 610,000 214,300 - --- ---- TABLE 20-K KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 28 of Text) Item and CWIS Number SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Blue River Basin, KS & MO - 12382 Kansas and Osage Rivers, Kansas - 12204 Osage River above Harry S. Truman Dam - 14063 St. Joseph, MO, & Vicinity - 12433 Turkey Creek, KS & MO - 12381 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) Review for Deauthorization - 77000 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 FERC Licensing - 53857 Subtotal Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) - 51840 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) - 51820 Regional Planning (183) - 53847 Planning Assistance to States (186) - 14820 Technical Assistance for Streambank Erosion (188) - 51731 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) - 82030/40 Hydrologic Studies (260) - 53820 TOTAL (Category 200) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (Category 400) Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (451) - 12319 TOTAL (Category 400) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 20-21 Federal Cost FY 87 Totals By Categories $65,381 56,115 197,603 182,434 270,660 $762,193 $ 4,184 $ 4,184 $ 65,127 2,323 $ 67,450 $ 9,214 16,727 5,298 58,024 7,342 $96,605 $930,432 $149,718 39,022 $188,740 $510,235 $510,235 $1,629,407 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 20-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 25 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Status 1 Cost Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS F $76,220 Bedford, East Fork 102 River, IA R 22,586 Fairway, Rock Creek, KS R 17,235 Deshler, Snake & Spring Creeks, NE R 8,545 DeWitt, Big Blue River & Turkey Creek, NE R 8,332 TOTAL FOR 5 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $132,918 5 Section 205 studies were terminated in FY 1987, total $36,465 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $169,383 Emergency Streambank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress July 24, 1946, as Amended West Fork Grand River, Ringgold County, IA, Redding Bridge P $13,375 West Fork Grand River, Ringgold County, IA, Parker Bridge R 7,283 Weldon River, Decatur County, IA, Bridge #J2140 R 5,804 East Nodaway River, Page County, IA, Waterline & Road R 651 Middle Nodaway River, Adair County, IA, Site 2 R 3,447 Little Blue River, Marshall County, KS, FAS Road 1108 O 72,909 Wakarusa River, Baldwin City, KS, City Waterline O 117,957 Trib Kill Creek, DeSoto, KS, Sewage Treatment Plant R 10,736 Wakarusa River, Douglas County, KS, Blue Mound Bridge R 7,089 Marais Des Cygnes River, Osawatomie, KS, Water Wells R 5,779 Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, Spence Bridge R 5,974 Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, Site 1 R 5,935 West Fork Wolf River, Brown County, KS, Avenue Road Bridge R 6,876 Gregg Creek, Brown County, KS, Granada Bridge R 7,099 Delaware River, KS, Kickapoo Indian Water Supply Intake R 2,162 Nodaway River, Andrew County, MO, Road T O 74,352 Kimsey Creek, Holt County, MO, Casteel Bridge O 2,473 Nodaway River, Andrew & Holt Counties, MO, Fillmore Bridge O 3,638 Osage River, Miller County, MO, Road HH O 1,720 Chariton River, Schuyler County, MO, Eason Bridge R 7,500 Greggs Creek, Glasgow, MO, Sewage Lift Station & Road R 5,651 Big Blue River, Saline County, NE, Tuxedo Park Road & Bridge O 44 Yankee Creek, Johnson County, NE, Vesta Bridge O 7,944 Yankee Creek, Johnson County, NE, West Tecumseh Bridge O 3,685 Turkey Creek, Fillmore County, NE, Road & Bridge #123 O 15,183 Turkey Creek, Fillmore County, NE, Road & Bridge #385 O 31,257 Little Blue River, Adams County, NE, Road & Bridge- Pauline O 31,198 Little Blue River, Adams County, NE, Road & Bridge - Pimpel O 62,716 Little Blue River, Adams County, NE, Road & Bridge - Overy O 8,829 Beaver Creek, Webster County, NE, Road & Bridge #43430 O 15,909 Elm Creek, Webster County, NE, Road & Bridge #33425 O 12,219 Elm Creek, Webster County, NE, Road & Bridge #23015 O 23,783 Beaver Creek, Webster County, NE, Road & Bridge #23025 0 16,071 Beaver Creek, Webster County, NE, Road & Bridge #14710 O 16,509 Little Blue River, Clay County, NE, Weyenberg Bridge P 11,324 Little Blue River, Nuckolls County, NE, Bridge #4525 P 16,604 Little Blue River, Thayer County, NE, Gilead North Bridge R 5,884 Big Blue River, Blue Springs, NE, Sewerline R 1,065 Big Blue River, Gage County, NE, Grant TWP S18 R 427 Big Blue River, Gage County, NE,Wymore TWP Bridge R 2,871 Big Blue River, Gage County, NE, Rockford TWP Road R 754 Big Blue River, Gage County, NE, Grant TWP Bridge R 629 20-22 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 20-L (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 25 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Status' Cost Emergency Streambank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress July 24, 1946, as Amended - cont'd Big Blue River, Gage County, NE,Wymore TWP Bridge R 2,871 Big Blue River, Gage County, NE, Rockford TWP Road R 754 Big Blue River, Gage County, NE, Grant TWP Bridge R 629 TOTAL FOR 42 ACTIVE PROJECTS IN FY 87: $653,315 4 studies were terminated in FY 1987, total $22,444 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $675,759 Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work - Public Law 99 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation Disaster Preparedness Program $308,806 Flood Fighting and Rescue Work 354,051 Rehabilitation 2,371,192 TOTAL $3,034,049 1. Status: R = Recon; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; 0 = Operational 20-23 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyo- drainage basin of Missouri River along main stem and ming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colo- tributaries to Rulo, NE. rado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE................. 2. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................. Page .21-2 .21-2 Flood Control 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO .................... 21-2 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND ................. 21-2 5. Chatfield Lake, CO ....................... 21-2 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO ................... 21-3 7. Fall River Basin, SD ..................... 21-3 8. Great Falls, MT ............... ........... 21-3 9. Little Sioux River, IA .................... 21-4 10. Lost Creek atColumbus, NE ............... 21-4 11. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD ...... . ............... .21-4 12. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA ..................... 21-4 13. Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE ............... 21-4 14. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes,N E .............. ..... ........... 21-5 15. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist) .................... 21-5 16. Pipestem Lake, ND ....................... 21-5 17. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE .............. 21-5 18. South Platte River Basin, CO .............. 21-6 19. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works ........................ 21-6 20. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ...................... 21-6 21. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization .................. .. 21-6 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Page 22. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD ................ 21-7 23. Fort Peck Lake, MT.....................21-7 24. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD ................ 21-7 25. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND ................ 21-7 26. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD .......... 21-8 27. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND ................. 21-8 Miscellaneous 28. National Emergency Preparedness. ......... 21-8 General Investigations 29. See Table 21-K .......................... 21-8 Tables 21-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... 21-9 21-B Authorizing Legislation ............... 21-12 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 21-15 21-D Not Applicable 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.. 21-15 21-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ...................... 21-17 21-G Deauthorized Projects ................ 21-17 21-H Missouri River Levee System, SiouxCity, IA to Rulo, NE ............. 21-18 21-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ...... 21-18 21-J Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects .................. .21-18 21-K Active General Investigations .......... 21-21 21-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ............ 21-22 21-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulob) in fiscal year 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. Total cost of new work Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE is $189,226,000 (1987), of which $187,639,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $1,587,000 is the non-Federal cost, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed for cost sharing on construction of recreation by constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities are included in the Missouri River Navigation Maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. 2. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. Flood Control 3. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet, and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. The total cost of construction was $61,503,600. Recreation facilities were developed utilizing cost sharing funds at an additional cost of $500,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work by hired labor included miscellaneous items of ordinary repair and maintenance. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 195,392. 4. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing project. A dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and reservoir with a storage capacity of about 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 21-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on capacity of North Fork channel below reservoir; obtain water rights for storage; pay the United States for costs allocated to water supply; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved June 19, 1964. With respect to water rights, requirements have been complied with. A contract with the Bowman County Water Management District for water storage space was signed November 10, 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 112,904. 5. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet, a crest length of 21-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT 12,500 feet, and a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation, and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps is participating with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and is 99 percent complete, with a scheduled completion date in FY 1989. Construction is essentially complete at the project with the exception of the downstream channel improvement, associated recreation facilities and fish and wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $105,060,000 (1987) of which $95,100,000 is the Federal cost for construction, $7,060,000 local cost in connection with the downstream channel improvement, and $2,900,000 is the local cost for acquisition of water for the recreation pool. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies to the downstream channel improvement. The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided assurances of local cooperation for the downstream improvement on December 13, 1967. Local interests must provide water for filling the sediment reserve pool for recreation use which the state agreed to on April 25, 1967. Operations during fiscal year. Continued design by hired labor. Completed construction on Stage II of the downstream channel improvements. Continued construction on Stage III of the downstream channel improvements. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 2,020,302. 6. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and 14,300 feet long. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in fiscal year 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $15,220,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 1,249,854. 7. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during fiscal year 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in fiscal year 1953 with exception of a road and parking area which were completed in fiscal year 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs unit dam was completed in fiscal year 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities which were completed in fiscal year 1972. (See Table 21-A for total cost of construction.) For last funding see FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. Annual project visitation hours were estimatedat 121,034. 8. GREAT FALLS, MT Location. In Great Falls, Cascade County, MT at confluence of the Sun and Missouri Rivers. Existing project. Provides for levees along the left bank of the Sun River and an interceptor ditch and closed conduit to collect and convey side-hill runoff to the Sun River. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $13,987,000 of which $11,937,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $2,050,000 is the local cost for lands, relocations and a cash contribution for replacement of a storm sewer conduit desired by local interests. Local cooperation. Section 3. Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition local interests must zone the unleveed portion of the flood channel through the damage area to preserve its capacity and to prevent further encroachments and contribute in cash $179,000 representing the estimated cost of replaced storm drainage facilities which will be incorporated into the closed 21-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 conduit of the Watson Coulee Interceptor. West Great Falls Flood Control and Drainage District provided assurances on January 17, 1968. State Supreme Court decision on assessments required a change in state law, which was enacted in 1973. The final court ruling on compliance was made April 1, 1981, and the local sponsor was instructed to proceed toward project construction. Operations during fiscal year. Completed work on Sun River repair and mitigation planting. Work continued on the O&M manuals. 9. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Location. The project is located in the lower portion of the Little Sioux River Basin in Harrison and Monona Counties, IA, near the confluence of the Little Sioux and Missouri Rivers. Previous Project. For details see page 646, Annual Report for 1970. Existing project. Construction of the original project was completed in June 1966. Sill No. 4 was identified as a design deficiency in a June 17, 1981 report by the Omaha District, approved by OCE. Based on that report, design studies for a permanent solution to the problem were completed. Estimated cost of the new work is $5,123,000 (1987) of which $5,117,000 is the Federal cost, and $6,000 is non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. The Little Sioux Inter-County Drainage District was sponsor of that portion of the original project where the remedial work is being accomplished. Remedial work was 100 percent Federally funded. Operations during fiscal year. Ice and debris accompanying high flows during the spring of 1986 caused extensive damage to the bed grade control structure (Sill No. 4) that was constructed during the winter of 1985 to correct a design deficiency of the original project. A contract for repairing the damage was awarded 4 May 1987. 10. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Location. On Lost Creek just north of the City of Columbus in Platte County, NE. Existing project. This project provides levee and channel improvements on the north side of Columbus and provides protection to commercial and residential areas. The estimated cost of the construction is $4,330,000 (1987) of which $3,470,000 is the Federal cost, and $860,000 is non-Federal contributed funds - other, that provides for all necessary right of way, utility, and bridge relocations. Local cooperation. A contract with the City of Columbus to sponsor the project was approved on February 18, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Completed work on Stage II. The final inspection was made on 28 Oct 86. At that time several project deficiencies were identified which are currently being corrected. Work continued on the O&M manuals. 11. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE, AND SD Location. NE and SD. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,030,000 (1987) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $30,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds - other costs. Local cooperation. All construction on this project will be done in accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the State of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 26, 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction on the Myron Grove access site. Efforts to protect Federally listed threatened and endangered species continued. 12. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 21-A for total costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 13. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBRASKA, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA to St. Louis, MO. Active portion of the project in Omaha District extends from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Construction was initiated June 1948. (See Table 21-H for status of active units). Construction was initiated on Levee Unit L-611-614 in September 1980 and is 99 percent complete. Construction of Unit R-616 was initiated in 21-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT May 1983 and is complete. Cost estimate for active portion of project from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE is $42,511,000 (1987) of which $37,911,000 is Federal cost for construction and $4,600,000 local costs for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units. Local interests have furnished assurances of their willingness and ability to fulfill local cooperation requirements for the remaining active units. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction on Levee Unit R-616 and on Stage 2 Fish & Wildlife Facilities and Stage 3 on Levee Unit L-611-614. Construction is complete except for drainage structure modifications and some other minor deficiencies on Levee Unit L-611-614. 14. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair, flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha area where it is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvement and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) December 1978 and Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11) December 1979. Construction of the dam portions of Sites 18 and 20 are complete. Remaining work includes construction of recreational facilities at both sites and channel improvement on the Big Papio Channel. Estimated total costs for the project are $57,300,000 Federal funds with $2,477,000 non-Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design studies were initiated in July 1987 for the Big Papio Channel. Design for Sites 18 and 20 continued by hired labor. Construction continued at Sites 18 and 20. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued at Sites 11 and 16. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 1,494,063. 15. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising Missouri River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 21-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 16. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 21-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement and to bear the first cost of associated improvements in the wildlife management area; pay, contribute in kind, or repay, with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 112,104. 17. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alterations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of Salt Creek survey report, remaining units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 21-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for the completed levee and channel improvement part of the project. For the dams, local interests are required to operate and maintain the permanent pools for fish and wildlife conservation and assume all costs related to utilization of the permanent pools for recreational purposes and insure public access to the pools. 21-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual visitation hours to the system of dams were estimated at 4,543,011. 18. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 21-B for authorizing legislation). 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the fiscal year are set forth in Table 21-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. Fiscal year costs were $209,511. Inspection of Non Federal flood protection works was initiated in FY 1984. The cost incurred for FY 1987 was $325,962. 20. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1987 were $278,567 and total costs to September 30, 1987 were $5,088,333. 21. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for FY 1987 were $341,038 for disaster preparedness and emergency operations, and $122,451 for repair and restoration. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). Stage II construction continued on Lost Creek at Columbus, NE. Plans and specifications are being done on Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE and Lodge Pole Creek, Sidney, NE. Reconnaissance Reports are being prepared on Beaverhead River, Twin Bridges, MT; Belfield, ND; Cache La Poudre River, Greeley, CO; Carter Lake, NE; Dry Creek, Linday, NE; Elkhorn River, Crowell, NE; Lodge Creek, Chinook, MT; Maple Creek, East Fork, Howells, NE; Milk River, Malta, MT; Nowood River, Manderson, WY; Platte River Cedar Creek, NE; Square Butte Creek, Center, ND; Thirty Mile Creek, Harlem, MT. Verdigre Creek, Verdigre, NE. Detailed Project Study is being prepared on Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND. Five negative Initial Appraisal Studies were submitted during FY 87 at a total cost of $28,085. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946). Operations under this heading were as follows: Construction was completed on 12 projects; Big Sioux River, Harrisburg, SD; completed in June 1987; operation and maintenance manual completed in February 1987. Big Sioux River, Sec 4, Plymouth, IA, completed October 1986; operation and maintenance manual completed in March 1987. Blackbird Creek, Burt Co., NE; completed in October 1986, operation and maintenance manual completed in February 1987. Elk Creek, Willis, NE, completed in November 1987, operation and maintenance manual completed in March 1987. Little Sioux River, Anthon, IA, completed in March 1987, operation and maintenance manual scheduled for completion in December 1987. Marne Creek, Yankton, SD, completed in September 1987; operation and maintenance manual scheduled for completion in February 1988. Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain, WY, completed in September 1987, operation and maintenance manual completed in March 1987. Muddy Creek, Syracuse NE, completed in May 1987, operation and maintenance manual scheduled for completion in February 1987. South Platte River, Fort Lupton, CO completed January 1987, operation and maintenance manual completed June 1987. South Creek, Martinsburg, NE (Sites 1 & 2) completed November 1986 operation and maintenance manual completed March 1987. South Platte River, Weldona, CO completed November 1986 operation and maintenance manual completed March 1987. South Platte River, Morgan Co., CO; completed October 1986, operation and maintenance manual completed April 1987. Plans and specifications are currently being prepared on Hauser Lake, MT; James River, Yankton, SD; Logan Creek, Bancroft, NE; Muckey Creek, Mapleton, IA; Niobrara River, Carns Bridge, Bassett, NE; Platte River, North Bend, NE; Platte River, Ginger Cove Lagoon, NE; Soldier River, Ute, IA; Waterman Creek, O'Brien, Co., IA; and West Nishnabotna, River, Oakland, IA. The following projects were initiated in FY 1987, Battle Creek, Blaine, Co., MT (Unruh Bridge); Knife River, Stanton, ND; Lovell Sewage Lagoons, WY; Madison River, Madison, MT (HWY 287); Milk River, Blaine, Co., MT (Finley Bridge); Milk River, Blaine, Co., MT (Zurich Bridge); Milk River, Malta, MT (Sewerline); and Yellowstone River, MT (HWY 1-90). 21-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 22. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River, 987.4 miles above mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall Reservoir. Big Bend Reservoir extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of eight 58,500 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,883,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple uses. During the period, 1,036,780,000 net kilowatt- hours of electricity were produced. Installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams continued. Initiated work on emergency repair to generator unit #1, construction of new administration building, purchase spare generator coils, mitigation of Whistling Elk archaeological site, and extend relief well outfall pipes. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 953,997. 23. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Location. Reservoir is in Missouri River Valley in Mc- Cone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above mouth of Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest, and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,909,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on original project in October 1933 and on second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,250 KW, 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued work on installation of a powerplant controller system for the six Missouri River dams. Initiated work on replacement of the electrical distribution system shaft and spillway areas. Fort Peck Lake was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multi-purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 829,690,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. Total cost of Operation and Maintenance during the period was $4,383,100, however, reimbursement from the Western Area Power Administration for the prorata share of Operation and Maintenance cost of the power plant reduced net cost to $2,455,200. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 529,173. 24. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above mouth of Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet, a crest length of 10,700 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,574,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple uses. Generating facilities produced 1,957,347,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Continued work on installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams, initiated work on new maintenance facility, rehabilitate mechanical system at power plant, and paint penstock and surge tank interiors unit #3. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 2,168,073. 25. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above mouth of river and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 24,137,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units, three units rated at 80,000 kilowatts each, and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each, three flood control tunnels and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000 including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with 21-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required except cost sharing with the State of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 2,175,304,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Continued work on installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams. Initiated work on powerhouse and intake structure roofing, painting turbine and surge tank interiors unit #4, rehabilitate heat exchanger, rehabilitate spillway gates and pavement repair. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 9,787,846. 26. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A concrete and rolled-earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 504,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 33,333 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of original project was initiated in March 1952 and was completed in 1964. Project is providing its multiple purpose benefits for flood control, navigation, power, and other uses. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating units produced 839,255,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during fiscal year. Continued work on installation of a power plant controller system for the Missouri River dams. Initiated work on rehabilitation of HVAC and renovation of the visitors center. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 5,109,126. 27. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam with maximum height of 245 feet, a crest length of 9,300 feet, and reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,337,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 85,000 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated August 1948 and project placed in operation June 1963. Land acquisition is 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Generating facilities produced 2,928,971,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Installation of a power plant controller system on the Missouri River dams continued. Initiated work on bank stabilization at the Havens archeological site, boundary surveys and monumentation near Mobridge, SD, replace cable tunnel oil pipe supports, repair left tailrace retaining wall, and rehabilitation of the Lake Pocasse spillway channel. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 7,052,216. Miscellaneous 28. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $280,654.77. 29. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal Year 1987 costs totaled $1,838,902 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 21-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Continuation of Planning and Engineering, Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Advance Engineering and Design. 21-8 TABLE 21-A OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2. Sioux City Marina 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 5. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 7. Fall River Basin, SD 8. Great Falls, MT (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 1 I l FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 2,330,000 1,792,000 2,306,324 1,814,990 - 100,000 - 100,000 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,660 1,544,000 2,018,572 470,000 501,369 332,000 440,291 99,000 112,048 1,600,000 889,677 530,250 2,130,250 889,677 456,000 451,280 285,000 284,444 831,000 1,150,517 296,000 326,557 200,000 1,235,141 200,000 1,235,141 2,47 2,46 -2 -2 26 27 17 17 60 1,361 94 60 1,46 47' 47 - -6[ 56 56( 26( 254 -8C 118 1,073 261,000 258,363 168,000 168,693 2,022,000 2,573,718 150,980 492,748 2,172,980 3,066,466 625,000 623,240 -177,023 373,000 374,702 253,000 260,565 92,375 129,600 221,975 - 189,225,9911 - 189,225,9911 5,000 106,398,419 4,261 106,383,022 0,000 80,000 1,364 78,636 - 62,003,600 - 62,003,600 8,000 1,860,000 5,403 1,858,599 - 4,372,174 - 4,372,174 5,000 1,845,043 4,940 1,843,643 0,000 93,782,700 9,780 93,664,209 3,941 1,246,171 6,498 743,375 3,941 95,028,871 6,278 94,407,584 4,000 3,523,800 1,710 3,516,539 5,000 15,220,364 - 15,216,249 7,000 5,993,511 3,993 5,990,039 - 5,538,432 - 5,538,432 3,000 3,331,141 1,829 3,319,109 ),000 11,937,1124 x,213 11,864,3974 - 308,600 - 308,600 ),000 12,245,7124 3,213 12,172,9974 825,000 -80 563,139 118 21-9 ~ll~~~"~~l~"~"""~R""""11"1~11~11"1"-~ -11 --- ~ II ~I 1111_1 1n-1., 11 ~-L~.r~-~UI 17 227,000 225,407 127,000 126,115 2,584,000 1,892,138 561,000 154,129 3,145,000 2,046,267 748,000 752,420 -53,000 55,464 404,000 402,689 287,000 288,506 825,000 563,139 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 9. Little Sioux River New Work: and Tributaries, IA Approp. Cost (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 10. Lost Creek, Columbus, NE (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 11. Missouri National Recreational River NE & SD 12. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA 13. Missouri River, Levees, IA, NE, KS & MO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 14. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 16. Pipestem Lake, ND 17. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 19. Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,300,000 3,467,000 1,291,413 3,288,990 1,300,000 1,291,413 1,367,000 703,300 5,000 1,372,000 703,300 6,698 40,000 37,996 495,000 1,269,792 495,000 1,269,792 3,655,000 6,943,608 198,000 205,100 3,467,000 3,288,990 610,869 8,345 619,214 20,000 215 200,000 32,073 34,000 36,231 1,462,000 3,076,518 38,810 1,462,000 3,115,328 2,428,000 2,524,245 306,000 312,244 310,000 345,000 375,541 349,945 10,045 5,302 457,000 537,000 444,306 549,826 311,000 183,000 276,596 232,834 176,247 176,247 294,000 547,369 294,000 547,369 136,000 95,984 352,000 511,978 39,000 38,585 287,000 218,155 287,000 218,155 1,627,000 1,610,484 473,000 469,039 271,000 269,506 213 390,000 387,776 278,000 277,285 100,000 26,511 6,329 20,599,920 20,511,562 6,329 106,329 20,606,249 26,511 20,511,562 -15,000 3,469,518 -50,000 3,379,020 - 147,300 125,069 147,300 -15,000 3,616,818 74,232 3,526,320 25,000 781,800 57,516 754,299 - 552,000 5,533 549,585 - 11,294,414 - 11,294,414 52,000 4,442,000 51,304 4,440,254 120,000 39,909,388 166,202 39,832,918 - 38,810 - 38,810 120,000 39,948,198 166,202 39,871,728 2,270,000 45,887,7625 2,129,384 45,701,5195 514,000 2,463,000 513,416 2,450,089 - 9,277,545 - 9,277,545 351,000 2,994,000 352,918 2,993,520 - 12,197,6222 - 12,197,6222 946,000 7,652,475 946,653 7,648,921 209,000 2,808,348 209,511 2,808,142 21-10 - -~I- I -I--- ------- - -- OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 19. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees 20. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 22. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 23. Fort Peck Lake, MT 24. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 25. Garrison Dam- Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, SD and NE 27. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND Funding Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Major Rehab Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total Thru FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 46,000 46,094 209,000 208,870 243,000 243,000 3,066,000 3,396,128 -22,000 1,694 2,391,000 3,470,461 455,000 464,367 6,379,000 7,162,997 287,000 296,675 6,083,000 7,543,117 130,000 130,000 3,699,000 3,817,338 737,000 746,523 7,723,000 9,237,595 44,000 44,525 268,000 269,355 33,000 32,979 3,420,000 3,482,368 -4,091 4,327,000 4,300,604 112,000 114,700 5,701,000 5,896,791 6 9,166,000 9,179,213 163,000 163,000 3,641,000 3,602,668 -308,000 -307,758 8,119,000 8,062,707 43,000 43,167 274,000 273,069 -25,000 -24,979 3,667,000 3,642,938 4,200 3,399,000 3,461,784 311 6,957,000 6,925,109 7,148,000 7,144,937 78,000 78,000 4,246,000 4,311,714 -2,892 7,149,000 7,283,549 334,000 494,000 325,962 485,846 279,000 5,089,976 278,567 5,088,333 - 107,497,597 . 107,497,597 4,861,200 47,439,1743 4,868,068 47,392,2923 - 158,428,080 - 158,428,080 2,555,400 55,362,9543 2.535,237 55,312,8323 - 199,065,883 - 199,065,883 6,418,100 86,895,9523 6,525,664 86,851,3193 - 295,729,613 - 295,729,613 8,332,700 100,254,4003 8,366,465 100,195,1993 - 4,208,310 - 4,208,310 - 686,961 - 686,961 - 49,617,239 - 49,617,239 5,307,300 64,600,4503 5,306,454 64,571,7793 - 346,520,603 - 346,517,696 7,452,300 90,491,4453 7,395,467 90,370,5863 1. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. 2. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. 3. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 4. Includes $110,000 transferred to inactive portion for planning cost. 5. Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 21-11 -- - -~-- ' -- I -- -- - -- -- -- ------------------- ---;------ - - -----~I-pl---m~--~'~- ~ ~Is II ---" - -- -- - - - - - -- SSeeection REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 1. Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Flood Control Act of 1950 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Acts of 1955, 1965 Flood Control Act of 1954 June 30, 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE Appropriation of $12 million authorized for H securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend F (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments P1 totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works P Admimnistration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux H City, IA. P For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood control reservoir and water supply. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. GREAT FALLS, MT Levees and channel improvement for local protection. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Correction of design deficiency. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. . Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 70-560 L 71-520 PL 73-67 . Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 343, 85th Cong. PL 85-500 PL 89-298 PL 341, 80th Cong. PL 83-780 PL 858, 80th Cong. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri PL 95-625 River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. and other Federal improvements to achieve PL 99-662 authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exempt prohibition of encroachments for Mineral Ave/Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. 21-12 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. - ----- - I -- I--- - I --s U-- -Z1-1-- -- PP----L~--~~-- --~LI-------~~11^------~ --s l - OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO. Levees along both sides of river from H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. Sioux City, IA to Kansas City, MO. PL 77-228 Extended project from Kansas City, MO to mouth H. Doc. 475, 78th Cong. and provided for increased protection. PL 78-534 S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing pro- H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. tection for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. PL 90-485 Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. improvement on Big Papillion Creek, and to PL 99-662 Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River Basin and authorized $9 million for Doc. 1, 75th Cong. initiation and partial accomplishment. PL 75-761 Modified general comprehensive plan to include H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on PL 77-228 Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. Missouri River Basin and authorized additional and 247, 78th Cong. $200 million. PL 78-534 Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 191 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st River Basin and authorized additional Cong. PL 83-780 $217,710,000. Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux PL 83-776 Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri PL 84-505 River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. River Basin and authorized additional $200 PL 85-500 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution PL 86-645 of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of PL 88-253 general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution PL 89-042 of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $20 million for prosecution PL 90-17 of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 21-13 12. 13. 14. 15. - -- -- -- I ----~- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Dec 22, 1944 June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 June 3, 1948 Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution PL of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution H. I of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River S. Basin. PL Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan S. E Missouri Basin Program. PL Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. H. I PL Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution PL of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution PL of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution PL of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution PL of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and H. I downstream areas. PL SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood H. I control around Lincoln, NE. PL SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte H. I River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for PL initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. I control and other purposes in the Missouri 78t River Basin. 90-483 D)oc. 91-748 and Doc. 91-895 91-282 )oc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. 91-576 D)oc. 91-23 and 91-611 92-222 93-251 94-347 95-189 D)oc. 266, 89th Cong. 89-298 D)oc. 396, 84th Cong. 85-500 D)oc. 669, 80th Cong. 81-516 PL 90-17 PL 90-843 PL 91-282 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 D)oc. 475, S. Doc. 247, th Cong. PL 78-534 FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. Chief of Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by PL 74-409 Executive Order by the President and included in Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a PL 75-529 hydroelectric powerplant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. Modified authorization to provide for full multiple H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 purpose operation. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 Payments to be made to school districts serving PL 80-586 project as reimbursement for educational facilities (including transportation to and from school) for pupils who are dependents of persons engaged in construction, operation, and maintenance of projects. 21-14 16. 17. 18. 22. 23. - OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Water Resources Modified authorization to include recreation as a H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. Development Act project purpose. PL 99-662 of 1986 24. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 control and other purposes in the Missouri and 247, 78th Cong. River Basin. PL 78-534 25. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, PWA 1968 control and other purposes in the Missouri 78th Cong. PL 78-534 River Basin. 26. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, control and other purposes in the Missouri 78th Cong. PL 78-534 River Basin. 27. OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, SD & ND Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 control and other purposes in the Missouri and 247, 78th Cong. River Basin. PL 78-534 TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1987 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582- TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Full Report Cost to September 30, 1987 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD1 Complete 1940 37,410- Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934- Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE 2 Complete 1970 262,479 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE 2 Complete 1974 293,016 - Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND 2 Complete 1960 102,980 - Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 - Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 -- Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 21-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 21-E (Continued) Project Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD2 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N.D. Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Forsyth, MT Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Gering Valley, NE Glasgow, MT Greybull, WY Havre, MT Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Hooper, NE 2 Ida Grove, IA 2 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Linton, ND2 Little Papillion Creek, NE Loup River, Columbus, NE 2 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD Lower Heart River, ND Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks 2 Mandan, Heart River, ND Marmarth, ND McCook Lake, SD Miles City, MT Missouri River, Aten, NE Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Mott, ND Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE 2 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Norfolk, NE Omaha, NE Pierce, NE Platte River Near Schuyler, NE 2 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Platte River and Tributaries, NE Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Saco, MT Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Sheridan, WY3 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT 2 Sioux Falls, SD South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO Vaughn, MT, Sun River 2 Waterloo, NE West Point, NE Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Status Complete Complete Active Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Deferred Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Cost to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1981 1964 1978 1970 1950 1982 1971 1939 1960 1958 1954 1968 1972 1950 1973 1976 1973 1966 1964 1967 1960 1960 1958 1956 1951 1945 1976 1948 1971 1954 1967 1948 1971 1980 1958 1978 1976 1951 1966 1957 1971 1970 1966 1960 Operation and Maintenance 234,839 676,916 169,498 147,627 578,791 99,370 1,000,000 236,000 3,400,504 5,903,640 296,597 74,940 257,398 1,538,269 1,004,000 67,793 184,380 2,618,809 25,747 5,288,707 457,582 237,883 149,596 230,294 5,633 - 1. Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Includes inactive segment. 21-16 _ I __ Construction 3,000,000 400,000 616,639 11,556,667 255,177 435,000 5,989,663 16,832 248,507 1,825,881 50,216 326,667 522,344 3,643,111 1,000,000 1,961,173 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 21-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1987 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 Springfield, SD Water Intake Active - -- Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Authority Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Date Expended Expended Billings, MT 1976 Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 75,000 - 23 Mar 81 Boulder, CO Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO Davids Creek Lake, IA Dayton, WY 1976 1961 1943 1972 1956 1952 1969 1973 1950 1966 1962 1968 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE Indian Creek Lake, IA Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE Morrison, Bear Creek, CO Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD Shell Creek, NE Vermillion River and Tribs, SD FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 PL 77-228 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 203, PL 90-483 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA Of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 21-17 142,666 135,000 30,000 1,000 71,000 208,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 21-H MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE (See Section 13 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 Mosquito Creek Levee 14.2 Complete 1950 L601 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 15.0 Complete 1966 L594 Pleasant Valley Levee 11.4 Complete 1964 R580 Nebraska City Levee 0.2 Complete 1950 L575 Thurman-Hamburg Levee 45.8 Complete 1950 R573 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 5.9 Complete 1950 R562 Peru Dike 7.6 Complete 1950 L561-550 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 41.3 Complete 1952 R548 Brownville-Nemaha Levee 19.5 Complete 1952 L536 Mill Creek Levee 13.6 Complete 1952 R520 Richardson County Drainage Dist. No. 8 6.3 Complete 1960 R613 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 14.0 Complete 1971 R616 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 4.5 Complete 1987 L611-614 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 22.0 Under Construction LL562617,- 5L5602 4, Remedial Studies on Completed Units Studies Complete Comprehensive Restudy of Levee System Scheduled to Start 1988 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 21-I (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT 1 ,2 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND 1 ,2 299,938,000 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE)1',3 37,911,000 4,600,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe SD and ND 1 ,2 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD1,2 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD 1 ,2 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE 1 ,2 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 2 13,516,000 - Omaha, NE 2 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA 2 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND 1 ,2 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO 1 ,2 15,220,000 285,000 1 Details presented on individual report. 2Completed. 3 Active portion of project. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-J (See Section 19 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Jun 86 Saco, Beaver Creek Aug 87 Havre, Milk River Aug 87 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Aug 87 Clyde Park, Shields River Nov 86 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Jun 84 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Apr 87 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Nov 86 Vaughn, Sun River Sep 87 *Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston Sep 85 21-18 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-J (Continued) (See Section 19 of Text) Location *Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge *Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge *Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge *Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon *Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings *Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, Near Billings *Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, Near Big Timber *Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks *Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo *Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges *Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges *Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin *Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton Month Inspected Inactive Nov 86 Inactive Inactive Inactive Nov 86 Nov 86 Feb87 Feb87 Feb87 Feb87 Inactive Nov 86 Wyoming Greybull, Big Horn River Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks *Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell *Shoshone River, Byron North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Marmarth, Little Missouri River Scranton, Buffalo South Dakota Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Herreid, Spring Creek *Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood *Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre *Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau *Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton *Vermillion River, Vermillion *Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh *Big Sioux River, Jefferson Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam *Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora *Cache La Poudre River, Windsor *South Platte River, Kersey *South Platte River, Merino *South Platte River, Iliff *South Platte River, Platteville *Big Thompson River, Johnstown Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington St. Water and Sanitary District Nov 86 Nov 86 Nov 86 Nov 86 Aug87 Aug87 Aug87 Jul 87 Aug 86 Sep 87 Sep 87 Sep 85 Sep 87 Jun 85 Apr 87 Apr87 Sep 87 Apr87 Apr 87 Apr87 Apr87 Jul 87 Jul 86 Jul 86 Jul 86 Jul 86 Jul 86 Jul 86 Jul86 Jul 86 Jul 86 21-19 - - - I- I-- Y----- -----~ -~LI REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-J (Continued) (See Section 19 of Text) Location Month Inspected Nebraska Blackbird Creek, Decatur Sep 87 Omaha, Missouri River Sep 87 Waterloo, Elkhorn River May 87 West Point, Elkhorn River Sep 87 Pierce, Elkhorn River May 87 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Jun 87 Hooper, Elkhorn River Jun 87 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Aug 87 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Jun 87 *Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island Sep 87 *Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Aug 87 *Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Sep 87 *Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Sep 87 *North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Dec 85 *Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft Sep 87 *Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Sep 87 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River May 87 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Jul87 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Feb 87 Macy, Blackbird Creek Jun 87 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Jul87 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 87 Columbus, Loup River Aug 87 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Aug 87 *Tangeman, Little Nemaha River Sep 87 *Julian, Rock Creek Inactive *Muddy Creek near Syracuse Jul87 *Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue Aug 87 *Platte River, Brady Aug 87 *Elm Creek, Decatur Sep 87 *Wiggle Creek, Homer Sep 87 *Elk Creek, Jackson Sep 87 *South Creek, Martinburg Sep 87 *Elk Creek, Willis Sep 87 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 87 *Shell Creek, County Road near Columbus Sep 87 *Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Sep 87 *Elm Creek, Burt County Sep 87 *Redbird Creek, O'Neal Sep 87 *Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln Aug 87 *Platte River, Ashland Sep 87 Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Jul87 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek May 87 Sioux City, Floyd River Jul87 Hawarden, Dry Creek Jul87 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River Aug 87 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 87 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Jul87 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Jun 87 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Malvern Sep 87 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, Near Hastings Sep 87 *East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex Aug 87 *Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Sep 87 *West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock Sep 87 *East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Sep 87 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Jun 87 21-20 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 21-J (Continued) (See Section 19 of Text) Location Month Inspected Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County *East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County *Little Sioux River, Anthon *Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees L601, Watkins Levee District L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 L594, Waubansie Drainage District L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District L575, Benton-Washington Levee District L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District L575, McKissock Island Levee District L575, Buchannan Levee District L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District L611-614, M & P Missouri River Levee District R613, Papio Natural Resources District R562, Peru Levee District R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District R548, Little Nemaha Levee District R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Jul 87 Sep 87 Sep 87 Sep 87 Apr 87 Jul 87 Jul87 Jun 87 Jul 87 Jul 87 Aug87 Aug 87 Aug 87 Aug87 Jul87 Aug 87 Jun 87 Sep 87 Jul 87 Jul 87 Jul 87 Jul 87 Jun87 Sep 87 *Denotes Section 14 Projects ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 21-K (See Section 29 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 87 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Platte River Basin, CO 135,700 Eastern SD and Upper Big Sioux River, SD, IA 113,699 Missouri River, SD, NE, ND, MT 557,405 Western Dakotas Region of SD 2,135 Subtotal 808,939 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Cannonball River at Mott, ND 25,137 Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 110,616 Deauthorization Review Program 6,065 Subtotal 141,818 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations 97,461 FERC Licensing 1,987 Subtotal 99,448 21-21 -- ---- I- --~ - -~- - ------ ~- --- - - -I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 21-K (Continued) (See Section 29 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 87 Categories Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) 4,349 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) 14,983 Missouri River Basin Commission (183) 2,518 Planning Assistance to States (186) 70,397 Technical Assistance for Streambank Erosion (188) 13,817 Subtotal 106,064 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,156,269 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) 184,511 Hydrologic Studies (260) 34,732 TOTAL (Category 200) 219,243 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (Category 400) Perry Creek, IA (450) 213,848 Westerly Creek, CO (450) 90,758 Gregory County Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Facility (460) 3,612 TOTAL (Category 400) 308,218 PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION (Category 500) None ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Westerly Creek, CO (650) 155,172 TOTAL (Category 600) 155,172 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 1,838,902 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 21-L (See Section 21 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness - 300,645 Flood Flight and Rescue Operations - 40,393 Rehabilitation - 112,638 Advance Measures - 9,812 Section 205: Beaverhead River, Twin Bridges, MT R 20,180 Belfield, ND R 7,476 Cache La Poudre River, Greeley, CO R 17,655 Carter Lake, NE R 3,152 Dry Creek, Linday, NE R 24,940 Elkhorn River Crowell, NE R 3,730 Lodge Creek, Chinook, MT R 3,253 Lodge Pole Creek, Sidney, NE P 109,482 Lost Creek at Columbus, NE C -50,864 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND D 24,576 Maple Creek, East Fork, Howells, NE R 25,448 21-22 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 21-L (Continued) (See Section 21 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Milk River, Malta, MT R 3,325 Nowood River, Manderson, WY R 4,844 Pebble Creek Scribner, NE P 114,706 Platte River Cedar Creek, NE R 2,550 Square Butte Creek, Center, NE R 3,905 Thirty Mile Creek, Harlem, MT R 3,319 Verdigre Creek, Verdigre, NE R 20,836 5 Negative Appraisals 28,085 Total (Section 205) 370,598 Section 14: Battle Creek, Blaine Co, MT, (Unruh Bridge) R 6,895 Big Sioux River Harrisburg, SD C 38,505 Big Sioux River, IA (Sec 32) C 23,288 Big Sioux River, Plymouth, IA (Sec 4) C -17 Blackbird Creek, Burt Co, NE C 21,815 Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, CO C 102 Cr Bridge Elm Creek Decatur, NE C 569 Elk Creek, Jackson, NE C 980 Elk Creek, Willis, NE C 28,605 Elm Creek, Burt Co, NE C 825 Elm Creek, Decatur, NE (Broadway St. Bridge) C 87 Elm Creek, Burt Co, NE (Sec 15) C 253 Elm Creek, Burt Co, NE (Sec 16) C 391 Hauser Lake, MT P 18,049 Hudson, WY (City Wells) R 4,000 James River, Yankton, SD P 15,631 Knife River, Stanton, ND R 7,500 Little Sioux River, Anthon, IA C 43,125 Logan Creek, Bancroft, NE C 7,313 Lovell, WY (Sewage Lagoons) R 3,649 Madison River, Madison, MT (Hwy 287) R 7,474 Marne Creek, Yankton, SD C 134,779 Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain, WY C 30,252 Milk River, Blaine Co, MT (FInley Bridge) R 6,988 Milk River, Blaine Co, MT (Zurich Bridge) R 6,666 Milk River, Malta, MT (Sewerline) R 6,914 Muckey Creek, Mapleton, IA C 12,588 Muddy Creek, Syracuse, NE C 14,604 Muddy Creek, Syracuse, NE (Jobs Bill) C 14,029 Niobrara River, Bassett, NE (Carnes Bridge) C 7,928 Platte River, Brady, NE C 614 Platte River, Camp Ashland, NE C 125,440 Platte River, North Bend, NE P 17,008 Platte River, Ginger Cove Lagoon, NE P 6,961 Redbird Creek, Holt Co., NE C 875 Salt Creek, Lincoln, NE C 717 Soldier River, Ute, IA P 12,236 South Creek, Martinsburg, NE (Sites 1 & 2) C 21,894 South Platte River, Fort Lupton, CO C 32,553 South Platte River, Iliff, CO C 473 South Platte River, Kersey, CO C 173 South Platte River, Merino, CO C 716 South Platte River, Morgan Co, CO C 124,798 South Platte River, Platteville, NE C 316 South Platte River, Weldona, CO C 39,368 Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD C 3,459 Vermillion River, Vermillion, SD (Waste Water Treat. Plant) C 2,102 Waterman Creek, O'Brien Co, IA P 11,425 21-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 21-L (Continued) (See Section 21 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost West Nishnabotna, River, Oakland, IA P 8,851 West Papillion Creek, Douglas, Co, NE C 49,344 Wigle Creek, Homer, NE C 780 Yellowstone River, MT C 78 Yellowstone River, MT (Hwy 1-90) R 6,954 26 Negative Appraisals 138,589 Total (Section 14) 1,069,511 Total Flood Control Activities 1,903,597 R = Recon D =Detailed Project Study P = Plans & Specs C =Construction - =Does Not Apply 21-24 -1-11-11-11 ~--~l~-UI--"ll-~ll-II ~II 111 - 111111 1111 --- 1 - 1 11 -1-111 1 I-----Y -~-----Y-----YYIII OHIO RIVER * For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed stuctures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va., and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island and Hannibal locks and dam. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, Ky., and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Gallipolis, Greenup and Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine locks and dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal) Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland locks and dams and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ................................. 22-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River............ 22-3 Tables Table 22-A Cost and Financial Statement..... 22-5 Table 22-B Authorizing Legislation........... 22-6 Table 22-C Not Applicable Table 22-D Not Applicable Table 22-E Not Applicable Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela rivers at Pittsburgh, Pa., and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, Ill. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide a channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, Ky. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine locks and dams with an auxiliary lock at Gallipolis being 110 by 360 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Gallipolis are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable Table 22-F Table 22-G Table 22-H Table 22-I Table 22-J Not Applicable Not Applicable Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project .......................... 22-6 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ............. 22-6 Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics ........................ 22-7 type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and Uniontown; two locks 110 by 1200 feet at Smithland; 110 by 1,200 foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110 by 1200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 22-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project, 1983), exclusive of Gallipolis Locks and Dam reported under Kanawha River project is $1,778,840,999, estimated non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968 for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Gallipolis Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935 Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown Locks and Dam, presently under construction; and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, presently under construction, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. Table 22-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing projects. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 21-I for licenses. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 22-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in fiscal year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 22-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Emsworth Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Upper lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber, were installed by hired labor in October 1981. Contract for Locks and Dams Rehabilitation, awarded October 15, 1981, was completed on November 9, 1984. Dam work included: placing stone erosion protection downstream of both back channel and main channel, structurally rehabilitating all 14 dam gates, painting of the service bridge on main channel dam and painting dam gates on the back channel. Lock work included: rehabilitation of the river chamber and land chamber including all lock machinery. Contract for modernizing electrical system of main and back channel dams, awarded August 6, 1984 for $1,543,000 was completed on June 27, 1986. Contract for scour protection repairs, gate bay #4, was awarded on November 16, 1984 for $347,870 and completed on February 21, 1985. Contract for shotcrete repairs consisting of placing shotcrete coating, repairing damaged areas with reinforced shotcrete and repairing monolith joints on the lock walls with reinforced shotcrete, awarded on February 28, 1985, for $377,830 was completed on August 9, 1985. Contract for miscellaneous painting and sealing concrete surfaces, awarded April 17, 1985 for $289,270 was completed February 9, 1987. Expenditures during FY 1987 for real estate acquisition and coordination, construction, and engineering and design of remaining project was $123,,815. Montgomery Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Contracts completed include: Fabrication of lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber for $1,049,132; upper guard wall cells for $856,468; emergency dam bulkheads for $329,631; fabrication of 56-foot lock miter gates for $344,519. Contract for installation of 56-foot lock miter gates and major rehabilitation of locks and dam, awarded on July 29, 22-2 OHIO RIVER 1985 for $22,193,960 is 81 percent complete. Installation of 110-foot lock miter gates completed by hired labor. Overall scheduled completion date is March 1989. Expenditures during FY 1987 for real estate coordination, construction, engineering and design of remaining project was $9,431,588. Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Gallipolis Lock and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for a single 1200-foot lock in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. During the fiscal year real estate acquisition continued. Plans and Specifications were completed. The project was advertised and bids were opened in September 1987. The contract is scheduled for award in October 1987. The total estimated cost of the project is $336,000,000, which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent inland waterways trust fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Markland Locks and Dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area was authorized by Public Law 97-137 on December 29, 1981. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and-other wildlife. Planning, consisted of efforts to locate a Non-Federal sponsor to help cost share project accomplishments. Real Estates activities consisted of acquisition procedures against forty of the fifty tracts needed for the projects: $71,357. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. Cannelton Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for continuing action on Declarations of Taking on one tract. $26,848. Newburgh Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for continuing action on Declarations of Taking on one tract. $3,173. Uniontown Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for continuing action on Declarations of Taking on one tract. $1,990. Smithland Locks and Dam: All major construction features are complete and the project was advanced to 99 percent completion. Land acquisition is complete except for purchasing of two mineral tracts at one recreation site. One relocation contract for electric lines is being delayed for rights-of-way problems. Contracts for recreational sites at Blackburn, KY, Site 8 and Birdsville, KY, Site 2 were completed. Contracts for recreational sites at Lusk Creek, IL, Site 4, and Caseyville, KY, Site 8A were advanced to 99 percent and 84 percent completion, respectively. A contract for paving over demolition was completed. Engineering and Design of remaining projects features was continued. $968,965. Locks and Dam No. 52 (New Lock): Construction initiated in December 1967 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Construction initiated in December 1972 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Project is complete. A contract to repair the beartrap piers and dam sill was awarded in July 1985 and advanced to completion. A contract to repair miter gates and piston was advanced to completion. Engineering and design of remaining project features was completed: $131,218. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Project is 99 percent complete. A contract to reinforce and grout beartrap piers and install piston rods was awarded in August 1985 and advanced to completion. A contract to construct a stone dike was awarded in August 1986 and advanced to completion. A contract to modify electrical wiring at 1200-foot locks was awarded 20 May 1987 and advanced to 67 percent completion. Wicket assemblies were installed with hired labor: $278,887. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Cost were $9,777,666 for Pittsburgh District, $12,051,903 for Huntington District and $10,950,507 for Louisville District. Dashields Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Feature Design Memorandum for Major Rehabilitation of Locks and Dam was completed on September 17, 1985. Contract for installation of mooring cells, awarded May 29, 1986, for $474,320 was completed on May 6, 1987. Contract for Rehabilitation of Locks and Dam was awarded on September 17, 1987 for $25,918,504. Overall scheduled completion date is March 1990. Expenditures during FY 1987 for construction and engineering and design for rehabilitation project was $1,578,959. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district the work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work, but in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also to permit movemment of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, Pa., to 80 feet at Cincinnati, Ohio, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, Ky. (head of falls), 53.8 feet at Evansville, Ind., and 59.5 feet at Cairo, Ill. (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16,160,000, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, Ind., authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954) is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 22-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927 authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong. 1st sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,380,275. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River in FY 87. Dredging by contract: Huntington District 777,847 cubic yards at $1,856,811 and Louisville District 1,029,381 cubic yards at $1,847,109. 22-4 OHIO RIVER TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 1. Construction of New Work Locks and Dams Approp. $1,801,200 $1,814,000 $7,065,000 $5,479,000 $1,396,198,7721 3 5s o1107 21 on Ohio River Cost 2,573,878 2,518,511 6,639,783 4,974,653 1,394,326,3951 3 6 11 12 15 16 18 21 Maint. Approp. 30,976,373 31,056,817 32,293,874 33,309,500 622,952,3342 4 19 Cost 30,961,371 33,742,851 32,804,809 32,780,076 621,866,7102 13 14 19 20 Rehab. Approp. 10,189,000 4,605,000 10,151,000 12,486,000 80,001,572 Cost 7,502,809 6,484,902 12,571,165 9,965,508 76,604,069 Rehab.(O&M) Approp. - - 1,267,100 1,784,400 3,051,500 Cost - - 1,166,100 1,578,959 2,745,059 2. Open Channel New Work Work, Ohio River Approp. - - - - 15,962,2609 Cost - - - - 15,962,2608 Maint. Approp. 5,265,000 5,029,763 4,508,800 3,860,500 112,477,726"9 Cost 4,479,208 5,799,647 4,555,393 3,854,324 112,449,1567 9 Rehab. Approp. - - - - 944,649 Cost - - - - 944,649 1 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. $ Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4 Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. s Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 8 Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. ' Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8 Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. s Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 10 Includes $100,000 placed in FY 1971 Budget Reserve. 11 Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 12 Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13 Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. 14 Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15 Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 16 Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. "1 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds and $1,759,812 Code 713 Funds. ' Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. 19 Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). 20so Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. 21 Includes $4,250,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River March 3, 1827 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. January 21, 1927 Construct ice piers as a part of project, with funds H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. July 3, 1930 Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near H. Doc., 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Evansville, Ind., and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. July 3, 1958 Act of March 3, 1827 modified to include maintenance H. Doc., 434, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of River slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. Locks and Dams, Ohio River December 29, 1981 Act of December 29, 1981 established the 1,000 H.R. 2241, PL 97-137, Title II, acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conser- 95 Stat. 1710 vation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 TABLE 22-H (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $1,301,929,220 $580,904,993 $79,349,128 $1,962,183,341 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 - 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation - 3,039,789 - 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 -254,578 Executive 1963 0 Total 1,306,602,2373 584,002,548"' 279,349,1284 1,969,953,913 1 Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under 4 Includes $2,745,059 cost for O&M Rehabilitation. permanent indefinite appropriation. 2 Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care of previous Note: All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes projects. of Table 22-A. 3 Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSES TABLE 22-I AT LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam F.E.R.C. License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 License Public Service Co. Louisville Gas and Ohio Power Co. City of Vanceburg, of Indiana Electric Co. Kentucky Annual Charge $45,950.00 $95,000.00 $64,232.00 $261,103.00 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1987 $963,061.64 $8,150,353.84 $349,905.00 $1,252,472.00 22-6 TABLE 22-4 Lock Miles and Below Dam Pittsburgh OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Distance From Nearest Town Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost of For Full mean Year to Date of Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 1 - Replaced 6 2 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - 3 - Replaced Replaced 13.3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1 4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54 4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH 9 - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 126 4 Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV 15 - Replaced 16 - Replaced 161.7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 110 600 18.0 710 0 17 0' 4 12 93 Rock 56 360 15 5' 5 1293 110 600 56 360 10 0 692 0 13 4' 17 53 Rock Rock and piles 100 Rock 1921 100 1929 110 600 56 360 17 5 682 0 16 0' 14 63 Rock and piles Rock and piles 100 110 1,200 110 600 205 6645 70' 14 83 Rock Rock 100 110 110 1,200 600 21 0 644 0 17.0' 18 0' Rock 110 1,200 110 600 21 0 6230 380 170 Rock 110 1,200 110 600 20 0 602 0 35 0 15 0 Rock and piles Rock Rock $ 870,034 43,342,366 ' 4 976,767 1,144,588 6,278,135' * - 1,071,472 - 1,080,132 - 1,123,442 1936 31,402,550 ' * - 1,075,000 - 1,167,456 1959 39,099,688 1,177,100 1,138,000 1,162,165 100 1968 56,623,946 - - 1,166,104 - - 1,222,389 - - 1,133,371 99 1972 87,649,818 - - 1,180,478 - - 1,275,532 Rock 100 1972 76,520,876 tb3 10 11 12 13 14 O 0 TABLE 224 (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237.5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.5 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 279.2 Gallipolis Locks and Dam, 0.7 mile below Hogsett, WV Gallipolis Modernization - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles above Foster, KY 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 22.0 582.0 37.0 15.0' Rock and piles 1,200 600 22.0 560.0 18.0 15.0 Rock and piles 600 360 23.0 538.0 18.0 15.0 Rock 1,200 600 23.0 538.0 18.0 15.0 Rock 1,200 600 30.0 515.0 18.0' 13.0 Rock 1,200 600 30.0 485.0 18.0' 15 0 Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock - - $ 1,362,591 - - 927,091 - - 1,213,848 - - 936,696 100 1968 62,591,255 - - 1,484,562 - - 1,218,798 - - 1,851,488 100 1971 64,922,680 - - 1,187,542 - - 1,925,205 - - 1,307,241 100 1937 5,687,433 - - 5,917,056's - - 1,063,133 - - 1,088,802 - - 1,579,618 100 1959 57,464,191 - - 1,359,231 - - 2,951,216 - - 1,937,166 - - 3,437,057 100 1962 74,188,216 60 do 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 0o 0 H O' 0 Au 0C 0 0 TABLE 224 (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 35 - Replaced 36 - Replaced 37 - Replaced 38 - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN 39 - Replaced 40 - Eliminated 41 -- Falls of the Ohio, 1 mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) 42 - Eliminated 43 - Replaced 44 - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 - Replaced 48 49 - Replaced - Replaced 846.0 Uniontown Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY 50 - Replaced 51 - Replaced 918.5 Smithland Locks and Dam, 2 miles above Smithland, KY $ 1,894,942 3,704,535 1,297,924 2,857,040 110 110 N/A 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 35.0 455.0 50.0 15.0 Rock N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,200 49.0 12.0 600 37.0 420.0 19.0 11.0 Rock 360 19.0 11.0 1,200 25.0 383.0 38.0 13.0 Rock 600 1,200 600 16.0 358.0 32.0 16.0 Rock 1,200 600 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 Rock 1,200 1,200 22.0 324.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Piles N/A Rock Rock 100 0 1963 N/A 63,019,403 2,222,448 7,658,134' 341,666 100$ 1961 45,726,189' 99 1972 2,592,242 2,819,930 3,202,890 96,787,43610 - - - 3,129,028 Pile 99 1975 104,481,255 - - - 4,415,526 - - - 3,062,710 - - - 3,325,964 Rock 99 1975 100,297,051 -- - - 3,751,762 - - - 4,370,566 Rock 95 1980 273,380,297 0 TABLE 22-4 (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Lock Miles and Below Dam Pittsburgh Distance From Nearest Town Width of Chamber (feet) Greatest Length Available For Full Width (feet) Upper Normal Pool Elevation (feet, mean Lift sea (feet) level) Depth on Miter Sills Upper Lower Character of Foundation (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Year Percent Opened to Complete Navigation 1 4 miles below Brookport, IL 1 4 miles below Brookport, Ii (New lock) 10 8 miles above Mound City, IL 10 8 miles above Mound City, IL (New lock) Mound City Lock and Dam 1 mile below Mound City, IL TOTAL 110 600 12 0 302 0 15 4 110 Pile 110 1,200 120 3020 154 110 Pile 110 600 134 2900 154 9 69 Pile 110 1,200 134 2900 154 96 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,336,284" Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 Pile 100 1929 9,994,66012 - 100 1982 38,570,920 - - - 1,539,470' 3 $1,464,461,31316 ' Depths are on emergency dam foundation and are controlling depths 2 Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938 ' Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths * Land chamber ' River chamber SRoller-gate dam Cost not included in total Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River ' Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921 Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928 Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30 Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960 Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971 Completed except for deferred alteration of iailroad bridge 2 Dam below not yet constructed Depth on lower miter sill at lower water o10 Reflects reduction of $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978 " Includes $8,874,537 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 1979 12 Includes $4,583,992 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 1979 13 For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized See Section 1 of text " Includes $37,480,601 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1980 14* Includes $25,664,939 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1983 14**Includes $2,745,059 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1986 (O&M funds) '15 Includes $4,250,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds '6 Exclusive of $6,994,235 details below Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute $ (under previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants and miscellaneous Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam TOTAL GRAND TOTAL 5,359,203 966,232 668,800 6,994,235 $1,473,675,523 52 938 9 938 9 53 962 6 962 6 974 2 0 Actual Cost to Date of Each Lock and Dam ITJ 0 O1 0 O 0 0 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of southern Ken- western portion, and embraces drainage basins of tucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Caro- Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tribulina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern taries. Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page General Investigations Page 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY ........ 23-2 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY ...... 23-3 3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS ........................... 23-4 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 23-4 Alteration of Bridges 5. Authorized Alteration of Bridges ...... 23-4 Flood Control 6. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN .......... 23-4 7. Martins Fork Lake, KY .............. 23-5 8. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY ......................... 23-5 9. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY ......................... 23-5 10. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) .... 23-6 11. Inspection of completed flood control projects ..................... 23-6 12. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 23-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN ........................ . 23-6 14. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY ........................ 23-7 15. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ................ 23-7 16. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ......................... 23-7 17. Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY ................ 23-8 18. 19. Surveys ............................ 23-8 Collection and study of basic data ...... 23-8 Tables Table 23-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation ........ Table 23-C 23-9 23-11 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 23-13 Table 23-D Not Applicable Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... Table 23-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects, Including Pow er ........................ Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects .......... Table 23-H 23-13 23-14 23-14 Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principle Features ............. 23-15 Table 23-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions .................. 23-17 Table 23-J Table 23-K Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project .............. Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ...... Table 23-L Reservoirs .................... Table 23-M Table 23-N Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 23-18 23-18 23-18 23-19 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 23-19 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. CUMIBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, Ky., about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, Ky., from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, Ky. (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provided for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, river mile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky., to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 23-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, Tenn., varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, Tenn., has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,904. Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1985) is $213,000,000. (See table 23-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, Tenn. (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tailwater at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville are shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 41 terminals on the Cumberland River (3 municipally owned and open for public use; 4 government owned facilities and 34 privately owned facilities). A total of 21 terminals have 23-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals, and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Below Nashville: Recreation facilities provided at Barkley project under (Code 711) cost $75,586. Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements at Barkley included painting of spillway gates, switchyard and crane, and paving. Dredging below Old Hickory continued and Cheatham lock was unwatered and repaired. Painting of spillway gates at Cordell Hull was completed. At Old Hickory repairs on cracks in lock walls and replacement of quion and miter blocks were begun. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (667,015,961 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hoosier Energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (174,200,153 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (354,306,065 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (484,315,010 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902-1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tenn. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by that agency of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, Tenn. (See table 23-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 150 terminals on the Tennessee River (10 municipally owned, 16 government owned facilities and 124 privately owned facilities). A total of 81 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $593,997. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major repairs were completed at Pickwick Auxiliary Lock and were begun at Wilson Auxiliary Lock. In addition other major maintenance included revising lock lighting at Ken- 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 tucky Lock, unwatering Nickajack Lock, construction of shop building at Chickamauga, and repair to culvert valves at Ft. Loudoun. Work was begun to install gear reducers at the main lock at Pickwick and revise lock lighting at Wilson Lock. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110x600 feet. Construction of the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $750,000,000. (See 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. Various structural revisions and repairs in the Divine Section, and repairs to Tishomingo County Roads were completed. In addition recreation work continued. Initial facilities were provided at Natchez Trace, Crow's Neck and BS Damsite. A contract was awarded to provide campsites at the Piney Grove site. The project is 99% complete. Navigation features are 100% complete. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $77,809 was expended for a study of Port of Florence, AL., $483 for Tennessee River at Calvert City, TN., and $61,193 for Tennessee River at Morgan City Port, AL. Alteration of Bridges 5. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 6. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA, KY AND TN Location. The proposed project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage is not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically establishes the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archaeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The area is divided into two categories, gorge and adjacent areas, with no construction permitted except limited clearing for establishment of day-use facilities, historical sites, primitive campgrounds and access roads. Lodges and other facilities will be provided in the adjacent areas. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) The present authorized cost (ceiling) for the project is $156,122,000. The National Park Service operates and maintains the useable units of the area upon completion of land acquisition and construction by The Corps of Engineers. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. The project is 62% complete. Local cooperation. None required. 23-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 699.05 acres fee. Construction was completed at the Blue Heron Overlook and Bandy Creek recreation site, and continued on the access road and recreation facilities at Blue Heron with the award of a second phase of recreation. 7. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam will be concrete type, about 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acrefeet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, will thus be provided during potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is to be operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and to provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project will prevent major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and result in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and at other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. 8. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away from present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 9. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, Ky. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan, Ky. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is currentby being formulated. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 25.69 acres fee. Construction of the Pineville Levee was completed and work on the highway and floodwall continued. A contract was awarded for the first phase of Wallsend Levee and construction of the 459 Bridge at Barbourville. Funds were provided by the state of Kentucky for the bridge approach. Design of the Harlan Structural project was begun and some nonstructural evacuations were accomplished at Harlan and Pineville. 10. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-K. 11. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $9,374. Total cost to September 30, 1987 was $283,531. For project inspection data see table 23-M. 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal costs for fiscal years were $248,542 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, Tenn. It is in DeKalb County, Tenn., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Major maintenance work items were replacement of power plant roof and thrust bearing springs. Total net energy generated (333,985,400 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. 23-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 14. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, Tenn. It is in Clay County, Tenn., and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, Tenn., 28 miles north of Cookeville, Tenn., and 3 miles east of Celina, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, Ky., and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (92,454,057 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, land management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Major accomplishments were replacement of power plant roof and paving of roads and parking area. 15. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, Tenn.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, Tenn. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (69,015,300 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Contracts were awarded for construction of the resident engineer's office, and improvements at East Fork Recreation area. 16. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 1.9.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, Ky. water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of a net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reser voir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake 23-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed this FY. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (58,765,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. 17. WOLF CREEK DAM-LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.9 (above mouth) in Russell County, Ky., about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, Ky. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, Ky. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for publicuse and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,372 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Replacement of the power plant roof was completed and contracts were awarded to replace the intake hoist cables and pave the Alligator recreation site area. Total net energy generated 824,645,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of publicuse facilities. General Investigations 18. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $1,850,239 for which $1,391,824 was for navigation, $387,664 for flood damage prevention studies, $64,769 for special investigations, and $5,982 for coordination studies with other agencies. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $28,647 for technical services to others, and $44,964 for flood plain management services, totalling $73,611. 23-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text 1. Cu TN Project mberland River, and KY 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY 3. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 5. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 6. Martins Fork Lake, KY 7. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 8. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 11. Cumberland, KY 12. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 13. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 14. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 84 11 FY 85 FY 86 Total to FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 929,000 - 7,800 - - 320,252,240 1,2,3 523,103 722,194 538 75,587 320,252,240 1,2,3 [4,670,200 18,453,000 18,496,000 16,388,500 196,874,176 4 5,494,335 18,461,695 18,461,695 16,532,247 196,033,548 5 - - - - 16,251,428 6 - - - - 16,251,428 0 6,848,500 9,855,000 16,900,000 13,763,000 132,150,951 7 6,978,158 9,755,161 16,908,385 13,527,412 131,560,620 8 - - - - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 25,000,000 19,755,000 11,405,000 1,435,000 737,595,050 17,837,084 27,688,233 6,844,558 2,954,077 733,256,609 10,300,000 8,405,000 10,231,765 8,648,000 99,938,920 9 9,432,902 9,183,262 10,105,683 5,883,134 96,229,341 10 - 50,000 - - 6,765 - 20,479,911 244 - - 6,765 - 20,479,911 406,000 545,000 480,000 676,000 3,906,000 401,981 523,757 507,448 658,851 3,873,930 - - - - 817,830 11 - - - - 817,830 11 22,000 65,000 27,000 64,000 1,786,844 27,384 60,309 28,020 63,990 1,779,463 4,000,000 13,684,000 11,840,000 23,263,000 65,757,000 12 8,286,077 14,504,087 12,317,354 17,204,246 58,307,208 13 - - - - 66,642 - - - - 66,642 9,000 - - - 53,412,023 14 153,247 2,209 - - 53,412,023 15 3,790,000 3,198,000 2,820,000 3,341,000 43,358,967 16 4,078,470 3,195,628 2,853,975 3,277,917 43,213,77517 30,000 - 17,700 - - 28,317,746 18 341,796 5,509 - - 28,317,746 19 2,554,000 3,180,000 3,007,000 3,108,000 42,139,807 20 2,732,605 2,966,610 3,101,316 3,087,685 41,978,526 21 - - - - 56,914,039 22 3,810 471 - - 56,914,039 2 2,290,500 2,553,000 2,353,000 2,740,000 27,855,586 24 2,173,573 2,489,352 2,497,915 2,646,484 27,666,411 25 545,000 - 58,000 - 56,741,232 379,374 219,221 141,682 - 56,741,232 771,000 864,000 886,000 850,000 6,893,000 26 828,369 840,428 883,590 817,325 6,820,577 26 23-9 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 16. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - 12,300 77,800 - - 83,267,958 27 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost 2,615 79,000 9,190 - 83,267,958 27 Maint. Approp. 3,894,000 5,360,000 4,847,000 5,361,000 60,707,441 28 Cost 4,097,459 5,066,321 5,055,966 5,272,882 60,426,477 29 Rehab. Approp. - 35,000 - - - 104,999,237 30 Cost 7,249 - - - 104,999,237 30 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous projects.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by Metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $1,743,157 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees and $1,743,157 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. Includes $6,470,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 13. Includes $5,336,932 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 21. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $142,078 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $142,078 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 23-10 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Jul 13, 1892 Provision made for lock A Jun 25, 1910 Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Aug 30, 1935 Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests. Jul 24, 1946 Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville; via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Jun 19, 1952 Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Sep 3, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Aug 5, 1886 Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Mar 2, 1907 Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Mar 2, 1919 Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 1934 2 Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Jul 24, 1946 Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Oct 1, 1980 Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Documents Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Docs. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663. Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 23-11 See Section in Text 1. Date of Authorized Act 1. - --- ~-~- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Aug 28, 1937 Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300, for local flood protection works. Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. May 17, 1950 H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Mar 7, 1974 Authorized establishing Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Jul 24, 1946 Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. 3. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings. 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 23-12 -- NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) Project Status Caney Fork River, TN Clinch River, TN and VA Duck River, TN Elk River, AL and TN French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN Holston River, TN Little Tennessee River, TN Obey River, TN Red River, TN South Fork of Cumberland River, KY abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Report see Operation and Annual Report Construction Maintenance 1895 1923 1887 1904 1931 1911 1888 1887 1884 1892 $ 27,828 53,949 13,000 4,000 249,605 5,714 5,510 11,500 5,000 11,967 - $ 7,873 33,554 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Report see Project Barbourville, KY Chattanooga, TN and Rossville, GA Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY Paint Rock River, AL Pineville, KY 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. Status Annual Report Constri 1963 1949 1962 1969 1949 1967 1963 completed completed completed completed completed completed completed Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Operation and uction Maintenance $2,088,147 180,997 460,134 567,703 26,309 544,173 1,679,126 23-13 TABLE 23-E ~-------- -- 1 TABLE 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS F INCLUDING POWER Project Status Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, KY and TN beneficial use Celina Dam, KY active Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY." See Table 23-H. TABLE 23-G Project Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN Middlesboro, Yellow Creek Bell County, KY Cumberland River above Nashville, TN Hiwassee River, Polk and Bradley Counties, TN Annual Report for 1970 1923 Rossview Lake, Tennessee and Kentucky For last Full Report see Annual Report Date and Authority Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Aug 14, 1876. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: FC Act, Jun 28, 1938, PL 761, 75th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance $146,498,644 $61,707,710 1 222,575 __ 1 31,682,762 47,136,348 1 79,874,492 30,228,952 1 52,266,412 56,960,538 1 Federal Contributed Funds Funds Expended Expended $111,855 - 123,065 - 6,779 - 23-14 DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Report see ------ ---- -- NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet)1 Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guardsills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level) : Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canal: Length (miles) Bottom width (feet) Depth at minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Kuttawa, KY, 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 50 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,000 3,4 259,000 610,000 2,082,000 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles. 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 385 382 7,450 19,800 7 84,200 104,000 Old Hickory, TN, 3 miles. 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,605 2 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 450 8 442 27,450 125,000 5 63,000 357,000 545,000 Carthage, TN, 5 miles. 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,138 2 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 508 3 508 501 499 13,920 85,600 5,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 3 12,000 36,000 4 25,000 100,000 3 33,333 100,000 23-15 Celina, TN, 5 miles. 385.4 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 564 3 560 559 559 16,960 55,950 5 14,700 287,300 357,950 3 36,000 - -- 108,000 -1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 23-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (Continued) (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Celina Cheatham Cordell Hull Old Hickory Percent of project completion 8 - 8 8 8 Year opened to navigation 1964 - 1952 1973 1954 Estimated cost 9 $146,500,000 $213,000,000 $31,700,000 $79,874,500 $52,266,400 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acrefeet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage. 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during nonflood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 23-16 TABLE 23-I TENNESSEE RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dimensions Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Year Miles Chain- Full Nor- Maxi- Opened Cost of Above Miles from her Width mal mum Lower Upper Character Navi- Kind Type of Each Lock Project 1 Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) of Foundation gation of Dam Construction and Dam Kentucky Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock Main lock Wilson: Auxiliary lock Main lock General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock Main lock Guntersville: Auxiliary lock Main lock Nickajack: Auxiliary lock Main lock Chickamauga Watts Bar Fort Loudon Melton Hill (Clinch R.) t- 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, 110 KY 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, 110 TN 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg 110 TN 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 60 AL 259.4 2.9 above Florence, 110 AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence 60 AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, 110 AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 60 AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, 110 AL 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 nooga, TN 424.7 39.4 below Chatta- 110 nooga, TN 471.0 6.9 above Chatta- 60 nooga, TN 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, 60 TN 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, 60 TN 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, 75 TN 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 600 55 63.0 1000 55 63.0 292 94 100.0 300 600 94 100.0 400 48 51.5 600 48 51.5 360 39 45.0 600 39 45.0 600 800 360 360 360 400 39 41.0 39 41.0 49 53.0 58 70.0 72 80.0 54 60.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 12.8 10.0 Limestone 11.0 4 11.2 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.2 14.7 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 11.8 13.0 Limestone 12.7 13.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.0 10.0 Limestone 11.8 12.0 Shale 11.8 12.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed Concrete and 2 earthfill 1937 Fixed Concrete and s earthfill 1984 Fixed Concrete and 8 earthfill 1927 Fixed Concrete and $46,973,540 5 earthfill 1959 - - 7 1934 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1963 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1937 Fixed - 1965 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1967 Fixed Concrete Fixed Concrete 1939 Fixed - 1941 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1943 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1963 Fixed Concrete 2 1,796,295 6 7 r 3&7 77 7 3 &7 1. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess., contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, 1916 (H. Doc. 1262, 64th Cong., 1st sess.). Actual cost of lock and dam. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. ti REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 23-J TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO (See Section 2 of Text) SEP 30, 1987 Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $7,829,101 $119,714,674 $129,788,0111,2 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compensation, - 5 - 5 rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $7,235,109 $106,792,924 $129,799,6811,2 1. In addition, surplus property value at $54,336 was tion and care of works of improvement under provisions of transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended between 1890 and June 30, 1935, on opera- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 23-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Estimated Cost Type of Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channel 520,000 240,000 760,000 1 Improvement 1. Deferred. TABLE 23-L RESERVOIRS Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Center Hill Lake, TN Caney Fork River $53,412,0001 Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY Obey River 28,167,7001 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones River 59,038,200 1,2 Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel River 56,683,200 s Martins Fork Lake, KY Martins Fork 20,486,700 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 23-18 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Apr. 1987 and Oct. 1987 Corbin, KY Apr. 1987 and Oct. 1987 Lake City, TN Apr. 1987 and Oct. 1987 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Mar. 1987 and Oct. 1987 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Mar. 1987 and Oct. 1987 Paint Rock River, AL May 1987 and Oct. 1987 Pineville, KY Mar. 1987 and Oct. 1987 Spring City, TN May 1987 and Oct. 1987 TABLE 23-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 87 Cost Browns Creek, Nashville, TN $ 7,357 Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, TN 31,184 Richland and Sugartree Creeks, TN 550 Whiteoak Creek, Sunbright, TN 22,555 Whites & Ewing Creeks, TN 16,481 Gibson Creek, TN 16,771 Limestone Creek, TN 11,188 McCrory Creek, TN 2,804 Roaring Creek, Graysville, TN 7,500 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 87 Cost Canton Bridge, Trigg County, KY $205,239 Crab Orchard Branch, Wise County, VA 52 Tenn. River, Downtown Airport, Knoxville, TN 118,004 Lewis Branch, Houston County, TN 109,269 Paris Landing, TN 140,593 Sheffield, AL City Dock 200,427 Soddy Daisy, TN Repair 35,070 Paint Rock River, Jackson, TN 8,500 23-19 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central upstream from Foster, KY. to mouth. Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City All cost and financial statements for projects are listed area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River.............. ........... 24-2 2. Green and Barren Rivers, KY............. 24-2 3. Kentucky River, KY....................24-2 4. Open Channel Work, Ohio River.......... 24-3 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ ........................ 24-3 6. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ .. 24-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Dayton, KY ............................ 24-3 8. Evansville, IN..........................24-3 9. Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN................. ..... 24-4 10. Mason J. Niblack Levee, Wabash River, IN.......................24-4 11. Mill Creek, OH.........................24-4 12. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ............................ 24-5 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. Barren River Lake, KY..................24-5 14. Brookville Lake, IN ...................... 24-5 15. Buckhorn Lake, KY ...................... 24-6 16. Caesar Creek Lake, OH..................24-6 17. Cagles Mill Lake, IN.................... 24-6 18. Carr Fork Lake, KY....................24-7 19. Cave Run Lake, KY ...................... 24-7 20. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN................. 24-7 21. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH.........................24-8 22. Green River Lake, KY...................24-8 23. Huntington Lake, IN..................... 24-8 24. Mississinewa Lake, IN...................24-9 25. Monroe Lake, IN........................ 24-9 26. Nolin Lake, KY........................24-9 27. Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.)........................24-10 28. Patoka Lake, IN.......................24-10 29. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY......................24-10 30. Salamonie Lake, IN....................24-11 31. Taylorsville Lake, KY..................24-11 Page 32. Wabash River Basin....................24-11 33. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ........ 24-12 34. William H. Harsha Lake, OH............24-12 35. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects........................ 24-12 36. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... ......................... 24-13 37. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization.................... 24-13 General Investigations 38. Surveys .............................. 24-13 39. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 24-13 40. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ................... ............ 24-13 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement.....................24-14 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation.......... 24-18 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.......................24-19 Table 24-D Not Applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................24-20 Table 24-F Not Applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects...........24-22 Table 24-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems........ 24-23 Table 24-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan..............24-24 Table 24-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan..............24-28 Table 24-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...........24-29 Table 24-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization............ 24-31 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 2. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY. Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River and Dam 3 at mile 108.5 Green River. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River are in fair condition, and Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs were deferred pending completion of survey report for navigation on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot depth to coal loading teminal at mile 105.7. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 3. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-foot-depth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976 the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour yearround operation to two shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On 1 October 1981 Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and was again closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the State of Kentucky on 21 May 1985. The State of Kentucky plans to operate these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons. During the fiscal year Locks 1 through 4 continued a two shift, year-round operation. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1987, $275,605. 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance: Contract for miter gate repair and guard chain replacement was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963,1964 and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 4. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-C. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. DAYTON, KY Location. In Campbell County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 467.0 to mile 469.2 and across the river from Cincinnati, Ohio. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Newport, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of 8,170 feet of levee, two pumping stations with gravity drainage structures, and major relocations of storm and sanitary sewers serving the community. Cost of the completed project is $13,117,300 Federal and $2,013,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Formal assurances of cooperation were executed by City of Dayton, KY, on November 1969. Levee, floodwall, and pumping plants were transferred to the City of Dayton for operation and maintenance December 30, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Operation by local interests for flood control prevented no damages during 1987 flood season. 8. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost of new work (1987) is $49,500,000 Federal, and $7,630,000 non- Federal. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1937 Flood Control Act. Howell Section, Unit 2, was reclassified from the "active" category to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on current studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1 and Knight Township sections. Assurances for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1, were executed February 11, 1963. Authorizations-of-entry for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, Parts 1 and 2 have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Contract for design of North 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue and Stringtown Road pumping plants advanced to about 45% completion. Plans and specifications for U.S. Highway 41W Pump Plant and Power Service for 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue and Stringtown Road advanced to about 55% and 90% completion, respectively. Flood damages estimated at $21,000 were prevented during the 1987 flood season. Knight Township, Howell, Unit 1 and Pigeon Creek, Unit 1 Sections are complete. Howell Section, Unit 2, is in the "inactive" category. Construction of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, was started in April 1974 and is about 45 percent complete. General Design Memorandum and Supplement on Pigeon Creek Unit 2, and Design Memorandum and plans and specifications for Delaware, Dresden and North 6th Avenue pumping plants are approved. Design Memorandum for North 1st Avenue, Diamond Avenue, and Stringtown Road pumping plants is complete. Project is about 58 percent complete overall. 24-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 9. LEVEE UNIT NO. 5, WABASH RIVER, IN Location. In Gibson and Posey Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, from 58 to 94.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. Provides for construction of 41.9 miles of earth levee, drainage structures, pumping plants, together with alterations to three railroad bridges crossing Wabash River. Project provides protection for 44,000 acres of farm land and towns of Lyle, Skelton, and Griffin, IN, against a flood equal to that expected on an average of 7 times in each 100-year period. Estimated total cost of new work (1987) is $8,355,500 of which $905,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and road utility relocations. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1946. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936, applies. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Levee District on January 8, 1962. Completed portions of project (levees) were transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance October 15, 1969. Emerson Ditch pumping plant was transferred to the Levee District for operation and maintenance November 24, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Construction contract for Coffee Bayou pumping plant and entire project were completed. Flood damages estimated at zero were prevented during the 1987 flood season. 10. MASON J. NIBLACK LEVEE, WABASH RIVER, IN Location. In Knox and Sullivan Counties, IN, on left bank of Wabash River, between miles 134.8 and 151.8 above mouth. Existing project. Construction of two sections of earth levee totaling 18 miles in length, three pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, and other necessary appurtenances. Length of protection, including high ground between the two levee sections, is 18.9 miles long. Project protects 15,900 acres of agricultural land against a flood equal to that expected to occur 7 times in a 100-year period. Cost of the completed pumping plants was $2,782,905 all Federal cost and cost of the completed levee was $1,663,912 of which $109,200 was non-Federal cost and $1,554,712 was Federal cost. The levee project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act; pumping facilities were authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for levees and pumping plants. Operations during fiscal year. Operation by local interests for flood control prevented no damages during 1987 flood season. Construction of levees complete and transferred to Mason J. Niblack Levee District in January 1965 for operation and maintenance. Construction of the pumping plants and channel improvements complete and transferred to the local sponsor in May 1980. 11. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Proposed project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, OH. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Estimated cost of new work (1987) is $187,695,000, of which $41,076,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Construction contract for channel Section 2 was advanced to completion. Contract for Railraod Relocation and Construction of Channel Section 4A and Section 3 to Center Hill Road was advanced to 100 percent completion. Contract for construction of Section 8 (Barrier 24-4 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT Dam) was awarded in December 1986 and advanced to 4 percent completion. Flood damages estimated at $67,000 were prevented during the 1987 flood season. Design Memoranda, Hydrology & Hydraulics, Concrete Aggregate and Stone Protection Sources, and Railroad Relocations, General Design Memoranda, Phase I and Phase II, Design of Channel - Sections 5 and 7 are complete. Construction of channel and levee - Sections 2, 3 and 7A, Phase I, are complete. Project is about 32 percent complete overall. 12. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Provides for the construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project will provide protection fo 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1987) is $67,585,000, of which $57,668,000 is Federal, and $9,917,000 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirement by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Contract for Pond Creek Pumps and Motors, awarded in May 1985, was advanced to 69 percent completion. Contract for Levee Section 5 and Pond Creek Pumping Station awarded in September 1985 was advanced to 69 percent completion Contract for Remedial Work for Railroad Closure at Levee Section 5 was awarded in September 1986. Engineering studies are about 98 percent complete. Construction of levee and floodwall Sections 1, 2, 3,4 and 4A; railroad closure at Section 4; electric service for gatewells; Riverport and Upper and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants; rehabilitation of pump stations; and relocation of Texas Gas pipeline are complete. Project is 85 percent complete overall. Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for control tower maintenance and bulkhead modification continued. A contract for riprap repairs was awarded in November 1986. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages of $1,269,000. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 14. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 24-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Estimated cost of new work (1987) is $45,243,922 of which $37,804,367 is Federal cost and $7,439,555 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Installation of hydropower unit is complete but is not in operation pending finalization of contract with Southeastern Power Administration for purchase of surplus power. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages of $60,000. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 15. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream'from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages of $121,000. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 16. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1987) is $64,781,000 including $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $398,000 were prevented during the 1987 flood season. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. Project is about 99 percent complete overall. 17. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Cost of completed new work is $4,263,184 including $155,416 Federal funds and $106,813 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Depart- 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT ment of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages of $4,816,000. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. 18. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1987) is $50,854,800 including $76,700 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate administrative action required for condemnation of remaining tracts was continued. Maintenance: Contract work was completed on modification of hydraulic system. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages of $304,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. All land required for the project has been acquired; however, a number of condemnation actions remain unsettled. 19. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U. S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1987) is $114,826,300 of which $35,213,000 is U. S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Real estate administrative action required for acquisition of remaining tracts was completed. Contract for Zilpo Recreation Buildings and Paving was awarded in November 1986 and advanced to completion. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages of $834,000. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is about 93 percent complete overall. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete except recreation facilities. 20. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U. S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $533,000 were prevented during the 1987 flood season. 24-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 21. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acre-feet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages of $15,000. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 22. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock-fill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,606,061, including $317,145 Federal funds and $183,732 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance, and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $981,000 during the 1987 flood season. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 23. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consiste of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost for new work (1987) is $19,777,863 made up of $19,273,252 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,903 non- Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 Federal cost and $155,354 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $84,000 during the 1987 flood control season. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 24. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gatecontrolled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acrefeet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,985,521 made up of $23,967,537 Federal cost for the initial project and $239,200 non- Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage and $389,392 Federal cost and $389,382 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $1,114,000 during 1987 flood season. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities cconstructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 25. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,569,589 made up of $7,032,484 Federal cost for the initial project and $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $870,343 Federal cost and $869,158 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3,1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $274,000 during 1987 flood season. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 26. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gatecontrolled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1987) is $17,193,381 including $2,596,317 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract for control tower maintenance and 24-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 bulkhead modification was continued. A contract for Stilling Basin repairs was awarded in April 1987. Rountine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages estimated at $1,038,000. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 27. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing leglsiation, and Table 24-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 28. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1987) is $78,417,700 of which $1,361,200 is Federal cost for emergency remedial measures and to clear and snag the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake, which work was directed by Congress in 1981; $51,507,800 is Federal cost for other construction, and $25,548,700 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to insure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27,1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damage estimated at $926,000. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. 29. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acrefeet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1987 flood season prevented damages estimated at $2,947,000. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 30. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acrefeet is for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1987) is $17,046,151 made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $170,697 non- Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1987 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $515,000. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 31. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated cost of new work (1987) is $120,352,000 made up of $92,350,000 Federal cost for the initial project and $16,550,000 non- Federal contributed funds for initial recreation facilities and $5,726,000 Federal cost and $5,726,000 non-Federal contributed funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980 the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provded for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies and land acquisition continued. Contracts for telephone line relocation and Possum Ridge Roads were awarded. Contract for final paving of relocated state highways and Settlers Trace access road and parking lot repairs advanced to completion. Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1987 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $519,000. Engineering and design studies are about 89 percent complete and land acquisition is about 96 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except utility relocations and recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. The project is about 87 percent complete overall. 32. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located 24-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 33. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid onehalf cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1987 flood season prevented damages estimated at $11,000. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 34. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Batavia, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1987) is $54,932,000 including $3,484,354 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981 by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1987 flood season prevented zero damages. Construction was started in May 1970. Engineering studies are 94 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired. Major relocation and construction features are complete, except one recreation item. Project is about 95 percent complete overall and was placed in operation in February 1978. 35. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise in- 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT terests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-K for local protection projects and channel improvements inspected.) Fiscal year costs were $121,920. Total costs to September 30, 1987 were $2,901,967. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-E. 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $181,797 for disaster preparedness, $0 for emergency operations, and $81,062 for repair work on four local protection projects. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $169,073 for preparation of Reconnaissance Studies. Summary Fact Sheets, and Detailed Project Reports on 11 projects, and $80,942 for Plans and Specifications and construction on three projects. See Table 24-L. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $27,500 for one Reconnaissance Study, $1,395 for Plans and Specifications on one project, and $130,173 for construction of one project. See Table 24-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14,1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $56,030 for preparation of Reconnaissance Studies on nine projects. See Table 24-L. General Investigations 38. SURVEYS. Fiscal year costs were $2,523,133 consisting of $2,046,493 for four flood damage prevention studies and the Ohio River Main Stem Study; $142,591 for the Wabash River Navigation Study and Grayville Special Report, $90,091 for Special Investigations, $35,006 for review of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licenses, $208,542 for planning assistance to states, and $410 for Deauthorization review study. 39. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $153,749 for flood plain management services. 40. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $2,422,587 for continuation of detailed planning and engineering studies for Olmsted Locks & Dam. Fiscal year costs were $429,908 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) studies on Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio; Miami River, Pleasant Run, Ohio; and South Frankfort, Kentucky Local Proteciton Projects. 24-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-A See Section in Text COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project Funding 1984 1985 Total to 1986 1987 Sep 30, 1987 Navigation - Locks 2 Green and Barren Rivers, KY 3 Kentucky River, KY and Dams New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost - $ - $ - $ - $13,808,2221 - - - - 13,808,2221 1,516,927 1,987,840 1,238,500 1,254,300 29,356,4122 3 1,926,628 2,154,447 1,267,516 1,206,604 29,294,6362 3 -- - - 4,176,749 - - - - 4,176,749 1,161,700 1,411,000 2,505,800 1,744,500 50,700,0894 5 1,168,626 1,609,460 2,493,699 1,735,988 50,667,7504 5 - - - - 556,956 - - - - 556,956 Flood Control - Local Protection 7 Dayton, KY New Work Approp. Cost 8 Evansville, IN New Work Approp. Cost 9 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN 10 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN 11 Mill Creek, OH 12 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 207,000 510,989 1,800,000 1,664,831 15,100 76,533 716,000 757,338 -59,600 -89,000 175,279 473,628 105,000 109,246 -89,000 300,448 0 -37,029 -1,000 673 1,439 363,000 410,957 13,117,3456 13,117,3456 28,739,8567 28,651,309' -90,000 7,440,987 5,054 7,439,014 - 4,337,617 - 4,337,617 7,639,900 9,586,000 9,614,000 12,463,000 6,083,545 10,952,631 10,064,391 10,592,245 52,834,742 49,826,505 1,420,000 2,430,000 3,484,000 6,422,000 48,767,183 2,552,857 1,286,893 4,731,054 5,664,866 46,957,285 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 1,077,000 1,268,000 1,189,000 1,015,488 1,322,216 1,167,073 - 27,371,2998 - 27,371,2998 1,740,100 15,156,5269 10 11 1,658,886 15,008,7769 10 11 - 108,41812 - 108,41812 14 Brookville Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 15 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp, Cost -23,000 28,440 329,000 334,843 663,000 672,955 24-14 -56 409,000 418,991 640,000 651,327 95 555 420,000 416,500 410,678 400,067 - 13,805 12 555 791,500 801,081 660,400 648,737 37,918,889 37,905,074 4,237,689 4,205,850 7,578,195 7,578,195 11,766,2061 11,766,206' 9,527,31014 9,497,22014 _ ___ I_ _ __ I I__ W~_ ~1~_~1~ ---^------~-- LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1984 1985 1986 1987 Sep 30, 1987 Flood Control - Reservoirs 16 Caesar Creek Lake, OH 17 Cagles Mill Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 18 Carr Fork Lake, KY 19 Cave Run Lake, KY 20 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 21 Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH 22 Green River Lake, KY 23 Huntington Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost $ -268,000 $ 169,000 $ - 1,080,039 320,283 162,680 561,000 579,000 631,000 515,619 618,053 601,671 -100,000 - - 77,972 447 228 317,000 506,000 346,000 317,164 489,109 371,968 205,000 - - 106,813 - - 2,627,600 -40,000 - 2,697,307 4,993 1,845 781,000 803,000 747,000 776,283 768,785 784,850 1,332,000 724,500 - 543,867 1,381,479 786,628 588,000 562,000 485,000 583,073 557,164 501,921 327,700 312,000 518,400 330,662 313,930 500,086 420,000 374,000 379,000 373,189 419,925 372,932 915,500 1,183,000 1,124,000 908,362 1,177,646 1,143,281 -251 - - 522,000 359,000 483,000 584,133 381,804 458,903 - $62,893,882 11,388 62,855,555 792,100 4,644,563 771,070 4,578,765 - 4,263,18415 - 4,263,18415 404,600 5,337,106 386,493 5,314,765 -91,906 113,094 - 106,813 - 50,854,82616 27,269 50,844,40116 855,900 7,497,800"7 814,628 7,426,73017 400,000 74,262,282 615,829 74,165,069 478,300 4,833,846 470,412 4,815,350 - 6,633,81218 - 6,633,81218 474,000 6,071,496 472,566 6,046,411 - 22,083,660 - 22,083,660 420,900 4,057,247 412,987 4,035,862 - 33,422,32919 - 33,422,32919 941,000 12,686,74920 945,408 12,640,43120 - 19,428,60621 - 19,427,95321 464,900 5,159,912 431,702 5,097,407 - 193,903 - 193,812 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding 1984 1985 1986 1987 Sep 30, 1987 Flood Control - Reservoirs 24 Mississinewa Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 25 Monroe Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 26 Nolin Lake, KY 27 Ohio River Basin, Louisville District 28 Patoka Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) 29 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvement, KY (Contributed Funds) 30 Salamonie Lake, IN (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 364,000 345,812 $ - -3,003 399,000 331,851 $ - 3,003 411,000 494,721 P - 411,200 397,788 $23,967,5372" 23,967,53722 4,890,305 4,863,867 239,200 237,871 - - - - 7,902,82723 - - - - 7,902,82723 416,300 308,160 459,600 434,800 5,437,22524 449,356 341,747 467,832 413,156 5,405,34624 - - - - 7,797,604 - - - - 7,797,604 -1,503 1,222,500 1,196,882 -2,460 -966 1,320,000 1,323,666 9 1,413,000 1,424,694 -970 2,011,400 1,958,358 17,193,38125 17,192,41126 17,368,91527 17,232,88327 - 1,526,142 - 1,526,142 43,400 399,647 320,000 312,123 447,150 339,137 90,216 311,000 313,500 76,114 8,114 379,000 385,206 -29,640 1,618 20,863 412,700 408,563 53,080,790 53,079,298 2,827,831 2,810,289 - 20,646,649 3,528 20,297,349 - - - - 10,620,38928 - - - - 10,620,38928 1,304,000 1,288,000 1,095,000 1,304,500 16,819,31029 1,279,021 1,320,794 1,104,891 1,241,626 16,712,32429 - - - - 22,61212 - - - - 22,61212 362,000 325,759 304,000 349,873 444,000 418,578 411,700 394,597 16,559,90530 16,559,90530 4,999,013 4,951,061 170,697 163,867 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1984 1985 1986 1987 Sep 30, 1987 Flood Control - Reservoirs 31 Taylorsville Lake, KY New Work Approp. $3,200,000 $ 844,400 $ - $305,000 $81,601,478 Cost 4,433,310 1,838,703 516,124 285,296 80,813,120 Maint. Approp. 379,000 468,000 528,000 548,900 2,213,900 Cost 373,917 489,253 535,625 541,164 2,197,661 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. - - 228,993 678,000 2,678,831 Cost 448,100 118,180 249,331 186,604 1,922,239 33 West Fork of Mill New Work Creek Lake, OH Approp. -86,600 - - -3,622,3021 Cost 78 - - - 3,622,3021 Maint. Approp. 294,000 264,000 285,000 296,200 4,055,089 Cost 288,634 289,713 286,138 282,997 4,038,634 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 50,000 Cost - - - - 50,000 34 William H. Harsha New Work Lake, OH Approp. 37,500 -15,000 - - 52,023,1572 Cost 665,689 69,624 116,209 8,270 52,016,894"2 Maint. Approp. 381,000 422,000 481,200 444,900 3,624,466 Cost 378,829 425,414 482,245 443,723 3,604,839 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3 Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. * Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters," and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. a Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6 Includes $12,426 allotted to Bellevue-Dayton and used in study of that project. ' Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds. 8 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds and $110,107 Code 713 funds. * Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 1o Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 1 Includes $66,678 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water.' 1 Cost sharing for Code 713 recreation facilities. s Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 14 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. * Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds and $119,602 Code 713 funds. 16 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. "17In cludes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 1 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds and $353,995 Code 713 funds. 19 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds and $183,732 Code 713 funds. 2o Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees. 21 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds. 22 Includes $389,392 Code 713 funds. 23 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds and $869,158 Code 713 funds. ' Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,596,317 Code 711 funds. 26 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,595,347 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees, $52,000 Supplemental Funds, and $66,678 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water. * Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,396 Code 711 funds, and $22,612 Code 713 funds. 2" Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees. 30 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds. 81 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds. 82 Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 24-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 2 of Text) Aug 11, 1888 Purchase of original improvement Mar 3, 18931 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Jul 13, 1892 Construction of Lock 5, Green River Jul 13, 1902 Construction of Lock 6, Green River Mar 3, 19052 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River" Mar 3, 1909 Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River Jul 3, 19302 Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, widens bends in Bear Creek, KY Jun 26, 19343 Aug 30, 19352 Sep 3, 1954 Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Improvement of Nolin River Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River Recovation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 27 of Text) Aug 28, 1937 Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, Kentucky at an estimated cost of $129,350 Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an estimated cost of $360,000 Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River Basin, Illinois and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000 Jul 3, 1958 Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000 Oct 23, 1962 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin May 12, 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin _ _ _ __ _ _ ____~I~ 24-18 Documents H. Ex. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Annual Report 1887, p. 1903 Annual Report, 1891, p.2 4 39 Annual Report, 1891, p.2 4 78 S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Session, and H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Session H.D. 480, 72d Congress, 2d Sess. S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Congress., 1st Session Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, 2d Session S.D. 105, 78th Congress, 1st Session H. D. 535, 78th Congress, 2d Session H. D. 197, 80th Congress, 1st Session H.D.198, 80th Congress, 1st Sess H. D. 192, 85th Congress, 1st Session H. D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong. 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Session LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (Cont'd.) Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehen- Public Law 91-282, 91st Congress, sive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehen- Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, sive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session Mar 7, 1974 Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized 2d Session August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 32 of Text) Aug 13, 1968 Construction of five multiple purpose reservoirs and one S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2d Session local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with proviso that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Dec 29, 1981 Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River Basin were Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, deauthorized 2d Session 1 Deficiency act. 2 Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sep. 3, 1954. 3 Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30,1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River Rough River, KY Tradewater River, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed 1901 1951 1858 1909 $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 $ � 101,196 33,331 24-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project and Status' Report For Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Construction Operation and Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River)2 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River s Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River)2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN s Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River)2 Levee Unit 8, IN (White River) Louisville, KY4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)2 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) ' Newburgh, IN (Ohio River)2 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River)2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River)a Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclare, IL Saline River & Tribs, IL Shawneetown, IL7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River)' Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River)2 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)7 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort) (Kentucky River)2 * Grayville, IL Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio9 (Great Miami River) Louisville, KY Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity I rfield, OH9 (Great Miami River) Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) Salyersville, KY (Licking River) 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1953 1972 1965 1979 1948 1960 1953 1952 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 1953 1967 1952 1975 1944 1965 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 1956 1964 1977 1979 1946 $ 392,443 1,240,299 S597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 144,563 734,498 372,353 2,960,970 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 130,417 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 1,554,712 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 52,088 256,986 24-20 _ __ _ __ _I _ __ LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-E CONTINUED OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status' Report For Construction Maintenance Inactive: Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) 1979 - - Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 1979 157,935 - Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) 1976 153,410 - Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 1979 355,963 - Lewisport, KY - - - New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River)' 1959 - - Newport-Wilder, KY - - - Owensboro, KY - - - Salyersville, KY (Licking River) 1946 12,000 - Smithland, KY - - - Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) 1964 - - West Point, KY - 4,490 - Reservoirs: Active - no FY 1987 expenditure Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) 1983 160,773- Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,270,590 - Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1980 1,009,188 Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,038,595 - Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) - - Eagle Creek Lake, KY 1975 702,471 - Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) 1981 944,386 - Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,200,920 - Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) 1983 2,355,395 - Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) - 350,474 - Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,794,308 - i All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. : Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. $ Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. ' Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contribution from City of Louisville, KY. 8 Cost shown are for Levee only. Does not included costs for pump plants. 6 The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. ' Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portion of project deauthorized. 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project are active and inactive. * Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ Alton, IN - 1977 Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724 Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420 Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 Bromley, KY - 1977- California (Cincinnati) OH - 1977 16,465- Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713- Caseyville, KY - 1986- Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977- Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977- Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977- Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343- Clinton, IN -1977 6,848 Cloverport, KY - 1986- Concordia, KY - 1986 Deer Creek, Prairie, Levee, IN - 1977 Derby, IN - 1977 Elizabethtown,, IL - 1977 Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 Leavenworth, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275 Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977- Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977- Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977- Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 Madison, IN - 1977 - - Mauckport, IN - 1977- - Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975- McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575 Milton, KY - 1977 - - Moscow, OH - 1977 - - New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 - - New Harmony, IN - 1977- - New Richmond, OH - 1977 7,104 Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158- Patriot, IN - 1977- Prestonville , KY - 1977- Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977- Rising Sun, IN - 1977- Rockport, IN - 1977- Rome, IN - 1977- Shawneetown, IL - 1986 25,367- Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 Shufflebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487- Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 Terre Haute, IN - 1997 Tolu, KY - 1986 Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 Troy, IN - 1977 Utica, IN - 1978 Vevay, IN - 1977 Vincennes, IN (Partial) 1964 1986 Westport, KY - 1977 Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 Helm Lake, IL 1976 1981 41,616 Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 Metamora Lake, IN - 1977 1 24-22 TABLE 24-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Greatest Length Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and Dam (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER - For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 2 of Text) Green River New New 9.1 63.1 108.5 149.0 168.1 181.7 Spottsville, KY 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY Woodbury, KY 0.3 miles below- Glenmore, KY 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY Barren River 15.0 " 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY 84.0 84.0 35.8 35.8 56.0 36.0 56.0 600.0 600.0 137.5 138.0 360.0 145.0 360.0 11.8' 14.3 170 16.4 15.2 9.2 349.1 363.4 380.4 396.8 412.0' 421 1 Barren River 15.2 412 0 12.1 15.0 73 7.1 12 0 80 11 3 11.7 56 6.5 9.3 88 Shale and Coal Shale Rock Rock Piles and Rock Gravel 12.0 9 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 1956' 1956' 1836' 1839' 1905' 1905' $5,101,978' 4,799,271' 121,377 125,718 1,020,868" 168,415 100 1934 871,565" KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Kentucky River 1 4 0 3.8 miles above Carrollton, KY 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 3 42.0 Gest, KY 4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 5 82.2 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 11 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum) ' New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956; old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970 71 with O&M General funds at cost of $822,000. ' Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956 Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2 SOperation discontinued September 30, 1981. SBreaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. * With movable A frame crest 3 feet high. ' Operation discontinued Aug. 1, 1951. SDoes not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5 n Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. " Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934 " At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River elev 421 8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). " Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882 S Built by State of Kentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construc tion costs to State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983; L&D 3, $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; and L&D 5, $137,436 1 Lock was closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status in September 1982. C3 Kentucky River 0 CI) 38 0 38 0 38 0 38 0 38 0 52 0 52 0 52 0 52 0 52.0 52.0 52 0 52 0 52.0 145 0 145.0 145.0 145 0 145.0 147.0 147 0 146 0 148 0 148 0 148 0 148 0 148.0 148 0 8.2 13 9 13.2 132 15.0 14 0 153 187 173 170 18 0 170 18 0 170 430 0 443 9 457 1 470 3 485 3 4993 514 6 533 6 550 6 567 6 585.6 602.6 620 6 637 6 8.2" 76 86 64 10 0 94 91 10 6 10 0 9.0 100 96 96 86 14 8 61 65 74 65 64 69 60 66 60 60 60 60 60 Rock and Clay Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock and Piles Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1839' 1839" 1844" 1844' 1844'"' 1894" 1897" 1900" 1907'1 1907" 1906" 1910'1 1915" 1917" 1,350,385' 314,847 290,788 275,463 237,646 221,500 296,593 425,693 461,476 392,902 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-I OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost2 Project and Status' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River s Brookport, IL5 6 Cannelton, IN5' Cincinnati, OH5 Covington, KY5 ' Delphi, IN (Wabash River)' 10 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River)1 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) North Frankfort5 Golconda, IL5 12 Harrisburg, ILs5 10o Hawesville, KY 5 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) ' Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN7 Lawrenceburg, IN5 Louisville, KY5 " 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash Rivera)' New Albany, IN5 8 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River)a' Newport, KY5 ' Paducah, KY5 ' Reevesville, IL (Cache River)' " Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River)11 Rough River, KY5 ' Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River)11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) 16 Tell City, IN5' 14 Uniontown, KY5 17 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)' (completed portion) West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Dayton, KY'4 Evansville, IN'4 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) South Frankfort5 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River)' Inactive: Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) Benson Creeks Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River)' Island Levee, IN (Wabash River)' Lewisport, KY5 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River)a' Owensboro, KY5 Smithland, KY5 Wilders, KY Channel improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Channel improvement Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Bank protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 144,563 734,498 2,960,970 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 600,300 1,079,236 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 13,115,900 55,692,700 7,120,000 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 17,164 107,000 272,100 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 p - 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 161,727 841,498 3,233,070 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,139 26,721,438 109,200 4,446,817 740,000 6,115,471 - 297,624 298,506 7,811,493 232,000 4,993,551 40,000 640,300 100,000 1,179,236 93,000 1,919,778 63,309 441,359 32,707 964,936 72,153 1,143,079 285,000 3,593,941 150,000 1,245,704 2,043,000 7,982,000 660,000 15,158,90018 63,674,700"8 7,780,00019 19,400,000 2,340,000 21,740,00020 3,340,000 4,600,000 4,630,000 610,000 664,376 886,000 864,000 10,800,000 1,150,000 1,087,000 528,000 243,000 99,000 195,000 414,000 959,000 4,490,00021 5,687,00022 5,158,00022 853,00023 763,37624 1,081,000 1,278,000 11,759,00025 24-24 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost' Project and Status' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (Public Law 93-251): Alton, IN Bellevue, KY Bromley, KY Carrollton, KY Cave-in-Rock, IL Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) Cleves, OH Clinton, IN (Wabash River) Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) Derby, IN Elizabethtown, IL Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) Grandview, IN Honey Creek Levee, IN Leavenworth, IN Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 17, IN Levee Unit 1, White River, IN Levee Unit 2, White River, IN Levee Unit 7, White River, IN Ludlow, KY Madison, IN Mauckport, IN McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) Milton, KY Moscow, OH New Amsterdam, IN New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) New Richmond, OH Patriot, IN Prestonville, KY Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) Rising Sun, IN Rockport, IN Rome, IN Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) Troy, IN Vevay, IN Westport, KY Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall $ 255,000 1,570,000 1,250,000 2,220,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 580,000 653,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,090,000 2,850,000 3,410,000 1,160,000 1,580,000 2,180,000 724,000 1,490,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 616,000 3,200,000 753,000 1,710,000 426,000 896,000 466,000 359,000 2,380,000 418,000 2,050,000 502,000 1,170,000 1,610,000 $ 40,000 400,000 925,000 97,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 133,000 32,000 266,000 40,000 715,000 164,000 136,000 56,000 118,000 116,000 73,000 88,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 25,000 720,000 372,000 55,000 37,000 280,000 133,000 67,000 90,000 29,000 191,000 133,000 146,000 41,000 $ 295,000 1,970,000 2,175,000 2,317,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 223,0003 620,000 712,000 574,000' 3 713,000 685,000 1,736,000 244,000 2,805,000 3,014,00026 3,546,00027 1,216,000 1,698,00027 2,296,00026 797,00026 1,578,00026 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 641,000 3,920,000 1,125,000 1,765,000 463,00023 1,176,000 599,000 426,000 2,470,000 447,00025 2,241,00027 635,000 1,316,000 1,651,000 24-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 27 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost2 Project and Status' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Aurora, IN Wall and Levee $4,300,000 $1,190,000 $5,490,000 California (Cincinnati), OH Wall and Levee 1,750,000 720,000 2,470,000 Deauthorized October 3, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) Levee 292,000 14,000 306,00027 Utica, IN5 Levee 1,570,000 120,000 1,690,000 Deauthorized May 6, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River)5 Channel 1,080,000 630,000 1,710,00027 improvement Deauthorized November 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Caseyville, KY5 Levee 396,000 35,000 431,000 Cloverport, KY5 Wall and Levee 728,000 193,000 921,000 Concordia, KY5 Levee 590,000 55,000 645,000 Metropolis, IL5 Wall and Levee 3,070,000 431,000 3,501,000 Shawneetown, IL5 Wall and Levee 1,810,000 361,000 2,171,000 Tolu, KY5 Levee 303,000 35,000 338,000 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)5 Wall and Levee 3,340,000 - 3,340,00027 (Uncompleted Portion) West Point, KY5 Wall and Levee 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,00023 1 All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 9 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. $ Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. ' Details of this project are in individual report. s Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." * See Annual Report for 1958 for details. ' See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. ' See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 1o See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 1 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. " Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 22 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 23 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 24 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 25 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 26 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 24-26 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 27 of Text) RESERVOIRS Tributary Basin Estimated Cost' Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN 2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY2 Green River Lake, KY2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY2 Rough River Kentucky2 Kentucky River Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY2 Carr Fork Lake, KY2 Licking River Cave Run Lake, KY2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN2 Monroe Lake, IN2 Patoka Lake, IN2 Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete East Fork of Whitewater River West Fork of Whitewater River Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River South Fork of Kentucky River Middle Fork of Kentucky River North Fork of Kentucky River Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River West Fork of Mill Creek Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River $37,904,424 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,422,329 69,100,000 17,193,381 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 50,854,826 114,826,300 125,000,000 $7,578,738$ $ 45,483,162 - 35,300,000' 108,41865 183,732' 22,6125 27,479,717 33,606,061 69,100,000' 17,193,381 10,643,001 60,700,0006 11,766,206 50,854,826 114,826,300' 125,000,0008 59,744,000 5,037,0009 64,781,000 51,447,500 3,484,5009 54,932,000 3,622,302 1,100,16110 4,722,463 4,156,368 6,633,812 7,902,827 106,8165 353,9955 8,666,76211 4,263,184 6,987,807 16,569,589 52,869,000 25,548,70012 78,417,700 Latest cost estimate revision 1986 unless otherwise noted. Details of this project given in individual report. Cash contributions for water supply storage. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. For Code 713 recreation development. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. Includes $35,213,000 United States Forest Service cost. Latest cost estimate revision 1979. Reimbursement for water supply storage. o10 Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. 11 Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $869,158 for Code 713 recreation development. 12 Includes $14,173,500 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $11,375,200 for initial recreation development. 24-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN: (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 32 of Text) Type of Construction Estimated Cost Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,0002 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,846,000$ 141,046,0004 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000$ 126,869,0004 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 138,648,0001 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000' 40,000,0008 Louisville, Lake, IL Little Wabash River Inactive 113,000,000 14,435,0009 127,435,00010 i Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. 4 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. a Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. ' Latest cost estimate revision 1979. a Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. * Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. ' Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $2,133,000 for recreation facilities. 8 Latest cost estimate revision 1975. s Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. 24-28 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Date of Local Protection Projects Inspection Brevoort Levee, IL May 1987 Brookport, IL Oct 1986 Cache River Levee, IL Oct 1986 Cannelton, IN Nov 1986 Cincinnati, OH May 1987 Covington, KY Nov 1986 Dayton, KY May 1987 Delphi, IN Mar 1987 England Pond Levee, IL May 1987 Evansville, IN Jun 1987 Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Dec 1986 Gill Township Levee, IN Apr 1987 Golconda, IL Oct 1986 Harrisburg, IL Oct 1986 Hawesville, KY Nov 1986 Indianapolis, IN Mar 1987 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Dec 1986 Lawrenceburg, IN May 1987 Lebanon Junction, KY Dec 1986 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Oct 1986 Levee Unit No. 8, IN Apr 1987 Louisville, KY Sep 1987 Lyford Levee, IN Apr 1987 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN May 1987 Mt. Carmel, IL Oct 1986 Muncie, IN Mar 1987 New Albany, IN Dec 1986 Newport, KY Nov 1986 Paducah, KY Oct 1986 Reevesville, IL Oct 1986 Rochester-McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL Oct 1986 Rosiclare, IL Oct 1986 Shawneetown, IL Oct 1986 Sturgis, KY May 1987 Taylorsville, KY Dec 1986 Tell City, IN Nov 1986 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Apr 1987 Uniontown, KY May 1987 Vincennes, IN May 1987 West Terre Haute, IN Apr 1987 24-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 35 of Text) Dates of Channel Improvements Inspection Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY Jan 1987 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY Sep 1986 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Jul 1987 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Apr 1987 English, IN (Little Blue River) Aug 1986 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Sep 1985 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Sep 1986 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Jul 1986 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jul 1987 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Aug 1987 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Sep 1986 Neon-Fleming, KY Jun 1987 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Sep 1986 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Jul 1987 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Aug 1986 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Mar 1987 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Jul 1987 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Ot 1986 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY Jul 1987 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Jun 1987 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jun 1987 Bank Revetments Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham Co., KY Aug 1986 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Mar 1987 Green River, Calhoun, KY Jan 1986 Licking River, Butler, KY Nov 1986 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Oct 1986 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH May 1987 Little Miami River, Milford, OH May 1987 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jul 1986 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Jul 1987 Ohio River, Daviess Co., KY Jul 1987 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL May 1986 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Jul 1987 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Jul 1987 Ohio River, Madison, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Nov 1986 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN May 1987 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Jun 1987 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Jun 1986 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Sep 1987 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone Co., KY May 1987 Ohio River, Rockport Landing, IN May 1987 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Nov 1986 Ohio River, Troy, IN May 1987 Ohio River, Upper River Rd., Jefferson Co., KY Aug 1987 Ohio River, Vanderburg Co., IN Jun 1987 Patoka River at Jasper, IN Apr 1987 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Apr 1987 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Aug 1987 Wabash River near Merom, IN Apr 1987 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Jan 1985 White River, Brownstown, IN Apr 1987 White River, Pike Co., IN Apr 1987 Whitewater River, Levee Rd., near Brookville, IN Jan 1986 WTP, Great Miami River, Ross, OH May 1987 24-30 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 37 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Jobs Bill' Total Flood Control: Buckhorn Creek, Campbellsville, KY2 $ 27,808 Camp Run, Sellersburg, IN 2 - 1,333 Canoe Creek at Henderson, KY6 $ 580 76,557 Cross Creek, Paducah, KY2 - 6,962 Dry Run, South Lebanon, OH2 -16 Great Miami River, Port Jefferson, OH' - 9,672 Lancassage Creek, Clark Co., IN4 - 55 Licking River, Salyersville, KY3 - 35,986 Little Beaver Creek, Kettering, OH3 - 67 Lyford Levee, IN' - 49,920 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN' -12,504 Salamonie River, Blackford County, IN 2 -7,500 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH 3 - 17,305 Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN4 - 4,330 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control: Lick Creek, Hartford City, IN6 - 130,173 Pigeon Creek, Vanderburgh County, IN 2 - 27,500 Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN4 - 1,395 Emergency Bank Protection: Embarras River, Charleston, IL2 - 7,500 Four Mile Creek, Butler County, OH2 - 7,495 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY2 - 10,921 Ohio River, Cave-in-Rock, IL3 - 7,500 Ohio River, Chickasaw Park, Louisville,KY2 - 7,500 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY2 - 5,496 Ohio River, Union County, KY' - 7,500 Whitewater River, Cedar Grove, IN2 - 1,465 Whitewater River, Laurel, IN' -653 ' Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983 2 Reconnaissance Study ' Detail Project Report 4 Plans and Specifications b Construction Funds Received 6 Construction Completed 24-31 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, Pa.) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River ......................................... 25-2 2. Kanawha River, WV ........................................ 25-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River .................... 25-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................................... 25-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH ..................................... 25-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV ...................................... 25-3 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, W V .............................................. 25-3 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W V .............................................. 25-3 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ...................................... 25-3 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .......... :................................... 25-4 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY .............................................. 25-4 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .............................................. 25-4 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ...................................... 25-5 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............ 25-5 15. Grayson Lake, KY ............................................ 25-5 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin,VA ...................... 25-6 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, KY, WV and VA .................................... 25-6 18. M assillon, OH .................................................. 25-6 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH .......................... 25-6 20. Newark, OH ..................................................... 25-7 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH ................................................ 25-7 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA ............. 25-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ......... 25-8 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ............................................. 25-8 25. Paintsville Lake, KY ........................................ 25-8 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV ...................................... 25-9 27. Roseville, OH ................................................... 25-9 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W V .............................................. 25-9 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ............... 25-9 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH ............................................. 25-10 31. Yatesville Lake, KY ....................................... 25-10 32. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................... 25-10 33. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 25-11 General Investigations 34. Surveys ........................................................... 25-11 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............... 25-11 Tables Table 25-A Table 25-B Table 25-C Table 25-D Table 25-E Table Table Table 25-F 25-G 25-H Cost & Financial Statement .......... 25-12 Authorization Legislation .............. 25-17 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................ 25-20 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................... 25-21 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ..................... 25-22 Inspection of Flood Control Projects ............................... 25-23 25-1 Navigation Page Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON THE OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 22- Ohio River 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875,1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 360 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. The existing project was completed at a cost of $23,403,201. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. For further cost details see Table 25-B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. Feasibility studies for modernization have been completed. The recommended plan includes construction of an additional lock chamber (800'x110') adjacent to the existing locks and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the navigation dam. The annual estimate for new work is $153,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 22 - Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 25-C. 5. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,267,422. The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $4,077,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $42,359,000 in flood damages. 25-2 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT 6. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV., on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. The 485 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The full funding estimate for new work is $47,900,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Engineering activities for remaining work items continued. The project is essentially complete, except for remaining recreation facilities, landscaping and cleanup. Operations and maintenance. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated at $104,000 during the fiscal year. To date the project has prevented an estimated $2,959,000 in flood damages. 7. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV., approximately three miles above Hinton, WV and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23 foot highweir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated to be $25,380,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $582,821,000 in flood damages. 8. BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County WV, on the LIttle Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,195,839. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated at $243,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $22,699,000 in flood damage. 9. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. 25-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741 foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $152,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $17,673,000 in flood damages. 10. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $3,644,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $58,437,000 in flood damages. 11. DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $148,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $53,040,000 in flood damages. 12. DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual 25-4 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acre in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost ofthe project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $3,325,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $106,057,000 in flood damages. 13. EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the project was $37,025,968. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented flood damages estimated at $365,000 during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $34,635,000 in flood damages. 14. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,670,126, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs wer made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,973,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $265,482,000 in flood damages. 15. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, Kentucky on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $547,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $31,528,000 in flood damages. 25-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 16. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest of Haysi, VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $336,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $138,193,000 in flood damages. 17. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY AND CUMBERLAND RIVERS, WV, VA, AND KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY; and Grundy, VA on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for the project is $464,200,000, which includes $19,200,000 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV was awarded in April 1983 and is complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 and is 13% complete. The contract for the Williamson Area Clearing was awarded in September 1987. The contract for the Williamson Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in September 1987. The overall project is 29% complete. 18. MASSILLON, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 19. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 25-6 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets and/or relief wells and grouting. The estimated full funding cost of the rehabilitation program is $39,100,000 in total, with $25,500,000 from the Construction, General Appropriation and $13,600,000 from the Operations and Maintenance, General Appropriation. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at all the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top the dams. The full funding estimate for the Dam Safety Assurance Program is $60,870,000. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work. The Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus far, twenty contracts have been awarded and the program is 83% complete. The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far seven contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 27% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $44,358,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $1,137,732,000 in flood damages. 20. NEWARK, OHIO Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existing project see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood Control Act the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate for the project is $10,100,000 Federal cost and $4,215,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel - As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project required re-formulation. A reanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contract for construction of North Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 21. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage'area of approximately 45 square miles. the 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. 25-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. Necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 22. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $18,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $4,680,000 in flood damages. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection porjects, which are operated and maintained by local interest, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated aggregate total of $10,508,000. 24. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, Ohio, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gale controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 arcre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $26,969,962, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $146,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $38,046,000. 25. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See also Appendix A. The full funding estimate for new work is $63,784,000, which includes $2,990,000 non-Federal Costs. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $298,222 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. 25-8 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is well advanced. The remaining work items include minor highway relocations, landscaping and final cleanup. Operations and Maintenance: The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $4,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $5,647,000. 26. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. The estimate for new work is $264,100,000. Local cooperation. None required. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is well advanced. The remaining work items include remaining recreation, landscaping and cleanup. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,404,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $58,696,000. 27. ROSEVILLE, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. 28. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $9,372,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $255,881,000 in flood damages. 29. SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel 25-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1960. A total of 13,154 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $37,029,585, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,341,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $173,123,000 in flood damages. 30. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, Ohio and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met, see also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $190,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $9,597,000 in flood damages. 31. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of an earthfill dam, 104 feet in height and 770 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located approximately one-half mile east of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 208 square miles. The full funding estimate for new work is $104,000,000, which will be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $6,615,000 for the cost sharing portion of the recreation development. To date, 408 of the required 758 real estate tracts have been acquired. A contract for construction of the dam was awarded in January 1977 and was terminated for the convenience of the Government in August 1977. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Congress appropriated funds in fiscal year 1981 to resume project construction and work progressed until March 1981 when administration directed a deferral action which resulted in a substantial reduction in project funds and the elimination of any recommendation for funding in fiscal years 1982 and 1983. Congressional action provided fiscal year 1982 through 1987 funding for the project. The contract for Construction of Dam and Appurtenant Works, Phase I, was awarded in March 1984 and is complete. Contracts with the Commonwealth and the County for relocation and/or abandonment of roads affected by the project are complete. The contract for construction of Dam and Appurtenances (Phase II) was awarded in April 1986 and is 87% complete. The contract for Relocation of SR32-2 was awarded in February 1986 and is complete. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The flood control act of June 22, 1936 and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of those completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in 25-10 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1987 were $84,726. Total cost to September 30,1986 were $1,361,065. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 33. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1987 Cost Apple Creek, Apple Creek, OH Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV Jardin Manor, Lick Creek, OH Kenova, WV Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV Little Stillwater Creek, Urichsville, OH Ohio River, Gallipolis, OH Ohio River, Williamstown, WV Prices Creek at Smithfield, WV Sistersville, WV, Storm and Sanitary Sewers State Route 62, Buffalo, WV $3,865 134,293 10,295 14,462 11,710 600 69,113 2,460 5,381 13,837 10,276 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Black Fork, Richland County, OH Blacklick Creek, Franklin County, OH Hughes Creek, Hugheston, WV Landis Ditch, Rittman, OH Marsh Fork, Fairdale, WV Muskingum River, Mansfield, OH Olentangy River, Galion, OH Shope Creek, Ashland, KY Spring Creek, Spencer, WV Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH FY 1987 Cost $3,194 245,904 33,565 51,004 61,238 990 1,801 10 21 171,711 Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1987 Cost Krouts Creek, Huntington, WV Shope Creek, Ashland, KY Whetstone, Mt. Gilead, OH $1,518 2,307 1,828 Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1987 at a cost of $256,041. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1987 were $173,069. 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year 1987 costs were $2,671,098 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Review for Deauthorization Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies Continuation of Planning and Engineering Advance Engineering and Design 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $173,994. $787,562 907,728 430,409 96 98,501 127,238 23,406 296,158 25-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 25-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 2. Kanawha River, WV (Existing Project) Winfield L&D New Work Approp. 22,000 - - Cost 155,886 - - Maint. Approp. 5,631,000 6,271,000 6,765,000 Cost 5,522,048 7,008,174 6,780,172 Rehab. Approp. - - - Cost - - - New Work Approp. Cost 5. Alum Creek Lake, New Work OH Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - -20,300 719,142 146,538 450,000 691,000 438,273 698,086 6. Beech Fork Lake, New Work WV Approp. 1,950,000 1,200,000 Cost 1,839,500 1,382,433 Maint. Approp. 490,000 554,000 Cost 484,504 545,316 - 27,853,6991 - 27,853,6991 5,326,600 78,383,1842 5,273,037 78,294,4852 - 130,394 s - 130,394* - 1,185,000 - 788,585 -45,933 5,341 600,200 608,490 186,000 281,817 608,000 620,375 578,800 584,656 77,021 807,500 800,170 1,185,000 788,585 56,267,422 56,267,422 5,018,065 4,998,992 42,027,500 41,952,603 5,339,539 5,324,929 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV New Work Approp. - - Cost 1,049 - Maint. Approp. 1,033,000 1,055,000 Cost 953,694 1,181,993 - - 29,458,652' - - 29,458,652' 730,200 831,300 12,541,578 725,974 818,116 12,505,107 8. Burnsville Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Deer Creek Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 650,000 -110,000 1,399,214 413,697 745,000 989,000 726,644 1,014,583 -39,426 12,722 1,079,600 1,063,503 1,036,000 1,051,479 470,000 447,960 431,200 466,200 489,691 446,813 454,619 454,016 975,000 334,000 1,244,500 831,500 1,150,611 481,846 1,255,843 804,290 25-12 56,195,839 56,195,839 6,911,1056 6,890,0526 20,406,5456 20,406,5456 6,152,725' 6,133,887' 7,631,821 7,631,821 8,112,7198 8,073,2548 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30,1987 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 15. Grayson Lake, KY 16. John W. Flannagan Dam & Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA 17. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV, & VA 18. Massillon, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 920,000 1,235,000 848,817 1,281,093 380,000 597,000 376,678 631,304 83,884 837,000 811,006 -1,967 7,805 1,175,000 1,140,831 935,400 1,102,600 935,266 1,087,460 823,300 809,990 27 - 973,000 1,169,000 984,952 1,201,498 869,000 757,500 992,134 777,145 720,000 694,000 606,442 785,280 -14,215 759 681,000 677,713 674,000 732,210 1,600,000 5,140,000 4,744,091 8,063,946 12,000 12,013 18,000 17,999 572,000 598,334 666,500 674,436 14,526,000 30,865,000 15,005,640 20,547,722 13,300 12,942 25-13 410,900 405,026 7,845,5479 7,845,5479 12,573,97610 12,528,28410 30,218,135 30,218,135 5,339,04311 5,313,14411 37,025,968 37,025,968 10,298,20712 10,257,51412 54,670,12613 54,670,12618 6,893,6981' 6,872,03814 19,162,74115 19,162,74115 8,545,070 8,527,043 20,444,38316 20,444,383' 6 10,037,6621' 10,017,67517 68,731,000 57,496,277 8,139,40618 8,139,40618 293,708 293,449 960,300 945,656 806,000 803,962 639,000 631,346 857,300 844,377 -100 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 25-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 19. Muskingum River Dams & Lakes, OH 20. Newark, OH (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, VA 23. Ohio River Basin 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 25. Paintsville Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. (Rehab.) Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 41,247,81519 - - - - 41,247,81519 4,380,000 4,118,000 4,041,000 4,110,000 61,085,07020 4,067,444 4,347,427 4,154,795 3,980,201 60,896,87820 1,550,000 1,344,317 1,600,000 1,673,128 26,000 26,002 300,000 350,514 94,000 103,989 313,000 296,015 1,636,000 2,248,347 900,000 1,312,092 17,377 17,377 134,000 251,472 103,000 109,710 993,000 1,139,211 60,000 308,507 13,800 13,737 297,785 198,296 58,600 59,642 255,000 199,000 268,505 206,538 196,800 195,560 2,052,000 1,915,129 6,000,000 4,473,692 23,200 23,004 265,000 356,352 158,300 151,627 297,400 284,700 196,800 195,560 21,587,94521 21,353,44821 12,940,000 11,301,466 845,916 845,916 739,142 738,883 6,037,512 6,027,630 6,665,98522 6,665,98522 1,501,917 1,492,560 6,186,901" 6,186,901 5,137,7592 5,123,069 355,861 355,861 425,000 475,195 3,790,000 3,273,809 505,000 486,911 415,000 464,000 435,438 455,093 1,721,000 1,693,268 573,000 579,651 84,359 435,106 844,500 816,543 - 26,969,962" - 26,969,962" 706,700 5,353,6567 669,305 5,293,6827 620,000 856,936 685,600 672,878 58,487,147 58,412,408 3,445,600 3,426,019 25,14 TABLE 25-A (cont'd) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept.30,1987 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, New Work WV Approp. 15,600,000 9,250,000 - 45,250,000 261,222,23328 Cost 14,817,521 10,295,735 271,600 45,222,538 261,180,61028 Maint. Approp. 1,575,000 1,034,000 2,551,000 1,335,800 9,427,61429 Cost 1,541,382 1,042,399 2,571,582 1,313,257 9,381,15029 27. Roseville, OH New Work Approp. - - - - 910,785 Cost - - - - 910,785 Maint. Approp. 7,000 10,000 20,000 12,000 160,968 Cost 7,003 9,998 19,961 12,004 160,931 28. Summersville Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. 7,183 -10,000 - - 48,375,88430 WV Cost 7,598 17,895 - - 48,375,88430 Maint. Approp. 1,119,000 982,000 1,649,000 2,784,500 16,839,41431 Cost 1,087,885 1,046,276 1,656,311 2,794,884 16,810,66731 29. Sutton Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. 185,000 10,000 -5,376 - 37,029,58532 WV Cost 29,016 147,803 12,805 - 37,029,58532 Maint. Approp. 1,228,000 1,526,000 1,480,000 1,024,800 18,894,28733 Cost 1,360,473 1,496,687 1,567,279 1,023,670 18,848,22433 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, New Work OH Approp. - - - - 2,086,50334 Cost - - .- - 2,086,50334 Maint. Approp. 225,000 268,000 371,000 234,400 3,871,875 Cost 228,745 258,014 378,150 240,242 3,866,368 31. Yatesville Lake, New Work KY Approp. 10,000,000 15,000,000 9,642,000 5,410,000 60,096,500 Cost 3,508,186 5,921,767 10,201,760 15,907,584 49,206,380 See page 25-16 for footnotes. 25-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 1lncludes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3Public Works Acceleration funds. 4Includes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. 5Includes $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 4Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. 'Includes $130,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 8Includes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. "Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,94 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 1oIncludes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 1Ilncludes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 12 lncludes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. lI3 lncludes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 14Includes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 15 lncludes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. "elncludes $422,983 Code 711 funds. lI7lncludes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 'slncludes $477,813 contributed funds. lncludes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. 0"Includes $198,578 Maintenance and Operations funds. 21lncludes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. "Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. nIncludes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 4Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. "'Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. "Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. ~Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. "Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. "Includes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. "Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. slncludes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, $300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operation Funds. Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. ~Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $142,078 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 4 lncludes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 25-16 TABLE 25-B HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30,1935 Aug. 15,1985 Oct. 23,1962 Oct. 23,1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28,1938 Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22,1944 Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22,1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 25-17 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation 5. H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd. Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 9. 10. 11. 12. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 25-B (cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22,1944 14. Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22,1944 EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 17. Oct.1,1980 18. Jun. 28,1938 19. Feb. 20,1934 Jun. 28,1938 Aug. 11, 1939 20. Jun. 28,1938 Aug. 13,1968 21. Oct. 23,1962 22. Jul. 14, 1960 JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. 25-18 GRAYSON LAKE, KY 15. Jul. 14, 1960 Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. TABLE 25-B (cont'd) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 24. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 25. Oct. 27,1965 26. Oct. 23, 1962 27. Jun. 28, 1938 28. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 29. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 30. Dec. 22, 1944 31. Oct. 27,1965 32. Jun. 22, 1936 PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., lst Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 25-19 - I m- I - - 1 II I -~--~--a II1 I ---- ---I1CI~ 1P~-C-~ -"---- --I-I -~----L I_ -- Ce 111- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 25-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 1In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30,1952. 3Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 6Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8Private Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 25-20 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 - - Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 - - Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 - - Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 - - Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 - - East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 - - Galax, VA 1953 480,536 - - Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 - - Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 - - Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 - - Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 - - Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 - - Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 - - Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 - - Russell, KY 1953 552,493 - - Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 - - Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY - 11,577 - - Burlington, OH - - - - Chesapeake, OH - - - - Coal Grove, OH - 3,389 - - Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 - - Dover, KY - - - - Fullerton, KY - - - - Greenup, KY - 4,962 - - Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV - 17,721 - - Miller, OH - - - - Normal, KY - - - - Proctorville, OH - - - - Ravenswood, WV - - - - South Point, OH - - - - South Portsmouth, KY - - - - Vanceburg, KY - - - - Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 - - - Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 - - Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA - 2,656 - - Leading Creek, WV 1974 272,880 - - Panther Creek, WV 1976 22,879 - - Salt Creek, OH 1975 1,089,943 - - Utica, OH 1975 757,550 - - West Fork, WV 1974 663,192 - - Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Birch, WV -... Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 - - Logan, OH -... Moores Ferry, WV -... Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 25-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 25-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH - May 1981 1,334 - Athalia, OH - Aug 1977 - - Belpre, OH - Nov 1977 - - Brooklyn, WV - Nov 1979 - - Buena Vista, OH - Aug 1977 - - Chambersburg, OH - Aug 1977 - - Cheshire, OH - Nov 1977 - - Chilo, OH - Aug 1977 - - Clifton, WV - Aug 1977 11,237 - Columbus, OH - Aug 1977 - - Friendly, WV - Aug 1977 - - Gallipolis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hanging Rock, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hartford, WV - Aug 1977 - - Henderson, WV - Aug 1977 - - Higginsport, OH - Oct 1978 - - Hockingport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Letart, WV - Aug 1977 - - Letart Falls, OH - Aug 1977 - - Manchester, OH - May 1981 - - Mapleshade, OH - Oct 1978 - - Marietta, OH - Nov 1981 - - Mason, WV - Aug 1977 - - Middleport, OH - May 1981 9,783 - Millwood, WV - Aug 1977 - - New Martinsville, WV - Nov 1979 - - New Matamoras, OH - Aug 1977 - - Newport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Pomeroy, OH - Aug 1977 - - Portland, OH - Aug 1977 - - Racine, OH - Aug 1977 - - Ripley, OH - Oct 1978 7,523 - Riverview, WV - Aug 1977 - - St. Mary's, WV - Aug 1977 - - Sardis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sciotoville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sistersville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Syracuse, OH - Aug 1977 - - Waverley, WV - Aug 1977 - - Williamstown, WV - Nov 1979 - - Zanesville, OH - May 1981 - - Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV - Aug 1977 - - Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 - Frazeysburg, OH - May 1981 5,000 - Millersburg, OH - May 1981 - - Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 - Mud River, WV - Nov 1979 - - Poca, WV - May 1981 - - Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 - White Oak Creek, OH - Nov 1981 - - 25-22 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 25-H INSPECTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS - See Section 33 of Text Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY Apr 87 Athens, OH May 87 Bramwell, WV Sep 87 Cairo, WV Sep 87 Canton (Nimishillen), OH Nov 87 Cattletsburg, KY May 87 Oct 87 Ceredo-Kenova, WV May 87 Oct 87 Chillicothe, OH May 87 Nov 87 East Rainelle, WV Sep 87 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Sep 87 Fourpole Creek, WV Sep 87 Galax, VA Sep 87 Grahn, KY Sep 87 Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Sep 87 Hutchins, KY Sep 87 Huntington, WV Sep 87 Inez, KY Oct 85 Ironton, OH Apr 87 Sep 87 Jacksonsburg, Fishing Creek, WV Sep 87 Maysville, KY May 87 Oct 87 Montcalm, WV Sep 87 Newark, OH May 87 Oct 87 Olive Hill, KY Sep 87 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Sep 87 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Oct 87 Parkersburg, WV May 87 Nov 87 Pax, WV Nov 87 Point Pleasant, WV May 87 Oct 87 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Apr 87 Prestonsburg, KY Jan 87 Jun 87 Princeton, WV Sep 87 Richwood and Fenwick, WV Sep 87 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Jan 87 Ripley, WV Sep 87 Roseville, OH Jun 87 Russel, KY Apr 87 Oct 87 Smithfield, WV Sep 87 South Williamson, KY May 87 Nov 87 Utica, OH Nov 87 West Union, Middle Island, WV Sep 87 Williamson, WV May 87 Nov 87 25-23 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT * This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Allegheny River, PA....................26-2 2. Construction of locks and dams, Ohio River ............................ 26-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV .......... 26-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River ............ 26-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV ....................... 26-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects.......26-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Allegheny River, Oil City, PA ............. 26-3 8. Chartiers Creek, PA .................... 26-4 9. Elkins, W V ............................ 26-4 10. Johnstown, PA ......................... 26-4 11. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA...........................26-5 Flood Control- Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ............................ 26-5 13. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA...................26-5 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.................... 26-5 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA .................... 26-6 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY.............26-6 17. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA .............................. 26-6 18. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA .................... 26-7 19. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH ........... 26-7 20. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ........................ 26-8 21. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh D istrict) .............................. 26-8 22. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH ................. 26-8 23. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ............................ 26-8 24. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............. ........ 26-9 25. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA...........................26-10 26. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA............................26-10 27. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD ..................... 26-11 28. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................. 26-11 29. Other authorized flood control projects .... 26-11 30. Flood control work under special authorization .......................... 26-11 General Investigations 31. Surveys ............................. 26-11 32. Collection and study of basic data......... 26-11 33. Research and development...............26-11 Tables Table 26-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 26-12 Table 26-B Authorizing Legislation............ 26-16 Table 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects26-20 Table 26-D Not Applicable ...................... Table 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.........................26-21 Table 26-F Not Applicable .................... Table 26-G Deauthorized Projects ............. 26-22 Table 26-H Allegheny River Statistics ......... 26-23 Table 26-I Monongahela River Statistics ....... 26-24 Table 26-J Monongahela River Total Costs ..... 26-25 Table 26-K Ohio River Basin Local Protection Projects.........................26-25 Table 26-L Ohio River Basin Reservoirs ........ 26-26 Table 26-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.........................26-26 Table 26-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................... 26-27 26-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 325 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations during fiscal year: Contract for dam warning signs at dams 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 was awarded on March 16, 1987 for $440,000 and progressed to 55% completion. Contract for erosion protection at lock and dam 7 was awarded on 6 August 1987 for $4,302,885. Contract for foundation exploration at dam 2 was awarded on 10 April 1987 for $480,000 and progressed to 100% completion. Major maintenance items accomplished by the District's Repair Party were unwatering chamber and repairing sills at lock 2; repairing valves at locks 7 and 8; and purchasing tow haulage equipment for locks 6 and 7. Operation and maintenance, general: Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. There are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New work: The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (to be renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). On Grays Landing, activities during the fiscal year included the completion of Feature Design Memoranda for Bank Excavation for the Lock and Dam and for Real Estate. Work continued on cultural resources investigations and on real estate acquisition at 26-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT the lock site. Work began on plans and specifications for the bank excavation contract. On Point Marion, activities during the fiscal year included completion of the General Design Memorandum for the project and initiation of work for the Feature Design Memorandum for the Lock. Major Maintenance: Contract for painting tainter gates, valves and bulkheads at Morgantown, Hildebrand and Opekiska, awarded in FY 1983 for $395,430 was completed. Contract for stone protection, upper guard wall extension, lock and dam 4, was awarded on 5 January 1987 for $309,675 and was completed. Contract for painting emergency bulkheads and footbridge at locks and dam 4 was awarded on 18 February 1987 for $79,000 and was completed. Contract for erosion protection at locks and dam 2, was awarded on 27 February 1987 for $2,064,295 and progressed to 75% complete. Contract for dam rehabilitation at Point Marion was awarded on 9 June 1987 for $2,450,300, but no physical work was accomplished. Contract for upper guard wall repairs at locks and dam 2 was awarded on 11 June 1987 for $136,375 and progressed to 63% complete. Major maintenance items accomplished by the District Repair Party were dewatering chambers at Lock 2 and Maxwell; gate repairs at locks 2 and 3; and valve repairs at locks 7,8 and Morgantown. Operations and Maintenance, General: Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extend feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal costsharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general; Contract for Concrete Repairs for Parapet Walls and Roadway, awarded 19 May 1986, was completed. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $1,883,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1987 are $528,700,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 26-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. ALLEGHENY RIVER, OIL CITY, PA Location. Oil City is located in Venango County, PA at the junction of Oil Creek and the Allegheny River (Allegheny River Mile 132.1). See Geological Survey Chart for Oil City, PA. Existing Project: Ice jams and ice-related flooding have plaqued Oil City for more than a century. Traditional approaches (dredging, walls, dikes, etc.) in past studies could not provide a cost-effective solution. The most recent study was conducted under the general authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood control Act, as amended. What was different about this study effort was the involvement of the Corps Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). After extensive investigations to determine the causes of the ice jam flooding, CRREL recommended the installation of a floating ice control structure (ICS) on the Allegheny River and fixed ICS on Oil Creek. The Allegheny River ICS consists of a series of steel pontoons and floats connected to 2 1/4 inch diameter steel cables which are anchored on each shore, approximately 0.4 miles above the junction of Oil Creek. The Oil Creek ICS will consist of a Bascule gated dam in Oil Creek with earthen dike extensions on both creek banks and a supplemental floating ICS approximately 75 feet upstream from the dam. The concrete dam will be approximately 351 feet long and 5 feet high, and will be located in the Oil Creek State Park, approximately 5.2 miles above the creeks mouth at the Allegheny River. Estimated first cost for the project is $3,932,000, of which $3,911,000 is Federal and $21,000 is non-federal. 26-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Local Cooperation: The city of Oil City is responsible for the acquisition of required project land interests and the operation and maintenance of the ice control structures. To date, the city has acquired all the necessary rights-ofway for both the river and the creek ICS. The city has operated and maintained the Allegheny River ICS through the 1985 and 1986 winter seasons. Operations during fiscal year: Installation of the Allegheny River structure was completed in October 1983 at a cost of $802,000, and subsequently turned over to the city for operation on 16 December 1983. A contract was awarded on 27 August 1987 for the Oil Creek ICS in the amount of $2,225,000. The project is scheduled to be complete by 1 November 1988. Cumulative flood damages prevented by the project were estimated to be $24,000. 8. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg-Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvments would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood ControlProject-Construction of Unit I was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over tolocal interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was Completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Canonsburg-Houston Reach- Construction of Unit I was started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10,1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, are 99% complete. Remaining work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rights-of-way. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,225,188. Operations during fiscal year. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by the Chartiers Creek project through September 30, 1987, totaled $15,888,000. 9. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV) Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artifical cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started May 1946 and completed May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Replacement of trash boom was awarded on 8 Oct 86 for $35,700 and was Completed. Project was last inspected in June 1986. Cumulative total flood damages prevented to September 30, 1986, totaled $14,311,000. 10. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Land acquired for project consists of easements over 192 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. 26-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities and routine investigations were made. Project was last inspected in April, 1986. Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $417,940,000 to end of September 1987. 11. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started May 1946 and was completed June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities continued and routine investigations were made. Project was last inspected in October 1986. Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $28,913,000 to end of September 1987. Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started January 1942 and completed June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for construction of Administration Building was awarded on April 30,1987 for $338,403 and progressed to 32% completion. Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $5,408,000; total benefits through September 30,1987 are $223,091,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of publicuse facilities continued. 13. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Land acquired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7,618.1 acres in fee and 518.5 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Painting Crest Gates and Service bridge was awarded 27 Feb 87 at an estimated $90,000 and progressed to 30% complete. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $2,619,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1987 are $562,347,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. 14. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and 26-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,563.6 acres in fee and 99.98 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year: Major maintenance: Contract for construction of water supply and waste water systems, awarded on 13 January 1986 for $399,700, was completed. Contract for construction of maintenance complex and administation building was awarded on 23 September 1986 for $896,149 and progressed to 91% completion. Contract for grading, drainage and paving improvements was awarded on 2 June 1987 for $254,494 and progressed to 50% complete. Operation and maintenance, general: Master Plan Design Memorandum No. 2 was approved on June 3, 1987. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1987 are $123,748,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 15. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and lowwater regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gatecontrolled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general; Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $227,000; total benefits through September 30, 1987 are $32,210,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 16. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA -NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,646.6 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.4 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28,1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operation during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $3,994,000; total to end of this fiscal year, $333,055,000. Of 2,212 surface tracts authorized for acquisition, all have been acquired but are subject to a final audit. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 17. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway 26-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,334.7 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Concrete Repairs, Parapet Walls and Roadway, was awarded on 12 June 1986 for $200,695 and was completed. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $407,000; total benefits to September 30, 1987, $165,724,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 21.6 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in February 1939 and completed in June 1941. Land acquired for projects consists of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for Wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first cost of initial wildlife development. Cost-sharing for construction of fishing access area awarded in September 1980 was completed in July 1981 for $335,405.75. On June 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. Cost-sharing contract for construction of hunting access areas awarded July 30, 1980 was completed on Nov 25, 1981 at a final cost of $44,540. On September 9, 1980, a contract for camping and day-use recreational development was executed between the U.S. Government and the County of Armstrong. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial camping and day-use recreational development and 50% of the costs for future development. Cost-sharing contract for Construction of Milton Loop Recreation Area awarded July 19, 1981 was completed on September 17, 1982 for $467,842. Each cooperation authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacement without cost to the Government of all facilities developed with their support. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1987 were $155,338,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 19. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, lowwater regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolledearth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Construction of dam and access road was started in May 1963 and completed in November 1966. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 areas. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.). with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project was $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid $530,881.24 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,423,921.24 towards total of $5,200,000 non- Federal costs. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and 26-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $2,781,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1987 are $79,180,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 9 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-water regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolledearthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for benefical use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.6 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this dam for this fiscal year were $2,213,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1987 are $62,015,000. Activities under reservoir managment program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 21. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 26-B, 26-K and 26-L on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $4,913,000 during this fiscal year. Total flood damages prevented through September 30, 1987 are $704,227,000. 22. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,632.2 acres in fee and easements over 197.7 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Ranger Check Station was awarded on 25 October 1985 for $221,800 and was completed during the fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $674,000. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1987 are $19,383,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 23. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) 26-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam would be of the concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works will consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway will be uncontrolled. Storage capacity will be 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1987) is $212,000,000 (includes $21,270,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,200,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer projectiland and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $17,070,000; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $1,162,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation costsharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27,1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Relocation of US Rt. 30, Section 2 contract, awarded September 12, 1984, progressed to 99% completion. Relocation of US Rt. 30, Section 3 contract, awarded March 26, 1985 for $5,926,755, was completed on November 17, 1986. Contract for Relocation of WV Rt. 44 and Associated Routes, awarded February 18, 1986 for $4,605,724 progressed to 88% completion. Contract for construction of dam, awarded July 29,1983 for $15,985,064 was completed on December 19, 1986. Construction of Equitable Gas Company Access Roads, Phase II, awarded May 31, 1985 for $1,267,138 was completed on October 25, 1986. Construction of Equitable Gas Company Access Roads, Phase III, awarded March 25, 1986 for $1,250,662 progressed to 99% completion. Costreimbursable contract with Equitable Gas Company for Phase II Piping Work was negotiated and awarded on March 8, 1985, for an estimated amount of $4,276,808, and progressed to 98% completion. Contract to Relocate Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Track and Appurtenances, awarded June 18, 1985 for $3,496,215 was completed on August 31, 1986. Costreimbursable contract with Baltimore and Ohio Railroad for Track Raise and Communication Lines was negotiated and awarded on January 22,1985 for an estimated amount of $405,000 and was completed during fiscal year 1987. Cost-reimbursable contract with Consolidated Gas Transmission Corportion for Relocation, Removal or Abandoment and Subordination of Gas Pipelines, Gas Production Wells and Access Roads, was negotiated in July 1984 for an estimated amount of $2,725,000 and was completed during fiscal year 1987. Roanoake Elementary School construction contract, awarded August 1, 1984 for $3,193,000 was completed on July 17, 1986. Contract for construction of Maintenance Complex, Roanoke Bay Recreation Area, awarded June 10, 1986 for $1,989,000 progressed to 83% completion. Contract for Reservoir Clearing was awarded on September 20, 1986 for $1,114,000 and was completed on July 6, 1987. Contract for fencing cemetaries was awarded on January 20, 1987 for $54,673 and completed on September 29, 1987. Contract for construction of Georgetown Boat Access Area was awarded on August 13, 1987 for $329,774. Contract for relocation of Mary Conrad House and Roadside Park was awarded on August 17, 1987 for $364,955. Contract for Carrion Bay and Roanoke Bay Recreation Area was awarded on September 17, 1987 for $1,136,825. Surface land acquired for the project consists of 20,849 acres. Land acquisition, detailed engineering work and construction continued and all items of work were progressing on schedule. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for the fiscal year were $23,000. Total flood control benefits for the reservoir through September 30, 1987 are $28,578,000. 24. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) 26-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additiopal recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Contract for Miscellaneous Road Work was awarded on August 18, 1987 for $319,112. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $60,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1987 are $171,995,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 25. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolled sidechannel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.3 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsyvlania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Spillway Repairs was awarded on 23 August 1985 and was completed in FY 1987. Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $71,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1987 are $14,490,000. 26. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolledearth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a tworeservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1, 731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this 26-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT period were $3,000; total through September 30, 1987 is $1,610,000. 27. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. A license was issued Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve the public needs. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for Erosion Protection at Jockey Hollow was awarded on 29 September 1986 for $107,863 and completed during FY 1987. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $801,000. Total flood control benefits for this dam through September 30, 1987 are $151,804,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities were continued. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 26-M for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $43,436. Total cost to September 30, 1987 was $1,013,983. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 26-E on other authorized flood control projects. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 26-N. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 26-N. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster Preparedness $121,585 Flood Emergency Operations 54,040 Rehabilition: Buckhannon, WV. 7,428 Elkins, Randolph County, WV. 45,539 Pine Creek Flood Protection Allegheny County, PA 9,289 Total Cost for fiscal year: $237,881 General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Flood control studies $1,223,167 Review of authorized projects 104 Coordination with other agencies 35,309 Special investigations 100,002 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 62,824 Continuation of Planning and Engineering: Grays Landing Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 7), Monongahela River, PA. 20,378 Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8), Monongahela River, PA and WV 5,702 Total cost for fiscal year $1,447,486 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $179,930 for flood plain management services and $12,457 for related hydrologic studies. 33. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 26-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 1987 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River New Work PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3. Monongahela New Work River, PA and Approp,. WV Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 5. Tygart Lake, New Work WV Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Allegheny River New Work Oil City, PA Approp. Cost 8. Chartiers New Work Creek, PA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost New Work (Contributed Contrib. Funds) Cost 9. Elkins, WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10. Johnstown, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11. Punxsutawney, New Work Ohio River Approp. Basin, PA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. 3,788,000 3,971,500 4 3,762,006 4.037,823 4 8,496,900 8,375,983 -120,000 44,567 -417,500 -195,337 689,500 700,570 98,000 244,784 26,508 -,o 6,000 4,181 131,000 314,450 -6,000 263,795 8,96( 9,61 - i 39 0,000 9 3,100 10 1,698 12 642,000 705,320 69,000 68,648 41,764 8,000 9,619 -56,591 19,281 1,988 12,104 - - 18,157,860' - - 18,157,860' ,975,000 5,985,100 64,321,4622 ,986,772 5,905,479 64,217,8982 400,000 3,323,000 132,926,0853 209,436 3,080,973 132,493,4944 ,721,852 11,813,800 157,970,2065 ,063,705 11,727,436 157,771,4866 - - 15,857,000 7 221 15,857,000 - - 19,077,932' - - 19,077,932' 726,400 873,300 9,636,5398 741,774 846,746 9,585,0398 120,000 435,000 1,746,000 95,599 179,474 1,463,441 - - 26,586,186 5,134 - 26,560,187 - - 4,225,188 - - 4,204,498 - - 1,772,627 - - 1,772,627 3,500 21,000 252,987 2,838 10,372 241,171 - - 8,865,3889 - - 8,865,3889 7,000 84,000 3,894,205 7,098 50,417 3,860,422 - - 3,586,10710 - - 3,586,10710 8,000 8,346 7,000 1,029,888"1 2,679 1,025,45911 Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp.: Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost -- - - 8,739,98712 -- - - 8,739,98712 1,259,000 1,425,500 1,366,700 1,204,900 16,093,88313 1,025,185 1,610,473 1,397,114 1,238,771 16,061,35513 26-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 1987 13. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 17. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 19. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 20. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 21. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 22. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -4,000 7,405 670,100 460,055 - - - 46,012,41114 - - - 46,012,411"14 742,091 717,000 900,000 8,165,904 768,355 880,435 763,414 7,998,521 63,000 - 43,001 - 4.474,52415 68,849 26,610 - - 4,431,52315 1,236,200 1,726,000 2,619,000 3,003,400 15,384,32116 1,186,299 1,713,527 2,701,478 2,775,020 15,105,98816 - - - - 9,539,58617 - - - - 9,539,58617 804,423 452,500 539,482 728,300 7,966,15718 915,649 586,993 514,479 712,557 7,910,63518 - - - - 109,309,07619 1,214 8,286 - - 109,298,20519 1,203,000 1,065,500 1,083,000 1,137,900 15,633,178 1,163,944 1,138,420 1,115,419 1,095,568 15,568,514 2,000,000 5,000 -100,000 -200,000 2,940,000 1,399,020 229,472 230,032 8,928 2,920,279 -5,000 - - - 5,727,53120 411 - - - 5,727,53120 826,577 940,705 953,700 1,120,000 11,392,25621 1,001,587 919,272 999,266 1,047,093 11,288,53321 -190,000 30,160 - - 7,144,97322 -95,443 30,160 - - 7,138,81425 584,000 780,500 650,200 909,000 8,287,516 546,449 803,900 656,660 829,775 8,167,703 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 17,376,09724 - - - - 17,376,09724 659,100 580,807 655,500 596,100 7,581,39625 808,210 768,377 652,378 605,411 7,569,86125 - - - - 4,253,02926 - - - - 4,253,02926 523,000 514,500 683,000 795,900 7,240,764 531,555 538,675 672,132 815,130 7,220,246 - - - - 985,19727 - - - - 985,19727 - -- - -10,500 1,239,000 2,089,000 1,270,706 2,117,222 - - 40,227,20128 - - 40,209,89428 2,019,000 2,045,000 18,685,61729 2,068,686 1,890,645 18,467,37329 26-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 1987 23. Stonewall Jack- New Work son Lake, Ohio Approp. 22,300,000 25,300,000 24,106,000 16,913,000 176,629,200 River Basin, WV Cost 21,414,527 26,553,633 25,450,413 15,713,411 174,868,710 Maint. Approp. - - - 25,500 25,500 Cost - - - - - 24. Tionesta Lake, New Work Ohio River Approp. 17,000 -17,286 -32,403 - 7,792,3783s0 Basin, PA Cost 218,519 41,048 - - 7,788,37931 Maint. Approp. 1,025,000 811,000 1,060,000 1,010,500 12,274,45332 Cost 895,102 1,049,901 1,074,808 951,589 12,178,42832 25. Union City New Work Dam, Ohio Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 345,000 417,000 512,000 434,900 3,457,568 Cost 288,948 445,085 528,818 451,946 3,444,639 26. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. 540,000 23,398 5,376 - 20,553,474"3 River Basin, PA Cost 194,349 392,820 137,846 6,497 20,545,06534 Maint. Approp. 582,900 592,000 749,000 621,800 5,800,07135 Cost 555,237 613,235 751,253 622,437 5,761,75435 27. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake Approp. 5,000 -6,112 -10,959 - 12,521,16736 Ohio River Cost 279,125 7,397 2,334 - 12,521,16736 Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 1,229,200 1,253,000 2,602,000 1,722,600 18,254,9873' Cost 1,561,741 1,312,586 2,409,684 1,837,361 18,113,30937 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2, Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 3. Includes $5,420,541 for New Work for previous projects, $789,000 appropriated to Point Marion, L/D 8, PA in FY 87; $2,534,000 appropriated in FY 87 arid a total of $2,934,000 appropriated to date for Grays Landing, L/D, PA. 4. Includes $654,010 expended for Pt. Marion, L/D 8, PA in FY 87; $2,426,963 expended in FY 87 and a total of $2,636,399 expended to date for Grays Landing, L/D 7, PA. 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public works funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $269,635 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes$500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $555,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,423,921.24 for new work contributed by local interest. 25. Includes $315,500 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 26-14 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,299,077 Code 711 funds, ($252,761 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 33. Includes $1,679,774 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26-15 TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) Aug 5, 1886 For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a movable dam.) June 3, 1896 For locks and dams 2 and 3. July 25, 1912 For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. July 3, 1930 For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Aug 30, 1935' Aug 30, 1935' June 26, 19342 Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Mar 3, 1899 Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. June 13, 1902 Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Mar 3, 1905 Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Mar. 3, 1905 Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Mar 2, 1907 Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Mar 4, 1913 Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Sep 22, 1922 Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruct dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. July 3, 1930 Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Jan 31, 1931P Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. June 26, 19342 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. May 17, 1950 Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 22, 70th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 26-16 1. 3. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Nov. 17, 1986 5. Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 9. Jun 28, 1938 10. Jun 28, 1938 11. Jun 28, 1938 12. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 13. Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 14. Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total estimated cost is $165,000,000. Replace existing 56' x 360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84' x 720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total estimated cost is $82,900,000. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of adam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Develop ment Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 26-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended 15. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Aug 28, 1937 Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. June 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehenplan including additional projects in tributary basins. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water, regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 26-18 16. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st. Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st. Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H.Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st sess. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of cmprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Ses. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc., 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Nov 7, 1966 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. UNION CITY DAM, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation and storage for water quality control. Jun 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 1. Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. 26-19 SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. regulation and recreation. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. I - - -' - ' ---- ' - - - I ~ -- - -- =ms s. I .. �,.ll~~ll -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, PA and OH 1 4 Inactive 1938 - - Buckhannon River, WV 2 3 Completed 1893 5,500 - Cheat River, WV2 3 Completed 1895 12,997 - Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 1. January 23, 1939, Chief of Engineers recommended constructing a waterway from Ohio River through Beaver, Mahoning, and Grand River Valleys to Lake Erie (H. Doc. 178, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. No Commerce reported. 4. Eligible for deauthorization. 26-20 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Amsterdam, OH' Benwood, WV2 Big Run, PA' Black Fork at Hendricks, WVI ' Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Burgettstown, PA' Butler, PA DuBois, PA Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH2 Friendsville, MD' Girty's Run, Millvale, PA'5 Granville, PA' Johnsonburg, PA Kittanning, PA, part I Latrobe, PA Latrobe, PA Leetonia, OH' Oakdale, PA' Oil City, PA' Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgway, PA (Elk Creek) Ridgway and vicinity, PA (on Clarion River)' 4 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY Rouseville, PA' Rowlesburg Lake, WV3 Salamanca, NY Slovan, PA' Sykesville, PA' Tarentum, PA' Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA' Turtle Creek, PA6 Uniontown, PA2 Wallace, WV' g Washington, PA Wellsville, OH, Sec. I Wellsville, OH, Sec. II Weston Mills, Olean, NY' ' Weston Mills, Portville, NY' 4 Wilmore, PA' Youngstown, OH Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Inactive Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Completed Active Active Completed Completed 1964 1954 1965 1972 1962 1963 1972 1970 1979 1986 1958 1949 1951 1970 1954 1965 1954 1959 1964 1979 1986 1977 1972 1964 1981 1972 1956 1964 1956 1956 1976 183,072 81,028 364,208 6,800 7,601,763 964,976 1,568,661 83,129 1,556,181 4,465,200 100,000 41,529 2,648,849 75,908 674,664 130,317 207,659 2,556,652 89,299 14,127 43,595 3,217,531 150,386 2,070,484 385,494 628,888 132,464 1,591,436 1,642 2,857,575 2,880,535 57,811 184,246 136,591 1,554,428 15,387,542 11,035 789,093 483,910 157,633 50,100 52,100 96,853 3,621,134 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Eligible for deauthorization. 3. Lacks local support. 4. 5. 6. No longer economically justified. Excludes $701,722 contributed by local interests. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. 26-21 'e I I 'I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River)' Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' Bellaire, OH Brackenridge. Tarentum and Natrona. PA' Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Empire-Stratton, OH' Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA Leetsdale, PA' Martins Ferry, OH' McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, OH Moundsville, WV' Muddy Creek Dam, PA' Neville Island, PA' New Cumberland, WV New Kensington and Parnassus, PA' Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) Powhaten Point, OH' Proctor, WV' Redbank Creek Lake, Pa Rochester, PA' St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Warwood, WV' Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewater, PA Wheeling, WV' Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)' Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)' Wilcox, PA'3 Youghiogheny River, PA and Md (Canalization)' 4 1975 1965 1972 1941 1977 1954 1971 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Oct. 3, 1978 Oct. 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 5, 1955 Nov 17, 1986 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 26-22 13,452 4,100 64,851 76,487 194 16,884 33,031 190,722 1,342,000 25,164 402,459 156,377 13,529 6,387 189,067 21,700 16,761 ' ' 232,863 ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level- Foundation Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Type of Year Construction Per- Opened cent to Kind of Corn- Nay- Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 Total Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 2 Abandoned lock and dam 3 Demolishing old dam 1 Dredging channel Total 360 11.0 360 13.5 360 10.5 360 11.8 360 12.2 360 13.1 721.0 734.5 745.0 756.8 769.0 782.1 360 17.9 800.0 360 22.0 822.0 12.0 10.8 10.0 10.5 10.6 9.8 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $ 1,763,485 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $1,875,665 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1.707,690 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 $15,630,637 591,187 544,929 310,103 26,001 1,055,003 $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. TABLE 26-H _ I _ _ _ TABLE 26-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depths on Miter Width able Lift at Pool Sills at Normal Character of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level- Foundation Construction Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Corn- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 360 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $17,872,212 ' 110 720 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56* 360 8.2 726.9 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1953 15,538,536 720 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 56' 360 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19322 17,254,071 720 - 61.2 Maxwell locks and dam, 84' 720 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 30,110,889 Maxwell, PA - 82.2 Grays Landing Lock 84 720 15.0 778.0 15.0 26.0 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete - - 3,439,399' and dam, Grays Landing, PA 87 9805..80 Greensboro, PA 56 360 15.0 778.0 10.0 10.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19252 2,639,804' Point Marion, PA 56 360 19.0 797.0 10.0 14.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19252 6,681,263 - 102.0 Morgantown lock and 84 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1950 8,778,000' dam, Morgantown, WV - 108.0 Hildebrand lock and 84 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1959 12,506,829 dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV 115.4 Opekiska lock and dam, 84 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 25,179,622 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV Marine ways, etc 250,0005 Abandoned lock and dam 1 1,019,9076 Abandoned lock and dam 4 780,8166 Abandoned lock and dam 5 1,074,8126 Abandoned lock and dam 6 770,4496 Abandoned lock and dam 7 213,7766 Abandoned lock and dam 8 245,9005 Abandoned lock and dam 9 191,0006 Abandoned lock and dam 10 210,4456 Abandoned lock and dam 11227,6686 Abandoned lock and dam 12 200,5506 Abandoned lock and dam 13190,6916 Abandoned lock and dam 14 210,1276 Abandoned lock and dam 15175,8296 Dredging587,8996 Total148,350,4946 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926) and $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of lock. 5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000). I 0a 0 0A 'I, 0O I PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $142,929,95313 $136,848,9852 $279,778,938' 2 3 Maintenance and operation 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $142,929,953' 3 $137,324,1272 $280,254,110' 2 3 1. Excludes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of L/D 3, $2,636,399 for replacement of L/D 7 and $654,010 2. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1987 for Point Marion L/D (replacement of lock). and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. TABLE 26-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) Estimated Cost s Type of Location' Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Benwood, WV2 6 9 Wall 8,500,000 3,180,000 11,680,000' Elkins, W V (Monongahela River Basin)4 5 Channel diversion 1,772,6273 40,000 1,812,627 Johnsonburg, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Wall 674,6643 130,000 804,664 Johnstown, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Channel 8,865,3883 - 8,865,3883 Kittanning, PA, part I (Allegheny River)2 5 Wall 130,3173 2,000 132,317 Latrobe, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Channel 207,6593 44,400 252,059 Olean, NY (Allegheny River)2 5 Levee 3,217,5313 597,000 3,814,531 Portville, NY (Allegheny River)2 5 Levee 2,070,4843 353,000 2,423,484 Punxsutawney, PA (Allegheny River Basin)4 5 Channel and levee 3,586,1073 180,4853 3,766,5923 Ridgway, PA (Allegheny River Basin)2 5 Channel 628,8883 72,000 700,888 Uniontown, PA (Monongahela River Basin)2 9 Channel and wall 5,820,000 980,000 6,800,0008 Wellsville, OH, sec I2 5 Wall and levee 483,9103 113,000 596,910 Wellsville, OH, sec. II2 5 Wall and levee 157,6333 - 157,6333 1. All projects are on the Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 3. Actual Cost. 4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 5. Completed. 6. Reported in detail in Annual Report for 1954. 7. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 8. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 9. Eligible for deauthorization. 26-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 26-L OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 21 of Text) Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA' Conemaugh River $ 46,012,411 3 Crooked Creek, PA' Crooked Creek 4,431,523 3 East Branch Clarion River, PA' Clarion River 9,539,586 ' 3 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY' Allegheny River 112,218,484 1 36 Loyalhanna, PA' Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,531 ' 3 Mahoning Creek, PA' Mahoning Creek 7,138,814 1 3 Tionesta, PA' Tionesta Creek 7,788,379 ' 3 Union City, PA' French Creek 14,559,800' 3 Woodcock Creek, PA' Woodcock Creek 20,545,065 ' 3 Beaver: Berlin, OH' Mahoning River 8,739,987 ' 3 Eagle Creek, OH 2 Eagle Creek 12,700,000 2 4 7 8 Michael J. Kirwan, OH' Mahoning River 17,376,097 ' 3 Mosquito Creek, OH' Mosquito Creek 4,253,029 3 Shenango River, PA and OH' Shenango River 40,209,894 ' 3 Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV' West Fork River 212,000,000 ' Youghiogheny River, PA and MD' Youghiogheny River 12,521,168 ' " 1. Reported in detail in an individual report. 5. Latest cost estimate revision in 1987. 2. Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6. Includes $2,920,279 actual cost for Dam Rehabilitation. 3. Actual Cost. 7. Inactive. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 8. Eligible for deauthorization. TABLE 26-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Project Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, Oh October 1985 Leetonia, Oh October 1986 Big Run, PA March 1987 Marianna, PA June 1986 Bobvar, NY September 1987 Millvale, PA June 1986 Bradford, PA July 1987 Oil City, PA May 1987 Brookville, PA October 1986 Olean, NY September 1987 Buckhannon, WV September 1986 Portage, PA August 1982 Burgettstown-Slovan, PA September 1986 Portville, NY September 1987 Butler, PA July 1987 Reynoldsville, PA March 1987 Chartiers Creek, PA Ridgway, PA December 1986 Cannonsburg-Houston Reach September 1986 Salamanca, NY September 1987 James G. Fulton Reach July 1987 Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV July 1983 Colliers, WV October 1982 Sykesville, PA March 1987 DuBois, PA March 1987 Tarentum, PA November 1976 Eldred, PA April 1987 Turtle Creek, PA September 1987 Friendsville, MD March 1987 Washington, PA September 1986 Granville, PA September 1986 Wellsville, OH November 1987 Johnsonburg, PA December 1986 Weston, WV May 1987 Kittanning, PA August 1983 Wilmore, PA August 1982 Latrobe, PA July 1984 Youngstown, PA November 1986 26-26 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 26-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (Construction) $ 179,474 Parsons, Hambleton, Hendricks, WV 50,492 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (Construction) 1,871.996 Total Cost for current fiscal year: $2,101,962 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Airport, Glendale, WV (Post Authorization Project Definition Study) Beaver River, Bridgewater, PA (Complete) Brook County, Hooverson Heights (Complete) Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (Reconnaissance Report) Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (Post Authorization Project Definition Study) Crows Run, Conway, PA (Tabled) Dry Brook Creek, Poland, NY (Reconnaissance Report) Dutch Hollow, Ellery, NY (To be Eliminated) Elks Creek, Clarksburg, WV (Complete) Kennedy Twp. and McKees Rocks Borough, PA (Complete) Mahoning River, Hwy 139A, Trumbull County, OH (Complete) Mahoning River, Warren Twp., OH (Complete) Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (Post Authorization Project Definition Study) Martin's Ferry, WV (To be Eliminated) Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (Post Authorization Project Definition Study) Monongahela River, Granville, WV (Complete) Neshannock Creek, New Castle, PA (Reconnaissance Report) North Scenic Rd., Buffalo Twp., PA (Tabled) Ohio River, Chester, WV (Complete) Ohio River, River Ave., Chester, WV (Tabled) Salamanca (Power Transmission Tower), NY (Reconnaissance Report) Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV (Post Authorization Project Definition Study) Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, PA (Detailed Project report) South Scenic Rd., Buffalo Twp., PA (Tabled) Turkey Run, Shenango Twp., PA (To be Eliminated) Unnamed Tributary to Pymatuning (Reconnaissance Report) Water Works, Park and Pool, Wellsburg, WV (Post Authorization Project Definition Study West Run, Munhall, PA (Detailed Project Report) Yorkville, OH (To be Eliminated) Total cost for current fiscal year: Fiscal Year Costs $ 2,731 203,759 143,035 7,285 2,109 4,762 7,826 6,564 82,020 244,045 564 98,081 1,838 5,000 2,229 191,061 11,150 8,536 99 9,849 7,492 875 16,766 9,532 1,728 15,807 4,081 12,125 2,230 $1,103,179 26-27 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, MN ......................... 27-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ......................... 27-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN......................... 27-2 4. Warroad Harbor and River, MN ............... 27-2 5. Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN ......................................... 27-3 Flood Control 6. Bassett Creek, MN ............................ 27-3 7. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD ................................. 27-3 8. Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN ...................... 27-4 9. Chaska, MN.................... .................. 27-4 10. Devils Lake, ND ............................... 27-5 11. Eau Galle River, WI ........................... 27-5 12. Enderlin, Maple River, ND ................... 27-5 13. Hanover, Hennepin County, MN.............. 27-6 14. Homme Lake and Dam, ND .................... 27-6 15. Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI............... 27-6 16. Lac qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, MN.... 27-7 17. La Farge Lake and channel improvement, WI .............................. 27-7 18. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND ......................... 27-7 19. Lake Darling, Souris River, ND ............. 27-8 20. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN .......... 27-8 21. Lake Traverse and Bois de Soiux River, SD and MN ............................. 27-9 22. Mankato and North Mankato, MN ............ 27-9 23. Middle River at Argyle, MN ................. 27-9 24. Prairie du Chien, WI.......................... 27-9 25. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN ......................... 27-10 26. Red River of the North at Argusville, ND .... 27-10 27. Red River of the North drainage basin, MN, SD & ND .................................. 27-10 28. Redwood River at Marshall, MN.............. 27-11 29. Rochester, MN ................................. 27-11 30. Root River at Houston, MN ................... 27-12 31. Roseau River, MN ............................. 27-12 Page 32. Sheyenne River, ND ......................... 27-12 33. Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND............. 27-13 34. Souris River, Velva, ND ........................ 27-13 35. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI..........27-13 36. Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, MN ...... 27-14 37. Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, M N ..................................... 27-14 38. Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN......................... 27-15 39. Winona, MN.................................. 27-15 40. Inspection of completed flood control projects.................. ............... 27-15 Miscellaneous 41. Other work under special authority......... 27-16 General Investigations 42. Surveys ...................................... 27-1 43. Collection and study of basic data........... 27-16 44. Continuation of planning and engineering... 27-16 45. Advance engineering and design ............ 27-16 Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 27-17 Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 27-20 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 27-21 Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 27-22 Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects ............... 27-23 Table 27-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River ..................... 27-24 Table 27-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan.................................. 27-25 Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 27-26 Table 27-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.................. 27-27 Table 27-L General Investigations .............. 27-29 27-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately-owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract cost $94,775 and by hired labor, $111,830. Snagging and clearing cost $57,703 by hired labor. Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $18,599. Condition at end of fiscal year: Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN, and easements on 123.08 acres of land. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1987, were $4,500,973, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $2,560,793 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See table 27-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor at a cost of $855,593. Reservoirs were operated by contract at a cost of $133,729. Physical security cost $7,496 by hired labor. Periodic inspection, bridge and dike inspection, and dam safety costs were $125,576 by hired labor, $144,117 by contract and $29,363 by other Corps. Cultural resource investigation cost $13,931 by contract, $28,406 by hired labor and $18,436 by other Corps of Engineers districts. Land acquisition analysis and survey cost $23,914 by hired labor and $68,958 by contract. Data collection, water analysis and maintenance of stream gauging cost $90,319 by hired labor, $1,330 by contract and $30,020 by U.S. Geological Survey. Revision of water regulation manuals by contract cost $110,251. Miscellaneous engineering and design cost $4,339. Real estate was managed by other Corps of Engineers districts at a cost of $16,710. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $261,341. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by thet United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See table 27-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) 4. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN Location. At southwestern extremity of Lake of the Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14999). Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel 27-2 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 feet wide out in lake; for a turning basin 500 by 900 feet to a depth of 8 feet; and for a pile-brush stone jetty on north side of channel extending from shore 700 feet into the lake. For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 1965. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. (See table 27-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for repair and revetment wall cost $4,457. Administrative costs were $310. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project is complete. Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. A walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. A revetment wall, constructed under Section 2 of Public Law 269, 69th Congress, in accordance with Article VIII of the Lake of the Woods Treaty, has deteriorated and will require future maintenance. 5. ZIPPEL BAY, LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTY, MN Location. Zippel Bay is a natural harbor located in northwestern Minnesota on the south shore of Lake of the Woods near Williams, Minnesota. The navigation project will be located in Zippel Bay State Park. Existing Project. Boats based at a state park, resort, marina, and a number of private residences use Zippel Bay to provide access to the lake. However, the natural channel between the bay and Lake of the Woods varies in depth and width and restricts navigation. The plan of improvement provides a small-boat access channel 50-70 feet wide and approximately 1,800 feet long between Zippel Bay and Lake of the Woods. Jetties are currently being constructed on both sides of the channel to minimize the amount of maintenance dredging. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in October 1985 under the authority contained in Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract cost $203,283. Engineering and design and supervision and administration of the construction contract costs were $11,763. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the small boat navigation project is currently under way. Flood Control 6. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The proposed project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound floodwaters and a new tunnel (part of which is being constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the plan are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work is $23,700,000 and $3,819,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, and rights-of-way are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous lands and damages cost $3,567. A Stage I construction contract cost $85,134. The city of Golden Valley was reimbursed for Section 215 work for $304,320 and the Minnesota Department of Transportation was reimbursed for $3,642,880. Engineering and design cost $199,784 by contract, $782,617 by hired labor and $27,963 by other Corps. North Central Division real estate cost $895. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $112,733. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the first control structures is complete. Design of tunnel and other upstream features continues. 7. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Coun- 27-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 ties, MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Doc. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. The project requires sponsorship from both the States of Minnesota and South Dakota. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District on June 10, 1969, and accepted by the District Engineer on November 3, 1969. Formal resolution of assurances adopted by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District for South Dakota on October 23, 1969, was furnished on November 18, 1969, and accepted by the District Engineer on November 19, 1969. Supplemental assurances covering the requirements of Public Law 91-646 were provided by the Upper Minnesota Watershed District on August 13, 1974, and by the East Dakota Conservancy Sub-District on April 15, 1976. Rights-of way for construction on the Whetstone River and the entire cash contribution of $153,000 for the project were furnished by the local sponsors on December 21, 1981. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Minnesota River channel construction contract costs were $8,885. A Big Stone Lake outlet and silt barrier contract cost $84,914. Engineering and design, supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $11,161. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $67,579 by hired labor and $15,034 by contract. Data collection and water control analysis cost $7,864 and $9,722, respectively. Data collection by other government agencies cost $39,150. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $377. Dam failure planning cost $7,608 by hired labor and $3,588 by other districts. Supervision and administration cost $26,605. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the new dam above Highway 75 and roads are completed. Surveys for land lines are complete, and the land acquisition program is complete. The first land payment was made on November 28, 1969, and 128 tracts have been purchased. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administrating the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975, the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. Construction on the Whetstone River portion of the upstream works is complete. The construction of the Minnesota River work is complete. The project was transferred to the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District for operation and maintenance. 8. BLACK BEAR AND MILLER LAKES, CROW WING COUNTY, MN Location. Black Bear and Miller Lakes are near the center of the State, 20 miles north of Brainerd, Minnesota. The two lakes lie adjacent to the left (east) bank of the Mississippi River. Miller Lake is linked to Black Bear Lake by a very short channel. In turn, Black Bear Lake is joined to the Mississippi River by a one-half mile creek. Existing project. Spring high water on the Mississippi River backs up the creek channel, flooding shoreline properties and causing damages to buildings and related facilities. Some flooding is experienced here every 3 to 5 years. The project consists of an embankment across the creek approximately 300 feet upstream of its juncture with the Mississippi River. This structure has a culvert extending through it which would be closed off during periods of high flow on the Mississippi River. Residences around the two lakes would be protected up to the 500-year flood elevation on the Mississippi River with 3 feet of freeboard. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in March 1985 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Crow Wing County, the local sponsor, in July 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $98,203. Engineering and design cost $8,996 by hired labor. U.S. Fish and Wildlife costs were $2,631. Supervision and administration costs were $3,506 Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the flood protection project at Black Bear and Miller Lakes is essentially complete. 9. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion and bypass channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 0.3 mile of flood bypass channel, and a 1,500-foot conduit on East Creek. Approximately 1.6 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee 27-4 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work is $18,300,000 and $2,290,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local assurance agreement will be required prior to the start of construction. By letter of November 3, 1986, the city of Chaska indicated its willingness to participate financially in construction of a project consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $1,347. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is essentially complete. Plans and specifications for the first stage of construction are substantially complete. 10. DEVILS LAKE, ND Location. In Ramsey County in north central North Dakota about 80 miles west of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Involves a system of levees and interior flood control facilities at the head of Creel Bay. The main embankment across Creel Bay is 1,810 feet long and varies from 0 to 27 feet high. The south Creel Bay tieback embankment is 1,030 feet long and varies from 0 to 3 feet high. The north Creel Bay tieback embankment is 2,400 feet long and varies from 0 to 8.5 feet high. The south embankment is 3,100 feet long and varies from 0 to 9.5 feet high. The interior flood control system consists of temporary stormwater retention ponds immediately north and south of the city's sewage lagoons, a 16,000 gallon per minute pumping station and a system of ditches and culverts linking the ponds to the pumping station. Total Federal cost (1987) for the project is estimated at $2,670,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 15, 1983, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Devils Lake in August 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts cost $22,828. Engineering and design cost $45,198 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $7,675. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction work on the project is substantially complete. 11. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, MN, and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations and evaluations were performed at a cost of $213,030 by hired labor and $13,281 by contract. A road repair maintenance contract cost $54,093 and recreational maintenance contracts cost $181,914. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $2,805. Data collection cost $2,973 by hired labor and $7,000 by other government agencies. Water control analysis and water quality by other Corps of Engineer districts cost $10,929 and $66,805, respectively. Administrative and other miscellaneous engineering costs were $110,471. Condition at end of fiscal year: Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964: minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. Repair of failing discharge conduit by installing a steel liner was completed in April 1982. 12. ENDERLIN, MAPLE RIVER, ND Location. In Ransom County in southeastern North Dakota on the Maple River about 45 miles southwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project at Enderlin involves a system of levees along the right bank of the main stem and the left bank of the South Branch of the Maple River. The total levee system would be about 1.2 miles 27-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 long and would have an average height of about 8 feet. Other features of the project include channel improvements on the south branch, replacement of the Soo Line railroad bridge, and interior drainage facilities consisting of three ponding areas with gated outlet conduits. To prevent failure of the channel and levee by erosion, rip-rapping would be provided in selected reaches. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 11, 1982, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See page 27-5 of Annual Report for 1982 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Enderlin in July 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A Phase III Highway 46 frontage road levee contract cost $1,159. A Phase IV contract on the south branch of the Maple River cost $10,203. Engineering and design by hired labor cost $3,982 and by contract, $1,374. Supervision and administration cost $3,339. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the project is substantially complete. 13. HANOVER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Location. Hanover is in south-central Minnesota in northwest Hennepin County and eastern Wright County. The erosion project is located along the right bank of the Crow River adjacent to the Hanover Dam in the city of Hanover. Existing project. County State Aid Highway #19 is located on top of the bank of the Crow River and was in danger of being lost due to continuing erosion. The project consists of placement of fill to reconstruct the bank and riprap to protect this bank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in May 1986 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Hennepin County, Minnesota, the local sponsor, in August 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construciton contract cost $151,738 and a printing contract, $192. Engineering and design, North Central Division real estate management and supervision and administration cost $22,895, $790 and $12,859, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the erosion protection project at Hanover is essentially complete. 14. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1285 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non- Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $65,211. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. 15. KICKAPOO RIVER, GAYS MILLS, WI Location. Left bank of Kickapoo River, in Gays Mills, in southwestern Wisconsin. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion which threatens a sewage treatment digestion tank is authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal report, dated September 1985, recommended protection with 150 cubic yards of gravel bedding and 300 yards of riprap along about 200 feet of eroding river bank. The project was approved for construction by the Office Chief of Engineers on June 18, 1986. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was adopted by the village of Gays Mills, Wisconsin, in August 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $-1,832. Engineering and design and other study costs were $12,187. Condition at end of fiscal year: A contract for slope protection was awarded in September 1986. Project was formally transferred to the village of Gays Mills, Wisconsin by a letter dated April 13, 1987. 27-6 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT 16. LAC QUI PARLE LAKE MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1291 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations were performed at a cost of $206,388. Dam failure planning cost $4,441 by hired labor and $55,427 by other Corps districts. Data collection cost $9,707 by hired labor and $36,380 by U.S. Geological Survey. Stream gauging and water control analysis cost $1,089 and $12,165, respectively. North Central Division real estate cost $4,970. Dam maintenance contracts cost $44,185 and a radio equipment contract, $14,426. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $45,605 and $44,192, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 17. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction of aggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See page 1087 of Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $68,774 which includes a contract for the removal of five bridges deemed unsafe for $24,400. Condition at end of fiscal year: General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15, 1969, and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has been completed. Funds to complete the authorized project have been withheld and all further construction has been indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has relocated out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. A study of a modified dry dam was completed in early FY 1985. On the basis of the study results, it was recommended that no further work be done to establish the economic feasibility of a dry or wet dam at La Farge and that the La Farge Lake and channel improvement project be deauthorized. 18. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See page 1287 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See page 1288 of Annual Report for 1962. Complied with except for construction of Fargo diversion dam and ditch for which assurances furnished by city of Fargo were approved by the Secretary of War on June 26, 1947. Necessity for this feature will be reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations, monitoring and evaluations were performed at a cost of $414,909 by hired labor and $8,840 by contract. Dam instrumentation, stability and safety assurance cost $409,482. Real Estate Management by the North Central Division cost $5,180. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service coordination cost $3,524. Data collection cost $9,771 by hired labor and $39,280 by 27-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 other government agencies. Water control analysis and water quality by other Corps of Engineer districts and hired labor cost $18,286 and $7,860, respectively. Dam safety engineering and design cost $5,469 by contract and $26,461 by hired labor. Administrative costs were $135,288. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. 19. LAKE DARLING, SOURIS RIVER, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survcy Map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The current plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is the one-time purchase of 400,000 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation and maintenance of Rafferty Dam, Alameda Dam and the existing Boundary Dam in conjunction with the existing Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97-88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) will no longer be authorized upon completion of the structure(s) in Canada. If it is determined that an agreement between Canada and the United States for the construction of the Canadian Dams cannot be reached, the 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (PL 97-88) shall proceed. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99-662, consists of either one or two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a downstream flood warning system from the Canadian border; levee improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot, flood proofing of about 80 rural homes between Minot and Towner, North Dakota and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge; and compensation to Manitoba, Canada for altered return flows. Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work is $76,000,000 and $4,488,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is being developed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning for the Lake Darling unit was continued at a cost of $1,240,865. Construction costs for improvements at Velva were $1,022,947. Engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs for Velva were $124,626. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the levee improvement work at Velva is substantially complete. 20. LAKE PULASKI, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Location. Lake Pulaski is approximately 45 miles northwest of the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. It lies within three local political jurisdictions (City of Buffalo, Wright County and Buffalo Township). Existing project. Lake Pulaski has no natural outlet. Prior to construction of this project, the lake had been rising, inundating a number of houses or summer residences. A combination of a pumped pipeline and gravity-flow storm sewers to convey excess water through the city of Buffalo from Lake Pulaski to Buffalo Lake was constructed to stabilize the lake. Included in this project was a storm sewer upgrade which was constructed by the city of Buffalo. The lake will be maintained at elevation 966.0 feet mean sea level. This is the lowest level permitted for an artificial outlet under State of Minnesota rules governing landlocked lakes. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in March 1985 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the Lake Pulaski Improvement District, the local sponsor, in August 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $933,121. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and North Central Division real estate costs were $958 and $953, respectively. Engineering and design cost $659 by contract and $19,587 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $26,695. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction is essentially complete. 27-8 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT 21. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, SD AND MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and the two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1289 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $399,078. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreational facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structure are open to public travel. 22. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work is $95,700,000. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. See Annual Report for 1973 for requirements. Resolutions agreeing to provide formal assurances of local cooperation, when requested, were passed by the city council of North Mankato, Mankato, and South Bend Township (Le Hillier), respectively, on November 12, 1968. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the T.H. 60/Main Street bridge relocation was completed. Construction of the C&NW railroad bridge relocation and Stage 2B-HP work in Le Hillier continued. Construction of Stage 3C-2 and the T.H.169 Bridge relocation was initiated. Construction costs for improvements at Mankato were $7,355,314, at North Mankato were $-177,338 and at Le Hillier were $2,589,397. Engineering and design by contract cost $304,785 and by hired labor cost $160,481. North Central Division Real Estate cost $68,365. Supervision and administration cost $246,676 by hired labor and $200 by contract. Other miscellaneous costs were $2,534. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the pumping stations, interior drainage facilities and the diversion channel are complete. The flood barriers are essentially complete except for the short segments of floodwall at the Main Street bridge (Stage 3C-2), and the Stage 2B-HP levee work underway. 23. MIDDLE RIVER AT ARGYLE, MN Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Middle River within the city limits of Argyle, Minnesota. Existing project. The plan of protection includes a system of levees, road raises along with interior drainage facilities to provide main developed parts of the city of Argyle with one percent chance flood protection. Also included is the evacuation of 12 residences which are located outside of the line of flood barrier protection. The project was approved for construction on August 1, 1985, by the Chief of Engineers. The project is being constructed under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Argyle in August 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction improvements cost $1,096 by hired labor and $114,115 by contract. Engineering and design cost $62,198 by hired labor and $7,320 by contract. North Central Division real estate cost $-32. Supervision and administration costs were $22,290. Contributions in lieu of cash were $-10,653. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction contract for Stage I is complete. Work on plans and specifications for Stage II is complete. Further work on Stage II is being delayed until the city of Argyle provides the necessary real estate requirements. The evacuation of the 12 residences is substantially complete. 24. PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI Location. In Crawford County in southwestern Wisconsin on the left bank of the Mississippi River. (For 27-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Combines total evacuation with flood proofing and land use control measures to provide the desired reduction of potential flood damages within design limits. Evacuation was accomplished by purchase and relocation of structures in lowest portions of the floodplain. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was entered into with the City of Prairie du Chien on May 2, 1978, and signed by the Chief of Engineers on September 11, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: North Central Division real eastate cost $99 and real estate audit costs were $3,817. Engineering and design cost $6,836 by hired labor and supervision and administration cost $1,622. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project was completed in September 1984. 25. RED LAKE RIVER, MN, INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $68,424. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River and the Clearwater River were completed in June 1956. Replacement of rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 26. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT ARGUSVILLE, ND Location. In Cass County in eastern North Dakota near the confluence of the Red River of the North and the Sheyenne River about 15 miles northwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project involves a levee encircling the city of Argusville with associated interior flood control facilities. The total levee system is about 1.9 miles long and has an average height of about 8 feet. Interior flood control facilities consist of interceptor ditches and pipes, two temporary ponding areas and a pumping station to periodically discharge impounded water. Total Federal cost (1987) of the project is estimated at $1,600,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction July 5, 1985, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the city of Argusville, the local sponsor, in July 1985. Operations at end of fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts cost $669,708. Engineering and design cost $5,363 by contract and $72,666 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $55,437. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for Stage 1 involving the west levee was completed in July 1986. A construction contract for Stage 2 involving the remainder of the project was awarded in August 1986 and was 90 percent complete at the end of fiscal year 1987. 27. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North Basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See page 1278 of Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reser- 27-10 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT voir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See table 27-I for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of the City of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See page 1039 of Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the City of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975, permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975, and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. In a July 9, 1986 letter, the city of East Grand Forks withdrew support for the project presented in the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued for the East Grand Forks project at a cost of $185,313. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $146,189 by hired labor and $88,412 by contract. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $14,001. Data collection and maintenance of stream gauging cost $6,786 by hired labor and $15,610 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water quality and control cost $54,577 by hired labor. Supervision and administration, engineering and design and other miscellaneous costs were $52,257, $38,591 and $-2,565, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. The East Grand Forks project will be recommended for a change in status from active to inactive. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See table 27-I at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) Costs to date for operation and maintenance of Orwell Lake and Dam are $3,721,627. Total costs for active portion of project are $11,859,361. In adddition, $350,034 was expanded from contributed funds for work done for local interests. 28. REDWOOD RIVER AT MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Section 401(a). Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The recreation plan consists of 2.5 miles of biking/walking trail, five miles of cross-country skiing/hiking trail, and related picnic and rest area facilities. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work is $4,950,000 and $1,040,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See page 1150 of Annual Report for 1963 for requirements. Project was transferred to local interests on December 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. By letter dated November 19, 1986, the city of Marshall indicated its willingness to participate financially in construction of a project consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $94,958. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. Preconstruction planning for the new work is in progress. 29. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmstead County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 0.5 mile of grass-sloped channels, 6.1 miles of riprapped or gabionlined channels, 0.9 mile of architecturally-treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, six drop structures, 2.4 miles of levee, and hiking and biking 27-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 trails. Estimated cost (1987) to the United States for new work is $50,500,000 and $8,150,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed August 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $563,018, including $41,161 for advance engineering and design. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for Stage 1A2A was awarded in September 1987. Plans and specifications for Stage 1A2B are substantially complete. 30. ROOT RIVER AT HOUSTON, MN Location. In Houston County in southeastern Minnesota on the Root River in the city of Houston, Minnesota. Existing project. The plan of protection provides levee flood protection together with appropriate flood plain regulation measures. Main features of the project include 3.1 miles of levee, 0.2 miles of road raise, an interior drainage pumping station, and road and rail closures. Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work is $7,200,000 and $1,698,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was approved for construction by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662) and is being reevaluated based on changes since the 1975 Feasibility Report. Local cooperation. During reevaluation of the project, the items of local cooperation will be modified to reflect current cost sharing requirements. Local cooperation requirements for flood control (other than a nonstructural project) are: a) pay 5 percent of the cost of the project assigned to flood control during construction of the project; b) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway and dredge material disposal area required only for flood control and perform all related necessary relocations; c) provide that portion of the joint cost of lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredge material disposal areas and relocations which is assigned to flood control; and d) pay an additional amount, if needed, so that the non-Federal cost is equal to 25 percent of the cost of the project assigned to flood control. The non-Federal share shall not exceed 50 percent of the cost of the project assigned to flood control. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was initiated at a cost of $152,000. Condition at end of fiscal year: General Reevaluation study was initiated in January 1987 to reevaluate the feasibility of the authorized project based on changes in existing conditions, public views, and design criteria since completion of the feasibility report in 1975. 31. ROSEAU RIVER, MN Location. In Roseau County and northeastern Kittson County, in northwestern Minnesota, and in south-central Manitoba, Canada. (For general location of the works in the United States see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Roseau River for flood control consisting of 44.4 miles of channel improvement, two sections of earth levees with lengths of 1.9 and 5.9 miles, respectively, 76 side ditch inlet transitions; remedial works along 16.6 miles of channel in Canada or an acceptable alternative therefor; one new bridge; and alteration of the existing dam in Roseau Village. Remedial works will be constructed in Canada at the expense of the United States. Estimated cost (1986) to the United States for new work is $23,400,000 including $6,690,000 for cost of work in Canada to be accomplished with United States funds and $6,600,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 282, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. Local interests have formed a Roseau River Watershed District to provide local cooperation requirements and acquire rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Planning activities were continued relative to coordination of the project plan with Canadian interests. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost, $23,548. Condition at end of fiscal year: Planning is in progress and coordination with Canadian interests is underway. The general design memorandum was submitted in October 1971 and approved in March 1972. Design memorandum supplements which contain dimensions of environmental features added to the project were submitted in October 1975 and June 1980 and approved in November 1975 and July 1980, respectively. An EIS supplement was filed with the EPA in October 1981. 32. SHEYENNE RIVER FLOOD CONTROL, ND (Formerly Kindred Lake) Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area offlood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the City of West Fargo. The authorized Kindred Lake project is in Richland County, ND, on the Sheyenne River, about 70 miles above its mouth and 5 miles above Kindred, ND. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a multiple-purpose impoundment for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife 27-12 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT purposes to control the runoff from 3,014 square miles. The improvements would be coupled with a revised operating plan for the existing Baldhill Dam and with appropriate flood plain management measures at communities along the river. See Annual Report for 1973 for details. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 330, 91st Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Due to local concerns, a changed set of planning criteria, and potential changed conditions, a complete reformulation and reevaluation of alternatives was undertaken during preconstruction planning. The reevaluation studies showed that another alternative plan is more favorable than the authorized project. The General Reevaluation Report, completed irn 1982, recommends implementation of a plan other than the authorized plan. The plan recommended in the General Reevaluation Report includes levees and diversions at West Fargo/Riverside, a flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo, and a five foot raise of the flood control pool at Baldhill Dam. The project as proposed in the 1970 Flood Control Act has subsequently been replaced with the project authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act which stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. The Kindred Lake project was deauthorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Other actions are also identified that could be taken by non-Federal interests to enhance the degree of flood damage reduction provided by the overall plan. The estimated Federal cost (1987) of the plan is $38,100,000 and $2,805,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of the project as authorized. On July 7, 1982, and May 20, 1983, the North Dakota State Water Commission furnished a letter of support for the recommended plan for flood control in the lower Sheyenne River Basin and also expressed its willingness to act as a non-Federal sponsor. On August 2, 1982, and July 30, 1982, respectively, the City of West Fargo and the Southeast Cass Water Resource District furnished letters of support and indicated their willingness to cooperate with the North Dakota State Water Commission. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District reiterated its support of the project by letter dated March 30, 1984. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $688,070. Condition at end of fiscal year: The General Design Memorandum was completed in April 1987. Preconstruction planning is in progress. 33. SHEYENNE RIVER, VALLEY CITY, ND Location. In central Barnes County in southeastern North Dakota on the Sheyenne River within the city limits of Valley City, North Dakota. Existing project. The plan of protection includes placement of pervious fill, riprap, and suitable bedding material for emergency bank erosion protection along a 400 foot reach of the left bank of the Sheyenne River. The purpose of the project is to control the erosion and subsequent sloughing threatening College Street and utilities under the roadway. The project would provide a stable bank and protect both the road and utilities. The project was approved for construction on July 25, 1986, by the Chief of Engineers. The project is being constructed under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91-611 was adopted by the city of Valley City in August 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $63,718. Engineering and design and real estate management cost $3,610 and $569, respectively. Supervision and administration costs were $9,122. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract was awarded in September 1986 and construction is near completion. 34. SOURIS RIVER, VELVA, ND Location. In McHenry County in north central North Dakota on the Souris River about 24 miles Southeast of Minot, North Dakota. Existing project. Provides for erosion control along the north bank of the Souris River at the sewage lagoons serving the city of Velva. The proposed protection plan involves the excavation of unstable river bank material in two reaches totalling about 600 feet long and the placement of a pervious sand and gravel fill and rip-rap. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in July 1986 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was adopted by the city of Velva in July 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $77,930. Engineering and design and administrative costs were $10,531. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for the recommended work was awarded in September 1986 and construction was substantially completed at the end of fiscal year 1987. 35. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WI Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the south side of the City of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement for local protection (flood control) consists of channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth of Pammel Creek and includes 10,200 feet of concrete-lined rectangular channel, a drop chute inlet structure, a side channel inlet structure, a stilling basin, 27-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 a terminus structure, and three new street bridges. The upper 4,000 feet of rectangular channel is designed for supercritical flow and the remaining 6,200 feet of channel is designed for subcritical flow. When completed, the project will provide Standard Project Flood (SPF) protection. The city replaced a fourth bridge in 1980 that was previously included in the authorized plan. The city also replaced a railroad bridge in 1985 that was also included in the authorized plan. In 1986, the city constructed 400 feet of rectangular channel in the downstream reach to SPF protection. Estimated cost (1987) to the United States for new work, exclusive of the Ebner Coulee portion of the project which was deleted due to lack of economic feasibility, is $26,600,000 and $8,860,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977, but was reactivated on November 8, 1978, after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. All three groups reaffirmed their support by letter in July 1981. On October 4, 1982, the city of La Crosse furnished a letter in further support for the project and acknowledged that it would serve as the local sponsor. The city sent a letter of intent again on December 13, 1984, and furnished letters of assurance on September 17, 1985 and December 15, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was completed at a cost of $14,136. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is substantially completed. Plans and specifications for the first stage of construction are complete. Ebner Coulee was classified to "inactive" in 1981 due to lack of economic feasibility. 36. TWIN VALLEY LAKE, WILD RICE RIVER, MN Location. In Norman County in west-central Minnesota, northeast of the city of Moorhead, on the Wild Rice River about 2 miles east of Twin Valley, MN. The Wild Rice River is a tributary of the Red River of the North. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project, The project authorization provides for reservoir development on the Wild Rice River near Twin Valley, Minnesota, for flood damage reduction, recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement. The principal features include an 84 foot high, 7,700 foot long, earthen dam, a gated concrete spillway with concrete chute and stilling basin, a 10 foot diameter gated circular conduit for low flow outlet works, and recreation development on the created 540 acre reservoir. Storage capacity would provide 7,500 acre-feet for recreation and sedimentation and 44,700 acre-feet for flood control. The proposed works include development of three recreation areas along the margin of the lake for public use. The Federal Government would acquire about 3,500 acres of land necessary for carrying out the purposes of the project. Approximately 2,200 additional acres will be acquired to offset fish and wildlife habitat losses associated with project construction. Estimated Federal cost (1986) for new work is $22,200,000. Project was authorized by 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 366, 90th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1971 for requirements. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. The Norman County Board of Commissioners, by resolutions dated November 7, 1974, September 19, 1978, and August 26, 1981, has declared its intention to provide local cooperation for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. By letters dated August 17, 1982, and August 31, 1984, the Wild Rice Watershed Board expressed their support and intent to provide local cooperation requirements and participate in innovative financing for flood control. The Norman County Board of Commissioners has also indicated the capability to provide assurances of local cooperation relating to flood control improvements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $93,437. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project will be recommended for reclassification to "inactive" status due to lack of economic feasibility. 37. WARNER ROAD, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, ST. PAUL, MN Location. Left bank of Mississippi River, adjacent to Warner Road at about River mile 839, St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion which threatens Warner Road was authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal report, dated August 1984 recommended protection with 7,660 cubic yards of graded rock fill along about 350 feet of eroding river bank. The project was approved for construction by the Office Chief of Engineers on July 2, 1985, Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was adopted by the city of St. Paul, Minnesota, in August 1985. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: A bank protection contract cost $-500. Engineering and design and other study costs were $29,832. Condition at end of fiscal year: A contract for slope protection was awarded in December 1985. Project was 27-14 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT formally transferred to the city of St. Paul, Minnesota by a letter dated April 10, 1987. 38. WILD RICE RIVER- SOUTH BRANCH AND FELTON DITCH, MN Location. In Clay and Norman Counties in westcentral Minnesota northeast of the city of Moorhead, MN. The South Branch of the Wild Rice River and Felton Ditch drain areas of 253 and 122 square miles and enter the Wild Rice River at points 29.5 and 20.5 miles, respectively, above its confluence with the Red River of the North. (For general locations, see Geological Survey map of Minnsota.) Existing, project. Provided for increasing the capacities of the South Branch and Felton Ditch channels by widening the existing channels through the floodplain. Debris removal was accomplished in the lower reaches of both streams. In addition, short reaches of low dikes were constructed on both banks of Felton Ditch near the upper limit of improvement. The plan also included bridge and culvert structure alterations, new bridges, multi-plate pipe arches, side ditch inlet and lateral ditch entry modifications, and a drop inlet structure. The project provides flood protection in both watersheds for a 6-percent chance flood and outlets necessary for removal of crop-damaging surface waters from lateral and onfarm drainage systems. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 98, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See page 826 of Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was executed by the Wild Rice Watershed District on October 18, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $30,160 by contract and $80,993 by hired labor and supervision and administration cost $9,820. Condition at end of fiscal year: The original flood control project was completed in 1983. After assuming responsibility for its operation and maintenance, the local sponsor reported a problem associated with certain types of inlets that had been installed. It was determined that the problems resulted from a design deficiency. The current project is to correct this deficiency by realigning/relocating the outlets of 103 culvert inlets. The total Federal cost of the remedial work is estimated at $1,146,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in February 1987 and a contract was awarded in September 1987 under the original flood control project authority. 39. WINONA, MN Location. At Winona County in southeastern Minnesota on the right bank of the Mississippi River about 725 miles above mouth of the Ohio River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 833 of Annual Report fbr 1968 for completed upstream improvements authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958 providing for a continuous flood barrier about 6.1 miles long with related pumping and interior drainage facilities. Federal costs amounted to $2,147,131 of which $111,500 was expended for the portion then deferred for restudy and $17, 316 was contributed by local interests. Improvement authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 152, 92d Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map) provides for levee and floodwall protection with necessary interior drainage works for the riverfront and the Lake Winona closure reaches, as well as a sound floodplain management program to prevent unwise development of the area bordered by U.S. Highway 61 and Burns Valley and Pleasant Valley Creeks. The plan would also provide the downstream flood barrier needed to prevent Mississippi River backup flows from entering Lake Winona and inundating the area now only partially protected by the completed segment of the project authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act. The plan would also provide control of Burns Valley Creek by means of channel improvement, raising and extending the existing levee system, a drop structure, an erosion control structure, alteration of two highway bridges, and a sewer line modification. Earth levees averaging 10 feet in height total approximately 3.1 miles in length. Concrete floodwalls, also averaging about 10 feet in height, total about 2,025 feet in length. Resolutions authorizing the project were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the House on July 29, 1971, and the Senate on November 18, 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See page 833 of Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. For improvements authorized in 1971 see Annual Report of 1972 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement required under Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was executed by the City of Winona on October 6, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous minor construction contracts cost $1,237. Engineering and design cost $56,697 by contract and $23,316 by hired labor. Real estate management by NCD cost $1,179. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $4,448. Condition at end of fiscal year: The upstream improvement except for a portion of the project raising and extending the existing levee downstream from the Lake Winona outlet was completed in August 1967. Work authorized in 1971 is substantially complete. Project was formally dedicated by the city on October 13, 1985. A contract was awarded in September 1987 to repair a distressed wing wall on the upstream drop structure in reach E-3, Burns Valley Creek. 40. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are 27-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted (See table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $78,174. Total cost to September 30, 1987, is $887,603. Miscellaneous 41. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) coordination with the state of Minnesota cost $9,140, and the state of Wisconsin, $14,476. Other Corps of Engineer Wisconsin related costs were $854. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $3,244. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,442,082 which included six flood damage prevention studies, one review for deauthorization study, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 27-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $247,919 which included the items concerning inventory of dams, international water studies, flood plain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 27-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 44. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Fiscal year cost was $57,575 which included one local protection project. For details of the individual project see section 28 in text. 45. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $1,212,847 which included seven local protection projects and one flood control reservoir. Table 27-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. For details of the individual projects see sections 9, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 35 and 36. 27-16 TABLE 27-A ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 1. Minnesota River, MN 2. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 4. Warroad Harbor and River, MN 5. Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN 6. Bassett Creek, MN 7. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 8. Black Bear and Miller Lakes, MN 9. Chaska, MN 10. Devils Lake, ND 11. Eau Galle River, WI 12. Enderlin, Maple River, ND 13. Hanover, Hennepin County, MN 14. Homme Lake and Dam, ND 15. Kickapoo River Gay Mills, WI Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost to September 30 FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 1987 44,000 439,098 1,361,800 1,485,496 17,000 30,503 75,000 52,669 25,000 41,949 1,450,000 904,550 128,000 147,247 50,000 32,045 373,000 364,914 1,767,000 570,621 331,000 285,094 2,600,000 861,589 102,000 108,738 59,000 6,605 1,785,000 1,673,967 24,000 22,720 34,000 25,752 15,000 14,668 205,000 800,088 302,000 227,418 147,000 59,680 346,000 316,949 213,000 1,413,067 575,000 502,985 -72,000 1,898,355 83,000 99,956 -48,300 7,585 2,263,000 2,040,208 34,600 38,947 331,000 87,146 415,000 323,387 130,000 221,445 107,000 173,867 274,000 244,984 15,000 52,066 283,000 282,907 1,643,200 1,964,106 24,0004 24,5694 215,046 5,522,000 5,159,893 104,960 181,300 177,527 113,336 1,347 - 100,000 90,124 75,701 606,000 472,034 361,669 44,500 23,960 68,000 83,257 33,000 22,645 488,500 663,301 20,057 200,000 188,474 64,600 65,211 10,355 27-17 $ 2,057,7221 $ 2,057,7221 2,560,886 2,560,793 4,398,6282 4,398,6282 25,464,8463 25,403,0013 425,000 425,000 86,105 86,105 1,145,000 1,144,344 630,000 543,2835 7,652,000 7,180,863 12,175,000 12,174,9146 2,292,500 2,275,637 471,000 450,045 1,843,000 1,842,496 2,570,000 2,499,848 9,039,250 9,039,250 5,449,605 5,346,125 4,000,000 3,962,2817 244,500 212,434 1,396,0978 1,396,0978 2,268,021 2,266,660 33,000 33,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 27-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project 16. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 17. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 18. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND 19. Lake Darling, Souris River, ND 20. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN 21. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 22. Mankato and North Mankato, MN 23. Middle River at Argyle, MN 24. Prairie du Chien, WI 25. Red Lake River, MN, including Clearwater River, MN 26. Red River of the North at Argusville, ND 27. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND 28. Redwood River at Marshall, MN 29. Rochester, MN Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 1987 263,000 312,230 175,614 21,000 25,439 180 881,200 898,714 1,100,000 1,113,594 7,500 7,500 179,000 210,966 7,645,000 7,835,568 40,000 52,937 -140,000 -171,891 26,000 52,072 45,000 44,994 255,000 250,178 200,000 183,822 150,000 149,998 100,000 149,589 1,139,000 517,273 38,372 42,000 27,484 1,241,000 955,731 3,000,000 1,641,509 75,000 68,764 203,000 187,906 9,176,000 8,928,093 215,000 98,985 -125,000 103,876 123,000 72,031 259,000 108,758 275,000 241,385 481,000 445,057 235,000 118,804 400,000 402,047 384,500 931,793 78,000 68,208 934,000 1,082,717 3,434,000 3,994,344 325,000 106,728 265,000 277,289 10,875,000 10,276,105 345,000 448,055 -70,000 -87,787 100,500 142,367 535,000 233,838 331,000 365,679 385,000 367,879 75,000 133,624 244,000 229,894 476,600 478,975 45,600 68,774 836,000 1,084,350 2,057,000 2,388,438 760,000 981,973 400,900 399,078 10,035,000 10,550,414 200,000 196,334 12,734 65,200 68,424 570,000 803,174 214,000 185,313 358,400 413,858 190,000 94,958 673,000 563,018 964,873 964,873 5,471,263 5,388,343 18,642,000 18,642,000 226,600 223,425 3,325,6389 3,325,6389 13,744,152 13,738,481 11,541,000 10,974,955 1,167,500 1,164,96510 1,339,727 1,339,727 3,513,519 3,495,038 86,880,500 85,792,351 925,000 904,385 3,685,000 3,556,187 3,120,07911 3,120,07911 1,006,502 998,735 1,584,000 1,360,400 8,173,98412 8,137,73412 3,742,934 3,721,627 2,452,86613 2,300,25013 3,797,000 3,645,856 27-18 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 1987 30. Root River at New Work: Houston, MN Approp. - - - 250,000 250,000 Cost - - - 152,000 152,000 31. Roseau River, MN New Work: Approp. 250,000 - - - 2,128,000 Cost 53,911 19,271 9,748 23,548 1,933,886 32. Sheyenne River, New Work: ND (formerly Approp. 165,000 265,000 711,000 845,000 4,261,000 Kindred Lake) Cost 152,862 245,105 733,305 688,070 4,092,922 33. Sheyenne River, New Work: Valley City, ND Approp. - - 39,000 72,000 111,000 Cost - - 26,344 77,019 103,363 34. Souris River, New Work: Velva, ND Approp. - - 42,500 95,000 137,500 Cost - - 17,937 88,461 106,398 35. State Road & New Work: Ebner Coulees, WI Approp. 350,000 315,000 15,000 - 1,787,000 Cost 344,756 323,466 20,953 14,134 1,787,000 36. Twin Valley Lake, New Work: Wild Rice River, MN Approp. 30,000 20,000 82,000 75,000 2,118,700 Cost 1,680 45,983 61,707 93,437 2,114,507 37. Warner Road, New Work: Mississippi River, Approp. - 25,000 209,600 - 250,000 St. Paul, MN Cost 7,027 23,049 182,419 29,332 250,000 38. Wild Rice River, New Work: South Branch and Approp. - - - 946,000 5,480,700 Felton Ditch, MN Cost 28,506 7,815 - 120,973 4,655,673 39. Winona, MN New Work: Approp. 2,210,000 2,772,000 - 165,000 32,741,13114 Cost 2,354,380 2,770,665 186,137 86,877 32,583,86214 1Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 3Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. aIncludes $19,000 appropriated and $19,802 expended in FY 1987 for condition surveys. 5Excludes $76,663 contributed funds. 6Excludes $152,223 contributed funds. In addition, $484,447 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid- for by the Ottertail Power Company. 7Excludes $153,896 contributed funds. 8Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. 9Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. 10Excludes $11,782 contributed funds. 11Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 12Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit, $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 13Ilncludes $1,802,866 for new work for previous project. 14Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 27-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sec. Date of in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MINNESOTA RIVER, MN 1. July 13, 1892 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a Annual Report 1891. channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. p. 2209 July 3, 1958 Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to mile 14.7 S. Doc. 144. 84th Cong., 2d sess.' RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN 3. Mar. 3, 1899 Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Mar. 2, 1907 Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. June 25, 1910 Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project 2d sess. abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) July 27, 1916 Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., Gull Lake. 1st sess.' June 26, 19342 Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN 4. Mar. 3, 1899 Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. Specified in Act. June 6, 1900 Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. H. Doc. 92, 56th Cong., 2d sess.4 June 13, 19023 Mar. 3, 1905 Enlarging turning basin H. Doc. 703, 61st Cong., 2d sess.4 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Deepening to 8 feet. Aug. 5, 1977 Deauthorized portion of entrance channel and turning basin to Public Law 93-251 complete project width and depth. 'Contains latest published map. 2Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3Appropriation. 4Latest published map is Report for 1911. opposite p. 1984 in Annual 27-20 TABLE 27-C ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3,4 1921 92 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN 5 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, MN and ND 3,6 1921 293,344 76,209 St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1986 150,410 1,108,355 Wisconsin River, WI 2,3 1888 Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive5 1928 27,941 11,139 1Existing channel adequate for commerce (see table 27-G for deauthorized portion of project). 20Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2d sess.). Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3No commerce reported. 4Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). 5Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.). bAbandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.). 27-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTITVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND5 Completed 1985 58,500 - Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND Deferred 1983 5,568,5001 - Dry Run, IA Completed 1966 1,790,7592 - Elk River, MN Completed 1970 259,7003 - Grafton, ND Active4 1983 -- - Guttenberg, IA Completed 1974 2,361,915 - Irving Township, Jackson County, WI5 Completed 1984 189,600 - Irving Township at Nicols Road, Completed 1986 158,500 - Jackson County, WI5 LaCrosse, WI Active6 1983 - - Lost River, MN Completed 1967 517,519' - Lower Branch Rush River, ND8 Completed 1974 1,000,0009 - Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN5 Completed 1986 250,00010 Minneota, MN8 Completed 1963 161,545 - Minot, ND Completed 1983 21,479,50011 - Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Completed 1957 1,675,835 - Pembina River, ND Active4 1983 - - Pembina River Lake, ND Inactive 12 1950 50,000 - Red Lake River at Huot, MN5 Completed 1984 64,500 - Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN5 Completed 1984 131,000 - Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN5 Completed - 27,500 - Red River of the North at Halstad, MN Completed 1986 2,012,000 - Red River of the North at Oslo, MN8 Completed 1984 1,960,200 - Red River of the North at Pembina, ND8 Completed 1979 2,000,000 - Redwood River below Marshall, MN8 Completed 1960 202,400 - Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 - Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN Completed 1985 250,00013 - St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,01214 - Tongue River Lake, ND Inactive 12 1950 23,695 - Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 - Velva, ND8 Completed 1970 334,628 - Vermillion River, Hastings, MN8 Completed 1980 999,900 - Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Completed 1985 182,000 - Hastings, MN5 Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 - 1Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 2Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 3In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. 5Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 6 Preconstruction planning has not started. 7Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see table 27-G). Excludes $246 911 contributed funds. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 9Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 10Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. 11Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 12Further work deferred pending review of project document (inactive). 13Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 14Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 27-22 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI1 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Hudson Harbor, WI2 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 - - Maple River, ND3 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 $ 1,241 - Moorhead, MN3 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 - Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 - Sheyenne River, ND3 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 - Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000 - Warroad Harbor and River, MN 4 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 - - 1Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see table 27-C for costs for completed portion of project). 2Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project (see Section 4 of 1986 Annual Report). 3Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 27 in text and table 27-I for costs for active units of the project). 4Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see table 27-A for costs for completed portion of project). 27-23 TABLE 27-G TABLE 27-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (square Original Stage Com- Com- Total Reservoir (feet)1 River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) pleted Cost pleted Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1,442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1,163 173 250.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 24,334,947 24,435,804 Permanent indefinite appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 - - - - 967,197 967,197 Rehabilitation - - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $29,443,967 $30,226,629 1Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. tTj n d OLj 0 z CI r 0 c y a U, i i i i TABLE 27-I ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 27 of Text) Total Cost to Estimated Name of Unit State Type September 30, 1987 Federal Cost Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,000 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, pumping plants 1,696,950 17,500,000 Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement, levees 1,639,924 1,639,9002 Total cost to date 8,059,5983 Total estimated cost 23,862,0004 'Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 2Includes $67,900 for lands. 3Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge inactive unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 4The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in table 27-G. 27-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 27-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date Inspected Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN & SD ............................... Black River at North Bend, WI........................................... Breckenridge, M N ..................................................... Decorah, IA ............................................... ........... Eau Galle River, WI (Mines Creek Improvements) .............................. Elk River, M N .............................................. .......... Enderlin, Maple River, ND .............................................. Forest River, ND ............................................. ......... Grand Forks, ND...................................................... Guttenberg, IA ...................... ......... ........ ......... Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI ............................ Irving Township, Jackson County, WI....................................... Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI........................................... Lost River, M N ........................................................ Maple River, ND............................................ .......... Mankato and North Mankato, MN ........................................... M inneota, M N ........................................................ M ustinka River, M N................................................... Otter Tail River, MN ........................................ ........... Park River, ND................... ............................... Plum Creek at New Haven Township, MN ................................... Prairie du Chien, WI .................................... Red Lake and Clearwater Rivers, MN ....................................... Red River of the North at Fargo, ND ......................................... Red River of the North at Halstad, MN ....................................... Red River of the North at Oslo, MN .......................................... Red River of the North at Pembina, ND....................................... Redwood River at Marshall, MN.......................................... Redwood River below Marshall, MN.......................................... Rushford, M N ................................................ ........ Rush River, N D .............................................. ......... Sand Hill River, MN................................................... Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ................................. Sheyenne River, ND .................................................... Trempealeau River at Arcadia, WI........................................ Upper Iowa River, IA ................................................... Vermillion River, Hastings, MN .......................................... Veterans Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN ....................... Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, MN ......................................... Wild Rice River, Norman County, MN ........................................ Wild Rice River-South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN ............................ W inona, M N .............................................. ........... Zumbro River, M N ........................................... .......... September 1987 August 1987 September 1987 September 1987 September 1987 October 1986 September 1987 October 1986 September 1987 August 1987 August 1987 August 1987 August 1987 October 1986 November 1986 September 1987 September 1987 October 1986 October 1986 October 1986 September 1987 August 1987 October 1986 September 1987 September 1987 September 1987 September 1987 November 1986 September 1987 August 1987 October 1986 October 1986 November 1986 October 1986 August 1987 August 1987 November 1986 November 1986 October 1986 October 1986 November 1986 September 1986 August 1987 27-26 Proj-ect I L- -- - -- '' I- --- -- ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Anoka, MN ...................................................................... $7,500 Beaver Lake, Stearns County, MN ................................................ 703 Beebe Lake, Frankfort, MN ........................................................ 2,859 Briggs Lake Chain, MN ......................................................... .. 7,500 Diann Lake, Sherburne Co., MN ............. ....................................... 7,500 Emerson, Manitoba/Noyes, MN .................................................... 35,793 English Coulee, Grand Forks, ND .................................................. 36,901 Fridley, MN ........................ ................ ................... ... 819 Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN ..................................................... 47,377 Gilmore Lake, Washburn County, WI ............................................... 7,500 Helene Lake, Sherburne Co., MN .................................................. 7,500 Jordan, M N ...................................................... ............. 5,852 Lac qui Parle, MN ............................................................. 33,339 La Crosse, W I ..................................................... ............ 7,500 Lake Cantlin, MN................................................ .............. 34,637 Lake Carnelian, Stearns County, MN................................................ 4,162 Lake Charlotte, MN ........................................................... 20,922 Lansing, IA ...................................................... ............. 7,500 Little Minnesota River, Browns Valley, MN ........................................... 7,500 Minnesota River, Henderson, MN ................................................... 234,728 North Fork Crow River, Lake Koronis, MN ............ ........................ 3,000 Neche, ND ......................................... ............................ 257 Pelican Lake, Frankfort, MN ....................................................... 2,818 Rabbit River, Wilken County, MN ................................................... 7,500 Red River, Perley, MN............................................................. 7,500 Root River, Hokah, MN........................................................... 2,461 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI ....................................................... 11,580 Sandy Lake, MN ................................................................ 5,000 Shell Lake, W I.................................................... ............ 5,833 Sheyenne River, Harwood, ND ..................................................... 2,058 Snake River, Alvarado, MN ....................................................... 78,610 Trempealeau River, Arcadia, WI .................................................. 102,871 Vermillion River, Farmington, MN .................................................. 2,577 Whitewater River, Elba, MN ....................................................... 3,000 Wild Rice River, Ada, MN......................................................... 26 27-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 27-K (CONTINUED) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Blue Earth River, MN ........................................................ $7,500 Cannon River, Faribault, MN ..................................................... 7,500 Minnesota River, Upper Sioux Reservation, MN ......................... ............ 10,000 Minneapolis Barge Terminal, MN.................................................. 7,500 Mississippi River, Alma, WI ...................................................... 1,276 Mississippi River, Itasca, MN ..................................................... 2,000 Mississippi River, Pettibone Park, LaCrosse, WI ...................................... 10,000 Mississippi River, Wabasha, MN ................................................... 10,000 Mississippi River, Lake Andrusia, MN.............................................. 8,057 Pickwick, M N ..................................................... ........... 2,000 Red River at Breckenridge, MN ................................................... 7,500 Zumbro River at Genoa, MN ...................................................... 9,000 Zumbro River near Jarrett, MN ................................................... 9,845 Zumbro River, Millville, MN ...................................................... 7,500 Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Project Fiscal Year Costs Disaster preparedness......................................................... $249,026 Rehabilitation .............................. ....... ........................... 27,681 Total emergency flood control activities ......................................... 276,707 27-28 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 27-L GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 42, 43, 44 and 45 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Minnesota River Basin, MN ................................................ $382,396 Mississippi River, Coon Rapids Dam to Ohio River.............................. 91 Red River of the North, MN and ND ......................................... 535,064 St. Croix River, MN and WI ................................................ 3,041 Souris River, ND .......................................................... 2,465 Wild Rice-Marsh Rivers, MN................................................ 235,457 Review for Deauthorization Tongue River, ND ......................................................... 893 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations ..................................................... 31,453 FERC Licensing Activities.................................................. 2,001 Coordination with Other Agencies Soil Conservation Services .................................................. 2,059 Bureau of Reclamation ..................................................... 5,023 Planning Assistance to States-MN ........................................... 55,578 Planning Assistance to States-ND ........................................... 135,540 Planning Assistance to States-WI ............................................ 51,021 TOTAL SURVEYS ......................................................... $1,442,082 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Inspection of Dams ........................................................ $3,343 International Water Studies ................................................ 55,1781 Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services Unit ..................................... 103,965 Technical Services, General ............................................... 35,410 Hydrologic Studies Sedimentation Studies ................................................... 46,000 Stream FlowData ..................... ............. .................... 4,023 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA.............................. $247,919 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Redwood River at Marshall, MN ............................................ $57,575 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Chaska, MN ............................................................ $1,347 East Grand Forks, MN .................... 18..5..,.3..1..3........................ Redwood River at Marshall, MN............................................. 37,383 Rochester, MN ........................................................... 41,161 Root River at Houston, MN ................................................. 152,000 Sheyenne River, ND ....................................................... 688,070 State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI .......................................... 14,136 Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, MN ....................................... 93,437 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ................................ $1,212,847 lIncludes $46,139 for International Water Studies under O&M Appropriation. 27-29 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL ............ 28-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN ................ 28-2 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, IL ..... 28-3 4. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ..................... 28-3 5. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI ... 28-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 28-3 7. Work under Special Authorization............ 28-3 Flood Control 8. Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA .... 28-4 9. Bettendorf, IA ........................... 28-4 10. Coralville Lake, IA ........................ 28-4 11. Davenport, IA .............................. 28-4 12. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA ............................ 28-5 13. Farm Creek, IL .......................... 28-5 14. Milan, IL ................................ 28-5 15. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA ........ 28-5 16. Rockford, IL .............................. 28-6 17. Saylorville Lake, IA .................... 28-6 18. South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL... 28-6 19. Waterloo, IA .............................. 28-7 20. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 28-7 21. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... 28-7 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.............................. 28-7 General Investigations Page 23. Surveys ................................ 28-7 24. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 28-7 25. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .... 28-7 26. Advance Engineering and Design ............ 28-7 Tables Table 28-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ 28-9 Table 28-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 28-11 Table 28-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 28-14 Table 28-D Not Applicable Table 28-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................... 28-15 Table 28-F Not Applicable Table 28-G Deauthorized Projects ............. 28-17 Table 28-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 28-17 Table 28-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................... 28-19 Table 28-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams ................. 28-20 Table 28-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost ..... 28-20 Table 28-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost ......... 28-21 Table 28-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project ...................... . 28-22 Table 28-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project .................. 28-22 28-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Further repair and modification continued under the 1986 new authorization pending fund appropriations. Engineering and design work cost $377,489 during FY 1987. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties against .the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On 4 November 1981, the Corps of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. Districk Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds are currently being used by the counties to complete bridge rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation by the Federal Government was restarted in FY 1984 with the remainder of the $8,528,000 funding authorization depleted in FY 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles); Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, IL, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 28-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work is $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferredfor- restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non-Federal; and widen Marseilles Canal to 300 feet, a portion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the deferred category, cost of $1,859,300 (July 1972) Federal, are all excluded from present cost estimate. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. (See tables 28-J through 28-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project, and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by the Dredge DUBUQUE was performed at various locations in LaGrange pool at a cost of $670,000 with a total of 147,176 cubic yards of material being removed; and by the dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON at a cost of $161,300 with 161,780 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and approval were completed at a cost of $51,800. Strike removal and snagging and clearing was accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of $291,600. Maintenance of the Lucas- Berg Disposal Facility cost $9,000, and contractor earned $32,400 on a construction mitigation contract at this facility. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,099,800. Contractor earned $845,200 for repairs to the west embankment of the Lockport pool. Contractor completed replacing valve operating machinery at O'Brien Lock at a cost of $59,700. Repairs to upstream lock gate at Lockport Lock were completed by contract at a cost of $26,200. Cortractor substantially completed construction of a combined maintenance building and central control station at Marseilles L/D at a cost of$410,700. Contractor earned $226,900 for construction of maintenance/office building at Peoria Lock and Dam. Storage building was constructed for $58,200 at Starved Rock Lock and Dam. Dredged 28-2 ROCK ISLAND IL, DISTRICT material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging cost $9,200. Real estate support of maintenance activities cost $39,600. Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at locks and dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled $126,100. Permanent operating equipment costs were $138,500. Engineering and design work, including preparation of design memorandums cost $189,000, and supervision and administration for the maintenance features totaled $251,300. Total maintenance costs were $4,696,500. Net credits to the project were $202,100, primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $5,884,300. Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria was continued at a cost of $680,400. Real estate management services were provided at a cost of $31,200. Visitor's Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $162,400 with contract law enforcement provided at a cost of $10,300. Surveys, studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of $696,900; natural resource activities cost $10,300; and water control management costs were $578,700; and the amount of $2,900 was expended on Master Plans. Supervision and administration for the operation features totaled $196,800. Total operation costs were $8,254,200. Total operation and maintenance costs were p12,748,600 for all pools above Alton Pool. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work at LaGrange, Peoria, Marseilles, Brandon Road, and Lockport Lock Locks and Dams was in progress. Costs at LaGrange were $7,799,556; at Brandon Road, $6,857,788; at Lockport, $636,834; and at Marseilles, $6,703,906; and at Peoria, $8,574,267; for a total of $30,572,351. Alton Pool Operation: Costs by hired labor for condition and operation studies were $124,740; water control management $59,859; and supervision and administration $28,935. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $411,769 for dredging and $17,267 for supervision and administration. Total cost for work in Alton Pool was $642,570. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $12,748,600; Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $642,570; for a total operation and maintenance cost of $13,391,170. 3, MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, IL Location. Mill Creek and South Slough are small streams, tributaryto the Rock River, at Milan, Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. The existing project providedfor flood protection at the village of Milan necessitated by the construction of the Illinois and Mississippi Canal. The project consisted of diversion of Mill Creek into South Slough, floodgates in the walls of the Illinois and Mississippi Canal to carry Mill Creek flood waters across the canal right-of-way into Rock River, levees, and other works for flood protection. The project was constructed in 1931-1932. In 1962-1963, $73,366 was expended from Illinois and Mississippi Canal maintenance funds for restoration of the Mill Creek outlet into Rock River. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Minor channel maintenance was performed at a cost of $305. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The project is located in the Mississippi River Basin encompassing a 5-state area including IL, IA, MN, MO, and WI. Existing project. The project represents the initial implementation of the master plan prepared by the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association (report dated January 1982). Project features include long-term resources monitoring, habitat rehabilitation and enhancement, recreation improvenent and studies, traffic monitoring, and computerized inventory and analysis. The project was initiated in FY 1986 utilizing funds provided by the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act. The execution of the project will be closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, other Federal agencies, affected States, and local communities. See Table 28-B for authorization legislation. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements will be sought as required. Operations during fiscal year. Costs during the year totaled $1,571,225. The majority of funds were expended on two program elements: habitat projects and continuation of long term resource monitoring. Design was initiated on nine projects, continued on five, and construction completed on one. Funds were also used for the recreation economics study, the traffic monitoring program, and the general plan. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 28-C. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTH. COMMERCIAL HARBOR STUDY, DUBUQUE COUNTY, IA Location: The area is located at the Peru Bottoms at the mouth of the Little Maquoketa River located north of 28-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Dubuque, Iowa. Existing Project: The existing barge terminal capacity at the city of Dubuque is not expected to be able to accommodate future volumes of primary commodities. The Reconnaissance Report completed in December 1986 concluded that there was no Federal interest in commercial harbor development at Dubuque County due to economic infeasibility. Operations during fiscal year: Reconnaissance Report was completed at a cost of $5,099. Flood Control 8. AMES DAM AND RESERVOIR, SKUNK RIVER, IA Location. The Ames Lake project is located on the Skunk River in Story County, IA, about 5 miles upstream from the city of Ames, IA. Existing project. Major project features would include a dam constructed of compacted impervious earth with gated outlet works and spillway; a subimpoundment forming a 30-acre lake by blocking a ravine with embankment for access road crossing the dam; relocations consisting of roads, telephone and power lines; and remedial protection for Story City by levee and street raises. The conservation pool would have a surface area of 2,100 acres and the full flood control pool would have a surface area of 5,000 acres. The project was authorized to store water for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife benefits. Current study efforts concluded that a smaller scaled down project was the only feasible alternative. The scaled down project would have a surface area of 1,850 acres and the full flood control pool would have a surface area of 3,620 acres. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. By letter dated October 26, 1973, the Governor of IA advised "There is general agreement that the project provides definite flood control benefits to the downstream landowner. However, the costs associated with it and the values to be foregone as a result of the project outweigh the benefits. Therefore, at this time, the State's position must be that of general opposition to the project." Due to the State's position in regard to the project, it was reclassified from the "active" to the "inactive" category on June 20, 1974. By letter dated March 6, 1984, the city of Ames, IA, provided a copy of a resolution that the City Council adopted February 28, 1984, requesting reactivitation of the project. The project was approved for reactivation on July 2, 1984. By letters dated August 27, 1986 and September 9, 1986, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources and City of Ames, Iowa advised that they did not support the scaled down project. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The General Reevaluation Report was approved in September 1987. Project has been recommended to be classified inactive. Costs totaled $127,082. 9. BETTENDORF, IA Location. The city of Bettendorf is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River 485.7 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Scott County, IA. Existing project. Local flood protection from the Mississippi River to be provided by construction of 3 miles of earth levee, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps. Construction was started in July 1982. Project cost is $16,291,980 including $1,510,000 non-Federal cost for lands and relocations. See Table-28B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued. The project is 100 percent completed. Costs for 1987 were $993,110. 10. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,406 acres of land were acquired in fee, and flowage easements obtained for 9,494 acres. The project was modified to provide fori construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except in connection with the Mehaffey Bridge, which has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Additional land acquisition to provide for the present plan of reservoir operation performed at a construction cost of $132,327. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $2,225,575. Reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY cost of $66,678. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $83,789. 11. DAVENPORT, IA Location. The city of Davenport is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River, 482.4 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Scott County, IA. Existing project. Local protection to the city from floods on the Mississippi River to be provided by construction of levees, floodwall, interior drainage facilities and pump plants, closure structures, and recreational facilities. The project also provides for the enhancement and preservation of Nahant Marsh at the downstream edge of the city as a wetland area with important contribution to environmental quality. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Nahant Marsh. It included the acquisition of 163 areas of marshland as a mitigation measure for the Davenport project. 28-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT Estimated federal cost is $388,000; non-federal cost, $129,000. Estimated project cost for Davenport is $37,400,000 including $11,700,000 non-federal costs. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. The city has withdrawn support for the project because of high costs and public opposition. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction costs were $1,538. 12. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20 at Fort Dodge, IA. It includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Saylorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) the operation and maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development and other activities as will enhance the natural environment for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project, the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to carry out such project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee will be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of eight counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Letters of Assurance have been furnished by Polk County (28 Oct. 85), City of Johnson (11 Nov. 85), Iowa Conservation Commission (6 Dec. 85), City of Ft. Dodge (5 Dec. 85), City of Swan (7 Dec. 85), Marion County (16 Dec. 85), Jasper County (16 Dec. 85), Boone County (18 Dec. 85), Webster County (14 Jun. 86), City of Des Moines (7 Apr. 86) andthe Town of Lehigh (13 Mar. 86). Operations during fiscal year. The General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement were completed. Construction of Bennington Bridge Access was completed. Costs incurred were $404,519. 13. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual Report for 1983 for description of project. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $93,704. 14. MILAN, IL Location. The village of Milan is located on the south bank of the Rock River several miles upstream from the confluence of that stream with the Mississippi River at mile 479.1 above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Existing project. Local protection against direct flooding from Rock River and Mill Creek and against backwater flooding from the Mississippi River to be provided the community by construction of levees, floodwalls, closure structure, bridges, pumping stations, drainage facilities, and street ramps. Construction was initiated in March 1981. The estimated project cost is $17,645,400, including $3,440,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project continued at a cost of $1,017,500. The principal work item was levee construction. The project is about 99 percent completed. 15. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 47,615 acres in fee and 29,057 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operations have flooded their lands more frequently than what they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, led Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. Potentially, there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres involved. Estimated Federal cost is $28,900,000. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A Real 28-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Estate Design Memorandum was initiated in FY 86 and completed in FY 87. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $2,801,950. Flood control reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY cost of $66,678. Expenditures from the return of recreation use fees were $72,852. 16. ROCKFORD, IL Location. The city of Rockford is located along both banks of the Rock River, in Winnebago County, IL. Kent Creek is a small stream, tributary to the Rock River, which flows through the right-bank portion of the city. Existing project. The project provides flood protection for the right-bank portion of the city from floods on Kent Creek. It consists of a rolled earth dam with outlet works and spillway on North Branch Kent Creek in Page Park; 12,000 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek; raise of Levings Lake Dam on South Branch Kent Creek and construction of spillway and diversion channel; 10,800 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on South Branch Kent Creek; and relocations. Construction was initiated in October 1978. The estimated project cost is $16,930,000, including $6,430,000 for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the project was continued at a cost of $159,867. The principal work item was channel cleanout on South Branch Kent Creek. The project is about 88 percent completed. 17. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and houses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an escavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification includes relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main access road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of a diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 26,526 acres acquired in fee, flowage easements for 1,925 acres. The estimated project cost is $128,216,000, including $2,770,000 non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, Iowa toward recreational development. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The principal work item was the construction of recreational facilities and improvements to Highway 415, and on engineering and design work for the downstream floodway corridor. New work costs were $4,740,366. Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $3,362,400. Maintenance: Reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY costs of $66,678. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $16,742. The project is about 96 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 18. SOUTH QUINCY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, in Adams County, is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 318 5 and 325.5 just south of Quincy, Illinois. It is bounded by the Mississippi River on the west, the river bluffs on the east, Curtis Creek on north, and Mill Creek on the south. Existing project. About 8.8 miles of earth levee and a pumping station constructed by local interests and improved by the Federal Government in 1967 was designed and built to provide protection against a flood having a 2 percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any one year. Increasing the level of protection to a 500-year change of occurrence includes raising the existing levee approximately 3.5 feet in height and adding .4 mile of levees and floodwall. Associated features of the proposed plan include raising and resurfacing existing road ramps, and a railroad closure structure. See Table 28-G for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. The General Design Memorandum was completed in FY 87. Continuation of Planning and Engineering costs were $2,374. The first major construction contract for Stage I (levees and floodwalls) was 28-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT awarded. Costs for FY 87 were $231,040. 19. WATERLOO, IA Location. The city of Waterloo is located along both banks of the Cedar River in Black Hawk County, IA. The U.S. Highway No. 20 and Lafayette Street Bridges cross Blowers Creek, an interior stream within the area of Blowers Creek Improvements of the Waterloo local flood protection project. Existing project. The 100 percent complete project provides local protection to the city of Waterloo from floods on the Cedar River, Black Hawk Creek, Virden Creek, and Blowers Creek. It consists of 15.4 miles of earth levee, 2 miles of floodwall, 11,330 feet of channel improvement, an impounding dam on Virden Creek, and interior drainage facilities including 8 pumping plants. Construction was initiated in August 1972. The project cost was $63,620,100, including $15,000,000 non-Federal cost for land and relocations. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized modification of the Waterloo Flood Protection Project by providing for the reconstruction of the U.S. Highway 20 Bridge and LaFayette Street Bridge over Blowers Creek in the city of Waterloo. Estimated federal cost is $1,150,000; non-federal cost, $1,150,000. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements will be sought as required. Operations during fiscal year. None. Waterloo (Bridges) Project is not funded. -$140,363 construction credit or adjustment for the Waterloo project in FY 87. 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $138,167. (See Table 28-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 28-E. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 84- 685. See Table 28-I. Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 28-I. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526.) See Table 28-I. Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 28-I. General Investigations 23. SURVEYS Flood control studies in progress included the Mississippi River, Coon Rapids to Ohio River; the Illinois River from Henry to Naples, IL; Quincy Bay, IL; and the Vermilion River Basin, IL. Total cost of flood control studies was $231,580. Special investigations, FERC review, SCS Coordination, and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $114,466. Total cost of surveys was $346,046. 24. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost $136,689. Hydrologic studies, including general studies, sedimentation studies, streamflow studies, and rainfall studies cost $1,825. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $138,514. 25. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING None accomplished. 26. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN The Hannibal, MO, project area is on the right bank of the Mississippi River at the city of Hannibal, MO, 309 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River. The project would provide flood protection to the business and industrial area of the city of Hannibal by the construction of a system of levees and floodwalls. The plan also includes a pumping plant, closure structures for railroads and streets, alteration of the existing sewage system, and a tainter gate closure at the mouth of Bear Creek. Advance planning on the project was begun in 1962; however, in 1965 further work was discontinued because of lack of local support. Local interest revived in 1979, and the project was reclassified from "inactive" to the "active" category. A study has been undertaken to reformulate the project to meet existing needs of the project area between Mark Twain Memorial Bridge and Bear Creek and to reflect current Federal and State criteria for water resources projects. No action toward fulfillment of local cooperation requirements has been taken. Detailed studies for reformulation of the project and evaluation of alternatives were continued at a cost of $119,421. The Loves Park, IL, project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, lies in Winnebago County, IL, on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, 17 miles south of the IL-WI State line. The project would provide local flood protection (100-year level) for the city of Loves Park, IL, against flooding of Loves Park Creek (formerly called the Large Unnamed Creek). Protection measures would consist of 17,350 feet of channel improvements, a 75,000 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The General Design Memorandum 28-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 was initiated in FY 87. Total cost of advance engineering and design was $297,235. See Table 28-B for authorizing Legislation. The Moline, IL, project is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River, 485.7 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River, in Rock Island County, IL. Local protection at Moline from Mississippi River floods to be provided by construction of 4 miles of earth levee and floodwall, closure structures, aesthetic and recreational development, and interior drainage facilities consisting of gravity outlets, storm sewer interceptors, and pumping plants. Construction has not yet been initiated due to gaps in Federal funding. Local interests will be requested to furnish assurances after a firm project plan is established. Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $260. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Located in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, together with the city of Muscatine, Iowa form a joint drainage and flood protection area for 30,700 acres of bottom land. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 subject to a favorable Chief's Report and approved by the Secretary of the Army. The project will provide flood protection by increasing the height of the existing main stem levee and flank levee. A revised Feasibility Report was completed in July 1986. The General Design Memorandum was initiated in FY 87 at a cost of $25,843. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. The West Des Moines - Des Moines, Iowa project is located in Polk County in central Iowa. The recommended project of levees and floodwalls will provide flood protection from the Raccoon River, Walnut Creek, and Jordan Creek for approximately 927 urban acres. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. FY 87 Supplemental Appropriations Bill included funds for the project. Funds were received on 25 Sep 87 and were carried over into FY 88. These funds will be used to initiate work on the General Reevaluation Report (GRR) in FY 88. See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation. Total cost for advance engineering and design was $442,759. 28-8 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 September 1987 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 3. Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, IL 5. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 8. Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 9. Bettendorf, IA Cc 10. Coralville Lake, IA 11. Davenport, IA 12. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 13. Farm Creek, IL 800,000 99,000 695,000 57,049 330,888 359,615 - 7,605,1431 - 7,605,1431 42,558 17,933,3682 377,489 17,921,6772 .- - - 126,707,7513 -- - - 126,706,4193 13,673,299 10,476,000 10,847,351 12,491,000 238,239,7474 13,738,078 10,655,009 10,797,875 12,748,599 235,061,4804 17,025,000 15,270,000 13,841,000 29,671,000 105,221,625 18,248,288 10,389,719 16,528,634 30,572,350 103,428,239 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost ontributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 10,000 11,895 2,000 270 305 - 30,000 814,000 1,683,000 - - 442,750 1,571,225 - 250,000 144,000 100,000 - 194,053 172,865 127,081 3,315,000 2,800,000 3,701,200 2,952,322 - 289,121 1,965,000 2,086,884 2,101,000 2,329,008 95,717 2,037,000 3,656,994 2,453,500 2,524,087 2,240 3,741,000 1,159,000 3,853,355 993,110 - -1,047 270,052 18,021 507,889 2,290,600 2,045,866 132,327 2,048,522 2,225,575 1,538 15,000 238,000 371,000 - 163,997 404,519 142,000 70,314 52,000 98,920 60,000 79,811 63,7195 63,7195 396,553 387,449 2,527,000 2,013,975 2,285,800 2,285,799 14,781,980 14,580,649 288,074 288,073 29,969,4886 29,710,6366 25,459,627 23,222,892 1,689,717 1,689,371 624,000 568,516 - 9,859,0207 - 9,859,0207 89,000 2,774,232 93,074 2,671,199 28-9 35,000 24,184 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 September 1987 14. Milan, IL 15. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA 16. Rockford, IL 17. Saylorville Lake, IA 18 South Quincy, IL 26. Hannibal, MO Loves Park, IL Moline, IL New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 3,530,000 3,263,505 213,950 2,875,000 962,000 130,000 13,816,640 2,464,332 566,240 1,017,500 13,203,735 - - - 225,950 201,554 - - 201,554 - - - - 95,303,484 - - - - 95,302,484 2,712,000 3,018,300 3,004,600 2,638,322 27,485,645 2,518,900 3,263,730 2,638,830 2,801,950 24,820,760 475,000 1,309,129 104,200 117,606 2,500,000 1,590,361 3,173,000 4,451,959 221,989 820,558 1,100,000 309,000 1,086,000 883,485 564,537 159,867 391 981 5,313,000 6,404,697 2,681,500 2,724,425 408,352 593,869 48 - 7,107,000 3,631,688 3,116,600 3,032,005 141,989 141,745 961,000 4,740,366 3,823,422 3,362,400 - 150,000 209,000 230,000 - 138,466 218,160 231,040 150,000 134,787 60,000 124,000 184,000 80,692 117,693 119,421 - 200,000 311,000 430,000 - 187,644 303,507 297,233 106,759 90,000 48,410 -25,000 12,715 Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. Cost West Des Moines, IA New Work: Approp. Cost 260 - 100,000 - 25,843 - 75,000 10,054,273 8,305,153 249,361 244,208 110,787,887 109,432,4328 26,185,465 22,525,210 2,304,830 1,951,401 589,000 587,666 828,993 758,047 941,000 788,384 1,415,000 1,407,875 100,000 25,843 75,000 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 5. Includes $85 for previous project. 6. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). 7. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 28-10 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 19341 August 30, 1935 August 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 March 2, 1945 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration of Illinois Central RR. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. 28-11 H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 November 17, 1986 3. July 3, 1930 5. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navigation project to include an adjacent downstream water area. MILL CREEK AND SOUTH SLOUGH AT MILAN, IL Channel diversion, floodgates, and other work for flood protection. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Provide for a 10-year environmental program to include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoring. H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.4 Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 857, H:R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 28-12 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents November 17, 1986 8. October 27, 1965 (P.L. 89-298) 9. August 13, 1968 10. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 11. December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 12. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) November 17, 1986 13. 1944 Flood Control Act 14. August 13, 1968 15. June 28, 1938 December 19, 1985 16. October 23, 1962 17. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to implement GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. AMES DAM AND RESERVOIR, SKUNK RIVER, IA Reservoir for flood control, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BETTENDORF, IA Levees, railroad raises, closure structures, and street raises and ramps for flood control. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DAVENPORT, IA Levee, floodwall, and pumping plants. Davenport (Nahant Marsh), IA Land Acquisition DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. Defines area of work. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. MILAN, IL Levee closure structures, gravity drainage outlets, ditches, ponding areas, and pumping plants for flood control. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Land Acquisition ROCKFORD, IL Channel enlargement and realignment, levees, and appurtenant works for flood control. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 267, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 348, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 601, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc., 348, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 142, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 28-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents SOUTH QUINCY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL 18. November 17, 1986 Raise existing levee, construct levees and floodwalls Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water raise road ramps and construct railroad closure. Resources Development Act of 1986. WATERLOO, IA 19. October 27, 1965 Levees, floodwalls, pumping plants, and closure H. Doc. 166, 89th Cong. structures for flood control. 1st sess. November 17, 1986 (Bridges) Sec. 835, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. HANNIBAL, MO 26. October 23, 1962 Levee, floodwall, closure structures, and pumping H. Doc. 564, 87th Cong., plant for flood control. 2nd sess. LOVES PARK, IL November 17, 1986 Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. MOLINE, IL October 27, 1965 Levee, closure structures, and interior drainage H. Doc. 161, 92nd Cong., (Section 201) facilities for flood control, and aesthetic and 1st sess. Approved by recreational development. Committees on Public Works of House of Representatives and Senate, June 14, 1972, and June 21, 1972, respectively. MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO. 13, IA November 17, 1986 Raise existing levees. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. WEST DES MOINES, IA November 17, 1986 Construct levees and floodwall. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administration Program 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. Rivers. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet-Sag portion. TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 108,7004 6,256 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,9791 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,4993 0 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 466 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $137,869 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $20,300 contributed funds. 28-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL 1943 274,822 - - Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) 1962 1,679,056 - - Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 144,910 - - Canton, MO' 1964 1,496,555 - - Clinton, IA 1981 26,001,996 - 761,050 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,923,145 - - Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 68,898 - - Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO 1969 1,492,016 - - Des Moines, IA 1972 4,993,224 - 23,323 Drury Drainage District, IL 1964 1,144,875 - - Dubuque, IA 1974 10,861,170 - 145,415 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 207,826 - - East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 - - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 - - Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - - Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 - - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 - - Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 - - Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 - - Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 - - Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - - Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - - Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 - - Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 - - Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 - - Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 - - Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - - Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - - Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 - 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 - - Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 - 269,739 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 - - Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 - 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - - Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 - - Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN1 1957 72,432 - - 28-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 - - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 - - Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - - Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 - - Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - - Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 - Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 - - Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 - - South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 - - South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 - - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 - - Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 - - Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 - - Van Meter, IA1 1965 113,842 - - Authorized Projects Not Constructed Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 - - Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 - - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 28-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 1986 1986 - - Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL 1969 1979 $ 76,664 - Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA 1970 1977 55,664 - Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL 1942 1986 - - Freeport, IL 1979 1986 286,000 - Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA 1938 1977 - - Henderson River, IL 1964 1977 102,310 - Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks 1982 1981 - - Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) 1986 1986 - - Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1938 1977 - - Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 - - Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA - 1977 - - South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000 - William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 - - TABLE 28-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA October 1986 November 1986 March 1987 January 1987 November 1986 December 1986 September 1986 November 1986 November 1986 October 1986 October 1986 March 1987 December 1986 September 1986 28-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 28-H (Continued) Project INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) Date Inspected East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fultin, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District, No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Hergot Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, IL1 Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1, and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Van Meter, IA Volga, IA January 1987 November 1986 November 1986 January 1987 September 1986 November 1986 December 1986 November 1986 November 1986 September 1986 November 1986 December 1986 December 1986 December 1986 November 1986 December 1986 April 1987 December 1986 December 1986 February 1987 February 1987 February 1987 October 1986 November 1986 November 1986 November 1986 November 1986 March 1987 November 1986 September 1986 November 1986 December 1986 November 1986 December 1986 October 1986 November 1986 September 1986 November 1986 February 1987 March 1987 November 1986 March 1987 March 1987 November 1986 November 1986 April 1987 November 1986 October 1986 September 1986 28-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-H (Continued) INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) Date Project Inspected Waterloo, IA November 1986 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL February 1987 Worthington, MN August 1986 1. Project partially completed. TABLE 28-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 22 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA $ 44,898 Cedar River, Waverly, IA 26,808 Couler Valley, Dubuque County, IA 77 DeKalb, Kishwaukee River, IL 23,953 Illinois, and Michigan Canal, IL 7,500 Illinois River, Liverpool, IL 91,965 Iroquois River, Sugar Creek, Watseka, IL 99,365 North River, Marion County, MO 51,696 Oelwein, Fayette County, IA 4,647 Ottawa, IL 93,046 Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL 1,769 Plainfield, IA 19,367 Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA 56,451 Sac and Fox Indian Lands, Tama, IA 7,500 Tama, IA 38,656 Vermilion River, Pontiac, IL 148,100 Walnut Creek, Clive, IA 38,904 TABLE 28-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Preauthorization) (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Lower Edwards River, IL $ 7,500 Negro Creek, Bureau County, IL 142 Rock Creek, Morrison, IL 4,216 28-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 28-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Continued) Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs 320 St. N. Rock River, Rock Island, IL $ 44,196 Buena Vista, IA 3,191 Bureau County, Spring Valley, IL 7,500 Des Moines River, Bridge 32527, MN 7,500 Iowa Falls, River Road, IA 7,500 Iowa River, Wapello, IA 14,601 Jasper County, IA 1,200 Middle River, Adair County, IA 14,301 Mississippi River, Hannibal, MO 7,500 North River, Klien Bridge, MO 5,305 Sangamon River, Riverton, IL 9,642 Shell Rock River, Cerro Gordo County, IA 7,500 Shellsburg, Wildcat Creek, IA 7,500 Stuart, IL 7,042 Tama, IA 6,000 Turkey River, Elgin, IA 5,574 Turkey River, Jefferson Township, IA 53,885 Turkey River, Millville Township, IA 41,684 TABLE 28-I Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation) (See Section 22 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation $ 48,008 Rehabilitation: Bill Meyer-Connell-Cullinon, IL 20,447 Blout-Lundry Levee, IL 11,143 Cassell Levee, IL 28,180 Glueck Levee, IL 7,268 Green Island, Levee Drainage District I, IL 79,882 Hoffman Levee, IL 24,229 Iungerich -3-Fluegel Levee, IL 22,962 John Reiff Levee, MO 22,795 Judy-Dunham, et al Levee, IL 70,430 Mississippi-Fox River Drainage District -2 Levee, MO 39,489 Mississippi-Fox DD-2, Honey & Sugar Creek, MO 14,551 28-20 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water1 Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.02 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at flat pools. Lockport is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. TABLE 28-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Peoria Starved Rock Marseilles Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Movable (wicket type) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) $ 2,733,4991 2,744,5921 3,381,0301 885,3151 1,853,7251 Concrete and timber Concrete and timber Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Piles in sand Piles in sand Rock Rock 1939 1939 1933 1933 28-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 28-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Dresden Island Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 $ 2,503,3761 (tainter and gates) structural steel Brandon Road Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 2,031,6831 (tainter and gates) structural steel Lockport Concrete Rock Movable Concrete Rock 1933 133,6081 (Bear trap) and (Bear trap) structural steel T.J. O'Brien Concrete Piles in clay Fixed Concrete Piles in clay 1960 6,954,7001 and sheet and sheet piling piling Lock and dam - - - - - - 1,250,3041 equipment Total locks - - - - - - $ 24,471,832 and dams 1. Actual cost. TABLE 28-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers $ 2,135,3581 Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places 813,4181 Starved Rock to Lockport 3,650,635 Starved Rock to Grafton 2,917,607 Calumet-Sag Channel 19,238,200 Peoria small boat harbor 24,9371 Protection piers at all locks 77,613' Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design 5,141,474 Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration 5,466,804 Rebuild highway bridges 19,327,850 Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel 20,828,4351 Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers 18,362,0411 Recreation Facilities, Code 711 445,000 Removal of Blue Island lock 288,6001 Grand Calumet River controlling works2 St. Louis District 1,724,170' Total additional features $100,442,142 Total existing project $124,913,974 1. Actual cost. 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. 28-22 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 28-M EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams IL and IN Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 - junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL TABLE 28-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $118,317,646 $235,448,893 $103,428,239 $457,194,778 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $124,137,317 $235,448,893 $103,428,239 $463,014,4491 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 28-23 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Location. Mississippi River rises in northern part of Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Latest map and profile showing this section of river is in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri river (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge of 2.7 miles, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 29-C, 29-D, 29-E and 29-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, is subject to the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See table at end of chapter for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) Operations during fiscal year. St. Paul District. New Work: Under Section 107 authority, an initial appraisal was completed at Harriet Island, MN at a cost of $7,500. Studies were continued under Section 107 for the establishment of a small-boat harbor at Guttenberg, Iowa at a cost of $1,855. Total new work costs were $9,355. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 882,802 cubic yards of material at 16 locations at a cost of $1,787,324. Government derrick barge HAUSER removed 20,573 cubic yards of material at 4 locations for $266,455. Government pipeline dredge DUBUQUE 29-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 removed 319,867 cubic yards at 17 locations at a cost of $458,486. Mechanical dredging contract costs were $865,476. Contracts for dredge material removal, dredging at Weaver Bottoms, and Pool 1 site preparation cost $2,400,688, $3,667,098, and $229,966, respectively. Dredging surveys cost $486,858. Other dredging and snagging cost $183,361. Water quality testing for dredging cost $68,019. Painting at locks and dams cost $566,374. Scour repair contracts at Locks and Dams 2, 5A, and 10 cost $311,476, $435,439 and $149,584, respectively. Contracts for dike repair at Lock and Dam 3, and for general dam maintenance cost $212,328 and $74,220, respectively. Contracts for construction of handicapped facilities at Lock and Dam 9, for loading dock at Lock and Dam 5, for foundation investigations at Lock and Dam 2, and for aluminum grating at Lock and Dam 4 cost $15,938, $29,030, $167,769, and $23,494, respectively. Road repair contracts at Locks and Dams 1, 4, and 7 cost $23,529, $19,635 and $22,902, respectively. Supply and equipment contracts for lock operating machinery at Locks and Dams 2, 4, 5, and 10, for tow haulage units at Locks and Dams 2 and 4-10, for rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 2, for equipment replacement, for electronic positioning equipment, for computer processing equipment, and for processing and channel sweeping system cost $3,889,999, $421,773, -$184,077, $45,854, $175,039, -$80,000, and $123,425, respectively. Contracts for construction of storage building at Lock and Dam 5A and for major maintenance at Lock and Dam 3 cost $191,036 and $18,310, respectively. Maintenance costs for the small-boat harbors at Lake City, St. Paul and Winona, MN were $57,786, $30,000, and $5,000, respectively. Other miscellaneous hired labor, supplies, and equipment cost $3,283,583. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $1,581,792 and by contract for $955,124. The total cost of maintenance was $22,980,093. Rehabilitation: A lock supply contract for Locks and Dams 3 and 5A-9, and a supply contract for roller gate chains cost $2,159,999 and $405,522, respectively. Engineering, administration, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $272,354 and by contract for $83,238. Total rehabilitation costs were $2,921,113. Operating and care: Locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $10,049,435. Costs to St. Paul District were $9,355 for new work; $33,029,528 for operation and maintenance; and $2,921,113 for rehabilitation, for a total of $35,959,996. Rock Island District. New Work: Work continued on Stage 1, Rock Excavation, in Pool 15 with 23,000 cubic yards of rock and overburden being removed by contract at a cost of $913,600. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 16, 17, 21, and 22 at a cost of $1,373,800 with 621,889 cubic yards of material being removed. Contractor dredged various locations in Pool 22 at a cost of $165,000 with 46,111 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $60,600. Snagging, clearing, and excavation was performed by hired labor at various locations at a cost of $116,100. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging and channel maintenance activities cost $67,500. Repair of channel regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $1,648,400. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and painting, were performed by hired labor at locks and dams at a cost of $897,200. Contractor initiated repairs to undermined land guidewalls at Locks 12, 13, and 17 at a cost of $1,135,900. Repairs to the upper land guidewall damaged by a towboat at Lock 17 were completed by contract at a cost of $113,300. Small boat launching ramps were constructed at Clark's Ferry and Shady Creek Public Use Area at a cost of $61,800. Construction of public restroom facilities and access road improvements were initiated by contract at Lock and Dam 11 at a cost of $90,000. Final payments totaling $5,500 were made on two contracts physically completed in prior fiscal year. Contractor completed installation of upper bulkhead recesses at Locks and Dams 21 and 22 at a cost of $35,300. Maintenance of roads and bridges, and of buildings, grounds and utilities cost $56,400. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $551,300, and maintenance and purchase of permanent operating equipment cost $260,100. Maintenance of levees cost $81,700. Real estate activities relating to maintenance cost $31,900. Engineering and design work was performed at a cost of $442,600. Supervision and administration for maintenance features cost $464,100. Total maintenance costs were $7,658,500. Net credits to the project were $412,100, primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation of locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $8,972,800. Real estate management services were performed at a cost of $143,700. Natural and cultural resource activities cost $374,000, and public use areas and Mississippi River Visitor's Center were operated at a cost of $921,500, with contract law enforcement provided at a cost of $55,500. Surveys, various condition and operation studies, and structural inspections cost $1,043,900. Water control management costs were $701,100; amount of $20,000 was expended on Master Plans; and $8,300 was expended on various investigations and reports. Supervision and administration for operations features cost $248,600. Total operation costs were $12,489,400. Total operation and maintenance costs were $19,735,800. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation for Lock and Dam 20 cost $7,974,065; rehabilitation was initiated at Locks and Dams 21 and 22 at a cost of $407,120 and $981,105, respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $9,362,290. Costs to Rock Island District were $913,600 for new work; $19,735,800 for operations and maintenance; and $9,362,290 29-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN for major rehabilitation for a total of $30,011,690. St. Louis District. New work: Costs incurred for new Lock and Dam 26 were $856,295 for real estate acquisition, $7,195,257 for relocations, $6,834,230 for the dam, $53,650,396 for the lock, $537,051 for channels, $814,870 for levees and floodwalls, $18,728 for buildings and utilities, $57,242 for permanent operating equipment, $3,211,117 for engineering, and $5,219,892 for supervision and administration. Costs incurred for 2nd lock were $502,830 for the lock, $3,899,526 for engineering and $204,448 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $83,001,882. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made thereto and to appurtenant structures at a cost of $3,459,382. Costs to St. Louis District were $83,001,882 for new work and $7,635,785 for operation and maintenance for a total of $90,637,667. Condition at end of fiscal year: For information pertaining to locks, dams and harbors, see tables at end of chapter. St. Paul district. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City; Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: Construction of small boat harbor at St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN and construction of additional recreational facilities. Uncompleted guidewall extensions at Lock Nos. 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were available in all pools. Structures are in good condition. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: Construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hannibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pool 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year, was such that controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were being maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: Construction ofguidewall extension at 16, 18, and 21; mooring facilities at 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at 19 and 20; rock and/or congolmerate excavation in Pools 14, 15, 18, and 21. Small-boat harbors at New Boston, IL, Bellevue, IA, Cassville, WI, Davenport (Credit Island), IA, and Keokuk, IA are inactive, deferred or have been deauthorized. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam), except for guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25. Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 is under construction. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of lands in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 1,742 acres have been acquired for Lock and Dam 26 replacement project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Locks and Dam, 26 and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining on the Lock and Dam No. 26 (replacement) project includes completion of the second stage, the 1200 foot lock and two half gatebays of the dam, and the third stage, the 600 foot lock and 1 gatebays of the dam. Other work includes removal of the existing lock and dam, rerouting a railroad, and construction of the administration/ maintenance building and Visitor Center. Approximately 1,880 acres remains to be acquired, of which 1,331 acreas are for mitigation purposes for terrestrial wildlife loses. 'IbTotal Federal costs of existing project to end of fiscal year for the three Districts was $146,559,918 of which $83,924,837 was for new work, $50,351,678 regular funds for operation and maintenance and $12,283,403 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri River Approp.2 38,441,000 85,053,000 84,345,770 102,998,100 754,205,003 and Minneapolis, Cost3 42,157,597 84,591,964 86,217,056 83,924,837 735,611,399 Minnesota (Federal Maint.4 Funds) Approp. 51,692,401 52,296,749 56,548,589 59,089,429 782,841,054 Cost 60,514,185 53,051,295 52,409,293 50,351,678 760,868,379 Rehab. Approp. 0 0 1,240,000 12,950,000 71,723,197 Cost. 99,623 1,797 1,185,900 12,283,403 71,002,500 (Contributed funds) New Work Approp. 512,160 -99,561 0 0 2,041,140 Cost 774,696 37,903 0 0 2,041,140 1. Includes $56,945,518 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes replacement and 2nd lock Lock and Dam 26 funds $506,184,000. 3. Includes replacement and 2nd lock Lock and Dam 26 funds $503,763,000. 4. Includes $8,504,026 for maintenance on previous project. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 29-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $ 60,164,1682 $ 24,210,071 $ 9,071,214 $ 93,445,453 Maintenance3 321,696,901 - - 321,696,901 Rehabilitation 47,521,113 - - 47,521,113 Total 429,382,182 24,210,071 9,071,214 462,663,467 Rock New Work4 68,186,3455 17,403,322 11,338,865 96,928,532 Island Maintenances 273,015,033 - - 273,015,033 Rehabilitation 23,481,387 - - 23,481,287 Total 364,682,765 17,403,322 11,338,865 393,424,952 St. Louis New Work8 532,940,9317 10,282,566 2,440,266 545,663,763 Maintenance 175,389,575 - - 175,389,575 Total 708,330,506 10,282,566 2,440,266 721,053,338 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Costs subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $500,249,908 for replacement of Lock and Dam 26. 29-4 TABLE 29-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from her Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 1002 - $ 18,203,0003 Falls, upper Lock St. Anthony Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 Lock and dam 2 Lock and dam 3 Lock and dam 4 Lock and dam 5 Lock and dam 5A n Lock and dam 6 Lock and dam 7 Lock and dam 8 Lock and dam 9 Lock and dam 10 Lock and dam 11 Lock and dam 12 Lock and dam 13 Lock and dam 14 Le Claire Lock (Canal) Lock and dam 15 Lock and dam 16 Minneapolis, MN 853.3 In city of Minneapolis, MN 847.6 Minneapolis- St. Paul 815.2 1.3 above Hastings, MN 796.9 6.1 above Red Wing, MN 752.8 Alma, WI 738.1 Minneiska, MN 728.5 3 above Winona, MN 714.3 Trempealeau, WI 702.5 Dresbach, MN 679.2 Genoa, WI 647.9 3.3 below Lynxville, WI 615.1 Guttenberg, IA 583.0 3.7 above Dubuque, IA 556.7 Bellevue, IA 522.5 4.3 above Clinton, IA 493.3 3.7 below Le Claire, IA 493.1 3.9 below Le Claire, IA 482.9 Foot of Arsenal Island Rock Island, IL 457.2 1.8 above Muscatine, IA stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 56 400 26.94 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. piles. 56 400 35.94 725.1 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 56 400 35.9 - 12.57 7.6 in gravel. 110 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 1108 6008 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay, silt and clay. 110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. silt and clay. 110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and clay. silt. 110 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and gravel. broken rock. 110 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. gravel and silt. 110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand clay and and gravel. gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock. 80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.011 11.0 Rock. Rock. 110 360 16.0 - 17.011 11.0 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 100 1959 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 95 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 7 12,382,0005 2,358,0006 6,492,0009 5,596,000 4,865,000 5,081,000 4,549,000 4,874,000 5,574,000 6,061,000 z 6,539,000 4,750,000 7,428,000 O 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 11,439,000 98 1937 9,788,000 TABLE 29-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Miles Above Ohio Miles from Lock and Dam River Nearest Town Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 17 Boston, IL Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 18 Burlington, IA Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 19 Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above 20 Canton, MO Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below 21 Quincy, IL Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 22 Saverton, MO Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, MO 24 Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, t 25 MO Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, IL 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) New Lock and 200.8 Alton, IL dam 26 New Lock and 200.8 Alton, IL dam 26 (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams Lock Dimen Greatest Width Length of Available Cham- for Full ber Width (feet) (feet) 110 600 110 600 110 358 110 1,200 110 600 110 600 110 600 110 600 110 600 110 600 110 360 110 1,200 110 600 lsions Depth on Character of Foundation Upper Miter Sill Normal Pool Lift Eleva- Upper Lower (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. 5.0 13.0 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. 10.5 10.2 15.0 15.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Rock. Rock and piles in sand and gravel. 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles and - 16.0 10.0 sand. 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to bedrock. bedrock. 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to bedrock. bedrock. 1. Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from prev 1912 adjustment; pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as au 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. project cost $540,000. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over up 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is nor- lock 15. mally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississ 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower transferred to Government free in lieu of improve rock. (Federal cost only.) Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate inc 6. In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 lock and appurtenant work. from O & C appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam 13. Includes cash contribution of $3,950,000. rehabilitation program. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 7. Old upper guard sill. 8. Landward lock. I _ Percent Complete Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Work in to Navi- Dam Including Pool gation Work in Pool 99 1939 $ 5,843,000 , 90 1937 10,308,000 0 100 1913 99 1957 14,813,00012 97 1936 6,281,000 C 95 1938 8,065,000 99 1938 5,275,000 9914 1940 10,337,000 9914 1939 13,694,000 100 1938 12,824,000 0 66 - 747,480,000 0 4 - 214,000,000 0 $ 1,184,265,000 iious projects. xiliary to lock 14; previous per miter sill is 27 feet, at ippi River Power Company, ements destroyed. (Annual ludes $13,132,600 for main TABLE 29-D Name Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, MN St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors, MN S Lansing Harbor, IA Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Cassville Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA New Boston Harbor, IL Fort Madison Harbor, IA HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Miles above Location Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Type depth Percent Estimated Ohio River (feet) Width Length Complete Cost 840.2 In city of St. Paul, MN Small-boat 5 70 925 0 $ 292,000' 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 839.7 Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, MN 791.4 In city of Red Wing, MN 791.1 In city of Red Wing, MN 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, WI 773.0 In city of Lake City, MN 767.1 In city of Pepin, WI 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN 751.3 Upper end of Alma, WI 726.0 In city of Winona, MN Latsch Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, IA 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 606.6 At Cassville, WI 579.4 At Dubuque, IA 537.3 At Savanna, IL 519.0 At Clinton, IA 488.0 At Moline, IL 484.2 At Lindsay Park 479.8 At Rock Island, IL 473.0 Andalusia Slough 455.5 At Muscatine, IA 455.6 433.1 In Boston Bay 383.7 At Fort Madison, IA Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial4 Small-boat 4 Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat 5 12 5555 Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat Small-boat 400-1,000 300 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 120 340 280 400 230 200 100 40 150 200 90-135 250 2.7(mile) 100 400 100 500 100 1,200 100 800 100 5,990 100 600 1,000 850 600 800 100 100 100 100 100 500 100 1,000 100 6,000 100 500 100 800 100 1,000 frontage 565 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 435 950 1,890 600 900 100 0 100 0 78 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,8002 C 8,700 Ci) 39,4003 93,500 ; 1,077,0005 205,5006 tj 41,700 [ 56,300 M 89,800 84,500 95,300 Z 85,000 93,100 0 178,000 55,200 310,000 d 101,912 110,328 j 262,100 Z 31,000 21,000 r 353,000 23,000 184,200 TABLE 29-D (Cont,d) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Miles above Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Ohio Rive Location Type depth Percent Estimated (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Keokuk Harbor, IA Warsaw Harbor, IL Quincy Harbor, IL Hannibal Harbor, MO Total 363.5 At Keokuk, IA 359.1 At Warsaw, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat 5 100-600 5 100 5 200-300 5 180-260 1,015 600 9,000 600 0 100 0 100 1. In addition, local interests will contribute $292,000. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 3. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 4. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is smallboat, although some commercial activity exists. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $812,559. 6. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 7. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. 394,000 73,000 d - 129,000 ' $5,077,240 0 O y n d O Oi 0 m cA 0 0 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 29-E ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between Lock and Dam 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new work) $ 7,238,800 8,259,600 545,000 193,600 2,468,900 18,705,900 $468,584,858 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 29-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1987 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1987 St. Anthony Falls Lower Northern States Power $ 3,300 $ 83,377 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 5,916,840 Total project (No. 362) $6,000,217 29-9 _ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 29-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. 4 Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s. Winona, MN basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite Hamburg, IL harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL. 2 None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong. 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 254, 81st Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., 1st sess. 29-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 29-G (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st districts caused by operation of navigation pools. sess. July 3, 1958 Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 3, 1909 Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide None adequate facilities for existing navigation. July 14, 1960 Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna, Moline, H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Andalusia, New Boston,' Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue, 1 Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk', IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville,' WI. Oct. 23, 1962 Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. None Oct. 21, 1978 Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Public Law 95-502 1. Deferred. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 29-11 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT * This district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane DuPage and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, including a portion of LaPorte County along Lake Michigan. Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Calumet Harbor and Rv. IL and IN 3. Chicago Harbor, IL 4. Chicago River, IL 5. Indiana Harbor, IN 6. Michigan City Harbor, IN 7. Waukegan Harbor, IL 8. Reconnaissance and Cond. Surveys 9. National Emergency Preparedness 10. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Alteration of Bridges 11. Other Authorized Bridge Alteration Beach Erosion Control 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Casino Beach, Chicago, IL Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Indiana Shoreline, IN Other Authorized Beach Erosion Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control 30-2 30-2-3 30-3 30-3-4 30-4 30-4-5 30-5 30-5 30-5 30-5-6 17. Chicago River, IN (North Branch) 18. Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 19. Little Calumet River, IN 20. Little Calumet River Basin (Cady Marsh Ditch), IN 21. North Branch Chicago River, IL 22. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 23. Other Auth. Flood Control Projects 24. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization General Investigation 30-6 25. 26. 30-6 27. 28. 29. 30-6 30-6 30-6 3300--66 Surveys Collection and Study of Basic Data Continuation of Planning and Engineering Advance Engineering and Design Miscellaneous TITLE Cost and Financial Statement ......................... Authorizing Legislation ................... .............. Existing Projects ................................. Other Authorized Bridge Alteration ......................... Other Authorized Beach Eros. Projects ................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... Deauthorized Projects ............................... Reconnaissance and Condition Survey ..................... 30-1 Page 30-7 30-7-8 30-8 30-8 30-8-9 30-9 30-9 30-9 30-9 30-9 30-10 30-10 30-10 TABLES 30-A 30-B 30-C 30-D 30-E 30-F 30-G 30-H PAGES 30-11-12 30-13-16 30-17 30-18 30-18 30-18 30-18 30-18 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (see NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Existing Project. Provides for (a) rubble mound north breakwater 4,646 feet long; (b) a rubble mound west bulkhead 1,176 feet long; (c) a stone filled steel sheet pile cell, west bulkhead shore connection 2,300 feet long; (d) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (f) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; (g) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 27 October 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army to reimburse The State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Seven berths and docks are available, three on the west harbor arm, one on the harbor basin, and three on the east harbor arm. One dock on the west harbor arm is used for shipment and receipt of steel products. One dock on the east harbor arm is used for receipt of iron ore pellets and limestone and shipment of steel products. Five facilities are administered by the Indiana Port Commission and are used for handling general cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Detroit District at a cost of $10,200. Plans and specifications were developed by hired labor for the repair of the north breakwater at a cost of $41,314. Project management for these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $6,667. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $17,612,772 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 Federal and $15,900 non-Federal), and $4,012,872 for maintenance. 2. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within corporate limits of the city of Chicago, except for breakwaters, an approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Illinois and Indiana (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926 and 14929). Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) stone filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stone filled double row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) a north pier 2,450 feet long; (d) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (f) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (g) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th street; (h) three turning basins designated as numbers 1, 3 and 5; (i) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 3 March 1899, 13 June 1902, 30 August 1935, 14 July 1960, 23 October 1962, and 27 October 1965. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Chicago Regional Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are iron ores and concentrates, coal, and lignite. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Water quality activities are performed by contract at a cost of $27,097, by other federal agency at a cost of $3,000, and by hired labor at a cost of $31,108. Placement of 5000 tons of stone on the southerly exterior breakwater was performed by other COE at a cost of $121,643. Hydrographic surveys and cross section surveys on the attached breakwater (reaches A & B) were performed by contract at a cost of $68,652, and by other COE at a cost of $1,815. Engineering and design of the confined Disposal Facility were performed by other COE at a cost of $1,020 and by hired labor at a cost of $31,789. Project management for these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $51,226. Under the major rehabilitation project, hydrographic surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,582, and by contract at a cost of $10,000. Tug and crane equipped spud barge, accessory equipment, and operating personnel were leased at a cost of $15,130. General Design Memorandum was performed by other COE at a cost of $9,658 and by hired labor at a cost of $196,091. Project management was performed by hired labor at a cost of $4,027. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is 79% complete. Work remaining to be accomplished consists of widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106th Street, and the inactive portion which consists of closing the gap between the breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $48,506,145, of which $22,578,567 was for new work 30-2 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT ($19,541,964 regular funds and $3,036,603 public works funds) $24,164,422 regular funds for maintenance. $836,667 non-Federal funds for maintenance, and $926,489 regular funds for rehabilitation. 3. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928). Previous projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib shore arm extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stone filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubble mound and stone filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of 582 foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304 foot shore return, and a 754 foot gap; (f) a stone filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and manuever area inside the exterior breakwater and exterior breakwater southerly extension 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an inner basin 21 feet deep; (j) an entrance channel 21 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 11 July 1870, 14 June 1880, 3 March 1899, 25 July 1912, 2 March 1919 and 23 October 1962. See table 30-C. The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago. The deep draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep and uses a steel cellular design. Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government, pursuant to Public Law 98-63, approved 30 July 1983, Section 107 of the Public Law 97-88, and Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three docks, two for passenger excursion boats and one for cargo. The most important cargoes handled are sugar and nonmetallic minerals. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Breakwater surveys were performed by other COE at a cost of $4,228. A boundary survey was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,835. The lock operations contract was continued with International Research and Development, Inc. for $439,876. Other support for operations of the lock amounted to $28,673. A major rehabilitation study of the lock was performed by hired labor at a cost of $740. Plans and Specs of the lock electrical system were performed by hired labor at a cost of $203,922, and by other COE at a cost of $15,500. Lock supplies were purchased at a cost of $5,284. Boring Tests were performed by other COE at a cost of $6,920. Foundation Exploration were continued by contract at a cost of $6,242, and by hired labor at a cost of $1,077. Periodic Inspection activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $7,681 and by other COE at a cost of $532. Closeout of the dredging contract to remove 31,000 cubic yards of shoaling was completed at a cost of $7,723. E & D for a maintenace facility were performed at a cost of $131,198. Contract administration and project management for these activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,341 and $94,215, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $16,811,686, of which $4,342,822 was for new work. $11,142,264 for maintenance, and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928). Previous projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21 foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street. All dredging to within 20 feet of existing docks. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1899, 13 June 1902, 2 March 1907, and 24 July 1946. Portion of project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946 is in deferred-for-restudy category. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. River and Harbor Act of 24 July 1946 which provided improvement of channel is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: An Environmental Impact State- 30-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 ment was developed by hired labor at a cost of $152,738, and by other federal agency at a cost of $122. Under the Lake Michigan Water Diversion monitoring program, data collection for water control and water quality activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $299,752, by other Corps at a cost of $57,359, by contract at a cost of $67,128, and by other federal agency at a cost of $58,082. Close out of the dredging contract to remove 31,000 cubic yards of shoaling was completed at a cost of $7,723, and by: hired labor at a cost of $191. Project management was performed by hired labor at a cost of $51,001. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act. Head of navigation for deep draft vessels are North Avenue, 5.97 miles from deauthorized Michigan Avenue Bridge. Under Section 1142, PL 99-662, the Corps assumes responsibility for monitoring of the Diversion of Lake Michigan Water into the Illinois waterway. The Corps assumes full diversion accounting responsibility in FY 88. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $10,738,964 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $9,238,399 was for maintenance. 5. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926 and 14929). Previous projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Projects. Provides for (a) northerly rubble-mound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped concrete caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubble mound extention 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 4 March 1913, 2 March 1919, 20 March 1922, 3 July 1930, 30 August 1935, 26 August 1937, and 14 July 1960. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See the FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks for handling iron ore and limestone. Six docks for handling petroleum products. Three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: An Environmental Impact Statement associated with the confined disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $27,902, and by contract at a cost of $36,584. E & D for the confined disposal facility was continued by hired labor at a cost of $201,510. A research and development program was continued with the Waterway Experiment Station at a cost of $9,505. Project management for these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $18,193. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $13,356,776, of which $11,726,235 was Regular Funds, $1,618,041 was Public Works Funds, and $12,500 was Contributed Funds. Of the total cost, $4,848,980 was for new work and $8,507,796 was for maintenance. 6. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in LaPorte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Previous projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (i) an outer basin 12 feet deep; (j) an outer basin 8 feet deep; (k) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1889, 3 March 1905, 21 January 1927, 30 August 1935, and Section 107 of 14 July 1960 approved on 30 September 1966. See table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Detroit District'at a cost of $4,313. Water quality activities were performed by other Corps at a cost of $1,035, and by contract at a cost of $36,708. Maintenance dredging of 600 feet of the Entrance channel, and dredging of 21,000 cubic yards of polluted material from Trail Creek and placement into a land based government disposal area were performed by contractors at a cost of $773,350. Plans and specifications were performed by hired labor at a cost of $223,376. Contract administration and Project 30-4 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT management costs for these activities were $63,488 and $13,162, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $8,684,155 of which $1,287,057 was for new work ($1,256,257 Federal and $30,800 non-Federal funds), $5,778,428 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 7. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14904 and 14905). Previous projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Projects. Provides for (a) a northerly stone filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone filled double row steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone filled timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone filled double row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 13 feet deep; (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 13 June 1902, 3 July 1930, and 2 March 1945. See Table 30-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Condition surveys of the South Pier were performed by Detroit District at a cost of $870. Environmental dredging studies and monitoring activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $96,789. Inspection and reports were credited for $2,553. E & D for maintenance and repairs of the North Pier Breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,099. Collection and analysis of sediments within the approach channel was performed by contract at a cost of $5,000. A Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon study was performed by the Waterways Experiment Station at a cost of $25,000. E & D for the confined disposal facility was developed by hired labor at a cost of $34,853. FY 1985 dredging contract was credited $20,329. Project Management was performed by hired labor at a cost of $16,495. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is inactive. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $6,739,083, which $823,026 was for new work and $5,916,057 was for maintenance. 8. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Detroit District at a cost of $31,359 (see table 30-H for project cost). Aerial photos were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,519. Water quality studies and analyses were performed by hired labor at a cost of $7,462. Inspection and report were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,920. Project management for these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $28,616. 9. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year Costs of $154,917 were for: Training and Exercises $36,780 Management and Mobilization Planning $118,137 10. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Public Law 645, 86th Congress). Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1987 SBH Burns Waterway, IN Gary SBH, IN 1. I)oes not include $251,805 Contributed Funds. $239,5731 7,500 BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Portage County, at the mouth of Burns Ditch, approx. 35 miles southeast of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous projects. None. Existing Projects. Provides for (a) a rubble mound west breakwater 1,003 feet long; (b) a rubble mound north breakwater 678 feet long; (c) channel improvement 5,200 linear feet, 145 cubic yard dredged and used for beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facility. There are several marinas located at Burns Ditch. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish. Operations and results during period. Monitored the dredge material disposal west of the breakwater at a cost of $2,101. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987 were 30-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 $3,750,061, of which $3,747, 960 was for new work ($1,981,288 Federal and $1,766,672 non-Federal), and $2,101 for maintenance. Alteration of Bridges 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION See table 30-D. Beach Erosion Control 12. CASINO BEACH, CHICAGO, IL Location. Casino Beach and jetty are located within Jackson Park, Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The project consists of major rehabilitation of the existing jetty with steel sheet piling, placement of new fill stone and armor stone anda new concrete cap. Estimated project cost (1987) is $5,710,000 for new work, including Federal cost of $2,710,000 and an additional $3,000,000 to be contributed by the local interests. Project was authorized by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. Sec. 103 of the Water Resources Development act applies. The Chicago Park District has indicated by letter dated November 15, 1982 that they will be the local sponsor for the project. Operations and results during period. None. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and engineering has not been started. 13. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (see NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14095 and 14926). Existing Projects. Provides for 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of rip rap to maintain the full length of beach front at Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Pulbic Law 7-88 and Public Law 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. Plans and Specs were initiated for emergency repairs on the 13,000 feet existing revetment at a cost of $63,856. Emergency repairs of those areas where Lake Front Drive was threatened was performed by contract at a cost of $315,714. Contract administration and project management were performed by hired labor at a cost of $12,279 and $3,359, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total costs of existing project to 30 September 1987 were $1,055,208, of which $660,000 is for new work and $395,208 is for maintenance. 14. INDIANA SHORELINE, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment of approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, Indiana, requiring placement of 400,000 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment averaging about 70,000 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated Federal Cost (1987) for new work is $8,340,000. Local Cooperation. Sections 101 and 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. In letter dated March 27, 1984, the City of Michigan City stated its willingness to act as local sponsor in the event that a local sponsor may be required at a future date. Operations and results during the period. Prior year work by the National Park Service was credited for $1,016. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and engineering was initiated in fiscal year 1984. No additional work has been performed as the project is not in accordance with current administration policy. 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-E. 16. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended. Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1987 Langdon Park, Wilmette, IL $6,000 North Chicago, IL 4,952 Sunrise Park, Lake Bluff, IL 17,000 Highland Park, Park Ave., WTP, IL 5,000 30-6 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Flood Control 17. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 31 December 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of 7 March 1974. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all cost in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. Assurance of local cooperation for this act was approved on 31 July 1972. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non- Federal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: E & D for FY 86 and FY 87 Debris Removal project was performed by hired labor at a cost of $29,883. Real Estate costs were $1,804. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $1,958,772, of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds) and $1,726,888 was for maintenance ($1,337,899 Federal funds and $388,989 contributed funds). 18. LAKE MICHIGAN, EDGEWATER/ROGERS PARK COMMUNITIES, CHICAGO, IL Location. On the Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan in City of Chicago (Cook County) from Hollywood- Ardmore Beach to Chicago-Evanston border. Existing Project. The project includes construction of a series of rubble mound revetments at the following street ends: Granville, Rosemont, and North Shore Avenues (approximate total of 340 linear feet); offshore breakwaters, 100 feet long each, at Thorndale, Sherwin, Jarvis and Fargo Avenues and at Hartigan Park and Beach; 8,000 cubic yards beach nourishment placement at Rogers Park and Beach; a 40 foot seawall extension at Glenlake Avenue; and placement of 450 linear feet of rubble mound revetment at Berger Park. Planned construction activities at Devon Avenue were deleted at the local sponsor's request. The project was authorized by PL-99-190 Section 123 and amended by PL 99-591. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights of way, provide all required relocations, hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project, and contribute a minimum of twenty-five percent of the total project costs. The local sponsorship for Phase I (the completed activities) was shared by the City of Chicago and the Chicago Park District. The Chicago Park District will be the sole sponsor for the Phase 2 actions, currently under design. Operations and results during period. New Work: Construction of the first phase, which included breakwaters at Thorndale, Jarvis and Fargo Avenues, rubble mound revetments at Granville, Rosemont, and North Shore Avenues and the seawall extension at Glenlake Avenue, were completed. During the year a total of $1,457,879 ($1,174,867 Federal and $283,012 non-Federal) was expended for Phase I. Of this total, contract costs were $1,051,474 Federal and $203,035 non-Federal; in-house engineering and design costs were $44,453 Federal and $39,332 non-Federal; real estate management cost were $4,500 Federal and $2,500 non-Federal; supervision and administration costs were $74,440 Federal and $38,145 non-Federal. Construction of the rubble mound revetment at Berger Park was completed at a total cost of $333,397 ($251,670 Federal and $81,727 non-Federal). Of this total, contract costs were $228,493 Federal and $76,164 non-Federal; in-house engineering and design costs were $5,295 Federal and $1,465 non-Federal; real estate management costs were $1,000 Federal; supervision and administrtation was $16,882 Federal and $4,098 non-Federal. Plans and specifications were initiated for Phase II which includes breakwaters at Hartigan Park and Beach and Sherwin Avenue and beach nourishment at Rogers Park and Beach at a cost of $50,066 for contract, $23,032 for hired labor and $6,465 for real estate management services. A summary of total Federal costs by location is as follows: Fiscal Year Cost Project and Location 30 September 1987 Phase I - Completed Construction Lake Michigan-Granville Ave., Chicago, IL $ 76,641 Lake Michigan-Glenlake Ave., Chicago, IL 19,000 Lake Michigan-Thorndale Ave., Chicago, IL 301,320 ILake Michigan-Rosemont Ave., Chicago, IL 218,162 Lake Michigan,North Shore Ave.,Chicago, IL 84,366 Lake Michigan-Fargo Ave., Chicago, IL 223,900 ILake Michigan-Jarvis Ave., Chicago, IL 251,479 Lake Michigan-Berger Park, IL 251,670 $1,426,538 30-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Phase II- Currently under design Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park $ 79,563 (Devon & Sherwin Ave., Rogers and Hartigan Park), IL Condition at the end of the fiscal year. The existing project is 70 percent complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $1,983,637 for new work ($1,618,898 Federal and $364,739 contributed funds). 19. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. Little Calumet River is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois-Indiana state line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 22 miles of levees between the Illinois- Indiana state line and Cline Avenue; construction of 12 miles of levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 20 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 39 residential structures in Gary; modifying 4 miles of channel; modifying 4 highway bridges; construction of 14 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities, and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures., Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work is $56,600,000 and $20,200,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated June 22, 1981, the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission forwarded a resolution passed by the Commission affirming its understanding of the general items of local cooperation and indicating tentative willingness to act as local sponsor. By letter dated May 2, 1986, the Commission expressed its willingness to meet the non-Federal project sponsor requirements. The Commission is aware of the PL 99-662 cost-sharing requirements. The District Engineer believes that the Commission would have the ability to provide the local cooperation requirements for this project. Operations and results during period. New work: Continuation of Planning and Engineering was continued at a cost of $2,119. Advance Engineering and Design was initiated at a cost of $241,285. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1987 were $1,278,285 for new work. 20. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN (CADY MARSH DITCH) IN Location. Cady Marsh Ditch, a tributary to the Little Calumet River in Lake County, Indiana, is about 6 miles long and drains about 17 square miles. Existing Project. The project consists of channel improvements within the town of Griffith, Indiana and construction of a diversion from the ditch to the main stream of the Little Calumet River. Interior drainage would be part of the project. Local Cooperation. Sec. 103, Water Resources l)evelopment Act of 1986 applies. The town of Griffith, Indiana, has agreed to be the local sponsor of the project by a resolution of the town board of trustees unanimously adopted in June 1973 and reaffirmed by an unanimous resolution in November 1977. Informal contacts since then have indicated that the position of the town has not changed. Operation and results during period. None. Conditions at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction Planning and Engineering has not started. 21. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project consists of constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. The Water Resources I)evelopment Act of 1986, Section 401, also includes authorization to reimburse non-Federal interests 50 percentof the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork reservoir on the Middle Fork. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Brannockburn, the first reservoir to be constructed, will be built on the West Fork 12.7 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It will have a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acre-feet. Excavation for the reservoir will be approximately 48 feet deep. Approximately 700 feet of the West Fork channel will be improved and relocated for construction of the diversion structure. The second reservoir to be constructed, Reservoir 29A, will be built 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The reservoir floodwater storage capacity is 575 acre feet. Site 29A is located near the Village of' )eerfield in unincorporated Cook County. Two project features, the channel relocation and construction of two bridges, will be accomplished by private or local governmental interests prior to construction of the reservoir at Site 29A. The last reservoir to be constructed, Reservoir 15, will be located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The design floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. The excavated reservoir will be approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which will be about 15 feet deeper. Channel improvements and relocation of about 800 feet of the channel will be required for construction of the diversion structure at the north end of the reservoir. Estimated Federal cost (1987) for new work 30-8 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT is $16,600,000. An additional $8,200,000 will be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H. Doc 100-72 100th Congress, 1st session). Local Cooperation. By letter dated August 2, 1983, the Director of the Illinois Division of Water Resources has indicated that the State of Illinois will provide the lands required for the project. The Director also stated that the Lake County Forest Preserve District and the Village of Deerfield will operate and maintain the reservoirs. The Director has stated in conversations with the Chicago District that the State will be willing to participate in the cost sharing plan required by Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The local cooperation agreement for Reservoir 27 is scheduled to be executed in January 1988. Operation and results during period. New work: Continuation of Planning and Engineering was continued at a cost of $3,071. Advance Engineering and Design was initiated at a cost of $306,554. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Total costs of the project through September 30, 1987 were $1,175,553 for new work. 22. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir will be located in an unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservoir would be constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, recently constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1987) is $18,500,000 including Federal cost for new work of $13,900,000 and $4,600,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. Sec. 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated 12 April 1984, the Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago stated it would be the local project sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. Operations and results during period. New work: Advance Engineering and DI)esign was initiated at a cost of $39,587. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Total costs of the existing project to September 40, 1987 were $39,587 for new work. 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 30-F. 24. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation). Program Disaster Preparedness Rehabilitation Emergency Operations Advance Measures Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1987 $197,794 0 144,413 375,156 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act Public Law 526. 79th Congress). Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1987 Lake Michigan, Sunrise Park, Lake Bluff, IL $10,668 Lake Michigan, Lake Forest, IL 126,409 Lake Michigan, Berger Park, Cook Co., IL 120 Lake Michigan, Beverly Shores Road, IN 7,500 Lake Michigan, Long Beach, LaPorte Co., IN 7,681 Rosewood Beach Bath House, Highland Park, IL 195,081 Batavia, IL 1,500 Dune Acres, IN 8,900 Duneland Beach, LaPorte Co., IN 8,900 Lake Michigan, Lake Shore, Fullerton, IL 10,000 Lake Michigan, Temple Emanuel, IL 33,042 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1845, as amended. Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1987 Fox River, McHenry County, IL $ 63,937 Northfield, IL 7,500 Libertyville Estates, IL 56,370 Valleyview, IL 19,446 Wilmington, IL 139,750 Will Co., IL 3,300 General Investigations 25. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,731,656 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies Flood I)amage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Studies Special Studies Special Investigations Coordination Studies Supplemental Pre-authorization $ 0 124,780 240,038 151,647 33,000 26,000 186,006 26. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $130,000 were for: Flood Plain Management Services Hydrologic Studies $128,000 2,000 30-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 27. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Costs during the period were $4,175. For details, see section 14, 19 and 21 in text. 28. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $587,426. For details, see sections 19, 21 and 22 in text. Miscellaneous 29. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and the Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of the removal of approximately 900,000 cubic yards of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Estimated cost (1987) for new work is $3,750,000 Federal and $1,250,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 602(b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during period. None. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. No work has been initiated. 30-10 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total to Section September in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 30, 1987 1. Burns Waterway New Work: Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Calumet Harbor arid River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) 4. Chicago River, IL 5. Indiana Harbor, IN 6. Michigan City Harbor, IN (Contributed Funds) 7. Waukegan Harbor, IL Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 0 4,732 90,000 70,306 150,000 169,592 13,584,000 13,584,000 80,000 4,034,793 58,181 4,012,872 15,900 15,900 22,578,5671 22,578,5671 639,000 2,679,000 2,478,072 2,330,158 842,500 1,446,975 530,000 1,225,815 985,000 1,399,456 685,000 1,507,000 653,159 1,488,154 431,000 385,246 970,000 941,516 368,500 24,234,2742 337,350 24,164,4222 350,000 1,039,0013 237,488 926,4893 836,667 836,667 4,788,8274 4,788,8274 905,000 11,185,286 957,037 11,142,264 1,326,600 1,326,600 1,500,5655 1,500,5655 738,000 9,373,7376 694,096 9,238,3996 4,897,1487 9 4,897,1487 9 236,123 1,365,000 434,483 1,075,541 981,000 1,224,393 395,000 8,664,7788 293,094 8,507,7968 1,543,646 ' � 1,543,64610 20,000 18,685 0 1,315 25,000 1,292,000 5,957,512 22,484 1,115,432 5,778,428 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,800 30,800 823,02611 823,026" 566,671 504,344 507,000 309,456 380,000 753,002 300,000 6,067,98012 158,224 5,916,05712 30-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 30-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total to Section September in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 30, 1987 10. Burns Waterway New Work: Small Boat Approp. Harbor, IN Cost (Federal Funds) Maint.: Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. Cost 13. Indiana Dunes New Work: National Lake- Approp. shore, Beverly Cost Shores, IN Maint.: Approp. Cost 14. Indiana Shore- New Work: Line, IN Approp. Cost 17. Chicago River, IL New Work: North Branch Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 18. Lake Michigan- New Work: Edgewater/ Approp. Rogers Park Cost Communities, Chicago, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. Cost 19. Little Calumet New Work: River, IN Approp. Cost 21. North Branch New Work: Reservoir Approp. Chicago River, IL Cost 22. O'Hare Reservoir, New Work: Chicago, IL Approp. Cost 737,000 656,193 539,000 573,128 450,000 1,092,500 0 911,640 00 00 107,000 63,280 50,000 78,167 60,000 5,956 227,000 123,780 159,000 92,025 0 33,720 230,000 243,775 60,0( 74,41 450,0( 444,8 331,0( 383,64 270,000 107,727 135,000 603,227 9,9 c 00 0 99 66,000 137,171 00 96,898 15 26,458 0 121,000 0 113,972 00 360,000 34 466,267 00 379,000 37 390,216 0 1,987,000 239,573 1,981,288 30,000 30,000 2,101 2,101 89,172 1,766,672 251,805 1,766,672 0 660,000 571,486 660,000 467,500 467,500 395,208 395,208 0 107,000 -1,016 105,983 191,884 191,884 20,000 1,363,000 31,687 1,337,899 40,000 40,000 0 516,898 0 388,989 1,621,200 1,742,200 1,506,101 1,620,073 380,000 364,739 288,000 243,404 315,000 309,626 85,000 39,587 380,000 364,739 1,325,000 1,278,285 1,184,000 1,175,554 85,000 39,587 1. Includes $855,973 for previous projects 2. Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3. Includes $689,001 in settlement pursuant to decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue-dust. 4. Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5. Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6. Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7. Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8. Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9. Excludes $12,500 contributed funds. 10. Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 11. Includes $218,233 on previous projects. 12. Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 30-12 CHICAGO, IL DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935' 2 Aug. 30, 19351 2 Mar. 2, 19453 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 11, 1870 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 4, 1981 July 30, 1983 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths; North Breakwater, West Bulkhead, Approach Channel and Outer Harbor, East and West Harbor Arms. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 2 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide to 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basin 5, to a depth of 27 feet in earth and 28 feet in rock; deepen turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickle Plate) to permit dredging of full with of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 3 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater. Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 4 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning basins. Public Law, 89-298, H. Doc. 160, 88th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc. 277, H. 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 172, 54th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 349, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 494, 72d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 581, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 1562- 1567 Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790- 2791 H. Doc. 710, Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1303, 64th Cong., l st sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Section 107 of Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63 Specified in act. Specified in act. 30-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 30-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 July 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. Responsible for Monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 5 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 6 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863 and Annual Report, 1909, p. 709) H. Doc. 1294, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d sess.6 7 Section 1142, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Recommendations of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report, 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Report, 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, pp. 2264-2266. Annual Report, 1897, pp. 2903- 2904. Joint resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 30-14 CHICAGO IL, DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 30, 1966 Sec. 107 June 14, 1880 Aug. 3, 1882 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 4, 1981 July 30, 1983 Dec. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin to E Street bridge. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 7 of Text) Parallel piers and basins.9 Modified location of harbor entrance. Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers and enlarging inner basin. Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to the depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. CASINO BEACH, IL (See Section 12 of Text) Provides for shore protection repairs to the existing jetty. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IN BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 13 of Text) Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially constructed in 1973. Provides for operations and maintenance of the shore protection measures. LAKE MICHIGAN-EDGEWATER/ROGERS PARK COMMUNITIES, CHICAGO, IL (See Section 18 of Text) Provides for emergency bank stabilization, shore protection and flood control work. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch, permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st sess. through east pier. Detailed Project Report June 1965.8 Annual Report, 1880, p. 142 Annual Report, 1882, pp. 277, 2162. H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 501, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63. Public Law 99-190 amended. Sec. 401, Water Resource Development Act of 1986. 30-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 30-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, (CADY) MARSH DITCH), IN (See Section 20 of Text) Nov. 17, 1986 Provides for channel improvements and construction of a Sec. 401, Water Resources diversion from the ditch to the Little Calumet River. Development Act of 1986. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (see Section 17 and 21 of Text) Nov. 17, 1986 Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals H. Doc. 100-72, 100th Cong., for 50 percent of the costs for Techny and Mid-Fork reservoirs. 1st sess., Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Dec. 31, 1970 Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which River and Harbor Act. (Sect. 116) contribute to flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, CHICAGO, IL (See Section 22 of Text) Nov. 17, 1986 Provides for a 1,050 acre foot excavated reservoir. Sec. 401, Water Resources LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Development Act of 1986. (See Section 29 of Text) Nov. 17, 1986 Provides for removal of silt, acquatic growth and construction Sec. 602, Water Resources of silt traps. Development Act of 1986. 1. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 2 Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is an Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch). 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 30-16 CHICAGO, IL. DISTRICT EXISTING PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth in Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 3. Chicago Harbor, IL 4. Chicago River, IL 5. Indiana Harbor, IN 6. Michigan City Harbor, IN 7. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater Outer West Bulkhead Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Approach channel Outer Harbor River entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning basin No. 3 to turning basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension into Lake Calumet Turning basins 1, 3, and 5 Shore arm extension Exterior breakwater Exterior breakwater southerly ext. North inner breakwater South inner breakwater North pier Approach channel Channel and maneuver area Lock Inner basin Entrance channel Main branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin Northerly Breakwater Easterly Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor Entrance Channel Main Canal Turning Basin Lake George Branch Calumet River Branch Detached breakwater West pier East pier East breakwater Entrance channel Main channel Outer basin Trail Creek Trail Creek North breakwater and Shore Connection North pier and North Revetment South pier Entrance Channel Channel to inner basin Inner basin Anchorage Area 4.646 3,476 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 6,714 5,007 2,450 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,100 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 1,120 2,525 7,200 4,200 3,600 7,400 3,700 2,500 1,304 835 2,276 1,000 1,900 2,400 900 3,000 2,300 1,896 2,074 3,111 3,250 1,700 1,650 400 Varies 620 620 3,200 3,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 800 Varies 65-280 61-210 64-160 160-260 150-425 120-150 900 50-100 50 390 200 375-500 'Area of about 6 acres. 30-17 TABLE 30-C 30 28 27 27 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 29 28 27 22 22 22 22 18 18 8-12 86 22 1F 18 8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 30-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16, 1966, P.L. 89-670. TABLE 30-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 Lake Michigan--Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-F FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 TABLE 30-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended KANKAKEE RIVER, IL AND IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IL AND IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 53,136 TABLE 30-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 8 of Text) Date Reconnaissance or Condition Survey Project Conducted Cost Burns Waterway Harbor, IN Dec. 1986, Jan.-Feb. 1987 $15,293 Burns Harbor, IN June-July 1987 6,856 Indiana Harbor, IN Jan. 1987 148 Michigan City Harbor, IN Mar. 1987 2,804 Beverly Shores, IN Nov.-Dec. 1986, Jan. 1987 6,258 30-18 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT * The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 600 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 576.8 feet; Lake Erie, 568.6 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 571.7 feet. Elevations in feet are above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum-1955). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Alpena Harbor, MI ............................ 31-2 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI...........................31-2 3. Ashland Harbor WI...........................31-2 4. Big Bay Harbor, MI.........................31-3 5. Black River, (U.P.) MI ...................... 31-3 6. Bolles Harbor, MI................. ........... 31-3 7. Caseville Harbor, MI..........................31-3 8. Charlevoix Harbor, MI........................31-4 9. Cheboygan Harbor, MI ........................ 31-4 10. Clinton River, MI............................31-4 11. Detour Harbor, MI................. ........... 31-5 12. Detroit River, MI........................ ..... 31-5 13. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI............ 31-5 14. Forestville Harbor, MI.....................31-6 15. Fox River, WI.................... ........... 31-6 16. Frankfort Harbor, MI ......................... 31-7 17. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI.......31-7 18. Grand Marais Harbor, MI ..................... 31-8 19. Grand Marais Harbor, MN .................... 31-8 20. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI................ 31-8 21. Green Bay Harbor, WI ........................ 31-9 22. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI ..................... 31-9 23. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI......................31-9 24. Harrisville Harbor, MI ........................ 31-10 25. Holland Harbor, MI .......................... 31-10 26. The Inland Route, MI ....................... 31-10 27. Kenosha Harbor, WI ..................... 31-11 28. Kewaunee Harbor, WI ....................... 31-11 29. Keweenaw Waterway, MI .................... 31-11 30. Lake St. Clair, MI Channels...................31-12 31. Leland Harbor, MI.......................31-12 32. Lexington Harbor, MI .................. ...... 31-12 33. Little Lake Harbor, MI ...................... 31-13 34. Ludington Harbor, MI ....................... 31-13 Navigation (cont.) Page 35. Mackinac Island Harbor, MI ................... 31-13 36. Manistee Harbor, MI ......................... 31-14 37. Manitowoc Harbor, WI ....................... 31-14 38. Marquette Harbor, MI.......................31-15 39. Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI....... 31-15 40. Milwaukee Harbor, WI ....................... 31-15 41. Monroe Harbor, MI .......................... 31-16 42. Muskegon Harbor, MI ....................... 31-17 43. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ...................... 31-17 44. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ....................... 31-17 45. Pentwater Harbor, MI ........................ 31-17 46. Point Lookout Harbor, (Au Gres River) MI ...... 31-18 47 Portage Lake Harbor, MI ..................... 31-18 48 Port Austin Harbor, MI ...................... 31-18 49. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ...................... 31-18 50. Presque Isle Harbor, MI ...................... 31-19 51. Rouge River, MI .......................... 31-19 52. Saginaw River, MI..........................31-20 53. St. Clair River, MI................ .......... 31-20 54. St. Joseph Harbor, MI...................... 31-20 55. St. Marys River, MI.........................31-21 56. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI..... 31-22 57. Saxon Harbor, WI................ ........... 31-22 58. Sebewaing River, MI ........................ 31-23 59. Sheboygan Harbor, WI ....................... 31-23 60. South Haven Harbor, Mi......................31-23 61. Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI.................31-24 62. Two Harbors, MN...........................31-24 63. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ...................... 31-24 64. White Lake Harbor, MI.......................31-24 65. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys..........31-25 66. Other Authorized Navigation Projects........... 31-25 67. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization. .. 31-25 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Beach Erosion Control Page 68. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects...... .31-25 69. Emergency Shore Protection................... 31-25 70. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization................................31-26 71. Mitigation of Shore Damages .................. 31-26 Flood Control 72. Kawkawlin River, MI....................... 31-26 73. Paw Paw Lake, MI........................ 31-26 74. Red Run Drain & Lower Clinton River, MI ...... 31-27 75. Saginaw River, MI. ........................ 31-27 76. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI............... 31-28 77. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...31-28 78. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects......... 31-28 79. Flood Control Under Special Authorization...... 31-28 80. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters....... 31-29 Navigation 1. ALPENA HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Thunder Bay River which empties into Thunder Bay, Lake Huron. Harbor is 100 miles southeast of Cheboygan Harbor, MI. River has its source in Montmorency and Alpena Counties, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Previous project. For details see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1548 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a bay channel 200 feet wide and 25 feet deep from deep water in Thunder Bay to a point 300 feet lakeward of the Alpena Light; thence an entrance channel 24 feet deep, narrowing to a width of 100 feet at a point 700 feet upstream from the light; a river channel 100 feet wide, 23 feet deep to Second Avenue Bridge; thence 18.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide for 1,600 feet to upper limit of Federal project; a turning basin at upstream end of project, basin at river mouth 19 feet deep, trapezoidal in shape, with a maximum width of 700 feet including the channel width and a maximum length of 900 feet along the channel line, including removal of existing rubble breakwater; and a breakwater about 550 feet long paralleling lakeward side of new turning basin. Work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, which consists of the proposed turning basin and breakwater reconfiguration, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662--Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. 2. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. General Investigations Page 81. Surveys ................ ................. 31-30 82. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.........31-31 83. Collection and Study of Basic Data............. 31-31 Tables Table 31-A Cost & Financial Statement............. 31-32 Table 31-B Authorizing Legislation ................. 31-44 Table 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects..... 31-56 Table 31-D Not Applicable ............................ Table 31-E Other Authorized Flood Control Pr'ojects.. 31-57 Table 31-F Multiple Purpose Projects, including Power (St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project) ... 31-57 Table 31-G Deauthorized Projects .................. 31-58 Table 31-H Features of Existing Project ............. 31-59 Table 31-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams.......... 31-60 Table 31-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys.. ... 31-61 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $48,844. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $52,215, removing approximately 11,572 cubic yards of shoal material by hydraulic dredge. A rental contract was awarded and completed for emergency repairs to the north and south piers and revetments at a cost of $83,600. Government furnished supplies and materials were provided at a cost of $50,632. Repairs to navigation.structures were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $57,411. Engineering and design for repair to north and south piers and revetments was performed at a cost of $48,482. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $45,904. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Future maintenance of the harbor will be based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in good condition with some sections in need of major repair. Total cost at the end of FY for existing project was $1,641,905. 3. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,652. Breakwater repairs were performed by hired labor using the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $333,721. Supervision and administration were performed at a cost of $11,873. 31-2 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $4,666,239, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $2,970,594 for maintenance. 4. BIG BAY HARBOR MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, MI, and 38 miles easterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for two converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,952. A dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $99,241, removing approximately 17,300 cubic yards of dredged material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $30,689. Project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. A contract for repair of breakwater, damaged by storms, was completed in August 1969. Total cost to end of FY was $1,555,742, of which $390,432 was for new work and $1,165,310 for maintenance. 5. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,410. Project was completed in June 1958. A triangular-shaped rock shoal 50 feet wide at easterly end extends along southerly side of channel. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $961,773, of which $383,350 was for new work and $578,423 for maintenance. 6. BOLLES HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek, 7 miles southwest of Monroe, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an access channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $33,976. Minor repairs to the diked disposal area were performed by hired labor at a cost of $300. The contract for repair of Dike Disposal Facility awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $69,857. Engineering and design during construction cost $1,537. Engineering and design for dredging was completed at a cost of $20,686. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY in the amount of $316,972. No work was performed this FY. Supervision and administration cost $17,546. The existing project was completed in 1970 (Adequate depths exist over the project length except for the upstream 800 feet). Total costs to the end of FY were $2,809,387, of which $426,413 was for new work ($255,000 contributed funds) and $2,382,974 for maintenance. 7. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI. Location. At mouth of Pigeon River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 17 miles southwest of Port Austin, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14860.) Existing project. A small craft harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater protected channel extending from the 10-foot contour in Saginaw Bay into Pigeon River. Project depths are 10 and 8 feet. For additional details see page 1320 of Annual Report for 1963. Widening river channel from 50 to 60 feet for about 1,000 feet, with widening to 80 feet in upper 300-foot reach, is considered inactive. Estimated (1963) cost of this portion of project is $30,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Complete public boating facilities constructed by State and local agencies are available in addition to privately owned and operated marinas. 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $17,898. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed at a cost of $195,799, removing approximately 27,828 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $43,409. The existing project was completed in 1964 except for the inactive portion of the project. Total costs to end of FY were $1,683,614 of which $587,314 was for new work (including $293,657 contributed funds) and $1,096,300 for maintenance. 8. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $652,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $69,111. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed this FY by hired labor at a cost of $502. A contact was awarded for South Revetment repairs, Sections G & H, in the amount of $214,588. No work was performed this FY. Engineering and design for repair of South Pier and Revetment Sections A, F, G & H was performed at a cost of $167,120. Real estate and supervision cost $14,661. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. A controlling depth of 18 feet is available throughout the entire project, except for minor shoaling along the channel limits. Total costs to end of FY were $7,705,049 of which $180,623 was for new work, $6,395,030 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352) and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 9. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14881 and 14886.) Previous project. For details see page 1956 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer end of west pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from this bridge to the lock in Cheboygan River; a turning basin 21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 feet long on east side of existing project channel just below East First Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Project is 12,000 feet long, of which about 6,000 feet are in Straits of Mackinac. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum products. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available. These facilities satisfy existing commerce and vessel traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $11,099. Total costs to end of FY were $1,375,576 of which $504,236 was for new work and $871,340 for maintenance. 10. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its source in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area 31-4 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private piers and wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $79,661. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by the Derrickbarge HURON at a cost of $10,000. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility was completed at a cost of $220,633. A contract for construction of a confined disposal facility was awarded in the amount of $1,495,000. No work was performed this FY. Surveys and layouts, supervision and administration cost $16,489. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total costs to end of FY were $2,354,741, of which $549,798 (including $289,752 contributed funds) was for new work, and $1,804,943 for maintenance. 11. DETOUR HARBOR, MI Location. On the west side of DeTour Passage, about 2 miles upstream from Lake Huron. The passage forms the mouth of the St. Marys River which connects Lakes Huron and Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14882.) Existing project. Provides for small boat harbor and harbor of refuge by dredging a 10-foot deep entrance channel and providing an 8-foot deep access channel protected by a 1,305-foot breakwater. The total estimated (October 1981) project cost is $2,650,000; the Federal cost is $1,400,000 and the non-Federal cost is $1,250,000, which is a cash contribution. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public docking, landing, parking and sanitary facilities are being provided by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,320. Engineering and design began this FY for breakwater repairs at a cost of $10,011. Existing project is complete. Total cost to end of FY is $2,581,453, of which $22,107 was for maintenance and $2,559,346 for new work. 12. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 31-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 571.7 and 568.6 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum--1955.) (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated 1978 Federal cost of new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $159,300,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968, is considered inactive. Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, support of water control center, environmental studies, master plan, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,124,399. Studies continued under extended navigation season at a cost of $81,038. Maintenance of disposal areas by hired labor cost $140,344. Location and removal of obstructions cost $1,507,016. A contract for dredging East Outer and Lower Livingstone Channels awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $568,016, removing 65,000 cubic yards of material. A contract for repair of diked disposal facility, Pte. Mouillee, was awarded this FY and is approximately 94% complete at a cost of $468,596. Engineering and design for repair to disposal area cost $7,731. Other engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $80,555. The contract awarded last FY for construction of Wetland Marsh under Section 150 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1967 was completed at a cost of $88,562. Engineering during construction, surveys, supervision and administration for this contract cost $53,928. The State of Michigan contributed $89,344 of the above Section 150 cost. Work under the diked disposal program cost $54. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. All work in Trenton Channel is complete. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 31-H. Costs for existing project were $193,021,801, of which $74,780,103 was for new work ($72,969,197 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds) and $118,241,698 ($292,344 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance. 13. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet in inner channels. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel is inactive. Estimated cost (1967) of this portion was $577,000. 31-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel, and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. Estimated cost (Oct. 86) is $12,600,000; which includes $6,756,000 Federal and $5,844,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $2,259,000. The estimated cash contribution of $2,259,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $902,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one are privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: The contract awarded in FY 85 for rehabilitation of North and South Piers Sections O, N-1, N and M is approximately 99% complete at a cost this FY of $3,722,670. Engineering and design, real estate, supervision and inspection cost $207,497. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, master plan, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $307,239. Operation and maintenance of the museum was performed by Government forces at a cost of $325,702. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and pier was performed at a cost of $133,617. Repairs to breakwater and seawalls were performed by the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $312,976. Safety maintenance was performedby hired labor at a cost of $15,974. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $38,810. An adjustment of $11,110 and 23,503 cubic yards was made to a maintenance dredging contract awarded in FY 85 and completed last FY. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed with 130,824 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $799,999. A contract for maintenance dredging of contaminated materials was awarded this FY in the amount of $1,390,368. The contract is approximately 10% complete with 19,899 cubic yards of material removed at a cost of $177,999. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration were performed at a cost of $180,858. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which is inactive. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $66,211,055, of which $16,109,258 was for new work, $39,106,172 for maintenance, and $10,995,625 for rehabilitation. 14. FORESTVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On southeasterly shore of Lake Huron, in Sanilac County, about 47 miles northerly from the head of St. Clair River at Port Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two breakwaters having an aggregate length of 2,240 feet with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about six acres and eight feet deep; and a flared entrance channel ten feet deep decreasing in width to 160 feet through the breakwaters. Existing project was authorized by August 13, 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 183, 90th Congress, 1st Session, contains latest published map). This project was never funded and was subsequently deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662-Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X (See Table 31-G for list of deauthorized projects). 15. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI, and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and othewise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513,424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. River and Harbor Act of 1925 portion of project is considered inactive and excluded from cost estimate. Estimated cost (1924) of this portion is $2,886,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. 31-6 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 31-I on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, boundary monumentation, miscellaneous inspections and reports, safety training and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $53,083. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $129,752. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $693,228. Two tainter gates and seals were reconditioned at Menasha Dam at a cost of $13,391. Fox River O.S.H.A. Program and major miscellaneous items of supply totaled $9,063. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $222,176. Engineering and design costs were $18,786. Supervision and administration costs were $111,954. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 31-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Existing locks and dams are generally in fair to good condition. Costs for existing project to end of FY were $3,753,334 for new work and $38,106,494 for operation and maintenance; a total of $41,859,828. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 16. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters and to a maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters; thence to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outerbasin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $34,018. Repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $108,599. Repairs to safety features were performed at a cost of $1,094. Supervision and administration cost $7,012. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are in good condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $9,861,174, of which $1,955,159 (including $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $7,631,239 for maintenance, and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 17. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan. 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct. 86) is $17,800,000; which includes $10,400,000 Federal and $7,400,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legistlation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: 31-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $3,460,000. The estimated cash contribution of $3,460,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $1,386,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $144,381. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed repairs to the N. Revetment Section F; N. Pier Sections A, A-2, and B; S. Pier Sections H, and H-l; and S. Revetment Sections L, S, and T, at a cost of $153,563. Repairs to safety features were performed at a cost of $4,000. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,172. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging at a cost of $160,733, removing approximately 22,400 cubic yards of shoal material from the outer harbors. This contract was also for beach nourishment. A contract was awarded and completed this FY to remove platform and trestle in the diposal area in the amount of $40,485. Another contract was awarded and completed to cap off part of the confined disposal facility in the amount of $75,085. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $88,636. Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $36,036. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $45,354. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost for Section 111 was $11,218. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are generally in good condition; repairs are made on an as needed basis. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $25,942,459, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $23,670,377 for maintenace, and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 18. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 93 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a channel protected by parallel piers and for closing natural entrance channel with a pile dike. Project depths are 18 feet between piers and 20 feet in lake approach. For additional details see page 1449 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation). The uncompleted portion of the project, which consists of widening the inner portion of the channel from 250 to 300 feet, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662--Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. 19. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet near entrance and 8 feet in small-boat basin. For additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legilsation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $23,896. An adjustment of -$45,227 was made on the contract for repair of the East and West Breakwater completed last FY. Supervision and administration cost $17,511. Existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $3,643,950. 20. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilties. Several privately owned fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,466. A dredging contract was awarded and completed at a cost of $71,045, removing approximately 10,450 cubic yards of 31-8 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT shoal material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $14,073. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $1,928,274. 21. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI, and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1986) is $3,960,000 Federal and $1,436,000 non-Federal which includes $1,320,000 local contribution. Section 601c of the Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $264,061. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $126,426. The contract for maintenance dredging the Bay Section awarded last FY was completed removing approximately 52,791 cubic yards of material at a cost of $540,000. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the Inner Section. The contract is 25% complete with approximately 28,280 cubic yards being removed at a cost of $300,000. A contract for maintenance dredging the Outer Bay portion was awarded in the amount of $824,720. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $154,354. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $205,760. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. The total cost of the existing project was $33,890,241, of which $18,005,884 were regular funds and $940,800 Public Works funds; $9,946,395 for new work and $23,943,846 for maintenance. The new work costs do not include $100,000 contributed funds. 22. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge; protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,284. In connection with the Section 111 project, an adjustment of -$647 was made to a monitoring contract for sediment samples. The existing project was completed in 1965. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $1,576,538, of which $1,092,366 was for new work and $484,172 for maintenance. 23. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $53,921. A contract was awarded this FY for repairs to south revetment in the amount of $214,588. No work was performed this FY. An adjustment of $9,845 was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering and design for repair of main breakwater was performed at a cost of $105,823. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $83,011. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of FY were $7,917,823, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $6,522,721 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 24. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft; considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $15,069. A contract for maintenance dredging the harbor was awarded this FY and is approximately 99% complete at a cost of $170,492, removing approximately 48,213 cubic yards of material. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $29,582. Condition surveys and environmental studies in conjunction with the Section 111 project cost $21,926. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $18,625. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $1,336. Total costs of project to end of FY were $3,688,325, of which $2,639,392 was for new work (includes $287,454 contributed funds) and $1,048,933 for maintenance. 25. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of annual Report for 1915 and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. Widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa is in an active category as a result of a reclassification recommendation approved by the Office of the Chief of Engineers on August 20, 1981. Estimated cost of this portion (1986) is $2,650,000, Federal and $1,244,000 non-Federal which includes $890,000 local contribution. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Work authorized by Act of 1954 is subject to condition that work on either or both proposed modifications may be undertaken by the United States provided local interests furnish all lands except 1.5 acres of Federal lands, easements, rightsof- way, and suitable spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance; remove buildings and other structures, except existing revetments, from lands to be furnished; and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $147,288. Repairs to North and South breakwater connection Section Q were performed this FY by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $64,621. Repairs to safety features were performed at a cost of $6,633. A contract for maintenance dredging of the outer harbor was completed at a cost of $98,909, removing approximately 19,046 yards of dredge material. This contract was also for beach nourishment. An adjustment of -$10,979 was made to the contract completed last FY for maintenance dredging. Engineering and design for repair of South Revetment, Sections J thru P, was performed at a cost of $102,971. Engineering, design, real estate, supervision and administration cost $62,843. Condition surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $35,301. An adjustment of -$3,659 was made to the contract completed last FY for mitigation of shore damage. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $40,474. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $1,977. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Costs of existing project to end of FY were $1,392,827 for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $16,045,339 regular funds for maintenance, and $502,452 regular funds for rehabilitation, for a total of $17,940,618. 26. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargo-handling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks 31-10 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the Village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at the water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the Village of Alanson at a cost of $66,644. In 1987 the lock was operated from April 25 through May 1 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; from May 2 through September 30 it was open from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $18,523. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total costs to end of FY were $3,609,522, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds) and $2,691,300 for maintenance. 27. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $195,000 non-Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fishing wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Financial closeout of the terminated Section 107 project at Kenosha, WI, cost $1,072 in FY 87. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $63,776. Repairs to Detached Breakwater-Section H and Confined Disposal Facility Filter Cells were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $201,067. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging and repair of confined disposal facility was completed at a total cost of $841,078. (Maintenance dredging cost $414,275 removing approximately 38,200 cubic yards of material. Repair of confined disposal facility cost $426,803.) Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration were performed at a cost of $100,098. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which will be completed after rehabilitation of the piers. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. The north pier is in excellent condition. The south pier and breakwater are in generally good condition. The total costs of the existing project to end of FY were $10,764,193, of which $7,907,899 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $988,969 being for new work, $8,504,949 for maintenance, and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work costs do not include $3,000 contributed funds. 28. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021, Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000-July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, master plan, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $37,326. Minor repairs to diked disposal area were performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,912. Repairs to CDF were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $8,642. Engineering and design for repair to N. Stub Pier Section A was completed at a cost of $74,587. A contract was awarded for repair of the N. Stub Pier Section A in the amount of $784,200. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $29,606. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outer end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $8,031,479, of which $758,333 was for new work ($183,021 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief funds) $6,655,846 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) 31-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, Public Law 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662-Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $60,411. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $804. The Derrickbarge COLEMAN performed breakwater repair at a cost of $477,670. Engineering and design for major repair of Section F, North Revetment to be performed by contract next FY continued at a cost of $54,245. The contract for repair of E. and W. Revetments awarded last FY is approximately 94% complete at a cost this FY of $2,050,000. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $134,606. The contract awarded last FY for construction of a confined disposal facility is 81 % complete at a cost this FY of $799,999.. Engineering and design during construction, supervision and administration for Dike Disposal cost $75,856. Active portion of the project is complete. Breakwaters are in generally good condition except for a weakness occurring in about 300 feet of substructure of breakwater lower entrance, and major storm damage repairs needed for stone-covered portions of breakwater at upper entrance. Mooring pier at Lily Pond requires repairs to halt movement and permit dredging to project depth adjacent thereto. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $21,615,625, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, and $15,641,484 for maintenance. 30. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI CHANNELS Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, support '" Water Control Center, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $99,496. Environmental studies in connection with the extended navigation season cost $1,487. Minor disposal area maintenance, supervision and administration cost $4,943. Total costs for existing project at the end of FY were $20,035,875, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,010,582 regular funds and $1,008,595 public works funds) and $12,360,518 for maintenance. 31. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $13,291. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed this FY by hired labor at a cost of $1,843. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging this FY removing approximately 16,630 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $68,614. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $16,411. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. The total costs to end of FY were $2,710,896, of which $1,027,089 was for new work, $1,613,129 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 32. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost for new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. 31-12 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, monitoring, inspections and reports and minor safety maintenance were performed by Government forces at a cost of $17,960. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $169,975. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $5,036. Condition surveys, monitoring and environmental studies under Section 111 mitigation were performed at a cost of $72,618. Engineering, design, supervision and administration under Section 111 were performed at a cost of $19,690. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $4,055,710, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $948,518 for maintenance. 33. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project site consists of a public dock built by State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $15,823. The design deficiency study continued at a cost of $56,369. An adjustment of -$66,126 was made in cost for maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY for $134,427 with approximately 26,700 cubic yards of shoal material removed. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $25,750. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. An analysis for the Design Deficiency Report was submitted to North Central Division in March 1978 and approved. A design deficiency letter report and Environmental Assessment were drafted this FY. Total cost at end of FY is $3,526,736. 34. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwater, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total costs for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Has been complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $53,567. Minor repairs to the navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,397. Contract awarded last FY for repairs to N. Revetment and S. Breakwater is approximately 98% complete at a cost this FY of $1,566,000. Engineering and design during construction for repair to the North Revetment and South Breakwater was performed at a cost of $3,900. Engineering and design for repair to the North Revetment Sections K, J-1 and S, and South Breakwater Sections D and E cost $46,933. An adjustment of -$25,000 was made to this project due to a claim by the Corps against North American Marine, Inc. to recover costs incurred when the North Revetment was damaged by the M/V Roger M. Keyes. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $110,598. Under the Section 111 program, surveys, monitoring, supervision and administration cost $40,390. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $19,733,092, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $10,842,977 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 35. MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On the southeast side of Mackinac Island which lies just east of the Straits of Mackinac, the connecting waterway between Lakes Michigan and Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for the construction of two breakwaters 910 and 950 feet long from Mission and Biddle Points, respectively. The breakwaters are of rubblemound construction. Estimated (1969) Federal cost for new work is $230,000, excluding $105,000 to be contributed by local interest. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consists of private piers used by small commercial vessels and light-draft passenger ferry boats. Facilities for recreational craft are provided by the State dock 31-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 which is open to all on equal terms. These facilities satisfy current traffic requirements, however, they are usually hard pressed during the annual Chicago to Mackinac-Port Huron to Mackinac sailboat races. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Governemnt forces at a cost of $5,985. Engineering and design for repair of the rubblemound breakwater was performed at a cost of $48,241. A contract was awarded for repair of rubblemound, east breakwater in the amount of $1,763,300. No work was performed this FY. Real estate, supervision and administration cost $5,390 The existing project was completed in 1967. Total costs to end of FY were $487,198, of which $334,089 ($105,004 Contributed Funds) was for new work and $153,109 for maintenance. 36. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and miscellaneous reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $72,810. Repairs to safety features were performed at a cost of $8,292. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed repairs to north breakwater Sections A-1, and B-E, south breakwater Sections B, B-l, and M-O, south pier Sections J and K, and N revetment section H at a cost of $172,875. Engineering and design for repair of the south breakwater Sections M, N, O, and 0-1 cost $105,841. A contract awarded last FY for repair of the north revetment was completed at a cost of $378,149. Supervision and administration cost $46,479. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project from regular funds to end of FY were $9,982,019, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $5,911,333 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 37. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and the non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1970) at $1,150,000, Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension reaffirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $14,200; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance:. Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $41,879. Repairs to exterior dikes were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $160,649. Maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $15,914. Engineering and design for repair of S. Breakwater Sections B and F-l continued at a cost of $53,196. Engineering and design for repairs to the confined disposal facility cost $648. Supervision and administration cost $24,874. Existing project is completed except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification is inactive. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The 31-14 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. The breakwater, completed in 1910, is in generally fair condition. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Cost of existing project to end of FY was $3,959,991 for new work (includes $1,911,076 contributed funds) and $8,280,204 for maintenance; a total of $12,240,195. 38. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $22,773. Repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor using the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $159,161. Supervision and administration cost $3,415. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $3,740,328, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $1,991,678 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 39. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of the Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects are $221,053 Federal and $50,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by City of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $20,367. Minor repairs to S. Breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $937. Supervision and administration cost $2,471. Engineering and design for site selection of a confined disposal facility for toxic level hazardous waste dredged material from the turning basin continued at a cost of $125,429. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. The costs of the existing project to end of FY were $570,238 for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $2,518,243 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation; a total of $4,440,333. 40. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,937,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was placed in the inactive category in June 1973. Estimated costs are $119,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,170,000 (July 1972) non-Federal for this portion. Uncompleted portion 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except inactive portion of 1945 Act. Act of August 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: Environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $10,197. The contract for major rehabilitation of the North Pier and North Breakwater is approximately 99% complete at a cost this FY of $632,656. Engineering and design dur- 31-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 ing construction cost $72,418. Engineering and design for Phase II of the rehabilitation project was completed at a cost of $61,123. A contract was awarded for major rehabilitation Phase II of the North Breakwater in the amount of $2,383,440. The contract is approximately 9% complete at a cost this FY of $280,000. Engineering and design for Phase III of the rehabilitation project cost $29,196. Supervision and administration was performed at a cost of $143,962. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $222,073. An adjustment of -$3,896 was made for the General Design Memorandum for major rehabilitation of the Inner North Revetment and the detached North Breakwater. Hired labor maintenance of the diked disposal facility cost $34,622. Repair to S. Breakwater - Section E was performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $214,141. Engineering, design for breakwater, and revetment repair cost $8,116. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging and CDF repairs was completed this FY. Maintenance dredging was completed at a cost of $1,522,921 removing 307,656 cubic yards of material. CDF repairs were completed at a cost of $549,457. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $205,722. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for inactive portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humbolt Avenue. In recent years, some repairs were completed on the north shore breakwater; however, additional repairs are required and are scheduled to be accomplished in Phase III of the major rehabilitation effort underway. South breakwater and shore connections are in generally good condition. Costs of existing project were $8,231,024 for new work, $33,686,606 for maintenance, and $8,251,651 for rehabilitation; a total of $50,169,281. 41. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to City of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 �authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200 foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between the existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated cost (Oct. 86) is $143,600,000; which includes $56,114,000 Federal and $87,486,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. for 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $18,705,000. The estimated cash contribution of $18,705,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,482,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. c. The confined dike area construction is a non-Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $68,000,000. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $75,181. Maintenance of the disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $102,242. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $65,425. An equitable adjustment to this contract was made in the amount of $259,575 due to an underrun of more than 15% below the estimated contract quantity. Another contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed with 129,766 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $967,029. Engineering and design for repair of confined disposal facility - Cell #1 to be performed by contract next FY cost $41,946. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $66,377. Final contract cost for construction of a confined disposal facility completed in FY 85 was $29,993. An adjustment of $5,442 was made to the contributed funds for engineering and design of the confined disposal facility. Engineering during construction, supervision and administration cost $4,888. 31-16 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Total costs to end of FY were $54,007,458, of which $987,340 was for new work (including $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe), and $53,020,118 for maintenance including $166,667 contributed funds. ($125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company.) 42. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14934.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: An adjustment of $43,992 was made to the contract last FY for major rehabilitation of the North and South Revetment. Engineering and design cost $10,940. Supervision and administration cost $29,153. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $63,368. Safety maintenance and repairs to Navigation Structures were performed at a cost of $12,168. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $1,705. Condition surveys and environmental monitoring was performed in conjunction with the authorized Section 111 project at a cost of $40,619. Engineering, design, real estate, supervision and administration cost $17,771. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs to end of FY were $24,301,564, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $7,468,791 for maintenance, and $13,815,663 for rehabilitation. 43. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $5,897. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $45. Engineering, design, real estate, supervision and administration cost $4,115. Existing project is complete. Total costs at end of FY were $4,268,096, of which $1,285,716 was for new work and $2,982,380 for maintenance. Contributed funds were in the amount of $1,186,467. 44. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior. It consists of improvement of mouth of Ontonagon River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A total of $48,354 was spent in FY 87 on two studies: $42,635 for the Section 205 Draft Definite Project Report, and $5,719 to closeout the terminated Section 103 study. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $32,163. Repairs to the East and West breakwaters were performed by hired labor using the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $65,186. The General Design Memorandum for major repairs to the North and South Piers and Revetments was performed at a cost of $23,210. An adjustment of -$959 was made on a dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $260,680 removing 54,101 cubic yards of material. Engineering, and design for maintenance dredging to be performed by contract next FY cost $15,193. Other engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $25,524. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $9,033,267, of which $922,822 was for new work and $8,110,445 for maintenance. 45. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) 31-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $31,371. Repairs to north and south piers were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $86,990. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY removing approximately 20,784 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $80,572. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $23,571. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project at end of FY were $3,421,732, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $3,241,833 for maintenance. 46. POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2-,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long, 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $20,517. Contract awarded in FY 85 for repair of East and West Breakwater was completed this FY with a cost adjustment of-$2,644. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $17,611. Existing project was completed in 1974. Total costs to end of FY were $5,733,188, of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $3,090,604 for maintenance. 47. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,664. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. The structures are generally in fair condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $1,821,200. 48. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron "at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of Au Sable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of docks near mouth of Bird Creek and a State-owned dock inside breakwater. Facilities accommodate recreational craft and are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: While only $5 was spent this FY, supplemental FY 87 funds were provided in late Sept. 87 to initiate obtaining a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for an additional breakwater authorized by the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1987, Public Law 100-71, dated July 11, 1987. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,040. An adjustment of -$24,999 was made for contract awarded FY 85 for breakwater access. Liquidated damages were assessed the contractor due to late completion, adjusting supervision and administration cost to -$42,896. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $2,901,203, of which $1,179,087 was for new work (includes $172,100 contributed funds) and $1,722,110 for maintenance. 49. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and 31-18 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater additions. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, were performed by Government forces at a cost of $27,000. A contract for maintenance dredging and beach nourishment was awarded in the amount of $276,282. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $24;263. Condition surveys, inspections and reports under Section 111 mitigation were performed at a cost of $42,649. Engineering, design, supervision and administration under Section 111 mitigation cost $2,829. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $4,328,722 (includes $2,120,593 contributed funds). 50. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior at Marquette, MI. It is an identation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet at inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $29,727. Repairs to the breakwater, riprap concrete portion, were performed by hired labor using the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $147,187. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $80. Project authorized by earlier Acts was completed in 1939. A contract for harbor deepening authorized by 1960 Act was completed in April 1962, except for a section where rocks were encountered in southeast portion of harbor. Rock removal has been accomplished intermittently by hired labor and the project is completed. Breakwater is in good condition. A Section 111 project was approved by Chief of Engineers in October 1981 providing a rock groin, beach restoration and nourishment program at vicinity of Shiras Park and 3,000 feet west of park. Total costs of existing project to end of FY are $2,227,888. 51. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of City of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation chanel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, master plan, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $147,280. Maintenance of the disposal area by hired labor cost $7,854. The contract for repairs to the confined disposal facility at Grassy Island awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $1,887,920. A contract was awarded for repair of the diked disposal facility at Pte. Mouillee and is approximately 94% complete at a cost of $147,977. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY with approximately 22,454 cubic yards of material removed at a cost of $338,061. Engineering and design for CDF repairs cost $2,241. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging cost $35,251. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $91,827. An adjustment of $5,580 was made for engineering and design of the contract for construction of a Wetland Marsh under Section 150 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1967. Supervision and administration for Section 150 cost $9,434. Supervision and administration for dike disposal program cost $12. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $33,581,610, of which $675,251 was for new work and $32,906,359 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended for new work from Emergency Relief Act Funds. 31-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 52. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep just downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $502,870. A contract for maintenance dredging the bay section was completed at a cost of $668,536, removing approximately 245,000 cubic yards of material. Another contract for maintenance dredging the mouth and upper river was awarded and completed at a cost of $1,104,241. Approximately 152,100 cubic yards of dredged material was removed. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $10,122. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $137,077. Engineering and design for construction of a diked disposal area for upper Saginaw was continued at a cost of $149,558. The selected site at Crow Island State Game Area was rejected and site selection resumed. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total costs for existing project to end of FY were $69,401,523, of which $14,930,727 was for new work and $54,470,796 for maintenance. 53. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair, 576.8 and 571.7 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec; International Great Lakes Datum 1955. (See Tables 31-B and 31-H for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non-Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the Middle Channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, support of water control centers, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $165,884. Environmental studies in connection with the extended navigation season cost $158,694. Location and removal of obstructions cost $507,599. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded this FY and is approximately 46.6% complete with 92,233 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $659,999. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $27,491. Existing project is complete. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $35,538,801, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $16,325,555 for maintenance. 54. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88th Congress declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and 31-20 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety and environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $105,518. Repairs to North Revetment and N. and S. Piers were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $86,998. Hired labor cost for maintenance of disposal area and safety features was $6,450. An adjustment of -$23,587 was made to the contract for dredging completed last FY. A contract was awarded and completed for dredging the Inner Harbor, Outer Channel, and excavation and repair of Whirlpool Interim Disposal Site, removing approximately 27,547 cubic yards of material at a cost of $168,544. Excavation of approximately 18,695 cubic yards of existing material and dike repair at Whirlpool Interim Disposal Site cost $99,744. Engineering and design for repair of North Pier Section A, South Pier Sections H and N and North Revetment Section B was performed at a cost of $109,667. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $80,208. Engineering and design for confined disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $37,592. Under the Section 111 Program, $298,450 was expended to complete a contract awarded last FY for beach nourishment. A contract awarded this FY to place sand on the beach is approximately 32% complete at a cost of $89,683. Monitoring, surveys, engineering, supervision and administration cost $132,301. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs of existing project to end of FY were $15,425,647, of which $1,301,372 was for new work, $13,162,059 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 55. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Province of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200 foot by 110 foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 31-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 600 feet and at upstream side of locks is 577.8 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Estimated (1973) cost for new work is $164,630. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 86) is $149,240,000 Federal and $57,400,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as follows: a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/ demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; c) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage and other utilities, structures and improvements made necessary by the project (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor costs.); d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $57,400,000. The estimated cash contribution of $57,400,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $23,000,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/dem- 31-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 olition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and Village of Detour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, was out of service) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 285 days (from 1 October 1986 through 30 September 1987). During that period, a total of 11,134 vessels, aggregating 78,920,311 short tons of freight and 273,151 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe and Davis Locks. Cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks for this FY was $4,796,432 which included $81,554 for extended season operation and maintenance and $90,397 for operation and maintenance of the Gatelifter PAUL BUNYAN. Powerhouse and equipment: Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained at a cost of $856,035 during the FY which includes a deducation of $35,048 for interdepartmental electricity sold but not paid for. Other operation and care items: Building and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operation studies, real estate, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $898,224 which includes a custodial, snow removal and grounds upkeep contract for $262,507. Security measures were performed at a cost of $606,625 which included a service contract for $565,673. Janitorial service of the facilities was done by a contract at a cost of $52,097. A study on winter and extended navigation season, ice measurements, and weather monitoring was performed at a cost of $429,805. The Soo Harbor ice boom was installed and removed at a cost of $33,083. Work was done on the Compensating Gates at a cost of $167,321. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor with U.S. Derrickboats NICOLET and HARVEY at a cost of $1,009,651 including engineering and design. A total of $125,279 has been expended this FY in operating and update of an electronic survey sweeping system. Other miscellaneous items: A contract was awarded for repair of the Davis Lock Dewatering Gates in the amount of $542,300. No funds were expended on this contract this FY. Engineering and design in connection with the contract cost $63,801. A contract was awarded and completed for sandblasting the Davis Lock and Administrative Buildings at a cost of $28,860. Engineering and design, supervision and administration in connection with this contract cost $13,258. Engineering and design was performed on the repairs to the rock cut at a cost of $23,093. Engineering and design for the master plan for the facility was performed at a cost of $95,844. Other miscellaneous engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $124,636. Recreational facilities: Information center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platforms were maintained at a cost of $172,870 which included a janitorial contract for the Information Center at a cost of $25,446. Guide uniforms at the Information Center were purchased at a cost of $597. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Information Center numbered 685,601. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the locks numbered 584,139. Total visitors to the Soo Locks park was 794,423. A grand total of 1,067,574 people visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 87 amounted to $9,497,511. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total costs to end of FY were $160,657,070 for new work and $185,522,168 for maintenance, for a grand total of $346,179,238. 56. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to Village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456, 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Village of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At Village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, safety and environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $26,250. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total costs to end of FY were $3,392,907 of which $364,527 was for new work and $3,028,380 for maintenance. 57. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see page 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 31-22 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,434. The project was completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. A detailed project report is being prepared to develop an acceptable plan for mitigation measures. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $1,562,606. (Includes $50,193 Contributed Funds.) 58. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,826. A contract for repair of diked disposal facility awarded this FY is 30% complete at a cost of $49,297. Engineering and design for diked disposal maintenance cost $44,041. Real estate, supervision and administration cost $3,353. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total costs to end of FY were $2,436,523, of which $35,573 was for new work and $2,400,950 for maintenance. 59. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230, Annual Report for 1963. New Work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $28,584. Minor repairs to the breakwater were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,197. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $176,999 removing 24,303 cubic yards of material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $23,742. Engineering and design for revetment repair cost $701. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging clean material to be performed by contract next FY cost $552. Engineering and design for dike disposal site selection continued at a cost of $19,857. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Costs of existing project to end of FY are $5,969,598 for maintenance, $609,028 for rehabilitation, and $1,136,088 for new work; a total of $7,714,714. 60. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, woodpulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $27,068. Repairs to north revetment and south pier were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $125,225. Hired labor cost for maintenance of safety features was $5,608. Engineering and design for major repairs to the north and south Piers was continued at a cost of $32,947. Supervision and administration cost $3,530. Environmental studies and monitoring in conjunction with Section 111 was performed at a cost of $3,198. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively, in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized, which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total costs for existing project to the end of FY were $7,456,418, of which $984,426 was for new work, $4,839,916 for maintenance and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 31-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 61. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous projects. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in City of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from City of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,296. Breakwater repairs were performed by hired labor at a cost of $15,797. Engineering and design for confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $69,979. Other engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $5,086. Total cost of existing project to end of FY is $1,059,722 for new work, $7,526,257 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation: a total of $9,470,878. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 62. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 local cooperation agreement was entered into with the city of Two Harbors on August 14, 1978. Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,939. Engineering and design for repair to W. Pier-Section C was performed at a cost of $5,377. The existing project is complete. Total cost to end of FY was $4,170,710 for new work and $1,918,508 for maintenance, a total of $6,089,218. 63. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $14,000. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,052. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $947. Supervision and administration cost $446. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion of project which consists of dredging a 10-foot width along east side of lakeward portion of entrance channel between the piers. This dredging was omitted to avoid removal of necessary riprap along entrance piers. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North pier was completed in 1908. North revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total costs of existing project were $360,320 for new work, $6,576,826 for maintenance, and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation, for a total of $6,995,203. 64. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a'channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on north side of lake about 3 miles from inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across lake, at Village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. 31-24 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $17,809. Repairs to the east and west piers were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $61,880. Minor safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $7,076. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $5,107. Condition surveys, environmental studies, monitoring, inspections and reports in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $51,538. Engineering, supervision and administration cost $1,945. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. The structures are in generally good condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost to end of FY is $3,400,897, of which $457,563 was for new work and $2,943,334 for maintenance. 65. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 31-J. 66. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 31-C. 67. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) Physical and financial close-out of the study authority was accomplished on the terminated projects at Bayfield, WI ($2,410), Douglas County, WI ($467), Kenosha Harbor, WI ($1,072), and Two Harbors, MN ($548). Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed for the Kenosha Harbor, WI, breakwater modification ($1,200). Beach Erosion Control 68. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS A beach erosion control project is authorized at the Shore of Manitowoc County, WI. For last full report see Annual Report for 1963 (Berrien County). The project is in the inactive category. The project for beach erosion control, Berrien County, MI (St. Joseph Shore), authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. (See Table 31-G for list of deauthorized projects.) 69. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit public services. (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended.) Baileys Harbor, Union, WI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $1,200. Bar Lake, MI - A favorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed and plans and specifications for protection of 600 feet of shoreline adjacent to Lakeshore Road was initiated at a cost of $10,179. Baraga County, MI - Reimbursement of a favorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed at a cost of $7,500. Barkers Island, WI - Financial closeout of the project authority was completed at a cost of $3,933. Bayshore Drive, N. Shoemaker Road, WI - Financial closeout of the project authority was completed at a cost of $1,110. Bridgeport Charter Township, MI - Construction of streambank erosion protection works for the Fayette Street bridge was completed on November 25, 1986, and the O&M manual was completed in August 1987. FY 1987 costs were $93,372. Caseville, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $3,000. Charlevoix Co. East Jordan River, MI - Reimbursement of a favorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed at a cost of $7,500. Elkhart River, Elkhart, IN - Financial closeout of the project authority was completed at a cost of $4,322. Fair Haven, MI - Reimbursement of a favorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $7,500. Fox Point Village, WI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $5,000. Gladstone, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal report was completed at a cost of $7,500. Glealand & Lincoln Beaches, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $1,300. Grand Haven (Power and Light), MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $3,000. Grand Traverse Bay, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $1,000. Harbor Springs, MI - Reimbursement of a favorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $7,500. Harsens Island, St. Clair, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $1,800. Keweenaw Bay, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $1,900. Keweenaw, Eagle River, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $2,000. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Grand Haven, MI - Construction of shoreline erosion protection works for Harbor Drive was completed on November 12, 1986, and the O&M manual was completed in August 1987. FY 1987 costs were $151,286 Federal and $9,902 non-Federal. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Muskegon, MI - A favorable Initial Appraisal report was completed and plans and specifications for protection of 600 feet of shoreline for the City's water filtration plant and Beach Street were initiated at a cost of $7,458. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Caledonia, WI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal report was completed at a cost of $3,000. 31-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Lake Michigan Shoreline, South Milwaukee, WI - A reconnaissance study, to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to the outfall pipe of the city's Wastewater Treatment Plant, was initiated at a cost of $11,855. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Whitefish Bay, WI - A reconnaissance study, to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to the Water Intake Pumping Station, was initiated at a cost of $11,905. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Cudahy, WI - Construction of shoreline protection works for the city's electric substation and pump house was completed on November 13, 1986, and the O&M manual was completed in August 1987. FY 1987 costs were $55,664. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Sturgeon, WI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $2,000. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Cleveland, WI - Construction of shoreline protection works for the city's Waste Water Treatment Plant was completed on December 11, 1986, and the O&M manual was completed in August 1987. FY 1987 costs were $88,709. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Brevort, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $1,000. Lake Superior Shoreline, Marquette, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal report was completed at a cost of $6,500. Leelanau County, Sutton Bay, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $1,000. Madeline Island, Lake Superior, WI - Reimbursement of the ongoing unfavorable Initial Appraisal report at a cost of $6,470. Manistee, MI - Financial closeout of the project authority was completed at a cost of $3,207. Marquette County, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $3,000. Marysville, St. Clair River, MI - A favorable Initial Appraisal report was completed and plans and specifications for protection of 2,200 feet of shoreline adjacent to River Road was initiated at a cost of $9,231. Memorial Drive, McKinley Park, WI - Reimbursement of the ongoing Initial Appraisal study efforts at a cost of $7,500. Memorial Drive, Muskegon, MI - Reimbursement of the ongoing Initial Appraisal study efforts at a cost of $7,500. Memorial Park, Wayne County, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal report was completed at a cost of $11,500. Menominee, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $1,000. Milwaukee South Shore Park, WI - Reimbursement of the ongoing favorable Initial Appraisal report at a cost of $6,993. Mosel, WI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal report was completed at a cost of $11,500. Port Sanilac, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $2,938. Scenic Drive, Duck Lake, MI - A favorable Initial Appraisal report was completed and plans and specifications for protection of 1,500 feet of shoreline adjacent to Scenic Drive was initiated at a cost of $12,478. Sheboygan, WI - Reimbursement of the ongoing Initial Appraisal report at a cost of $6,499. Shoreham, MI - Reimbursement of an unfavorable Initial Appraisal study was completed at a cost of $3,000. Silver City, MI - Reimbursement of the ongoing Initial Appraisal report at a cost of $4,500. Tawas City, MI - Reimbursement of the Initial Appraisal report and termination of Plans and Specification work due to withdrawal of project sponsorship by the State, Department of Transportation. FY 1987 costs were $7,700. Traverse City, MI - Reimbursement of a favorable Initial Appraisal report was completed at a cost of $7,500. 70. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. Physical and financial closeout of the study authority was accomplished on the terminated projects at Escanaba, MI (-$2,000) and Ontonagon Harbor, MI ($5,719). 71. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Report efforts were continued on Algoma, WI (-$308), and Sturgeon Bay, WI ($1,945). Coordination efforts continued on Grand Traverse Harbor, MI (-$4,738). Reimbursement of unfavorable Initial Appraisal Reports were completed for Ontonagon Harbor, MI ($7,000) and Superior, WI. ($6,000) while reimbursement of a favorable Initial Appraisal Report was completed for Cornucopia Harbor, WI ($7,500). Flood Control 72. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI Location. River drains an irregularly shaped area of about 220 square miles in Bay, Gladwin, Midland, and Saginaw Counties in east-central Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay 2 miles northwest of Saginaw River. (See Geological Survey Bay City quadrangle and NOAA Nautical Charts 14867 and 14863.) Existing project. Provides for deepening about 1.8 miles of river channel between the river mouth and Euclid Street Bridge; altering Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge by addition of two 45.9-foot spans; protecting by riprapping the channel bottom through Euclid Street Bridge, existing piers at Henry Street Bridge and Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge; and a number of utility relocations. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986, dated Nov. 17, 1986, Section 837, modified the flood control project on the Kawkawlin River, MI, that was authorized by Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) 73. PAW PAW LAKE, MI Location. Approximately 10 miles north of St. Joseph/Benton Harbor on the Paw Paw River, in Berrien County. 31-26 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing Project. Accomplished under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, the project provides for: a gated control structure at the Paw Paw Lake outlet to the Paw Paw River; a 1,722 foot long, 72-inch reinforced concrete drainage from the southeast corner of the lake to the Paw Paw River; entrance and exit structures to improve hydraulic efficiency and provide protection to the pipe from floating debris; and two small levees to alleviate induced downstream damages. The project was completed in February 1987. (See Table 3.1-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The contract for flood damage reduction at Paw Paw Lake, MI, which was awarded in FY 85, was completed in February 1987, with a current FY cost of $263,233. Total costs to end of FY were $3,577,044. 74. RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. The Clinton River basin has an area of 760 square miles and includes part of Macomb, Oakland, St. Clair and Lapeer Counties in the Southeastern portion of the lower peninsula of Michigan. The project itself is located in the southeastern section of the basin. Existing project. Provides for abandonment of the upper 2 miles of the Red Run Drain in Oakland County and for enlarging and paving the Red Run Drain from Dequindre Road on the west downstream to the Main Branch, Clinton River, a distance of approximately 8 /2 miles. Bottom widths of the channel would vary from 70 to 240 feet. The Main Branch, Clinton River would be widened, deepened and straightened for a distance of about 4 '1 miles. The channel width would vary from 180 to 200 feet and adjacent lands would be maintained as a floodway with a width of 500 feet. The authorized plan provides for a rectangular concrete-lined channel below this point, varying in width from 180 to 210 feet, to the existing Clinton River Cut-Off Canal, a distance of about 2 miles. The Cut-Off Canal would consist of a rectangular channel with concrete bottom 210 feet wide and steel sheet pile walls in the upper 1 V2 miles and a trapezoidal concrete-lined channel with a 170-foot bottom width and 75-foot wide benches placed on each bank over the lower mile of the Canal to Lake St. Clair. The authorized plan would provide protection for surrounding urban areas against rainfall and flood having a 1.0 percent chance of occurrence under anticipated urbanized basin conditions in the year 2000. Post authorization studies revealed additional capacity in the existing drainage system and the degree of potential flooding should not be as great as had been assumed. Also, a detailed flood damage assessment comparing the authorized plan with the existing system and several alternatives determined the project could not be economically justified. Subsequently this project was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. (See Table 31-G for list of deauthorized projects). 75. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River basin including its tributaries, Tittabawasee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upsteam from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modification of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of costs of rights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on December 15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel.improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal, and a non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting works for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers 31-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood-waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-ofway, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on November 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished February 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on September 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on June 7, 1982 declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated January 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated August 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Shiawassee: Work on preparing a General Design Memorandum, initiated in FY 83, :continued in FY 87. Total cost for Shiawassee this FY is $1,580. Flint: Investigation of claims for contract completed in FY 80 was continued at a cost of $43,348. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. Total FY 87 costs for this project were $44,928. 76. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through Village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for Village ofSebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,000. Total costs to the end of the FY were $762,286. 77. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NAME OF PROJECT DATE OF INSPECTION Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, MI Jul 1987 Burr Oak, Prairie River, MI Aug 1987 Estral Beach, Lake Erie, MI Aug 1987 Flint, Flint River, MI June 1987 Fort Wayne Mechanic St. Dike, St. Marys River, IN Sep 1987 Frankenmuth, Cass River, MI July 1987 Kawkawlin, Kawkawlin River, MI July 1987 Mount Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal, Clinton River, MI May 1987 Red Run, Clinton River, MI May 1987 Rouge River, MI May 1987 Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI Aug 1987 FY 87 costs were $148,584. Total costs to end of FY were $1,307,162. 78. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 31-E. 79. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and P.L. 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1987 Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Advance Measures Advance Measures (Contributed Funds) $ 316,723 $ 328,016 $ 61,136 $ 3,828,853 $ 167,127 Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. The Draft Definite Project Report was continued on the Ontonagon, MI project ($42,635). The Initial Appraisal Report reimbursement was completed and the Reconnaissance Report was initiated for Cedar Creek, Auburn, IN ($25,866). A reconnaissance report was initiated to determine if there is a Federal interest in participating in a flood control project at Kenosha in the lower Pike River, WI ($1,283). Negative appraisal reports were completed for Dunn's Bridge, Kankakee, IN ($7,500), Gilkey Creek, Flint, MI ($6,000) and Tuscarora Township, Sturgeon River, MI ($5,000). Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Termination of the LaGrange County, IN project due to completion of the proposed works by local interests ($5,005). Completion of the O&M Manual and financial closeout of the Maple River, MI project ($1,000). Reconnaissance report efforts were initiated on the North Fond Du Lac project to deter- 31-28 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT mine if there is Federal interest in improving Supple, Mosher and Anderson Creeks to reduce flood damages. Aquatic Plant Control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL 89-298). An Aquatic plant control reconnaissance study was initiated for Hess Lake within Newaygo County, MI. Funds in the amount of $1,998 were expended in FY 87. 80. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS Field Operations. The following field operations, which were complemented by office activities in support of basic missions, were conducted during the report period: In support of the International St. Lawrence River Board of Control, the District conducted velocity and flow distribution measurements on the St. Lawrence River during FY 87, a period of critically high outflows from Lake Ontario. These measurements are being used for the development and calibration of mathematical models by the Waterways Experiment Station (WES) to evaluate the feasibility of placing remedial measures in the area to mitigate navigation hazards. Discharge measurements were also conducted in the Niagara River to check the verification of stage-discharge relationships for the Buffalo and Fort Erie gages, to investigate the effect on flows of manipulating the Grass Island Pool, and to support mathematical modeling activities. Additional field measurements are scheduled on the St. Marys, St. Lawrence, Niagara, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers during FY 88. During the winter months, the District monitors the presence of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers as an ongoing mission. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers for automated updating of hydrographs used for detecting possible ice jams and the associated potential for flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and other governmental agencies (in support of respective Flood Alert Plans). The monitoring activity is constantly being updated to utilize new technologies for relaying data via satellites. This provides water level data in the District Office within minutes of data collection. During the winter of 1986-87, severe ice retardation occurred on the lower St. Clair River; the monitoring of ice-induced flooding was enhanced by the use of automated data collection equipment. International Activities. The following activities were conducted specifically for the International Joint Commission (IJC) Boards and Committees: Members of the Detroit District staff attended the spring and fall semi-annual appearances of the International Great Lakes Boards before the Commission in Washington, D.C. and Ottawa, Ontario, respectively. As a result of the record high lake levels, changed economic conditions and improved analytical techniques, the Governments of the United States and Canada issued the IJC a Reference, on August 1, 1986, requesting a new Great Lakes level regulation study. The IJC will investigate appropriate methods to alleviate problems associated with fluctuating water levels and to assess the viability of further lake level regulation. Initially under this study, the IJC formed eight task groups to undertake a technical evaluation of measures which could be implemented within approximately one year to reduce water levels. Upon completion of these evaluations, each group then provided a report on their findings, to the IJC, which subsequently cornmpiled a combined interim report. Because of the complexity of the issues to be addressed during the study, the bulk of the work has been assigned to functional study groups, each with a responsibility to play a lead role with respect to a group of related tasks. The work activities of each group, in turn, will frequently require integration and close collaboration with work activities of the other groups. In addressing potential measures for alleviating the adverse effects of water level fluctuations, the study groups will identify and provide advice on crisis intervention, intermediate measures and long-term considerations, building on, as appropriate, the work of the Commission's Task Force. Once the studies are complete, the governments should be in a better position to make a determination regarding management of the Great Lakes. a. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of the Board of Control. In support of the U.S. Section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes, rendering outflows under Plan 1977, the currently approved operating rule. During the May to August 1985 period, outflows from Lake Superior were reduced below those specified under Regulation Plan 1977, to provide a measure of relief to the very high water levels occurring downstream on Lakes Michigan-Huron, St. Clair and Erie. However, as the level of Lake Superior began to rise towards elevation 602.0 feet, it became necessary to increase the outflow from that lake and at the same time to gradually eliminate the storage accumulated on Lake Superior. This procedure was followed until March 19, 1986, when the IJC directed the Board to immediately return the outflows to those specified by Plan 1977. Through the end of FY 87, there remained 30,000 cfsmonths of the emergency storage on Lake Superior, thus raising the level of Lake Superior by 0.08 foot while lowering the levels of Lakes Michigan-Huron, St. Clair and Erie by 0.03, 0.02 and 0.02 foot, respectively, in comparison to the levels that would have occurred under the strict application of Plan 1977. The Board continues to closely monitor lake levels and will advise the Commission if and when additional flow changes are warranted. In an effort to make improvements upon Plan 1977, the Board is presently testing the regulation model with various modifications which might better reflect the present conditions while also providing further optimization of Plan 1977. b. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is on the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Under the auspices of the International Niagara Committee, the Detroit District computes, coordinates and publishes, with Canada, the monthly flows in the Niagara River. The District also provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to the Board and Committee. During FY 87, a series of discharge measurements were made at the International Bridge Section for a hydraulic study of Lake Erie outflow. Additional measurements are planned at this section in FY 88 and FY 90. The District is involved with the verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. As part of the on-going program to periodically verify the stage-discharge relationship for these gages, a series of measurements are scheduled in FY 88 at the Cableway Section 31-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 for verification of the Ashland Avenue Rating Curve. Also during FY 89, measurements are planned at the American Falls Channel Section to check the amount of flow over the American Falls. c. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, the Detroit District supported the Buffalo District in its activities. In FY 87, the Detroit District conducted flow measurements on the St. Lawrence River during periods of critically high outflows from lake Ontario. In FY 88, the Detroit District plans to conduct an intensive flow measurement program in the Copeland Cut reach of the St. Lawrence River to collect data to be used as input to existing mathematical models of the river and also for proposed physical models. These efforts are required to assist the Board in making various regulatory decisions during periods of high flow in the St. Lawrence River. A drogue survey is scheduled for FY 90 and additional discharge measurements in FY 91. d. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The UC submitted its recommendations, based on the Board's report and subsequent public hearings, to the governments of the United States and Canada, in a report dated January 1985. A former Detroit District Engineer was Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Until such time as the Board is either dissolved or continued, certain personnel within the District continue to hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittees and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. e. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is the Secretary to the U.S. Section of this Board, as well as a member on the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. The Board completed its study and provided a report of its findings and recommendations to the Commission in December 1984. In January 1985, the IJC informed the governments of the United States and Canada of the findings of the Board. Furthermore, the Commission recommended that a committee be established to provide an international mechanism for institutional coordination between the operational Boards of the IJC and agencies making studies, gathering and providing data on the Great Lakes System. This Board would assume the functions of the "Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data." Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is the U.S. Secretary to this committee, as well as a member of its subcommittees. Operations continued pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. Coordinating Committee reports being worked on in the District include one which documents the discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1900- 1985. Another report being worked on documents the flow in the St. Clair and Detroit Rivers, 1900 - 1985. Through the auspices of the Coordinating Committee, the Corps of Engineers, by 1983, had provided funds to Canada, in the amount of $215,000, to aid in completion of precise leveling in the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. This survey, as well as similar surveys conducted in the U.S. by NOAA, are part of a program to update the International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD). The new IGLD will evolve around the epic year 1980 and is expected to be published in FY 88. NCD Master Plan for Water Control Data System. During FY 87, the District continued in the implementation of the Great Lakes Water Control Data System, based upon a Harris-800 minicomputer and automated gaging stations. The computer collects data from the District's data collection platforms (DCP's), from dedicated lines to the National Weather Service's telecommunication network, and from NOAA/NOS and Canadian water level computer systems. The District has 24 DCP's active and plans to install as many as 10 additional DCP's in FY 88. Great Lakes Information Management. The District has developed an automated computer mapping center based upon a dedicated image processing system capable of processing satellite image data and aerial photography. Besides processing remotely sensed data, the system provides capabilities for encoding cartographic information to be used for generating multiparameter data bases for basin-wide hydrologic models. The system provides capabilities for generating high-resolution graphics and drafting products. The computer mapping center is supporting the District's water control minicomputer in the monitoring of snowpack and ice conditions, and will be used in FY 88 to monitor lake surface temperatures for input to lake evaporation models. The computer mapping center will also be used for storing and retrieving information on all of the historic District aerial photography archives. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, precipitation over water, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch staff members. A hydrologically based model is being studied and calibrated for the Great Lakes for possible use in future forecasts of lake levels and outflows. District personnel participated, for the fifth year, in a program to assess water supplies on the Lake Superior basin through use of airborne snow and soil moisture surveys, and satellite imagery. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch provided technical information and expertise regarding recorded lake levels and still water lake level forecasts to many interested parties, such as Congressmen, state and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, and concerned property owners. Explanation of the water levels was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with news media. The publication of an international (U.S. and Canada) forecast of Great Lakes water levels, under the auspicies of the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data, was continued during the period. Total costs under Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters for FY 87 were $1,278,991. General Investigations 81. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $44,198 for the navigation study on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and Harbors. Flood Damage Prevention studies cost $885,793. A feasibility study at Fort Wayne, IN was continued with the completion of the Final Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement, at a cost of $122,419 Federal funds and $117,588 non-Federal 31-30 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT contributed funds. Funds in the amount of $36,698 were spent on completing the Ecorse Creek Basin, Wayne County Flood Protection Study. In addition, $53,661 were expended in completing work efforts on a Summary Report dealing with the overall study authority for the Great Lakes, particularly Lake Ontario and Lake Erie, of which Ecorse Creek Basin is an Interim study. Continuation of planning on the Saginaw River, MI Basin Study was accomplished at a cost of $673,014. Coordination Studies with Other Agencies includes: Special Investigations, $64,917 (includes $45,000 for engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of high lake levels of the Great Lakes). F.E.R.C., $1,162. Soil Conservation Service, $1,936; and Planning Assistance to States (Section 22), $33,975. 82. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN MONROE HARBOR, MI: A Final Survey Report recommending structural modifications was completed in February 1980. The report recommendations are: to deepen the River Raisin portion of the project to 27 feet; to widen to 500 feet and deepen to 28 feet the entrance channel from Lake Erie; to provide a new turning basin able to accommodate 1,000 foot vessels; and to construct a confined disposal facility that would create a 700 acre marsh and provide shoreline protection behind the disposal facility. The Monroe Harbor Study was included in the FY 1984, 1985, and 1986 budgets under the category "Continuation of Planning and Engineering" for the purpose of collecting updated and detailed project data, reevaluating project channel dimensions and dredged material disposal requirements, reaffirming project economic and environmental feasibility, and preparing preliminary project design. Although no major change in the scope of the recommended plan is anticipated at this time, a reduction in recommended channel width and alternative dredge material disposal options were considered. The report is under review at North Central Division. In FY 87 a minor adjustment of -$116 was made to prior year costs. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN-WI: A Final Survey Report recommending a commercial navigation project at Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN-WI, was completed in November 1982. The report recommends deepening approximately 4.0 miles of navigation channels (North, South, Upper and Minnesota Channels) in the St. Louis River to a 27 foot project depth, widening the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet, widening the bend at the Arrowhead Bridge to 600 feet and disposing the dredged material in the 130 acre Superior Forest upland confined disposal site. FY 1987 costs for initiating the General Design Memorandum for Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN-WI, were $149,543. 83. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA FY 87 costs for International Water Studies were $25,971, and $146,800 for Flood Plain Management Services. A special hydrologic study to develop a regional flood frequency study for the Saginaw River Basin was continued in FY 87 at a cost of $1,974. Flood Insurance Studies. Nine Flood Insurance Studies were completed in FY 87. They were: Allen County, IN; and in Michigan, Banger City, Van Buren County; Allegan City, Allegan County; AuGres City and AuGres Township, Arenac County; Clare City, Clare County; Manistee Township, Manistee County; Mayfield Township, Lapeer County; and Scio Township, Washtenaw County. The studies were completed at a total cost of $219,000. The FY 87 costs were $16,274, $8,203, $6,479, $5,463, $16,077, $7,035, $9,151, $5,894, and $8,737, respectively. Flood Insurance Studies for Novi City, Oakland County; Three Rivers City, St. Joseph County; Lapeer Township, Lapeer County; as well as the new starts in FY 87 for Ann Arbor City, Washtenaw County; Armada City, Macomb County; Holland City, Ottawa County; Holland Township, Ottawa County; Adrian Township, Lenawee County; Chassell Township, Houghton County; Manistique City, Schoolcraft County; Northfield Township, Washtenaw County; and Pittsfield Township, Washtenaw County, MI will be completed in FY 88. The FY 87 costs associated with these studies were $32,810, $14,930, $16,209, $17,887, $8,399, $2,639, $5,126, $7,347, $7,153, $8,304, $14,662, and $2,781, respectively. In addition, work was initiated on a Flood Insurance study for Sheboygan County, WI at a total FY 87 cost of $17,524. Final coordination meetings were held on completed flood insurance studies for the Village of Blissfield, Lenawee County; Hamlin Township, Mason County; City of Memphis, Macomb County; Sault Ste. Marie, Chippewa County; and Summit Township, Mason County, MI. The FY 87 costs for these meetings were $635, $1,858, $725, $194 and $1,972, respectively. Costs in FY 87 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance Program, limited map maintenance program, and a special study on Great Lakes wave runup were $25,512, $30,080, and $16,460, respectively. 31-31 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI 3. Ashland Harbor, WI 4. Big Bay Harbor, MI 5. Black River Harbor, MI (U.P.) 6. Bolles Harbor, MI 7. Caseville Harbor, MI 8. Charlevoix Harbor, MI 9. Cheboygan Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - 0 62,514 291,000 117,000 67,248 263,563 144,618 433,000 387,088 238,000 27,552 115,000 364,948 246,921 15,687 129,603 360,246 - - 8,757 144,000 - - 8,757 141,882 11,000 81,000 -6,000 10,912 65,033 8,645 1,410 - 26,412 167,964 222,422 - 18,642 153,415 143,902 - - - 261,899 - - - 257,106 272,000 63,000 182,000 288,220 52,979 154,568 - - 0 - - 0 10,000 10,585 2,396 2,798 -16,528 -15,337 253,000 251,394 14,371 11,099 31-32 TABLE 31-A 0 0 1,688,362 1,641,905 1,695,645 1,695,645 2,975,296 2,970,594 390,433' 390,433' 1,167,428 1,165,310 383,350 383,350 578,423 578,423 426,4132 426,4132 1,293,263 1,192,424 1,190,550 1,190,550 587,314 587,314 1,101,093 1,096,300 180,623 180,623 5,306,900 5,265,634 1,129,396 1,129,396 504,236 504,236 875,101 871,340 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 10. Clinton River. New Work MI 11. Detour Harbor, MI Contributed funds 12. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds 13. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI 15. Fox River, WI 16. Frankfort Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 16,001 16,001 6,539 8,662 89,661 6,539 8,662 89,661 115,000 40,000 71,000 261,000 88,419 62,567 72,663 237,122 -34,600 - - - 1,455 - - - -975 1,478 1,478 5,975 4,266 3,900 3,752 22,320 4,118 12,331 549,7983 549,7983 1,113,120 1,113,120 722,200 691,823 1,354,910 1,354,910 1,204,436 1,204,436 32,096 22,107 --- - 76,877,3574 - - - - 76,877,3574 3,894,546 9,438,900 3,446,800 4,017,500 76,611,324 4,546,281 8,932,080 4,109,489 4,030,841 76,551,690 -14,000 25,000 0 5,459 22,256 1,383 - - 242,280 - - 203,000 54 72,612 89,344 41,400,694 41,397,664 314,892 292,344 - - - - 16,109,2585 - - - - 16,109,2585 2,431,000 3,377,400 1,973,700 2,219,700 37,601,970 2,687,668 3,493,775 1,945,302 2,304,284 37,549,923 2,410,000 4,830,000 3,773,000 2,291,677 4,773,781 3,930,167 1,556,249 1,556,249 11,013,000 10,995,625 - - - - 3,753,3346 S- - - 3,753,3346 1,782,000 1,018,000 1,063,000 1,246,100 38,141,7737 1,603,620 1,247,075 1,064,843 1,251,433 38,106,4947 372,500 72,000 45,000 150,999 367,153 75,243 49,296 150,723 23 1,955,1598 1,955,1598 6,429,896 6,426,739 274,776 274,776 1,204,500 1,204,500 31-33 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 17. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 Contributed Funds 19. Grand Marais Harbor, MN 20. Grand Traverse Harbor, MI 21. Green Bay Harbor, WI 22. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 887,546 1,442,616 615,700 673,200 3,551,803 1,497,972 615,944 670,055 125,000 203,184 1,181,500 91,000 70,860 236,764 1,204,587 92,608 15,334 251 - 251 - 50,000 292,000 1,079,000 -16,000 44,199 273,423 1,071,033 -3,820 1,283,4699 1,283,4699 175,000 175,000 21,057,35510 21,050,71310 813,613 813,613 780,400 780,400 1,824,684 1,823,679 27,200 15,585 450,972 450,972 1,998,879 1,962,978 1,230,000 1,230,000 - - - - 266,037 - - - - 266,037 - - 0 89,000 1,663,653 - - 0 87,584 1,662,237 - - - - 9,946,39511,12 - - - - 9,946,39511,12 917,350 1,035,672 1,761,000 1,299,000 17,262,23513 961,792 1,069,546 1,604,864 1,384,841 17,159,32313 230,000 395,000 290,000 205,000 211,613 390,568 310,913 205,760 3,244 4,000 3,683 25,000 19,202 68,875 2,898 58,841 12,430 - 25,000 2,669 26,647 7,465 8,284 -647 6,788,807 6,784,523 1,015,366 1,015,366 77,000 77,000 436,300 436,300 50,000 47,872 31-34 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 23. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 24. Harrisville Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 25. Holland Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 26. Inland Route, MI 27. Kenosha Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 60,000 532,200 313,949 295,641 113,766 525,580 310,694 252,600 -90,000 232,368 70,000 259,445 22,000 320,813 4,000 8,239 1,422,760 1,758,195 35,000 33,713 -15,000 -63,981 -32,516 24,215 6,401 3,376 13,000 11,137 571,720 934,563 558,000 421,857 -36,700 12,281 1,603 3,770 24,000 25,557 507,000 484,876 694,000 828,919 219,000 215,143 51,000 41,887 1,200,598 1,200,598 6,334,980 6,279,621 194,504 194,504 243,100 243,100 1,849,938 1,849,938 287,454 287,454 502,000 502,000 975,201 970,352 88,000 78,581 - 771,82714,15 - 771,827'14,15 - 621,000 - 621,000 454,000 12,860,712 472,286 12,852,592 80,000 1,540,200 74,093 1,529,447 - 502,452 - 502,452 2,400 90,000 86,000 64,000 12,934 90,723 60,666 85,167 30,000 38,658 368,000 380,004 12,000 3,726 94,491 107,405 8,077 208,000 168,916 1,072 1,182,600 1,206,019 1,663,300 1,663,300 918,222'6 918,222'6 2,295,888 2,287,000 404,300 404,300 988,96917,18 988,969",' 18 4,143,46819 4,126,34919 1,270,275 1,270,275 31-35 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 28. Kewaunee Harbor, WI 29. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 30. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 31. Leland Harbor, MI 32. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 33. Little Lake Harbor, MI Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,378,600 4,378,600 - 6,000 - 6,000 406,250 189,000 400,880 218,132 243,000 225,007 - 758,33320 - 758,33320 172,000 3,725,59121 159,073 3,694,38521 - 617,300 - 617,300 - - - - 2,961,461 - - - - 2,961,461 - - - - 5,974,141 - - - 5,974,141 309,000 410,000 681,000 2,822,000 14,373,68422 329,088 438,285 668,439 2,777,736 14,298,89522 70,000 72,000 241,000 855,000 90,863 70,506 220,193 875,855 1,346,000 1,342,589 --- - 7,675,35723 - - - - 7,675,35723 745,400 297,000 262,600 103,000 7,258,08424 767,954 299,095 260,663 105,926 7,240,71824 - - - - 5,119,800 S- - - 5,119,800 236,466 66,600 100,000 105 251,778 62,264 104,735 100 12,000 11,033 20,000 19,789 3,131 4,125 254,000 101,984 26( 402 - 49 - 22 ),000 88 7,397 92 165,283 229,458 263,000 165 135,253 256,986 279,129 166 - 1,027,08925 - 1,027,08925 ,000 1,618,511 ),159 1,613,129 - 70,678 - 70,678 - 1,646,304 - 1,646,304 1,088,888 - 1,088,888 - 372,000 - 372,000 ,000 173,044 ,997 147,041 ,000 802,000 ,307 801,477 - 600,47826 - 600,47826 ,600 2,934,115 ,243 2,926,258 31-36 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 34. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 35. Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 36. Manistee Harbor, MI 37. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 38. Marquette Harbor, MI 39. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost - - - - 7,912,20227 - - - - 7,912,20227 - - - - 620,000 - - - - 620,000 564,366 427,900 329,000 1,743,000 10,149,56628 544,182 420,772 337,698 1,764,395 10,141,72228 - - - - 357,913 - - - - 357,913 - 710,540 -64,000 41,800 703,340 - 692,796 -46,931 40,390 701,255 - 22,274 136,000 - 22,023 59,616 474,300 466,666 10,000 22,154 9,206 1,883 309,690 763,277 229,085 229,085 105,004 105,004 229,744 153,109 - - - 2,696,52229 - - - 2,696,52229 29,000 816,000 777,000 5,931,73330 36,254 791,534 784,446 5,911,33330 - - - 1,374,164 - - - 1,374,164 -141,950 -137,174 -74,718 114,139 124,000 125,891 9,206 296,000 2 300,389 2� - 2,048,91431' - 2,048,91431' 9,206 1,957,700 - 1,911,076 83,000 5,210,51532 97,160 5,198,44832 73,192 22,448 204,384 184,646 73,577 21,556 204,324 185,349 3,081,756 3,081,756 1,282,893 1,282,893 1,991,927 1,991,678 465,757 465,757 - - - - 533,47633 - - - - 533,47633 113,000 55,000 104,000 149,886 1,934,34034 35,520 123,282 109,403 149,204 1,927,22934 - - - - 1,351,852 - - - - 1,351,852 31-37 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 Contributed Funds 40. Milwaukee Harbor, WI 41. Monroe Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 42. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 43. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 47,000 110,000 -10,000 64,434 101,568 2,288 1,106,700 74,000 1,027,490 168,317 - 2,010,000 - 1,940,752 440,000 399,452 3,205,000 3,189,537 593,660 591,014 36,762 36,762 - 8,231,02435 - 8,231,02435 2,783,000 27,379,27436 2,753,156 27,305,68136 1,235,000 8,341,810 1,229,552 8,251,651 - - - 6,380,925 - - - 6,380,925 - - - 987,340 3 7 - - - 987,34037 777,450 1,873,000 1,640,900 1,576,000 14,354,12037 656,686 1,936,061 1,700,939 1,577,775 14,321,46737 2,850,000 995,000 -17,000 6,152,561 1,024,457 -23,493 610 579,000 574,185 20,000 16,028 -350,000 3,315,594 -1,000 34,881 - - -1,818 - - 5,442 81,000 90,592 48,000 34,955 5,100,000 4,996,129 86,000 89,926 1,593,000 1,602,842 1,337,300 1,468,604 112,000 311,600 526,000 105,922 173,015 664,118 80,000 77,241 45,000 58,390 60,000 84,085 5,000 10,057 38,620,900 38,615,469 83,182 83,182 2,912,11038 2,912,11038 105,000 105,000 5,524,11539 5,519,79139 1,949,000 1,949,000 13,824,300 13,815,663 1,285,716 1.285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 2,803,153 2,800,880 181,500 181,500 31-38 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 44. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 45. Pentwater Harbor, MI 46. Point Lookout Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 47. Portage Lake, MI 48. Port Austin Harbor, MI 49. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 1ll New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 157,000 162,633 359,300 353,444 150,000 145,546 544,000 541,664 83,000 77,669 916,000 919,158 56,000 48,354 443,600 420,997 97,533 174,004 194,666 221,000 99,697 169,340 194,467 222,504 124,734 441,522 1,701,100 33,991 263,875 291,697 1,882,296 35,484 8,651 - -2,743 - 606 1,340 13,336 120,385 1,584 8,544 125,487 - - 52,000 - - 50,753 17,272 531,472 60,613 9,795 48,528 544,368 13,854 14,664 50,000 5 -62,502 -55,855 16,522 16,000 1,772 177,000 16,065 9,552 8,676 51,263 230,000 249,000 222,335 71,321 - 207,000 185,852 45,478 31-39 942,90340 922,82240 8,124,15341 8,089,4454' 21,000 21,000 179,899 179,899 3,246,255 3,241,833 2,642,584 2,642,584 2,972,181 2,969,004 121,600 121,600 9,257 9,257 256,129 256,129 1,565,071 1,565,071 1,230,33442 1,179,09242 1,563,131 1,563,111 159,000 159,000 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 1,752,184 1,626,446 115,000 115,000 9,158 9,158 1,009,000 845,047 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 50. Presque Isle Harbor, MI Section 111 51. Rouge River, MI. 52. Saginaw River, MI. (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 53. St. Clair River, MI. 54. St. Joseph Harbor, MI. Section 111 Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 30,700 32,626 203,347 134,363 600 63,355 7,331 00 00 182,100 176,994 00 0 0 1,190,492 1,190,492 61,700 61,700 887,802 882,696 76,500 76,500 16,500 16,500 - - - - 675,2514> - - - -675,25143 859,615 776,500 711,700 2,685,000 18,432,60344 835,802 836,762 694,589 2,673,425 18,389,31744 24,085 10,000 4,885 329 - 14,523,823 12 14,517,042 - - - - 14,917,12745 - - - - 14,917,12745 - - - - 13,600 - - - - 13,600 5,531,140 2,781,675 626,200 2,548,000 35,297,295 5,729,604 2,829,598 680,370 2,422,846 35,161,304 223,000 260,000 182,500 126,000 19,311,90046 184,873 256,689 207,953 149,558 19,309,49246 1,224,256 1,259,444 1,510,000 816,100 1,462,529 863,958 - 19,213,246 - 19,213,246 1,527,000 16,347,913 1,519,667 16,325,555 413,616 511,900 611,000 647,000 423,156 506,647 591,221 670,265 21,000 51,533 333,000 258,348 31-40 135,000 127,783 114,000 152,156 14,595 730,000 632,995 868 387,000 520,434 976,48547 976,48547 828,000 828,000 8,831,465 8,823,106 962,216 962,216 643,776 643,776 3,732,300 3,695,177 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 55. St. Marys River, MI 56. Saugatuck Harbor, MI and Kalamazoo River, MI 57. Saxon Harbor, WI Section 111 58. Sebewaing River, MI 59. Sheboygan Harbor, MI 60. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 1ll New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost --- - 160,657,07148 -- - - 160,657,07048 10,006,700 9,221,000 9,704,800 9,934,400 186,501,508 10,323,209 8,973,402 9,761,729 9,497,511 185,509,068 - - - - 13,100 - - - - 13,100 - - - 364,52749 - - - - 364,52749 -15,000 265,100 78,559 29,270 3,031,55650 19,969 249,974 95,146 26,250 3,028,38050 41,500 39,200 6,649 6,649 3,000 4,685 56,259 36,398 -1,130 477 2,237 25,098 15,191 2,434 230,400 111,517 426,50751' 426,5075' 667,870 667,870 430,793 418,036 35,573 35,573 2,519,833 2,400,950 -- - - 1,136,08852 -- - - 1,136,08852 775,000 157,000 327,000 301,000 5,112,39253 1,449,627 124,641 363,502 251,568 5,061,80653 - - - - 609,028 - - -- 609,028 203,000 82,000 -15,000 200,475 68,476 9,231 907,792 64 907,792 - - - - 452,42654 - - - - 452,42654 - - -- 532,000 - - - -532,000 -10,000 148,868 87,000 197,335 3,681,80155 15,372 133,324 84,580 194,378 3,660,68055 - - -- 1,632,076 --- - 1,632,076 25,000 483,000 312,000 14,741 125,600 669,316 3,198 42,381 42,381 1,144,000 1,136,855 31-41 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 61. Sturgeon Bay, WI & Lake MI Ship Canal, WI 62. Two Harbors, MN 63. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 64. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 11ll Section 111 73. Paw Paw Lake, MI 75. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 76. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 1,059,72256 - - - - 1,059,72256 72,000 406,000 176,000 141,300 7,239,91557 68,069 234,819 346,931 121,157 7,215,13857 -9,000 37,000 9,057 25,485 11,953 311,119 311,119 884,899 884,899 _- - 4,170,71058 - - 4,170,71058 - 24,521 1,929,714 - 13,315 1,918,508 - - - - 360,320 59 - - - - 360,320 59 27,000 131,000 21,978 23,416 5,409,48260 26,890 119,914 21,017 15,445 5,389,35460 - - - - 1,187,472 - - - -1,187,472 - - --- - 58,057 - - - - 58,057 -5,300 1,678 - -20,000 193,000 13,691 189,917 - 262,000 - 214,040 98,000 98,248 389,000 429,111 95,000 91,872 49,000 53,483 90,000 157,000 2,900,000 125,000 77,031 139,660 2,777,125 263,233 658,400 180,000 957,427 108,667 -10,500 11,411 57,336 44,928 ...-. 17,000 9,000 7,332 16,224 5,000 8,000 207,862 207,862 249,700 249,700 2,253,463 2,246,700 700,000 696,634 3,592,000 3,577,044 24,553,359 24,547,164 173,000 172,997 365,64261 365,64261 396,644 396,644 31-42 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 Sept.30,1987 80. Surveillance of New Work North Boundary Waters Approp. - - - - 0 Cost - - - - 0 Maint. Approp. 1,234,000 1,596,000 1,330,000 1,230,000 41,454,33462 Cost 1,281,669 1,587,312 1,308,778 1,278,991 41,421,18562 'Excludes $56,500 contributed funds. 2Includes $255,000 contributed funds. 3Includes $25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 contributed funds for existing projects. 4Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 5Includes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. 6Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. 7Includes $89,309 for previous projects. 8Includes $31,709 contributed funds. 9Includes $311,329 for previous projects. '0Includes $13,437 for previous projects. "Includes $396,974 for previous projects. '2Includes $109,463 for previous projects. '3Includes $8,918 for previous projects. 14Includes $176,620 for new work, $127,598 for maintenance. '5Includes $35,705 contributed funds. '6Includes $148,000 contributed funds for existing project. "Includes $453,839 for previous projects. , ' Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. '9Includes $21,818 for previous projects. 20Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 21Includes $88,364 for previous projects. 22Includes $402,242 for previous projects 23Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 24Includes $235,346 for previous projects. 25lncludes $354,139 contributed funds. 26Includes $57,670 contributed funds. 27Includes $491,416 for previous projects. 28Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. 29Includes $354,999 for previous projects. 30Includes $150,910 for previous projects. 3'Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 32Includes $54,288 for previous projects. 33Includes $312,423 for previous projects. 34Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 35Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 36Includes $459,305 for previous projects. 37Includes contributed funds of $300,000 for new work and $166,667 for maintenance contributed by: Port Commission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co., $125,000 and River Raisin Co., $41,667. 38Includes $613,408 for previous projects. 39Includes $446,183 for previous projects. 40Includes $284,802 for previous projects. 41lncludes $113,326 for previous projects. 4 2Includes $172,100 contributed funds. 43Includes $50,084 for previous projects. 44Includes $56,608 for previous projects. 45Includes $962,556 for previous projects. 46Includes $1,671,660 Public Works Funds and $49,419 emergency relief funds. 47Includes $503,113 for previous projects. 48Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. 49Includes $90,232 for previous projects. 5oIncludes $117,554 for previous projects. 51Excludes $50,193 contributed funds. 52Includes $487,817 for previous projects. 53Includes $87,131 for previous projects. 54Includes $187,233 for previous projects. "5Includes $131,239 for previous projects. 56Includes $323,419 for previous projects. "Includes $219,730 for previous projects. 5sIncludes $48,404 national recovery act for new work funds. "5Includes $212,857 for previous projects. 6 0lncludes $33,113 for previous projects. 6 Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 62lncludes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 31-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1900 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 6, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 29, 1977 Jun. 2, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 ALPENA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Channel depth of 162 feet Rubblemound breakwater for protecting channel on south side and widening entrance channel. 21 and 18'/f2oo t channel depths and turning basin. Present project dimensions, New turning basin. Removal of old breakwater,and construction of new breakwater. Deauthorization of the feature authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 2 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI. (See Section 3 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project.' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of East Basin and West Channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 4 of Text) Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) (See Section 5 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. BOLLES HARBOR, MI (See Section 6 of Text) Entrance channel in Lake Erie, Access channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel sheet pile revetment. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 10 to 8 Feet Deep Protected by Breakwater. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 8 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI (See Section 9 of Text) 18/2 foot channel. 8'/f2o ot channel. 31-44 Annual Report, P. 2288, H. Doc. 830, 65th Cong., 2d Sess., and livers Committee Doc. 1, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 42, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc, 151, 88th Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong. 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 64th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1876, p. 523 No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 H. Doc. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 Oct. 21, 1964 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Jun. 3, 1969 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 19504 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 Turning Basin. 21-foot channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin, deepen to 21 feet. Breakwater. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 10 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. DETOUR HARBOR, MI (See Section 11 of Text) Small boat harbor and harbor of refuge, 10-foot channel, 8-foot deep access channel protected by 1,000-foot breakwater. DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 12 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse Ile shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and t5 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works. Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower, (29-foot depth) Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel. 27.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal. Inclusive. Trenton Channel; Deepen to 27 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from the Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1880, p. 2062 and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1886, p. 219 Section 107, 1960 River-and Harbor Act. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess, and 32, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' 31-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 13 of Text) Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 19085 Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 19303 Aug. 30, 19303 Jul. 16, 19526 Jul. 14, 19607 Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 19258 Jun.26, 19349 Jul. 3, 195810 Jun. 23, 1866" Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. Jun. Sep. Jul. Jul. 23, 1866 14, 1880 19, 1890 13, 1892 3, 1930 Aug.26, 1937 Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area for basin inside Duluth entrance* to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 15 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River. Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 16 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance Channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 17 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor Channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake. H. Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong.; 1st Sess. H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567) 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (Water Resources Development Act of 1986) Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong. 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong.,' 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong.,lst Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong.,l1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3d Sess.' 31-46 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1880 May 17, 1950 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2. 1945 Mar. 3. 1871 Jan. 21.1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel and 18 feet deep. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (See Section 18 of Text) Existing Project, Except for Pile Dike. For Pile Dike. 800-Foot Extension of West Pier. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of project. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN (See Section 19 of Text) Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. Seawalls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage basin and deepening of entrance. Small-boat basin with breakwater. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 20 of Text) Two Parallel piers, and entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. GREEN BAY HARBOR WI (See Section 21 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Islands.12 Inner channel.'12 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western Ry. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 22 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters. 10-foot depth in harbor basin 12-foot depth in entrance channel. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 23 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong.,3d Sess.' H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567) 99th Cong., 2d. Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) Specified in Act. Annual Report 1881, p. 2050. Annual Report 1895, p. 351 H. Doc. 751, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Ex. Doc. 75, 43d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 184. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986, Sec 601c) H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1873, p. 292 H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. 31-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 19352 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19352, 14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935's5 HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 24 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters. 12-foot depth entrance channel 10-foot depth in harbor basin. Extend north end of south breakwater 100 feet; extend southeast end of north breakwater 145 feet; install two navigation light structures. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 25 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.12 Piers and Revetments.'12 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Reveted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 26 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 27 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater' 2. Extending breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 28 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Acquisition of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved Mar. 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, 1960 River and and Harbor Act. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report 1905, p. 2176. H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committe Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2772, H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082 H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105 49th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' 31-48 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19333 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 17, 1966 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1907 Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 30 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Point. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 31 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area. Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) 12-Foot Deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension Reconstruction and Repairs to Existing Structures and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of Outer Ends of the Two Inner Piers. Deepen Channels and Widen Opening between Breakwaters. MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 35 of Text) Original Breakwater. 30 500-foot extension to East Breakwater. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present Project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 37 of Text) Breakwaters. H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567) 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) Annual Report 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th. Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1867, p. 11416 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1897, p 2951 H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.' 6 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 646, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report 1867, p. 115 Annual Report 1891, p. 2678 H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., Ist Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 31-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935"7 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935' Jul. 11, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Aug. 30. 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 194518 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct- 23. 1962 Feb. 24, 1835'9 Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th St., and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream Construct 765-Foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 38 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 39 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 40 of Text) North pier.' Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.'2 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater: a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater: deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo St., and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western Ry. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 41 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun 1967 Detailed Project Report; Apr. 1982 Supplement.' Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. pts. 1 and 2, and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, P. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1960.' S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report 1906, p. 1752. (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions.) H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., Ist Sess.') Annual Report 1872. p. 237 31-50 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 193221 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul.13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 16, 1984 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 21-foot channel, dikes and Turning Basin. 20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act. of Jul. 3, 1930 Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 42 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new no. and so. breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 44 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 45 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 46 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 47 of Text) Entrance Channel 18 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 48 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 49 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) Breakwater, 1,00 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubblemound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long. Changed designation of project. 31-51 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbor Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong. 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbor Comm. Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 163422 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong.. 1st Sess., Annual Report for 1903, pp. 474, 1823. H. Doc. 473. 72nd Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19352.26,27 Jul. 3, 19582 Oct. 23, 19622 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 51 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter, and 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Ave. (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 52 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw Turning Basin. Present Project Channel Dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot Project above 6th St. Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins. 3 Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 53 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada of Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Jul. 24, 1946 ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 54 of Text) Interior Revetments. 28 Benton Harbor Canal. 28 Present Project dimensions of Piers and a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of Channel above West Line of 9th St. Turning Basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate Turning Basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of Turning Basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 5 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cng. 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 21, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1875, pt. 1, p. 162 Annual Report 1880, pp. 2030, 2031 and 2049, 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' 31-52 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22; 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 19349 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 55 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel.28 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. David Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls. Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Co. provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below Locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lake Superior and Huron are at their respective low-water datum. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, June 21, 1940. Construct a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 56 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 57 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. 31-53 Report by Maj. O. M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1891, p. 2810 H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3) H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Comm. Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. and H. Doc. 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1896, Vol. 2. Pt. 5, p. 2739 Annual Report 1907, p. 6416 H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., Ist Sess.,' Annual Report for 1965, p. 1025. Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1958 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Apr. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 58 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 59 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Ave. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 60 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge.12 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present Project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 61 of Text) Breakwaters. 12 Acquisition of the canal. TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 62 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredign maneuvering area. Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 63 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment. 12 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 64 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present Project Depth of Channel. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI (See Section 72 of Text) Deepening River Channel, altering Railway Bridge, Riprapping portions of Channel bottom, and utility relocations. Provides that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. H. Doc. 71, 54th Cong., 1st Ses. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 9, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' and unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, Dated Dec. 21, 1934. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Ex.Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report for 1887, p. 1952 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 17. 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H.Doc. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Doc. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess' Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate. 29 Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (Sec. 837 of W.R.D.A. of 1986) 31-54 TABLE 31-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PAW PAW LAKE, MI (See Section 73 of Text) Jul. 23, 1985 Construct a gated control structure at the Paw Paw Lake outlet; Section 205, 1948 a 1,722 foot long, 72-inch reinforced concrete drainage from the Flood Control Act Lake to Paw Paw River; entrance and exit structures to improve efficiency and provide protection; and two small levees. RED RUN DRAIN-LOWER CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 74 of Text) Dec. 30, 1970 Flood control and major drainage improvements to Red Run Drain H.Doc. 431, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. and Lower Clinton River. Nov. 17, 1986 Deauthorization of project authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1970. H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) SAGINAW RIVER, MI FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 75 of Text) Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 76 of Text) Aug. 18, 1941 Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. 'Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935, 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. SAdministrative Act, Section 4. 'Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 7Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8This portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. ' Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. '2Completed under previous project. '3Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. 14Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 'SLatest published map is in Annual Report 1914, p. 2974. '6Latest published map in Annual Report 1914, p. 2914. '7Superceded by Act of October 23, 1962. '8Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo St. Bridge to North Humboldt Ave. Bridge). '9Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20Riprapping of protectipg dikes portion of project is inactive. 21War Department Appropriations Act. 22Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 23Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 24Deauthorized in 1977. 25Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 26Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth in old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 27This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 28 Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 29Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 30Project complete except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 31-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alpena Harbor, MI Completed 1985 337,394' 919.784 Algoma Harbor, WI Completed 1981 205,0102 920,817 Ausable Harbor, MI Completed 1985 209,776; 2,474,868 Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 80,398 Bayport Harbor, MI Completed 1975 93,597 53,985 Belle River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 74,696 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Big Suamico Harbor, WI Completed 1986 (20,243) 191,919 Black River (Alcona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 0 Black River (P.H.), MI Inactive 1985 830,1654 512,4415 Cedar River Harbor, MI Active 1982 215,000 0 Chnls. in the Straits of Mackinac, MI Completed 1984 2,832,629 180,208 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 13,528 Cornucopia Harbor, WI Completed 1986 462,653 834,366 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 Eagle Harbor, MI Completed 1985 205,1646 85,418 Grand Marais Harbor, MI Completed 1980 1,055,871 1,709,536 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 657,856 Greilickville Harbor, MI Completed 1976 366,579 125,680 (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Kawkawlin River, MI Completed 1986 0 241,700 Knife River Harbor, MN Active 1986 412,945 282,474 Lac La Belle Harbor, MI Completed 1985 269,270 480,384 La Pointe Harbor, WI Completed 1986 139,874 92,639 Les Cheneaux Islands Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 319,802 Little Bay DeNoc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 79,432 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,2867 79,935 Manistique Harbor, MI Completed 1985 1,299,3558 2,187,127 Northport Harbor, WI Inactive 0 0 Oconto Harbor, WI Completed 1985 130,754' 1,116,94010 Pensaukee Harbor, WI Completed 1986 0 13,193 Petoskey Harbor, MI Completed 1986 123,839 545,508 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 33,831 Port Washington Harbor, WI Completed 1986 2,582,204" 2,438,88412 Port Wing Harbor, WI Completed 1986 63,393 794,585 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,171' 55,847 St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1986 1,954,821 22,623 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 71,368 Whitefish Pointe, MI Completed 1981 771,639 229,368 'Includes $18,889 for previous projects. 8Includes $3,955 for previous projects. 2Includes $92,774 for previous projects. "Includes $84,569 for previous projects. 3Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 'oIlncludes $8,161 for previous projects. 4Includes $85,849 for previous projects. ''Includes $188,495 for previous projects. Sincludes $12,008 for maintenance previous. 12Includes $15,123 for previous projects. 6 Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. 13Excludes Contributed Funds of $7,500. 7 Excludes $136,286 Contributed Funds. 31-56 TABLE 31-E DETROIT, MI DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Grand River, Grandville, MI' Inactive 1966 -- Grand River, Lansing, MI Inactive 1971 7,300 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI2 Deferred 1975 4,471,235 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo) MI Active 1975 421,466 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI3 Completed 1953 1,136,0084 Upper River Rouge, MI5 Inactive 1968 7,935 River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332 'Awaiting Appropriation of Funds. 4Includes $202,996 Contributed Funds. Zlncludes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 5Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of local 3Completed. cooperation. TABLE 31-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 55 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,0002 $3,275,0003 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,0005 $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064,7 $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost -9 $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Recessed Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed -9 $169,2248 Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 599.5 above and 577.8 below. 2Includes Cost of North Canal. 3Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 5Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. 6Excludes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 8Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separable from cost of locks. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 31-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 31-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See 4nnual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Berrien County, MI 1963 Nov. 1986 0 0 (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&1 Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI 1969 Nov. 1986 0 0 (1968 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI 1966 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Kewaunee River, WI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (1960 R&H Act) Lansing, (Grand River), MI 1971 Jun. 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; Mar. 2, 1945, R&H Acts and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 Nov. 1986 3,823,000 0 (1970 Flood Control Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug 1977 5,892 0 (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 22,000 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 12,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI 1906 Aug. 1977 0 0 (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI 1977 Oct. 1978 0 0 (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) 31-58 TABLE 31-H DETROIT, MI DISTRICT FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Project Datum Planes Length Miles Used by Above Mean of from Upbound Water Level Channel Mouth or Down- Project Project at Father of bound Width Depth Point,Quebec Year Name of Channel (Feet) River Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) Complete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 12 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Isle 1,2 Channel at Head of Detroit River Miscellaneous Shoals and Obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc., Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstburg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Reach (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal .30 38,800 32 44,500 25 24,800 17 12,200 12 Both Both Both Both Both 26,000 10 Down 10,887 12,313 42,000 5 Down Both Both - - Both - - Both 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 Up - Up - Up - Down 17 14 14 Local Local Local Local 200 21.0 571.3 800 28.5 571.5-570.9 - 28.5 570.9-570.3 800 28.5 600 28.5 569.8 569.8 450 27.7 5.69.8-568.6 450,800 800-1,200 1,200 29.0 29.0 28.5 568.6 568.6 568.6 - 28.5-29.53 568.6 - 29.5 568.6 600 600 6000 800 300 300 250-300 27.5 21.27.54 21.28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 569.8-569.5 569.5-568.9 568.9-568.6 568.6 569.9-569.7 569.7-569.6 569.6-568.8 569.8 ST. CLAIR RIVER MI (SEE SECTION 53 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron Channel North of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russel Island Russel Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 4,100 39 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 39 31 24 11 5 Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 800 800 800 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 576.8-576.5 30.0 576.4-576.1 30.0 27.4 27.3 17.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 576.4-576.1 574.9-573.8 573.8-572.4 572.4-572.1 573.1-572.0 572.1-571.7 571.7 'This is a Side Channel. 2Extends from Deep Water Near Windmill Point to a Point Opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 Feet. 3Project Depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4 Project Depth 21 feet in Easterly 300-foot width of Channel and 27.5 feet in Westerly 300-foot width. 5Project Depth 21 feet in Easterly 300-foot width of Channel and 28.5 feet in Westerly 300-foot width. 6 Project Complete Except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 31-59 1964 1964 1964 1962 1963 1964 1961 1961 1964 1962 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 1961 1962 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 IY I - -- - - a' - II'' '- ' '- I - I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 15 OF TEXT) Depth At Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Character Kind Year Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill of of Type of Com- Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Actual Cost DePere lock 2 DePere dam 2 Little Kaukauna lock2 Little Kaukauna dam2 Rapide Croche lock2 Rapide Croche Dam2 Kaukauna fifth lock2 Kaukauna fourth lock2 Kaukauna third lock 2 Kaukauna second lock2 ~o Kaukauna first lock2 Kaukauna Dam2 Kaukauna guard lock Little Chute combined lock: Lower Upper Little Chute second lock2 Little Chute first (guard) lock' Little Chute Dam2 Cedars lock2 Cedars Dam2 Appleton fourth lock 2 Appleton lower dam2 Appleton third lock 2 Appleton second lock2 Appleton first lock2 Appleton upper dam Menasha lock 2 Menasha Dam2 7.1 DePere 7.2 DePere 13.0 DePere 13.1 DePere 19.2 Wrightstown 19.3 Wrightstown 22.8 Kaukauna 23.1 Kaukauna 23.3 Kaukauna 23.4 Kaukauna 23.6 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.4 Little Chute 25.4 Little Chute 26.4 Little Chute 26.5 Little Chute 26.6 Little Chute 27.3 Little Chute 27.4 Little Chute 30.7 Appleton 30.9 Appleton 31.3 Appleton 31.6 Appleton 31.9 Appleton 32.2 Appleton 37.0 Menasha 37.8 Menasha 6 6 2 2 1 1 I 1 1 1 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 40.0 - - 9.4 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 35.4 - - 6.6 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 12.0 Rock - Concrete 1936 $229,308 - Rock Fixed3 4 Concrete 1929 209,536 9.5 Clay - Concrete 1938 362,427 - Clay and gravel Fixed 3 4 Piers and concrete 1926 179,398 9.3 Rock - Concrete 1934 228,738 - Rock Fixed 3 4 Concrete 1930 118,975 9.3 Rock - Composite 1898 13,3105 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 37,536 6.3 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 39,948 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1903 24,313 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1883 38,704 - Rock Fixed 3 4 Concrete 1931 123,763 - Rock - Stone masonry 1891 12,630 8.6 Rock 6.0 Hardpan 6.1 Rock - Rock - Rock 7.3 Rock - Rock 7.9 Rock - Rock 8.6 Rock 6.0 Clay 6.0 Rock - Rock 8.0 Clay - Hardpan - Stone masonry - Stone masonry - Stone masonry - Stone masonry Fixed 3 4 Concrete - Stone masonry Fixed3 4 Concrete - Stone masonry Fixed 3 4 Concrete - Stone masonry - Stone masonry - Stone masonry Fixed3 Concrete - Composite Fixed 3 Concrete 1879 102,304 1879 - 1881 48,555 1904 7,8175 1932 82,554 1888 34,972 1933 84,973 1907 40,893 1934 73,903 1900 32,238 1901 22,940 1884 36,004 1940 151,558 1899 19,3265 1937 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 2Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 3Provided with sluices. 4Flash boards used. 5Partially rebuilt. TABLE 31-I DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 31--J RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Algoma Harbor, WI Bayfield Harbor, WI Belle River Harbor, MI Big Suamico River Harbor, WI Black River Harbor, MI (Port Huron) Channels In Straits of Mackinac, MI Chippewa Harbor, MI Cornucopia Harbor, WI Detour Harbor, MI Eagle Harbor, MI Grand Marais Harbor, MN Greilickville Harbor, MI Knife River, MN Lac LaBelle Harbixr, MI La Pointe Harbor, WI Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Little Bay I)e Noc Harbor, MI Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Manistee Harbor, MI Manistique Harbor, MI Oconto Hlarbor, WI Petoskey Harbor, MI Pine River Harbor, MI Port Austin Hlarbor, MI Port Wing larbor, WI St James Harbor, Mi Tawas Bay Harbor, Mi Washington Island (tIiarbors at Wisconsin) Whitefish Point hlarbor, MI August 1987 June 1987 August 1987 July 1987 August 1987 August 1987 August 1987 June 1987 September 1987 May 1987 May 1987 August 1987 June 1987 May 1987 June 1987 August 1987 January 1987 June 1987 August 1987 March 1987 June 1987 June 1987 August 1 987 September 1987 June 198' September 1987 May 1987 September 1987 May 198 - 31-61 Name of Project Date Survey Conducted _ _ _L L ____ _ I I _ _ _ _ L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ __ ~__s ___ ______ I I I _I ___ I I _ BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT * The district comprises Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania and western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan to international boundary line east of Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation rase 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio .............. 32-2 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. ............. 32-2 3. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y ... .............. 33-3 4. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y............... 32-3 5. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio................ 32-3 6. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio.... ............. 32-5 7. Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y ................... 32-5 8. Erie Harbor, Pa........................ 32-5 9. Fairport Harbor, Ohio ................ 32-6 10. Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio ............. 32-6 11. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y........... 32-7 12. Huron Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-7 13. Irondequoit Bay, N.Y .................. 32-7 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y........... 32-8 15. Lorain Harbor, Ohio................... 32-8 16. Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y............. 32-9 17. Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y .............. 32-10 18. Olcott Harbor, N.Y ................... 32-10 19. Oswego Harbor, N.Y. ............... 32-10 20. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y............. 32-11 21. Rochester Harbor, N.Y ............... 32-11 22. Rocky River Harbor, Ohio ............ 32-11 23. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio .............. 32-12 24. Toledo Harbor, Ohio ................. 32-12 25. West Harbor, Ohio ................... 32-12 -26. Reconnaissance and condition surveys 32-13 27. Other authorized navigation projects.. 32-13 28. Navigation work under special authorization ................. 32-13 Beach Erosion Control Page 29. Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio ......... 32-13 30. Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio ........ 32-13 31. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa ....... 32-14 32. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .................... 32-16 33. Beach erosion work under special authorization ................ 32-16 Flood Control 34. Ellicott Creek, N.Y .................. 32-16 35. Mount Morris Lake, N.Y., Genesee River ........ ........... 32-17 36. Ottawa, Ohio ........ .... ....... 32-17 37. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio ............ 32-18 38. Reno Beach- Howard Farms Area, Ohio ......... 32-18 39. Inspection of completed flood control projects............... 32-18 40. National Emergency Preparedness ... 32-18 41. Other authorized flood control projects ..................... 32-18 42. Flood control work under special authorization ............... 32-19 Deauthorized prqjects 43. Deauthorized Projects .............. 32-19 General Investigations 44. Surveys ........................... 32-19 45. Collection and study of basic data . . 32-19 46. Advance Engineering & Design ...... 32-19 47. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .................. 32-19 32-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1297- 99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by city of Ashtabula and one is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by government plant and hired labor cost $34,242. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $965. Repairs to 169 1.f. of the west breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Tonawanda cost $258,436. Dredging, by contract, removed an estimated 84,650 cubic yards of shoaled material from the outer harbor and cost $339,431. Engineering and design cost $99,134. Supervision and administration cost $17,897. 2. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, N.Y., to and including Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, N.Y., Black Rock Harbor and Channel, N.Y. and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous projects. For details see item 5 and 7, page 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost, (1961) of this portion is $339,000. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interests for relocation of utilities. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY, on April 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two Stateowned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, N.Y., and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of an elevated concrete walkway with railing and three refuge platforms on Bird Island Pier, under cost-shared recreation development at completed projects was completed in 1987. FY 87 non-Federal costs were $209,852 for the contract. Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 246 days and closed for underwater cleaning and repairs from January 4, 1987 through May 2, 1987. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds was accomplished throughout the year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $1,985,726 were distributed as follows: Operation and care: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair $540,058; maintenance of grounds $59,247; 32-2 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT miscellaneous inspection and condition sediment surveys, project supervision, economic study and support of Water Control Center $125,210. Snagging and clearing in project channels by Government plant and hired labor cost $86,108. Finalization of FY86 dredging contract cost $153,262. Repairs to approximately 6800 1.f. of Bird Island Pier (within project channel), by contract initiated in June, 1985, were completed in April 1987 and cost $758,254, including supervision and inspection. A/E contract for stability analyses of lockwall cost $42,025. Intercommunication system, by contract, cost $5,154. Contract for hi-potential tests on power/control cables cost $820. Engineering and design cost $215,588. 3. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of -Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on December 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 are along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor, water control management, and real estate activities cost $232,362. Repairs to about 150 l.f. of south breakwater by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $192,161. Removal of an estimated 107,000 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $884,340. Environmental activities at Times Beach, by contract and hired labor, cost $151,110. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $5,819. Snagging and clearing in Buffalo River by Government plant and hired labor cost $18,424. Engineering and design cost $52,535. 4. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys were conducted at a cost of $5,547. Engineering and design studies related to ice-jamming and subsequent flooding cost $11,850. 5. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous projects. For details see page 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 32-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 ~s - -- -I-. 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88). The commercial navigation portion of the overall project consists of: (a) enlarging and deepening to 31 feet LWD the east entrance channel; (b) deepening the east basin channel to 27 feet LWD; and (c) expanding the capacity of Dike Site 14 to contain the polluted dredged material resulting from the project. This portion of the project is currently on hold due to the inability of the local sponsor to finance their share of the project costs. The recreational navigation portion of the overall project consists of bulkheading and other necessary repairs to Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). This act also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $34,760,200 (Oct. 1986) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $5,445,000 is for new work. Estimated non- Federal cost is $13,151,000 (Oct. 1986) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $3,948,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88 and PL 99-662. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) is $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B.& O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Items of local cooperation for the commercial navigation portion of the overall project authorized by PL 99-88 consist of: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and maintenance of the harbor improvements, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for the initial and subsequent disposal of dredged material and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of transportation systems, storm drains, sewer outfalls, utilities, and other relocations and alterations made necessary by the project; (c) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (d) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels; (e) Provide, during the period of construction, a cost contribution equal to 25 percent of the estimated total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities assigned to commercial navigation; and (f) Repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of the project, an additional 0-10 percent of the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities assigned to commercial navigation depending on the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas provided by local interests for the general navigation features of the project. Items of local cooperation have not been established for the recreational navigation portion of the overall project. Terminal facilities. There are 65 piers and wharves. Fourteen are located in the outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River 40 along the deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-one terminals have both railroad connections and mechanicalhandling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1981, Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with local interests on the authorized project continued and assistance in developing a financing plan to fund the local share of the cost of the commercial navigation portion of the authorized project was provided at a cost of $49,794. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, letter report on new confined disposal facility, and real estate 32-4 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT management cost $487,634. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $88,668. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $1,417. Economic study, by contract, cost $20,125. Repairs to approximately 250 l.f. of east arrowhead and east breakwater by U.S. derrickboats Tonawanda and Simonsen cost $1,176,883. Dike repairs by Government plant and hired labor cost $42,079. Removal of shoaled material: 213,112 cubic yards from the harbor and 34,375 cubic yards from the upper Cuyahoga River, by contract, cost $1,568,174. In-house engineering costs for preparation of plans and specifications on contract dredging were $65,556. Major Rehabilitation: Supervision and administration cost $3,199. Finalization of FY85 contract cost $90,336. Engineering and design cost $42,833. 6. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing projects. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. See page 1274, Annual Report for 1967, for complete description of project modification authorized by 1966 R&H Act. Estimated cost (1970) of this modification is $717,000. For completed work non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for the construction of service facilities for the 1966 project modification. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for project modification as authorized by the River and Harber Act of 1966. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located ininner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys were done by Government plant and hired labor at a cost of $20,490. Finalization of FY86 stone contract cost $5,959. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $1,724. Engineering effort cost $3,141. 7. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year, Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $24,084. Environmental testing of harbor sediments, by contract, cost $3,427. Engineering and design cost $3,403. 8. ERIE HARBOR, PA. Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Repoirt for1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 act was deauthorized in November 1981. Estimated cost (1955) of this 32-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 - __ ---- portion is $1,071,000. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 1982. Estimated cost (July 1962) of this portion is $78,000. Non-Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscai year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, and economic study by Government plant and hired labor cost $22,551. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $17,754. Finalization of FY86 dredging contract cost $25,104. Engineering and design effort toward late-FYawarded structure repair contract cost $45,662. 9. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized through the 1960 modifications, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962; for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1977. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of piroject and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act which is deferred. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this modification is $3,170,000 (1963). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000 of which $101,000 were for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560,000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non- Federal cost of $3,821,000 (1963) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and dock and bulkhead modifications. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considerd adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, including economic study, and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $61,733. U.S. derrickboat Simonsen completed structure repair initiated in FY86 summer on west breakwater at cost of $34,145. Engineering and design effort cost $20,399. 10. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles east of Fairport Harbor, Ohio and 12 miles west of Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. Small boat harbor project provides for: (a) breakwaters in Lake Erie aggregating about 1,350 feet in length; (b) entrance channel about 730 feet long, 100 feet in width, 9 feet deep; (c) inner channels, 100 feet wide totaling 1,500 feet in length and 6 feet deep; (d) a mooring area 0.5 acres in area with a depth of 6 feet; (e) development of recreational facilities and (f) development of wetland mitigation features. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $4,020,000 (Oct. 1986). Non-Federal cost estimate is $4,020,000 (Oct. 1986). Existing project was authorized under provision of Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H.D. 409, 91st Cong., 2d sess). Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control 32-6 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Act. The State of Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) the responsible agency, signed a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on June 24, 1986. The LCA was executed on the part of the Federal Government on June 26, 1986. Terminal facilities. There are no commercial or recreational facilities at the harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction started on October 9. 1986 and is scheduled for completion by May 3, 1989. It is anticipated that the project will be completed in the spring of 1988 about one year ahead of schedule. Construction continued and was 89% complete at the end of fiscal year. Federal funds in the amount of $2,211,508 were expended for the construction contract, including supervision and administration, $85,009 were expended to complete Plans and Specifications and $134,384 were expended for inhouse engineering effort. Non-Federal expenditure was $1,931,460 for the construction contract including supervision and administration and $13,717 for in-house engineering effort. 11. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous projects. For details see page 1972 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, to include title search action, and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $6,002. U.S. derickboat McCauley repaired 50 l.f. of east breakwater at a cost of $76,078. 12. HURON HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1.961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 f Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act is deferred. Estimated cost of construction of breakwater is $12,970,000 (July 1972). Non- Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $36,972. Economic study, by contract, cost $10,660. Finalization of FY86 stone purchase cost $2,079. Maintenance dredging, by contract, to remove an estimated 106,100 cubic yards of shoaled material cost $679,317. Engineering design costs were $25,168. 13. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, N.Y. at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing project. Provides for: (a) entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels a distance of about 1,300 feet; (b) inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet; (c) access channel, 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; (d) two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 feet in 32-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 length at the natural entrance; and (e) recreational facilities of parking area, concrete walkways and hand railings on the breakwater and jetty and a boat launching ramp. The local sponsor (New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation) requested that the boat launching ramp, parking areas and other recreational features be constructed under a separate contract from that for the navigation features. Construction of the breakwaters, jetty, navigation channel and highway bridge removal was completed in May 1986. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct. 1984) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the CoE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of certain recreational facilities were completed. Non-Federal contract cost including supervision and administration was $246,283. Federal contract cost including supervision and administration was $182,341. Inhouse engineering effort cost $16,223 Federal and $16,442 non-Federal. Construction of the recreational facilities was completed in August 1987. Maintenance: Engineering and design cost to determine impact of development of scour hole at northerly end of west breakwater cost $1,850. 14.LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work for completed project cost $69,066. Non-Federal costs of $6,000 were incurred for channel dredging. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $8,318. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repaired 50 l.f. of east breakwater at a cost of $40,302. 15. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 28 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319- 22 of Annual Report for 1966. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $26,246,000 (Oct 1976). Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization as authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act is classified deferred. The estimated cost of $5,317,000 for this work is included in the above estimate. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers is also deferred and estimated cost of $60,200 (July 1966) is excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Total non-Federal cost~ estimate is $8,853,000 (Oct 1976) including $3,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of west shorearm. For work authorized by 1960 act, including deferred portion, non-Federal costs are estimated to be $8,805,000 for lands, relocations of utilities, modifications of existing docks and, bulkheads, construction of new bulkheads and dockside dredging. For work authorized by:1965 act, classified as deferred, local interests must make a cash contribution presently estimated to be $45,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL.. 99-662) authorized construction of commercial navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cutsare to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing authorized depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $3,790,000 Federal and $2,050,000 non-Federal (Oct 1986). On March 12, 1986 the chief of Engineers under 32-8 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, authorized construction of a small boat harbor. The project consists of a 225- foot detached rubblemound breakwatrer and an 800-foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including supervision and administration, were $855,709 Federal and $694,341 non-Federal. Local cooperation, for completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 act (and modified by 1965 act) is deferred. All other conditions fully complied with. On March 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, Ohio signed the local cooperation agreement, for the Section 107 project. Fordetails see page 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. Items of local cooperation for project authorized by 1986 WRDA are: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for implementation and maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged material, and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels; (d) Accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of transportation facilities (excluding railroads, combined highway and railroad and publicly owned highway bridges and approaches thereto), storm drains, sewer outfalls, utilities, and other structures and improvemnts made necessary by the project; and (e) Pay 25% of the cost allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, and pay an additional 10% of the cost allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion, if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, except utility relocations, and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.42, revised 1972, Corps. of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the Section 107 small boat harbor was completed in July 1987 and the project was dedicated on August 3, 1987. Federal funds in the amount of $648,427 were expended for the contract, including supervision and administration. In-house engineering effort cost $31,213. Non- Federal contract costs, including supervision and administration were $694,311. In-house engineering effort cost $1,728. Advance engineering and design funds in the amount of $108,471 were expended on in-house engineering effort for project authorized by the 1986 WRDA. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $71,372. Economic study, by contract, cost $17,653. Repairs to 150 l.f. of the west breakwater and 35 1.f. of the west breakwater extension by the U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $396,132. Removal of an estimated 150,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from Black River Channel and upper turning basin, by contract, cost $562,180. In-house engineering costs were $11,880. 16. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous project. For details see page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description of completed existing project see page 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (July 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. ). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and condition sediment surveys cost $26,742. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $15,136. Engineering and design cost $2,879. 32-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 17. OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of St. Lawrence River, 62 miles by water from Lake Ontario. (See NOAA. Nautical Chart 14764.) Previous projects. For details see page 1975 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1635 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For descriptioh see page 1568 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed portion of project was $375,086. Removal of hard material shoals from lower basin portion of project as authorized by 1935 act, at an estimated cost of $183,000 (1954) was deauthorized Nov. 17, 1986. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. On April 20, 1983, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized an extension of Lower East Entrance Channel, 600 feet west of the existing pier to a depth of 27 feet below LWD. This was completed in FY 1985. Actual contract cost for this work including supervision and administration was $974,903 Federal and $50,596 non-Federal. In addition to the above described dredging, the local cooperator is required to provide $4,000,000 for upland improvements. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Finalization of FY86 economic study, by contract, cost $4,930. 18. OLCOTT HARBOR, N.Y. Locaton. On soutn snore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous project. For details see page 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Existing project. For description, see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1961 Local cooperation. r'ully complied with. Local interests contributed $1,500. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $6,202. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $17,067. 19. OSWEGO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego river, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous projects. For details see page 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1383- 84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 act, is classified as inactive. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 act, was deauthorized in May 1981. Estimated Federal costs for this work are $246,000 (July 1957) and $2,419,000 (July 1966) respectively, and estimated non-Federal costs are $500,000 (July 1966) for dockside dredging for work authorized by 1940 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Seven piers and wharves in harbor and along river channel. In addition, Port of Oswego Authority owns two public terminals, one of which is west of river and includes a grain elevator and warehouse for miscellaneous freight. Other terminal is east of river and used for handling aluminum and general cargo. State of New York owns a river terminal used for mooring vessels. City of Oswego owns one dock and shore facilities for recreational craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $73,469. Repairs to about 85 1. f. of west arrowhead breakwater by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $227,156. Dredging, by contract, for removal of 44,801 cubic yards of shoaled material cost $214,891. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $32,146. Engineering and design for dredging cost $5,774. 32-10 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 20. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, N.Y., and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. Existing project. As modified by Phase I and II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) two shore connected rubblemound breakwaters in Lake Ontario at mouth of Salmon River, south breakwater about 1,350 feet and north breakwater about 350 feet long; (b) entrance channel between breakwaters, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep, from deep water in lake to a limit about 1,200 feet from 8- foot depth contour in lake; (c) river channel 85 feet wide and 6 feet deep from inner limit of entrance channel for a distance upstream of about 450 feet. Estimated Federal cost for project is $2,350,000 (Oct. 1987. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $1,670,000 (Oct. 1987) including cash contribution of $1,350,000. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. ). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances have been received from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The LCA was executed on June 24, 1986. Terminal facilities. The only commercial navigation at Port Ontario is charter boat fishing. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Actual construction of the project began in May 1987. Federal contract costs, including supervision and administration, were $916,772. Non-Federal contract costs, including supervision and administration were $819,018. In-house engineering effort cost $111,532 Federal and $5,339 non-Federal. 21. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $21,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $25,420. Environmental testing, by contrast, cost $2,959. Aerial photography of shoreline, by contract, cost $1,074. Stone placement by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $4,806. Finalization of pier repair contract initiated in FY86 resulted in credit of $2,325. Removal of 149,833 cubic yards of shoaled material, by contract, cost $534,504. Supervision and administration cost $48,728. Engineering and design cost $106,198. 22. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. 32-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services cost $59. 23. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeasterly portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous projects. For details see page 1960 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1574 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1511- 12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000 including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepened channels authorized by 1960 act. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned are used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $71,646. Economic study by hired labor cost $12,454. Maintenance dredging, by contract, removed an estimated 87,000 cubic yards of shoaled material and cost $450,220. Supervision and administration cost $68,905. Engineering and design cost $20,857. 24. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautucal Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567.147. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deepdraft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part I by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition sediment surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $274,674. Removal of an estimated 300,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Bay Channel and an estimated 84,645 cubic yards from the Maumee River Channel, by contract, cost $955,132. Repairs to confined disposal facility by hired labor cost $126,298. Finalization of FY86 environmental contracts resulted in credit of $9,921. Finalization of aerial photography contract cost $4,880. Design of new confined disposal facility by A/E contract, cost $287,966; in-house engineering and design cost $105,391. Engineering and design for dredging cost $155,620. Supervision and administration cost $101,173. 25. WEST HARBOR, OHIO Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northeast of Port Clinton, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $3,303,898. Total non-Federal cost was $3,922,000 including cash contribution of $3,795,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By 32-12 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on March 9, 1981. Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year.Maintenance: Engineering and design for late FY awarded contract cost $824. Reconnaissance and condition surveys and studies to determine impact and necessity of first-time maintenance cost $25,471. 26. RECONNAISSANCE CONDITION SURVEYS AND Project Date of Survey Barcelona Harbor, NY Oct 1986 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY Aug 1987 Pt. Clinton Harbor, OH Aug 1987 Vermilion Harbor, OH May-Sept 1987 Wilson Harbor, NY Aug 1987 FY Cost $ 554 28 4,169 52,597 3,377 Remaining reconnaissance and condition surveys are reported in individual project writeups. 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 32-C. 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-G. Navigation work pursuant to Section 302, Public Law 89-298. Lake Neatahwanta, Fulton, NY - Costs of $7,500 were incurred for preparation of Detailed Project Study by contract. In-house engineering effort cost $23,923. Investigation and removal of sunken vessels and other obstructions to navigation under authority of Section 19 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899. Removal of sunken Barge No. 45, pinned against the upstream face of Peace Bridge pier 4, on the Niagara River was continued at a cost of $3,907,008. Navigation work pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483. Fairport Harbor, OH - Costs of $8,809 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Beach Erosion Control 29. LAKEVIEW PARK, LORAIN, OHIO Location. In the city of Lorain, Lorain County, Ohio, on south shore of lake Erie between 1,500 and 3,000 feet west of Lorain Harbor west breakwater. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Existing project. For description of existing project see page 32-19 of Annual Report for 1977. The Federal cost of the completed project was $1,360,986 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) was $50,000 for relocation. In addition, local interests contributed $583,280. Five-year monitoring program was completed in 1982. Cooperative beach nourishment was conducted in FY 80 and FY 81, during which time a total of 9,000 cubic yards of sand was placed within the project limits. Annual cost of 5-year program for beach replenishment and monitoring was approximately $75,000. In FY 84 an agreement was made between city of Lorain and the Federal government to continue cost sharing, 70% Federal and 30% local, the costs associated with annual beach nourishment until September 30, 1992, as provided by Section 156, P.L. 94-587. A beach nourishment contract was awarded and completed in FY 85, at a cost of $31,704 ($22,465 Federal funds, $9,239 non- Federal funds). Existing project authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 224, 83rd Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year, New Work: In-house engineering effort cost $51 Federal funds and $49 non-Federal funds. The Federal cost for nourishment has totalled approximately $98,000 and costs to local interests have totalled approximately $40,000. 30. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OHIO Location. Maumee Bay State Park is located in Lucas County, OH approximately 5 miles east of Toledo. The 1,855 acre park has 11,000 feet of shoreline along the southerly end of Maumee Bay (Lake Erie). (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Oregon, OH). Existing project. The study for Maumee Bay was conducted under the Western Lake Erie Shore Study authorized by the Committee on Public Works of the House of Representatives on April 11, 1974 32-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 The project was authorized for construction by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (PL 99- 662), November 17, 1986. The recommended plan as described in the General Affirmation Report (Feb 1986) consists of a protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound offshore breakwaters and jetties along the west half (5,300 ft.) of park shoreline and rubblemound revetment 7,200 feet long at the east end of the park. In July 1986, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources initiated advance construction of the rubblemound revetment along the easterly half of the park and work was completed in February 1987. This has reduced the estimated cost of the project to $12,440,000 (Oct. 1987) of which $4,400,000 is Federal cost and $8,040,000 is non-Federal cost including lands,utilities and other recreation facilities. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, will, prior to construction enter into a binding agreement which -addresses .project construction and satisfies the -requirements of Section 221 of Public Law 91-611. The items of local cooperation listed in the Final Feasibility Report (Dec 83) are: (a) Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and spoil disposal areas as determined by the Chief of Engineers, necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; (b) Contribute in cash 30 percent of the project construction cost, including periodic beach nourishment, to be paid in a =lump sum prior to initiation of such work. In the event such work is scheduled over more than one Federal Fiscal Year, said contributionmayj be made in annual installments over the period of construction at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled apportionment of Federal funds to the project with the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual completion of construction and determination of actual costs; (c) Provide appurtenant facilities shown on the State's Master Plan, for which recreational benefits have been taken; (d) Hold and save the United States free from all claims for damage due to construction, operation and maintenance of project, except for damage due to the fault or negligence of the Government orits Contractors; (e) provide without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations to existing improvements including highways, buildings, utilities sewers, and other facilities which may be required in connection with the construction of the project; (f) Construct permanent ! park structures and park roads above the 100-year water surface elevation of 577.3 IGLD and consider such elevation when constructing other facilities, which would be significantly affected by high waters; (g) Maintain and repair the protective structures and improvement measures during the useful life thereof as may be required to serve their intended purposes; (h) Control water pollution from within the park to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of the bathers; (i) Maintain continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the Federal participation is based during the economic life of the project; (j) Provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas, and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms; and, (k) Comply with the applicable provisions of the uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, and inform affected persons of pertinent benefits, policies and procedures in connection with said Act. Provisions contained in the 1986 Water Resources Act specify that project costs will be shared 50% Federal / 50% non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In-house engineering effort for FY 87 cost $24,630. 31. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, N.Y. and 102 miles eastnortheast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835). Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. The Water Resources Development (WRD) Act of March 7, 1974, reinstated and extended authorization for beach erosion control project, as provided in 1960 R&H Act, for a period of five years from date of enactment of 1974 WRD Act, or if the review study of such project is not completed prior to end of such period, until such study is completed and a report thereon submitted to Congress. Work authorized by the 1974 WRD Act was completed in 1979. The 1976 WRD Act provides for continued annual nourishment by stating: "At expiration of authorization provided in Section 57 of WRD Act of 1974, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may provide 32-14 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT periodic beach nourishment in accordance with cost sharing provisions of Section 103 (a) (2) of Act of October 23, 1962." The act also authorized preparation of a Phase I General Design Memorandum. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum (GDM) was completed in June 1980 and the recommended plan provides for construction of 58 offshore rubblemound breakwater segments, beach restoration by placement of sand fill, and annual beach replenishment for shore protection. A draft reformulation report was prepared in June 1985 to reassess the Presque Isle project and analyze additional plans for controlling beach erosion. The report concluded that the plan selected in the Phase I GDM could be modified to reduce the number of offshore breakwater segments from 58 to 38 and to construct 10,000 feet of bank run gravel beaches along the neck of the peninsula. The project would be constructed by a 12-year staged construction program. On September 20, 1985, the Office, Chief of Engineers recommended to the Assistant Secretary of the Army that the Corps proceed with the ongoing 58-breakwater plan with staged construction. Detailed engineering and design studies (CP&E) concluded that construction of the 58-breakwater plan by a 12-year staged construction program is the most efficient and practicable plan for reducing the net combined Presque Isle Beach and Erie harbor annual costs. The WRD Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, which was approved on November 17, 1986, authorized construction of the project for shoreline protection at Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pennsylvania in accordance with the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 2, 1981 at an estimated total cost of $34,800,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $18,900,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $15,900,000. Estimated Federal cost for the authorized project modifications (Oct. 1986) is $16,301,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $8,036,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Estimated non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications (Oct 1986) is $8,555,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $3,461,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. The estimated Federal cost (Oct 1986) for the 58 breakwater project is $25,400,000 of which $9,500,000 is for continuation of the present annual nourishment project while the permanent features are being built. The estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1986) for the breakwater project is $12,600,000 of which $4,000,000 is for continuation of the present annual nourishment project while the permanent features are being built. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources, was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRD Act. The 58 breakwater project is contingent upon local sponsor, namely the Department of Environmental Resources of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, agreeing in writing to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas for excavated material as determined by the Chief of Engineers and necessary for implementation and for periodic nourishment of the project; provide a cash contribution based on the appropriate percentage of final construction cost, exclusive of lands, easements, and rights-of-way, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law based on shore ownership and use existing at time of construction, which contribution is presently estimated at $12,600,000 or 35% ($8,600,000) for permanent project features and 30 percent $4,000,000 for continuation of the present annual nourishment project while the permanent features are being built; pay 30% of the cost for annual beach redistribution and replenishment work for the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works, exceept for damages due to fault or negligence of Government or its Contractors; maintain and operate all the works, including breakwaters and periodic sand nourishment and redistribution as needed, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and assure continued public ownership and continued public use without cost to the United States of appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain beach for continued public use during life of project. Formal assurances of local cooperation will be requested and executed prior to initiation of construction of improvements. 32-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRD Act was continued. One contract for providing beach nourishment was awarded and completed. A total of 228,000 tons of sand were placed on the beaches. The 1987 program included a test placement of 45,000 tons of coarse sand that was obtained from the offshore borrow area and placed on beach no. 8 and 10,000 tons of fine sand that was obtained from the offshore borrow area and placed on beach no. 1. The balance of the sand (173,000 tons) was obtained from upland sources. The contract also included placement of a 12-inch top dressing layer of wave washed sand over the course upland sand that was used to construct the protective berms. About 27,000 tons of sand that were washed onto the haul roads during winter storms were removed and used for the dressing layer. During the year a total of $1,671,530 ($1,163,404 Federal and $508,126 non-Federal) was expended for beach nourishment overations. Of this total, contract costs were $1,055,292 Federal and $473,073 non-Federal. In-house engineering effort cost $108,112 Federal and $35,051 non- Federal. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $518,571 for their share of the FY 87 nourishment operations. The cumulative non- Federal total project share through FY 87 is $7,443,957. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was submitted to the Secretary of the Army in October 1981 for his review and transmittal to Congress. In FY 87 a net credit of $1,488 was due to finalizing the year's real estate activities for the permanent project. The Phase II General Design Memorandum which presents the detailed final design of the project recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum has been completed and is being reviewed. 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-D. 33. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTORIZATION LAKESHORE PARK ASHTABULA, OHIO Location. Lake shore Park is located in Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, Ohio, about 40 miles southwest of Erie, Pennsylvania, and about 50 miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Ashtabula North, OH). Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in July 1983. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 87 Federal cost was $73,045 for beach nourishment contract. Beach erosion activity pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Mentor Beach Park, Mentor,OH-Costs of $274 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Simms Park, Euclid, OH-Costs of $149 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Point Gratiot, Dunkirk, NY-Costs of $15,000 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Put-In-Bay, OH-Costs of $7,500 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Willowick, OH-Costs of $7,500 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Wright Park Beach, Dunkirk, NY-Costs of $7,500 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Flood Control 34. ELLICOTT CREEK, N.Y. Location. The proposed channel improvement is located on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in the towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. (See Geological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and Buffalo Northeast, N.Y.) Existing project. For detailed description of the original project as authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual Report for 1973. The basic authorization, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, provides authority to undertake flood control measures to alleviate flooding that is compatible with authorized project and any alternatives currently under restudy pursuant to Flood Control Act of 1970. As a result of restudy of alternatives, the project provides for: (a) widening, straightening and deepening about 2.5 miles of existing creek channel including the existing bypass channel in Ellicott Creek Park; (b) construction of a diversion channel about 5,850 feet long between Maple Road and Millersport Highway; (c) construction of a diversion channel about 1,950 feet long through Pfohl Park; (d) construction of a diversion channel about 9,150 feet long from Niagara Falls Boulevard upstream to about Pfohl 32-16 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Park; (e) construction of 3 highway bridges; (f) modification of culverts at Tonawanda Creek Road; (g) modification of utilities and drainage outlets; and (h) recreation facilities consisting of a bike and hike path about 5.4 miles long, with open space park areas. The estimated Federal cost of existing project is $12,800,000 (Oct. 1986). The estimated non-Federal cost is $9,200,000 (Oct. 1986). Completion of preconstruction planning and construction was authorized Dec. 29, 1981, under Section 5, PL 97-128. Local cooperation For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976. On October 25, 1976, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation furnished a letter of intent to cooperate toward construction of project. On June 22, 1983, a formal Local Cooperation Agreement was requested from N.Y. State. On January 20, 1984, this agreement was fully executed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work; The FY 85 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88) provided funds to initiate construction of the Federal project. In August 1986 a contract for the Stage 1 portion of the flood control project was awarded. In August 1987 Stage 1 contract work was completed, and a contract was awarded and construction initiated on Stage 2. A third contract, Stage 2A is scheduled to be advertised in December 1987 which will complete the project. Construction on Stages 2 and 2A is scheduled for completion by December 1988. Costs for FY 87 were $2,299,890 for the contract, including supervision and administration and $519,495 for in-house engineering effort. 35. MT. MORRIS LAKE, N.Y. GENESEE RIVER Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, N.Y. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, N.Y. (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, N.Y.) Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir, and service facilities, condition and operation studies and miscellaneous reports, to include stability analysis and dam safety study, were accomplished by hired labor for $396,334. Co- Operative Stream Gaging program accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service reporting and hydroclimatic network cost $86,289. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $167,311. Debris removal, by contract, cost $116,159.Repair of radio tower cost $4,850. Installation of sanitary facilities in garage cost $3,325. Engineering and design costs for maintenance were $177,533. 36. OTTAWA, OHIO Location. Ottawa is located on the Blanchard River, about 22 miles upstream from its confluence with the Auglaize River. The Blanchard River drains about 765 square miles of the extreme southeastern corner of the Maumee River Basin which covers about 6,586 square miles in northwestern Ohio, northeastern Indiana and southeastern Michigan. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Ottawa, OH.) Existing project. The local protection project, authorized by Section 203 of the 1966 Flood Control Act (Public Law 89-789), provides for construction of levees, floodwalls combined with channel improvement, bridge change, and construction of new bridges. The reformulated project consists of improving the floodway by clearing and snagging the Blanchard River, removing abandoned railroad and highway embankments, relocating a power line, clearing a floodway and doing some selected filling -on the riverbanks. The non-structural component of the selected plan consists of automating one gage at Ottawa, OH, to provide an early warning system to residents. Estimated Federal cost of the project (Jan 86) is $661,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $418,500 (Jan 86) including a cash contribution of $62,300. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, Maumee Watershed Conservancy District, will, prior to construction, enter into a binding written agreement, which addresses project construction and satisfies the requirements of Section 221 of Public Law 91-611. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-15 of Annual Report for FY 85. By letter dated 10 September 1987, the Conservancy District informed the Buffalo District that it cannot provide a Letter of Intent because the Village of Ottawa is unable to provide any funds to meet the non- Federal funding requirements for this project. 32-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The Final General Reevaluation Report/Final Environmental Impact Statement was completed in April 1987 and submitted to North Central Division (NCD) for review. NCD reviewed the subject report and issued final report review comments that were addressed by the District. The plans and specifications were completed in September 1987. In -house engineering for FY 87 cost $98,091. 37. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO Location. Point Place is located on a peninsula in northeast portion of city of Toledo, Ohio. Its shores are bounded on the east by Maumee Bay of Lake Erie and on the west by Ottawa River. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction immediately north of mouth of Maumee River. Existing project.The project provides for: (a) combination of protective structures consisting of 5,700 linear feet of steel sheet pile wall and 18,700 feet of levee; (b) three new pumping stations; and -(c) 5,500 linear feet of new storm sewer facilities, including 2,400 linear feet of gravity outfalls. The project costs are $9,916,000 Federal and $4,220,897 non-Federal including a cash contribution of $1,865,800. Existing project was authorized by 1965 Flood Contol Act (H.D. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess). Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see pages 32-24 and -25 of Annual Report for 1978. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed by city of Toledo on January 27,1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The entire project was completed in June 1986. Total Federal costs for FY 87 were $3,972 for contract costs including supervision and administration, and $6,530 for in-house engineering efforts. Non-Federal funds expended were $28,333 for contract costs and $29,831 for in-house engineering effort. 38. RENO BEACH - HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OH). Existing project. The local protection project, as authorized, provides for construction of 8,200 feet of roadway seawall, consisting of an earth dike, faced on the lakeward side with a quarry-run stone fill; and a steel sheet pile floodwall connecting the easterly end of this seawall at Wards Canal to the existing inland dike paralleling the canal. Estimated Federal cost of new work consisting of reconstructing to a permanent project the "Operation Foresight" work which was completed in 1973, is $5,540,000 (Oct 1987). Non-Federal cost estimate of $1,850,000 (Oct 1987) includes cash contribution of $520,000 toward first cost of construction plus all lands, easements, and rightsof- way. Project was authorized under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (H.D. 554, 80th Cong. 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See pages 32-16 of 1982 Annual Report for full requirements of local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) has been negotiated with the Local Sponsor and has been sent forward. Approval is pending submittal of the local sponsor's Statement of Financial Capability. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In FY 87 coordination at the Federal, State, and local level cost $12,159. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $183,592. Total cost to Sept. 30, 1987 was $857,034. Inspection of non-Federal Levees was performed at a cost of $6,626. 40. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FY 87 costs were $156,121 41. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 32-18 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 42. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 32-H. CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, N.Y. Location. Conesus Lake is situated in western New York State about 25 miles south of the city of Rochester. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Livonia, NY). Existing project. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, on July 22, 1985. Project provides for a steel sheet piling and concrete control structure with sluice gates, just upstream of the Route 20A bridge. The outlet channel will be aligned immediately west of the trailer park. The channel is designed with a bottom width of 60 feet and 1V on 3H sideslopes. Downstream of the Route 20A bridge, the creek will be channelized with a 35-foot bottom width and 1V on 3H sideslopes. The channel will continue downstream for about one mile. Approximatelyl4 acres of land were required for temporary and permanent easements. The non- Federal sponsor is required to enact and enforce flood plain management regulations. A 1.2 acre parking lot will be provided at the north end of Conesus Lake. A small-boat launching platform and an ice-fishing access trail will be constructed. The "Ames Parcel" wetland located at the southern end of Conesus Lake is used by northern pike during spring high water levels as a spawning area. Under the mitigation plan, approximately 10 acres of this wetland is being shallowly scalped, graded, and revegetated, to prevent entrapment of fry and eggs, by receding water levels. This plan will provide 25- year flood protection and prevent 96% of flood damages. Estimated cost of the project is $867,800 (Oct. 1983). Estimated non-Federal cost is $288,630 (Oct. 1983). Local cooperation. On September 25, 1985, the New york State Department of Environmental Conservation signed the Local Cooperation Agreement. For details see page 32-16 of Annual Report for FY 86. ODerations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction is 75% complete and is scheduled for completion in June 1988. Federal costs for contract including supervision and administratior: were $1,016,074 and non-Federal costs were $14,928. Federal in-house engineering -cost $68,810 and non-Federal cost $37. EUCLID CREEK, CLEVELAND, OH Location. Euclid Creek has a drainage area of approximately 25 square miles and is located east of Cleveland in Cuyahoga County and a small portion in Lake County, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, East Cleveland, OH). Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-14 of the Annual Report for 1983. Initial construction of project was completed in 1986. In FY 88 minor work will be done including construction of a concrete floodwall and a slope revetment as well as minor dredging of shoals. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-13 of Annual Report for 1984. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In-house engineering effort cost $36,532. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962). FY 87 costs for Disaster Preparedness were $417,992. Cost for Emergency Operations were $18,247. Federal costs for Advance Measures were $1,498,853 and non-Federal costs were $69,196. The Advance Measures project at Eastlake, Lake County, Ohio provides for repair to an existing 1,000 foot rubblemound dike and was completed in early FY 87. FY 87 Federal costs for the contract including supervision and administration were $40,200 and non-Federal costs were $61,637. The project at Bayview, Erie County, Ohio, provides for placement of a 1,400 foot impervious dike along Sandusky Bay and was completed in FY 87. A net credit of $7,559 was the result of an adjustment made to balance Federal and non-Federal shares. The Advance Measure at Wightman's Grove, Sandusky County, Ohio was made ready for construction during FY 87. Contract award and construction will take place in the first half of FY 88. Estimated Federal costs, $245,000, non-Federal costs $105,000. The Advance Measures Self-Help Program initiated in FY 87 has seen the distribution of 3.9 million sandbags with requisite quantities of sand and plastic sheeting to Great Lakes shoreline counties in New York (9 counties), Ohio (8 counties) and Pennsylvania (1 county). FY 87 Federal costs totaled $1,348,261. 43. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 32-I. 32-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 General Investigations 44. SURVEYS During FY 1987 costs of $1,456,562 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies .................... $185,328 Flood Damage Prevention Studies ....... 724,824 Shoreline Protection Studies ........... 147,562 Special Studies .............................. Miscellaneous Investigations ............. 88,770 Coordination Studies ................... 111,286 Phase I GDM Studies ........................ Comprehensive Studies ............... 198,792 Review of Authorized Projects ................ 0 45. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $21,298 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $451,155 incurred under the Operations and Maintenance appropriation for a total cost of $472,453. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $202,790. During the year, a flood hazard evaluation study was completed for the Maumee River in Henry County, Ohio. The results of this study will enable Henry County to encourage and enforce prudent .use of the flood plain along the Maumee River. Also, hundreds of technical assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were completed during the year responding to individuals, corporations, real estate companies, insurance agents, engineering firms and local agencies. Costs for General Hydrologic Studies were $2,000. 46. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $218,721 for advance engineering and design projects. For details of individual projects, see sections 15, 36 and 38 in text. 47. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Costs during the period were $23,142 for continuation of planning and engineering. For details of individual projects, see sections 30 and 31 in text. 32-20 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY84 FY 85 FY 86 FY87 Total Cost to Text Prqject Sept 30, 1987 1. Ashtabula Harbor, New Work Ohio 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. 4. Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio 6. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 12,805,339' - 12,805,339 1 253,762 435,196 732,518 757,638 5 310,000 310,000 1,502,215 1,688,268 304,500 325,492 781,500 750,105 10,636,946 10,585,576 - 6.077,000 - 6,077,000 310,000 310,000 2,423,821 2,869,826 2,463,803 2,718,745 020,000 250,000 159,998 - 11,135,120 2 - 11,135,1202 1,861,755 35,596,965' 1,985,726 35,527,624 a. 620,000 209,852 619,850 - 23,115,187' - 23,115,187' 980,715 947,421 2,222,000 2,043,936 1,610,000 1,764,633 1,806,000 52,905,515 s 1,536,751 52,539,625 6' 295,457 295,457 -197,000 -192,556 956 956 50,029 242,593 422 1,425 1,425 157 93,141 49,039 4,804,060 - 4,804,060 5,547 17,397 101,069 68,817 - 2,566,529 - 2,566,529 15,000 4,472,125 6,057,166 178,000 193,000 2,942,000 3,050,000 3,265,105 3,088,149 - 2,915,000 - 2,109,110 901,700 979,729 54,000 97,511 32-21 2,895,000 3,646,340 651,000 633,847 50,000 31,896,299 e 49,794 31,896,093 6 3,509,000 142,855,4857 3,450,536 142,728,221 7 300,000 16,404,903 136,368 16,186,721 - 8,346,641k - 8,346.6418. 14,000 31,314 9,138,102 9 9,138,050 - 651,850 - 651,850 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Costto Text Project Sept. 30, 1987 t. Dunkirk Harhnr New Work N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 8. Erie Harbor, Pa. 9. Fairport Harbor, Ohio 10. Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 12. Huron Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost _- 3,010,02410 - 3,010,02410 11,161 20,124 9,338 13,523 35,095 34,406 33,000 30,914 1,745,870 1,743,058 1,950,000" - 1,950,000"1 _- 3,597,87312 - 3,597,87312 72,944 2,020,193 -12,685 301,108 353,185 296,835 185,006 111,071 15,031,76113 14,901,47613 - 1,154 - 1,154 - 2,959,61114 - 2,959,61114 692,469 783,369 760,500 764,300 15,000 267,000 263,177 215,000 92,221 - 750,000 - 64,036 10,925 7,500 706 4,131 7,500 7,398 111,000 116,277 2,303,000 2,430,901 2,356,000 1,945,177 85,000 82,080 13,148,672 13,148,117 3,195,000 3,185,122 3,106,000 2,009,213 610,9591' 610,95915 2,459,403 2,456,381 713,544 713,544 - 5,103,79516 - 5,103,79516 1,047,523 996,446 465,000 530,980 600,000 598,849 792,000 754,196 15,618,926 15,563,021 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 32-22 7 BUFFALO. NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to Text Project Sept 30, 1987 13. Irondequoit Bay N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. funds) 14. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. 15. Lorain Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. 17. Ogdensburg harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Olcott Harbor N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost ,New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 1,060,000 838,951 1,200,000 7,637 1,047,523 996,446 788,368 25,000 -166,925 1,389,500 1,589,224 198,565 105 000 1,850 71,340 262,725 3,535,800 3,535,576 105,000 1,850 2,660,840 2,647,954 - 301,394"7 - 301,394'7 12,289 1,308 11,000 9,560 1,421,000 1,271,705 62 11,043 70,000 43,839 906,000 1,064,095 3,000 2,803 575,000 263,456 1,124,000 1,093,955 - 660,000 - 14,198 50,000 48,621 3,097,569 3,095,993 742,822 742,822 377,000 21,772,55818 679,640 21,736,05318 1,087,000 1,059,216 203,000 696,038 24,323,429 24,251,229 863,000 710,236 -- 1,586,99619 -- 1,586,996' 1,436 1,436 317,647 22,000 50,585 135,076 24,062 150,000 703,736 3,801 3,801 6,205 -25,717 85,297 5,406 26,823 21,893 210 45,005 44,757 236,523 236,275 -- 1,720,46620 - 1,720,46620 4,930 1,357,00721 1,357,00721 57,000 57,000 140,21022 140,21022 76,804 69,019 -12,464 -4,679 23,336 23,269 32-23 549,5842:1 549,517 2" 14,47724 14,47724 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section i Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to TTeexxtt PPrrqojjeecctt Sept 30, 1987 19. Oswego harbor, NY 20. Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Rochester Harbor, N.Y. 22. Rocky River Ohio 23. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio 24. Toledo Harbor, Ohio 25. West Harbor, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 8,430,01625 8,430,01625 115,000 111,237 7,000 16,576 17,703 17,703 7 3 3,009 553,436 6,720,52726 6,540,95426 307,590 307,590 10,000 160,000 59,808 -- 270,000 1,795,000 2,069,140 98,000 422,623 1,828,000 1,734,843 920,000 1,028,304 560,000 824,358 1,900,00027 1,898,11227 830,000 824,358 2,439,30828 - 2,439,30828 627,000 17,269,81629 721,364 17,249,38029 343,494 343,494 25,004 14,432 716,240 683,523 628,768 397,652 909,000 956,276 3,951 245,580 813,000 813,049 - 2,231,036 59 2,231,036 - 6,727,27030 - 6,727,270 � 639,000 624,082 14,324,439 14,309,415 675,606 675,606 17,191,84231 17,191,8423' 4,586,188 4,037,727 -90,000 -88,787 20,364 20,364 141,747 3,999,000 4,632,667 1,071 14,739 14,739 3,320,000 3,367,229 3,741,500 2,001,213 77,548,55332 75,773,15232 3,303,898 3,303,898 48,744 48,744 45,472 26,296 129,319 110,143 - 3,795,000 - 3,795,000 32-24 BUFFALO. NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to Text Prqject Sept 30, 1987 29. Lakeview Park Lorain, Ohio (Federal funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio 31. Presque isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. funds) 33 .Lakeshore Park Ashtabula, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. Ellicott Creek N.Y. 35. Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. Genesee River 36. Ottawa, Ohio 37. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 38. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 25,000 7,108 990,000 426,294 1,092 1,092 373,254 1,656 939 3,187 21,494. 24,927 10,700 9,239 1,160,000 1,708,859 44 44 497,143 870,230 -2,808 -12,293 14,745 15,000 -239 22 1,412 200,000 175,258 1,085,000 1,101,511 497,143 529,863 85,000 13,739 865,000 505,283 - 1,741,125 51 1,741,125 49 250,000 1,163,000 1,163,404 486,429 508,126 73,045 2,474,000 2,819,385 739,700 739,700 450,000 175,258 13,833,562 13,831,336 4,978 4,978 6,292,141 6,287,654 871,844 870,820 249,707 249,707 5,234,000 5,203,515 - 23,365,559 - 23,365,559 965,000 1,042,141 690,000 2,000,000 3,149,683 290,895 152,000 143,715 856,000 999,826 250,000 105,113 3,500,000 3,512,573 740,000 1,408,243 101,000 94,459 990,000 1,004,820 142,821 117,000 109,421 45,320 57,021 3,000 '17702 931,000 951,801 135,000 98,091 10,501 90,480 58,164 25,000 12,159 11,822,309 11,806,270 385,000 346,025 9,916,000 9,915,991 .- 1,865,800 1,829,481 635,467 622,391 32-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FIcN'IANCiAL rEMENT See Section in Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Total Cost to Text Project Sept 30, 1987 42. Conesus Lake New Work Livonia, N.Y. Approp. 32,000 35,000 448,000 953,000 1,943,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 59,834 24,443 134,255 1,084,884 1,748,877 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. - 35,000 - 35,000 Cost - - 14,964 14,964 42. Euclid Creek, New Work Ohio Approp. - 390,000 90,000 85,000 3,337,000 Cost 1, 541,480 992,579 108,791 36,532 3,258,617 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 3. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96 3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96 5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 5. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 6. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 7. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 963123 Operations and Maintenance and 965125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 8. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 9. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 10. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 11. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 12. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 13. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 15. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 16. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 17. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 18. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R&H Act. 19. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 20 Includes $271,380 for previous projects. 21. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 22. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 23. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 25. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 26. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. 27. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 28. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 29. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 30. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 31. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 32. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 33. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 32-26 U FFALO NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 22, 1922 ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater; pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater, extend breakwaters to present project dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 24- foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outerharbor to 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just outside outer ends of breakwaters; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channeltto inner breakwater; thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River; 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor, to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo t to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier and towpath wall. Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132. H. Doc. 654, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. 321, 77th Cong., 1st 486, 83d Cong., 2d 148, 86th Cong., 1st H. Doc. 269 89th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888, p. 2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116-3120. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1900 p. 4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1901, p. 3343 H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong.,. 3d sess. 32-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 1934' Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 190710 June 25 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2. 1 94 5 1' July 14, 1960 Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island pier; improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet ofTonawanda Creek channel from the project.7 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)' Construction of old breakwater. 9 Extension of old breakwater. Stony Point and south breakwater.9 North breakwater.9 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater.9 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.9 Deepening areas A, B, and D in outer harbor to 21 feet, and area C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor to 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channel to 30 feet; deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of south entrance channel; and deepen to 28 feet southerly part of outer harbor. 32-28 H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. sess. 28, 73d Cong., 1st H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 423, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 4 , 8 Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232 Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Jul3. 7, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 193512 Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet orthward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth area to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined with this act as a single improvement. Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan bridge. Replace dike at the Small Boat Harbor. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY (See Section 4 of Text) Construction of arrowhead breakwaters at mouth of Creek; entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and eight feet deep from that depth in lake to point 1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, six feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational fishing facilities at mouth. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 5 of Text) West breakwater. Part of east breakwater.9 Extension of east breakwater. Reconstruction of piers.9 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. -Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater; removal of easterly 150 feet of west main breakwater; elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension of west pier; and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. 32-29 H. Doc., 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 15, 1980 Sec. 601, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1876, p. 558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1883. p. 2005 *H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong., 2d sess. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 193511 Mar. 2, 194514 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 175) Nov. 17, 1986 June 25, 1910 Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit.',' 6 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges.2 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower 2,000 feet of river.3 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin.25 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending about 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. Bulkheading and other necessary repairs at pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of pier 34. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 6 of Text) Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1966 Sec. 202, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 32-30 -- BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 8, 1917 17 Aug. 30, 193511 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 19668 Mar. 2, 1827 Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Comm.) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 M.ay 26, 1824 Realinement of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. Removal of a portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255- foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east break water to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Recreational small-boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long: access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide: closing of 100-foot gap in existing west breakwater; and personnel guard rail on west breakwater. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Construction of west pier.9 ,18 Breakwater and excavation of entrance channel to 13 feet." Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Construction of small-boat harbor. Dredging and maintenance of eastern inner harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA. (See Section 8 of Text) Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle Peninsula.9 H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d sess.4 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1866 pt. IV, p. 155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 848, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965 32-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 192220 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar.. 3, 182521 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193522 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Deepening channel and harbor basin to 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, deepening a portion of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier; thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over a 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin. T Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier; and deepening of harbor to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present project dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier; and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. H. Doc. 70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p. 3237.'1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess.4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153 H. Doc. 347, 54th Cong.,lst sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p. 2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2d sess.4 32-32 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 196028 May 10, 1977 (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193522 Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in the outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to the upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. Construction of small boat harbor. GENEVA-ON-THE-LAKE, OHIO (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of breakwaters aggregating 1,350 feet in length; entrance channel about 730 feet long, 100 feet in width, 9 feet deep, inner channels 100 feet wide totaling 1,500 feet in length, and 6 feet deep; mooring area 0.5 acres in area with a depth of 6 feet; development of recreational facilities; and development of wetland mitigation features. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 11 of Text) Construction of piers and breakwater.9 Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the !stke. Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150- foot width. Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Dredging channel to present project dimensions. HURON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 12 of Text) Extension of west pier; construction of east breakwater; removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier; construction of new spur pier; enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of beach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pier with pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and constructing pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 409, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1876, pt.II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong., 2d sess. 32-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 30, 1852 June 23, 1866 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1881 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 -Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin, a detached breakwater, 1,575 feet long 2,000 feet lakeward of outer end of existing west pier; and, abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY (See Section 13 of Text) Construction of entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet: access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 feet in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 14 of Text) West entrance pier.9 Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide.9 East pier and east breakwater.9 Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 15 of Text) Breakwaters and extensions of piers to present dimensions. Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present project dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock.12 Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 to present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintain dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1874, p. 256. Annual Report, 1874, p.256. Annual Report, 1871, p. 234. Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364 H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718 H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 32-34 _ ___ __ _ I_ _^_~---------------------L-DI-L~- ~ ' -- -~c--- -~r-~ U-3L .~-Y BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1969 Oct. 2, 1965 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 19351" July 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913 Nov. 17, 1986 July 11, 1870 Mar. 2, 1907 upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet of east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project." Construct bank of stabilization works at cut numbered 1 along left bank of river channel above Erie Avenue Bridge.8 Construction of a 225 foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800 foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Two bend cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY (See Section 16 of Text) Harbor of refuge. OGDENSBURG HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 17 of Text) Deepening the several channels to 19 feet. Widening upper entrance channel to 400 feet, and city front to 350 feet. Enlarging and deepening lower basin to 21 feet, and removal of elevator wharf. Extend Lower East Entrance Channel, 600 feet west of existing pier to a depth of 27 feet below LWD. Dredged material to be disposed of in dredged disposal area site 5, owned by Ogdensburg Bridge and Port Authority. OLCO'T HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 18 of Text) Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers.' Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. Construct the project for Navigation, Repoit of the Chief of Engineers dated June 11, 1980. OSWEGO HARBOR N.Y. (See Section 19 of Text) Construction of outer west breakwater. Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A).9 Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st sess.4 PL 89-298 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar. 12, 1986. Sec. 202, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 920, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 663, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 266, 72d Cong., 1st sess. 4,24 Section 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Apr. 20, 1983. Annual Report, 1866, pt.III, p. 15 and pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d sess.4 Sec. 601, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220 and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2d sess. 32-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 4une 30, 1948 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters; west outer harbor east of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet.32 Widening channel to harbor lines in Oswego River north of Seneca Street. Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.33 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor.34 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater; and, elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. PORT ONTARIO, NY(See Section 20 of Text) Construct harbor of refuge. Maintain harbor of refuge. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 21 of Text) Construction of piers.? Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers.' Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel front the lake to the west pier; a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 615, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1874, p. 247 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437 Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383 H. Doc. 342. 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong.. 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess.4 32-36 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 19352 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHO ' (See Section 22 of Text) Eas. pier and dredging of chand. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 23 of Text) Construction of channel protection works. Widening of straight and dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of dock channels to 21 feet, and westerly portion of dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of dock channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of bay channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels and deepening to 26 feet; deepening the Straight channel to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to juction with Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock No. 3 to 25 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 24 of Text) A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500-foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper End 18 feet deep. Annual Report, 1871, p. 211 H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st. sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess.4 H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and annual Report 1898, p. 2708 H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693 H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. 32-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1986 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 101) Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Dec. 22, 1944 Nov. 7, 1966 Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Deepen Bay Channel including widenings to 28 feet, deepen River channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Bridge.31 WEST HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 25 of Text) Construction of arrowhead breakwaters entrance channel, and access channel. LAKEVIEW PARK, LORAIN, OHIO (See Section 29 of Text) Construction of offshore breakwaters, alteration and extension of groins, and placement of beachfill. Periodic beach nourishment through 1992. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OHIO (See Section 30 of Text) Protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound offshore breakwaters and jetties along the west half of shoreline and rubblemound revetment at the east end of the park. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA. (See Section 31 of Text) Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 10-year period. Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. ELLICOTT CREEK, NY (See Section 34 of Text) Widening, straightening and deepening channel in Ellicott Creek Park; construct diversion channels; construct 3 highway bridges; modify culverts; modify utilities and drainage outlets; and construct recreation facilities. MT. MORRIS LAKE, NY, GENESEE RIVER (See Section 35 of Text) Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. OTTAWA, OHIO (See Section 36 of Text) Construction of levees, floodwalls, combined with channel improvement, bridge change, and construction of new bridges. H. Doc. 189, 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 2d sess. H.Doc. 153, 1st sess.4 81st Cong., 81st Cong., 84th Cong., 86th Cong., H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 224, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 156, PL 94-587 Sec. 501, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 397, 2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 2d sess. 86th Cong., 93rd Cong., Sec. 501, PL 99-662 Sec. 201, PL 91-611 Sec. 14, PL 93-251 H. Doc. 615, 2d sess. H. Doc. 485, 89th Cong. 78th Cong., 32-38 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO (See Section 37 of Text) Construction of steel sheet pile wall, levees, pumping stations, storm sewer facilities, and gravity outfalls. RENO BEACH -HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO (See Section 38 of Text) Construction of dike and levees. CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, NY (See Section 42 of Text) Jun. 30, 1948, as amended. Construction of sheetpiling, concrete control structure, outlet channel, and creek channelization. Sec. 205, PL 858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 22, 1985. EUCLID CREEK, CLEVELAND, OHIO (See Section 42 of Text) Jun. 30, 1948, as amended. Construction of diversion channel, levees. and creek channelization. Sec. 205, PL 858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 9, 1981. 32-39 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948 H. Doc. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 554, 80th Cong., 2d sess. ~s -p~~ _ __ _ _LI- -I-~-I--- - _ -____ ~_~UIUlllllll~--~41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-B (Continued) 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3, Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov. 81. 20. Public Law 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 23. First Supplemental national Defense Appropriation Act, 1944, approved Dec. 23, 1943. 24. Removal of remaining hard-material shoals in lower basin was deauthorized Nov. 17, 1986. 25. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River , classified deferred. 26. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 15, 1933. 27. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug. 82. 28. Modification classified inactive. 29. Construction of breakwater classified deferred. 30. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 classified deferred. 31. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet and turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 32. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is classified inactive. 33. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 34. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct. 26, 1962. 32-40 ___ __ -- I--- -e I - I--- I -- -- -- - ~- -- ----- - - I ----- I- -- ------ I - - - II-- - - I- - ----- --- --- I -- BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 27 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. Completed 1985 1,185,853' 7 1,921,187 Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio' Completed _2 19,763 - Black River Harbor, N.Y.' _ _2 42,401 - Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. Completed 1962 275,082 1,562,244 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y _ _2 57,410 - Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. Active 1978 101,500 Grasse River (Massena), N.Y.4,7 _ 1891 9,0003 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y.6 Deferred 1973 72,052 Kelleys Island, Ohio Active 1974'" 129,874 Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y.9 Completed 1969 46,804s 42,393 Morristown Harbor, N.Y.' Completed 1949 6,221 9,694 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y.9,'0 Completed 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, N.Y.'," Completed 1964 559,45711 141,059 Ottawa River Harbor, Michigan and Ohio" Inactive 1977's 99,000 - Port Bay, N.Y. Active - - Port Clinton harbor, Ohio Completed 1985 71,950 909,869 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y.'3 - 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, Ohio Completed 1951"' 51,609 12,720 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. Completed 1982 25,010 24,023 Sandusky River, Ohio' 1894 58,0003 557 Vermilion Harbor, OH Completed 1986 1,295,893"8 1,980,816 Wilson Harbor, NY Completed 1986 535,42619 492,62920 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project classified deferred. 7. Channel improved by local interests. 8. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 9. Completed. 10. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 11. Includes local interests contribution of $27,563. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 13. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 14. Project classified inactive. 15. Annual Report for Detroit District. 16. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 17. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,500 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $740,649 contributed funds. Includes $139,775 for rehab. 19. Includes $57,342 for previous projects. Excludes $166.998 contributed funds. 20. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 32-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION TABLE 32-D CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 32 of Test) Cost to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio: Edgewater Park' Deferred White City Park' Deferred Fair H:aven Beach State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y.2 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y.3 Active Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y.& Completed 1976 $1,769,600 Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y.4 Deferred 1963 58.978 $2,946 1. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954 is classified as deferred. 2. Project authorized by River and harbor Act of July 3, 1958 is classified as deferred. 3. Project authorized under provision of Section 201,1965 Flood Control Act has been reclassified as active. 4. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. Uncompleted portion of project is classified as deferred. 5. Project completed. 32-42 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) Cot to September 30, 1987 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, N.Y. Owasco Outlet' Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, N.Y.' Caledonia, Genesee River, N.Y. Camp Perry, Ohio' Cayuga Creek, Cheektowga, N. Y. L', Chittenango Creek and tributaries, N.Y.2,3 Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y. East Lake, Ohio, Chagrin River3 Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River' Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet, N.Y.' Lackawanna, N.Y., Smokes Creek' Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, N.Y.' Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y. 5 Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' Onandaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y.', 5 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y.' Scajaquada Creek, N.Y.' Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N.Y.' Warsaw, N.Y., Oatka Creek', 5 Wellsville, N.Y., Genesee River' Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Inactive Active Active Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive/Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed 1. Completed. 2. Local interests required to contibute $25,000. 3. Project is not considered economically justified and is inactive. 4. Inactive portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interests and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 5. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 6. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 7. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 8. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes costs of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $125,000. 11. Annual Report for Detroit District. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 13. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 32-43 1962 1957 1950 19671t 1984 1948 1985 1985 1976 1976 1978 1971 1954 1954 1964 1950 1985 1954 1969 1978 371,9856 335,385 275,00010 1,404,500 12,464 1,117,000 490,300 506,344 8,589,8248 3,929,33012 3,542,0687 797,300 226,429 1,681,785 330,231 281,559 4,944,852 3,349,248 558,3178 3,145,30313 _ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 28 of Text) Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Cooley Canal, Lucas Co., OH Edgewater Marina, Cleveland, OH Huron Harbor, OH Lake Erie, Sheffield, OH Lake Erie, Sturgeon Point, NY Little River, Niagara Falls, NY NFT'A-Sm. Boat Hbr.,Buffalo, NY North Sandy Pond, Oswego Co., NY Toussaint River, Carrol Twsp.,OH Fiscal Year Cost -3 1,308 6,863 64 167,117 7,416 174 7,500 8,577 32-44 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 32-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 42 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Baldwin Creek, N. Royalton, OH Buffalo River, W. Seneca, NY Butternut Creek, Dwitt, NY Canandaigua Lake. NY Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY Cazenovia Creek, Buffalo, NY Chittenango Creek, Sullivan, NY Cross Lake, NY Ellicott Creek, Lehn Springs, NY Keuka Lake Outlet, NY Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY Maumee River, Defiance, OH Muddy Creek, Evans, NY Oneida Creek, Oneida, NY Oneida Lake, NY Owasco Inlet, Groton, NY Plum Creek, Columbia Station, OH Swan Creek, Toledo, OH Wightman's Grove, Sandusky, OH W. Br. Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY Fiscal Year Cost $3,000 20,131 23,535 41,157 15,019 109,306 45,928 13,544 9,684 9,631 15 36,756 2,473 13,923 14,368 7,500 16,255 84,860 2,300 25,053 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY Chagrin River, East Branch, Baldwin Rd., OH Chagrin River, East Branch, Sperry Rd., OH Chagrin River, East Branch, SR 615, OH Cuyahoga River, Akron, OH (Sewer) Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Rd., OH Cuyahoga River, North Portage Path, Akron, OH Cuyahoga River, Riverview Rd., Northhampton, OH Lake Erie, Domonakas Library, Sheffield Lake, OH Lake Erie at Fredonia, Sewer Outfall, NY Lake Erie, Linwood Park, Vermilion, OH Lake Erie, Middle Bass Island, Put-in-Bay, OH Lake Erie State Park, Brocton, NY Lake Erie, SR 163, Port Clinton, OH Lake Erie, SR 531, Geneva, OH Lake Erie, Sturgeon Pt., Evans, NY Lake Erie, Walnut Blvd., Ashtabula, OH Lake Ontario, Lake Rd., Webster, NY Lake Ontario State Parkway, Orleans Co., NY Mill Creek, Warner Rd., Garfield Heights, OH Seneca Lake, Watkins Glen, NY Seneca River, Seneca Falls, NY St. Lawrence River, Shotbag Island, Clayton, NY Sugar River, Lower James Rd., NY Sugar River, WWTP, Constableville, NY Thatcher Brook, Gowanda, NY Fiscal Year Cost $505 61,670 8,479 70,545 4481 9,958 18,047 7,870 2,969 9,809 17,594 7,500 12,711 7,500 104,741 1,000 7,500 949 3,000 7,500 24,457 116,864 6,600 6,500 4,500 2,191 1. Does not include $3,248 in contributed funds. 32-45 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 32 (See Section 43 of Text) FFoorr LLaasstt Federal Full Contributed Report Date Funds Funds See Annual Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act' 1962 Aug 1977 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY - - 1954 R&H Act 1962 May 1981 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1962 Nov 1986 Crane Creek State Park, OH Nov 1979 1962 R&H Act 19683 Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov 1981 Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1982 Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug 1977 $1,524 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Act 1963 Aug 1977 Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act 1951 Nov 1983 29,000 Ithaca, NY-Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 8,159 Ithaca, NY-Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug 1977 12,300 - Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 19713 Nov 1977 12,000 Niagara River, Compensating Works, NY 1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug 1977 -- Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act 1986 Nov 1946 - Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act2 1963 May 1981 - Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act 1975 Nov 1986 361,241 Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 May 1981 19,010 Sheffield lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act - Aug 1977 -- Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 Aug 1977 43,182 1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 32-46 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area, about 230,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north of entrance to Los Angeles Harbor); lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ), which is in southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the United States parts of those small drainage basins in southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA ........... 33-2 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA .......................... 33-2 3. Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, CA ......................... 33-2 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA .............. 33-3 5. Oceanside Harbor, CA ................ 33-3 6. Port Hueneme, CA .................... 33-3 7. San Diego Harbor, CA .............. 33-3 8. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA .............................. 33-4 9. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA ............ 33-4 10. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA .......................... 33-4 11. Reconnaissance and condition surveys .......................... 33-4 Flood Control 12. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ .......................... 33-4 13. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA ................... 33-5 14. Gila River Basin, AZ: ............... 33-5 14A. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ .......................... 33-5 14B. Phoenix, AZ, and vicinity (including New River) .............. 33-5 14C. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ .......................... 33-6 15. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA ............................. 33-6 16. Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA ......................... 33-7 17. Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA .................. 33-7 18. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA ..................... 33-7 19. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV ............ 33-7 20. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA ............ 33-7 21. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA ................ 33-8 22. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA ..................... 33-8 Flood Control (Cont'd) 23. West Magnesia Canyon channel, Rancho Mirage, CA ................... 24. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....................... 25. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ............................ 26. Flood control work under special authorization .................. General Investigations 27. Surveys .............................. 28. Collection and study of basic data .................................. 29. Research and development ............ 30. Preconstruction engineering and design ........................... 30A. Goleta, CA, and vicinity, Santa Barbara County ............ 30B. Rillito River in the vicinity of Tucson, Gila River and tributaries, AZ ....................... 30C. Santa Ana River mainstem, including Santiago Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA .................. Page 33-8 33-8 33-8 33-8 33-9 33-9 33-9 33-9 33-9 33-9 33-9 Tables Table 33-A Cost and financial statement .................... 33-10 Table 33-B Authorizing legislation ................. .33-14 Table 33-C Other authorized navigation projects ........... 33-19 Table 33-D Other authorized beach erosion control projects ............. 33-20 Table 33-E Other authorized flood control projects ............... 33-21 Table 33-F Not applicable Table 33-G Deauthorized projects ........ 33-22 Table 33-H .Reconnaissance and condition surveys ............. 33-23 Table 33-I Inspection of completed flood control projects ......... 33-23 Table 33-J Flood control work under special authorization ...... .. 33-24 33-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California about a mile northwest of existing harbor of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two thousand and six hundred boat slips in 9 marinas, with restroom and shower facilities; dry storage area for 300 boats with 3-ton and 1-ton hoist facilities; 2 marine construction and repair yards with 5-ton travel lift and 35-ton hoist to 70-ton boatway haulout capacities; a fuel dock facility; a sportfishing complex; 6 restaurants; 2 coffee shops; 800 waterfront apartments-many with adjoining slips; 300 motel units; 4 yacht club buildings; 3 public convenience docks; a 66-slip guest boat complex; a harbor administration building/harbor patrol office and dock complex; a marine emporium complex, housing a chandlery store, a sail loft, a delicatessen, a fishing tackel shop, yacht sales, an underwater repair service, and an adjacent dock complex; a 7-lane free access public launch ramp, with paved pay parking for cars and trailers; a boaters' convenience center; a commercial fishing pier and hoist; 2 large public parks; a fire station; and a U.S. Coast Guard station. Waterwayconnected and north of the harbor is Mandalay Bay, a private keys-type waterfront homes development with an area for about 500 homes and connected dockage for boats. Transition from harbor to Mandalay Bay is restricted by a 4-lane high-rise bridge with a clearance height of 29 feet at high tide. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and completed maintenance dredging of sand trap and entrance channel in March 1987 at a cost of $2,933,597 regular funds and $734,818 Navy funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $15,174. 2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA Location. On coast of southern California in San Pedro Bay about 25 miles south of City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5147.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1984. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Terminal facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 82,553 feet of wharves, of which 75,729 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, 58,985 feet of wharves, of which 51,775 feet are owned by the city and 7,210 feet are owned by private interests. In Long Beach Harbor, Federal Government owns 19,700 feet of waterfront inside the Navy mole, exclusive of finger piers. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for channel and basin dredging (1976 modification of existing project) at a cost of $376,851 regular funds, $31,088 required contributed funds, and -$407,938 other contributed funds. Completed contract payment for maintenance repair (phase 3) of San Pedro breakwater at a cost of -$109,599 regular funds. 3. MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA Location. On coast of southern California, Santa Monica Bay in Los Angeles County, 20 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. About 6,039 boats are presently berthed in 20 operating anchorages, which afford 6,039 berths. A Coast Guard station with a permanently assigned 82-foot cutter; a firefighting detachment with a fire boat, a reserve fire boat, a pumper, and a ladder truck; and a sheriffs harbor patrol with 5 patrol boats and 5 auxiliary vessels are on 24-hour duty. Two fuel docks, one on each side of the main channel, are operational. A 10-lane public launching ramp with parking for 233 cars and trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and several commercial hoists are in operation, as well as 2 haul-out yards, one containing a 100-ton and 60-ton marine travel lift. Three hotels, 2 motels, a ship chandlery, a fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 26 restaurants, several snack bars, 5 coffee shops, and 8 yacht clubs called the Marina home port. About 5,886 apartments are almost fully occupied; and additional residential/transient facilities are being planned, including a total of 600 rooms in 2 high-rise hotels. The Marina has reached its design capacity for about 6,000 boats and dry storage for about 2,000 more. Condominium conversion of 600 mid-rise apartment units is under way. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance dredging in April 1987 at a cost of $616,615 regular funds and $75,109 other contributed funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $15,709. 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay, 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. None required under rehabilitation plan. Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers constructed by Navy; 550 feet of piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department of Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by City of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance dredging in June 1987 at a cost of $2,093,599 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $17,152. 5. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5101.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for maintenance to date. Terminal facilities. Berthing for 957 boats (783 single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips, and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors slips); 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars, with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a boatel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Operations during fiscal year. Completed maintenance dredging in November 1986 at a cost of -$9,031 regular funds and $209,983 Navy funds. Continued construction of second contract for experimental sand bypass system, pump facilities and power system, which is about 94 percent complete. Cost for construction was $1,539,908 regular funds. In addition, a reconnaissance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $3,915. 6. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, about 1 mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the City of Port Hueneme, 4 miles southwest of the City of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast of the City of Ventura. Existing project. Adoption, maintenance, and expansion of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels at Port Hueneme, constructed by local interests and subsequently acquired by the U.S. Navy. Harbor as modernized and expanded consists of a west jetty about 800 feet long; an east jetty about 1,000 feet long; an approach channel about 800 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 40 feet deep; an entrance channel about 1,550 feet long, 330 feet wide, and 36 feet deep; a central basin 1,080 feet long, 1,025 feet wide, and 35 feet deep; and a channel (channel A) 2,830 feet long, 275 feet wide, and 35 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 5.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. Terminal facilities. Oxnard Harbor District owns and operates terminal facilities known as the Port of Hueneme. Two commercial deep-water concrete wharves provide berthing space for vessels of 35-foot draft at mean lower low water; and 400 feet of medium draft berthing is available, as well as fishing vessel berthing. Ancillary facilities include extensive paved open storage areas; two clear span transit sheds and a warehouse provide 125,000 square feet of covered storage area, with ample rail and truck loading capability; and an administration building. Construction is under way to expand deep draft facilities to 5 berths. Plans also include expanding transit shed capacity by 60,000 to 80,000 square feet, with additional truck loading capacity. Expansion is scheduled for completion in mid-1988. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed harbor expansion in July 1987 at a cost of $374,443 regular funds and $720,543 other contributed funds. In addition, a reconnassiance and condition survey was conducted at a cost of $14,538. 7. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California just north of United States-Mexico boundary line, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report'for 1938. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on Page 33-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned wharves, of which 21,070 feet are Port District owned and 24,000 feet are 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and completed maintenance dredging in April 1987 at a cost of $947,236 regular funds. 8. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Location. The San Diego River has its source on the tableland in the Cuyamaca Mountains near Santa Ysabel, CA, and flows southwestward 52 miles to the Pacific Ocean at the City of San Diego. Mission Bay Harbor is adjacent to the outlet of the San Diego River, 77 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and 8 miles north of San Diego Harbor. Existing project. A leveed flood channel 800 feet wide, with a capacity of 115,000 cubic feet per second, from 0.4 mile above Morena Boulevard, 3.3 miles directly to the ocean; an altered railroad bridge over the leveed river flood channel; an entrance channel about 5,200 feet long, 670 feet wide, and 20 to 25 feet deep into Mission Bay; in the bay, a main channel and turning basin about 2,700 feet long, 1,000 feet wide, and 20 feet deep, and two anchorage basins, one about 3,200 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 15 feet deep, and the other about 1,600 feet long, ranging from 800 to 1,800 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; three jetties at the entrance; and stone revetment for the banks of the entrance and main channels and turning basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.4 feet. Extreme range is about 10 feet. Latest approved estimated (1986) first cost is $37,700,000 ($20,200,000 Federal and $17,500,000 non-Federal). This project modified the flood control project: "San Diego River Basin, California." (See H. Doc. 635, 77th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None, with the exception of mooring facilities for recreational craft and commercial sport-fishing boats only. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of supplemental project plan, which is about 98 percent complete. Continued preparation of environmental assessment, which is about 98 percent complete. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed maintenance repair of north jetty in September 1987 at a cost of $293,339 regular funds. 9. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 320 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5261.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. Terminal facilities. A wharf 2,000 feet long; a pier 325 feet long in harbor for tie-up mooring for Coast Guard cutter; landing float; an open mooring and slip anchorage for small craft; and a launching ramp for small craft. Operations during fiscal year. Awarded contract for and initiated maintenance dredging, which is about 35 percent complete, in December 1986 at a cost of $699,999 regular funds. 10. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CA Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and about 6 miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two fuel docks; guest berthing docks; 3 boat-repair facilities, 1 full service with a 60- ton travelift, 1 full service with a 150-ton marine elevator, and 1 do-it-yourself boatyard with a 20-ton travelift Fisherman's Pier, with 350-ton jib cranes for off-loading commercial fishing vessels; flake ice manufacturing and distribution system; 3 wholesale fish buying stations; a retail fish market and seafood restaurant; 1,800 boat slips; a mast up dry storage area for 112 trailerable boats; a 6-lane deluxe launch ramp; 2 yacht clubs; restaurants; cocktail lounges; sport-fishing facilities; harbor and offshore islands excursion boats; 3 yacht sales; marine communications sales and services; 3 marine chandleries; 2 public restroom buildings; a harbor administration building/harbor master's office; a headquarters/visitors center for Channel Islands National Park; marine related ancillary businesses, including a convenience grocery store, a marine bookstore, a dive shop, gift shops, and a jewelry store; and a 230-room resort and time-share hotel. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and completed maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap, and repair of detached breakwater in April 1987. Cost for maintenance dredging was $902,245 regular funds; and for breakwater repair, $386,499 regular funds. 11. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See table 33-H. Flood Control 12. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ, in a narrow gorge at river mile 39 on Bill Williams River, AZ, a tributary of Colorado River. 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 13. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. In and near the Cities of Upland, Rancho Cucamonga, and Ontario, and the communities of Alta Loma and San Antonio Heights, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA. Existing project. A debris basin on Cucamonga Creek and a concrete channel along Cucamonga Creek from the debris basin to Prado Dam; an improved San Antonio Heights diversion system that includes 6 debris basins and a concrete diversion channel that diverts West Cucamonga Creek headwaters into Cucamonga Creek; a collection levee and a debris basin downstream from Demens, Thorpe, and Angalls Canyons and a concrete outlet channel from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; a debris basin in Deer Canyon and a channel along Deer Creek from the debris basin to Cucamonga Creek; the Hillside debris basin in a canyon just west of Deer Canyon with an outlet channel to Deer Creek channel; an improved existing levee system along the west bank of Day Creek that assures flows from Day Canyon do not enter Deer Creek channel; turnouts that mitigate ground water basin recharge losses; landscaping appropriate for esthetic treatment; and recreational facilities in the project area. Subdrainage is provided along specific reaches of the channels. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 2, General Design for Flood Control and Recreation, Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, California," prepared by Los Angeles District in June 1973. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of fourteenth contract, erosion control of Cucamonga and Deer Creeks, in February 1987. Completed construction of sixteenth contract, recreational facilities (part 2), in October 1986. Cost for construction of channels was $5,000 regular funds; and for recreational facilities, $17,409 regular funds and $15,934 required contributed funds. 14. GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ 14A. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. On Gila River (mile 126) about 20 miles downstream from Gila Bend, AZ, in Gila River Basin, which is a part of Colorado River Basin. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 14B. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) Location. On Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, Dreamy Draw, New River, and Agua Fria River in and adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing project. Plan as modified by Division Engineer, South Pacific Division, in July 1977, provides for four dams and detention basins, one each on Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; Arizona Canal diversion channel; channel improvements on Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; flowage easements along Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers; flood plain management along Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; and recreational facilities. Approved estimated (1987) first cost for modified project is $421,712,000 (full funding estimate and includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $254,009,000 Federal and $167,703,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum-Phase I, Plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1976. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 1, Skunk Creek to Cactus Road, in February 1987. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers. Awarded contracts for Skunk Creek bank stabilization and for Agua Fria River levees, both in September 1987. Awarded contract for and initiated construction of Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 2A, Cactus Road to 47th Drive, which is about 97 percent complete. Awarded contract for, initiated, and completed construction of recreational facilities (phase 2) at Dreamy Draw Dam in July 1987. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 2B, 47th Drive to 29th Avenue; and awarded contract in September 1987. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for recreational facilities, Arizona Canal diversion channel, City of Glendale. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications ,for -Gave Creek channel and sediment basin. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 3, 29th Avenue to Dreamy Draw Dam. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Costs for construction of channels were $4,616,075 regular funds, $121,320 required contributed funds, and $282,212 other contributed funds. Costs for construction of dam were $52,112 regular funds and $1,227 required 33-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 contributed funds; and for recreational facilities, $127,658 regular funds and $127,645 required contributed funds. 14C. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. On Queen Creek, AZ, a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-10 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; and administered real estate. 15. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, CA. Previous project. For details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1941; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Flood control improvements in four stream basins in Los Angeles County, CA, as follows: Los Angeles River Basin, San Gabriel River Basin, Rio Hondo Basin, and Ballona Creek Basin. Protection of about 325,000 acres in densely populated Los Angeles County, including areas in Los Angeles, Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank, and other cities. Five flood control dams (Hansen, Lopez, Santa Fe, Sepulveda, and Whittier Narrows); debris basins at mouths of 22 canyons; channel improvements along 101.3 miles of Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek; and channel improvements along 192.89 miles of tributary channels. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1962. For other pertinent information, see table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." A rehabilitation plan was approved in May 1984. The rehabilitation plan provides for restoring deteriorated portions of the Los Angeles River channel along a 23.5- mile reach from Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road, and for repairing and improving the Los Angeles River channel along a 1-mile reach upstream from Sepulveda Dam in the vicinity of Balboa Boulevard. Latest approved estimated (1985) Federal first cost for rehabilitation is $29,700,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period). A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-11 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operations for units in Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Compton Creek: Maintained channel in good operating condition from Alameda Street to Hooper Avenue storm drain. (b) Haines Canyon: Maintained debris basin and channel upstream from Plainview Avenue in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Hansen Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Lopez Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (e) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road: Administered real estate. Completed construction of seventh rehabilitation contract, sideslope (Olympic Blvd. to Washington Blvd.) and main channel invert (4th St. to Washington Blvd.), in December 1986. Completed construction of eighth rehabilitation contract, subdrain flapgates (Dayton Ave. to Stewart and Gray Rd.), in December 1986. Awarded contract for and initiated construction of ninth rehabilitation contract, main channel invert overlay under 4 bridges (Golden State Fwy to Fletcher Dr.), which is about 98 percent complete. Initiated and completed construction of tenth rehabilitation contract, main channel invert overlay (Dayton Ave. to Atlantic Blvd.), in January 1987. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for eleventh rehabilitation contract, main channel invert overlay (Niagara St. to Burbank-Western channel confluence). Completed preparation of plans and specifications for twelfth rehabilitation contract, main channel invert overlay (Dayton Ave. to Soto St.); and awarded contract in September 1987. Cost for construction of channels was $4,191,941 regular funds. (f) Los Angeles River channel, Santa Ana Branch, Pacific Electric railway bridge to Pacific Ocean: Completed construction of phase 2A construction of recreational facilities in November 1986 at a cost of $41,353 regular funds, $107,413 required contributed funds, and $116,365 other contributed funds. (g) Sepulveda Dam: Continued preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in San Gabriel River Basin: (a) Santa Fe Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Initiated preparation of revised master plan. (b) San Gabriel River channel, San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam, Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work): Maintained channel in good operating condition. (c) Whittier Narrows Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in Rio Hondo Basin: (a) Alhambra Wash: Maintained channel upstream from Valley Boulevard in good operating condition. (b) Rio Hondo channel, Whittier Narrows Dam to Los Angeles River (lower): Completed construction of phase 2A construction of recreational facilities in November 1986 at a cost of $41,353 regular funds, $107,413 required contributed funds, and $116,365 other contributed funds. Operations for unit in Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties: Maintained channel downstream from Washington Boulevard to La Salle Avenue and downstream from Los Angeles city boundary to ocean; jetties; and Pacific Avenue bridge in good operating condition. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 16. LOS COCHES CREEK, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Location. In the community of Lakeside, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for a 1.8-mile-long rectangular concrete channel; an inlet structure just downstream from the Los Coches Creek bridge and adjacent to Los Coches and Ha-Hana Roads; and an outlet structure at the confluence of the San Diego River. Plan also provides for 5 double box culverts and 1 triple box culvert. Latest approved estimated (1983) first cost for project is $6,197,000 ($4,000,000 Federal and $2,197,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1985. Operations during fiscal year. Completed first construction contract in February 1987; and initiated phase I mitigation contract, which is about 98 percent complete, at a cost of $1,237,736 regular funds and $2,185,239 required contributed funds. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for phase II mitigation measures. 17. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Near San Bernardino and Colton, San Bernardino County, CA. Existing project. A rectangular concrete channel extending for 3.5 miles along East Branch of Lytle Creek from existing Foothill Boulevard inlet structure to confluence with Warm Creek; a concrete trapezoidal channel on Warm Creek for 1.5 miles from confluence with East Branch of Lytle Creek to confluence with Santa Ana River; a leveed channel extending about 1.8 miles along Santa Ana River from mouth of existing East Twin and Warm Creeks concrete channel to Mount Vernon Avenue crossing; 4 replaced railroad bridges and 12 replaced highway bridges; 3 new highway bridges; inlets for side drainage; and relocated and protected utilities. Design capacities of improvements are: East Branch of Lytle Creek, 58,000 cubic feet per second; Warm Creek, 60,000 to 90,000 cubic feet per second; and Santa Ana River, 167,000 to 234,000 cubic feet per second. Authorized project was modified by Design Memorandum No. 1, approved in May 1972, which contains a map of modified project plan. Supplement to Design Memorandum No. 1 was approved in August 1985. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed constructed to partly correct project deficiency in May 1987 at a cost of $1,399,364 regular funds. 18. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 19. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dams in good operating condition and administered real estate. 20. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Lower San Luis Rey River Valley along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road (river mile 7.2) to Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for about 5.7 miles of earth-bottom trapezoidal channel along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road to about 1 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101; about 1.5 miles of channel grading, which would generally be limited to the removal of spoil banks, from about 1 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101 to ocean; and about 800 feet of stone-revetted levee on the left (south) bank from the Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad to ocean. Plan also provides for beautification features. Latest approved estimated (1986) first cost for project is $45,400,000 ($33,900,000 Federal and $11,500,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; perform necessary construction, modification, or relocation of highways (including bridges), utilities, and irrigation and drainage facilities; maintain and operate works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; adjust water-rights claims resulting from project; prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce flood-carrying capacities of improved channel; and provide guidance and leardership in preventing unwise future development of flood plain. Under terms of Water Resources Development Act of 1986, contribute minimum project 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 cost share of 25 percent and maximum project cost share of 50 percent, including a minimum of 5 percent cash during construction. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated preparation of supplemental project plan, phase II, which is about 60 percent complete. 21. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Location. On Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. General plan of improvement. For details, see page 33-14 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. For other pertinent information, see table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. (a) Brea Dam: Initiated preparation of revised master plan. Continued preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Fullerton Dam: Continued preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Prado Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Initiated preparation of water control manual. (e) San Antonio Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (f) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. 22. SWEET WATER RIVER SWEET WATER RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Lower Sweetwater River Valley, along Sweetwater River from Interstate Freeway 805 to San Diego Bay, San Diego County, CA. Existing Project. Plan as modified provides for about 3.2 miles of improved trapezoidal channel along Sweetwater River from Interstate Freeway 805 to San Diego Bay as part of a combined flood control and highway project. Latest approved estimated (1986) first cost for project is $49,000,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $25,200,000 Federal and $23,800,000 non- Federal. Map of modified plan is in "General Design Memorandum No. Ifor Sweetwater River Flood Control Channel, San Diego County, California," prepared bS' Los Angeles District in March 1982 and revised in May 1984. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-16 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Contract payment for construction of channels at a cost of $2,930,878 regular funds; and for relocations, $1,039,061 regular funds. Construction was terminated as a result of a court injunction issued in April 1987 because of environmental mitigation problems. 23. WEST MAGNESIA CANYON CHANNEL, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA Location. In the City of Rancho Mirage, Riverside County, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for a debris basin at mouth of Magnesia Spring Canyon; a 1.4-mile-long rectangular concrete channel; and an energy dissipator at the confluence of the Whitewater River. Plan also provides for preservation and enhancement of wildlife habitat values on 20 acres of alluvial cone. Latest approved estimated (1983) first cost for project is $8,279,000 ($4,000,000 Federal and $4,279,000 non- Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-10 of Annual Report for 1985. Operations during fiscal year. Completed first construction contract in November 1986; and initiated mitigation contract, which is about 98 percent complete. Cost for construction of channel was $130,393 required contributed funds; and for bridge alteration, $166,322 required contributed funds. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $279,747. (See table 33-I on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 25. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued for the following Bureau of Reclamation projects: Hoover Dam and Twitchell Dam. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $56,775. 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-J on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $1,213 for Rillito River, Pima County, AZ; $905 for Nazlini Wash, Chinle, Apache County, AZ; $3,136 for Gila River, Pima Bridge, Safford, Graham County, AZ; $1,567 for Santa Ana River, Colton, San Bernardino County, CA; $21,000 for 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Arroyo Conejo Creek, Camarillo, Ventura County, CA; and $1,822 for Chino Canyon, Palm Springs, Riverside County, CA. Emergency flood control activities- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $238,872, all of which was for advance preparation. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements at fiscal year cost of $6,568 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. General Investigations 27. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $5,278,164 regular funds, of which $898,574 were for navigation studies; $36,746 were for beach erosion control studies; $2,883,145 were for flood control studies; $1,046,893 were for surveys; $82,189 were for special studies involving coordination with other agencies; $215,345 were for review of authorized projects; and $115,272 were for miscellaneous activities. 28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $184,157 for technical services; and $40,868 for flood plain management. 29. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year cost was $12,821 for hydrologic studies. 30. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 30A. GOLETA, CA, AND VICINITY, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY Goleta, CA, and vicinity is in Goleta Valley along Atascadero Creek and its tributaries, including Tecolotito, Carneros, San Pedro, Las Vegas, San Jose, and Maria Ygnacio Creeks, from the Santa Ynez Mountains in Santa Barbara County to Pacific Ocean near Goleta, CA. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, -ublic Law 91-611, dated December 31, 1970. Plan of improvement provides for about 12.5 miles of channel improvement, comprising abodit 1.3 miles of channel clearing and about 11.2 miles of channel construction. Channel clearing would be required on Maria Ygnacio, San Jose, Las Vegas, San Pedro, and Carneros Creeks. Channel construction would include the improvement of Atascadero Creek from San Marcos Road to ocean; Maria Ygnacio Creek from Hollister Avenue to Atascadero Creek; San Jose Creek from 0.2 mile north of U.S. Highway No. 101 to San Pedro Creek; Las Vegas Creek from Cathedral Oaks Road to San Pedro Creek; San Pedro Creek from a point 0.1 mile downstream from Stow Canyon Road to Atascadero Creek; Carneros Creek from 0.6 mile upstream from U.S. Highway No. 101, by means of a diversion route, to Tecolotito Creek; and Tecolotito Creek from U.S. Highway No. 101 to Atascadero Creek. Plan also provides for beautification and recreation features. Continued preparation of project plan, phase I, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,650,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $16,419. 30B. RILLITO RIVER IN THE VICINITY OF TUCSON, GILA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AZ Rillito River and associated streams are in the north and east parts of the Tucson metropolitan area, Pima County, AZ. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, dated November 17, 1986. Plan of improvement provides for bank erosion control and grade control structures to prevent degradation; landscaping; and recreational features. Initiated preparation of project plan during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $830,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $69,787. 30C. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, INCLUDING SANTIAGO CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Santa Ana River mainstem, including Santiago Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA, is on Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, dated November 17, 1986. Plan of improvement provides for construction of Seven Oaks Dam in the San Bernardino Mountains north of Redlands, San Bernardino County; management of flood plain between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Reservoir; raising Mill Creek levee near Redlands; improvement of Oak Street Drain in Corona, Riverside County; enlargement of existing Prado Dam and reservoir, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties; improvement of lower Santa Ana River channel from Prado Dam to Pacific Ocean; and improvement of lower reach of Santiago Creek channel in Orange County; recreational development along project length; purchase of 8 acres of salt marsh for mitigation of project effects; and purchase of 84 acres of wetlands at mouth of Santa Ana River for preservation of endangered least tern habitat. Continued preparation of project plan, phase II, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $27,300,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $7,531,750. 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 3. Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Oceanside Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 6. Port Hueneme, CA (Regular Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. : Approp. Cost -$164,000 2,157,690 -$340,000 -268,794 704,000 3,062,364 3,513,800 3,513,156 -$69,000 17,627 1,102,904 1,065,667 80,057 515,690 165,000 1,676,263 3,021,874 2,920,156 -1,970,133 1,162,500 2,411,303 1,001,590 200,000 28,704 -305,657 1,110,676 122,601 11,000 10,625 - - $5,123,3451 - - 5,123,3451 261,415 3,203,174 24,693,8952 273,870 3,198,140 24,682,4292 - - 64,710,719s 18,467 391,771 64,709,402$ 1,821,249 1,566,000 13,336,212' 1,889,994 1,481,763 13,224,378' - - 1,203,180 - 31,088 1,200,514 - - 37,961,705 b - -406,047 37,104,2346 - - 4,238,7526 - - 4,238,752 61,871 969,709 2,354,6177 59,576 840,434 2,223,047 - - 4,238,752 - - 4,238,752 - - 120,840 - - 114,000 - - 1,843,146 - - 1,843,146 - 175,000 175,000 - 75,109 75,109 - - 2,612,0938 - - 2,612,0938 149,093 2,392,152 12,207,0589 251,252 2,331,215 12,195,256 9 - - 2,128,411 - - 2,128,411 5,019,575 2,518,915 16,766,52910 5,192,340 2,301,884 16,394,53510 - - 491,286" - - 491,286" - - 1,200,000 - - 1,187,500 15,000 580,000 2,076,400 65,934 483,161 1,979,561 5,000 14,538 1,275,60612 16,191 14,538 1,273,44212 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 Other Contrib. Funds) 7. San Diego Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. unds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 8. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 9. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 10. Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA 12. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ 13. Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 14A. Gila River Basin, AZ, Painted Rock Dam (Gila River) New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cog+ New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost - 810,475 - 720,543 119,610 202,656 662,437 35,000 58,373 -107,000 3,154,990 13,127 112,300 1,24 66,685 113,854 1,22 69,000 58,939 -20,600 14,774 19,586 44,475 83,097 33 31 868,563 778,152 119,610 - 28,094,095s 40 28,092,239 s 8,243 3,641,00814 4,701 3,611,22714 - 717,910 - 715,215 - 1,926,56315 - 1,900,06316 - 11,974,09916 190 11,972,42216 4,000 5,125,34817 9,850 5,109,50817 --- - 172,00018 - - - 172,00018 341,000 328,000 720,700 787,000 10,095,81919 729,914 324,420 686,790 823,733 10,094,29319 - - - 1,711,53t- -.- - 1,711,53920 653,000 1,635,000 1,823,920 1,659,500 17,411,85721 818,882 1,635,618 1,836,388 1,644,746 17,393,90221 - -525 494,000 546,000 580,299 579,462 -56 697,000 684,264 100,000 1,553,000 160,600 1,041,150 2,686,070 370,430 -39,526 6,823 472,000 479,419 458,000 57,000 - 491,644 64,521 -57,000 47,380 27,728 752,000 751,204 651,000 616,553 - 16,934,060 581 16,934,060 777,000 5,902,799 741,897 5,828,089 - 93,360,500 45,747 93,311,017 - 600,512 15,934 579,842 - 9,390,853 49 9,332,327 - 19,980,564 - 19,980,56423 805,000 8,990,148 803,109 8,912,968 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS AACCTTIIVVIITTIISE S FOR FY 1987 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 14B. Gila River Basin, AZ, Phoenix, AZ, and vicinity including New River) (Regular Funds) Required Contrib.) unds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 14C. Gila River Basin, AZ, Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek 15. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 16. Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) 17. Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA 18. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 19. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 12,860,000 5,600,000 16,539,000 34,500,000 11,998,004 6,526,194 15,556,495 8,925,957 500,000 624,923 143,000 206,863 -23,800 858,698 3,084,000 6,864,570 5,000,000 1,800,240 166,382 31 2 621,000 149,008 1,775,000 10,169 135,000 134,559 207,361 4,264,000 3,474,626 6,520,000 9,475,162 6,028 516,000 3, 4, 63 08,007 200,000 28,946 51,373 - 245,000 2, 10,054 240,846 1, - 100,000 4, - - 3, - 200,000 2 -6,210 202,993 1 342,000 275,000 588,335 391,117 119,394,297 92,066,723 333,500 745,000 3,413,714 275,076 251,052 2,053,737 - 1,730,000 3,964,700 740,297 282,212 1,429,240 - - 1,867,96324 - - 1,867,96324 42,000 58,000 1,001,413 39,914 52,423 992,728 - - 377,026,88525 26 -1,199 4,647 377,023,328 27 ,444,000 3,649,400 59,273,42025 28 ,423,901 2,911,406 58,255,40328 29 ,869,000 11,121,000 29,510,000 ,929,743 4,566,377 19,771,282 - - 13,933,3410 659 366 13,891,23231 - - 516,00032 352,572 107,413 459,985" - - 36,644,86534 -_ 36,639,8888 161,186 - 669,19335 241,091 116,365 637,775" ,070,000 1,400,000 4,000,000 ,994,218 1,407,470 3,919,716 ,700,000 1,587,488 6,387,488 ,915,870 2,225,517 6,141,387 ,583,000 150,000 37,978,83137 ,150,453 1,538,906 37,908,42037 - - 17,838,198 - - 17,838,198 116,000 134,000 3,278,548 180,500 115,710 3,259,604 - - 286,300 - - 284,501 S- 1,401,248 - - 1,401,248 240,000 143,000 105,000 107,000 1,211,356 261,434 139,766 108,416 106,915 1,208,840 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 20. San Luis Rey New Work: River, San Luis Rey Approp. 75,000 - - 250,000 1,689,000 River Basin, CA Cost - 73,974 301 223,717 1,661,992 21. Santa Ana River New Work: Basin (and Orange Approp. 23,800 - - - 47,994,738 * 4o County), CA Cost 770,398 17,747 -436 2,211 47,994,738 ' (Regular Funds) Maint: Approp. 1,377,000 2,039,000 1,886,600 1,728,000 25,885,410 41 43 Cost 1,775,951 2,202,404 1,982,194 1,670,993 25,746,496m '2 3 Required Contrib. New Work: unds) Contrib. -17,394 - - -38,322 3,065,000" Cost -432 - 4,132 -38,322 3,065,000" Maint.: Contrib. - 75,000 - - 75,0000 Cost - - 67,555 100 67,6553 22. Sweetwater River, New Work: Sweetwater River Approp. 1,500,000 4,000,000 6,242,000 6,919,000 20,285,503 Basin, CA Cost 467,244 4,964,685 6,295,436 4,164,487 17,507,766 23. West Magnesia New Work: Canyon channel, Approp. 80,000 705,000 2,765,000 - 4,000,000 Rancho Mirage, CA Cost 84,040 322,836 3,146,924 275 4,000,000 (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. New Work: unds) Contrib. - 350,000 1,974,206 - 2,324,206 Cost - 266,137 1,715,919 336,250 2,318,306 1. Excludes $1,361,668 Navy funds; Coast Guard costs; and $210,748 other contributed funds. 2. Includes $41,767 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $5,624,131 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 3. Includes $2,187,047 for new work for previous project; $1,593,667 public works funds; a credit of $33,050 for transfer of land at Reservation Point; and $996,792 emergency relief funds. Excludes Federal funds spent by the Navy for new work on middle breakwater, and Coast Guard costs. 4. Includes $139,347 for maintenance for previous project and $177,076 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 5. Includes $1,672,575 for new work betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. Excludes $87,120 for maintenance betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. 6. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 7. Includes $103,862 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 8. Navy funds. 9. Includes $371,943 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958 and $307,945 Navy funds. Excludes $124,578 other contributed funds. 10. Includes $73,719 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $5,380,249 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 11. For jetty and groin extensions desired by local interests. 12. Includes $75,606 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 13. Includes $154 704 for new work for previous project; $86,352 public works funds; and $1,226,793 emergency relief funds. Excludes $254,795 Navy funds for dredging entrance channel in FY 1961 to depth of -42 feet mean lower low water (or 2 feet below project depth); and Coast Guard costs. 14. Includes $59,904 for maintenance for previous project and $200,972 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since TF-i95.in addit ti includesi $144 for retroactive pay increase shown in "cost" figure only, as reported in 1958 Annual Report, page 1430. Excludes $270,696 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 15. Includes $4,441 for betterments desired by local interests prior to modification by 1968 River and Harbor Act. 16. Excludes $557,832 other contributed funds. Includes $2,610,000 regular funds and excludes $2,910,000 required contributed funds, both for new work on flood control project, "San Diego River Basin, California." 17. Includes $103,116 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 18. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 19. Includes $29,198 public works funds; $11,000 working funds for work performed in addition to existing project; and $19,741 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $462,986 other contributed funds spent by the Corps for maintenance-dredging betterments desired by local interests. 20. Excludes $1,708,836 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 21. Includes $89,819 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $10,000 after contributed funds. 22. Includes $57,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1975. 23. Includes $357,469 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 24. Includes $3,758 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 25. Includes $11,008,935 emergency relief funds for new work. Excludes $16,726,888 emergency relief funds spent by Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project and $107,939 for minor rehabilitation. 26. Includes $23,763,900 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,226,100 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,290,000 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $535,000 for Hansen Dam; $10,422,100 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,562,200 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,483,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 27. Includes $23,760,342 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,223,226 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,289.734 for Whittier 33-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $535,000 for Hansen Dam; $10,421,682 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,562,200 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,483,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 28. Jncludes $2,013,400 for recreational facilities since FY 1985($1,518,400 for Sepulveda Dam and $495,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 29. Includes $1,495,509 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($1,003,097 for Sepulveda Dam and $492,412 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 30. Includes $13,933,341 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,797,556 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $199,541 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,500 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,467,538 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,191,500 for Ballona Creek channel). 31. Includes $13,891,232 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,755,767 for Whittier Narrows Darn; $199,541 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,180 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,467,538 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,191,500 for Ballona Creek channel). 32. Includes $516,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($516,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 33. Includes $459,985 for recreational facilities since FY 1986 ($459,985 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 34. Non-Federal funds spent by the Federal Government to September 30, 1987, for replacements required as part of local cooperation and betterments desired by local interests. Excludes $4,238,000 other contributed funds spent by the Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project. 35. Includes $669,194 for recreational facilities since FY 1984 ($299,194 for Santa Fe Dam and $370,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 36. Includes $637,775 for recreational facilities since FY 1984 ($299,194 for Santa Fe Dam and $338,581 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING 37. Excludes $5,499,193 other contributed funds. 38. Comprises funds for Brea, Fullerton, Prado, and San Antonio Dams, Carbon Canyon Dam and channel, Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel. 39. Includes $5,000 working funds for San Antonio Dam; $67,361 for San Juan Dam (deauthorized unit) (also reported under "Deauthorized Projects"); and $85,310 undistributed funds. Excludes other contributed funds spent by the Corps, as follows: $124,105 for water conservation betterments desired by local interests at Prado Dam; $8,500 for betterments desired by local interests at San Antonio Dam; $234,709 for betterments desired by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel; and $601,762 for required items of local cooperation on Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements. Excludes $290,000 spent direct by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel for local cooperation items not required. 40. Includes $5,920,831 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,264,300 or Fullerton Dam; and $3,597,800 for Prado Dam). 41. Includes $114,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($114,000 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 42. Includes $112,996 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($112,996 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 43. Excludes maintenance for Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, which are operated and maintained by local interests. 44. Includes $3,065,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,388,651 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,250,349 for Fullerton Dam; and $426,000 for Prado Dam). 45. Includes $75,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($75,000 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 46. Includes $67,655 for recreational facilities since FY 1986 ($67,655 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Sep. 3, 1954 2. June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. For silt-diversion works. H. Doc. 362, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 18, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 64th Cong., 2d sess. 33-14 - -- -- LOS ANGELES. CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLAI1ON See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Do. Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 17, 1940 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor H. Doc. 1013, 66th Cong., entrance channel. 3d sess. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance H. Doc. 349, 68th 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor Cong., 1st sess. turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation Rivers and Harbors of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). Committee Doc. 33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles S. Doc. 130, 71st Cong., inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 650 2d sess. feet wide in East Basin from turning basin to U.S. station 406; dredge 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; a turning basin 35 feet deep at Long Beach; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot-wide entrance channel to Los Angeles S. Committee print, outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 74th Cong., 1st sess. feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. Dredge to a depth of 40 feet areas A and B adjacent to H. Doc. 843, 76th Cong., 40-foot-depth entrance channel; construct and maintain a 3d sess. rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward direction from northeast end of existing detached breakwater; dredge about 4 million cubic yards initially for a settling basin at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel, and deposit material on beaches eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of areas A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modifi- H. Doc. 161, 83d Cong., cation of existing project. This act provides that the Secre- 1st sess. tary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefor and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a H. Doc. 401, 86th Cong., modification of existing project. 2d sess. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet H. Doc 94-594, 94th deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Cong., 2d seas.i Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long;, West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures 33-15 _ _ - - , -. ~ _ _ __ _ ~ ~ ~ I _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ __ I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Sep. 3, 1954 4. Mar. 2, 1945 5. Oct. 27, 1965 6. Aug. 13, 1968 7. Mar. 3, 1875 Sep. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels. H. Doc, 389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to H. Doc, 283, 77th Cong., bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro 1st sess. Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar H. Doc. 76, 89th Cong., Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. 1st sess. PORT HUENEME, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing harbor for deep- H. Doc. 362, 90th Cong., draft vessels; dredged central basin to 35 feet deep; and 2d sess. widen, dredge to 35 feet deep, and extend southernmost interior channel. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Annual Report, 1873; p. 1142 Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. H. Ex. Doc. 177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p. 2114) Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 H. Doc. 961, 60th Cong., feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet 1st sess. deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 H. Doc. 1309, 62d Cong., feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet 3d sess. deep. Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by H. Doc. 648, 64th Cong., dredging area C (north of area B). 1st sess. Dredging area A (south of area B). Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. Dredging areas D and E. H. Doc. 1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 River and Harbors by dredging a portion of area F (north of area C). Committe Doc. 2, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south S. Doc. 81, 71st Cong., and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, 2d sess. widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista. Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet H. Doc. 223, 73d Cong., from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to navel 2d sess. air station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q, Q-1, M, N, and 0. Rivers and Harbors Committe Doc. 89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S) of about 3,000 acres, H. Doc. 844, 76th Cong., 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent 3d sess. to southern end of basin. Dredge triangular approaches to 26- and 35-foot H. Doc. 390, 77th Cong., anchorages, area M. 1st sess. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete H. Doc. 365, 90th Cong., uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. 2d sess. 33-16 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) Date of Authorizing Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 8. July 24, 1946 9. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 10. Aug. 13, 1968 12. Dec. 22, 1944 13. Aug. 13, 1968 14A. May 17, 1950 14B. Oct. 27, 1965 14C. July 24, 1946 15. June 22, 1936 May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. VENTURA MARINA (VENTURA HARBOR), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. CUCAMONGA CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Debris-collection facilities, with a system of channels, and a diversion system. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), tILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government nstead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000.) H. Doc. 760, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1 S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 518, 87th Cong., 2d sess.' None H. Doc. 356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 323, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. None None None 33-17 See Section in Text Documents --- L-~ -- -- - ~Y REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 16. Feb. 7, 19852 17. Oct. 27, 1965 18. July 14, 1960 19. May 17, 1950 20. Dec. 17, 19703 Nov. 17, 1986 21. June 22. 1936 Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under the comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. Authorized modification of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. LOS COCHES CREEK, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA Channel improvements. LYTLE AND WARM CREEKS, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Channels and levees. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. Authorized non-Federal project cost sharing at a minimum of 25 percent and a maximum of 50 percent. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None None None None None None None None None None S. Doc. 53, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. None None 33-18 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of H. Doc. 688, 75th Cong., improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 3d sess. for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States, $3,500,000.) Aug. 18, 1941 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for None prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Dec. 22, 1944 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned 2d sess.' flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. July 3, 1958 Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million None for prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA 22. Aug. 13, 1968 Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong., control and highway project. 1st sess. WEST MAGNESIA CANYON CHANNEL, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 23. Feb. 7, 19852 Debris basin, channel improvements, energy dissipator, None and preservation and enhancement of wildlife values. 1. Contains latest published map. 3. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions Works Committees resolution under provisions of section 201, of section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended. Public Law 89-298. TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Dana Point Harbor, CA Completed 1984 $4,737,5501 555,1472 Harbor office at Morro Bay, CA - - - Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, San Pedro Bay, CA 3 Newport Bay Harbor, CA Inactive & 1982 796,8974 621,5455 Active (mod)3 Port San Luis, CA Completed & 1984 1,426,0506 1,042,3527 Active (mod) Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA Completed & 1984 4,766,8989 1,765,252io Active (mod)s Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA 3 1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 2. Includes $45,147 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 33-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 33-C (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 3. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. 4. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 5. Includes $137,622 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed funds. 6. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes $104,031 expended in FY 1987. TABLE 33-D 7. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act and $18,958 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Includes $90,130 expended in FY 1987. 8. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 9. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 10. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. Includes $293,167 expended in FY 1987. For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, CA 1 Completed 1967 $89,119 Bird Rock area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA2 Completed 1967 25,8813 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro breakwater, CA Completed 1972 1,253,5944 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), CA Completed 1968 578,7175 - Imperial Beach, CA Active 1986 2,194,3676 - Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA7 Completed 1960 7,912 - Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,442 - San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,0009 - San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Active 1985 9,722,100 - Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,81911 - & Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H. Doc. 602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes 75,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes 1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes 431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Excludes $919,437 required contributed funds; $66,124 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 7. Plant in service. 8. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 10. Excludes $4,626,638 for required contributed funds. Includes $10,772 expended in FY 1987. 11. Excludes $117,406 other contributed funds for beachnourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 33-20 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville, AZ' Completed 1984 $3,000,000 - City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA' Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Indian Bend Wash Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson diversion channel Goleta, CA, and vicinity Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (modification) Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Little Colorado River at Holbrook, AZ Needles, San Bernardino County, CA' Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA' Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, CA' Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA' Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA' San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee Mill Creek levees Riverside levees San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA' Completed Deferred Active (part) & Deferred (part) Completed Inactive Active Deferred Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Terminated Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed 400,000$ 1963 1966 1985 1975 1970 1968 1982 1986 1982 1950 1973 1970 1973 1972 1978 1962 1961 1959 1985 1961 1984 1983 1984 73,2014 31,809,294' 2,413,051 402,867 121,509' 10,218,900 6,922,6316 500,000 335,000 1,000,0008 1,000,0009 212,745 195,194 982,43210 1,708,437 7,753,93711 617,89012 2,104,478 9,258,2071" 2,126,672 10,079,92714 4,790,1731 4,000,00016 33-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 33-E (Cont') OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA' Active 1985 632,158 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA' Active 1985 844,732 7 - Tijuana River Basin, CA Completed 1979 1,703,03118 Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel Completed 1964 939,90819 Ventura River levee Completed 1950 1,349,63820 Whitewater River, CA 7 Whitewater River Basin, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County1 Completed 1966 97,868 Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs Completed 1973 819,87821 Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements Completed 1967 1,420,55222 Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 & Deferred (part) 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of 11. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 2. Excludes $187,965 required contributed funds. 12. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 13. Excludes $712,000 other contributed funds. 4. Advance planning only. 14. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. Includes 5. Excludes $304,720 required contributed funds and $74 expended in FY 1987. $3,130,762 other contributed funds. Includes $31,071 15. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local expended in FY 1987. cooperation items not required and $49,458 other contributed 6. Includes $1,158,006 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. funds. Includes $20,652 expended in FY 1987. Excludes $749,058 required contributed funds and $394,364 16. Excludes $559,525 required contributed funds. other contributed funds. 17. Includes $3,846 expended in FY 1987. Excludes 7. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of $104,941 other contributed funds. 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 18. International Boundary and Water Commission funds. 8. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and 19. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. $91,160 other contributed funds. 20. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. Excludes 9. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and $17,006 other contributed funds. $176,295 other contributed funds. 21. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds and $53,470 10. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and other contributed funds. $154,733 other contributed funds. 22. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA 1958 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 33-22 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-G (Cont') DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV 1964 1977 $295,191 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Aliso Creek Dam - 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 San Juan Dam 1950 1986 67,361 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 Trabuco Dam - 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 Villa Park Dam - 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 Sierra Madre Wash channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA 1986 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA 1975 1986 213,313 - Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 11 of Text) Project Date Newport Bay Harbor, CA October 1986 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA June 1987 Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), CA April 1987 TABLE 33-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 24 of Text) Project Date Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA July 1987 San Diego River channel and levees, San Diego River Basin, CA July 1987 33-23 - -- --- -- -- --- -- ----- LI REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, As Amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 33-J (See Section 26 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Costs Ephriam Canyon Wash, Nogales, AZ $250 Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, CA 99,238 Mission Zanja Creek, CA 9,119 Rialto Channel, Rialto, CA 109,538 Santa Clara River, Fillmore, CA 42,169 33-24 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, CA .............. 34-1 2. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA ...... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ....................... 34-2 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA ........................ 34-2 5. Santa Cruz Harbor, CA .............. 34-3 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .............................. 34-3 7. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .......................... 34-3 Flood Control 8. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 34-3 9. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ........................ 34-4 General Investigations 10. Surveys ................................ 11. Collection and Study of Basic Data....... 12. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .. .......................... Page 34-4 34-4 34-4 Tables Table 34-A Cost and Financial Statement .................. 34-5 Table 34-B Authorizing Legislation ....... 34-8 Table 34-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... 34-8 Table 34-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ....... 34-9 Table 34-E Not Applicable Table 34-F Not Applicable Table 34-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 34-9 Navigation 1. FISHERMAN'S WHARF AREA, SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA Location. Fisherman's Wharf is located on San Francisco Bay on the northern waterfront of the City of San Francisco, approximately 2-1/2 miles east of the Golden Gate Bridge. (See USGS Quad Sheet San Francisco North, Calif. N3745-W12222.5/7.5) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete sheet pile breakwater starting 150 feet to the west of Hyde Street Pier; curving around the end of Hyde Street Pier and extending in an easterly direction to an extension of the east fender line of Pier 45. The entrance is a 165-foot channel between the breakwater and the end of Pier 45. The total length of this sheet pile breakwater is 1,509 feet. In addition there are two segmented breakwaters (28-foot solid walls with 6-foot openings), one 150 feet long extending in a northerly direction in the abandoned slip at the end of Pier 45, and the second is a 250-foot section 250 feet from the bayward end of, and on the west side of Pier 45. Also included are two 10-foot wide caps which may be used as walkways for the purpose of recreational pier fishing. Pedestrian access is constructed to the 150-foot segmented break-water. Access to the 1,509-foot solid breakwater, included in Phase II Construction is delayed indefinently until reconstruction of Hyde Street Pier by locals. Federal and non-Federal costs were $8,293,695 and $722,275, respectively. Construction contract was awarded in February 1985 to Riedel International, Inc. of Portland, OR. Total contract award was $7,887,000 with final contract cost being $7,818,375. Construction was completed in October 1986. Local cooperation. The Agreement of Local Cooperation, along with estimated costs, was negotiated 34-1 _ ____ I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 with, and accepted by, the local sponsor. The 221 Agreement was signed by the local sponsor on 13 November 1984. Terminal facilities. Project protects existing commercial and recreational waterfront structures: commercial fishing fleet and fish handling structures; recreational small craft harbor; and Hyde Street Pier used for historic ship berthing. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Monitor completed construction. 2. RICHMOND HARBOR (DEEPENING), CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County near the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay to the Port of Richmond. The channel is maintained at a depth of -35 feet MLLW, except at its terminus in the upper Santa Fe Channel where the depth decreases to -30 feet MLLW. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its depth. At Point Potrero, however, the channel flares into a turn and then continues at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. A rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. Proposed improvements consists of a two-phased construction plan extending four miles through the Inner Harbor. Phase I would deepen the existing 35- foot channel to -38 feet for bulk carriers, and provide a turning basin of 1,200 feet diameter near Point Potrero. Approximately 1,400,000 cubic yards of sediment are to be dredged and transported to an ocean disposal site. In addition, 2,600 cubic yards of rock are to be excavated and disposed of at the Port-owned land disposal site. The estimated cost of Phase I is $10,250,000. Phase II will be deferred and is reclassified to the inactive category. The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Subsequent projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the City of Richmond which would provide an access channel, share 25% of the project cost during construction and repay an additional 10% over 30 years. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses ten privately-owned terminals and six terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. Complete preconstruction planning and engineering. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to vicinity of Concord through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Concord to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Concord; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route; and widening the Suisun Bay Channel. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf manevering area was completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1987) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, No. 31, revised 1982, and No. 32, revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 4. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND DELTA MODEL, CA Location. The model, including a regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continues. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1987, was $13,779,656, of which $5,375,340 was for the regional visitor center, $911,895 for exhibits, and $7,492,421 for maintenance. 5. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CA Location. Santa Cruz Harbor is located on the northernmost part of Monterey Bay, near the southeastern boundary of the City of Santa Cruz. Existing project. Adopted by Act of July 3, 1958. Provided for construction of jetties, 850 feet (south jetty) and 1,125 feet long. The entrance channel is 100 feet wide, 20 feet deep, and 900 feet long, with an additional 370 feet at a depth of 15 feet. The inner harbor channel is 15 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 800 feet long, with an additional 600 feet, 10 feet deep. The turning basin is 300 feet wide, 207 feet long and 10 feet in depth. Project authorization also provided for a sand bypassing plant, if required. A cooperative agreement finalized in April 1986, provides the Santa Cruz Port District with a bypass system to be used in Santa Cruz Harbor. The primary component of the system is a 16 inch hydraulic dredge. The federal government shared in the cost of the dredge system in return for the Port District assuming full responsibility for channel maintenance for the remaining life of the authorized project. The Port District assumed responsibility of maintenance dredging upon delivery of the dredge system in October-November 1986. Local cooperation. See above concerning the Cooperative Agreement for the dredge system. Terminal facilities. N/A Operations during fiscal year. Procurement of dredge system. The Port District will assume responsibility for maintenance of the harbor during FY 87. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than FY 87 were conducted on the following projects: Berkeley Harbor; Bodega Bay; Monterey Harbor; Napa River; Redwood City Harbor; Richardson Bay Channel; San Leandro Marina; San Pablo and Mare Island Straits; San Rafael Creek; and Suisun Channel, all in California. Fiscal year costs were $319,409 of which $33,879 was for jetty condition surveys and $285,530 for project condition surveys. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year total costs for preauthorization studies were $74,244 of which $7,400 was for Humboldt Bay, Field Landing, CA and $66,844 for Larkspur Ferry, Marin County, CA. 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $373,695. Total cost to September 30, 1987 was $1,557,898. Projects inspected included Alameda Creek, October 1986; Butte Creek, August 1987; Canyon Creek, August 1987; Coffee Creek, August 1987; Colma Creek, March 1987; Corte Madera Creek, November 1986; Coyote Creek, November 1986; East Weaver Creek, August 1987; Eel River at Sandy Prairie, May 1987; Eel River at Lolita Bottoms, June 1987; Klamath River, May 1987; Klamath River, OR, August 1987; Mad River at Blue Lake, May 1987; Mark West Creek, May 1987; Meiss Lake, August 1987; Pajaro River, September 1987; Pinole Creek, April 1987; Redwood Creek, June 1987; Rheem Creek, April 1987; Rodeo Creek, April 1987; Russian River, May 1987; Salinas River, July 1987; San Leandro Creek, October 1986; San Lorenzo Creek, October 1986; San Lorenzo River, October 1986; Santa Rosa Creek, May 1987; Smith River, June 1987; Sonoma Creek, June 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 1987; Van Duzen River, June 1987 and Wildcat Creek, March 1987. 9. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $103,358 for preauthorization studies of which $3,200 was for Klamath River, CA; $7,500 for Mattadero/Barron Creeks, St. Clara County, CA; $13,363 for Pescadero and Butano Creeks, CA; $36,731 for Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $29,135 for Rohner Creek, Fortuna, CA; $12,435 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; and $994 for Soquel Creek, Santa Cruz County, CA. Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs of $1,913,998 were incurred for emergency flood control activities, of which $224,666 was for disaster preparedness; $93,463 for emergency operations; and $200,541 for field investigation; and $1,395,328 for rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $13,507 for emergency bank protection of which $566 was for Humboldt County, Wilder Ridge Road, CA; $4,246 for Marina County WWTP, CA; $1,800 for Pacifica, Beach Boulevard, CA; $815 for Shelter Cove Resort Improvement District #1, CA; $4,926 for Trinity County, Hyampon, Trinity Cove, CA; and $1,154 for Trinity County Ruth Airport, CA. General Investigations 10. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,177,247, of which $24,448 was for navigation; $1,103,250 for flood damage prevention; $46,549 for inventory of dams; and $3,000 for coordination with other agencies. 11. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $38,145 were incurred, of which $36,125 was for flood plain management service program and $2,020 was for hydrologic studies. 12. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year total costs were $641,960 of which $174 was for Fisherman's Wharf, CA, $829 for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA; $534,921 for Oakland Inner Harbor, CA; $41,641 for Oakland Outer Harbor (Deepening), CA, and $64,395 for Richmond Harbor, (Deepening), CA. 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 Bodega Bay, CA Crescent City Harbor, CA 1. Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, CA Halfmoon Bay, CA Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA Moss Landing Harbor, CA Napa River, CA Noyo River and Harbor, CA Oakland Harbor, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,314 16,270 16,270 - 1,226,765' 2 - 1,226,7651 3 204,651 179,999 67,210 39,374 1,121,8994 82,427 42,542 1,115,6324 397,7795 397,7795 850,808 230,000 2,333,215 -44,000 11,409 1,093,278 1,657,383 1,993 5,110,486 5,004,776 - 9,454,9726 - 9,454,9726 777,000 19,264,7387 850,714 19,221,7177 - - - - 525,0008 - - - - 525,0008 350,000 3,000,000 5,265,000 -116,000 8,499,00041 180,543 1,138,269 7,151,055 27,839 8,317,7064' - - - - 6,697,39643 44 - - - - 6,697,39643 44 - 271,000 - 241,765 10,000 -3,700 2,084,36743 44 36,818 -1,244 2,084,36744 45 - - - - 9,847,2999 40 - - - - 9,847,2999 40 1,475,009 6,107,060 4,236,000 2,369,000 56,302,94110 40 6,304,195 6,983,429 4,414,387 2,342,236 56,236,46210 40 - - - - 338,215" 40 - - - - 338,21511" 40 448,000 161,583 427,295 164,383 38,254 43,816 275,000 156,999 530,000 991,649 -426 -426 115,747 405,000 470,898 36,570 465,000 4,431,78412 40 52,051 467,211 4,418,57612 40 26,583 26,583 12,423 598,000 534,352 - 1,021,27413 40 - 1,021,27413 40 6,412 1,846,63213 14 40 6,412 1,846,632'3 14 40 829 422,000 445,886 1,521,48215 16 1,521,48215 17 6,675,65418 19 6,629,48018 19 S- - - 222,81020 40 - - - - 222,81020 40 - - - - 9,646,98421 40 - - - - 9,646,98421 40 1,294,000 1,325,973 1,075,000 2,620,200 31,337,44622 40 1,251,503 1,414,766 1,060,589 2,582,782 31,271,89222 40 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 Petaluma River, CA Redwood City Harbor, CA 2. Richmond Harbor, CA 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA San Francisco Harbor, CA San Francisco Harbor and Bay, CA (Removal of Drift) San Leandro Marina, CA San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA San Rafael, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 297, 14623 40 297,14623 40 1,025,407 1,797,546 26,272 -168,185 755,000 8,568,65324 40 446,628 -115,226 729,877 8,541,83124 40 - 1,672,72225 40 - 1,672,72225 40 3,079,000 -588,465 14,674 2,868,440 -374,925 14,674 - 15,000 370,000 - - 345,184 2,047,000 601,226 1,074,000 2,663,006 1,136,050 1,097,818 59,010 59,010 561,000 598,484 1,811,300 1,803,232 7,399,63826 40 7,399,63826 40 3,832,69527 28 3,830,36327 28 18,383,64229 18,364,92328 -- - - 164,689 -- - - 164,689 1,200,000 10,580,000 5,166,000 1,937,000 26,225,200 628,744 10,246,428 5,877,031 2,216,315 26,010,596 1,141,000 1,159,000 1,100,000 980,000 13,862,700 1,400,852 1,089,231 1,067,138 1,077,118 13,779,658 - - - 2,689,35628 30 - - - 2,689,35628 30 424,860 2,087,500 1,566,340 1,593,036 24,082,28131 478,865 2,042,272 1,726,548 1,595,213 24,060,50331 - - - - 40 - - - - 40 1,143,000 1,018,000 930,000 1,305,000 22,281,182 1,040,828 1,010,551 1,047,460 1,109,605 21,945,319 410,176 147,205 274,097 261,171 44,171 38,337 1,284,24032 66,284 38,337 1,284,24032 -- - - 1,369,37228 33 -- - - 1,369,37228 33 3,696,143 1,725,125 1,939,000 1,898,935 34,210,63634 3,615,383 1,996,024 1,978,259 1,848,904 34,158,61634 - - - 32,35940 47 - - - 32.35940 47 26,924 26,924 8,545 970,994 626,591 3,614,95540 46 8,545 932,781 629,727 3,597,87840 46 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 5. Santa Cruz New Work Harbor, CA Approp. - 120,000 2,134,000 - 4,106,340 (Federal Funds) Cost - 94,699 1,960,377 198,922 4,106,338 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 160,00035 Cost - - - - 160,00035 Maint. Approp. 659,000 834,000 994,500 64,000 9,538,659 Cost 769,335 935,374 1,035,571 59,497 9,524,524 Suisun Bay Channel, New Work CA Approp. - - - - - 36 Cost - - - - - 36 Maint. Approp. 312,000 204,725 1,797 174,000 2,935,86036 37 Cost 305,091 204,887 8,568 160,402 2,919,37636 37 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,67738 Cost - - - - 217,67738 Maint. Approp. 15,130 651 51,594 92,312 1,495,64439 Cost 15,130 651 51,594 92,312 1,495,64439 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $584,563 Preconstruction Planning costs ($455,563 Construction, General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $187,349 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. 5. Excludes contributed funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $75,795 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956- 1987. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royaltyfree rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,710 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $67,265 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $274,508 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $1,223,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($773,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $273,000 under General Investigations); ($450,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $285,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $1,223,001 Preconstruction cost ($773,001 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $273,001 under General Investigations); ($450,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 under Construction, General and $285,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $15,436 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $774 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $122,402 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. Excludes contributed funds of $178,308. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $165,378 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1986. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $3,364 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes $193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $55,195 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $139,440 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1987. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $746,947. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $7,307 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1987. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds. 34-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for details. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $11,610 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1987. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $188,135 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1986. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZIN( 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $17,567 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1987. 46. Includes $157,008 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1987. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. G LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. FISHERMAN'S WHARF AREA-SAN FRANCISCO CA Nov. 14, 1983 Breakwater. Cont. Res. (H.J. Res. 413) of 1984, Public Law 98-151, 98th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 34-C GTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA' Berkeley Marina, CA' Lower San Francisco Bay, CA Monterey Harbor, CA San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA' San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA' San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA' 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645). 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administration funds breakwater modifications (1960 Act) placed inactive The barrier groin and sandtrap feature of the project eauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 5. Includes $8,041 for reconnaissance and condition surveys for FY 1956-1987. 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and excludes contributed funds $153,618. 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and excludes contributed funds $138,189. 9. Includes $6,120 for jetty condition surveys for FY 87. 34-8 Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed 1966 1979 1935 1971 1974 1976 976 155,5502 505,2013 1,108,1824 180,4726 848,2277 210,3908 6,1209 85,8805 - - - --- I -- - -- SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Humboldt Bay, CA Inactive 1958 2,000 - Santa Cruz County, CA Inactive 1966 245,639 - TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 34-9 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA ................. 35-2 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ........................ 35-3 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) .......................... 35-3 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................. 35-4 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA .................. 35-5 6. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA .............................. 35-5 7. Corte Madera Creek, CA ................. 35-6 8. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ........... 35-7 9. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA ............................. 35-8 10. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA ............ 35-8 11. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA ..... 35-9 12. Little Dell Lake, UT ..................... 35-11 13. Lower San Joaquin River, CA ........... 35-11 14. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA ............................. 35-11 15. Merced County Streams, CA............. 35-12 16. Merced County Stream Group, CA ........ 35-12 17. Pajaro River, CA ......................... 35-13 18. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ...................................... 35-13 19. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ........ 35-15 20. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA ............................... 35-15 21. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ....... 35-16 22. Walnut Creek, CA ..................... 35-18 23. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ........ 35-18 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................... 35-19 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 25. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ............................ 35-20 26. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations...............................35-20 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 27. New Melones Lake, CA ................... 35-20 General Investigations 28. Surveys ................................. 35-21 29. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 35-21 30. Research and Development ............. 35-22 31. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .................................. 35-22 32. Other Work under Special Authority ...... 35-22 Tables Table 35-A Cost and Financial Statement .................... 35-24 Table 35-B Authorizing Legislation .................. .. 35-30 Table 35-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... 35-32 Table 35-D Not Applicable Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 35-33 Table 35-F Not Applicable Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects .......... 35-35 Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing ................... 35-25 Table 35-I San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work for Project ........................ 35-25 Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost .................. 35-36 Table 35-K Merced County Stream Group, CA, Maximum Inflow, Storage, and Outflow for Projects.......................35-36 Table 35-L Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work .. 35-36 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) Page Tables Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs .......................... 35-37 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Project Units Reclassified and Excluded from Cost Estimate ......... 35-37 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, from Table 35-P Page Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Costs ............... 35-38 FIlood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) .............. 35-39 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provides for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. Estimated Federal cost (July 1973) of new work for shallow-draft river channel is $1,360,000 (includes $1,163,000 for deferred portion between Colusa and Chico Landing). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallowdraft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Minor maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major maintenance items consisted of: Maintenance dredging on Sacramento River, vicinity of Rio Vista by suction dredge continued by contract, $1,433,255. Repair of west levee, Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, was initiated and completed by contract, $2,045,706. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallowdraft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallowdraft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 35-2 Tables Table 35-M Table 35-N Table 35-0 -"--- I I-~----I SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel 250 to 350 feet as necessary. Selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, authority to construct a submerged sill, 45 acres of land for establishment of wetland habitat, and 156 acres of land for upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1987) is $76,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $41,800,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $600,000; and non-Federal cost of $34,700,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($13,770,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $13,770,000. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. An LCA modification was prepared and is awaiting final action by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Modification approval is pending approval of financing plan. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. General Design Memorandum was approved and Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) modification was approved and was signed by Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987, but final action on LCA modification by Assistant Secretary of the Army is dependent upon approval of financing plan. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or lowlying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. Project estimate (October 1987) is $170,600,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $132,000,000, including basic recreation facilities; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $1,100,000; and non-Federal cost of $37,600,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($250,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoildisposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoil-disposal 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting therefrom; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial construction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $250,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation; and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon- Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon-Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreational development on Roberts Island. The Port of Sacramento by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion. A sec. 221 agreement satisfying all requirements of local cooperation for Southampton Shoal and Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was obtained from Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, and 31, revised 1982, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1986, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. Channel improvement-dredging of various reaches between McDonald Tract and Avon was continued by Contract No. 4 at fiscal year contract cost of $503,325. Channel improvement dredging of New York Slough to Middle Point was initiated by Contract No. 5 and completed at a fiscal year contract cost of $1,318,849. San Francisco District: Continued planning activities. Channel improvement: A second dredging contract for Richmond Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, Contra Costa County, (awarded in September 1986) was initiated and completed at fiscal year cost of $358,148. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 35 percent complete. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contribu- 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT tions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Dredging of settling basin by suction dredge, Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel, San Joaquin River, was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $682,615. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H. V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205- foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H. V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $142,410. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 101,200 acrefeet occurred April 26, 1987. Maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 1,100 cubic feet per second on February 13, 1987. Maximum release of 660 cubic feet per second on August 3, 1987, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 73,900 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances were combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 6. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non- Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; local interests paid $2,915,102 through December 31, 1986. A long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During the rainflood season, maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 1,400 cubic feet per second March 6, 1987. Maximum storage in reservoir was 6,300 acre-feet on March 6, 1987, and maximum inflow to reservoir was 7,500 cubic feet per second on March 5,1987. Maximum release of 990 cubic feet per second on March 6, 1987, was below maximum permissible flood release. New Hogan Lake-Maintenance and operation activities continued. Modification of water treatment plant was initiated at a fiscal year contract cost of $157,923 and renovation of recreational area was initiated at a fiscal year contract cost of $393,786. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 144,200 acre-feet occurred April 5, 1987. Maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 3,400 cubic feet per second on March 6, 1987. Maximum release of 320 cubic feet per second on August 6, 1987, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 99,300 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 7. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and discharge into west side of San Francisco Bay at a point about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle San Rafael.) Existing project. Provides for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprapping, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Approved estimated cost for new work (October 1987) is $25,300,000, of which $14,400,000 is Federal cost and $10,900,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $730,000 to be contributed by local interests.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposalof waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley unit and tidal areas, an estimated $730,000. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Acquisition of rights-of-way and dredge material disposal areas, relocations and construction for remaining work is being held in abeyance as a result of a request from Congress for a review of alternatives other than completing the project as an open concrete channel. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court Judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Redredging Lower Corte Madera Creek channel was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $1,479,664, and was transferred to local interests by letter of May 28, 1987. San Francisco District will monitor maintenance and operation of the project. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. Project is about 75 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Frances Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by letter of May 28, 1987. San Francisco District will monitor maintenance and operation of the project. 8. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. Provides for channel improvement on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield (Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel Creek into McCoy Creek). Project related recreation facilities such as access roads, parking areas, a boat-launching ramp and hiking, bicycle, and horseback trails would also be constructed. Estimated cost (October 1987) for existing project is $27,800,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $11,000,000 is Federal and $16,800,000 is non- Federal. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions) and Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), December 19, 1985. (HD 91- 159, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains published map). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project, pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $370,000, of which $120,000 is for lands, $105,000 is credit for recreation facilities built by local interests per PL100-71, July 11, 1987, which directs that project proceed under provisions of sec. 117, PL99-190, and $145,000 is cash contribution; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities and flood control facilities. Ultimate non-Federal cost for flood control will be reduced by a Federal reimbursement of one-half of the non-Federal costs in excess of the Federal construction costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project had been in "deferred" status since September 15, 1977, due to lack of local assurances. In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun affirmed their support and intent to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation for a modified version of the authorized project from 200-year to 100-year flood protection. On June 23, 1982, project was reclassified from "deferred" to "active" status. The State of California Reclamation Board has provided a letter of intent to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, November 8, 1982, to cooperate with the Federal Government to begin construction of the project. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization language which will be reflected in any future modified agreements: "The Secretary shall include as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project for flood control, Fairfield Vicinity Streams, California, authorized in accordance with sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, the cost of any work carried out by non-Federal interests on the project after December 31, 1973, and before the date of the enactment of th s joint resolution if the Secretary determines such work is reasonably compatible with the project. Costs and benefits resulting from such work shall continue to be included for purposes of determining economic feasibility of the project." Prior local expenditures of $6,800,000 have been reported by the sponsor. The Corps is evaluating costs and benefits of all completed works by non- Federal interests after December 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract for McCoy Creek and Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was completed at a fiscal year contract cost of $569,183 and was transferred to local interests (California State Reclamation Board, and Cities of Fairfield and Suisun) on July 17, 1987 for maintenance. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 3, 1986. Construction contract for enlarging McCoy Creek and constructing Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was completed and was transferred to local interests in July 1987 for maintenance. 9. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163- foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $94,415. Erosion repair on downstream face of the dam was completed. Runoff of Fresno River below Hidden Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 30,100 acrefeet occurred June 6, 1987. Inflow to the reservoir and outflow was negligible. Maximum release of 230 cubic feet per second on June 28, 1987, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 28,900 acrefeet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 10. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allo- 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT cated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. All concessionaires will operate under permits granted by the Corps. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982 the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HB07-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effdctive retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1986, amounted to $1,709,168. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Fiscal year contract costs for major items of work included continuation of Eastside recreation area renovation, $2,099,195. Dam safety assurance studies at Isabella Dam were continued at a fiscal year cost of $78,107. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 327,000 acrefeet occurred October 1, 1986. Maximum estimated inflow to the reservoir was 2,400 cubic feet per second on February 13, 1987, and maximum outflow of 4,410 cubic feet per second occurred July 16, 1987. During the year, 533,900 acre-feet was released for irrigation. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 11. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE. CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and waterright holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading, works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1986: Terminus, $1,674,706 and Success, $782,235. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council, developing a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds, None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $90,022. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 107,400 acre-feet occurred on June 4, 1987. Maximum estimated inflow to the reservoir on February 13, 1987, was about 3,500 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 1,500 cubic feet per second occurred June 23, 1987. Water released for irrigation and spreading releases totaled 185,000 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $91,205. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was below normal during the year. Maximum estimated inflow to the reservoir was 2,100 cubic feet per second on February 13, 1987, and maximum outflow of 480 cubic feet per second occurred on February 15, 1987. Maximum storage of 35,900 acre-feet occurred on May 12, 1987. Water released for irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 70,600 acre-feet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 12. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Project will include an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acrefoot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (October 1986) is $57,900,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $33,300,000 is Federal and $24,600,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $18,900,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88), August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $18,900,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities included essential completion of the Outlet Works Design Memorandum and the Embankment and Spillway Design Memorandum, and completion of embankment and foundation exploration program. Redesign of Highway 65 realignment and relocation were functionally completed by the Utah Department of Transportation at a fiscal year cost of $2,137,036. The dedication ceremony was held on September 14, 1987. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. 13. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. On Lower San Joaquin River, CA, from city of Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam (about 19 miles northeast of Fresno). Existing project. This project is a modification and extension of the previous Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries project (see Annual Report for 1976) to provide clearing and snagging on the San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam. Estimated first cost (October 1987) is $6,000,000, of which $5,000,000 is Federal and $1,000,000 is non- Federal for lands and damages (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). Existing project was included in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 98-63, July 29, 1983, which states that the project for flood protection on the Lower San Joaquin River, CA, authorized by the Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1984, as amended, is hereby further modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief cf Engineers, to perform clearing and snagging on the San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, to Friant Dam, at an estimated cost of $5,000,000. Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, a non-Federal entity shall furnish adequate assurance for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations at no expense to the Federal Government, execute a written agreement pursuant to sec. 221 Public Law 96-611; agree to operate and maintain the project works upon completion of construction in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Department of the Army; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Coordination with local interests and pertinent agencies and redraft of a combined General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement were continued. Historical summary. A Plan of Action, February 1984, has been prepared. Design Memorandum No. 5 for Eastside Bypass at San Joaquin River was prepared in September 1984. First construction contract, dredging Eastside Bypass, was awarded October 12, 1984 and completed in May 1985. 14. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Drainage control system modification at Martis Creek Dam was completed at fiscal year contract cost of $150,042. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 850 acre-feet occurred on February 12, 1987. Inflow to the reservoir and outflow was neglible. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 15. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 16, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new reservoirs - Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, iespectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs - Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Estimated project cost (October 1987) is $94,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $65,200,000 is Federal and $29,100,000 is non-Federal Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $220,000, of which $180,000 is a cash contribution and $40,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $2,870,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued with initiation of plans and specifications for Castle Dam. 16. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns; Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was below normal for the year. (See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for projects.) Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and streamgaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 17. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 2- mile levee along the north side of Uvas Creek from a point about 2,000 feet south of Thomas Road to about 3,500 upstream of Miller Avenue. Project will also include a bikeway and hiking trail. Estimated cost (October 1987) for existing project is $10,900,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $5,395,000 is Federal and $5,505,000 is non-Federal (which includes $610,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Flood Control Act of 1944, December 21, 1944 (HD 505-78, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, right-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay one-half of separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $3,875,000 for one half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agrees to make all required payment concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local Cooperation Agreements for flood control and recreation were executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District in June 1987 and the City of Gilroy in July 1987, respectively. First construction contract for levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge was awarded in September 1987. Historical summary. Responsibilty for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. 18. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $12,812,126 for irrigation services through December 31, 1986. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires-one each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85- acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost to date of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoortype powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1 182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 791,700 acre-feet occurred on May 22, 1987. Maximum estimated inflow to the reservoir was 6,600 cubic feet per second on February 13,1987, and maximum outflow of 7,780 cubic feet per second occurred on July 14, 1987. During the year, 1,217,700 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $57,478. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 19. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno- Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1987) for existing project is $69,600,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $52,200,000 is Federal and $17,400,000 is non- Federal (which includes $5,010,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local Cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 7 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which $5,010,000 is cash contributed, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in August 1987. Engineering activities were continued. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. 20. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the construction cost, (27.8% of total construction cost, currently estimated at $99,400,000) and the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, tentatively estimated at $368,000. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $77,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. Major items of contract work included: Initiation of Rockpile Road Upgrade, $1,157,605; initiation of Yorty Creek Beach, $1,235,405; completion of administration building modifications and functional completion of Buzzard Rock (now known as Liberty Glen) camping area, $2,203,771. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Spillway restoration was continued at fiscal year contract cost of $830,343. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 River at Coyote Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 90,200 acre-feet occurred on April 7, 1987. Maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 3,300 cubic feet per second on February 12, 1987. Maximum release of 1,930 cubic feet per second occurred on March 6, 1987. During the year, 24,300 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 118,500 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at fiscal year cost of $63,937. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 213,100 acre-feet occurred October 1, 1986. Maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 8,100 cubic feet per second on February 12, 1987. Maximum release of 1,060 cubic feet per second occurred March 17, 1987. During the year, 147,200 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 95 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, reservoir clearing in July 1981, project overlook in May 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, and boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Major items of work remaining include upgrading Rockpile Road, minimalrecreation facilities, boat ramp facilities, and vegetation management program with remaining boundary fencing. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 21. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM L ocation. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an armof San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1987), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,800,000, of which $30,000,000 is Federal cost and $1,800,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1987) first cost for project is $137,000,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $95,800,000 is Federal (including $2,845,000 for recreation facilities) and $41,200,000 non-Federal comprising for lands and damages including relocations and $22,300,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported by California Debris Commission under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major andminor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1987) at $22,500,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries - Engineering activities continued. Contract No. 10 for bypass levee revetment on Yolo Bypass awarded August 12, 1986, was continued at fiscal year cost of $306,895. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. Engineering activities continued. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 67,800 acrefeet occurred May 2, 1987. Maximum estimated inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 2,500 cubic feet per second on March 13, 1987, and maximum outflow of 390 cubic feet per second occurred on October 8, 1986. During the year, releases of water for irrigation totaled 120,500 acre-feet. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 82 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama County-one site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been oper- 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 ating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at the dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 22. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (1987) is $88,800,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $63,400,000 is Federal cost and $25,400,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $20,330,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,070,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1987) at $5,070,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. To date, $4,365,081 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the uncompleted portions of Walnut and San Ramon Creeks and upper Pine Creek is continuing. Construction on San Ramon Bypass Channel has been split into three contracts. Contract No. 1 was continued at fiscal year contract cost of $229,160 and Contract No. 2 was continued at fiscal year contract cost of $3,112,301. Construction on Upper Pine Channel was initiated at a fiscal year contract cost of $1,860,475. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 85 percent complete. Total of 16.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, and Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Planning and design continued on remaining reaches. Work remaining consists of channel improvement on Walnut Creek and San Ramon bypass (Ygnacio Valley Road to Rudgear Road along SPRR alignment) and upper Pine Creek. Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 23. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Plan of improvement consists of 15,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 9,600 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Plan would also create a linear park environment with picnic facilities, comfort stations, full environment treatment, and a two-mile segment of trail to connect with other regional park trails in the vicinity. Approved estimated cost of new work (1987) is $35,800,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $21,500,000 is Federal cost, and $14,300,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,800,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests will be required to: (a) provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-waynecessary for construction and operation of the project, including disposal 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT areas, and adhere to requirements of sec. 210 of the 1970 Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, Public Law 91-646; (b) modify or relocate all utilities and bridges (except railroad) necessary for construction and maintenance of the project with such modifications and replacements being in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers, and replace vehicular traffic facilities, including, but not limited to, streets, curbs, gutters, and signs affected by the project; (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the project after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment of the flood channels that may result in decreasing the effectiveness of the project; (d) maintain, operate, and replace recreation facilities; (e) hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works; (f) adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; (g) make a cash contribution prior to start of construction for that portion of the cost of recreation lands and recreational facilities; (h) assure access to all persons on equal terms for approved recreational use; (i) at least annually inform affected interests regarding the limitations of protection afforded by the project; and (j) publicize flood plain information in the areas concerned and provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the flood plain, and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to insure compatibility between future development and protection levels provided by the project. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73- 466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99- 662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement will be required prior to initiation of that construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction on Reach l of channel improvement on Wildcat Creek was initiated at a fiscal year contract cost of $2,192,167. Historical summary. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a general design memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986.. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24,1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $702,348 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA ($175,178). 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $233,167. See Table 35-P for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $9,897,458, of which $262,280 was for disaster preparedness, $602,115 for flood emergency operations, $8,922,338 for repair and restoration, and $110,725 for advance measures. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $20,486. Bank protection was initiated on Spanish Creek, CA ($11,824) and Wolf Creek, CA ($2,500); Uncompahgre River, Olathe, CO ($2,500); and Green River, Lincoln County, WY ($3,662). Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208,1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $5,000. Initial appraisals for snagging and clearing were initiated, completed and found to be infeasible for Mokelumne River near Interstate 5, CA ($2,500) and Walker River, Yerington, NV ($2,500). Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, four flood insurance studies were initiated, three flood insurance studies were continued, and three flood insurance studies were completed in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements EMW-E-1153, 2226 and 2549, respectively, at a fiscal year cost of $425,663 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 26. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, and Vallecito, CO reservoirs were prepared. Work was begun and essentially completed on Folsom water control manual and essentially completed on the Blue Mesa water control manual. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $325,314. Total cost to September 30, 1987, $3,278,226. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 27. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1987) Federal cost is $391,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91- 282, 92-222, 93-251,94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land acquisition activities, $3,351,531; continuation of McHenry recreation area contract, $577,216; and initiation and essential completion of the following contracts: Sanitary facility modifications at Tuttletown, $862,189; Knights Ferry recreation area, $868,651; and road paving at Glory Hole and Tuttletown, $687,510. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. A boundary fencing contract, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities contract, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard contract, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contract have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. McHenry recreation area contract has been initiated. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits are being attained. Project is about 99 percent complete. General Investigations 28. Surveys Fiscal year costs were $2,448,061, of which $2,235,033 was for flood damage prevention studies (in addition, $184,649 was expended from required cost contributions for feasibility cost shared studies and $40,000 was expended from other non-Federal contributions); $5,000 for coordination with Soil Conservation Service; $14,000 for coordination with Bureau of Reclamation pertaining to projects under reclamation program (including PL 984); $105,000 for special investigations; $35,000 review of FERC licenses; and $54,028 for planning assistance to states ($19,028, CA; $15,000, UT; and $20,000, CO). MORRISON CREEK STREAM GROUP, CA (PHASE I, STUDY) Minor fiscal year costs were $17,181. 29. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $379,873. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $8,000. 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 30. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $963,960, of which $126,294 was for planning methodologies, $551,154 was for analytical techniques, $97,209 for Water Conservation and Supply, $119,720 for risk assessment for Corps dams and $69,583 for earth resources satellites, all at the Hydrologic Engineering Center. 31. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA Project is located on eastern slope of the Coast Range. Clear Lake unit is about 110 miles north of San Francisco and Settling unit is about 15 miles northwest of Sacramento. Plan of improvement consists of two project units: Upper basin at Clear Lake-widening and/or deepening 3.3 miles of existing 5 mile long Clear Lake outlet channel to a capacity of 8,000 cubic feet per second, constructing a 1.1 mile long bypass channel around the highly developed area adjacent to existing channel, and nonstructural measures; and lower basin at the mouth of Cache Creek-enlarging existing perimeter levees of Cache Creek Settling Basin an average of 12 feet to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity and enlarging existing project levees from settling basin mouth upstream to County Road 102, reconstructing and enlarging existing Cobble weir, degrading the existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to the western perimeter levee to allow utilization of entire basin for sediment deposition, purchasing in fee 3,600 acres of existing settling basin and establishing a wildlife refuge and nonstructural measures. Preconstruction planning estimate is $3,000,000. Continuation of planning and engineering, including a sedimentation study for Upper Basin and separate General Design Memorandums for the Clear Lake Outlet Channel (Upper Basin) and Cache Creek Settling Basin (Lower Basin) without wildlife refuge was continued at a fiscal year cost of $514,136. COTTONWOOD CREEK, CA Project will be located on main stem and the North, South, and Middle Forks of Cottonwood Creek on eastern slope of the Coast Range and southern slope of Trinity Range between cities of Redding and Red Bluff, CA, and was authorized by the 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed). Plan of improvement provides for two multiplepurpose reservoirs, one at Dutch Gulch (capacity 900,000 acre-feet) and one at Tehama (capacity 700,000 acrefeet), and includes base facilities for future installation of hydropower generating equipment. General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement were completed in FY 1984. Advance Engineering and Design activities were essentially discontinued in FY 1985 as by letter of June 25, 1985, the State of California indicated they could not financially participate in the project at this time. Final documentation of record of the Advance Engineering and Design studies was continued at a fiscal year cost of $4,979. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA Project is located in the downtown area of San Jose in Santa Clara County, CA. Plan of improvement includes widening and deepening of one or both sides of Guadalupe River for 3.5 miles and the construction of an underground concrete channel bypass conduit 2,900 feet long to provide flood protection to downtown San Jose, including approximately 550 commercial businesses, 2,400 private residences, 4 major traffic arteries, and the San Jose International Airport. Plan also includes fish and wildlife mitigation measures, would preserve to the greatest degree possible the existing riparian vegetation along Guadalupe River, and would also enhance the redevelopment potential of the downtown San Jose area. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,000,000. Feasibility Report was transmitted to the Assistant Secretary of the Army on June 10, 1987. General Design Conference was held in June 1987 and General Design Memorandum was initiated at fiscal year cost of $435,345. 32. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY Under the Aquatic Plant Control Program (River and Harbor Act of 1965, sec. 302, Public Law 289, 89th Congress) a State Design Memorandum and an environmental assessment regarding the waterhyacinth problem in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, CA, were completed by the Corps in FY 1985. The Calif Department of Boating and Waterways had requested assistance from the Corps on September 28, 1981, to find a solution to the waterhyacinth problems in the Delta. In a meeting on May 28, 1985, the Department of Boating and Waterways notified the Corps that the State control program had reduced the problem to a maintenance problem, that State funding is adequate to operate the current waterhyacinth maintenance program, and that Federal assistance is not needed at this time. State 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT control program included chemicals to eliminate the immediate problem and biological control agents to provide long term control. Cost sharing agreement (70 percent Federal-30 percent State) was not applicable to preparation of State Design Memorandum nor the environmental assessment. Waterways Experiment Station (WES) has essentially completed a research study at an estimated cost of $60,000 to identify extent of water-hyacinth infestation in the Delta and Central Valley of California and to identify pathogens to control such infestation. Research report is to assist Sacramento District with its waterhyacinth problem and is scheduled for completion in February 1988. Total Federal cost as of September 30, 1987, was $153,670. 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 1. Sacramento River, CA 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA Required Contributed Funds) 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 4. San Joaquin River, New Work CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. New Work Eastman Lake, Approp. Chowchilla River, CA Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 6. Calaveras River and New Work Littlejohn Creek and Approp. Tributaries including Cost New Hogan Lake and Maint. Farmington Dam, CA Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 7. Corte Madera Creek, CA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Required Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 8. Fairfield Vicinity New Work Streams, CA Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 9. Hidden Dam-Hensley New Work Lake, Fresno Approp. River, CA Cost (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost 856,000 1,835,000 2,025,601 1,892,496 - 33,474 1,807,800 1,841,271 800,000 649,054 - 40,331,1921 - 40,331,1921 3,973,000 42,896,6312 3,914,755 42,821,7863 400,000 1,233,4744 450,454 1,099,5084 85,000 85,000 3,680,000 13,580,000 12,513,000 3,137,000 50,593,0005 4,314,658 14,903,051 12,140,776 4,354,831 50,159,5346 - - - - 5,833,1177 - - - - 5,833,1177 850,000 625,000 20,000 778,000 12,725,4768 898,753 565,138 80,224 764,102 12,708,9088 - - - - 27,369,597 - - - - 27,369,597 804,000 819,000 853,000 1,150,000 7,876,500 889,621 861,266 870,983 1,062,828 7,732,713 - - - - 111,1879 - - - - 111,1879 - - - - 23,723,14410 - - - - 23,723,14410 1,074,000 1,563,000 1,124,000 1,740,300 14,882,46911 1,093,472 1,551,672 1,132,703 1,641,032 14,654,50511 30,000 40,000 20,000 4,000 1,398,25112 13 14 24,440 43,920 26,468 6,780 1,398,10712 13 15 325,000 525,000 2,374,000 1,325,000 11,583,72516 281,271 390,051 1,602,532 1,869,610 11,178,05916 - 110,000 -50,000 - 166,09517 18 - 5,156 41,977 11,109 159,56618 - - 270,000 - 806,921'19 - - 121,420 103,880 762,22120 320,000 155,000 905,000 582,000 2,649,000 282,442 176,886 285,206 998,510 2,430,047 - - - 200,000 200,00021 - - - 30,555,426 - - - - 30,555,426 773,000 969,000 874,000 918,000 8,776,500 855,484 940,029 897,340 893,031 8,696,581 35-24 i SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 (Contributed Funds, Other) 10. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 11. Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (Contributed Funds, her) 12. Little Dell Lake, UT (Contributed Funds, Other) 13. Lower San Joaquin River, CA 14. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 15. Merced County Streams, CA 16. Merced County Stream Group, CA 17. Pajaro River Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Other) (Contributed Funds, Other) 18. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 165,11222 - 165,11222 - 24,450,53723 24 - 24,450,53723 24 1,773,000 3,450,000 2,426,000 3,882,598 1,920,956 3,450,385 2,519,690 3,863,211 - - - 20,000 - - - 10,230 27,322,59625 26 27,185,92825 26 458,00027 448,32028 - 34,997,23029 - 34,997,23029 1,524,000 1,652,000 1,758,899 1,623,969 - 20,000 - 3,364 1,893,000 1,918,526 135,000 80,405 515,000 90,000 1,335,000 143,472 358,810 1,274,320 -- 300,000 2,164,000 2,076,605 105,000 114,581 2,500,000 1, 43,225 3,260,000 2,250,170 23,137,52530 22,915,73130 302,42031 32 34 240,77031 33 35 6,644,900 5,374,728 3,560,00036 2,250,17037 350,000 2,300,000 448,000 900,000 3,998,000 311,799 2,259,644 415,547 132,867 3,119,856 - - - 8,504,989" - - - 8,504,98938 242,000 1,069,000 252,000 272,000 3,970,350 300,768 947,669 359,725 282,598 3,937,052 6,141 20,000 180,000 450,000 7,000,000 100 121,269 319,218 6,790,487 -2,751,25939 - 2,751,25939 47,000 130,000 97,228 81,967 50,000 132,984 60,000 71,498 81,000 113,000 1,553,506 109,537 118,837 1,534,864 20,000 480,000 10,396 101,162 - 61,000 - 650 - 21,000 2,749,96840 2,361,13840 61,000 650 21,00041 - - - 43,356,26542 43 44 - - - 43,356,26542 43 44 1,481,000 1,448,000 1,492,000 1,395,000 19,643,28545 46 1,401,043 1,632,427 1,464,946 1,365,827 19,500,01145 46 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project (Required Contributed Funds) Contributed Funds, ther) 19. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) 20. Russian River Basin, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Contributed Funds, Other) 21. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 22. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 23. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other 27. Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA including Tuolumne Total Cost to Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 10,000 10,000 - - - 110,00047 - - - 110,00047 29,065 820,000 685,000 1,534,06548 - 813,805 468,756 1,282,56148 - - - 14,435,86949 - - - 14,435,86949 1,707,000 2,036,905 50,000 56,295 12,000,000 16,490,897 1,500,000 1,565,404 85,000 81,218 5,500,000 5,301,011 2,542,000 2,518,357 78,411 66,758 8,615,000 8,878,305 3,467,102 3,445,754 5,000 21,290 12,670,000 8,577,136 1,213,000 1,508,000 1,772,000 1,962,000 1,316,176 1,524,472 1,758,290 1,864,917 30,000 30,000 - 55,000 - 40,400 3,381 60,698 4,365,000 4,102,000 4,042,500 7,574,000 4,360,826 5,216,643 3,921,536 6,714,273 1,330,000 969,000 941,000 2,058,000 1,382,425 906,080 1,011,304 2,007,449 495,000 1,723,000 1,600,000 400,000 484,650 2,363,965 923,511 969,483 34,000 75,000 90,000 100,000 3,143 96,121 101,299 78,785 1,335,000 1,280,000 4,591,000 7,700,000 2,848,189 994,554 3,667,875 6,049,719 47,165 -483,000 710,000 1,026,834 239,037 -476,657 641,386 625,832 220,000 622,000 -210,000 2,323,166 - 783,015 -232,098 1,672,179 320,000 500,000 526,000 2,800,000 313,561 359,187 404,415 2,606,849 - - 160,000 15,158 - - - 140,472 - - 150,000 265,000 -- - 302,467 5,700,000 4,700,000 5,719,000 6,830,000 6,251,283 5,500,387 2,855,897 7,915,389 26,156,1775o 51 26,020,262o 51 238,41152 238,35753 306,119,6454 300,797,04554 9,163,00055 6 8,910,5426 56 115,00057 104,478 s 100,217,00859 60 98,996,52059 60 14,935,33461 14,816,22261 18,955,538 18,753,340 2,751,36262 63 2,726,13862 63 64 51,147,43065 48,199,30466 4,365,08167 3,871,94466 5,198,23769 4,461,40769 5,256,000 4,794,012 165,158 140,472 425,00070 302,467 353,986,99671 71 351,598,31271 72 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 aRnivde Srst,a nCiAsl,a uNsew Approp. 411,000 437,000 550,200 593,000 3,503,200 Melones Lake, CA Cost 433,032 462,832 529,709 608,037 3,467,115 (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. 80,000 - - - 80,00073 Cost 4,486 - - - 4,48674 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,591,707 for shallow-draft and $26,681,204 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,517,190 for shallow-draft and $26,680,875 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 5. Includes $24,367,800 funds for Sacramento District and $26,225,200 or San Francisco District. 6. Includes $24,148,931 costs for Sacramento District and $26,010,602 for San Francisco District. 7. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 8. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds. 9. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 10. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: Total to date $897,742. 11. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake. 12. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 13. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 14. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 15. Includes $103,856 contributed funds, other, costs for New Hogan hydropower studies. 16. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 17. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. 18. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 19. Contributed funds, other, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and 270,000 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 20. Contributed funds, other, costs including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $225,300 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes $200,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocations (automotive type bridges) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield. 22. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for miscellaneous ,design and construction at Hidden Dam. 23. Includes total Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake: Total to date $2,199,085. 24. Includes $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 25. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 26. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 27. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $20,000 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 28. Includes $10,320 contributed funds, other, for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 29. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date $700,004. 30. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 31. Contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 32. Includes $150,000 contributed funds, other, from the Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, CA, for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 33. Includes $127,876 contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 34. Includes $110,000 contributed funds, other, from DITT Inc., Paris, France, for hydropower studies at Success Lake. 35. Includes $70,473 contributed funds, other, costs for Success Lake hydropower studies. 36. Includes $3,560,000 contributed funds, from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 37. Includes $2,250,170 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes $1,200, initiation of plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. 39. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT rights-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream group. 40. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 41. Includes $21,000 contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 42. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date $1,595,100. 43. Includes Public Works Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities. 44. Includes $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 45. Includes $158,300 special recreation use fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake. 46. Includes $75,000 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 47. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 48. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project costs (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 49. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds; $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 50. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $798,680 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985, FY 1986 and FY 1987. 52. Includes $238,411 contributed funds, other, from city of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 53. Includes $238,357 contributed fund, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 54. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 55. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 56. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes $115,000 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies. 58. Includes $104,478 contributed fund, other costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies. 59. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 60. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 61. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 62. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries project). Includes State Highway Commission payment, 789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 63. Includes $41,984, contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Departnment of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; and $275,000 contributed funds, other, from the city of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake. 64. Includes $249,776 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies. 65. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 66. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required contributed funds for Walnut Creek. 68. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required contributed costs for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed fund costs for Walnut Creek. 70. Includes $425,000 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 71. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E) 72. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 73. Contributed funds, other, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones lake. 74. Contributed funds, other, costs for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 1 Cache Creek Basin, New Work CA Approp. - 24,336 574,000 640,000 1,238,3362 Cost - - 375,436 514,136 889,572 Cottonwood Creek, New Work CA Approp. 2,885,000 1,055,000 -50,000 - 15,765,0002 Cost 3,472,949 1,019,478 17,510 4,979 15,750,447 Guadalupe River, New Work CA Approp. - - 25,000 739,000 764,0002 Cost - - 16,822 435,345 452,167 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) programs allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included are funded under General Investigations Appropriations. in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1987 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 21. Dec. 22, 1944 1. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide for extensions in levees and other structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct lowlevel Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 204, 1966 Flood Control Act. H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 404, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess.2 35-30 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess.' The 1Q-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet Rivers and Harbors betweeniColusa and Chico Landing, at a cost of $390,000 Committee Doc. 35, provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 73d Cong., 2d sess. 5,000; cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Rivers and Harbors Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., CA, to provide for construction of a ship channel 30 2d sess. feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa to Red Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California 20. TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. May 17, 1950 Improvement for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., full monetary authorization). 1st sess.2 July 3, 1958 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and 2d sess.2 modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). July 3, 1958 Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. July 14, 1960 Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., Project by construction of initial 10-year phase of 2d sess. 2 bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. May 12, 1967 Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection PL 90-17 approved in act of July 14, 1960. Mar. 7, 1974 Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion PL 93-251 control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose.3 June 19, 1975 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir 4 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 8,3543 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,1325 6 - Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,1857 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,1518 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,9289 10 11 3,316,62212 13 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,48913 14 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,7285 15 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages, and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry road and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous projects. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal years 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-32 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA American River, CA Aquatic Plant Control, CA Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Chester, CA Coyote Creek, CA Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA East Weaver Creek, CA Folsom Lake, American River, CA Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Kays Creek, UT Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Klamath River, CA Lake Camanche, CA Lake Oroville, CA Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Marysville Lake, CA Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA New Bullards Bar, CA North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Pinole Creek, CA Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Rheem Creek, CA Rodeo Creek, CA Salinas River, CA Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT San Leandro Creek, CA San Lorenzo Creek, CA San Lorenzo River, CA Sevier River near Redmond, UT Sonoma Creek, CA Truckee River and tributaries, CA and NV Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 87 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 87 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 87 expenditure Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Active/no FY 87 expenditure 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1981 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 1968 26,995,350 2,125,8183 1,000 1,369,9314 217,8795 6 26,0496 3,570,0007 705,6221 5 664,8255 8 220,6361 5 9 63,014,81010 136,0265 11 407,9895 12 1,503,0735 13 4,838,000' 10,252,950'14 70,425,470's 27,835,26316 .17 10,918,79618 2,643,49919 2,965,40220 2,639,9551 21 12,890,62522 904,2785 23 24 885,7501 5 4,620,0701 25 133,3395 26 400,0001 5 27 974,1001 5 94,2131 28 1,227,57029 1,000,0001 30 5,130,8211 31 4,314,4061 32 919,00033 781,5001 34 1,038,960 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 35-33 54,7781 2 - - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 7. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. 8. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 9. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 10. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 11. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 12. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 13. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non- Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 14. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $24,876,842. 15. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,015) for flood control reservation. 16. Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (non-project) at local interests expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-ofway for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. 17. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 18. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District. Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 19. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 20. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 21. Project was reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 22. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 23. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 24. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 25. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 26. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 27. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 28. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 FY 1962 and 1963 to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 29. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. 30. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 32. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 33. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). 34. Placed inactive 1974. 35-34 TABLE 35-G SACRAMENTO, 'A, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 300,000 - Bear River, CA 1980 1986 Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 - Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 - Humboldt River and Tributaries, 1982 1986 1,532,932 - NV Lakeport Lake, CA 1976 1986 2,353,003 - Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 - Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 (Morgan County) TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Miles from Range in Feet Mouth of Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Place River Tidal' Tidal2 Flood3 Flood 4 Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.02 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 2. Tide at low water season only. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT1 (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Corps of Coast Required Lands and Engineers Guard Cash Damages (includ- Total Modification (Construction) (Construction) Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,179 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. 35-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff' $1,073,000 $ 30,000 $ 200,000 $ 230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel2 5 7,882,0003 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement4 5 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. District, Improvement No. 3. 3. For lands and construction. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (bihourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 550 60 520 Bear 730 100 570 Owens 50 10 30 Mariposa 900 530 350 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 20 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino); Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000' Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements below Dam 249,600,000 99,520,0002 349,120,000 Total $264,036,000 $105,118,000 $369,154,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at ment for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid completed projects, over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Govern- initiated and exclusive of lands and damages. 35-36 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 20 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet-Earthfill 122,500 $ 17,550,0001 Mendocino) of Russian River Channel Improvement (East Fork Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork below Coyote Valley Dam and Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian lower 98 miles of Russian River) River Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet-Earthfill 381,000 345,560,000 Channel Improvement (Dry Creek) Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 3,444,000 below Dry Creek (Warm Springs Creek Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 21 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal' Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek2 Inactive $1,400,000 $ 340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomes Creek2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 21 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 38B continuation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, miles 62.6-117.7) 1,765,613 308,867 2,074,480 Contract 39 completion (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, miles 178.0-189.0) -250,000 -250,000 Contract 40A continuation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, miles 132.4-179.5) 2,750,000 357,216 3,107,216 Contract 40C initiation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River and Sloughs, downstream from Sacramento) 400,000 - 400,000 35-38 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 25 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage Cost Bear River, Smiths Fork, WY Reconnaissance $ 2,192 Blacksmith Fork River, Millville, UT 1 Initial Appraisal 1,000 Cross Creek vicinity, Hanford, CA 1 Initial Appraisal 7,500 Fourteenmile Slough, Stockton, CA Detailed Project Report 21,389 Gunnison River near Delta, CO Initial Appraisal 7,500 Sacramento River near Hamilton City, CA Initial Appraisal 7,500 Hobble Creek, Springville, UT 1 Initial Appraisal 1,000 Kaweah River near Visalia, CA 1 Initial Appraisal 7,500 Logan River near Logan, UT 1 Initial Appraisal 1,000 North Fork Gunnison River, Paonia, CO Initial Appraisal 7,500 Papermill Creek, Point Reyes Station, CA 1 Plans and Specifications 2,329 Plateau Creek near Collbran, CO Initial Appraisal 7,500 Provo River, Utah County, UT Reconnaissance 29,256 Roaring Fork River near Basalt, CO Initial Appraisal 7,500 Rock Canyon Creek, Utah County, UT Initial Appraisal 7,500 San Joaquin River, Madera County, Road 4 Bridge, CA Initial Appraisal 7,495 San Joaquin River, Madera County, Road 9 Bridge, CA Initial Appraisal 7,500 Tehama, CA Initial Appraisal 7,500 Truckee River near Lockwood, NV 1 Initial Appraisal 7,500 Uncompahgre River near Delta, CO Initial Appraisal 7,500 Uncompahgre River near Ouray, CO Initial Appraisal 7,500 Weber River near Morgan City, UT Initial Appraisal 1,000 West Antioch Creek vicinity Antioch, CA Reconnaissance 69,006 Total 233,167 1. No further studies recommended. 35-39 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION The Pacific Ocean Division is an operating division with both district and division functions. It's civil works responsibilities encompass the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that the area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Agat Harbor, Guam ................... 36-1 2. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ..... 36-1 3. Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ..... 36-2 4. Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii ...... 36-2 5. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ... 36-3 6. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 36-3 Erosion Control 7. Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa .......... 36-3 8. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization......................... 36-3 Flood Control 9. Agana River, Guam .................. 36-3 10. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii ......... 36-4 11. Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii ......... .36-4 12. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 36-4 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 36-5 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Page Including Power 14. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia .......... 36-5 General Investigations 15. Surveys ............................ 36-5 16. Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 36-5 Tables Table 36-A Table 36-B Table 36-C Table 36-D Table 36-E Table 36-F Table 36-G Cost and Financial Statement ... 36-6 Authorizing Legislation ........ 36-7 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 36-8 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects........ 36-10 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............... 36-11 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects.......... 36-12 Navigation 1. AGAT HARBOR, GUAM Location. On the southwestern coast of the island of Guam, about 3,318 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408.) Existing project. For a description of the existing project,- see -page 36-1 of the FY86 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-1 of the FY86 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded in October 1986 for $3,170,000, with completion scheduled in August 1988. Construction is approximately 24% complete as of September 30, 1987. 2. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the west coast of Oahu, about 25 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 4110 and 4133.) 36-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-1 of the FY84 Annual Report. Total project cost estimate is $63,600,000 of which Federal cost is $55,300,000 (including $372,500 in U.S. Coast Guard cost) and non-Federal cost is $8,300,000 including lands and rights-of-way and cash contribution of $2,500,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-1 of the FY85 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. See page 36-2 of the FY84 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Work remaining to be completed includes completion of plans and specifications for project beautification and stockpile plantings estimated at $1,348,000. Plans and specifications for project beautification are approximately 85 percent completed as of September 30, 1987. Remaining work is scheduled for completion in mid 1989. Maintenance: Annual operational cost for the Regional Visitor Center located at Fort DeRussy was $38,497. 3. LAUPAHOEHOE HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Laupahoehoe is located on a peninsula on the northeast coast of the island of Hawaii, about 25 road miles northwest of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320.) Existing project. The project provides for construction of a 200 foot long breakwater, a 60 foot long wave absorber, a 9.5 foot deep entrance channel, and a 7,5 foot deep turning basin. The estimated first cost of the project is $3,762,000 for which Federal cost is $3,297,000 (including $12,000 in U.S. Coast Guard cost) and non-Federal cost of $465,000. Project authority is Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Project was authorized for construction in May 1987. Local cooperation. The Local Sponsor has agreed to: (a) Construct, operate, and maintain at its own expense, all those non-Federal features necessary to insure a complete and adequate Project. These features are identified and described in the Final Detailed Project Report and Environmental Impact Statement. (b) Provide without cost to the Government all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers to be necessary for construction of the Project. Prior to the advertisement of any construction contract, the Local Sponsor shall furnish to the Government rights-of-entry to all lands required for the Project, together with evidence supporting the Local Sponsor's legal authority to grant such rights-of-entry. (c) Accomplish without cost to the Government all alterations and relocations, including buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements required for the Project. (d) Provide or pay to the Government the full cost of providing, all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins, determined by the Government to be necessary for construction, operation or maintenance of the general navigation features. (e) Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the Project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act. (f) Provide during the period of construction a cash contribution equal to 10 percent of the "Total Cost of Construction of the General Navigation Facilities." This cash contribution is currently estimated at $365,000. In no instance shall the Government's share of project costs, including costs of preauthorization planning, exceed $4,000,000, the funding limit imposed by Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. The Local Sponsor shall assume full responsibility for all such project costs in excess of $4,000,000. (g) Repay with interest over a period of 30 years following completion of the Project, an additional 0-10 percent of the "Total Cost of Construction of General Navigation Facilities," depending on the value as calculated under Article IV of the Local Cooperation Agreement dated June 29, 1987. Terminal facilities. The current facility includes a single lane, concrete paved launch ramp, roadways and parking areas. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were completed in July 1987. A Local Cooperation Agreement in conformance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was executed in June 1987. A construction contract is scheduled for award in November 1987. 4. NAWILIWILI HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the southwest coast of the island of Kauai and about 100 nautical miles northwest of Honolulu. (See NOAA Chart 19383.) Existing project. For a description of the existing 36-2 _ I I~ _ ___ _ II)- ----CILI--- PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION project, see page 36-3 of the FY84 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See page 36-3 of the FY84 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A construction contract for repair of the breakwater was awarded in May 1986 for $3,303,000 and physically completed in July 1987. Financial completion is pending. 5. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted at Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu; Hilo Harbor, Hawaii; Kaunakakai Small Boat Harbor, Molokai; Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii; and Rota Harbor, CNMI, in February 1986 by the Portland District for $28,596. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Preauthorization studies were continued on Merizo Harbor, Guam, $26,494; East Molokai, Molokai, $3,081; and Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, $21,125; initiated on Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, $21,095; and terminated on Kukuiula Boat Harbor, Kauai, $50,000. Beach Erosion Control 7. OFU AIRSTRIP, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. On the southern end of the island of Ofu, about 2,300 miles southwest of Honolulu, Hawaii. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190, Manua Islands.), Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY86 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract, awarded in August 1986, was completed in October 1986 for $149,000. 8. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Preauthorization studies were initiated and terminated on Aunuu Shoreline (School), American Samoa, $1,000, and Ofu Airfield (West End), American Samoa, $2,000; initiated on Saipan Beach Road, Northern Marianas, $8,753; and Kihei Shoreline, Maui, $7,056 Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874. Preauthorization studies were initiated on Amouli to Tula, Tutuila, American Samoa, $227; Nua to Amaluia, Tutuila, American Samoa, $227; Tua to Faleasao, Tau, American Samoa, $227; and Lauliifou to Aumi, Tutuila, American Samoa, $227. Plans and specifications were initiated on Lepua Area, American Samoa, $24,966; and terminated on Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, $402. Plans and specifications for Masefau Bay, American Samoa, will be completed under emergency streambank and shoreline protection, Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Flood Control 9. AGANA RIVER, GUAM Location. The Agana River basin and the City of Agana are located on the western end of the Island of Guam near the center of the Island. The Territory of Guam is located approximately 3,800 statute miles west of Honolulu. (See NOAA Chart 81048). Existing project. The existing project consists of a levee system and channel improvements extending seaward to Agana Bay. The plan consists of 1,300 feet of concrete-lined channel, 410 feet of riprap and unlined channel, 850 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of floodwall, interior drainage improvements, minor modifications to the Marine Drive Bridge,- and a new bridge/culvert at the Saylor Street crossing.; The estimated cost of the project is $5,280,000 for which the Federal cost is $4,090,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,190,000. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. Local cooperation. The local sponsor has agreed to: (a) Provide during the period of construction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of the total project costs. Total project costs are currently estimated to be $5,280,000 of which an estimated $1,130,000 will be in the form of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility and facility alterations and relocations. The local sponsor must provide a total cash contribution presently estimated to be $64,000. (b) Provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, bridges, sewers, and 36-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project. (c) Publicize floodplain information in the area concerned and shall provide this information to zoning and other regulatory agencies for their guidance and leadership in preventing unwise future development in the floodplain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary to ensure compatibility between future development and protection levels provided by the project. (d) To the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation and maintenance. (e) Prior to the advertisement of any construction contract, the local sponsor shall furnish to the Government all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project. (f) Provide or pay to the Government the full cost of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins, determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project. (g) Upon reasonable notification from the Government, the Local Sponsor shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment at no cost to the Government of all alterations and relocations of buildings, highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges), storm drains, utilities, cemetaries, and other facilities, structures, and improvements determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project. (h) The Local Sponsor shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-ofway for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the Project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act. (i) Operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project in accordance with regulation or directions prescribed by the Government. (j) The Local Sponsor hereby gives the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and, if necessary for the purpose of completing, operation, repairing, replacing, maintaining, or rehabilitating the project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were initiated in October 1986 and is approximately 8 percent complete as of September 30, 1987. A construction contract is scheduled for award in March 1988. 10. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Kahoma Stream drainage basin is located in Lahaina, Maui. Lahaina is on the west coast of Maui about 4 miles from Kaanapali. The drainage basin of Kahoma Stream totals 5.3 square miles. (See NOAA Chart 19348.) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-5 of the FY84 Annual Report. Total project cost estimate is $17,200,000 of which Federal cost is $10,840,000 and non-Federal cost is $5,500,000 for lands, damages, relocations, and a cash contribution of $860,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of the FY86 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in June 1986. A construction contract was awarded in September 1986 for $12,180,000 with completion scheduled in July 1989. Construction is approximately 19% complete as of September 30, 1987. 11. WAIMEA RIVER, KAUAI, HAWAII Location. On the west-central portion of the island of Kauai which is about 103 statute miles northwest of Honolulu. (See NOAA Chart 19381.) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-4 of the FY86 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-8 of the FY82 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Work remaining to be completed includes the flood warning system, estimated at $300,000, upon receipt of non-Federal funds. 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. Preauthorization studies were continued on Vaipito Stream, American Samoa, $28,669; initiated on Malaeloa Stream, American Samoa, $4,319; Mapusagatuai Stream, American Samoa, $3,828; completed on Garapan Area, Northern Marianas, $388; terminated on Fagatogo Stream, American Samoa, $15,000; Leafu Stream, American Samoa, 36-4 _ _C I _ I ___ I _ IC _ I _____~_ _I C ___ __ I__ _ __ ____ _ _ _ _1_1_1_ ~_ II __~__ _ PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION $10,000; and Vaitele Stream, American Samoa, $10,000. Plans and specifications were continued on Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, $65,805; and initiated on Garapan Area, Northern Marianas, $107,322; Lake Susupe, Northern Marianas, $90,365. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $158,251 for disaster preparedness. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were conducted on Asan River, Guam, in April 1987; Hanapepe River, Kauai, in October 1986 and April 1987; Iao Stream, Maui, in November 1986; Kaneohe-Kailua Dam in October 1986; Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, in October 1986; Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, in November 1986; Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, in October 1986; Namo River, Guam, in April 1987; Paauau Stream, Hawaii, in October 1986; Wailoa Stream, Hawaii, in October 1986; and Waimea River, Kauai, in October 1986 for a total cost of $11,421. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 14. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA Location. Nanpil River is located on the island of Pohnpei in the Federated States of Micronesia. (See State of Hawaii, the New Pacific map.) Existing project. For a description of the existing project see page 36-4 of the FY85 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on Page 36-5 of the FY85 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract for $5,622,000 was awarded in October 1985 with completion scheduled in November 1987. A contract to operate and maintain the project for a one-year period to October 1988 is incorporated in the work to be done. Construction is approximately 95% completeas of September 30, 1987. General Investigations 15. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $729,964 of which $288,244 was for navigation studies, $215,897 for flood damage prevention studies, $5 for review of authorized projects, $69,947 for miscellaneous activities, and $155,871 for coordination with other agencies. 16. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Federal and non-federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, flood-water velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 532. Of this total, 141 were from other federal agencies, 127 from nonfederal agencies, and. 264 from individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and others. Of the 532 requests, assistance resulted in 1,189 site specific responses. Costs for providing Flood Plain Management services during fiscal year were $217,258. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $5,001. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $222,227. 36-5 ICU-PD~I P I I ~-- P~IIlPsl~ E --- - -~----I--- --- -~ ---- --n--l-~-u-~ --- - ------~----------- Ir-ur-- l----I U~1 -Y ~~.---~-- -.---r~ar---l ; REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sept. 30, 1987 1. Agat Harbor, Guam (Federal Funds) 2. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, HI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 4. Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (Federal Funds) 9. Agana River, Guam (Federal Funds) 10. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 35,000 9,771 16,500,000 14,346,100 567,464 673,952 55,950 37,343 18,800 41,838 11,827,000 8,348,616 374,434 376,920 155,000 158,604 52,000 52,808 -4,155,000 1,485,293 58,485 68,000 76,793 1,196,000 1,590,300 385,532 778,449 -200,000 53,545,500 -87,348 53,238,659 --- 4,249,670 110,159 2,383,440 22,000 26,172 428,450 424,687 --- 2,127,724 --- 2,127,724 -25,000 34,328 85,000 53,775 480,000 511,030 3,228,000 9,518,220 2,920,372 9,210,391 --- 233,261 --- 233,261 32,000 7,000 160,000 25,461 -2,500 157,039 --- 250,000 --- 117,422 10,000 10,315 20,000 10,009 87,000 82,959 189,500 189,500 250,000 117,422 5,800,000 6,656,000 2,350,275 3,192,217 (Contributed Funds) 11. Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii (Federal Funds) 14. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, FSM (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -69,600 2,180,214 60,000 9,188 405,000 462,599 114,000 145,350 -130,000 14,251 6,000,000 1,786,232 --- 2,917,400 2,742 2,917,311 530,000 6,704,000 4,090,598 6,031,368 36-6 Contrib. Cost 416,550 104,911 416,550 104,911 - -- -- PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 20, 1980 Dec 8, 1983 2. Appropriation of funds for a feasibility study and construction of a hydroelectric project. Sec. 2, PL 98-213 36-7 BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII An entrance channel 42 feet deep, 450 feet wide, and H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 3,100 feet long; an inshore basin of about 46 acres, 1st sess. 28 feet deep, a breakwater on the north side of the entrance channel, if model study shows it to be necessary; spending beaches with wave absorbers within the harbor totaling 1,320 feet in length; and a main access channel 12 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long to a smallboat harbor on the west side of the deep-draft harbor to be developed by local interests. NAWILIWILI HARBOR, KAUAI, HAWAII An entrance channel 35 feet deep; a harbor basin H. Doc. 609, 62nd Cong., 1,100 feet wide, 35 feet deep, and about 1,950 feet long; 2nd sess., as modified and a rubble-mound breakwater. by Chief of Engineers. Deepening entrance channel to 40 feet; enlarging H. Doc. 453, 83 Cong., harbor basin; and constructing a revetted-fill area. 2nd sess. (Contains (Modified bythe Chief of Engineers.) latest published maps. Modification of General Navigation features. River and Harbor Act. AGANA RIVER, GUAM A levee system and channel improvements Sec 401, PL 99-662 extending seaward consisting of 1,300 feet of concrete-lined channel, 410 feetof riprap and unlined channel, 850 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of floodwall, interior drainage improvements, minor modifications to the Marine Drive Bridge and a new bridge at the Saylor Street crossing. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII A debris basin 100 feet wide and 700 feet long with a H. Doc 94-488, 94th capacity of 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion Cong.,2nd sess. levee which is 80 feet long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280 feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FSM Construction of a hydroelectric power facility. Sec. 101, PL 96-205 4. 9. 10. 14. c -- "-~ -II~ --~- II I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY' OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 36-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30,1987 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for* Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii KeehiLagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred 1978 1982 1982 1978 1972 $ 937,798 1,033,015 1,783,129 527,047 1,481 Completed 1982 Completed 1971 Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Deferred Deferred Active Completed Active Inactive Active Completed Deferred 5,423,440 781,036 16,044,095 751,867 7,203,221 157,997 159,400 138,188 5,983,501 3,348,000 193,000 186,937 195,000 372,000 1985 1976 1984 1967 1968 1986 1966 1981 1956 1981 1977 1981 1986 1972 Completed 1976 Completed Completed Completed Active 1976 1979 1984 1967 Completed 1985 Active 1982 Completed Completed Completed 1985 1979 1950 1 2 3 4 11,196 27,920 208,902 3,680,856 5 63,693 6 2,038,271 7 8 6,738,020 9 3,127 292,441 10 61,800 11 41,857 12 423,622 30,378 584,513 13 980,018 432,523 752,645 2,000,000 194,000 1,991,569 1,940,011 2,448,056 30,707 668,354 884,833 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 65,000 92,767 2,111 36-8 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,474 forConstruction. 2 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1982. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 3 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1982. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 4 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1975. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 5 Completed in March 1970. In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. 6In addition Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1976. 8In addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1967. 10In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. 1 1Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 1 2In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 1 3 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. 1 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in August 1975. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. 1 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1979. 16In addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. 1 7 Reclassified from deferred to active category on May 16, 1983. 1 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in March 1985. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. 19Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1985. In addition, Contributed Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 2 0 In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 21Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-9 _ ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30,1987 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,015 1 $ Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227,181 2 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,148 3 Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,488 4 Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,916 5 Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,996 6 Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,313 7--- Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,472 8 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,000 9 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,941 10 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Active 1978 394,187 -- Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,040 12 Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,879 13 Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,309 14- Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Active 1979 729,087 15 108,060 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1985. 3Completed in April 1965. In addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 4 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1975. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. 5 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1976. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1980. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed funds. 7 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1980. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 8 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 9 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in June 1984. 1 0Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in June 1984. 11Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in September 1978. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. 1 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 13 Authoried by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1981. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. 14Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in October 1977. In addition, $132,075 in Contributed Funds 1 5In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 36-10 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30,1987 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for* Construction Maintenance Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 $ 1,275,500 1 $ Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,867 2 Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,285,000 3 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 4 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 5 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 6 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 7 Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 8 Paauau Stream, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 9 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Completed 1966 1,044,888 10 Hawaii, Hawaii 1Completed in December 1985. 2 Completed in November 1966. In addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 3Completed in November 1983. 4 Completed in October 1984. Includes Non- Federal reimbursement of recreation construction cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in Contributed Funds. 5 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in December 1950. 6Completed in August 1966. 7 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in February 1970. In addition, $540,335 in Contrubuted Funds. 8 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in April 1982. 9 Completed in September 1985. 10 Completed in August 1965. 36-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 November 1986 $ 40,117 PL 99-662 Hana Small Boat Harbor, 1967 November 1977 Maui, Hawaii HD #94-413 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, 1967 November 1981 Kauai, Hawaii HD #97-59 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii 1965 November 1986 PL 99-662 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, 1975 July 1981 86,235 Hawaii, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control 1979 July 1981 221,500 Molokai, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 Director of Civil Works Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam --- August 1981 80,764 Director of Civil Works Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 --- PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986 14,493 PL 99-662 36-12 PORTLAND, OR, DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA ............ 37-2 2. Chetco River, OR ........................ 37-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR ............................. 37-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ........ 37-4 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island ............... 37-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR. and WA ............................... 37-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR ..................... 37-4 8. Coos Bay, OR .......................... 37-5 9. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR ........... 37-6 10. Coquille River, OR .................... 37-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR .......................... 37-6 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 37-7 13. Nehalem Bay, OR ....................... 37-7 14. Port Orford, OR ......................... 37-7 15. Project Condition Surveys ............... 37-7 16. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR .... 37-7 17. Siuslaw River, OR ..................... 37-8 18. Skipanon Channel, OR ................... 37-8 19. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR .............. 37-8 20. Umpqua River, OR .................... 37-9 21. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR...................................... 37-9 22. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR ........... 37-10 Flood Control 23.-Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin,OR .............................. 24. Blue River Lake, OR .................... 25. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ................. 26. Deschutes River, Bend, OR .............. 27. Dorena Lake, OR .................... 28. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR .. 29. Fall Creek Lake, OR .................. 30. Fern Ridge Lake, OR .................... 37-10 37-11 37-11 37-11. 37-11 37-12 37-12 37-13 31. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................. 32. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............................. 33. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works .... 34. Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA ......................... 35. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA ....... .......... 36. Mt. St. Helens & Vicinity, WA ........... 37. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, Castle Rock, WA ............................. 38. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................... 39. Willamette River Basin, OR ............. 40. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR .................................... 41. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR ........ Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 42. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville, OR and WA ................. 43. Cougar Lake, OR ....................... 44. Detroit Lake, OR ........................ 45. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ............ 46. Hills Creek Lake, OR .................... 47. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ................. 48. Lookout Point Lake, OR ................. 49. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ........ .,................. 50. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR ............................ General Investigations 51. Surveys ................. ............ 52. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 37-1 Page 37-13 37-13 37-14 37-14 37-14 37-15 37-15 37-15 37-15 37-16 37-16 37-16 37-17 37-18 37-18 37-19 37-19 37-20 37-20 37-21 37-21 37-22 __ __ __ __ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Tables Table 37-A Cost & Financial Statement .... 37-23 Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 37-30 Table 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................... 37-38 Table 37-D Not Applicable Table 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 37-39 Table 37-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power .. 37-43 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects .......... 37-43 Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ................. 37-44 Table 37-I Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 ...................... 37-44 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR and WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88 August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $212,000,000 Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of relocation portion of the new navigation lock was initiated in May 1986 with award of a horizontal drain contract for stabilization of a potential slide area. Relocation of a section of the main line of the Union Pacific Railroad and modification of the I-84 off ramp was completed in August 1987. A contract for excavation of lock chamber was awarded in July 1987. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing projects. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification in 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge Table 37-J Project Condition Surveys ...... 37-44 Table 37-K Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ...... 37-44 Table 37-L Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ...................... 37-45 Table 37-M Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................... 37-45 Table 37-N Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA, Levees and Improvements to Existing Works .. 37-46 Table 37-0 Willamette River Basin Comprehensive Plan ............... 37-47 Table 37-P Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam and Powerplant ............. 37-48 turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 15,164 cubic yards of material was removed by the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520,18521,18522,18523,18524,18526, & 18531; 37-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT also Geological Survey Map of Washington). Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette Iiver to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended at its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30 foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth to Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver about 3 feet at low stages of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver they average about 12 feet, while highest known reached a stage of 33 feet above low water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976 except for observation of channel to determine if additional control structures or dredging will be required. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette River and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-lift-off and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 5,610,628 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 2,433,550 cubic yards, and U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 52,637 cubic yards. In addition, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 3,124,441 cubic yards. 37-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Smallboat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 40,226 cubic yards of material. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity ofPortland Street, Chinook, WA.Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract Clamshell dredge D. B. Beaver removed 177,059 cubic yards of material. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 4. Existing project. Provides for a one-half-mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 3,973,758 cubic yards of material. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, see Section 4, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, 37-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of paper-mill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is amunicipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is one one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 100,186 cubic yards of material and contract clamshell dredge D. B. Rainier removed 32,112 cubic yards of material. 8. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance to Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1970. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 of Annual Reportfor 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oilreceiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; 37-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300, 576, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Total of 1,353,773 cubic yards removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 280,192 cubic yards; Essayons removed 297,800 cubic yards and the contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 775,781 cubic yards of material. The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced sand from shoal areas. 9. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Location. South Fork and Millicoma Rivers rise in Coast Range in southern Oregon, flow generally westerly and join to make Coos River, 5.3 miles above mouth of Coos River in Coos Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18587, Allegany and Daniels Creek Quadrangle.) Existing project. Originally authorized project: a channel depth of 3 feet, generally, from mouth of Coos River and 1 foot near head of navigation. Project as modified: two channels 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from mouth of Coos River to Allegany on Millicoma River, mile 13.8 and to Dellwood on South Fork, mile 14, and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mile 14.7 on South Fork, including stabilization works on Coos River. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at the mouth of Coos River is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. Tidal range at head of navigation in both forks is about 1 foot. Freshetstages usually reach a height of from 10 to 15feet at Allegany, head of navigation on Millicoma River. Originally authorized project providing for a channel from mouth ofCoos River to head of navigation in both forks, to provide a depth of 3 feet generally and 1 foot near head of navigation, was completed in 1899. In March 1966 construction of project as modified by 1948 River and Harbor Act was completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned docks and landing places on the river are used by towboats and pleasure craft. There are no publicly owned docks. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Major log processing yards are located at the head of navigation on both rivers. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications prepared in anticipation of dredging need. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a smallboat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 37,999 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. An analysis was performed to determine the economic benefits generated by maintaining this project. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; and inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of 37-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modification, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract pipeline dredge Karen removed 1,456 cubic yards of materials at North East corner of boat basin. An analysis was performed to determine the economic benefits generated by maintaining this project. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). See Table 37-I. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): Sampling and identification of aquatic plant infestation in Columbia River and Willamette River Basins were accomplished. Total costs for fiscal year were $51,163. 13. NEHALEM BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast, 40 miles from Columbia River mouth and 10 miles north of the entrance to Tillamook Bay. Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 3,850 feet long on the north side of entrance and a jetty 4,950 feet long on the south side. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 15 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1918. Rehabilitation work was initiated in May 1981 and completed November 1982. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities for pleasure craft only: Dart's Marina, Brighton Moorage, Jetty Fishery, Port of Nehalem and city of Nehalem Dock. All areas have approximately 50-60 slips. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Inspection performed. 14. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR.) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 550-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is 90% complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months, the sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic within the authorized project. A contract submersible pump dredge removed 3,800 cubic yards of material which would provide users with adequate depths to utilize cranes during the winter months. An analysis was performed to determine the economic benefits generated by maintaining this project. 15. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during FY 1987 at a cost of $57,816; cumulative costs, $650,816 (See Table 37-J). 16. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1984, three pile dikes, south side ofchannel, oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total 6f55,661 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 31,531 cubic yards at the entrance bar. Contract pipeline dredge Karen removed 24,130 cubic yards of material at Gold Beach boat basin channel. An analysis was performed to determine the economic benefits generated by maintaining this project. The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced isolated shoals on the entrance. 17. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 18583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 85. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions will terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originate approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Estimated cost of jetty work is $28,295,000; $28,368,000 Corps of Engineers, $183,000 non-Federal, and $44,000 U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contractual work on extension of the north and south jetties was completed on December 31, 1986. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 215,778 cubic yards of material. An analysis was performed to determine the economic benefit generated by maintaining this project. 18. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 6 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to public on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use of a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 61,364 cubic yards of material was removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 11,335 cubic yards of material and the contract pipeline dredge Karen removed 50;029 cubic yards of material. 19. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles 37-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956, and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of north jetty was accomplished September 1965. Construction of south jetty was initiated April 1969 and was completed in September 1979. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports, and an analysis to determine the economic benefits generated by maintaining this project was performed. 20. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. The 12-foot channel in Scholfield River is currently classified inactive. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also, there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Final fiscal requirements were completed. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 407,184 cubic yards of material. An analysis was performed to determine the economic benefits generated by maintaining this project. 21. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Provides for construction of a new single-lift main lock and a guard lock each with clear dimensions of 56 by 400 feet and a minimum depth over sills of 9.5 feet, to replace existing facilities which were provided for by purchase, rehabilitation, and deepening to 6 feet at low water of existing canal and locks and separation of canal from waterpower intake by construction of a concrete division wall. Construction of a new lock has been deauthorized. The existing locks are on the National Register for historic sites. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal 37-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-K. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Canal and locks originally constructed by private interests in 1873 were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. Replacement of gates Nos. 6 and 7 was completed August 1967 under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in fair condition and in continuous operation except when flooded out by high water or undergoing repair. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. James River Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Normal operation and maintenance performed. Traffic through lock totaled 802,937 tons during calendar year 1985.' 22. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR SLocation. Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in ' 956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of th jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was 1pleted in October 1968, and extension of south jetty completed in June 1972. (For details relating to ous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage for 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 192,362 cubic yards and the contract hopper dredge Westport removed 350,586 cubic yards of material. An analysis was performed to determine the economic benefits generated by maintaining this project. 23. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN; OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. .Existing project. A gravel-fill embankiment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chutetype spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities 37-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 24. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum,of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board made an application in April 1982 for permit to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-M. 25. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at four sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded to replace supervisory control and data acquisition equipment. Normal operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 26. DESCHUTES RIVER, BEND, OR Location. Deschutes River channel at River Mile 168.2, just upstream of the city of Bend. Bend, Oregon is approximately 125 miles southeast of Portland, Oregon. Existing project. Flooding occurs in the city of Bend when ice accumulations block the flow of the Deschutes River. The flooding can occur during any normal discharge causing inundation of 112 dwellings. Plans to solve the flooding problem include construction of an ice boom. The ice boom would span the entire width of the river and would consist of timber units connected to a flexible steel cable, held in place with on-shore anchors. The boom would intercept most of the ice floes which would then consolidate and form an ice cover upstream of the boom. The boom would contain the ice in an unpopulated area upstream of the city where the ice collection and sub-sequent flooding would not cause any significant damage. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The City of Bend is the project sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New work. Contract for construction of the ice boom was advertised. Completion of construction is scheduled in the first quarter of FY 1988. 27. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity freeoverflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project initated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded to replace supervisory control and data acquisition equipment. Normal operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-M. 28. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work continues to provide for a 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam. Reservoir 6.2 miles long will provide 95,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project will control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles. Reservoir will be operated to provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of a bypass road to route traffic away from the damsite and stockpiling of gravels to be used in the main dam and relocated roads. All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Final environmental statement was filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No.1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated Federal cost of project is $119,000,000. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume all operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. In October 1985, NPP was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC) an environmental group, they intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court 16, December 86. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On 23 June 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief The resulting District Court order issued in Aug. and Sep. 1987 allows construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of a foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The Department of Justice has petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. Depending on whether the hearing is granted and the outcome of that hearing, may require termination of the existing main dam contract. 29. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. r Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the costsharing contracts with Lane County and Bethel School District. 37-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Nbrmal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-M. 30. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane County, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam, 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory water fowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts awarded to replace supervisory control and data acquisition equipment, rehabilitation of outlet works and bank protection at Fern Ridge Shores Location. Normal operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-M. 31. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 37-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Mill Creek, OR $803 and Winchester Bay, OR $16,190. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were: $225,339, disaster preparedness; $29,185, emergency operations; $465,939 rehabilitation; $215,051, advance measures. Mt. St. Helens Emergency Measures. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valleys. Volcanic debris substantially reduced the river's hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected even with normal runoff. A major recovery program for the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers funded under advance measures was initiated a short time after the eruption and was essentially completed during FY 1982. Total cost of Mt. St. Helens emergency measures, from initiation through FY 1987, with some contract modifications remaining to be negotiated, is $275,942,051. The authorized navigation channel on the Cowlitz between River Mile 0 and 4.2 remains unusable due to continued sedimentation. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 47 leveed areas and 264 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Of this total, 41 leveed areasin Oregon and 6 leveed areas in Washington were inspected during FY 1987. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin was supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Periodic contact was maintained with uncooperative areas reported in FY 1986 and 1987 to ascertain any change in attitude and to provide technical assistance, if requested. Of the 81 sponsors for some 125 local flood protection projects inspected in Portland District, 19 were reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $196,245 and total costs to September 30,1987 were $1,443,533. 33. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL FLOOD PROJECTS Annual inspections and evaluations are made of flood control works constructed by non-federal agencies. These evaluations are to determine eligibility for assistance under PL 84-99, of damages by flooding. This evaluation consists of an engineering study to determine degree of flood protection being provided, a tabulation of improvements within the protected area for cost-benefit studies and an inspection to determine compliance with maintenance agreements executed by the project sponsor and the Government. These inspections also serve a valuable disaster preparedness function in terms of explaining to local sponsors their preparedness responsibilities. All local sponsors are advised of the results of these evaluations and inspections. Approximately 20 locations throughout the Portland District were evaluated under this feature during FY 1987 at a cost of $120,156. 34. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and minor tributaries, channels, and sloughs, between Sandy River, OR, about 15 miles east of Vancouver, WA, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Plan for bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin provides for new construction and supplementing and extending projects constructed in Lower Columbia River Basin under authority of 1936 Flood Control Act: (a) Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA provides for bank protection works at 96 locations on Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River and mouth of Columbia River, totaling about 224,000 linear feet. Estimated total Federal cost is $24,700,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,435,000; (b) See Table 37-N on Levees and Improvements to Existing Works; (c) Lower Columbia River Basin levees at new locations, Oregon and Washington, provides for construction of flood control works at: Washougal area, Clark County, WA, about 5.5 miles of levee and appurtenant works at a Federal cost of $1,803,488, and non-Federal cost at $98,000; and Vancouver Lake area in vicinity of Vancouver, WA, about 18 miles of levee and appurtenant works at an estimated Federal cost (1980) of $19,500,000 and non- Federal cost at $900,000. This portion, Vancouver Lake, WA, has been reclassified "deferred". Total estimated Federal costs (1980) for both areas of work are $21,303,488 and non-Federal costs $998,000. Federal cost for all work under project, Lower Columbia River Basin, OR, and WA, is $67,458,776. Construction of improvement to existing project in Sandy Drainage District, OR, was completed by local interests at no construction cost to the Government. Improvements of levees have been accomplished by contract at the following locations: Multnomah County Drainage District, No. 1, OR, June 1962; Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR, October 1962; Woodson Drainage District, OR, December 1963; Rainier Drainage District, OR, June 1964; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District, No. 15, WA, December 1965; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts, Nos. 2 and 13, WA, June 1965; Midland Drainage District, OR, April 1967; Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District, No. 2, WA, June 1974; Beaver Drainage District, OR, June 1978; Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District #1, WA, October 1979; and Scappoose Drainage District, OR, September 1980. Washougal Area, WA, (new location) levee construction has been completed. Under authorization for Lower Columbia River Basin bank protection works, construction has been completed at numerous locations. (See Section 44 for additional information). Local cooperation. Flood Control act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Total non- Federal cost for all work is $4,567,000. For details of status or requirements of local cooperation, see individual project reports. Operations during fiscal year. See individual projects. 35. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $24,700,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate works after completion. Under Section 103 of the Water Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $1,435,000. Operations during fiscal year. Tansy Railroad location near the cities of Hammond and Warrenton, OR 37-14 _ _II_ __ ___-_ _I_____ ____~___~ II____________I_ I__ ~L-IR~-I C-~~- -I-Y- -I~ --L--I-~- ~----_____ __-_I~_ ___ III_____I~--~--YIY-------- PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT was completed (3,840 linear feet). Protective work as Lerch location (700 linear feet) on Sauvie Island Drainage District, and 128th Avenue location (250 linear feet) at Multnomah County Drainage District No. 1 was initiated. 36. MOUNT ST. HELENS & VICINITY, WA Location. Along the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers from Spirit Lake at the base of Mt. St. Helens to the confluence of the Cowlitz with the Columbia River (River Mile 68) approximately 55 miles downstream from Portland, Or. Existing project. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valley. Mudflows triggered by the eruption carried large volumes of sediment from the debris avalanche into these river valleys, reducing the hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected with even normal runoff. Storm runoff and surface drainage continue to deliver sediment from the debris avalanche into the rivers. Funds allocated under Public Law 84-99 were used for major recovery work on the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers. In late FY 1983, interim flood control measures were implemented under the authority of Public Law 98-63 to assure 100-year flood protection to developed areas along the Cowlitz River. Measures implemented are primarily dredging on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers and a monitoring program. Local cooperation. Local sponsors are responsible for obtaining any additional lands easements and rights-of-way. The State of Washington has agreed to act as the local sponsor. State funds have been appropriated for acquisition of lands and related expenses for Mt. St. Helens recovery operations. The State of Washington has spent over $2,500,000 to procure disposal sites for dredged material. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to remove sediment from the Lower Toutle River was awarded in late November 1986. A total of 2.5 million cubic yards was removed at LT-3 and LT-1 through April 1987, at a cost of $1,192,000. Two additional contracts to remove sediment from LT-1, and LT-3 are underway at this time. 37. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, Lexington and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing Project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green Rivers, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision Document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125-foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests are responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests are also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites will be the responsibility of local interests. Nonfederal cash contribution is $3,500,000 and the estimated non-federal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $20,800,000. Operations during fiscal year. The Sediment Retention Structure contract was awarded in December 1986 at a cost of $56,490,770 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1990. 38. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins) and (Mossyrock) a municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light. The Bureau of Reclamation projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. Under licensing agreement, the Tacoma City Light utility is required to provide 360,000 acre-feet of flood storage by December of each year. The Bureau of Reclamation sponsored projects were operated satisfactorily during FY 1986 for flood control. At Mossyrock there were no significant high water periods in 1986. Peak discharges at Castle Rock were below the regulation goal of 70,000 cubic feet per second during the flood season. The spring snowmelt runoff was much below normal with very little precipitation during October through December period. Preparation of Reservoir Regulation Manuals for Scoggins and Mossyrock Projects is scheduled. Total cost of monitoring the five projects during FY 1987 was $5,352. 39. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. Willamette River, formed by Coast and Middle Forks which join a few miles above Eugene, OR, flows north 189 miles, and enters Columbia River 101.5 miles about its mouth. The basin has an area of 11,200 square miles and lies between Cascade Range on the east and Coast Range on the west. Major tributaries of Willamette River rise in Cascade Mountains and consist of Coast and Middle Forks and McKenzie, Calapooia, 37-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Santiam, Molalla, and Clackamas Rivers. Important tributaries that head in the Coast Range are Luckiamute, Yamhill, and Thalatin Rivers, Minor tributaries, all of which enter the main stream from the west, are Long Tom River, Marys River, and Rickreall Creek. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Willamette River Basin and authorized funds for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial development: the reservoirs and related works to be selected by Chief of Engineers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts, 1941 through 1974, authorized additional flood control and other works and increased monetary authority. Following projects were completed as authorized and are in continuous operation: Fern Ridge Lake, August 1951; Cottage Grove Lake, April 1952; Dorena Lake, October 1952; Detroit Lake, December 1960; Lookout Point Lake, June 1961; Hills Creek Lake, June 1963; Cougar Lake, March 1964; Fall Creek Lake, November 1965; Green Peter-Foster Lakes, June-December 1967 respectively; and Blue River Lake, October 1968. Under the authorization for construction of recreation facilities at completed projects, work has been accomplished at Fern Ridge, Cottage Grove, Dorena, Lookout Point, and Fall Creek Lakes. Under the memoranda of agreements with the U.S. Forest Service, recreation facilities also have been constructed at Detroit, Lookout Point, Cougar, Blue River, and Hills Creek Lakes, Recreational facilities were constructed at Green Peter-Foster Lakes with initial construction funds. Details of operation, construction, and financial status of projects are in individual reports. During low-water season, July-September, supplemental water releases are made from Willamette River Basin Reservoirs. Uses which benefit from increased downstream flows include irrigation, navigation, power, fisheries, pollution abatement, and recreation. Although optimum regulation cannot be provided for every purpose, water released from reservoirs during the lowwater season for a particular purpose will usually provide benefits to other uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall regulation, consistent with established water-use priorities. (See Table 37-0 on Willamette River Basin comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local cooperation for other projects is in individual reports for those projects. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports. 40. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south:of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $29,200,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,239,000. Operations during fiscal year. No construction was conducted during the fiscal year. Maintenance: Annual inspection of revetments was made by helicopter in July 1987. 41. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs, (cubic feet per second) an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acrefeet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20,1979. The provisions ofthe Clean Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12,1980, and a Section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. None required. Development of recreation facilities will require cost sharing with a nonfederal local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New work: (See Walla Walla, WA District Annual Report.) Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 42. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east 37-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT' of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 4. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade Island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 vertical-lift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of two units of 43,200 kilowatts and eight units of 54,000 kilowatts each, totaling 518,400 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests upon solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 15 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-P. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest -Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provides for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,076.6 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in bthihe powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1953. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 projectwide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. Estimated cost for construction of second powerhouse is $672,000,000. A cost sharing agreement between The Corps and Skamania County has been finalized. Development of recreation facilities is now under way at Home Valley and is expected to be completed in 1988. Through September 1987 power generation totaled 195.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $289,924,572 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non- Federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction continued on restoration of areas disturbed by powerhouse construction. Final stages of the juvenile bypass system and monitoring facilities were under construction. Correction of deficiencies in fish guidance efficiency at the Second Powerhouse will reduce fingerling mortality incurred during annual downstream migration. Maintenance: The First Powerhouse modernization program continues to be implemented. Normal operation and maintenance was performed during period. During the fiscal year 5,118,603,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 5,095,385,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock consisting ofrafted logs, petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo. 43. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with 37-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runnoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Urvit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical n--service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. 1'hrough September 1987 power generation totaled 3.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $16,518,795 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $106,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continuation of negotiations for the innovative financing of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. Maintenance: Work continued to replace turbine runners. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 118,814,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 117,983,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-M. 44. DETROIT LAKE, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 45 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed on-line June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1987 power generation totaled 16.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $55,810,015 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 405,199,000 kilowatt-hours of electical energy were generated at project of which 401,983,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 45. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6,5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate 37-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICFT controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with a capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1987 power generation totaled 6.9 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $38,747,416 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 3 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. These parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn County under lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 290,387,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 287,618,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 46. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1987 power generation totaled 4.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $16,708,714 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 138,627,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated, of which 138,144,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 47. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acrefeet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-P. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Entire project is estimatedto be 99 percent complete. Through September 1987 power generation totaled 200.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $248,831,493 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $512,523,000, consisting of $512,190,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 4 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Irrigon Park was 37-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 expanded under cost sharing agreement and is managed by the Irrigon Park and Recreation Commission. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the juvenile fish by-pass system began in January 1984 and is 99% complete. The by-pass facility consists of a collection system of submersible traveling screens, a conduit mined above the intakes to each turbine-generator unit and across the length of the powerhouse, a conduit extending from the powerhouse to an outfall structure downstream, and an intake gantry crane to handle fish facilities equipment. The juvenile by-pass system work is fully operational and work on remaining sites is anticipated to be completed by April 1988. Maintenance: Contract awarded to upgrade the existing spillway gate position indication and control system. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 9,301,770,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 9,284,487,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo. Rehabilitation: Refurbishment of two generator windings and rebuilding (to strengthen) two turbines were completed. A multi-unit generator refurbishment contract awarded will enable completion of 75% of all turbine generator work included in the rehab program. The contract for upgrading the powerhouse control system was awarded in 1985, which when complete should increase the reliability and ease of operation of the powerhouse. 48. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of main stem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Use of Dexter Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Lookout Point units was effected in December 1954. Through September 1987 power generation totaled 13.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $57,938,549 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 318,402,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 316,513,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 49. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francistype turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility with provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles 37-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Through September 1987 power generation totaled 3.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income frotn sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $15,169,372 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26,1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Rogue River hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 286,670,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 284,109,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. -50 THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM-LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 mileseast of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially and substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fishwater units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts, the 22 unit total is 1,808,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-P. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water Supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineers authority to add these power facilities. A Local Interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District is pursuing the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1987 power generation totaled 210.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $262,859,300 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operative and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded to upgrade the existing spillway gate position indication and control system. Work initiated to modify the microwave communication link to the Bonneville Power Administration's Big Eddy Substation. Rewind of Unit #13 initiated. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 7,627,830,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 7,609,082,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains and miscellaneous cargo. General Investigations 51. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,540,532 of which $294,123 37-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 was for navigation studies, $502,600 for flood damage prevention studies, $396,304 for comprehensive studies, $170,024 for miscellaneous activities, and $67,954 for coordination with other agencies. 52. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International water studies. The Columbia River Treaty between Canada and the United States of America relating to cooperative Development of the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin was signed at Washington, D.C., on January 17, 1961, and the exchange of ratifications took place on September 16, 1964. Implementations of the Treaty by the United States and Canada entities under the guidance of the Permanent Engineering Board has continued. The two permanent committees established by the entities, the Operating Committee and the Hydrometeorological Committee, continue to function. Costs for support of both committee activities were $14,965 for the fiscal year. Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year: Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 815. Of this total, 73 were from other Federal agencies; 263 from non-Federal agencies; and 479 from private sector realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Cost for providing these services during FY 1987 totaled $106,650. Hydrologic studies. Environmental and ecological aspects are being considered on all hydrologic studies. Improvements in procedures to determine reservoir temperatures, nitrogen supersaturation, dissolved oxygen, suspended sediment, turbidity, design floods, flood forecasting and flood regulation are a continuing program. Costs for hydrologic studies during the fiscal year were $2,877. 37-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles OR 8. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 1. 2. - 130,000 6,451,000 23,299,000 - - 6,396,070 22,931,894 361,300 475,000 552,000 300,200 361,560 472,802 554,702 296,243 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost. New Work Contrib. Cost 15,213,000 15,306,888 11,459,400 11,430,195 10,932,230 10,861,438 16,500 312,000 438,000 311,000 29,861 312,160 438,112 252,899 34,500 51,058 7,008,000 7,003,593 5,744,000 5,771,078 338,000 321,474 347,900 352,944 7,250,000 7,243,987 594,000 501,000 605,577 505,301 8,911,415 6,302,400 8,818,651 6,385,156 938 - 188,400 190,017 663,000 652,345 429,000 441,000 438,416 428,767 2,971,940 5,042,000 3,041,000 2,992,359 4,974,845 3,085,466 3,933,300 3,886,842 29,880,000 29,327,964 2,043,7131 2,043,7131 5,119,626 5,114,978 28,349,3042 28,349,3042 247,079,7563 246,949,6293 665,9544 665,9544 941,252 941,252 3,346,185 3,288,081 220,2835 220,2835 4,144,813 4,143,434 24,913,6616 24,913,6616 90,593,4997 90,564,5757 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,5098 5,989,5098 11,707,9489 11,694,4279 29,750,09210 29,750,09210 63,157,95211 63,087,30511 2,335,966 2,335,966 486,680 486,680 37-23 120,815,100 120,716,288 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-A (Continued) See Section In Text Project 9. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 13. Nehalem Bay, OR 14. Port Orford, OR 16. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR 17. Siuslaw River OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Total to FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 - - - - 350,23812 121,900 135,609 191,400 193,508 89,700 89,446 126,000 134,975 365,900 365,818 387,700 677,713 8,000,000 12,713,495 719,900 723,964 45,000 - 49,000 43,230 426,000 418,273 55,000 52,512 170,000 175,970 333,000 341,125 - 27,000 29,397 51,600 50,373 339,000 336,007 45,000 43,260 5,724 15,777 1,249 392,000 389,311 1,000,000 985,538 12,900,000 12,915,368 646,000 641,001 45,000 90,000 208,000 210,184 354,000 368,738 2,081,000 1,821,733 581,000 584,714 295,000 293,510 917,800 824,626 62,000 315,633 689,000 687,256 350,23812 1,745,610 1,743,468 693,36613 693,36613 5,382,94414 5,379,55714 367,364 367,364 792,876 790,587 302,00615 302,00615 55,195 55,195 12,088,000 12,088,000 758,69216 758,69216 2,699,329 2,697,145 4,156,25217 4,156,25217 9,246,52018 9,151,60018 635,783 635,783 29,527,21219 29,517,22519 11,173,09920 11,169,75320 879,285 879,285 412,532 412,532 37-24 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) See Section In Text Project 18. Skipanon Channel, OR 19. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 20. Umpqua River, OR 21. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 22. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 23. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 80,500 336,000 292,000 294,000 403,165 334,934 291,905 284,590 31,000 217,000 59,000 32,593 205,228 68,044 9,851 827,700 829,517 528,000 710,319 1,493,400 1,494,202 30,000 189,499 512,000 650,948 161 604,000 580,834 501,000 480,860 1,131,000 1,094,881 31,300 111,836 580,000 590,699 20,000 20,691 956,000 1,723,900 965,341 1,665,197 496,000 510,761 493,000 523,138 9,300 47,546 550,000 556,380 748,000 746,399 1,834,400 1,817,346 996 625,000 605,461 280,854 280,854 3,123,014 3,112,410 22,434,82721 22,434,82721 2,937,79022 2,935,56122 2,839,799 2,839,799 17,718,87723 17,718,87723 23,131,889 23,059,137 2,500,677 2,500,677 520,00524 520,00524 14,706,82325 14,692,38525 234,794 234,794 19,242,04626 19,242,04626 20,509,70227 20,485,15727 12,005 12,005 91,642,489 91,624,484 3,381,70050 3,359,76250 37-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 24. Blue River Lake, OR 25. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 26. Deschutes River Bend, OR 27. Dorena Lake, OR 28. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 29. Fall Creek Lake, OR 30. Fern Ridge Lake, OR 35. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR & WA 36. Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA 37. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, Castle Rock, WA 40. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 180,000 184,659 673,000 655,509 1,200 1,600 342,000 342,563 3,500 8,100 270,000 269,304 77 937,000 958,097 2,600,000 2,458,996 10,345,000 18,267,493 624,500 636,359 56,600 62,436 151,000 147,919 623,000 605,928 57,500 28,405 352,000 328,889 10,000,000 4,773,965 235,000 232,116 7 1,C 1,1 6,1 6,2 213,000 219,165 284,000 267,968 - - 708,000 896,000 730,380 854,918 - 17,000 25,848 20,230 382,000 405,563 32,226,000 20,345,020 255,000 258,853 - - 742,000 847,000 745,135 856,543 )00,000 2,850,000 149,563 2,840,161 133,000 6,280,000 !32,116 6,347,141 - 1,400,000 - 1,365,665 744,000 343,000 760,094 300,794 178,000 96,000 179,056 95,917 619,000 544,805 9,100,000 26,012,598 341,000 337,548 2,332,000 2,289,234 216,000 224,638 3,740,000 3,647,394 29,265,000 28,825,326 389,000 458,945 70,200 60,544 32,038,22528 32,038,22528 2,197,991 2,180,502 4,013,12329 4,013,12329 8,874,67830 8,816,67230 74,500 74,483 14,568,26231 14,568,26231 5,039,174 4,962,339 63,192,579 62,961,093 22,118,26432 22,118,26432 4,387,415 4,382,807 8,526,93533 8,526,93533 12,496,63434 12,449,39234 20,790,745 20,786,587 42,228,000 42,051,512 30,665,000 30,190,991 24,697,81635 24,690,31435 3,611,744 3,601,531 37-26 I J TABLE 37-A (Continued) See Section In Text Project 41. Willow Creek Lake, OR 42. Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, OR and WA 43. Cougar Lake, OR 44. Detroit Lake, OR 45. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR 46. Hills Creek Lake, OR 47. John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 48. Lookout Point Lake, OR PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 (See Walla Walla, WA District) 86,000 83,904 12,200,000 12,032,268 8,820,000 8,478,177 6,241 860,000 861,133 1,789,000 1,757,050 1,694,000 1,679,567 591,000 641,968 10,624,000 9,103,019 9,746,000 9,956,705 498,000 467,009 17,530,000 17,905,137 10,468,000 10,848,327 492 731,000 733,379 1,411,000 1,426,060 1,810,000 1,825,339 457,000 442,717 6,483,000 8,046,653 10,633,000 10,663,086 382,000 405,626 14,826,000 14,958,973 12,994,000 12,979,585 34 1,141,000 1,153,266 1,456,000 1,435,467 1,688,000 1,667,370 446,000 457,531 8,685,000 8,665,982 6,125,000 6,257,535 403,000 399,378 6,850,000 5,472,560 11,512,000 11,118,185 1,260,000 1,245,605 1,557,000 1,554,727 1,925,000 1,887,327 658,000 643,258 1,930,000 1,941,379 8,103,000 8,037,902 1,369,000 1,355,917 760,146,60436 758,682,27936 141,782,10137 141,119,87737 58,636,39338 58,636,39338 10,790,81651 10,774,90251 62,729,698 62,729,698 25,417,77249 25,374,84649 363,086 363,086 84,005,78839 84,005,78839 21,978,13240 21,912,24440 45,700,619 45,700,619 7,677,26741 7,659,13041 511,866,24642 511,780,81142 98,477,15943 98,263,67543 138,000 4,450,000 3,800,000 15,543,000 18,669 167,842 4,418,339 3,766,284 15,473,917 S- - - 88,238,39544 S- - - 88,238,39544 2,348,000 2,119,000 2,194,000 2,520,000 36,434,60545 2,332,882 2,138,429 2,156,310 2,461,925 36,296,57645 37-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Total to Sep. 30, 1987 49. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 50. The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, WA and OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 290,000 235,687 271,310 4,700 7,270 2,105,000 2,600,000 2,420,000 2,636 2,100,169 2,522,379 2,466,125 2,627 6,201,000 7,606,000 8,927,000 7,095,000 5,840,781 7,851,423 9,027,285 6,866,803 - 136,408,150 132 136,391,810 ,000 19,499,80046 ,487 19,437,03746 301,064,28847 301,064,28847 90,065,00848 89,742,25448 1Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. sIncludes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon Slough; $161,897, Camas- Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157 470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9Includes $2,033,408 under Code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10Includes $802,096 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds. 11Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12Excludes $80,000 (other funds) contributed for new work by Port of Coos Bay to cover additional cost of disposing of dredge spoils in Coos Bay, OR; includes $8,000 for previous project. 13Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. Includes $36,000 under Code 711. 14Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 15Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 16Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 17Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 18Includes 21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 19Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 20Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 2 1Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 22Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 23Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 24Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 25Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 26Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 27Includes $6,026 for previous project. 28Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 29Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 30Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 31Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 32Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 33Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 34Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 35Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 36Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recovery Act funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,332,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,000 allotted $6,000 expended, power units funds. 37Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 37-28 See Section In Text In Text Project Project PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 38Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 39Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Sweet Home Lake. 40Includes $198,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 41Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 42Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 43Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 allotted under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 44Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 45Includes $198,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 46Includes $198,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 47Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15-22 funds. 48Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49Includes $142,078 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 50lncludes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 51Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 52Includes $14,959,000 under Code 310, Inland Waterway Trust Fund. 53Includes $14,570,957 under Code 310, Inland Waterway Trust Fund. 37-29 __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act& 1. Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 4, 1981 3. Feb. 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 4, 19232 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1927 July 3, 1930 Sep. 6, 19333 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Project and Work Authorized BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Construction of a new navigation lock just south of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, Wa. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. Documents P.L. 99-88 P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.1 H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.1 No Prior Report. H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.' 37-30 37-B Led) TABLE (Continu See Section in Text Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 11, 1933 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 3, 1905 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Sep. 3, 1954 July 30, 1983 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.9 Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide by 800 feet long. H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.1 P.L. 98-63 H. Committee Doc. 94, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.1 37-31 6. 7. Project and Work Authorized An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East channel. Main channel. West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. Documents H. Doc. 630, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.1 H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong., 1st Sess.1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 Dec. 31, 1970 June 3, 1896 June 30, 1948 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Project and Work Authorized 8. See Section in Text 37-32 COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Dredging channel from mouth to head of navigation. For a 5 ft. depth from mouth to head of navigation on the Millicoma River and South Fork. Except on South Fork above M. 14 where 3 ft. will suffice. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with entrance channel of same depth and 50 feet wide. Construction of inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. _ _ 9. 10. 11. I _ I _ _I_I__ _ _ Documents H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 237, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. S. Doc. 124, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. NEHALEM BAY, OR 14. July 25, 1912 Two rubble-stone jetties. Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 31, 1970 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1958 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 1, 1980 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 June 30, 1948 July 26, 1912 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot South Jetty. 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of North Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with tegulating works as needed.4 Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garbaldi OR, to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Construct South Jetty, 80,000 feet long. 37-33 II. Doc. 623, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.1 Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L. 96-367 H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' 16. 17. 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 June 26, 19346 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 20. UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. A short south jetty. A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River.5 WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks.8 YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. 37-34 H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 1 S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong., 3d Sess.1 S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.1 S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess.1 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 21. 22. TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Section Au in Text PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date thorizing Act 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 May 17, 1950 Nov. 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1948 June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 7, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 28. 29. 30. 34. 35. May 17, 1950 Project and Work Authorized APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COYITAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DESCHUTES RIVER, BEND, OR Construction of an ice boom. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorizes construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE OR Earthfill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Bank protection work, improvements to existing projects and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. Documents H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Section 205 P.L. 80-858 as amended. Auth. by COE May 12, 1987 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 37-35 _ __ _ I_ _ _ _ I~ _ _ _ II_ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 30, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 June 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 20, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Aug. 22, 1984 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 June 30, 1948 36. P.L. 98-63 P.L. 99-88 MT. ST. HELENS AND VICINITY, WA. Implement and maintain flood control measures on the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers to assure flood protection for developed areas in the vicinity of such rivers against a one-hundred-year flood and to reduce sedimentation flow and the chance of blockage on the Columbia River. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, CASTLE ROCK, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. General improvements. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Eergency Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by Congress. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville Project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power. Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 21, 1933) Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 98-396 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780 P.L. 87-874 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. 37-36 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 37. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. TABLE 37-B (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 24, 1965 June 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended May 17, 1950 Sep. 21, 1962 Oct. 15, 1966 50. May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended 45. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. Changes location of reregulating dam from White Bridge location to Foster. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill dam. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. Construction, operation and maintenance of recreation facilities. John Day waterfowl management area. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Earth-and-gravel filled dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake as reregulating dam. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN OR Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. Authorizes construction of project but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAMLAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and -power. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 1Contains latest published maps. 2Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3Public Works Administration. 4lncludes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5Inactive. 6Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 7Flood Control Act. sClassified deferred. 9Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 37-37 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 83-780 F.C. Act 1954 S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 89-689, Public Works Approp. Act, 1967. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 46. 47. 48. 49. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Alsea River, OR Astoria Turning Basin, OR1 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA 1 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR Clatskanie River, OR2 Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR1 Deep River, WA2 Depoe Bay, OR1 Elochoman Slough, WA2 Grays River, WA2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, ORX Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver, WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), OR1 Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR2 Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR2 Salmon River, OR2 Smith River, OR2 South Channel, Government Island, OR South Slough (Charleston), OR1 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, OR 1" The Dalles-Celilo Canal, OR and WA1' Umatilla Harbor, OR 12 Westport Slough, OR2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, OR' Yaquina River, OR1 Yaquina River, OR Youngs and Klaskanine River, OR Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR2 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1985 1975 1963 1971 1971 1941 1977 1961 1963 1983 1985 1982 1963 1949 1974 1985 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1984 1979 Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance 2,000 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,2403 277,436 329,423 15,384 145,5883 18,6416 2,500 519,0907 1,154,1628 15,281 2,700 58,132 4,000 25,000 437,6699 6,000 16,881 2,145 143,120 221,80016 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,69513 195,31314 28,800 2,000 9,348 26,237 194,8934 1,474,036 32,768 16,648 35,670 - 58,127 685,677 90,514 205,130 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 749,69415 34,449 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 2Channel adequate for present commerce. 3Includes $15,537 for previous project. 4Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 7Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. '�Project abandoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. "Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 12Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. "Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. "Excludes $50,565 contributed funds. '5Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. '6Includes $102,000 contributed funds. 37-38 _ __ ___ __ __ I __ _~__ _ I ~____ _ - -- PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Diking Dist 5, Clatsop County, OR Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, WA Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, WA Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Peninsula Drainage District 2, Multnomah County, OR Port of Kalama, WA 1 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Scappoose Drainage District, OR Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Upper Grays River Area, WA State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report Operation See Annual and Status Report For Construction Maintenance Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1939 1941 1942 1943 1940 1940 1940 1941 1941 1951 1939 1942 1941 1942 1942 1962 1940 1940 1939 1951 1942 1942 1942 1951 1984 1946 1985 1939 1947 1985 163,397 163,291 69,724 574,123 25,609 25,609 161,381 258,795 26,810 169,542 240,939 33,080 25,773 18,789 158,419 181,652 61,186 39,475 77,7743 593,0344 211,160 241,148 99,844 47,662 1,623,505 3,991,558 178,885 5,289,833 133,778 61,263 504,64213 37-39 TABLE 37-E REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District, Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 - Total Columbia River Basin 16,399,775 - LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA Completed 1985 250,000 - Total Cowlitz River Basin 442,735 - LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 - Columbia Drainage District 1, OR Inactive - - - Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 - Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 - Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA1 Completed - 236,860 - Deer Island Drainage District, OR Inactive - - - Hayden Island, OR Inactive 1950 - - Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1964 1,499,186 - Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Active 1961 35,265 - Rainier Drainage District, OR Completed 1967 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR Completed 1954 154,012 - Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Completed 1966 674,137 - Vancouver Lake Area, WA Deferred 1981 889,391 - Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Inactive 1971 48,619 37-40 TABLE 37-E (Continued) PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project Status Report For Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Woodson Drainage District, OR Total Lower Columbia River Basin WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Cascadia Lake, OR Gate Creek Lake, OR Holley Lake, OR Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Shelton Ditch, OR Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging Total Willamette River Basin ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR9 Bear Creek, Medford, OR1 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR1 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR2 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' Johnson Creek, OR McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Miami River, OR1 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR 1 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR1 Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR"1 (a) Riverside Area Units (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR0 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Rogue River, OR' Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Sumner Parker Airport, OR1 Completed Completed Completed Deferred Deferred Deferred Completed Inactive Inactive Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1973 1964 1960 1976 1972 1963 1967 1950 - 1967 1957 1959 1952 1982 1981 1985 1967 1948 1955 1952 1960 1959 1960 1939 1971 1960 1985 1961 Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance 1,803,488 162,500 11,928,364 1,214,3006 1,066,1147 840,0008 241,992 276,700 39,624 3,678,731 23,439 23,050 106,198 104,921 182,655 42,761 70,84510 1,307,216 22,963 170,245 29,500 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 11,690 16,000 9,100 267,748 161,540 143,263 968,71612 86,230 288,447 435,00014 215,939 176,351 92,500 3741 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Trask River, Tillamook County, OR" Tualatin, OR Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' Total All Other Flood Control Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act funds. 4Excludes $25,000 contributed funds. 6Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs project constructed by local interests. 6Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 7Includes $112,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Sweet Home. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1984 1985 1985 1952 1952 Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance 121,273 1,803,094 33,835 154,600 428,881 45,677 30,000 7,965,985 8Includes $95,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 9Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-85. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887. 1'Excludes $2,520 contributed funds. "Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974. '12Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 37-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR Completed 1954 350,0001 TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR - 1977 - - Bachelor Island, WA - 1977 - - Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 - Calapooya River OR 1959 1965 11,595 - Cascadia Lake, OR - 1987 954,1141 - Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 - Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 - Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 - Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 - Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR - 1978 - - Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 - Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR - 1987 - - Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 - Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 - Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement Dist. 1 OR - 1977 - - Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 - Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 6,819 - Deer Island Drainage District, OR - 1987 - - East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 - Ferguson Creek, Long Tom River, OR - 1978 - - Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR - 1977 - - Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR - 1977 - - Gate Creek Lake, OR - 1987 745,0012 - Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,9923 - John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 - John Day River OR 1974 1974 210,220 - Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 - Lake River Delta Area, WA - 1977 - - Lewis River Area, WA - 1978 - -- Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 - Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR - 1977 - - Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR - 1987 9,000 - Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 - Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 - Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 - Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 - Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 - Shelton Ditch Marion County, OR 1967 1987 39,624 - Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 - - Soap Creek, WA - 1977 - - Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR - 1978 - - Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 - Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR - 1987 4,000 - Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR - 1958 - - West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 - Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 - - Wiley Creek Lake, OR - 1960 112,000 - Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) - 1987 - - Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR - 1961 - - Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 - 'Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home 3Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. Reservoir. 2Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir. 37-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1987 (See Section 3 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 26,235,146 234,760,144 260,995,290 Public Works 446,296 14,515 460,811 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 26,819,891 234,873,327 261,693,218 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 - 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 27,485,845 234,897,647 262,383,492 TABLE 37-I NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1987) Coquille River, Bandon, OR 15,031 Columbia River, Willow Bar, OR 25,489 Columbia River, Henrici Bar, WA 23,466 Columbia River, Kalama, WA 32,052 Columbia River, Longview, WA 23,702 Astoria Deep Draft Anchorages, OR 32,427 Nehalem Bay, OR 7,484 Tongue Point, OR 25,934 Columbia River, Vancouver, WA 17,061 Yaquina Bay and Bar, OR 22,643 TOTAL 225,289 TABLE 37-J PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Skamokawa Creek, WA September 1987 Tillamook, OR May/September 1987 Willamette River, OR January, 1987 Yaquina River, OR March 1987 Youngs Bay, OR January/September 1987 TABLE 37-K WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 24 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet' Lift of Each Lock Lock I (Lower), 22.5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of Foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed 3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 1A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states of water, is at upper end of canal basin. 2A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co. which is now being operated by Portland General Electric Go. 3The dam is owned by private parties. 37-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Clatsop County Drainage District Nos. 2 and 5, OR Clatsop County Drainage District No. 1, OR Deer Creek, OR Libby Dike Coal Bank Slough, OR McCorkle Creek, WA Warrenton Diking District No. 1, OR Salmon Creek Levee, Oakridge, OR Tutuilla Creek, OR Umatilla River, at Riverside, OR Youngs R. Diking District #22, Clatsop, OR TOTAL Fiscal Year Costs (1987) 1,612 7,500 7,452 40,844 11,057 125,110 7,000 37,449 33 6,338 $244,395 See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. Ft./Sec. Acre/Feet Applegate Lake, OR Blue River Lake, OR Cottage Grove Lake, OR Cougar Lake, OR Detroit Lake, OR Dorena Lake, OR Fall Creek Lake, OR Fern Ridge Lake, OR Foster Lake, OR Green Peter Lake, OR Hills Creek Lake, OR Lookout Point Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, OR February 2, 1987 November 27, 1986 November 27, 1986 November 28, 1986 November 27, 1986 November 28, 1986 November 28, 1986 November 28, 1986 November 28, 1986 November 27, 1986 November 27, 1986 November 28, 1986 February 2, 1987 37-45 TABLE 37-M FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 23. 24. 25. 43. 44. 27. 29. 30. 45. 45. 46. 48. 49. 2,920 5,400 3,395 5,920 15,480 9,880 6,930 6,900 20,700 17,810 7,650 13,680 4,320 2,410 14,300 6,700 12,500 46,000 24,400 9,300 7,500 0 22,000 5,000 42,000 2,000 -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-N LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA LEVEES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WORKS (See Section 37 of Text) Estimated Cost of Work Location Approved 1987 Beaver Drainage District, OR Cowlitz County Diking Improvement I)istrict 2, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, WA Midland Drainage District, OR Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District No. 2, OR Rainier Drainage District, OR Sandy Drainage District OR Sauvie Island Drainage bistrict, OR Scappoose Drainage District, OR Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1, WA Woodson Drainage District, OR Total Estimated Cost, Federal Funds Estimated Non-Federal Cost Locations deauthorized or reclassified inactive and excluded from above cost estimate: Bachelor Island, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Clatskanie Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatskanie River Area, OR (Deauthorized - 1965) Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Columbia Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1987) Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Deer Island Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1987) Hayden Island, OR (Inactive) John Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1979) Kalama River Levee, WA (Deauthorized - 1978) Lake River Delta Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Lewis River Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Magruder Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1977) Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (Inactive) 'Cost is for Engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 37-46 $ 2,857,366 363,000 65,345 304,794 1,661,367 304,511 1,499,186 3,600,000 593,945 15,0561 674,137 3,567,248 5,289,833 162,500 20,958,288 $ 3,600,000 - -- I----~----~ ~'~-11--- ~----1--------~--'-L---- --- --~~--~--- -~-I --- TABLE 37-0 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 43 of Text) Project Blue River Lake, McKenzie Basin' 3 Cascadia Lake, South Santiam River4 " 1 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries Channel Improvements for Flood Control Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River' 7 Cottage Grove Lake, Coast Fork' Cougar Lake, South Fork McKenzie' 3 Detroit Lake, Including Big Cliff Lake, North Santiam River' Dorena Lake, Row River' Fall Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River' Gate Creek Lake, McKenzie Basin3 5 11 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Middle Santiam' 4 Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork' Holley Lake, Calapooya River 5 " Lookout Point Lake, Including Dexter Lake, Middle Fork' Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works North Fork, Middle Fork, Willamette River Willamette River Bank Protection' '--------- 'See individual reports for details of the project. 2Actual cost. 3For construction in lieu of originally authorized Quartz Creek Lake. 4For construction in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake. 6Project classified deferred. 6Project classified inactive. 7Does not include Reclassified Locations. 8Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958, Public Law 85-820. 9Includes cost of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, (710). 1'Does not include $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake and Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Units. 11Authorization rescinded November 17, 1986, Public Law 99-662. 37-47 Authorizing Act ---- May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. and June 30 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Oct. 23 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc. 131, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. and July 14, 1960, S. Doc. 104 86th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 5318, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 22, 1936, Special Report Division Engr., June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess., and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Estimated Federal Cost (1987) $ 32,038,2252 104,000,000 (1975) 3,005,000 (1960) 1,214,3003 4,013,1232 9 56,750,4052 1 62,729,6982 14,568,2622 1 22,118,2642 1 8,526,9352 9 127,000,000 (1980) 84,005,7882 45,700,6192 13,300,000 88,238,3952 9 106,000,000 29,200,000 (1987) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 37-P PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam, OR and WA - Lake Bonneville (See Section 46 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA - Lake Umatilla (See Section 51 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height Above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Pool Elevation (Normal) (Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length Length (Second Powerhouse) Width Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (Second Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM 'rpe of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 Cubic Feet Per Second 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 190 Feet 235 190 Feet 200 Feet 1-4,000 kw 2 @ 43,200 kw each 8 @ 54,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,076,600 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 Feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Tainter 50 Ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 37-48 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-P (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project POWERPLANT The Dalles Lock and Dam, WA and OR - Lake Celilo (See Section 54 of Text) Length: Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net Clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened to navigation SPILLWAY DAM 'rype Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 276 500,000 Ac.-Ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 Miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 Feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each Additional 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 37-49 SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT * This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA ................. 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA ............... 3. Edmonds Harbor, WA ................. 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA ............................... 5. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ............................... 6. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA ...... 7. Lake Crockett, WA ...................... 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ....... 9. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ......................... 10. Olympia Harbor, WA .................... 11. Port Townsend, WA ...................... 12. Project Condition Surveys .............. 13. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA ................. 14. Quillayute River, WA .................... 15. Seattle Harbor, WA ...................... 16. Swinomish Channel, WA ............... 17. Tacoma Harbor, WA ................... 18. Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA .................. 19. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA ...................... Beach Erosion Control 20. Beach Erosion Work under Special Authorization ........................... Flood Control 21. Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha, WA ..................................... 22. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ........................... 23. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA .......... 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 25. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works .... 26. Little Quilcene River, near Quilcene, WA ................ ......... 27. Mud Mountain Dam, WA ................ Page 38-2 38-2 38-2 38-3 38-3 38-4 38-4 38-4 38-5 38-5 38-5 38-5 38-5 38-6 38-6 38-7 38-7 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................... 29. Spokane River, Spokane, WA .......... 30. Stillaguamish River, WA ............... 31. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA .......... 32. Wynoochee Lake, WA ................. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 33. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ................. 34. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, W A .............................. 35. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT ...... General Investigations 36. Surveys ................ ............ 37. Collection and Study of Basic D ata ................ .. .......... 38. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ............ .. ............ Page 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-11 38-11 38-11 38-11 38-12 38-12 38-12 Tables 38-7 Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement .... 38-14 Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 38-19 38-8 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 38-25 Table 38-D Not Applicable Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control 38-8 Projects ............ .... 38-26 Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ...................... 38-30 38-8 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 38-30 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA 38-9 Principal Features of Double 38-9 Lock and Dam ................. 38-31 Table 38-I Project Condition Surveys .... 38-31 38-9 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities 38-9 Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ................... 38-32 38-9 Table 38-K Emergency Flood Control Activities - 38-9 Public Law 99, 84th Congress .. 38-32 38-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; and mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in July 1957, excluding the inactive portion and inner portion of boat basin. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1958.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway that are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys. Channel sediments were analyzed to determine suitability of dredged material for open-water disposal. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $152,400. 2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet. Project was completed in February 1961. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961. For details relating to previous project see page 797 of Annual Report for 1907.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles, and Anacortes, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $160,000. 3. EDMONDS HARBOR, WA Location. On easterly shore of Puget Sound in northwestern Washington, about 9 miles north of Seattle and immediately north of Edward's Point. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6445.) Existing Project. Maintenance of a rubblestone breakwater and entrance channel of small-boat harbor. Project consists of a rubblemound breakwater about 1,850 feet long with a top elevation of 18.5 feet, extending along southerly and westerly sides of basin; an entrance channel 13 feet deep and about 610 feet long, with a minimum width of 65 feet between deep water in the Sound and the basin; and the necessary navigation lights. Project was constructed by local interests and completed in April 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 1601 of FY 1966 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Two wharves and 4 pleasure craft handling facilities at Edmonds Harbor. One wharf is publicly owned and operated as a ferry terminal, the other, privately owned, is a gravel-unloading facility. There is also a Port-operated and-owned small-boat basin. These facilities, with exception of the small-boat basin, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys. 38-2 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Maintenance, contract: A contract was awarded in September 1986, for repair of the Federally-maintained south rubblestone breakwater. Placement of 10,629 tons of armor rock was completed in November 1986, at a contract cost of $181,778. 4. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. The 1968 modification included raising the southerly 4,100 feet of existing training dike, extending the training dike 1,500 feet farther south, and constructing a breakwater along the south and west sides of the existing small boat basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. The boat basin breakwater has been deleted at the request of the local sponsor, and the remainder of the 1968 modification has been deferred indefinitely. Project was completed in April 1963, excluding the deleted and deferred portions. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. (See Port Series No. 37- Ports of Everett, Bellingham, Port Angeles and Anacortes, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $20,000. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract for the Upper Snohomish River channel and settling basin was completed in December 1986, at a cost of $498,350 with 181,582 cubic yards of material being removed. 5. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 600 feet wide and 30 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; a channel 14 feet deep and 100 feet wide in South Bay to Bay City; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; and protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in March 1965 excluding deferred and inactive portions. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company-owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government-owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina accomplished dredging in South Reach, Crossover, and North Channels in October/November 1986, and in July/August 1987, removing 92,400 cubic yards of material at a cost of $633,800. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the 38-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 inner and outer harbors was completed in June 1987 at a cost of $1,916,900 with 1,411,231 cubic yards of material being removed. Approximately 630 lineal feet of revetment was rehabilitated, using stockpiled rock, at Point Chehalis, WA, at a cost of $106,760. 6. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Location. The Kenmore Navigation Channel lies at the northern end of Lake Washington adjacent to the Sammamish River. Kenmore, an unincorporated industrial and business center in King County just north of Seattle, WA, encompasses the lands to the north of the channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. The construction of a navigation channel to serve the Kenmore industrial area, King County, WA, involves a 15-foot-deep channel which would consist of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot-long transition channel with a 240 30- foot bend and a maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. The project also consists of the installation of a goose nesting area on property adjacent to the new channel as mitigation for the removal of goose nests during construction. Project was completed in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $30,000. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract was completed in February 1987, at a cost of $254,906 with 24,106 cubic yards of material being removed. 7. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 150 feet wide, protected by a breakwater. The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1948. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1948.) Recreational facilities at project under cost-sharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission include the following construction and improvements: Construct a 35-unit camping loop and restroom, new -. boat ramp handling facility, breakwater, a restroom in the day-use area and porto-potti dumps for boats; and expand day-use facility and add riprap at the construction site. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately owned passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys conducted. Maintenance, contract: A contract to dredge approximately 24,000 cubic yards was awarded in August 1987, and is 76% complete. Material will be used for beach feed to protect the Federal breakwater. 8. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to' Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is about 22 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The eight waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, passing 20,000 commercial and 65,000 pleasure vessels, and 2,200,000 tons of commerce. Fishladder passed 500,000 fish and there were more than 1,000,000 project visitors. Maintenance, contract: The following contracts were awarded in late September: Equipment Storage Building, Spillway Gate Seal Replacement, Repair of Saltwater Barrier, and Upgrade Water Distribution and Fire 38-4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Protection Systems. Major Rehabilitation. New work; contract: Contract for construction of a new Emergency Closure System and rehabilitation of the downstream guard gate is complete. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Gooseberry Point Small Boat Harbor, Hale Passage, WA, $35,753; Oak Harbor Marina, WA, $159 (Unfavorable Report); Sandy Point Harbor, Whatcom County, WA, $139; Coupeville, Whidbey Island, WA, $2,907; Fisherman Bay, Lopez Island, WA, $7,473. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. Operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 84 acres, maintaining 5 acres of fiberglass bottom screens, adding 0.75 acres of fiberglass bottom screens, and rototilling 12 acres at Lake Washington, Lake Union and Lake Sammamish, WA; aerial photo-mapping and rototilling approximately 30 acres at Osoyoos Lake, WA; and rototilling 101 acres at Pend Oreille River, WA. The FY 1987 work also included treatment effectiveness and carryover studies, cooperation with the University of Washington on a Grass Carp study, aquatic plant surveys, and public information efforts. Total costs for fiscal year were $478,156. 10. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6462.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend, and a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide. Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1939. Entrance channel and turning basin authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act have been deferred. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report of 1938.) Local cooperation. Modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, requires that local interests furnish suitably bulkheaded areas for retention of dredged materials, when and as required. The Port of Olympia advised on January 25, 1949, that it could not comply with requirements at that time, but would do so on earliest possible date. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port Series No. 35, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Annual sub-surface dive inspection of concrete floating breakwater was performed. Monitored the Port of Olympia operations of the dissolved oxygen and aeration systems. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $103,000. 11. PORT TOWNSEND, WA Location. In northwestern Washington, about 40 miles northwest of Seattle, on Olympic Peninsula, at demarcation point between Strait of Juan de Fuca and Admiralty Inlet which forms northerly part of Puget Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6405.) Existing project. Mooring basin and breakwater, basin with an area of 12.5 acres and depths of 10 and 12 feet below mean lower low water in inner and outer sections, respectively, and a gravel and rockfill breakwater 1,946 feet long. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Port Townsend is 8.8 feet. Extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in November 1964. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 11 piers and wharves in the harbor. One, publicly owned and operated, is available for public use and one, privately owned and operated, serves as a general cargo terminal. The remaining nine are used for various industrial purposes. Of these, one is used for ocean-going vessels and one is used as a railroad car ferry terminal. In addition, there are two protected basins, publicly owned and operated, for commercial fishing and pleasure craft. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $52,000. 12. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels, and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Channel centerline markers are inspected for visibility and proper operation in applicable areas frequented by boating traffic consisting mostly of recreationalists. In addition, all subject areas arp inspected to insure that they are clean of snags and obstructions. Total costs for fiscal year were $301,856. 13. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Eve- 38-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 rett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441 and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris, considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. City of Seattle is cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in Seattle Harbor. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 2,545 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: 2,925 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $72,891. Current contractor is recycling some of the debris and placing the remainder in a landfill. 14. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) Jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit was nourished in conjunction with channel dredging contracts completed in 1973 and in 1977. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982. In addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. Project was completed in February 1960; however, the channel upstream of the boat basin has been classified as inactive. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that the requirement to provide a public landing open to all on equal terms in the boat basin was not complied with between May and July 1981, due to the closure of the Quileute Indian Reservation to the landing of salmon by sport and charter fishermen. Project sponsorship was transferred from the Port of Port Angeles to the Quileute Tribe Port Authority in 1983. Terminal facilities. There are 6 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel during the year. Maintenance, contract: The river channel and spot shoals in the boat basin were dredged in February/- March 1987, removing 83,766 cubic yards of material at a cost of $369,045. 15. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long, and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions; and dredging Duwamish Waterway 200 feet wide and 30 feet deep between West Waterway and First Avenue South, 150 by 20 feet between First and Eighth Avenues South, thence 150 feet by 15 feet to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, with turning basin 600 by 350 feet and 20 feet deep just south of First Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep, and settling basin of about 100,000 cubic yardscapacity at upper end of waterway, a distance of 5.12 miles. Total length of waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding the settling basin at upstream end which is classified inactive and East Waterway above the 750-foot section. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 196 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at 38-6 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/outfitting/ drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company-owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $207,440. Maintenance, contract: The annual maintenance dredging of the Duwamish Waterway was completed in March 1987, with the removal of 80,200 cubic yards at a cost of $176,400. 16. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the-Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, l is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading, and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various reaches of the channel. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $121,000. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract for clamshell dredging with open-water disposal was completed in February 1987, at a cost of $369,111 with 156,141 cubic yards of material being removed. The Corps removed a deteriorated timber pile structure on Swinomish Channel with the debris vessel Puget and disposed of the demolition materials through the PS&TW harbor debris disposal service contract. 17. TACOMA HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor includes Commencement Bay and tributary waterways at Tacoma, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) Channel in City Waterway 500 feet wide and 29 feet deep from deep water in Commencement Bay to 11th Street Bridge, 500 feet wide and 22 feet deep to 14th Street Bridge, and varying from 500 to 250 feet wide and 19 feet deep from 14th Street Bridge to end of this waterway, a total length of 8,500 feet; (b) channel in Hylebos Waterway 30 feet deep, 3.1 miles long, and 200 feet wide except where width is increased to 250 feet at the bend below East 11th Street, to 300 feet at Lincoln Avenue bend, and to 510 feet and 770 feet, respectively, at the channel widening above Lincoln Avenue and the turning basin at the head of the waterway; (c) construction of two training walls, each about 700 feet long at mouth of Puyallup River; and (d) channel in Blair Waterway 2.6 miles long, including a portion seaward of East 11th Street, 650 feet wide and 30 feet deep over southerly 350 feet, and 35 feet deep over northerly 300 feet; and remaining portion, 35 feet deep and 150 feet wide at East 11th Street, 600 feet wide between East 11th Street and Lincoln Avenue, and 300 feet wide between Lincoln Avenue and a 1,200-foot wide turning basin at head of waterway. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.8 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 20 feet. Project was completed in December 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 1372 to 1376 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1875 of Annual Report for 1938 for Puyallup Waterway, and page 1702 of Annual Report of 1944 and page 1502 of Annual Report for 1954 for Blair (formerly Wapato and Port Industrial) Waterway.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 81 terminal facilities, exclusive of those available to recreational craft, located in Tacoma Harbor which is comprised of Commencement Bay and its many waterways. These facilities serve a variety of purposes which includes cargo handling, fueling small vessels, ferry traffic, marine repair, conversion/outfitting, dry-docking, mooring, bunkering, ship-building, and shipbreaking. (See Port Series No. 35, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $26,000. 18. WATERWAY CONNECTING PORT TOWNSEND AND OAK BAY, WA Location. Canal connects two bays which are arms 38-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 of Admiralty Inlet on west side of Puget Sound, in northwestern part of Washington, about 40 miles north of Seattle. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 6405.) Existing project. Provides for a canal 15 feet deep, 75 feet wide on the bottom, and about 4,800 feet long, and for construction of jetties to protect channel at southern or Oak Bay end, and a bulkhead for retention of dredged material. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.3 feet in Port Townsend Bay and 9.4 feet in Oak Bay. Extreme tidal range is 16 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None directly served by the canal. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $52,000. 19. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram lumber mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River- Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; one of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Conducted ocean disposal study. Maintenance, contract: Tokeland entrance channel maintenance dredging was completed in July 1987, at a cost of $77,236 with 27,749 cubic yards of material being removed. Beach Erosion 20. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 84-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA, were $1,464. Flood Control 21. ELWHA KLALLAM RESERVATION, ELWHA, WA Location. Within the Elwha River basin on the Olympic peninsula of Washington State, and approximately 6 miles west of the city of Port Angeles in Clallam County. Existing project. A setback levee, 7,640 feet long, averaging 8 feet high with a 12-foot top width, to reduce flood damages along the lower Elwha River within the Klallam Tribal Reservation. The landward levee slope would be covered with soil and the riverward slope would be protected with quarry spalls. Both slopes would be planted with native grasses. Top of levee would be surfaced with gravel to provide a suitable road for inspection and maintenance. Interior runoff reaching the levee would be drained through gated culverts and a 2,000-foot-long drainage ditch which would parallel the downstreanportion of the levee. Several ramps would be built across the levee to provide access to property and the existing hatchery fish holding pond would be relocated behind the levee. Estimated cost of the project is $1,196,000 ($897,000 Federal; $299,000 non-Federal). Expected completion date is 1988. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing 38-8 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT requirements, the local sponsor (Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe) will provide 25% of project cost. Local sponsor will also provide operation and maintenance of the completed project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Plans and specifications were initiated after completion of the Definite Project Report. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for Sauk River, Skagit County, WA, were $5,312., 23. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake quadrangle, WA") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, turbidimeter, ditches, powerline, and other project features. The outlet works stilling basin was inspected. Work continued on water quality surveys, water storage studies, and channel capacity study. Maintenance, contract: Settlement of the fill for the relocated Burlington Northern Railway between stations 10989 and 10991 was under continued surveillance. The deferred construction period has been extended to cover this area to observe effect of remedial work. (Improvements to the drainage system have apparently stabilized the railroad fill.) Generator set replacement and exploratory drilling contracts were completed. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintainedby local interests; and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, Dungeness River at Sequim, Sammamish River, Shelton Creek, Stillaguamish River and Yakima River, all in Washington State; Coeur d'Alene, and St. Maries projects in Idaho. Streambank vegetation evaluations were made at Omak and Oroville and on the Green River in Washington. 40 Section 14 bank protection projects in WA, ID and MT were inspected in conjunction with flood control projects. Fiscal year costs were $74,627. Costs to date have been $747,738. 25. INSPEGCIONOFCOMPLETEDPL-99WORKS A levee inspection program was initiated this FY to determine new eligibility criteria for rehabilitation under PL84-99. Non-Federal levees in Whatcom County were contracted to a consulting firm. Approximately 50 miles of non-Federal levees in the Snohomish River basin were evaluated by the Seattle District. Fiscal year costs were $72,083. Total costs to date have been $237,696. 26. LITTLE QUILCENE RIVER, NEAR QUILCENE, WA Location. Project is located in Jefferson County, 1 mile northeast of Quilcene, WA, in Mt. Walker Quadrangle SE 1/4 sec. 11, T. 27 N., R. 2W. Existing project. Approximately 200 lineal feet of riprap bank protection to prevent further erosion of Wildwood Road which is adjacent to the Little Quilcene River. Protection would consist of a riprap blanket 36" thick on a 1V to 1.5H slope and a 12-foot-wide, 4-footthick weighted riprap toe. Estimated cost of the project is $48,500 ($36,375 Federal; $12,125 non-Federal). Expected completion date is 1988. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Jefferson County) will provide 25% of project cost. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Plans and specifications were initiated. 27. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 425 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of T39,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps 38-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation: None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, and fish facilities. Approximately 1,300 fish were transported from the fish collection facility. Engineering work continued on investigation and evaluation of a seepage problem in dam core. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: A Feature Design Memorandum for correcting earthquake and debris blockage deficiencies in the intake tower was initiated in late FY 87. New work, contract: Completed construction of resident engineer's facility. Major Rehabilitation. New work, hired labor: Completed bid documents and prepared to award a contract for construction of a seepage control cutoff wall in the core of the dam. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee Project, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $201,661. 29. SPOKANE RIVER, SPOKANE, WA Location. Project is located on the right bank of the Spokane River at approximately River Mile 82.6, in the city of Spokane, WA, in Spokane NE Quadrangle NE 1/4 sec. 11, T. 25 N., R. 43 E. Existing project. Approximately 600 lineal feet of riprap bank protection to prevent further erosion of Upriver Drive, a city of Spokane arterial street. Protection would consist of a riprap blanket 36" thick on a 1V to 2H slope and a 15-foot-wide, 5-foot-thick weighted riprap toe. Estimated cost of the project is $166,500 ($124,875 Federal; $41,625 non-Federal). Expected completion date is November 30, 1987. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (City of Spokane) will provide 25% of project cost. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Plans and specifications were initiated. 30. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor and equipment to remove brush and trees on 38,000 linear feet. Maintenance, contract: Contracted to aid in removal of brush and trees. Contracted the repair of 5 segments with rock and gravel. 31. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, WA, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 lineal feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project will be provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. None required. 38-10 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor and equipment to remove brush and trees on the entire project. Maintenance, contract: Contracted to aid in removal of brush and trees. 32. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970. The project was completed and became operational in December 1972. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a reexamination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1972.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project facilities were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam and fish facilities, roads, ditches, culverts, and visitors' facilities. The project tank truck hauled upstream migrant fish past the dam. Maintenance, contract: Contract for spillway gate repainting was completed. A contract in the amount of $62,146 for Generator Replacements was awarded in late September. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 33. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purposeplan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Work continued on the boundary monumentation. 34. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at river mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Additional work will be required to bring turbine efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards. Uprating and plant modernization of units 1-16, and other miscellaneous project work, is approximately 93 percent complete. Estimated cost of current construction project is $387,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued real estate acquisition. New work, contract: Contracts were awarded for powerhouse roof repair, exhibits for the powerhouse public access facility, and project completion. Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included generator stator rewind, installation and fire protection, transformers, station service system, 15 kV circuit breakers, main unit excitation system, powerhouse shops, mobile sealing inspection unit, Bridgeport State Park (Phase II), relocation of public access in powerhouse, and wildlife mitigation: mule deer study and mitigation evaluation. Contracts completed during the fiscal year included turbine cavitation ($1,338,967) and governor system ($1,752,038). Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Contracts awarded during the fiscal year included: wildlife mitigation O&M in the amount of $90,000, intake trashrack sections in the amount of $96,000, and miscellaneous replacement parts orders. 35. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai with Columbia 38-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 River. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project will be operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River Basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units with provision for four additional units, one of which is currently under construction. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River Basin. Construction is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Work continued to upgrade and maintain the left abutment instrumentation. Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam Powerhouse. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is complete; however, only the unit 5 generator was installed. Installation of the electrical equipment is limited to unit 5. Parts for units 6 through 8 have been stored at the site. Project is 99% complete. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. Operations during fiscal year. New work, contract: Contracts for turbines and generators continued. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 mile of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating dam. Operations during fiscal year. In FY 82, all work was terminated due to court direction. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3, 1981. General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $260,258 for navigation studies, $194,418 for flood damage prevention studies, $374,377 for comprehensive studies, $68,446 for miscellaneous activities and $58,323 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $955,822. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Board of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Coordination with the Osoyoos Lake Board of Control included technical assistance in review of construction and operation plans for the recently constructed Osoyoos Lake control structure. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $3,056 for international water studies, $102,180 for flood plain management services, $5,050 for hydrologic studies, and $11,925 for Coastal Data Collection, a total of $122,211. 38. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Tacoma Harbor, Pierce County, is located in southern Puget Sound at Tacoma, WA, about 30 miles south of Seattle. The proposed plan of improvement provides for (a) modification of the existing Federal project for Blair Waterway to provide for the construction and maintenance of a 45-foot and a 41-foot channel including replacement of the East 11th Street Bridge and (b) Federal maintenance of the locally constructed Sitcum Waterway to depths of 40 and 35 feet. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included coordination with the Port of Tacoma and contracting with the Washington State Department of Transportation for bridge replacement evaluations. Estimated preconstruction engineering and design cost is $2,640,000. Fiscal year costs were $101,682. Total costs to date have been $957,163, including $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County, west central Washington. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington. 38-12 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT The plan of improvement, authorized in PL99-662, would protect most of the left bank flood plain at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement would include: an earthen levee 22,500 feet long roughly following the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis; 2,200 feet of concrete floodwall in two industrial areas; five pumping stations and tide gates; and 10 smaller gravity drain culverts with flap gates. The levee would protect 1,318 acres of the cities from inundation by the standard project flood. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included completion of hydrologic, hydraulic, and economic studies, preparation of design and cost estimates, and Fish and Wildlife coordination. Estimated preconstruction engineering and design cost is $1,474,000. Fiscal year costs were $250,947. Total costs to date have been $1,011,711. East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Seattle Harbor, WA, an authorized project, includes East, West and Duwamish Waterways within its city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. The plan of improvement, authorized in PL99-662, includes: Deepening and narrowing East and West Waterways (from 34 x 750 feet to 39 x 500 feet); deepening and widening Duwamish Waterway (from 34 x 200 feet to 39 x 250 feet); replacing the constrictive Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge with one having 250 feet horizontal clearance; deepening one turning basin to 39 feet; deauthorizing an unneeded turning basin; mitigating for loss of 4 acres shallow-water and 27 acres deepwater fish habitat; creating 2 acres of shallow-water habitat for fish enhancement; and constructing a public boat ramp for recreation access. Preconstruction engineering and design studies were initiated in October 1984. At the request of the local sponsor, further studies were deferred late in FY 86. During the fiscal year work involved organizing and filing results of sediment testing and foundation exploration for future use. Estimated preconstruction engineering and design cost is $4,380,000. Fiscal year costs were $9,147. Total costs to date have been $662,884. Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Grays Harbor is a large tidal estuary in southwestern Washington. The entrance is 45 miles north of the mouth of the Columbia River and 110 miles south of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The estuary lies entirely within Grays Harbor County, State of Washington. The proposed plan of improvement consists of modifying the existing Federal project for Grays Harbor. The existing 30-foot channel would be deepened to a depth of 46 feet through the Outer Bar and widened in this reach from the existing 600 feet to a 1,000-foot-wide channel; thence, the entrance reach would be widened and deepened from the existing designated 350 feet wide by 30 feet deep channel to a channel tapering landward from 1,000 to 600 feet wide and 46 to 38 feet deep; thence, the existing channel to Cow Point would be widened and deepened from 350 feet wide and 30 feet deep to 400 feet wide by 38 feet deep for the South reach and Crossover reach and to 350 feet wide by 38 feet deep for the Moon Island, Hoquiam, and Cow Point reaches; and thence, the Aberdeen and South Aberdeen reaches would be widened and deepened from the existing designated 200 feet wide by 30 feet deep channels to channels 250 feet wide by 36 feet deep. Two turning basins located at Aberdeen would be constructed and the existing railroad bridge would be replaced with a new bridge having horizontal clearance of 250 feet. During the fiscal year environmental and engineering studies were essentially completed, leading to a General Design Memorandum (GDM). Based on preliminary results, it appears project dimensions can be reduced without affecting the project benefits. The final project design will be presented in the GDM which is scheduled for completion in June 1988. Estimated preconstruction engineering and design cost is $6,000,000. Fiscal year costs were $606,375. Total costs to date have been $3,571,137. Yakima River at Union Gap, WA The flood plan under study is located between the confluence of the Yakima and Naches Rivers and the community of Union Gap, within Yakima County, in southeastern Washington State. The proposed plan of improvement consists of: Constructing two levees downstream of the Moxee Bridge on the Yakima River (1.1 miles of levee on the west bank and 2.5 miles on the east bank); improving sections of existing 7 miles of levee by raising and providing additional riprap; installation of drainage control gates on existing culverts and flood plain management for unprotected areas. Preconstruction engineering and design studies were initiated in October 1984. Study was deferred in FY 86. FY 87 work consisted of final coordination and study termination. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $566,000. Fiscal year costs were $5,483. Total costs to date have been $501,851. No work is scheduled for FY 88. 38-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bellingham Harbor WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Edmonds Harbor, WA5 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost - 185,000 167,000 - 175,612 157,312 - 15,000 - 11,813 - 188,000 3,147 170,000 - 160,000 20,000 45,000 - - 28,836 195,680 792,000 155,000 291,000 492,000 689,169 253,987 294,189 489,763 - - - -9,635 4,347,000 4,252,725 4,339,277 4,243,299 -9,600 - 36 - 3,927,140 3,278,700 3,944,749 3,267,434 222,345 222,3451 896,239 877,163 59,523 59,523 5,000 5,000 1,566,840 1,566,8402 1,252,067 1,234,0273 29,421 29,421 9,103 9,103 225,000 224,516 1,775,744 1,775,7446 7,554,079 7,551,1867 116,618 116,618 584,090 584,090 5,155,796 5,155,7968 81,516,029 81,501,9539 120,592 120,592 4,606,145 4,606,145 38-14 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Project (Contrib. Funds) Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA Lake Crockett, WA 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA 10. Olympia Harbor, WA 11. Port Townsend, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA 14. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section In Text FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total to Funding FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 22 35,834 35,834 47,889 47,889 946,000 946,00010 437,000 436,889 377,990 377,99011 668,440 656,591 4,611,436 4,611,43612 64,764,910 64,658,814'13 ,970,000 1,120,230 - - 7,465,230 ,951,805 994,066 133,987 10,373 7,465,230 - - - - 359,315 -- - - 359,31514 - -100,000 114,000 739,377 -- - 100,000 111,719 737,09615 -- - - 480,899 -- - - 480,899 - - - 52,000 78,787 - - - 52,000 78,787 -- - - 92,423 -- - - 92,423 -- - - 43,337 - - - - 43,337 593,000 542,500 617,000 597,000 17,011,802 552,674 575,607 612,490 597,072 17,000,14516 - - - - 521,850 - - - - 521,85017 454,000 536,261 17,000 456,050 9,592,072 452,875 530,793 19,410 456,244 9,586,582 -- - - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 - - - - 170,335 -- - - 170,335 405,000 274,000 1,001,000 393,000 7,585,746 398,225 273,308 940,157 459,554 7,583,988 38-15 - - 134,000 303,000 - - 112,775 324,114 - -.. - 155,500 - - - 143,651 2,999,240 3,595,440 3,755,000 3,641,000 2,936,228 3,560,062 3,778,291 3,640,034 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project (Contrib. Funds) 16. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Tacoma Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA 19. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA 23. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 26. Little Quilcene River, near Quilcene, WA 27. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) ------ Total to Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 50,000 - 50,000 90,000 89,712 578,000 573,690 16,500 16,169 84,000 80,542 50,000 110,000 49,810 105,763 515,000 496,871 693,049 681,307 26,000 26,000 - - - 52,000 619 52,000 - 115,650 4,953 113,884 68,000 20,000 70,712 19,091 727,000 616,769 - 1,439,000 - 1,326,358 805,500 918,895 9,000 7,981 1,200,000 1,196,536 69,333 69,333 20,000 20,000 808,332 808,33218 6,243,940 6,234,613 32,000 32,000 2,383,891 2,383,89119 1,390,745 1,390,74520 1,144,416 1,144,416 222,500 222,500 73,322 73,322 378,378 378,378 1,579,269 1,579,26921 13,356,628 13,351,96122 98,372 98,372 405,900 403,274 37,048,061 37,048,061 10,363,800 10,336,05523 2,000,000 2,000,000 9,000 7,981 15,934,848 15,818,74224 38-16 347,760 20,000 353,000 376,000 352,506 19,797 149,813 570,290 TABLE 38-A (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project (Contrib. Funds) 29. Spokane River, Spokane, WA 30. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA 32. Wynoochee Lake, WA 33. Albeni Falls Dam, ID 34. Chief Joseph Dam- Rufus Woods Lake, WA 35. Libby Dam, Lake Koocanusa, MT (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Total to FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 1,138,000 2,967,944 1,230,000 1,151,000 1,118,723 2,937,358 1,272,504 1,152,114 19,341,476 19,297,88325 285,908 285,908 Funding Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 155,000 162,671 100,000 100,163 40,000 50,000 39,829 48,911 110,000 110,406 40,000 40,851 100,000 96,786 35,000 32,177 994,500 1,047,877 1,032,000 1,382,000 963,671 1,027,462 1,020,809 1,405,109 2,018,000 2,062,473 18,200,000 18,292,811 5,890,000 5,811,108 1,915,000 1,844,303 2,860,500 2,824,490 2,580,000 2,555,530 13,990,000 14,012,821 5,968,576 5,966,340 830,000 853,369 2,877,000 2,852,195 2,974,000 2,971,854 11,023,000 10,091,596 6,608,000 6,525,685 630,000 715,232 3,653,000 3,654,719 2,743,000 2,823,626 6,200,000 7,151,901 6,885,000 7,054,829 17,893 3,746,100 3,782,076 - 520,000 - 515,530 - 9,000 - 8,891 38-17 - -I- ----- -- 1 ~-------1-~~11-^-~ ~ "111' - - 520,000 515,530 3,928 3,928 9,000 8,891 220,594 220,59426 1,674,845 1,671,610 21,000 21,000 3,947,853 3,947,85327 531,597 528,311 23,494,445 23,494,44528 12,291,446 12,249,95329 31,878,297 31,878,29730 31,216,831 31,192,23531 512,291,235 512,262,31732 79,755,511 79,722,72733 297,630 297,630 543,726,14034 543,723,88935 29,206,579 29,144,30836 1,458,252 1,458,25237 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 'Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. lIncludes $1,092 appropriate and expended for previous project. 4Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended and $2,159,633 expended by Port of Bellingham in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 5Constructed by local interests. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 6Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 7Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous project. "Includes $124,945 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $113,134 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $162,000 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. "Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $798,135 Emergency Relief Funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. "'Includes $148,765 preauthorization cost, appropriated and expended. "Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). '2Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), and $485,002 for previous projects, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246 567 expended by State of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. S3Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. "Includes $183,257 for previous projects, and $18,700 expended for restudy Fiscal Years 1968-1973. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration Funds expended. 15Includes $14,418 expended for previous projects. S6Includes $67,496 appropriated and expended for previous project. '?Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. S8Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended and $9,000 expended by Skagit County in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 19Includes $159,584 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration Funds expended. Excludes $62,697, value of work contributed by Port of Tacoma in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 20Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 2 1Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes 40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,557 Emergency Relief Funds expended. 22Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration Funds expended. 2"Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 24Includes $87,785 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief Funds expended. 25Includes $5,000 Advance Procurement Funds expended and $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 26Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration Funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief Funds expended. 27Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 28Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 2"Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. o0 Includes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act Funds and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. 1'Includes $174,776 Special Recreation Use Fees and $10,000 Advance Procurement Funds, appropriated and expended. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 32Includes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act Funds and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. 33Includes $774,561 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 34Includes $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 3"Includes $42,219,382 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. Includes $7,240,838 appropriated and expended for preconstruction planning, and $132,300 appropriated and expended for Kelley Flats Airport. 36Includes $366,224 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. "7Excludes $185,349 expended by Federal Aviation Agency and $17,500 expended by Lincoln County-City of Libby Joint Airport Board. 38-18 TABLE 38-B SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 5. June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Project and Work Authorized ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Channel in Capsante Waterway. Mooring basin. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. EDMONDS HARBOR, WA Maintenace of rubblemound breakwater, 1,850 feet long, and entrance channel, 13 feet deep, 610 feet long and 65 feet wide. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. Raise and extend existing training dike; and construct breakwater on westerly and southerly sides of 14th Street small-boat basin.4 GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. See Section in Text H. Doc. 147, 88th Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 89-298 H. Doc. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 357, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.5 Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. 38-19 Documents H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 102, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.3 1. 3. __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 19348 Aug. 30, 19359 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano 6 Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal, which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel.7 Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Construction of navigation channel 15 feet deep consisting of a 100-foot wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot long transition channel with 24 30-foot bend and maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Small-boat basin. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA For a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 315, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 11. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. DI)oc. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Oct. 7, 1980 H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 38-20 6. 8. TABLE 38-B (Continued) SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193510 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Channels of 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, with turning basin of same depth. Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and widen entrance to turning basin. Entrance channel 500 feet wide to and including a turning basin 3,350 feet long and generally 960 feet wide, all at a depth of 30 feet at mean lower low water.7 PORT TOWNSEND, WA Mooring basin and breakwater. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin.11 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". TACOMA HARBOR, WA City Waterway. Hylebos Waterway H. Doc. 244, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc, 699, 76th Cong., 3d Sess.5 H. Doc. 418, 84th Cong. 2d Sess.5 Annual Report for 1893, page 342510 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.5 S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. and H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.5 H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.5 H. Doc. 76, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 25, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and 91, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 38-21 11. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents Training walls at mouth of Puyallup River (previous- Rivers and Harbors ly authorized by Public Works Administration Sep. Committee Doc. 55, 6, 1933) 72nd Cong., 2d Sess. Blair Waterway extension. H. Doc 171, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. Blair and Hylebos Waterways extension. S. Doc. 101, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.5 18. Mar. 4, 191312 19. July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19359 Aug. 30, 19351 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 21. June 30, 1948 as amended May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 July 24, 1946 as amended June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 as amended June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 WATERWAY CONNECTING PORT TOWNSEND AND OAK BAY, WA Canal 15 feet deep, 75 feet wide on the bottom, and about 4,800 feet long; construct jetties to protect channel at southern or Oak Bay end, and a bulkhead for retention of dredging material. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. ELWHA KLALLAM RESERVATION, ELWHA RIVER, WA 7,640-foot long levee, 8 feet high with 12-foot top width and bottom width of 45 feet. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam LITTLE QUILCENE RIVER, NEAR QUILCENE, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities SPOKANE RIVER, SPOKANE, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements H. Doc. 625, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.5 Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sep. 1, 1987 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.5 P.L. 85-592 Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 21, 1987 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 19, 1986 H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess.5 P.L. 75-761 38-22 23. 26. 27. 29. 30. TABLE 38-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 31. June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended 32. Oct. 23 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 33. May 17, 1950 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs, $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Documents S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong. 2d Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.5 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.5 P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.LI. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.5 P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-23914 P.L. 90-48315 P.L. 91-28216 P.L. 91-625 38-23 34. 35. I _ ~ _ P REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering longterm economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land not to exceed $2,000,000 for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, ID for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation, not to exceed $1,500,000, to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands, in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. 'Contains latest published map of Squalicum Creek Waterway. 2Contains latest published map of small-boat basin. :Contains latest published map of Whatcom Creek Waterway. 4Deferred. 5Contains latest published map. "Inactive. 7A portion deferred. 'Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Included in Public W c .s Administration Program. P.L. 91-611 S. Doc. 93-29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 10Annual Report for 1913 contains latest published map (page 3127.) t"Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. 12Annual Report of 1915 contains latest published map (page 3441). 3"Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. "1Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 5'Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 16River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 38-24 See Section in Text Documents SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA' Completed 1977 825,2634 - Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)' Completed 1966 125,6345 - Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, WA' Completed 1981 1,744,0256 - Blaine Harbor, WA Completed 1958 346,650 - Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Completed 1923 274,3907 7,693 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA' Completed 1985 1,619,9568 - Ediz Hook, WA Completed 1986 5,878,7409 1,124,86010 Flathead River, MT Completed 1901 9,811 - Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, WA' Completed 1985 1,461,590 - Friday Harbor Marina, WA' Completed 1985 1,618,53711 - Hammersley Inlet, WA Completed 1950 9,000 10,683 Hoquiam River, WA Completed 1950 51,294 5,316 Kingston Harbor, WA Completed 1967 262,57012 5,000'13 Kootenai River, ID and MT Completed 1933 9,255 5,643 Mats Mats Bay, WA' Completed 1970 137,679'14 - Neah Bay, WA Completed 1982 2,057,266 1,854,05815 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Abandoned 1913 63,880 7,634 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Completed 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, WA2 Completed 1960 470,873 - Port Gamble Harbor, WA Completed 1953 11,91116 13,337 Port Orchard Bay, WA3 Completed 1928 42,804 - Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Completed 1962 2,575,09117 - Skagit River, WA Completed 1950 102,33018 36,258 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA1 Completed 1981 2,000,00019 - 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 3No maintenance required. 4Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 5Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 6Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. Includes $40,790 appropriated and expended for WA State Sales and Use Tax, FY 85. 7Includes $8,005 expended for previous project. Excludes $50,000 expended by State of Washington in fulfilling terms of local cooperation. "Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 9Excludes $396,000 contributed funds expended. 10Excludes $131,275 contributed funds expended. 1'Includes $43,037 expended for previous project. Excludes $1,267 881 contributed funds expended. 12Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 13Mitigation shore damages study expended. 14Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 15Includes $34,352 appropriated and expended for WA State Sales and Use Tax, FY 85. '6Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 17Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. "'Includes $2,500 expended for previous project. 19Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. 38-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA' Completed 1957 59,5825 - Bear Creek, Flathead County Bridge, near Essex, MT2 Completed 1971 1,424 - Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Completed 1964 17,836 - Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 156,000 - Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 57,000 - Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Completed 1949 32,264 - Chehalis River, City of Chehalis, Raw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Completed 1966 35,454 - Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1965 47,916 - Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Completed 1977 140,080 - Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 48,698 - Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Completed 1981 43,500 - Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Completed 1978 18,660 - Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Completed 1978 31,548 - Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Completed 1971 28,356 - Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Completed 1950 27,947 - Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Completed 1968 50,0006 - Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1950 49,165 - Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Completed 1941 152,872 - Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Completed 1950 25,452 - Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Completed 1983 384,8627 - Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Completed 1959 42,726 - Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge, near Thmwater, WA2 Completed 1965 26,292 - Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Completed 1967 22,956 - Dungeness River, Area #5, WA2 Completed 1950 2,1558 - Dungeness River, Area #8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 - Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA' Completed 1964 52,0409 - Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 - Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 - Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,09310 - Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 - Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 - Flathead River, MT2 Completed 1972 20,940 - Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Completed 1955 26,265 - Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1948 33,347 - 38-26 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Deferred 1981 300,00011 - Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1964 13,438 - Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 - Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 - Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 - Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Completed 1977 37,359 - Hoh River, County Road 16, WA2 Completed 1980 143,000 - Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Completed 1980 194,000 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Completed 1956 22,08212 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Completed 1961 11,916 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Completed 1964 41,622 - Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1983 173,00013 - Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 p Completed 1977 21,083 - Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Completed 1977 59,812 - Hoquiam River, WA2 Completed 1977 52,600 - Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Completed 1950 42,325 - Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 Completed 1965 14,885 - La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Completed 1979 40,525 - Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Completed 1974 15,700 - Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Completed 1974 11,200 - Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Completed 1974 13,450 - Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Completed 1976 19,810 - Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Completed 1949 31,783 - Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Completed 1951 33,200 - Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Completed 1951 11,72614 - Middle Fork Nooksack River, Deming, WA2 Completed 1986 79,000 - Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Completed 1972 11,836 - Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Completed 1977 17,608 - Naches River, Naches, WA2 Completed 1982 59,000 - Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Completed 1972 24,792 - Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Completed 1948 37,636 - Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1960 26,790 - Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Completed 1952 19,445 - Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Completed 1985 77,300 - Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Completed 1950 6,07515 Nooksack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA2 Completed 1960 10,807 - North Fork Skykomish River, WA2 Completed 1981 222,500 - 38-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Okanogan River, WA2 Okanogan River, Omak, WA 1 Okanogan River, Oroville, WA1 Pilchuck River, WA Pilchuck River, WA2 Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Placer Creek, ID Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Quillayute River, Quileute TIibal Float and Bridge, WA2 Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Rock Creek Road, MT2 Rye Creek, MT2 St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Sammamish River, WA Sauk River, WA2 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, MT2 Shelton Creek, WA' Skagit Creek, WA (Avon Bypass) Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Snohomish River, Lowell- Snohomish River Road, WA2 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA' Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed I----~--- 38-28 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1974 1981 1982 1985 1971 1980 1971 1986 1964 1977 1981 1972 1981 1961 1974 1973 1980 1973 1942 1967 1974 1965 1979 1968 1982 1949 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 1967 1969 1970 1977 1961 1963 1970 Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance 10,100 - 2,231,03016 1,787,63017 81,000 - 10,713 - 54,000 - 30,973 - 5,865,000 - 11,291 - 86,160 - 125,000 - 39,300 - 208,000 - 15,92818 49,657 - 31,565 - 50,000 - 22,819 - 357,698 - 2,582,53619 20,860 - 50,00020 872,021 - 54,46811 1,934,792 - 50,000 - 46,489 - 93,000 - 137,000 - 40,753 - 17,719 - 50,00021 44,227 - 60,90022 15,565 - 16,43623 11,433 - 271,713 - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTIS Project Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Stillwater River, MT2 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 Tahola, WA2 Upper Puyallup River, WA2 Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, WA4 West Fork Foster Creek, Wa2 Willapa River at Raymond, WA Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72) 2 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Yakima River, Yakima, WA2 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1964 1973 1977 1970 1979 1938 1977 1958 1982 1976 1969 1972 1948 1949 1947 1977 1983 Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance 50,00024 17,457 34,513 8,442 223,893 71,49525 544,331 19,513 508,13026 111,072 50,00027 50,000 381,961 8,047 48,272 36,768 125,500 1Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 3Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 65-93-917. 4Authorized by Secretary of Army under authority of Section 201, Public Law 298, 89th Congress, H. Doc. 91-370. 5Excludes $10,000 contributed funds expended. 6Excludes $24,728 contributed funds expended. 7Includes $20,580 preconstruction planning cost and $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $13,500 contributed funds expended. 8Excludes $2,154 contributed funds expended. 9Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 1 0Excludes $3,314 contributed funds expended. 11Preconstruction planning only. 12Excludes $21,807 contributed funds expended. 13Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended. 14Excludes $11,726 contributed funds expended. 15Excludes $6,075 contributed funds expended. 16Includes $1,030 appropriated and expended for WA State Sales and Use Tax, FY 85. 17Includes $8,130 appropriated and expended for WA State Sales and Use Tax, FY 85. l8Excludes $4,843 contributed funds expended. 19Excludes $696,923 contributed funds expended. Includes $117,420 preconstruction planning cost. 20Excludes $5,339 contributed funds expended. 21Excludes $24,488 contributed funds expended. 22Excludes 14,307 contributed funds expended. 23Excludes $1,960 contributed funds expended. 24Excludes $46,182 contributed funds expended. 25Emergency Relief Funds, Works Progress Administration. Excludes $13,704 contributed funds expended. 26Includes $23,742 preconstruction planning cost and $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967-1972. 27Excludes $21,311 contributed funds expended. 38-29 __ __ 1 _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report For Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Construction Operation and Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,0001 'For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for 544 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Utility District. Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Date Deauthorized Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA Entiat River, WA Methow River, WA Okanagon River, WA St. Regis River, MT Wenatchee River, WA Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA Hammersley Inlet, WA (Uncompleted Portion) Port Angeles Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) Port Gamble Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) Quillayute River, WA (Uncompleted Portion) Seattle Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) Skagit River, WA (Uncompleted Portion) Spokane River, Spokane, WA Stillaguamish River, WA 1Preconstruction planning only. 2Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. 3Economic study only. 38-30 Project For Last Full Report See Annual Report 1958 1958 1958 1958 1958 1958 1980 1950 1960 1953 1986 1986 1950 1939 1946 1964 1986 1986 1986 1978 1978 1986 1978 1977 1977 1986 1986 1978 1986 1986 $ 9,0001 1,1001 1,4001 44,3002 2,9441 4,2343 _ __ I - - -- -- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (See Section 8) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 11/ 1 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill' Feet 331/2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 - Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 'Low water in upper pool. 3Cost of double lock and dam was $2,224,712 and the 2Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. emergency gates, completed in 1923, $174,693. TABLE 38-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 12) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Washington: Anacortes Harbor Hoquiam River Kenmore Navigation Channel Lake Crockett Olympia Harbor (East Bay) Tacoma Harbor Willapa Harbor July 1987 September 1987 January 1987 June 1987 September 1987 August 1987 August 1987 38-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1987) Bowman Hilton Mobile Home Park, WA 1 Cedar River, WA Clear & Clarks Creeks, Pierce County, WA Davis Creek, Almira, WA2 Dungeness River, Sequim, WA Ellensburg, WA2 Issaquah Creek, Issaquah, WA Nooksack River, Everson, WA Omak, WA2 Prairie Creek, Pierce County, WA Snohomish River, Ebey Island, WA Swamp Creek, Brewster, WA2 Toppenish/Simcoe Creek, Yakima Indian Nation, WA Upper Green River, King County, WA2 Yakima River, Richland, WA 1Study terminated. 2Unfavorable appraisal. TABLE 38-K EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES REPAIR, FLOOD FIGHTING, AND RESCUE WORK (PUBLIC LAW 99, 84TH CONG., AND ANTECEDENT LEGISLATION) Project and Location Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation1 TOTAL Fiscal Year Costs (1987) $274,621 84,360 267,722 $626,703 1Excludes $40,000 contributed funds expended. 38-32 $ 276 13,341 50,664 7,500 7,149 7,500 7,472 14,483 7,500 4,573 9,620 7,500 49,985 7,500 1,500 $196,563 _ I~ WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge (River Mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge (River Mile 8.4) near Richland, WA. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................... Flood Control 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ................ 3. Catherine Creek, OR .................... 4. Clear & Burnt River, OR ................. 5. Colfax, Palouse River, WA ............. 6. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 7. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... 8. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works .... 9. Lucky Peak Lake, ID .................... 10. Mill Creek Lake, WA .................... 11. Owyhee River, OR ....................... 12. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................... Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID ....... 14. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam- Lake Sacajawea, WA .................... 15. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA .............................. 16. Little Goose Lock and Dam-- Lake Bryan, WA ....................... 17. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA ...... 18. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam--Lake Herbert G. West, WA ........ 19. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR, ID ......... Page 20. McNary Lock and Dam--Lake Wallula, 39-2 OR and WA ........................... 21. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and Id ......... 39-2 General Investigations 39-2 22. Surveys ............................... 39-2 23. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 39-2 24. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ............................ 39-2 39-2 39-3 Tables Page 39-6 39-7 39-7 39-7 39-8 39-3 Table 39-A Cost & Financial Statement ... 39-9 39-3 Table 39-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 39-11 39-3 Table 39-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... 39-14 39-3 Table 39-D Not Applicable........... Table 39-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 39-14 Table 39-F Not Applicable........... 39-4 Table 39-G Deauthorized Projects ......... 39-15 Table 39-H Columbia River Basin, Local 39-4 Flood Control Projects ....... 39-15 Table 39-I Inspection of Completed Flood 39-5 Control Projects ............ 39-16 Table 39-J Principal Data Concerning 39-5 Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, 39-5 Powerplant and Impoundment ............... 39-16 39-6 Table 39-K Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Or, WA 39-6 and Id .................... 39-21 39-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $1,407 for Clearwater River, Lewiston, ID draft detail project report. Flood Control 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization should be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. No projects were recommended for deauthorization during the fiscal year. 3. CATHERINE CREEK, OR Location. Catherine Creek is a tributary to the Grande Ronde River located 8 miles east of the city of La Grande, Union County, Or. Existing project. Organic debris such as fallen trees, brush, and a select number of large cottonwood trees were removed from the creek to increase its capacity to convey future floods. The work was funded under authority of Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954. Local cooperation. The Catherine Creek Corridor Improvement District sponsored the project and complied with requirements as set forth in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 plus additional requirements set forth in the project document. Operations during fiscal year. None. 4. CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Location. At the city of Huntington waste water lagoon, Malheur County, Oregon. Existing project. Place 800 feet of rip rap along three cells of the lagoon system under authority of Section 14 of the 1946 flood control act. Local Cooperation. City of Huntington sponsored the project and agreed to sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year: None. 5. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Location. On the main stem North and South Forks of the Palouse River and includes a portion of Spring Flat Creek, a tributary stream, all within the city of Colfax, WA. Existing project. Project consists of 3740 feet of concrete lined channel, 4910 feet of revetted channel, and 2330 feet of unrevetted channel and drainage structures. Authorizing legislation was provided under PL 78-534, Section 10, Flood Control Act of 1944. Local cooperation. The city of Colfax has provided the necessary right of way and other sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. None. 6. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $10,589 for preauthorization studies: $16,757, Oakley Westside Channel, ID; $3,181, Salmon River, Vicinity of Salmon, ID. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $82,155 for disaster preparedness, $368,037 for emergency operations, $2,296,013 for rehabilitation. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Fiscal year costs were $18,500 for preauthorization studies: $12,414, Pocatello Creek, Bannock County, ID; $35,526, Burnt River, Baker County, OR. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208,1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Congress). Fiscal year costs were $32,653 for preauthorization studies and $265, Catherine Creek, Union County, OR; $26,802, Owyhee River, Malheur County, OR, for snagging and clearing operations. 7. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. Work to investigate the geological and seismological conditions at Ririe Dam, ID continued through the fiscal year. See Table 39-I for inspections made during fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $335,555. Total costs to September 30, 1987 have been $2,094,921. 39-2 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS Inspections are pursuant to Public Law 84-99 which directs the Corps to establish through inspection whether non-federal flood control works will continue to provide the intended degree of flood protection and to determine if the maintenance program is adequate. FY 1987 costs for this program were $162,705. 9. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of city of Boise. Existing project. A rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. (For further details see page 2000 of Annual report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. A feasible method of achieving better flood control through diversion into New York Canal, through Lake Lowell, and into the Snake River was developed but rejected by local interests due to the projected infrequent use of this diversion method. Since 1961, $118,468,600 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. Final Environmental Impact Statement on the initial project was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on November 29, 1976. A revised draft Environmental Impact Statement for the modification work was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on September 18, 1978. During the detailed investigation of outlet capacity and the potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized on the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980 and 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project is scheduled for completion in April 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to repair outlet gates was completed in FY 1987. 10. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. Off-stream earthfill storage dam about 145 feet high and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Federal cost of original project was $2,162,155. Adding recreation facilities has thus far increased project costs by $96,340 to $2,258,495. Not included in that cost is $80,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of the channel through Walla Walla. (For further details see page 2005 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of channel through city of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Park and recreation facilities were opened to the public July 1, 1964. Since 1942, $5,424,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on December 12, 1975. The rehabilitation of the existing project was designed to correct the seepage and internal erosion which have occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir requiring limited flood control use of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 2006 of Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation: all major rehabilitation work completed in FY 1987. Maintenance: Routine maintenance by Government forces continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. 11. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Location. The lower 12 miles of the Owyhee River from the junction with the Snake River, upstream 23 miles to the Owyhee River diversion dam, Malheur County, OR. Existing project. Remove organic debris and gravels from the lower 12 miles of the Owyhee River under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. The Owyhee River Water Control District sponsored the project and agreed to sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Work was completed in FY 1987. 12. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulations of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, 39-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control was accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $105,990. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, Id. Existing project. A straight concrete gravity dam about 717 feet in maximum structural height above foundation and 3,300 feet long at crest Elevation 1613. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control, and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into a rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The project also provides substantial recreation benefits. Powerhouse includes two 90,000 and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units, with provisions for three additional 220,000 kilowatt units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Fish passage at Dworshak Dam is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. The reservoir area is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Construction of the project started April 1963 and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June of 1972 it has prevented about $737,000 of potential flood damage. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 220,000-kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. Environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Units 4, 5, and 6 are now classified "inactive". Power generating Unit No. 1, 90,000-kilowatt capacity, was put in service March 1, 1973; Unit No. 2, also 90,000-kilowatt capacity, began producing April 6, 1973; .Unit No. 3, 220,000-kilowatt capacity, went on the line April 20, 1973. Power generation through September 1987 has been 25.61 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are open to the public. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, car-trailer parking, comfort stations, and fully developed overnight camping at each site. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Hatchery operations continue to be impaired by IHN virus. Steelhead eggs have been transferred to Kooskia National Fish Hatchery for incubation and early rearing of fry to a point past their normal period of susceptibility. In spring of 1987, 2,106,000 steelhead smolts weighing approximately 380,000 pounds were released. In addition to steelhead, the hatchery also released 1,711,000 spring chinook smolts (93,000 pounds), 252,000 spring chinook fingerlings (1,000 pounds) and 174,000 rainbow trout (5,100 pounds). Rainbow trout production is also hindered by the IHN virus and fish were acquired from Hagerman National Fish Hatchery and Grace State (Idaho) Fish Hatchery. A return of 9,000 adult steelhead from previous years juvenile steelhead releases is expected in 1987. 14. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and relocation of railroads. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between Elevations 440 and 437 mean sea level, and extends upstream about 31.9 miles, providing slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Beginning at south end, project consists of a concrete nonoverflow section, concrete powerhouse, spillway dam navigation lock, and an earth and rockfill embankment at north abutment. Fish passing facilities, including two 90,000-kilowatt units and three 111,000- kilowatt units in operation. Spillway dam is 610 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 391 mean sea level is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide by 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 mean sea level and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam. Principal project data are set forth in Table 394. Construction started December 1955 and the project was placed in useful operation January 1962. The project is complete. An Environmental Impact Statement concerning power units 4 through 6 was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality August 1971. Power generation through September 1987 has been 58.02 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: 39-4 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts awarded for thrust bearing repair and powerplant control. Contract awarded and completed for vertical barrier screens in connection with fish guiding efficiency (FGE) work. A total of 3,096,340 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1986. 15. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Location. On the Snake River, River Mile 141.3, 1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge connecting the towns of Lewiston, ID and Clarkston, WA. Existing project. The project consists of a new fixed high-level four lane highway bridge and approaches onU.S. Highway 12 across the Snake River constructed at a cost "not to exceed $21,000,000". In December 1981 Congress authorized an additional expenditure of $2,200,000 for construction of Lewiston's North Ramp. An approach roadway from the bridge to 16th Avenue in Clarkston, WA was authorized in July 1983 at an additional expenditure of $800,000. Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 16, 1979. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests have provided without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the bridge and its approaches, and after construction have agreed to own, operate toll free, and maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non-Federal costs for land and relocation are $755,193. Operations during fiscal year. All work complete. 16. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mhouth of Snake River at head of Lower Monumental Lake, about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Improvements provide navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 mean sea level. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,670 feet long and about 160 feet high above streambed and consists of a powerhouse, spillway dam, navigation lock, and necessary nonoverflow sections. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt generating units for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam can pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Relocations along the lake include 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 5.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on January 8, 1975. Power generation through September 1987 has been 45.24 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contract awarded for powerplant control. Work is continuing on the design for a permanent juvenile fish facility. A total of 2,629,261 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1986. 17. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities, and requires about 8 miles of backwater levees along Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Benefits afforded by project include slack-water navigation, power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Water surface at the dam varies between Elevations 738 and 724 to maintain a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 in the Lewiston, IDClarkston, WA area. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Powerhouse now has six 135,000-kilowatt units. Spillway has a capacity for a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is a single-lift type (105 feet maximum) with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started July 1965 and is complete. Acquisition of lands is also complete. Lake was filled February 15, 1975 and the first power generating unit went on the line April 15, 1975. Approximately $4,119,300 in potential flood damage has been prevented since the levees became functional. An Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality November 1971. A revised statement to include the additional units was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 23, 1975. Power generation through September 1987 has been 36.20 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts awarded and completed were dredging Port of Lewiston, Lewiston Water Intake, and ScreenDeflectors (fish guiding efficiency). Also awarded contracts for powerplant control and rockfall repair. As the first juvenile fish collection point on the Snake River, ower Granite is a primary component in the District's Juvenile Fish Transport Program. This program was begun because construction of eight dams on 39-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 the Columbia and Snake Rivers has had a significant impact on the survival during downstream migration of juvenile anadromous fish such as salmon and steelhead trout. Since the early 1960's, efforts to mitigate the adverse impacts have included extensive research, structural modifications of the dams, installation of turbine screening systems, and implementation of a system for collecting and transporting juvenile fish. The Walla Walla District operates the Juvenile Fish Transportation Program for the Columbia-Snake system. Three primary collection points have been established at Lower Granite, Little Goose and McNary dams, with fish sorting and handling facilities. Smolts collected at these facilities are taken by specially designed barges and trucks to an area downstream of Bonneville Dam and released to make the rest of their journey to the sea. In 1987 a total of just over 17,000,000 juvenile fish were transported. Increased hatchery production and improved fish guiding efficiency (FGE) have resulted in increased numbers of fish to be transported. A total of 1,822,154 tons of cargo passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1986. 18. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAMLAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA. Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea, about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The facility includes a dam, powerplant, fish ladders, navigation lock, appurtenant facilities, and relocated railroads and highways. The project functions include navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation and irrigation. Reservoir has normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537. The lake extends about 28.7 miles upstream to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam is concrete gravity type with earthfill and rockfill abutments. It is 3,800 feet long including abutments, spillway, navigation lock, and powerhouse, and is about 135 feet high above streambed. There are two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000-kilowatt units for a total capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway is 508 feet long, and overflow crest at Elevation 483 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 8 radial gates, each 50 feet wide and 61 feet high. Deck is at Elevation 553 feet and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type, with lock chamber 86 by 675 feet and minimum depth of 15 feet over the sills. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction began June 1961, and the project was opened to navigation April 1969. The project is complete. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on May 21, 1976. Power generation through September 1987 has been 48.99 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. Contracts awarded for thrust bearing repair, powerplant control, and Unit 2 repair. Cargoes totaling 2,723,880 tons passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1986. 19. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Existing project. The project will consist of a series of fish hatcheries and wildlife development areas at sites to be selected. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). In 1980 the first release from the McCall, ID summer chinook hatchery was made, and the adult trapping facility which provides the fish egg supply for the McCall Hatchery became operational. The real estate design memorandum, and feature design memorandums on the McCall Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Dworshak Hatchery Expansion, Irrigon Hatchery, Magic Valley Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery, East Fork Salmon River Satellite Facility, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The Dworshak National Fish Hatchery, the Irrigon and Wallow Satellite Hatcheries, Hagerman Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, McCall Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery and Magic Valley Hatchery are in operation. The compensation plan is 73 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $185,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts were awarded for: Corrective work at Sawtooth, Imnaha Satellite Hatchery, and water collection at Irrigon. Work was also underway at the Little Sheep Creek Satellite facility. The above contracts are scheduled for completion during FY 1988. The final hatchery site has been selected at Ahsahka, Idaho for the Clearwater River basin. This hatchery will rear both spring chinook and steelhead. Red River-Crooked River & Powell hatcheries have been identified as satellite sides for the Clearwater Hatchery. 20. McNARY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. Includes a concrete dam 7,300 feet long overall and 183 feet high above streambed, powerplant with 14 power generating units, navigation lock, fishways, levees and pumping plants, incidental 39-6 WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT irrigation, and modification and relocation of railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947 and is complete. Project placed on permanent operating basis and lake raised to Elevation 340 in November 1953. Except for maintenance interruptions, all 14 power units have been in commercial operation since February 1957. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1976. Power generation through September 1987 has been 203.29 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. Contract awarded for repair of powerhouse wall. Contracts continuing for repair to excitation equipment and stator replacement for unit 14. A total of 5,893,825 tons of commodities passed through the navigation lock during calendar year 1986. 21. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 230. Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slackwater navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for that portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam--Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam--Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Tables 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite are in full operation. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privately owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slackwater navigation to Snake River Mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slack-water reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite locks and dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. General Investigations 22. SURVEYS The Upper Snake River and Tributaries is the principal ongoing survey. The area covered by the study extends from the headwaters of the Snake River in Wyoming down to and including the Weiser River in Idaho. The potential for supplemental water storage, power generation, and streamflow augmentation to enhance fisheries, continues to be the primary focus. A survey study of the Mill Creek Basin continued in FY 1987. Mill Creek originates in the Blue Mountains in northern Oregon and southern Washington and is tributary to the Walla Walla River. Water resource problems and needs being investigated include municipal and industrial water supply, power generation, fish enhancement, flood control, and irrigation. The Columbia River and Tributaries is a survey study directed by the North Pacific Division in which the Walla Walla District is participating. A major activity of the CR&T study, the Regional Hydropower Assessment being performed in coordination with the Northwest Power Planning Council, was completed in FY 1987. Other work on the CR&T study involved preparation of basin summary reports, plan formulation information, and continued work on the Clearwater River Basin interim study. A survey study investigating the flooding problems associated with the rising water levels of Malheur Lake in Harney County, Oregon was completed in FY 1987. Five consecutive years of above normal runoff from the basin have raised the level of this closed basin lake above any historical record and caused great economic and social impacts on Harney County. Alternatives investigated included a canal from Malheur Lake that would discharge lake water into the South Fork of the Malheur River, relocations of transportation facilities and land exchange and/or buy out of private lands. Total cost of surveys during fiscal year was $1,040,883. That sum was expended for: flood control studies, $885,197; special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, River Basin and Regional Planning Commissions, Cooperation with States, $33,380 and Special Investigations and FERC Licensing Activities, $122,306. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year flood hazard data for a number 39-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $99,746 which was expended for flood plain management services, $40,666 and technical services, $59,079. 24. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN McNary Lock and Dam (Second Powerhouse), OR and WA McNary Second Powerhouse is a proposed addition on the south shore of McNary Lock and Dam on the Columbia River near Umatilla, OR. The project will increase the present 1127 megawatt generating capacity by an additional 742 megawatts. Provisions are included for compensation of negative impacts on fish and wildlife. The project is estimated to cost $667,000,000 at October 1, 1986 price levels. The General Design Memorandum Phase I was prepared under the Water Resource Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94,587, and submitted to the Secretary of the Army on July 1, 1981. Studies were initiated in FY 1982 and continued through FY 1984 on the General Design Memorandum Phase II and the Powerhouse Preliminary Design Report. FY 1987 expenditures of $1,011 were spent on hydraulic model study by Waterway Experiment Station in Vicksburg, MS. There has been no further design activity on the project. The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA The proposed project consists of a roller compacted concrete dam 90 feet high with uncontrolled spillway and a fixed maximum release outlet works that would create a detention reservoir of 1,260 acre-feet of capacity. The storage comprises 860 acre-feet for flood control and 400 acre-feet for sediment. In addition, the project also includes a conduit with a capacity of 580 cfs and a dike and floodgate across the Union Pacific Railroad to protect downtown Kennewick. The plan of improvement would provide protection against heavy rainfall, snowmelt, and thunderstorm floods to the city of Kennewick, WA. Estimated Federal project cost is $6,300,000. Reevaluation of the project was initiated to revise the General Design Memo No. 2 with fiscal year costs of $124,549. 39-8 TABLE 39-A WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text 3. Project Catherine Creek, OR 4. Clear & Burnt River, OR 5. Colfax Palouse River, ID 9. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 10. Mill Creek Lake, WA 11. Owyhee River, OR 13. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID 14. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA 15. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID & WA 16. Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA 17. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA 18. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA II Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 185,000 107,968 71,400 839,000 654,651 27,894 27,894 317,200 302,422 1,775,000 1,710,362 7,500 7,500 3,081,100 3,052,306 4,527,800 4,478,567 200,106 200,106 4,004,900 3,969,635 640,000 486,402 1,000,500 11 5,436,056 5,292,141 394,800 396,804 5,249,400 5,263,880 3,98 3,48' 5,48 5,36! 12,932 88,500 63,974 11,215 1,101,999 1,136,570 2,500 616,000 9,107 613,230 1,043 2,517,000 6,813 2,517,177 - 68,000 - 35,014 3,000 50,000 7,491 559,901 1,000 5,446,000 9,881 5,499,554 49,004 50,004 4,168,629 3,875,053 80,000 227,516 55,995 1,000,036 4,338,143 3,998,368 74,689 84,600 5,706,000 5,594,704 4,868,671 5,183,795 6,210 56,460 3,921,401 4,442,150 8,890,205 9,053,763 -2,600 18,121 -1,706 18,141 38,000 15,603 68,000 131,581 71,400 1,211,650 1,358,698 39-9 -- -- 301 30' 2,28 2,34f Total to FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 -9,200 28,800 265 28,800 11,000 99,500 35,526 99,500 - 5,810,240 2,236 810,240 - 19,652,0811 - 19,652,0811 1,560,698 11,766,5512 1,492,378 11,689,5922 - 2,258,4953 - 2,258,4953 499,000 7,016,893 494,044 6,997,329 -90,000 17,705,607 -89,857 17,704,628 -6,184 69,316 26,802 69,316 - 329,523,2964 1,250 329,509,2084 6,027,728 54,615,5156 5,985,953 54,427,958$ - 167,240,7576 - 167,240,7576 5,609,800 55,852,5747 5,290,932 55,496,2027 - 22,957,664 - 22,957,664 - 221,355,0228 - 221,355,0228 5,298,710 44,729,5059 5,145,627 44,476,7959 - 367,780,31510 - 367,780,31310 8,493,700 53,578,20211 8,114,145 53,053,18311 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 - 236,373,73212 - 236,373,73212 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 39-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 Total to FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 19. Lower Snake Fish & Wildlife Compensation, ID, OR & WA (Contributed Funds) 20. McNary Lock & Dam-Lake Wallula, OR & WA (Contributed Funds) 21. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA & ID Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4,300,500 3,220,629 4,037,830 5,556,200 40,341,43213 3,390,678 3,819,029 4,322,908 5,375,064 40,092,36813 25,225,000 13,235,129 14,971,000 16,100,000 135,236,909 25,024,768 12,989,270 15,096,848 16,303,537 135,109,829 - 223,965 - 223,965 202,600 19,019 203,380 19,242 223,965 223,965 - 322,515,10514 - 322,515,10514 14,767,500 13,147,025 9,977,999 13,440,800 140,781,83515 12,505,395 13,859,268 11,305,733 13,048,173 140,119,24915 - 43,707 43,707 43,707 43,707 1,592,806 197,809 1,595,240 209,206 - 993,184,58916 - 993,184,58716 18,990,856 17,455,401 21,725,107 24,958,410 195,058,28817 17,916,334 17,305,877 23,008,630 23,928,713 193,673,42217 1Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 2Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 3Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 4Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 5Includes $15,734,980 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. FY 72-78 funds of $6,097,000 were charged to the project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $36,700 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 6Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 7Includes $48,500 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees; $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Includes $60 941,807 appropriated and expended for addtional units 4 through 6. 9Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. o0 lncludes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for additional units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. "Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 12Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for additional units 4 through 6. 13Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 14Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 15Includes $45,800 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees and $1,035,860 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 16Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $82,500 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 17Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $370,005 appropriated and $368,304 expended open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. 39-10 TABLE 39-B WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized May 17, 1950 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Ada County unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas Creek, ID. Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Deauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. Heise Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY. Flood Protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection in immediate area. Deauthorized in 1965. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 1986. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection. South Fork Clearwater River, ID. Emergency Construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 1986. Teton River, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon, ID. Channel improvement. Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. Whitebird Creek, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. CATHERINE CREEK, OR Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Construction of riprap bank protection at city of Huntington waste water lagoon. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. 39-11 See Section In Text H. Doc 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 208, P.L. 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sep. 3, 1985 Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 10, 1985 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Documents 3. 4. 5. Sep. 24, 1954 July 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 39-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized July 24, 1946 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Sep. 24, 1954 as amended July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1958 Aug. 15, 1963 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 29, 1981 July 30, 1983 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 25, 1978 Oct. 22, 1976 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended 9. 10. 11 LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concrete lined channel. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Gravel brush and small tree removal from 12 miles of Owyhee River. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Preparation of detailed plans. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project, Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four lane highway bridge and approaches. Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BRYAN, WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. McNARY LOCK AND DAM-LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. 39-12 See Section In Text P.L. 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L. 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 208, P.L. 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 11, 1985. S. Doc 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 88-96 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 97-140 P.L. 98-63 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.O. 91-638 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 95-285 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Documents 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. - _ I TABLE 39-B (Continued) See Section A In Text 21. WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date authorizing Act June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Table E 18 Aug 41 22 Dec 44 11 Jul 56 23 Oct 62 27 Oct 65 7 Nov 66 Project and Work Authorized SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA AND ID Open-river navigation. Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID only. See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Dayton, Touchet River, WA. Flood protection. Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR. Flood protection. Heise Roberts Area, Snake River, ID. Channel improvement. Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR. Flood protection. Pullman, Palouse River, WA. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA. Levees and protective work. Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wa. Channel Improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID. Construction of levee. Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID. Channel improvement. Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID. Construct left bank levee. Lyman Creek near Rexburg, ID. Channelization. 'Icannon River, Camp Wooten, WA. Levee and channel work. Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, ID. Modification to increase spillway capacity. Deauthorized in 1986. Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, ID. Storage for flood control, irrigation and recreation facilities. Grande Ronde Lake, OR. Flood control, irrigation, water supply, anadromous fish, downstream and resident trout fishery, recreation and downstream power. Deauthorized in 1986. Cottonwood Creek Dam, ID. Protection to highly developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Deauthorized in 1986. Stuart Gulch Dam, ID. Protection to highly developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Deauthorized in 1979. Documents H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 411, 55th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 662, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc 719, 76th Cong. 3d Sess. 78th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 84-685 P.L. 87-874 P.L. 89-298 P.L. 89-789 39-13 I _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Project Status Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA1 Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1968 Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance 1,851,195 'Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary projects TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Status Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID' Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID' Big Wood River, ID5 Boise, River, ID5 Catherine Creek Lake, OR Connell, WA' Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID2 Dayton, Touchet River, WA Dry Creek, WA' Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA' Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA' Gooding Area, ID' Graves Creek, ID' Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID' Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID' Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA' Lyman Creek, ID' Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID' Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID2 Rapid Creek, ID5 Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA' Ririe Lake, ID Sewage Lagoons, Vale, OR2 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR' Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID' South Fork, Boise River, ID5 South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID' Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID' Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA' Tucannon River, Wooten, WA' Umatilla River, OR' Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR2 Weiser River, ID5 Willow Creek, ID' Willow Creek Lake, OR Yakima River, West Richland, WA 1, 4 Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1951 1970 1985 1985 1978 1967 1984 1966 1961 1967 1969 1954 1953 1955 1978 1972 1973 1972 1971 1957 1968 1965 1949 1985 1977 1967 1972 1983 1985 1970 1980 1952 1968 1985 1973 1955 1973 1971 1961 1960 1985 1963 1985 1964 Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance 12,019 133,518 170,000 236,500 1,552,000 60,000 23,400 380,617 384,426 232,792 2,665 59,167 75,469 1,575,838 2,388,270 176,833 113,296 17,592 230,315 55,894 1,786,753 54,538 23,050 19,500 110,815 39,172 28,839 39,677,448 75,000 5,000 131,700 8,501 32,425 44,400 61,055 128,635 72,140 73,932 161,540 16,118 106,900 976 37,168,114 238,890 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 80-858. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 79-526. 3Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. 4Includes $9,000 contributed funds. 5Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 83-780. 39-14 TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS - -- - I- I------- - I I--------^-I--~---- -- 'U '"" YI I" "- "-" ~ 'U 'U 'Y" ~ "U -" I TABLE 39-G WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Project Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA Blackfoot Reservoir, ID Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit Canyon County Unit Camas Creek ID Cottonwood dreek Dam, Boise, ID Grande Ronde Lake, OR Grande Ronde Valley, OR Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit Little Wood River, ID Lower Walla Walla River, WA Malheur River, OR Willow Creek Unit Mill Creek, WA Palouse River, WA Payette Valley, ID Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID Pullman, Palouse River, WA S. Fort Clearwater River, ID Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID Teton River, ID Touchet River, WA Whitebird Creek, Columbia River Basin, ID For Last Full Report See Annual Date Report For Deauthorized 1964 1975 1980 1986 1963 1963 1960 1972 1966 1958 1968 1960 1953 1961 1958 1958 1960 1964 1973 1974 1955 1957 1957 1986 1967 1965 1986 1986 1986 1986 1965 1986 1969 1977 1986 1978 1969 1986 1986 1979 1986 1977 1986 Federal Contributed Funds Funds Expended Expended 267,626 - 46,084 - 10,600 - 9,080 - 183,100 - 102,458 - 27,800 - 21,334 - 4,000 - 13,000 - 3,537 - 2,000 - 23,178 - 99,540 - 3,899 - 234,100 - 10,387 - 11,198 - 1,896 - TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Project Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Blackfoot River, ID Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Snake River Unit Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Mud Lake, ID Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Weiser River, ID Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Total Estimated Federal Cost Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 - 42,796 391,143 'Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. 39-15 Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Deferred Deferred 1,187,000 1,565,000 3,375,158 59,942 325,581 5,996 6,456,0321 32,335 37,757 75,000 10,801,740 ~----------------------- ~'~---~----~1"~11------~I- ----~-~1-----" ~---- I~ -- -- I- I-U' I - - - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 39-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 7 of Text) Blackfoot River, Idaho Boise River, Idaho Clearwater River, Idaho Columbia River, Washington Little Wood River, Idaho Malheur River, Idaho Palouse River, Idaho Payette River, Idaho Portneuf River, Idaho Potlatch River, Idaho Salmon River, Idaho Snake River, Idaho Snake River, Wyoming Touchet River, Washington Tucannon River, Washington Yakima River, Washington August 1987 April 1987 March 1987 March 1987 August 1987 April 1987 February 1987 April 1987 May 1987 March 1987 September 1987 August 1987 July 1987 March 1987 March 1987 March 1987 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 13 of Text) Type of Constructi Completed Maximum Capacil SPII on ty Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POv Length Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each LLWAY DAM WERPLANT Total Capacity Installed Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 Cubic Feet Per Second 1613 Feet Tainter 50 Ft. by 55 Ft. 2 428 Feet 3 3 2 @ 90,000 kw; 4 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 Feet March 1973 1600-1445 Feet 1605 Feet 2,000,000 Ac.-Ft. 53 Miles 17,090 Acres 175 Miles 39-16 TABLE 39-J TABLE 39-J (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Ice Harbor Lock and. Dam, WA (See Section 14 of Text) Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 16 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 100 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 Feet Radial 50 Ft. by 51 Ft. 10 671 Feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw; 3 @ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 Feet December 1961 440-437 Feet 446 Feet 31.9 Miles 9,200 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 80 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 93 Feet 98 Feet 101 Feet 15 Feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Radial 50 Ft. by 60 Ft. 8 39-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 39-J (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Little Goose Lock and Dam (Continued) Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 17 of Text) POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type: Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 244 Feet March 1970 638-633 Feet 646.5 Feet 37.2 Miles 10,025 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 92 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 95 Feet 100 Feet 105 Feet 15 May 1975 Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 Feet Radial 50 Ft. by 60.5 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 Feet April 1975 738-733 Feet 746.5 Feet 38 Miles 8,900 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 91 Miles 39-18 TABLE 39-J (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 18 of Text) McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (See Section 20 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 86 Feet 675 Feet 97 Feet 98 Feet 103 Feet 15 Feet April 1969 Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 Feet Radial 50 Ft. by 61 Ft. 8 656 Feet 243 Feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 Feet May 1969 540-537 Feet 548 Feet 28.7 Miles 6,590 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 78 Miles 86 Feet 675 Feet 67 Feet 75 Feet 83 Feet 15 Feet November 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 Feet Vertical Lift 50 Feet by 51 Feet 22 39-19 TABLE 39-J (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (Continued) POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 1,348 Feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 Feet November 1953 340-335 Feet 356.5 Feet 64 Miles 38,800 Acres 14 Ft. by 250 Ft. 242 Miles 39-20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 39-K SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (See Section 21 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps of Engineers Funds Only) New Work to Sep. 30, 1987 Approp. Cost Maintenance to Sep. 30, 1987 Approp. Cost Percent Com- Constr. pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Totals Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Recreation Facilities Power Units 4-6 Totals Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project Power Units 4-6 Totals Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing- Open River Pasco to Lewiston Totals Existing Project Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 129,578,480 914,256 36,748,021 167,240,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 221,355,022 321,503,981 63,800 46,212,534 367,780,315 184,712,361 51,661,371 236,373,732 34,613 992,784,439 400,150 129,578,480 914,256 36,748,021 167,240,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 221,355,022 321,503,981 63,800 46,212,534 367,780,315 184,712,361 51,661,371 236,373,732 34,613 1 992,784,439 400,150 129,578,490 914,256 36,748,021 167,240,757 160,413,215 60,941,807 221,355,022 321,503,979 63,800 46,212,534 367,780,315 184,712,361 51,661,371 236,373,732 34,613 992,784,437 400,150 55,852,574 55,496,202 55,852,574 44,729,505 44,729,505 53,578,202 53,578,202 40,341,432 40,341,432 365,655 4,350 194,871,718 186,570 55,496,202 44,476,795 44,476,795 53,053,183 53,053,183 40,092,368 40,092,368 363,954 2 4,350 193,486,852 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 993,184,589 993,184,589 993,184,587 195,058,288 193,673,422 1New Work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2Includes $2,945 FY 1987 project condition survey cost. 39-21 Project 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 FY 57 FY 57 FY 71 FY 63 FY 74 FY 65 FY 84 FY 74 FY 61 FY 75 100 -- ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK .................. 2. Dillingham Harbor, AK ................. 3. Homer Harbor, AK .................... 4. Kake Harbor, AK .................... 5. Metlakatla Harbor, AK .................. 6. Ninilchik Harbor, AK ................... 7. Nome Harbor, AK ....................... 8. Project Condition Surveys ............... 9. Stikine River, AK ...................... 10. Wrangell Harbor, AK .................... Flood Control 11. Chena River Lakes, AK ................. 12. Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK ........................ 13. Galena Emergency Bank Stabilization, A K ..................................... 14. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................. 15. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ......................... Page 40-1 40-1 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-4 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 16. Snettisham, AK ......................... 40-5 General Investigations 17. Surveys ................................. 18. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 19. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design .. Tables Table 40-A Table 40-B Table 40-C 40-4 Table 40-D Table 40-E 40-4 Table 40-F 40-4 Table 40-G Table 40-H 40-4 Table 40-I 40-5 Table 40-J Table 40-K 40-5 40-5 40-5 Cost & Financial Statement ...... 40-6 Authorizing Legislation .......... 40-8 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 40-10 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 40-11 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ........... 40-11 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............ 40-12 Project Condition Surveys ....... 40-12 Not Applicable Not Applicable Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,000-foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 35 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977 was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during Fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging has been accomplished across the entire project during FY 1987. Controlling depth at the harbor was -34.2 feet mean lower low water, with a majority of the harbor at project depth of -36. A contract was awarded in October 1986 to clean up sediments which the dredge Essayons could not reach in FY 1986. Approximately 19,600 cubic yards were removed in November 1986 under that contract. Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract during June through September 1987. A total of 307,000 cubic yards of silt was removed. 2. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. At head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on right bank of Nushagak River just below its confluence Wood River; about 470 miles northeasterly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing Project: A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek; and a sheet pile sill across the basin outlet with a top elevation of 7 feet above mean 40-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 lower low water. During design stage the project was revised to include a rock sill with adjacent scourprotection blankets and the embankment was relocated to include a berm between the basin and the embankment. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city of Dillingham, and four publicly owned small-boat floats in the project basin. Two docks are used by the city to unload barges which come into Dillingham. New floats for the harbor were installed in June 1982 and removed before fall freezeup. They are replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are inadequate for number of boats using small boat harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Government plant and hired labor performed dredging from the end of May to the middle of June 1987. A total of 89,200 cubic yards of material was removed. 3. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. Harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) Existing project. Provides for sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer spit about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the most western segment of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the most eastern segment of the harbor; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annuual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. Small-boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, apublicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock Iocated at the soiuthern end ofthe harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging operations were initiated in October 1986 but ?re suspended because of adverse weather conditions. idging was resumed in July 1987. Government plant Shired labor removed a total of 8,500 cubic yards g July and August 1987. 4. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake Harbor is located in the city of Kake, on the northwest corner of Kupreanof Island in southeastern Alaska, 39 air miles west of Petersburg, AK, and 850 water miles northwesterly of Seattle, WA. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 8201.) Existing prqject. The authorized project consists of a 1,580-foot-long west breakwater and a 1,750-foot-long south breakwater. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.0 feet with an extreme range of 22 feet. Estimated project cost is $12,537,000 (October 1985), including $12,500,000 Corps of Engineers funds $21,000 Coast Guard funds, and $16,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Kake, a publicly owned wharf with seaplane float equipped airplanes and shallow-draft vessels is located within area of proposed basin. At cannery 1 mile from city, there are two privately owned deep-draft piers; one for cargo, open to all local boat owners, the second for fuel, including a float for fueling small boats. At Portage Cove, 2 miles from the city, the existing float was expanded into a small boat facility by the state in 1982. It consists of 2 mooring floats, a launch ramp, a grid and is protected by a floating breakwater. Facilities are not considered adequate for present commerce due to the following deficiencies in small-boat facilities: shallow water at Portage Cove and its approaches; ice formation on the cove during the winter months causing major boat damage and limiting the use of the mooring float; and transportation problems between city and present facility at Portage Cove. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A temporary automatic meteorburst wind monitoring station was maintained to gather wind velocity and directional data more closely associated with the location of the project for comparison with data used in preparing the plans and specifications. 5. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small-boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. New basin consists of two rubbiemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one 40-2 ALASKA DISTRICT general-cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small-boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year; New work: Project is physically complete; however, various contractor claims are still pending. 6. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, AK about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. Project was modified in design stage to delete pile jetty and revise harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, was accomplished 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, limited to shallowdraft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small-boat floats in project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep-draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished with 8,600 cubic yards removed in 1987. A survey of the basin during May 1987 indicated project depth was available throughout the Federal limits. 7. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing water-front improvements on easterly beach by means of rock-mount seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. Project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravelfilled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for offloading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract was accomplished throughout the ice-free season. 2,900 cubic yards were removed in FY 1987. Seriously damaged conditions of the entrance channel sheetpile wall necessitated immediate interim repairs. A Letter Report for interim repairs was prepared and approved. Construction was initiated in September 1986 and was completed in December 1986. 8. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Total costs for fiscal year were $372,113. (See Table 40-I). 9. STIKINE RIVER, AK Location. Rises in northwestern Canada and flows southwesterly through Canada for about 200 miles, then about 30 miles westerly across Panhandle of Alaska to Sumner Strait. Mouth of river is on coast of mainland about 3 miles north of Wrangell. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #17360.) Existing project. Snagging Stikine River from its mouth for about 3 miles to Canadian border. The Canadian Government maintains that portion of the river between Alaskan border and Telegraph Creek, British Columbia, a distance of 130 miles. The head of navigation is at 'ITelegraph Creek, B.C., about 160 miles above the mouth. No data is available concerning stages of high and low water in river. At mouth, tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 13.9 feet, and maximum range is about 25 feet. Tidal effects have been reported at a distance of 20 miles from the mouth. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None along Alaskan portion of river. Vessels operating on Stikine River are dependent 40-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 on terminal facilities at Wrangell Harbor. Facilities include a city operated pier for general cargo and passengers; two publicly operated small-boat mooring floats; two privately operated small-boat fueling floats; a State of Alaska Ferry Pier, and three industrial wharves. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Under a Memorandum of Understanding between the Corps and the Forest Service signed in 1972, $8,804 was expended on a contract administered by the Forest Service for removal of snags. Snagging was accomplished during May and June 1987. 10. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the west side of the northern end of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. This provides for a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor; dredging a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long and a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water; and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about 1 foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 was estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and servicing small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil-handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A letter report was initiated to address repairs required to the concrete curb wall which tops the breakwater. This curb wall, which has received no maintenance work since 1938, has become badly spalled and deterioriated. The letter report, scheduled for completion in December 1987, will evaluate replacement in kind, encapsulation and replacement with additional rubblemound alternatives. $45,200 was expended during FY 1987. Flood Control 11. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, D1, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22-mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana River to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $210,000,000, (excluding Little Chena Dam, presently deferred) and estimated non-Federal cost is $12,548,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the Tanana River Levee Protection Phase II, Groins 9 and 10, the Relief Wells, and the Office and Warehouse contracts were completed. A construction contract for the Visitors' Facilities was awarded in August 1987. 12. DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. City of Dillingham is located at the confluence of the Wood and Nushagak Rivers in the Bristol Bay area of southwestern Alaska. Existing project: Relocate water and sewer lines. Local cooperation. Will be required prior to construction. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: Continued contacts with local sponsor. 13. GALENA EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Galena is located on the north bank of the Yukon River approximately 270 miles west of Fairbanks, AK and 325 miles north-northwest of Anchorage, AK. Existing project. The project will provide approximately 1200 feet of riverbank protection when contributed funds are included. The protection will be in front of "New Town" Galena or the Alexander Lake area, thus extending the bank stabilization project the State started in 1985. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was developed. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: Contract awarded July 1987. 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $267,221 for disaster preparedness and emergency operations. 40-4 ALASKA DISTRICT Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization study was: Aniak, $2,102. Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14, 526, 79th Cong. (preauthorization) 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Lowell Creek, Gold Creek, Skagway River, Salmon River, Talkeetna River, and Klutina River during FY 1987. Repairs at each project were recommended to the local authority. Total costs for the fiscal year: $8,949. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 16. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. At mouth of Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 28 nautical miles southeast of Juneau. (See Coast Geodetic Survey Chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage of the initial phase which was completed in 1977 tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. The second stage which is under construction, will provide a tunnel to Crater Lake and add a third unit. The final phase will provide a dam on Long Lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is currently unscheduled. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal 13-foot diameter tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400-foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the underground powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a submarine cable traversing Taku Inlet. The Crater Lake stage of construction provides for tapping Crater Lake (elevation 1,022 feet) to drive a third turbine to be installed in the existing underground powerhouse to provide an additional nameplate-rated generating capacity of 34,500 kilowatts. Estimated cost of initial phase construction is $132,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design is continuing on the remote supervisory control and data accumulation contract, on the voltage surge equipment, and the trash rack contract. A study to determine the economic viability of proceeding with the development of the Long Lake Dam was completed. It concluded that the dam should continue to be deferred until the need for additional power in Juneau is more pressing. The initial construction contract of the Crater Lake Phase II was awarded August 1986. Work performed under the contract includes completion of the power tunnel, excavation of a surge shaft a gate shaft with access adit, performing a lake tap; installation of a penstock, turbine an sperical valve, governor, switchgear, and transformer; and completion of the powerhouse. General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys include $146,162 for navigation studies, $1,220,744 for flood control studies, $31,723 for coordination studies and $109,205 for miscellaneous activities. 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies, Architectural/Engineering firms, lending institutions and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $108,093. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $11,076. 19. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK The proposed project would provide streambank protection to the city of Bethel, located in western Alaska on the Kuskokwim River. The recommended plan calls for rock riprap protection for 5,000 feet of river bank with the rock extending from above the active wave zone to the thalweg of the river. A Plan of Study was prepared for the General Design Memorandum in FY 1984. Work on the General Design Memorandum initiated in FY 1984 was completed in November 1987. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $614,000. Fiscal year costs were $87,662. 40-5 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK 2. Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 3. Homer Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 4. Kake Harbor, AK Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 6. Nimilchik Harbor, AK 7. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 9. Stikine River, AK -- FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 1,679,000 1,185,725 1,102,000 754,434 2,086,585 1,250,458 Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 372,000 400,000 421,969 393,395 50,000 49,655 8,057,500 258,960 8,010,237 275,719 70,000 25,000 85,533 34,887 -229,000 75,000 -204,702 17,134 - 99,000 - 13,839 65,000 63,991 2,059 15,000 4,507 67,698 -1,000 84,161 - -206,827 150,923 .- -- -. 300,000 156,000 200,000 302,425 155,806 197,723 273,000 561,000 367,979 407,142 2,500 10,000 4,722 5,000 5,000 22,000 27,255 1,195,045 1,245,955 2,500 2,500 I----- ~-----~--- -- I - 40-6 Total to FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 - 533,235 - 533,235 2,072,000 18,584,172 2,008,806 18,518,280 - 548,790 - 548,790 320,500 5,659,321 331,159 5,652,931 - 1,700 - 1,700 - 3,512,3502 - 3,512,3502 439,000 2,902,711 435,194 2,897,482 - 67,974 - 67,974 - 8,316,4603 - 8,288,0153 - 870,700 8,757 865,701 115,000 5,037,470 75,668 4,987,968 - 148,520 - 148,520 - 830,644 - 772,096 - 428,720 - 428,720 222,000 3,542,476 211,162 3,529,153 - 1,348,240 - 1,348,240 479,000 8,628,952 465,606 8,490,391 -125 - 125 2,500 162,500 2,500 162,500 13,000 196,364 8,804 190,353 350,000 325,219 1,723,000 1,729,421 70,000 72,435 TABLE 40-A (Continued) ALASKA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 10. Wrangell Harbor, AK New Work Approp. - - - - 537,020 Cost - - - - 537,020 Maint. Approp. - - - 75,000 406,352 Cost - - - 45,319 376,671 11. Chena River Lakes, AK New Work Approp. 4,656,300 7,103,000 3,478,000 7,200,000 207,195,7654 Cost 5,349,609 7,114,257 3,590,751 6,819,420 206,783,9344 Maint. Approp. 718,000 859,000 913,500 887,000 4,726,8245 Cost 685,741 938,688 871,881 847,469 4,630,2655 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. 150,600 - - - 2,182,300 Cost 522,722 6,767 - - 2,145,929 12. Dillingham Emergency New Work Bank Stabilization, AK Approp. - - 20,000 -14,000 6,000 Cost - - 5,419 581 6,000 13. Galena Emergency New Work Bank Stabilization, AK Approp. - - 50,000 960,000 1,010,000 Cost - - 45,420 64,755 110,175 16. Snettisham, AK New Work Approp. 1,499,700 7,997,000 3,505,000 27,200,000 124,154,556 Cost 1,258,244 8,226,946 3,561,846 17,964,165 114,898,644 Ilncludes judgment and associated cost. 2Includes $2,672 of Code 710 Rec. Funds and $1,509,678 for previous project. 3Includes only actual Funds retained and cost incurred. 4Includes $310,000 for previous project (Fairbanks). 5Includes $1,624 for previous project (Fairbanks). 40-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 40-B See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK July 3, 1958 Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.1 Oct. 22, 1976 Extension of project limits. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK July 3, 1958 Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, AK July 2, 1958 Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Aug. 19, 1964 Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. July 14, 1960 Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 KAKE HARBOR, AK Basin 7-acre berthing area, 15 feet deep, inclosed by a 1,580-foot west rock breakwater and a 900-foot south rock breakwater. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acres in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK July 3, 1958 Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410-foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Aug. 8, 1917 Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Aug. 30, 1935 Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long.; June 16, 1948 Seawall Documents H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st, Sess.2 P.L. 88-451 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 S. Doc. 70, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong. 2d Sess.2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H. Doc. 1932, 64th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.2 Report of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 40-8 ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 'Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2Contains latest published map. 3Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4Little Chena Dam classified "deferred". 40-9 See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. STIKINE RIVER, AK Aug. 30, 1935 Snagging from mouth to Canadian border. H. Doc. 210, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.2 10. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Sept. 22, 1922 Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern H. Doc. 161, 67th Cong., portion of harbor. 2nd Sess. Aug. 30, 1935 Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and H. Doc. 202, 72nd Cong., 10 feet deep. 1st Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing H. Doc. 284, 76th Cong., mooring basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, 1st Sess. and breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. 11. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Aug. 13, 1968 Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam S. Doc. 89, 90th Cong., and detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and 2d Sess.2 a levee along the north side of the Tanana River.4 12. DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATI'ION, AK Dec. 19, 1985 Relocate Water and Sewer Lines Section 116 of P.L. 99-190 (H.J. Res. 465) 13. GALENA EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZANION, AK Dec. 19, 1985 Provide approximately 1200 feet of riverbank Section 116 of P.L. 99-190 protection in front of the Alexander Lake area. (H.J. Res. 465) 16. SNETTISHAM, AK Oct. 23, 1962 Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission H. Doc. 40, 87th Cong., facilities. 1st Sess. 2 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Project Status Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK' Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Cordova Harbor, AK Craig Harbor, AK Douglas Harbor, AK Dry Pass, AK Egegik River, AK Elfin Cove, AK Gastineau Channel, AK Haines Harbor, AK2 Hoonah Harbor, AK Humboldt Harbor, AK Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Ketchikan Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor, AK Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Naknek River, AK Neva and Olga Straits, AK Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK2 Pelican Harbor, AK Petersburg Harbor, AK Port Alexander, AK Rocky Pass, AK St. Michael Canal, AK Seldovia Harbor, AK Sergius Whitestone, AK Seward Harbor, AK Sitka Harbor, AK Skagway Harbor, AK Valdez Harbor, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed . Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1920 1983 1977 1978 1983 1963 1983 1972 1959 1964 1977 1983 1977 1941 1974 1975 1979 1973 1970 1961 1960 1972 1964 1972 1949 1960 1916 1974 1973 1973 1973 1972 1968 1979 Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Operation and Construction Maintenance $ 128,896 2,000,0003 1,220,000 843,534 1,033,5004 282,019 943,351 4,441 154,191 789,461 1,000,0006 4,255,0006 3,679,6837 66,037 1,381,150 109,848 1,602,417 1,891,2128 9,700 20,789 155,009 370,415 369,683 252,932 17,000 337,668 377,062 1,051,883y 1,798,010 712,36910 1,611,009 133,180 649,74011 3,562,343 $ 2,154 5,000 488,156 72,500 23,466 3,107 102,701 260,991 331,256 37,946 132,946 18,973 26,800 560 5,518 1,934 219,789 15,490 32,665 221,498 309,260 'Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 31n addition, $272,779 of State funds. 4Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 51In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6In addition, $973,875 of State funds. 7In addition, $857 000 of State funds. 8Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 9Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. '�Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. "Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed projects. 40-10 TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIWIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1987 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 - Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,0061 4,301 Klutina River, Copper Center, AK2 Completed 1973 260,681 - Lowell Creek, AK3 Completed 1945 416,3824 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,7705 6 162,9257 Skagway River, AK Deferred8 1966 26,385 - Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 - 'In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 2Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3During FY 87, $727,800 was made available from FC & CE. $31,044 spent for plans and specs. Contract to be awarded during FY 88. 4In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 5Includes $34,197 of PWA funds. 6In addition, 7,000 expended from contributed funds. 7In addition, $2 400 expended from contributed funds. 8Project eligible for deauthorization. TABLE 40-G Project Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) Bradley Lake, AK Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Date Report For Deauthorized 1967 1977 1983 1979 1949 1931 1982 1979 1977 1977 Federal Funds Expended $6,701,000 Contributed Funds Expended 40-11 - -- -- ~------Y~------ -- - -- I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 40-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Study Identification Chignik, AK Dillingham Small Boat Harbor, AK Hooper Bay, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Larson Bay Small Boat Harbor, AK Mekoryuk, AK Mountain Point, AK Ouzinkie Small Boat Harbor, AK Sand Point, AK St. George Island, AK Saxman, AK Seward, AK Togiak Harbor, AK Trident Basin, Kodiak, AK Whittier, AK TOTAL Fiscal Year Costs $ 20,248 40,882 36,411 52 93,209 -112,739 17,512 34,338 33 12,962 44,732 29 12 10,000 3,876 $201,555 PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted ALASKA: Seward Harbor Ketchikan (Bar Point Harbor) Ketchikan (Thomas Basin) Metlakatla (New Harbor) Petersburg Harbor Wrangell Narrows Douglas Harbor Juneau (Aurora Harbor) Juneau (Harris Harbor) Humboldt Harbor October 1986 January 1987 January 1987 January 1987 February 1987 February 1987 March 1987 March 1987 March 1987 June 1987 40-12 TABLE 40-I - I---~-I-~-- BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and consists of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as chairman. Five members are division engineers with membership rotated among divisions having civil works missions. The seventh member, assigned full time to the board as Resident Member, also directs the staff in carrying out the responsibilities of the board. The board meets quarterly or on call of the chairman. The board has several statutory duties. It conducts independent reviews of corps survey reports covering water resources projects and reports its conclusions and recommendations to the Chief of Engineers. The Chief of Engineers then forwards the reports with his conclusions and recommendations to the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) for transmission to the Congress. The board also conducts independent reviews of special reports ordered by the Congress. It considers and approves general plans for major modification and reconstruction of any lock, canal, canalized river or other work for the use or benefit of navigation. In addition to its statutory duties, the Chief of Engineers has assigned further duties to the board. It reviews coprs policies and procedures as directed, additional special reports for the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers, reports of other Federal agencies pertaining to water resources development as directed, and conducts a 10-month program of in-service training for approximately 15 corps planners annually - generally at GS 12 and 13 leves - in all aspects of federal water resources development. The training program helps meet corps needs for increased numbers of qualified people in the planning field. The board also has administrative responsibility for processing proposed reports of the Chief of Engineers, along with Final Environmental Impact Statements, to states and federal agencies for their 90-day review. In addition to other duties, the resident member of the board has served as second alternate for the Secretary of the Army on the Foreign-Trade Zones Board. The Secretary of the Army has also appointed the resident member to serve as his representative on the Committee of Alternates of the Foreign-Trade Zones Board and authorized him to act directly on the secretary's behalf on all nondiscretionary matters involving foreign-trade zones. This appointment relieves the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works of routine duties in this regard; however, discretionary matters concerning the Foreign-Trade Zones Board remain under previous delegations of authority. Total membership of the board is fixed by law at seven. In December 1982, the Chief of Engineers instituted a mechanism for predesignating future members, based on their time of service as division engineers, geographical factors, and other criteria. This procedure achieves a wider involvement of division engineers and their staffs with the proceedings of the board. Members Designate attend and participate in meetings of the board, but are not permitted to vote on board actions. The membership of the board as of September 1, 1987 was as follows: Members: Major General Jerome B. Hilmes, Chairman, Division Engineer, Southestern, Dallas, TX Major General Thomas A. Sands, Division Engineer, Lower MIssissippi Valley, Vicksburg, MS Brigadier General (P) C. Ernest Edgar III, Division Engineer, South Atlantic, Atlanta, GA Brigadier General (P) Charles E. Williams, Division Engineer, North Atlantic, New York, NY Brigadier General Robert H. Ryan, Division Engineer, Missouri River, Omaha, NE Colonel (P) Ernest J. Harrell, Division Engineer Ohio River, Cincinnati, OH Colonel Robert B. Wilson, Resident Member, Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Fort Belvoir, VA Members Designate: Brigadier General Patrick J. Kelly, Division Engineer, South Pacific, San Francisco, CA Colonel Thomas A. Rhen, Division Engineer, New England, Waltham, MA Official Board Actions. In compliance with resolutions of Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the board completed 23 official report reviews during Fiscal Year (FY) 1987. The favorable reports category includes favorable recommended projects for federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for construction by any agency of the federal government. Reports Recommending Favorable for Federal Construction: The board recommended 11 projects at an estimated total first cost of $840,723,000, of which $662,493,000 is the first cost to the United States. A listing of the projects follows: Scioto River, West Columbus, Ohio Clifton, Arizona Port Sutton Channel, Florida Cypress Creek, Texas Rillito River & Associated Streams, Tucscon, Arizona Mill Creek, Tennessee Winfield Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, West Virginia Claremont Terminal Channel, Jersey City, New Jersey Lower Mission Creek, Santa Barbara County, California West Bank, Mississippi R, Vic of New Orleans, Louisiana 41-1 Reports Recommending Unfavorable for Federal Construction: During FY 1987, the board concurred in the unfavorable recommendations of the reporting officers for federal construction on 12 projects: Pleasure Island, Port Arthur, Texas Golden Gate Estates, Florida Biloxi Bay to East Harrison, Mississippi St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin Yort & Pamunkey Rivers, Virginia Mississippi River, Coon Rapids Dam Vermilion River Basin, Illinois Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio Roanoke River, South Boston, North Carolina and Virginia San Luis Obispo County Streams, California Turkey Creek, Georgia General Design Memoranda: The board reviewed and submitted favorable recommendations on one General Design Memorandum during the reporting period: Chicagoland Underflow Plan, Illinois. During FY 1987, the board held three meetings: October 7, 1986, March 11, 1987, and June 3, 1987. Since 1902, the board has acted on 8,772 reports, recommending favorably on 3,917 and unfavorably on 4,855. 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: MG Thomas A. Sands, U.S. Army, President, appointed May 10, 1985; Mr. Sam E. Angel, appointed Sept. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; MG Jerome B. Hilmes, U.S. Army, appointed Nov. 21, 1983; RA John D. Bossler, NOAA, appointed Mar. 14, 1984; BG Robert J. Dacey, appointed May 10, 1985; COL Dennis B. Bulger served as Secretary of the Commission. There is one civilian/engineer vacancy due to the death of Mr. Roy T. Sessums on Mar. 10, 1984. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of four salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement in lower Mississippi River Delta region; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural-water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds- Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Field operations of the Commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction- St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO. Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 1.15 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time ranges in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 57 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $9,902,820,000 (Cost projected through the construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1987, of $4,312,752,917, the entire project is about 79.2 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1979/ 1982, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1981, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (54th edition), 1986. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, including maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1987, was $4,358,618,837. (See Table 42-S.) (See also Tables 42- R, 42-T, and 42-U for additional financial statements.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Commission activities: The 329th Session was held on April 27 through May 1, 1987, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and New Orleans, LA, with approximately 160 people in attendance. This session adjourned at New Orleans, LA, at 10:00 a.m. on May 1, 1987. The 330th session was held on September 14 through September 18, 1987, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to Morgan City, LA. On September 15 the Commission and staff viewed a sinking unit in operation at the Rescue Landing, AR. On September 17, Commission members and staff toured and were briefed on the Old River Control Structure and on September 18 had an aerial inspection of the Atchafalaya Basin and area. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Vicksburg, MS; and Morgan City, LA, with approximately 175 people in attendance. At 10:05 a.m., September 18, 1987, the 330th Session adjourned at Morgan City, LA. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Road-maptype information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1986 (54th) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. The 1987 (1st) edition folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:24,000) covering the Atchafalaya River was revised and printed. Approximately 120 flight-line miles of infra-red color; 6,266 flight-line miles of black-and-white aerial photography (various scales); 10 flight-line miles of color photography; and about 223 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District--Revision of Breton Sound Map, 1:250,000- scale was completed and will be printed. Memphis District--Series conversion of USGS 1:24,000 scale to 1:62,500 scale quads of Evadale, Dee, Mellwood, Latour, Jonesboro, Vanndale and Wynne are complete. Vicksburg District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale quadrangles to 1:62,500- scale quadrangles of McCarley, MS; Water Valley, MS; Ingalls, AR; Bearden, AR; and Hampton, AR, is in progress. Horn Lake, MS; Crenshaw, MS; Sledge, MS; Crowder, MS; Oakland, MS; Grenada, MS; Princeton, AR; Camden, AR; and Warren, AR, were completed. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District--Mississippi River crest stage of 42.1 feet at Cairo gage on Apr. 19, 1987, and maximum discharge of 892,000 cubic feet per second, occurred on Apr. 19, 1987, at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 24.8 feet at Memphis on Mar. 23 and Apr. 22, 1987, with maximum discharge of 927,000 cubic feet per second on Mar. 8, 1987. Vicksburg District--No significant flooding occurred in the Vicksburg District during FY 87. Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg District's reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City - 30.1 feet on Mar. 11, 1987, and maximum discharge of 1,190,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg - 36.5 feet on Mar. 13, 1987, and maximum discharge of 1,230,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez - 44.1 feet on Mar. 14, 1987, and maximum discharge of 1,200,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District--On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 47.93 feet NGVD on Mar. 15, 1987, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 14.0 feet NGVD on Mar. 17, 1987. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 30.5 feet NGVD on Mar. 14, 1987. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public 42-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. No requests were received for modifications of the existing project, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as amended (see Table 42-D). Bayou Du Chien, KY Feasibility Report-The President, MRC, on Jul. 25, 1987, concurred with the Memphis District's finding that the study be terminated and the study resolution be closed since no economically feasible plan could be implemented by the Corps. Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potamology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major causeand- effect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District-Enlarged 14.1 miles of levees and surfaced 14.1 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District-Constructed 2.3 miles of berms and enlarged 2.5 miles of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District-Constructed 2.6 miles of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42-M, and 42-N.) There are 1,608.3 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.5 are in place with 1,186.1 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,202.1 miles, of which 2,195.3 are in place with 1,625.6 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 in place with 294.9 completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 723.4 miles of berms, 513.1 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 1,814.6 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,608.2 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,120.0 are in place with 895.1 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 9.8 miles and 811.7 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For last summary of levee work accomplished under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act, see Table 42-N, pages 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. Mississippi River and Tributaries- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 42-G). Work included dredging 29,781,300 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: New Orleans District, Baton Rouge Harbor (Devil's Swamp) was maintained by Unit Price dredge Galveston. Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was performed by government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin and leased dustpan dredge Lenel Bean. The MR&T Harbors, in the Vicksburg District, maintained were Greenville and Vicksburg by leased cutterhead dredge George D. Williams and the leased cutterhead dredge Pontchartrain. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Burgess, leased cutterhead dredge Natchez, and leased dustpan dredge Lenel Bean. The MR&T Harbor maintained was Memphis Harbor (MCKeller Lake). Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J.) Construction of 12.85 miles of new bank revetment and 115,936 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 1.23 miles of new dikes were constructed and 5.2 miles required for maintenance. In addition, work on tributaries consisted of 3.26 miles of new bank revetment and 0 squares of concrete mattress for maintenance. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 878.41 miles of operative bank revetment and 215.54 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9-by 300-feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 99.8 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 68.23 miles of revetment and 5.2 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42- H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. New work by contract: Construction of floodside and landside berms and levee enlargement continued on the east and west protection levees. One contract on the west protection levee was completed over a distance of 3.8 miles with placement of 449,000 cubic yards; and on the east protection levee, one contract for 1.2 miles of steel sheet piling was completed. A contract for a composite earthern/sheet pile closure of the Bordelonville floodgate was also completed with placement of 30,000 cubic yards. On the west protection levee four all-earth levee contracts, totaling 20.4 miles, are under construction with placement of 2,958,000 cubic yards during this period. A contract for a composite floodwall/levee totaling a distance of 1.3 miles is also under construction on the west protection levee. On the east protection levee 11.7 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms are under construction with placement of 145,000 cubic yards during this period. Contract for the new Morgan City floodwall, north of Brashear Avenue, was completed Dec. 19, 1986. A contract for construction of the Wax Lake Outlet control structure was awarded at a cost-of$-3,531,460 and construction is underway. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrell Locks, Morganza Control Structure, the West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee borrow pit, and numerous drainage structures as required, condition and operation studies, and water control management. Maintenance by contract: Maintenance contracts for replacement of the Charenton floodgate bridge and replacement of timber guidewalls at Bayou Sorrel lock were awarded on Aug. 12 and Aug. 14, 1987, respectively. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 2,000,000 cubic yards by one leased cutterhead dredge from Berwick Bay harbor between June and August 1987; and removal of 125,000 cubic yards by leased cutterhead dredge from Three Rivers during August 1987. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 74 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $1,460,000,000 and non- Federal cost of $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 294.9 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works in the lower basin, control of distribution of flows through Wax Lake Outlet, and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 36.7 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by contract: Dredging for the removal of shoal from the entrance channel was performed, resulting in the removal of 145,508 cubic yards between Aug. 30 and Sep. 6, 1987. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The project is 16 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $699,200 and cash contributions of $650,000. Completion of the remaining 2.5 miles is dependent on economic justification by developments on the initial channel. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $26,500,000 and non- Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, 42-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, and 1983. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies and placement of stone bank paving in the auxiliary structure inflow channel. New work by contract: Stone bank paving in the auxiliary structure inflow channel was completed Aug. 6, 1987, with 405,443 tons of stone placed. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, operation of a picket boat at the inflow channels to the low-sill and auxiliary control structures, and engineering studies. Maintenance by contract: From Aug. 21 to 28, 1987, 174,604 cubic yards of shoal were dredged from the lock forebay. From June to September 1987, gate rail repairs and stilling basin dewatering, inspection, and repair were perforemd at the low sill structure. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $306,000,000. Principal items completed are as-follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low sill structure, February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, ARK AND LA Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Planning and design were continued on project features. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation, except for the Rowdy Bend recreational facility; awarded in FY 87, and two future recreational sites. (b) Red River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure is complete and the pumping plant was completed on Jun. 5, 1987. Structural mitigation features for this project are scheduled to be constructed in FY 87, FY 88, and FY 89. Design and right-ofway acquisition are continuing for the remainder of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee enlargement. An 8A contract has been completed for construction of the 1.5- mile connecting channel and drainage structure at the Six Mile Bayou Project. A contract for Sicily Island Item 1A is complete. Item 1A includes 1.0 mile of levee and a water control structure (two 60" pipes). An 8A contract for construction of Item 1B which included 2.8 miles of levee, has also been completed. Preparation of the Fool River Bayou Pumping Plant design document is being initiated. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM is under way. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. A Reevaluation report for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61.0, and the Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal project has been completed and work on the GDM is under way. (b) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 12.7 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Based on results of that study, work is underway to complete enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee system. 42-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bankprotection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. (c) Main stem. Construction of the Bee Lake Drainage Structure is 96 percent complete. Design is underway to provide levee closure at Bee Lake. Main Stem construction is continuing for bank stabilization at Greenwood Bendway Site 3, which was awarded in FY 86. Construction of additional bank stabilization works along the Greenwood Bendway continues at Sites 4 andd 5, which were awarded on Nov. 13, 1986, and May 29, 1987, respectively. A contract was awarded on Sep. 22, 1987, for $221,728 for Tallahatchie River Site 1 Bank Stabilization. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees and drainage facilities. (d) Big Sunflower River, etc. A contract was awarded Oct. 31, 1986, on Item 66-A, Steele Bayou Channel Improvement, Miles 63.0 to 68.7. The next item of work is scheduled for award in March 1988. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is substantially complete. Levee work associated with Item 1, Pelucia Creek is complete. Construction is continuing at Pelucia Creek, Item 1A. Construction of the next item of work at Pelucia Creek, Item 2, is scheduled for award in Sep. 1988. (2) Channels. An award for construction of the Alligator-Catfish, Round Lake, Water Control Structure is scheduled for April 1988. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees and drainage facilities. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 247.48 feet NGVD on July 2, 1987, when storage in the flood control pool was 231,400 acre-feet. Peak 24-hr. inflow was 13,100 cubic feet per second on Feb. 28, 1987. On Sep. 30, 1987, pool elevation was 243.5 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 178,500 acre-feet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non-Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 210.58 feet NGVD on Jun. 27, 1987, when storage in the flood control pool was 405,800 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 35,600 cubic feet per second on Feb. 28, 1987. On Sep. 30, 1987, the pool elevation was 206.8 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 305,400 acre-feet. Construction of a levee to provide protection to the community of Coffeeville from high Grenada Lake stages was begun in FY 82. In addition to the levee, other features of Coffeeville project include: three drainage structures through the levee; portable pumps; area rehabilitation; and raising of a town street. Construction of the levee and two of the drainage structures was completed in FY 82. The remaining feature of the Coffeeville project was completed in early FY 84. (h) Sardis Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 258.48 feet NGVD on Aug. 5, 1987, when storage in the flood control pool was 564,100 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 29,000 cubic feet per second on Mar. 1, 1987. On Sep. 30, 1987, the pool elevation was 249.9 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 334,000 acre-feet. An 8-mile reach of the Little Tallahatchie River from Sardis Dam to Highway 51 was clogged with sediment restricting releases from the lake. This reach has been dredged to restore the design capacity of the river. Six disposal sites were selected, located in upland hill areas to reduce the adverse impact on prime agricultural lands along the river and still be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Dredging was completed in August 1982. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tiributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 220.25 feet NGVD on Aug. 25, 1987, and storage in flood control pool was 125,500 acre-feet. Peak 24- hour inflow was 27,000 cubic feet per second on Feb. 28, 1987. On Sep. 30, 1987, the pool elevation was 217.3 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 91,500 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo Area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater 42-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. A Phase I GDM was completed in FY 82 which addresses rural flooding from ponded runoff inside the backwater levee. A GDM for a pumping station of 17,500 cfs to reduce this ponding was approved Jul. 12, 1985. Later budgetary guidance reduced the pumping plant capacity to 10,000 CFS. A contract for portions of the inlet and outlet channel excavation for the pumping plant was awarded in March 1986. A construction schedule for the remaining project features is dependent upon the local sponsor meeting the cost sharing requirements specified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Item lA was awarded in March 1985. Plans and specifications are being prepared for levee Item lB with award scheduled for March 1986. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs are now complete. Two of the three remaining reservoirs will be constructed when funds are appropriated. One reservoir has been indefinitely delayed because of right-of-way problems. The pumping station for Greentree 8 is complete. Pumping stations for Greentrees 1, 3 and 7 are under construction and will be completed in FY 88. (k) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first eight items of channel improvement, approximately 56 miles, and two drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, MS, to about 15 miles upstream of Belzoni, MS. A contract for the next item of work, levee and channel Item 3A-1, is scheduled to be awarded in Dec. 1987. Two drainage structures, East Hollie Lake Drainage Structure located about 18 miles north of Belzoni and Mosquito Lake Drainage Structure located about 11 miles south of Greenwood, are scheduled for award in Dec. 1987 and Aug. 1988, respectively. The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure is under construction and will be completed Late FY 89. Planning is continuing on upstream channel and levee work. (1) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek 1A; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and S5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA Soil Conservation Service was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to six demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin Hill area. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 35 percent complete. A total of 50.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. The ongoing Yazoo Basin Comprehensive Study will address other water resources problems and needs in the area to include urban and rural flood damage prevention, hydropower, and water supply. During FY 87, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. The district completed the construction of five grade control structures and 28,700 linear feet of bank stabilization and initiated the construction of six grade control structures; 4.1 miles of clearing, snagging, and debris removal; and 32,500 linear feet of bank stabilization. LOWER RED RIVER-SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY29 and is 90 percent complete, based on the current estimated cost of $42,000,000. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized, are complete to approved grade and section. (See Table 42-L for status of levees and Table 42-I for status of revetments. Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Little River Drainage. No work performed this fiscal year. (b) Upper St. Francis River. Stateline Ditch channel cleanout awarded May 17, 1985, completed Jul. 31, 1987. Belle Fountain Ditch, alteration of Missouri State Highway NN bridge awarded Jul. 16, 1986, 1 percent complete. State Line Ditch 29 alteration of Arkansas State HIighway 181 bridge awarded Jul. 12, 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION 1985, 70% complete. Upper Buffalo Creek alteration of Missouri State Highway 164 and N awarded Jun. 27, 1985, 60 percent complete. Upper Buffalo Creek channel enlargement awarded Sep. 23, 1986, completed Jul. 13, 1987. Alteration of Arkansas State Highway 119, Upper Buffalo Creek, awarded Aug. 29, 1983, completed Apr. 30, 1987. Blackfish Bayou County bridge at Mile 26.59 awarded Mar. 11, 1987, 85 percent complete. Channel excavation Big Creek, Item 2, Parcel 2, awarded Jul. 31, 1987, 18 percent complete. Madison to Marianna Floodway drift and sediment removal awarded Aug. 31, 1987, 0 percent complete. Bank repair, Ditch No. 81, Big Lake area awarded Jul 28, 1987, completed Sept. 28, 1987. Aggregate deliver to roadway, White River Levee and ramps awarded Jun. 10, 1987, 23 percent complete. Honey Cypress Creek county bridge at Mile 0.95 awarded Feb. 13, 1987, completed Jul. 27, 1987. Honey Cypress Creek county bridge at Mile 4.55 awarded Mar. 12, 1987, completed Oct. 11, 1987. Alteration to Arkansas State Highways 77 and 119, Ditches 10 and 12 awarded Mar. 2, 1987, 0 percent. Alteration of seven powerlines Ditches 10 and 12 awarded Feb. 24, 1987, 0 percent. Oak Donnick Floodway alteraiton of railroad bridges awarded Jun. 5, 1987, 0 percent complete. Honey Cypress Creek county bridge at Mile 5.18 awarded Mar. 9, 1987, completed Sep. 16, 1987. Alteration 3 x 6 gas pipeline Upper Buffalo Creek awarded Apr. 13, 1987, completed Aug. 20, 1987. Township bridge at Mile 35.80 Upper Buffalo Creek awarded May 29, 1987, 38 percent complete. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Upper Buffalo Creek Alterations of Highways 77 and 119 awarded Aug. 29, 1983, completed Apr. 30, 1987. Huxtable Access Road awarded Sept. 17, 1985, completed Dec. 21, 1985. Helena Floodwall awarded Aug. 23, 1985, completed Dec. 9, 1985. Asphalt surfacing, W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant, awarded Sep. 22, 1986, completed Jan. 12, 1987. Outlet channel scour repair, W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant, awarded Oct. 11, 1985, completed Aug. 21, 1987. Big Lake Floodway, ditch bank repair, awarded Sep. 23, 1986, completed Jul. 20, 1987. Bank repair, Ditch No. 81, Big Lake area, awarded Sep. 23, 1986, completed Aug. 21, 1987. Castor River bank repair, Missouri flood control, awarded Aug. 22, 1986, completed Sep. 26, 1986. Riprap stone protection at Arkansas State Highway 139, Big Slough Drainage Ditch, awarded Jan. 22, 1985, completed Apr. 14, 1986. Cleanout and embankment closure cross Ditch No. 2 awarded Jul. 21, 1987, completed Sep. 22, 1987. Balckfish Bayou, Item 3, countybridge at Mile 27.70 awarded Aug. 25, 1987, 0 percent complete. Highway 79 to Huxtable landside ditch cleanout awarded Sep. 17, 1987, 0 percent complete. Channel cleanout, Parcel 1, Castor River, Item 2 awarded Apr. 28, 1987, completed Oct. 17, 1987. Blackfish Bayou, Item 3, alteration of county roads awarded Jun. 17, 1987, 0 percent complete. W. G. Huxtable Pumping Plant cleaning and painting awarded Nov. 10, 1986, 42 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 86 percent complete. (b) Upper and Lower St. Francis River and Tributaries. Project was initiated during 1937 and is 80 percent complete. WHITE RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. Graham Burke cleaning and painting awarded Sep. 26, 1984, completed Mar. 28, 1986. Water service to Graham Burke Pumping Station, awarded Aug. 20, 1986, 99 percent complete. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River, TN. Below Bradford bridge awarded Jul. 1, 1986, completed Apr. 14, 1987. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 64 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 13 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 41 percent complete. 42-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) L-10 AC Cairo awarded Sep. 27, 1985, completed Aug. 15, 1987. L-628 Rena Lara Coahoma awarded Sep. 30, 1985, 99 percent complete. Levee roadway resurfacing, Point Pleasure, MO, awarded Sep. 26, 1986, completed Dec. 17, 1986. Levee roadway resurfacing, Concord, MO, awarded Sep. 22, 1986, completed Dec. 8, 1986. Levee roadway surfacing, Cottonwood Point, MO, awarded Sep. 23, 1986, completed Dec. 5, 1986. Floodwall alterations, Hickman Floodway, awarded Oct. 24, 1985, completed May 30, 1987. Levee work, Item No. L-101, Parcel 2, above Cairo, awarded Sep. 27, 1985, completed May 30, 1987. Nash Relief Wells, Parcel I, Cape Girardeau, MO, awarded Mar. 30, 1984, completed Sep. 3, 1987. Levee work, Item R-678, Walnut Bend, AR, awarded Jul. 16, 1986, completed Oct. 16, 1986. DeValls Bluff Pumping Plant repairs awarded Jul. 7, 1987, 4 percent complete. Channel improvement Lick Creek at Humboldt awarded Jun. 2, 1987, 31 percent complete. R-0-5 Ac. Parcel 2, Cairo-Mound City, Illinois, awarded Dec. 18, 1987, 74 percent complete. Demolition of buildings, City of Hickman awarded Sep. 9, 1987, 0 percent complete. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Ten ton bridge crane Ensley Engineer Yard awarded May 19, 1987, 10 percent complete. Fire alarm system Ensley Engineer Yard awarded Sep. 8, 1987, 0 percent complete. 42-10 TABLE 42-i Mileage Above Head of Passes 0-9571 10-81 11-25 38 45 118 81 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 104-234 127-129 235 279-287 287-303 303-314 314-572 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Locality Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) Caernarvon, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carrey8 Floodway, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Morganza-Old River, LA Old River, LA control Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN -" Remarks A Improvement Dredging, revetment, and contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. 42-11 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Modified by Public Law 87- 874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 803-873 Tiptonville-Obion River Main line levee, left bank, levee Modified bv Acts of Jul. 24, 857 Near Mud Lake, TN exte Riv( Pum] char 890 St. Johns Bayou, MO Draii clos 890 New Madrid Floodway, MO Draii clos 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Flooc 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Main 922 Hickman, KY Flooc 946 Peafield, MO Draii 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district Flooc 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district, Flooc Mounds, Mound City, and plar vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL LeveE Cape Girardeau, MO to Rock LeveE Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." nsion, and diversion Obion er ping station and adjacent nnel improvements nage floodgate and levee ure nage floodgate and levee ure dway, right bank line levee, left bank dwall, left bank nage floodgate Iwalls and levees dwalls, levees, and pumping nt es, both banks es 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 42-12 MISSISSISIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-11.7 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 29 40 40 40 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA1 Atchafalaya Basin. Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Flood ways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrel Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick' Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. 42-13 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock' Alternate navigation channel, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf1 Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 41 41 '41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth- 0-8 50-133 96 133 0-17 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins SCourtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Bouef diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boez f Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee. Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure 42-14 Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf. Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Boeuf River, AR, and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou LaFourche Boeuf River, AR, and LA above Bayou LaFourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks 87 (2, 3) Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvements 42-15 Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977. MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.2 3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 82-145 3-56 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Tributaries of Boeuf Ri'er- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot: 0-6 0-165 0-22 0-0.2 (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR , Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake . � Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard i Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M: Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank 'Levees, left bank (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. 42-16 Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal 23-98_ 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 ' 127 185 381 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 Locality Yalobusha kiver below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocona River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee 42-17 Improvement Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures Remarks See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534.3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36' 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 (5) (5) Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR, AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN 42-18 Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtanent structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970, See Table 42-D. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY 0-47 Obion Creek, KY Channel improvement Authorized by Public Law 89-298. LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO Levees Mile 49 above Cairo. MISSOURI RIVER, MO 0-28 Mouth to St. Charles, MO Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). ILLINOIS RIVER, IL 0-120 Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, Floodwall, levee, revetment, and IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Teche Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans district. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Yalobusha Yocona Little Tallahatchie Coldwater St. Franbis Nearest town to damsite Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Drainage area, square miles 1,320 560 1,545 1,000 1,310 Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres 10 6 11 5 4 Volume, thousand acre-feet 86 58 108 31 31 Elevation, 'feet, NGVD 193 230 236.0 209.3 354.7 Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres 65 28 58.5 33 23 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,252 602 1,462 494 582 Runoff, inches 17.8 20.2 17.7 9.3 8.4 Outlet gates: Number 3 2 4 3 3 Size, feet 7.5 by14 8 by 16 6 by 12 8.5 by 19 10 by 20 Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 10.7 9.4 10.0 10.0 18.0 Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Chute Chute Chute Chute Gravity Length, feet 200 200 400 300 740 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 231 268 281.4 238.3 394.7 Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 52 50 132 89 229 Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres 106 41 90 63 32 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,385 554 1,447 858 521 Runoff, inches 19.7 18.5 17.6 16.1 7.5 Elevation, feet, NGVD 247.5 284.0 301.0 256.3 413.7 Dam: Type, earthfill Rolled Rolled Hydraulic Rolled Rolled Length, thousand feet 13.9 8.4 15.3 11.5 2.7 Elevation, crest, feet NGVD 256.0 293.0 311.4 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. 42-20 TABLE 42-D MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carr6 Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for flood control work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title) Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River; construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie, LA Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR' Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees (below Plum Bayou).' 42-21 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public 351, 72d Cong. Public 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA' Flood protection at Des Arc, AR Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA Bank protection, Amite River, LA Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure,' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN Improve Greenville Harbor, MS 42-22 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Document H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., Ist sess. TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27. 1965 Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-$50 million. Modification-Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $.100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS 42-23 H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report Approved-Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 Dec. 31, 1970 Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively.4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23,.1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. 42-24 TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Waterand Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1 - Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda - On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26, 1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. 42-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report.2 Jun. 28, 1980 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 Supplemental Appropria t ions Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc. for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 42-26 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,700,000. c. Vicksburg, Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigating fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommmended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200- foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. 42-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jun. 4, 1987 Modification of Mississipppi Delta Region project to construct Unpublished New Orleans salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than District report, Nov. 1, at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). 1984. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 42-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 42-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 improvements, TN Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on 1946, p. 1053 north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou). Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De 1946, p. 1083 Valls Bluff, AR Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA 1945, p. 982 Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton Rouge, LA 1948, p.1059 (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p.773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 42-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Project Title Estimated Cost1 Fiscal Year 1987 Completed features2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River-- South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Eight Mile Creek, AR L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake, TN & KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance) Bushely Bayou St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway Nonconnah Creek Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries Greenville Harbor Memphis Harbor Helena Harbor Helena AR and Vicinity West Memphis AR and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee Teche Vermilion Basin TOTAL $ 199,238,000 1,240,000,000 4,950,0003 4,000,0003 3,075,000,000 1,460,000,000 139,000,000 20,400,0003 301,300,000 25,900,0003 50,000,000 57,900,000 452,000,000 35,000,0003 130,900,0003 1,340,000,000 16,802,0003 39,000,0003 168,000,000 376,000,000 19,900,000 10,600,0003 108,000,000 13,800,0003 (10,400,000)3 440,000 9,960,000 25,400,0003 40,000,0003 7,400,000 37,000,0004 44,400,0004 23,300,0004 2,750,0004 28,000,0004 23,000,0004 64,803,0004 15,700,0004 11,100,0004 56,000,0004 18,500,0004 35,700,0004 $ 9,429,843,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. 2. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Roug3 Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche- Vermilion Basins, LA. 3. Incremental (not projected through the construction period.) 4. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 42-30 TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Location Fiscal Year 1987 Mileage Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 - 145.5 145.5 Main stem channel 234-320 - 0.0 0.0 Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 2,710.7 2,710.7 Vicksburg Harbor 437 - 183.7 183.7 Greenville Harbor 537 - 241.9 241.9 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 24,070.0 24,070.0 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 1,196.5 1,196.5 TOTAL 28,548.3 28,548.3 42-31 TABLE 42-Hi BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) Operoantiosntrs uTtihnis FY Nonop- Oea- Constructierative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of B sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Venice, LA .................. 12 Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ............. 22 Buras, LA............... ... 25 Tropical Bend, LA............ 30 Bayou Lamoque, LA .......... 33 Port Sulphur, LA ............ 39 Point Michel, LA ............. 44 Bohemia, LA ............... 46 Diamond, LA................ 49 Gravolet, LA............... 51 Junior, LA ................... 54 Harlem, LA .................. 56 Myrtle Grove, LA ............ 59 Monsecour, LA.............. 61 Alliance, LA................. 62 Belair, LA .................. 65 Jesuit Bend, LA ............. 68 Linwood, LA ................. 71 Oak Point, LA ............... 72 Scarsdale, LA ................ 75 English Turn, LA ............. 78 Poydras, LA ................. 82 Cutoff, LA .................. 88 Third district reach, LA ....... 93 Algiers Point, LA ............ 95 Gouldsboro Bend, LA ......... 96 Gretna Bend, LA ............. 97 Greenville Bend,LA .......... 100 Carrollton Bend, LA .......... 104 Avondale Bend, LA ........... 109 Kenner, LA .................. 114 Luling, LA.................119 Good Hope, LA.............. 126 Waterford, LA............. 128 Montz, LA ................. 132 Lucy, LA .................... 136 Reserve, LA................. 138 Willow Bend, LA .............. 141 Angelina, LA................ 145 Vacherie, LA................ 148 Belmont, LA................ 152 R RRR L R R L R L R L R L RL R L R L R L R HL R R RR LRL RLRL RLRLRL 2,850 390 2,277 1,378 8,047 45 12,222 60 2,401 43 9,499 60 5,245 57 17,815 2,400 1,000 9,216 4,820 19,798 4,315 5,529 8,206 16,210 15,430 17,283 LT 25,012 7,264 36,995 21,932 1121,,368000 17,435 19,345 15,148 16,315 10,020 0 9,750 22,841 22,860 10,638 12,377 , 13,852 16,408 i 45,864 21,256 27,167 7,728 4,960 9,662 22,045 15,015 28,074 37,167 28,908 16,298 12,295 " 17,502 17,826 20,947 7,618 27,047 13,295 25,575 Rich Bend, L ...A... ......... 157 Romeville, LA.............. 161 St. Alice, LA ................. 165 Burnside, LA ................ 170 Aben, LA .................... 172 St. Elmo, LA .......... ..... 174 Smoke Bend, LA .............. 177 Marchand, LA.............. 180 Philadelphia Point, LA ........ 183 New River Bend, LA ......... 185 White Castle, LA ............ 193 St. Gabriel, LA................. 201 Plaquemine Bend, LA ........ 209 Manchac, LA................ 215 Missouri Bend, LA ........... 222 Arlington, LA................ 227 Port Allen, LA.............. 231 Allendale, LA................. 238 Springfield Bend, LA ......... 244 Arboth LA ................... 250 Faulkner Lake, LA ........... 253 Grand Bay, LA .............. 258 Bayou Sara, LA .............. 265 Red Store, LA................... 269 Arrow Bend, LA ............. 272 Boies Point, LA ............. 275 Morganza, LA............... 279 Iowa Point, LA .............. 282 Brunette Point, :LA ........... 285 Greenwood Bend, LA ......... 289 Hog Point, LA ................ 296 Carr Point, LA................ 304 Above Old River, LA ......... 305 Fort Adams, MS ................ 308 Point Breeze, LA ............ 313 Coochie, LA ................ 317 Palmetto, MS................ 322 Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River....... Dikes: None RL R L RLRL R LRL RL RL RRLRLRL RLRRL RL RRRLRRL 5,755 2,755 1,740 4,820 2,400 32,412 (6.14 Miles) 35 17,705 65 21,521 214 12,966 160 26,770 - 15,061 739 141,205 370 2,066 5,836 (1.11 Miles) 2,469 17,477 3,386 3,991 33,982 45,225 33,163 21,625 27,052 24,900. 10,063 1.0;240 17,075 10,144 5,379 33,414 37,276 26,809 36,137 35,480 22,632 12,244 14,073 25,502 25,690 13,190 9,552 $ 7,090 C 16,958 11,315 CI 13,600 16,094 C 20,513 - 11,375 8,038 14,987 13,368 8,600 r 4,800 0 17,219 13,565 17,150 30,864 O - 1,434,520 (271.69 Miles) OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel .............. 315 L - Inflow channel ............... 315 R - Outflow channel................ 315 L&R - Auxiliary inflow channel...... 312 L&R 17,200 Auxiliary outflow channel 312 L&R - Total standard revetment, Old River ................ 17,200 (3.26 Miles) 2,415 4,365 19,891 17,200 5,790 600 97,571 600 97,571 - - - - 49,661 (9.41 Miles) 0 0 TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) OpeCraotnisotnrsu cTthioisn FY Nonaop- Opera- Constructionerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard revetment: Mile One, LA ................. Coville, Bayou, LA.......... Legonier, LA ................. Simmesport, LA .............. Kuhlman Bayou, LA......... Odenburg, LA ................. Cason, LA .................... McCrea, LA .................. Woodside, LA ................ Provosty, LA ................. Crooked Bayou, LA......... Mercier, LA .................. Barberton, LA............. Evans Point, LA............ Goudeau, LA ................. Morris Bayou, LA.......... Goodwood, LA ................ Red Cross,:LA ................ Melville, LA .................. Cross Bayou, LA .............. Melville South, LA.......... Toles, LA .................... Petite Prairie, LA.......... Holloway Lake, LA.......... Bayou Sherman, LA......... Krotz Springs, LA ............. Sherburne, LA............. Bayou Big Graw, LA........ Morgan City ................... Total standard revetment ... Below Confluence of Red and Atchafalaya Rivers 1. 34 6 7 9 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 37 38 40 43 46 115 L R+ L RL R R LRL RL RL RL RL RL RL R LLR RRL - - - - - - 4,150 - - - - - - - 6,550 - - - - - - - 8,940 - - - - - - - 10,636 - - - - - - - 5,565 - - - - - - - 5,375 - - - - - - - 10,798 - - - - - - 5,027 - - - - - - - 13,002 - - - - - - - 7,768 - - - - - - - 9,600 - - - - - - - 10,478 - - - - - - - 3,592 - - - - - - - 4,898 - - - - - - - 3,618 - - - - - - - 3,800 - - - - - - - 8,505 - - - - - - - 8,065 - - - - - - - 4,870 - - - - - - - 3,815 - - - - - - - 4,070 - - - - - - - 6,355 - - - - - - - 8,381 - - - - - - - 7,085 - - - - - - - 5,200 - - - - - - - 4,625 - - - - - - - 7,035 - - - - - - - 8,394 - - - - - - - 3,410 - - - - - - - 193,607 - (36.67 Miles) Dikes: None LOWER RED RIVER Below Confluence of Old River Outflow Channel and Red River Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA............. Naples, LA ............... Turnbull Island, LA....... Total standard revetment 10 79 R RL - - - - - - - 6,652 - - - - - - - 6,190 - - - - 11,038 - - - - - - - 23,880 (4.52 Miles) Dikes: None 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 12 H zv 0 L O 0 0 O O 0 C1,, TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) OpeCraotniosntrsu cTtihoisn FY Nonop- Opera- Constructionerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) 1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA.......... Dead Mans Bend, MS........ Glasscock Cutoff,, MS-LA ..... Railroad Landing, MS....... St. Catherine Bend, LA ....... Morville, LA .................. Natchez Island, MS......... Carthage, MS ................ Vidalia Casting Field........ Natchez Front, MS......... Gibson, LA .................. Ashland, LA-MS, TF........ Kempe Bend, LA........... Browns Field, LA.......... Goldbottom, MS............ Hardscrabble, LA ............. Grand Gulf, MS............ Point Pleasant, MS-LA ........ Togo Island, LA............ Lake Karnac, LA-MS ........ Diamond Point, LA-MS ....... Reid-Bedford, LA........... Racetrack, MS............ Barge Line Terminal, MS ..... Vicksburg Harbor, MS ....... Delta Point, LA ............... King's Point-Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ......... False Point, LA............ Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-M S ...... :............. Milliken Bend, LA............. Belle Island, LA-MS........ Goodrich, LA ................ Cottonwood Bar, MS, TF ...... Fitler-Cottonwood, MS....... Hagaman, LA ................. Ben Lomond, MS.......... Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS........... Lake Providence, LA........ Mayersville, MS .............. Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-M S .................... CCraarocrlianfat,, 4AS .R................................ Worthington, MS-AR........ Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ................... American Cutoff, MS-AR ..... Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ...... Vancluse, AR ................ Island 84, AR, MS.......... Warfield Point, MS ........ Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS ..... Spanish Moss, AR.......... TarpleyIsland, MS......... Miller Bend, MS.:.......... Island 82, AR ................ Ashbrook Island, MS........ Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR ................... Huntington Point, MS....... Pair O'ice, AR ............... Eutaw-Mounds, MS.......... Cypress Bend, AR.......... Catfish Point, MS.......... Ozark, AR-MS. ............ Prentiss, AR-MS........... Rosedale Bend, AR......... Riverton, MS.............. Klondike, AR ................ Victoria-Bend-Terrene, MS .... Big Island, AR ............... Smith Point, MS........... Dennis, MS .................. Cessions, MS. ................. Total revetment, Vicksburg.District, Mississippi River........ Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ............ Opposite Warnicott Ldg, MS Natchez Island, LA-MS....... Waterproof Bar, LA ............ Spithead Towhead, MS....... Browns Field, LA.......... Cottage Bend, LA-MS....... Bondurant Towhead, LA ...... Coffee Point, LA........... Yucatan, MS ................. Togo Island, LA............ Below Racetrack, MS........ Racetrack Towhead, MS ..... False Point, LA............ Marshall Cutoff, LA......... Forest Home Towhead, LA .... Willow Cutoff, LA.......... 329 335 342 346 350 356 357 361 363 364 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 429 433 437 437 437 439 443 446 453 460 467 470 474 481 486 488 489 497 RL RL RRRLLL RL RRL RL RRL RRLLLR LR LRL RRL RL RRL 503 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 585 586 588 593 598 601 611 615 RL RR LL RRLLL RRL RR RL RL RL RLLL RL RLL .L 5,250 2,240 1,965 3,040 505 5,250 23,374 11,488 11,572 12,506 2,772 9,424 674 495 O 0 26,055 v 21,385 1,965 11,595 28,093 y 14,855 . 2,180 14,700 0 2,670 'T 6,510 24,230- 27,092 28,285 9,280 30,250 C 22,530 z 53,948 c 32,345 5,670 t 19,260 . 12,125 0 18,392 13,935 3,040 7,350 n 7,650 19,330 12,860 19,580 0 44,650 24,160 37,220 m 14,290 28,427 37,756 10,235 52,1242 11,600 34,992 1,200 12,683 - - - 23,825 --.-.-...- - -.-.- 2121,,201800 -- - - - 8,350 - - - 45,653 - - - - 2,980 "- - - - 33,685 "- - - 4,300 " - - - 13,475 - - - - 4,320 - - - - 14,150 - - - - 4,580 "- - - - 2,000 "- - - - 29,360 "- - - - 3,080 - "- . - - 3,455 __- - - 40,560 - _-.__ - - - 10,045 - _ - - - 9,095 - -..-- 40,188 - _ - - - 26,585 "- - - 20,075 - - -.- - - - 22,015 "- - - 20,315 - -"- - - 4,820 - -".- - - 12,500 " - "_- - - 23,400 "- - - 29,245 "- - 16,515 - - - - 18,185 - _ - 25,195 " -- . - 10,910 19,450 (3.68 Miles) 61,712 5,250 23,276 S 1,348,765 (255.45 Miles) (3) 330 352 358 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 430 431 441 448 449 462 L L R RLRL RRRLL RRRL R 4,306 5,351 7,695 11,372 3,6614 4,8354 14,049 4,421 3,260 9,010 8,256 11,7694 1,752 5,355 5,1664 4,5744 4,2754 5,355 -.z TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) OpeCraotniostnrsu cTthioisn FY Nonop- Opera- Constructionerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Dikes: Arcadia Point, MS ............ 470 Point Lookout, LA ............ 478 Ajax Bar, MS ................. 482 Ben Lomond, MS ............. 488 Balshed Ldg., MS ............. 493 Wilson Point, LA .............. 500 Corregidor, MS ............... 505 Carolina, AR ................. 509 Cracraft Lower, AR .......... 510 Cracraft, AR ................. 513 Leota, MS .................... 514 Island, 86, AR ................ 520 Seven Oaks, AR .............. 523 Walnut Point, MS ............ 525 Refuge, MS .................. 528 Island 84, AR ................ 532 Leland Bar, AR-MS .......... 538 Leland Neck, AR-MS ......... 540 Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR....... 540 Island 82-Miller Bend, AsAhRbr-oMo kS- M....i.l.l..e..r. ..B...e..n..d , 544 AR-MS .................... 547 Ashbrook Cutoff, MS......... 549 Chicot Ldg., AR.............564 Catfish Point, MS'............571 Below Prentiss, MS ........... 580 Malone Field, AR ............ 585 Terrene, MS .................. 590 White River Landing, AR..... 591 Montgomery Towhead, AR .... 592 Victoria Bend, AR ............ 596 Smith Point, MS............. 600 Island 70, MS ................ 608 Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River........ L RLLL RLL RRL RRLLL RL R R&L L&R L RL RRL RRRLL 0 0 'z7 - - - - - - - 9,4634 n - - - - - - - 2,751 - - - - - - - 24,319 y - - - - - - - 24,6674 - - - - - - - 8,238 - - - - - - - 3,592 p - - - - - - - 6,730 "J - - - - - - - 2,897 x - - - - - - - 9,614 - - - - - - - 3,809 - - - - - - - 7,571 - - - - - 6,592 -.-.....- -5,754 p - - - - - - - 4,725 z - - - - - - - 5,278 � - - - - - - - 4,580 - - - - - - - 16,878 - - - - - - - 13,646 - - - - 13,015 - - - - - - - 8,728 - - - - - - - 17,451 - - - - - - - 5,290 - - - - - - - 7,813 - - - - - - - 7,59 I --.-..-..-.- - - - - - - 791 0 7,549 -.-..-..-.- 7,921 0 -- -- -- - - - - 2,201 i - - - - 6,071 - - - - - - - 5,0334 - - - - - - - 7,617 - - - - - - - 14,949 -, 4,930 (0.93 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVERS Standard Revetment: Menard Bend, AR............ 31 L Como, AR .................... 34 R Morgan Bend, AR............ 36 L Yancopin, AR.................24 R Total standard revetment, Arkansas River......... Dikes: 388,482 (73.58 Miles) 11,770 11,720 5,250 2,800 31,540 (5.97 Miles) RL R Hopedale Cutoff, AR.......... 30 Morgan Bend, AR............ 36 Fletcher Bend, AR.............39 Total dikes, Arkansas River .... RED RIVER6 Standard revetment:8 Dupre, LA .................... 69 R Bringol, LA .................. 73 R EggBend, LA ................ 75 R Cologne Bend, LA............. 77 R Roxana, LA .................. 83 R Ryland, LA ................... 88 R Whittington, LA .............. 89 R Smith, LA................... 91 R Latanier, LA ................. 93 R Hudson, LA .................. 99 R Robert, LA .................... 102 R Alexandria Front, LA..........105 R Callahan, LA ................. 110 R Cotton, LA................... 116 R Rapides, LA ................. 119 R Boyce, LA ..................... 125 R Total standard revetment, Red River .................... Dikes7: Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA ...... 71 R Bringol (Egg Bend), LA ....... .73 R Egg Bend, LA................ 75 R Cologne Bend, LA............ 77 R EchoLA .. ................. 78 R Richardson, LA .............. 79 R - - - - - - 1,848 - - - - - - 3,658 - - - - - - - 2,187 c 7,693 0 (1.46 Miles) - - - - - 2,690 .-. - - - 4,000 c - - - - - - 2,400 .- - - - 650 _ - - - - 2,900 - - - - 2,700 0 .-.. - - 2,460 Z - - - - - 1,458 ..-.... _- 5,500 ....... _ - 5,280 .......- 4,000 ....... _-_- 14,700 .......- 1,030 ....... _--4,548 -. - - - 61,566 (11.66 Miles) 2,000 2,477 900 1,850 1,900 2,700 rP t 00 EP TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) Operations This FY Construction Construcerative Nonop- Otpiveera- Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) RED RIVER7 continued Dikes7: Alexandria, LA .............. 105 R - - - - - - (Rock groin) 270 Bertrand, LA ............... 122 R - - - - - -7,630 Total dikes, Red River ....... - - - - -19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. Changed to correct previous errors. 5. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 6. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 7. Includes all types of dikes and retards. 0 0 y O~ 0 0C O Y 0 0 0 TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) OpeCroantisotnrsu cTthioisn FY Nonop- Opera- Conserative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR .............. Scrubgrass Bend, AR ........ Henrico, AR ................. Cessions Towhead, AR ........ Knowlton, AR ............... Island 67, MS ................ Island 68 Bar, AR ............ Ludlow, AR ................. Rescue Landing, AR-MS ...... Fair Landing, AR ........... Burke Landing, MS .......... Island 62, AR ............... Island 63, MS ............... Island 63 Bar, MS ........... Oldtown Bend, AR ........... Horseshoe, MS .............. Westover, AR ............... Delta-Friars Point, MS ....... Helena, AR .................. Trotters Landing, MS ........ Flower Lake, MS ............. St. Francis, AR .............. Harbert Point, MS ............ Walnut Bend, AR ............ Mhoon Bend, MS ............ Peters, AR ................... Commerce, MS ............... Porter Lake, AR ............. Pickett, MS-AR .............. Norfolk-Star, MS ............. Cow Island Bend, AR ......... Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN ........................ Coahoma, TN ............... Ensley, TN ... ........... Dismal Point, AR ............ Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR ....... Presidents Island, TN ........ Hopefield Point, AR, TN ....... Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ......... St. Clair, AR ................. Island 40, TN-AR ............. 598 600 606 615 620 621 622 626 629 632 637 638 639 639 644 647 650 655 660 665 667 672 675 680 685 692 695 700 703 709 714 716 717 723 724 730 733 736 737 740 742 744 RRRL RL RRL RL RLL RL RL RLLRLRL R L RR L R RLL RRL RL RR R 1,100 3,190 2,260 4,970 60 3,428 2,933 3,040 9,251 M,, C,, C 0M M 3,905 7,315 25,040 10,615 16,900 8,735 6,445 10,390 27,020 25,690 19,070 9,030 11,454 3,795 26,860 16,385 12,730 30,090 36,460 32,905 16,385 24,663 9,065 27,220 35,828 26,865 23,575 34,155 12,575 35,582 22,274 6,853 9,270 44,026 7,200 24,530 12,755 10,360 31,293 2,070 2,9302 30,750 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) OpeCraotniostnrsu cTthioisn FY Nonop- Opera- Constructionerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares) 1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Standard Revetment: Brandywine, AR-TN........ Shelby Forest, TN.......... Dean Island, AR .............. Cedar Point-Densford, TN ..... Chute of Island 35, TN....... Lookout Bar, TN........... Lookout, TN ................. Sunrise Towhead, TN........ Lower Bullerton, AR........ Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN .............. Osceola, AR .................. AOsshcepoolrat, -KAeRy e.s. .P..o.in..t,. T..N.. ........... Kate Aubrey, TN........... Island 26, TN ................ Bend of Island 25, TN........ Barfield, AR .................. Obion-Tamm, TN........... Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN .... Heloise, TN .................. Island 18, MO ................ Linwood Bend, TN.......... Blaker Towhead, TN........ Bells Point, MO .............. Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .... Island 15, TN ................ Hathaway Landing, TN ....... Robinson Bayou, MO........... Fritz Landing, TN.......... Lee Towhead, MO.......... Bend of Island 14, TN........ Above Lee Towhead, TN ....... Little Cypress, MO.......... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN .... Linda, MO ................... Below Toney's Towhead, TN ... Toney's Towhead, KY-TN ..... New Madrid Bend, MO....... Kentucky Point, KY......... New Madrid Bar, KY........ 750 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 826 831 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 869 876 879 882 886 887 888 RL RL RRRRR RRRL RRL RL RL RLL RRLLRLLLL RL RLL RL R 2,770 70 5,341 New Madrid, MO........... La Forge, MO ................ SlTouNg-hK LYa n.d..in.g.. N..e.c.k.,......... Winchester Towhead, MO ..... Island 9, KY-TN .............. Milton Bell, MO............ Chute of Island 8, KY........ Bend of Island 8, MO........ Island 8, KY ................. Hickman-Reelfoot, KY....... Beckwith Bend, MO......... Williams, KY ................ Wolf Island, KY............ Columbus, KY............. Belmont, MO ................. Island 3 and 4, KY.......... Campbell, KY ................ Pritchard, MO............. Mayfield Creek, KY......... Wickliffe, KY ................ Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River),... Total revetment, Memphis District Mississippi River........ Dikes: Henrico, AR ................. Below Knowlton, AR........ Island 67, MS ................ Below Ludlow, AR.......... Sunflower, AR................ Island 64, AR ................ Island 62, AR.............. Island 63 Bar, MS.......... Island 63, MS ................ Kangaroo Point, AR......... Friars Point, MS........... Montezuma Bar, MS........ Montezuma Towhead, AR ..... Prairie Point, AR........... Flower Lake, MS........... St. Francis Towhead, MS ...... Below Walnut Bend, AR ....... Bordeaux Point, MS......... Peters, AR ................... Commerce, MS ............... Basket Bar, AR .............. Buck Island, MS .............. Porter Lake, AR .............. Pickett, M S .................. Seyppel, AR .................. Cat Island, AR............. Coahoma, TN ................ Armstrong, AR-TN......... 1C+ o 889 892 899 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 949 953 958 R R L R L R L RRL RL RL R RL RL L R 1,700 16,000 (3.03 Miles) 350 3,047 1,476 (7) 1,159 1,673 3,082 2,105 520 21,067 47,435 (5) 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 671 676 681 693 694 696 700 701 704 706 710 718 720 R RL RL RRL L RLL RR LL RL RL RL RL RR L R 4,6 1,600 6,790 1,280 00 - (7) - (7) - g00 - 300 - 300 - 5,559 22,380 37,5207 5,540 33,5854 14,375 12,620 9,800 13,175 43,359 14,588 10,015 19,205 3,825 5,785 19,970 6,865 15,045 8,935 8,455 26,152 1,854,455 (351.22 Miles) (6) 6,310 10,233 4,320 5,040 5,520 7,330 23,180 2,600 5,640 5,730 6,870 12,430 3,450 10,391 11,060 3,380 6,420 4,920 7,830 7,300 5,060 4,705 17,480 7,180 12,250 15,590 4,640 18,690 0 ! 0 0 1,738 7,174 13,857 9,198 18,010 9,550 7,555 20,190 29,190 2,9902 5,005 14,615 28,350 30,808 1,3503 5,823 44,232 2,500 15,690 30;630 46,070 51,321 26,984 12,935 22,170 14,850 17,087 5,420 25,600 3,630 1,000 22,630 15,670 8,470 12,050 4,943 34,090 41,058 11,950 20,895 6,200 30,348 7,960 16,825 Ct2 Ct2 C12 z - c L C r TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) OpeCr oatnisotnrus cTtihoins FY Nonop- Opera- Constructionerative tive Above New Work Reinforcement Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This Location of R sion Lap Mainte- FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear nance (Linear (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Dikes: Dismal Point, AR........... Hopefield Point, AR......... Robinson Crusoe, TN........ Loosahatchie Bar, TN........ Above Loosahatchie, TN ....... Redman Point, AR.......... Randolph Point, TN......... Poker Point, AR............ Corona Bar, TN-AR......... Densford, TN ................ Cedar Point, TN............ Below Richardson Landing, T N ........................ Lookout, TN-AR .............. Plum Point, TN .............. Lake Neark, AR .............. Kate Aubrey, TN ............. Keyes Point, TN............ Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ...... Forked Deer, TN........... Island 25, AR ................ Nebraska Point, TN......... Below Tamm Bend, TN ....... Wrights Point, AR.......... Island 21, Chute, TN......... Head of Island 21, TN........ Island 20, MO-TN.......... Island 18, TN.............. Tennemo,.TN ................ Blaker Towhead, TN........ Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, M O.................... Sandy Hook, TN .............. Island 15, TN ................. Robinson Bayou, MO........ Hathaway, TN............. Island 15 Neck, TN......... Above Lee Towhead, TN ....... Below Cherokee, TN......... Stewart Towhead, MO....... Ruddles Point, MO.......... 724 736 738 739 742 743 747 748 755 757 759 767 771 784 786 791 791 795 798 804 808 813 820 824 828 831 837 842 843 844 850 851 853 854 854 859 866 871 874 RRRRL RL RRLL L RL RRL RL RLL RLL RL LL RRLRLLLL RR 490 500 1,100 1,350 715 1,760 1,500 1,225 1,150 600 41,,090000 200 800 1,200 1,400 25,510 1,330 21,9391 3,950 8,990 7,750 16,740 8,050 8,430 7,780 2,890 5,950 5,538 9,695 2,5459 11,270 19,775 17,330 8,550 5,450 12,149 8,300 32,635 3,170 5,460 18,139 8,670 4,390 4,070 25,877 2,350 7,510 9,890 26,750 21,100 1,300 6,230 18,290 8,130 i Island11, MO . ............ Kentucky Point, KY......... Morrison Towhead, MO....... Hotchkiss Bend, MO........ Below Island 9, TN......... Donaldson Point, MO........ Island 9, KY ................. Moore Island, KY-MO....... Above Williams, KY........ Campbell, KY ................ Pritchard, MO............. Island 1, KY ................. Total dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River........ 882 887 890 895 901 905 906 929 930 942 944 948 RL RRL RLRLLRL 1,600 (0.3 Miles) 8,070 600 600 700 150 4,039 11,550 1,070 6,583 18,859 8,320 7,0106 4,685 1,1508 2,610 9,390 15,260 27,440 749,947 (142.04 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Lumber mattress revetment. 3. Rock Groins. 4. Stone in pile dike. 5. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 6. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 7. Changed to correct previous errors. 0 0 pC tTj 0 OE 0 �x 0 OI Y m~ aI C,, 0 C0 z TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- Authorized PlIanc e Total System Com- ystem pte Thru When Built plete When Built for This This This Comrn- This This Comr- This This System FY FY FY pleted1 FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District........ (16.8) (16.8) Levees ............................ 15.5 15.5 Old River structures and levees ..... 1.3 1.3 Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ..... (126.3) (126.3) Levees ............................ 118.7 118.7 Morganza structure and levee ...... 0.8 0.8 Morganza forebay levee............ 6.7 6.7 Port Allen lock .................... 0.1 0.1 Lafourche Basin Levee District Levees 61.7 61.7 Plaquemines West Levee District Levees 37.9 37.9 Buras Levee District ................ (34.1) (34.1) Levees ............................ 34.0 34.0 Empire lock ...................... 0.1 0.1 Baton Rouge front levees............. (2.1) (2.1) Pontchartrain Levee District ......... (124.9) (124.9) Levees ............................ 110.8 110.8 Bonnet Carrc guide levees. ......... 11.3 11.3 Bonnet Carre forebay levee......... 1.3 1.3 Bonnet Carre structure............ 1.5 1.5 East Jefferson Levee District Levees . 11.6 11.6 West Jefferson Levee District......... (20.0) (20.0) Levees ............................ 19.8 19.8 Floodwalls ........................ 0.1 0.1 Harvey Canal Lock................. 0.1 0.1 Orleans Levee District ............... (27.2) (27.2) Left descending, east bank........... (13.3) (13.3) Levees............................. 4.6 4.6 Floodwalls ......................... 8.6 8.6 IHNC lock......................... 0.1 0.1 Right descending, west bank......... (13.9) (13.9) Levees .............................. 13.8 13.8 Algiers Canal lock................. 0.1 0.1 Lake Borgne Basin Levee District Levees 11.6 11.6 Grand Prairie Levee District Levees .. 37.4 37.4 Total Mississippi River.......... 511.6 511.6 (-) (10.7) 1.1 9.4 - 1.3 (-) (85.4) - 77.8 - 0.8 - 6.7 - 0.1 - 24.1 - 28.5 (-) (19.7) - 19.7 (-) (0.9) (-) (91.1) - 77.0 - 11.3 - 1.3 - 1.5 - 10.8 (-) (4.6) - 4.4 - 0.1 - 0.1 (-) (19.5) (-) (7.5) - 0.6 - 6.8 - 0.1 (-) (12.0) - 11.9 - 0.1 - 11.5 - 19.7 - 326.5 (-) (5.3) 5.3 0.1 (-) (-) (4.7) 4.7 (-) (-) (-) (-) 10.1 (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (1.1) (.15.5) - 15.5 (-) (118.7) - 118.7 0.1 61.7 - 37.9 (-) (34.0) - 34.0 (-) (2.1) (-) (110.8) - 110.8 - 11.6 (-) (19.9) - 19.8 - 0.1 (-) (18.4) (-) (4.6) - 4.6 (-) (13.8) - 13.8 - 11.6 - 37.4 1.2 479.6 Other Levees Included in Mainstem Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises .................. (148.4) (148.4) East bank Atchafalaya River....... 52.5 52.5 Bayou des Glaises.................. 7.9 7.9 West bank Atchafalaya River ....... 60.1 60.1 Simmesport Ring................. 1.6 1.6 Melville Ring ..................... 4.1 4.1 Krotz Springs Ring................. 1.7 1.7 Mansura Hills to Hamburg.......... 20.5 20.5 West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet...... (128.7) (128.7) Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal (56.5) (56.5) Morganza upper guide levee .......... (8.9) (8.9) East protection levee, Morganza to Cut- (-) (143.9) - 52.5 - 7.9 - 55.6 - 1.6 - 4.1 - 1.7 - 20.5 (7.8) (77.4) (-) (-) (9.6) (8.9) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (148.4) - 52.5 - 7.9 - 60.1 - 1.6 - 4.1 - 1.7 - 20.5 (-) (127.7) (-) (56.5) (-) (8.9) (-) (43.9) 20.2 12.0 11.7 (7.8) (76.4) (-) (-) (-) (8.9) 0II Dayou, Iciuuialg ilii s Ut Morganza lower guide levee........ Total Atchafalaya Basin....... Total-Main Stem Levees............ TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA ............... Item A'levees........... ........ Item B levees ....................... Item C levees ........................ Total.Tributary Levees in MR&T Project GRAND TOTAL .................. (106.7) (106.7) (6.3) (55.1) (-) (-) (-) (105.0) (6.3) (53.5) 449.2 449.2 14.1 294.9 - - - 446.5 14.1 182.7 960.8 960.8 14.1 621.4 10.1 - 1.2 926.1 14.1 662.3 (17.4) (17.4) (-) (17.4) (-) (-) (-) (17.4) (-) (17.4) 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 - - - 5.0 - 5.0 10.1 10.1 - 10.1 - - - 10.1 - 10.1 2.3 2.3 - 2.3 - - - 2.3 - 2.3 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 978.2 978.2 14.1 638.8 10.1 - 1.2 943.5 14.1 679.7 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. L!J 0 O m 0 L! 0 0 C 0 �x A 0 -a (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (15.5) 15.5 (118.7) 118.7 61.7 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 (2.1) (110.8) 110.8 11.6 (19.9) 19.8 0.1 (18.4) (4.6) 4.6 (13.8) 13.8 11.6 37.4 479.6 C12 C12 F1 C,, C,, Ma H v . " v w + -. .. . , , TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) Levees and Floodwalls (Miles) Location Authorized for System Total In Place This FY Built to Approved Grade and Section Total Thru This This FY FY2 Berms (Miles)1 In System When Completed3 Built This FY4 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) Com- ~lete his FY In System hen Completed Built This FY Total Cornm- J lete hru This FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees East bank in Mississippi ............ Greenville Harbor dikes ............ West bank in Arkansas ............ West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) .................. Total Mississippi River Levees..... Other Levees Included in Main Stem Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees .................. Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees ..... Arkansas River, South bank ....... Total Other Levees Included in M ain Stem ..................... Total-Main Stem Levees ......... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Arkansas River, North bank ........ Red River Backwater Levees ......... Yazoo River Basin .................. Headwater........................ Backwater ....................... Total Tributary Levess in MR&T Project GRAND TOTAL ...................... 178.35 7.8 75.6 178.3 7.8 75.6 - 109.1 - 7.8 2.5 50.1 158.9 51.7 114.9 49.3 168.4 75.4 168.4 75.4 198.7 198.7 - 67.1 88.7 - 69.4 197.8 - 1978 460.4 460.4 2.5 234.1 299.3 - 233.6 442.5 - 442.5 (59.2) (59.2) (.1) (59.2) (-) (-) (-) (59.2) (-) (33.6) 59.2 59.2 .1 59.2 - - - 59.2 - 33.6 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 144.6 144.6 - 144.6 24.7 - 24.7 143.3 - 114.7 605.0 605.0 2.4 378.7 324.0 - 258.3 585.8 557.2 61.57 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 4.0 47.4 263.6 160.5 - 141.58 - - - 249.0 - 145.9 (721.3) (356.5) (15.7) (152.4) - - - (717.3) - (320.5) 624.76 305.6 15.7 152.4 - - - 620.7 (-) 281.5 96.6 50.9 - 0.0 - - - 96.6 - 39.0 1,046.4 573.2 15.7 350.1 8.3 - 8.3 1,354.4 4.0 513.8 1,651.4 1,178.2 18.1 728.8 332.3 - 266.6 1,940.2 4.0 1,071.0 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Based on refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line. 5. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 6. Includes 36.9 miles of local protection works 61.3 miles along Whittington Auxiliary Channel; 210 miles in Upper Yazoo Projects; 156.1 miles along main stem; and 160.4 miles on tributaries. 7. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 8. Reflects results of 1985 flowline reanalysis. 0a n HT 0 0x 0 0 OT 0o _I _ __ _ _ _~ _ __ - -- TABLE '42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- In Total System Comrn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Mounds, IL ......................... Mound City, IL ..................... Cairo Drainage District ............. City of Cairo ........................ Little River Drainage District ........ Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO ................. Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO ............. St. Johns Leveee and Drainage District .................. St. Francis Levee District of MO ...... City of Hickman, KY................ Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton County, KY ................. Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ................ Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN ...................... Lake Count Levee and Drainage District .................. Dyer Count Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ............. Tipton-Obion levee extension ........ St. Francis Levee District of AR ...... Helena Improvement District No. 1 ... Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 ...... Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR ................ Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Desha County, AR .................. Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Desha County, AR ........ Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee D istrict ............................ 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 13.8 26.0 26.0 59.03 55.7 1.4 58.7 55.7 1.4 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.2 55.7 1.4 16.7 16.7 4.5 4.5 5.2 5.2 15.9 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 5.3 23.9 21.3 156.7 5.3 23.9 0.5 2.5 4.6 4.4 4.9 4.2 12.9 43.0 23.0 .0 .5 - 1.7 - 2.0 1.1 4.9 4.9 26.0 12.0 16.74 15.5 11.4 4.54 5.24 15.9 - 21.3 - 153.24 - 5.3 - 23.9 20.5 20.5 18.1 20.5 18.1 6.6 6.6 0.6 9.1 1.3 94.6 2.4 18.8 11.5 0.3 4.5 5.2 4.5 15.9 - 0.4 1.5 81.8 - 2.4 - 18.8 11.5 18.14 12.9 9.2 16.5 6.6 4 93.6 93.6 - 93.6 87.3 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 46.9 55.1 0.5 16.3 3.6 1.1 8.5 3.5 19.3 - CI, 13.8 26.0 46.1 C 55.1 - c 16.3 4.3 5.2 z 15.9 21.3 156.7 4.2 23.9 20.5 16.5 21.3 6.5 156.7 4.7 23.9 20.5 87.3 3.6 -93.6 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)1 Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Corn- In Total System Com- S stem lete Authorized Place Thru When Built lete hen Built hru for This This This Com- This his Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY Mississippi River Levees (continued) Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., KY ..................... 4.4 4.4 - 4.44 - - - 4.4 - 4.4 Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee ...................... 35.3 35.3 - 35.3 35.3 - - 35.3 - 35.3 Total Mississippi River ........... 636.3 629.5 - 625.5 389.3 2.6 253.6 604.1 - 595.1 TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES ..... 636.3 629.5 - 625.5 389.3 2.6 253.6 604.1 - 595.1 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT St. Francis River . .................... (308.2) (302.9) - (302.9) - - - (301.0) (7.0) (127.5) East bank ........................... 159.5 156.2 - 156.2 - - - 156.7 7.0 88.7 West bank ........................ 148.7 146.7 - 146.7 - - - 144.3 - 38.8 Little River .......................... (130.1) (130.1) - (130.1) - - - (128.9) - East (67.5) bank (left) ..................... 40.7 40.7 - 40.7 - - - 40.7 - 13.1 West bank ......................... 35.1 35.1 - 35.1 - - - 35.1 - 23.7 Elk Chute ........................... 39.9 39.9 - 39.9 - - - 39.7 - 17.3 West Basin and middle valley ........ 14.4 14.4 - 14.4 - - - 13.4 - 13.4 Lower White River .................. (95.6) (85.9) - (84.1) - - - (88.0) - (75.0) White River backwater levee .......... 40.2 40.2 - 40.2 - - - 38.8 - 38.8 Augusta to Clarendon ............... . 49.2 39.5 - 39.5 - - - 49.2 - 36.2 Clarendon levee ..................... 6.2 6.2 - 4.4 ...... Memphis Harbor ..................... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .................... 544.4 529.4 - 527.6 7.0 - 1.5 528.4 7.0 355.5 GRAND TOTAL ...................... 1,180.7 1,158.9 - 1,153.1 396.3 2.6 255.1 1,387.6 7.0 951.6 int 0 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Shown complete. Authority MSRC-ED-TL (MD 19 Mar. 80) 1st Ind. 21 Apr. 80. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0I CD, 0 A PC 4C O O z A TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1987) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- In Total System Comrn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Con- This This Corn- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River New Orleans District, Table 42-K ..... 511.6 511.6 Vicksburg District, Table 42-L ....... 460.4 460.4 Memphis District, Table 42-M ........ 636.3 629.5 Total Mississippi River ......... Other Levees Included in Main Stem Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-NOD .................. Lower Red River- South Bank-VXD ................ Arkansas River-South Bank-VXD.... Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem ................... Total Main Stem Levees ......... TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,-NOD ........ Yazoo River Basin-VXD ............. Arkansas River-North Bank-VXD ..... Red River Backwater-VXD .......... St. Francis River-MD ................ Little River-MD ..................... Lower White River-MD .............. Memphis Harbor-MD ................ Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .................... - 326.5 10.1 2.5 234.1 299.3 - 625.5 389.3 (-) 1.2 479.6 2.3 233.6 442.5 2.6 253.6 604.1 - 479.6 - 442.5 - 595.1 1,608.3 1,601.5 2.5 1,186.1 698.7 4.9 488.4 1,526.2 - 1,517.2 449.2 449.2 14.1 294.9 - - - 446.5 14.1 182.7 59.2 59.2 - 59.2 - - - 59.2 - 33.6 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 593.8 593.8 14.1 439.5 24.7 - 24.7 589.8 14.1 297.4 n 2,202.1 2,195.3 16.6 1,625.6 723.4 4.9 513.1 2,116.0 14.1 1,814.6 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 721.3 356.5 15.7 152.4 - - - 717.3 - 320.5 4 61.5 56.2 - 141.5 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 263.6 160.5 2.8 141.5 - - - 249.0 4.0 145.9 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 7.0 127.5 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 - 67.5 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 1,608.2 1,120.0 18.5 895.1 15.3 - 9.8 1,559.5 11.0 811.7 Grand Total in Project............3,810.3 3,315.3 35.1 2,520.7 738.7 4.9 522.9 3,675.5 25.1 2,626.3 Grand Total in Project ........... . . 3,810.3 3,315.3 35.1 2,2. 737 4.9 22.9 3,65.5 5.1 2,626.3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Corn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) Bayou des Glaise diversion channel ................ 1938 6.0 - 6.0 100 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie .............. 1946 92.6 - 63.4 75 Charenton drainage and navigation canal .......... 1939 6.3 - 6.3 100 Wax Lake Outlet ................................. 1938 15.7 - 15.7 100 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway ..................... 1933 244.2 - 186.4 76 Morganza Floodway ............................. 1941 3.3 - 3.3 100 Old River outflow channel ........................ 1956 8.3 - 8.3 100 Old River inflow channel ......................... 1960 2.3 - 2.3 100 Old River lock approach channels .................. 1961 2.2 - 2.2 100 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) .............. 1958 2.5 - 2.5 100 Eastern Rapides-S.C. Avoyelles .................... - 83.5 - - Teche-Vermillion Water Supply ................... . - 6.3 - 6.3 100 42-52 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Comn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River .............................. 1947 199.1 - 199.1 100 Quiver River ..................................... 1947 69.6 - 69.6 100 Deer Creek ....................................... 1947 7.0 - 7.0 100 Steele Bayou ..................................... 1947 54.9 - 54.9 100 Steele Bayou' .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 71.2 - 63.0 70 Main Canal ...................................... 1959 21.1 - 21.1 100 M ain Canal2 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 22.2 - - - Black Bayou ...................................... - 36.5 - - - Big Sunflower River tributaries ................... 1957 227.2 - 227.2 100 Quiver River tributaries .......................... 1960 35.4 - 35.4 100 YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ................................. 1960 39.9 - 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project ............................. 1976 179.0 - 55.7 31 Coldwater River ................................. 1941 54.6 - 54.6 100 Arkabutla Canal .................................. 1948 0.4 - 0.4 100 Tallahatchie Canal ............................... 1940 74.8 - 73.5 85 Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ..................... 1939 48.0 - 48.0 100 Greenwood protection works ...................... 1971 2.9 - 2.9 100 Yacona River .................................... 1952 1.8 - 1.8 100 Bobo Bayou ....................................... 1944 16.1 - 16.1 100 Cassidy Bayou ................................... 1934 69.0 - 69.0 100 Cassidy Bayou 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 26.0 - - - Bear Creek Diversion ............................ - 4.8 - - - Lake Cormorant ................................. - 20.9 - - - Hurricane Bayou ................................ - 2.5 - - - Opossum Bayou ................................... - 20.8 - - - Abaica Creek .................................... - 7.7 - - - Chicopa Creek ................................... - 7.0 - - - Bear Creek ...................................... - 23.3 - - - Rocky Bayou .................................... - 7.8 - - - W hiteoak Bayou ................................. - 55.9 - - - Miscellaneous ditches ............................. - 12.3 - - - Yalobusha River ................................. 1939 46.0 - 46.0 100 Yazoo River ..................................... 1940 160.2 - 160.2 100 Whittington Auxiliary Channel .................... 1956 30.8 - 30.8 100 Tchula Lake ...................................... 1964 26.4 - 26.4 100 David-Burrell Bayou ............................. 1957 40.4 - 40.4 100 McKinney Bayou ................................ 1960 3.5 - 3.5 100 Hillside Floodway ............................... 1964 11.0 - 11.0 100 Yazoo City protection works ...................... 1953 1.6 - 1.6 100 -Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous......................... 1975 30.2 - 15.1 50 Alligator-Catfish Bayou .......................... 1973 8.3 - 8.2 99 Pelucia Creek ..................................... 1975 8.3 0.8 6.6 80 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ................................. 1949 45.3 - 45.3 100 Bayou Lafourche4,7 ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 - 4.4 10 Big & Colewa Creeks ............................. 1947 81.4 - 81.4 100 42-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1987) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR- continued Bayou Lafourche ................................ Bayou Lafourche4 ,7 ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Big & Colewa Creeks ............................ Big & Colewa Creeks5,7 ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tensas River .................................... Tensas River 6 ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boeuf River, AR and LA .......................... Fleschmans Bayou, AR .......................... Caney Bayou, AR ................................ Canal 18, AR .................................... Big Bayou, AR ................................... Black Pond Slough, AR ............................ Bayou Macon, AR and LA Rush Bayou, AR ................................. Canal 19, AR ...................................... Canal 43, AR .................................... Canal 81, AR .................................... Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou Vidal Cutoff ....... Kirsch Lake Canal ............................... Canal 19 Extension .............................. Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ...................... M ill Bayou ...................................... RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant ................... Six M ile Bayou, LA .............................. GRAND PRAIRIE, AR .......................... BAYOU METO, AR ............................. 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 miles of channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 additional miles of channel to the project. 7. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district. 42-54 1949 1972 1947 1965 1947 1968 1953 1963 1964 1963 1952 1962 1959 1964 1957 1956 1957 1964 1955 1976 45.3 4.4 81.4 51.5 96.5 61.0 103.9 6.6 7.4 10.3 33.3 14.3 150.8 6.7 50.2 34.5 32.7 9.4 2.5 4.8 45.3 43.0 81.4 86.8 96.5 165.0 103.9 6.6 7.4 10.3 33.3 14.3 150.8 6.7 50.2 34.5 32.7 17.1 9.3 9.4 2.5 4.8 6.9 1.5 338.1 164.9 100 10 100 60 100 37 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6.9 1.5 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1987) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Comn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO ........... 1952 9.6 - 9.5 100 ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO ........................ 1963 298.9 9.0 256.0 86 St. Francis River, MO and AR .................... 1953 617.1 22.3 412.3 67 West Memphis Drainage, AR ..................... 1951 19.8 - 19.8 100 Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR ................... 1960 28.0 - 28.0 100 Tyronza River, AR ............................... 1939 12.7 - 12.7 100 L'Anguille River, AR ............................ (1) 95.0 - - LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR ............................ 1972 231.5 - 7.2 3 Big Creek and tributaries, AR ..................... (1) 103.8 - - WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY ................................. (1) 41.7 - - WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas)(1946 Act) ................... 1952 34.3 - 34.3 100 Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) .................................. (1) 9.3 - - Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ....................................... 1974 15.8 - 3.0 19 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ...................... 1955 19.7 - 19.7 100 MS River Below Cape Girardeau; West TN tributaries. (1948 Act) ...................... 1961 225.0 - 92.5 40 Wolf River and tributaries, TN .................... 1960 25.5 - 25.5 100 1. Not started. 42-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-R COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake Subtotal Memphis District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees St. Francis Basin Lower White River Cache Basin, Ark. Channel improvement West Tennessee tributaries West Kentucky tributaries Inspection of completed works Mapping Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-KY Mud Lake, TN Eight Mile Creek Devalls Creek Pumping Station Subtotal Vicksburg District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Lower Arkansas River Tensas Basin Yazoo Basin Channel improvement Mapping Inspection of completed works Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Lower Red River-South Bank Red River Levee Dam Safety Assurances 5,766,613 8,598,497 284,349 16,872,802 2,355,882 247,461 5,402 11,006 404,448 34,546,460 2,551,340 7,081,199 24,939,211 20,771,671 12,300 21,742 1,782,812 $ - -- 4,001,211 4,001,221 2,516,956 3,583,241 487,207 25,278,967 630,259 204,356 221,023 32,922,009 684,380 950,446 3,181,680 19,875,928 11,831,263 311,623 179,140 66,683 Subtotal New Orleans District: General investigations Advance engineering and design Mississippi River levees Old River Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System Channel improvement Teche-Vermilion Basin water supply Inspection of completed works Mapping Subtotal Total Federal Funds 57,160,275 37,081,143 2,042,333 -- -- 1,570,670 9,477,970 4,381,623 -- 8,202,823 13,757,728 -- 109,096 98,159 -- 23,203,249 6,171,737 -- 283,323 -- -- 35,907,722 11,582,228 -- -- 242,637 -- -- 171,396 -- 77,184,183 36,405,508 1,570,670 168,890,918 110,409,871 6,296,443 42-56 2,683,440 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,683,440 2,042,333 -- ______1_1________1________~~ ___ TABLE 42-R (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Item Construction Maintenance Other CONTRIBUTED FUNDS New Orleans District: Old River -- 70,032 -- Atchafalaya Basin 3,303 (205) -- Mississippi River Levees 118,000 -- -- Channel Improvement -- 12,826 Total Contributed Funds 121,303 69,827 -- Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 169,012,221 110,479,698 6,296,443 42-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-S STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1987 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1987 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, Ark. Contraction works DeValls Bluff, Ark. Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: BoeufBasin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carr6 Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & 0. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 169,352 169,352 -- 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,055 39,546,055 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17,384,030 17,384,030 -- 699,185 699,185 -- 3,375,492 3,375,492 -- 14,212,198 14,212,198 -- 1,258,916 1,258,916 -- 1,112,967 1,112,967 -- 540,838 540,838 -- 2,701,566 2,701,566 -- 10,098,817 10,098,817 -- 35,992,117 35,992,117 -- 5,513,110 5,513,110 -- 387,917 387,917 -- 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 -- 42-58 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1987 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1987 UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Eight Mile Creek Subtotal Vicksburg Distict: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, etc. Red River Backwater: Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas, Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 169,053,354 98,000 333,714,307 57,249,400 116,945,000 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 197,728,982 965,429 48,388,292 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,501 108,651 38,056,900 8,250,000 1,440,000 107,000 865,000 1,003,225,720 199,139,990 7,049,414 15,676,286 903,385,400 40,919,200 54,022,446 52,781,900 438,400 39,800,000 363,701,065 23,549,260 84,997,040 958,175 26,523,300 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,355,100 11,543,000 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 169,024,042 98,000 333,653,009 57,249,400 115,896,560 439,434 7,877,053 9,019,908 197,482,385 965,429 48,356,251 496,715 1,779,846 10,624,501 108,651 36,906,187 8,214,183 1,341,407 91,175 827,874 1,000,452,011 196,263,793 7,049,414 15,676,286 89,327,526 40,817,070 53,807,982 52,471,678 253,066 39,800,000 363,391,547 23,549,260 84,103,700 958,175 26,505,111 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,353,833 11,543,000 42-59 29,312 61,298 1,048,440 17,947 246,597 32,042 1,150,713 35,817 98,593 15,825 37,126 2,773,709 2,876,197 1,057,874 102,130 214,464 310,222 185,334 309,518 893,340 18,189 1,267 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1987 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1987 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Belzoni Yazoo City Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin-Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries-Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater (Except Muddy Bayou) Muddy Bayou Steambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Demonstration Erosion Control Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion Basin Water Supply Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Channel improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Mississippi Delta Region Atachafalaya Basin: Atachafalaya Basin Floodway Atachafalaya River Navigation Atachafalaya Basin Floodway System Old River Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 38,866,000 32,898,400 63,558,506 65,774,610 612,484 24,337,100 67,147,600 5,145,200 14,767,000 19,471,900 3,740,000 1,443,925,110 33,806,000 5,029,008 35,945,266 565,363,117 18,056,600 200,680 217,549,000 100,000 561,619,537 303,463 561,000 290,274,000 1,728,807,671 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 35,986,476 30,474,546 54,100,065 65,139,342 612,484 23,937,426 64,917,689 5,145,200 14,767,000 15,349,052 1,792,846 1,413,859,901 33,806,000 5,007,796 35,945,266 564,620,721 18,056,600 200,680 216,167,343 552,119,433 303,463 444,102 289,109,264 1,715,780,668 2,879,524 2,423,854 9,458,440 635,268 399,674 2,229,911 4,122,848 1,947,154 30,065,208 21,212 742,396 1,381,657 100,000 9,500,104 116,898 1,164,736 13,027,003 4,178,435,942 4,132,570,023 45,865,920 150,000 150,000 -- 30,000 30,000 - 420,000 420,000 -- 365,000 364,339 -- 65,000 65,000 -- 175,000 175,000 -- 350,000 350,000 -- 540,000 540,000 -- 2,095,000 2,095,000 -- 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 200,000 -- 229,700 229,700 -- 42-60 -- MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENT OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1987 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1987 New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region 69,753 69,753 -- Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes 965,247 965,247 -- Subtotal 2,144,000 2,144,000 -- TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 4,468,700 4,468,700 -- TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 4,348,337,142 4,302,471,222 45,865,920 RECREATION FACILITIES-COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Program Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO 2,405,300 2,404,890 410 Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing 203,286 203,286 -- Subtotal 2,608,586 2,608,176 410 Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- Enid Lake 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- Arkabutla Lake 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- Grenada Lake 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- Subtotal 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- Total Eight-Year Program Funds 10,281,695 10,281,285 410 Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies 4,358,618,837 4,312,752,917 45,865,920 Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 1,699,830,855 1,694,762,049 5,068,806 Total rehabilitation 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 66,231,881 64,525,573 1,706,309 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 6,170,694,873 6,118,053,839 52,641,035 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1986 6,202,763,782 6,150,122,747 52,641,035 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been exluded from this report. 42-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 42-T STATEMENTS OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1986 Engineer District St. Louis Memphis Vicksburg New Orleans Total Expenditures $ 70,448,732 262,982,832 130,201,691 561,325,260 $1,024,958,515 42-62 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1 Total Project Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep. 30, 1987 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Allotted 6,805,000 4,510,000 6,809,000 5,890,000 66,231,8812 (Regular Funds)1 Cost 5,722,645 5,499,308 5,955,532 6,296,443 64,525,572 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Allotted 199,330,000 216,083,000 194,438,000 192,260,000 4,178,435,942 Cost 265,108,622 224,369,411 196,535,725 168,890,918 4,132,570,023 Maintenance Allotted 94,345,000 102,554,000 100,480,000 112,403,000 1,750,209,406 Cost 111,777,503 104,920,222 102,958,345 110,409,871 1,535,300,151 Rehabilitations Allotted -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Cost -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Allotted -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,922 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 46,311 315,294 20,000 124,692 9,705,463 Cost 56,321 63,875 352,749 121,303 9,680,181 Maintenance Contributed 128,923 279,972 169,279 101,108 2,436,122 Cost 161,616 242,576 139,621 69,827 2,240,151 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1987): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: $4,347,917,370 Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: 10,281,695 Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 4,995,215 Transferred to revolving fund: 24,944,460 Impounded savings: 1,593,097 $4,389,731,837 Flood control emergencies: Net total allotted: 14,885,922 Impounded savings: 14,378 14,900,300 Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: 66,231,881 Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1987 1,699,831,855 1,766,063,736 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): 32,068,909 Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: 6,202,763,782 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1987 6,171,216,632 Transferred to revolving fund: 24,944,460 Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 4,995,215 Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 1,607,475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1987: 6,202,763,782 Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 84: $300,480,000; FY 85: $323,297,000; FY 86: $301,727,000; FY 87: $310,553,000. 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 78, teletype. 42-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE .42-V MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3112) Item and CWIS Number SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Atchafalaya Basin Water & Land Res - 12026 Subtotal Vicksburg District Boeuf-Tensas Basin, AR & LA-81273 Larto Lake-Saline Lake, LA - 12065 Yazoo River Basin,:MS - 12074 Subtotal Memphis District Bayou du Chien - 33008 Eastern AR Reg-Comprehensive Study - 81266 Mayfield Creek- 10850 Reelfoot Lake, TN - 00086 St. Francis River Below Wappapello - 22000 Tiptonville, TN - 12246 Tuscumbia River Study - 12408 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 110) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) Vicksburg District Memphis District TOTAL (Category 120) SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-AUTH STUDIES (Category 130) Flood Damage Prevention 132) Vicksburg District MS River'East Bank Natchez - 76022 TOTAL (Category 130) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 140) Flood Control Projects (142) New Orleans District MS-LA Estuarine Area ADVCPE - 12193 Vicksburg District Bushley Bayou Area, LA - 75226 Memphis District St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy - 77005 Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS - 12417 Horn Lake Creek & Tribs/Cowpen Creek - 81282 TOTAL (Category 140) ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) New Orleans District Eastern Rapides & S.C. Avoyelles Parishes - 75031 Mississippi Delta Region - 23270 Subtotal Federal Cost Totals by FY 87 Categories ($) ($) 51,596 51,596 1,059,779 137,446 560,006 1,757,231 181,136 300,773 462 170,361 56,602 40,000 347,449 1,096,783 2,905,610 217,685 72,594 290,279 385 385 753,227 67,032 132,771 710,030 185,738 185,738 1,848,798 28,568 737,279 765,847 42-64 _ ~I _ __ _ I __I__ I II I I_IL~- ~L ~ I----Y -~ - __U-U MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-V (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 87 Categories Memphis District Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY - 77009 -0- L'Anguille River Basin - 00082 485,524 Subtotal 485,524 TOTAL (Category 160) 1,251,371 GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 6,296,443 42-65 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Authoriy. Public Law 84-99, as amended, (Flood Control and Costal Emergencies) provides authority for the Chief of Engineers to undertake disaster preparedness activities, flood fighting and rescue work, rehabilitation of flood control works damaged or destroyed by flood, protection or repair of Federally authorized shore protective works threatened or damaged by coastal storm, provision of emergency drinking water, and drought assistance. Activities. FY 1987 disaster preparedness activities include the review and update of existing emergency response plans; development of required new plans; training of response personnel exercises to test plans, personnel and training procurement and maintenance of critical supplies and requirements not readily available during initial response phase; maintenance and required upgrade of emergency operations centers; coordination with Federal, State and local response agencies and other public entitites; and overall management of the preparedness program. The year started with widespread major flooding due to very heavy rains which began in late September over the northern plains and upper Midwest and moved southward in early October. The Corps of Engineers responded to requests for assistance in Montana, Nebraska, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. In early October, the remnants of Hurricane Paine moved out of Mexico northeastward into the Midwest. The result of the additional heavy rains was record flooding in parts of Oklahoma, Kansas, and Missouri. Numerous Corps of Engineers dams reached record levels in their pools. Corps districts across this large area provided technical assistance, flood fight materials, and in some instances undertook flood fights to supplement state and local efforts. The dams in conjunction with downstream flood control projects and emergency operations prevented over a billion dollars in damages. During this period, over 100 non-Federal levees were either overtopped of ailed. The effort to repair those eligible projects continued through the remainder of the year. A unique result of this record flooding occurred when the lower Missouri River overtopped its north bank, breached a railroad embankment, and took a shortcut to the Mississippi River several miles north of St. Louis. As the flood waters receded, the river returned to its normal channel. New monthly maximum reocrds continued to be established on the middle Great Lakes during the early part of the fiscal year and the Corps of Engineers continued efforts to identify and undertake appropriate large temporary flood protective works. In October, a special Self-Help program was instituted. Materials, such as sandbags, sand, and plastic sheeting, were provided local interests to implement small temporary flood protective works. Over $4 million was expended on this program. Drier conditions finally began to spread across the Great Lakes and no new records were established after February. By the end of September, the lakes were from one and one-half to two and one-half feet below their monthly maximum records. In December, Typhoon Kim devastated parts of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariannas, particularly the islands of Saipan and Tinian. The Corps of Engineers Pacific Ocean Division provided extensive support to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recovery efforts. In January, Tropical Cyclone Tusi hit the islands of American Samoa requiring an extension of the support to FEMA to include these Pacific islands. In early April, major flooding developed across New England. Record levels occurred at 25 of the 35 Corps of Engineers lakes in the New England Division. The same series of storms resulted in moderate flooding of urban areas in New York and New Jersey. Corps emergency assistance was limited to technical advice and flood fight supplies. Flooding occurred in many other areas across the country during the year. There was localized urban flooding in the Lower Mississippi River Valley, the Southeast, and the Northeast in February and March. Widespread lowland flooding developed across most of the central plains states during this same period. Other flood situations that developed included: localized flooding in Puerto Rico in April due to a tropical depression; widespread flooding along major rivers in Virginia in mid-April and again in September; widespread small streat flooding in southeast Nebraska, southwest Iowa, and northwest MIssouri at the end of May and the end of August; localized flooding in Ohio, Indiana, and Alabama in early July; localized urban flooding in south MIssissippi, south Alabama, and the Florida panhandle in August; and, widespread urban flash flooding in Chicago and the surrounding areas in mid-August. The extent of Corps assistance varied as a result of each of these flood situations. STATUS OF THE PL 84-99 EMERGENCY FUND Unallocated Balance as of 30 Sep 86... FY 1987 Appropriation .............. Revocation FY 1987 ................ $ 41,577,252 10,000,000 8,832,508 Totasl Funds Available .............. $ 60,409,760 Allocations Disaster Preparedness ............ . Emergency Operations ............. Rehabilitation .................... Advance Measures ................ Hazard Mitigation ................ $ 10,475,270 3,120,245 17,912,735 10,379,204 41,707 Unallocated Balance as of 30 Sep 87... $ 18,480,599 43-1 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION This Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ..................... 44-1 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control).......................... 44-2 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA........ 44-2 Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA ................... 44-3 Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provides for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners are fully investigated Tables Table 44-A Table 44-B Table 44-C Page Cost and Financial Statement ..................... 44-5 Authorizing Legislation .................... 44-6 Sacramento River CA ...................... 44-7 by California Debris Commission and permits to operate are issued to those who provide satisfactory debrisrestraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Governmentconstructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners must bear all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 44-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of. $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. On March 1, 1984, Permit No. DACWO5-4-79-527 was renewed for another 5 years and will be effective until February 28, 1989. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105- eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1987, amounts to $1,230,393; these funds are paid to California Debris Commission and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1987, amounts to $1,673,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $542,572, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at Englebright Dam at a fiscal year cost of $5,615. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debriscontrol structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATIONRESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysvilyule and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 44-2 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations included condition and operation studies by hired labor; and bank protection, Yuba River, various locations upstream from Marysville completed by contract, $2,218. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic yards are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 44-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non- Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1987 cost for the 2.4 miles of remedial levee work, Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109) is $7,475,000, of which $5,875,000 is Federal and $1,600,000 is non- Federal for lands, easements and rights-of-way, for a total project cost of $171,400,000. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Local interest costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Engineering continued. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement 44-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947,1948,1949, and 1951. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109). (See table 44-C for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1987.) 44-4 TABLE 44-A See Section i CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY 84 FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 Sep 30, 1987 Maint. n Text Project 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) Contributed Funds, her) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, CA (Federal Funds) Required Contributed unds) Contributed Funds, Other) 4. Sacramento River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 554,000 702,000 695,000 63 653,198 695,102 690,522 59 Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost MaAinptp.rop. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 24,000 10,066 14,000 11,282 24,000 3' 44,177 1 26,500 3 41,476 1 300,000 201,500 24 274,092 165,245 15 821,325 821,325 - 5,093,999' 2 - 5,093,9991 3 3,000 7,795,0434 3,316 7,703,3045 - 12,4206 - 12,4206 - 361,482 - 361,482 7,000 1,707,6567 5,778 1,678,8257 - 1,053,904 - 1,053,904 - 361,777 - 361,777 6,865 1,697,588 4,901 1,671,801 - 1,053,904 - 1,053,904 - 34,0008 - 34,0006 8,000 68,375,8359 9,929 68,225,6019 - 1,979,104 - 1,979,104 - 10,724,08510 - 10,724,08510 S9,68611 9,68611 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $447,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations. 3. Includes $447,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 costs. 4. Includes $6,618,962 from regular funds and $1,176,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 5. Includes $6,527,222 from regular costs and $1,176,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 6. Funds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 44-5 25,000 22,435 15,000 19,436 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 44-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 22, 1944 and May 17, 1950 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without 47th Cong., 1st sess.' injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit (Amendment of sec. 13, hydraulic mining without construction of impounding Act of Mar. 1, 1893.) 1 works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and trans- Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA ferred all authorities, powers, functions, and duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Additional levee construction and reconstruction, including H. Docs. 649. 78th Cong., levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, and multipurpose 2d sess., and 367, 81st reservoirs.2 Cong., 1st sess. Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Sacramento River from Chico Landing to Red Bluff, and 2d sess. local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing.2 Bank protection works at critical locations, Sacramento S. Doc. 103, 86th Cong., River.2 2d sess. 44-6 4. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 21. 74th Cong., 1st sess. CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 44-C SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $66,059,132 $1,979,104 $68,038,2361 Public Works 1,486,469 1,486,469 Total U.S. $67,545,601 $1,979,104 $69,524,705 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 5,104,333 Total All Funds $77,589,686 $1,988,790 $79,578,476 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 44-7 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and functions. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Director, Research and Development. COL Dwayne G. Lee, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. Dr. Robert W. Whalin, PE, is Technical Director. Dr. Dennis R. Smith is Assistant Technical Director. WES, the Corps of Engineers largest laboratory complex for research, testing, and development, consists of six technical laboratories: Hydraulics, Geotechnical, Structures, Environmental, Coastal Engineering Research Center, and Information Technology Laboratory. The Hydraulics Laboratory, the largest laboratory of its kind in the world, uses a wide range of working models and computer-based numerical models for research and analysis of dams, levees, river and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Laboratory conducts research in soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Laboratory uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and nonnuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and various construction materials with emphasis on concrete, especially the testing, repair, and preservation of existing concrete structures. The Environmental Laboratory researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environment. Research programs include Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, Environmental Impact, Wetlands, and the Natural Resources Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Laboratory range through waste management, environmental regulations, and military aspects of terrain and camouflage. The Coastal Engineering Research Center conceives, plans, and conducts research and data collection in coastal/ocean engineering and nearshore oceanography to: provide a better understanding of waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents; and provide scientific and engineering data and design criteria for materials as they apply to navigation improvements, flood storm protection, beach erosion control, recreation, and protection of structures in the coastal zone. The Information Technology Laboratory is responsible for all communications, mainframe computer functions for both technical and administrative applications, graphic presentations, and printed media at the station. WES Laboratories are engaged in research and engineering investigations in support of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research, develops state-of-the-art methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services. Subject to the approval of the Chief of Engineers, studies and investigations may be undertaken for agencies outside the Department of the Army. WES maintains an extensive scientific and engineering reference library to serve the specialized needs of the Corps of Engineers and issues publications of general interest; operates DoD Information Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, Soils Mechanics, and Coastal Engineering; and maintains the Corps of Engineers Engineering Computer Programs Library. During Fiscal Year 1987, 396 WES numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for WES, 14 information reports, 25 information exchange bulletins, 9 video reports, 14 technical manuals, and 10 various special purpose technical documents (conference reports, special study reports, etc.) for WES and other offices were printed and distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is, in general, initially financed by the Corps of Engineers Revolving Fund, with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1987 was $122,745,579 which included $32,429,900 performed by contract. Of the total program $62,276,678 was oriented toward the civil sector and $60,468,901 to military. The plant replacement and improvement program was $6,096,700 for this period. 45-1 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESSES (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearing house where engineers and port operators of the nations of the world exchange views and experiences on problems relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements. Its objective is broadly stated "to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation". In 1902, the United States began an annual appropriation for the support and maintenance of the Permanent International Commission of Congresses for Navigation and for payment of the actual expenses of properly accredited national delegates of the United States to meetings of the Congresses and Commissions. As a member nation to the Association, the U.S. Section pays an annual subvention of about $6,900 to the International Secretariat in Brussels, Belgium. The objective of the Association - to promote the progress of inland and maritime navigation - is met by holding International Congresses and publishing technical bulletins and other documents. The Congresses are held in various member countries, usually at fouryear intervals. The Association is supported principally by member governments, but membership also extends to corporations and to individuals. Member governments are represented at the Congresses and at meetings of the Permanent International Commission by delegates, the number of official delegates to be determined by the amount of the annual subvention paid by the government, but not to exceed ten in number. Corproate members may send one official representative to the Congresses. Currently, the Permanent International Commission has 39 countries represented. Individual membership is of two classes - Annual and Life - depending on the method of payment of dues. There are 1,495 annual international members, 552 life members, and 692 corporate members, for a total of 2,739 members. Membership of the U.S. Section on June 1, 1987 totaled 642, consisting of 106 life members, 438 individual members and 98 corporate members. The affairs of the Association are managed by the Permanent International Commission composed of delegates from the supporting governments. The National Commission constitutes the governing body of the U.S. Section and the U.S. Members of the Permanent International Commission. The Director of Civil Works, Office of the Chief of Engineers, US Army, and the Commander and Director, Water Resources Support Center, are the exofficio Chairman and Secretary, respectively, of the National Commission. The Secretary handles all administrative matters of the U.S. Section. During Fiscal Year 1987, National commissioners were: Major General Henry J. Hatch, Director of Civil Works, USACE, ex-officio Chairman; Colonel George R. Kleb, Commander and Director, Water Resources Support Center, ex-officio Secretary; Rear Admiral John Paul Jones, USN; Mr. John Pisani, MARAD; Mr. Jack E. Ravan, EPA; Dr. G. Edward Dickey, HQUSACE (confirmation pending); Mr. J. Ron Brinson, Port of New Orleans; Mr. John A. Downs, National Association of Dredging Contractors; Mr. James M. Goldston, Goldston Corporation; and Mr. Charles R. Roberts, Port of Oakland. One position on the U.S. Section National Commission was vacant. At the 1987 annual meeting of the PIC Lieutenant General E. R. Heiberg I, Chief of Engineers, was elected Honorary Vice President of PIANC, having served two terms as an International Vice President. Lieutenant Genral John W. Morris, USA (Ret) is also an Honorary Vice President of PIANC. Major General Charles G. Holle, USA (Ret), Secretary-General, XXth International Navigation Congress, 1961, is an ex-officio member of the Permanent International Commission. The annual meeting of Permanent International Commission (PIC) was hosted by the Moroccan Section in Agadir, Morocco, on June 9, 1987, and was attended by all National Commissioners, except J. Ron Brinson, Mr. Charles R. Roberts and Dr. G. Edward Dickey. Messrs. Herbert Haar, Charles Conners and Harry Cook filled in for members of the Commission who were unable to attend. Lieutenant General E. R. Heiberg III, Chief of Engineers and PIANC International Vice-President, and Lieutenant General John W. Morris, USA (Ret) also attended the PIC meeting. American representatives attended meetings of the International Study Commission, two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs) and Working Groups of PTCs. U.S. representation on these groups during this fiscal year was as follows: International Commission for Study of Locks, Ship Lifts, and River Weirs - Dr. Michael Yachnis, USN. The Commission has published the portion of the study dealing with locks and continues working on the sections devoted to ship litts. Dr. Yachnis replaces Mr. John Davis, who resigned after having served as the U.S. Representative to the Locks Commission for 13 years. Permanent Committee for Developing Countries - Mr. Jack Ravan, EPA Permanent Technical Committee I - Major General Robert Seedlock, USA (Ret) Working Group 1, Economic Implications of Inland Waterways - Mr. Howard E. Olson Working Group 2, Disposal and Land Dumping of Dredged Materials: Impact on the Environment - Mr. Paul Sorensen Working Group 3, Consideration of Risk in Determining Bank Protection - Mr. Alan D. Crowhurst Working Group 4, Use of Geotextiles for Inland Waterways Bank Protection - Mr. Max Lamb Working Group 5, Container Transport with Inland Vessels - Mr. Morris A. Clyde Working Group 6, Problems Created by Salt Water Intrusion in Inland Navigation Canals and Rivers - Ms. Christina Correals Working Group 7, Economic and Statutory Aspects of Management of Materials Dredged from Inland Waterways - Mr. Charles Hummer Working Group 8, Hydraulic Consequences of the Automatic Functioning of Wiers - Mr. Jack Niemi Working Group 9, Standardization of Inland Waterway Dimensions - Mr. Anatoly Hochstein 46-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Working Group 10, Control and Monitoring of the Stability of Long Lateral Dykes - Vacant Working Group 11, Analysis of the Cost of Water Transport and of the Cost of Terminal Fees - Mr. Howard Olson Working Group 12, Bank Protection Using Natural Materials - Mr. Max Lamb Permanent Technical Committee II- Mr. Eugene H. Harlow Working Group 1, Navigation in Muddy Waters - Mr. John B. Herbich Working Group 2, Stability of Rubble Mount Breakwaters in Deeper Water - Mr. Eugene Harlow Working Group 3, Ice Navigation - C. Allen Wortley Working Group 4, Handling of Dangerous Goods in Ports - Captain William R. Reidel Working Gropu 5, Underkeel Clearance, Hard Bottom/ Sea Conditions - Mr. Ronald Uhlin Working Group 6, Classification of Soils and Rocks to be Dredged - Mr. James W. Bean Working Group 7, Dimensions and Lay-out of Channels, Including two-way Channels - Mr. Leonard Van Houten' Working Gorup 8, Damage Inflicted by Ships With Bulbous Bows on Underwater STructures - Mr. Wesley Allen Working Group 9, Development of Modern Marine Terminals - Mr. Charles Roberts Working Group 10, Disposal of Dredged Materials into the Sea - Colonel Herbert Haar, USA (Ret) Working Gorup 11, Consequences of New Developments of Car/Passenger Ferries - US not participating Working Group 12, The Performance and Design Parameters of Rubble Mound Breakwaters - Dr. Robert Whalin Working Group 13, Floating Breakwaters - Mr. John Oliver Working Group 14, Economical Channel Maintenance Methods - Mr. James W. Bean Working Gropu 15, Graving Docks - Dr. Michael Yachnis Working Group 16, Specifications of Loading Transportation and High Temperature Destruction of Toxic and Chemical Wastes at Sea - Mr. Patrick Tobin Working Group 17, Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of Maritime Structures in Salt Waters Exposed to Material Degradation - Mr. Charles Connors Working Group 18, Planning of Fishing Ports - Vacant Working Group 19, Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material - Mr. Jesse Pfeiffer Working Group 20, Capacity Simulation Models for Approach Channels - Mr. John Pisani Working Group 21, Flexible Revetments in the Marine Environmental - Mr. Gene Chatham Joint Subcommittee on Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Mr. John Nichol Working Group 1, Ecological conservation in Relation to Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Mr. Neil Ross Working Group 2, Waves in Yacht Harbors & Marinas - Mr. Orson Smith Working Group 3, Provision of Navigation Aids for Sport & Pleasure Craft - Mr. Austin E. Brant, Jr. Working Group 4, Chartering Services - Their Growth and Impact on Sport & Pleasure Navigation - Mr. Ted Schad Working Group 5, Standards for Construction, Equipment and Operation of Yacht Harbors and Marinas - Mr. William A. Jansen U.S. Section regional meetings were held on 5-6 March in Mobile, Alabama, by the Eastern Region; 9-10 July in Buffalo, New York by the Central Region (the first joint meeting of the U.S. and Canadian Sections); and 8-9 October in Los Angeles, California, by the Western Region. During 1987, the U.S. Section also held concurrent meetings and the PIANC exhibit was displayed at meetings with the Western Dredging Association, American Association of Port Authorities, and National Waterways Conference. 46-2 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT a. The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC) composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all water over which Congress has jurisdication. The act further required that work of the commission be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Secs. 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Department of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Parts II and I were added to that Act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. (August 4, 1977) and Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary of Energy and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy was activated on OctOber 1, 1977. b. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Sec. 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers on 5 September 1980 delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of plans for non-Federal hydropower development affecting navigation. c. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: (1) 581 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, and structural safety, and environmental impacts, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the FERC. (2) 73 licensed power plants were in various stages of design review for addition of power at Corps dams, and (3) 17 Corps approved non-Federal power plants were in active construction stages by the end of the fiscal year. d. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the costs incurred by the Corps for reviewing and approving final design, plans and specifications for construction of power plants at Corps projects. In FY 1987, the total cost reimbursement to the Corps for this service was $1,269,045. Review of license applications is funded by the Corps as a line item in the General Investigation Account, in FY 1987, the cost of this activity was $657,534. This cost was reported to FERC for the Commission's assessment of annual charges to licensees. 47-1 REGULATORY SUNKEN VESSEL REMOVAL & NATIONAL EMERdENCY PREPAREDNESS ACTIVITIES 1. Regulatory Activities Authorities. The following authorities charge the Corps of Engineers with the regulation of various waterrelated construction activities: Sections 9 and 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (structures in an alteration of waterways, e.g. boat docks); Section 103 of the Marine Protection Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (ocean dumping); and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (discharge of dredged and fill material). Work Completed. During FY 1986, the Corps received approximately 14,400 applications for permits and issued about 7,000 permits and 2,700 letters of permission. In addition about 20,000 activities were authorized by regional or statewide permits which did not require individual applications from the public. More than 50,000 of other minor activities were authorized by the Corps' nationwide permits. In FY 1987 the Corps continued its efforts toward regulatory reform based on a May 7, 1982, directive from the President's Task Force on Regulatory Relief. On November 13, 1986, the Corps published final consolidated permit regulations that had been under development for several years. TABLE 48-A GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 86 ...... $ 725,371 Allotments ...................... . 55,113,900 Total Funds Available ............... 55,839,271 Obligations ........................ 55,375,104 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 87 ...... $ 464,167 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 86 ...... 1,990,062 Allotments ....................... 55,113,900 Total Funds Available............... 57,103,962 Expenditures...................... 56,082,866 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 87 ...... $ 1,021,096 2. Investigation and Removal of Sunken Vessels Under the authority of Sections 19 and 20 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899, the Corps of Engineers investigated sunken vessels in navigable waters and removed those obstructing navigation. For obligations expenditures, see Table 48-B. 3. National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 11490, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies to undertake national emergency planning and preparedness to develop an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic emergencies and national security emergencies. Status: During Fy 1987, the Corps of Engineers continued its efforts to improve its readiness posture and ability to respond to various national emergencies. Emphasis was placed on the initiation of program activities that require a long-term commitment of resources. These activities included the institution of the Mobilization Command Readiness Program to address mobilization requirements and resources; the Corps of Engineers Readiness Evaluation System; maintenance of, planning for and development of emergency facilities to support continuity of operations: and, planning to meet the nation's water resources requirements during a national emergency. In the latter case, Executive Order 11490 has tasked the Corps of Engineers to be the Executive Agency responsible for emergency water planning. Significant strides were made in the development of preparedness guidance and execution plans at all levels. While the efforts undertaken identified additional shortfalls or problems to be addressed, the Corps program continues to move towards the goal of ensuring a national engineering and construction capability that can respond to any national emergency. For fiscal year obligations and expenditures see Table 48-C. TABLE 48-B REMOVAL OF SUNKEN VESSELS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 85 ...... $ 5,398 Allotments ........................ 2,319,391 Total Funds Available ............. 2,324,789 Obligations ...................... 2,322,270 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 86 ...... $ Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 86 ...... Allotments ...................... Total Funds Available ............... Expenditures ....................... 2,519 5,398 2,319,391 2,324,789 2,246,270 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 86 ...... $ 78,519 *The institution of the Mobilization Command Readiness Program to address **The Corps of Engineers Readiness Evaluation System; 48-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 TABLE 48-C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 86 ...... $ 856,769 Allotments ........................ 7,760,250 Total Funds Available ............... .8,617,019 Obligations ........................ 7,711,833 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 86 ...... Allotments ........................ Total Funds Available ............... Expenditures....................... Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 87 ........ $ 905,186 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 87 ........ $ 1,562,661 48-2 1,613,054 7,760,250 9,374,104 7,811,443 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and Districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation on numerous international boards, committees, and other groups. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering or technical boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other informal arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources of joint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. For an explanation of the consitition of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 annual reports. An innovative study organization, neither a board nor a committee, was established to cnoduct a study of fluctuating Great Lakes levels pursuant to a Reference to the IJC from the Governments of Canada and the United States, dated August 1, 1986. A discussion of that study organization, which was established during FY 87, follows Table 49-1. TABLE 49-1 IJC BOARDS OF CONTROL HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Int. Lakes Superior Int. St. Croix River Int. Lake of the Woods Int. Lake Champlain Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 11. Int. Souris River 12. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer 13. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 14. Int. Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 1959 1948 1975 1977 1979 *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr., Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, Olympia, WA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, fERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, Waterton, NY 3. NY Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismark, ND 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA *1. New York Dept. Envir. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Envir. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commission, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS Boston, MS *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. Of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. CENCE-ED, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA 49-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS YEAR BOARD NAME ESTABLISHED 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 Study of Fluctuating Great Lakes Levels Under the August 1, 1986, Reference On August 1, 1986, the Government of Canada and the United States issued a reference to the IJC to study methods to alleviate the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River basin. The IJC was requirested to address the immediate high lake level crisis and identify and evaluate intermediate and long-term potential measures, while considering such vital matters as domestic water supply and sanitation, navigation, agriculture, shore property, flood control, wildlife and others. The IJC is to determine the full costs and benefits of any works or measures and indicate how the various interests on either side of the boundary would be affected. Compensatory works or measures to offset costs to the interests which may be adversely affected by any proposed regulatory measures also must be deteremined. The IJC proceeded with its reference responsibilities on three tracks. First, it submitted an initial report to the federal governments on November 14, 1986, listing immediate actions that could be taken to lessen damages from the then current high water levels. Second, the IJC formed a taskforce to evaluate measures which could be implemented within approximately one year to reduce high lake levels. The third track is the comprehensive study of long-term measures. The U.S. Department of State requested, by letter dated November 24, 1986, that the Corps of Engineers provide lead agency support to the IJC effort on this study. The IJC appointed a Steering Committee and a Project Management Team in April 1987. Study Level United S Governance Level All Three Steering Committee Lead U.S Project Management Team *Div. Eng Lead IJC Chairpers Functional Group No. 1 *Chief, C] Functional Group No. 2 *Wisconsi Functional Group No. 3 *Dr. Leor Functional Group No. 4 *Keith Bi Functional Group No. 5 *Dr. Mic *Signifies U.S. Co-chairman UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Eng. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD *Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr., NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. OCE, CEEC-Z, Washington, D.C. *2. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. In the study for evaluating the long-term solutions to the problem of fluctuating lake levels, four distinct levels of study management are emobdied in four different groups. They are made up of representatives from the IJC and Federal and state agencies, as well as individuals from universities and private sector enterprises. * Governance level - the six IJC Commissioners. * Steering Committee level - two lead IJC Commissioners and their lead staff and the two co-chairs of the Project Management Team. * Project Management Team level - the United States and Canadian co-chairs and the chairpersons of all the functional study groups, following. * Functional study groups level - there are five functional study groups: Group No. 1. Hydraulic, Hydrologic and Climate Group; Group No. 2. Coastal Zone Ecology, Resources, Uses and Management Group; Group No. 3. Socio-economic and Environmental Impact Assessment Group; Group No. 4. Public Participation and Communication Group; and Group No. 5. System Synthesis and Analysis Group. Key United States representation is presented in the following tabulation. In addition to the positions listed therein, Corps of Engineers personnel also serve as vital members of the various taskforce and functional work groups conducting different parts and different levels of the study. tates Representation U.S. IJC Commissioners SIJC Commissioner Div. Engr., Corps of Engineers gr., NCD staff on of the Functional Groups Listed Below ENCD-ED in DNR, Bureau of Water Resources and Zoning iard Shabman, Virginia Polytechnical Institute ulen, U.S. IJC Commissioner hael Ben-Eli, the Cybertec Consulting Group, Inc. 49-2 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) at Champaign, IL, conducts research in vertical construction as applied to buildings and construction. During FY87, CERL conducted an extensive amount of laboratory corrosion protection and abrasion testing of metallised coatings in an immersion environment. The coatings included zinc, aluminum, zinc-aluminum alloy, aluminum bronze, as well as several stainless steels. Coatings were applied using both two wire arc and wire flame spray processes. The processes were also used to apply the most durable materials to the high abrasion area on a dam gate at Belleville, Ohio. USA-CERL also implemented Micro ABS Version 1.0 at 40 Civil Works Districts which resulted in an average cost saving of $5,000 per district. This was due to a shift in workload from the district Harris computer to the micro-computer environment. USA-CERL developed an electronic application update distribution system to ensure that all districts were running the latest version of Micro ABS and could be upgraded in one to two hours instead of two to three days by normal mail. Over the course of FY87, each district realized an estimated savings of $1,000. The total savings per district for the Micro ABS work is $6,000 per district. 50-1 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories (USAETL) began during World War I as a temporary Engineer Detachment formed to test aerial photographic mapping. Since that time, USAETL has grown to become a sophisticated, modern research and development laboratory. The laboratories apply the latest advances in electronics, computer data processing, space sciences and related technologies to military and civil problems in mapping, surveying, land navigation and geodesy. USAETL is now a field operating activity of the Corps of Engineers commanded by Colonel Alan L. Laubscher. USAETL is the only defense research and development laboratory that addresses the full range of developments in the topographic sciences, from basic research to a final product. Support is provided to both the military and civil works elements of the Corps and to the Army Materiel Command, Army Space Program Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Defense Mapping Agency. To provide this support, USAETL is organized into five operational elements, three of which are developmental laboratories. The Geographic Systems Laboratory performs research and development associated with the extraction and presentation of geographic data for the Army in the field. The Topographic Developments Laboratory supports technological developments in surveying and mapmaking. The Space Programs Laboratory conducts research and development relating to the Army Space Program and acts as the Corps' executive agent for space. The Research Institute performs most of the Laboratories' basic and applied research, and the Terrain Analysis Center prepares terrain studies needed by the Army elements in the field as directed by the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence. During FY 87, copies of 33 USAETL reports on individual studies conducted at or for USAETL were distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. In recent years, the emphasis of USAETL's research and development program has shifted from conventional mapmaking and surveying equipment and related techniques to new topographic data systems. These systems are required to support the next generation of complex weapon systems and military geographic information systems required by field commanders for improved command, control, communications and intelligence. The new systems frequently use data acquired by remote sensing, and much of the work done at USAETL involves this technology. USAETL researchers are investigating the types of data derived from sensors and the means for exploiting that data. Studies showing the possibility of automating image interpretation are an important aspect of this work. The knowledge gained in these areas will apply iot only to the mapping and terrain analysis missions of USAETL, but also to the Army thrust of teleoperated and autonomous vehicles. Other work is to investigate the digital processing of remotely sensed data and to define remote sensing inputs required for Army terrain graphics and terrain data bases. In addition, USAETL conducts short courses on remote sensing for Corps of Engineers and other government personnel. Operations and results during FY 87. USAETL's total program for FY 87 was $94,279,900 (including $23,521,800 DARPA Direct Allotment funds). This included work done for other agencies as well as for the Corps of Engineers. Of this total program, $43,247,600 supported work performed by contract. Work in FY 87 included $378,300 charged to civil works funds. Civil works efforts in FY 87 focused on developing and demonstrating new survey techniques and equipment for use by districts and divisions. Engineers concentrated on transferring technology of the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) to the field. This system uses signals transmitted by satellites to calculate extremely precise, relative, 3-D coordinates. USAETL engineers continued development of an automatic dam deformation monitoring system based on the GPS. Other GPS projects were conducted to investigate the potential of precise positioning of Corps hydrographic survey vessels. Other civil work projects included work on a new technique for computing earthwork volumes, developing software for performing datum transformation between the old North American Datum of 1927 and the new North American Datum of 1983, and the investigation of optical digital mass storage techniques for district application. 51-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY BACKGROUND The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (USACRREL), located in Hanover, New Hampshire, was created in January 1961. It merged the Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment (created in 1949) and the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (created in 1953), both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland and Greenland. As the Army's center of expertise, USACRREL conducts cold regions scientific and engineering research solving problems encountered by the Army and other DOD agencies, wherever accomplishment of their mission is impacted by winter/cold regions effects. The major problem areas are: Ice-jam Floods Winter Navigation Remote Sensing for Civil Works Base Support Combat Operations Materiel Performance The total authorized strength of USACRREL is 293 (277 civilian and 16 military), with a budget for FY87 of $22 million. USACRREL has six main buildings in Hanover (a total of 285,322 square feet on 31 acres of land), including the main laboratory, the ice engineering facility, the logistics and supply building, the plant and equipment building, the equipment storage building and the frost effects research facility. The facilities include: 24 cold laboratories that can be operated to -50�F; an ice engineering laboratory for large scale ice modeling experiments; an electron microscope laboratory, a soils processing laboratory; a wastewater treatment research facility; a frost effects laboratory where 6-8 freeze/thaw cycles can be conducted in one year, trace chemicals analysis laboratories including a clean room complex; a small laser facility and a materials testing facility; an impact test research facility capable of simulating the space environment; and a snow drift modeling wind tunnel. USACRREL is in the final stages of modernizing cold room facilities in the main laboratory. When complete, temperatures down to -50 0F will be attainable in specific cold rooms. USACRREL's refrigerated research facilities will total 50,000 square feet, with 840 tons of refrigeration capacity. USACRREL maintains a presence in Alaska at tenant facilities located at Ft. Wainwright in Fairbanks. The Alaska office provides research logistics support and maintains coordination with Alaska agencies. In addition there is an active 120 acre research site and a permafrost tunnel (369 feet long, excavated in permanently frozen ground). USACRREL's basic and applied research covers a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in the physical, mechanical and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, freshwater ice, sea ice and frozen ground. Basic research supports applied research in the major cold regions mission areas of Ice-jam Floods, Winter Navigation, Remote Sensing for Civil Works, Base Support, Combat Operations and Materiel Performance. Major Civil Works cold regions research topics include Ice Engineering, River Ice Management, Cold Regions Hydrology, Remote Sensing, and Environmental Impact. USACRREL has an international reputation and maintains close ties with the international research community and with Federal and State agencies, where it provides consulting services on a reimbursable basis. As the cold regions scientific and engineering expert for the Corps of Engineers, USACRREL supports Corps districts and divisions by publishing field engineering reports, conducting demonstrations, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, making field visits to consult on engineering problems, and providing support to NORDA's polar oceanographic research group located on-site. The following members of the professional staff received the Army R&D Achievement Award: P. Sellmann, S. Arcone and A. Delaney for contributions in the use of geophysical systems for characterizing subsurface conditions in permafrost areas. 52-1 M. Mellor, Cpt. M. Wait, D. Calkins, B. Coutermarsh, and D. L'Heureux for contributing techniques to deploy the ribbon bridge in rivers that have a significant ice cover. T. Jenkins and D. Leggett for contributions to the establishment of a standard analytical method for the determination of explosive residues in ground water. M. Ferrick for formulating a new theory for understanding river ice breakup. OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY87 In FY87 USACRREL published and distributed 242 scientific and engineering reports. (CRREL Reports; Monographs; Special Reports; Technical Notes; Technical Digests and information bulletins; journal articles; conference papers and abstracts; Corps, DA and other government publications; and books and nongovernment publications). A total of 433 Installation Support or One-Stop Consulting Services were provided. Civil Works research at USACRREL addresses the impacts of ice on the nation's waterways, the total hydrology of northern river basins, and the application of remote sensing technology to Corps engineering, operations, and planning needs. Research originating in the Civil Works area often has a synergistic benefit to the military program. A prime example of this is the development of a soil moisture sensor for Civil Works hydrology measurements that is now being applied to military mobility predictions. Currently our major civil works effort is the River Ice Management Program, which is demonstrating methods to improve winter navigation and control ice on inland waterways. This effort is focused on the Ohio and Upper Mississippi Rivers and the Illinois Waterway. A major accomplishment was a demonstration of the use of waste heat from a power plant to control ice formation on the Kankakee River, a tributary to the Illinois Waterway. USACRREL is the Corps' R&D manager for Civil Works applications of remote sensing technology. The goal of the program is to evaluate and demonstrate the capabilities of remote sensing technology to Corps engineering, operations and planning needs. As part of this program, USACRREL recently evaluated the applicability of imagery from the SPOT satellite to monitor dredging and dredge disposal activities. FY88 is the final year of the River Ice Management Program. This will perhaps be the first demonstration and technology transfer program in the Corps that has a complete, field-scrubbed draft engineer manual available at or before the end of the demonstrations. In FY89, we hope to initiate a new program in Ice Jam Flood Prevention, which is specified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. We are also evolving the con cept of a remote sensing assistance center to provide a central focus for helping the field offices exploit this rapidly evolving technology and to accelerate technology transfer of results to the field. ACCOMPLISHMENTS SPOT Satellite Evaluation SPOT satellite imagery was acquired for dredging and dredge disposal activities in Lake Erie at Toledo, Ohio, and Hart-Miller Island near Baltimore, Maryland. SPOT imagery, with its 20-meter multispectral resolution, promises to be a cost-effective source for remotely monitoring these activities. The satellite imagery can be used to monitor sediment transport and other changes in the dredging and disposal areas. A classification of the Toledo site was completed showing varying turbidity levels. This data is beneficial to Corps disposal efforts because it shows the relative impact of the disposal activity on turbidity and can be used to focus sampling activities. Ice Jam Suppression, Kankakee River Wilmington, Illinois experiences frequent ice jams on two reaches of the Kankakee River. In 1980, approximately $1 million in damages resulted from ice jam flooding, and in 1982 another ice jam incident caused $9 million in damages. USACRREL is studying this problem from the Chicago District. One of the jamming problems occurs on an upper reach of the river. The solution here appears to be a fairly straightforward one where a boom will be used to form a stable ice cover. On the lower reach of the river, a more unique solution is being evaluated this winter. During the 1986- 87 winter, a $500 thousand project was undertaken as part of USACRREL's River Ice Management (RIM) Program to install a warm water distribution system from a nearby power plant cooling pond to the river. During the winter, the cooling pond typically has a temperature of at least 45�F. When the cooling pond is mixed with the river water, using the distribution system, the temperature of the river water will be raised approximately 0.5�F. Although this rise in temperature is small, it should be sufficient to prevent freeze-up in the areas of the river where ice jamming has been a problem. Actual performance of the system will be evaluated this winter. Winter Bridging Tactical bridging is a critical element of the Army's ability to preserve the freedom to maneuver and logistically sustain the forces. In January 1987, two operational techniques for deploying the lightweight ribbon bridge in ice-covered waters were successfully demon- 52-2 strated on the Imjin River in Korea. The Army does not have doctrine or equipment for expedient winter bridging in ice-infested waters, although the Soviets consistently deploy their much heavier ribbon bridge under such conditions. A USACRREL experiment with the 2nd Engineer Battalion-Korea in 1986 represented the first attempt to deploy the ribbon bridge in an ice-clogged river. In this experiment, ice demolition methods were attempted to break the ice cover, and the resulting chunks of ice that could not be adequately cleared from the channel caused difficulties in assembling and retrieving the bridge. As a result, research efforts in this area were accelerated. A new method developed in January 1987 employed a combination of chain saws, explosives and bulldozers. Bulldozers cleared a storage site on the near shore while soldiers cut large sections of ice with chain saws and then floated the ice toward the dozers. Demolition methods were altered to create large sections of ice that were maneuvered by bridge boats. The successful techniques developed and tested in Korea provide the basis for the Army to develop doctrine for tactical winter bridging operations. Work will continue to develop ice clearing procedures for other site conditions and to assure that the results are incorporated in pertinent doctrinal and training literature. 52-3 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC), under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, is commanded by Colonel Richard A. Rothblum. The Center is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, with satellite elements at other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center for the Navigation Data Center at New Orleans, Louisiana. The Water Resources Support Center underwent major internal reorganization during Fiscal Year 1987; The Data Collection and Management Division was abolished, with certain of its functions transferred to Headquarters, USACE, and others incorporated into the newly established Navigation Data Center; the Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses U.S. Secretariat functions were transferred to the Directorate of Civil Works; Information Management missions were placed in the Resource Management Office; and, the Dredging Division and its satellite Marine Design Center were placed under the direct staff supervision of the Directorate of Civil Works. The accomplishments of WRSC during FY 1987 are listed by division: HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER The mission of the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) is to support the Corps and the Nation in its water resources management responsibilities. This is accomplished through research, training and technical assistance programs in hydrologic engineering and planning analysis. The HEC makes every effort to be aware of the present needs and upcoming problems of the water resources community. HEC maintains continuous dialogue with universities, private industry, other Federal Agencies and state and local governments to keep abreast of the latest developments. The Center provided substantial technical assistance to 23 Corps offices during FY 1987, including the Office of the Chief of Engineers, the Waterways Experiment Station and the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Technical assistance was also provided to the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. About one-half of HEC's resources were devoted to direct field assistance projects during FY 1987. Fifteen formal training courses involving 11 weeks of training were conducted at HEC. Six workshops, totaling three and one-half weeks, were also held. Research funding was somewhat reduced to less than one-third of HEC's budget this year. Planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of today's multiple-purpose water projects require complex interdisciplinary analyses. These complex problems present major methodological and computational tasks to water resources professionals. The HEC seeks solutions to these problems through development of systematic methods and use of modern comptuers. Research activities were carried out in 16 work units. These work units represent specific technical areas that have been identified in the Corps R&D program. The HEC's primary research area is entitled "Analytical Techniques in Water Resources Planning Studies." The HEC also participates in the Corps research programs in water conservation and supply, planning methodologies, remote sensing, and dam safety. New work units addressing interior flooding and risk concepts in flood hydrology began this year. HEC's R&D work units for FY 1987 are shown below. Improvements in Methods of Evaluating Hydrologic Phenomena Computer Methods for Water Resources Planning Real-Time Reservoir Regulation Modernization of Computer Programs Water Resource Data Storage System 53-1 Flood Forecasting for Use During Flood Emergencies Analytical Techniques for Evaluating Reservoir Systems Water Waulity Procedures for Water Control Management Flood Warning Systems Hydrologic Techniques for Leveed Interior Areas Spatial Data Management and Analysis System Groundwater Recharge and Storage Hydrologic Methods for Determining Water Supply Potential Remote Sensing and Spatial Data Applications Hydrologic/Hydraulic Risk Assessment of Dams Risk Concepts in Flood Hydrology and Damage Analysis Focus continued on the development of practical computer programs and companion user materials for use by field office professional staff. Areas that received particular emphasis this past year include: risk-cost analysis; dam safety; water control and flood forecasting; flood damage computations and data management; and water surface profile accuracy. The use of microcomputers to assist in flood control planning continued to receive increased attention. Several important HEC hydrologic engineering and flood damage analysis computer programs were integrated and released in a flood damage analysis package. Significant advances were make in improving HEC's library of computer programs during FY 1987. Fifteen new programs were developed this year, mostly in the water control and data management area. HEC programs were upgraded to FORTRAN77 standards to make them more transportable to other computers. Twenty-four HEC programs were added to the twenty-eight microcomputer versions already available in FY 1986 from HEC. These 52 microcomputer programs cover technical areas of rainfall-runoff, river hydraulics, flood flow frequency, flood damage computations, groundwater analysis, smallscale hydropower cost, and spatial data management. Important milestones were achieved through the development of a MENU control system for PC operations and the implementation of HEC's data storage system on the PC. Meaningful new capabilities were developed for water control software and real-time reservoir regulation. During FY 1987, HEC distributed about 4,200 computer programs to other Federal, state, local governments, universities, and private industry, both domestic and foreign. HEC actively provides assistance to all its program users. INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES The Institute for Water Resources (IWR) was established in 1969 to provide a center for research and analysis which would contribute to developing, maintaining and managing the nation's water resources. The Chief of Engineers directed the Institute to: - Create methods for anlayzing and planning the comprehensive development and management of the nation's water resources. - Initiate, perform and monitor research to evaluate existing water resources planing methods and to develop new, innovative planning techniques. - Identify new applications for the Corps water resources development work. In 1979, IWR was incorporated with several other Corps elements into the Water Resources Support Center (WRSC). To conduct its current program, IWR is composed of three divisions: Policy Studies, Research and Navigation. The divisions are staffed by 30 professionals, with over 80% having previous Corps experience and over 70% with advanced academic degrees. The IWR mission is to perform research in planning methods, conduct policy studies, manage data systems for planning and operations, maintain a center of expertise on water transportation planning and analysis, manage and conduct national and special studies, train Corps personnel in water resources planning, and provide consulting and technical assistance on water resource related problems and studies for OCE division and district offices and other government agencies. Research Division The Reseach Division responds to the water planning research needs of the field, as well as one-of-a-kind projects assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. At the same time, research assistance is given to Corps field divisions and districts. The staff members of the Research Division apply their specialized knowledge of economics, sociology and engineering in developing and conducting the broad range of research aimed at producing practical and economical planning tools. Research outputs are applied in CW throughout the Corps, and, in several cases, to military problems. During FY87 the Research Division was responsible for three long range research programs: Planning Methodologies, Risk Assessment and Water Supply Planning. Planing Methodologies is focused on developing economic, financial, environmental and social evaluation techniques for planning flood control, navigation, and other water resources outputs. Work includes developing economic evaluation manuals, incrocomputer applications, regional analysis models, navigation project evaluation procedures, spatial data anlaysis techniques, deep draft navigation analysis, and flood control benefit estimation techniques. FY87 accomplishments in this program include an urban flood control and deep draft navigation evaluation manual, an assessment of planning management information needs, a methodology for evaluating the economic impact of competing ports on traffic and the benefits of port improvements, and a plan to enhance our ability to evaluate flood control benefits. The research and development program in risk analysis includes the development and application of risk analysis techniques to traditional Corps water resources planning areas of flood control and navigation. The work includes detailed analyses of risk perceptions, display, and communications techniques for public use. Several important topics cover the role of risk analysis in environmental planning. The risk research has produced the "Guidelines" for Phase I risk analysis; draft reports on alternative risk evaluation models; dam safety; socioeconomic considerations; rare flood theory; case study analysis; and risk evaluation simulation models. The Water Supply research program was completed in FY87 with the inclusion of a water conservation module into the IWR - MAIN water demand forecasting computer program. The Institute's training program provides a means for transferring research results and state-of-the-art planing techniques to various Corps users. Courses on topics ranging in scope from Conflict Management to Economic Analysis for Water Resource Planning were conducted during the year. During FY87 approximately 600 persons attended 19 sessions of 10 training courses. Policy Studies Division The Policy Studies Division undertakes investigations, studies, and research on emerging water resources issues to assist in the development of Corps policy and to provide the analytical bases for addressing current national water resources policy issues. The overall mission of the division is to provide policy analysis and decision support to the Director of Civil Works. The urgency of these issues generally precludes their inclusion in the research program which requires a more deliberate research needs identification and funding process. A typical policy study is accomplished within a period of 3-6 months and is accomplished entirely by the IWR staff. In FY 1987 the staff of the Policy Studies Division completed work on a dozen important studies. Several other activities, which were initiated a year earlier, were carried forward. Work undertaken for the Planning Division resulted in a published report on the role of the Corps in local flood warning and response systems. Taking a look at 50 years of experience and applying lessons learned to the present and future, the Division had a major role in a symposium on the 1936 Flood Control Act. Proceedings of "The Flood Control Challenge" will be published in FY88. Of the 12 reports completed in FY87, several have applications to increasingly significant water resource problems. The Corps concerns about leadership were addressed in a LEAD Team paper. A report was prepared for the Chief of Engineers on project partnership with local sponsors. Climate change and potential effect on Corps programs was the subject of a conference - the first held in North America. Co-sponsored by the Corps, representation was provided by the staff of the Policy Studies Division. Flood control, specifically the policy issue of Federal vs. non-Federal responsibilities (i.e. the 800 cfs issue), was evaluated in a series of white papers on the subject. 53-2 With the passage of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, the Corps of Engineers entered into a new era of project development and management. The Policy Studies Division participated in charting the Corps role in that change by preparing a report that addresses a broad range of planning, financing and development. NAVIGATION DIVISION The Navigation Division supports Corps planners by developing and maintaining transportation planning data bases on waterway carriers, other transportation modes, and commodity movements; development of analytical capabilities; and dissemination of technical information and advice with regard to use of navigation data and analytical techniques. The division also conducts studies and performs reimbursable and research studies for HQUSACE and field offices. With the advent of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the Navigation Division has supported the Inland Waterways Users Board by preparing analyses of the revenues, outlays and balance of the Waterway Trust fund under varying assumptions. A new report "The 1988 Annual Inland Waterway Review" was developed by the Navigation Division to provide a 10 year look ahead at the traffic, problems, performance and investment requirements on the inland waterways. This report provides a vehicle to discuss needs, budget constraints and priorities within the Corps and with the oeprators and shippers who use the system. Vessel operating costs (ocean and inland), waterway and tow characteristics, and commodity and other economic projections are maintained to support various navigation system studies. The Navigation Division has developed computer models to estimate economic development which would occur due to water resource and navigation projects, and maintains the navigation user charge data base, which is used to estimate impacts of various cost recovery policies and strategies. Research underway includes methods for estimating the economic impacts of longer trip times due to cleanup caused by congresion, methods for estimating vessel operating costs for ships which call on several ports, and completion of a user manual for economic anlaysis of deep draft channels. The Navigation Division has completed remarkable work for the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Divisions and Districts. These projects range from special studies of project economics to evaluation of the employment and income effects of Corps navigation projects. A training session for 25 Corps personnel covering economic analysis of deep-draft and shallow-draft navigation projects was completed. FUSION CENTER The Fusion Center is a unique part of IWR composed of three interactive elements: a thorough, flexible process, a trained professional staff and a specially designed facility. The Center was organized to provide work groups, project teams, and task forces with creative problem-solving, strategic planning, and task group management capabilities in resolving dynamic, complex, systematic issues. The Fusion Center became part of the IWR on October 1, 1986 upon transfer from Fort Belvoir. During FY87 the staff of the Fusion Center provided 41 customer operations. Some of the activities at the Center are completed in several days while others extend over many months and may run as long as a year. For the Chief of Engineers, the Center staff facilitated the Chiefs Leadership Enhancement and Development Team, a Strategic Planning Initiatives Group, and several Civil Works team building sessions. The Center also assisted and facilitated the Army Engineer School Engineer Force Modernization Task Force, and a workshop on the Fort Belvoir DEH Backfill Planning. Among other important activities were DA Civilian Personnel Program Administration task groups and Army Long Range Stationing Study. NAVIGATION DATA CENTER The newly formed Navigation Data Center provides for the Corps navigation data collection, management and distribution. The new Center improves the opportunity for data integration under a single organization. The strategic planning for the systems integration and automation has been initiated for the three data areas: Waterborne Commerce, Lock Performance Monitoring, and Port Facilities. Each data area is at a different stage of development: WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS CENTER The planning for, and implementation of a relational database has begun. This involves the rewrite of the total software system, with completion scheduled in FY89. As a result of PL 99-662, Harbor Maintenance Fee, the WCSC received a new mission to provide vessel/cargo movement and shipper information to the U.S. Customs Service for audit purposes. 53-3 LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM (PMS) PMS continues the collection and archiving of data. Initiated in FY87 was the test and evaluation of relational database software for future implementation, the use of CD-ROM for historical data archiving, and microcomputer application software. PORT FACILITIES Initiation of automated report preparation and the design for a Port Facilities database has begun. In support of the Harbor Maintenance Fee, brochures and maps were prepared for public distribution delineating the geographic boundaries for the fee implementation. In FY87, Port Facilities completed eight reports, as follows: Number Title 12 Ports of Wilmington and Morehead City, NC 13 Ports of Charleston and Georgetown, SC 15 Ports of Jacksonville and Fernandino Beach, FL 18 Port of Mobile, AL 19 Porets of Panama City and Pensacola, FL; Pascagoula and Gulfport, MS; and Ports on the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers. 27 Port of San Diego, CA 49 Ports of Duluth, MN; Superior, WI; Taconite Harbor, Silver Bay, and Two Harbors, MN; and Ashland, WI. 68 Ports on the Missouri, Arkansas, Verdigris, White and Ouachita Rivers. 53-4 APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ALASKA Chena River Lakes ARIZONA Adobe Alamo Cave Buttes Dreamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Yukon -Kuskokwim Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Chena River Skunk Creek Bill Williams River Cave Creek Dreamy Draw New River Gila River Santa Rosa Wash Fairbanks 1981 2,000 NPP FR Phoenix Wenden Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix Gila Bend Casa Grande 1982 18,350 NPP FR 1968 1,046,310 560 FRWX 1979 46,600 NPP FRX 1973 320 NPP FRX 1985 43,520 NPP F 1959 2,476,340 NPP FRWX 1974 198,550 NPP GWX ARKANSAS Blakely Mountain Dam Blue Mountain DeGray DeQueen Dierks Gillham Millwood Narrows Dam Nimrod CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam- N.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Farmington Fullerton Hansen Narry L. Englebright Hidden Dam- Hensley Lake Isabella Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group: Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan North Fork Pine Flat Prado San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Success Terminus Whittier Narrows Ouachita Ouachita Arkansas Ouachita Red Red Red Red Ouachita Arkansas Hot Springs 1955 2,768,500 20,900 FP Petit Jean River Paris Caddo Arkadelphia Rolling Fork River DeQueen Saline River Dierks Cossatot River Gillham Little River Ashdown Little Missouri Murfreesboro Fourche La Fave River Plainview Sacramento Stony Creek Orland Santa Ana Brea Creek Fullert San Joaquin Chowchilla River Chowcl Santa Ana Carbon Canyon River Brea Russian East Fork Ukiah Russian River Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Los Angeles Sacramento Dry Creek Healdsburg Littlejohn Creek Farmington East Fullerton Creek Fullerton Big Tujunga Wash Los Angeles Yuba River Marysville Fresno River Madera Kern River Bakersfield Pacoima Wash San Fernanado Martis Creek Reno San Joaquin Bear Creek San Joaquin Burns Creek San Joaquin Mariposa Creek San Joaquin Owens Creek Majave Mojave San Joaquin Calaveras Sacramento American River San Joaquin Kings River Santa Ana Santa Ana River Santa Ans San Antonio Creek San Gabriel San Gabriel River Los Angeles Los Angeles River San Joaquin Tule River San Joaquin Kaweah River San Gabriel San Gabriel River and Rio Hondo 1947 257,900 2,910 FRWX 1971 881,900 6,400 FRZRS 1977 136,100 1,680 FSQRW 1975 96,800 1,360 FSRAW 1975 221,800 1,370 FSQW 1966 1,854,930 29,200 FSW 1949 407,900 2,500 FP 1942 336,010 3,550 FSWX 1963 160,000 770 FIRX 1942 4,010 NPP FRX 1975 150,000 470 FIRW 1961 6,610 NPP FERX 1959 122,500 1,700 FRX 1983 381,000 500 FRSW 1952 52,000 NPP F 1941 760 NPP FRX 1940 25,450 120 FRWX 1941 69,000 400 DR 1975 90,000 5,000 FIRW 1953 570,000 1,850 FIRW 1954 440 NPP FX 1971 20,400 71 FSR 1954 7,700 NPP F 1950 7,000 NP F 1948 15,000 NPP F 1949 3,600 NPP F 1971 89,670 NPP FRWX 1963 325,000 715 FIRX 1939 14,700 280 DR 1954 1,000,000 NPP FIRX 1941 196,240 NPP FRX 1956 7,700 NPP FX 1948 32,110 NPP FRX 1941 17,430 NPP FRX 1960 85,000 400 FIRX 1961 150,000 345 FIRX 1957 35,150 NPP FRWX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Concrete Concrete 235 1,100 115 243 160 153 160 88 175 97 Earth 156 Earth 87 Earth & Rock 205.5 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 99 2,610 160 3,500 319 3,000 60 7,800 45 575 97 10,475 280 1,142 163 5,730 185 4,952 50 1,300 113 2,670 92 1,830 55 4,075 88 1,330 75 790 200 2,200 429 1,820 155 620 429 1,820 106 2,280 160 3,850 92 23,800 57 15,444 142 3,490 250 2,375 56 19,960 A-1 Earth 50 40,200 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 109 283 109 50 104 1281 75.5 2,275 975 2,275 448 2,320 4,780 12,500 2,800 3,400 2,360 2,500 1,750 17,554 941 1,012 2,970 1,765 1,800 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30,1987 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) COLORADO John Martin Trinidad CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson IDAHO Lucky Peak ILLINOIS Carlyle Farmdale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie IOWA Coralville Red Rock Saylorville KANSAS Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River John Redmond Marion Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Toronto Arkansas Arkansas River Arkansas Purgatoire River Housatonic Connecticut Housatonic Housatonic Thames Thames Housatonic Thames Branch Brook West Branch, Farmington River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Natchaug River Northfield Brook Naugatuck River Quinebaug Columbia Boise River Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Kaskaskia River Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Big Muddy River East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamonie Iowa River Des Moines River Des Moines River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Grand (Neosho) Cottonwood River Big Hill Creek Verdigris River Lamar Trinidad Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson Boise Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Tere Haute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash Iowa City Des Moines Des Moines Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Burlington Marion Cherryvale Toronto 1943 615,500 1977 123,500 1970 1969 1960 1968 1952 1965 1960 1965 8,700 97,700 4,030 6,970 52,000 2,430 42,000 26,800 1,844 FIR 280 FIRX 20 760 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 FR FRSX FRW FR FRW FRW F FRW 1956 306,000 2,850 FIR 1967 1951 1951 1970 1970 1974 1952 1960 1969 1967 1964 1978 1966 983,000 15,500 3,780 684,000 294,000 359,600 228,120 132,800 153,100 368,400 441,000 301,600 263,600 1958 492,000 1969 1,830,000 1975 602,000 1964 1981 1966 1949 1964 1968 1981 1960 112,265 236,200 284,300 256,400 630,250 143,850 40,600 200,800 26,000 NPP NPP 11,100 18,900 2,250 1,400 1,100 500 1,100 3,280 2,010 976 1,820 8,950 74,000 3,235 8,000 4,450 2,350 9,280 6,200 1,240 2,660 Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth FSNRWA Earth F Earth F Earth FSNRW Earth FQRSW Earth FRSW FRX FRX FRW FRW FARS FRSQW FRW FARW FARWQ FARWQ FSQR FSQR FSQ FSX FSQR FRQS FSR FX Earth& Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth A-2 106 13,274 200 6,610 154 223 57 97 68 118 142 70 933 1,300 630 520 12,420 810 2,000 2,550 250 1,700 67 80 67 108 54 182 150 117 91 137 93 84 133 100 110 125 96 99 107 94 86.5 67 83 90 6,570 1,275 1,000 3,000 10,600 3,000 950 1,790 5,332 8,100 1,400 1,550 6,100 1,400 5,676 6,750 6,500 20,930 4,840 6,015 21,790 8,375 3,870 4,712 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30,1987 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Tylorsville LOUISIANA Bayou Badcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Jennings Randolph Lake MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Charles River Natural Valley Storage Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River LacQui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou Potomac North Branch Potomac River Connecticut Connecticut Thames Charles Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connectiuct Blckstone Thames Ware River Millers River Little River Charles River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Tullyt River West River Quinebaug River Upper Minnesota River Mississippi Upper Chippewa River Mississippi Upper Minnesota River Mississippi Upper Minnesota River Mississippi Red River Otter Tail River of the North Red River Red Lake River of the North Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintsville Pikeville Grayson Campbells -ville Harlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchfield Taylorsville Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Barnum Barre So. Roylaston Charlton Millis Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington Chester Gryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls 1964 815,200 4,340 FARS 1960 168,000 550 FQRW 1976 47,700 530 FQRW 1974 614,100 6,790 FQRW 1949 93,000 1,100 FARW 1968 164,360 569 FARW 1967 118,990 1,050 FQRW 1969 723,200 5,070 FRSQW 1978 21,00 578 FQ 1983 73,500 261 FQRW 1963 609,400 2,890 FAR 1958 334,400 2,180 FRX 1983 291,670 1,625 FQRW 1949 357,300 NPP FRW 1971 175,000 32,700 NFRS 1946 96,100 2,300 FQRS 1981 130,900 952 FQRS 1958 24,000 NPP FRW 1941 49,900 NPP FRW 1958 12,700 200 FRW 1983 35,000 NPP F 1966 3,740 NPP F 1960 30,000 360 FRW 1959 12,800 NPP FRW 1941 49,000 NPP FRW 1965 32,400 275 FRWS 1949 22,000 300 FRW 1960 12,350 NPP FRW 1961 11,100 23 FRW 1973 45,000 12,700 FRW 1950 (2) NPP FRWX 1950 122,800 6,500 FRWX 1953 14,100 210 FARS 1953 14,100 210 FARS Red River 1951 2,680,000 279,000 FARSX Earth 146 3,970 Earth 162 1,020 Earth & Rock 130 720 Earth & Rock 148 2,740 Earth 118 913 Rock 195 1,100 Earth & Rock 120 1,460 Earth & Rock 142 2,350 Concrete 97 574 Earth & Rock 160 1,600 Earth & Rock 174 990 Earth & Rock 124 1,530 Earth & Rock 164 1,280 Earth 70 12,850 Concrete 3,700 & Earth Earth 30 4,994 Earth & Rock 296 2,130 Earth & Rock 62 885 Earth & Rock 56 1,400 Earth & Rock 66 3,255 Nonstructural - -- Earth & Rock 85 1,050 Earth & Rock 55 520 Earth & Rock 55 2,140 Earth & Rock 160 1,200 Earth & Rock 1,164 1,360 Earth & Rock 62 1,570 Earth & Rock 51 2,400 Earth & Rock 78 560 Earth 25 Earth & Rock 21 Earth & Rock 21 Earth & Rock 19.5 Eaarth & Rock 47 Earth & Rock 15.5 13,700 17,97 4,100 11,800 1,355 36,500 A-3 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30,1987 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MISSISSIPPI Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Branch Wappapello NEW HAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO Abiquiu Conchas Galisteo Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam Santa Rosa Dam & Reservoir NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTH CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Pascagoula Lower Mississippi White Grande Chariton Lower Mississippi Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut Connecticut Coldwater River Yocona River Yalobusha River Okatibbee Creek Little Tallahatchie River Black River Little Charlton St. Francis River Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook Pemigewasset River Contoocook River Piscataquog River Otter Brook Ashuelot River Colorado Mathews Canyon Colorado Pine Canyon Rio Grande Arkansas Rio Grande Rio Grande Rio Grande Pecos Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin- Pee Dee Rio Chama Canadian River Jemez River Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyo Pecos Canacadea Creek Canisteo Creek Ouleout Creek Genesee River Otselic River New Hope Neuse Yadkin Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon Wappapello Webster West Peterborough Feranklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Caliente Caliente Pena Blanca Tucumcari Bernalillo Roswell Santa Ross Hornell Arkport Franklin Mount Morris Whitney Point 1943 525,300 1951 660,000 1954 1,337,400 1969 142,400 1940 1,570,000 1948 413,700 1980 65,000 1941 613,200 1941 46,000 1950 12,800 1943 154,000 1962 71,500 1962 87,500 1958 18,300 1941 32,500 5,100 F 6,100 F 9,800 F 1,280 FQSR 10,700 F 1,630 FRWX 2,430 FRSQW 4,100 FR NPP FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW 120 FRW 85 FRW 265 FRW 1957 6,270 NPP FX 1957 7,750 NPP FX 1975 596,300 1939 529,000 1953 102,700 1963 168,000 1979 447,000 1949 14,600 1940 7,900 1950 33,550 1952 337,000 1942 86,440 1,200 FRWX 3,000 FIl NPP FX NPP FX NPP FIX 124 FRW NPP F 210 FRW 170 FR 1,200 FRW Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth Durham 1982 753,500 14,300 FQRSWX Earth Raleigh 1983 335,600 11,300 FQRSWX Earth Wilkesboro 1963 153,000 1,470 FARSX Earth A-4 81 99 102 67 117 154 71 109 75 67 140 76 115 133 86 11,500 8,400 13,900 6,543 15,300 4,225 3,800 2,700 1,150 1,030 1,740 790 2,000 1,288 1,670 71 800 92 884 251 200 135 98 212 212 90 113 130 210 95 112 92 148 28,300 19,400 780 4,885 2,940 1,950 1,260 1,200 2,010 1,028 4,900 1,330 1,915 1,740 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30,1987 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Homme OHIO Alum Creek Berlin Caesar Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Wills Creek North Branch, Kakosing River Lake Paint Creek Tom Jenkins West Fork Mill Creek William H. Harsha OKLAHOMA Arcadia Birch Broken Bow Canton Copan Eufaula Fort Gibson Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Keystone Ooologah Optima Red River Sheyenne River of the North Red River South Branch of of the North Park River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Alum Creek Mahoning Creek Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Licking River West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas River McGuire Creek Walhondoing River Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Fork Little Stillwater Creek Wills Creek North Branch of Kakosing River Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek Little Miami River Deep Fork River Birch Creek Mountain Fork North Canadian River Little Caney River Canadian Grand Wolf Creek Salt Fork, Arkansas River Polecat Creek Kiamichi River Caney River Arkansas River Arkansas Verdigris River North Canadian River Valley City 1950 70,000 325 FARS Earth Park River 1951 3,650 51 FARS Earth Africa Deerfield Wilmington Springfield New Holland Zanesville Newton Falls Cortland New Cumberland Beach City Bolivar Muffin Tippecanoe Dover Leesville Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappan Conesville Fredericktown New Petersburg Gloucester Mount Healthy Williamsburg Edmond Barnsdall Broken Bow Canton Copan Eufaula Muskogee Fort Supply Cherokee Sapulpa Hugo Caney Ponca City Tulsa Oologah Hardesty 1975 134,800 348 FRSW 1943 91,200 240 FARSWQ 1978 242,200 13,300 FRSQW 1974 63,700 1,010, FQRW 1968 102,500 727 FRW 1961 273,000 1,325 FRWX 1966 78,700 580 FAQRSW 1944 104,100 700 FARSWQ 1937 49,700 1,540 FRX 1937 71,700 420 FRX 1938 149,600 NPP FR 1936 88,000 1,350 FRX 1937 54,000 1,800 FRX 1938 203,000 350 FRX 1937 37,400 1,000 FRX 1937 285,000 NPP FR 1936 102,000 NPP FR 1937 65,000 2,270 FRX 1938 87,700 850 FRX 1937 88,500 3,550 FRSX 1936 61,60-0 2,350 FRX 1937 196,000 900 FRX 1973 14,900_ 98 FRW 1972 145,000 710 FRSQW 1951 26,900 394 FRSWX 1952 11,380 200 FRX 1978 284,500 18,760 FRSQW 1986 92,000 1,820 FSR 1977 58,200 1,137 FSQRW 1970 1,368,200 14,200 FSRWP 1948 377,100 7,910 FSI 1983 227,700 4,850 FSQRW 1964 3,825,400 105,500 FSPN 1953 1,284,400 19,000 FP 1942 100,700 1,820 FSX 1941 271,400 8,690 FRWX 1950 55,030 880 FRWXS 1974 966,700 13,250 FSQRW 1951 289,000 3,570 FSAX 1976 1,348,000 17,040 FSQRW 1964 1,737,600 23,610 FSPYW 1963 1,519,000 24,460 FSN 1978 229,500 5,340 FSRW 61 67 Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 93 96 165 72 93 118 83 47 65 64 87 48 64 83 74 111 46 56 113 45 52 87 71 118 84 100 200 104 97 225 73 70 114 110 85 68 89 101 94 125 121 137 120 A-5 1,650 865 10,000 5,750 2,750 6,620 3,880 1,400 9,900 5,650 3,700 5,600 6,300 1,390 950 824 1,694 2,330 1,220 1,750 775 2,350 1,550 1,950 1,400 700 944 1,100 1,450 5,250 3,193 4,026 15,140 7,730 3,200 2,990 12,225 6,010 2,920 10,200 5,200 9,466 4,600 4,000 15,200 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30,1987 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OKLAHOMA (Continued) Little River Jackfork Creek Hominy Creek Arkansas Beaver Creek Poteau River Applegate River Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Middle Fork, Willamette River Long Tom River Willow Creek Wright City Clayton Skiatook Tulsa Waurika Wister Medford Blue River Cottage Grove Cottage Grove Eugene Eugene Heppner 1969 465,780 1983 429,600 1985 500,700 1953 1,230,800 1977 343,500 1949 427,900 1981 82,000 1968 85,000 1942 30,060 1949 70,500 1965 115,000 1941 110,000 1983 13,250 3,750 FSQW Earth 14,360 FSRW Earth 10,190 FSQRW Earth 12,900 FP Earth 10,100 FISQWR Earth 5,360 FSAX Earth 988 AFIQRSW Gravel Embankment 975 FINR Earth 1,155 FINR Concrete & & Earth 1,885 FINR Concrete & Earth 1,865 FINR Rockfill & Concrete 10,305 FINR Rockfill & Concrete 96 FRN Roller Compacted Concrete PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Aylesworth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque Crooked Creek Curwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kinzua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenanago Stillwater Tioga-Hammond Lakes Hammond Lakes Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Kettle Creek Aylesworth Creek Pohopco Creek Tulephoken Creek Conemaugh River Cowanesque River Crooked Creek West Branch, Susquehanna River East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Lackawaxem River Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenanago River Lackawanna River Tioga River Crooked Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny River Renovo Archbald Lehighton Reading Saltsburg Larenceville Ford City Curwensville Wilcox Blanchard White Haven Honesdale York Warren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Honesdale Huntingdon Sharpsville Uniondale Tioga Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence 1962 75,000 1970 1,700 1971 68,250 1978 50,010 1952 274,000 1980 89,000 1940 93,900 1965 124,200 1952 84,300 1969 99,000 1961 110,700 1960 24,500 1942 28,000 1965 1,180,000 1942 95,300 1941 74,200 1960 52,000 1973 762,000 1966 191,400 1960 12,000 1978 62,000 1978 63,000 1940 133,400 1970 47,640 1973 20,000 1943 254,000 160 FRW NPP F 947 FQRSW 960 FAQRS 300 FW 410 FR 350 FRW 790 FR 90 FARQW 1,730 FRW 80 FNRW NPP F NPP FRW 1,900 PFAQRW 210 FRW 170 FRW 290 FNRW 8,300 FRW 1,910 FAQRW 85 FS 470 FR 680 FR 480 FRW NPP F 118 FQRA 450 FARWQ A-6 Pine Creek Sardis Skiatook Tenkiller Waurika Wister OREGON Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Fall Creek Fern Ridge Willow Creek Red Red Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Rogue River Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia Columbia 124 81 143 197 106 99 242 319 114 145 193 49 160 7,712 14,138 3,590 3,000 16,600 5,700 1,300 1,329 2,110 3,352 5,100 6,624 1,780 Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & rock Earth & Rock Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & rock Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth 165 90 170 98 137 151 143 131 184 100 234 112 83 1'77 114 162 140 225 68 77 140 122 154 88 90 184 1,350 1,270 4,300 1,775 1,265 3,100 1,480 2,850 1,725 6,835 3,000 1,273 1,000 1,877 960 926 1,230 1,700 720 1,700 2,710 6,450 1,050 1,420 4,650 1,610 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30,1987 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Cottonwoiod Springs Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Dam White Rock TEXAS Addicks Aquilla Bardwell Barker Belton Benbrook Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' the Plains Granger Dam and Lake Grapevine Hords Creek Lake Kemp Lavon Lewisville Navarro Mills North San Gabriel Dam, Lake Georgetown O.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan Gathright Dam & Lak Moomaw North Fork of Pound River Missouri Missouri Red River of the North Red River of the North San Jacinto Brazos Trinity San Jacinto Brazos Trinity Red Brazos Trinity Colorado Red Trinity Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Ohio James Chehalis Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Creek Bois de Sioux River Bois de Sioux River Sourth Mayde Creek Aquilla Creek Waxahachie creek Buffalo Bayou Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek Hords Creek Wichita River East Fork, Trinity River Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River North Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River West River Ottauguechee River Black River West River Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton Addicks Hillsboro Ennis Barker Belton Fort Worth Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Wichita Falls Fort Worth Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Paris Comanche Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana Jamaica North Hartland Springfield Townshend Ompompanoosuc River Union Village Pound River Jackson Wynoochee River Haysi Alleghany Montesano 19534 7,200 36 FRWX Earth 1970 8,385 41 FRWX Earth 1941 164,500 10,925 FRX 1941 85,000 6,500 FRX 1948 204,500 1983 146,000 1965 140,000 1945 207,000 1954 1,097,600 1952 258,600 1959 842,100 1980 244,200 1952 425,500 1948 25,310 1972 502,900 1953 748,200 1954 989,700 1962 212,200 1980 130,800 1952 396,400 1967 189,100 1963 374,200 1967 507,500 1968 630,400 1965 726,400 1957 2,654,300 1961 54,600 1960 71,420 1960 51,067 1961 33,700 1950 38,000 1963 145,700 1979 123,739 1972 70,000 NPP FX 3,280 FSX 3,570 FRSX NPP FX 12,300 FIRSX 3,770 FNRXA 18,700 FRS 4,400 FRSWX 7,280- FNRSXA 510 FARSX 15,590 FX 21,400 FRSW 23,280 FRSX 5,070 FRSX 1,310 FRSWX 5,440 FRSX 5,993 FRSX 4,610 FRSX 11,460 FRSX 6,430 FRSX 7,270 FRSX 20,300 FRSX 75 FRW 220 FRW 290 FRW 100 FRW NPP FRW 310 FAWR 2,532 FQR 1,150 FSARI Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Earth Earth Earth Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Concrete & Earth 127 925 123 1,190 14 9,100 16 14,400 49 61,166 104.5 11,890 82 15,400 37 72,844 192 5,524 130 9,130 97 10,600 115 16,320 137 12,850 91 6,800 115 8,890 81 19,483 125 32,888 82 6,700 164 6,700 128 40,885 96 7,080 86 13,460 80 26,175 200 15,624 140 24,618 100 18,500 265 915 185 1,520 120 2,940 133 1,700 170 1,100 250 960 257 1,172 177 1m700 A-7 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30,1987 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) WASHINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain Wynoochee WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Bluestone Burnsville East Lynn R. D. Bailey Summersville Lake Sutton Tygart River WISCONISIN Eau Galle Green Columbia Puyallup Chehalis Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Green River Mill Creek White River Wynoochee River Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw Montesano 1961 106,000 1,600 FAS Rock 1942 8,300 225 FR Earth 1953 106,000 NPP FR Rock 1972 70,000 1,150 FSARI Concrete & Earth 235 675 145 3,200 425 700 177 1,700 Beech Fork Lavalette 1977 37,540 450 FRW Earth 86 1,080 New River Hinton 1952 631,000 1,800 FRWX Concrete 180 2,048 Little Kanawha Burnsville 1977 65,400 550 FQRW Earth & Rock 89 1,400 Twelve Pole Creek East Lynn 1970 82,500 823 FQRW Earth & Rock 122 650 Guynabdot River Justice 1979 203,700 440 FQRW Earth & Rock 310 1,397 Gauley River Summersville 1965 413,800 407 FANR Rock 390 2,280 Elk River Sutton 1960 265,300 270 FNAR Concrete 220 1,921 Tygart River Grafton 1938 287,700 620 FNAR Concrete 230 1,921 Chippewa Eau Galle Spring Valley 1969 43,600 150 FR Earth 122 1,600 A-8 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA Big Dry Creek Comanche 2 Cherry Valley3 Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar 2 New Don Pedro3 New Exchequer2 Oroville 2 Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook IDAHO Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW YORK Onandaga OKLAHOMA Altus4 Lake Hudson5 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees UTAH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville San Joaquin San Joaquin Tuolumne Alameda Rio Hondo Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Sacramento Whitewater Big Dry Creek Mokelumne River Cherry Creek Arroyo Del Valle Eaton Wash Yuba River Tuolomne River Merced River Feather River Tahchevah Creek Colorado Pinon Canyon Arroyo Housatonic Housatonic Connecticut Connecticut East Branch, Naugatuck River Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook Upper Snake Willow Creek Potomac Savage Upper Bear Creek Mississippi Oswego Onondaga Creek Red North Fork, Red Arkansas Grand (Neosho) River Arkansas Grand (Neosho) River Beaver Big Wash Winooski Jail Branch Winooski Waterbury Winooski North Branch, Fresno Clements Sonora' Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Torrington Torrington Winchester Winchester 1948 16,250 1963 431,500 1956 268,000 1968 77,000 1937 960 1968 960,00 1970 2,030,000 1966 1,026,000 1964 3,539,000 1965 960 NPP NPP 475 200 NPP 1,910 3,520 1,900 5,838 NPP F FRS FS FRS F FIRPW FISP FIR FIRSW F Earth 40 Earth &Rcck 171 Earth & Rock 315 Earth 223 Earth 82 Concrete 645 Earth & Rock 565 Rock 480 Earth 770 Earth 42 1964 4,350 NPP FRW Earth 1964 4,350 1962 8,620 1963 9,700 1970 1,480 NPP NPP 10 NPP FR F FR F 20,038 2,450 2,500 880 1,795 2,323 1,920 1,200 6,850 3,610 92 700 Earth 92 Earth & Rock 73 Earth 178 Earth 68 Idaho Falls 1979 100,500 364 FIR Earth 100 1,200 940 1,160 184 840 Western Port 1952 20,000 360 FRS Earth & Rock 184 Hannibal 1962 8,700 NPP F Earth Syracuse 1949 18,200 NPP F Earth Altus 1948 152,429 6,260 Locust Grove 1964 444,500 10,0006 Disney Milford East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 1961 1,200 NPP 1938 12,050 NPP 1938 37,000 890 1938 20,300 570 FISR FRP FRP 1,050 65 1,450 67 1,782 Concrete 98 1,112 Concrete 147 4,494 & Earth Concrete 147 6,565 F Earth F FRH FR Earth Earth Earth 34 2,814 65 158 115 1,460 1,800 1,525 A-9 - -~-~--I -- -- FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 (Continued) NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power Q - Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 1 Acres of Water surface at top of permanent pool 2 Federal Government contributed for flood storage 3 Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on itnerim basis. Second and final phase,N ew Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection, construction and operation by City and County of San Fransisco, and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 4 Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 5 Construction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 6 Top of power pool. A-10 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Allegheny River, Oil City, PA............................................ Allegheny River, Tionesta, PA........................................... Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and M O ..................................................... Alum Creek Lake, OI....................................................... Ararat River, Mt. Airy, NC (Sec 205)................................. Arcadia Lake, OK......................................................... Ardsley, NY........................................................................ Arkansas-Red Basins Chloride Control (Area VIII), Ok, TX, and KS (Stage I)............................................ Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS.............................................. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC.............................. Beaver Creek, Webster Co., NE, Bridge 14710 (Sec 14)... Beaver Creek, Webster Co., NE, Bridge 23025 (Sec 14)... Beaver Creek, Webster Co., NE, Bridge 43430 (Sec 14)... Beaver River, Bridgewater, PA (Sec 14)........................... Bee Lake Drainage Structure............................................ Beech Fork Lake, WV....................................................... Bettendorf, IA .................................................................... Big Blue River, Saline Co., NE, Tuxedo Park Read & Bridge (Sec 14).......................................................... Big Brown Creek & Tributary, Prentiss Co., MS............. Big Sioux River, Harrisburg, SD (Sec 14)......................... Big Sioux River, Sec., 32, Plymouth Co., IA (Sec 14)........ Big Sioux River, Well House, SD (Sec 14)........................ Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area, KY and TN...................................... Big Stone Lake & Whetstone River, MN and SD............. Big Wood River, ID (Sec 208).......................................... Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, WI 9Sec 205)................................................. Blackbird Creek, Burt Co., NE (Sec 14)............................. Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (Sec 14)......... Blackstone River, Millbury, MA (Sec 14).......................... Bloomington Lake, MD and WV........................................ Boggy Creek, TX................................................................ Boise River, ID (Sec 208)................................................... Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL............................................... Bridgeport, MI (Sec 14).................................................... Brookville, Lake, IN.......................................................... Brush Bayou, LA............................................................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX................................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker, Dam Saftey Assurance.................................. Biirnsville Lake, WV......................................................... Caesar Creek Lake, OH.................................................... Calloway Branch, TX.......................................................... Candy Lake, OK ................................................................ Canton Bridge, Trigg Co., KY............................................ 1982 1982 1983 1970 1985 1980 1987 1976 1984 1967 1986 1986 1986 1986 1987 1970 1982 1986 1986 1985 1984 1985 1979 1971 1984 1984 1985 1985 1985 1971 1985 1984 1986 1986 1966 1977 1956 1986 1972 1971 1985 1976 1986 1983 1983 1975 1987 1986 1987 1982 1987 1987 1987 1978 1986 1987 1987 1987 1975 1987 1985 1986 1981 1986 1987 1974 1978 1986 1984 1984 1984 1986 1987 1990 1989 19883 1987* 1989 1987 1987 1987 1988 1988 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1988 1988 1985 1988 1987 1986 1986 1984 1990 1985 1986 1987 1983 1980 Indefinite 1989 1986 1985 1986 Deferred 1987 Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Chloride Control Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection National Recreation Area Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Dam Safety Reservoir Reservoir Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection B-1 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Carrfork Lake, KY............................................................ Catherine Creek, OR (Sec 208)......................................... Cave Run Lake, KY......................................................... Central and Southern, FL................................................. Chartiers Creek, McKees Rocks & Kennedy TWP, PA (Sec 14)................................................................ Chattahoochee River, Eugaula, AL.................................. Chena River Lakes, AK................................................... Chillicothe, OH................................................................ Clear River, Burrillville, RI (Sec 14)................................. Columbus, NE (Sec 205.................................................... Conesus Lake, Lovonia, NY (Sec 205)............................... Cooper Lake and Channels, TX......................................... Copan Lake, OK .............................................................. Corte Madera Creek, CA................................................... Cowanesque Lake, PA....................................................... Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA (Sec 14)...................................................................... Creek Road Bridge, MS............................................. Cucamonga Creek, CA.................................................... Dade County, FL............................................................. Darby Creek, PA............................................................. Dayton, KY....................................................................... Demonstration Erosion Control, MS................................. Deschutes River, OR (Sec 205)........................................... Devils Lake, ND (Sec 205)................................................ Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel.................... Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14).......................... East Branch, Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel near Huger, SC (Sec 14)............................................. East Branch, Chagrin River, Baldwin Rd, Kirtland, O H (Sec 14).................................................................. East Branch, Chagrin River, SR 615, Kirtland OH (Sec 14) ..................................................................... East Lynn Lake, W V......................................................... East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet & Jamaica Bay, NY, Part I......................................................... East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL.......................................... El Dorado Lake, KS.......................................................... El Paso, TX ...................................................................... Elizabeth, NJ................................................................... Elk Creek, Clarksburg, WV (Sec 14)................................. Elk Creek Lake, OR........................................................ Elk Creek, Willis, NE (Sec 14)........................................... Ellicot Creek, NY............................................................. Elm Creek, Burt Co., NE (Sec 14)..................................... Elm Creek, Webster Co., NE, Bridge 23015 (Sec 14)........ Elm Creek, Webster Co., NE, Bridge 33425 (Sec 14)........ Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha, WA (Sec 205).......... 1964 1985 1965 1950 1986 1986 1973 1971 1986 1982 1986 1958 1973 1966 1987 1986 1985 1976 1975 1986 1978 1985 1987 1983 1967 1986 1986 1986 1986 1965 1975 1974 1974 1971 1972 1986 1971 1985 1986 1985 1986 1986 1987 1976 1982 1987 1981 1987 1986 1983 1990 1984 1986 1987 1997 1987 1987 1989 1986 1987 1988 1988 1992 1989 1989 1990 1987 1987 1985 1985 1982 1988 1992 1987 1982 1986 Indefinite 1988 1986 1988 1983 Indefinite 1987 1987 1987 1987 1970 1987 1987 1987 1982 1977 1988 1986 1981 1989 1973 Indefinate 1988 1987 1990 1987 1987 1989 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1988 Reservoir Snagging and Clearing Reservoir Local protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Reservoirs and Levee Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir, channel improvement Reservoir Local Protection Water Supply Modification Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Shore Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Beach Nourishment Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection B-2 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Enderlin, Maple River, ND (Sec 205)................................ Euclid Creek, OH (Sec 205).............................................. Evansville, IN .............................................. .................... Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA.......................................... Falls Lake, NC .................................................................. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY ............................ (Rem ainder)...................................... ......................... Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO............................................. Four Rivers Basin, FL ..................................................... Galena Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK...................... Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS................................. Great Fa;;s. M T................................................................. Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS....................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, MS....................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS....................................... Gult Street and Trumbull Avenue, Milford, CT (Sec 14). Hanover, Hennepin County, MN (Sec 14)......................... Hooverson Heights, WV (Sec 14)....................................... Joe Pool Lake, TX............................................................ Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee Dist., IL.................. Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI (Sect 14)......................... Kimsey Creek, Holt Co., Casteel Bridge (Sec 14)............. Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR....................................... Lake Darling, Souris River, ND........................................ Lake Erie, SR 531, Geneva, OH (Sec 14).......................... Lake Michigan, Cleveland, WI........................................... Lake Michigan, Lake Forest, IL (Sec 14)......................... Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Forest Park, IL.................... Lake Michigan, Waterworks Facility, Cudahy, WI.......... Lake Pontchartrain, LA.................................................... Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN (Sec 205).................... Larose to Golden Meadow, LA........................................... Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Im provem ent, TX..................................................... Lead Bayou, MS (Sec 205).................................................. Leaf & Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS............................. Levee Unit 5, Wabash River, IN........................................ Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA............................. Lewis Brank (Mile 2.0 to 4.0) County Rd, Houston Co., T N ............................................................................... Liberty State park, Levee and Seawall, NJ (Sec 205)...... Little Blue River, Marshall Col, KS FAS Road 1108 (Sec 14)..................................................................... 1982 1983 1939 1986 1973 1963 1963 1987 1966 1987 1986 1982 1986 1987 1987 1986 1986 1986 1975 1980 1986 1986 1981 1985 1986 1986 1986 1987 1986 1967 1986 1972 1970 1982 1986 1964 1981 1986 1987 1986 Little Blue River, Adams Co., NE, Overy Bridge (Sec 14)1986 Little Blue River, Adams Co., NE, Pauline Bridge (Sec 14).............................................. ....................... 1986 1986 1986 1983 1988 1987 1987 1987 1986 1987 1987 1987 1987 1976 1969 1988 1988 1993 1989 1990 Indefinate Indefinate 1990 1990 1988 1987 1987 1988 1988 1988 1987 1988 1987 1990 1986 1987 1987 1985 1991 1987 1987 1987 1988 1987 Indefinate 1988 1992 1985 (mod) 1988 1988 1984 Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Bridge Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir and Channel Improvement Local Protection Bridge Protection Local Protection Indefinate Local Protection 1987 1986 1987 1987 1988 1987 1987 1987 Streambank Protection Shore Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection B-3 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Little Blue River, Adams Co., NE< Pimpel Bridge (Sec 14)........................................................... 1986 Little Blue River Channel, MO.......................................... 1975 Little Blue River Lakes, MO............................................. 1978 Little Dell Lake, UT.......................................................... 1986 Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV (Sec 14)................ 1986 Little Quilcene River, Near Quilcene, WA (Sec 14).......... 1987 Little Red River, Clinton, AR (Sec 205)............................. 1985 Long Branch Lake, MO..................................................... 1973 Los Coches Creek, San Diego County CA (Sec 205)......... 1986 Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA..... 1961 Lower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging & Clearing)..... 1985 Lytle & Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA........ 1973 Machjias River, Machias, ME (Sec 14).............................. 1987 Mahoning River, Highway 139 A, OH (Sec 14).............. 1985 Mahoning River, Warren, TWP, OH (Sec 14)................ 1986 Mankato and N. Mankato, MN.......................................... 1971 Marginal Way, Oguinquit, ME (Sec 14)............................. 1986 Marne Creek, Yankton, SD (Sec 14).................................. 1986 Martin Creek, Prentiss Co., MS........................................ 1986 Martins Fork Lake, KY..................................................... 1973 M auvaise Terre, IL.......................................................... 1985 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee Dist., IL..................... 1979 Medicine Bow River, Elk, MT, WY (Sec 14)...................... 1986 Merced County Streams, CA.............................................. 1986 Middle River at Argyle, MD (Sec 205)............................... 1985 M ilan, IL ............................................................................ 1980 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT (Sec 14)................................ 1986 M ill Creek, OH .................................................................. 1981 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO........ 1948 Miss. River Channel Improvements (AR, IL, KY, LA, MI, MO & TN)............................................................ 1928 Miss. River Levees............................................................. 1928 Monongahela River, Granville, WV (Sec 14)..................... 1986 Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA.............................. 1986 Mt. St. Helens & Vicinity, WA........................................... 1983 Muddy Creek, Syracuse, NE (Sec 14)................................ 1984 Mudline to Pineville, MS.................................................. 1984 Murder & Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL..................... 1986 Muskingham River Lakes, OH.......................................... 1976 Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance)........................................... 1982 New Orleans to Venice, LA.............................................. 1969 Newark, OH....................................................................... 1976 Nodaway River, Andrew Co., MO, Rad T (Sec 14).......... 1985 Nodaway River, Andrew & Holt Co., MO, Fillmore Bridge (Sec 14)........................................................... 1986 Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS.................. 1986 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (Sec 14)............................. 1986 1987 1987 1987 1989 1991 1987 1988 1986 1987 1980 Indefinate 1987 1990 Indefinate 1988 1987 1987 1987 1987 1985 1985 1987 1989 1987 1987 1987 1988 1987 1978 1982 1987 1985 1986 1987 Indefinate 1989 1988 1987 1987 1999 Indefinate (4) (4) 1985 1985 1986 1986 1987 2010 2008 1987 Indefinate 1988 1988 1985 1988 1988 1995 Indefinate 1989 1987 1987 1987 1987 Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Reservoirs Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Channel Improvement Main Line Levees Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Major Rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection B-4 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Ohio River, Chester, WV (Sec 14)...................................... Oil Creek Ice Control Project, Oil City, PA....................... Osage River, Miller Co., MO, Road HH (Sec 14)............... Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205)....................... Owyhee River, OR (Sec 208).............................................. Paintsville Lake, KY.......................................................... Pajano River, CA............................................................... Panola-Quitman Item C, MS............................................ Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE....................... Passaic River Basin, NJ and NY (Sec 205)....................... Patoka Lake, IN............................................................... Paw Paw, MI (Sec 205)..................................................... Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI (Sec 205)............................ Pearl River, M S.................................................................. Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS................................................ Pelucia Creek, Item 1A, MS....................... ......... Perkiomen Creek, PA........................................................ Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO................................ Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including New River)............. Platte River, Ashland, NE (Sec 14).................................... Pleasant Point, Perry, ME (Sec 14).................................. Plum Creek, Penn Hills, PA (Sec 14)................................ Point Place, OK .................................................................. Poquessing Creek, Bucks Co., PA..................................... Porter Bayou, MS (Sec 205).............................................. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR.................................... Presque Isle Peninusula, PA.............................................. Pt. Leflore, M S ....................................... ........................ R. D. Bailey Lake, WV...................................................... Rapidan River, Orange, VA (Sec 14)................................. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections.......................................... Ray Roberts Lake, TX....................................................... Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA........................................ Redbird Creek, Holt Co., NE (Sec 14)................................ Red River below Denison Dam, TX.................................... Red River Emergency Bank Protection............................ Red River of the North at Argusville, ND (Sec 205)......... Reserve Sewage Lagoon, NM (Sec 14)............................... Roberto Clemente Park, Pittsburgh, PA (Sec 14)............. Rochester, M N ................................................................... Rockford, IL (Kent Creek)................................................. Root Creek, Bolivar, NY (Sec 205).................................... Rosewood Beach, Bathhouse , IL (Sec 14)....................... Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA........................... Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA........ Sacramento River Flood Control, CA................................ Sacramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, CA...... Saginaw River, MI............................................................. San Antonio channel Improvement, TX........................... 1983 1987 1986 1984 1986 1973 1987 1984 1972 1987 1972 1985 1982 1984 1985 1987 1986 1977 1973 1986 1986 1983 1982 1987 1982 1975 1975 1985 1967 1983 1965 1975 1987 1984 1948 1971 1985 1986 1983 1987 1979 1979 1986 1963 1963 1918 1949 1965 1957 1984 1986 1984 1983 1974 1978 1987 1987 1985 1987 1987 1984 1986 1975 1986 1986 1987 1989 1984 1984 1987 1979 1984 1989 1987 1986 1987 1991 1988 1986 1991 1988 1983 1987 1987 1985 1987 1987 1987 1985 1991 1987 1987 1984 1987 1988 1988 1993 1989 1986 1988 1987 Indefinate 1991 1993 1987 1989 Indefinate 1988 1987 1984 1995 1988 1984 1987 1991 Indefinate 1989 1988 1992 1991 Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Beach Replentishment Streambank Protection Reservoir Streambank Erosion Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-5 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project San Gabriel River, TX..................................................... Sardis Lake, OK....................................... ....................... Saxis Island, Accomack Cnty, VA..................................... Saylorville Lake, IA ......................................................... Scotts Creek, newberry, SC (Sec 205)................................ Scottsville, VA ................................................................... Seneca Lake, Sewage Treatment Plant, Watkins Glen, N Y (Sec 14)................................................................. Seneca River, Sewage Treatment Plant, Seneca Falls, NY (Sec 141)............................................................... Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND (Sec 14)........................ Sicily Island, LA, Levee................................................... Skiatook Lake, OK..................................... ..................... Smithville Lake, MO.......................................................... Sope Creek, Marietta, GA.................................................. Souris River, Velva, ND (Sec 141)...................................... South Creek, Martinsburg, NE (Sec 14)............................ South Fork, Boise River, ID (Sec 208)............................... South Platte River, Ft. Lupton, CO (Sec 14).................... South Platte River, Goodrich, CO (Sec 14)........................ South Platte River, Morgan Co., CO (Sec 141)................... South Platte River, Weldona, CO (Sec 14)........................ South Quincy, IL........................................ ..................... South River, Conway, MA (Sec 14).................................... Southwestern Jefferson County, KY................................. Spokane River, Spokane, WA (Sec 141).............................. Steele Bayou, MS....................................... ..................... St. Francis Basin...................................... ....................... Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV............................................ Stuart, Patrick Co., VA (Sec 2051)...................................... Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14)......................... Sweetwater River, CA..................................................... Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS............................ Tallahatchie River, Site 1, MS........................................... Taylors Bayou, TX................................... ........................ Taylorsville Lake, KY....................................................... Tennessee River (Mile 254) City Duck, Sheffield, AL.... Tennessee River (Mile 67.0) Paris Landing State Park, T N ............................................... ................................. 1973 1976 1986 1965 1986 1986 1987 1986 1986 1983 1974 1974 1986 1986 1985 1984 1986 1985 1985 1984 1987 1986 1974 1987 1966 1938 1977 1986 1984 1984 1986 1988 1982 1974 1986 1986 Tennessee River (Mile 650) Downtown Is. Airport, TN....1986 Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA 11........................... 1983 Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee (5)...................................... 1974 Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization)........... 1962 Tombigbee River, Hwy. 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL......... 1986 Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS....................... 1965 Trout Run, Portage Borough, PA (Sec 14)........................ 1984 Turkey Creek, Fillmore Co., NE, Bridge 123 (Sec 14)...... 1986 Turkey Creek, Fillmore Co., NE Bridge 385 (Sec 14)....... 1986 19801 1983 1987 1977 1987 1987 1987 1985 1982 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1983 (4) 1986 1983 1987 1984 1987 1987 19842 1990 1987 Indefinate 1988 1988 1987 1987 1988 2010 1988 1986 1988 1988 1987 1985 1987 1987 1987 1987 1990 1987 1989 1988 1995 1999 1988 1988 1986 Indefinate 1987 1988 1992 1990 1987 1987 1987 1987 1989 1987 1988 Indefinate 1984 1987 1987 Reservoir Reservoir Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Tributary levees & channels Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Bridge Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection B-6 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Tynes Branch, Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., M S........................................................................ 1986 Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH (Sec 205)........... 1986 Upper Yazoo Projects, MS................................................. 1976 U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (Sec 14).......................1985 U.S. Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (Sec 14).................. 1985 U.S. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL (Sec 14)............. 1985 Valley Creek, AL (Sec 14).................................................. 1985 Vermillion River, WWTP, SD (Sec 14).............................. 1985 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX.................................... 1968 Wakarusa River, Baldwin City, KS, City Waterline (Sec 14)....................................................................... 1986 Walkill River (Black Dirt Area), NY (Sec 2050............... 1984 W alnut Creek, CA............................................................... 1964 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (Sec 14).. 1986 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA.................................. . 1986 West Magnesia Canyon Channel, CA (Sec 205)............... 1985 West Papillion Creek, Douglas, Co., NE (Sec 14)............ 1985 West Tennessee Tributarieas............................................... 1960 Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205)....................... 1983 White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 14)................................ 1984 White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205)........................... 1984 Wigle Creek, Homer, NE (Sec 14)...................................... 1985 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA.................................... 1986 Wilamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR................... 1938 William H. Harsha Lake, OH........................................... 1970 W inona, M N ........................................................................ 1979 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL................... 1953 Wyoming Valley, PA.......................................................... 1983 Yankee Creek, Johnson Co., NE, Vesta Bridge (Sec 14)......................................................................... 1986 Yankee Creek, Johnson Co., NE, West Tecumseh Bridge (Sec 14 ..................................... ....................... 1986 Yatesville Lake, KY................................... ...................... 1964 Yonkers, NY................................................ ..................... 1975 1986 1986 1986 1986 1987 1986 1987 1987 1986 (4) 1094 1986 1986 1986 1978 1985 1962 1976 1986 1986 1987 1987 2013 1986 1986 1987 1986 1987 1988 1987 1988 1900 1987 1987 1988 1988 2003 1984 1986 1986 1986 1990 Indefinate 1985 1988 1986 1986 1987 1987 1992 1985 Bridge Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Sewerline Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Tributary Channels Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protectin Local Protection Rehabilitation of levee system Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir Local Protection 1Granger Dam & Lake Georgetown - Complete FY 83 2 South Fork - Constuction deferred indefinately, work on Reevaluation Report only 3Completion of Stage I (Truscott facilities) only. Stage II (Ross facilities) indefinate 4Project was in useful operation before Corps started working on it. Work consists primariliy of improvements to existing local interesst channel and levees 5Project consists of Levee upgrade and enlargement B-7 APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20,1987 Locks Dame Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL Claiborne Lock & Dam Millers Ferry Lock and Dam Jones Bluff Lock and Dam Allegheny River, PA and NY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Walter F. George Lock and Dam Atlantic Intracoastal Wasterway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock Dismal Swamp Canal Route: Deep Creek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keystone Lock Black Rock Channel and Tonawonda Harbor, NY Black Rock Lock Black Warrior, Warrior and Tombighee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam Armstead I. Selden Lock and Dam Win. Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam Holt Lock and Dam John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam (New Lock) Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaveral Lock Cape Fear River, NC Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 William O. Husks Lock and Dam Central and Southern Florida S-61 Lock S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock 81.82 Claiborne, AL 142.32 Camden, AL 254.42 Benton, AL 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick, PA 24.2 Natrona, PA 30.4 Freeport, PA 36.3 Clinton, PA 45.7 Kittanning, PA 52.6 Templeton, PA 62.2 Rimer, PA 84 600 30 16 13 Movable 3,1603 1973 84 600 45 16 13 Movable 9,9003 1969 84 600 45 16 13 Movable 14,9623 1974 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 107.64 Chattahoochee, FL 82 182.85 Columbia, GA 82 182.85 Fort Gaines, GA 82 11.56 Great Bridge, VA 72 10.66 Deep Creek, VA 52 33.26 South Mills, NC 52 1.5 3 Berwick, LA 72.53 New Iberia, LA 0.0 Buffalo, NY 116.610 Coffeeville, AL 213.210 Demopolis, AL 261.110 Eutaw, AL 338.110 Tuscaloosa, AL 347.010 Holt, AL 365.1 Adger, AL 2.7 Cocoa, FL 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC 99.0 Browns Landing, NC 123.0 Tolars Landing, NC 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 11 13 10 12 12 13 18 22 11 12 9 10 11 11 14 11 12 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 1,393 193420 1,436 193420 876 1927 780 1927 1,140 1928 916 1930 984 1931 950 1938 450 33 14 14 Movable 5,924 1957 450 25 19 13 Movable 620 1963 450 88 18 13 Movable 13,371 1963 530 3 167 167 None 1932 300 12 127 127 None 300 12 12 7 127 None 45 307 79 36 162 9 97 9 97 None 8 Fixed 60.5 9 200 103.1 9 200 88.0 9 200 7.8 9 200 9.7 9 200 6.2 9 200 5.9 9 200 9.4 9 200 6.9 9 200 9.6 9 200 9.8 9 200 46.7 6 100 28.5 6 100 85.0 6 100 12 90 1940 6 50 1941 6 1950 175 1913 68 625 5 21.6 21.6 None 1914 110 600 33 13 13 Movable 1,185 1965 110 600 40 13 13 Fixed 1,485 1962 110 600 22 13 13 Movable 1,832 1962 95 460 28 12 12 Fixed 700 1940 110 600 64 19 13 Movable 1,138 1969 50 8 80 34.5 6 80 7.1 21 200 96.6 9 200 47.9 9 200 77.0 9 200 8.9 9 200 18.1 9 200 110 600 68 13 13 Fixed 1,170 1975 42.7 9 200 90 40 40 40 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 30 56.0 Frostproof, FL 30 46.0 Avon Park, FL 30 32.0 Sebring, FL 30 25.0 Sebring, FL 30 16.0 Okeechobee, FL 30 600 3 14 14 None 1965 12 125 200 11 9 9 Fixed 275 1915 32.0 8 100 200 9 12 12 Fixed 229 1917 24.0 8 100 300 9 9 9 Fixed 220 1935 20.0 8 100 90 90 90 90 90 90 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 6 None 1963 1964 1967 1965 1965 1964 8 28.0 3 10.0 3 14.0 3 7.0 3 9.0 3 20 30 30 30 30 30 C-1 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20, 1987 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) S-65E Lock S-308B S-310 Chicago Harbor, IL Chicago Lock Columbia River, OR and WA Bonneville Lock and Dam The Dalles Lock and Dam John Day Lock and Dam McNary Lock and Dam Cross-Florida Barge Canal Inglis Lock, Dam and Spillway Eureka Lock and Dam Harry H. Buckman Lock Cumberland River, KY and TN Barkley Dam Cheatham Lock and Dam Old Hickory Lock and Dam Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir Fox River, WI DePere Lock DePere Dam Little Kaukauna Lock Little Kaukauna Dam Rapide Croche Lock Rapide Creche Dam Kaukauna Fifth Lock Kaukauna Fourth Lock Kaukauna Third Lock Kaukauna Second Lock Kaukauna First Lock Kaukauna Dam Kaukauna Guard Lock Little Chute combined Lock Lower Upper Little Chute Second Lock Little Chute First (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton Fourth Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton Third Lock Appleton Second Lock Appleton First Lock Appleton Upper Dam Menasha Lock Menasha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Green and Barren Rivers, KY Green River. Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Channel Lock Harvey Lock Algiers Lock Bayou Bouef Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Port Allen Lock 12.0 Okeechobee, FL 30 38.7 Port Mayaca, FL 56 0.0 Clewiston, FL 50 0.0 Chicago, IL 146.0 Bonneville, OR 190.0 The Dalles, OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 292.0 Umatilla, OR 168.611 Inglis, FL 20.0 Sparr, FL 90.4 Palatka, FL 90 400 60 5 14 5 6 14 13 6 None 14 Movable 13 Movable 80 600 4 23 23 None 76 86 86 86 84 84 84 30.6 Kuttawa, KY 110 148.7 Ashland City, TN 110 216.2 Old Hickory, TN 84 313.5 Carthage, TN 84 7.1 DePere, WI 7.2 DePere, WI 13.0 DePere, WI 13.1 DePere, WI 19.2 Wrightstown, WI 19.3 Wrightstown, WI 22.8 Kaukauna, WI 23.1 Kaukauna, WI 23.3 Kaukauna, WI 23.4 Kaukauna, WI 23.6 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 24.0 Kaukauna, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 25.4 Little Chute, WI 26.4 Little Chute, WI 26.5 Little Chute, WI 26.6 Little Chute, WI 27.3 Little Chute, WI 27.4 Little Chute, WI 30.7 Appleton, WI 30.9 Appleton, WI 31.3 Appleton, WI 31.6 Appleton, WI 31.9 Appleton, WI 32.2 Appleton, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 37.8 Menasha, WI 36 36 36 36 37 31 35 35 40 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 34 19.08 Intracoastal City, LA 84 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84 63.1 Calhoun, KY 84 92.612 New Orleans, LA 75 98.312 Harvey, LA 75 88.012 Algiers, LA 75 93.3 Morgan City, LA 75 131.013 Plaquemine, LA 56 228.512 Port Allen, LA 84 500 675 675 675 600 600 600 800 800 400 65 88 110 75 28 20 20 57 26 60 32 15 15 15 18 14 14 11 14 14 24 Movable 15 Movable 15 Movable 20 Movable 1964 4.0 3 30 1977 5.0 8 100 1980 .5 6 50 1939 .15 21 470 2,680 1938 8,735 1957 5,900 1968 7,365 1953 47.5 27 300 25,0 14 250 76.0 14 250 64.0 14 250 15 Movable 5,100 1968 11.0 12 150 Movable 3,830 1971 12 150 15 None 1972 21.2 12 150 13 Movable 9,959 1964 118.1 9 150 12 Movable 801 1959 67.5 9 150 10 Movable 3,605 1957 97.3 9 150 400 59 14 13 Movable 1,138 1973 71.9 9 150 146 146 146 144 144 144 144 144 147 144 144 144 144 144 145 145 144 9 7 8 9 10 10 10 11 9 11 11 14 7 10 8 9 10 10 8 10 12 8 10 9 10 7 9 7 6 7 6 6 6 7 6 600 16 1936 Movable 986 1929 1938 Movable 588 1926 1934 Movable 461 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 Movable 603 1931 1891 1879 1879 1881 1904 Movable 562 1932 1888 Movable 654 1933 1907 Movable 549 1934 1900 1901 1884 Movable 691 1940 1899 Movable 401 1937 16 None 5.9 6 100 6.2 6 100 3.6 6 100 0.3 6 100 0.2 6 100 0.1 6 100 0.2 6 100 0.4 6 100 1.4 6 100 6 100 6 100 1.0 6 100 0.7 6 100 3.4 6 100 0.6 6 100 0.3 6 100 0.3 6 100 5.1 6 100 28.3 6 100 401 1968 12 125 600 12 12 11 Fixed 482 1956 54.0 9 200 600 14 15 12 Fixed 519 1956 45.4 9 200 640 425 797 1,158 800 1,198 99 109 109 69 109 45 317 127 137 137 147 137 317 None 127 None 137 None 137 None 147 None 147 None 1923 1935 1956 1956 1952 1961 12 150 12 125 16 150 16 150 12 125 12 125 C-2 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20, 1987 Locks Dame Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Vermilion Lock" Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates Colorado River East Lock West Lock Hudson River, NY Troy Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL LaGrange Lock and Dam Peoria Lock and Dam Starved Rock Lock and Dam Marseilles Lock Marseilles Dam Dresden Island Lock and Dam Brandon Road Lock and Dam Lockport Lock Thomas J. (YBrien Lock and Dam Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir Kanawha River, WV Winfield Lock and Dam Marmet Lock and Dam London Lock and Dam Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia Lock and Dam Kentucky River, KY Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 624 Lock and Dam No. 724 Lock and Dam No. 824 Lock and Dam No. 924 Lock and Dam No. 1024 Lock and Dam No. 1124 Lock and Dam No. 1224 Lock and Dam No. 1324 Lock and Dam No. 1424 Lske Washington Ship Canal Kiram M. Chittenden Lock Large Lock Small Lock McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK Norell Lock and Dam Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam Murray Lock and Dam Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam 162.713 238.513 404.113 Abbeville, LA 56 Lake Charles, LA 75 Freeport, TX 75 1,200 39 117 1,205 69 137 157 117 137 157 None None None 444.8 Matagorda, TX 75 1,200 59 157 15 None 444.8 Matagorda, TX 75 1,200 59 157 157 None 153.8 Troy, NY 1934 1950 1943 1954 1954 16 16 12 200 200 125 12 125 12 125 45 493 17 16 13 Fixed 1,495 1917 2.2 14 200 80.2 Beardstown, IL 110 600 10 16 13 Movable 1,066 1939 77.5 9 300 157.7 Peoria, lL 110 600 11 16 12 Movable 536 1939 73.3 9 300 231.0 Uitca, IL 244.6 Marseilles, IL 247.0 Marseilles, IL 271.5 Morris, IL 110 600 19 17 14 Movable 1,280 1933 13.6 9 110 600 24 19 14 1933 26.9 9 Movable 819 1933 24.6 300 300 110 600 22 17 12 Movable 1,616 1933 14.5 9 300 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34 18 14 Movable 2,373 1933 5.1 9 300 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 40 12 15 None 1933 9 300 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 2 14 14 Movable 257 1960 6.9 9 300 30.0 Alanson, MI 17.8 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 83 1967 4.0 5 30 31.1 67.8 82.8 Winfield, WV Marmet, WV London, WV 56 56 56 360 360 360 28 24 24 18 18 18 12 12 12 Movable 834 1937 36.7 9 300 Movable 707 1934 15.0 9 300 Movable 707 1934 7.8 9 300 .8 Ellis Grove, IL 84 600 32 18 11 Movable 130 1973 35.0 9 225 4.0 31.0 42.0 65.0 82.2 96.2 117.0 139.9 157.5 176.4 201.0 220.9 239.9 249.0 Carrolton, KY Lockport, KY Gest, KY Frankfort, KY Tyrone, KY High Bridge, KY High Bridge, KY Camp Nelson, KY Valley View, KY Ford, KY Irvine, KY Ravenna, KY Willow, KY Heidelberg, KY 1.3 Seattle, WA 1.3 Seattle, WA 10.3 13.3 40.5 50.2 66.0 86.3 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 145 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 148 148 148 8 14 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 17 8896 10 9 9 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 80 760 26 33.5 29 28 123 26 16 16 Arkansas Post, AR 110 Arkansas Post, AR 110 Arkansas Post, AR Grady, AR 110 Pine Bluff, AR 110 Rodfield, AR 110 108.1 Little Rock, AR 110 125.4 Little Rock, AR 110 600 600 600 600 600 30 20 20 14 17 16 18 18 18 18 15 14 14 14 14 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 424 1839 400 1939 465 1844 534 1844 556 1844 413 1891 350 1897 257 1900 362 1907 472 1907 208 1906 240 1910 248 1915 248 1917 27.0 6 11.0 6 23.0 6 17.2 6 14.0 6 20.8 6 22.9 6 17.6 6 18.9 6 24.6 6 19.9 6 19.0 6 9.1 6 9.6 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Movable 235 1916 17.0 34 150 Fixed 4,677 1967 1967 Movable 42,073 1968 Movable 6,110 1968 Movable 5,745 1968 Movable 7,455 1968 600 18 18 14 Movable 8,890 1968 600 18 18 14 Movable 3,930 1969 155.9 Conway, AR 110 600 16 18 14 Movable 1,580 1969 3.0 9 36.9 9 15.8 9 20.3 9 21.8 9 250 250 250 250 250 17.3 9 250 30.5 9 250 21.0 9 250 C-3 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20, 1987 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Lock and Dam No. 9 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Ozark-Jetta Taylor Lock and Dam Lock and Dam No. 13 W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir Webbers Falls Lock and Dam Chouteau Lock and Dam Newt Graham Lock and Dam Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Locak and Dam No. 26 Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dam No. 19 Lock and Dam No. 18 Lock and Dam No. 17 Lock and Dam No. 16 Lock and Dam No. 15 Lock and Dam No. 14 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 Mississippi River (Continued) Between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 5A Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 1 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam Upper Lock and Dam Monogahela River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 Locks and Dam No. 3 176.9 Morrilton, AR 110 205.5 Russellville, AR 110 256.8 Ozark, AR 110 292.8 Fort Smith, AR 110 319.6 Fort Smith, AR 110 336.2 Salisaw, OK 110 366.6 Webbers Falls, OK 110 401.2 Muskogee, OK 110 421.4 Inola, OK 110 185.114 Granite City, IL 110 202.915 Alton, IL 110 241.415 Cap Au Gris, MO 110 273.415 Clarksville, MO 110 301.215 Saverton, MO 110 324.915 Quincy, IL 110 343.215 Canton, MO 110 364.215 Keokuk, IA 110 410.515 Burlington, IA 110 437.115 New Boston, IL 100 457.215 Muscatine, IA 110 482.915 Rock Island, IL 110 110 493.115 LeClaire, IA 80 493.315 LeClaire, IA 110 522.515 Clinton, IA 110 556.715 Bellevue, IA 110 583.015 Dubuque, IA 110 615.115 Guttenberg, IA 110 647.915 Lynxville, IA 110 679.215 Genoa, WI 110 702.515 Dresbach, MN 110 714.315 Trempealeau, WI 110 728.515 Winona, MN 110 738.115 Minneiska, MN 110 752.815 Alma, WI 110 796.915 Red Wing, MN 110 815.215 Hastings, MN 110 847.615 Minneapolis,, MN 56 St. Paul 56 853.315 Minneapolis, MN 56 853.915 Minneapolis, MN 56 11.2 Braddock, PA 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 56 110 56 600 19 18 14 Movable 1,505 1969 600 54 18 14 Movable 1,815 1969 600 34 18 600 20 18 600 20 14 15 Movable 2,480 1969 14 Movable 4,725 1969 15 Movable 7,400 1970 600 48 18 14 Movable 7,230 1970 600 30 19 16 Movable 4,370 1970 600 21 15 14 Movable 11,490 1970 600 21 15 14 Movable 1,629 1970 1,200 21 16 15 Fixed 3,240 1953 600 24 360 24 600 15 600 15 600 10 600 10 600 10 1,200 38 600 10 600 8 600 9 600 16 360 16 320 11 600 11 600 11 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 9 600 11 600 8 600 7 600 6 600 9 600 7 600 8 600 12 500 12 400 38 400 38 19 16 19 19 18 17 15 15 17 16 17 27 27 18 21 19 17 19 15 16 22 18 17 18 18 17 17 22 16 13 13 10 Movable 1,725 1938 10 12 Movable 1,296 1939 12 Movable 4,280 1940 14 Movable 1,024 1938 12 Movable 1,066 1938 12 Movable 2,144 1936 13 Fixed 4,434 1913 14 Movable 1,350 1937 13 Movable 921 1939 12 Movable 1,099 1937 11 Movable 1,203 1934 11 11 1922 14 Movable 1,343 1939 13 Movable 1,066 1939 13 Movable 849 1938 13 Movable 1,278 1937 12 Movable 763 1937 13 Movable 811 1937 14 Movable 935 1937 12 Movable 940 1937 13 Movable 893 1936 13 Movable 682 1936 12 Movable 1,619 1935 13 Movable 1,367 1935 14 Movable 365 1938 13 Movable 822 1931 15 1948 8 Fixed 574 1932 10 1917 400 25 14 10 Movable 188 1956 400 49 16 14 Fixed 3,584 1963 360 9 16 720 9 16 360 8 12 28.6 9 250 51.3 9 250 36.0 9 250 26.8 9 250 16.6 9 250 30.4 9 250 34.8 9 250 20.2 9 150 23.7 9 150 17.8 9 200 38.5 9 200 32.0 9 200 27.8 9 200 23.7 9 NS 18.3 9 NS 21.0 9 NS 46.3 9 NS 26.6 9 NS 20.1 9 NS 25.7 9 NS 10.4 9 NS 29.2 9 NS 34.2 9 NS 26.3 9 NS 32.1 9 NS 32.8 9 NS 31.3 9 NS 23.3 9 NS 11.8 9 NS 14.2 9 NS 9.6 9 NS 14.7 9 NS 44.1 9 NS 18.3 9 NS 32.4 9 NS 5.7 9 NS 0.6 9 100 3.8 9 100 16 Fixed 748 1951 12.6 9 300 16 195321 12 Fixed 670 1907 17.7 9 300 C-4 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20, 1987 Locks Dame Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Locks and Dam No. 4 Maxwell Locks and Dam Locks and Dam No.7 Locks and Dam No. 8 Morgantown Lock and Dam Hildebrand Lock and Darn Opekiska Lock and Dam Ohio River Locks and Dam No. 53 Locks and Dam No. 52 Smithland Locks and Dam Uniontown Locks and Dam Newburgh Locks and Dam Cannelton Locks and Dam McAlpine Locks and Dam Markland Locks and Dam Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam Greenup Locks and Dam Gallipolis Locks and Dam Racine Locks and Dam Belleville Locks and Dam Willow Island Locks and Dam Hannibal Locks and Dam Pike Island Locks and Dam New Cumberland Locks and Dam Montgomery Island Locks and Dam Dashfields Locks and Dam Emsworth Locks and Dam Okeechobee Waterway, FL St. Lucie Lock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Ortona Lock and Dam W. P. Franklin Lock and Control Structure Old River, LA Old River Lock Ouchita and Black Rivers, AR & LA Jonesville Lock and Dam (Black River) Columbia Lock and Dam (Ouachita River) 56 41.5 Monessen, PA 56 56 61.2 Maxwell, PA 84 84 85.0 Greensboro, PA 56 90.8 Point Marion, PA 56 102.0 Morgantown, WV 84 108.0 Morgantown, WV 84 115.4 Morgantown, WV 84 720 8 360 17 720 17 720 20 720 20 360 15 360 19 600 17 600 21 600 22 18.4 Mound City, IL 110 600 12 110 1,200 12 42.1 Brookport, IL 110 600 12 110 1,200 12 35.3 Smithland, KY 110 1,200 22 1,200 22 135.0 Uniontown, KY 110 1,200 22 600 22 204.9 Newburgh, IN 110 1,200 16 110 600 16 260.3 Cannelton, IN 110 1,200 25 110 600 25 374.2 Louisville, KY 110 1,200 37 110 600 37 56 360 37 449.5 Markland, IN 110 1,200 35 110 600 35 544.8 Chilo, OH 110 1,200 30 110 600 30 640.0 Greenup, KY 110 1,200 30 110 600 30 701.8 Hogsett, WV 110 600 23 110 360 23 743.5 Letart Falls, OH 110 1,200 22 110 600 22 777.1 Reedsville, OH 110 1,200 22 110 600 22 819.3 Waverly, WV 110 1,200 20 110 600 20 854.6 New Martins- 110 1,200 21 ville, WV 110 600 21 896.7 Warwood, WV 110 1,200 21 110 600 21 926.6 Stratton, OH 110 1,200 21 110 600 21 949.3 Industry, PA 110 600 18 56 360 18 967.7 Glenwillard, PA 110 600 10 56 360 10 974.8 Emsworth, PA 110 600 18 56 360 18 15.1 Stuart, FL 50 78.0 Moore Haven, FL 50 93.6 LaBelle, FL 50 121.4 Fort Myers, FL 56 250 13 250 2 250 11 400 3 304.0 Simmesport, LA 75 1,200 35 25.0 Jonesville, LA 117.2 Columbia, LA 84 84 600 30 18 600 18 18 12 20 20 21 21 11 15 18 14 18 15 15 15 15 34 34 34 34 32 32 38 38 49 19 19 50 50 45 45 45 45 18 18 37 37 37 37 35 35 38 38 17 17 17 17 16 16 13 13 17 16 14 10 12 13 12 190721 11 Movable 535 1932 11 193221 15 Movable 460 1964 15 1964 10 Fixed 610 192521 10 Movable 560192521/22 15 Movable 410 1950 15 Movable 530 1959 14 Movable366 1964 7.0 10 Movable 3,978 1929 10 Temporary Lock 1980 11 Movable 3,073 1928 11 Temporary Lock 1969 12 Movable 3,560 1980 12 12 Movable 3,516 1975 12 16 Movable 2,272 1975 16 13 Movable 1,965 1972 13 12 Movable 8,627 1961 11 1921 11 1930 15 Movable 1,395 1963 15 1963 15 Movable 1,756 1962 15 1962 15 Movable 1,287 1962 15 15 Movable 1,132 1937 15 15 Movable 1,202 1970 15 15 Movablel,206 1969 36.4 15 15 Movable 1,128 1973 15 17 Movable 1,098 1972 17 18 Movable 1,306 1965 18 15 Movable 1,315 1961 15 15 Movable 1,379 1936 15 18 Fixed 1,585 1929 18 13 Movable 1,717 1921 13 12 Movable 170 1941 11 None 1953 11 Movable 104 1937 -- Movable 1,150 1965 11 11 None 1963 14 Movable 450 1972 13 Fixed 400 1972 19.7 9 300 23.8 9 300 5.8 9 300 11.2 9 300 6.0 9 300 7.4 9 300 9 300 23.7 9 300 35.8 9 300 99.7 9 300 69.9 9 300 55.4 9 300 116.3 9 400 75.3 9 300 95.3 9 300 9 300 95,2 9 300 61.8 9 300 41.7 9 300 33.6 9 300 9 300 35.3 9 1,000 36.0 9 300 29.9 9 300 22.7 9 300 18.4 9 300 7.1 9 300 6.2 9 300 15.1 8 80 15.6 8 90 15.6 8 90 7.9 8 90 12 125 92.2 9 100 106.2 9 100 C-5 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20, 1987 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Calion Lock (Ouachita River) Felsenthal Lock (Ouachita River) Pearl River, MS and LA Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 Red River Waterway Lock 1 Sacramento River, CA Barge Canal Lock Snake River, WA Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Lower Monumental Lock and Dam Little Goose Lock and Dam Lower Granite Lock and Dam St. Mary's River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock Savannah, GA New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KY 1 8 Kentucky Lock and Dam Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam Auxiliary Lock Main Lock Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS Gainesville Lock and Dam Aliceville Lock and Dam Columbus Lock and Dam Aberdeen Lock and Dam Lock A and Spillway Lock B and Spillway Lock C and Spillway Lock D and Spillway Lock E and Spillway Bay Springs Lock and Dam Wilson Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock General Joe Wheeler Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock Guntersville Lock and Dam Main-Lock Auxiliary Lock Nicknjack Lock and Dam Chickamauga Lock and Dam Watts Bar Lock and Dam Fort London Lock and Dam Melton Hill Lock and Dam 281.7 226.8 84 84 29.417 Pearl River, LA 65 40.717 Bush, LA 65 43.917 Sun, LA 65 43.8 42.8 West Sacramento, CA 9.7 Pasco, WA 41.6 Kahlotus, WA 70.3 Starbuck, WA 107.5 Pomeroy, WA 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, MI 187.2 Augusta, GA 22.4 Gilbertsville, KY 206.7 Hamburg, TN 206.7 Hamburg, TN 49.1 Gainesville, AL 89.8 Aliceville, AL 117.6 Columbus, MS 140.4 Aberdeen, MS 154.1 Amory, MS 159.3 Smithville, AL 174.0 Fulton, MS 181.4 Fulton, MS 189.7 Belmont, MS 194.9 Tupelo, MS 259.4 Florence, AL 259.4 Florence, AL 600 12 18 600 13 18 310 26.7 10 310 15 10 310 11 10 84 685 38 22 86 600 4 13 86 675 100 15 86 675 98 15 86 675 98 15 86 675 100 15 80 800 22 31 110 1,200 22 32 80 1,350 22 24 80 1,350 22 24 56 360 15 14 110 600 56 11 110 600 55 10 110 1,000 55 10 110 600 36 15 110 600 27 15 110 600 27 15 110 600 27 15 110 600 30 15 110 600 25 18 110 600 25 18 110 600 30 18 110 600 30 18 110 600 84 18 110 600 94 13 60 292 94 11 274.9 Florence, AL 110 600 48 13 274.9 Florence, AL 60 400 48 15 349.0 Guntereville, AL 110 600 39 13 349.0 Guntersville, AL 60 400 39 13 424.7 Ghattanooga, TN 110 600 39 13 471.0 Chattanooga, TN 60 360 49 10 529.9 Breendenton, TN 60 360 58 12 602.3 Lenoir City, TN 60 360 72 12 13 Movable 350 1984 50.3 9 100 13 Movable 350 1984 55.2 9 100 10 None 10 None 10 None 1951 11.1 7 80 1951 3.2 7 80 1951 13.2 7 80 13 Fixed 550 1984 44.2 9 200 13 None 1961 1.5 13 120 15 Movable 2,790 1962 31.9 14 250 15 Movable 3,800 1969 28.7 14 250 15 Movable 2,670 1970 37.2 14 250 15 Movable 3,200 1975 38.0 14 250 31 None 32 None 23 None 23 None 1943 1968 1914 1919 27 12 Movable 360 1936 16.2 9 90 13 Tainter 7,976 1944 184.3 9 300 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 52.7 9 300 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1984 52.7 9 300 15 Movable 15,460 1978 49.1 9 300 15 Movable 14,790 1979 40.7 9 300 15 Movable 10,040 1981 27.8 9 300 15 Movable 10,640 1984 22.8 9 300 15 Movable -- 1985 13.7 9 300 18 Movable -- 1985 14.7 9 300 18 Movable -- 1985 7.4 9 300 18 Movable -- 1985 8.3 9 300 18 Movable -- 1985 5.2 9 300 18 None 10,640 1985 64.5 9 300 13 Bulkhead 3,728 1959 15.5 9 300 11 Bulkhead 3,728 1927 15.5 9 300 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1963 74.1 9 300 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1962 74.1 9 300 13 Tainter 3,837 1965 75.7 9 300 12 Tainter 3,837 1939 75.7 9 300 11 Tainter 3,763 1967 46.3 9 300 14 Tainter 5,654 1940 58.9 9 300 12 Tainter 2,646 1942 72.4 9 300 12 Tainter 3,687 1943 49.8 9 300 C-6 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20, 1987 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type 1 (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) (Clinch River) 23.1 Kingston, TN 75 400 54 13 13 Tainter 1,072 1963 38.2 9 30019 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR Lock No. 1 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 20 6 8 None 1872 6 150 Lock No. 2 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 3 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 Lock No. 4 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 .4 Guard Lock 26.4 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 6 8 None 1872 23.6 6 NS 1 Fixed; crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable; includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow. 2 Above mouth of Mobile River. 3 Includes length of earth dikes. 4 From mouth of Apalachicola River. 5 From mouth of Chattahoochee River. 6 Above Norfolk, VA. 7With reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 9 Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. 1 0 Frmm foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL. 1 1 Frm mouth of St. Johns River. 1 2 Above Head of Passes. 1 3 From New Orleans, LA. 1 4 Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. 1 5 Above the Ohio River. 1 6 Channel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. 1 7 From mouth of West Pearl River. 1 8 Tennessee River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 1 9 300-foot width from lock to mouth of Clinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton, TN. 2 0 Dates shown represent replacement structures. 2 1 Dates shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos. 2-8 inclusive. 2 2 Dam was rebuilt in 1959. 2301d 11(0 X 358 lock replaced in 1957. 2 4 Inoperable, caretaker status September 7, 1982. 2 5 Inoperable, caretaker status October 1, 1981. C-7 APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam (Sec 107).............................. AIWW - Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC................ Baltimore Harbor (50 foot), MD & VA.......................................... Barnegat Inlet, NJ......................................................................... Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA........................................ Brandon Road Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL................. Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Sec 107)..................... Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN........................................... Calumet-Sag. Mod., Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, Part 1........... Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY..................... Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.).................................. Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.).................................. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX............................................. Dashields L/D, Ohio River, PA............................... ................... Delaware River in the Vicinity Of Camden, NJ............................. Emsworth Locks and Dams, Ohio River, PA................................. Fisherman's Wharf Area, CA........................................................ Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY........................................................... ....................... Freeport Harbor, TX................................................. ................... Gallipolis Locks and Dam, Ohio River........................................... Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH.......................................... ................... Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD.............................................. Irondequoit Bay, NY................................................. .................... Jonesport Harbor, MER.............................................. ................... Kaskaskia River, IL................................................ .................... Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY....................................... Krebs Lake, M S (Sec 107)............................................................. LaGrange Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL......................... Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Little Rock, AR.......................... Lock and Dam 20, M O........................................... ...................... Lock and Dam 21, IL.................................................................... Lock and Dam 22, M O............................................ ...................... Lock and Dam 26 Replacement IL and MO.................................. Lockport Lock, Illinois Waterway, IL............................................ Locks and Dam 52, IL and KY............................................. Locks and Dam 53, IL and KY.................................................... Lorain Small Boat Harbor, OH (Sec 107)...................................... Lower Thorofare, Somerset County, MD.................................... Marseilles Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL......................................... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR........... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers............... Mississippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA.... ....................... 1987 1982 1987 1985 1985 1983 1984 1964 1955 1962 1967 1987 1972 1986 1987 1980 1984 1984 1987 1985 1986 1986 1984 1987 1966 1986 1983 1986 1987 1986 1987 1987 1974 1983 1979 1979 1986 1986 1985 1963 1910 1958 1983 1987 1966 1968 1966 1968 1986 1987 1986 1974 1983 1987 1988 1984 1990 1991 1992 1988 1987 Indefinite Indefinite 1982 Indefinite 1988 1990 1990 1988 1985 1987 In 1987 1987 1968 Dredging and breakwater Streambank Protection Deepdraft channel deepening Jetty realignment and dredging New larger lock Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Dredging and breakwater Dredging and channel, widening and deepening Channel improvements and relocation Replacement of existing locks and dams 43-45 inclusive Deep draft channel widening and deepening, deferred anchorage construction Dredge 50 ft. Channel Dredging Major rehabilitation of ocks and dams Dredging Major rehabilitation of lock and dam Breakwater idefmite Protection of a National Natural Landmark 1992 Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation 1995 Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam 1988 Breakwaters, channel excavation, wetland mitigation 1987 Beachfill, stone revetment 1987 Dredging, breakwater, navigation channel, getties and recreation 1989 Breakwater, dredging of new channel and anchorage 1986 Lock, dam and channel 1989 Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening 1984 Dredging, navigation channel 1990 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1988 Dredging, deepening, channel and turning basin 1990 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1989 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1989 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1991 Lock and Dam 1987 Major rehabilitation of lock 1985 Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 1987 Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 1987 Breakwaters 1987 Stone breakwater, jetty 1988 Major rehabilitation of lock and dam 1989 Locks and dams 2000 Regulating works 1984 Dredging and jetties D-1 APP NDIX D (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to mouth....................................... Montgomery Locks & Dams, Ohio River, PA................................ Moriches Inlet, NY................................................ ................. Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal W aterway).......................... ... ..................... Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI................................. ..................... New York Harbor, NY and NJ................................................... Newburgh Locks & Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY........................ Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.)..................................... 1912 1980 Indefinite Navigation and bank stabilization complete. Wildlife mitigation awaiting authorization 1983 1987 Major rehabilitation of locks & dams 1987 1989 Dredging and jetty repair 1984 1985 1976 Inc 1965 1966 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet, MD .............................................. 1983 Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA........................................ 1964 Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod)................................... Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA............................... Peoria Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL................................ Port Everglades Harbor, FL...................................... .................. Port Hueneme, CA....................................................... ................ Port Ontario Harbor, NY................................................................. Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA................... Rockport Harbor, Rockport, MA (Sec 107)..................................... Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA........................ San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA.......................................... San Francisco Bay to Stockton, VA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)................................................. Santa Cruz Harbor, CA............................................. .................. Shallow Creek, MD (Sec 107).................................. .................... Siuslaw River and Bar, OR....................................... .................. Smith Island, M D (Sec 107)...................................... ................... Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and KY.................................. 1987 1987 1986 1979 1970 1987 1974 1986 1986 1948 1971 1985 1987 1983 1982 1971 Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel).............................................. 1976 Tombigbee River, Columbus Port, MS (Sec 107)......................... 1987 Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY................... 1965 W allisville Lake, TX.................................................. ................... 1967 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN................................. 1991 Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation 1987 1987 Breakwater repair remental Indefinite Collection and removal of drift 1969 1974 Replacement of locks and dams 46 and 47 1967 Indefinite Deep draft channel, deepening and deferred anchorage const. 1936 1985 Rehabilitation of south jetty 1984 1994 Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment 1988 Dredge 50 ft. channel 1988 Dredge outbound element 1990 Major Rehabilitation of lock and 1972 19842 1987 1987 1987 1988 In In 1986 1987 1982 1980 1987 1970 1986 dam Dredging Dredging Breakwaters, channel excavation definite Lock and dam construction. Channel improvement and realignment 1987 Channel improvement and deepening 1994 Deep draft channel, widening and deepending definite Dredging and breakwater Indefinite Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging 1987 Sand bypass system 1988 Dredging 1987 Extending jetties 1983 Channel cut with breakwater 1987 Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 1987 Dredging 1987 Navigation channels & turning basin 1985 Replacement of locks and dams 48 and 49 Indefinite Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) 1988 Breakwaters and Jetties 1Walter Jones and Joseph P. Knapp completed; Core Creek has been funded for iniation of design; the three remaining bridges have not been funded. 2Lock and Dam No. 1 placed in useful operation in 1984. Construction is continuing on Lock and Dam Nos. 2 and 3, and has not ben initiated on Lock and Dam Nos. 4 and 5. *Funded by O&M Major Rehabilitation Program D-2 APPENDIX D (Contihued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1986 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project D-3 APPENDIX E NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20, 1987 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capability in useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project Height Height Project River in Vicinity (acre-feet) 1 Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Albeni Falls, ID Pend Oreille Newport, WA 1,153,000 Allatoona Lake, GA Etowah Cartersville, GA 670,000 Barkeley Dam & Cumberland Frand Rivers, 2,082,000 Lake Barkeley, KY KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR White Eureka Springs, 1,952,000 AR Blakely Mountain Ouachita Mt. Pine, AR 2,768,000 Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR Bonneville L&D Columbia Bonneville,OR 537,000 Lake Bonneville, OR & WA Broken Bow Lake,, Mountain Fork Broken Bow, OK 1,368,230 OK Buford Dam, Lanier, GA Chattahoochee Buford, GA 2,554,000 Bull Shoals Lake White Mountain Home 5,408,000 AR & MO AR Clarence Cannon Salt Perry, MO 1,428,000 Dam Carters Dam, GA Coosawatte Carters, GA 472,756 Center Hill Lake, Caney Fork Lancaster, TN 2,092,000 TN Cleatham L&D, TN Cumberland Ashland City, TN 104,000 Chief Joseph Dam Columbia Bridgeport, WA 593,000 (Rufus Woods Lake),WA Clarks Hill Lake Savannah Augusta, GA 2,900,000 GA & SC Cooper River, Santee St. Stephen, SC 2,560,000 Charleston Harbor, SC CordnlelHl ull L&D, Cumberland Carthage, TN 310,900 TN Cougar Lake, OR S. Fork McKenzie Blue River, OR 219,000 Dale Hollow Lake, Obey Celina, TN 1,706,000 TN & KY Dardanelle L&D, Arkansas Dardanelle, AR 486,200 AR DeGray Lake, AR Caddo Arkadelphia, AR 831,900 Denison Dam (Lake Red Denison, TX 5,312,300 Texoma), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, North Santiam Mill City, OR 461,000 including Big Cliff Lake, OR Dworshak Dam N. Fork, Orofino, ID 3,453,000 & Reservoir, Clearwater ID Eufaula Lake, OK Canadian Eufaula, OK 3,825,400 Fort Gibson Lake, Frand (Neosho) Ft. Gibson, OK 1,284,400 Lake Green Peter Lake, Middle Santiam Sweet Home, OR 491,000 OR, including Foster Lake, OR Greers Ferry Lake, Little Red Heber Spings 2,844,000 AR Harry S. Truman Osage Warsaw, MO 5,202,000 Dam & Res. Hartwell Lake, Savannah Hartwell, GA 2,842,700 GA & SC Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork Oakridge, OR 356,000 OR Wilamette Ice Harbor L&D Snake Pasco, WA 417,000 (Lake Sacajawea), WA Jim Woodruff Dam Appalachicola Chattahoochee, FL 367,300 (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL John Day L&D Columbia Rufus, OR 2,500,000 (Lake Umatilla), OR & WA John H. Kerr Roanoke Boydton, VA 2,750,300 Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA Robert F. Henry Alabama Benton, AL 234,200 L&D, AL J. Percy Priest Stones Nashville, TN 652,000 Dam & Reservoir, TN 1962 1955 42,600 1950 1950 74,000 1964 1966 130,000 1963 1965 112,000 1953 1956 75,000 1938 1938 1,076,600 1968 1970 1956 1967 1962 1953 1983 1985 1975 1975 1948 1961 1952 1958 1955 1956 100,000 86,000 340,000 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 2,457,384 1952 1953 280,000 N/A 1985 84,000 1973 1974 1963 1964 1943 1949 1969 1965 1969 1972 1944 1945 100,000 25,000 54,000 124,000 68,000 70,000 1953 1054 118,000 1972 1973 400,000 1964 1964 1950 1963 1967 1967 1962 1964 1982 1982(4) 1961 1962 1961 1982 1982 1982 90,000 45,000 100,000 96,000 160,000 344,000 30,000 603,000 1967 1967 30,000 1968 1969 2,160,000 1962 1953 204,000 1972 1975 68,000 1967 1970 28,000 42,600 NFPR C 90 1,055 74,000 FPRW C 190 1,250 130,000 NPFR CE 157 9,969 112,000 FPSR CE 228 2,575 75,000 FPRW E 235 1,100 1,076,600 NPR C 122 2,690 100,000 FPWSR E 225 2,750 86,000 NFPW E 192 5,400 340,000 FPR C 258 2,256 58,000 FNPRSW CE 138 1,700 500,000 FPRW ER 450 1,950 135,000 FPR CE 250 2,160 36,000 NPR C 75 801 2,457,384 PIR C 230 5,998 280,000 NFPRSW CE 200 5,680 84,000 PW CE 86 876 100,000 NPR CE 94 1,306 64,600 NFPRI ER 445 1,738 54,000 FPR C 200 1,717 124,000 NPR C 6B 2,683 108,000FNPRS E 243 3,400 175,000 FPRSN E 165 17,200 118,000 NFPRI C 382 1,528 1,060,000 PNFR C 717 3,300 90,000 ENPS E 114 3,200 67,500 FP CE 110 2,990 100,000 PFNIR C 340 1,380 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 160,000 FPRW CE 96 5,000 344,000 NFPRS CE 204 17,852 30,000 NFPRI GE 304 2,150 603,000 NPRI CE 130 2,790 30,000 NPRW CE 67 5,150 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 161 5,900 204,000 FPRW CE 144 22,285 68,000 NPRW CE 101 14,962 28,000 FPRW CE 147 2,716 E-1 APPENDIX E (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 20, 1987 Flood Control and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capability in useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project Height Height Project River in Vicinity (acre-feet)1 Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Keystone Lake, OK Arkansas Laurel River, KY Laurel Libby Dam, Lake Kootenai Koocanusa, MT Little Goose L&D Snake (Lake Bryan), WA Lookout Point Lake Middle Fork including Dexter Willamette Lake, OR Lost Creek Lake, Rogue OR Lower Granite Snake L&D, WA Lower Snake Monumental L&D, WA McNary L&D Columbia Lake Wallula, OR & WA Millers Ferry Alabama L&D, AL Lake Greeson, AR Little Missouri New Melons Stanislaus Lake, CA 6 Norfork Lake, AR North Fork & MO Old Hickory L&D, Cumberland TN Ozark-Jeta Taylor Arkansas L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Roanoke Robert S. Kerr Arkansas L&D and Reservoir, OK Sam Rayburn Dam & Reservoir, TX Angelina St. Mary's River, Great Lakes MI Snettisham, AK 7 Speel Stockton Lake, MO Sac Table Rock White Lake, AR & MO TenkillerLake, OK Illinois The Dalles L&D Columbia (Lake Celilo), WA & OR Walter F. George Chattahooche L&D, GA & FL Webbers Falls Arkansas L&D, OK West Point Chattahooche Lake, AL & GA Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Wolf Creek Dam Cumberland (Lake Cumberland), KY Tulsa, OK London, KY Libby, MT Starbuck, WA Lowell, OR Trail, OR Pomeroy, WA Kahlotus, WA 1,737,600 435,600 5,809,000 565,000 483,000 465,000 484,000 376,000 Umatilla, OR 1,550,000 Camden, AL 331,8090 Murfreesboro, AR 407,900 Oakdale, CA 2,400,000 Norfolk, AR Hendersonville, TN Ozark, AR Bassett, VA Sallisaw, OK 1964 1973 1972 1970 1954 1977 1975 1969 1968 1978 1975 1970 1955 1977 1975 1969 70,000 61,000 525,000 810,000 135,000 49,000 810,000 810,000 1953 1964 980,000 1969 1950 1978 1979 1950 1979 75,000 25,500 300,000 1,983,000 1943 1944 80,550 545,000 148,400 318,500 522,700 Jasper, TX 3,997,600 Sault Ste. Marie --- MI Juneau, AK 352,400 Stockton, MO 1,674,000 Branson, MO 3,462,000 Gore, OK 1,230,800 The Dalles, OR 53,000 Fort Gaines, GA 934,000 Wevbbers Falls, OK 170,100 West Point, GA 604,500 Whitney, TX 1,999,500 Jamestown, KY 6,089,000 1954 1969 1951 1970 1957 1973 1954 1971 1965 1966 1855 1952 1973 1969 45,200 1958 1959 1952 1953 1957 1957 1963 1970 1975 1953 1950 1963 1973 1975 1954 1952 100,000 100,000 14,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 46,700 200,000 34,000 1,806,800 130,000 60,000 73,375 30,000 270,000 70,000 FNPWS E 121 4,600 61,000 FPRW R 282 1,420 840,000 FPR C 420 3,055 810,000 NPRI CE 160 2,670 135,000 NFPRI CE 243 3,381 49,000 DFPISWR CE 345 3,600 810,000 NPRIF CE 146 3,200 810,000 NPRI CE 135 3,800 1,625,000 NPRI CE 183 7,300 75,000 NPRW CE 90 11,380 25,500 FPRW C 183.5 941 300,000 FIPRW ER 625 1,560 163,000 FPRS C 216 2,624 100,000 NPR CE 98 3,605 100,000 NPR C 58 2,480 14,000 FPR C 220 892 110,000 NPR E 75 7,230 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 18,400 NP Control Gate 27,0008 73,700 P C 9 18 338 45,200 FPRW CE 128 5,100 200,000 FPR CE 252 6,423 34,000 FP E 197 3,000 1,806,800 NPR CR 300 8,875 130,000 NPRW CE 114 13,585 60,000 NP E 84 4,370 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 30,000 FPR CE 159 17,695 270,000 FPR CE 258 5,736 1Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool level 2 G: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 4 All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be done for their testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. 6 Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 7 Being operated by the Alaska Power Administartion 8 Crater Lake Unit 9 Weir for Long Lake Nomenclature for Project Functions D--Debris Control P--Power F--Flood Control R--Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I--Irrigation S-Water Supply N--Navigation W--Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) E-2 APPENDIX F MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 30,1987 Nameplate Capacity Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Powerhouse, OR and WA.............................. 1974 1881 1991 PR 558,200 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO........................................ 1966 1985 1987 FNPRSW 58,000 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO................................................ ..................... 1965 19821 19891 FRPW 160,000 160,000 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, TTPI2 .................. ......... . . .... 1985 1988 1988 P 2,000 2,000 New Melones Lake, CA3 .............................. ........... ............ ... ........ 1966 1979 IND DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC............................................... .................... 1975 1985 1991 FRP 600,000 600,000 Cooper River, Charleston Hbr, SC.............................................. 1977 1985 1986 NWD 84,000 84,000 Snettisham, AK...................................................... ...................... 1967 1989 1989 P 73,700 27,000 1All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be done for either testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. 2 Single Purpose Power. Special Appropriation by Congress. 3New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation on november 20,1979. Corps retains responsibility ofr facilities along the lower Stanislaus River. Remaining construction consists of recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. KEY DFI NP RS W Redevelopment Flood Control Irrigation Navigation Power Recreation Water Supply Fish and Wildlife F-1 M O, NA Ji JL JL A A MAJOR FLOOD AND DAMAGES SUFFERED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1987 Damag Lives Suffere Conth Location Lost ($000) ct 86 Middle America 5 400,0 ov 86 Washington 1 25,0 pr 87 Northeast 14 210,0, in 87 Middle America 13 550,0 ul 87 Ohio Valley 4 50,0 ul 87 Texas 10 1,0 ug 87 Gulf Coast 0 50,0 ug 87 Illinois 4 100,0 es d 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Subtotal Estimated Total Major Floods Only All Floods in U.S. OTHER MAJOR WEATHER EVENTS AND DAMAGES Event Tropical Cyclones Tornadoes Tidal (SYZYGY) Drought Estimated Total (Exclusive of Floods) *Values from the National Weather Service 51 88 Number 5 747 11 754 1,386,000 $1,500,000 Dmages Sustained ($000) 0* 150,000 50,000 440,000 $640,000* Lives Lost 0* 42 00 42 G-1 DISTRIBUTION BY REGION FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) FY 1987 10-Year Average (1978-1987) Region $000 $000 New England 463,300 1,883,947 Mid Atlantic 30,300 3,406,567 Gulf & So. Atlantic 220,000 708,572 Ohio 172,900 4,427,933 Tennessee 4,400 5,045 Great Lakes 51,200 223,957 Upper Mississippi 430,600 1,164,539 Souris-Red-Rainy 52,000 171,879 Missouri 1,504,500 5,715,070 Arkansas-Red-White 996,600 2,103,112 Lower Mississippi 666,800 73,456,171 Rio Grande 113,600 583,686 Texas and Gulf 190,900 1,134,679 Colorado 0 398,260 Great Basin 0 60,315 California 154,900 19,117,250 Columbia-North Pacific 126,000 7,103,176 Alaska 17,000 55,559 Hawaii 200 7,529 Total 5,195,200 121,727,246 G-2 DISTRIBUTION BY DISTRICT FY 87 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS* (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) District $000 Vicksburg 405,606 Memphis 190,341 New Orleans 1,040 St. Louis 69,771 Kansas City 1,111,711 Omaha 392,827 Baltimore 8,157 New York 11,928 Norfolk 6,964 Philadelphia 3,291 Buffalo 19,893 Chicago 2,000 Detroit 31,352 Rock Island 428,568 St. Paul 52,039 New England 463,321 Alaska 17,000 Portland 73,932 Seattle 52,002 Walla Walla 61 Huntington 124,477 Louisville 26,655 Nashville 4,376 Pittsburgh 21,734 Pacific Ocean 220 Charleston 694 Jacksonville 2,619 Mobile 3,321 Savannah 1,594 Wilmington 211,710 Sacramento 0 Los Angeles 154,858 San Francisco 0 Albuquerque 115,063 Fort Worth 154,912 Galveston 36,002 Little Rock 154,701 Tulsa 840,472 Total $5,195,212 *Includes Corps-controlled projects and Corps-supported emergency operations. G-3 DISTRIBUTION BY STATE FY 87 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS* (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) State $000 Alabama 0 Alaska 17,000 Arizona 0 Arkansas 395,504 California 154,858 Colorado 642 Connecticut 224,314 Delaware 0 Florida 2,619 Georgia 4,220 Hawaii 220 Idaho 623 Illinois 260,336 Indiana 14,257 Iowa 376,965 Kansas 284,377 Kentucky 20,768 Louisiana 113,053 Maine 7,605 Maryland 7,000 Massachusetts 203,457 Michigan 2,828 Minnesota 5,888 Mississippi 226,975 Missouri 1,006,876 Montana 277 Nebraska 172,657 Nevada 0 New Hampshire 14,397 New Jersey 94 New Mexico 97,900 New York 4,739 North Carolina 94,430 North Dakota 53,497 Ohio 80,044 Oklahoma 718,329 Oregon 38,568 Pennsylvania 9,971 Puerto Rico 0 Rhode Island 9,975 South Carolina 694 South Dakota 536 Tennessee 5,253 Texas 192,464 Utah 0 Vermont 6,295 Virginia 124,709 Washington 86,774 West Virginia 48,768 Wisconsin 12 Wyoming 91 Total $5,120,860 *Includes Corps-controlled projects and Corps-supported emergency operations. G-4 FY 87 FLOOD DAMAGES INCURRED Property Acres Inundated State ($000) (Thousands of Acres) Lives Lost Alabama 755 5 2 Alaska 20,000 1 Arizona 7 0 Arkansas 15,045 63 3 California 1,015 0 Colorado * 0 Connecticut 5,000 0 Delaware * 0 Florida 645 10 0 Georgia 1,470 4 Hawaii 2,050 2 Idaho 17 0 Illinois 150,000 30 4 Indiana 1,906 20 1 Iowa 16,755 137 0 Kansas 152,000 415 1 Kentucky 68 2 Louisiana 1,175 1 Maine 61,250 5 1 Maryland 51 1 Massachusetts 47,480 7 1 Michigan 15 0 Minnesota 27,800 3 2 Mississippi 6,380 15 0 Missouri 100,550 16 1 Montana * 0 Nebraska 25,890 139 0 Nevada 13 0 New Hampshire 19,100 4 0 New Jersey 17,050 8 0 New Mexico 10 0 New York 75,275 15 12 North Carolina 20,461 5 0 North Dakota 4,943 30 0 Ohio 20,518 1 0 Oklahoma 22,250 6 4 Oregon 900 1 Pennsylvania 28 0 Rhode Island 550 0 South Carolina 31,771 4 0 South Dakota 3 0 Tennessee 95 4 Texas 546,515 5 29 Utah 250 0 Vermont 10,500 1 Virginia 1,510 6 Washington 30,150 1 West Virginia 125 0 Wisconsin 2,992 0 Wyoming 16 0 Puer-to-Rico 1,850 3 Total $1.5 billion 88 *Property damage unavailable but flooding occurred G-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 INDEX The following abbreviations are used in the index: LMK LMM LMN LMS MR+T MRK MRO NAB NAN NAO NAP NCB NCC NCD NCE NCR NCS NED NPA NPP VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT NEW ORLEANS, LA., DISTRICT ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI, RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES PROJECT KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OMAHA, NEBR., DISTRICT BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT NEW YORK, N.Y., DISTRICT NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT CHICAGO, ILL., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ALASKA DISTRICT PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT A Aberdeen, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Aberdeen Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Abilene, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-3, 17-10 Absecon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Absecon Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Accotink Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass. (NAN) 2-36 Adams Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Adams Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Addison, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Adena, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Adldkin Branch, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-8 Agat Harbor, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-1, 36-6 AIWW-Mooring Basins, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 AIWW-Tidal Lock in Snows Cut, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-28, 10-38 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 NPS NPW ORD ORH ORL ORN ORP POD SAJ SAM SAN SAS SAW SPK SPL SPN SWA SWF SWG SWL SWT SEATTLE, WASH., DISTRICT WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER DIVISION HUNTINGTON, W. VA., DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KY., DIVISION NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION JACKSONVILLE, FLA., DISTRICT MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT CHARLESTON, S.C., DITRICT SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT GALVESTON, TEX., DIVISION LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Alabama-Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-18, 10-29, 10-40, 10-45 Alameda Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Alamo Lake, Ariz. (SPL) 33-3, 33-10, 33-15 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (Closed) Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal (Great Bridge, Va.) (NAO) 5-22 Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho (NAS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-1, 17-8, 17-10 Alford, Green River, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-50 Algoma Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Alhambra Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35- 31 Aliso Creek Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Allatoona Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-21, 10-30, 10-40 Allegany, N.Y. Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Allegany, N.Y. Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17, 26-21, 26-26 Allegheny River, Pa., Locks and Dams (ORP) 26-24 Allegheny River, Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13 Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 I-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Allenville, Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Alley Bay, Beals, Maine (NED) 1-43 Alloway Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-14, 3-21 Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR + T) 42- 3 Alma Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Almond Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Almond Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 11-18, 12-18, 12-19 Alpena Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Alpine Dam, Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Alpine, Tex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Alsea River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. (SAS) 8-1, 8-11, 8-12 Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-14 Alteration to Rosiclare, Ill. (ORD) 22-3 Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir (NED) 1-45 Alton, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Altus Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Alum Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-2, 25-12, 25-16 Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Amazon Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 American River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Atchison,.Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Athalia, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Athens, Ohio (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Atlantic City, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Atlantic Coast of Maryland and Assateague Island, Va. (NAB) 4-20 Atlantic Coast of N.J. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets (NAN) 2-36 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (NAO) (SAW) (SAN) (SAS) (SAJ) 5-2, 5-14, 5-18, 5-22, 6-2, 6-18, 6-22, 7-2, 7-9, 7-11, 8-2, 8-11, 8-13, 9-2, 9-25, 9-32 Au Sable Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Auburn, N.Y., Owasco Outlet (NCB) 32-37 Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Augusta, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Augusta Levee, Ga. (SAS) 8-7 Augusta Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-15 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Aurora, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 Avoca, N.Y. (NAB) 4-13, 4-25 Avon Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-18 Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C. (Formerly New Hope Lake, N.C.) (SAW) 6-10, 6-15, 6-20 Bachelor Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Back Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Bagaduce River, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-43, 1-45 Bailey, R.D., Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-18 Bainbridge, N.Y. (NAB) 4-35, 4-39 Baker Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Baker River, Warren, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-25, 9-32 Ball Mountain Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-12, 1-27, 1-48 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-28 Baltimore Harbor, Md. Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. and Va. (NAB) 4-3, 4-22, 4-27 Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (NAO) 5-2, 5-14, 5-18, 5-25 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Bank Revetments and Dikes: Memphis District (MR+T) 42-39, 42-42 Bank Revetments and Dikes: New Orleans District (MR+T) 42-30, 42-32 Bank Revetments and Dikes: Vicksburg District (MR+T) 42-34, 42-36 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-11, 18-21 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith (SWL) 18- 21 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Banning Levee-San Gorgonio River, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Bar Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bar Point Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Barataria Bay Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-14 Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-6, 36-7 Barbourville, Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-35 Bardwell Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-15, 16-19 Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Barnegat Inlet, N.J (NAP) 3-2, 3-15, 3-18 Barnegat Light, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 I-2 INDEX Barnett Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-24 Barre Falls Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-12, 1-27, 1-48 Barren River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14, 24-27 Bartley, Nebr. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Bashbish Brook, Copake, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Bass Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-46 Bass Harbor Bar, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bassett Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-4, 27-19 Bastrop Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Batavia and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Bath, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Baton Rouge Harbor, La. (LMN) 11-14 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devil's Swamp), La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-29, 42-50 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Baudette Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Bay City Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33 Bay River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Bayard, W. Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Bayfield Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-9, 12-11, 12-14, 12-16 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-9, 12-11, 12-17 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. (LMK) 12-16, 12-18, 12-19 Bayou Bonfouca, La. (LMN) 11-14 Bayou Choupique, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-14, 42-28, 42-54, 42-58 Bayou Coden, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-26, 10-32 Big Sandy Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-3, 16-15, 16-19 Big Sandy River, W. Va. and Ky., including Levisa and Tug Forks (ORH) 25-19 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Big Slough - Mayo Ditch, Ark. (MR+T) 42-57 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-4, 23-9 Big Spring, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-4, 27-19 Big Stranger Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Big Suamico River, Wis. (NCE) 31-2, 31-33, 31-46 Big Sunflower River, Miss. (LMK) (MR-T) 12-14, 42-51 Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Big Thompson River, Johnstown (MRO) 21-20 Big Timber Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Big Walnut Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Big Wash, Milford, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Big Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-17 Billings, Montana (MRO) 21-18 Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-4, 10-26, 10-33, 10-45 Biloxi Harbor, East Harrison County Canal, Miss. (SAM) 10-5, 10-26, 10-33 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Binghamton, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Birch, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Birch Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Birch Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-9, 19-13, 19-17 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mo. (MR+T) 42-53 Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-53 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, La. (LMN) 11-16 Black Bayou Reservoir, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Minn. (NCS) 27-5, 27-19 Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Black Fork at Hendricks, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Black River, Ark. - Mo. (SWL) 18-16, 18-17 Black River, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Black River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Black River, Wis. (NCS) 27-23, 27-25 Black River, Butler County Road 607, Mo. (SWL) 18-4, 18-11 Black River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-33, 31-46, 31-63 Black River Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Black River Lake, Wis. (NCS) 27-25 Black River (North Bend), Wis. (NCS) 27-27 Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Black River (Port Huron), Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-2, 32-18, 32-24, 32-39 Black Rock Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33 Black Rock Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-49 Black Walnut Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Black Walnut Point, Md. (NAB) 4-36 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-5, 10-26, 10-33, 10-47 Blackberry Creek, Henry County, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Blackbird Creek near Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 I-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Blackfoot River, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Blackfoot River, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Blackstone, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Blackstone River Basin, Mass. and R.I. (NED) 1-10, 1-23, 1-47 Blackstone River, Millbury, Mass. (NED) 1-10, 1-23, 1-27, 1-35, 1-48 Blackwater Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Blackwater River, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Blackwater River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-22 Blaine Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-12 Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ark. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19 Blind Slough Diking District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Block Island, Harbor of Refuge, RI (NED) 1-53 Bloomington Lake, Md. and W. Va. (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-32 Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-11, 3-17 Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-11, 18-22 Blue River Basin (Kansas City District) (MRK) 20-17 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, Mo. (MRK) 20-2, 20-10, 20-13 Blue River Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Bluestone Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-16 Bluff Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) 41-1 Bodega Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Bodie Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-51 Boeuf River, La. (LMN) 12-14 Bogachiel River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Boggy Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-15, 16-19 Boise River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Boise Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Boligee Canal, Boligee, Ala. (SAM) 10-13, 10-28, 10-38 Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 26-28 Bolles Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-33, 31-46 Bon Secour River, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-26, 10-34, 10-42, 10-45 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, N.D. (NCS) 27-24 Bonnet Carre Spillway, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-56 Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-2, 37-17, 37-24, 37-28, 37-31, 37-37, 37-51 Bonpas Creek, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Bonum Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Boone County, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Booneville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Boston Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-52, 1-53 Boswell Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Boulder Creek, Boulder, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Bound Brook, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Bowman, Leland, Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Bowman-Haley Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-2, 21-10, 21-13 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Bradford, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Bradford, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Bradley Lake, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Bramwell, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Brandon Road Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20, 28-21 Branford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Branson Cove, Va. (NAB) 4-33 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Braymer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Brazos Island Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Brazos River, Tex., Velasco to Old Washington (SWG) 15-27 Brea Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Breckenridge, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Breton Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Brevard County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-29, 9-40 Brevoort Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Bridge Alterations Authorized Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-15 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-4 New England Division (NED) 1-9 Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-38, 1-45, 1-53 Bridges, Columbia River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Bridgewater, Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Brilliant, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Bristol Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33, 1-38 Broad Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Broad Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Broad Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-14, 5-18 Broad Creek River, Del. (NAB) 4-33 Broadkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Broadwater Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Broadway Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-7, 8-11, 8-15 Brockway, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Brockway Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Broken Bow Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-12, 19-14, 19-17 Bromley, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Bronx River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-22, 2-27, 2-37 I-4 INDEX Brookfield Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Brooklyn, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Brookport, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Brookville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Brookville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14, 24-27 Broward County, Fla., Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-18, 9-29, 9-40 Brown, Clarence J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24-8, 24-15 Browns Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33, 2-37 Brownwood Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina-South Carolina State Line) (SAW) 6-27 Brunswick Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-3, 8-6, 8-11, 8-13 Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO. (MRK) 20-9 Buchanan Dam-H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-23 Buck Creek, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Buckhannon, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Buckhannon River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21 Buckhorn Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-6,. 24-14, 24-27 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bucksport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Buena Vista, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Buena Vista, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Buffalo, Wyo. (MRO) 21-16 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-9, 15-14, 15-25 Buffalo Creek, Lee County, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Buffalo Fork, Ferry Location, Wyo. (NPW) 39-17 Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-18, 32-25 Buffalo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-19 Buffumville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-52 Buford Dam, Ga. (SAM) 10-22 Bull Run, Pa. (NAB) 4-36 Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-13, 18-24 Bullocks Point Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Bunker Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Burbank-Eastern System, Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Burbank-Western System (Lower) Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Burbank-Western System (Upper) Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Burch Creek, Weber County, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Burgettstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Burgettstown-Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Burlington, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Burlington, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Burlington Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Burlington Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Burns Small Boat Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-15 Burns Waterway Harbor, Ind. (NCD) 30-2, 30-6, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14, 30-15 Burnsville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-16 Bush, Alvin R., Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Butler, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Buttermilk Bay Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33 Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. (NAN) 2-36 C Cache Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-28, 42-53 Cache Creek Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 Cache River Diversion, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Cache River Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-29 Caddo Lake, La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-9, 12-11, 12-17 Cadet Bayou, Miss. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Cadle Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Caesar Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-6, 24-15, 24-27 Cagles Mill Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-6, 24-15, 24-27 Cahaba River, Ala. (SAM) 10-42 Cairo, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Calabash Creek, N.C. (SAN) 7-15 Calapooya River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Calaveras River and Little John Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, Calif. (SPK) 35-5, 35-23 Calcasieu River and Pass, La. (LMN) 11-14 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, La. (LMN) 11-14 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. (LMN) 11-14 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, La. (LMN) 11-14 Caledonia, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 California (Cincinnati) Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 California Debris Commission (CDC) 44-1 Calion, Ark. (LMK) 12-13, 12-16 Calloway Branch, Hurst, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Indiana (NCC) 30-2, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14, 30-15 Calumet River Bridges, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Camas Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Cambridge Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Cambridgeport Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 I-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Camden Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Camelsback Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Camp Ground Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Camp Perry, Ohio (NCB) 32-37 Campbells Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 Canal Point, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Canapitsit Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-25, 9-32, 9-42 Candy Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-9, 19-13 Cane River, La. (LMN) 11-14 Caney Fork River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Canisteo, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Cannelton, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Cannon, Clarence, Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-8, 14-10, 14-12 Canoe Creek, Henderson, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Canton, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Canton, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Canton Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-3, 19-9, 19-14, 19-17 Canton (Nimishillen), Ohio (ORH) 25-22 Canyon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-4, 16-15, 16-19 Cape Charles City Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-14, 5-18 Cape Cod Canal, Mass. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33, 1-53 Cape Fear River, N.C., above Wilmington (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-30 Cape Florida State Park, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Cape Girardeau, Mo., No. 2 (LMS) 14-14 Cape Girardeau, Mo., Reaches Nos. 1, 3 and 4 (LMS) 14-14 Cape Henry Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-18 Cape Lookout, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Cape May City, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Cape May Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Cape Porpoise Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Carbon Canyon Dam and Channel (SPL) 33-24 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Carlyle Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-20, 6-31 Carr Fork Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-42 Carrabelle, Fla. (SAM) 10-44, 10-45 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Carrollton, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Carters Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Carters Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-19, 10-29 Caruthersville Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-5 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Maine (NED) 1-38 Carvins Creek, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Cascadia Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Caseville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Caseyville, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Cashie River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Cassville Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Castine, Maine (NED) 1-22 Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Castlewood Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Cathance River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Catherine Creek, Oreg. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11, 39-17 Catherine Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Cathlamet, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-3, 32-18 Cattlettsburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Cave Run Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Cave-In-Rock, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Cecil M. Harden Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-7,24-15,24-27 Cedar Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Cedar Canyon Dam, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-16 Cedar Creek, Sussex City, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cedar Point, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Cedar Point Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-15 Cedar River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Cedar River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Cedars Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Celina Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-14 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-6, 23-9, 23-18 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-21, 9-30, 9-40, 9-47, 9-48, 9-49, 9-50, 9-51 Central City Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Chambersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries, (NPP) 37-49 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Channel Connecting York River, Va. with Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-23 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 I-6 INDEX Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, HFla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-25, 9-32 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Channel from Phoebus, Va. to Deep Water in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-23 Channel Improvements for Flood Control and Major Drainage on 16 Streams Tributary to Willamette River (NPP) 37-49 Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 Channel to Liberty, Tex. (SWG) 15-8 Channel to Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Channel to Port Bolivar, Tex. (SWG) 15-2, 15-13, 15-16, 15-34 Channels in the Straits of MacKinac (NCE) 31-62 Chapel Hill, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Chaplin River, Perryville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Charenton Drainage and Navigation Canal (MR+T) 42-50 Chariton River, Mo. (1944 Act) (MRK) 20-17 Chariton- Little Chariton Basin, Mo. (1965 Act) (MRK) 20-17 Charles River Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-36 Charleston Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-2, 7-9, 7-11, 7-15, 7-17 Charlestown, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Charlevoix Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-3, 31-33, 31-46 Charlotte Harbor, HFla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-25, 9-32 Chartiers Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13, 26-28 Chaska, Minn. (NCS) 27-5, 27-19 Chatfield Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-2, 21-10, 21-13 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-38 Chattanooga, Tenn. and Rossville, Ga. (ORN) 23-13 Chattooga Dams and Lakes, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Cheat River, W. Va. (ORP) 26-21 Cheatham Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Cheboygan Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-33, 31-46 Cheesequake Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, La. (LMN) 11-14 Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-12, 38-26 Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, Mass. (NED) 1-9 Chena River Lakes, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-12 Cheney Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-18 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Cherry Creek Lake, Colo. (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13, 21-19 Cherryfield, Maine (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Chesapeake, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Chesconessex Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Cheshire, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Chester, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Chester River, Md. (NAB) 4-4, 4-22, 4-28 Chester River, Pa. (NAP) 3-21 Chester River at Chester, Pa. (NAP) 3-13 Chetco River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-24, 37-31 Chewaucan River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Chicago Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-3, 30-9, 30-11, 30-14, 30-15 Chicago River, Ill. (NCC) 30-3, 30-9, 30-11,30-14 Chicago River, Ill. (North Branch) (NCC) 30-6, 30-10 Chickamauga Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Chicopee, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-45, 1-49 Chicopee Falls, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Chief Joseph Dam-Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Chignik, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-3, 25-12, 25-16, 25-22 Chilo, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Chincoteague Bay, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Chincoteague Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-14, 5-18 Chino Canyon Improvements, Palm Springs, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-16 Choctawhatchee Bay to Pensacola Bay, HFla. (SAM) 10-35 Choctawhatchee Bay to West Bay, HFla. (SAM) 10-35 Choctawhatchee River, HFla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-42 Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Chouteau Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-16 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Chowan River, N.C. (NAO) 5-23 Chowan River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Christiansted Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cibolo Creek, Tex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Cincinnati, Ohio (ORL) 24-20, 24-22, 24-24, 24-25, 24-29 Cincinnatus, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 City Creek Levee, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 City of Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-16 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 I-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Claiborne County Port, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Claiborne Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Claiborne Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-19, 10-30 Clallam Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Clallam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Clanton, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Claremont Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-8, 14-10, 14-12 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 24-8, 24-15 Clarendon to Laconia Circle, Ark. (LMM) 13-6 Clarington, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Clark Fork River, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Clarks Hill Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-11, 8-15, 8-17 Clarkson, Nebr. (MRO) 21-16, 21-20 Clarksville, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Clatskanie Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clatskanie River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Clatskanie River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clatsop County Diking District 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Clear and Burnt River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11 Clear Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15-14, 15-25 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Clear River, Burrillville, R.I. (NED) 1-10, 1-23, 1-27, 1-36, 1-48 Clearwater Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-4, 18-11, 18-24 Clearwater Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Clearwater River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Clesson Brook, Buckland, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio (NCB) 32-36 Cleveland Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-3, 32-18, 32-26 Cleves, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Clewiston, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Cliff Walk, Newport, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Clifton,-W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Clifty Creek Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Clinch River, Tenn., and Va. (ORN) 23-13 Clinton, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Clinton, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Clinton Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Clinton Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Clinton Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-2, 20-10, 20-13 Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-33, 31-46 Cloverport, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Clyde, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Coal Grove, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Coal River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Coan River, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro Breakwater, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) 45-1 Coasters Island Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Cobscook Bay, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cocheco River, N.H. (NED) 1-38, 1-43 Cochiti Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-3, 17-8, 17-10 Cochrane, Wis. (NCS) 27-27 Cockrells Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Coeur D'Alene, Idaho (NPS) 38-26 Cohansey River, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-14, 3-15, 3-18 Cohasset Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-22 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) 52-1 Cold Spring Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-15, 3-18, 3-21 Colebrook River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Colfax, Wash. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-11 Colfax, Grant Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Colliers, W. Va. (ORP) 26-28 Collinsville, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Colonial Beach, Va. (NAB) 4-11, 4-24, 4-32 Colorado River, Matagorda, Tex. (SWG) 15-11, 15-27 Colorado Springs, Colo. (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Columbia, La. (LMK) 12-13, 12-16 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, Wash., and Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-24, 37-31, 37-45 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River at the Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 I-8 INDEX Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPW) 39-2, 39-11, 39-16 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Idaho, Mont., and Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-30 Columbia River between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg. (NPP) 37-4, 37-24, 37-32 Columbia River, Ilwaco, Wash. (NPP) 37-5, 37-24, 37-33 Columbia River Treaty Entities 49-2 Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering Board 49-2 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Columbia Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20, 21-21 Columbus, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Compo Beach, Westport, Conn. 1-42 Conant Brook Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Conchas Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8 Concordia, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Conemaugh River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18, 26-27 Conesus Lake, Livonia, N.Y. (NCB) 32-16, 32-22 Conetoe Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Coney Island Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Coney Island Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Conklin-Kirkwood, N.Y. (NAB) 4-19, 4-36, 4-39 Conneaut Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-4, 32-18, 32-27 Connecticut River (above Hartford), Conn. (NED) 1-38 Connecticut River Basin, Vt., N.H., Mass. and Conn. (NED) 1-11, 1-23, 1-48 Connecticut River below Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-4, 1-25, 1-33, 1-45, 1-53 Connecticut River, Comish, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Connecticut River, North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-43 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-43 Connecticut River, Walpole, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Connell, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Conoho Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) 50-1 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22-1, 22-5, 22-6 Contentnea Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27, 6-28 Conway County Drainage - Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, - 8, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Cook Inlet Shoals, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-16, 16-5, 16-15, 16-19 Cooper River, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-9, 7-12 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 Cooper River Seismic Modification, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-9, 7-12 Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data Board 31-30, 49-2 Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-25, 37-33 Coos Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-5, 37-24, 37-33 Coosa River Navigation, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-30 Copan Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-3, 19-9, 19-14, 19-17 Copes Corner Lakes, New York (NAB) 4-37 Coquille River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-25, 37-33, 37-44 Coralville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Coraopolis, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Corbin, Ky. (ORN) 23-19 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), Ky. (ORN) 23-13 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Cordova Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Cordova Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-11 Core Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Corea Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Corning, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-25 Corning-Monkey Run, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Cornucopia Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-4, 31-33, 31-46 Corpus Christi, Tex., Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula (SWG) 15-27 Corpus Christi Beach, Tex. (Restoration Project) (SWG) 15-9, 15-14, 15-25 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-13, 15-16, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Corsica River, Md. (NAB) 4-33 Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Corte Madera Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-3, 35-6, 35-23, 35-28 Cortland, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Cottonwood Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-21, 35-27 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Cottonwood River, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 I-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Cottonwood Slough Pumping Plant, Ill. (LMN) 13-6 Cotuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Cougar Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-28, 37-37, 37-47, 37-49 Council Bluffs, Iowa (MRO) 21-16, 21-19, 21-21 Council Grove Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-3, 19-9, 19-14, 19-17 County Road Bridge Over Leaf River, Miss. (SAM) 10-14 Courtenay Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cove Island, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-17, 1-23, 1-30 Covington, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Cow Castle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Cow Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-15 Cowanesque Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44, 37-48 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts 2, 13, and 15, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-23, 37-39, 37-41 Cowlitz River at Randle, Wash. (NPP) 37-44 Cowpens Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Coyote and Spencer Creeks, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Coyote Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPK) 35-34, 35-35 Crabtree Creek and Tributaries, Wake County, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Crabtree Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Craig Harbor, Alaska (f ') 40-13, 40-15 Crane Creek Drainage d Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Crane Creek State Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-39 Cranes Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-14, 5-18 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Creede, Willow Creek, Colo. (Floodway) (SWA) 17-7 Crescent City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Criehaven Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Crisfield Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-33, 4-38 Crooked Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18, 26-27 Crooked Creek Lake - Levee, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Cross-Florida Barge Canal (SAJ) 9-4, 9-25, 9-32, 9-42, 9-43 Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Crystal River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Cucamonga Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-10, 33-15 Cuckold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Cuivre River, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Cumberland, Ky. (ORN) 23-18 Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24, 4-32, 4-39 Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-2, 23-9, 23-11, 23-15 Cummings Park, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Cunninghill Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Current River, Ark. - Mo. (SWL) 18-16 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Curwensville Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Cushman-Mapleton Channels Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Cuttyhunk Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio (NCB) 32-37 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex., and Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-14, 12-14 Cypress Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Cypress Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-33 D Dade County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-18, 9-29, 9-40 Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-29, 9-40 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Dallas Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Dam "A" Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-19 Dam Neck Disposal Area, Va. (NAO) 5-25 Dam Safety Program, New York District (NAN) 2-20 Damariscotta River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Dana Point Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 Danbury, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-50 Dansville and Vicinity, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Danville, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Dardanelle Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-13, 18-20 Darien Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Dashields Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-3, 22-7 Data Collection and Management Division, 53-1 Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-27, 10-34, 10-45 Davenport, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Davenport Center Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) (NCD) 29-7 David D. Terry Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-19 Davids Creek Lake, Iowa (MRO) 21-16 Davis, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Davis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 I-10 INDEX Day, John, Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-51 Day, John, River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-27, 37-36, 37-40, 37-44 Days Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Dayton, Ky. (ORL) 24-3, 24-14, 24-24, 24-29 Dayton, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Dayton, Wyo. (MRO) 21-18 Daytona Beach Side Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45 De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, S.D. (MRO) 21-17 Deep Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., Va. (NAO) 5-23 Deep Creek, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Deep Fork River, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 Deep River, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Deep River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-16 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Deer Island Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Deer Island Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-38 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 DeGray Lake, Ark. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19 DeKalb, Ill. (NCR) 29-16 Delaware Coast Protection, Del. (NAP) 3-11, 3-17 Delaware Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-12, 25-16 Delaware River, Pa., N.J. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-15, 3-18 Delaware River at Camden, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Delaware; River at East Branch, N.Y. (NAP) 3-13 Delaware River at Pennsville, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, N.J. (NAP) 3-3, 3-15, 3-18 Deleware River, Mouth of Neversink (NAP) 3-24 Delphi, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Denison Dam-Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) 19-13 Dennis Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Depere Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Depoe Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-33, 37-39, 37-42, 37-45 Dequeen Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-11, 18-23 Derby, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-50 Derby, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Des Moines, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, Iowa (NCR) 28-4, 28-8, 28-12 Deschutes River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Detour Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-4, 31-34, 31-47 Detroit Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-37, 37-47, 37-49 Detroit River, Mich. (NCE) 31-5, 31-34, 31-47, 31-58, 31-63 Devils Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-5, 27-19 Devil's Swamp, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-29 Dewey Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-4, 25-13, 25-16 Dickey Lake, Maine (NED) 1-45 Dickinson Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-12, 18-23 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Diking Districts 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Diking Districts 2, 3, and 5, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Dilking Improvement Districts 2 and 13, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-12 Dillingham Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-11, 40-15 Dillon Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-4, 25-13, 25-16 Dillonvale, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 26-23 Dismal Swamp Canal (Deep Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-22 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills, N.C.) (NAO) 5-22 Dively Drainage - Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Dodge City, Kans. (SWT) 19-17 Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-27, 10-34 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Dorena Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Double Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Double Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Douglas Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Dover, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Downeyville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Dresden Island Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20, 28-21 Drinkwater Sewer, Mo. (LMM) 13-6 Drum Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Drury Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Dry Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 I-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Dry Creek, Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-17 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPK) 35-24, 35-34, 35-35 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Dry Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Dry Run, Iowa (NCS) 27-24 Dubois, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Dubuque, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Dubuque Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Duck Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Duck Island Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Duck Point Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Duck River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. and Wis. (NCE) 31-5, 31-34, 31-47 Dune Road, Southampton, N.Y. (NAN) 2-40 Dungeness River, Wash. (NPS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22, 38-26 Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-5, 32-19, 32-28 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Duval County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-29, 9-40 Duxbury Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18 Dyersburg, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) (LMM) 13-6 Dymers Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 E Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Eagle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 Eagle Creek Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Eagle Creek Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Eagle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 East Barre Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 East Bay (Hanna Reef), Tex. (SWG) 15-27 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 East Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-6, 26-14, 26-18, 26-27 East Branch Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 East Brimfield Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31,1-52 East Canada Creek, Dolgeville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 East Fork, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 East Lynn Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-17 East Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 East Muddy and Lake Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 East Muddy Creek, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, Near Essex, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, Iowa (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13, 21-21 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-7, 10-27, 10-34 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 East Peoria Sanitary District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 East Point, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-19 East Poplar Bluff - Poplar Bluff, Mo. (SWL) 18-17 East Rainelle, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 East River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 East Rockaway (DEBS) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-22, 2-27 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) (NAN) 2-16, 2-25, 2-31 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) (NAN) 2-36 East Sidney Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 East St. Louis and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 East Weaver Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-12 Eastchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Eastern Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, La. (MR+T) 42-15, 42-28, 42-50, 42-59 Eastlake, Ohio (NCB) 32-37 Eastman, H. V., Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-23 Eastport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Eau Galle River, Wis. (NCS) 27-6, 27-19 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-25, 9-32 Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Edenton Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Edgar Jadwin, General, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 Edgartown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Edisto River, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-15, 7-16 Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Ediz Hook, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 Edmonds Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 1-12 INDEX Edward MacDowell Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Eel River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Eel River, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Egegik River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Eight Mile Creek, Ark. (MR+T) 42-28 Eighteen Mile Island, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 El Dorado, Kans., W. Br., Walnut River, Channel Improvement (SWT) 19-15 El Dorado Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 El Paso, Tex. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8, 17-9 El Tuque Beach, P.R. (SAJ) 9-47 Eldred, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 Eldrid, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Elfin Cove, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Elizabeth, N.J. (NAN) 2-37 Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. (NAN) 2-39 Elizabethtown, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Elk City Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Elk Creek, Clyde, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-35 Elk Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-27, 37-36 Elk River, Ala. and Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Elk River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Elk River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, near Gretna, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, near Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Elkins, W. Va. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13, 26-18, 26-26 Elkland, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Elkport, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Ellicott Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-14, 32-22 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Elm Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Elm Fork Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-6, 16-15,16-19 Elmira, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Elochoman Slough, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Elwha River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Emergency Bank Protection Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-7 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-25 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-7 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-19 New England Division (NED) 1-23 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 21-7 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-8, 14-14 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-28 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Emergency Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-7 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-28 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-12 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-12 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-7 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-8 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-3 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-18 New England Division (NED) 1-23 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-9 New York District (NAN) 2-20 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-12 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 21-6 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-19 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-32 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-8 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-28 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-14 Emergency protection for highway and railroad facilities at Chester, Ill., bridge (LMS) 14-14 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (LMS) 14-14 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois and Kaskaskia Rivers (LMS) 14-14 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-25 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-24 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-18 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-20 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Empire-Stratton, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 Enderlin, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-6, 27-19 Endicott-Johnson City and Vestal, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) 51-1 England Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 English, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Enid, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Enid Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-59 Entiat River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Ephraim Canyon Wash, Nogales, Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Erie Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 32-5, 32-19, 32-28, 32-39 Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Esopus Creek, Ulster, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Esquatzel Coulee, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Essex River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Estes, Carl L., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Euclid Creek, Cleveland, Ohio (NCB) 32-17, 32-22 Eufaula Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-7, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Evansdale, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Evansville, Ind. (ORL) 24-3, 24-14, 24-24, 24-29 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-14, 38-19 Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Exeter River, N.H. (NED) 1-38 Existing levees and extensions from Bastrop, La. to mouth of Boeuf River (LMK) 12-16 F Fabius River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 Factory Brook, Middlefield, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Fair Haven Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Fairbanks, Tanana River and Chena Slough, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Fairbury, Nebr. (MRK) 20-17 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-23 Fairport Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-5, 32-19, 32-29 Fajardo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-46 Fall Brook Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-37 Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Fall of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area (ORD) 22-3 Fall River Basin, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-3, 21-10, 21-13 Fall River Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Fall River Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Falling Creek, Rockingham, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Falls Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-15, 6-20 Falmouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Falmouth Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Falulah Brook, Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Fancy Bluff Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Far Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Farm Creek, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-8, 28-12 Farmers Levee and Drainage District (NCR) 28-14, 28-15, 28-16 Farmington, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Feather River, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) 47-1 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses at Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) 22-6 Federal Prison Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-7 Felsenthal, Ark. (LMK) 12-13 Ferguson Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-13, 37-27, 37-36, 37-47, 37-49 Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-26, 9-32 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-16, 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Filberts Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-22, 2-27, 2-36 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Fisher, O. C., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-20 Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-1, 34-5, 34-8 Fishing Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Fishing Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Fishing Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Fishtrap Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-17 Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-45 Flannagan, John W., Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-17 1-14 INDEX Flat Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Flat Rock Creek Channel Improvement, Tulsa, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Flathead River, Mont. (NPS) 38-25, 38-26, 38-27 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Floating Breakwater Prototype Test Program, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Activities Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-12 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-19 Flood Damage Prevention Studies, Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-20 Flood Insurance Activities Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-31 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-8 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Hazard Information Reports, Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-49 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Florence Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Floyd River, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-17 Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Fly Creek, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-27, 10-35, 10-45 Follansbee, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Folly River, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-9, 7-12 Folsom Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Forest Heights, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Forestville, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Forked Deer River, Tenn., including South Fork (LMM) 13-5 Forsyth, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Fort Cobb Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-17, 6-26 Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-7, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Fort Kent, Maine (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Fort Leavenworth, Kans., Bridge Removal (MRK) 20-16 Fort Loudon Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Fort Macon State Park, N.C. (SAW) 6-26 Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-26, 9-33 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Fort Peck Lake, Mont. (MRO) 21-7, 21-12, 21-15, 21-19 Fort Pierce, Fla. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-29, 9-40 Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-26, 9-33 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16, 21-19 Fort Scott Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Fort Supply Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Fort Trumbull Beach, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Foss Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Foster Creek Road, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Foster Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-47 Four Pole Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Four River Basins, Fla. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-30, 9-41, 9-52 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Fourmile Run, Va. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Fowl River, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, R.I. (NED) 1-23, 1-43 Fox River, Wis. (NCE) 31-6, 31-34, 31-48 Fox River Locks and Dams, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-12, 3-17, 4-21 Frankfort, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Frankfort, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Frankfort Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-6, 31-34, 31-48 Franklin Falls Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-51 Franklin, W. P., Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAM) 9-48 Frazer-Wolf Point, Mont. (MRO) 21-17 Frazeysburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Freeport, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Freeport, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-11, 15-27 Freeport Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 15-3, 15-13, 15-18, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Fremont, Ohio (NCB) 32-37 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Frenchboro Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Freshwater Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-14 Friday Harbor Marina, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Friendly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Friendsville, Md. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (Above Plum Bayou) (SWL) 18-17 Fullerton, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Fullerton Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Fulton, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-16 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY. 1987 G Galax, Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Galena, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Galena Emergency Bank Stabilization, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-12 Galisteo Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-8 Gallipolis Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Gallipolis, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-4, 15-13, 15-19, 15-28, 15-29, 15-34 Galveston Seawall Extension, Tex. (SWG) 15-11 Gapway Swamp, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-27, 7-8, 7-16 Gardner, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Gardners Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Garland City, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 Garnett Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-18, 20-19 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16, 21-19 Gasconade River, Mo. (MRK) 20-16 Gastineau Channel, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Gate Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Va. (NAO) 5-10, 5-16, 5-21 Gauley River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16, 21-18, 21-19 Gaysville Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Genegantslet Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-37 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 General Joe Wheeler Dam (ORN) 23-17 Geneva-On-The-Lake, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-19, 32-35 Genoa Sewer Facility, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Geographic Systems Laboratory 51-1 George Street, Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-23 George, Walter F., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-24, 10-31, 10-41 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-22, 10-30, 10-41 Georges River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Georgetown Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-9, 7-12 Gering Valley, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Gila River Basin, Ariz. (SPL) 33-4, 33-11, 33-19 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18 Gill Township Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Gillham Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-5, 18-12, 18-23 Gill's Creek, Lancaster, S.C. (SAN) 7 -17 Girty's Run, Millvale, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13 Glasgow, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Gleason Creek, Nev. (SPK) 35-31 Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-22, 2-27 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-46, 1-53 Goat Island, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Golconda, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Gold Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Goleta, Calif., and Vicinity (SPL) 33-8, 33-20 Goodfood Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-28, 10-39 Gooding Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Goose Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Goshen Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Governor's Run, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Grafton, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Grahn, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Grand Bayou Pass, La. (LMN) 11-14 Grand Calumet River Lock, Ind. (NCC) 28-21 Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, Mich. (NCE) 31-7, 31-35, 31-48, 31-63 Grand Isle and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-5, 11-10, 11-12 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, Okla. (SWT) 19-7, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-18 Grand Marais Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Grand Marais Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-7, 31-35, 31-48 Grand Prairie, Tex., Sanitary Landfill (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Grand Prairie, Tex., Streambank Erosion at Meyers Road (SWF) 16-6, 16-15, 16-19 Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, Ark., (MR+T) 42-16, 42-28, 42-52 Grand River, Grandville, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Grand River, Lansing, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Grande Ronde Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Grandview, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Grandview Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-39 Granger, Tex. (SWF) 16-17 Grant Parish, Below Colfax, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Grant's Canal Lake Providence, La. (MR+T) 42-56 Granville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-28 Grapevine Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-16, 16-20 Grasse River (Massena), N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 I-16 INDEX Grassy Creek, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Graves Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Grays Creek Canal, Shelby Co., Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-12, 38-14, 38-19 Grays Landing Lock and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Grays Reef Passage, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Grays River, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Grayson Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-5, 25-13, 25-17 Great Chazy River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Great Coharie Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Great Falls, Mont. (MRO) 21-4, 21-10, 21-13 Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Great Lakes Information Management 31-30 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Great Miami River, Ind. (ORL) 24-27, 24-30 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Great Salt Plains Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Great Salt Pond, R.I. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-6, 32-19, 32-29, 32-39 Great South Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Green and Barren Rivers, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-14, 24-18, 24-23, 24-27 Green Bay Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-7, 31-35, 31-48 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Green'Brook, Green Brook, N.J. (NAN) 2-40 Green Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-4, 1-25, 1-33, 1-46, 1-53 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-38, 37-47, 37-49 Green River, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Green River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Green River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-8, 24-15, 24-27 Green Valley Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Greene, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Greenfield Bayou Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Greenport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Greenup, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Greenup Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-8 Greenvale Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-15, 5-18 Greenville, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Greenville Harbor, Miss. (MR+T) 42-29, 42-56 Greenwich Bay, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Greenwich Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Greenwich Point Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Greenwood Beach, Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Greers Ferry Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-9, 18-13, 18-24 Gregory Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Greilickville Harbor, Mich. (Formerly Traverse City Harbor) (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Grenada Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-59 Greybull, Wyo. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Griffithsville-Yawkey, W.Va. (ORH) 25-22 Grifton, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Gros Ventre River, Wyo. (NPW) 39-17 Grove Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Guadalupe River, Calif. (SPK) 35- 21 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Guayanes Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-46 Guilford Creek, Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-25 Guilford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Gulf Beach, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border (Mobile District) (SAM) 10-8, 10-27, 10-35 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-14 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (Galveston, Tex., District) (SWG) 15-5, 15-13, 15-19, 15-28, 15-34, 15-32, 15-34 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Gulf Street and Trumbull Avenue, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-36 Gulfport Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Gull Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Guntersville Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Guttenberg, Iowa (NCS) 27-24 Guyandotte River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Gypsum, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 H H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-23 Hackleman Corners Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Haines Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Haleiwa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Hamburg L-575, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Hammersley Inlet, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-30 Hammonassett Beach, Madison, Conn. (NED) 1-42 I-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-8, 31-35, 31-49 Hammond Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Hammondsport, N.Y. (NCB) 32-39 Hampton Beach, Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Hampton Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hampton Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-5, 1-25, 1-53 Hampton Institute, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va.-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAO) 5-4, 5-15, 5-18 Hampton Roads Harbor, Supervision of (NAO) 5-8, 5-16 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Hanalei Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Hanapepe Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Hanapepe River, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Hancock Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-49 Hanging Rock, Ohio (ORH) 25-2 1 Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 28-9, 28-13 Hannibal Harbor, Mo. (NCD) 29-8 Hannibal Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Hanover, Minn. (NCS) 27-7, 27-19 Hanson, Howard A., Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-8, 31-35, 31-49 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Harbor of Refuge, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Harbor of Refuge and Pt. Judith Pond, R.I. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-35 Harden, Cecil M., Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-7, 24-15, 24-27 Harkers Island Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Harlan County Lake, Nebr. (MRK) 20-2, 20-10, 20-13, 20-19 Harlem River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Harpers Ferry, W. Va. (NAB) 4-37 Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-22 Harraseeket River, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-28, 42-58 Harrisburg, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Harrisville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-8, 31-36, 31-49 Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-8, 20-12, 20-16, 20-19 Harsha, William H., Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24-27 Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Hartford, Vt. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Hartford, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-22 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-9, 14-11 Hartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-15, 8-17 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La. (LMN) 11-16 Hastings Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Hatchie River, Miss. (LMM) 13-1, 13-4 Haverhill, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Havre, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Hawesville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, N.Y. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Hayden Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Hays, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Haysi, Va. (ORH) 25-20 Hayward Creek, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Hayward Creek, Quincy-Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Heise-Roberts Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-19 Heise-Roberts Extension, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Helena Harbor, Ark. (LMN) 13-5 Hellens Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Helm Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-28 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Henderson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Henderson Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Henderson County Drainage Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Henderson River, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Hendrick's Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Henry, Robert F., Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-30 Henry T. Rainey Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Hergot Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 28-17 Herkimer, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Herreid, Spring Creek, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Herring Bay - Rockhold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 Herring Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-22, 4-29 1-18 INDEX Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Hickman Harbor, Ky. (LMM) 13-5 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-23 Higginsport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Highland Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Highway 12, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-39 Highway 101, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Highway 362 Bridges, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Hildebrand Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Hills Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-47, 37-49 Hillsborough Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-53 Hillsborough River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Hillsdale Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-10, 20-13, 20-19 Hillview Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Hingham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Hiwassee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Hoback River, Wyo. (NPW) 39-17 Hockingport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Hodges Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-21 Hodges Village Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-52 Hoh River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Hoko River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Holbrook Levee, Ariz. (SPL) 33-8, 33-20 Holland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-36, 31-49 Holley Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Holly, Colo. (SWA) 17-7 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach along Lake Michigan, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Holmes Bay, Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-43 Holmes Creek, Fla. (SAM) 10-42 Holston River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Holyoke, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Homer Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Hominy Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-7, 27-20 Homochitto River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14, 12-19 Homosassa River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 Honey Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Honey Hill Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Honga River and Tar Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Hood Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 ' Hoonah Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Hooper, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Hop Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-49 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-51 Hoquiam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Hords Creek Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-16, 16-20 Horn Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hornell, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-25 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Hoskins Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Hot Springs, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Houlka Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Houma Navigation Canal, La. (LMN) 11-14 Housatonic River, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-45 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-35, 1-43 Housatonic River, Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Housatonic River Basin, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-23, 1-49 Houston School Road Bridge, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-39 Houston Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15-21, 15-28, 15-30, 15-34 Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-22 Howards Mill Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Hudson River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Hudson River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-23, 2-28, 2-32, 2-33, 2-38 Hudson River Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Hugo Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Hulah Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-4, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Hull, Cordell, Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Humboldt, Tenn. (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Humboldt Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-9 Humboldt Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev. (SPK) 35-31 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Hunting Island Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Huntingdon, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Huntington, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Huntington, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Huntington Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-8, 24-15 Huot, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Huron Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-6, 32-19, 32-30 Hurricane Barrier Operations, New England Division (NED) 1-23 Hutchins, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Hutchinson Levee and Channel, Kans. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Hyannis Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-5, 1-25, 1-34 Hyde County Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes 31-31 Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) 53-2 I lao Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. (NAP) 3-21 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-12, 39-18, 39-22 Ida Grove, Iowa (MRO) 21- 17, 21-21 Iliuliuk Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill. (NCR) 28-2, 28-8 Illinois River, Ill. (MR+T) 42-19 Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind. (NCR) 28-2, 28-8, 28-10, 28-16, 28-20, 28-21, 28-22 Imperial Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-10, 33-15 Indian Bend Wash, Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Indian Creek Area, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Indian Creek, Corydon, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Indian Creek Lake, Emerson, Iowa (MRO) 21-4, 21-10, 21-13, 21-18 Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Indian Island, Maine (NED) 1-22 Indian Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-4, 3-15, 3-19 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Emergency Stone Repairs, Beverly Shores, Ind. (NCC) 30-6, 30-9, 30-13 Indiana Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-4, 30-9, 30-12, 30-14, 30-15 Indianapolis, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-29 Indianapolis, Ind. (Fall Creek Section) (ORL) 24-20 Indianola, Nebr. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Industry, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Inez, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Inland Route, Mich. (NCE) 31-9, 31-36, 31-49 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va., to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (NAP) 3-6, 3-16, 3-19 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-14 Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-5, 3-15, 3-19 Institute for Water Resources 53-3 Intercounty D. D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 International Boundary Waters Boards, 49-1 International Champlain-Richelieu Board 49-2 International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board 31-30, 49-2 International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board 31-30, 49-2 International Joint Commission Board of Control (IJC) 49-1 International Kootenay Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Champlain Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Memphremagog Board 49-2 International Lake of the Woods Control Board 49-1 International Lake Superior Board of Control 31-29, 49-1 International Niagara Board of Control 31-30, 49-1 International Niagara Committee 49-2 International Niagara Working Committee 31-30 International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Rainy Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Skagit River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris-Red Rivers Engineering Board 49-2 International St. Croix River Board of Control 49-1 International St. Lawrence River Board of Control 31-30, 49-1 Interstate Bridge, Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Interstate 20 Bridges, Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-26, 9-33 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-26, 9-33, 9-46 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 Intracoastal Waterway, Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-14 Investigations of Projects Under the Federal Power Act 47-1 Iola Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Ipswich Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Irondequoit Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-7, 32-19 Ironton, Ohio (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Irving Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Irving Township, Jackson Co., Wis. (NCS) 27-7, 27-20, 27-24, 27-27 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Isabella Lake, Kern River, Calif. (SPK) 35-8, 35-24 Island Avenue, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 I-20 INDEX Island Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Island End River, Chelsea, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Island Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-53 Isle of Shoals Harbor, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-39 Islesboro (The Narrows), Maine (NED) 1-18, 1-22, 1-29, 1-36, 1-43 Ithaca, N.Y., Cascadilla Creek (NCB) 32-39 Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet (NCB) 32-37 Ithaca, N.Y., Fall Creek (NCB) 32-39 J J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Jackson, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-30 Jackson and East Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Jackson Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Jackson Hole, Wyo. (NPW) 39-14 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, W.Va. (ORH) 25-22 Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-26, 9-34 Jadwin, General Edgar, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 James River, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-15, 5-19, 5-25 Jamestown Reservoir, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, Wis. (NCR) 28-16 Jarvis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Jefferson River, Bank Protection, near Waterloo, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, near Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Jemez Canyon Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-8, 17-10 Jenkins, Tom, Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-15, 25-18 Jenkins, Tom, Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 25-10 Jenks Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Jeremy Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-23, 10-30, 10-41 Joe Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 19-17, 19-18 Joe Pool Lake (Lakeville Lake), Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-16, 16-20 John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-51 John Day River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-14, 37-27, 37-36, 37-40, 37-44 John Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-16, 6-20 John Martin Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Va. (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-17 Johns Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-26, 9-34 Johnson Bay, Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-43 Johnson Bayou, La. (SWG) 15-27 Johnson Creek, Vicinity of Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42, 37-49 Johnsonburg, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26, 26-28 Johnstown, Pa. (ORP) 26-4, 26-13, 26--18, 26-26 Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33 Jonesport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-5, 1-26, 1-34 Jonesville, La. (LMK) 12-13 Jordan, B. Everett, Dam and Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-15, 6-20 Jordan Creek, Henry County, Va. (SAW) 6.. 31 Josias River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Julian, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Juneau Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 K Kaaawa Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kahoma Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-4, 36 6, 36-- 7 Kahului Beach Road, Hawaii (POD)) 36-- 8 Kahului Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36 - 8 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-- 12 Kake Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-i1l Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Wash. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Kalama Turning Basin, Wash. (NPP) 37--7, 37-25, 37-35 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), Mich. (NC(E) 31-63 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo), Mich. (N( E) 31-- 63 Kalaupapa Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36--8 Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-2, 25 --12, 25-- 16 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Hawaii (POD) 36- 11 Kankakee River, Ill. and Ind. (NCC) 30--15 Kanopolis Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-3, 20-10, 20-13, 20-19 Kansas City, Kans. (1962 Mod.) (MRK) 20--17 Kansas Citys on Mo. and Kansas Rivers, Mo. and Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK) 20-19 Kansas River Navigation, Kans. (MRK) 20-16 Kapaa Town, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 1-21 REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Karlson Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Kasilof Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11, 14-14 Kaskaskia River, Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Kaukauna Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Fifth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna First Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Fourth Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Guard Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaukauna Third Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-6 Kaunakakai Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kaunakakai Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-11l Kaw Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kawainui Swamp, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-9, 35-24 Kawkawlin River, Mich. (NCE) 31-26, 31-44,31-56 Kays Creek, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Keach Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Keehi Lagoon, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Kehoe Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Keithsburg Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Kekaha Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kelleys Island, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Kendrick, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Kenmore Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-20, 38-31 Kennebec River, Maine (NED) 1-6, 1-26, 1-34 Kennebunk River, Maine (NED) 1-6, 1-25, 1-33, 1-39 Kenosha Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-10, 31-36, 31-49 Kentucky Lock and Dam, Ky. (ORN) 23-17 Kentucky River, Ky. (ORL) 24-2, 24-14, 24-23, 24-27 Keokuk Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-8 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Kerr, John H., Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-16, 6-20 Kerr, Robert S., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-16 Kerr, Robert S., Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-14 Kewalo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kewaunee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-10, 31-36, 31-50 Kewaunee River, Wis. (NCE) 31-63 Keweenaw Waterway, Mich. (NCE) 31-109 31-37, 31-50 Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-47 Key West Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Keyport Harbor, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Keystone Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-7, 19-12, 19-15, 19-16, 19-17 Kickapoo River, Gay Mills, Wis. (NCS) 27-7, 27-20 Kihei Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay Channel, N.J. and N.Y. (NAN) 2-7, 2-23, 2-28 King Cove Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Kings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Kingston Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), Mass. (NED) 1-39 Kingston-Edwardsville, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Kingstree Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Pa. and N.Y. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-18, 26-27 Kirwan, Michael J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Kishwaukee River at De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Kissimmee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Kittanning, Pa. (ORP) 26-28 Kittanning, Pa. Part I (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Kittanning, Pa. Part II (ORP) 26-23 Kitzmiller, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Klamath River, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 35-31 Klutina River, Copper Center, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Knappa Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Knapps Narrows, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Knife River Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-11, 31-37, 31-50 Knights Valley Lake, Calif. (SPN) 34-9 Knightville Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Knobb's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Kodiak Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Konkapot River, North Canaan, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Kootenai River, Idaho and Mont. (NPS) 38-25, 38-27 Kualoa Regional Park, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kuliouou Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kuskokwim River, Bethel, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-12 L L'Anguille Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-28 L'Anguille River, Ark. (MR+T) 42-18 La Conner, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 La Crosse, Wig. (NCS) 27-24 1-22 INDEX La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, Wis. (NCS) 27-8, 27-20 La Grange Bayou, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 La Grange Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20 La Pointe Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-11, 31-37, 31-50 La Trappe, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Lac La Belle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Lac Qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-8, 27-20 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Lackawanna, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Lackawanna River Basin, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-32 Lafayette Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-21 Lafayette River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Lago De Cerrillos, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Lago De Portugues, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-9, 27-20 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur-Bulkheads and Jetties (LMN) 11-14 Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-12 Lake Camanche, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-29, 37-38, 37-52 Lake City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Lake Champlain, Plattsburgh, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, La. (LMN) 11-14 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, N.Y. (ORP) 26-23 Lake City Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Lake Crockett, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Lake Darling, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-9, 27-20 Lake Douglas, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, Ohio and Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Lake Francis Case, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16 Lake Georgetown, Tex. (SWF) 16-17 Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19 Lake Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lake Hudson, Okla. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 Lake Kemp, Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Lake Meredith, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, Ill. (NCC) 30-7, 30-10, 30-13 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Lake Neatahwanta, Fulton, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11 Lake Ocklawaha, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5 Lake Ogleton, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Lake Oroville, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Lake Pontchartrain, La. (MR+T) 42-15, 42-56 Lake Pontchartrain, La. Project Levees (MR+T) 42-45, 42-49 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, La., (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-6, 11-10, 11-12 Lake Providence Harbor, La. (LMK) 12-14 Lake Pulaski, Minn. (NCS) 27-9, 27-20 Lake River, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Lake River Delta Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Lake Rousseau, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5 Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-12 Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12 Lake Sharpe, S. Dak (MRO) 21-7, 21-12 Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga. (SAM) 10-30, 10-41 Lake St. Clair, Mich., Channels (NCE) 31-11, 31-37, 31-50 Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (SWT) ,9-7, 19-13, 19-15, 19-17 Lake Traverse, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 27-23 Lake Traverse and Bois De Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. (NCS) 27-10, 27-20 Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-38, 37-51 Lake Wallula, Wash. (NPW) 39-7, 39-10, 39-12 Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-20, 38-31 Lakeport Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, Ohio (NCB) 32-14, 32-22 Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (NCB) 32-12, 32-21 Lamoille River, Vt. (NAN) 2-36, 2-38 Lamprey River, N.H. (NED) 1-39 Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Lancaster, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Lancaster, Israel River, N.H. (NED) 1-43 Langdon Park, Wilmette, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 28-17 Lansing (Grand River), Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Lansing Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 LaPlatte River, Shelburne Bay, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Lared, Kans. (SWT) 19-17 Larose to Golden Meadow, La. (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11- 7, 11 - 10, 11-13 Larson Bay Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 I-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Las Animas, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Las Cruces, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Las Tunas Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Nev. (SPL) 33-21 Latrobe, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26, 26-28 Latta Brook Road, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Lava Hot Springs, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Lavaca-Navidad River, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Lavon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-16, 16-20 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-16, 16-20 Lawrence, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20+-19 Lawrenceburg, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24," 24-29 Lawyers Creek, Kamiah, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Lead Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-5, 12-9, 12-11 Leading Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-39 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Leavenworth, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Lebanon Junction, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Le Claire Lock (Canal), Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Lee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lee, Housatonic River, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Leech Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project (SAW) 6-12, 6-20 Leetonia, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Leetsdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Lehigh River at Allentown, Pa. (NAP) 3-13 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-24 Leipsic River, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Leith's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Leith's Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Leland Bowman Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Leland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-37, 31-50 Lemon Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Les Cheneaux Islands, Channels, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Letart, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Letart Falls, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Levee Unit No. 1, Ill. (ORL) 24-21 Levee Unit No. 5, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-14, 24-29 Levee Unit No. 8, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Levees (LMK) (LMS) (MR+T) (ORL) 14-14, 24-22, 24-25, 42-4, 42-10, 42-28, 42-44, 42-46, 42-47, 42-54, 42-55, 42-57 Levels of the Great Lakes 31-31 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-17, 25-19 Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-8, 21-12, 21-16 Lewis and Clark River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Lewis River, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Lewis River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-44, 37-48 Lewisport, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12 Lewisville Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-8, 16-16, 16-20 Lexington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-37, 31-51 Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa, Mont. (NAS) 38-11, 38-17, 38-23 Liberty Local Protection Project, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J. (NAN) 2-18, 2-25, 2-31 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-27 Licking River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19, 24-27, 24-30 Lido Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lighthouse Point Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Lincoln, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Lincoln, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Lincoln Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Lincoln School Lake, Me. (NED) 1-43 Linton, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Lisle, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Little Bay, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Mo. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-14 Little Blue River Lakes, Mo. (MRK) 20-3, 20-11, 20-14 Little Caillou Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-14 Little Calumet River, Ill. (NCC) 30-15 Little Chute Combined Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Chute Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Chute First (Guard) Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Chute Second Lock, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Little Creek, Kent Island, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Little Dell Lake, Utah (SPK) 35-10, 35-24 Little Egg Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12, 39-19, 39-22 Little Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-39 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Little Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 Little Kaukauna Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Little Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-38, 31-51 Little Machipongo River, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-15, 5-19 1-24 INDEX Little Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12 Little Miami River, Ohio (ORL) 24-27, 24-30 Little Missouri River, Ark. (LMK) 12-14, 12-16 Little Neck Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Little Nemaha River, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Little Papillion, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Little Pee Dee and Pee Dee Rivers, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Little River, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Little River, La. (LMK) 12-14 Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Little River Basin (Little Rock District), Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12, 18-23 Little River (Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-23 Little River Dike, Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Little River Diversion Channel, Mo. (MR+T) 42-19 Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-9, 7-13 Little River Project Levees (MR+T) 42-48, 42-49 Little Rock Levee, Ark. (East End Fourche Bayou) (SWL) 18-17 Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-11 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Little Sioux River and Tributaries, Iowa (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-13 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-7, 32-20, 32-30 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Little Tallahatchie River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Little Tennessee River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Little Valley Wash, Magna, Utah (SPK) 35-33 Little Wicomico River, Va. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Little Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Littleville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Lloyd Park, Winnetka, Ill. (NCC) 30-6 Lock and Dam No. 1, Minn. (NCD) 29-5, 29-9 Lock and Dam No. 2, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 2, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-19 Lock and Dam No. 2, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 2, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 3, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 3, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 3, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 3, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 4, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 4, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 4, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 4, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 5, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 5, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-18 Lock and Dam No. 5, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 5A, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 6, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 6, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 7, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 7, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 7, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. 8, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 26-24 Lock and Dam No. 8, Monongahela River, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. 26-24 Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. 18-20, 19-16 8, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 9, Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 9, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-19 9, Wis. (NCD) 29-5 10, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 11, Ark. (SWL) 18-20 11, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 12, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 13, Ark. (SWL) (SWT) 18-3, Lock and Dam No. 13, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 14, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 15, Ill. (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 16, Iowa (NCD) 29-5 Lock and Dam No. 17, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 18, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 19, Iowa (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 20, Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 21, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 22, Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 24, Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 25, Mo. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 26, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Lock and Dam No. 52, Ill. (ORD) 22-3, 22-10 Lock and Dam No. 53, Ill. (ORD) 22-3, 22-10 Lock S-53, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-55, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-57, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-58, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-59, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Lock S-60, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-61, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-62, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-63, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-63A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65C, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65D, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-65E, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-96, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-96A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-157, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-158, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-193, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-308B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock S-310, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lock Haven, Pa. (NAB) 4-20, 4-36 Locklies Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Lockport Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20, 28-21 Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Logan, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, near Bancroft, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Lone Rock, Ark. (SWL) 18-18 Long Beach Island, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Long Branch Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-4, 20-11, 20-14 Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-7, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33 Long Lake Area, Helena, Ark. (LMM) 13-6 Long Tom River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Longboat Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-27, 9-34 Lookout Point Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-28, 37-38, 37-47, 37-49 Lopez Canyon Diversion, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Lopez Dam, Los Angeles River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-22 Lorain Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-7, 32-20, 32-30 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-10, 33-14 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-11, 33-16, 33-22, 33-23 Los Coches Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-11, 33-16 Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-13 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Lost Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-29, 37-38, 37-47 Lost River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Louisville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Louisville Lake, Ill. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Loup River, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Loves Park, Ill. (NCR) 28-9 Lowell, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-51 Lowell Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Lower Arkansas River, Ark. (MR+T) 42-16, 42-28, 42-54, 42-57 Lower Arkansas River Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-7 Lower Big Sioux River, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Lower Branch Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-15, 37-36, 37-41, 37-48 Lower Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Lower Gila River Levee and Channel Improvements (Gila River and Tributaries) Downstream from Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Lower Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-12, 39-20, 39-22 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Lower Heart River, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Lower Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-9, 39-12, 39-20, 39-22 Lower Red River-South Bank, Red River Levees, La. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-15, 42-28, 42-46, 42-49, 42-57 Lower Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-33, 42-37 Lower San Francisco Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Lower San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-11, 35-24, 35-33 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif. (SPK) 35-25, 35-31 Lower Snake River, Wash., Oreg., Idaho, Fish and Wildlife Compensation (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-12 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-22, 4-29 Lower Walla Walla River, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Lower White River and Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-17, 42-28, 42-53 Lower White River Levees (MR+T) 42-9, 42-48, 42-49, 42-57 Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-43, 1-48 Lowes Wharf, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-23, 4-29 Loyalhanna Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Loyalsock, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-22 Lubec Channel, Maine (NED) 1-39 Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11 Ludington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-12, 31-38, 31-51 I-26 INDEX Ludlow, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Ludlow Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Lukfata Lake, Okla. and Ark. (SWT) 19-15 Lusk Creek, Ill. (ORL) 24-30 Lutsen Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 31-62 Lyford Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Lyman Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Lynn Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Lynn-Nahant Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-9, 1-27, 1-35, 1-42 Lynnhaven Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Lytle and Cajun Creeks channel improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-12, 33-16 M Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 MacDowell, Edward, Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Machias River, Maine (NED) 1-23, 1-39 Mackay Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-28 Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-38, 31-51 Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-38, 31-51 Macon, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Mad Creek, Muscatine, Iowa (NCR) 28-17 Mad River, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-48 Mad River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Mad River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Madison, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Madison, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Madison Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Madison Parish Port, La. (LMK) 12-14 Magruder Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-44, 37-48 Mahnomen, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Mahoning Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-7, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-21 Malden River, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Malheur Improvement District, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Malheur River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-16, 39-17 Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Manasquan River, N.J. (NAP) 3-7, 3-16, 3-19 Manatee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Manchester, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Manchester Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Mandan, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-2 Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Manhattan, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Maniece Bayou, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 Manistee Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-13, 31-38, 31-51 Manistique Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Manitowoc Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-14, 31-38, 31-51 Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. (NCS) 27-10, 27-20 Mann's Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Manokin River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-52 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-19 Mantua Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Maple River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-25 Mapleshade, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Marblehead Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Marengo, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-23, 1-31, 1-37 Markham Ferry, Okla. (SWL) 18-22 Marietta, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Marina Del Rey, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 Marine Design Center 53-5 Marion, Ind. (ORL) 24-21, 24-28 Marion, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17, 19-18 Marion County Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Marion Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Markham Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) 18-22 Markham Ferry Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Markland Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-9 Marmarth, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Marquette Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-14, 31-39, 31-52 Marseilles Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20 Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Marshalltown, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Marshland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Martin, John, Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-2, 17-8 Martin, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Martin Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-15, 10-29, 10-39 Martins Ferry, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Martins Fork Lake, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9, 23-18 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev. and Calif. (SPK) 35-11, 35-24 Marysville, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Marysville Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Mason, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Mason J. Niblack Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-14, 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Massillon, Ohio (ORH) 25-6, 25-13, 25-17 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD), 36-10 Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-6, 15-14, 15-22, 15-30, 15-35 Matawan Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Matinicus Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Mats Mats Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Mattapoisett Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Mauckport, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-12 Maumee River, above Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-39 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Maurice River, N.J. (NAP) 3-21, 3-24 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-9, 14-11 Maxwell Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-25 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-34 Mayo, W. D., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-16 Mayse, Pat, Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Maysville, Ky. (ORH) 25-'20, 25-22 McAlpine Locks and Dam (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-9 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System (SWT') 19-2, 19-9, 19-13, 19-16 McCook Lake, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 McDonald Dike Road, Ore. (NPP) 37-42 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12 McGinnis Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 McKees Rocks, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 McKenzie River near Walterville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula-Oreg. and Wash. (NPW) 39-7, 39-8, 39-10, 39-12, 39-21 Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Medomak River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Meherrin River, N.C. (NAO) 5-23 Mekoryuk, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-34 Meldahl, Captain Anthony, Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-8 Melton Hill Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Melvern Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-11, 20-14, 20-19 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Memphis Harbor, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-29 Memphis Harbor Project Levees (MR+T) 42-48, 42-49 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Menasha Lock and Dam (NCE) 31-60 Menemsha Creek, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Menominee Harbor and River, Mich. and Wis. (NCE) 31-15, 31-39, 31-52 Meramec Park Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9 Meramec River Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-4, 14-12, 14-13 Merced County Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-12, 35-24, 35-34 Merced County Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-11, 35-24 Merced River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Mercer Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Meredosia, Ill., and Meredosia, Willow Creek, and Coon Run Drainage and Levee Districts, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-12 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12, 14-14 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-14 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, La. (LMN) 11-14 Merriam, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-43 Merrimack River, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-51 Merrimack River Basin, N.H. and Mass. (NED) 1-18, 1-23, 1-51 Merrimack River, Concord, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Metamora Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-27 Methow River, Wash. (NAS) 38-27 Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-11 Metropolis, Ill. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Miami Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-34 Miami River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45 Miami River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Mianus River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Michigan City Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 30-5, 30-9, 30-12, 30-14, 30-15 Middle Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Middle Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Middle Fork Nooksack River, Deming, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38--16, 38-22 Middle Gila River Channel Improvements, Upper End of Safford Valley to Buttes Damsite 1-28 INDEX (Camelsback Damsite to Salt River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder, Nebr. (MRO) 21-21 Middle River and Connecting Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Middle River at Argyle, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27-20 Middleport, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Middlesboro, Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9 Middlesboro, Ky. (Diversion Canal) (ORN) 23-19 Middlesboro, Ky. (Yellow Creek) (ORN) 23-13, 23-18, 23-19 Middleton Shoals, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Midland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12, 28-17 Miles City, Mont. (MRO) 21-17 Milford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-53 Milford Haven, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Milford Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-4, 20-11, 20-14, 20-19 Mill Brook, Brownsville, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-23, 1-28 Mill Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-27, 24-30 Mill Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Mill Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Mill Creek, Ohio (ORL) (ORH) 24-4, 24-14, 25-21 Mill Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Mill Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Mill Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-16 Mill Creek and South Slough at Milan, Ill. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-11 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, Ark. (SWL) 18-- 6, 18-12 Mill Creek Lake, Wash. (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-11 Mill Creek levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Mill Four Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Mill Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Miller, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Miller Pond Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-30 Millersburg, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Millican Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-20 Millwood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 18-6, 18-12, 18-23 Milton, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Milton, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Milton-Freewater, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Milton Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-15, 31-39, 31-52 Mineral Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Mingo Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Mingo Junction, Ohio (ORP) 26-23 Mining City Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-27 Minneota, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-19, 27-22 Minnesota River at Le Sueur, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27-20 Minot, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24, 27-27 Mispillion River, Del. (NAP) 3-7, 3-14, 3-16, 3-19 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Mission Zanja Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt. (NAN) 2-36, 2-39 Mississinewa Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Mississippi Delta Region, La. (MR+T) 42-28 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR+T) 42-3 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, Ill., Underseepage Measures (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River and Alluvial Valley below Cape Girardeau, Mo. (MR+T) 42-2 Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR+T) 42-1 to 42-63 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-4 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees (MR+T) 42-4 Mississippi River at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-30, 42-34, 42-39 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. (NCS) (NCD) 27-2, 28-3, 29-1, 29-4, 29-10 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Mo. and Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-9, 14-11 Mississippi River Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-29, 42-50, 42-51, 42-53 Mississippi River Commission (MR+T) 42-1 Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La., (New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-8, 11-11, 11-13 Mississippi River Delta Region, La. (MR+T) 42-59 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-10, 11-12 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, La. (LMN) 11-15 I-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Mississippi River Headwater Reservoirs, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-19, 27-22, 27-26 Mississippi River Improvements (MR+T) 42-11 Mississippi River Levees (MR+T) 42-10, 42-28, 42-44, 42-46, 42-47, 42-49 Mississippi River Main Stem Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-29 Mississippi River near Aitkin, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La. (LMN) 11-4, 11-10, 11-12 Mississippi River Project Levees (MR+T) 42-44, 42-46, 42-47, 42-49 Mississippi River Tributary and Outlet Improvements (MR+T) 42-13 Mississippi River Tributary Dams and Lakes (MR+T) 42-20 Missouri National Recreational River, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 21-4, 21-11, 21-13 Missouri River, Mo. (MR+T) 42-19 Missouri River at New Haven, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Missouri River, Aten, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-14, 21-19 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, Nebr. to Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-14 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Rulo, Nebr. to Mouth) (MRK) 20-5, 20-11, 20-14, 20-18, 20-19, 20-21 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kans., and Mo. (Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr.) (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-14, 21-18, 21-19, 21-21 Missouri River Main Stem (MRK) 20-19 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Missouri River, Niobrara, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 21-16 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (MRK) 20-2, 20-10, 20-13 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-2, 21-10, 21-13, 21-18 Mitigation of Shore Damages, Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-26 Mobile Bay, Ala. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-35 Mobile Harbor, Ala. (SAM) 10-9, 10-27, 10-36 Mocassin Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Moccasin Springs, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Moclips River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Mojave River Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-12, 33-17 Mokelumne River, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Molalla River at Milk Creek location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Molalla River at Ressel location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Moline, Ill. (NCR) 28-9, 28-13 Moline Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va. Locks and Dams (ORP) 26-2, 26-13, 26-17, 26-25, 26-26 Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Monoosnoc Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Monroe, La., floodwall extension (LMK) 12-16 Monroe Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Monroe Floodwall, La. (LMK) 12-19 Monroe Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-39, 31-52 Monroe Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16, 24-27 Montcalm, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Monterey Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Montgomery Locks and Dam, Pa. (ORD) 22-2, 22-7 Montour Falls, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Moore Haven Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Moorefield, W. Va. (NAB) 4-37 Moores Ferry, Va. (ORH) 25-20 Moorhead, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Moosabec Bar, Maine (NED) 1-39 Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-19 Morgan City and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-7, 11-10, 11-13 Morgantown Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Morganza Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-50 Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-7, 2-23, 2-28 Mormon Slough, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Morrison, Colo. (MRO) 21-18 Morrison Creek Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-20 Morristown Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-10, 33-15 Moscow, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19, 26-27 Moss Bluff Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-52 Moss Landing Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Mott, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-17 Mound City Locks and Dam, Ill. (ORD) 22-1, 22-10 Mounds and Mound City, Ill. (LMM) 13-6 Moundsville, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, Wash. (NPP)37-15, 37-27, 37-37 Mount St. Helens Emergency Measures, Wash. (NPP) 37-13 Mount St. Helens Sediment Control, Wash. (NPP) 37-16, 37-27, 37-37 1-30 INDEX Mountain Brook Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Mountain Park Reservoir (Tom Steed Lake), Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Mouth of Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Moyock Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Ind. (NCC) 30-15 Mt. Carmel, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y. (NCB) 32-15, 32-22 Mud and Basket Slough, Rickreall Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Mud Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-28 Mud Mountain Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-9, 38-16, 38-22 Mud River, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Muddy Creek Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Muddy Creek near Syracuse, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Mulberry Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Mullet Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Multnomah Chaniel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Multnomah Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Muncie, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Munday Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-15, 10-29, 10-39, 10-43 Murder Creek, East Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-29, 10-39 Murderkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-7, 3-14, 3-16, 3-19 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-19 Murray Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-3, 18-19 Murrells Inlet, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-10, 7-13 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Muscatine, Iowa (Mad Creek) (NCR) 28-14 Muscatine Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 29-7 Muscatine Island L. and D. D., Louisa D. D. No. 13, Iowa (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Muscooten Bay, Ill. (NCR) 28-13 Muskegon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-39, 31-52 Muskingum River, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Muskingum River Lakes, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-17 Mustinka River, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Myers Chuck Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Myrtle Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Mystic, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Mystic River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Mystic River, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-26, 1-34 N Naches River, Naches, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Nagel Drainage District, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Nahunta Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Naknek River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Namo River, Territory of Guam (POD) 36-11 Nan Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nandua Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (POD) 36-5, 36-6, 36-7 Nansemond River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Nantasket Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Nanticoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), Del. and Md. (NAB) 4-34 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), Mass. (NED) 1-39 Napa River, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Napa River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Napatree Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Narragansett Pier, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Narraguagus River, Maine (NED) 1-24, 1-39, 1-53 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19 Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-8, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33 Nashua, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-51 Natchez Port Area, Miss. (LMK) 12-19 Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 National Dredging Program 53-4 National Emergency Management Activities, Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-11 National Emergency Preparedness Activities, 3-14, 21-9, 32-16, 48-1 Natural Disaster Activities, New York District (NAN) 2-20 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery Activities, 43-1 Navajo Reservoir, N. Mex. (SPK) 35-30 Navarro Mills Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-20 Navasota Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Navigation Aids (U.S. Coast Guard), Ark. (SWL) 18-21 Navigation Locks and Dams, Ark. (SWL) 18-11 Navigation Work under Special Authorization (Calcasieu Pass Channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, La.) (LMN) 11-15 Nawiliwili Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-6, 36-7 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 NCD Master Plan for Water Control Data System 31-30 Neabsco Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Neah Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Neale Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, Ill. (NCR) 28-14 Neavitt Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Needles, Calif. (SPL) 33-20, 33-31 Nehalem Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-34 Neodesha Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-15, 19-16 Neon-Fleming, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Neshaminy State Park Harbor, Pa. (NAP) 3-21 Nestucca River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-42 Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-28 Neuse River Barrier, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Neuse River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-30 Neuse River, 300 foot-wide channel in front of New Bern, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Neva and Olga Straits, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Neville Island, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 New Albany, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 New Amsterdam, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, Mass. (NED) 1-39 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-36 New Bedford-Fairhaven Hurricane Barrier, Mass. (NED) 1-23 New Boston Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 New Buffalo Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-16, 31-40, 31-53 New Bullards Bar, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 New Cumberland, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, Ohio (ORD) 22-7 New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-22 New Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 New Harmony, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 New Harmony Bridge, Ill. and Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24 New Haven Breakwater, Conn. (NED) 1-39 New Haven Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-6, 1-26, 1-34, 1-38 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-16, 3-19 New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 New Lock and Dam 26, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 New London, Conn. (NED) 1-19, 1-22, 1-23, 1-30, 1-37 New London Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-34, 1-53 New Madrid Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-5 New Martinsville, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 New Matamoras, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 New Melones Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-19 New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection (LMN) 11-8, 11-11, 11-13 New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-27, 9-35 New Richmond, Ohio (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 New River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 New River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 New River, Onslow County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 New River, Va. and W. Va. (ORH) 25-19 New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 New York and New Jersey Channels, (NAN) 2-10, 2-24, 2-29, 2-32, 2-33, 2-38 New York Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-11, 2-24, 2-29 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-11, 2-24, 2-29 New York Harbor, Supervisor of (NAN) 2-16, 2-25, 2-32 Newark, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-17, 25-20, 25-22 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J. (NAN) 2-8, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33, 2-38 Newaukum River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Newbegun Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Newburgh, Ind. (ORL) 24-20 Newburgh Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Newburyport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-34, 1-53 Newhall Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Newmarket Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Newport, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Newport, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-.24, 24-29 Newport, Ohio (ORH) 25- 21 Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Newport Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Newport News Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Newry-Old Pickens Dam and Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-17 Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-16 Newtown Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-9, 2-24, 2-29, 2-33 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Niagara River, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35, 32-39 Niantic Bay and Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Niblack, Mason J., Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-4, 24-14, 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Nicholasville, (Townfork) Vicinity, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Nichols, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Nickajack Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Nimrod Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12, 18-22 Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-9, 40-12 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, Iowa (MRO) 21-17, 21-21 1-32 INDEX Nisqually River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Nixon Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Nolin Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-9, 24-16, 24-27 Nome Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-9, 40-12 Nomini Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, Tenn. (LMM) 13-2, 13-4 Nonewaug River, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Nookagee Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Nooksack River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Norfolk Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-6, 5-15, 5-19, 5-25 Norfork Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-9, 18-13, 18-24 Normal, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Norman Reservoir (Lake Thunderbird), Okla. (SWT) 19-18 Norrell Lock - Dam (No. 1) - Entrance Channel, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-18 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. (NAN) 2-36 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 North Andover and Lawrence, Mass. (NED) 1-45 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-7, 25-14, 25-17 North Canaan, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-50 North Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 North Fork of Pound River Lake, Va. (ROH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-17 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 North Fork Skykomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-45 North Hartland Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-48 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-43 North Nashua River, Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 North River Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-42 North Second St., Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge) (LMM) 13-6 ... North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 North Springfield Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-48 North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-49 North Wildwood, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Northampton, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-49 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Northeast Harbor, Maine (NED) i-39 Northeast River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Northfield Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-49 Northport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Northport Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-62 Norwalk, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Norwalk Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Norwalk-Wilton, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Norwich, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-52 Norwich, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Nottoway River, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-15, 5-20 Noxubee River, Miss. (SAM) 10-15, 10-29, 10-39, 10-42 Noyo River and Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 O Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin S. Dak. and N. Dak. (MRO) 21-9, 21-12, 21-16, 21-19 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-8, 32-20 Oakdale, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Oakford Special Drainage District (NCR) 28-14, 28-17 Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Oakland Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-9 Oates Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-10, 8-16 Obey River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Obion River, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 O'Brien, T.J., Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20, 28-21 Occohannock Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Occoquan Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Ocean Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Ocean City, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-29 Oceana, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Oceanside, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Oceanside Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-10, 33-15 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-42 Oconto Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-62 Ocracoke Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-19 Ocracoke Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (POD) 36-3, 36-6 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20, 32-31 Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area (ORD) 22-3 Ohio River, Ill. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-19 I-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 25-8, 25-14 Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) (ORL) 24-10, 24-16, 24-18, 24-24, 24-30 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 23-6, 23-12, 23-18 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 26-8, 26-14, 26-19, 26-26, 26-27 Ohio River, Locks and Dams (ORD) 22-1, 22-5, 22-6 Ohio River, Open Channel Work (ORD) 22-4, 22-5, 22-6 Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Okabena Creek at Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 28-14 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers (NPS) 38-25 Okanogan River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Omak, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Okatibbee Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-12, 10-28, 10-38 Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-27, 9-35, 9-44, 9-45, 9-47 Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Oklawaha River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-27, 9-35 Olcott Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20, 32-31 Old Field Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Old Highway 82 Bridge, Columbus, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 Old River, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Old River, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-28, 42-50 Old River, Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-31 Old Town Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Oldmans Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21, 3-24 Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Olive Hill, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21 Omaha, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19, 21-20 Onaga Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Onancock River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Oneonta, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-17, 31-40, 31-53 Oologah Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-16, 19-17 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga. (SAM) 10-42 Opekiska Lock and Dam, W. Va. (ORP) 26-25 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) 22-4, 22-5, 22-6 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-22 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-22 Optima Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Orange River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Orchard Beach, Bronx, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Orleans, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-20, 33-31 Orofino Creek and Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) (NCS) 27-27 Osage River, Kans. and Mo. (MRK) 20-19 Osage River, Mo., Lock and Dam (MRK) 20-16 Osawatomie, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Osceola Harbor, Ark. (LMM) 13-5 Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-35, 32-39 Ottawa, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Ottawa, Ohio (NCB) 32-15 Ottawa River Harbor, Mich. and Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Otter Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-48 Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12 Otter Creek Park, Ky. (ORL) 24-31 Otter Tail River, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Ottumwa, Iowa (NCR) 28-15 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La. (Felsenthal Canal) (LMK) 12-14 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La., Locks and Dams (LMK) 12-13 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Ouachita River and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-12, 12-16 Ouachita River Basin (LMK) 12-21 Ouachita River Levees, La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-9, 12-16 Ouzinkie Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Overton-Red River Waterway, La. (LMK) 12-14 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Owego, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Owensboro, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Owl's Head Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Owyhee River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-12 Oxford, Md. (NAB) 4-35 Oxford, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Oyster Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Oyster Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Ozan Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-16 1-34 INDEX Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock- Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-9, 18-13, 18-20 Ozona, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 P Paauau Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Paducah, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Pagan River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 25-22 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, Ohio (ORH) 25-22 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-18 Paint Rock River, Ala. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Painted Post, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-4, 33-11, 33-15 Paintsville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-8, 25-14, 25-18 Pajaro River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-22, 35-27 Palm Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-47 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Martin County Line of Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County Line (SAJ) 9-20, 9-29, 9-40 Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-27, 9-36 Palouse River, Wash. (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-19 Pamunkey River, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Panacea Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Panama City Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-9, 10-27, 10-36, 10-45 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Panther Creek, Curdsville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Panther Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, Nebr. (MRO) 21-5, 21-11, 21-14 Parish Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-30 Park City, Kans. (SWT) 19-17 Park River, Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-36, 1-49 Parker Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-15, 5-20 Parkersburg, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Parrotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-23 Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-10, 10-28, 10-36 Pascagoula River, Miss. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Pasquotank River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Pass Christian, Miss. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-42 Pass Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-15 Pass-a-Grille Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Passaic River, N.J. (NAN) 2-39 Passaic River Basin, N.J. and N.Y., Phase I (NAN) 2-18, 2-31 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, Maine (NED) 1-44 Pat Mayse Lake, Tex. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Pataha Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Patchogue River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Patman, Wright, Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-17, 16-12, 16-17, 16-21 Patoka Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-10, 24-16, 24-27 Patoka River at Jasper, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Patoka River, Winslow, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Patriot, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Patten Bay, Maine (NED) 1-46 Pattonsburg Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Patuxent River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Pawcatuck, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-23, 1-43 Pawcatuck River, R.I. and Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Pawtucket, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Pawtuxet Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Pawtuxet River, Cranston, R.I. (NED) 1-23 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-36, 1-47, 1-48 Pax, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Payette River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Payette Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, Ga. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Pearl River, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-12, 12-14, 12-21 Pearl River Basin, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-21 Pearl River, Interstate 20 Bridges, Jackson, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-11, 19-14, 19-17 Pebble Creek, Scribner, Nebr. (MRO) 21-22 Pecan Bayou Lake, Pecan Bayou, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Pecatonica River at Darlington, Wis. (NCR) 28-16 Peconic River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Pecos, Tex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Pelican Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Pembina River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Pembina River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Pembroke Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Pendleton, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Pendleton Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-44, 37-48 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Penny Slough, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Penobscot River, Old Town, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-31, 1-37, 1-39 Pensacola Bay, Fla. to Mobile Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-35 Pensacola Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-10, 10-28, 10-37, 10-45 Pensacola Lake, Okla. (SWL) 18-22 Pensaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-17, 31-40, 31-53 Pentwater Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-17, 31-40, 31-53, 31-63 Peoria, Ill. (NCC) 28-15 Peoria Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20 Pepin Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 Pepper Creek, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Pepperell Cove, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (SAM) 10-11, 10-28, 10-38 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) 46-1 Perquimans River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-10, 14-12 Perry Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-5, 20-11, 20-14, 20-19 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements) Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Perth Amboy, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Petaluma River, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Peters Creek, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Petersburg Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Petit Jean River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-15 Petoskey Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-40, 31-53 Peyton Creek, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla. (SAJ) 9-53 Phillips Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Philpott Lake, Va. (SAW) 6-15, 6-16, 6-20 Phoenix, Ariz., and Vicinity (including New River) (SPL) 33-4, 33-11, 33-16 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist) (MRK) 20-5, 20-14 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Omaha Dist) (MRO) 21-5, 21-14, 21-19 Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Pierce, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Pig Island Gut, Maine (NED) 1-39 Pike Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-1, 22-7 Pilchuck River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Pilot Rock, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Pinal Creek Channel Improvements (Globe), Ariz., (SPL) 33-19 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Nev. (SPL) 33-7, 33-12, 33-17 Pine Bluff, Ark. (LMK) 12-16 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Pine Creek Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-11, 19-14, 19-18 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif. (SPK) 35-12, 35-24 Pine Ford Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9 Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Pine River, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Pine River Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Pinellas County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-21, 9-30, 9-40 Pineville, Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-19 Pineville, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Pinole Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Pioneer Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-18 Pipestem Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-6, 21-11, 21-15 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip) (ORP) 26-23 Pittsburgh Harbor, Pa. (ORP) 26-21 Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-50 Placentia Canal, Ga. (SAS) 8-7 Placer Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 Plainview Local Flood Protection Project (SWF) 16-22 Platoro Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 17-6 Platte River, Mo., Channel Improvement (MRK) 20-17 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Platte River and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17 Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Platte River Basin, Colo. (MRO) 21-21 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Platte River near Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-12, 2-24, 2-30 Pleasant Bay, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Pleasant Point, Perry, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-24, 1-31 Pleasant River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Pleasanton Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Plum Creek, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 Plum Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 1-36 INDEX Plum Island, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Plymouth, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Plymouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Poca, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Pocomoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, R.I. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-35, 1-45, 1-46, 1-53 Point Lookout Harbor (Au Gres River), Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-40, 31-53 Point Place, Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 32-15, 32-22 Point Pleasant, W. Va. (ORL) 25-20, 25-22 Pokegama Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Poloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, Mont. (NPS) 38-25 Pomeroy, Ohio (ORL) 25-21 Pomme De Terre Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-5, 20-11, 20-15, 20-19 Pomona Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-11, 20-15, 20-19 Ponce, P.R. (SAJ) 9-41 Ponce De Leon Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-28, 9-36 Ponce Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-28, 9-36 Pontiac Diversion, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Pool, Joe, Lake (Lakeview Lake), Tex. (SWF) 16-7, 16-16,.16-20 Port Alexander, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-14, 40-15 Port Allen Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Port Angeles Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-30 Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-25 Port Austin Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-41, 31-53 Port Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-35 Port Dickinson, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-28, 9-36 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-24, 1-30, 1-36 Port Gamble Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-30, 38-31 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port Hueneme, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port Jervis, N.Y. (NAP) 3-13 Port Lions Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-12, 40-15 Port of Kalama, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-9, 32-20 Port Orchard Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Port Orford, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-25, 37-34 Port Royal Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-10, 7-13 Port San Luis, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-19, 31-41, 31-53 Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Port Townsend, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-31 Port Washington Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-19, 31-41, 31-53 Port Wing Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-19, 31-41, 31-53 Portage, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Portage Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-18, 31-41, 31-53 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Porter Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-12 Portland, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Portland, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Portland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot (NAO) 5-23 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-39 Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-30, 9-41 Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Posten Bayou, Ark. and La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-17, 12-19 Poteau River Navigation, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Poteet Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-7, 4-23, 4-30 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, D.C., Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River Aquatic Plant Control, Md., Va., D.C. (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 Potomac River at Alexandria, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River below Washington, D.C. (NAB) 4-34 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, D.C. (NAB) 4-34 Potowomut River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Pottstown, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 Poverty Point, La. (LMN) 12-6, 12-10, 12-12 Powell County High School, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Powhatan Point, Ohio (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Prado Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Prairie Du Chien, Wis. (NCS) 27-11, 27-20 Prairie Du Chien Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 29-7 1-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prairie du Rocher and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prattville, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Pre-Authorization Studies for Beach Erosion Control Activities Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-14 SChicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-6 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-26 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-8 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-21 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-12, 10-44 New England Division (NED) 1-46 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-36 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-10 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-10 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-8 Pre-Authorization Studies for Flood Control Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 17-7 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-19 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCR) 31-28 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 16-12, 16-23 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-12 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-53 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 20-7, 20-21 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-5, 18-25 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-25 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-3 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-44 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-6, 23-19 New England Division (NED) 1-47 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-9 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-37 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-12 Omaha, Nebr., District (NRO) 21-6, 21-22 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-46 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 - Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-32 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-8 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-28 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19-7, 19-19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-31 Pre-Authorization Studies for Navigation Activities Alaska District (NPA) 40-15 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-11 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-11, 32-36 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-15 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 30-6 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 31-25 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 15-9 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-17 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 18-4 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-1 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-12, 10-44 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 23-4 New England Division (NED) 1-46 New Orleans, La., District (LMN) 11-5 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-37 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-9 Pacific Ocean Division (POD)'36-3 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-8 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-45 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-3 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-4 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-7 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-3 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-29 Prescott Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Presque Isle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (NCB) 32-13, 32-21, 32-33 Prestile Stream, Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-43 Preston Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prestonburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Prestonville, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Priest, J. Percy, Dam and Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-7, 23-9, 23-18 Priest Rapids Dam, Wash. (NPS) 38-30 Princeton, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Prineville Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Proctor, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Proctor Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-9, 16-16, 16-20 Proctorville, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Prompton Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 Prospect Beach, West Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-42, 1-46 Providence River and Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), Mass. (NED) 1-45 Provincetown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1--45 1-38 INDEX Pudding River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Pueblo Arkansas River, Colo. (Floodway Levee Extension) (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Puget Sound and Its Tributary Waters, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21 Pullman, Palouse, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35 Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Pungo Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Pungo River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Punta Salinas, P.R. (SAJ) 9-47 Punxsutawney, Pa. (ORP) 26-5, 26-13, 26-18, 26-26 Punxsutawney, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-26 Put In Bay, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Pysht River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Queens Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Queenstown Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Queets River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Quillayute River, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-21, 38-28 Quinalt River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Quinby Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-16, 5-20 Quincy, Ill., Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 28-13 Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Quincy Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Quinnipiac River, North Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-23 R R. D. Bailey Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-14, 25-18 Raccoon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Raccoon Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Racine, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Racine Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-19, 31-41, 31-54 Racine Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 22-3, 22-6, 22-8 Rahway, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Rahway, South Branch, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Rahway River, N.J. (NAN) 2-38 Rainey, Henry T., Dam, Ill. (NCD) 29-6 Rainier Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Rancocas Creek at Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-13 Rancocas River, N.J. (NAP) 3-24 Randleman Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-20 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-20 Rapid Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Rapide Croche Lock and Dam, Wis. (NCE) 31-60 Rappahannock River, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-18 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Raritan River, N.J. (NAN) 2-12, 2-24, 2-30, 2-33, 2-38 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Rathbun Lake, Iowa (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-17 Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 20-17 Ravenswood, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 Ray Roberts Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-20 Rayburn, Sam, Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-17, 16-20 Raystown Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-12, 4-24, 4-32 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Red Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Red Lake and Red Lake River, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Red Lake Falls, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Red Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn. (NCS) 27-11, 27-20 Red Lake River at Huot, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red River, Tenn. (ORN) 23-13 Red River at East Grand Forks, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Red River at Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Red River at Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Red River Backwater Levees (MR+T) 42-46, 42-49, 42-52 Red River below Denison Dam including Little River Basin, Okla. and Ark. (SWL) 18-15 Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization (LMK) (SWT) 12-7, 12-10, 12-12, 12-17, 19-15 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-7 Red River below Fulton, Ark. (LMK) 12-14 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Red River from Fulton, Ark., to Mouth of Washita River (SWT) 19-15 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Red River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Red River of the North, Minn. and N. Dak. (NCS) 27-23 1-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Red River of the North, Argusville, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-12, 27-20 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red River of the North at Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Red River of the North at Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, Minn., S. Dak. and N. Dak. (NCS) 27-12, 27-21, 27-27 Red River of the North, Halstad, Minn. (NCS) 27-13, 27-21 Red River Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-37 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex. (LMK) 12-14 Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La. (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Daingerfield, Tex. (LMK) 12-14 Red River Waterway-Shreveport, La., to Index, Ark. (LMK) 12-7, 12-10, 12-12 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Red Wing Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 Redbank Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Reddies River Lake, N.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-27, 7-16 Redmond, John, Dam and Reservoir, Kans. (SWT) 19-5, 19-10, 19-14, 19-17 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif. (SPL) 33-18 Redwater River and Hay Creek, S.D. (MRO) 21-18 Redwood City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Redwood River at Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-13, 27-21 Redwood River below Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Reedsport Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Reedy River, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-28 Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev. (SPK) 35-31 Reevesville, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans {CDC) 44-1, 44-5, 44-6 Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness Activities 48-1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del. (NAP) 3-23 Removal of Aquatic Growth, La. (LMN) 11-15 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida (SAJ) 9-13, 9-28, 9-37, 9-45 Removal of Sunken Vessels 48-1 Removing Snags and Wrecks from Mississippi River below Mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) (LMM) 12-14, 13-5 Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District (SAM) 10-42 Rend Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-7, 14-10, 14-12 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio (NCB) 32-15, 32-37 Republican River, Neb. and Kan. (MRK) 20-19 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn. (NCS) 27-2, 27-19, 27-22, 27-26 Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, B44neville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Revere Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-10, 1-27, 1-35 Reynoldsville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Rheem Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 Rice Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Richland Creek, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Richland Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-18 Richmond, Va. (NAO) 5-10, 5-16, 5-21 Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Richmond Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-2, 34-6 Richmond Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Richmond's Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Richwood and Fenwick, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Ridgecrest, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Ridgeley, W.Va. (NAB) 4-39 Ridgway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 26-26 Ridgway, Pa. (Elk Creek) (ORP) 26-22 Ridgway and Vicinity, Pa. (On Clarion River) (ORP) 26-22 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-3, 17-9, 17-10 Rio Grande Floodway, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-4, 17-9, 17-10 Ripley, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Ripley, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Ririe Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Rising Sun, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Riverdale, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-47, 1-49 Riverland Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Riverside Area, Pasco, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Riverside levees, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 1-40 INDEX Riverview, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Roanoak Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Roanoke River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-30 Roaring River, N.C. (SAN) 7-16 Roaring River Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-20, 10-30 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-16 Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sallisaw, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Roberts, Ray, Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-16, 16-20 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Rochester, Minn. (NCS) 27-13, 27-21 Rochester, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-10, 32-20, 32-31 Rochester Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-16 Rock Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Rock Hall Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Rock Island, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Rock Island District (NCD) 29-2, 29-3, 29-4, 29-7 Rock Island Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Rock River Agricultural Levees, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Rockfish Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Rockingham, Vt. (NED) 1-22 Rockland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Rockland Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-16, 16-20 Rockport, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Rockport and Old Harbors, Mass. 1-8, 1-26, 1-46 Rockport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-53 Rockport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-35, 1-39 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Rocky Fork, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Rocky Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Rocky River Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-21, 32-32 Rodeo Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Rogers City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Rogue River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-34 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Rolling Fork Road, Sevier County, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Rollinson Channel, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19, 6-29 Rome, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Rome, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Rondout Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-13, 2-25, 2-30 Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 26-5, 26-13 Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, Calif. (SPL) 33-20, 33-24 Roseau River, Minn. (NCS) 27-14, 27-21 Rosedale Harbor, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Rosendale, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Roseville, Ohio (ORH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-18, 25-22 Rosiclare, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Rossview Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 23-13, 23-18 Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-8 Rouge River, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-42, 31-54, 31-63 Rough River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19, 24-24, 24-27, 24-30 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, Ky. (ORL) 24-10, 24-16 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Rouseville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Rowlesburg Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Royal River, Maine (NED) 1-8, 1-27, 1-35 Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Rudee Inlet, Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-25 Ruffy Brook, Minn. (NCS) 27-25 Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-16, 38-22 Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-27 Rushford, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Russell, Ky. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Russell and Allison Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24 Russell, Richard B., Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Russian River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-14, 35-24, 35-28, 35-34, 35-35 Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Rye Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Rye Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-39 S Sabine-Neches Waterway, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-22, 15-28, 15-30, 15-35 Sabine River and Tributaries, Tex. (Echo to Morgan Bluff) (SWG) 15-27 Sabula, Iowa (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-35, 32-39 Saco, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Saco River, Maine (NED) 1-9, 1-27, 1-35, 1-45, 1-53 Sacramento River, Calif. (CDC) 44-3, 44-5, 44-6, 44-7 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Sacramento River, Calif. (SPK) 35-2, 35-23, 35-28, 35-33 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif., from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (SPK) 35-15, 35-25, 35-28, 35-35, 35-36 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-2, 35-23 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Sag Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Saginaw River, Mich. (NCE) 31-20, 31-26, 31-42, 31-49, 31-54, 31-56 Saint John River Basin, Maine (NED) 1-20 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-8 Sakonnet Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Sakonnet River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Salamanca, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Salamonie Lake, Ind. (ORL) 24-11, 24-16 Salem Church Lake, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Salem Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Salem River, N.J. (NAP) 3-14, 3-21 Salina, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Salinas River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Saline Point, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-18, 12-19 Saline River, Ark. (LMK) 12-14 Saline River and Tributaries, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-50 Salkahatchie River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Salmon Creek near Vancouver, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Salmon River, Alaska (N A) 40-14 Salmon River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Salmon River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Salt Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 Salt Creek and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 21-6, 21-11, 21-15 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Saluda River, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Salyersville, Ky. (ORL) 24-21 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-17, 16-20 Sammamish River, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-17, 16-20 San Antonio and Chino Creeks Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Antonio Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Antonio Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 San Diego Creek, Alice, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 San Diego Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-18 San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. (SPL) 33-18, 33-22 San Diego River (Mission Valley), Calif. (SPL) 33-20, 33-24 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), Calif. (SPL) 33-19 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif. (SPN) 34-2, 34-6 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPK) (SPN) 34-2, 34-6, 35-3, 35-23 San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6, 34-8 San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift), Calif. (SPN) 34-6 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), Calif. (SPN) 34-8 San Gabriel River, Tex. (SWF) 16-10, 16-17, 16-20 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-19 San Jacinto River Levee and Bautista Creek Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-23, 35-33, 35-34 San Juan, P.R. (SAJ) 9-47 San Juan Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Juan Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-28, 9-37 San Leandro Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 San Leandro Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), Calif. (SPN) 34-8 San Lorenzo Creek, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-9, 35-31 San Lorenzo River, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 San Luis Rey River, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif. (SPN) 34-6, 34-9 San Rafael Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Sand Hill Cove Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-42 Sand Hill River, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Sand Island, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Sand Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Sand Point, Alaska (NPA) 40-16 Sandburg Creek, Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-40 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Sandusky Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-21, 32-32 Sandusky River, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Sandy Creek, Jackson, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 1-42 INDEX Sandy Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Sandy River and Sleepy Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Sangamon River (Mouth), Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Sanitary District of Beardstown, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Sans Bois Navigation Channel, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-12, 33-17, 33-20, 33-24 Santa Ana River Basin, Calif.: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-20 Santa Ana River Main Stem, Calif. (SPL) 33-8 Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-10, 33-15 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Santa Cruz County, Calif. (SPN) 34-8 Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-7 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Santa Maria Valley Levees, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-8 Santa Rosa Wash (at Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair), Ariz. (SPL) 33-19 Santee River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Sapelo Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Sardis, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Sardis Lake, Miss. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-59 Sardis Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-11, 19-14, 19-18 Sasanoa River, Maine (NED) 1-40 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Satilla River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, Mich. (NCE) 31-23, 31-43, 31-55 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Sauk River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-41, 37-48 Savage, Md. (NAB) 4-39 Savage River Dam, Md. (NAB) 4-36 Savanna Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-7 Savannah Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-4, 8-6, 8-10, 8-11, 8-14 Savannah River above Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Savannah River. at Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Savannah River Basin, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-17 Savannah River below Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-5, 8-6, 8-11, 8-15 Saw Mill River at Elmsford and Greenburgh, N.Y. (NAN) 2-19, 2-31 Sawkill Creek, Kingston, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Sawmill Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Saxis Island, Va. (NAO) 5-11, 5-17, 5-21 Saxman, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Saxon Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-23, 31-43, 31-56 Saxonville, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-43, 1-51 Saxtons River, Rockingham, Vt. (NED) 1-24 Sayers, Foster Joseph, Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-26 Saylorville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 28-5, 28-9, 28-12 Scajaquada Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-48 Scarboro River, Maine (NED) 1-40 Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Schuylkldll River, Pa. (NAP) 3-9, 3-16, 3-20 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-21 Schuylkill River-Fairmount Park, Pa. 3-8 Scioto River at Portsmouth, Ohio (ORH) 25-19 Sciotoville, Ohio (ORH) 25- 21 Scituate Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-40, 1-46, 1-53 Scott, W. Kerr, Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-16, 6-20 Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Scotts Creek, S.C. (SAW) 7-7, 7-10, 7-14 Scotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20, 5-25 Scottsville, Va. (NAO) 5-12, 5-17, 5-21 Scranton, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Scranton, Buffalo, N. Dak. (MRO) 21-19 Scuppernong River, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-20, 6-25 Sea Bright to Ocean Township, N.J. (NAN) 2-17, 2-25, 2-31 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Searsport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Seaside Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-15, 38-21 Sebasticook River, Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-20, 1-30, 1-36, 1-43 Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, Mich. (NCE) 31-27, 31-45, 31-56, 31-61 Seekonk River, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Seldovia Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Selkirk Shore State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 32-36 Sergius Whitestone, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Sesuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-53 Sevier River near Redmond, Utah (SPK) 35-31 Sewage Lagoons, Vale, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, Mont. (NPS) 38-28 Seward, Nebr. (MRK) 20-17 Seward Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Sewerline Protection, Valley, Ala. (SAM) 10-16, 10-29, 10-39 1-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Shad Landing State Park, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Shallotte River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-29 Shark River, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Shawneetown, Ill. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Sheboygan Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-23, 31-43, 31-56 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-38 Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-50 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio (NCB) 32-39 Shelburne, N.H. (NED) 1-22, 1-43 Shell Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 21-18, 21-21 Shelley Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Shelton Creek, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Shelton Ditch, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Shenango River Lake, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 26-9, 26-14, 26-20, 26-27 Shepard Road, St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Sherburne, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Sheridan, Wyo. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-14, 27-21, 27-25 Shidler Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-15 Shields River, near Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Shinnecock Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-14, 2-25, 2-30 Shipyard River, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-10, 7-13 Shoal Harbor and Comptori Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Shoals, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Shobe Canyon, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Shooters Island, N.Y. and N.J. (NAN) 2-34 Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration, Philadelphia, Pa. District (NAP) 3-10 Shoreline Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-10 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Short Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-19 Shoshone River, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 21-19 Shot Pouch Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-14, 2-25, 2-30, 2-33 Shufflebarger Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Sid Simpson Project, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 Siler City Streams, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Silver LakeHarbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19, 6-23 Simmons Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Simpson Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 Sioux City Marina, Iowa (MRO) 21-2, 21-10 Sioux Falls, S. Dak. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Sistersville, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Sitka Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Siuslaw River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-34, 37-42 Six Runs Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Sixes Bridge Lake, Md. and Pa. (N) 4-37 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Skagit Creek, Wash. (Avon By-Pass) (NPS) 38-28 Skagit River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-28, 38-30 Skagit River, Wash. (Levee and Channel Improvements) (NPS) 38-27 Skagway Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Skagway River, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Skamokawa Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34, 37-45 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), Wash. (NPP) 37-44 Skiatook Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-14, 19-18 Skipanon Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34 Slaughter Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-23, 4-30 Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Chester, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Hamburg, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 21-16 Smelt Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Smith Creek, Colo. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Smith Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Smith Creek, Pamlico County, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Smith Ferry, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Smith River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Smithfield, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 Smithland, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Smithland Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 22-3, 22-9 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-15 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers (MRK) 20-19 Smyrna River, Del. (NAP) 3-21, 3-24 Snagging and Clearing Activities Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 32-38 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-7 Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 25-11 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 24-13, 24-31 New England Division (NED) 1-23 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 28-18 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-19 I-44 INDEX St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 27-28 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 19- 19 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2 Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Snake River, Minn. (NCS) 27-28 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Oreg., Wash., and Idaho (NPW) 39-7, 39-10, 39-12, 39-22 Snettisham, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-10, 40-12 Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Snoqualmie River, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Sny Basin, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Soap Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-44 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-7, 17-10 Soleduck River Bridge, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Somerville Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-17, 16-20 Sonoma Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-31 Sope Creek, Marietta, Ga. (SAM) 10-16, 10-29, 10-39 Soules Swamp, Whiteville, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Souris River, Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-15, 27-21 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 South Bank Arkansas River, (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark. (SWL) 18-17 South Bank Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, Ark. Tucker Lakes (SWL) 18-17 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 South Beloit, Ill. (NCR) 28-15 South Bristol Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 South Channel, Government Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 South Coventry Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-45 South Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 South Deer Creek Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-17 South Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 South Fork, Boise River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 South Fork, Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 South Fork of Cumberland River, Ky. (ORN) 23-13 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 South Haven Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-24, 31-43, 31-56 South Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-63 South Orange, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 South Platte River, Adams County, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River, Bank Protection, Denver, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River Basin, Colo. (MRO) 21-6, 21-15 South Platte River, Iliff, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River, Kersey, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, Colo. (MRO) 21-17 South Platte River, Merino, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Platte River, Platteville, Colo. (MRO) 21-20 South Plymouth Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38 South Point, Ohio (ORH) 25-20 South Portsmouth, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-9, 28-15, 28-17 South River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 South River, Conway, Mass. (NED) 1-15, 1-24, 1-29 South River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 South Slough (Charleston), Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 South Tunbridge Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 South Williamson, Ky. (ORH) 25-22 South Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Southern Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-13, 4-32 Southport Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Southport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Southwest Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Southwestern Jefferson County, Ky. (ORL) 24-5, 24-14 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Space Programs Laboratory 51-1 Spanish Fork River, Utah (SPK) 35-33 Spewrell Bluff Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-23, 10-30, 10-41 Spirit Lake, Wash. (NPP) 37-14 Spokane, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Spring City, Tenn. (ORN) 23-19 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Springdale, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Springer, William L., Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Springfield, S.D., Water Intake (MRO) 21-18 Springfield Canal, Ga. (SAS) 8-7 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-50 Squaw Chute at Quincy, Ill. (NCR) 28-13 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 St. Anthony Falls, Lower Lock and Dam, Minn. (NCD) 29-5, 29-9 St. Anthony Falls, Upper Lock, Minn. (NCD) 29-5 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-14, 9-28, 9-37 St. Catherines Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 St. Clair River, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-42, 31-54, 31-58, 31-63 1-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 St. Croix River, Maine (NED) 1-39 St. Croix River, Minn. and Wis. (NCS) 27-2, 27-19, 27-22 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, Ark. (LMM) 13-5 St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-28, 42-53 St. Francis River and Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-18 St. Francis River, Highway 90, Ark. (LMM) 13-6 St. Francis River Levees (MR+T) 42-48, 42-49 St. Georges Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-37 St. James, Beaver Island, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 St. James Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61 St. Jeromes Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney (SAJ) 9-14, 9-28, 9-37 St. Johns River and Tributaries and Withlacoochee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45 St. Jones River, Del. (NAP) 3-21, 3-22 St. Joseph Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-21, 31-42, 31-54 St. Joseph River, Mich. (NCE) 31-62 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 St. Louis District (NCD) 29-3, 29-4 St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-28, 9-37 St. Maries, Idaho (NAS) 38-28 St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 St. Marys, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 St. Marys, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 St. Marys River, Mich. (NCE) 31-22, 31-43, 31-55, 31-59, 31-63 St. Michael Canal, Alaska (NPA)40-13 St. Michaels Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Patricks Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-23, 4-30 St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 St. Paul and South St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 St. Paul District (NCD) 29-3, 29-4 St. Paul Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 St. Peters Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 St. Thomas Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-46 Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-22, 1-31, 1-37 Stamford Barrier, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Stamford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-45 Starlings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Startup, Wash. (NAS) 38-28 Starved Rock Lock and Dam, Ill. (NCC) 28-20 State Highway 101 and 401, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 State Road and Ebner Coulees, Wis. (NCS) 27-15, 27-21 Staten Island, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. Bridge Across Arthur Kill, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Steinhatchee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Stewart Canyon Debris Basin and Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Stikine River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Stillaguamish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22, 38-25, 38-29 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-17, 16-21 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, Mont. (NPS) 38-29 Stillwater Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26, 4-32 Stillwater River, Mont. (NPS) 38-29 Stillwell Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Stockton Harbor, Maine (NE) 1-40 Stockton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-9, 20-12, 20-16, 20-19 Stone Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Stonehouse Creek, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Stoner Creek, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26--9, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Stonington Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-46 Stonington Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40, 1-45, 1-53 Stony Brook, Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-44 Stony Creek, Branford, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Stratford, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Streambank Erosion Control Evaluation and Demonstration Project New England Division (NED) 1-23 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 21-9, 21-12, 21-16 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 26-29 Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Strong Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-29 Strube Lake - Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Oreg. 37-49 Stuart, Va. (SAW) 6-13, 6-20 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wis. (NCE) 31-24, 31-43, 31-56 Sturgis, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Ill. (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Sucker Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Sugar Creek Basin, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Sugar Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Sugar Hill Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Suisun Bay Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-7, 35-30 1-46 INDEX Suisun Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-7, 35-30 Suisun Point Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-30 Sullivan Falls Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Sulphur River, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-15 Sulphur River Levees, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Summersville Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-18 Sumner Parker Airport, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Sun Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Sunbury, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Sunken Vessel Removal 48-1 Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-8, 5-16 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-16, 2-25, 2-32 Surry Mountain Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-48 Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters (NCE) 31-29, 31-45 Susquehanna Basin at Harrisburg, Pa. (NAB) 4-20 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-34 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, N.Y. and Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-32 Sutton Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 25-9, 25-15, 25-18 Suwannee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-45, 9-46 Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, Taney County, Mo. (SWL) 18-7, 18-12 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Sweetwater Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Sweetwater River, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-12, 33-17 Swift Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Swinomish Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-21 Swoyersville, and Forty Fort, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Sykesville, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Syracuse, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Syracuse, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 T Table Rock Lake, Mo. (SWL) 18-9, 18-13, 18-24 Tacoma, Puyallup River, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-21, 38-31 Tahchevah Creek Detention Basin and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-21 Tahola, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Tahquitz Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-21 Talkeetna River, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Tallabinella Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-16, 10-29, 10-39 Tallahala Creek Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-28, 10-38 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, Miss. (LMK) 12-14 Tallapoosa River, Ala. (SAM) 10-42 Tallow Hill, Ga. (SAS) 8-17 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD) 36-12 Tamaqua, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-23, 4-21 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Tampa Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-16, 9-28, 9-38 Tangeman, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Tangier Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-8, 5-16, 5-20 Tangipahoa River, La. (LMN) 11-15 Tar River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tar River and Tributaries, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tar River, Princeville, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tarentum, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Taskinas Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-8 Taunton River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-24, 31-44, 31-56 Taylors Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-10, 15-15, 15-25 Taylorsville, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Taylorsville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 24-11, 24-17 Teche-Vermilion Basins, La. (Water Supply) (MR+T) 42-50, 42-59 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Tell City, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Tenants Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Tenasillahe Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-16, 19-18 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala., and Ky. (ORN) 23-3, 23-9, 23-11, 23-17, 23-18 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Ala. and Miss. (ORN) (SAM) 10-48, 23-4, 23-9, 23-12 Tensas Basin, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-15, 42-28 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, La. (LMK) 12-15 Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge (MR+T) 42-28 Terrain Analysis Center 51-1 Terre Haute, Ind. (ORL) 24-22 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-29 Terre Noire Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-16 Terry, David D., Lock and Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-2, 18-19 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Teton River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Texas City and Vicinity, Tex., Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 15-11, 15-15, 15-25 Texas City Channel, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-24, 15-28 Thames River, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Thames River Basin, Conn., R.I., and Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-23, 1-52 The Cascades Canal, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-39 The D)alles Lock and Dam-Lake Cello, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-22, 37-29, 37-38, 37-52 The Island Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Thomaston Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-49 Thoroughfare Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Three Islands Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 23-14 Three Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Three Rivers, Tex. (SWG) (SWF) 15-27, 16-21 Thumpertown Beach, Eastham, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, La. (LMN) 11-15 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Tijuana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Tilghman Island Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-34, 37-45 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. (NAB) 4-17, 4-26 Tionesta Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-10, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Toad Suck Ferry Lock - Dam, Ark. (SWL) 18-4, 18-19 Tocks Island Lake, Pa., N.J., and N.Y. (NAP) 3-24 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 Only) Pa. (NAP) 3-24 Todd Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Togiak Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Toledo Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-10, 32-21, 32-32 Tolovana River, Alaska (NPA) 40-14 Tolu, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio (ORH) 25-15, 25-18 Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 25-10 Tomahawk Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Tomanovich-Salmon City, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-19 Tombigbee River, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-39 Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 Toms River, N.J. (NAP) 3-21, 3-24 Tongue River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24 Topeka, Kans. (MRK) 20-17, 20-19 Topographic Laboratory 51-1 Topsail Beach and Surf City, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Toronto Lake, Kans. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-6, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-18 Torrington, East Branch, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-50 Torrington, West Branch, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-50 Totuskey Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Touchet River, Wash. (NPW) 39-15, 39-16 Towanda Lake, Kans. (SWT) 19-15 Town Beach, Plymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-17, 16-21 Town Bluff Hydropower, Tex. (SWF) 16-13, 16-21 Town Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-38 Town Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-10, 7-14 Town Creek, Americus, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-20 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Townshend Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-48 Trabuco Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Tradewater River, Ky. (ORL) 24-19 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Tex. (SWG) 15-27 Tranters Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Trask River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Traverse City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Treasure Island, Mo. (LMM) 13-6 Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation- Restraining Barriers, Calif. (CDC) 44-2, 44-5 Tred Avon River, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-24, 4-31 Trent River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27, 6-28 Trenton Lake, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Trexler Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-23 Trim Cane Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Trinidad Lake, Colo. (SWA) 17-5, 17-8 Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 15-7, 15-14, 15-24, 15-28, 15-35 Trinity River Project, Tex. (SWF) 16-2, 16-15, 16-21 Triplett Creek, Morehead, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-30 Tri-Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Trotters Shoals Lake (SAS) 8-9, 8-12, 8-15 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Troy, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Truckee River and Tributaries, Calif. and Nev. (SPK) 35-31 Truman, Harry S., Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (MRK) 20-8, 20-12, 20-16, 20-19 Trumbull Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-44 Trussville, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-5, 17-9 Tualatin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 1-48 INDEX Tuckahoe River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Tuckerton Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-9, 3-16, 3-20 Tucson Diversion Channel, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-11, 33-16 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORN) 23-5, 23-9 Tully Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-48 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, Okla. (SWT) 19-15, 19-17, 19-18 Turkey Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-16 Turtle Creek, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Tuskahoma Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-16 Tuttle Creek Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-6, 20-12, 20-15, 20-19 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kans. (MRK) 20-19 Twelvemile Bayou, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-17, 12-20 Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-16, 27-21 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, Md. (NAB) 4-9, 4-24, 4-31 Two Harbors, Minn. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Two Rivers Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 17-6, 17-8 Two Rivers Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 31-24, 31-44, 31-56 Tyaskin Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Tybee Island, Ga. (SAS) 8-6, 8-11, 8-15 Tygart Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 26-3, 26-13, 26-17 Tylers Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Tyrone, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 U Umatilla Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Umatilla River (Echo), Oreg. (NPP) (NPW) 37-43, 37-44, 39-15 Umpqua River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-26, 37-35 Umpqua River and Tributaries, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Unadilla, N.Y. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Union City Dam, Pa. (ORP) 26-10, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Union Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Union River, Maine (NED) 1-40, 1-53 Union Township Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 28-15 Union Village Dam, Vt. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-48 Uniontown, Ky. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 Uniontown, Pa. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORL) 22-3, 22-9 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Upper and Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-22 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouth (SAM) 10-42 Upper Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 20-17 Upper Grays River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Upper Iowa River, Iowa (NCS) 27-24 Upper Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-34 Upper Marlboro, Md. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program, Ill., Ia., Minn., Mo., Wis. (NCR) 28-3, 28-8, 28-11 Upper Puyallup River, Wash. (NAS) 38-29 Upper River Road, Jefferson Co., Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Upper River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 31-63 Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-31 Upper White River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Urban Areas at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Urbanna Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 U.S. Highway 11 Bridge, Fosters, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Ala. (SAM) 10-43 U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 U.S. Highway 51, Tenn. (LMM) 13-6 Utica, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-26 Utica, Ohio (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 V Valdez Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Van Meter, Iowa (NCR) 28-15, 28-17 Vanceburg, Ky. (ORH) 25-20 Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Vaughn, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 27-24, 27-27 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. (NAP) 3-23 Ventura Marina (Ventura Harbor), Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-10, 33-15 Ventura-Pierpont Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-19 Ventura River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Vermilion Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-21, 32-33 Vermilion Lock, La. (Replacement of Lock) (LMN) 11-2, 11-10, 11-12 Vermillion River, S.D. (MRO) 21-18 Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Verona Lake, Va. (NAB) 4-36 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Vevay, Ind. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Vicinity of Nehalem, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. (MR+T) 42-29 Victory Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Villa Park Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-21, 33-24 Village Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Village Creek, Jackson- Lawrence Counties, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee District, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 Village of New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Village of Saxtons, Vt. (NED) 1-44 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. (SWG) 15-11, 15-15, 15-25 Vincennes, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-21, 24-24, 24-29 Vineyard Haven, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Vinton Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-15 Virginia Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-16, 5-21 Virginia Beach Streams Canal Number 2, Va. (NAO) 5-12, 5-17, 5-21 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Volga, Iowa (NCR) 28-17 W Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Wabash River Basin, Ind., Ill., and Ohio (ORL) 24-11, 24-19, 24-27, 24-28, 24-30 Wabasha Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Waccamaw River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-7, 7-15 Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 6-27 Waco Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-11, 16-17, 16-21 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-48 Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-48 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-8 Waikiki Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Waimea Beach, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Waimea River, Hawaii (POD) 36-4, 36-6 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-8 Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44, 37-49 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Wallace, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Wallace Lake, La. (LMK) 12-16, 12-18, 12-20 Wallis Sands State Beach, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Wallisville Lake, Tex. (SWG) 15-8 Wallkll River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Wallowa River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Walluski River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Walnut Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-17, 35-25 Walter, Francis E., Dam, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-12, 3-17, 4-21 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-24, 10-31, 10-41 Walters Slough, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Wappapello Lake, Mo. (MR+T) 42-20, 42-59 Wappinger Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35, 2-36 Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Ware, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-23, 1-44, 1-49 Wareham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-53 Wareham-Marion, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 27-16, 27-21 Warren River, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Warrenton Diking Districts 1, 2, and 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-19, 27-22, 27-25 Warroad River and Bull Dog Creek, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 Warsaw, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Warsaw Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 29-8 Warwick Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Warwick River, Md. (NAB) 4-34 Warwood, W. Va. (OPR) 26-22, 26-26 Washington, D.C. and Vicinity (NAB) 4-21, 4-36, 4-39 Washington, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-20 Washington Canal and South River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Washington Harbor, D.C. (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-31 Washington Island, Wis. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Washougal Area Levees, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) 53-1 Water Valley, Ark. and Mo. (SWL) 18-18 Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center 53-1 Waterbury, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Waterbury Dam, N.Y. (NAN) 2-20 Waterbury Reservoir, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Waterbury-Watertown, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-50 Wateree River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Waterford, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Waterloo, Iowa (NCR) 28-6, 28-12, 28-17 Waterloo, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, S.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19, 6-23, 6-29 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22, 38-31 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 1-50 INDEX Waterway Connecting Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers, Ala. and Miss. (SAM) 10-11, 10-28, 10-38 Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-15 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-21 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, La. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) (LMN) 11-5, 11-10, 11-12 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La. (LMN) 11-15 Waterway-Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Waterway on the Coast of Virginia (NAO) 5-8, 5-16, 5-21 Waterways Experiment Station (WES) 45-1 Watkins Glen, N.Y. (NCB) 32-39 Watts Bar Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 23-17 Waukegan Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 30-5, 30-9, 30-13, 30-14 Waurika Lake, Okla. (SWT) 19-6, 19-12, 19-14, 19-18 Waverly, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Wax Lake Outlet, La. (MR+T) 42-50 Waycake Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Webb District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-20, 19-8, 19-13, 19-15, 19-16 Weber River and Tributaries, Utah (SPK) 35-33 Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-16, 39-17 Welles Harbor, Midway Island (POD) 36-8 Wellfleet Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Wells Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 26-23 Wellsville, N.Y. (NCB) 32-37 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. I (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. II (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-42 West Atchalafaya Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-13 West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19-18 West Branch of Susquehanna River, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-33 West Branch, Westfield River, Mass. (NED) 1-44 West Bridgewater, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 West Brookfield Reservoir, Mass. (NED) 1-45 West Canaan Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-45 West Fork, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20 West Fork, Foster Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24-27 West Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 West Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 32-11, 32-35 West Hickman Area, Hickman, Ky. (LMM) 13-6 West Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-47 West Kentucky Tributaries, Ky. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-19, 42-28, 42-53 West Magnesia Canyon Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-12, 33-17 West Makinster Road, Wilson River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-16, 37-27, 37-37 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 28-17 West Muddy Creek and Marys River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Hastings, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Malvern, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West Nishnabotna River, near Hancock, Iowa (MRO) 21-21 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 West Oneonta Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-38 West Point, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 West Point, Ky. (ORL) 24-21, 24-24 West Point, Nebr. (MRO) 21-17, 21-20 West Point Lake, Ga. and Ala. (SAM) (SAS) 8-9, 10-24, 10-31, 10-41 West Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1- -2, 1-29, 1-36, 1-44, 1-49 West Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-22 West Tennessee Tributaries, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-10, 42-18, 42-28, 42-53 West Terre Haute, Ind. (ORL) 24-20, 24-24, 24-29 West Thompson Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-31, 1-52 West Union, W. Va. (ORH) 25-22 West Warren, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-44. 1-49 Westchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-15, 2-25, 2-31, 2-38 Westcott Cove, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-44 Western Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin (Westport Marina), Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Westland District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Weston, Vt. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Weston Mills, Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Weston Mills, Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 26-22 Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Westport, Ky. (ORL) 24-22, 24-25 Westport District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-45 I-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Westport River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Westport Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-44 Westville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-32, 1-52 Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-22 Weymouth Back River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Weymouth-Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-22 Weymouth-Fore - Town Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-53 Wheeler Creek, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Wheeler, General Joe, Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wheeling; W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-26 Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling) (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 White Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 31-25, 31-44, 31-56 White Oak Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 15-11 White Oak Creek, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 White Oak River, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 White River, Ark. (above Peach Orchard BluTf) (SWL) 18-16 White River, Ark. (below Newport) (LMM) 13-5 White River, Ind. (ORL) 24-19, 24-30 White River at Highway 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, Ark. (SWL) 18-17 White River Backwater Levees (MR+T) 42-9 White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, Ark. (SWL) 18-7, 18-13, 18-25 White River Basin (Little Rock District), Ark. and Mo. (SWL) 18-7, 18-13, 18-15, 18-24 White River, Jacksonport, Ark. (SWL) 18-8, 18-13 Whitebird Creek, Idaho (NPW) 38-15, 39-16 Whitefish Point, Mich. (NCE) 31-61, 31-62 Whitesburg, Ky. (ORL) 24-30 Whitewater River, Ind. (ORL) 24-30 Whitewater River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-20 Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-22 Whitings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-11, 33-16 Whitmanville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-44, 1-51 Whitney Lake, Tex. (SWF) 16-14, 16-17, 16-21 Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Whitney Point Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-26 Whittier, Alaska (NPA) 40-15 Wichita arid Valley Center Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 19-16, 19-17, 19-18 Wickford Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Wicomico River, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-24, 4-31 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Wilcox, Pa. (ORP) 26-23 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 27-27 Wild Rice River, Minn. (NCS) 27-28 Wild Rice River, Mahnomen Co., Minn. (NCS) 27-17, 27-21 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn. 27-24 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-17, 35-25 Wilders, Ky. (ORL) 24-24 Wiley Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Willamette Falls Fishladder, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-26, 37-35, 37-45 Willamette River Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-16, 37-37, 37-42, 37-49, 37-50 Willamette River Basin, Oreg.-Bank Protection (NPP) 37-17, 37-27, 37-37, 37-50 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-42 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-22 Willapa River at Raymond, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Willard Beach, South Portland, Me. (NED) 1-42 William H. Harsha Lake, Ohio (ORL) 24-12, 24-17, 24-27 William L. Springer Lake, Ill. (NCR) 28-16 Williamson, W. Va. (ORH) 25-20, 25-22 Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-36, 4-39 Williamstown, W. Va. (ORH) 25-21 Williamsville Reservoir, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Williston, N.D., Water Intake (MRO) 21-18 Willoughby Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPP) 37-17, 37-28, 37-37 Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Willow Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 22-3, 22-7 Wilmington Harbor, Del. (NAP) 3-8, 3-10, 3-16, 3-20 Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-19, 6-29 Wilmore, Pa. (ORP) 26-22 Wilson Branch, Cheraw, S.C. (SAN) 7-8 Wilson Creek, Sumter County, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Wilson Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 32-11, 32-21, 32-33 Wilson Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-7, 20-12, 20-16, 20-19 Wilson Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 23-17 Wilson Point Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Wilson River, Oreg. (NPD) 37-43 Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-22 Winchester Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Winfield Levee, Kans. (SWT) 19-16 I-52 INDEX Winnibigoshish Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 27-26 Winnipesaukee Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-40 Winona, Minn. (NCS) 27-17, 27-21 Winona Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 29-7 Winooski River, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Winslow (Tributaries of Little Colorado River), Ariz. (SPL) 33-21 Winsted, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-49 Winter Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Winter Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Winthrop Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Winthrop Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-46 Wisconsin River, Wis. (NCS) 27-23 Wishart Point Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-24 Wister Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 18-22, 19-6, 19-12, 19-14, 19-16, 19-18 Withlacoochee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. (SAM) 10-42, 10-45 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Kans. (MRK) 20-17 Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 23-8, 23-10 Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-29, 10-40 Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-43 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Wood Island Harbor, Biddleford, Maine (NED) 1-40 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-7, 14-10, 14-12 Woodbridge Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Woodbury, Conn. (NED) 1-22 Woodbury Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-21 Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Woodland St. Bridge, Tenn. (ORN) 23-4 Woodlands, W. Va. (ORP) 26-22, 26-27 Woodmont Shore, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Woodruff, Jim, Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-23, 10-30, 10-41 Woods Hole Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Woodson Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-42, 37-48 Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-22, 1-44, 1-48 Worcester, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-48 Worcester Diversion, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 28-17 Wrangell Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Wrangell Narrows, Alaska (NPA) 40-13, 40-15 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-17, 16-12, 16-17, 16-21 Wright's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Wrightsville Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Wynoochee Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-23 Wynoochee River, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Wyoming Valley, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-20, 4-27, 4-33 Y Yadkin River Basin, N.C. - S.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-30 Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River at Union Gap, Wash. (NPS) 38-13 Yakima River, Cle Elum, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yakima River, West Richland, Wash. (NPS) (NPW) 38-29, 39-15, 39-17 Yakima River, Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Yalobusha River, Miss. (LMR) 12-15 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-26, 37-35 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Yaquina River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Yatesville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 25-10, 25-15, 25-18 Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-3, 12-9, 12-11 Yazoo River Backwater Area (MR+T) 42-51 Yazoo River Basin, Miss. (MR+T) 42-7, 42-16, 42-28, 42-46, 42-51 Yazoo River Basin Project Levees (MR+T) 42-46, 42-49 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. (SAM) 10-43 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, near Miles City, Mont., Water Intake and Sewage Lagoon (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, near Big Timber, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 21-17, 21-19 Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, near Billings, Mont. (MRO) 21-19 Yonkers, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 York Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40, 1-53 York, Indian Rock Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-27, 4-33 York River, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-16, 5-21 York Spit Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-18 Youghiogheny River, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-21 Youghiogheny River Lake, Pa. and Md. (ORP) 26-11, 26-15, 26-20, 26-27 Youngs and Klaskanine River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 I-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1987 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-45 Youngs River Dikes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Youngstown, Ohio (ORP) 26-22 Z Zacate Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 16-22 Zanesville, Ohio (ORH) 25-21 Zintel Canyon Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-8 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, Minn. (NCS) 27-3, 27-19 Zippel Bay Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 27-23 Zumbro River, Minn. (NCS) 27-24 I-54 1-54S .GOVERNIMNT PRINTING OrrICEC g989g62o 634:OO953 APR 1